iF


B

The United Nations vote: abstention from the US is only half full water in the glass that is wide enough at their side.

26 March 2024

In the rest of our global community the world has had enough with Israel's war in Gaza. We have no further information on why most nations now see Israel as clearly the aggressor in this war against Hamas. Here we are lacking details. The sentiment almost is a clear match, e.g., that Hamas is the most moral army in the world. It is after all fighting the occupation regime and has a heroic history for the last twenty years, approx, to have been the resistance army against brutalities from the IDF throughout the years. In the West Bank and in Gaza. Hamas is in fact in this scenario easily to see as the Wellington of Palestine, fighting a tyrant like the Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu. How else could they have become the victor of morals in the war after 7 October? There is very little sympathy for the people of Israel and their loved ones, still in Gaza and held by Hamas as hostages. But that is not news any more. It is in fact old news. It was also the most moral thing to do against the occupation regime. In Israel all of Israel is confused, especially when they can't understand why it is taking their government and the IDF infinitely long to bring back the hostages and entering the sixth month since 7 October. It must be to them an eternal hell. On top of everything now the US abstention yesterday at the United Nations Security Council on an immediate ceasefire of hostilities in Gaza, this was not what the people of Israel had ever experienced before. But they are torn by their own conscience as part indeed of humanity, and the other part that is Jewish and in danger of being moved to aside by their most powerful ally in the western world, the US. It all comes down to one man, the Israeli Prime Minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. A man that was overcome by a war he had never seen or been prepared for throughout his whole career life. Nor as a Jewish citizen or Prime Minister. He could however be telling the truth this time, but who would want to believe him that he is fighting this new existential threat against Israel? It is still the 21st century and Israel is not used to be treated as the villain of the two between Israel and Hamas. In short there is only one solution and that is for the Prime Minister to do something quick and smart. The world that will come after the war will be a new one too. And with that in mind it is perhaps the most tactical thing to do and resign as Prime Minister and announce for the Deputy Prime MInister to take over the helm at his cabinet. It has nothing to do with strategy or the military plan to eradicate Hamas from Gaza.

This problem from the Israeli point of view should not be as easy as we think it is, that the Prime Minister of Israel is doing everything only to stay in power and to save his political career. What is ongoing in Israel goes beyond the mundane idea of power hunger by the Israeli longest serving Prime Minister. He should be in fact more hungry to see Israel stay sovereign as a nation and country. And no one thinks that Mr Netanyahu is not the right person to have that kind of sentiment as a Jew and being also as the leader of Israel. He is not a tribal leader, but Statesman by democratic title. And it is the strategy that Israel should maintain its position in the future the day after. Also, on his side the Prime Minister will realize that the glass is half full. And some might say that the PM is naive for not having seen this before, that the objective to remove Hamas from God's good earth, was not the 'wider war in the region' that he has been anticipating for many decades, e.g. against Iran. The implication now seems lost, from an independent and strong army leader and leadership. It is maybe a common mistake in all of the orient to make, that fortune can be tempted and to give the desirable outcome for one ruler over another and their kingdom. In the modern world the only fortune one has is going as far as the International Laws and the United Nations. "Remember, Caesar, thou art mortal," perhaps is what the PM of Israel also should remember? The trick is how can Israel come out of this war against Hamas much stronger as a people and country. Many are saying that if aid can come through for the people of Gaza, caught in the war and trapped, that this would be in favour of Israel. A ceasefire is also desperately needed at this point in the war, nearly after six months of relentless attacks on Hamas in Gaza, and that this should result in a peaceful new beginning between the two peoples, the Israelis and Palestinian people. The IDF is not convinced of the poetry of peace they are now hearing from their ally the US and others. The other side is that Israel is failing to make their side of the story hard to be a matter of survival of the Jewish people living in this part of the world among the many enemies who want to destroy the very existence of Jews being in the Middle East. Will a Palestinian State become the democratic ally to the rest of the world, stronger than Israel has ever been in our living memory? Perhaps, but that day is yet far from today. The world will have to wait and see and wait for another fifty years if that were to happen. In living memory let's not forget that it was the existence of Israel that brought change for humankind to the Middle East and has pulled western countries into the world of seclusion of Arab nations. When speaking about global politics in the Middle East this was only possible with a strong ally in the region that was loyal and knew how to forge Anglophile relations with both sides. It is a pity to see this strong ally taking bad decisions in a very bad situation it has found itself in after 7 October. Before 1922 the Middle East needed something to change the Middle East. Question is: what was that?

The best thing to do for Israel is to do the smart thing: a cabinet reshuffle and change of Prime Minister in the present time coalition. Not for strategic reasons, but tactical reasons. And, also, fortune favours the brave.










The difficulty is that Israel is facing a prolonged war that is unprecedented in its entire history as a State.

15 March 2024

After Senator Chuck Schumer yesterday's speech in the House of Senate its reading and hearing it is making it all too easy for Israel to brazenly be mistaken in what the Senator was trying to say and what his plan is for Israel's future, the day after. The effort is sublime, in the least to say. And the question on the mind of Israelis will be what hard choices they should be making next, especially when the country is still at war against Hamas. In 75 years one wonders what lesson was learned here for Israel and the rude awakening what life amidst the enemy in fact means. The war represents a certain reality and Israel fears how that is still being underestimated grossly by not only its allies, but more so by their staunch ally the United States. The tomorrow reality is represented in the Senator's speech and is also a promising vision, so said by the most prominent Jewish leader in the US. That too is not to be underestimated. Another question for Israel is whether this war is the first among the previous ones that has been prolonged for more than one month. There is no telling where the Israeli Prime Minister can go next, or say where the war will take the country and its people tomorrow. At the same time it is also important for the Prime Minister to see it from the political viewpoint, where at least it will leave him with no lasting embarrassment. A very interesting point here made by the Senator is that no one expects Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu to do the things needed when this war will be over, and probably was said so in the spirit of his layout for tomorrow's Israel. Where Israel might see a problem is where the Senator has mentioned the change the people of Israel should make and hold new elections. The Prime Minister's response was rapid as honest, that Israel is not a banana republic, adding to this that the President of Israel, Mr Isaac Herzog, also responded in a similar way and insisted that Israel was and is a democracy. Tonight it doesn't look like that there is anyone who will stop the Prime Minister of Israel. And that could become dangerous to the survival of this Prime Minister once everyone will realize his shortcoming that he does not know how to keep on fighting the war for a long period of time, while the rest of the country should continue to keep the cycle of life going. The Prime Minister is fighting time and not realizing that he will never be able to overtake the future, while he is pumping the gas pedal and keep fighting Hamas the phantom. These are plain truths and they do matter in Israel's every day lives. At one point someone did stop Lyndon Johnson to keep sending troops to Vietnam.

Israel's new security plans alone could reassure Israelis as they are the citizens of Israel and have lived their lives in two to three consecutive generations. They will have a problem when it comes to what the people need and what the government has to offer. And that will be a first time to meet in this way. The war is not yet over and whenever there is talk of a balance between peoples in a new mind setting, today is not that day. The insecurity has reached too many in the Israeli society like a terrible Cherub standing in front of the Garden of Eden. When the battle and war are over what one can expect is the balance of the country and that its Prime Minister will then know whether the new course to take will guarantee the iron clad security for the people of Israel, and that no enemy will ever try again to attack Israelis in their sovereign land. Before 7 October that security had always been in the hand of one man only, that is Benyamin Netanyahu, a rare streak of nobility to never let anyone hurt Israel was always at the center of his heart it seemed. Is Hamas to be defeated by the present time government in Israel under Prime Minister Netanyahu? What is known before 7 October is that if there is anyone who will know the answer it can only be the man who knows this region and his neighbours best, but most of all who knows his closest enemy like an adder in his bosom. Senator Chuck Schumer his plan set out yesterday in the House of Senate will take another ten years before Israel will be ready. All architects know how a masterplan works and how to implement time. It is not as unreasonable as it now might seem when the Prime Minister and his government will act in defiance of the speech made by the Senator. Except when Hamas will become the phantom enemy of Israel, if the war takes any longer than today, say another five months from now. One tends to wonder which one is biting much harder in the heels of the Prime Minister, the death toll in Gaza, or the words reflected in the speech by Senator Chuck Schumer yesterday morning, in the House of Senate. Plus, there is a black worm in the apple in his hands about the unwillingness of Hamas to release the hostages. Let's hope that the Prime Minister will not fall indefinitely into this trap set out by Hamas, and strangely enough also in his own coalition that are forbidding in their view. On Social Media one asked, who was Amalek? As the story goes that the God of Abraham had rejected the King Saul because he had saved the king of Amalek, Agag. Painful as it is in the present time sometimes the Prime Minister of Israel is always looking like he alone knows how not to save Amalek. (And that could be anyone, even yours truly, as long as Israel exists without a true friend in this world)












The first day of the week in Israel, sunday today and there is much of a high expectation, on the deal to release the hostages in Paris.

26 February 2024

If the hostages will be released, a total of first 40, in the coming days or hours, that will be a political and highly diplomatic win for the Prime Minister of Israel. Last week there was still disbelief in some of his inner circle and others, that Mr Netanyahu would not succeed after he had rejected the extended demands made by Hamas on the deal to release the hostages. Now the world is beginning to see the clear view through the small window of diplomacy in Paris, between Quatar, Egypt, and Israel's delegation in Paris. Some on X are tweeting that the deal is looking at least good on paper, and one can only read between the lines that the nation should be prepared for bad news, when that is part of the returning back home of the hostages. Israel now seems miles away from what the other side of the world means to the nations. It is becoming more of a world of its own, this young nation and country that are a little more than seven decades old. Had Israel been a little more older, e.g. one hundred years, these generations in Israel then would have seen a country old 170 years. A different cause to celebrate a sovereign State, built 170 years ago. Just as simple a sentiment as that, but supremely important to continue without any fear of a setback in time or oblivion. As in previous eras and centuries. Another goal of the Prime Minister is to win the war against Hamas, to say in the coming weeks/months and within the year 2024. Again, this too will be another moment when many will air their disbelief and say it is unlikely that Hamas can be destroyed within a calendar year. In the war against Hamas the idea of existing borders has become the most dominant issue for the military/ IDF, as this would have made the war more decisive and clear where Israel begins and ends, and where the territories of the Palestinian people are outlines to build their future State. In the present time let's hope that the Palestinian people now will participate more seriously in rebuilding their future, after Hamas' atrocities on 7 October, and reconcile with the new plans set out by Israel last week by the Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu. It is not the most ideal sort of plan and maybe what it is worth today is that there is at least an attempt made by the Israelis in an early stage of the- day- after.

By looking at the small attempt made by the Prime Minister to plan the future of the Palestinians living in Gaza and the West Bank, the day after, one cannot help but feel that Hera will find herself again at the junction with Aphrodite on where Jerusalem should be situated between the two nations. Who is more beautiful, so to speak, with Paris in the middle or on the sidelines. We are still in the northern part of the Middle East, and bordering with the Mediterranean Sea almost in a cosinus/ sinus angle of 90 degrees by estimation. The apple of discord between Israel and the future of the Palestinian people is an impossible choice, but then again it is what happens to all mortals. Palestinians should therefore be inclined to do more in the world than just winning on the gift of the gab, e.g. in real wording of the Arabic word Al ghayb. If Al Aqsa is historically theological, so is Kotel and to the end of its property lines set in Holy Scriptures in the Torah and Tanakh. And if the arugment spills over into logic that geographically the Middle East is Palestinian land to Arabs, this must be answered with no Jews living in Israel. The most awkward thing to now say or think, but there is method in the madness when Christians want Jerusalem to mean something religious and ancient history. In whatever way you put your mind to it Israel is the apple of discord in the Middle East, and the fight is between Hera and Aphrodite. This is not meant to be disrespectful to the Torah or Quran, but political discord make it almost impossible to believe there is another way to put it after 75 years fighting the same fight between Israel and the Palestinian people. It is also the softer approach. In harsh reality it is the Palestinian people who should be revered most at this point in the conflict. And for the simple reason that they have political ambitions and are people of the world in the 21st century, and they have become extremely assertive. Of course they have failed terribly after 7 October, and have given cause again for another war with Israel's Defense Forces, but now the question is whether they are capable of usurping other ways of powers and to do it smarter and more determined to win the intellectual argument they have been dreaming of winning for a very long while. Perhaps since 2010. And let's not forget those invisible people living in Israel and the poorest in the Palestinian territories. Jitschaik Rabin never forgot either side of this economic cycle and that the way forward was not to ignore (neglect) the inequality between the two sides, among the ordinary people/ citizens. A simple example: two million people living in Israel (Sabras) without work or wealth (basic income), with two million Palestinians working and living in Israel, makes it another political illusion when one has every right in their democracy and and the other has no democratic rights in the same democracy. And both peoples are now looking to the government for real answers why this status quo is sadly enough perpetual, while the new comers in the West Bank get everything they need to co- exist. When the war is over will another Yitzhak Rabin stand up in the middle of Israel again? Well, Israel, the world is your oyster and let's hope the future will become truly what other prime ministers have said, a desert blooming. The world is anxious today and waiting for the hostage deal of releasing 40 hostages in the coming days. 












17 February 2024

Regimental rule: Military necessity is governed by several constraints: an attack or action must be intended to help in the defeat of the enemy; it must be an attack on a legitimate military objective,[17] and the harm caused to protected civilians or civilian property must be proportional and not excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.[18], Wikipedia principles of the law of war.


(Personal Draft/ concept/ idea to stop the war after 7 October in February 2024)


Stop the war in Gaza after five months, and talk to the people of Israel and the world, that the assessment we have made is this: the children, the Bibas family Kfir and Ariel, and the other hostages are not found, and the new situation will make us come to a different conclusion after five months relentless war against Hamas in the north and south of Gaza, where we will go now only after the terrorists and without hope of finding our hostages. If, God willing, they do appear and will be released back to us, again then we will have to make new assessments if or how to continue the war against Hamas.

At this point it is also too early to talk about the political change between the two peoples and what is remnant to us in the foreseeable still unborn future. 75 Years have now come to a complete standstill.

The State of Israel depends on two children, Kfir and Ariel.

12 February 2024

A posthumous finding of Kfir and Ariel Bibas will be the definite proof of global truth and how long it took the Israeli Military to find the infant (taken from his home in Ha Negev when he was nine months old) and toddler (taken when he was four years old), and how far the IDF had to go into the war against Hamas. Also, after today this morning at 01:00 AM when another two hostages were found in Rafah by the IDF on the ground (airstrikes in the air), this has made it very clear to the world that Hamas is prepared to continue the war and has very little considerations for what happens underway to their 'victory' to the people living in Gaza or Rafah. It is imperative for Israel to find the Bibas children (and mother, and father), as from now on Israel will be seen by the International world void of real proof and purpose. That might even mean to say that Hamas is not the guilty party in this war, as so many are already saying in public in the International arena of public opinion. Nothing of the 7th October five months ago turns the stomach of public opinion about Hamas' atrocities, and they should have. When the children are found and pronounced dead it will by then be too late for everyone who didn't take a step back on 7 October, to then now say how their stomach are turned by the inhumane actions by Hamas on that fatal day. (This is my personal op) And, let's pray it is so, if they are found alive this will still be proof of the atrocity that was upon all hostages on that day, and the world will remember the images from video footages that everyone in the world has seen since then, and we will know the truth what should be understood as Hamas' capability. It can only have one outcome that will deem decent and that is to sack the government of Hamas and to lose its legitimacy to rule again indefinitely from these territories. Not only because they could have stopped the war by releasing the hostages immediately, but allowing Israel to keep on retaliating and bomb Hamas' strongholds, intentionally built in what should have been normal civilian life for Palestinians under the government of Hamas. (AKA Urban warfare) What then would set the tone after the war in our world?

In memo: the Bibas children as it shows by the international world that they are not part of the International Order after 7 October to order their immediate release or made a criminal offense against a sovereign nation and State; Israel however does find the Bibas children and perhaps under Jewish law a crime to have abducted not only many hostages, but especially when taking an infant and toddler as war prisoners as foreign and not sovereign in the hands of a terrorist organisation callling itself resistance and fighting for the Palestinian people their dignity. 











Israel's total war five months later.

9 February 2024

It is somewhat unusual to think of Israel to be isolated in a total war as they want to take out Hamas completely from Gaza, Hezbollah in the north from Lebanon, and they are also fighting to deal with the many thousands of Palestinians on mainstream in the war against Hamas since 7 October 2023. Prime Minister Netanyahu has a clear objective how from his point of view he sees the end of this war that Hamas must not be able to return on the border with Israel. What Mr Netanyahu is saying or talking about there is no clear message to the rest of the world what he means, and it is not only public opinion out there in the global world. This isolation, according to the world, is something Israel has brought on itself when ignoring the call for a stop to the bombing in Gaza or a ceasefire. In the military we can be quite sure isolation is not in that same meaning as global opinion, it is real meaning, and it is a reality in which Israel has to live again and to bring back security for its nation and hostages taken by Hamas on 7 October, all military demands the State is now requiring to 'make Israel safe again'. From that point of view who can protect the country as where it finds itself now in without any public support in retaliation for Hamas' brutality against innocent and sleeping civilians in Ha Negev on 7 October. But all this will come later and not while the war is still ongoing as we speak. Be it now that Israel is in total shutdown as a country and at war. Whether for private persons or delegations with a diplomatic passport. It is the Israeli perspective that is now beginning to look more and more interesting and how the military and government are conducting the war, against the objectives south and north. It is also this war that will not only make the world see it differently, but that Israel too will see the world differently. Before 7 October 2023 could Israel have ever seen it this way, that their perception of safety and security for the people of Israel would need a radical change if only to deal with a world that does not want to hear, see and know about Hamas and their brutal massacre against Israeli civilians in the kibbutzim near the Gaza border in the south? In fact the euphoria in the first week after 7 October in favour of the resistance forces was a great moment in all of the Middle East and in the rest of the world. The question post war will always be one for Israel, 'Why?' Two infants are among the hostages in Gaza taken by Hamas on the fatal day when they broke through the high and heavy concrete fenses into Israel. Israel should not snap at this point in the moment? Hence that means it isn't your problem in the rest of the world, but it is certainly the problem for Israel and Israelis alone and how to deal with this brutality by Hamas.

Rafah is next according to the latest military update on X via I24 tweets. There is some discussion on I24 on whether the IDF will go into Rafah if they can do something about the 1.2 million people living (above ground) as civilians. Last night the US President said that this would be over the top to go in and it clearly confuses the President on the issue of the war against Hamas. Wherever Israel has had allies in the world it will now be clear that most leaders will deal with the same problem or confusion that something is changing and that no one knows whether for the better or worse once it will all be over. And the US President is known to have had a special relationship with Israel all of his diplomatic life, and he has always loved Israel perhaps for religious reasons or simply being part of the old world order almost starting at the same time when Israel was still creating its youngest State ever out of thin air, so to speak. The world cannot pretend to not know the real force behind Israel's military power over the last three decades. And Hamas is pretending not to have known that their violent infiltration and killing of thousands in Israel would not require a violent response by Israel. If Israel is a brutal occupier that is the knowledge one must have of Israel's brutality. The fact of building tunnels in civil areas is a clear signal of premeditation, it is not defense allowed by the International world... Or have they known and condone this premeditated measure? It is not clear what these tunnel systems and infrastruces were built for if it wasn't for sewage or waste waters. One would want to know what then were these tunnels built for and how can no one close enough to Gaza not have known about its constructions? A bear trap is a bear trap. (Maybe also in military economics and visuals) Or as they say in English: for whom the bells (tunnels) toll. It is something Hungary has also called for that not investigating the first moment since 7 October will become something no one will ever understand and Israel will be blamed for forever. (The latter they did not say) In short: there is innocence above ground and there is innocence underground in Gaza, according to the present time worldview. Or prove this wrong and say that the tunnel infrastructure in Gaza was meant to help the Palestinian people when Israel is bombing civilians.











Without Jerusalem where is Israel, in Tel Aviv?

7 February 2024

What is looking like a comprehensive for the Two- State solution between Israel and the Palestinians, is for Israel to go back to 1967 with East Jerusalem where to build the Palestinian State. This is interesting and from the part of common sense logic, that if so where than would Israel become Israel proper? Without Jerusalem where would Israel be Israel proper? In Tel Aviv, Haifa, Ashkelon, Beersheva or in Eilat and to build the third temple? There is such a dramatic promise of a third temple to be built by the Jewish people in Jerusalem, whether in the Torah or Tanach, but that this has to move unto a different Israel without Jerusalem. It is perhaps antisemitic to say, but what is it that makes Germany the German heimat to old generations of Germans? Sometimes land cannot be switched or moved out of its socket, and for the simple reason that it is tied to blood and soil. And so will, presumably, be the third temple in the Jewish history. And seen not only from Jews, but the entire world. There will certainly be something not right to the nations, let's say if history of the Jews will now change for political reasons by the new world order lawmakers, even if these were and are nations who prefer to be right when it means that the Palestinian people will get East Jerusalem as part of the deal in 1967, when the UN votes have been in favour of giving East Jerusalem to the Palestinians. The question is put to Jews only and to answer the question: without Jerusalem where is Israel proper? Saxony, Vikings, Franks, Goths, all have ancestral lands and it will not ever become bequeathed to even kinsmen of these ancestors in the new generations of time. The real piety of humanity and what it truly believes is that Jersulem is a theocratic gem of all times to eternity. And like the hexagon it has specific sharp features, each to point in a direction where to find God Almighty. How can the Palestinian State be entitled to the road to eternity, unless of course this was designated even in the New Testament?

If Israel should go back to the 1967 green lines, prior to the war, this could be seen as part of a political effort by the Israelis, and in good faith, to have the Palestinian people living in the lands not partitioned for Israelis to live in. But without Jerusalem. East, south, north or west Jerusalem all sides are part of a vertical plan to most nations where they come for pilgrimage around the year and should remain open for entrance to every living human being or animal. In the architecture of the Old Testament or the Torah it was specifically partitioned to Jews, for the theocratic reason to build the third temple, as the first two temples have been destroyed in previous centuries in the history of Jerusalem. There is nowhere in the rest of the Middle East a free passage as in any other country in the west, because of the religion Islam. Theology is the architecture of the Middle East, be it Jew or Arab. In the 21st century however it is the call of the world and Jews (on the Left) that what Israel now needs is a Two- State solution and do away with all that brings war between the two nations, Palestinians and Israelis. Well, politics is a very attractive porridge when you are hungry like Esau and you care less about your first birth right. And when you are strong what will stop you for pursuing your younger brother, Jacob, and kill him for 'stealing' your birth right? In this political porridge, once more, where is your birth right without Jerusalem? The uncircumsized pagan empires have made even better a deal about Jerusalem, taking it as a trophy. And not to throw it out like pearls. One thing however is very clear to both peoples when living in this part of the world, one as Israel and the other being the Palestinian State, that they need to learn how to share the land and honor this partition. East Jerusalem is not for horizontal politics, and not for terrorism against democracy.











In 2024 to the world military victory is the future.

3 February 2024

In the mechanism of cause what sends out the first signal of war and not the method and to many this is unconventional specifically and only in the military, the military victory always makes the first iota of war history, e.g. throwing a stone through the window, a bullet flying through the crowd and hit the king on his way to the State building, or just a president watching a military parade. In 2024 what one wonders is whether there is a difference between the military signal of war and war history. Israel and Hamas are at this point in either of these two territories, especially when pulling the future from its far distance like the moon choking on the umbillical cord of the lasso and scorch the earth in stages I, II, III, IV and V. This is what limits the outcome in its final stage as the fallen earth. Hamas took the world by surprise and gave it quite a shock and after shock, after the 7 October last year. And still it does not return the innocent civilians of Israel to their homeland and people. At the end of the war the prize that the world had to pay was the end of the military history as everyone has known it, and for one reason only. Israel as not many realize and to a certain extend there was no such thing in Israel before this fateful day in Ha Negev, 7 October, but neither was this a well known fact in the military family of nations, that one day after 75 years of Israeli coexistence this was possible to happen again to the Jewish nation and to be violated in a sub human way by a small group of armed terrorism in 2023. After four months of war operations by Israel's military defense in Gaza the question is what is happening as we speak in the rest of the world? Hamas still appears to lose the battleground fights against the IDF, but what it has really done is to get to this stage when and where it was capable of involving the whole world. In most of these war blue prints it is looking that way as a possibility or probability, and which is part of the probability why it is so difficult to win the war against Hamas. One can kill the enemy as an objective by their Defense Forces, but to kill the ideology of the enemy has now gone out of the window. Hamas appears to be the natural weed of terror in Gaza and the West Bank small factions fulfilling one of earth's greatest needs, that Jews are everywhere in the world domination a continent of a fight between the desirable against the undesirable. While in the meantime in 2023-2024 Hamas became the magician of white rabbits and to fill the earth with the hatred that many have since learned after WWII are the antisemites. This is important to illustrate here and than to ask the question with immediate speed, what is military vicotry?

There is no proof that ever has an Arab nation come this far and to offer the world a relief at large scale and attack the Jews 'in the face' and make it global newsfeed in every corner of the world. (Warning: L' ennemi de mon ennemi est mon ami. Or it is keeping your enemy closer) You should deal with this problem and do it before moving a defense force to the next level of total victory over the terrorism of this particular enemy, e.g. to the State of Israel. There are two ways to look at this: one is helping Israel as so many Palestinian analysts say either legal experts or political expertise. And two: Hamas pulling the military power of the world to fight Hamas' organisation, government and establishment in Gaza. Israel should always remember how time and their history ancient or modern have one thing that it shows, it is that military history to some nations have no such thing as victory. And if so they will always concentrate on the small 'militia' of armed gangsters who have shown the world it is possible to beat a formidable force and than pull the most powerful nations and their defense forces to come bring things back in order for peace in the future. That, in fact, is what their military victory really looks like. But who would dare say so? This too has two ways: one that you must admit that this is the truth, but who will win the future and make it their own next? Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu is adamant: he will do this for the people of Israel and all the Jews in the rest of the world, and to fight for their future that this may never happen again to any Jew living in Israel. Security of Israel is the future and by military fact it was Hamas attack on innocent civilians in Ha Negev that made the Jewish nation think again. And that is not good. Imagine that the same had been but happened in the geo political sphere and Hamas had proven their seriousness in high diplomatic debate? And not rape, massacres, hostage takings, and brutally murdering c.q. indiscriminate murders of infants and young children, men and young men, girls and women, and the elderly people of some who were/ are holocaust survivors. And now UNRWA this week has come under, another, attack of aiding the Hamas organisation with an agenda of their own. Than how can an independent Palestinian State be called for with immediate effect by the US in this corruption proof (given by Israel)? The military analyst will always judge from the point of view how the war was triggered and how it did in the evolution of that war when it ends up triggering the world military powers. Russia has done very much the same in the case to Ukraine. In 2021. It is the method by which the military architecture was built on since Alexander the Great, or King Leonidas against Persia mightiest military men. Hamas, did they change the world for Jews and win the horizontal war across the center of the world (public square domain)? In the 'military' perhaps the answer is astonishingly and pure fact, yes (old world order). In high social rank and order, No (new world order).












On Social Media: 27 January 2024.

Word of the day: ICJ court learned ruling yesterday. Utmost sensible approach and bring it to world's attention. On 2 details: intent and protected people. Hamas 78 seats win in last election, civilians are perhaps not complicit in 7 oct atrocities, but are implicit by the usurp of the last win in elections and making this a constituency under Hamas rule and government (as in making it the will of the people).

mctaytelbaum
@mctaytelbaum
·
2 s
A protected people under PA 73 or less seats in West-Bank in 2006/2007 have not been under attack by IDF after 7 oct; Hamas has not complied and released the hostages immediately after ICJ court ruling. That is as good as willful defiance. Israel priorities: release of hostages, reform their national security. The military is inherent to Law.And is at the moment not defiant as government and the IDF to the ICJ court ruling.
  










The Two State Solution Israel- Palestine 2024.

20 January 2024

The demographic changes to both peoples will become another challenge in twenty to thirty years. Where will they live, and if quota's will return in the Jewish history where and when Jews can come live in Israel? The answer is not easy and the Prime Minister of Israel, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, hasn't yet given his answer on the issue of the Two- State solution the US wants to revive as soon as possible. He is still at war against Hamas and the hostages that he wants to come back home are still ongoing problems that he alone is facing as the incumbent Prime Minister and Head of State. To the rest of the world that is looking very much like rejecting the proposals the US has discussed with the Prime Minister, several models so the JP said, were part of the talks between the US President and Mr Netanyahu on friday, yesterday. It is a hard question after 75 years to find the answer in the middle of another war against Hamas for the Israeli Prime Minister. What is the lesson learned every time the Two- State solution comes back to the table to secure peace and prosperity to both peoples, the Israelis and Palestinians? The last time the same urgent call came when Operation Cast Lead was the latest war against Hamas, in 2010. With the last war after Hamas' massacre in Ha Negev on 7 October 2023, and which is still ongoing as we speak, because Hamas still is holding hostages taken from Ha Negev on that fatal day, now the same urgency is put to the Israeli Prime Minister that now is the time for a return of the Two- State solution for Israel and the Palestinian people. Let's say that in theory we are looking at a possibility here to both nations and that a complete still of hostilities will be the result on both sides, how will it be realistic in two to three decades if, again in theory, let's say the population growth will be for Israel over 14 million people, and on the side of the Independent Palestinian State with a rapid growth of 9 million, will the Two- State solution not again become a new problem in time? If the world is right there are more than 500 thousand new settlers living illegally in Judea and Samaria, on the Israeli side. And when will a Jewish Prime Minister say to fellow Jews that enough is enough, there are no more places for Jews to come live in the fatherland? It is not the norm for any other country in the western world, to say e.g. in Britain that there are no places left to British people to come live in England. Why impose the norm in Israel as from Jew against Jew, or force the government to design a system and only allow certain Jews to live in Israel? The true nature of the State of Israel might become obscure and go lost in time as it progresses in the future. The Palestinian stands in 2024 at approximately 4.5 million people living in the lands to Palestinians, either the West Bank or in Gaza. 3 Million are living in Israel among the Israelis. It is for this reason why there needs to be carefully thinking again and not to be too hasty against the Prime Minister's prime concerns and why he has severe reservations on the US proposals for working on the Two- State solution and prepare for change in 2024.

The Jewish sensitivity on the system of only allowing a quota of Jews to come live in Israel, is a problem, as it reminds the nation again of what history tells them when they had fled Europe and could only come in hundreds to Palestine. After 75 years the world has forgotten what it meant to Jews living in Nazi Germany and that in fact the real holocaust wasn't because of Auschwitz and Dachau alone, but in fact that all of Europe was mentally and physically against Jews being in Europe. It might also be that many in Europe hated the Zionist's dream to revive a Zionist place where Jews could again live, that this would only mean war with the longest breath in the Middle East, then already knowing that no Arab nation could accept such an intrusion in their apparent hegemony in the levant. The question again is, will it work in 2024 to create a peaceful coexistence for the Israelis and Palestinians? It is more than just ideological differences between the two nations, with so many deaths every time there is another war between Israel and Hamas. It is also not a lie to say that the Middle East is complex theoretically and more so in reality. (Incidently on the side of the Palestinians with the call against Israel on the last war and that is still not concluded over the hostages taken by Hamas, had Hamas put in contingency plans after operation Cast Lead, the number of deaths would have been half, at least) Both nations have no excuses left to either prolong the wars or not to fight for their apparent future. These are the perils that cannot be seen in terms of abstract ideas or designs. The reality is far more grim, especially and paradoxically with peace by pact. History taught the world one thing about peace, that there will always be 'underground' resistance to the new order and especially when it brings prosperity to the once so battered people by Israel. And the slightest could set off the powder keg once more. The State of Israel has gone through decades of perhaps an outdated system in the military and State, and 75 years is still quite young to do more giant steps like other countries have done in longer periods of time, e.g. hundreds of years. How can its problems be over after 75 years and in 2024? Next to the State of Israel the question will also apply to the Palestinian people and to seriously answer the question whether their problems will be over in the immediate aftermath of the destruction in the last war against the IDF. It is very clear that nothing can be easily solved while the war has not yet been concluded, that the need to keep on fighting, either rape, massacre of Jews, and shoot to kill policies on the side of Israel, will always hang above the heads of the two nations like the invisible sword of Damocles and pointing as the wind comes and goes, still or strong. And we know that growth is either horizontally or vertical, on two factors, demographically and in economics. For now fact is that the birth of the Israeli parliament is real and not fictional, and so are its parliamentary laws to lead her people.

History occupation Jerusalem: learned historians ancient or AC wrote on the empires that have brutally occupied the promised land of Israel and have never mentioned any uprise from Palestinian people against, e.g. Medieval Knights, Byzantine empire and Roman empire. But in fact have only mentioned of a people who did uprise: the Jewish people. And for that the proof of Masada is still right above the high hills outside Jerusalem.
Oxford, Cambridge, Ecole or Sorbonne Nouvelle, Harvard, Yale and Princeton. Just naming a few universities.











The nature of politics in the UK under Keir Starmer 2024.

8 January 2023

How to put this into some perspective firstly is to ask the question of politics under Keir Starmer, if in the coming months his message about the future for Britain can either go two ways: Labour or the Conservative Party. The people of Britain expect as always that a general election is their very right and it is law in British democracy to cast your vote to each and every eligible citizen. After years their right has come to some useful exercise, to think of one reason here is that Keir Starmer is the man who excited the voters either to vote against him, by a deliberate vote for an independent other Party, or stay with the Tories, or worse and to try some other  bipartisan way to prove their revolt against the Labour leader who wants to be their prime minister. It's a full whack against Sir Keir Starmer, Left and Right. Mr Starmer's allies may begin to tremle at the sight of a possible massive defeat when the next general election will be over and votes are counted by election morning. Yes, it is terrifying when seen from this angle. And also being a very realistic angle, no doubt about that. To these 'doubtful' voters, experts on real politics in Britain, that is all that matters, and not e.g. that a battle was lost for a man who stood at the Rubicon of change in a very difficult time when no one dared to cross over to the other side of Brexit. There is no previous proof of any Labour Minister or prime minister who came to this dark and difficult place on their own, and to reverse the victory of the British people in Brexit and leaving the European Union in 2020 in a binding law in the International world. Sir Keir Starmer is also the man who talks about Britain's future, a very realistic one that is natural to the rest of the world dynamics. Time will not stand still for Britain, but it will migrate to another second it knows as magnitude or the global world. The younger generations are the very proof of Mr Starmer's future Britain, to put things in the right perspective. Unless it collapses if the US elections go back in time and the former President Donald Trump becomes president once more. Than it will be to Mr Starmer a matter of short time, just after the election if held in May this year. Without the leadership of Secretary of State Mr Antony Blinken global insecurity will become the new reality again, even sooner than we have thought and also again leave behind all bridges to burn built by the previous Administration. And what will the British voters than say?

The British voters than can only say one thing, that Mr Starmer rightly was defeated and it couldn't have come any sooner. Thus begins the memory of a Starmer politics birth, be it all in memory. An interesting angle to think of, because the invisible truth is that where Keir Starmer has been putting the mood for the British people is to return to politics and that the Labour Party was determined not to be subjected to extinction of a political law/ order in Britain, that the people do need a two- party system politics, that the people need a system in parliament that works for country and people and not for one Party only. (Outsider's view) Two years ago the Labour Party was out manoeuvred by Brexit and their Prime Ministers, and the Labour leadership was lost in obscurity. This is the perspective that no one cares to understand that in fact Sir Keir Starmer opened again the seas of politics and to let it stream back into the River Thames (not a very flattery image in the present time compared to the burning of parliament by Monet). The paradox of all this is that neither Tories or royalists deny that Britain needs a future in the modern world geopolitics and a national politics of some kind of renewal. But it can't be and should not be the way for Britain, if correctly thought in this or any writing. No free man can rule Britain as its Prime Minister, you have to be a nobleman and see temptation from miles ahead to both political Parties. Oliver Cromwell thought himself to be a nobleman and who would rule Britain as a free man and humanist, and yet he has failed terribly by becoming what he had decapitated and denounced a tyrant, the King. His politics were never in any second of life about the future of Britain. And if Keir Starmer wins and put the Labour Party back in government, where will the Tories go? Opposition will be fortified and only God Almighty knows what that means... How do you know Keir Starmer is and will be the cause of all that? Has the time with Jeremy Corbyn brought back the battle for Britain and British politics so closely to the voters in the streets, and they are the British people? Their choice will be about their own future and basic logic tells you that how can they vote against their own future in a moment so crucial to all people living in big societies in the world? And also how is this proper politics and democracy if Britain doesn't do future?

erichte













The land of Israel 2024

2 January 2024

Reality of the State of Israel is slowly splitting from the reality in which the world lives, and it is causing increasing pressure on the Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. It is also in the 88th day of the war against Hamas in Gaza, south and north, and in the middle the Palestinian people that are being sandwiched between death and life. This war scenario has only one reason: the Israeli hostages that Hamas still hasn't released. Full stop. And to Israel and its Prime Minister there is no other pressure. What the International community wants or is saying that the idea of Israel's right to defend itself against a 'barbaric' organisation, Hamas, is baseless under International Law. We have heard it before, but after bombing Gaza in Real Time for 88 days, the striking is pitching this time a little higher against the State of Israel as the settler's colonialism. And more and more becoming a new reality for the Palestinian people that you can take away legitimacy from underneath the people of Israel to be a State. 'A so called State, what is this?" Hamas official Ghazi Hamad asked in an TV interview by the Arab media in October last year. A dangerous notion is the new narrative that Israel is not an Arab nation and cannot continue the blind vision of its occupation of Palestine or Arab land. The Middle East is Arab land region, compared to Jewish land had it been different. The Palestinians and their Arab allies in the Middle East will not see it any other way, and even by military force by the IDF that is Israel. It is a logical view and a valid one in the 21st century. To the rest of the world it is also the most natural truth to pursue and put Israel to the pressure of withdrawing from its settlement policies in the short term future. And the world understands. However at a different level of reasoning about the ways in our world it is clear that history is never logical and straight lined. That has not been for kingdoms or serves, land is subjected to administration and prosperity by the people and nation to build country and peoples for higher purposes, e.g. politics and defense laws of their community. It is history itself that has shown to the world that terror organisations have never been in power to administer a people in a civil way without terror of any kind. Israel is part of this level where history does make the difference, in prosperity, political sciences, economics, defense, law codex, and above all democracy (sub democracy). However Israel does not live peacefully in the land of Israel for 75 years in what is called Arab land and Palestine for an Arab nation.

MCT.......................................












71 Days, this war should not become embarrassing to the Israeli IDF and government if no hostages are returned.

16 December 2023

Last night in Tel Aviv thousands have held a demonstration against the IDF (Defense Ministry) when it was reported officially that three of the hostages kept in Gaza by the terrorist organisation Hamas were killed by friendly fire, by accident. (In fact the military discipline could not take any risk of the spook that Hamas had thrown to them like dogs) Video footage is also going around on Social Media by the PQB shooting from their hide outs at Israeli tanks driving through small paths in urban areas in Khan Yunis and being hit by insurgents fire. You would argue immediately how the IDF could send tanks (with wide circular range of fire) in these densed populated areas, and also with key component in the battle that young women drive these tanks. From afar this is looking like one way of demoralising the situation, especially when the enemy of a lesser military power are men only as the fighting force against the more superior military forces of Israel. Is Israel aware that after 71 days today whether the enemy can make up its own mind and understand the weakness at this point, where the enemy is 'not being able to go any further' in their war against Hamas? The infant and his brother (mother & father) are still abductees held by Hamas. If this war continues without bringing back the infant and his brother back home to Israel, just across the border over the Green line, it will be embarrassing for the far more superior and sophisticated IDF of Israel each and every following day from today. Something tells you that it is going wrong on the side of Israel to take the right action against Hamas with the more precision operations on the ground and in the air (satellite). The Palestinian Q. Brigade surely cannot have obtained kryptonite as their secret weapon and weaken the IDF in the critical phase of the 71th day in the war against Hamas? Political there are diplomatic efforts to call for an immediate cease- fire, at the UN and in Norway, with a meeting of several prominent Foreign Ministers, including Palestinian diplomats. There is urgency for political diplomacy to restart the political process promptly, according to Norway Ministry for Foreign Affairs. When seen on the balance of the scale of the war after 7 October you will see where again the effort is failing its own noble intentions. You have to be practical if only you wanted to bring back sanity to the two nations and their existentiality living side by side in the north part of the Middle East. The war 'against the population' has cost in terms of human lives more than ever before than when the IDF fought wars against Hamas, since they came to power in Gaza. These lives count for something and they should become a factor. Not just verbal letters in the text of diplomacy of a willing State here or there, and to make peace. 75 Years everyone should be tired when it is going nowhere between Israel and the Palestinians. Which was never difficult to understand with a State that is a renaissance of Israel and 75 years old. How has the world worked on the side of Israel to achieve its full potential as the State and democracy they were building in this 'new nation'? There was also never any reality left for the Palestinians to give any accountability over their future that needed changing, not in stages, but almost immediately. These side effects are still hunting the Middle East and both peoples, Israelis and Palestinians.

75 Years later Israel is clearly the sovereign State and a Republic. It is not just a contract with the International World, but more that the Jewish nation has an ancient old contract with the God of Abraham, e.g. Shema Israel and that is also never going to resound any better than at home and not in England, Germany or Sweden, etcetera. The Two- State solution may be the only supreme diplomatic solution and make it politically affiliated to other governments in the rest of the western world, but de facto is not producing any reality result for either peoples. Israel is not even considered that it does have the right ideas when it speaks of the Palestinian right to a State nextdoor. How can we know when talks are only held by Foreign Ministers clearly apart from Israel, without any representation of the other political and delegate, for Israel? If simple courtesy is not possible there is no peace possible when conditions for normality are being kept apart and singling out the one important key partner to peace in the Middle East. You have to talk. And the same will come to Israel when the moment for talks will resume, because one thing is true in the conflict: intrinsically the Palestinian people by their right title are Arabic and Arab people, and belong in the Middle East. The Palestinian people are not indigenous to China or Japan. Where they fall short in the present time to make it the intellectual property for their nation is to demand the territories in Israel as designated to only Palestinians as also their land. No Nubian Prince or kingdom could come to Medina and say that they have a prophecy to fulfill and take it from Saudi Arabia. Even if in this case Islam will be Islam to both, Nubia and Saudi Arabia. After 7 October the world has to understand that it might take another decade to clean things up and to seek another way how to build the future in Israel and for the Palestinian people. How to avoid war or conflict should become the Treaty between the two nations, without any interferrence from third parties, politically or military. This prolongation of one being good at building and the other being good at destroying can't be good for the natural living evironment of peoples. Let alone for children to grow up in these environments. Ten years from now none of these children should come to the same perpetual understanding again, that their children again will be wiped out by bombing from Israel, because they are still destroying Hamas. There are many things no one agrees with from the Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, but one thing he is absolutely right about is education of children in Palestine. You simply can't teach terrorism at nurseries and call it the valour of the Palestinian future and nation. While at the same time their 'reformists' politicians have studied either at Oxford or Yale uninversity. (Incidently many Palestinian specialists in Radiology or Oncology are working and living in the western world!) And because many are still donkey cart workers in Palestine, Hamas can only dream on with their crave for opportunity and keep these simple people close to their terrorist organisation bosom and transform them to adders. The Palestinian donkey workers have rights in their State (e.g. living standard of indefinite right to work and living wage), equally that is what Israel also needs to revive in their democracy for the ordinary Israeli hard working people or hard hit by unemployment.

In conclusion Tzipi Livni's terminology, come to democracy.













The plan for a Palestinian State post war 7 October 2023.

12 December 2023

It is quite revealing to hear that some in the Arab world are now openly calling for the legitimacy of the Palestinian people and their lands that is 'from the river to the sea'. The Hamas terror attack 7 October two months ago gave the impetus to the people of the Middle East, and they have been quite clear this week that Israel in fact does not exist as a government or State. They could not have been more transparent about the direction they are planning on taking in the coming weeks or months. Iran's Foreign Minister Hoessein Amirabdollahian yesterday at the International Forum in Doha told the audience present, Hamas was a resistance group and organisation against the Israeli illegitimate regime and that the people of the Middle East want an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestine. After 75 years it was clear that Israel does not belong in a place that is Arab only land. The whole world in fact agrees with Hamas and the Middle East, who are calling for this plan. Except the US and by abstain the UK last week at the United Nations for a call of unilateral ceasefire. When can you make public such an announcement, if one you understand that public opinion in the International World will hear your every word, and to other more professional ears there will be immediate understanding that this can only be said and done, secondly when you have proportionate military power and weapons to start the war against the Zionist regime in Israel, and dragging with it the United States most powerful army, as President Biden calls it, on the face of the earth, one has to take it that this plan in its precalculations has already established a certain 'focus' on winning the battle. Because if you are only spewing wishes and revenge against the Zionist regime over its Jewish Home since 1948, according to the Balfour Declaration, perhaps it would be better to shut up and leave the Israel conflict with the Palestinians off your hands. It might have been inspirational after 7 October to dream in great dimensions to rid yourself of Israel from the 'Palestinian lands', and take it before the International community free as you wish and you will prosper. The West Bank and Gaza have become humiliating to the Arab world and Iranians how Israel is acting as if they had invented the Middle East. But the subjugation of the Palestinian people is not a dream. It is in many ways reality for many decades, because the world helped Israel believing in a greater Israel. That worldwide belief has now dropped to an absolute nil after 7 October 2023...

When you think of success for the Middle East against the State of Israel and its people living in this country, what could be the weapon to make Israel yield to leave Palestine indefinitely? If you take advice from the best in the world how to win a war with a magnitude, something you should have some experience with if you don't want to meet with certain and uncertain surprises, there is a possibility for you to succeed. Does Iran have experience with the plan of war they are beginning to announce verbally against Israel? Israel has fought different kinds of wars and is an expert with enemy military force, terrorism, and other more lethal wars. It is a very effective enemy if you take up war with the little country that is Israel. And than there is other news as well about the loss of lives in the IDF in Gaza. Palestinian journalists should make an effort and see the bigger picture, e.g. the US restraining Israel and the use of their full potential. Two months later something is wrong in Israel... The hostages are still in the hands of Hamas. The global audience or public opinion has chosen to be on the side of the Palestinian people. If there was no motive e.g. the massacre of thousands of children by the IDF in the war since 14 October, after the week of euphoria by Hamas and the rest of the world, they would have found another one. The Middle East however thinks differently. Public opinion is their other weapon as is the no 1 global economics. Ok, enough of this post war outlook and taking back land from Israel. From the same point of view the outlook is prosperity, while in fact the reality will be an unprecedented scale of black depression, and lets not be too premature and now say that they have been warned. Like Hamas the Middle East will again blame Israel for their defeat at an unprecedented scale. By the time this great war against Israel will happen, this personal note is that I will not be here, as so many believe, to enjoy. If I am lucky, my oncologist told me that I could still do a few months. I am afraid that the world is your oyster and I mean it wholeheartedly. What can we expect the coming days, weeks and months? The God of Israel has never failed on His promises to His people. In other words, Shema Israel is sovereignty and cannot be meant in England, the US or Europe the same thing.

PS For the time being we should stick to Mark Regev, spokesperson to Likud and the government and to Jonathan Conricus of the IDF, and both brilliant spokepersons in the government and military of Israel. 

To be continued.











On Social Media today,


25 November 2023



Word of the day: military aristocracy. When Israel violates the Green Lines/ armistice lines in the West Bank, it is against the International Law. When Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad violates the Green Lines (Ha Negev) on 7 October2023 it is not against the International Law, but against the occupation of 75 years by Israel.
The demarcation lines are International borders.

(Legal Q: Yes or no?)  


Plaatsen

Nieuwe posts bekijken

mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

Word of the day: military aristocracy. When Isr violates the Green lines in WB, it is against the IL. When Hms violates the GL (Ha Negev) it is not against the IL, but against occup... Papa fume une pipe... Paf, paf, paf.



9:29 a.m. · 25 n

Plaatsen

Nieuwe postsekijken


mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

Word of the day: military aristocracy. When Isr violates the Green lines in WB, it is against the IL. When Hms violates the GL (Ha Negev) it is not against the IL, but against occup... Papa fume une pipe... Paf, paf, paf.



9:29 a.m. · 25 nov. 2023

1

Weergave

Interacties van post













2:24 p.m. · 23 nov. 2023

@mctaytelbaum

Mijn reactie op de overwinning PVV G Wilders vanochtend bekend met 37 zetels. Defensie wordt interessant, de economie niveau 1 en 2 (wereldeconomie new world order), de euro, en veiligheid Nederland. (En zo nog meer)

Het kan best goed lukken dat Premier Wilders een goede en oude, en echte, politiek zal doorvoeren en de keur voor goede orde zal handhaven. Maar voorgangers liegen er ook niet om in de bredere visie van politieke transities. De Premier zal toch niet met nul op het rekest willen staan en een land als Nederland overlaten aan de grillen van zijn nieuwe wereld?

Het voelt nieuw aan met Geert Wilders als toekomstige Premier en het zit een beetje als in de achterban dat hij dit misschien verdiend heeft na 20 jaar in de politiek.

Het is niet mijn persoonlijke keuze in deze laatse verkiezing, met vooral het oog op Brexit! Naast de Heer Wilders zijn voorkeur voor Nxt is Brxt niets anders dan een zwak spinnenrag zonder enige toekomst als troost. Omzichtigheid is geen concrete politiek, maar dat is instorten van een politieke richting helemaal ook niet. Caution helps.

Maar bewonderingswaardig was Geert Wilders ook wel de laatste vijf weken om pal te staan aan Israel's zijde, dat het dit keer in de oorlog tegen het krankzinnige terreur van Hamas, 7 October 2023 in Ha Negev, het recht had om Israel's republiek te verdedigen.

Defensie tussen Israel en Hamas blijft altijd soeverein geschreven (niet voorgeschreven) aan de Staat van Israel.

Laat niemand wanhopen, want het is Nederland en kan daarom alleen Nederland blijven (al honderden jaren bewezen). En de Heer Wilders zijn gelijk zit ergens hier tussenin, bidden wij, ten goede en niet ten kwade (zo door velen reeds gezegd sinds vanmorgen).

Een bijzonder moment voor deze toekomstige Premier. En misschien ook een beetje voor de gewone man/ vrouw. Voor ons dus.

Additional: er zijn ook geen superieure woorden nodig om het te kunnen accepteren dat de Heer Wilders de gelukkige overwinnaar is, in deze zin dat de overwinning kwam tegen alle verwachtingen in, en niet vanuit een 'bij rade' strategie de 'establishment' omver te werpen. De Heer Wilders had dit zelf ook nooit kunnen dromen of weten, vanaf aan de 'verliezer' kant gezet jarenlang.
Maar nu met zijn 37 zetels overwinning zou het alleen maar netjes zijn om serieus aan de toekomst te denken en een centrum- rechtse nieuwe richting te vormen, voor iedereen, rechtvaardig en eerlijk wat alleen een echte overwinnaar betaamt. Is Nederland er nu klaar voor?












Military


Outsider's View.


Hamas attack was on 7 October 2023 within the armistice lines 1948, and that makes it de facto a crime against sovereignty.





Cease-fire now can't be the next step for Israel.

16 November 2023

The people and families of the horrific attack by Hamas in the western Negev region / 2 km from the Gaza border are still in deep perplexity. Officially these are also the natural inhabitants of the territory within the armisitce green lines since 1948. If there had been a two-state solution this would also have been the territory to be recognised as natural and hierarchical land to the State of Israel in the International world. It is hard to imagine to think it can be overruled by a simple chant of 'Free Palestine, from the river to the sea', as is being called for by the thousands of protesters around the world in support of the Palestinian people. The question is therefore one of a serious mind as how Israel than should defend itself from 7 October onward, after the Palestinian people and their government in Hamas have clearly underlined (with the blood of innocent inhabitants of Ha Negev) that it wants to end the existence of the Jewish people on their lands (read: from the river to the sea). What can a cease- fire now then mean? And also after 7 October 'from the river to the sea' can hardly be understood as a hearts and minds political struggle for a peaceful end to the 78 year old conflict in the Middle East between Israel and Hamas. Or when looking for the road to reconciliation. On this occasion while it was opportunity calling for Hamas, knowing that global opinion never supports Israel when they retalliate with military force and that this would not be in their favour, to Israel it was a mixed blessing of misfortune and fortune, and that this time the Hamas attack was repulsive. After 41 days hardly anyone is accepting the truth of the massacre on 7 October to be one of truthful and are turning it more faster to banal lies told by the Israelis. The Israeli military defense isn't in the luxury of too much time and explain then why the Hamas official Ghazi Hamad has in clear language said in an interview post 7 October that their goal is clear: Israel must leave the Middle East. Sec. It is not a white flag for surrender either.

It is for another reason that the world is shtum or perhaps has also been struck with the same perplexity as the families in Ha Negev are since the massacre 41 days ago, knowing that Justice will never turn a blind eye, while keeping one eye wide open against the military operations by Israel. When Wellington during the battle of Waterloo had seen many of his high rank men had been killed and that there was almost nothing left of his allied army, he did not start the blame game on the French and their emperor Napoleon Bonaparte and said for historical and military annals that they were losing the war because of Napoleon had killed all his men. Wellington stood almost alone with his trusted army commanders overlooking the loss on his side and the battlefields filled with dead soldiers in their uniform to nought and to earth. This is military war and may God Almighty forgive them. Wellington wanted to send a message to Brussels that they had lost the war, when in war fortune Baron von Blucher came out of the dark woods and had attacked the French in the rear and slaughtered Napoleon's soldiers. It is a strange phenomenon that seeing it many hundred years later in the future of our world that this maquette does not make any real impression on anyone how the battle plan on either side did at the time make enormous impression. It is a battle one must read first and search for the battleground. When you see Waterloo you will understand, climate and situation. Today it is so easy to just blame one side while harbouring the other and all their fiendishness about their apparent enemy Israel. In the meantime there is still no comfort and sympathy for the people of Ha Negev in the International arena public opinion domain.

Equality when wounded will make no discrimination whether it is the eagle or starling. 











For many in Israel Shabbat is not a word, it is flesh literally deep asleep.

9 November 2023

In the kibbutzim the only people not skipping breakfast in the central Kibbutz dining room are the elderly. The young adults and always there are many young fathers and mothers too, these are all staying in bed until 12:00 noon. Our saturdays in the western world are not anything like Israelis know on Shabbat. And even when they are not religious life just is at a complete standstill in Israel on Shabbat. Cars can drive in- and out of the Kibbutz for a day trip somewhere in another part of the country, from Nirim/Nir- Oz, Kissufim, Magen and others, from this region you can either go to Beersheva, Eilat, to the South where you either go visiting families or people that you are still having some connection with since you moved to the kibbutz. These are daily life stories and life on a daily businesses basics. And there is nothing eye- catching from it, at face value. However this can produce a certain echo throughout all of Israel unnoticed or as white noise. All depending on who is listening and one can only want to listen in on what or why Shabbat is the strangest day in Israel to so many in the rest of the world. From the observation point of view that may only be interesting not to a friend, but to an eye of a more vigilant observant... It is what he might find so very interesting here on the Shabbat day, whether religious or not, they are all doing it on this day only. It is the sleep of an immense different character. When comparing to a siësta in Spain, that are sometimes only troubled by the midday sirocco. An extremity of wind cloud and dust. The point to make here is that one has to know about the Shabbat resting day of all Israelis in Israel, if your plan is to attack the Jewish neighbourhood of Ha- Negev, within the region of sovereign Israel since its inception in 1948. In ancient Israel it had also happened on one or two occasions, where the enemies to the kingdoms of Israel/ Judah had attacked on the Shabbat and had won their day in battle. In the 21st century no one would dream doing so again when for more than five decades Israel had been the most superior army in the region. Accept, when the enemy would understand Shabbat and not from the resting side. If it wants to succeed it will have to know the meaning of Shabbat. It looks obvious that from the attack of 7 October whoever had planned the operation of massacre knew in advance that Shabbat would be their only chance to win the battle against Israel. A first moment to last forever, so to speak. In the west we call it unawareness. In Israel even on another weekday unawareness is not something Israelis do understand. In fact it seems that Israelis were born to be only aware. Hence the comparison to the fruit of the cactus: the Sabra. One has to ask when did Hamas studied the Israelis and their Shabbat? And why now and never before?

From what we have seen in the videoclips on Social Media it is as if the terrorists came as swift as eagles down on the kibbutzim in Ha- Negev. Postal code: 85-125. One paragliding down, the others coming through the high fenced concrete walls, with at the same time a dozen on motorcyles (perhaps 150/175 CC and always more easy to manoeuvre steering and speed, especially in rocky or difficult terrains), guns, handgranades, or in short heavily armed looking men and all moving in the same direction. These are they not specific manoeuvres? Are they not more coordinated looking? This could not be coincidental, one can assume from the videoclips. The killing was therefore the easiest part as this was catching people in their 'Buelah land sleep'. Something similar and archaic as the first night of the wedding sleep, but not as conscious as that. This is what makes the Jew different from the rest in the Middle East region, who are buy the way also people respecting the friday and saturday deeply. For prayers. In the rest of the world Shabbat is not known to them as in Israel many Israelis know. It is not just a word. Ha Shem withdraws completely as God and Creator from His creation and doing so only on the designated day that He had chosen to do so, on His own timeline you could say. And that is why every Shabbat evening on friday evening Jews automatically become wedded to this moment and pray or praise Ha Shem. (Even when modern day Israelis are not aware of this resting day) It is a great contrast to the rest of time and week. Screaming everywhere and abusive language is what comes natural out in the atmosphere during the rest of the weekdays. And you will hear it loud and clear until you become tone- deaf. It is therefore very curious how Hamas had suddenly turned a scholar and knew the 'sleep of this wedded rest' and than strike. In the rest of our time this future that Hamas had made from catching Israelis like rabbits in holes will be never ending. No matter how you look at it and it has purpose of deep functionalities, Hamas made history. As they are now chanting him in echoes of what the people of Israel had chanted thousands of years ago, that Saul had killed thousands, but that David had killed tens of thousands. Netanyahu had killed thousands, but Hamas has killed tens of thousands (meant here as spoof). We are now looking at the white week with still no hostages released. Why is it taking Hamas so long to release the hostages? The International world has called for an immediate cease-fire. As of today there will be a four- hour every day pause from all bombing on the Gazastrip by the IDF. No one knows the intel, of course. For now that will only be in the hands of the IDF Military.

Curious story when evaluating the unseen and 'nonsense' (as one Palestinian politician called the horrible scenes of time and place in Ha Negev on 7 October 2023).

Additional from distant observation: It needs to be said that Hamas victory was a military victory and in the region that will be seen as winning a holy war against Israel, the occupation of Palestine and the regime of apartheid. Nominally it was indeed a military victory and also was the first time since the inception of Israel as a State/ Republic. When in the Middle East there is no doubt and it is even natural for the ordinary people to say hail to Hamas in every metric where they are living and breathing the same religion, a fulfillment was achieved here. This morning in the Fox Interview with Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu it is therefore imperative to pay heed to his words and understand why Israel will now more than ever want to expand peace / would want peace expansion with its neighbours and to rebuild the region with a new reality (consensus). The world has changed.  












The key to the future for Israel is politics. And a competent sophisticated security as well as the Military / IDF.

6 November 2023

We can see why Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu is facing much criticism among the many in the Israeli population at the moment and which can only be seen and understood as the most logical point of view from all that are now living under and in this war hysteria since 7 October tomorrow four weeks ago. And that is not looking good for a man like Benyamin Netanyahu, who is as old as the State of Israel since he was at the age of four. This war became his moment of realizing that after all his effort to make something great of Israel while he was Prime Minister, that this didn't work out too well for him somewhere in between his last election victory in November 2022,with much help from the more extreme Right- Wing Parties, and 7 October 2023. Today it feels as if Mr Netanyahu has now witnessed the universal truth. The key to the future for Israel is not an end to Israel, if he were not to be the Prime Minister anymore. The future also in its mirror reflex today means is the key to Israel's existence, let's say when estimated. Another 100 hundred years, or when successful perhaps adding another addition of 150 years? 81 Year old Ehud Barak last week gave an interview with Charlie Rose, and even Mr Barak can see the importance of continuity in a new Israel, without wars against the terror group Hamas, but living in some contiguity peaceful existence with their closest Arab neighbours, the Palestinian people. You can't simply put the next generations on their knees by taking away their most vital dreams as Jews and who want to exist in the Jewish Homeland as a sovereign nation. The world is ready for that kind of land everywhere on the planet and for Israel there will be no exemption. A clever generation with technologies, military or civil, education and industries, why would Israel be an outsider and starve its people to extinction?

The latest on the war in Gaza however seems to be pushing for a whole new direction. With the Palestinian experts and intellectuals pushing the bombing of hospitals and schools in the Prime Minister of Israel his tiny shoes and making it fit whether he wants it or not, and to be the Cinderella of all bad outcomes that only Israel deserves... We in the world love it when things fall into place and then move on, stuffed with satisfaction and self- righteousness that now we have won the day. This could be good news for the Palestinian side, as that would not be so good for the side of Israel if there will be a label tagged on Benyamin Netanyahu's forehead. He will carry the sign of Cain on his forehead, so to speak. Strangely enough when taking a closer look at the global public opinion, what does innocence mean in a war? Israeli wars have always been seen as the most competent (army) on the planet for decades long, in fact since the incumbent Prime Minister came to power. It needs to be said, but how is innocence as adequate as what is meant by International Standards when there is some kind of engagement of armed combat? And there are plenty provided to us by the Military Laws and rules of engagement wherever in an armed conflict. No nation has personal flavours. Take for example the condemnation by the global audience on the bombing by the Israeli IDF, of hospitals and schools. Agricultural fields are not included in this list. Technically one needs to ask the hard questions, e.g. the length and width of rockets attacking Israel and its citizens randomly in each and every Hamas war season. And then ask another hard question to define then the place where the experts say that there is no such thing as a tunnel where Hamas is keeping his stacks of multi million Dollars military merchandise. And geographically the Gazastrip is just as a sliver is to a small island somewhere distant in the Pacific Ocean. Secondly: the moment of war. This was initiated by Hamas and not Israel. Fact. And thirdly: while Israel is on a mission of getting its hostages back home, and therefore has been bombing Hamas, it is quite the opposite moral story with Hamas and the Palestinian people. It seems that Hamas is sophisticated and very competent as a fighter for the Palestinian people who in return will understand to die is martyrdom, a sacred law for freedom fighters and the Palestinian resistance.

The Palestinian resistance many Palestinian intellectuals have been aired in the last four weeks on why Hamas has attacked Israel. It is the occupation and apartheid they want to fight and some even went as far as calling the reports of the massacre by Hamas on 7 October four weeks ago, complete nonsense. And perhaps not realizing that what is being said here is that Hamas has the right to defend itself? In fact SOS Antony Blinken has urgently called for a stop to settler's violence in the West Bank and deemed it the wrong thing to continue. In the meantime the world is convinced about the relentless bombing of Gaza, that Israel is committing crimes against the Palestinian people and humanity. Maybe we need to slowdown on natural prejudices and antisemitic logic and consider the military law very carefully before going to the streets to kill people, and who happen to be Jews. Incidently: are these Jews guilty of another crime, again? Anyone ever thinking that no one needs to steal from Israel, if it has all the facts right when fighting a war against Hamas in the south- west, a war that was a moment chosen by Hamas. (Let's leave out here the massive massacre for a moment) On this side of the picture one can easily see why it is important to understand who the Prime Minister of Israel is while the war continues in Gaza as we speak. He needs to make a statement and realize the reason why Israel is politically more responsible for its own future. And it is hard work, and not champagne and Beluga caviar. The future of Israel should be his winning argument and key to this are the hostages taken by Hamas on 7 October 2023. The Prime Minister might just survive and stay on till the end of his term, after the statement.

















On Social Media today,


4 November 2023.


mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

1 m

Word of the morning: war Israel- Hamas October 2023. Hamas should fully pay (monetary) / compensate the families of all the victims they have killed on 7 October 2023, adding full compensation for the victims they took hostage. 

















Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu this evening, we will call for a national day of mourning for the murdered families on 7 October.

25 October 2023

There are two chapters to this mourning: one is the time before the fateful day of 7 October, 18 days ago this month, and the time ahead that will glue itself by the memory of this bloody war by Hamas against innocent citizens of Israel on just another ordinary day, to its future. Israel has not even turned 79 years as the State of Israel, it is in fact only still 78 years old. It will somehow grow back to their skin again that 'once' and not so long ago, Israel became an understanding in this part of the region in the Middle East as nation and State. Perhaps time fizzled in the eyes of these beholders, but to learn something new other than what is known for thousands of years in this part of the world, couldn't be more than a freak accident, of nature? The Prime Minister is right and everyone close to Israel should appreciate today his humble words and adhere to this humility for a moment. He is always more magnificent when showing integrity at the national level when and where it matters most. For thirty years unfortunately for him these were only rare moments, but they matter a great deal when the whole country is in deep shock and are also confused emotionally and feeling physically sick from the horror they have been witnessing live. The whole world knows of their shame, so to speak. And Mr Netanyahu today is privileged to take a white sheet to the bereaved, like Shem, and hopefully will walk backwards while offering this day of mourning. The world does not see why the Hamas attack has been excessive and insane, for in the manner they had chosen to kill innocent people with no relation to politics or the military as a war tactics against the occupation. No one understands the order 'Shoot to kill' here. Hamas is not the regular army of a State or democratic State. After 1967 some should know the picture. And there are deeper problems for Israel as a State, its economy and choice of economics since the eighties. Mr Netanyahu his free market economy of the eighties into the twenty first century.

When it is saying here that Israel is a young State and only 78 years old this looks like someone is trying to talk to a child. While in fact Israel is still an embryo and fighting to get out when the time is not just ready yet. For example, was it ready in 1980 to make the transition of monetary decision from the Lire to the Shekhel? It had barely begun to exist as a new nation in the old belly of the mother in the family of nations, and wasn't ready to cast its yields/ fruits just yet after twelve years (from 1967). Israel was a new country and its energy came from all people who wanted to have it prosper like any other nation... In Europe? What many had also lost in WWII here the energy came back again to their backbone, in the way perhaps to describe as social solidarity as a nation who had survived Nazi Germany. This had given the Jewish people and for the first time their self determination and to make that a right that was lawful and accepted by International Law, by a majority. Now when looking back at these obscured and historical facts in today's world who can remember them? Why did they made the decision to jump after twelve years (since 1967) from the system of Bretton Woods to a world unknown when starting off with blanco on the global monetary system? The Lire was weak, yes. It had also never had the chance to finish the first historical cycle of the State economy, let's say 25 years and with which this would also have set something of the first yield curve in place. And then came the shooting political star. Benyamin Netanyahu decided after twelve years, post war 1967, that Israel should join the big world of the US and stick to them as close as possible and it could never go wrong. His magic words: the free market. In the following decade it was evaluation time and GDP was equally magical up from 2 (?) to 4 %. (Please look this up) This vacuum will after 75 years (now 78) for some reason is in its last quarter and the fiction of the Shekhel and yield curve goes on as if no one cares. And some enemies of the State of Israel can do the maths and waiting for the best moment to attack the innocent in the South of Israel. Perhaps it is in their State religion that they automatically have the right of the first born to the Middle East? We now know what happened in Israel and it has created a tectonic shift in Israeli society, between people and government, past and future, and leader and his leadership. How will Mr Netanyahu survive, and the question is not only as a politician and Prime Minister, but more as the only global leader and military in the region? One good thing about life is that there is always hope for remedy. The Prime Minister went from democracy to semi democracy and he should be held accountable not for the past, but for the future. Failure is one thing inherent/ intinsic to every human, being a Jew like him that is something he alone has in the Middle East region as leader of Israel. He should give up being blasé and start believing again in (believe it or not) his beloved country, the Jewish State of Israel.

Tonight however he has promised that he was preparing for a ground invasion of Gaza, and to bring home all hostages brutally taken by Hamas on 7 October 18 days ago. Politically Israel is officially not a terror State, but has legitimacy to be a Republic. In the myth of Jupiter and Juno one can see it like this. That Benyamin Netanyahu was a product of their patron called the Balfour Declaration, then a deity like Hercule he had strangled the serpent in his cradle when he was a mere infant. No war can justify the devastation of killing innocent people... But in our time the punishment can come twice as hard if we can remember what happened in Kosovo. Military brutality post Kosovo war and bombing this devastation and punishment was studied and since then disproportionate force by superiority of the military it has been pleading with the nations to always keep it in mind that the better way to resolve conflict is to maintain the options open for clear diplomacy and fairness to all sides. After all the nation of Israel is in deep mourning as we speak and doing so because families, friends and neighbours were either raped, butchered, shot dead, and were indiscriminately used as the Hamas version of 'collective punishment' against the apartheid State Israel, randomly and free. This abuse of attacking a free State without a proper declaration of war is also a very serious crime. If not so how does the west differ and upgrade decency by law? And starting by forgiving. Incidently what happened in Jerusalem when the Palestinian journalist the late Ms Shareen Abu Akleh had been shot dead by an 'unidentified' sniper? It was a difficult moment for everyone, but we know that she was buried properly in a long if not the longest procession ever happened in the State of Israel. Then Prime Minister Naftali Bennett did somehow managed to keep the Israeli Police Squads still as the people came from all over the country (and from overseas) to be part of the event. No one is perfect, but credit where credit is due, isn't it?












It is not the wider conflict that should concern Israel or the US, it is simply the loss of lives.


(A polemic story, a personal view)


21 October 2023

The immediate moving of the Ford Carrier battleships to the Mediterranean Sea (East- West coast) to support Israel and what was meant to discourage another hostile party to the conflict since 7 October this month in the South of Israel, this time was more than symbolic as now many regional actors understand. On thursday evening (Europe time) there was another briefing on the present situation in the Middle East, and where there was something of an intercept of missiles from Yemen that had launched this towards the region of Israel/ that was meant for Israel, which now is making it not any easier to understand what exactly is happening in the Gaza war between Israel and Hamas. Neither does anyone know what will happen in the coming moments or hours. One thing is clear Israel has the US backing and it will also not hesitate to use any deterrence where needed to defend its ally Israel. In the news or on Social Media the global audience are reading that Israel is prepping up for a possible ground invasion of Gaza, let's say in the coming hours or days. While many are concerned about human casualties on the side of the Palestinians, who will firstly deal with the incursion by the Israeli military, backed by air and sea forces, this will be certain the most horrific experience they will face from this war. From emperical view here there is nothing new to say or expect. Neither will public or global opinion change when mainstream media footages of people being bombed or homes being destroyed will go viral as a consequence of the war against Hamas. And as another consequence is that no one will be interested to critically view the level of combat how this proceeds and in what manner, that this time the US and Israel will also experience something different here. You could almost think that if Israel will go into Gaza in the coming hours or days that this could be the first time for Israel to make a grave strategic mistake for the nation and its people. And that will result into consequences on the side of Israel unprecedented. For what the world knows Israel has never lost more than a thousand soldiers on the battlefield, as they had a particular military policy of getting in and out as quickly as possible and as less as possible with manpower. Many wars this was their way and it made them invincible in the eyes of their enemies. Question now is why this concern as here above?

The US equally invincible as the world's largest military power in the world, or as President Biden last said in his address to the nation (friday morning 02:00 AM Europe time), on the face of the earth, one thing is important to consider first. Can Hamas really be removed in this war in this time from Gaza for always? What people have learned over the many decades since the first moment this war of Palestinian resistance began, it was that no Arab nation in one way or another has been completely indifferent to these wars and the plight of the Palestinian people/ struggle for self rule or autonomy. Until today the Arab nations with upgraded military forces and weapons have never engaged in the wars of Israel against Hamas in the South in Gaza. From a military point of view that could also never have been the right way or move during the last seven decades, even after 1967 when the Arab nations against Israel had lost the war. Also even when combat level was low and not sophisticated as in the 21st century military in Israel and US. Strangely enough this time the critical angle for the US and Israel is a blind vision. With especially the promise by the US with no boots on the ground. The blind vision here will be triggered strangely enough on two levels, at least. One is where will the US be backing Israel in the River of Jordan and the Red Sea. And secondly the stations for the Israeli military in the south and north are going to be very critical and in terms of 'military on the ground'. We have to remember that Israel is not used to lose that many lives in a short period of time, and we are not even speaking theoretically of thousands but of hundreds per day/ per week. Population growth for the Jews living in Israel are not more than approximately seven million (including women, children and elderly). The high cost of military men/ women could add up very quickly and the loss could trigger an unusual anxiety for the people of Israel. This time the US would be seriously losing a nation either fast or drip by drip. And losing that many Jews by their own design as many in the world will say, could be close to what had already happened once in the world in the 1940ties. Except that was not a design of the Jewish nation. There is also no viewing available how the Arab nations in the north might see that this time they could try their either political or military luck against Israel. At that point we should be reminded that it won't be to help the Palestinians, but to gain from an unfortunate situation from their enemy Israel. These are the countries that have no profound sentiment for what sovereignty means, as in the other part of the Arab territories in the south. You may even say that overhere their responsibility is oil and global demand for continuity production. They could e.g. never do the same as what Saddam Hussain had done to his Iraqi oil fields by setting them on fire. Equally the question is now how to take out Hamas from where they have been for decades in Gaza. Israel cannot afford losing its own people even when the stakes are high and it is to bring back normality for their people in the South of Israel, or to bring back security for every Israeli living in Israel and that never again this horrific experience might happen to them.

The Prime Minister of Israel this time should not gamble (like a modern day Ahab) with the nation and people of Israel their ancient seal in the promised land to Israel. And have others to turn this sacred seal of promise land upside down.




















mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

1 s

Word of the day: proportionate. Exactly what this means is the military reference to logistics arsenal of one to the other party with inferior 'logistics' of weapons. Excessive means disproportionate. Not symmetrical.











On Social Media today,


16 October 2023


mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

11 m

Word of the day: there are two sides to this now, one is the interpretation of the western world, the other is live to Israelis. In the new dynamics of this war (hostage taking of Israelis by Hamas) there is no empirical to understand the full scale of the situation.

The truth of the pyramids in Egypt are the living memory of the killing of the first born of the Hebrews. 











On Social Media today,


14 October 2023


mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

1 s

Word: the abduction of the children by Hamas must be addressed by the institutions  of High Courts International Law and Human Rights Watch. It is precisely this when referring to a sovereign State. And why deterrence can be triggered into a fierce military action by the State as referred here above. And when it is the State of Israel from where these young children were abducted by Hamas in a raid of terror against Israel, we are looking wrong in four different directions and do not see why this time Hamas has indeed committed a crime against the sovereign State of Israel and the sovereignty of the here aforementioned citizens of Israel, from infant to adolescent children. Therefore it has immeditately triggered the lèse- majesté that both the Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu and the abducted children in this moment are one sovereignty.   

MCTaytelbaum...........................................





On Social Media today, 


12 October 2023


mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

2 m

Word of the day II: there is simply no fig leaf of peace falling on Hamas' waters; how is this rationale time and time again the same provocation (not good under Geneva Convention). Laws of war therefore will result from this situation disproportionate. The evil here is intent.










What could trigger a general election in Britain?

3 October 2023

This question what could trigger a general election in Britain takes you back to a different era when everything in politics was about the Conservatives. And that today when Party Conference doesn't have a massive turn up, but in fact is diminished to camera angles, either to the right or to the left and avoiding wider snapshots, you know something is terribly wrong with the Conservative Party. And it is not getting better even without the equally and massive blame- game (that is covering much of the last decade in government). Rishi Sunak should be in no illusion that he can bring back the Conservative Party and make it what it was before his time. And that is a very long 'before his time'. But at the same time it is wise to ask why Conference has become quite empty when cabinet ministers are speaking and making speeches and that this wasn't designed to make the empty chairs cheer or happy. If it is part of the Conservatives new strategy, to win the next general election, one has to say that this is a bit unusual and odd. And that all the dancing of Dame Priti Patel and Nigel Farage last night at Party Conference somewhere in the building (Can't take my eyes of you), does make one think that this is just a bit more than unusual. It is a mystery. And the worst you could think of was that dancing or prancing in empty halls at Party Conference, is who had won? It is difficult to solve this mystery at one go, because it doesn't say also that the Labour Party has now become the winner of the general election. Britain in a Brexit module of governing (unmanned steering) are now the new Pigs In Space and dancing because they took the Party where it has never gone before. And no one gets that, taking the Party where it has never gone before? We are talking about the same thing here, aren't we? No one takes the Conservative Party anywhere except to stay in government. And in Britain, till kingdom comes. If this were Ireland we at least could have understood that the merry men and women at Party Conference were dancing and singing at the funeral party of 'The Pig Had Died'.

Memory can be black the day when the Conservative Party isn't anymore what it used to be at these annual Party Conferences. The 'incumbent' Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is now offering too little too late, with his cryptic briefings on what he will do next to bring back growth for the British people, help the people with their energy bills, and what he will do at a more national level for big projects and industries. Some are finding his tax- cuts something of a new ideological decission and are also wondering whether this is a policy for his Party, or for Rishi Sunak himself. The Prime Minister is endangering himself to become the marshmellow man melting in the fireplace at Party Center or Downing Street No 10. Why did he ever become Prime Minister when clearly he was much better as Chancellor of the Exchequer, in fact a very good Chancellor just before Liz Truss had become Prime Minister in September 2022. Did he not know how this works for every prime minister in Britain, and that none have been a salesman? And the tragedy for this young Prime Minister is that when as Chancellor he understood the meaning of investing and purchasing power in the Conservative Government. He was right at one point in the fiscal study he himself constructed the pylons or mechanism, how to put Brexit in a more favourable posistion because by investing, for the long term revenues or incentives. (Perhaps still a Goldman Sachs hiccup and also because time here was for the future and not the past) This was his biggest design and to at least make the old system guys in the Conservative Party get it, that they couldn't return back to pretty much what Liz Truss had offered when announcing her Kamikaze budget. The Prime Minister in England doesn't sell anything, but invests and to bring more revenues back into Britain. Defense is the cycle economic dynamic, and even in a sell of 1 trillion, it is and remains a one- off selling power. Brexit should have changed the system how to make it work at every level, even changing history and historic / outdated politics and revenue systems (national and international). The Prime Minister was then on it, had put his finger on the pulse, felt its beating, but then lost it again. The future isn't like the past and in fact will soon have nothing to do with it in whatever figure or feature. The question is now: what changed the fate of this young man and who instead thought it better to put him forward as dead political meat at the dispatch box in the House of Commons? He did something there, just as much today when the EU announces single (not multiple?) tax returns from investments in October 2023. There is also an even greater tragedy to the Prime Minister's story at the moment. It happens so that the leader of the opposition has by nature something more of the purchasing Prime Minister, because he simply does not know how to sell. (In an interview last month he was asked whether he wanted to be more of a salesman or showman. And the Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer had great difficulty answering such a trivial question with an trivial answer) Rishi Sunak has made this mistake: he became the selling Prime Minister. It is not just the general election he will have to lose, but his greatest moment that could have given the Conservative Party something back of its arbitrary powers in the world, if only it took on the pylons of a Brexit investment led government and country. These are close enough observations and from an outsider's view. Does the Prime Minister has any of his own?

Caution: a great Conservative Prime Minister John Profumo has never been defined by his puchasing powers in government, because ending up buying expensive pleasures and sin obscured his memory.












The outsider's view: can Rishi Sunak win the general election 2024/2025?

30 September 2023
(23:06 PM)


A simple enough question but with no simple answer. Last year in october 2022 Rishi Sunak was appointed by the Conservative Party as the man to bring back calm when the then Prime Minister Ms Liz Truss had resigned from Office as PM. One year later bring back calm is not what people are looking for how the Prime Minister is to win the general election in 2024. In fact the point the Conservatives need to make is that with Labour getting closer to the GE things are beginning to look more favourable for the Labour leader, in fact so much as to become the next prime minister and have Labour return to government. After seven years with the Conservatives leading government and Brexit the time has come to give the people of Britain another chance to vote for Brexit and for the incumbent Prime Minister as their PM. Two moments: one now and one last year. Can anyone remember what political reality had been up to the new leadership contest in the Conservative Party, also when Boris Johnson resigned as Prime Minister? Rishi Sunak was looking very promising to lead the Party into the future and give the Conservatives the right to prolong their political reign, almost forever. Now perhaps that is not what it looks like after one year, and close to the rims of the next general election. He has but one year to start his election campaign, and this isn't looking all too good for the 'incumbent' Prime Minister. That depends on how Mr Sunak's perception on this occasion could be or should be. He will soon realize that he is starting his campaign one year short, compared to what the Labour leader has already had and entering his second year in the campaign to bring Labour back into power. Another comparison is that Mr Starmer has already been way ahead in the election process when he first announced his strategic start last year november 2022. This is all making more sense today, if you think e.g. how Americans on both sides of the House, Republicans and Democrats, when starting the primaries. Brexit and the parliamentary system do not have the same as the Americans their system, but comparison is by example in this writing and only to point out the mistake in the new system that Brexit has created for politics in Britain to infinity.

Brexit desperately needs to revolutionize, both as a government and also from the Conservative Party's point of view. The difficult question for them could only be at the moment whether they remember the Labour Party as their learned friend when it comes to the political system in Britain, that in fact both political parties are the only system in government. Labour has technically no real plans to convince the electorate why the change is in the country's best interest without creating a political civil war against their learned friends in the Conservative Party. Now both men have not been elected just yet to become prime minister and no one knows the answer at the moment why the people should vote for either of them. Except, that Keir Starmer has been doing much of campaigning already and doing so against all odds for one whole year. This at its best is political debate and science, and not what many have said about him and his vagueness on political strategy and policies. This writing favours only the Party with the starting point last year and for the simple reason of experience. To pull out the ghost of Jeremy Corbyn of the closet in Keir Starmer's past (now three years), the question here is: did Jeremy Corbyn had a strategy of time similar to that of Keir Starmer? Neither has Rishi Sunak, and perhaps this was also the reason why Liz Truss was only for 45 days prime minister. Governments work only better with long term strategies, but campaigning for to become prime minister in England also needs the process of an election strategy. Where Rishi Sunak is going to make his start this weekend will not be convincing and adequate enough to give people the impression that he can win the general election. His timing is bad and is not reflecting the same as with Keir Starmer (entering his second year). It is all a chilling fact, for the Prime Minister right now. Political context, how will this help him to win back time? Today another bizarre story was out that the Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt has pointed out, if inflation will come down to 3% next year in May, that this could trigger the general election in 2024. The future seems all to be about economic theories. And what other candidates are in the Conservative Party to be the Party leader if after a general election defeat? But let's not go into that distraction right now. The battle for prime ministership is between the two men, Sir Keir Starmer and the 'incumbent' Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. From the Labour leader what we have seen so far is that he has shown courage and humility (and not arrogance) to for prime ministership to go to the people of Britain and against all odds, since last year. It is what politics is not today. Labour had brought back the feeling of politics in Britain, and political allies known as the family of nations.
(Editing will follow soon)












Labour has but one chance to change the UK in 2024.

26 September 2023

Of course, having said that, as suggested here above in the title of this writing, equally it will be of vital importance to have the Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer holding on to strategy. It is also his only chance to become the likely prime minister at the next general election and for this reason only, namely it is where we are now standing in time between the past seven years and the present time. Keir Starmer as said in many writings before will never be the Jeremy Corbyn salami years, where slicing was the uber alles politics for a young generation the former Labour leader had inspired to become part of large segments in society in- and outside the Party. That doesn't seem like much now, but it won't be forgotten. What is much clearer in the new leader is that when looking to 2024 and 2025 it is the impossible task Keir Starmer will have to do, once he is prime minister and bringing back the ghost ship of the Labour Party to the seas of Real Time. You will not find many to admire him for this uniquely chance as in Tyche, and you have to wonder why not. This week all the media talked about was his 'diverge' usage, a choice of words, some saw as truth about his remain past in 2020. Far from defining what Keir Starmer will be as the Labour prime minister if in 2024 he would/ could win the general election. When you say that he is doing the unique thing this can only refer to the nature of his prime ministership in a future timing and going into government without nil proposals to change the UK. Reality at this point will be very confusing for the Labour prime minister, firstly because of what he will inherit as his government and impossible to change the face of the Tories throughout his one hundred days. And than there is Brexit. He has also nil proposals for the EU if partnership is what he so desires. The question you may ask is what can Keir Starmer really make hard a promise to the people of Britain, people in the thousands that are viying for change? Yes, it is change and impossible too. And that is also what will be the very nature of his prime ministership, exactly because it is impossible to promise anyone in Britain that he can change Brexit round to get a better deal and not just with the EU, but everywhere else in the world.
He can't do what Jeremy Corbyn has done in his salami years running the show and Party. Mr Starmer can only offer the pickled onion and say, this is British too. While in the rest of the world there is talk of AI changing mankind and the planet. And then again, if you want to be the prime minister you must find the balance somewhere in here, between the world and Britain post Brexit. In theory nothing is impossible. Especially when the Labour leader is known to be smart when it comes to theories, economics fiction, Nato alignment, and making friends with global leading nations and leaders, outside and inside Britain. AI is not insignificant, as the Prime Minister of Israel Mr Benyamin Netanyahu last said at a panel discussion with no other than TECHMOGUL Elon Musk, there is also what you have to be aware of is AI Military, one can only sum up so many questions on whether the Labour leader is on top of all these 'impossible' topics awaiting him in the nearest of futures. When the Conservatives had won en masse in 2016 to leave the EU and officially when former prime minister Boris Johnson had won the election his worries were none. Victory for leaving the EU only gave the former prime minister a fine time sitting next to Jove at Olympia, among gods. And all the British leave voters shouting in the streets: "Nothing but laurels for the victor that is Boris Johnson!" The Tory prime minister had a myriad of possibilities in front of his office at No 10 Downing Street. Inside Downing Street No 10, well after a few years we all in the world found out what these apparent possibilities for him as prime minsiter were... Rationality belongs to only a prime minister with the impossible task ahead as that of Keir Starmer, if he wins the general election. Peter Oborne in a video clip on Youtube yesterday has said it (not in so many words), that it would be tragic and sad if rumours are true that Keir Starmer's strategy was already imploding. Last year in november Mr Starmer had said in an interview on Times Radio, that he never had seen himself as the prime minister. One year later he became the boy wonder at sixty at this very unusual age and time to become the next Labour prime minister and bring back real government, one that will bring back memories for the British people...

In conclusion hoc: Keir Starmer has only one proposal and that is to win the general election in 2024/2025.













Jom Kipoer 2023


25 September 2023


The silver and golden scale for Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu and the Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud of Saudi Arabia is sovereignty. For Israel the Torah and political sovereignty, and the Holy Koran and sovereignty of soil for Saudi Arabia. The people of Israel expect their Prime Minister to be a great super power on the global stage, but that the Prime Minister will never go against the sovereignty of Israel, in casu the Declaration of Independence and letter to Baron de Rothschild in 1948 from Great Britain aka the Balfour Declaration. Saudi Arabia infinitely whether in grain of sand or regional swathes of soils will win the proof and test of sovereignty and determine the fate of Israel primary based on the argument for Palestine. 

The future of the Middle East, if Israel can build peace with Saudi Arabia, will turn the latter into a super power with x other territorial powers based on the international law of territorial integrity. And that might in time become to Israel either an adverse or reverse of fortunes in their fortitude of existenial security of the State of Israel. 

But with a little luck hanging above the Head of States if love is stronger than death, perphaps love for a better future might overcome the same, e.g. death of cooperation and political struggles at home. 

Yours Truly,

MCT............................................ 













Associate Member of the European Union for the UK, when?

20 September 2023

For the EU to alter democracy to 'Associate Membership' of new Members and also for the UK if Britain wants to restore relations with the continent, this will be seen as 'hardware' politics from the Eurozone, e.g. in 2025. Labour in British politics after the next general election, then, will have to decide across a few areas in daily and international politics, who, when and where the new strategic partnerships have been forged after their 100 days in government. Assuming they will come back to government post 2024 general election. This is what the present time Labour under Keir Starmer seem to be forgetting, that you firstly start your partnership at home with the people of Britain. Also called a strategic partnership, next to the Tories. This has always been the way for British politics and prime ministers. It doesn't need to be rocket science, but you must certainly know the knack of how to make the people of Britain become part of your national and international political strategy. Except for this time like no other prime minister before in Britain, Keir Starmer would have to find a way to then also deal with the matter of Brexit without causing a 'political civil war' between the two main political parties in the kingdom. He might not succeed to get it all in one term, mind you. In the EU the fiscal year for being outside the EU will now be reviewed in 2025, and the EU looking onward to ten years without Britain. If Keir Starmer has any ambition becoming the next Labour Prime Minister he better think this one again and then again, because what he is up against in layman terms isn't fortuna. Especially when Sir Keir has to shake off the dust from the years when the Labour Party had been something similar to the holiday resort Hi de Hi, or a park where everyone participating in the Party could put up a stand of their own and selling their goods or bads. Is there also a point for him to raise the flag 'I will make Brexit work'? To the Europeans in the EU that could intrigue the older politicians. How the new breed of new EU politicians will understand the 2025 British move to become an Associate Member is something entirely different. The younger generation of EU politicians might tag the idea first and than give the whole thing a light blue colour bracelet with date and time. And the deal is done. Politics is the new technology, like the world of medicine, and also moving at the same speed.

To be continued.











The point some are trying to make about Labour and the Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer, is that he is leading his Party into government.

17 September 2023

All weekend this was news, that the Labour leader has made a few foreign visits, Den Hague/ The Hague, Montreal Canada and later on this week Sir Keir will meet with President Emmanuel Macron of France. Strangely enough but the Conservatives have stopped airing their views about the number of illegal immigrants (100.000) on saturday night. There is no doubt that they have never stopped listening and keeping their ears like a secret platoon close to the trainrails, all softly- softly into the night, in case the train is real and not 'another ghost train'.. What do they have to believe, when the idea has changed from January 2025 to October or May 2024 and also when the general election is expected to happen. Of course we now know why Keir Starmer went to The Hague, Montreal and this week to France to meet the French President. In our computer age what you get here to see is the splitscreen view, one British from Britain (Brexit), and the other the EU and where some prominent leaders have come to visit and speak of 'progressiveness' on global issues, illegal immigrants, climate change, in Canada, with G-7 leader host Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Some are now wondering about where the mindset of the Labour leader must have been during these discussions or panel discussions between the presenters. Also, another group have given their full confidence that this was the way forward for the expected incoming Labour government, and to have discussions with leading nations and prominent speakers in the new global order of the future. Something Labour is either destined to be part of, if we stay on the strategic vision for Keir Starmer that he will be the next prime minister of Britain and the British people. History for Brexit is in the sands in the making of its own hourglass in 2020. It is true that if any sort of deal to reach with the EU that this can only mean something of  rapproachement, when coming back to the splitscreen on the side of the EU. And what will the new future mean globally?

This is difficult to say where these visits might lead to once back in the UK for Keir Starmer and where he still has to 'reconnect' with the people of Britain, if he wants to win the next general election. To be honest the idea of Keir Starmer becoming the next British and Labour Prime Minister looks dead to yours truly. At least if alive first it now is feeling stillborn. Everything isn't politics depending who and where you are. The Prime Minister and a British one will certainly have to only do politics, pre and post election victory. Keir Starmer had given us plenty of proof between November 2022 - May 2023 where he stood in politics, even philosophical, and that he had learned ways to rebuild the country he envisions as home for all people and nations living in Britain and the UK. These were good moments for him and whoever wanted to see him succeed. He has given his heart to politics and it was reciprocating up to a certain point, even from journalists in the British newspapers. It was then clear that Keir Starmer had a certain legitimacy over his peers in the Conservative Party, because he had put country first. This man could not fail, if you admired him during the period ut supra and hoping the future was where he was destined to be as prime minister of Britain. Putting country first and watch the sunset peacefully or with some kind of peace of mind after a day's hard work, yes, it was beginning to show something of new hope rising above the horizon, in politics. Now, politics requires language in a more exact way. It is also putting (the) country back into the G-7 and G-20, sailing a bigger sun. If, of course, he can put people first. Labour had aquired their first gentleman, this too, to bring back the Party from an apparent extinction during the Jeremy Corbyn years, and this was important to their Jewish members. If now dead the clinical question is but on what grounds? If discipline or principle, what were they? Leaving nothing to chance and cakeism. It will be unthinkable to say about Keir Starmer that he cannot be the next prime minister because he had failed on a matter of political discipline or principle (in September 2023 Tory mistakes). But sometimes temptation is subtle and wrapped in red crimson or violet blue. In other words: what will it be? Keir Starmer, prince of democracy (where Labour is strongest) or Starmerism (where Labour could lose strength)?

Post Scriptum:
Comment Starmer Pandora Box opening, 19 September 2023. The Labour leader definitely has not only opened but widened the Pandora Box with his remarks over the weekend, after Brexit took Britain out of the European Union in 2020. He will need a good team of 'confederate experts', or what it has become or will become after his gambit on rewriting and restoring relations with the European Union in 2025. Red coats versus Blue coats.

It is democracy this time, scalewise, something Brexit has stopped giving to the people of Britain, since 2020. No one should blame the Labour leader now that he has opened up the European- British political debate again. It is also aligned with what so many nations are believing today as everyone's universal and basic rights. You can't imagine a future world without universal basic human rights among the world's population of 7.8 billion people. And why should Britain and the British people be excluded from the new future world? Labour must find the regimental definition to that question. An odd thing to say, perhaps.












The nation of persecution and not of political revolutions, Israel.

(To Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu and the former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett)

11 September 2023

A very simple question about Israel and the people's fight against what they may presume as dictatorial change of the Judicial System in Israel, is why hasn't this reached mainstream world news after the lengthy time of ten months massive protests out in the streets? For decades the International world has only had to deal with the problem of bringing peace to the region and more specifically between the Palestinians and Israel. Whatever universal truth the State of Israel is now beginning to spew out how their history was made from especially the time after the Holocaust, between Jew and Jew, rich and poor, dependent and the diaspora, this is getting more each day and moment today an interesting twist of facts about the Jewish people and as a nation. What we may not notice in the rest of the world is that Israel is not a nation of persecution anymore, but is inflamed with political revolution against their lawmakers, politicians and powerhouses within and without Israel. To the world it just might be another escaping the IDF atrocities against the Palestinian people. As many are being seen fighting today against the coalition under Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu in the streets. It does get psychedelic in your eyes sometimes about these street and massive protests, as it is not very clear of why and where they are planning on going. It is however still a political protest.

When Israel awakens (to quote Byron in spirit, awake my spirit, not Greece, she is awake) from a thousands of years slumber and will now concentrate of (what is Janet Jackson's lyrics, what have you done for me lately) what 'have you done for me lately, as from the hearts of hearts question from Jew to Jew, a lot of dust will be thrown at them because there has never before been asked this question. We live in an open world and transparency is golden, and for Israelis too. In fact, isn't that the reason why Israel has never been able to work on the Two- State solution thus far? It was a young and vibrant nation that had no other choice but to deal with the present time situations after WWII in the country, what was designated as an obscure discontinuity of land for people living in the same domicile as the 'colonists' from abroad. There was no second choice for the people of Israel, or what would become later the people of Israel, now the State of Israel. Africa, as one minister had suggested in Britain, wasn't an option as of today we know that there was no such thing as an African speaking Hebrew country ever mentioned in the Old or New Testament. Jerusalem then felt as their first most and more natural homeland. And later on expanded into Tel Aviv, Beersheva, Sinai and also Haifa. (At least this was still in the seventies built- up) Time was never of the essence while building the State of Israel by the new people that came to live here and gradually each year more and still more after decades. The question today is: how can Israel make its case to protest a government out in the streets and have the world sympathy on their side in political solidarity? We are maybe having trouble getting used to the tectonic shift that Israel today is a nation not of persecution but of political revolution. If lucky, and Israel still has its ancestral fortunes with Ha Shem in the heavens, there still might be a way for them and to fight this individual in their own State.

The diaspora Jews are in for a big surprise then. And old themes in our world, rich and poor, now also will come back to plague the Jews in their ivory towers elsewhere in the world. And with that deterrence must also be a thousand times more vigilant.












9 September 2023


When there was hope in Israel and the people of Israel its living proof product:


A memory to honour:


The Naftali Bennett government second quarter since 13 June 2021.

27 December 2021

CGTN China Media on Twitter yesterday has said that Prime Minister Bennett of Israel was tested positive after a PCR testing. Today in the Jerusalem Post it is almost certain that the prime minister his daughter has caught the Omicron variant and must keep in quarantine. The JP in the news yesterday, sunday 26 December, did not mention that the test of the Prime Minister was positive. It definitely has said that the test was negative. Today however Likud MK's have called Prime Minister Bennett to attend Knesset behind the perplex walls and still to come listen to the ministers speeches. This was not the responsible thing to do, according to the prime minister. Israel and it's members in government or high office should know how this works for the people on the one side, and the other seems to be where government people are still ignoring restrictions and continue their business as usual. People also seem to be more risk to the virus averse in Israel. But others believe that that is just the other side to the myth of fighting Covid 19 and it's variants. 2019 Prime Minister Bennett had written a book on how to fight the pandemic by medical and social strategies, some have called later on that year the most stupidist book ever written. Today we are not sure whether the same people had any idea that for some reason the thing that is lacking are perhaps basic strategies for this 'new normal' globally. But Prime Minister Bennett seems to have been so far the only prime minister with the 'stupidist' ideas that no one needs to listen to or implement. He is also communication and technology minister in his present time Office as prime minister. Mr Bennett actually is the only Israeli citizen to think that the emperor is naked!

Another stupid moment in his short career as prime minister was the Haaretz peace conference in November 2014. What was it again he was saying? Territory matters, real peace (inclusive of Arab citizens) and inner strength based on solidarity. The hall was full of people heckling the Yamina candidate and minister (then economy?) and he nearly couldn't continue finish speaking on the stage. Strange how Israel imagines itself above the rest and when keep on thinking that all that it needs is to defend Israel. Which Israel is not defined in terms of territory, real peace and solidarity. Not in the military and not in civil greater Israel, as it is up to this day that many say in the military that Israel has no real borders within the armistice lines. Another strange coincidence probably is that this time it wasn't a colonial force from outside Israel envisioning the need for territory in Israel. Then still a political party third rank to the other major parties, Mr Bennett also did not know that this is exactly what matters in terms of territorial rights within fictional borders when there are no geographical borders. Plus having the 1967 grey area drawn up in shade lines as this is conflict (occupied) area. Yes, territory defining what is within this territory must be a stupid idea to build physical form and shape of the people civil and it's territorial right. Taxation laws could have been designed to be implemented on both sides of the borders. That seems to the observant's point of view as a good beginning of something in the future... Continuity and contiguity? The God of Abraham only knows how Israel needs to be defined through territory and it's territorial rights!

What do we think of the Bennett government so far is not very clear when one reads the news coming from Jerusalem. Everything seems to have stopped for Prime Minister Bennett after COP26 in Glasgow Scotland last October this year. It only reminded some of this moment when Queen Elizabeth II in her Christmas message again mentioned COP26 as important a milestone in the Climate Change Conference because it reflected Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, his life's work. Prime Minister Bennett his role can not be that of a more ceremonial prime ministership, is something of the jingle one keeps playing over and over until they understand that this is not child's play. Or, stupid. Israel needs continuity which does not stem from a letter once written to Lord Rothschild in 1948. What it needs is building physical proof of sovereignty, yes, and starting with territory. The military will always be right to defend also what is within that territory and it's borders (fictional or geographical- in the future). At the same time there is no time left to Prime Minister Bennett and start writing a white paper how to define Israel's sovereign borders and contiguity. Something that could inspire future generations to a different outlook when considering that the Palestinians have their own State nextdoor. Definition of country and people is defined not by personal will and view of an individual, but by a bureaucratic organisation and national currency. This is probably how neighbour country Turkey started after it's empire had fallen. But not in Israel where there is no one who wants to think about Israel in any other way than fighting Iran or attacking Iran by 'themselves'. The second quarter of the Bennett government will probably not last and it will certainly never become the biggest party like Likud. If this has any value perhaps Israel should never forget that before the Balfour Declaration there were no Israeli citizens in Palestine. Just Jews (as in Roma people or wanders). Territory does matter, as Prime Minister Bennett said in November 2014 at the Haaretz Peace Conference.















An interesting vision: Israel ten years on from today.

25 August 2023
(23:58 PM)

The unusual idea about the vision for tomorrow and to last one decade long is not only pointing to characteristics of what could become the State of Israel of the future, it is where the builder will try fit in all fractured pieces into a two- tier system. One on top is democracy, and with that reality as Israelis alone can know their country and people(s) living on either side of the platforms in the two- tier realities. Israel's Prime Minister will still be there, at the age of 84, and then perhaps looking back on his long career as leader of Israel and the Israeli people, is not what many after him will be able to say as future leaders of Israel. The rest of the world might have come to the final conclusion and accept the age when people believed peace was possible over land and seas seen from Israel and the Palestinian people, and then have let go the Jimmy Carter era completely. Nothing of the future as just described here above will ever become as sterile as this in another time and reality. It is expected that the whole world by then will become a product of its own and maybe have found ways to live with it, nations, governments, industries, politics and geo- politics, the military, and possibly many WWIII scenarios unsought and unfought for. If Israel has managed to accelerate the pace with which it is becoming part of the rest in the world, we might never have to worry again that the State of Israel is a failed State, and worse that Israel has become a failed nation, too. And still with Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu as leader. Both, Mr and Mrs Netanyahu will be sitting in their presidential seats as sitting monarchically on the throne. In 1970 that would have made quite an impression in either way, good and bad. Bad, when so soon after the Holocaust and returning to Israel as colonists. Let's hope for the sake of the Prime Minister and his wife Israel will not be ridiculed by the rest of the world at a respectable old age. It is the idea 'failed nation' to be completely new after the many decades being called by their enemies or everyone criticising Israel as the Apartheid State, and it is an interesting one too, one could say. In terms of politics and democracy to be in the state of 'as a failed nation', the philosophical question will be when did this thing or phenomenon have happened? And there will be plenty of references, seeking it all back to what happened during the time when the Prime Minister had formed a hardcore Right- Wing government with factions like that of Ministers Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich. Other nations in the Middle East, Africa, South America, Eastern Europe, become failed nations and States too and paying the price. They simply become economic migrants.

With the long standing Prime Minister it is possible that Israel is looking at an uncertain time without leaders strong enough to stay on as the helm of government in the nearest of the future. Also this is not strange for governments around in the places across the world just mentioned here above. For some reason the thought is more forceful if Israel fragmented as first it was for decades a failed State 'in the eye of the beholder' after WWII. History is seldom philosophical when the world is the maker of laws and politics. It will have only one answer this time about the State of Israel: the world did not fail Israel nor did it turn the people of Israel as a failed nation in the International world. Yes, indeed, we need to pray to the God of Abraham on this subject a lot more harder, then, if the people of Israel will still have time and the energy to fight as one. And not only in Israel, but everywhere in the diaspora. Once Israel has deteriorated from top to bottom, in fact it is from bottom to the top for Israelis in this imaginary 2033, the imagination will take the best idea and leave Israel in great numbers and to find elsewhere 'the better life' for them and their families. Palestine will take hold of the situation and perhaps find it still unbelievable that they finally got where they wanted to be, flocking Israel with their families and to build a future State. The future could be grimm if that happens and no one knows what that may be or look like, except it wasn't anyone's dream in Israel. Coming back to the sketch of the two- tiered system in Israel today: top and bottom citizens, democracy and 'distribution of wealth', one policy one man as Prime Minister, the future for the nation of Israel is right now only in the hands of Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. Internally however it can be all of politics and for all the political parties to take on great responsibility for all of Israel proper in the present time. Blind ambitions to the present time ministers are not a pass time episode of bad television and to gain popularity only. Security of Israel remains existential. And that never went without partnership with Jews in the diaspora. Most are likely or will be likely to keep on building more high towers in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and in the rest of the country to create an appearance of global wealth for all Israelis... 8 Million Jews and 3 million Arabs? Israelis don't want to leave their homeland and find a better life in another country, e.g. Europe. Remember it was precisely for this reason when Benyamin Netanyahu came to power he had stopped mass migration leaving Israel in the seventies and eighties! Racism will not make a better plan for Israel and Israelis if they are in danger of becoming a failed nation at one point in the future. Politics to build parliament symmetrically alone could save the day, if and when that happens. Democracy in government and democracy in opposition.











When will normalization return back in Israel?

6 August 2023

That is perhaps the most common and natural question to ask, all depending where you are standing and if you are a Jew living side by side with Arab fellow citizens in areas where politics, government and the security of Israel are matters outside the grocery store to buy either milk or vegetables. For how long have these citizens been left out of government politics and policies? The only thing that the world is watching for the last seven months are protests held in the streets of Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and places the global audience have never heard of in mainstream media. What no one knows are the real people of Israel and this is also not what fits the cinematic picture of the country and Jewish State. Normalization seems like a big word, a city or planet in its own right when in Israel. Without any regard for real politics or fiscal responsibilities. Why aren't there more working hours for protesters? At least more than protesting. What is considered a protest by 'the people' are bus drivers, retail businesses, public sector workers in general. That is a political argument to hold a protest long enough to get pregnant and give birth within this frame of time. It just makes you angry how reckless both sides of the JR arugment are and being in control of what should have been the new beginning for the Jewish State, that it has a plan for the next one hundred years for its people living in historic Palestine. How hard can that be when you're not building a kingdom? The whole show of force is about the extreme Right- Wing government under Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu that the opposition is protesting, and from where we are is looking like something to eternity. And also the other point one can make is that the protest seven or more months old is looking bankrupt when having a critical eye on government and democracy. What sort of Prime Minister has Mr Netanyahu become after his long serving time in government, before the Bennett government resigned last year in November 2022? Naftali Bennett has been and was Prime Minister for one whole year before he resigned over an issue, that has now gone to the world of amnesia. The settler's agreement every five years to extend.

That's about enough today to tell the story about Israel and the history where they are a distinct race since the kingdom of Israel began with David, for now.












After Uxbridge what will be the Labour strategic point for the beginning of the 2024 election season?

22 July 2023

To Labour it will be the billion dollar question, and to the Tories that may cost nothing. The Baron of Prussia Blucher might do the whole thing for the next genereal election and another Tory Party win, with the incumbent PM Rishi Sunak looking thinly meager on the side of the battle at parliamentary Waterloo. No one knows at this point who the Baron of Prussia is. It is still more than just in a manner of speaking or visual language, as every battlefield needs good and clear visual. Uxbridge to the Tories was all or nothing strategy, with the cleverness of nothing still being a strategic point win. If you follow the impulse. Just to point out how important strategic points are: Stephen Fynch in the House of Commons on wednesday was arguing his case on child poverty in Scotland on PMQs, with the PM answering in a harsh manner how to stop poverty households is to go to work. We can still remember how the incumbent PM made a pledge of being compassionate, which nothing of his strategic point is now left but to shreds. Parliamentary democracy in Britain does run through the veins of pledges aka a manifesto. It is in his Party's interest to unfold some of that compassion during his term as PM, and not 'undoing' his pledges to look more Tory. Could the Tories come back and win strategically at the next genereal election in 2024? Strangely enough, with Uxbridge everything is possible from the Tory point of view. And their view is a seven year old Brexit view. By now they know it was walking through the mud in the heavy rains caused by Brexit, and still muddling on into the sunshine of tomorrow's unknown. Question: does Labour have a strategy with poignant and strong strategic points to get into the campaign and to win the next general election, and plus sending a massive shockwave throughout the whole of the country? It wasn't ULEX or not ULEX, which by now can only distract the Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer. They lose a leg and still go on fighting Napoleon Bonaparte. And if voters are beginning to think of the Labour leader to be more like Napoleon it will be a bad strategy to begin with for him and his Party. It would be political regicide.

You see, with the man that Rishi Sunak is as the Tory Prime Minister one has to give him that he is looking more and more the role he is playing and slowly making it his natural home to be in his role as being the Prime Minister. And that can be challenging to the Labour Party and leader Keir Starmer. But then again, we knew it would turn out a titanic fight between the two anyway. And, there is another dark version of voting for the Tories at the next genereal election: voting perversion. Or Tory fetishism, which no one should underestimate and not even in a second nature. Britain and its strongholds rural areas or Tory territory will never want to lose its 'virgin green lands' as part of a national political landscape change. And whoever misunderstands that Englishness is misunderstanding the pride of the British rural people. It is their cathedral of evergreen and green pride. It is where England is, the only one. Politically you can't just see rural England as wood pigeons and not significant enough to vote other than the Tories. One also gets the impression of the so called 'wood pigeons' that they are not part of the wealthy Londoners as heritage is more closer to there livelihoods. In the Tory mindset while insignificant to big city and parliamentary politics, the wood pigeons are a born and bred stronghold to vote Tory eternally. And that is the Tory strategic win. The billion dollar question, what was it again for the Labour Party? To save the NHS? Going green? Location, location, location, that is the question. If we can remember former environmental and transport issues MP Justin Greening, Peter Hitchens on waste management, one will remember the past only of the Tories and not of Labour. And the future is about Health and Waste Management in the global industrial world. All that the Labour leader needs to do is slide his argument in between the sandwiches of every policy the Tories come up with, and he can have his hot-dog lunch or happy hour. It is in every European country to know its rural constituencies and followed by big city social and economics problems. Political analyst of Sky Beth Rigby is right, the next season will be about going to the polls in 2024, head to head for both leaders, the Tory and the Labour Party.


PS Lectori Salutem:

Oncology pains today feeling at a minimum. 












What many don't realize is that it is about sovereignty, from Jenin Palestine.


Shabbat Shalom.


7 July 2023


Israel and its Defense Forces are losing the battle and to a certain extend in retrospect make up assessments how to keep on fighting the war against Palestinian terrorism in the streets. Globally also what many Israelis don't realize is the growing public opinion of how the State of Israel is becoming unstoppable in all their military operations against Palestinians and the 'apparent' terror cells inside places like Jenin. Like so many of Israelis that are not 'going out' of Israel, are becoming the perfect match with the Palestinians who in a similar situation making it a day by day tight and densed place to live in by both peoples. It doesn't matter to switch places or sides. In this overview we are looking at one geography. Is it a true Roman or Grecian proverbial to say the conquerer is becoming the conquest? In modern English mannerism we say it differently, that the hunter is becoming the hunted. And no one should underestimate the force of the top layer, e.g. of Palestinians who are educated in rich and wealthier societies in the western world. You can't all of a sudden believe that what the world is missing here in Jenin is the clash of civilizations war is what is now ongoing, between the IDF Forces of Israel and the 'children' under eighteen years on the Palestinian side fighting as the new 'State Actors'. All happening in the streets of Jenin as we speak. Top Palestinian lawyers, engineers, scientists and economists, let's say that they are now the decision makers and leading 'their people' in these 'outposts' in the land of Palestine, what than is what we should be looking at? If for one moment the idea is thinking this one through one can only say, again, are we not looking at a strategic vision here and now being on the side of the Palestinian people?.. It is sovereignty.

And while Israeli Forces are executing mass military operations against the 'terror cells' in Jenin, what impresses more is the hubris for sovereignty and what the rest of the world will find appealing at some tactical point in time. The State of Israel therefore should watch out for losing its grip on sovereignty and democracy. In a recent BBC Interview between the former prime minister of Israel, Mr Naftali Bennett, and the journalist interviewer, we could already get a taste of the danger written here above, but faced with blind vision by Israel. The former prime minister willfully and skillfully had just managed to get out unscathed from this grilling interview, if the BBC presenter herself had not made an academic error of judgement against Israel. She went out of format and blatantly lost her argument's view by saying that the IDF is happy to kill children. Mr Bennett had just finished explaining the International Geneva Convention Order in a conflict or war zone, not in these words but in his own words, that they are not children when taking up arms against Israelis and Israeli citizens as targets. Of course, what can one say, it is only Jenin. But would it not be better to be cautious and think military, that these are kids transformers from a patriotic training and to die for 'their land'. Could it be that? By the way, the BBC presenter should explain why she asked a question outside the format of BBC professionals. And of course appologize to both the State of Israel and the former prime minister Naftali Bennett. Despite what the popular idea making of Israel, it is still a democracy and sovereignty. Now the question is: if sovereignty is the new Palestinian vision of Palestine, Israel will have a new problem. And, isn't it the way for honor killings that you should never touch my wife? The sovereignty of Israel is every prime minister's wife, a virgin of Judah and never a harlot as this is a grave sin in the eyes of God Almighty the God of Abraham. Israel, wake up! Not Greece, she is awake. (Lord Byron:

Awake (not Greece—she is awake!)

       Awake, my Spirit! Think through whom

Thy life-blood tracks its parent lake

                                    And then strike home!)













A reality fiction of tribunal decision.

(Personal op)

25 June 2023

Abortions


5-13 Weeks embryos

A reality fiction of tribunal decision.

You are crossing the natural natal boundaries of 'that what is in the making for life'.

Similar is during coitus, 'that what is in the making of life'.

The planet's abortion problem remains in the mass production of women having abortions disproportionately, something that was taken away from legal context what used to be only in the higly extraordinary circumstances and situations.
Par exemple: found in arbitrary ethics of circumstances and situations medically and neurologically history, and more specifically ancient medicine and science.

Embryo:
Arbitrary ethics intrusion on growth when seen at the scale of 5-13 weeks.
Puncture in the natal habitat of the embryo is alive during the 5-13 weeks, and boundaries already set in bloodstreaming of its own, following the mainstream bloodflow hierarchy through the carrier/ mother.

Termination of embryo natally asleep in its making is more than brutally intrusive when still carried by another larger body over its tender 'headroof' and dis- or formation body.

In mass production of abortions on embryos 5-13 weeks nataly 'homed' in the womb arbitrary ethics should be applied and reduced to a different scale per capita.
Illegal abortions vulgarity will determine two lives for the price of one.

Post Scriptum: As the state of the embryo is inconclusive by human understanding (neurological sensation) and language, reference to define life can only be voidness with a specific origin over 'staged' substance, as in post natal origins in the evolution and creation mythology of mankind tissue substance called anatomy.
This voidness with a specific origin is most experienced in other fields, e.g. with fertility treatments for women desiring to get a pregnancy and want its sensation to satisfy this desire, even by a mere voidness with a specific origin through the union of human. It is for this reason why the embryo has rather a golden status above that of 'when the world speaketh in silver', outside his/ her world.

Social and collective memory:
The world is familiar as a place dealing with mass production of human or animal, and leaving it to the mass and not moral substracts. And mass always equals numbers and not discipline biologically or neurologically.


MCT..........................................................

Post Scriptum:
What is the meaning of natal period?
the developmental period between conception and birth, in humans commonly divided into the germinal stage (approximately the first 2 weeks), the embryonic stage (the following 6 weeks), and the fetal stage (from 2 months to birth).













The Labour leader "isn't aware of the global macroeconomic situation," says the Prime Minister at PMQs today in the House of Commons.

21 June 2023

This won't make the Tokyo LED billboards. Tokyo Japan, the G-7 Asia Pacific leader next to G-7 Britain in the western world. One thing is clear from this is that the PM is not good at patronizing the leader of the opposition openly and publicly, when the global world is listening. Also and what is more important to ask is whether the Prime Minister is losing his cool on petty matters, as having no idea about the global macroeconomics in the world. And the PM went on to rebuke the opposition leader, Sir Keir Starmer, by saying that for all his talk that he has no plans and that the few that he was having are nothing but dangerous plans for working people. At this point it almost looked as if Keir Starmer didn't need any defense as it is very clear where he now stands: close to the general election in 2024. Maybe Prime Minister Rishi Sunak needs reminding to calm down and that it was all parliamentary business, nothing personal. And that means also when losing personal face. It is hard for the economics wonderboy Prime Minister to imagine that the knight of the realm can know one or two things in the world of the Prime Minister about spending. Spending is the father of the economy, as it is the mother who will do most of the spending. Same word, two different fields of costs combined with time. This is exactly where SNP leader Stephen Flynn is going with his PMQs, when given the floor. In short he just said this afternoon in the House of Commons to the PM, that it was Brexit that broke Britain. Tory MP Doctor Liam Fox however had said that wasn't it time Britain could see for what it really was and making success in growing the economy. Of course, good news is good news and is good for continuity. The Labour Party in opposition however will question this continuity time again and again till the next general election. It is all legitimate to keep these battle lines in a mother of all parliamentary debates or democracy continuously and infinitely. But the Tory Party is in luck snapshot mode, as we are still in the early months of 2023 and haven't reached yet the summer and third quarter of the whole year. Strategically where is Prime Minister Sunak taking the Tory Party in the coming months? There are no whispers known on this. "This Prime Minister will deliver for the British people." A quick and moment of flash photography?

In memo: the British Prime Minister who promised to deliver for the British people the day he took on Office at Downing Street No 10, last year in October 2022, yes he is the Prime Minister and from what the audience at home could watch and hear the opposition leader didn't need any reminding. Mr Keir Starmer takes his standing at the dispatch box very seriously when questioning the Prime Minister. The global audience finds it very enlightened watching two leading politicians wrestling it out like Spartans in ancient Greece when standing at the dispatch box in the House of Commons. From another angle why did it look like something had been sidelined in this debate? And then the best today in the House of Commons was when one MP (Northern Ireland) wanted to know about the Prime Minister where he stood at the prospect of economic incentive for the Irish people having a MotoGP of their own built. Money was needed to have this new infrastructure and grow the economy by hundreds of millions. The Prime Minister's timid answer concealed something of a swallowing his own words, being all about delivering for Britain and the British people. Ireland clearly was making the moves to build their economic prosperity plans to Real Time! What happened to Silverstone, Mr Sunak? Has anyone thought of upgrading the MotoGP circuit for the future under his Tory government? And also if you know global macroeconomics how is shying away from MotoGP going to look, next to what Europe is trying to get in Hungary ten years from now? It is not what the difference is between knowing women have no male sexual organ and knowing maths for eighteen year olds that is making a good prime minister when coming so close to the general election. It is massive projects that generate masses tons of money and all being part of our world industries. Unless the Prime Minister will seek refuge behind the Climate Change politics and be the sensible man. He should remember Tory first, man last. From what we have heard that is exactly where Keir Starmer is different from the present Prime Minister, that he is keeping his eye like a needle on the economy and is watching how this is ticking. One day very soon that might come in handy when he will have to take difficult decisions and balance the prosperity plans he and the Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves are planning on delivering for the people of Britain and the whole of the UK.













It is difficult to say, but losing focus could punish Keir Starmer for his long term plans...

12 June 2023

How can this be true to demand a general election in between the two moments, one the Boris Johnson resignation on friday last week, and of two other MP's; two, that Rishi Sunak for some reason is to blame for this disaster and not showing a backbone to call for a general election. Stark focus should be indeed on the general election, of which is practically put already in advantage to Keir Starmer and the Labour Party, with a careful lined out strategy at its nature. Mr Starmer also has another tower of strength to his disposal: time. If one reads carefully the letter of resignation by the former Tory prime minister on friday, isn't he too desperate trying to extend new plans for growth and investment into the 'coming months'? Politically this can only mean conceding to a loss he thought he would never have to fear and see that day, the bollard getting closest to the lost Brexit dream by Mr Johnson. But one thing can obfuscate the atmosphere slightly when there is so much noise around you with a former prime minister (mandate 14 million people) resigning, two others that followed, and a Tory Party with a Prime Minister at its head who according to law makers has no mandate, that perhaps the leader of the opposition can demand a general election from the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. As in Peter Calvocoressi, The British Experience 1945-75, is saying on page 241, "Chance is an element in history never absent and never calculable, a perennial potent actor usually out of focus," is it not how Keir Starmer has worked his way up over these last seven/ eight months and concentrating on the next general election? It is perhaps this that Boris Johnson has lost, despite all greater and privileged advance he had over 'the bollard'. And Mr Johnson in his desperation took the last shot of parting by admitting the plan for growth and investment was crucial to lead the Tory Party / Conservatives winning the next general election, approximately fifteen/ sixteen months from today. That was perhaps unwillingly noble of him to put this piece of cryptic line in his resignation letter.

Of course, how one interpretates the former Tory prime minister his words on growth and investment at this point in time, the last year of his apparent term if he had still been the prime minister, is a political matter for the corridors of Westminster. To the global audience it is unclear what the former prime minister is defending, what course or purpose. In the meantime everyone has heard the leader of the opposition defending his plans and promises for a new manifesto 'in the coming months'. And if this wasn't enough also has the Labour leader binned the previous Labour manifesto, said so in November 2022. Time, again, is clearly on Mr Starmer's side and so is his extraordinary chance. It doesn't do the same for Mr Sunak and in the coming months to change or bin anything in their manifesto. In fact as in political fact Mr Sunak as Prime Minister is locked in his manifesto from the previous prime minister. Where Mr Starmer has a great difficulty is with the 14 million people who voted for not only Mr Johnson, but who have voted for Brexit. These are the people who wanted benefits from leaving the EU, what was looking more like being rewarded in one way only. Now, what could they have been thinking that would become their reward for voting Britain out of the EU? In terms of benefits working people expected improvement of lives, more money, more sovereignty especially in all the nimbies areas. And if that is England than 14 million will not be voting at all or still vote Tories at the next general election, just to make their protest known and make it a very English folklore one. They could do it by voting for Rishi Sunak, because sovereignty matters more than eating from the hands of the Labour leader. Here for some reason ethnicity does matter in the hearts and minds of hardcore proletarians. Even when alien. And one should pay careful attention to these voters in the backyard of politics at Westminster.

One might wonder how is then the Labour leader lucky and who will be the next prime minister, God willing. Try another direction it will be without God Almighty, as chance is only defiable by He who makes providence and put men at the helm of great power.

Additional: Providence would have served the former Tory prime minister and now Mr Johnson had he from his first day in office told the people that he will introduce a Brexit Transparency Act/ Law. That could have been the first defense mechanism post EU Membership for Brexit and the British people. Mr Johnson knew that he was above all a Tory Prime Minister. This defense mechanism and put in place as law could also have been the stability mechanism to monitor not only how Brexit has become the country living of its own laws (taking back control), but that it monitored all sectors, both the private and public sectors. Dealing with the outside world, whether the EU or US, or any other country in the world, the Brexit law of transparency would have created more accountability for its partners. Putting this to Labour as maybe the incoming government we will never see how the Brexit dad, Mr Johnson, had made the British people a thriving economic power with a knack for transparency and accountability as a Brexit government. Instead we got the Johnson rise and fall/ crash. And Labour introducing the law of transparency, almost sure of failing under a Tory Party in opposition! It was totally unnecessary to put the world in the fog.












Sir Keir Starmer has to find out pronto what is making the British economy tick.

27 May 2023

Sky News (Sam Coates) in an article said yesterday that the Tories are planning to come out against Team Starmer of Labour with a new plan called the Attack Plan, on three main key new issues they see as imminent to win the next general election. Team Starmer, sorry, we're not following, and are right thinking or assuming the Labour Party saying what anyone imagines at this stage of the campaign up to the general election in 2024/ 2025... There is also another article saying that yet it still isn't clear how the Labour leader will find what makes the British people tick. It was too late now, they said. Wrong, Keir Starmer after last October 2022 had started his process of coming back from obscurity politics / a complete flat-lining Labour opposition over the last two years or more, to the general election territory now in 2023 again. It was only six months later! But also the Tories have been losing this moment entirely on their side and are now struggling how to bring it to the people of why one year before the general election next year Brexit does have a new strategy. It seems an unusual situation to the British electorate and no one knows how to put it on either side of the parties. Are they missing the juice of politics or something? This means what was unusual is that Labour has astonished the whole of Brexit politics and the electorate all in the same moment. (Just to make you passive writing on this topic the need for nicotine gets smoking on your mind, with all due respect to the Shadow Secretary for Health Wes Streeting) But we need to come back to earth and once again look at what or where Team Starmer has arrived at this point in their campaign. It is no suprise why the Tories will come out now against the prospect that Labour could win the next general election, it is their prerogative to win elections and make Brexit strong once again/ again and again. How, yes how? 14 Million had voted for leave and gave their votes to a prime minister and make Brexit final to leave the European Union forever. (Legally forever means indefinitely) If 14 Million had been an army how could they than be let down so badly by their government and repaid with disloyalty when the economy is near collapse internationally? The cost of living crisis is not an assumption as the incumbent Prime Minister is trying to make of it, not when 14 million were never 14 million richest in the country who voted for Brexit. No Prime Minister Sunak, the NHS is probably in your blood, but nobility of Conservative care (the late Liberal & Progressive William Beveridge) for the people in this country is not in your blood, no matter how much it pains anyone saying this. The Prime Minister's Britain is being runned by a running factor and not a 'reward/ grant factor' policy, if that is something the British PM knows.

Many articles say the same thing about the Labour leader and his team that they have yet to come out with detailed politics and policies, to attract voters to vote Labour at the next general election. It is a clear and clean slate, but isn't this time to make Brexit work under a Labour government different from a clear promise that was made six years ago on the side of a bus? And also it is even more strange in British politics to say that the Brexitsword can only be held by one and not the other... Next half of 2023 this is true to be cautious and not get too much into early euphoria and see Labour getting the laurels of a new era in Britain under a Labour government. What do they stand for internationally? Shadow Foreign Secretary David Lammy had he not already made it clear to the British people how Labour was planning to introduce the reconnect policy with the rest of what is western Europe, inclusiveness of the UK? This was January at the beginning of 2023. National politics and trade would be reconnected via a stability mechanism with the EU / in the rest of the world. It knows power politics just as well as the Tories from a time long behind, e.g. post industrialization and the millennium. And that is what is making the British people tick, one can safely assume. There is no point to vandalize the British economy just because many are saying how Brexit has failed. Yes, under the Tories and not under a Labour government. Outsiders might see something else to this as well, that loyalty in Britain is dead. For example what if the Labour Party turns around and would say to the people that they will not let loyalty be punished by poverty because they voted to leave the EU? It could make people see or believe the Labour leader was the knight in shining armour they were not praying for. But since he's got this far why not. You see, no outsider wants to fall out of love with Britain and start to doubt the temperament of Brexiteers being ill natured against a system to change for the good of the country and turn around this unfortunate business of exciting the world unnecessarily. A rapproachment now could be firmly put in the hands of a stable government with no history in Brexit failures. Timing is everything, isn't it? And is that meant for the Tories when looking in an honest try at the situation? It is the least dishonest, but Labour fits the profile more natural for a stable government next, without any iron and sharp toothed bear traps. Strategy is built on long term thinking, however the Tories seem to have found the elixir of doing strategic thinking in the shortest of term just before the general election in 2024. Than why blame everyone else and not yourself?

God save the king.












Check out the list again, month 5 May 2023. What could make Labour leader Keir Starmer not win the next genereal election in 2024?

19 May 2023

00:48 AM

G-7 Meeting, Group of seven summit, in Tokyo/ Hiroshima tonight/ morning, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has said unequivocally to Beth Rigby Sky News, who is travelling wit the Prime Minister, that he expects to stay Prime Minister at the next general election. Its out of his hands if Labour Sir Keir Starmer wins or loses in 2024 at the general election, so to speak. On this side of the world yesterday, 18 May, Lord Mendelson in similar unbending words (LBC Radio) said of Keir Starmer the same of him becoming prime minister. He said what he was thinking how the Labour leader is preparing for the battle of prime ministership in 2024, next year. The truth between the two leaders will somewhere underway do the honourable thing, perhaps of a political hara-kiri? The theater of war has already begun and getting settled to do battle at the earliest signal soon. Question is whether Mr Starmer is a battle prime minister and with that on his mind will be ready when the general election time comes on the physical clash. In the convential way, let's be clear about that.

The Labour leader this week did say that he was planning on taking Brexit under his control and will make it work under his leadership, or, as prime minister. If so the Labour leader will not be able for much longer to convince the British audience as he is already moving in general election territory and leave this to the last minute. One thing what the opposition can say is that they have never been here before. The situation has changed and the Tories are sailing the seas like a ghost ship with lots of new unidentified political cargo. One day they hang out the Conservative flag, and the next day it is democracy again. And it is not only confusing the enemies/ rivals, but their own side too. What could they be wanting here as the ultimate prize, if staying in power has been the obvious objective as a constant for the Conservatives/ Brexiteers/ Tories after the last general election?

And more importantly is whether the electorate will vote Labour. Just yes or no.












SNP Spokesperson Stephen Flynn javelin 62. mph throw at PMQs today, a spear of destiny?

Habakuk the ancient prophet: "On shigionoth. LORD, I have heard of your fame; I stand in awe of your deeds, O LORD. Renew them in our day, in our time make them known; in wrath remember mercy."

10 May 2023

On the issue of fundamental right of democracy to strike or protests (Not my king protests on Coronation King Charles III and their arrests), on who's terms was this, the SNP leader claimed, the nemesis out of the box against the Prime Minister, by saying, "So does the Prime Minister seriously say that moving forward that you can have your rights but only on his terms?" The Prime Minister visibly and audible enough clear response was one of confusion, by him asking the question to the leader of the opposition Keir Starmer, "I would like to know what the leader of the opposition has to say on this..." Triggering with that a prompt response from the speaker of the House, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, that the Prime Minister should answer questions at PMQs and not ask the questions. Here this afternoon at PMQs luckily it still remains the House of Commons and rules equally like the old ancient Olympic rules for competing athletes. It was equally remarkable to hear the PM stating against the leader Sir Keir Starmer of the opposition lacking to bring forward any policies and not bringing anything else forward on these. Labour strategically has twelve months to work out their side of political substance or intent; and from where they are after the local elections results also are looking at the perfect timing to proceed the course or any sort of course taken in the coming months. It looks as if the Tories have put themselves out by their own makings over the years and now are fighting not the Labour Party and their voters/ Members, but regression in the Conservative Party. Look away or don't look away to ward off the evil eyes in the meantime... Underneath all this the spear of destiny has pierced through a bloodless wind straight at the heart of Brexit and its aftermath without a whistle, why have things changed so rapidly in Britain? Labour can return to power, but something goes missing in the public sphere when rejecting the second main political Party its right to govern and by voter's choice or freedom chosing to be vague and vote for one of the other political parties. What was the contract (FTPA: An Act of Parliament (also called a statute) is a law made by the UK Parliament. All Acts start as bills introduced in either the Commons or the Lords. When a bill has been agreed by both Houses of Parliament and has been given Royal Assent by the Monarch, it becomes an Act) with the people again that made Britain and the British people part of the parliamentary system and their representatives? Was it Brexit (by new Royal Assent)? Listen: https://youtu.be/xfDQhgrEA-c (Constitutional law lecturer Dr Robert Craig discusses the Fixed Term Parliaments Act being repealed) 

When the late Mrs Thatcher went to the Falklands war in the eigthies, the question today is whether it was on her terms. Or during the Iraq war whether this was on Tony Blair's terms. When Britain left the European Union in 2019/2019/2020 the prime minister at any occasion was never told to execute law and order on his/her terms pre- Brexit, so what has changed when Brexit became reality for the British people? Isn't the spear of destiny 'on his terms' equivalent to the autocratic rule that overrules democratic rule, e.g. of freedom of movement, basic humanity rights, and a decent policy when it concerns immigrants or refugees? This is certainly not to compare with tsarist Russia, to the point where a good sovereign and his Christian faith had lost his life and that of his family to a 'mass of ordinary people', to take power and cunningly do away with the imperial powers behind the blue forests. Well let's hope not so in the 21st century. The historical misreading on autocratic power within a monarchy always is that it is the king who decides... Autocracy are for those 'king's men' to diligently read the kings law and decide everything on forward 'on their (own) terms'. Brexit is clearly in its present time maze of undefiable laws becoming a land of supreme autocratic rules, and will decimate all its political rivals at one unfortunate point and making consensus dead as the stone of destiny. How else can they keep the logic on their side to rule the country, people and 'serving' the king? A diligent 'autocrat' on his terms should never be underestimated how far he can take his ambition, e.g. Oliver Cromwell, also a very clever man and reader of English laws and the King's laws as no one was able to do so in his days. He was the conservative of the other side in the silver and gold coins, and so releasing some sort of vulgarity laws against anyone who stood in his ways, even minorities such as the prosperous mercantile Jewish communities.

Google Search Engine: What is the confidence principle?
It is a fundamental principle of the British constitution that the government must retain the confidence of the legislature, as it is not possible for a government to operate effectively without the support of the majority of the people's representatives.

God save the King echoed above England, Ireland and Scotland into the whole world within ear's distance and faded into whispering to the hearts of all people as witnesses of a glorious Christian rite of passage into the future of this English Royal Family. Labour alone should humbly accept the policy forward to a prosperous mercantile new Britain.















If Brexiteers lose the coming local elections they will have the battleground of 12 months dissecting Labour like a frog.

28 April 2023

In Britain's political pond two frogs (formerly, but now kissed by the electorate for the next battle toward the general election 2024 into political parties princes) will be battling it out the next twelve months to be Britain's next Prime Minister. In reverse logic there is an interesting rear mirror reflex for both men, to start just to say how long Rishi Sunak was leader of his Party, and next how long this is for Keir Starmer on his side. How relevant is this at face value isn't much because it will all be about who can now run fastest to the finish line, from this moment on. Back to today's home screen logic, it is perhaps also strange to say why not lose the local elections and make the coming twelve months your battleground, for the Labour Party? It will/ could leave the Brexiteers still winning the general election, but only thin on the periphery, if they win. Rishi Sunak is to still work hard in his own Party and stay the Tory Party leader during all of the coming twelve months. And in the meantime Labour is free of proving itself on leadership within its own Party. You have to take courage and lead your party to the end with no privileges in between and diverse from the main straight line. It looks like Rishi Sunak and his Tory Party are now polled to lose the local elections on 4 May next week. Hmm... Maybe it is their instinct telling them things will only look bad if they win it this time? They have been poor on defence for six years since leaving the EU, how will they manage another twelve months defending their victory by denying everything human and compassionate? Strike that from the five points list, if anyone can remember what the Prime Minister had promised to do in his New Year's speech. And on day 1 when he became Prime Minister. For the Labour leader Keir Starmer, after the debacle with Diane Abbott's bizarre 'letter' of anti- semitism, earlier this week, some have come to question the Labour leader his sense of leadership when there is a difference being the leadership the Party wants, and the leadership of becoming a serious candidate for becoming Britain's next Prime Minister. In a podcast yesterday Mr Starmer  had said that the prime ministership wasn't about him, like so many others before him that was the case. Prudence here means that becoming this important prime minister, Mr Starmer, it is looking like it will all have to be about you. E.g. when going to war (Falklands or Ukraine) how can this be inclusive? The welfare of the British people and the UK after the victory to be prime minister, how will that be inclusive across the Labour ministries by then? And also dealing with more industrial issues as returning to the EU or not, both will not be possible to be inclusive. Participation, maybe. On the issues of EU and Britain, no one should also forget that this is not something new to the Brexiteers. They refuse speaking of or about it because they need something bigger to that, which is completely pushing the whole Brexit issue from their mind as far as possible. With a Labour government don't look surprised to see eyes from the dark piercing through the walls when keeping everything under a hellish watch/ scrutiny. Politically they might clamp down the wheels of Labour's fortune and tow it away to the Police Park for illegal 'parking'. One thing that makes Mr Starmer a lucky man in all this is that he never thinks he has it in him to be prime minister. So, there is no telling in advance he just might pop up and rise to the occasion perfectly well and clear.

The next battle is not simply about how bad the Tories have done for the last six or even thirteen years. They have accumulated enormous tacit experience with dealing on the bigger processes of global and continental European politics. Brexit had made that impact in the world and rippled far and wide across seas and oceans. It is wrong to think all that they have done is draw straws who will be next negotiating Brexit. However what they promised the people in the UK how this will be for the better of the country and nations, now here is something to chew on during campaigning. As prime minister it is the political capital that Mr Starmer does not seem (critics say) to have at the moment. Like Boris Johnson, former Tory prime minister in 2022 when he resigned, it is the prime minister that is making historical decisions and must lead whether in the G-7 or G-20 (now outside G-7 + G-20). There is no special education for prime ministers, as one Dutch Princess Amalia once said, that there is no special school for becoming queen or king. So the prime minister as now it is looking likely that this will be Keir Starmer, he needs to make his own legacy and statesmanship or be on his own damned for eternity in political Hades. How it turns love from a civil contract to a matter of great statesmanship and devotion! Who will be the widow is the next question. What the new changes are in the world will also be very important to the prime minister and whatever is close to his own heart to make this his idea of personal expediency, in stead of just personal. Until that time there is no telling what future awaits the Labour government and under a new prime minister. Let's pray to God Almighty of Abraham in the heavens that this will be a man to remember as he who has enabled history in Britain, to come back to be this unique nation or sea peoples of the island called Britain. He does not need to become the Philistine princes riding in chariots of fire across the night skies. For the moment plain and simple king Starmer, the political come back kid from an obscure Labour Party past. (A little jest) Now, when looking back on the last half year this 'boring' man has done incredible well and for some reason knew to catch the bull by the horn, gently, compassionately and also in a prudent way not to hurt the animal in an offensive way. 'Sir Softy' or 'Sir Softie'? From the armchair it is so easy to write about leadership while lacking this trait in your own character; it is something different when one cannot envy the Labour leader if he becomes prime minister at the next general election. Name one homogeneous policy to make Britain better again?

Anti climax: 4 May 2023 if the Tories win the local elections. That will do two things for Labour: one is that Keir Starmer can then bring on the Labour Party to the center, with a perfect timing model towards the general election next year; second, post local elections he can then leave behind the time of campaigning as the candidate to become prime minister, and also leave behind his time of this introduction that was entirely based on the man that he is as leader of the Labour Party.
After 4 May Mr Starmer will go on, but take with him the Labour Party that should and must get into government; if, he wins the next general election than turn around and all eyes will be on him, but as the prime minister, Labour.
Should Labour win at the local elections, hmm... Smoke signals and guessing games will be on.













21st Century


25 April 2023


75 Years the State of Israel.













Which is the funny part, Sir Keir Starmer not being good at economics or winning the 2024 general election?

18 April 2023

Theorethically let's say the authors of this notion are right, when making short or brief analyses on Mr Starmer as Labour leader to fix Brexit, where the sniggers fit in the 'details' no one can say. Facts do give that impression about Sir Keir over these last four/ five months before the coming local elections 4 May next month, twelve days from now. Where the Labour leader now stands in his campaign for the local elections 2023, no impression will do right now who this man really is envisioning his prime ministership as a reality he will have to live through when that day comes. The best approach one can give is that no one is saying (e.g. in writings on this website) that Keir Starmer is an economist and therefore should be trusted with the nation's economy. It doesn't also mean that he could not become prime minister as a lawyer by profession and experience. Even if he had been a bad one. The next prime ministership, from this outsider's view, isn't about the economy, economics, or success in any field that science permits a candidate to become the PM of Britain. Not this time they can't do traditional blind politics with the people votes. It is in fact Brexit, now a taboo topic no one wants to hear about again. There is also sniggering when Keir Starmer turns around and says that he wants to make Brexit work, of course knowing very well that he has no choice. The people had voted for Brexit and that he must respect by showing to the voters, 'Yea hath no benefits as promised by Brexit when they left the EU.' If the Brexiteers and their Prime Minister can do the maths they will know you simply can't forget it that Britain came out of the EU and has Brexit, based on a sum it was going to bring back every week to the people of Britain. This is not a lie, but universal truth across the entire world. Would the people have voted to take out Britain out of the EU without benefits? Tread carefully now to leap out of the Brexit electorate victory 2019, because masses of people are asking the same question: where are the benefits? It is the same as leaving in the middle of the battle to save one's own skin and leaving the forces behind to do the fighting on their own without the commander in chief. In politics this leads to severe judgement, that the people should decide again. And if so it is good as anyone's guess that the Brexit project will collapse under punishment by call for a general election. You see why Keir Starmer doesn't need to be an economist to do the maths and win the general election 2024, when the geatest vision of Britain had massively failed country and countrymen/ women?

It is no wonder that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak walks like a cat on water before 4 May in two weeks. This unique Prime Minister is a very clever and young dashing Prime Minister in a long time that the Conservatives have had, yet when it comes to politics he is still not inspiring enough. This week he had even gone as far as saying to the public and their children how Britain could do better at maths, if they want a job when leaving school. Tony Blair in his days as campaigner to become prime minister (1990ties), did say 'education, education, education' was what Britain needed most. When coming from Labour no one needs much thinking or feeling about a slogan or plan to make education and employment part of their traditional strategies. When does the Conservative Party mingles wealth with pedagogy? Worse, it was not a good way showing integrity with the people who voted for the Conservatives massively when they were needed, numeracy skills or not, but based on trust in their government, now ripping off what's left to them on their skint skin. One would think education statements of this importance, because basically education does matter to make a real start in life, isn't that for the Secretary for education Ms Keegan? In stead this had almost felt like the PM still wanted to be best in the class. (His class would be the Brexiteers and not the people looking to eat somewhere for the homeless) And that doesn't feel like a bad joke either. Politics also is not making it any easier for the Prime Minister to help these people who didn't come out of the ground like mushrooms just overnight. Something like a plague or drop from the blue sky. Having said all this, equally for Labour there are no answers to give to the disappointed Brexit voters and promise them things will change for the better if they voted for Labour at the local or general elections next. Britain needs rebalancing between past and present. In one TV show on Youtube one had even asked the question that 'what if Keir Starmer would lose the election in 2024?' You can't help but take that question into your stride and make it inclusively as if putting it as part into the total sum of realities. It is also an interesting question. On the other hand there are some answers you can get by listening carefully to political rival parties such as Reform their campaign and mini conferences. How will you plead? It is the reverse of Solomon wisdom, that now the 'real mother' is the one who wants to keep the child and share it. Cut up Brexit in half, two main political parties should be able to work out something if they cherish their future as a nation and country. And don't say 'keep it' because we don't want 'it' anymore. Another question to ask at this point is: can the Tories win the next general election in 2024? Personally, I don't think so.

In today's news 21 April 2023: 

EXCLUSIVE: 

MPs set for crunch Brexit inquiry debate after 141,000 people demand probe

A debate takes place in Westminster Hall next week after calls for an investigation into the impact on the UK of quitting the EU - seven years after the Brexit referendum


Voters opted by 52% to 48% to quit the EU in the 2016 referendum (

By

Ben GlazeDeputy Political Editor

  • 13:15, 20 Apr 2023
  • UPDATED14:32, 20 Apr 2023

Additional: if this inquiry will take place half will be a coup d'grace to the Brexiteers, and the other half it will give Labour more strategic room for winning the next general election. Labour won't be in this inquiry for accountability or responsibility why it did not deliver for the British people what it had promised when leaving the EU. Labour will be on the outside of this inquiry, but the opening will be for the Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer, to put the balance straight. You can't make Brexit work twice and promise anew the benefits that didn't come in six years and for the future costs at the same time. Without the inquiry ut supra Sir Keir would have fallen into the abyss and not knowing in this generation why he didn't and couldn't win the election. His failure? 













9 April 2023



Collective name:


The Holy Land isat war, more specifically against Jews living in Israel. Time to call up Jewish reservists all over the world.


MCT.......................................












Why unite behind Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu.

7 April 2023

The country is in a state of national emergency, ongoing from yesterday afternoon to even tonight after the beginning of Shabbat friday evening in Israel. 34 Rockets from Lebanon were fired into Israel yesterday on thursday afternoon, when we read the news first time in the rest of the world. Within the hour also from Gaza came a barrage of rockets flying over into Israeli territory, and hitting global news immediately that Israel was under attack from Hamas in Lebanon and Gaza. Why did it came as a surprise to the Prime Minister and the country on this occasion when rockets are hitting into Israel, north and south? The fight for democracy against the coalition proposal to change the Judiciary and that was fiercely opposed by the oppositions in mass demonstrations throughout the entire population in Israel for thirteen weeks, was put immediately on hold. Why also did Israel's 'sleeping enemies' had they woken up this time, over the alleged violence that had erupted during the prayers on the Ramandan first day in Al Aqsa between the Israeli Police and Palestinian young rioters? It was something in the manner in which the rockets came firing into Israel and the timing, as if the impression came with a 'new message' to Israel, lectori salutem. Questions were in these first seconds very critical for the Prime Minister, asking or perhaps wanting to understand what the objective was from Hamas in Lebanon and in the south from Gaza. Were they trying to say that this was a coordinated attack to (atmospheric) fear? News went quickly into mainstream media around the world, that Israel had been surprised by Hamas. There wasn't much to focus on the 'surprise' this time for the Prime Minister, as it was already real ongoing while he blinked with his eyes. Sometimes it is best to keep quiet when the enemy has cleverly pinned the right timing, politically during the wide divisions in Israel for the last three months and still is surging underneath their political skin while fighting the enemy in national military and disciplined unity; and also impressed by synchronizing something of more than one front. The imagery was a clever cloud dust and in the next hours there was no clear vision of what to expect next.

There is much blame against Prime Minister Netanyahu from members in the public and political rival camps to the coalition. But it is possible this time to think clear, that even the Prime Minister known for his schticks and tricks politics and tactics, on this occasion it seems unlikely that it wasn't a genuine first time that he was taken by a complete surprise. He had just ordered the Minister of Defence, Mr Yoav Galant, a week ago to be dismissed from his Office as commander of the army, and also the Prime Minister's coalition were in no mood to reconcile with the opposition on the Judicial Reform proposal. The enemies of Israel must have been therefore political hawks who made political assessments and than took the 'military' decision pronto to surprise Israel. Only political hawks could have known this gravity as weakness, when so widely open a confrontation between the two dominant political parties and slightly coming closer to civil war. The civil war too was to 'outsiders' easy to see the holes in a system that had been up to now unseen before. Who was really to blame, within seconds had switched from division to 'Israelis stand together in the face of war', and let go of that question immediately. 24 hours later now a barrage of blame game came upon the Prime Minister and his coaltion, calling him to accountability over the Judicial Reform split in the nation and that this had put Israel's security in a worldwide danger. Should there be a lesson to be learned here? What if Israel was truly in danger of an attack like that of 1967 in the 21st century? Only more militarily and cleverly (anti lockwise) synchronized? The military visual must have been that Israel is always attacking in a straight line one on one, but how and where will it go when it has to attack or defend from different fronts and also keeping the narional home front absolutely safe? Israel has about 9 mln people, of which seven million are Jews, and most of them are reservists. Four fronts, logistically and battalions should be in a matter of seconds placed in the right position. After 1967 this was one experience no enemy of Israel would try again, or was that now truly myth to the generations after, in Israel and the rest of the Middle East?

The moment President Isac Herzog called to the International world to immediately condemn this attack on Israel the world knew how deep Israel was in trouble. Retaliation sorties were carried out today by the IDF, for almost the whole day in Gaza and on Hamas inside the Lebanon border, North of Israel. Last night (8 April, 00:48 AM, present time) the Prime Minister had called all Air Force reservists to be ready. At the same time since the rockets were fired into Israel from Hamas on the border of Israel and Lebanon, there was also something of a remarkable moment. This was Israel's first time without the US immediate response. Where do we go from here when the US to them this had equally taken them by surprise, too? Was this non visual? Let's hope and not to make the present technological systems outdated before its time! From a fifth dimension angle surely it could not have been randomly to decide to attack now? It is for this reason perhaps the best to do is to unite behind the Prime Minister and the people of Israel.


In memo: the killing of prominent Palestinian journalist Shereen Abu Akleh her death still remains mysteriously also 'non visual', as if the weapon had never been.  












5 April 2023


To former Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett. 


Seder evening.


Israelis came out against destroying something the coalition had/ has proposed on the Judiciary and its old 75 year old system. Democracy that had started as a social(ist) project was never really understood again since the eigthies why it was what it first was called a democracy. Two different eras, before the eighties and next the capitalist rise under Mr Netanyahu, still the longest serving prime minister of Israel. Era one: keeping Jews that fled Nazi Germany and the 'democratic process' coming to Israel as early colonists had purpose to keep the unity of different sectors as a unity, in the face of hostile enemies against Israel's establishment. There was no particular care in these hostilities for the fleeing of hostile Europe of Jews. Unity was then to bring together the professionals and ordinary people together and envision a Israel in which they could be living. Kibbutzim and moshavs are one proof of this new idea to bring doctors, civil engineers, politicians and ordinary people together, income and social engineering (what wasn't then yet born). Enriching the living of their home as a Jewish land. Era two created its own new vision under the incumbent PM, Mr Netanyahu. A capitalist vision and more globalist as other old world order globalists. It looks only important to remember today that Israel is a political system, now awakening again.


As for the apartheid, this will not change the political grammar of the State. Apartheid, indeed only serving as a convenient word. Which enemy has given Israel a plausible meaning of why it calls Israel apartheid, if only now the world can hear and see a first political revolution rise in Israel? If apartheid, what reference to politics? When the military and its ministry have committed atrocities against any people within the same territory as Israel, apartheid should refer to a political establishment, which in this case is contradicting the argument. E.g. that Israel is the occupier and living on stolen land. It is half hearted to now see for the first time a political revolution so wide of scale, that no nation can ignore as a legitimate peoples who enriched their country, political, economic, and State- wise. It seems hard on the one side to admit that for a fact, as it requires deference from nation to nation in the civilized world of older democracies. Israel is on their own, let's say when the revolution will not stop at the point where it has arrived in the streets of mass demonstrations in the cities. It is almost certain that further escalation of the fight against the Judiciary system could spark some sort of more intense confrontation between the different parties in the coalition and opposition. External out of Israel the world has a choice and one of them is not to indulge in prejudice against the young State at a time so difficult for its citizens. It cannot be like the Amalekites, once more.


Yours truly,


MCT........................................................












Crossroads: the Jewish State and the State of the people, Israel April 2023.

Prime Minister Netanyahu once more has proven to the whole world that he is as enigmatic and ordinary as he can/ wants to be when enjoying life as a Jewish leader in Israel. He has a family, with his wife Mrs Sarah Netanyahu and two sons in adulthood. A man of civil(ized) standards, and not only according to Israeli law. In the rest of the world of many politicians it is expected when Conservatives to always put high standards to the front. It tends to lead them in a just and serene path. In Israel however decency has many mirrors in politics and even more so in every day life. The ancient world of peoples in the Middle East since the days of Ur or Uruk (c. 3200 B.C) for some reason thought of the mirror and its reflection to be more than cosmetics. This we will never understand in the west, north, south of the planet. Has the Prime Minister been caught by this 'divine magic' when watching his image reflected in his face as the only one who was high born as a Lord of his people in our modern world? Greek historians call such great men Titans. Walk and talk like angels fallen to earth and to marry mortal women, the daughters of the earth of men who were most beautiful. The myth of the white bull and Europa, so to speak. The Prime Minister has become a different kind of man throughout his career as Israel's longest serving prime minister. The simple fact is that Mr Netanyahu, as is perceived by the rest of the Jews and nations, is no longer receptive to how the world works, but has instead become what he really was born for to be in the end: a man so blasé and who could no longer be endowed with the heart of a human. It is not strange that now he is eating the flesh to the bone of his people as if he was eating sweet sugarcane. What mr Netanyahu has become was for the late two decades already beginning to show when first stretching out his claws against any enemy of the Jewish State and nation worldwide, that he was always going to be a different class of his people. What relevance has this with the political upheavel in Israel as we speak that is ongoing, something that was triggered by no other than the Prime Minister himself in person? Correction: Himself in spirit and person. Religiously, one could also see and say, that the Prime Minister is at the same time at a crossroad with the God of Jacob, Ha Shem. Let's pray to the God of Abraham this is not going to be the Prime Minister's temptation, and overrule God his kindness and ancient greatness, to serve Israel.

It is this commandment of the Ten Commandments that the Prime Minister will come to meet with in his final days as prime minister, exactly for that reason because he is a Jew. You can't 'return' to the land of your ancestors, Abraham, Jitschaik and Jacob, and not be tempted in a more zealous way than your capricious self as a 'ruler' of the people of Israel by the 'First Commandment'?! It is this part in the Torah that also sets a Jewish king or leader apart from other nations on earth. Prime Minister Netanyahu has set his blood above that of many, good or bad, as a Jew, one of a kind. No enemy will ever forgive the memory of Mr Netanyahu, that such a man was once walking the earth next to other and many more powerful nations. It is a fate that has no relation with any other politics on earth. In a democracy and 75 years reinstate of the Jewish people in Israel, all written in this writing is irrelevant. Up to the point when being judged by the wisdom of Rabbis who would be astonished, because what if it may hold the truth? Is not the God of Abraham a living God with his distinctive demands from His people, in time untold or told? If the Prime Minister will leave the center stage of politics as a man who has lost relevance, the people have won as king for a day, since they too do not understand that God Almighty is the father of Israel and giveth great powers to whom He wants. A good rabbi should cast his attention to this remarkable fate of the Prime Minister and explain to him how he should exit power. In other words, this 'great man' his mikvah is to become Jewish again and wash away his secular mantle of power. Democracy will also come parallel to the exit of the most powerful man on earth, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, a Jew of Israel, in a slow process with or without him, according to station and with ancestors in heaven.

Post Benyamin Netanyahu, peace and justice should rule. A man and his name should take the procession of time to fulfill this next leadership, and perhaps who will be less coveted according to Torah than his predecessor?

Yours truly,

M.C.Taytelbaum












Israel: imperative is to restore trust again in the Prime Minister.

28 March 2023

After this period when Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu stood between the two pillars of Knesset to bring down Baal, the image which he was adored by the nation, the question is now how to bring back Knesset together and its new creation of Jewish heritage and the political democracy. No one knows how he is planning on unifying the country and its citizens back to basic law in the order of the day. For a brief moment it had looked as if Prime Minister Netanyahu had planned the Judicial Reform for the last three or four years, what now seems illusionary at best and worse to be void of real reform. Reform should not be ficitonal at any stage in a democratic process, as this is the work of constant progress and improvement. Older democracies know the cost and balance (new fiscalities after reform to impose on the citizens) of such improvements, and put the house back in order, but especially after a mini revolution against government proposals to the Basic Law. Mr Netanyahu has not only put the country and its people in a state of national confusion, but when ending up in a dead end street something then has gone terribly wrong within his coalition. Outsiders have kept schtum in the rest of the world, perhaps exactly for that reason (and not very unethical from their point of western view). What was the enhancement for that the Prime Minister was viying for when he pushed his call for Judicial Reform and to make democracy more wider to help put the country in a place of its own with the rest of the world? The protest demonstrations thirteen weeks long have given the rest of the world some idea why and what matters most to Israelis in the 21st century. The window of democracy in Israel went wide open to the global community, but without the necessary political real interests to both sides of the House as to what it wants to offer to the people. New hope? New sacrifices, or a new State for the Jewish nation? The Prime Minister of Israel has probably missed out this time on the most important political factor of Israeli democracy: unity. And how could it be with the extreme Right- Wing parties being part of his coalition? Has the Prime Minister his mission failed terribly and turned to a hate fest amongst the nation? The third temple was burning and it wasn't yet built and throwing people out from the high walls. That is not a very good bode for the future Jewish State in Israel.

The understanding any outsider gets from the result of the last election in November 2022, is that the choice was made for the Prime Minister and his coaltion the majority of Israel had voted for. A very important fact no matter if it feels a little tight for the feet in these new shoes. Where then did it go wrong after the election? The Haredim Parties came through and were from this new moment part of the coalition and wanted immediate change from their own definition of what they see as a government. It is not as simple as that, so it now proves after the violent eruption from the other side to what is not considered Jewish Orthodox. It is this part in the Judicial Reform that the Prime Minister is keeping obscure and as if there is a deliberate omission of truth and to stay rather vague. Outside of Israel Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu is not unfamiliar and is in fact known for his liberal views and also that he changed Israel into what it is today as the world has seen on the streets of Tel Aviv demonstrations. What the Haredim want, a Jewish State first, democracy second, is also not an unreasonable demand, 75 years later. Lets not forget what happened in the last World War between 1940-1945, when the first who suffered at the hands of Nazi Germany were in fact the Haredim (European Jews). Adolf Hitler had his prophecy made ready on the State of Israel, that it could never be made or happen, as Jews were not capable to reinstate the memory of their ancient religion in the land of Palestine, now a geopolitical magnitude. On the basis of an old prejudice this Jewish State should be part of the politics in Israel. Infinitely truth is in the New Testament (Luke/ Matthew), that the Jewish heritage as of ancient Israel is not fiction when ask, who was David? Who was Joseph? The Jewish heritage is Israel, c.q. in modern times to be known as the Jewish State of Israel and its people. Geopolitical one can only make reference to what is ancestral, without hate or deliberate hate. And here is where we see why Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu will not be the man to bring the nation to the level of a credible dualism fitting the needs on both sides in this democracy aisle, the Haredim on the one side and the secular or liberal Jews on the other side. For now we have to wait for that man to build the Jewish State next to the will of the Jewish State from the ancestral universal truth. Let's hope that this man will come soon and clear up the mess the nation is now in after their revolution against the Prime Minister void plans for Judicial Reform in Israel.

Delilah?















Steady as she goes, Sir Keir.

18 March 2023

The Labour Party is steadily and quietly heading for course into the future towards the final day when Britain will go back to the polling station somewhere near 2025. The time of looking behind is over and the new Labour is the Party that is now looking only toward the future. In comparison: when did the Brexiteers ever looked worried five/ nine months ago, fearing anything would suddenly change their perception having it all since 2016 and 2019? Labour would always have to look back, going to the usual places of pointing fingers at what they did wrong, as the Brexit government that never was or has ever been in being or Real Time is what the Brexiteers must have felt and what also was their universal truth. Sir Keir Starmer in a sudden serpentine giant twist has now been for the last five months changed that perception as in a millisecond, and introduced New Labour that will from now on only be working from and for the future. Looking back was never meant for the Labour leader anyway as this made him look like he was always lost for words and lagged behind the Tories in big chunks that he was never going to be able to catch up with them. Now we will remember him differently, still not being able to shake off the sticky bits of awkwardness and a bit middle aged nerdiness, but he is getting there where he was meant to be. He is looking quite more relaxed instead of bewildered as if not knowing where he was going. Or why he was in a position of leadership and being there for the Labour Party. Now people can clearly see that he has found his course, and that he is the man for the future, and here is where his leadership in the Party could yet become strongest a proof so unexpectedly. Beautiful when nature commands the leader his fate and fortune to change course from static confusion. At least this is how it works when it comes to politics in Britain. Brexit became half way brain- dead wherever the Brexiteers were looking and not going anywhere, blocked by a frame of their own making that one can only describe as ironclad. Labour could never come to power in the Brexit experience, as there was no such design yet made. The design is now made, and by no other than the Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer. It is even possible that the Brexiteers don't even know what has hit them.

It is equally important to say at this point, ten weeks into the new year 2023, that the Labour leader will not find any gratitude here or there among those having been quite happy where they were before. No one had then been bothered to worry too much about the future. Flatten everything, promise a rebuilt, and the deal with the electorate is done, short or long term, every time again and again, and tell them we must move on. Here there was no future for a Labour government, that would find it discouraging and disheartened ever to try glue everything back together. It was after all impossible to glue back parliamentary China together and shine as new conservation. The Brexiteers didn't understand what they were saying and doing, clearly when they had only one vase they were smashing or fragmenting slowly as they went on from 2019 into the sunset. Where was the other pair? Past and future come in pairs, antiquity or not. We are seeing something uncommon and so will it be when once in government to settle its realities, almost as if from an outside scheme. And proof for this is already falling upon the Labour leader in confused reports or challenges, from the public, media and critics of Sir Keir Starmer. Could it be that they are trying to block something? Their question now isn't about what the Labour leader stands for, too frightened that he may answer that he stands for the future of Britain? Perhaps. It is obvious that the Labour leader cannot afford to relax/ chillax either, but neither can the Brexiteers lounge like lazy lizzards sipping Martini with stirred emotion by the poolside again. The excitement last week with the budget announcement from Jeremy Hunt and Chancellor, was as good as medicine on dried out blood, to peel like live skin. For whom the skin or skint. The Chancellor of the Exchequer must have thought by passing the Labour leader and his Shadow Chancellor, Ms Rachel Reeves, that he never thought it so easy to overtake this curve. But will he miss the wall in the next one? Steady as she goes and Labour can do the next overtake, by hope and hard works prestige. This future matches everyone in the UK (and around the world) each and every month, what is your next pay/ income/ salary. You wake up every day again to see what's left inside your pocket to buy cheese, bread, milk or fruits (for children). The next rent, the next month, how much will you have left inside your purse? The future is inflexible on this point and it is time to make up for it by showing compassion and care, tolerance (bureaucratic rules), relax debt for those who are living more than five years under the povertyline, and so forth. The future, like a magician, shows you is inside your pocket, a dime? And not like what the Brexiteers are promising, pennies from heaven.














Unique isn't it to decide whether a country should have reform or a constitution, 75 years later since its inception in 1948.

13 March 2023

Israel is at a historic moment of political confusion if it decides to go ahead with what the coalition has proposed to do, that it wants to reform the Judiciary or several of its acts/ sections. Not many realize this but the emotion is also taking on something of a Mexican wave across the nation in serveral big cities in Israel. There is an unusual atmosphere building much similar to other cities in the western world, e.g. in Paris or Germany, with their street protests every saturday evening after closing of the Shabbat. Has the world ever witnessed this before what is happening in Israel as we speak in this moment? Ex Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni (next to Ehud Barak on Fareed Zakaria) lifted a bit of the veil as she explained to his audience that the protests are now becoming much more activated by their perception to stop the government and that the Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu should listen to the people. "The government is surprised by this," the ex FM said. "Here we see people who were not activists before, but are becoming more involved beyond the government's expectation and imagination." (Not literally quoted) Democracy, the Declaration of Independence, Judicial reform, what is the fight over and about where democracy had been given the country over 74 years much stability? If we in the global audience understood anything being said in Hebrew, reading or writing, we then perhaps could see the lead in their battle cry. And this goes for Turkey or Greece in the same curious way when taking a close interest in the region outside of your home town elsewhere in the world. Except that Turkey and Greece are old systems dating much older than the last century. Exactly, that is what is making the protests in Israel unique, as it happens and more precisely where it happens. The Mediterranean Sea coast and territory lowers on it a special descend to put it apart from, e.g. Europe close to the Danube or Black Sea. The people of Israel have the right not only to defend itself, but if succeed here with the protests will show to the rest of the world that it also has the right to decide its own political destiny.

The impetus has come from an unexpected corner in their society, maybe intentionally or just accidental, with the challenge to the Judiciary system in Israel. For many who do not agree with Yair Lapid, Center Left- Wing Yesh Atid leader, at other times now may think more seriously what he has said last weekend, not to see the protest as an end, but to see it as an opportunity. (Not his exact words) The Yesh Atid leader prefers to ad to the Declaration of Independence the constitution, maybe as an appendix to the Declaration of Independence. That would mean Israel is at a historic moment to up their political establishment and perhaps bring this to something more infinite, unexpectedly. Not a very bad idea, but how to realize this endeavour and virtue at this nuptial age of 75 (this year) years could prove an enormous challenge on both the people and their politicians, and not to forget their institutions still built as dwarfed columns in a Stately row of parliamentary/ Knesset memory. But there is legitimate protest if to keep the Declaration of Independence sacred to and by the people of Israel. Starting a State at 1948 in the Middle East North- side by the Mediterranean Coast, is and was an incredible audacious moment at the time of international persecution of Jews in the whole world, and dare then to create a State from the grain of desert sands to what it is and has become today. Not without one or two open vacuums in the Declaration if dealing with the whole of Palestine had other responsibilities and promises the first colonists had made up in cooperation with the international world. Where there could be no win- win situation is putting the DOI into a constitution, especially when reviewing certain words in the DOI. E.g., homelessness of Jews. In 1948 'homelessness' was referring to something of international rejection of all Jews, which has now changed to complete acceptance of the Jewish people living among the many other nations as equal or prominent members of society. What is not specifically mentioned was the Orthodox Jews to be part of the immigration from persecution Germany to Israel. And honest statistics of the growth of Haredim population in Israel shows however that they have increased into thousands and living in either Bnei Brak or other, e.g. in the old city of Jerusalem. With good hope in the hearts and minds some sort of reform should help the parties come together, all depending what vision of Israel they want for the future. And when turned into a success, phew!

Additional the outsider's personal view of the DOI of Israel:

1. "The catastrophe which recently befell the Jewish people - the massacre of millions of Jews in Europe - was another clear demonstration of the urgency of solving the problem of its
homelessness -note 2023 International homelessness (domicile fixe - stable or permanent home)- by re-establishing in Eretz-Israel the Jewish State,..."

2. "WE APPEAL - in the very midst of the onslaught launched against us now for months - to the Arab inhabitants of the State of Israel to preserve peace and participate in the upbuilding of the State on the basis of full and equal citizenship and due representation in all its (note: underlined 2023) provisional and permanent institutions."

3. "WE EXTEND our hand to all neighboring states and their peoples in an offer of peace and good neighborliness (note: replace with word. Kinship?),..."

4. (Note: underlined- 2023)
PLACING OUR (selfless/ unselfish) TRUST IN THE "ROCK OF ISRAEL," WE AFFIX OUR SIGNATURES TO THIS PROCLAMATION AT THIS SESSION OF THE PROVISIONAL COUNCIL OF STATE, (sacred to the nation note 2023) ON THE SOIL OF THE HOMELAND, IN THE CITY OF TEL-AVIV, ON THIS SABBATH EVE, THE 5TH DAY OF IYAR, 5708 (14TH MAY,1948).

Note 2023: Tempt not providence!














Outsider's view: Israel.

10 March 2023

Outsider's view: the ground principle is for always testimony, e.g. that the principle is referring to the State with minutes, name and nation as Israel. Another dominant law referring to Israel in the present time, should have a ground principle. There is no second (judicial) ground principle possible, or destroy the first, c.q. The State of Israel... The very same principle inferior to the Head of State, King and Majesty.

Outsider's view: communication hasn't been clearly enough; wanting reform is true that this is part within a democracy and the right of every civilian when 'said'. The parties who want more in- depth study of the reform in the end will decide on this whole issue. Transparency on reform should also be made public to the people and maybe stop the whole protest.


Additional:

This country is in the making. Sooner or later it was bound to clash being part dominant orthodox Jewish and partly democracy by representation. The people and authorities need thorough review, before deciding the future of the State.

Subsidy to the State of Israel comes the Two- State geopolitical agreement since the Oslo Accords in Washington DC, 13 September 1993, then signed between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat.












God Almighty save the King and his Prime Ministers... A new NI deal?


28 February 2023


Monday, 27 February 2023, came a very impressive day for most following the Northern Ireland protocol deal in the UK, with the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak organising the meeting with EU President Mrs Ursula von der Leyen in London. This morning with that also came much criticism from Brexiteers, and to some no surprise here with the former prime minister Boris Johnson disagreement on what seems to be Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's first impressive strike as one doing something impossible. Was this the right timing? Not to some. On this chessboard game with the King in his static place always there and never moving, the Prime Minister had made an exceptional move last week by deciding this was the moment to move the king a step sidewards, instead of a step forward. Player or chess piece (bishop?), which was Mr Sunak? And what had made imperative on his moves playing this tight and way out of the checkmate position with the old deal on Northern Ireland? In the shadow he must have noticed the impossible way out as the rook was making slow progress in the Labour Party under Sir Keir Starmer, and doing so for the last three months. In these new realities every factor matters that is moving forward power or victory in British politics. Following the same timeline as illustrated here above, Mr Sunak had no choice. Strategically the Prime Minister must have seen where he got stuck and where this could end up, cometh the by- election in May two/ three months from now. Keir Starmer in opposition, one could say, forced the Prime Minister to either bring back politics to the Brexit impasse with the Northern Ireland protocol, or sustainability. Isn't sustainability the bigger picture in all this unusual decision making from Downing Street No 10, and with this bring in the King to step sidewards and to meet with the EU President Mrs von der Leyen yesterday afternoon at Windsor? Hence the Windsor Agreement, renamed so for reasons yet unknown to the public.

Six years had passed since the referendum in 2016 and finalized in 2020, to leave the EU and leaving no trace behind of ever having been part of the Euro Zone. A group of unelected representatives of democracy without Britain, what could they be but as Aeschylus pais (child/ children) and feeling lost. Perhaps it had never occurred to many that wasn't the case to hurt the European Union's feelings, but that this was to take back control and the money (350 million) each week. And there is another story on rebate from the EU, if one can remember this well. Sans rancune, Mrs von der Leyen after meeting with the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak yesterday, made it very clear how the EU will perceive the coming days, weeks and time, as the new way to be productive and build on new ways to cooperate on common interests, between the UK and EU. The media in the UK this morning headlines said much as that the Prime Minister got Brexit done. Touché, all depending on the receiving end. No one wants to see the parties involved hurt or harmed by isolation or forcing solitary blocks of living communities in Northern Ireland, and hurt their life vitalities to continue as they had come to be accustomed to. AKA sustainability. What the world now has witnessed was that high profile politics means making the right moves and sacrifices, for the sake of belonging to one another in the family of civilized nations. The Windsor Agreement was also meant as a sign of civility, the Prime Minister said yesterday during his press conference at Windsor. And we must fully stand behind all government actors, Conservatives and the Labour Party, the UK, the EU, on this one (underlined). The God of Abraham will stand with the King, who without the need for further advancing will return back to his static role in all of this Brexit exceptionalism. Tomorrow is another working day and politics as usual. Labour still and fully concentrating to widen the scale of new politics and policies on growth and sustainability with the flavor of a broken memory: G-7.

Mrs Ursula von der Leyen EU President EU Commission. 












Intervening by exception from the monarch, a confusion?


History King's consent


25 February 2023


Note:

"In the UK and certain other Commonwealth countries, King's Consent[a] (Queen's Consent when the monarch is female) is a parliamentary convention under which crown consent is sought whenever a proposed parliamentary bill will affect the crown's own prerogatives or interests (hereditary revenues, personal property, estates, or other interests)." (Wikipedia)
"In 2014 the House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee undertook an investigation into the basis of the practice, and concluded after hearing expert legal and parliamentary evidence that consent is indeed a matter of parliamentary procedure.[9] The committee noted that if parliament wished to abolish consent it could do so by resolution, without any need for legislation."

Erskine May- "... The author defended the practice of prior communication between parliament and the crown on the basis that, without Queen’s Consent, if parliament were to dispose of the interests or affect the prerogative of the crown against its wishes, the crown would in any event be able to protect itself by refusing royal assent. Queen’s Consent, then, he considered advantageous, as it avoided the need for the crown to exert its prerogative in such a way.[10] Recent editions of Erskine May drop discussion of the advantages of the practice, and simply state that under certain conditions consent is "required",[11] leaving unsaid the implications of its not being given."

Etcetera.


Subject: Brexit, if questioned from tassel to fringes.


In today's Breaking News (SKY) UK: PM was 'naïve' to try to involve the King in NI negotiations...

Twitter response (Yours truly):
"The king 'intervening' in this particular case can't be seen as naive when Brexit is in danger becoming a replubic- style country if it cannot solve this problem with the rest of the world.
Or maybe I am being naive."













Israel.

15 February 2023

Would the opposition gamble with the people's vote, democracy and future of the State of Israel? It is somehow to many outsiders maybe not possible to see whether Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid has lost the plot on Judicial Reform tonight or not (article JP-Yair Lapid is drunk on Israeli judicial reform protest success - editorial ). There are two parts in his line of thinking: 1. that he is an experienced politician and 2. that he has lost the election to the former prime minister, now Prime Minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. Should protests of the last few weeks in Tel Aviv and this week on monday in Jerusalem come to him as a very important signal to negotiate a different deal or at least represent the people protesting by thousands in the streets and make their point heard, between the government and opposition? And there are also other signs within the coalition of having much trouble to maintain a steady course and start governing properly. Kicking the Prime Minister at this early stage as he is in danger going down with his coalition seems unnecessary force to make the - second sacred after Torah- political point about democracy and how to preserve the civil rights of the people in the State of Israel. That is how the opposition operates to save the country from 'bad leadership'. Post last election in November 2022 now everyone seems to be saying that they voted for the coalition partners and a Right- Wing government, but that they did not know then what was meant by Judicial Reform. Here there was another important issue omitted, either by the campaign managers or by the opposition, to get the votes, or to gather the votes needed to win the election, when this Judicial Reform was discussed by Likud leader Mr Netanyahu two years prior to his victory in November four months ago last year. The least to do for the leader of the opposition is to call for a referendum on the Judicial Reform in its existing writing and becoming a new writing. How timing in the Middle East works for democracy in Israel is another thing. When was first heard of Mr Netanyahu trying to change the Judicial System?

One can say many things about Mr Netanyahu one of them will not be the lack of transparency on his intentions after the indictments & alleged crimes he is standing on trial for. It is dangerous at this stage to leave out the 'political truth' of the Prime Minister, and that he in many ways is still doing politics to forcing all outside his Right- Wing coalition to make the wrong decisions, political decisions to be more precise. As said here above that doesn't mean that Mr Netanyahu doesn't have any problems right now at the moment, with Minister Itamar Ben Gvir on the one side and two more other new ministers and ministries under Bezalel Smotrich and 'fathom' Arye Deri who is barred from his post to be the Finance Minister. There is no exact name for this kind of governing model or government found just yet . Although, some believe in the political canvas once ready that it will be hung out from the State of Israel as a large wall with an Israeli Nightwake/ Nightwatch of Rembrandt, of all men with a pointed vertical sabre and swords guarding the peoples and country. Israel is dealing with more immediate problems in Judea and Samaria, if it continues to build settlements in the disputed areas, A, B and C. The Bennett- Lapid government and their balancing act to maintain the moment of quiet perhaps came closest to rebuilding something of an Israeli- Palestinian political dialogue intermezzo/ interval. At this point in the protest against the coalition and their intentions to change the Judicial System in the State of Israel, perhaps the only conclusion should be that both leaders are responsible politicians and not to gamble foolishly against the people who are becoming victims of their pride. What can a future democracy in Israel mean to the younger generation, but how must the older generations immerse in this political mikvah?
The land over Jordan and being the land of milk and honey will remain always like the ringtone of your smartphone in the 21st century. And the issue on Judea and Samaria remains the most troublesome at all times still...













Many in Britain are getting to realize that Brexit cannot be reversed.

7 February 2023

To reverse Brexit the arbiter would have to be the Geneva Convention, as it would proof that the nation was not capable of taking this kind of high profile decision on its own, and was more or less led by politicians in whom they have put their vote and trust to leave the European Union. A good shepherd leads his flock to grazing pastures and waters, and not to an imaginary well and only sands fata morgana. One must question this outcome based on where the nation has been looking for the grazing pastures and wells. Politically this is making it all the more harder to continue along the same path as that of the Tories (Right- Wing) for Labour, let's say that the Labour leader would win the next general election in 2024. The Brexit deal was a binding International Treaty and it therefore cannot be reversed. The arbiter will know his/ her job and see it too, that what some are now saying e.g. to 'rejoin' the EU under a different set of agreements between the UK and EU, on trade or regulations, could only be when EU laws agree to 'free trading' between the Member State and the UK out of the EU. And there is such a subtle difference: trading and trade are two different laws. The first referring to bilateral economic rules (no law) and the second is law to comprehend different objectives within the EU, coming in and going out. The issue here however is not trade or even trading. One need will certainly be that of the view before Brexit and the EU nations, and the other be of that after Brexit and the EU nations. You are inclined to feel with the Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, who in all honesty wants to do something back for the disappointed people who believed in Brexit and also the people who wanted to remain, and disappointed on a range of other reasons. No one doubts that the next general election will be Keir Starmer's electorate victory over the Tories, but others are more concerned about what Brexit might do to that victory. Perhaps the arbiter can do this much better and even go beyond the real motive for Brexit and ask for a copy of the design. Any responsible people and especially that of English politicians should have a Brexit model and original copy. You can't negotiate on a scribble and piece of cigarette paper. One could say that the Brexit plan copy must be next to the signing of Withdrawal Agreement as complementary. Is there such a copy?

Let's take it that there is a copy of the Brexit plan/ model, of course it will then be a lot more easier for Labour to come into government and than make a full checking on the objectives that the Tories have realized, and which ones still needed to be done. Mr Starmer could then form government and make promises to the people that Labour will deliver all of the plans that the Brexit model had designed when they left the EU. What fair is fair. And no one needs to 'rejoin' the EU, or reconnect Britain to the EU... And no one would also ask to rejoin and take it to the Geneva Convention. But if there is no such Brexit model copy should Labour now, six years later on, design one? In 3D that is perfectly legitimate, but in Real Time that would not be Internationally legal. The truth of Brexit seems an isolationist problem from the view of the Treaty. And if ignored by Britain the international world can / could make an issue of that. It is what Brexiteers wanted it is what Brexiteers now get. If Labour wants to win the next election it will be winning inside of Brexit and not inside of England/ UK. What does that mean? Outside the EU there is no one who will see Mr Starmer as one outside Brexit, because of wanting to remain in the EU in 2016. Everyone is entitled to an emotional mistake, but Brexit was meant for the whole of the UK. Its official name is: third country. And still the people are not aware of the complexities that go with Brexit, after 2016. It is quite and deeply tragic on one side when facing the nearest future, it is quite something else for those who voted to leave en masse. Brexit now doesn't represent a strong and sophisticated arbitrary power in the world, but a populist Britain and first time in a traditional Conservative Party. The fact now seems realistic enough to conclude in part I that Brexit has chosen a destiny of its own and has made that indefinitely, equals the Treaty of signing the Withdrawal Agreement. In order to reverse Brexit you will need to come to the Geneva Convention arbiters. 

Additional: free movement and free will (of a nation) make a critical questionnaire on why both are cemented as one whole issue in Brexit. 

(Populist Brexit, a term coined by the former PM of Israel, Naftali Bennett, in his five hours interview on Youtube saturday 4 February)












Tonight Michel Barnier to the UK: the door is always open for your return.

1 February 2023

My tweet: "Certainly, Mr Barnier, Britain needs a long term pitch view. 6 Yrs without the UK in the EU has made the Member States another mechanism, compatible only with the 21st century and not 19th century." (Daily Telegraph UK article: UK can rejoin EU 'any time', says Michel Barnier) Some of us are gettin confused from the latest news (bulletins) coming from the UK on the subject as here mentioned above. Six years has been a long time in terms of EU years. It is only lately that people are getting more to hear from the British press how bad things have gone for the British public and that many 'Bregret' the Brexit 'Yes' vote in 2016 to leave the EU. There was something of a landslide majority and was enough proof in the eyes and minds of the world to witness the great tectonic shift to make things better for 'only Britain'. Many ordinary citizens in the EU have not been affected in the slightest by the 'leave' of Britain, nor have any of the 'remain' been felt deeply loss on this side. We moved on. In the meantime at Top level EU and Britain the dynamics of leaving the EU had been another and whole different matter, then. Interesting as it may now seem with a possible return of the Labour Party into government, the question on the continent was getting back to having closer trade ties between the EU and UK, once again. But Labour's Keir Starmer has already made very clear that he was not to rejoin the single market or the EU. Mr Starmer is campaigning to make Britain and its people have a decent living again, after six years of Brexit failures. And the list goes on: NHS, NHS and the NHS. But also more strikes that go on as we speak across the whole country, now for a period of time.

The Tories or Brexiteers their message to the public is that the benefits will come some time later in the future, maybe the end of this year, next year or in four years. Labour might inherit the benefits of what they expect / forecast for in the coming time. It is therefore imperative for the Tories to stay in government and let the people once more vote Tory at the next election. When looking at their logic it is long term thinking. But without being too silly about it what was promised again on the double decker London buss in 2019? And perhaps also in 2016. £ 350 Million retrieved each week from the EU. It was the major benefit in the vote of Brexit and leave Britain. This in 2022/ 2023 when the country is on strike on a pay rise for people working in the NHS, schools, and other sectors? The EU does not fit in when it comes to industrial strikes in the UK and risk being conceived as 19th century. On the outside what is happening in Britain is becoming like the seventies again, seen only on TV in the rest of Europe and now perhaps on CNN in the US. Politically there is not a slight of chance even to have solidarity and 'feel' with the people of Britain, as they are sovereign and not in the EU, thus meaning completely within their own laws. These are two different forces and in the 21st century all EU citizens are familiar with only what they know on the continent. How can Britain return when circumstances have no compatibility between systems (EU and UK)? And to come back to Labour campaigning to restore relations with the EU it is perhaps better first to understand where Mr Starmer wants to take the UK: stay in the 20th century or join the 21st century with the EU and US partnerships? There will also be need of a mentality law. In the rest of the world nothing moves short term. Perhaps Mr Barnier was just testing the mood? For wasn't the Withdrawal agreement (art 50) a binding International Treaty?

Not to interfer but for Labour to make the case of higher ideology with their respected colleagues in the EU will be the hardest wall to crack open. The exchange will result in condemnation, since Brexit was not a concept of the bigger plan in writing for the country and the first minister had gone his own way since then, will or could not help Labour at this impossible stage when progressed out of the first two years when being in government. It will come down to who will then be the king's men and women for Britain. It is Labour, but Brexit is making that impossible as growth is sacred to a country and kingdom as that of Britain, but which the Brexiteers have never been able to materialise. Perhaps a little impudent to ask, but has Her Majesty the late Queen Elizabeth II been fully engaged on the Withdrawal Agreement signed by the first minister Boris Johnson? And what does Labour stands for? One is true according to many and saying that Sir Keir Starmer has fought hardest on the deal the Brexiteers signed with extremely smooth ease. It is one thing to get that wrong, it is another if found in contempt of Her Majesty, too. (Which does not fall on the side of the Labour Party under Keir Starmer)












As Keir Starmer deepens his campaign to win the next General Election in 2024 the hurdles are getting bigger as he makes his sprinting moves.

28 January 2023

Hurdles are perhaps part of the process as soon as you start your campaign toward a general election in most democracies. But this old political process in the UK will now face its first challence with the Labour Party leading in the polls (20 points ahead of the Tory Party) and become the first Labour government in Brexit. That seems just politics bringing this or that political Party to power and than it's all done. Wrong. That is only on the exterior of what Brexit after six years now means, being the easy street for the winning Party. Keir Starmer is doing particularly well for the last 27 days in the new year of 2023, bringing minds together wherever he meets with people in the country, or in the world of politics when asked questions that are serious, on a possible return of a Labour government in power and why this is such a good idea at this particular moment. The moment is fine and perfect for change in a healthy democracy as that of the UK, maybe many would say. Now, why is this so interesting to many outside the UK? And also making careful observations on a possible Starmer government. No one quite knows this appealing and why you can't just yet put your finger on it about the Labour leader Keir Starmer. He has already set out his plans for Britain's new approach when he does make it into government and become the first Labour prime minister in a Brexit led Britain, and putting more specifics out (reconnnect - David Lammy speech Chatham House last week) as the Labour Party wants to explain to the people why it is needed for change now. That is one giant hurdle if the Tory Party doesn't want this change. Again people outside Britain are very much interested in the Keir Starmer process to make Brexit work, for the UK and relations outside Britain.

When the cat gets out of the bag Mr Starmer will finally realize that some things will not change, even with the best of intentions or good will of the Labour government. Six years the Tory government has been kicking the high walls of Brexit outside of the EU and to a certain extent as they travel beyond the seas also with the United States. Anyone remember Britain pre- Brexit? And who can remember Britain as a third country in all of its history? The maturity of Sir Keir Starmer as the possible next prime minister, Britain can only thank its blessings that maybe the Labour leader can maybe bring about a tone of reconciliation with the EU after the battering of Brexit's withdrawal from the EU. One gets that impression from Starmer as the genuine 'king maker' to make good from the bad situation in the process of what they call 'legal implications', whether trade or goods traveling circular either from the continent into Britain, or to the continent. Others still want more proof whether the Labour leader, a lawyer by profession, has any understanding of the biggest hurdles he will have to face once when prime minister. Where the public comes in to all this booing at him is the sentiment of British resentment being in the EU or returning to the EU. He fought hard enough to stay / remain in the EU, some even are saying out loud. To discern Keir Starmer's motive for staying is harder when you take into account the meaning of the whole of the Withdrawal Agreement (art 50). He is a lawyer and one can only suspect that he must have known the meaing of art 50 and the binding agreement (at international level). Making his hard fight to stay in the EU all the more noble. Again: what do you remember of Britain and its sovereignty? The people alone can make out what they remember of Britain before Brexit. To the Labour Party that means soldiering it out to the bitter end if it is possible and persuade the EU that Brexit still is a deep political new establishment of the British government (Michel Barnier on LK sunday- Peace & Stability), as a starter. And maybe to say that where it lacks humility and respecting colleagues in the EU, it will now have a Labour leader bringing politics back to high level discussions between men and women in British and EU politics.

The present Tory government is nothing like the hubris of Margaret Thatcher, a highly functioning Tory government in the UK and on the global stage. Through the political veins of the present time Labour leadership shadow ministers, once again the desire for a highly functional government is ardently present. At least so it seems from listening to Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves and David Lammy. More hurdles for the Labour Party on the way to No 10?












The war in Ukraine might become Keir Starmer's Hecate.

22 January 2023

It is important to keep assessing the situation in Ukraine and the Russian constant on proceeding with its military occupation of Ukraine's infrastructure. Between today and spring 2023 if this situation intensifies again the western allies (NATO) will be in a new crisis level how to deal with Russia and save Ukraine, that is 1. safest for Europe, and 2nd limit the damage of disruption wherever beyond the battlefield when ongoing and raging. With the Labour leader still in his nuptial mission to become the next prime minister at the general election (date?) either this or next year, and many cheering his rise to power even passionately, might come to an abrupt end even before it had a chance to test or try its political destiny to get into No 10. One such fateful road obviously is that, but the other fateful road is that the government might take this chance into yet another merging with 'victory', and that the Brexit government alone can/ could rise to the occasion. There is of course a shorter version of that narrative, but what can it change for Mr Starmer? On the Labour side there seems to be a very capable Shadow Defence Secretary, Mr John Healey, and who in his long serving career under various PM's, has an impressive career built up, and in abstract could have been the right Minister for Defence if in government when reading his professional roman vecu (info Wikipedia). He could have worked closely with the US, and with the EU, from wherever this particular peculiarity of Brexit would then had come to be under the new government and also a Labour government/ Starmer Administration. It is here where the problem gets strategically awkward, something that wasn't here before Brexit. If the war between Russia and Ukraine will intensify during the coming months, to the government under the Tory Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, will strangely be an individual operation. Can the US work with its Brexit ally? An easy enough question. But on the side of Brexit that would be a complexity to deliver. And that does matter to the Labour leader Keir Starmer.

If the war in Ukraine intensifies to put it gently but blunt it will all be over to fight and lead the country to a new beginning under a Labour government. It is also a strange fortune that the Tory government alone can indeed rise to this occasion and with that win enormous ground to secure the next victory at the general election, such loyalty is natural to the British people to be expected and to support war heroes, defeat or victory. At least. Especially in Britain where military deep sentiment is regimental. And with the last briefing from Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and U.S. Army Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on last friday 20 January, the regimental sentiment can only be of greater importance to the Tory government. Here is where the road splits and spoils the campaign for a new election for the Labour Party in a sharp exact of not just yet relevant at this point. Or relevant at any such point in the nearest future. But that is just in one scenario from a general election point of view. And making all problems battering the country secondary. It is the way of a war of this global scale that can have its impact to change the fate of governments and countries. Is there another scenario the Labour Party can think of when circumstances create the most critical of thinking during the intensity of the war in Ukraine? (General Milley: this is an adversary that uses force- not literally quoted) What people will last remember of Keir Starmer will then be his words spoken in Switzerland at the Davos WEF 2023, to be rather in Davos than Westminister where he could meet people...














Changing policies is that a good or a bad thing for politicians?

20 January 2023
(00:45 AM)

This question was asked yesterday at Davos Switzerland WEF and put specifically to Sir Keir Starmer on the Energy (Repowering the world) Panel. Why did he changed his mind on nationalisation of private industries (aka industries in the private sector). Mr Starmer answered the question where he stood on the issue last summer in July and where he was now, where he had arrived at the eve of coming into government at the next general election. Policies clearly need a timetable, where changing your mind means that you are following schedule. In his answers that he gave at Davos yesterday timing was specific and he excecuted almost with natural precision to point out 'natural flow' of logic in his thinking. Take for example Ukraine. There is also a new situation for global cooperation on Energy and Gas, and one could almost here the Labour leader saying that he wasn't going to give up where things can only get tougher when you don't do anything or 'dare to hope' for taking action and get on to a different approach of the problem. He said it simple and clear, but in specifics he was pitching very clearly where to land the lunar module, quietly and steady on the throttle and pitching. How was he planning on getting his green industries on the global industrial platform? First he must get elected to be prime minister. Yes, but can he make the investments more efficient when it comes to oil and gas? His answer: he will not invest in oil and gas, if net- zero was the target. Wasn't that a bit over the top and unrealistic in Real Time? Well, big answers are for later. The net- zero thing to be honest isn't something anyone can say what that looks like, in Real Time. If natural it needs to be contained by something of a formula. No one has yet built a control mechanism for the point of net- zero. So, maybe not just yet so over the top.

It was a different discussion panel and was also not uninteresting to their audience. Grant Shapps 'next door' on another panel also had done his best to look business- like for a Tory Minister of Transportation and Business and being here at Davos Switzerland. A truck, a driver, diesel and movement, something the Transport Minister must have dealt with more than a hundred times everyday. Logistics can be very tricky and sophisticated when it presents the whole of global industrial worlds. When you visit Davos to represent industry or the economy of your country, you have to at least be/ show more self interest in your discussions. Be it of course in a moderate and global way. What is global nowadays? On the Energy Panel with Keir Starmer a lady had said something of great interest. Energy Union, in her closing statement. She would want something of an Energy Union as a new idea. If President Vladimir V. Putin continues the war in Ukraine, maybe that would not be such a bad idea and create a Global Energy Union among the different Members of a United Nations? From Tanzania also the respresentative in her speech talked about a global effort, e.g. on resources, supply of technical support and motivation to face these new challenges. Senator Manchin, also on the panel, wanted to work with anybody and not just Right or Left (US Politics). What can you do about EU regulations and bureaucracy expediency? This question was asked to Prime Minister Mark Rutte of the Netherlands, which is true when he answered that bureaucracy in the right place does / can make a difference and it should stay this way. We in the EU are so used to bureaucracy it hardly impresses anymore. It becomes every day life and natural second nature. New terminologies: IRA, Black Mass. The industrialist and only one on the panel clearly had also made an interesting observation, that many are looking in the direction of how to work with Energy, but that not many had the question of what is Energy as a natural commodity. You could say that it was an interesting panel and that the discussion left us with a few rare moments of insight and where global industries are standing on the big issues and have tried to introduce their take or views.

The UK Labour leader and Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves everyone can see tonight why they will not be going home empty handed without a glass snow globe souvernir. What they see is that tomorrow it is another working day in the UK and in the rest of the world. Politics is back on the menu (roasted or medium rare). 












The constest for who is the more radical MK is Israel's latest ministry.

11 January 2023

Between last weekend thousands of demonstrators in Tel- Aviv and next sunday on 15 January for the second big demonstration to be held, against the coalition government of Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu and his radical policies, things are still not very clear what change these apparent policies make. Ten thousands demonstrators in the heart of Tel Aviv can't be a good thing of a good omen for the country. Yesterday in the Jerusalem Post the Minister of National Security, Mr Itamar Ben- Gvir, was quoted saying about the demonstration as disturbing the peace and whoever was or became violent to be arrested. He also has called for a ban on the Palestinian 'national' flag as a symbol against the people of Israel, especially during Israelis demonstration. If all citizens are equal and demonstrate against the government of Israel and not of Palestine, the Minister has a point from the national point of view. What it doesn't or does mean isn't very clear from his point. Violence breeds violence response, perhaps? Last year and not so long ago Israel had a relative good and healthy democracy, then under the former government Bennett- Lapid. E.g. no thousands of demonstrators had gone up to the former prime minister, Naftali Bennett's residence, and demand change of his government, with which the prime minister and his National Security Minister made a similar call to arrest anyone who was unruly or behaved in a violent manner. That is the kind of difference between the two democracies, the present time democracy in the new coalition under Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, and the former under prime minister Naftali Bennett/ interim prime minister Yair Lapid. From the point of view in the new democracy it should perhaps alarm the people going out to the streets and demonstrate against the government (Judicial reform), that violence harms the citizens if democracy has shifted to a more radical form. And is or seems also a wild search for something unknown to the citizens and their government of Israel.

The world can barely keep up with the new government changes in Israel and its internal disturbances. The Prime Minister isn't yet clear too, whether his government still is in his hands or that maybe he got something of a fever and has become an ardent supporter of radicalism Right- Wing in Israel. And that he is becoming a true redneck Sabra Prime Minister and to keep his coalition more than the top jobs together. In the meantime little will the people notice of what government is deciding or creating for all of Israel. This logic is not hard to follow, as its economy must keep going as it had/ has been doing for the last 74 years. It is a hard reality even for the MK's and Cabinet Ministers that nothing can break the bloodline of the economy and not go unpunished. Why should the Minister of National Security make sick his healthy democracy, economy and country? And why should the Minister of Finance Betzalel Smotrich want to do harm to the economy? Chaos will not pay off. The call to ban tax on soft drinks and plastic utensils for takeaways was very vocal by Minister Smotrich and could bring a reduction of environmental awareness among many, but especially when there are some even more prone to lax of that awareness. That isn't just a thing for radical activists in the environmental business, e.g. Greta Thunberg, Former Environment Minister Tamar Zandberg, and it would not decimate the Minister of Finance his masculinity to be more prudent and care for what he sees around him at home and internationally. Israel is physically, infrastructure and environment, still a high score and standard anywhere you're looking from and unto. The same goes for Israel's democracy, one can say. But it is not hard to understand how revolutions begin and where/ when they end for any young democracy. The testing in time is fine when diversity is not its main battle and the will to live hasn't been ended.












All the king's men.

8 January 2023

UK politics is exciting again and it is only the eight day of January 2023. From Sir Keir Starmer being the Labour Party leader to the future Labour prime minister in the recent days is becoming or has become more audible, should anyone not have noticed yet. This morning on SKY (Sophie Ridge) Mr Starmer was clearly a little more fluent in speaking the language of a politician in waiting to become the next prime minister. But how do you notice such a thing, when in fact repeating the same lines "My wife works for the NHS, my sister and mum also worked for the NHS..."? It could be Mr Starmer's political Labour campaign accent of the recent years now changing to a real talk the talk politician. And if he understands why he wants to be prime minister, well, to a certain extent he should do a little more interpretations of past and present truths. Also, no one has a rational explanation why this man is what Britain wants next in No 10. And this time it is imperative to see the rationality of his straight line going in as prime minister if he wins the fictional general election coming any time soon. Now a little about the other 'focus group' Mr Starmer and his team seem to be paying lots of attention to: Rishi Sunak and his team of MP's. Is it your intellectual feeding who so desires to know what this writing has to say about the Prime Minister and his team? 12 Years should be your answer. From a personal point of view, it is exactly the Keir Starmer straight line that seems to be so disturbing to the incumbent government that they are moving to plan BJ. Now, that could become a problem for the future for the Labour leader Keir Starmer. Hmmm... If Mr Starmer wants to move into big territory, aka Brexit territory, he will have to do this impromptu: "Impromptu speaking is a speech that a person delivers without predetermination or preparation." (Internet search engine) The public wants to know how natural the future prime minister is on his topics, and how experienced the other candidate is. After all it is experience that maketh the PM. And not Nadine Dorries, who wants Boris Johnson to make a spectaculair live come back. And who will save Brexit? Only the king's man, who by paradox can only be Keir Starmer.

No one could deny the Tories being all the king's men had Brexit had a marvelous time of prosperity on the Thames hanging like the gardens of Babylon to indulge the spoils of Brexit after leaving the EU. It was high profile politics then and should have 'remained' high profile politics now. If Labour can adopt the traumatic experience of Brexit and save the leave project six years later on, the boy will live and forget about the years of abuse from a biological father, sadistic and abusive. But it stays all in the family of Britain. Wasn't this said by Mr Starmer in his New Year's speech on thursday last week, that he will submit or bring the take back control bill in the first of the King's speech? How is it going or wasn't it true when a father applied justice and fairness upon the adopted son too? Six years later Brexit has become a necessity to straighten it out. And that means no more squandering of wealth and money, and stop the 'addiction' not doing things the right way. Does Labour have a plan? Oh, the tease to say no. Okay, something else. This Mr Starmer seems also to be a little of a Jekyll and Hyde personality, some have said about him last week on Youtube. It was shocking when these people pointed out his past truths and the those of the present time. When was politics ever straightforward? Yes, there are some controversial moments for Mr Starmer, but controversy like satire and irony are very healthy in politics at high level. There is no need to treat Mr Starmer like Sophocles Socrates in his last 'speech' and speaking the philosophical truth about a system calling itself the rulers of the people. A bit of class does make a politician speak truth proportionally realistic. Nevertheless it was point taken. Because it does spurs one to be more critical of Mr Starmer and his policies when moving onto big Brexit territory. He and his dog. A typical A- type of rustique portrait of the real English life. Does the Prime Minister has a dog, too? For some reason you can't stay in government to save Brexit. It is for the opposition to save Brexit, from the shepherd's point of view. It is a written constitution in his crook, you see. In which also or incidently the writing is about parliamentary 1-1 scale democracy and holding up somehow the international jurisdiction fiction. Which is why the latest forming of government in Israel (in the Middle East) is proving somewhat difficult holding up and being under pressure from the electorate that reject a different and more extreme government. Their democracy this year will be 75 years old in the making. The same goes for Saudi Arabia with Prince and Prime Minister MB Salman, with his strong desire to reform and inclines to democracy far more than any of the predecessors in his Royal family. Etcetera, etcetera. How does the saying goes again? Taste, medicine, your own? Back to the return of the Jedi Boris Johnson. It is only fair to say that this bullish man in fact has the heart and tears of a good man, if anyone cares to remember how he teared over the death of the Late Queen Elizabeth II while giving his speech in HC. And his love for animals does make one think again whether he could make a majestic come back to the House of Commons at the dispatch box. When it concerns the King and his family Boris Johnson does render all of his body and soul as if it was through the fire. And we are talking how politics is best served in big Brexit territory, from an English point of view and one that is wholly different from our view in the EU. For example it is true that we can only think that Brexit needs a four corners plan to make it known to the world how to build and rebuild their Brexit system, and very little e.g. what being English means to all Brexiteers in England. It is to them fork handles and it is to us four candles. As simple a mistake like that.












Is there a point for the new government in Israel to annex the West- Bank in area C?

31 December 2022

Two peoples, Israel and the Palestinians, and one 'land'. Not physical land (geograhy) on this or the other side, but one for both by earth's infrastructure or design. With incoming Minister of Defense and Finance, Bezalel Smotrich, Area C will expand the settlements under his ministry with the new sworn- in government under Benyamin Netanyahu as Prime Minister. Mr Smotrich in an oped on Wall Street Journal tuesday 27 December this week has said to act fully according to (his) the interpretation of the agreement of Area C where settlers can/ are allowed to build new settlements. From his point of view Palestinians have been determined to 'annex' this area as their sovereign rights and must be deterred if necessary by force of the military. Of course, that's a long shot. Legal or illegal was not recorded with specifics of the settlers in the Penal Law of Israel. But in fact paradoxically to Mr Smotrich's perception of law and order in Area C, the Penal Law stating differs on the same matter and meaning slightly. It explains the reason for keeping the British Mandate military law in these areas, and that it should have been changed after Britain had left Israel/ Jerusalem. Where the Palestinian people 'civil administration' want to go back is to the beginning of that apparent law in the Penal Law of Israel, and is actually a bitter struggle to find any written document of proof what did take place, time, and also what the exact nature here and then was 'said'. Britain, we have never seen or read, whether the Palestinians were informed of the meaning of their departure from Israel and within/ without the green lines in the early days. Strangely but true as far as in written words for the global community to see and read is what Mr Smotrich in the same oped has also said, that if the Palestinians were 'ready to talk' that they would find a willing partner in him. What most people in the world do not know is that all Israelis when Sabras are 'radicals', even when talking to each other or about the engine of their cars. It is nevertheless an important line not to dismiss as nonsense or meaningless that Mr Smotrich himself said so about being a willing partner to listen/ talk. The Palestinian people are no different from these 'radical' Jews, where home is Palestine.

Where one knows the difference from Israelis and Palestinians is that we have clear visual of one being physically undermined, subjugated randomly, and when in military gear and holding rifles either against the heads of 'militants' or a shot in the back / head from a rifle on a Palestinian 'de facto' fellow man/ woman in the land of Israel (from the river to the sea). If Israel wants to annex Area C what the Oslo Accords in clear language have designated Palestinian territories, what will the Palestinian 'person' become/ be named in this bureaucracy? Nothing is a problem right now for the Minister of Defense/ Finance in Israel. He will continue to get on with his plans in the West- Bank. Period. In the new world order democracy is a political institution for all peoples and governments. Globalism has done with the old order, much closer to the time when the world still had relics of its feudal past incorporated in all matters of State and politics. But our concern is only one external for Israel to deal with in a style and manner of its own and in its own time. Internal politics is another story for the State of Israel. On physical appearance to the global audience religious parties are men in black hats and suits. The decisions these men can take or make is beyond in another dimension of Israel. And history has taught the world also one thing about these men in black what they include and exclude in their society. Based on religion or orthodoxy. The angle where the same world is not looking however is where the same men are most vulnerable, either to blind vision or excitement for being in central government. All in the end will depend on their sagacity how to keep Israel religious and democratic with Mr Benyamin Netanyahu as their Prime Minister and of Israel. Perhaps Israel's longing is for having authentic religious leaders to govern the State of Israel, at least a vast majority of Israelis. The other 25% might not be so happy to play their part of subordinates to the rule of rabbinates. Food on the table, money to keep your family, and milk and honey in the land of Israel to keep continuity. The question however remains: which half will take the milk and who will have the honey.


Letter to Minister of Finance / Defense Bezalel Smotrich

Let's not forget that on the other side of the bloody argument for Palestinian rights of existence is a country fighting its argument for keeping its country Israel.
The simplicity of the argument has become a blinding vision after x decades since 1948. But fact remains indefinitely that there are two and not one in the argument here above.

It is here also the only basics for international law, and that rarely envisions the argument of two and not one.

The will of the people always remains a matter of politics through imposing the ballot via the ballot box. Israel has such a system, and it knows how the experience becomes rule of State and the fight for basic laws, notably in what is called the principle of democracy. It has also testified democracy since 1946/1948 and can make a true reference.

The argument however remains that the Palestinian people are claiming through their blood and living waters that their homeland, Palestine, was stolen by the people living in Israel, c.q. since 1948. And theirs in this is a reference to land and peoples, c.q. the Palestinian peoples.

A rather difficult perception for the international community and law to see the whole point and find the letter of law that was designed for such abstract a matter to clear.

The structure of law, as we have come to understand in the global audience 21st century, is based on human reasoning and within the frame of a built order, or some adequate kind of order.

It leaves no other option but to decide truth from the purity of letter of law on physical truth of order, which is democracy for one and the other the will of a people fighting to reclaim their land from this physical democracy.

Israel should however take its long testified and living democracy very serious under the new present time circumstances of government under Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu and avoiding to skip and leap the argument written observantly (non- entity) as such here above.

Its ground principle for all world democracies universally among governments is democracy. Messianic or other interpretations of State and rule are rare when in Israel, but nevertheless is written in its ancient documents of Levitical Laws. 


Yours Truly,


....................................................................................













The next test for the new government in Israel will be the passing of the next State Budget.

(Unedited)

26 December 2022

December 2020 Likud then under Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu could not pass the State Budget and government was dissolved. New elections for March 2021 were then called and Naftali Bennett accelerated his campaign to become prime minister next. Mr Bennett had started his campaign on the broken system of Israel and the economy, and even wanted to copy a Singapore- like economic recovery for the people of Israel. Public service needed badly upgrading, also this was going to change if he would become Israel's prime minister. The former prime minister of the government of change was making his moves as he went on campaigning to become prime minister from a third party position under Likud and its majority of seats in Knesset, when compared to the second largest party Yesh Atid in the country. That is not old news when facing the new situation in Israel after the general election on 1 November 2022, after the last government of change had to resign. This news and the last government in fact will matter a great deal as a democracy and perhaps its last moment in the history of Israel as State and country. And also it matters because politics and polemics are related. What the people of Israel are looking at today or tomorrow is the new government, again under the former and longest serving prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. Mr Netanyahu is claiming victory for a hardline Right- Wing government in the last election. His coalition partners of 32 seats and all religious radicals to the last hair breadth of orthodox Jews in Israel, however do not see it that way. Politically there was no reason to believe anything could change in deeply anchored democracy of Israel. Unless for the best, e.g. as in the government of change under the coalition Bennett- Lapid? In fact what was for the best of people and country the people voted out Bennett- Lapid and brought in the likely coalition of Likud- religious parties. But something did change the meaning of Israel over the last eight weeks. The religious parties are making every effort to 'clean up' things first in the land of Israel, or to be more precise everything considered religiously perversion, amoral according to Torah. And sentiments are already getting high in the public sphere over LGBTQ communities living in Israel as free and equal citizens over decades. Politics becomes somehow secondary under these radical demands to quickly show to the public that they are 'in' and the rest is 'out' to govern. De facto the religious zeal is acting on behalf of the Torah already this day. Can that be legal?

Not necessarily from the pointview of democracy alone, but also from the Torah itself. If radical no woman should excecute the law on men and society, without the permission of her authorities. We should take Torah very seriously and not underestimate authority from it too easily or at free will. The nature of Torah is not Kabbalah, with the latter going into another world of alchemist's powers and magic. The State of Israel becoming Torah ruled will require a more sophisticated approach and no woman shall have the authority to speak for a series of matters on life and death, such as medical opinions. In a modern day society women do the job of men, even in the religious sector in Israel, to watch over their children and whoever approaches them. Most parents do, but the religious women or wives to religious men are extremely more hawkish when it concerns their offspring. We understand, Israel is not a European Union country, the UK, or the USA. Schools are meant to be pedagogic until adolescence and move to higher education. Medical Health (not pharmaceutical industries) operates its 'public health industry' on law and ethics. If there is an issue of conscience the board will have to listen and take on the patient wishes, from a technical and ethics point of view (and not necessarily environmental). To take this from a religious ministry without medical ethics (international law and standards) that will not be considered wise. Let's remember again which State of Israel is in power? If religious the subjects will have to listen to the authorities in power over Israel and its people. Ethics does not only mean swearing a medical oath of Hippocrates, but also is financially independent in some countries and others like Israel it is State dependent. And this is just an approach and example how realities really work in most democratic countries. Israel simply does not have the technicians among the religious parties just now. Perhaps in a much later stage most of these practical problems will be solved to fit the State new profile of country and the people. Having said a little here in the above about the situation in which the people are finding themselves with the radical moves of the religious parties in Israel in the incoming government, financially a State will still need a State Budget to pass. It is perhaps too weak an argument now to say that if Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid their democracy barely passed the last State and Financial Budgets, under much less radicalism or extremism, how will a State Budget get to pass this time under the threats of 'natural selection' over 'unnatural selection' random practices? Is it not more humane first to allow people to leave Israel if they cannot proceed to live free in a/ the religious State of Israel? (Not yet de jure) Executing should not become passive liquidations by simply say the religious authorities will decide what or who should be excluded from public services and who not. Again, be very careful taking these radical steps in a world living in the 21st century. There the people in greater powers will look for motive and not cause and consequences. It is how they will examine the sting of bees.

But the law for democracy can stay on if the religious parties can make an absolute presentation of political and Torah representatives to be in government, and not only study Torah, but also political development while being faced with the new situation. No one thinks it can't be done, but to make it sublime you must think hard and with exteme caution how to reach your goals. Public opinion and global opinion abroad will become unknown phenomenons to live under or experience. During the years of Exodus from Egypt nothing had been perfect then and there either. This should infer some compassionate ground for even those the religious leaders of the 21st century in Israel consider 'filth' among civilized people, one can carefully advice. There were the Korahites who were swallowed up by the middle of the earth being too overzealous over certain issues; and there was Dagan who in his cunning wanted to bring the people back to Egypt under the fleshpots of bondage and Pharaoh. These stories are written in the Torah. If absolute Torah rule is it not that kings are subjected to priests serving/ ministering in the Holiest of Holies in the temple? The absolute question should then be who is king to be subjected to the 'religious priests' in the 21st century in Israel? If the king listens, the people will follow the king's example. And the people even listen today to what the King's Christmas speech is when spoken by the king in person, addressing the people. All ears, even that of politicians and critics right and left are listening. If the parties or other 'tender' half of the Likud coalition in the new government want to exclude and expel the LGBTQ people, than let them do this humanely. It doesn't mean that the International world will not be critical against such measures, as this will be in great conflict with the human rights act. Israel could be downgraded to less than e.g. a developing country (like Egypt)? The Shekhel may suddenly plunge instrumentally, and so forth. And enemies even passive ones could take strength from all the 'fall of Israel' as a failed democracy, and making 'the one and only democracy in the Middle East' a mocking on how Jews run things. In a democracy integrity cuts both ways, left and right each is the sharp end of the blade.













LGBTQ people living in Israel as Jews under the new radical religious+ Likud government.

24 December 2022

MK's Smotrich and Itamar Ben- Gvir in a radio statement have said yesterday evening that LGBTQ people should not enjoy service in businesses where this is involuntary by the shopkeeper. (Words to read from the article on the JP) Will this become law against LGBTq people? Interesting. If that is about to happen in Israel against Jewish citizens the world might think it a good religious idea and copy/ ape the government in Israel/ Home of the Jewish people. Who brought LGBTq people to Israel in the first place? I wasn't trying to be funny on this occasion. The heart of the matter is incredible serious. With new powers to be in government for the religious parties one can understand their zealous to do things in ways they have wanted for a long time in memory. The question however remains is to quiz on the implementation of any law, good or bad. That is how the process of 'making' laws work. What can the reason be without this process when no one considers repercussions, not necessarily physical, but rationalities might end up entangled in a ball of thread. There is a credible argument here to give / render Mr Ben- Gvir or Mr Smotrich their demands for public service with limitations on the LGBTQ people to serve or services be denied to them, but by the law of freedom and democratic rights the same law might obstruct the 'free will of the people' democratic specificness. Both MK's have studied law, so it says in their curriculum vitae. Remember, gentlemen, both MK's, waiting patiently is better virtue and not to enter before marriage the respected bride to be. Law is not any different. No one can change any law without proper work on the meaning of what it will or might excecute as 'penal law'. On another matter more pressing here if this becomes law as Mr Gvir and Mr Smotrich have said in the land of Israel, to excercise great caution and think carefully again. What is allowed in Israel amongst Jews will also apply in the rest of the world, masked by 'helping' Israel to do the decent thing. There is also the matter of accountability on the issue who had brought LGBTQ people to Israel, as in 1976-1980 no LGBTQ freedom of expression was yet present. That might help pronouncing the law against LGBTQ public expression in civil life by first date to the last date (e.g. with incoming government under radical Jews and religious parties).

With Israel transforming from a representative democracy since 1948 to a radical religious State, however desired by the puritain thought of all inclusive Torah, also makes another mistake when neither history of the Jewish State will matter nor the Religious State of Israel. Four years from now might become a neutral free zone after the term in which the religious parties have had their 'demands' to control Israel in an absolute manner, but that once democracy is out it will be to any other form of leadership an open field to be the next leader. That might e.g. become a totalitarian military- police State. Who can say we are not looking at the possibility of having a leader to take control (by coup d' etat) and yet again transform Israel? Coming back to the present time as in previous writing it is equally important to 'allow' all that the God of Abraham allows for Israel and to lead the people. One gets that impression with which the kind of haste the Party leaders Ben- Gvir and Smotrich want to race to the center politics of Israel and calling democracy their right. We have lost count in the meantime whether that is de facto or de jure. And there is somewhere in the middle line a very thick steel length of time the incoming Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. To want to be in power is not the same thing as being a consummate leader of x political power time. No one should underestimate Mr Netanyahu his experience in his 'empire' he alone led for decades. Where others see reality in Israel, Mr Netanyahu knows that he created realities for Israel! For Mr Ben- Gvir and Mr Smotrich these big questions will become effective almost at immediate rate of speed the following morning or day 1 after sworn in the new government, with Mr Netanyahu as Prime Minister. That to be absolutely true makes it impossible to read as negative, and no matter how you turn it still to be the only nature it understands with Mr Netanyahu, is a compliment. After all it is democracy (the only one in the Middle East) and 'modernity' (his own words) that made Benyamin Netanyahu the only true advocate on the global stage against medieval rule in the Middle East. And not the other way round being 'radical orthodox Jew' against the rest of the mundane world. Proof for this are his trials on gifts such as cigars and champagne. It is therefore extremely important for Mr Ben Gvir and Mr Smotrich to take an absolute road to politics and Torah.












UK: what will a Labour government look like in Brexit Britain?

23 December 2022

New Labour has every chance of a possible landslide success if general elections were held next year in 2023, but not any time sooner. The reason for that is because Labour got stuck with old Labour before Brexit and after the general election defeat in 2019, when Boris Johnson took the Tory Party by an absolute majority of 80 / 364 seats into a landslide victory. Three volatile years of Brexit since then had followed. Common sense is very simple by design, that if Labour wants to make a comeback at the next general election it will have to be more constructive, build more on everything that went wrong during Brexit, as dull as it may be or sound, and also they will have to be the first Labour government in another time since Britain had left the European Union. Once Keir Starmer can understand both levels of what was and what is now in the present time, where the Tories have arrived and could leave again if they lose, from that point the chance of a Labour success can be unexpected but the new reality for the UK. One difficult threshold will be to convince the public why things will be different this time with a Labour government. Some might ask since when did the Labour Party and its leadership have come to understand what it means to be living in Britain and not being part of the EU anymore. Put in many policies in places where the Tories have failed the public and among that many of their own voters, will not make a convincing argument. Brexit is an argument only understood by hardliners Brexiteers. How they remember taking back Britain after the referendum in 2016 is a frenzie no Labour government or leader will ever be able to make that their/his own. Nigel Farrage last night said "Britain is broken". And that coming from a fierce supporter of Brexit is not telling you about the politics of Brexit, but about Brexit as a failed economy. Mr Starmer will still not be able to catch that electric eel with his bare hands if he wanted to and with the best intention of the world. He knows the car has broken down and desperately wants to fix things and to make it run again, but how many voters will not see the difference bringing back from the Labour garage classic cars spare parts assessories that do not fit the new look of electric hybrid cool cars running on smart technologies? It will take out much of the Tory slickness. In more explicit simplicity: you want to change it make one of the same kind that is broken, or make the car even more smarter.

It could be that the hardliners Brexiteers know that Labour got stuck in its old seats and diesel (engine). 2023 Strategically you could say therefore is a better year to get really started to win the next general election in a hybrid world where everything runs futuristic, yes even the economy. Labour has Green policies getting ready and stand- by in case they win the next general election! The global world is thriving as we speak on a Green Global Economy. You can't give the voters the impression of going Green if the first one hundred days in Office will be about changing the House of Lords, an ancient fossil. Reform is conservative thinking and setting the whole plan of a Labour future back in time. So, yes, we do have a leader to lead the next Labour government out of the mud and build the terra cotta parliament of democracy for all peoples living in Britain and the UK, but we don't see the terra cotta soldiers to lead the empire and its nations from the baseline of 'A new Britain with a new Labour government is your future'. Mud is mud. Mr Starmer needs to create a credible design for the future that will not be dislocated from Brexit but inclusive of that very hated thing called Brexit. Oh yes, Brexit is hated. And so are its prime ministers. His (Keir Starmer) strategists cannot fail to acknowledge all the here above changes and shifting in the Brexit facts of achievements and also of its failures. The Tories have a ready made logic however to change your mind if you want to go there, somewhere in their muddy waters of failures. One thing, they might say, it is absolutely true about Labour that it has never been in power yet in Brexit Britain. So, first lie but six years old already! On the other hand Sir Keir Starmer can always return the compliment by saying that he is ready for making a first time history and to do exactly what they deem impossible to win for a Labour government. He can be bold sometimes, but than again justice suits Keir Starmer always better. Especially standing opposite the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. 'Operation Tough', is it working on the nurses' industrial strike action? One positive point to make this late in the year is that we have discovered Mr Starmer to become the next prime minister of a Labour government in power isn't a fantasy we used to indulge in two months ago. And what does that mean in English is that Britain is where your home is and should not be moving about like a country on wheels of political madness. And it is moving only beserk because standing still causes many side effects for most ordinary people and their lives. And cruelty cannot be the new Labour government normality (even when inherited from the Tory last government). Stability is not hard to find for professionals, but it is extremely hard for non professionals and others without a place to call home and work. Social eliteness is stopping itself at the sight of most troubles and the mere size of it. Will Labour really do well as a Brexit government under Labour and the Labour leadership of Keir Starmer?












Israel will not become a Halachic State.

16 December 2022

When designate Prime Minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu is right and made this promise that Israel will not become a Halachic State, it is full moon again in Israel's politics. The faces in the water are new: Itamar Ben Gvir, Bezalel Smotrich and Aryeh Deri. In another article in the Jerusalem Post yesterday the Likud leader had said that he did not chose his partners, but that hey had chosen him. Behind the faces in the water everyone else can see the full moon and its reflection referring to a place thousands of miles distant from the 21st century in which the planet earth is seen as our living earth. But what do we in the western world know about oriental phrases as 'I did not chose my partners, but they had chosen me'? Also "Israel will not become a Halachic State', strictly translated to English understanding it is very clear that Mr Netanyahu was not only reassuring but securing that the State of Israel will remain a democracy in this part of the Middle East. From the 'partner's point of view' the very definition of Israel is a Halachic State to enternity. And that means only one thing of something of a 'class war' between the two blocs. The Likud and the religious factions of his soon to be coalition. For some reason or other we can't help but feel that what is happening in Israel to form a Hard Right- Wing government, that in the rest of the world there is this eerie quietness from the global opinion. It could be the high cost of living and energy poverty / crisis in our part of the world to keep our eyes fixed on those immediate concerns. All of Europe is becoming a frozen place without sufficient heating for the most vulnerable in our society and industries will also follow close behind. In his reflection Mr Netanyahu's face can only lighten up with complete enthousiasm and talk to the moon how golden he looks in his elderly age at 74. Compared to the moon and its reflection who can be more perfect?

The sun chariot with Naftali Bennett as prime minister of Israel that time has crashed hard against the rock and smashed the political head of the former prime minister. Mr Bennett will be rememberd as the 'dead political lion' who will always be revered as the good prime minister of Israel of the 21st century. Perhaps it is for the best this way and leave another government come to power again. What remains illogical is the century in which we live, if that will still be there for Israel in four years time. The Jewish year is 5783, a literal century in time for the Halachic State in waiting in Israel. Something that is clear from the outside where the power of democracy lies, which unfortunately is not in a Halachic State, or at least is the same and one thing. That shouldn't be meant also as cynical because in fact the idea is quite serious for on the side of the religious factions. Like the bridegroom they have to realize that entering the house and home for the first time is something eagerly desired, but can be the day after become just an ordinary day again. No wedding fest because the music has stopped, no more dancing with the bride, because the morning after she will have to clean up the dishes, and no more envelopes with lots of money in the pouch they kept publicly to the guests to see everything and now have to hide from unwanted prying eyes. It will be interesting how much the religious leaders of the 14 seats from the 32 seats religious parties, will now hide their faces as ministries in the government. Because like in the analogy here above of the bridegroom and bride the ministries would need or have to see their ministers. Politics after an election why is this always lots of more horse-trading almost evident in every democracy across the planet? Good, to say mazzel- tov to the new coalition of Israel we hope to see a good life after the wedding is over. And normality coming back again in civil life.



















Blue Winter sleep


(In memory of Queen Elizabeth II)


Through the window stars of centuries and crystals behind My eyes caught yours through the cold winter's night Next door she sleeps in her bed at the palace or in her castle and I swallowed the clouds and railtracks She has gone to her wintersleep Blue winter sleep when the stars at night are closest in my eyes

Laying on my back at the station when the lights have gone out and died on my way to maturity The new age had arrived and through my winter sleep I was back here I am trying to write something down in the new century a green leaf in autumn gold just passing on the wings of the blue winter sleep But now I see your light Your Majesty a memory in timelessness


Clearing the day for the winter blue sky


MCT.................................................










Yair Lapid, outgoing Prime Minister of Israel, is crying wolf yesterday about democracy in Israel.

3 December 2022

2 November 2022 Likud had won the election and celebrated his comeback to politics as the sixth time as Prime Minister, he told the world in the early morning. And the counting was still flooding in his favour the following days. Mr Netanyahu had rubbed the lamp of the genii three times, and popping up the three wishes came: MK Itamar Ben- Gvir, MK Bezalel Smotrich and MK Avi Maoz. In total the religious block counted for an equal share in the votes at this last election of approximately 32 seats. Many newspapers in the world have said about these radical groups in the coming government that the Israel they knew was gone if designated prime minister Benyamin Netanyahu will have no other choice in his sixth prime ministership. What most do not yet be able to comprehend at this early stage is that not only will the Israel they knew be gone soon, but that there has never been a real understanding between the diaspora and the orthodox groups in Israel a reality to get out one day. Israel knows very well how the existence of the Jewish Home was built from scratch and what remnants of the new migrants had brought Home with them from Europe and further east of Europe in Russia. After having been massacred for reasons exactly like theirs in the present state, the orthodox religious state of affairs, Christianity (Byzantine- like) made them see how no one was safe as a Jew living in Europe or Russia. And they were harsh methods in these times against the Jewish populations across the continent where they came from in 1948, after the Holocaust. In 1948 all who came to Israel and built the country would never have thought that in the 21st century in Israel there was going to be a mass change (1+mln Haredim) in the democracy of their Jewish Home. E.g. from democracy to a religious State. In fact last year when Naftali Bennett became prime minister of the government of change in 2021 (ending this year in 2022) no one then had any idea that this was their last day in a demcratic country that the people of Israel have known and lived seven decades long. We can't see it any other way at the present moment and keep our eyes fixed where this democracy has taken the country and its prime minister, Right- Wing Party Leader of Likud, into a mirage of an unorthodox state of democracy.

There is no hair's breadth to misunderstand the incoming government how they are planning on executing their political will on the people of Israel. Also any first time is rampant when the happenings are new and is to be expected here to make that rapid movement as soon as possible. They will go for 100% scoring points the first 100 days in government. Noam is fanatic on the LGBTQ communities and wants to press on with his personal views and if possible doing that according to State laws, and so will MK Bezalel Smotrich be eager to follow suit in the same direction. A bigger issue what many do not understand at this point is not to make any mistake with these religious fanatical views how they want to build a new and clean Israel and cleanse it from all the perversities or worldy lives/ views that are damaging for the holiness of Jerusalem and peripheries in the land of Israel. Men and women, children, the vision is archaic and deeply desired over thousands of years and now come true. That of course depends on the fortune of politics to make or break its politicians or political structures. 32 Seats came with that democracy and has a legal term of four years, before God Almighty and mankind. Now it is looking as if the outgoing government and its prime minister slowly is waking up (the awakening that came much too late) to this notion, that they must fight back and take hold of their right and say to the religious leading block in the Likud election win/ victory, say what you like but as long as Israel is constitutional a democracy our rights are sovereign too. How they will fight it on the left and center to bring back the democratic rights of the people of Israel is less convincing to the new reality, where the sovereignty of the religious block will be a mistake to think they will relinquish their right to rule in Israel. Mr Lapid is clutching on a straw, he must now realize. Unfortunately the religious state has not had the time yet to have a political ruling elite class in the same hierarchy of religion and leaders, which is making it very hard to understand in the 21st century what exactly is the purpose of this change in Israel. Will it only be murder and waste precious time to rebuild the living standards for the religious poorest? Mr Smotrich got the portfolio for the economy for a rotational two years. On a personal basis let's hope that he will do the right thing and not only for the religious Jews. Politically he will also be bound to the Jewish Home for all Jews and 21/2mln Arabs living in Israel as the citizenry. If this proves his incapability and deal with the century we're living in economic disciplines, macro or micro economics, that could bring him quickly down.

Benyamin Netanyahu seems sandwiched in an election victory of his own taste and making in November 2022, one month later in December. The next economic and state budget are expected somewhere next year in March 2023. And only if MK Smotrich passes the test of the budgets we then will have to accept that sovereignty in Israel will become Religious. A first time in modern day Jewish history since Israel was created from out of the humble dust that is the Middle East by the Great Sea (the Mediterranean Sea). And also, here is the same MK who calls himself a proud homophobe and the organizer of the beasts parade. His choice of terminology, or that of MK Itamar Ben- Gvir or Avi Maoz, against gay pride and the community of Tel Aviv as a densed population, here there are no softer words one can expect from the leaders of 32 seats in the Likud victory of November 2022 general election results. For now it's layla tov and we will have to wait and see what the immediate time will bring.












Coalition building in Israel: the fox went thinly through the hole in the fence but couldn't get out again from it after eating all the chicken.

25 November 2022

We are at an unusual junction in the coalition building talks now ongoing in Israel between Likud and his religious 32 seats block from the last election win. Itamar Ben- Gvir signed last night an agreement of his nuptial ministry and ministerial prerogatives in the coming new government. Internal politics is looking more promising from their view over Judea and Samaria, but also if you are religious this is the only way that makes sense. Judea and Samaria, and the periphery Negev, Beersheva and Galilee, will come under proper regulation of law, also is a positive step; remember that for 75 years or a little less the law has only been at the whim of any elected government and prime minister to decide the agreement of expiration each or every five years (over which the former PM Naftali Bennett resigned when there was no cooperation from the opposition, and has become somewhat like the white king immovable on the political chessboard in Israeli politics ). You could say that the uncertainty underhands of the agreement has caused a nervous anxiety for many decades and created an atmosphere of more extreme behaviour whoever wanted to live in these territories. Under the International law however territories such as these disputed areas will not yield under the law of the Security Minister. But let's leave that for the time being and go over this administration another day when Mr Ben- Gvir will be inaugurated as the Minister. You have to at least respect the outcome of the democracy in the last election win on 1 November this month. It is also becoming more clear every day while the coalition talks are still not govern- ready, that Mr Netanyahu understands where a full Right- Wing and religious block with 32 seats in his new government will mean for domestic Israel. This time we are not looking at popular rule. MK Bezalel Smotrich is another reason to say that this time we are looking at a highly unpopular coalition build-up if he insists on his demand in the House/ State. But here is another young leadership unknown to the rest of the world and who could become the next kingmaker in Mr Netanyahu's coalition building. And it doesn't feel all too pleasant in which way Mr Smotrich wants to become the next Finance Minister without disruption of a so called rotational agreement with another MK in his 32 seats block from the last election. His demands for the Finance Ministry and Defense Ministry are appearing to become set in stone, or leave politics to Mr Netanyahu on his own again.

It is somewhat paradoxical to say that we should give Mr Smotrich the benefit of the doubt and not to underestimate his Sabra vision for changing Israel from secular to a more Messianic opening stage of affairs. That doesn't necessarily has to be a change overnight, e.g. in Iran after the deposed Shah Reza Pahlavi in the seventies, but building of a procession of implementing more leverage for the religious State parallel to a more moderate secular State. No one in our part of the western world will know what Mr Smotrich may or may not have in his vision for the State of Israel and its people. He is however right to be more alert and prudent when it comes to give and pay more priority / attention to the long years of an apparent neglected group in the Israeli society and that here the wound of that neglect has taken on many forms of disadvantaged pushbacks, some deliberate and some not, in time. Where Mr Smotrich will find the rationalities for this group as here above mentioned and find the upgrade from social segregation to an imaginary more central social life, is hard to say or find at this stage. For one because it doesn't exist and two there has never been in the making of Israel over the years any 'paid' attention on how to respect these communities as part of the Jewish Home. If the RZP leader fails to materialize on his vision and administration position as Minister of Finance and Defense, and collapses, that would mean for the orthodox religious communities the end of the Messianic vision in the land of Israel. Mr Smotrich will need good wisdom and people who are willing to work on the unworkable in Israel and for the different segments of people in Israeli society. One such wisdom will be how to live with 2 and a half million Arabs in Israel. Justice will trouble his honorable or just conscience, you see. He is after all only human and not a monster/ mifletzit, despite the high pitch for having an only Israeli Israel. Half of that is of course true. The half of democracy.












64 Seats and its representational coming to power in Israel post election November 2022.

17 November 2022

Before the November election 2022 and after 1 November 2022 election results show that up to winning the election was made of one strategy and post election another one of political wrangling becomes strategy for the Israeli people. It is not making things any easier with the 'likely' partners in the presumed coalition the Likud Party has great difficulty to make it workable and functional before next wednesday sworn in. We can almost begin to think in layman terms how this will work out in the final stage of building coalition practice for Likud Party leader Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, that it won't be done with the religious list of partners, e.g. MK Bezalel Smotrich and MK Itamar Ben Gvir. The election results also had brought a more complex issue to the front where it was never before as clear as today, that Israel and the religious communities where it has been for the last 74 years was only alive in a phenomenon of being in a presumed partnership. Human nature was never part in their existentialism as was Judaism and the long lost dream of keeping the Jewish Home forever in the land of Israel. But there is also disease and deterioration at the core of this Israeli- Judaism existentialism and too late discovered that it was due to a presumed partnership. Judaism now the world has noticed does matter in Israel. One of the diseases one can only see as the lack of legislation with the laws of Torah segregation interior and exterior even more clear what that could mean for politics and the mainstream economy. Likud could find many scoring points of disagreeing on the demands made by the political leaders of the religious parties if they will join the coalition. The US as Israel's natural partner will not understand from the International Anglo Saxon point of view that here the ironplate will only boil more over by throwing more oil on the matter when demanding to work with partners in the coalition that they feel as safe and not going lost in translation on specific military matters in the Middle East. Judaism is not part of a safe hand in the International world and order, as most people understand.

Judaism in the 21st century according to many intellectual Jews in the developed countries is a thing of the European invention during the pogrom years in East- Europe. Chaim Potok, Kadinsky and Marc Chagall, they have left the Jewish world believing in their 'Judaism', almost at the rate of an artistic invention only. In Europe, e.g. Antwerpen Brussels, communities of the Chassidim still live in their own world next to the natives in Belgium, the kind of 'romanesque portrait' of Jewish life in modern day Europe. We in Europe are looking at remnants of the ghetto Jewry in Tsarist Russia, as in paintings by Marc Chagall. This would never have survived had it been a political and religious early representation from the 18/19/20th century of future Israel in Jerusalem... In the 21st century however the world is witnessing for the first time a real portrait of Judaism that was not intellectual inventionalism, but is the living body of what Judaism means as written in the Torah. Part of the Torah was written in political aspects, war, peace, land, peoples, kingdoms and kings. Also including exiles e.g. when taken to Babylon. The Likud leader Mr Benyamin Netanyahu doesn't need the late 34th President Dwight D. Eisenhower to explain the meaning of being Jewish in the US and its short history with the Jewish Home. We need to address the issue of MK Smotrich and MK Ben Gvir in the coalition reality of Israel in November 2022, and than say what it means to be Jewish. The election strategy was a simple one for the religious parties: "I believe what you believe, and you believe what I believe in. We have the same belief." Garnering with that 32 seats on their side of the political spectrum this last election. Perhaps we hate to say it that what we see here was a truly elected government in an established derelict democracy. Pure process, pure people's will. The latter is even more interesting to say when the rumours in the papers are calling Mr Smotrich and Ben Gvir innoncent and naive, not fit to lead the portfolios Defense and Finance (Deri). Hearts and minds are saying how was it possible to get the people to vote in an honest will, when in Israel there is much bloodshed and corruption politics? In fact one can only see that the world has a unique situation here and unlucky enough to have it in bloodthirsty Israel, that the will of the people not only chose their representation by honest ballots, but also that it was done only in a naive way and not briberies. Before the election the religious leaders one can say were not given any slots of ministries to bribe them and join the Likud when this week coalition talks are stalled again and again. It is not what the world likes, but democracy made it happen.

That is the first level of democracy after the last election. Next is the level of inclusive government and the exclusive existentialism of Judaism in government. Statistics for 2021 on the total population of Israel was 9.634.000 million, and in 2022 8,975,703 million. Four (approximately) hundred thousand are missing, leaving Israel with 2 mln Arab citizens and about 6. mln something Jewish citizens. 64%x 8.975.703= 5.744449.92 Estimate have voted in the last election 1 November 2022. Is Israel shrinking slowly and draining itself from existence on the geographical and political map? In Biblical terms that would be like the breaking of the stick in two. How can it be saved from a savage breakup of Israel and the Judaism communities in Jerusalem? The glue of cohesion does not only exists when in Anglo Saxon translated how the Israelis should live, it also consists of Hebrew classical grammar. But the International world in fact does have some saying how Israel should exist within the green lines and next that the Palestinian people should have their State, notably in the Areas A, B and C. Judean desert wilderness. Territory, as the former prime minister Mr Naftali Bennett said (Haaretz Peace Conference 7 years ago), does matter. But now we have a new point of view with actual legislation within six months, designated PM Mr Netanyahu seems to have promised the religious leaders in today's talks. Is that what the chairman of Likud believes, because the people who voted him in from the side of the religious parties do believe it. Not to mention also making for any next Israeli mundane leader harder to govern the people of all of Israel post Netanyahu era. One mistake was made in the building of Israel after 1980, that architecture is building up and not starting with the roof doing the rest downwards. Capitalism/ free market economy for Israel was the roof. The previous decades from 1948 were mostly building upwards to prosperity and mass productivity economics (under the pound lire exchange mechanism). The question is where will Mr Netanyahu take the country and the religious parties next. It is also dangerous for survival if the country is shrinking rapidly of its citizens.
















Between election results and coalition forming for the new government in Israel on sunday 13 November tomorrow.

12 November

Technically Mr Benyamin Netanyahu did not win when the other religious half also has 32 seats. A first time for the smaller radical religious parties in Israeli democracy. A program should be written immediately in which they explain their world view for and with their allies (home Likud and abroad US), or lose the chance to come to government. The writing and writer of such a program if possible will have to do two things: respect the outcome of the last election on 1 November and start building what you don't have, because if you can't do this in government you will not be able to do it in Judea & Samaria, Jerusalem and Knesset. If we compare a landslide win as was the morning after the election, 2 November, told to the Israelis and world, to the 2019 result in the UK for the Tories under Boris Johnson, we can see why landslide for Likud wasn't what happened in Israel last week on monday/ tuesday. One has to see and read it from a legislative point however hard and bitter to the world. Democracy had made it to the front door, but across the threshold theocracy as a minority faction of political parties had pushed for the other half of 32 seats. To ignore the outcome will be a breach of democracy, that too is also here inclusive in the bigger picture. 32 Seats next to 32 seats from Likud is not insignificant a win or slice of victory in this last election. Yet where it gets harder to pass these factions of smaller parties into a worldview as in the US relations with Israel, and not to forget the EU and UK, is how to explain their radicalism is not yet transformed to government. And that will make it something of a hard one to sell from a PR point of view. Government needs good PR especially when deeply controversial.

The truth is a pre- Messianic government, e.g. MK Smotrich, vision looming for decades in Israel. 32 Seats from the religious Parties will have to submerge almost from out of nowhere to mainstream politics in Israel and could take the stance against their ally and partner Likud under Benyamin Netanyahu, that they want their respresentation as a significant part of the law and order in Israel. How does one ignore a major stakeholder in the company? Of course there will be no such appetite among the more liberals and other centrist parties. But who speaks both Hebrew and English on these matters? If anyone cares to remember the moment when Yamina leader Naftali Bennett became Prime Minister on seven mandates and quickly shrinking to six, five and later on less than five, all of Israel understood that this was impossible. Now with 32 seats there is no one in Israel to say that this time they do not understand what you can do with that many seats. Whoever thwarts the democratic process of allowing the other major half to Likud can be held accountable as committing something of a political breach in the democracy of Israel. It is also not a question of taste or preference when the electorate clearly has chosen these factions to form government. The religious factions are not populists or political radicals (fascism or dogmatic). The radicalism from these parties are religious and deeply built on singular religious rituals no other nation knows of as well as the Haredim or Chassidim. The top layers exists of modern day orthodox religious cults and leaders who follow the will of their own will and want to be either popular or appear to be not so extemist. Israel however in the Messianic part of this hierarchy is the bottom layer and knows no compromise. Today that makes it a very difficult reading into their 32 seats in a democracy.

The program will have to include a writing to both worlds in Israel, civil society and the radical segments of Israeli society. It is perhaps what the Old Testament means by the heart too needs circumcision.

Post Scriptum (13 November 2022)

Politics: business as usual saying this morning in a letter to Mr Netanyahu from Likud Members that MK Deri will be unsuitable for Minister of Finance, and being known for his sectoral programs. It doesn't slide well here with the 32 seats to make up a Right- Wing government with Likud and having parties having been a minority for 75 years; call it micro economics for the smaller sectors of Israel in the religious world and making a start first time in government as a majority of the lion's share in the last general election 1 November this month. Their economist will have to do the simple accountancy in these sectors and use their own demographics, unlike the work of the comptroller of the State. Or drown in oblivion. 

Oblivion explained the first time for the religious parties in Israel are not in the International law as is democracy for all States and the world order.

Additional: MK B Smotrich and some of the other Torah MK's insist on the Ministry of Defence be awarded to Bezalel Smotrich. The straight line to follow with e.g. the US greater military power has always been part of Israel and the State, and making sovereignty of Defence in Israel a dualism all former prime ministers were able to manage in more than one way. As with the new government and the Torah leaders it will be important to both secular and non secular Israelis to hear from Mr Smotrich what his theory on this issue will be as Defense Minister. The days of Torah reading and begetting of offspring could be over in terms of retreat to priorities and not military strategies domestic and in line with the rest of the world. If Mr Smotrich survives the negotiations coalition talks and will become DM, perhaps it is also time for him to put more priority on the building of the Third Temple as part of Torah defence building. As he will know the marble should not be cut by chisle or cut he will therefore have to build a storage for keeping the blocks unscathed somewhere in a location in Jerusalem. Until ready for building. 












The new coalition government under Benyamin Netanyahu, next prime minister of Israel 2022.

7 November 2022

It will be interesting to see/ wait how Mr N will keep in reign two members in his new coalition that are equally obstinate and authorities in their field. One being MK Gvir and MK Smotrich. Mrs SUSAN HATTIS ROLEF article today- The election results and what we should expect - opinion- has made an attempt to reverse the dream to reality and the more realistic politics of the moment. The far Right in Israel has always been something of a political myth controlled by the incoming PM in his former years as prime minister. This myth will not be the same Right- Wing of years gone by. In fact if come alive the myth will truly be Right- Wing and its first time in Israel as a historical new beginning. We are not talking Italy, Hungary, or even Germany in the forties Right- Wing, which were never contemplated from a religious or Halacha point of view in the Christian world. In some ways one could see Mrs Hattis Rolef her point, for what if Mr Gvir and Mr Smotrich can envision a nationalism based on true Halacha rules? That would also mean the incoming PM has underestimated his likely and clever partners, that e.g. on the religious model he could be undermined if there is any need left in him to uplift the party according to western rules of civility as he very well remembers how to be in this game. At the same time there is no new playing field for the new partners when it comes to the harder issues, e.g. the Palestinian occupied territories, sovereignty in Judea and Samaria (especially after mr Netanyahu's failed attempt before the former prime minister Mr Naftali Bennett in 2020), yes these are all too realistic for legislative changes in the State of Israel in 2022, 75 years later since the inception of the Jewish Home. Another question not for Mr Netanyahu, but for Mr Gvir and Mr Smotrich and other head factions, is what they can do about the extreme diversities in Israeli society realism. With their number of seats they can dictate to make good their election promises to the people in their constituencies. Or face a terrible backlash and wrathful end. De facto that would be a very costful entertainment for the people of Israel if true.

Some are saying that with the incoming PM he is the leftist in the coalition. You do not play with Jews and Halacha rules and their inclination to dominate their ideal world of Israel. It could be very well that the days for Mr Netanyahu are politically over if Right- Wing now means purity of religion and modelled after a dynastic religious ruler. Something slightly different from where Iran after the deposed Shah's position in the seventies had become the regime of a new age of the mullahs.

Post Scriptum: extremist idea is circular against the LGBTQ communities in Israel with the thought of a new incoming government with many radicals who would want Israel/ Jerusalem to be cleansed of unfounded liberties according to the laws of the religious leaders. Politically that would be coming again in bad timing with the world moving fast on in the so called 'woke age'. LGBTQ by definition in Israel is a political right and is parallel to natural life between man, women and family life. Not a simple problem when the religious factions of government want to reverse this strata from Israeli society without a political alternative solution. 














Purity and Right Wing: Apply immediate sovereignty in Judea and Samaria.

4 November 2022

Israel election 2022 is over and the work for the incoming government and Prime Minister can start immediately. 20 Years of waiting what happens or not in the Judea- Samaria Area C should be the first matter for the prime minister of Israel on his to- do list after the last election this month. It is what the people want. It is also what the people en masse have voted for on 1 November 2022 for Likud and the parties known as extreme far- Right. This morning in the JP the outgoing government (Bennett- Lapid) was emphasized the intolerance with which they had led after the election in March 2021. Exclusion of a name in that government doesn't make it any easier to understand where the intolerance of the government of change should have been different. Policies in Israel during the Bennett- Lapid term in government had the country and people in mind, passing a budget in November 2021, and upgrade the public sector from where it had been for the last thirty years in complete economic depression. With no growth or revenue/ incentives. It wasn't tolerance but remedy, corrective measures. Fortunately that never happened as it was the intention of the opposition under the next PM leadership, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, to bring down the government and so he did in the end. When, from the point view of purity of logic, the former PM Mr Naftali Bennett did resign over the issue of settlers and for not finding cooperation in the opposition, tolerance comes to question. He did resign. And did the politics as the only reason for any Prime Minister and resigned. The people have voted for sovereignty and are celebrating the streets and public squares everywhere in the country that this time Judea and Samaria will come under the law of Israel de jure. Not like Naftali Bennett, as they say in Dutch, was a 'wappie' (wuss) and did not apply sovereignty for the settlers.

Jacob Katz in his CNN interview today also mentioned that Mr Ben Gvir, the extreme Right- Wing, is nothing more than the far Right of anywhere in Europe. This reasoning is the truth, but not in reality where Israel has arrived after the last election this month. As we speak in Real Time there are new attacks in Gaza by the IDF this morning. As are many leaders in the International world who have congratulated the next prime minister on his victory, happening on the same timeline. Mr Benyamin Netanyahu is thrilled to be back. It is what the Israelis have voted for and he has promised to bring unity to the government and in Israel. With the purity of a majority of Right- Wing parties, meaning all to make 'only Israel' a clear reality for the coming term of parliamentary office, four years, the good work will make revolutionary changes. In truth the other purity of thought of the new government in Israel is also that what we are looking at is a push for fully acceptance by the rest of the world for joining the privilege to live as the Romans did. After 75 years what could be the hurry this time for the next prime minister? Unless the 'hon member' wants to pass the bill of kingship through Knesset after the mass has 'chosen' (not elected) him to be their leader and only PM indefintely? For a parliamentary system in the west (EU) to have the same PM for decades would only mean that there is no more political progress and it stopped the political process of its democratic law. Much of this law is coded in the International world from where and which its legitimacy comes as we know from monetary policies. The legal tender in Israel may also get a new future and coin the head of State as sovereign, perhaps. Please, make a serious move and play no more with the building physics of the State of Israel stones or in between the rocks (Judea and Samaria) as if ordered from Ikea. 












Third Tory Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, put in place today after meeting with King Charles III as PM.

25 October 2022

We did not have to wait till friday for the new Prime Minister in Downing Street No 10. In one singular moment all was done in practically one day and night to install the newest member of the Tory line of prime ministers in six or seven weeks. No one knows just yet what will happen in the next hours and immediate days, whether Mr Sunak will call for a general election or continue his plans for stability in Britain and to bring back all the promises in the 2019 manifesto to the people. More definitely anyway than what his predecessor Ms Truss gave the country before she resigned last week on friday 21 October. It still is all feeling animated for the moment. One can't help but ask how Mr Sunak must be feeling right now when so much is expected of him to deliver within a minimum of time each and every second starting today. In Britain to be the first Hindu Prime Minister in British democracy and parliamentary history it is a kind of feeling both sad and glad where the former Chancellor of the exchequer had arrived. He must be thinking how Britain is now looking in a much different way once he had crossed that line between the people and His Majesty's government as Prime Minister. Conformity goes through your blood and spine, one imagines when you are not Anglo Saxon by birth or creed. Sad, yes, because would you not have rather become prime minister under more courteous circumstances when everyone was more merrier? Knowing the English hearts and minds why not and toasting a new challenge and century with more definite choices and bring democracy to much higher meaning? If the circumstances were not as bad as they are now there is very little doubt to think that this is a country indeed who could give much and elevate its greatness to height and lasting change in their political mind. But that is not that time or day and for a simple reason that no one is merry.

That is the British nature in peace time and when they turn the page. Maybe this was long overdue and had to be done sooner, e.g. in the eigthies when Princess Diane was popular worldwide as the kindest British aristocrat and wife to (then) the Prince of Wales, now Charles III and king of the UK and Commonwealth. Change in Britain in fact came with the popularity of Princess Diane, drawing the lines between the class system closer to the whole of the UK, Scotland, Wales, Ireland and beyond e.g. the Taj Mahal. Brexit is holding but a sliver of what Britain was during that time in the eighties. And every politician today has little awareness of the progress of the last three or four decades and what had really changed the country. In a sudden strike of lightning the country is now having a British Asian/ Hindu Prime Minister. There is not even a debate on these changes in e.g. the armed forces. As when Barack H. Obama had become the first black President of the USA vis a vis Commander in Chief of the US Military. Now seems like 100 years ahead of Europe, Australia and the UK. These are truly big changes, only it didn't come at a good time and under amicable circumstances. Especially with the big proponent of change in attitude Britain had in the Late Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Diane. The world can only hope that no despair will overcome a people when the world is falling apart before our very 21st century eyes... The Prime Minister will and is determined to give back to the country he owes much, he himself has said earlier today when announcing that he was the new Prime Minister of the UK. Britain has to overcome that eerie feeling of too little too late and never, or simply neglect of the more greater ways living in Real Time with humanity. The very thing that makes Britain greatest. What can one say about the time ahead sliding deeper into the abyss where the former PM Liz Truss has left the country behind, many are saying? We in the EU are hoping never to come to this moment and realise that it is all over for this century. Or Mr Sunak calls for a general election. We in the EU do not want to fail and let the European Union collapse, under pressure of the war in Ukraine. Britain has the choice to make for itself and follow the prescription of similar tones, because the energy prices are the stealth weapon of the Russian President Mr Vladimir V. Putin... In the UK the Prime Minister Mr Rishi Sunak is left with two stones and sticks and has to re- invent pronto how to rekindle the first fires of prosperity on the planet for the UK.  












After resignation by the PM in the UK today the opposition wants to get quickly on with the job and get elected.

20 October 2022

Any outsider (of the UK) thought the nation had it wrong demanding a new election and counting on a Labour government next. The nation had it right as we only found out this afternoon today when the Tory PM resigned from the mandate she got from her own Party 45 days ago to become Britain's next prime minister after the former PM Mr Boris Johnson. This morning at the TUC conference the Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer was only saying how it was time (distant future) for a Labour government when the news broke out only a few hours later that the Tory PM had resigned. She will take with her the last PQ's on wednesday this week as this was her strongest legacy and performance given as leader and determined Tory leadership. But the resigning was expected long ago since she took office. Why we will never know. Russia has congratulated her soon after her resignation for her 'illiteracy' and saying they were happy she had resigned. It is mirror mirror on the wall for now and more coquetry where the Party is going, that is if anyone has any idea from where since today. Ms Truss had handed her resignation already in the morning to His Majesty when Mr Starmer was setting out his economic and social plans at the TUC in the same hours. Globally the US President Mr Joe Biden thanked Ms Truss for her cooperation on the issues they had agreed on in the meantime during her job as prime minister. Yes, she was nothing else but the decent Ms Truss, first as Foreign Secretary before she had quantum leaped to being the UK Prime Minister 45 days ago. Mr Starmer has been given a clear view of what will happen next. Judging her short tenure as PM Ms Truss one could say was or has been pulled by her woolen/ green Kashmir sleeve from one extreme to the next and above all has also been heavily criticized for 'her performance' as PM. Anyone as leader of either a G-20 or G-7 country knows that was not a good sign but rather more like an omen for calamity for the Tory Party. How the mechanisms work within the British greater political Parties is not a lesson in vain to learn from, that even British politics can get unpleasant and physical if must. That is to a certain degree... Are we forgetting something in the meantime?

From the distance where I am you could say that Labour was even further away from reality at the TUC conference mirage this morning. Had it shown the slightest solidarity with their country and government as the opposition to take over maybe very soon, if you know that you are going to be the next winner at the election, well, what can one say? Putting the country first is not understood by intelligent people as leading a herd of animals to the zoo (global world) and everyone is happy. And you don't need to be British for your thought as is now evident how they are doing politics in Britain today, literally in Real Time. Any random observant of British politics can notice that here something existential has changed Britain, but that wasn't Brexit. It was in anyone's humble opinion a matter of balance and the determination of keeping Brexit under difficult circumstances going. The seven years of the Joseph effect, seven bad compared to seven good years of crop or cripple harvest. Unfortunately Britain is not ancient Egypt. And the only 'prophecy' that could do it for the Tories is their own. Taking back Rishi Sunak or Penny Mordaunt who had already lost the contest against the 'chosen one' Liz Truss at the last leadership contest, is under scrutiny of going back to your vomit and fighting like wild dogs if they want to keep it this time. How much damage could Ms Truss have done with the mini- budget Chancellor Mr Kwarteng in 45 days? The mini- budget was announced as opposing extremely slow growth when putting all the factors to make the economy run more smoothly, and thus brought a shock to the system. This could not be tolerated in e.g. a system like ours in the EU. There are 28 Member States and not an individual voice or country/ sovereignty. Perhaps the layman would know best when Britain goes off like a time bomb. It is the same after a suprise attack and than see how much rubble you or others are under. And than making an observational assessment without the expertise of the bomb experts. But if the King can take it they should too, is the last resort at the moment. In Ms Truss announcement today that she is resigning one thing was clear from her statement, that she knew the situation for which she was chosen and also that she knew how this has ended today. Labour is knocking on the door at Nr 10 with a strong desire to 'rebuild' Britain where clearly the Tories had failed... Brexit inconsistency perhaps? (Mr Starmer continuity does not know Brexit in the Labour Party indefinitely, compared to a government knowing what Brexit means) If he had been Mr Kinnock in the past one could then also clearly see Labour's vision was time bound with reality by the making of their own design. Growth on both sides of the House could not be different from having the same prosperity goals. The prosperity goals are now millennial goals (original idea the UNSG Late Mr Kofi Anan and former PM David Cameron), which Brexit was clearly not. Political ethics Brexit did win the moral of their time... And then came the seven bad years with the start of a new PM Ms Truss in September 2022. It could also be that some began to fear her that she would become a real prime minister? It is the utter ugliness of modern day Britain with its fierce Brexit nature and now to think there could be anyone left out to lead them 'walk through the fire'. (Song by Peter Gabriel)

From today whoever will take over from Ms Truss as Tory PM can't be convincing to the rest of the world that here we have a Tory Party still leading the Brexit ideology. The ambivalence is too great and is surging over their heads like an inflatable giant sculpture balloon serpent.












The war of realities, the UK and EU.

16 October 2022

EU chief Joseph Borrell tonight in a rare statement spoke of the jungle that needed to be kept outside the walls of EU prosperity beauty/ beautiful garden; the best way forward was to keep the EU engaged to the outside world, the jungle. These were the distinguished Mr Borrell's words just a few minutes ago in a tweet (Al Jazeera Marwan Bashar). Over in the UK across the channel and also not very far from our shores on the continent the UK Prime Minister Ms Liz Truss is fighting for her job to stay on as PM. From where these realities come tonight one can only say that perhaps the end of the 21st century economic mammoth has come a little too early for Christmas? If this is the situation for the western countries or States and sovereignties the only answer will be to prepare for the worst outcome. Maybe this is what was meant by the prophecy when nations will get into a scrum and feeling entrapped by their own schemes and makings? There is nothing in their schemes that is suggesting where they went wrong so that they could have fixed the problem. On the contrary it is more of a surprise to have come to the conclusion that the highest peak wasn't what they had expected to find, a complete emptiness. Proponents of the QE will say that it couldn't have been the QE, while others will say that perhaps there was another way to control the world's trillions. The Tories in the UK are 'naval staring' and are saying (85%) we need growth and than change the destiny of our great country, and also finding the right prime minister to keep Brexit a success. After all six years of Brexit after 2016 can't have just been an experiment for the richest. Wise now to say is that they can't blame Ms Truss, Tory Prime Minister, for the end of Brexit. That would just not be logical and a cruel lie. She and her former Chancellor, Mr Kwasi Kwarteng, did not succeed under these unfavourable circumstances, while de facto it was the only good plan to build a more 21st century Britain and doing so with the work of a Chancellor who seemed more in synchronisation with the rest of the world, something we in the EU know best by having a distinct system of our own that is more based on Member States solidarity. Not less superior when compared to Britain. Where does the world now fit in this shoebox economics for the leading countries in the EU and in Britain?

We should have known that to go to war with Russia through sanctions and crippling its economy would lead to certain disruptions across the world as we know it. The difficult kernel for world leading powers is now how to best understand the span of time: humanity (demographics), changes and new challenges, and the most unlikely of all fears the war in Ukraine. Are we on the receiving end? And also the better question is whether we are alone in this fight. Someone has to quickly find the answers because it makes a difference in the schemes of things for any future timing. Is there another plan how to shake off globalization and put in place another world? Globalization is becoming sooner more than later evident a thing of the past, but not in the way we want to see it. Where one can see a new future some will say that this is precisely something only globalization has 'sired'. From the individual mind or politics (UK infight over Ms Truss's prime ministership) we are not perfectly connected with the rest of the world/ or as Mr Borrell calls it 'the jungle'. I for one would like to see Europe having a more genuine European union designed by the 28 Member States, and being more prepared e.g. in times of war but paradoxically also for peace. Our peace has only taken the form of realism after the millennium, which was too late for the Euro or single currency. Half globalization had already by that time been covering the world and its populations! Six years ago it is no wonder where the UK in the present time isn't finding the other half of the world without running amok with the ships that sail along the same lines. The last that we need is a crash along these lines. They have opened up the world and became blinded by all these masses of success, like diamonds blinding the human eye as no other gemstone. Why not meet the opposition half way? (Even if Brexit falls a little spielraum will be imperative) Has that never been done before in all of human history? The fall of Ms Truss in the UK as Prime Minister if she falls that this will not be the same as when Mr Boris Johnson or Mrs Theresa May had to resign. Ms Truss as PM still holds the key of the Brexit castle or maybe ruins. Where the EU is trying to make everyone feel as if their home should be their castle, in Britain every castle should be the home of the people of Britain. So help me God Almighty in the heavens and on earth.

The new chancellor Jeremy Hunt how does he know how to be the captain of the ship that is the Tory Party and Britain/ UK? We are forgetting that to Russia this could only mean a betting game if he will be putting his money (capital) on the Dolce Vita.













The UK Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng is out.

14 October 2022

Was it too fast with many answering in the news (UK) not fast enough. Between today and two weeks ago the Chancellor had set out his mini- budget plans... That is 14 days government with the mini- budget and irreparable immediate damage was done to the whole of the country. Without giving or releasing any specifics the same people in the media kept saying over and over how bad this was for Britain. No one had said anything about which budget they were all talking about in the meantime. 31St of October it would go as planned and in more details. But the world has never seen the details of the mini- budget and they will never or ever going to see it (ice sheet?). It is easy to put what happened earlier today on friday 14 October to plain hysteria, as if it was expected that something greater would happen the moment the PM had fired her Chancellor. After she sacked him there were no fireworks, but in fact the whole thing fell flat. But then again I am not a financial technician to anticipate the scale for British economics & State finances. At the 'surprise' press conference the PM had said something intriguing about the mini- budget and the nature with which it had surprised the markets. Was it too fast, and that would mean Mr Kwarteng had done something unique or other. (Tweet by Robert Peston today: "Truss says parts of our mini budget went further and faster than markets were expecting. So £18bn increase in corporation tax will now go ahead. HUGE u-turn.") The revealing truth behind the PM's words here are exponential. But the farce is all on Britain with Labour trumpeting euphoria almost for hours long in the afternoon. To know economics just a little where it usually can go wrong to properly understand the instruments of the Chancellor are national debt and growth. Also empirical is important the meaning of timing. Britain has a base of strong Chancellors and delivering budgets that were always part open to the public and scrutiny, and part concealed from the public's domain. What was different with Mr Kwarteng's mini- budget from his predecessors is something the media can't answer or even is trying to answer. The PM has to go and call for another general election. Why the rush? The mini- budget did not even had a chance to do its work and just because 'the rich would get richer' Ms Truss' government has been doomed to failure? Two questions in one row and already the whole thing gets overcrowded.

But what is done is done. The next Chancellor has already been announced earlier today at the press conference by the Prime Minister. She wants to continue with her plans for growth threefold or use the magnet of the U-turn again. She seemed genuinely sorry to let Mr Kwarteng go and one can understand why. His loyalty to her could be one reason and the second reason can only be that he was the better candidate for the job. With finance or State finance integrity doesn't come with a fanfare and trombones to announce growth from cobblestone. It looked as if the former Chancellor was on to it and few could see it. His mistakes would come at a later time, perhaps after 31st of October? So what is the British way of doing the economics in 2022 and still doing Brexit? We in the EU do things intrinsincally different by EU regulations. Yet, you can't help admiring the British Chancellor for having put his work as straightforward as Mr Kwarteng has tried for the last two weeks. Like the PM said today at the Press Conference, it was perhaps too fast and unexpected. Now it is up to the people who want the PM out to say what they will be doing any different. How come that the British public do not expect to see a parallel world between the two ways, of one out of the EU and push for a future without the EU? It is beyond disbelief where Brexit has arrived when comparing it to 2016 after the referendum. To bring back the country from the EU could only be after a decade compatible and not overnight. Britain needs nine lives, making 2022 three more to go. Will Jeremy Hunt save the day and give the people what they want to hear and see? It was only yesterday in another writing where I said that sometimes doing it right can be the biggest miscalculation. Somehow that is still like fresh mint in my memory today. After the sacking of Mr Kwarteng there is no one who can really know at the moment whether the Tory Party can save itself from crashing and Brexit imploding.

PS high earners taxation is as old as the land of England. Something low earners with rent are exempt from paying. Hence the meaning of traditional British inequality. 












Ukraine- Russia October 2022


(Personal op)


3 October 2022


Aftermath, question, what is the EU plan? Peace in the EU and the regions in east Europe should include Russia as this is its natural border. A Europe without Russia would mean shifting the natural European borders from the historical geography and not just in a political sense. The aftermath can only be, if without Russia, and a lengthy ten years from today, when the 'new borders' will be set in place instead, to mean a new way for all of Europe and not just for the EU. After 1000 years Europe will get new borders in 2022/2023/2024 and forward, is another important question if to define what is realistic and realism.

The upside down view of the perestroika era is then also another shift. Remember one thing that here the main role is that the Russian President is and will always be a government actor. Isolating Russia and its natural borders with Europe will be in the long term dislocating the European nations and make a second shift and u-turn on the political spectrum, with no next or future new perestroijka in the plan. Secondly to say where the EU did not win the war on the balance for future real costs, Russia too did not win anything this time in real history after the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine. (Annexation can be reversed as legal or illegal, comparing to territorial rights.) In terms of time e.g. five or ten years from today there are no specific definitions on either side of the battle plan thus far except for sanctions against Russia and the raging of the war in Ukraine against the Russian invasion. 


MCT............................................................


Additional: the US vis a vis EU should do the administrative effort to convince or put the question forward to the Russian President what the motivation of his invasion of Ukraine is, that if as President of Russia was this in consensus with the Russian people, e.g. in a referendum. But specifically stressing the annexations of the four regions in east Ukraine and in 2014 the annexation of Crimea, also without a mandate of the people of Russia by parliamentary vote in the Duma.

If Mr Putin refuses to give his side of the story we in the west (EU/US) will then know our administrative effort has failed and the Russian President will continue with his invasion and annexation of territories in Ukraine. Russia is our natural ally in the whole of Europe, but from February this year until the present day, 5 October 2022, what the west is witnessing is that the Russian President wants to continue this course of action in deep belligerence against the European nations. His calculations seem to have great effects on the economy as are his deliberate other actions of retaliation for the crippling sanctions imposed on Russia since February this year.

No one knows why some have to make sacrifices to stop Mr Putin in Ukraine. It weakens some their hearts and minds why a consummate leader like the Russian President, Mr Vladimir V. Putin, should be our adversary on European ground or the continent. From as far as the orthodoxy of belief in God here we should also make the necessary distinction when going to war and destroy the good lands of many gone by eras or its peoples for a sinful and frivolous purpose of human dispute and many lives. Sin of a whole different kind as it is meant to destroy the beauty of the land and peoples in a common place or destiny. Annexation by the Presidential actor of government, wherever it takes hold, is and should be questioned by the International world. Or, when rejected, go to war and make the senseless sacrifices deep inside the democratic systems of Europe after WWII.










The people after QE II.

20 September 2022
(23:37 PM)

This was a deeply political shift of a new century with the death of Queen Elizabeth II on 8 September 2022 that not many felt in the immediate announcement of her passing. But how do we explain this twelve days later after her committal at Westminister Abbey, laid side by side by her great other half and strength. In death as they were together in life as the British Royal Family, a little more than seventy years. And can we grow roses from apples or the appletree? The people's voices and murmurs are and have given it much thought even before the Queen had passed away and are giving a blunt answer to the new king, King Charless III, son and heir to Her Majesty and now Late Queen Elizabeth II, and are saying 'no more' to the monarchy. We are facing a new century undoing much of the old one when Queen Elizabeth II was Regina and reigned for seventy years. We have to see and wait until the coronation, perhaps next April if that will be too soon than maybe a little later in June or July 2023. But the politics have already gone underway for King Charles III to mark this new era with his first State visit to France. In another order of things as they happen at this particular moment there are two ways: one is to keep on doing what the Late Queen would have 'continue been doing', and the other is that King Charles III doesn't have a new history just yet to make his royal moves across the world, if not a diplomat. At least not without the full recognition of the people and the Orb. From the window where we have witnessed this unusual ritual of regalia of the monarchy being removed from the coffin, time can only be father and advise to the people or nation on this strange tradition, at the centre of the earth and on our planet as a unique command. Our reality is nothing like to the Queen and her family came from, a thousand years or even more line of British monarchies. And that is just one part of what we see as the monarchy. Part II only consists of what the exterior of this rare interior means into the rest of the world, specifically the Commonwealth nations and territories. And Part III is globalization and geopolitics in British political and parliamentary history. King Charless III Part IV in the eyes, ears and minds of the people who do not want a monarchy, his part 4 seems empty. The people have a majority entrenched in maturity of politics, geopolitics and globalization while the nation still lived in the Elizabethan II century, just over twelve days ago. Something immediately tells you where King Charles will be experiencing a little discomfort with the people who are much more 'educated' by global politics in terms of realities and not monarchical traditions.

Let us not also forget that in the previous century in 1953 women were not allowed to be intelligent and educated or be damned as the devil's incarnate. (And perhaps with that later has turned the system of education for both aspiring parties or between interests groups - first only boys and later in time for both sexes- to a political agreement of indefinite conformity. Hence the time of change in the sixties, seventies, eighties and especially in the aftermath of this time where multicultural Britain had made a new beginning and encourage blacks or Asians (or Eskimos) to follow their ambitions for education- or an education of some sort e.g. Logical song by Supertramp saying it all - in Britain. This was what QE II has done for her people, as now is known and the most prevalent fact of her time as monarch in the UK and overseas.) Where the late Queen Elizabeth II as herself had arrived at 96 the political triumph over seven decades was the most unusual journey one can only describe as imperial and of epic proportions for a first female of her time. Oh, yes, we will know our loss when e.g. we have no idea how to make peace from a complex situation where the whole world finds war is the only answer. The hearts and minds today mourning her death and often are finding it hard to describe why she was greater than the rest, wait a little while longer and see what happens in six or more months from this day on. Men dealing in complex situations are more inclined to finish the job preferably now or one second earlier. (Based on reverse method disciplines. see logistics) As war is always too late than now and tomorrow even much too later. The reverse method is effective and time is not wasted. Is this how it happens in a probable WWIII scenario with the war in Ukraine against the Russian aggression or invasion? In other words the male optics do not see the appletree and it's blossoming flowers during conflict of interests, as would have Queen Elizabeth II during her reign do more efficiently. And the world will have also come to terms with the new situation without the monarch they have known for seventy years, e.g. the new world order with King Charless III. These are strategies completely different from what the Queen had after WWII and a complete willingness to commitment from all world leaders to world peace after 1945. Yes, this painful truth is that perhaps we were not just ready yet to let her go, so or too soon? Thinking here in terms or time and reason, not physiology. And a paradox too! Where love for Queen Elizabeth II is most fiercely felt, when it came to e.g. Brexit, once you are on the side of the European Union, that may come as a surprise to you how love is not adequate to bring her peace of mind, in death or life. We will never know her fierceness on matters of her realm and we should leave that judgement to either fate or destiny, or appeal at some point. King Charles III in many ways has been caught in between the time of change in the global world and his own with the death of his beloved mother and Queen. And the people with bulk ideas how to live their lives in a free democracy and world are not to be underestimated either at this junction of a new era after the death of Queen Elizabeth II, the reigning monarch for seven decades. Another question they will or are willing to answer is the part where heresy (that without the monarchy there is only hedonism) is can make a difference to the orb, if judgement against the people's free will is made to hedonism (thinking this is the time to change the world). With the writing here above even the most fiery of love for Queen Elizabeth II will end up in unrequited love, if the nature of that love means that we have signed to the Lisbon, Maastricht Treaties and Treaty of Rome. Perhaps it is then a love one (e.g. Yours Truly) should be gladly to walk away from?













8 September 2022


This night I should be speechless or still quietly chatter to her radiant image one last moment forever. Her Majesty Q ueen Elizabeth II, 96, has died today at Balmoral Castle in Scotland, peacefully and comfortably by the side of her family who will succeed after her as Queen and her reign.

God save the king, Charles III, son to Elizabeth II, Queen of the UK and Commonwealth.

May she rest in solemn peace.  










3 September 2022


Additional: the next big question will be whether morally the EU in future can continue under the same construction since the Maastricht and Lisbon Treaties for it's 28 Member States. Democracy also means when there has never been any mentioning of a possible war breakout on European Union ground in the Treaties, that the national treasury changes to a war chest, for each and every Member State. Saving the EU today, as Mrs von der Leyen assumes this morning in her pep talk against the dirty fuel of Russia and dependency on Russian oil & gas, should not mean falling tomorrow (e.g. within a decade). National governments have a point, deliberate or political, that where we have arrived today with the war against Russia wasn't in the Treaties. Isn't the moral question therefore if the EU can see the next decade to continue under the same construction as before the war against Russia in 2022? The EU has a defense policy and military and one wonders how the image of war and its cost were visualized, if ever this was visualized. After Covid-19 approximately February 2022 there was not much of a transparency financial picture of how much the cost of living already had been over reaching in terms of what exactly? Then the war against Russia in Ukraine was next in the immediate aftermath of the Corona pandemic. What are we looking at if we have to survive the energy crisis as a result from deep economic sanctions against Russia and it's aggression against Ukraine and the millions of ordinary EU citizens basic needs? Trillions of Euros? Perhaps a too impertinent question to put forward in casual writing. And how will that help the national governments without a war chest in the EU Treaties they have not signed up to de facto or de jure? Pressure is timing and the political mind for most EU Member States will be inclined to archaic means and belief that the EU construction does not sustain the heavy pressure of a war of great scale. And history taught it's citizens before when there is no survival of a political ideology or construction to do it the only way natural to Europeans, is to go their own way out of a dangerous situation, not International but national. No, we need more reassurances from the Top EU where we are now standing and will be tomorrow in the coming decade, and that we will have nothing to worry about it's construction in the war agaisnt Russia and the indefinitely shutdown of Nord Stream 1. That is what one could see as EU Military Defense when protecting it's EU Member States and citizens for it's own survival and ground universal principles.



A real battle of the minds on the energy price cap against Russian President Vladimir V. Putin comes with new pressures.

2 September 2022
(23:45 PM)

The G-7 earlier tonight have made the announcement that their energy price cap has been agreed on. The Group of Seven: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. But also in Bali where the G-20 have proposed a similar policy but did not yet find an agreement. Climate Change is high on their agenda in this meeting of the 20 Member States. Yesterday in the Gulf States Opec+1 decided it wanted to present the more realistic outlook of market stability in their industries for what they are calling the future challenges. And Saudi Arabia with it's reports in the news on fast growing economic prospects for the periods next year are also partly looking promising: here too the high energy prices are having a positive effect on their balance. Where do we in the European Union stand when the war (extra economic sanctions) in Ukraine against Russia is becoming anywhere in our developed economies and cities a grim reality for it's 477.7 million citizens, of which an estimated 250 million are low income or are living on unemployment and government social benefit. Winter 2022 could become a critical point for the national governments as this will also be for other Member States in the European Union, are a few possible scenarios almost everyone has already figured out individually. No one is looking back but are pinching their arms on the new realities.

Now perhaps is not the time to ask bizarre questions but one persists to ask what will the world be after the war and energy crisis that is affecting everyone and most industries in the European Union (and in the rest of the western hemisphere)? The grim fact is that it looks unending from now where we are standing. If the price cap on the Russian revenues surpluses from the energy high prices is not effective or will proof ineffective, in the very short term of two weeks, there is simply no telling of how this will solve itself in the coming fall in November. The elasticity of the cost of living will at one near future point snap and will cause human nature to regress, with no telling either how deep that might steep low. War in the Euro area has a certain logic about world wars with not many realizing just yet that this was before the European Union. Mr Putin perhaps to a certain extent has made his pre-calculations even before he had invaded Ukraine in February earlier this year. The Russian President must have known that sanctions were going to be the only action of war against his objectives in Ukraine, and knowing the balance on the other side that is the European Union. The militarized weapons of war to him were only going to be secondary, from his side of the specter. To him also as to the Russian people a physical cold war comes out as their natural habitat or home front, and they can easily now watch warm and comfortably (central heating or stove with the coffee pot boiling hot and bubbling) how the European Union hubris will come crumbling down and panic wide scale.

In between the short and long term there are rescue packages to help the most vulnerable and low income citizens, in memo 250 million European Union Member States citizens, that are meant to help out those who needed most. This much has already been communicated to the people in the Euro area and at national scale, maybe also to spur something of resilience behind the financial hurts that will befall most in this group. And like Covid-19 the pandemic had made it's impact on the world populations and their governments in an instant where this had never been experienced before from a virus. We are in the same situation again with this time no escape from catastrophe. It just makes you wonder who is winning the war, Russia or the west. For the last six months since the war in Ukraine broke out what we are seeing is that the pressure is much more on the west without the oil and gas supply from Russia, making with this the X- Y graph clear that this is in favour of the Russian President Vladimir V. Putin. The breaking points for the west are mostly because of the suspending of gas Nord Stream 1 or what happened six hours ago saying that Russia has indefinitely shutdown the Nord Stream 1. Financially that is not economics or science, but war. In fact a creeping world war against humanity. Which is the first of it's kind and has no equal under the sun as far as we know from WWI and WWII. Those paying insurances cannot file claims built on Russia's aggression against Ukraine and putting the EU citizens under inhumane extremities of life and death situations. Industries on the other hand have prerogatives.















The sticking point is that Iran has a moral obligation.

30 August 2022

From whichever strategic point you are looking, Israel or the West/ EU, the unchangeable course to take will still stay in the global demand. That could be also in Iran's long term objectives and strategic interests. Where we mostly get it wrong is to interpret Iran's strategic interests with the military ambitions for a nuclear armed Iran. Interestingly part of that interpretation is right as there is enough proof where e.g. the IAEA can access and reiterate the fact where this is more than an obvious evidence. After thirty years yet there the traces are flinter thin running, against for example a real nuclear armed power as that of Russia, close neighbour to Iran. On the wider scale when the world or much of the west are at war with Russia and want his aggression stop in Ukraine, the US President is right to push forward a diplomatic solution with Iran at this junction or point, and deciding that this requires thinking beyond realities from the old world order and during the time of its making. The future is where world powers have set their goals and they seem to indicate another important aspect of being final in a stage of it's own. Who is there to set the stage in the end? Tomorrow's generation of world leaders could be the new team, then. Israel too will be led by that same standard of future leaders. In other words what is now looking a bit obscure to the leaders of Israel could be very well be the beginning of a new Israel tomorrow. Under a different leadership style and which will be able than to see how important it is for their State and people not to stay out but to get in on board and move alongside with the rest of the family of nations. What do we know about Israel when their ways have never been different up to the present day? And what would the world look like if nominally Israel as State and people would be like ours in the west?

There are just two ways to go about this new JCPOA 2.0 deal. One is Israel and the other is the war in Ukraine on a world scale. Next question therefore can only be how to work diplomacy through the chaos or thought of it right now. Destabilize where the four most needed global demands are continuous are oil, gas, the monetary system and continuity. Ships can't go electric and the world of logistics across the globe will be sticking with oil on their hands indefinitely. Here is where all the money in our world is going to no matter any way you will be looking at it, and that is glued to time as we evolve, planet and people. Israel cannot e.g. take out any more installations out of Iran by overt or covert attacks while the Iranian President, Mr Ebrahim Raisi, is much more convinced of not signing the JCPOA 2.0 agreement/ deal. After 2019 simple logic once again is trying to tell us something empirical and who is listening? If the demand for oil and gas becomes an exponential global pressure, while Mr Raisi is hanging on to the last deal and walkway by the Trump administration, how do we see this skew? Without the nuclear threshold everyone is saying that Iran needs to wield power over the region and world, is doing fine without pressure by obligation. There are also no securities to make a deal last, at least not at the level of global constant cyclical demand as this is to no country realistic a desire. But all this can very well be only the thoughts of the observant not part of the world mechanics.

In terms of realistic optics: can Iran attack the Middle East or Israel for military reasons? And how put that to superiority abstract thinking? This looks unrealistic from afar when the world powers have military superiority to eternity. Where Iran did not succeed in Greece in it's days of antiquity how will it now survive a disproportionate attack by e.g. the US? Iran's power of domination in fact is the present time. If it fights out this abstract war against the world dominating powers by denying the demand they need from Iran, we will be looking at new ways in the coming time that were never calculated before. No one had made these calculations as everyone was quite happy with how the last time deal worked miracles and had made global impact by walking away from it. Those calculations are not workable anymore. Iran is militarily weak and can only shoot out by an occasional rocket and threat of wiping out Israel, but what it has now is worth more than thousands of nuclear bombs. It can now do what it does best: bureaucracy. Still only from an innocent bystander viewpoint. How do we put in moral obligation inside bureaucracy in Iran will be the most tricky of diplomacies as that isn't calculated just yet. Either by Iran and by estimation. Here is also that we are witnessing for the first time the dynamics of a static situation opposing the meaning of statics and dynamics in the old way. Coming back to where Israel stands in the present situation with Iran and the world powers one can easily see that it won't be the former prime minister Benyamin Netanyahu's way, but more likely the way forward is best served by Yair Lapid, Interim Prime Minister. 74 Years of State and nation building took Israel out of it's grass roots as a new people to Palestine and now are part of an integrated system of world powers. Even when at the moment the democracy of this young State is being heavily tested e.g. by the issue with the Palestinian people as immediate neighbours living side by side with Israelis. The Middle East is on the constant move and while we speak so are the Arab countries in the Gulf States next to Saudi Arabia, another major player in global politics and industrial demands. So, where does this leave us in the middle of the global energy crisis in our western home?















Will Benyamin Netanyahu now work with the coalition and forget his disgust for the elitist Naftali Bennett for the moment?

28 August 2022

It looks like to the ordinary observers in the global audience that Iran will not return to the JCPOA 2.0 agreement, principal cousin to the IAEA Treaty. (The treaties relating to the work of the IAEA cover a wide range of subjects, from the organization of the Agency's own work to nuclear safety, nuclear security, safeguards and nuclear non-proliferation, and civil liability for nuclear damage.) Israel will immediately respond with its own string of diplomacy against the signing of the deal, either by Iran or US c.q. EU. It is diplomacy of where Israel has not been before, neither Benyamin Netanyahu nor Yair Lapid, incumbent Interim Prime Minister. This is a particular situation that requires a disciplined review and processing of which direction will be the best way forward for the State of Israel, whether under this or the next government. Deciding who will be prime minister is equally of great importance. That is if it will go forward with the team Bennett- Lapid, the first being the last prime minister of Israel only a short time ago. Two months since 22 June 2022. The global audience perhaps has no idea how diplomacy can work for Israel, only used to what they can remember of the last prime minister in 2021. Almost three decades what Israel can remember was Mr Netanyahu or Bibi (when called by his nickname). But putting it more precisely what the people of Israel only remember today is that Benyamin Netanyahu is their king and that he was the chosen one. Iran however changes all that in the present time and also Russia with the invasion of Ukraine. And that has also made the former prime minister even more determined to start his 'diplomatic global campaign' against the new JCPOA 2.0 deal with Iran. All while the world is at a dangerous end and there are 'no automatic answers' this time. (Naftali Bennett on Iran last year in August after it had attacked the ship in the Persian Gulf, the MV Mercer Street) Is it wrong to get that impression of Mr Netanyahu that he knows automatically all the answers when it comes to Iran?

If Iran fails to sign the JCPOA 2.0 deal as early as this week the question will be what the west its response will be. Wherever they are looking they see only perils that have never been there under their microscopic idea of another time when nations were still sovereign and only traded through the WTO, the G7/8 (before 2014), and the G-20. And the Bric and ASEAN countries/ continents. We are now not sure what we are facing in the coming time without Iran signing the deal just yet. How Israel is reading the deal we can only pray to God Almighty that he has got it all wrong and that his kicking and screaming were only part of a personal theater and drama. This is why he should work together with the coalition and try to understand the difficulty in which the country is without the instinct for and of diplomacy and global politics when at war or in the middle of chaos. The man he never called prime minister and thought was arrogant to become prime minister with seven mandates, something we can dispute that perhaps not by consensus but certainly by consent from the parties in the coalition, and was therefore detested by the Likud and now opposition. But in particularly by the leader of the Likud Party, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. And then he made sure that Bennett would have no escaping from him when the settler's issue came to the table, to extend or not to extend the law. The prime minister resigned. End of the story? Why is this story now more important? When e.g. Iran can see from afar and takes from it its own ideas who knows what their wisdom will be when and if they ever needed to know the nature and instinct of their enemy? Naftali Bennett, now if Iran would draw it's tactics on instinct and nature he would prove a little nuancing and difficult. He is known to the leaders in the world and region as a man who is keen to do things the right way and holding up truth betwen leaders and States. Sometimes that truth is resolute depending on which of his stances, but as a young man he is also a man of the future and listens to the other party. My impression of him was always that he did so naturally and without prejudice. Iran was hopeful when Mr Bennett was prime minister, was also my impression from articles you could read last year whether in Iran (translated to English), or at AL Monitor. This year however Iran will only listen to it's own ears...

One thing that cannot be omitted from the drama the former prime minister in 2021 is screaming from the top of his ageing lungs and body, he is this year 73, is the Act unknown scenario where this will lead in the region and to what extent or price with Iran becoming the new economic giant or imperialist in the Middle East and outrival Saudi Arabia. But how will Mr Netanyahu convince the world of what peace means or is from his point of view, when the world also knows that he is doing so without a united front back home? And that includes talking and working together with the man he never talks to, Mr Naftali Bennett. It is the military way to find a format for a battle plan or tactics to engage the enemy, and you never do this on your own. IDF Sayeret Matkal in the sixties and seventies should have taught the former prime minister something how to lead the unit. But it is Naftali Bennett who had the privilege to serve in the same elite unit in the IDF as Mr Netanyahu, with one exception of having been in a time when the military had moved it's level of high tech weaponry and technologies. When Iran follows the man power of the political unit in Israel it is the military hierarchy between the units and men or leaders that will make the most impression, even when politics and their government is yet to be made mature through time. Iran believes the military to be immortal more than any other living creature or life, when they see it reflecting in the shields they bear. Iran will always remember ancient Greece one way or the other: "The decorated shields of all the attackers on Thebes described in the “shield scene” form a kind of single “mixed” shield, similar in complexity to the decoration on Achilles’ shield, which includes elements of intimidation, as it was on Agamemnon’s shield." That is if Israel knows Iran truly.

Additional:
Abstract
The article analyzes the descriptions of warriors in Aeschylus’s tragedy Seven against Thebes that are given in the “shield scene” and determines the pedagogical dimension of this tragedy. Aeschylus pays special attention to the decoration of the shields of the commanders who attacked Thebes, relying on two different ways of decorating the shields that Homer describes in The Iliad. According to George Henry Chase’s terminology, in Homer, Achilles’ shield can be called “a decorative” shield, and Agamemnon’s shield is referred to as “a terrible” shield. Aeschylus turns the description of the shield decoration of the commanders attacking Thebes into a core element of the plot in Seven against Thebes, maximizing the connection between the image on the shield and the shield-bearer. He created an elaborate system of “terrible” and “decorative” shields (Aesch. Sept. 375-676), as well as of the shields that cannot be categorized as “terrible” and “decorative” (Aesch. Sept. 19; 43; 91; 100; 160). The analysis of this system made it possible to put forward and prove three hypothetical assumptions: 1) In Aeschylus, Eteocles demands from the Thebans to win or die, focusing on the fact that the city created a special educational space for them and raised them as shield-bearers. His patriotic speeches and, later, his judgments expressed in the “shield scene” demonstrate a desire to justify and then test the educational concept “ἢ τὰν ἢ ἐπὶ τᾶς” (“either with it, or upon it”) (Plut. Lacae. 241f.10); 2) Aeschylus turns the description of the decoration of the “decorative” or “terrible” shields into a core element of the plot. The decorated shields of all the attackers on Thebes described in the “shield scene” form a kind of single “mixed” shield, similar in complexity to the decoration on Achilles’ shield, which includes elements of intimidation, as it was on Agamemnon’s shield; 3) Eteocles wants to establish himself as the king-mentor for the people, which will most clearly appear in the “shield scene”, where he solves a series of military riddles. These riddles require him to correctly decipher what is depicted on the decorative or terrible shields of each of the attackers. Aeschylus uses the shield as pedagogical tool in the tragedy Seven against Thebes, to which Euripides and Statius will later offer their alternatives by referring to the decoration of the shields of the leaders who attacked Thebes.

1 November this fall Israel will go back to the polls.

24 August 2022

Alternate Prime Minister of Israel Naftali Bennett last call to the POTUS and his administration, last night, signals the importance of the JCPOA 2.0 deal for the Israelis, that the US should not sign the new deal. While observing this that is also testimony to another key- importance during the new round of talks- process that started last year August 2021 in Vienna, that Israel has a political view on making prominence on concern and reason with the new deal (as also was their view in 2015). The political view did not result in a physical victory then and in the new deal, but has resulted clearly to the government of Alternate Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and interim Prime Minister Mr Yair Lapid in another victory that is that of global transparency where they hold their view on Iran and the JCPOA 2015 and JCPOA 2.0 the view of a political and geopolitical abstract.  

Continuity of State and people is a universal right to all nations. 

Israel appears to have resigned itself to the defeat of its prolonged campaign against an agreement.



Read more: https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2022/08/israel-resigned-new-iran-nuclear-deal-over-its-objections#ixzz7cpId4aQd

COTT comment: "Concern on YX- axis should result in reason and tackle the industrial plan in the JCPOA 2.0."










Can the State of Israel negotiate a different JCPOA- deal between Iran and the west?

22 August 2022

JCPOA 2.0 is not in the public opinion or domain. For better reading on the subject, when purely interested, one has to do this on the search engine of internet and read it. In the end you almost will agree with Israel that this is in the interest of public opinion for people living in the west, Europe or US. There is no simple understanding of what grave concerns Israel should have if the JCPOA- deal happens at the highest level of atom and nuclear scientists, title or staff. Reading the story from the newspapers will not provide clear justification on where and what exactly it is that Israel wants or perceives as 'a dangerous Iran'. 476 Pages doesn't make anyone in the public domain an expert, but you can already get the idea quickly by a first glance or table content. If there is full cooperation over eight to ten years between the IAEA and Iran, reading from the surface, slowly you are beginning to see a red dashed line getting longer and longer to it's end of why this could be to Israel a point of great interest. Without any toxic thing happened even. The JCPOA 2.0 is a bad deal because it is in fact a good deal, from an industrial scale point of view. The future right now has been physically slit through the middle man, woman, and child in global middle class industries and incomes, e.g. from the war in Ukraine. Clear answers, no. We have only one future as planet from only the industrial point of view. And that seems to be the new rationale or conglomerate between the super powers, for reasons unknown to the simple mankind. It has also very little answers for the military in Israel as we speak. The first JCPOA 2015 was abandoned by the US in 2018 under the Trump presidency and his administration. And in February 2019 Iran had slowly begun to leave the JCPOA 2015 deal, for it's own reasons. Israel under the former prime minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu was convinced he had done the right thing and sanctions would again be imposed on Iran to cripple the people and their regime, but more so their economy. On the military rationale imposing sanctions to cripple 'the enemy's economy' is old tactics, and making the mistake how far the military had come after WWII technologically across all continents, land, air, sea and space. And Mr Netanyahu did not stop there, but in fact had also made it his logic to the public that the economy once crippled could not finance it's nuclear arms race. The logic however is contrary to the former prime minister's words, because the money wasn't there but Iran did move on and with an appetite for nuclear arms race dangers.

The importance of Iran becoming a nuclear threshold for the future while the global powers are cooperating on getting much as possible of a nation- basis global power sharing has now become very confusing, if you take the former prime minister Mr Netanyahu of Israel his view. Something he personalizes to his electorate time and again during elections. And if you want to break with 'his tradition' and put Israel back in the negotiating corner during the JCPOA 2.0 deal and talks in Vienna, the best thing for the Prime Minister (not opposition) to do is to negotiate a good reason this time and not just grave concern. (Think Michael Oren, or even the former last prime minister- now alternate prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, both with similar views on the underlying potentials in the JCPOA 2.0 deal it's architecture) Mr Yair Lapid is interim Prime Minister and should keep negotiating Israel's stance as it is of great concern when Iran has the potential of becoming a global power from the industrial point of view as suggested in the building of the Iranian nuclear power in the JCPOA 2015. The public is under the impression that the new deal JCPOA 2.0 will semblance the first deal. Iran will not fool the world, is used freguently on social media and online newspapers. Here is where there are no redlines dashed or straight. The future will in the end pay little attention to the public domain or public opinion, if we can remember most recently with the global pandemic Covid-19 and the lockdowns for nearly two years. Industries now also decide for the public to pay for gas & oil prices from the monopoly economies of which no one understands how this was possible in the 21st century. In other words: be glad if you live, and be glad if you're dead too. Where humanity will stand on the platform of the global powers isn't something one cannot imagine anymore, but in fact you learn to live with it. For ordinary Israelis idem dito. But one thing you have to agree with is that Israel does see a dashed redline in the JCPOA 2015 and JCPOA 2.0. There is no saying right now how Iran will outgrow the region in terms of economics, nuclear powered, and regional cooperation, in the future. This destabilization is not just yet here... Equally important it is in Israel's interest to safeguard the State and people for future times. That is the military rationality in contrast to Iran industrialist future within the partners in the JCPOA 2.0.












Future seniority of euro currency, irrelevance.

"The ERM law or rule?" 

13 August 2022

Twenty years economic & monetary policies have one defense line deterrence for the European Union and the euro currency, that more immediately generates questions also on it's relevance. One other strong way of looking for relevance of course is the Maastricht Treaty signed in 1992 by the Member States of western Europe. Irrelevance: no one knows what happened after the UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband had signed, instead of Prime Minister Gordon Brown, the Lisbon Treaty in 2007 as we know today that the euro mechanism was only in the Maastricht Treaty. Yes, maybe, as Iphikles... Twenty years later now we know that after Gordon Brown left for a meeting with a committee on 13 December 2007 Britain has never again been able to play a relevant role for not being in the EU and has always said to be 'outside of the EU'. Brexit is the best answer for everything we would want to know about the relation between the 27 Member States and Britain. And with the present time leadership Tory contest after Prime Minister Boris Johnson was forced out of the premiership, some are saying that a new Tory leader will take back Britain to the EU, or leave it to the new Labour leader Keir Starmer to make the definite return. With the energy prices going sky rocketing the coming time many have lost their sight on the future of the global economy. Ukraine and Russia are not anywhere near a cessation of hostilities short or long term as we speak. And here is where the perception of the euro comes back and citizens in the European Union asking the difficult question why the EU is not doing more...

The euro was signed to promote and have all it's citizens inclusive as were or are the governments. It is not unfair to look to the EU for some of the answers how to deal with the energy crisis problem, when clearly the Russian President has stopped supplying Europe with gas as of last month in July. The European Union as a political magnitude however is not the same as having a currency old enough to give relevant answers where we are now arrived with the Ukraine- Russia war since 24 February this year. And how is it connected to the euro and not only to the euro area or the European Union? The answer: if Gordon Brown didn't sign the Lisbon Treaty and his predecessor before him also did not sign the Maastricht Treaty, how is it not connected to the euro when war is set against the EU Member States from oil & gas giant Russia? Also the prospect of another World War had never been precalculated by the Euro area in the Maastricht Treaty 1992, thirty years ago. It is no surprise that the first country was Britain who had sent billions of aid to Ukraine from the beginning of the war, with a currency much older and historical compared to the euro. You could say this was a very important signal into the world, too. Will the euro ever win the war from the oldest British currency law in our world, e.g. in the future? One can look up whether there is such a thing as future past and if that can relate to a young currency... Imagination tells you that filologically one could say there is such a thing possible, as future past. It would be ideally to use the same for the euro and say e.g. that it's seniority is the future past. 30 Years ago the world did not move as fast as today in 2022 with immediate new outlooks on 2023, 2024 and 2025. Time and speed/ velocity of 'the world moving on' is the strong reality component of every step the global economy is taking or making per second in future Real Time. There is however this other problem of the signature sovereignty... A very relevant aspect for the euro to find and to make it it's defense and deterrence in one linear line of tactics.

To be continued.

Line infantry: Line infantry was the type of infantry that composed the basis of European land armies from the late 17th century to the mid-19th century. Maurice of Nassau and Gustavus Adolphus are generally regarded as its pioneers...

Dutch: filologie. English: philology.

15 August 2022: note-

Note:
you would argue the Euro mechanism from what Keynesian economics had convinced the world economists in the developed countries and made it natural law science in every classroom to economics students.
The euro could suggest that it should become law, much as was the Keynesian law of economics in his time, and do so for the very logical reason of being an exchange mechanism. In mechanics the law is exchange mechanism, and once again law of motion. Imagine what the UK would have been without the Keynesian law!
Twenty years on the euro has come to being the only independent currency on the western half. But it's consequences have reached beyond the basic understanding of rule or signed by Treaty money. It was a necessity of time.
And scale- wise all objectives of the euro project became successful, perhaps wholly by surprise or precalculation much done by the work of the designers. The euro is hard work and the 21st century global world appreciates not only money. What was the first value the global world had believed in since J M Keynes? Here is where the mechanics of the Euro becomes law of exchange mechanism. It's new motion is now what their professionals call instrumental.
For the future generations of economists and scientific economics to explain the euro mechanism should therefore only be law (or how one put it: why it is a law of economics and not exonomics -new word?).
In the Maastricht Treaty the euro was rule and signature by independent Member States. There is no reference to the euro as law for any of these Member States present in the Treaty and by signature. The time of assumptions is over or just explaining the euro by it's exchange 'rate' mechanism. We know it has the rate in it's gearbox and drive the euro up to maximum speed. But without the science of exchange mechanism, by definition the law of mechanics, the rate falls of the cliff into abyss.
Keynes held up the abyss that was the economics after 1945 and the world was happy to follow his lead and science. Who did design the euro and let the world and all future economists study also now follow this good man. The Duisenberg law? E.g. what is the euro? Answer: it is the Duisenberg/ Jaques de Lores law.
Now the analysis. And saying so this means the mechanics of the euro science as a currency and law. Not trading. Perhaps not Mr Duisenberg, but Gustav Stresemann law...











Neom dream.

10 August 2022

The Line is not everybody's dream, one has to admit, because of it's infinity at the beginning and end. Simple mathematics teaches you that there is not a stop at the end of the line, any line with a starting dot and endless next x-trillions dots. Prince Mohammed Bin Salman however has chosen to keep his Line Project in Neom 170 km long. That is what makes his vision so hard to understand, perhaps in our part of the world and rationality thinkers. The value of irrationality and architecture was never visualized previously (except in art and obscene other ways during the renaissance and rococo) and that perhaps the Prince's vision has or will become one of just that. I have no idea. To have another closer look and also remembering the Architect's buro working and designing Neom and The Line is called Metamorphosis Group. It could be a link, except the metamorphosis that is called The Line then should have it's root somewhere in a different shape or form somewhere along this line. It is not to criticize the architect of The Line without having tried first understanding the exceptional design and visualization of it in a whole different era. But to make The Line truly great is there such a chance? Surprised by this bolt vision of architecture and being in a land with wonders that somehow we understand from all ages and times, yes perhaps that could be the middle of the eye with which we are now confronted, that from a far land from the western hemisphere out of the unknown came The Line. Boom! By the look of it Neom is nothing like a simple dream. Anyone could have told me (I make this a very personal writing) Neom came from Pluto and crashed into Tarbuk, because here it found it's perfect lining from the apogee and went straight into earth's perigee. For a visit and having a look around at our planet and earth's oldest prime lines coordinations. Prince Mohammed Bin Salman is not human... Perhaps he is a Plutocrat? Just a play of words, and yes, he is a Saudi plutocrat. How serious is he about the design of The Line? Again when having a much closer look at it's location by the Red Sea, close to Sharm El Sheik and Eilat (congruence of land), the reverse triangle does give it a lot more thought and than we see land, civil, sovereignty value. It is a position more favourable oddly enough when compared to it's twin neighbour Sharm El Sheik to the horizontal line as in the design The Line. From Sharm El Sheik to draw the mirror design of The Line there is a difficulty that is immediately, unless you draw this to Eilat along a vertical line. Or diagonal to Sint Catherine/ Mount Horeb in Judaic history of the prophet Moses. I still think of The Line as competency but not of a 'metamorphosis' order. The Prince of Saudi Arabia, could he have struck another order totally by accident?

Neom is the dream of an auto/ Plutocrat and not for people living in simple suburbans around in the world, or even for the highest officer bureaucrat (Housing & Urban Planning). Bureaucrats would like to see a civil city planning and low- key government budgets for what they perceive as sustainability of 'key areas'. Others mostly are unfamiliar with Mega Projects and a trillion dollar budget. Coming back to the military and strategic location of Tarbuk. You could say that in a way the political idea is not only the military but also civil if humans are expecting to live in Neom permanently. E.g. the so called Neom civilization and it's transformation, from Bedoin to dream- State. (So much better to be away from what so many call the deep- State back home in western countries) How can we highlight the dream- State of Neom? Someone please tell me. The Saudi people and bedoins are going to be an 'element' in this project, the Prince had said personally when announcing Neom and it's partners. That is an interesting angle as these are people who will only adhere to a plan that makes their archaic lifestyle 'great again' as in former times before Saudi Arabia had struck oil. Will the Bedoins be interested in mountain skiing, play squash, walk within five minutes distance to get food or water? But don't get me wrong, I like these realities on the ground and can only see them as the real challenges waiting in Neom to realize. Unlike the rest of the world where change and futuristic life have been realized since the eighties and rapidly too, these are not people who will submit to another lifestyle that has zero to do with their nomadic existence. In Sinai and the Negev deserts here are the troubles only beginning with colonies of Bedoins fighting for autonomy from either Egypt (Sinai) or Israel (Negev), often in more than one way. Will there be an influx of migration from Tarbuk? And they are right, unless you know another homeland for them. How will they understand that The Line only increases the land value for Saudi Arabia by accentuating it's strategic location in the region between the land and sea, if for the Bedoins there is only one life known the earth tent between the sun and gravity?

And at one point Saudi Arabia will have a new king. Blessed be he.

Error: Tabuk.













Met de stijgende energierekeningen vanaf Aug- Dec 2022, misschien handig om de huur tijdelijk te verlagen?

6 August 2022

Word of the day: energierekening omhoog in Augustus 2022 tot December 2022. Dus wat doen we eraan? Misschien handig om de 'sociale huur' onder de zogenaamde 'borderline inkomens' tijdelijk te verlagen, differentieel of ook wel een nieuwe theorie geheten in dit schrijven. Is er historisch een soortgelijk verhaal wanneer de energieprijzen stijgen (niet verbruik consumenten)? The oil embargo in de jaren zeventig zou een goed voorbeeld kunnen zijn hiervan, maar dan niet over het tekort aan olie bij de benzine pompstions in het land. Meer zou je in de richting kunnen kijken hoe toen de huren en hoe hoog ze waren voor de 'sociale sector'. Toen was alles nog gewoon simpel, want geen hoge huur gaf de mensen genoeg spielraum om de gasprijzen te deren. Het inkomen bleef dus een werkelijk inkomen in plaats van fictief. Dat krijgen wij nu wel te zien in de 21ste eeuw vanaf Augustus tot December 2022, waar de sociale sector/ borderline inkomens en een hoge huur betalen en hoge gasprijzen. Dat verkleurd het financieel plaatje wit of blanco van de allerlaagste inkomens. Je zou haast kunnen spreken van een 'spontaan' hoog fictief inkomen. De minister van financiën, Excellentie Mw Sigrid Kaag, heeft misschien al plannen klaar liggen voor de komende tijd in deze crisis met energieprijzen die blijven stijgen. In samenwerking met Minister van Vokshuisvesting en Ruimtelijke Ordening, Weledelgestrenge Heer Hugo de Jonge... Het is de schuld van de oorlog in Oekraine, dat zal wel iedereen straks ook nog zeggen. Maatschappijen binnenslands tegen kleinere maatschappijen 'vuistboksen' op lokaal niveau, dat staat ons misschien allemaal nog te wachten. De kou(de) liegt er niet om in de wintermaanden. Voor mensen, maar ook voor (mijn)huisdieren.

Uw dienaar,
.....................................................................











Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman aggregate total vision.


21 July 2022


From one glance on the new plans (last year 2021 in a 24.43' interview Al Arabiya) of the Crown Prince one point of attention is his apparent 'deadline', 2030, referring to the x million oil barrels per day closing period. As with many industrial plans in the global oil sector definite and detailed information is never publicly revealed, leaving everyone to estimate as experts or for those trading in similar expertise markets. How much this sells in the rest of the world depends on risk and trading in derivatives. Saudi Arabia historical wealth and oil production 1933- 2021 (last book year) however does not fit into the same aggregate vision when turning your head away from the multinational and multilateralism global levels. It is not the same for many different reasons based on simple observations where the new plans are literally 'first and new'. Visualizing something here of a hydraulic pneumatic system between the two - first and new- given opposite cyclical directions. It is an interesting screen down and viewing what is on the following page next. (Central government / hegemony/ democracy. Latter a danger of revolution...) To Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, age 34, new plans for reform seem very exciting (known in other parts of the developed world (The main plank of Keynes's theory, which has come to bear his name, is the assertion that aggregate demand—measured as the sum of spending by households, businesses, and the government—is the most important driving force in an economy.) as 'reorganisation') and if meant to be deliberate the domestic economic stream would be culminated in a desirable result and economic fact (in future time). From the videoclip it was clear enough to the audience His Royal Highness Prince Mohammed Bin Salman was clearly enthousiastic and especially when came to his precalculations about the future of Saudi Arabia and it's people. What does suprises you is that what we are looking at are the dualistic natures where the Prince one, is heading in the 21st century, and two, where the country has been since the nineteenth century/ beginning 20 th century. Staying here with the 21st century the question is whether Prince M Bin Salman is taking into account his plans for total reform as it's first year or even second or fifth subjected to where developing countries (decided by time) are making the same changes. Judging from the Saudis and their global economic wealth one expects that plans to 'change' domestic policies are plans to renew Saudi Arabia's representation in alignment with it's global partners, and not with partners who's first time are a matter of survival for coexistence of nation and country, and where the aggregate economic reform is a global adventure as well as a chance to get out of poverty via aggregate economics.


In the GCC+3 Prince Mohammed Bin Salman is a respected Member and Head. According to many stories about his life and career as apparent heir to the throne the Prince is planning on maintaining his role and work at all high levels in his kingdom or organisations. Question II: what is making Mr Salman, Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, anxious or even nervous about the future and his plans, what many deem to be his desire for reform? What most of the same crowd of people never ask is what if he is here to stay and anxiety becomes only relevant when it is just what makes him tick? On face value he is quite an interesting chap, when seen from afar and not be in the same presence as any interviewer when interviewing the Prince of Saudi Arabia. Exactly, that is what is or could make him anxious or nervous and why he would want only one thing in the present time: is to deliver. To deliver at 34 for a nation as old as your rivers and seas will put him under enormous pressure, and putting next to him on the balance the world demands especially where the US President, Mr Joe Biden, so resolutely has made clear his stance last week in Jeddah where the GCC+1 had met with nine other Arab countries in the region. What we must admire about the US President in Jeddah and after his visit to northern neighbouring country Israel and the Palestinian Authority President, mr Mahmoud Abbas, is that Mr Biden kept a brave and gallant posture while speaking with the man across the round table and to address him as Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, but also as the kingdom. (In other words: what does the kingdom of Prince M Bin Salman stands for... if...) In return the Prince paid the US President a compliment by reminding Mr Biden the same: the United States and the President. (What does the US and President stand for, so and so...) One could not have asked for more at this summit held last weekend in Jeddah, maybe also because of strict protocol and a limited amount of time by the visit of the US President and his Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, spokesman State Department, Mr Jake Sullivan and others. It has not escaped the world audience that when the President returned home in the US the media in particular wasn't optimistic about his four day visit in the Middle East. The President had failed his trip and meetings by adding nothing to the intention of this visit, especially the boost of oil by Saudi Arabia. Coming back to Prince Bin Salman it only seems fair and even right to discuss the message with Opec+ when they meet next later this month. Seconds of differences or variables have a side effect that is okay for horizontal businesses, but cannot be tolerated in the business of global oil production and it's currency. Politically everything else seems personal, self- will, and emotional or dramatic. Will the Abraham Accords stay in place or be revised with an appendix on the Palestinian- Israel issue and writing from the Israeli perspectives? It is everyone's impression so far that no one is expecting failure whether this be the Abraham Accords, the meeting with President Joe Biden in Jeddah, or the regional strategic securities. And time is ticking with Russia meeting with Tehran and Turkey this week.


Additional:

Personal choice (author ut supra) Israeli special envoy Israel- Palestinian resolution has only, unfortunately, one man in it's cadre of ex ministers or former prime ministers, Mr Naftali Bennett, and not the present time interim Prime Minister, Mr Yair Lapid in active government and paradoxically is a strong proponent of the Two- State solution. Mr Naftali Bennett is Right- Wing and opposes any Two- State solution period. Exactly the point where negotiations can be exchanged from alternative perspectives and preconditions, demands that could break deadlines or maybe bringing forward new openings. This is not an unusual drill to both parties here, one Saudi Arabia and Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman and two e.g. Naftali Bennett, and where honest brokering is essential. And hands- off.


In memo: when WWIII nearly broke out last February it was Naftali Bennett, then Prime Minister of Israel, who had the best position of organizing a meeting with the Russian President, Mr Vladimir V. Putin on the world stage where others had failed to be heard by Moskou. His resignation from government as Prime Minister on 22 June last month was on a matter of constitutional principle which gives the impression that he is also a man of patriotic conscience as 'prince' of his people and rather to stay unblemished from hurting them by playing politics. From the standpoint view of Right- Wing Israel which is the defender of nationalist ideologies, e.g. East Jerusalem and the Damascus Gate 1967, if correct Jordan (and not Palestinian), will not yield to this ultimatum of changing status where it proceeds with life and religion in the ancient laws for Israel, in it's 'occupied' territories. Or face fierce resistance, is to anyone's understanding after 74 years national and nation building in two ways: theocratic dominance and secular Israel as a sub dominance. It is here where the entities are conceived by the Jewish nation as the present time liberalism and desire to 'rebuild' it's relations with the 'new world' regionally and Internationally. Honest brokering comes in every situation as a matter of character residing in the chosen personality, incidently sometimes from the hardliner's position or the absolute monarchy and monarch. This is the trust in the God of Abraham where both parties want to make it work and not let a reasonable chance for normalization (heterogeneity based and not homogeneity) be lost forever.

The here above in the additional is the view of cityoverthetop.yolasite.com












Bahrain starting with logic for the GCC+3 countries in the region of the Middle East.


16 July 2022


Logic .... strategically surprisingly invites for extending or replacing old expansionist ideas between the member countries, seems like a good start. Accumulative for any further clear goals should be an indicative of what individual Arab countries envision for future strategic relationships and perhaps opening or hoping for opening new directives among the members at the table, hosted by the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman in Jeddah today. President Joe Biden confirmed the United States should be present and keep it's presence in the region indefinitely, that this also should not be open for random understanding or misinterpretation. (Not his exact words but interpreted) Logic equally should not be underestimated once there is enough consensus among the members where from beginning to end these are going to accomodate future partnerships. But there is one component in this architecture of the Middle East Logic if Israel is it's fourth dimension. Empirically the military presence covert or overt has over the last three decades have been identifiable as partly Israeli- US and partly regional fighting forces. Fear was never a component of any rationale until perhaps today and addressing the issue of the future in the region. There was something of a hesitance on the normalization relations between Arab members and Israel and proceeding from that starting point toward a more prosperous Middle East. The Saudis are drawing a straight long line from the Bahrain logic and see no immediate plans for normalization with Israel anytime in the short term period. There is a small missing link to their point of view as to also some of the other Members. Can Israel stop it's continuous war with the Palestinian people some time soon, or risk more or less to stay behind in the old world order before the millennium? Logic begs the question whether the future vision can be sustainable by keeping the smallest link unsustainable for indefinitely and cause imbalance in their design. A design that could have otherwise been an open new world on the planet and fully operating on sophisticated technological engineering and architectures.


The story continues.

Additional sketch:

Bahrain and human factor logic II- Middle East Economy & Macro Economics design GCC+3 level II term: 5- 10 years. Human factor is by nature not compatible with macro economics at sub regional- Egypt & Israel- domestic level; at regional level vertical projections favour both private and public sectors from this sketching point of view. Preliminary conclusion: the cycle of import and export symmetry is one, regional and two, sub regional, asymmetrical.












Jerusalem, 14 July 2022, tomorrow.


13 July 2022


Resolution Former US President, Donald Trump, recognised Jerusalem as the capital of Israel in 2018. Tomorrow it is expected to sign the declaration of Jerusalem between Israel and the US President, Joe Biden, in part of the reopening of the Palestinian Embassy as a prerequisite for the Two- State solution plan. Caretaker Prime Minister Yair Lapid is expected to sign this declaration.

I, MC Taytelbaum of City over the top, do not endorse the signing of the declaration of Jerusalem as written here ut supra. The U N General Assembly proper is the authority to sign declarations between nations, as it is to responsibly promote peace for the nations and region, when agreed between the parties.


Yours Truly,


MCT.............................................................


(Just heard about the 'declaration of Jerusalem' on I24 TV this morning)


Lectori Salutem


Rather that the Two- State solution draft should alter to a Two- States resolution and approach the United Nations Security Council (post inception Jewish Home), exemplary integration of land use, starting from nominal land use and view (historical or present time), as both 'lands'- one Jewish Palestine and second, Arab Palestine to find dual coexistence instead of competing for land by way of eternal bloodshed and without a thought on halt and excite a different prerogative future world.  

United Nations General Assembly: "The pandemic is not the only issue the world faces. Racism, intolerance, inequality, climate change, poverty, hunger, armed conflict, and other ills remain global challenges. These challenges call for global action, and the General Assembly is a critical opportunity for all to come together and chart a course for the future."











The letter US seems very clear that this was not to determine on severely damaged bullet and therefore making the outcome inconclusive.


5 July 2022


Two months later, nearly, one wonders about the killing of Shireen Abu Akleh and why this is dragging on this long since her death at the fatal day of her killing on 11 May 2022. Timing is important to point out with regard to the photo taken of the bullet, weeks later, when this was first published on Al Jazeera. The same photograph could have been sent on it's first day after her death around in the public domain or media. The US now in an official letter, coming weeks later, saying about the same bullet as in the photograph, that this was severely damaged and could not be determined any reference to a rifle (not literally quoted here). That makes it logical to conclude with what we see as inconclusive and technically you can't go anywhere near beyond fact and statement. Ms Abu Akleh's family, for whom this is not logic but a personal and dear loss, are determined to keep on seeking justice for the late journalist, Ms Shireen Abu Akleh. What Al Jazeera is not quoting when reporting on the US letter (Ned Price) and press statement, is what makes this killing very disturbing and how best to deal with: "The USSC found no reason to believe that this was intentional but rather the result of tragic circumstances during an IDF-led military operation against factions of Palestinian Islamic Jihad on May 11, 2022, in Jenin, which followed a series of terrorist attacks in Israel." The reading is one of caution and where treading carefully has been taken into consideration. The people may not know that nor anyone in the global audience, depending on how one reads the statement made by the department spokesperson.


Ms Abu Akleh's family also as a Palestinian family cannot refer to the killing of their family member as a routine killing by Israelis as known for decades long in what is known as the 'occupied forces in the occupied territories'. The US also seem to have taken her death very seriously and are leaving it 'inconclusive' in the sphere of a high profile investigation, for reasons that seem not to be made of public interest. At this point. Continue to seeking justice from the Abu Akleh family's standpoint is equally justified as a people familiar with the methods used by the IDF, Israeli Military, in Real Time on a daily and humanity basis. Another confusing way to put the death of the Palestinian journalist is to say 'why was her death or killing more important than others who have been killed by the Israeli Military?' The matter of militancy and armed out in the streets are different from going out into the streets and be the press. Reporters tell the truth and discreetly when they are professionals, what may look as propaganda by all military anywhere in the world. Whether in Bosnia, Uganda or Peru. And so forth. Journalism and war zones is toxic jounalistic territory. Ms Abu Akleh's death however strangely does not fit in the same category of 'getting killed in fire exchange' on a quiet early hour in the morning... Perhaps the ICC will come up with another report and make a transparent conclusion to Ms Shireen Abu Akleh's death. Reading the statement again one does not get the feeling of giving impunity to Israel. It's tone was rather more arbitrary, in fact unusual for the US press department always ready to say it more definitive.


Additional:

"Why do journalists stay in war zones?

War correspondents are protected by the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their additional protocols. In general, journalists are considered civilians so they have all rights related to the civilians in a conflict.


'Second statement' by US Spokesperson Mr Ned Price today, article The Jerusalem Post.

6 July 2022

Mr Price stating that accountability under wrongful death, “We do want to see accountability. We would want to see accountability in any case of wrongful death, that would especially and is especially the case in the wrongful death of an American citizen as was Shireen Abu Akleh,” US State Department spokesman Ned Price told reporters in Washington on Tuesday." And here referring clearly to Ms Abu Akleh as a citizen, which no doubt is referring to the Geneva Convention of 1949 and their protocols, that journalists are considered civilians and so they have all rights related to the civilians in a conflict. The public however do not see where this is going with the 'second statement' yesterday made by the US spokesperson Mr Ned Price. We can only assume that the US is trying to approach or meet the call for justice for the late Ms Akleh half way and to restore faith again in the judidical system known in the International world or in this case the United States. You have to say that it is surprising how far the US decided it wanted or could go in this particular and most unfamiliar case where the Israeli Military or IDF is part of a (global/ International) investigation, e.g. when a Palestinian civilian has been killed during one of IDF military operations against terrorists in a war neighbourhood, as in Jenin on the morning when Ms Akleh was killed, 11 May 2022.

In Mr Price's first statement on monday, 4 July, the day before yesterday, he did stated that the bullet came from certain angles taken from the IDF position. If protocol in the Geneva Convention 1948 has recorded these angles as proof beyond doubt in case the journalist as a result of exchange of fire has been killed, these positions and angles refer to a standardized protocol, as known in the case. Deformity of the bullet should therefore only come from the angle and position taken by the military or in this case the IDF. In any other proof where the traveling of the bullet does not fall or fit in the standardized category or the Geneva Convention 1949 protocol, that would mean or say cause of damage is referring to something outside of the GC1949 protocol, which is in this case not referring to that of the IDF. Another part of the damaged bullet is causing lots of grievance and this can be on either side of the parties in the investigation. To come back to Mr Price's statement on wrongful death, the astonishment of wrongful death seems only to refer at this stage to indeed what it is saying clearly that Ms Akleh's killing was a wrongful death and not taken from any intentional angle, but rather taken from a cynically new variant of 'unintentionally angle'. Meaning something totally non military but random.
Views are from cityoverthetop.yolasite.com


Additional: Geneva Convention 1949, article 49/50 quote:
"The development of arms and the increased radius of action given to armed
forces by modern inventions have made it apparent that, notwithstanding the
ruling theory, civilians were certainly “in the war”, and exposed to the same
dangers as the combatants – and sometimes worse."













Prime Minister Yair Lapid, Caretaker government from coalition agreement with outgoing PM Naftali Bennett.


27 June 2022


Precision has won the day and now the country can go to another round of elections, with Yesh Atid as caretaker Prime Minister and the other is opposition leader Benyamin Netanyahu and his party the Likud. This was not what was expected to happen late last night, but went as far as saying that the Likud could form an alternate government and avoid going to another election. Knesset procedures to dissolve Knesset the Likud would need 61 MK's. But miracles do happen when needed and the premiership could then be taken from the rotational government Bennett- Lapid and make it a lost chance forever against the Yesh Atid leader in the coalition or former government. Everything else seems eerie and quiet today and there is no fan fare tambourine heralding the opposition leader as Israel's next prime minister. Former prime minister Naftali Bennett against the background of all the new developments toward the fifth election is making assertive noises on how to go forward when including parties on the far or extreme right or left to form government. This is the experienced voice speaking against any deadlock in the next election results when it happens again. Prime Minister Yair Lapid can officially start his election campaign as of today, is my understanding. I am relieved for him and hope he can restore sanity in this broken system of Israeli politics and it's precious memory. This was his dream and one can feel a lot more sympathy for Yair Lapid as he is the only expert who has been studying the field of central government or it's centrality basics up to some abstract point, as this is not the system in Israeli politics. Not so surprising when he offered Naftali Bennett the first in the rotation to become prime minister, just because of his more advanced understanding on matters of improbable state building when difficult circumstances dictate the country and it's people to make fit for another idea, or more simple and attract a diverse party building to qualify as centrist and inclusive. But, and there are more buts to come when mentioning Yair Lapid's name, he seems right now the best man to fight for his belief in a new Israel that will match much of the polarised diverse society and it's anarchical social problems, whether for the man / woman/ child in the streets or higher cadre income citizens of Israel. Higher cadre citizens also and do have other problems, when not investing in domestic projects but take their capital overseas and invest in foreign countries... Or capital flight. (Creating a so called 'donor community' for the poorest?)


His party is the party not only for social cohesion in a national or local broken society, but also when promoting economic ideas deep into lowstream Israel. The private sector will remain operative at all times whether Israel comes down or not. As many have witnessed during two world wars, WWI and WWII. And to a certain extent also in the present time with the Russia- Ukraine war WWIII scenario. Prime Minister Yair Lapid could not have a stronger ally in the coming time as the former prime minister Mr Naftali Bennett. It's a fraternity made in heaven at least above 'Jerusalem Hayom'.


To be continued.













Campaigning in Israel makes it's political fifth round this time
again.

25 June 2022

Informal: Prime Minister Naftali Bennett will still be prime minister for another week till 28 June next week on tuesday. Interim Prime Minister will then be the next minister in the rotational agreement of the outgoing prime minister in the Bennett- Lapid coalition. One year feels like a whole new age that came too fast and was gone in seconds again, but did leave behind the trail of a Israel with a human face. Formal: President Reuvin Rivlin on 5 May 2021 passed the second mandate to Yair Lapid to form a coalition. In memo let's not forget that the mandate is still the most legal document to represent the 'will of the people' and substitutes for this during the prime ministership of any prime minister. How did Naftali Bennett get to this stage where he had to resign as prime minister one year later on 22 June 2022? We are back in informal mode politics, not in faculty politics during the Bennett- Lapid term in his first year. What is happening in Israel right now is also something important to ask, as if asking how it's political health is doing right now. A country 74 years old is still prone to fall in it's infancy from fever or any other children's political diseases. While the population is growing exponentially into maturity of some sort. A political philosophical phenomenon could make it look even more exponential, so we believe when listening to the leader of the opposition making his revitalized statements since the announcement of Naftali Bennett to resign as Prime Minister of Israel. "Naftali, Naftali, my son, your best day was yet to come when e.g. your second year could have been more than ever closer to creating the beginning principle of a central government in Israel, of course with the inclusion of another principle of Arab representatives in their political bloc," could come from a fairy tale story how Naftali Bennett was most unfavourite as prime minister. It is still a good fairy tale for future generations. Creating central government in his second year could have nevertheless made the real change for Israel and it's people, Jews and Arabs alike. We will now never get to that stage and see the light of day in it, I'm afraid. Likud is not made for central government, except where they could take the domestic political strategy seriously or as a sales point in some sort of quasi- political manifesto. Just to use a British term here and forgive me. What is next for Mr Bennett and Mr Yair Lapid?

Perhaps all of this went too fast with the resignation of Prime Minister Bennett and we are missing something here. Especially when he called the New York Times and have his interview where he could reflect on his days in Office as prime minister, just immediately after his resignation. Good thinking, Mr outgoing Prime Minister. But actually now it feels more like a tactical decision, why? As a complete outsider I thought the best way forward was to take where Mr Bennett had left and transpose some of it's economics and ideas to the next coalition government, even under Likud and Mr Netanyahu. The government of Bennett didn't do anything good in their first year with the high cost of living and taxes, so some are now saying post natal Bennett's prime ministership. Is there anyone practicing law or accountancy in Israel at all? Last year was at the least a poor result from previous bookyears with nil, nil on results for the economy in any sector you can think of or imagine. The signing of Liberman (Yisrael Beytenu) with the OECD, you could say was proof of the first move to bring back order in the Y- economy system of Israel, way beyond deficit and constant depression/ recession in the public sector and counting for at least 2-4 million people, Jews and Arabs. Prime Minister Bennett was and is not a wizzard to undo what was done in two decades in one measly year of his term. The man who was the only one in the world who could talk to President Vladimir V. Putin in a WWIII scenario last February and in the second week of the war between Russia and Ukraine, is now resigning as prime minister, because the opposition is refusing to vote with the coalition on a law that was designed to continue indefinitely or as long as the State of Israel was and is? Where does the Prime Minister thinks he's going? Surely this is the wrong man to send home now? On the offical website of Knesset his name is still Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and that should count for the agreement made with Yair Lapid as Alternate Prime Minister in the rotational agreement. Calling the leader of the opposition prime minister during this time is equal to treason. And treason is a very serious crime in every western democracy.

What could be the real motivation for the opposition leader Mr Benyamin Netanyahu to come back and this time return to power and the prime ministership? Judging from the writing here above one can make up his or her own assumption, that the Likud leader was dealing with a non political problem. It is and was always personal for him, because Naftali Bennett had grown into the new dynasty in Israel and getting closer to completely obscure the old dynasty of the leader of the opposition. Both do not have a political dynasty and yet... creating for the State of Israel in the 21st century the strange phenomenon of a mini central government, was dangerous to the old dynasty of schticks and tricks, that here Mr Bennett had hit the golden ground rule for this new political philosophy for 21st century Israel. At such a young age it would have made it the Hercules when threatened by the serpent in his cradle. What politics can do for Mr Netanyahu in the coming up elections is what the people should ask him. When it comes to policies and the present time of representing them the leader of the opposition seems unrelated in very high degree or smart politics to all that could bring back Israel from it's extinct political memory. Instead he is being pedant and creates around him this atmosphere of sophistication and suave, while he is living up in nostalgia in his former days of gone by glory. He is doing lot's of that in mantras and giving punditry while sitting under a large leaf (Coccoloba Gigantifolia) in the manner of the Indian guru or old aged Siddhartha practicing Sanskrit. Not Hebrew. A hundred years from today Israel will be 174 years old and then it might have political hierarchies and a military hierarchy to match it's ground principles of a democratic State and peoples. It's level: multicultural and bilateral. And religious. Will the West Bank be any different then in comparison to what it has been for five decades in the 21st century? Likud Member Ms May Golan has said last week on camera (ILTV) that the Likud is saving Israel for generations to come. Why did the oppposition not vote with the coaliton on such a high matter with national priority as principle of the State when it came to voting for the extension of the settler's law? And then there is also another poignant matter of the bill to dissolve the coalition Bennett- Lapid by the Likud. I stay with my earlier writings on this issue.

Additional: not voting on national security matters (the settler's legislation) the coalition gets an interesting angle to ask the opposition how they would vote e.g. if Iran would attack Israel between today and wednesday and that Prime Minister Bennett would have to go to war.  
















Prime Minister Naftali Bennett resigns his term in the rotational coalition agreement.

21 June 2022

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett resigns from the rotational coalition agreement and will serve as Alternate prime minister under Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Yair Lapid. This came last night on 20 June as a shock to the system in Knesset and no Member of Knesset had never seen it coming, that the initiative would come from the Prime Minister himself and not to resign under a bill from the opposition, and under Mr Netanyahu, to oust him next week on wednesday 29 June. From what it looks in a I24 on last night camera questions the reaction from the opposition Likud leader was clearly one of surprise, as he made a promise for all the citizens of Israel, Jews and Arabs, almost in confusion. That will make things certainly all the more interesting the coming weeks when Mr Netanyahu will start campaigning for his return to government as prime minister. For all citizens of Israel, Jews and Arabs, comes out of the government under Mr Naftali Bennett's playbook. And for which he was punished by the opposition and in particular Mr Netanyahu in person, all year long during his term as Prime Minister... Was this something we could expect as it is now and happening, with Naftali Bennett to 'retreat' from the coalition as Prime Minister of Israel? Expecting it, yes, but on his initiative was a brilliant move to knock- out his opponent important piece (rook?) on the chessboard as if from out of nowhere. The game is not over but nevertheless the move was unexpected and came from an angle the opposition leader did not or could not see it coming. The caretaker Prime Minister Mr Yair Lapid will now continue the game or this match via castling and proceed from where Mr Naftali Bennett has left off.

With the new polls conducted overnight one can see that this has gone back in mode of what Mr Netanyahu calls the 'real government' and his return to power. One thing to point out is also that the bill expected to be handed in next week to dissolve the government/ coalition was or could never have been legally binding or unbinding when not matching the prime ministership of Naftali Bennett, for one reason. Mr Netanyahu, nor Gideon Sa'ar, had the impression that Mr Bennett was their prime minister. The bill was meant for the Prime Minister, de jure. It is always custom here that it only comes down to what you are telling the people, the electorate and your base voters to win your majority and build up from there your success! This of course is Israel where technicalities of titles and laws do not make any match of political and a democratic DNA. In fact the political house and it's democracy in Israel are showing in fact the opposite, that a. de facto there was no prime minister during this time since last year 13 June 2021- 20 June 2022, as secondo the opposition has never called the official name of Prime Minister during all this time by force of title. (Something he made fraudulent and of false entitlement, on malice) What is the opposition bringing down de facto or de jure in this bill next week that Mr Netanyahu had in mind to vote against the coalition/ Mr Bennett as... What exactly? What I personally liked last night to hear the prime minister saying is that he is resigning and doing so with pain, but that there would have been a legal chaos if he would stay on. It takes a more better view outside looking in at the Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett holding up rank above intrigue when faced with exit of government and the coalition now under Yair Lapid, Foreign Minister and Prime Minister of Israel.

The Emergency Law for the settlers in Judea & Samaria will now pass or be renewed for extension of another five years, one JP journalist wrote after the announcement of resignation by the PM.

Ahead of Naftali Bennett there is the future and while he is still a young and energetic young man so much better would be for him to continue his studies, whether in the State of Israel laws or mechanisms in politics post his prime ministership. The star now in the night sky of Israel shines very bright, but perhaps that is all it is for now, bright and becoming too bright with no human warmth and courage.


The bill to annul the Prime Ministership of Naftali Bennett by the opposition no one should berate even if there was any chance to consolidate with a majority successfully. 


Additional:
Two bills: one addressing Excellency Naftali Bennett, Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Yair Lapid, Prime Minister from 21062022, to dissolve the coalition par force by opposition leader, Benyamin Netanyahu (not titled Former Prime Minister in any legal document); and the other one addressing Benyamin Netanyahu, opposition leader of Likud, to be barred for forming government or running it as prime minister. But when addressed by opposition leader BN in the bill (legal document) as by power of ? to dissolve Naftali Bennett (private person) this is not a legal document. In the bill it must read that the opposition leader is dissolving the coalition of Prime Minister Naftali Bennett to make it a legal document and dissolve his excellency the prime minister of Israel (executive).










21 June 2022



(01:03 AM)


Tonight, 20 June 2022, Jerusalem,


Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, and Foreign Minister & Alternate Prime Minister, Yair Lapid, will 'hand in' a bill next week to dissolve the coaltion prime minister rotational agreement. I think at this time next Israel will need all of good luck and form a new government after the coming elections.

Thank God Almighty of Abraham for the translucent government of Excellency Naftali Bennett from 13 June 2021 to 21 June 2022.

Yours truly,

..............................................................................................







In memory: Shireen Abu Akleh, 1971-2022.

19 June 2022

After a forty days period of mourning for family, close relatives, friends and colleagues, Shireen Abu Akleh once again was officially remembered in her place of birth and life today in a public memorial. The memorial read: "Shireen's blood will not be in vain. Yes to achieve justice and... " Accountability- should be the actual reading and saying with that how the law of accountability works as the International instrumentation. "... And hold the perpetrators accountable for the cold- blooded murder." Colloquial can sometimes get in the way when the emphasis is on enforcement of law and order (at national or international level). Someone should advise the party investigating the murder of the late Ms Akleh to excercise caution with their certainty of the facts a priori to the conclusion of the e.g. ICC investigation. Instrumental that would mean that the 'perpetrator' has already been tried, juried and condemned, even without getting a chance (equality is also law in the International world) for their defense. The real advise is that this killing of Ms Abu Akleh should proof adequate evidence for any military tribunal court or it's representative of choice, this is the ICC, for hearing... 'Opening' of hearing would be it's first importance during the process of investigation. With any free interpretation of condemnation, by media, publicly, or other, loss of weight of the case could occur and with no personal or biased intention.

The killing (by simple observation) of Ms Shireen Abu Akleh qualifies for any forensic and scientific, military or civil, standard for a thorough investigation as it was equally a very dramatic killing and with clear visual of where she was faced down and laying lifeless on the ground. It is not a matter of 'face value' criminal investigation level by the local Police and for public opinion. The here above is localised and not related in any way specifically to where Ms Akleh was found dead in the local place of Jenin. The perpetrator is what the investigation is trying to 'localise' or to locate. Also, with the call for an independent investigation, this is the work of it's mechanism that both sides are equal parties and will have the right to defense, as one understands. There simply cannot exist a fast judgement or verdict in this particular murder case across the assembly line of court cases around the world on perpetrators of war crimes against humanity. For reasons of it's own the killing of Ms Abu Akleh is looking more specific and has one or two unique features to it as a whole. Forty days of mourning her tragic death will not be enough after the investigation is concluded, perhaps at the end of this year or maybe next year in 2023. The only truth that comes to mind is that the whole world thought for a moment that it pains them all to have lost a fellow human in a tragic death by murder. Diplomatic jargon fails terribly to describe the tenderness of Ms Abu Akleh and her death by findings, which perhaps is looking very much as if this can be forgotten. What makes Israel impunitive? The world now knows that the impunity of Israel for the killing of it's Palestinian neighbours in places, Gaza or West Bank, is based on many decades of failed geopolitics in this part of the Middle East. The government with the new Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, also will again have no direct answers to why Israel has shot the Palestinian journalist when she was clearly doing her job that fatal morning, 11 May 2022. However, as was the original sin the basic human law, so too is the military justice law the original 'sin', that Israel has laws out of the court of the public, which is widely interpreted as 'impunitive' when envisioned by the public domain. Especially when operating as the military in the 'occupied territories' against any 'alien' movement and doing so indiscriminately.

This is also a people that are capable of executing a prime minister (Jitschaik Rabin). Decades later impunity prohibits any further investigation of his death and circumstance. In the 21st century we must hope that Shireen Abu Akleh will not like the late Mr Rabin be sharing the same faith of complacency and fatigue of law and order in a broken society like the present time Israel and it's struggle for relevance in government.












19 June 2022


In memo today one year later since the coalition under Naftali Bennett Prime Ministership.


Bennet's war cabinet, if forming the next new government in Israel.
(Personal op)

3 April 2021

Mr Bennett, if prime minister of the next government, has two priorities for rebuilding public trust in politicians and political parties. There is his own vision and that of the nearest future. How will he achieve both at the same time with a cabinet that has attracted also in the last election some of the other third parties on the left? Israel has arrived at this point of real political height in a democracy that was frozen over in the last governments under Mr Netanyahu. The people and the political parties are now looking much more included in this model, but he is not going to just yet make it without true pledges. What he seems to know is that with Mr Netanyahu out of government, he is the new face and voice to convey the message of the future. The latter also being at the brink of a new era around in the Middle East and in relation to global leadership. Which are the new prime minister's big project and priorities and which are his national priorities, if he can make the distinction? It is interesting e.g. how the Biden administration is making a new approach in the Middle East and the Palestinian issue, but also when revoking sanctions on ICC members as outgoing Mrs Besouda, ICC prosecutor. If there is a new era in this part of the world what then can the new prime minister expect to see or hear? No one just knows yet unless interactive peace is what is on the geopolitical menu. It is of great importance that the new prime minister will take notice of the changes being made by the US administration by approach. For one reason that his government will comply with these different sets on the global political stage how best to proceed where the world had stopped during the Trump administration, where there was such a thing. The newly elected prime minister of Israel does have a vision rationality for peace with the Palestinian people and between Israel and Palestine, if one cares to listen to his speeches in a previous time during his years as a minister of Defense and Education. But when habit is his main adviser and that of his cabinet it might go the other way and he will have to parrot the former prime minister (by then). Such an image of a man with a vision for peace, at home and abroad in the Middle East, does not make an adequate rationality as he is intended to portray. In his first addressing of the people also it is another importance to inform the public of his intention and how he intends to centralize the incoming parties on the left to his right- wing cabinet. Daily life in Israel should not be again about, what you can't buy dream it. What you can't earn, dream it, or, what you can't have, dream it. The frozen years are over in one strike.

The Middle East will be best served as an interesting partnership with different partners in the region, be it interactive or other. Israel has arrived with a crashing into the first moments of the future in this last election. It has also been heard abroad of how the political struggle was in fact a real one this time and not as many had said or thought of before the election, that this was theater and theatrical. A weak public now feels they are first and have reached the center of politics, a first time too after many decades of adoration for the man they worshipped as their prime minister, mr Netanyahu. Yes, indeed, Mr Netanyahu was a formidable man as the prime minister of Israel and also on the global stage. He will not be matched by any other next prime minister, even when Mr Bennett or Gideon Sa'ar would be the next prime minister. He was the unequal among equals prime minister without any doubt to say so. Even when sometimes it looked as if the world only wanted him to stop being the prime minister. Now, there is also this issue of State finances. In short there is the political architecture for the new government, and the second big priority would naturally be after this election State finances. How will the new prime minister make this differentiality with the former governments? There is news in the Jerusalem Post this morning that Mr Bennett is not as capable as one would believe to lead the people of Israel. Leading here is a big word when a frozen lake. Leading when the freezing is melting, now that would be something of a different nature to the kind of leadership that was never there. Mr Bennett should know the drill as he was a military commander in the IDF and would know how to deal with surprises during duty or excecution of combat. A simple protocol reading can sometimes do many wonders in these moments and then save the day. On the base back in politics it will remain a mammoth task to lead old Netanyahu veterans on the right when still mesmerizing in the Netanyahu 'democracy' years. Change is unpleasant for habitual persistence. That could turn ugly or in rumours. It could also trigger either a new election or party leadership contest. For now the question is whether the political system is ready to support the weakest link in government to lead right and left and endorse Mr Bennett as prime minister. Or get back to the 'Netanyahu style democracy' model. After all it is primus inter pares. And there is also a battle line in politics, sir.




April 2021 emancipation of timing today.


Outsider's view: not only a democracy (Bennett, Lapid, Saar and Lieberman), but a middle Israel translating to the people (instead of abstract centrist), and perhaps a little emancipation from the angry national mood against any change (political lethargy)? The mandate given to Mr Benyamin Netanyahu will expire in two weeks, on 4 May.
Insider's view: the current prime minister is a factor and is international as national knowledge. His party between left- wing and right- wing is not the idea of the Middle Israel in politics as suggested here above, in a new model of democracy.
Democracy formation by Yair Lapid, Naftali Bennett, Avigdor Lieberman and Gideon Sa'ar in two weeks time from today is a fast / quick formation. And new experiences lack experience, technically. If e.g. Mr Bennett would leave the 'unity government' at any given point in the future the question is how will he reunite with the Right- Wing and be the come back home kid? An election by that time could become his political coup d' grace in a new election for building a majority on this bloc. And the left may also not be fractured at the next general election and in fact perhaps have gained ground and political power in the meantime, and so becoming an exponential threat to the Right- Wing.
All that could disappear by a simple design of Middle Ground or Middle Israel, keeping all voters on the Right or Left, or in between the Liberals, safe. Democracy should not look over it's shoulders day in- day out, as this have been for the last two years on the previous four snap elections held in the country. There is a slight suspicion of the Left- Wing gaining incredible power if they will form government this time around, and be the first firm government in the 21st century to make a new start in Israel's political memory. What could also strengthen Israel are it's Jewish political allies overseas in the diaspora, now feeling the liberation from a time that was Right- Wing for thirty years, with little or faint intervals of a Labour Party attempt to keep the Left in power. And Left- Wing is making another point and one of vintage memory, how this was the start of the nation during the forties, fifties, sixties up to the eighties. All before the Netanyahu era and his global leadership. This is the time for Israel to remember the real kings in Israel's history, ancient history and the present time to make the people come back to a living memory.
Change in the Middle East and around in the world in the western hemisphere can work better with democracies by rule. In Israel democracy requires a third dimension if a serious attempt to make it lasting as it's vision. Once this third dimension has been designed and a Middle Israel is placed in the middle of the public domain, call it central government, change can then finally begin. Timing is motion and once you pressure it to friction everything could be exploding or be lost in a sharp curve, let's say filled with conflict and not only internally but also, e.g. with the Palestinians. Above all democracy is pure law and human nature, and can sometimes be even indifferent once it has grown or grown out of it's adolescence.
The new campaign for change starts now and the most serious of all questions will be that of who will be the next prime minister of Israel, next time... Memory will serve the people that Right- Wing man, Mr Naftali Bennett, did he not form government with the Left- Wing parties in 2021? Israel should not return to March 2021 when and where it started from and came back to the only two sides in politics, Left or Right, and when Left- Wing was being perceived as a perversity among Israelis. It is not for perversity they need change, but for humanity in politics and society (liberty and freedom of speech). There is a subtle difference somewhere here in this proposition. Perhaps even a more philosophical one of politics in Israel that has never been excercised before or just yet. With a strong inclination toward the religious and Zionist existential presence in Jerusalem it is only wise and prudence if a Middle Israel in politics could be designed. If only to prove that no one steals from the other more than this or that one. (Power grabbing) The Israeli democracy can now come forward as it really is and sees fit for the people of Israel, and not aping democracies made out of kingdoms and empires, also deteriorating and are looking for constant remedies.

If Mr Bennett wants to return to the Right- Wing as a majority bloc, one wonders what his reasons for the split would be and leave the unity government in the present time and near future. In the public's eye that would come across very unnatural and passé to return back to the Right- Wing bloc and say that he is everything the people want. Mr Bennett still in full energy to continue his political life then would face a stubborn self image of has been, wholly unfair to his age and short time in office as a rotation prime minister, but also how does one fight the law of nature in a natural ending (like a flower that has bloomed prematurely)? Mr Lapid will or might keep on continuing. And that would be the surprise no one had thought that this could exist. We are still looking at possible scenarios, if this time after the fourth election will not end up in triumph.

Is not Mr Gantz now being seen as the rotational prime minister who never was?





Unity government on rotational prime ministership in Israel?

22 April 2021

From an outsider's view: not only a unity government but in the long term it also should become a participation government. (With the Arab parties going to the liberal seats, as so to stop controversy coming or going to the center stage of politics) This unity government also seems like a one term solution and not to prolong the current political crisis. But in the middle when rotation changes hands we will have another breaking point, and after that the next general election to go back to the majority party rule in government. Especially seen from the point of view of Right- Wing, then prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett. We don't yet see any new updates on the situation how this is today, on the Jerusalem Post, but it is expected later on that we will have more on this, also whether or if any change in the Netanyahu bloc has been made in the meantime. This situation could go from bad to worse when there isn't a clear design ready- made to explain to the electorate on both sides, and not forget the side of the Arab parties, why there was no other solution but to go ahead with an emergency change of rules to form a coalition. Is mr Naftali Bennett seriously heading towards 'widening the political spectrum' in Israel with his Right- Wing party and change the present system that has been known to all of Israel for the last three decades under Mr Netanyahu? Here is the political devil at play, with a unity of Right- and Left- Wing, but also the Arab parties. It is especially one to notice when swearing in a new coalition into Knesset, and strangely enough not visible if one considers the Arab parties that have been part of Israeli politics now for some time. Mr Bennett is not only taking on an enormous step forward, but he is also making a great commitment to step back from his 11 or 12 years experience in government as minister of Defense and Education.

His announcement last night to head a unity government (Yesh Atid) if Mr Netanyahu would not be able to form a coalition before 4 May, in two weeks time, was almost as shell shocking before or post anything happening from now. The people will not understand how this has happened and that Mr Netanyahu is right to say that you can't become prime minister on sheva mandatie. The wider view and deeply rooted in ancient Judaism on the other hand can say that this was done before when King David went to Achish and formed a 'strange alliance' with the Philistine prince. It is true that what Mr Bennett has been suggesting here to head a unity government (with Yesh Atid) was committing himself to a 'strange alliance' which is how you feed to the political hybrid beast in history, wherever it takes residence in a direct democracy. Someone or something will benefit from this opportunity, in the end and become himself the hybrid beast... It happens, more than once or often. Design is therefore crucial to this political asymmetry at this very moment and do it a pronto. Before the break point will come when changing hands from Right- Wing to a Left- Wing prime minister and being cheered loudly by the parties on his side. This moment should be celebrated in a different style when it's beginning were humbled by crisis and not victory. What can the moment at the breaking say or be named and let the prime minister- rotate on a post steady course? His destiny? There should also made provisions at the beginning how Mr Bennett could go back to being a 'majority' and out of the unity government with the Left- Wing. (His Yamina Party at this start of prime ministership was not a majority) This is why symmetry is always the best and more strongest of democracy and it's architecture. 1 1/2 Year to be prime minister in a Unity Government is not only finite, it is forever finite.

Israel itself is also not ready at this point to accept a different system than the current one, to serve all the people alive in the country. Seven mandates should also not become a ridicule in the mouth of the people and have a laugh forever on Mr Bennett's expense. The people do not have a 3D vision to understand how difficult the situation was and how architecture works in politics, that most is done by structures. There is no such thing as a structural emotional democracy, just as much as there isn't a structural emotional economy. There is a difference of moral and ethics when social democracy leads to social welfare in a State! Many are also forgetting that Mr Bennett not only has seven mandates, but that he has also 12 years of ministerial experience in and outside of Knesset. No one will bring him presents on a 1 1/2 year prime ministership, as the rule says that one can only do that after a 10 year prime ministership at least. Today when not receiving presents, Mr Bennett also is Saul, who did not get any presents from the people or men when he became king. How bitterness remains our lesson in ancient and the present time histories, that is something that is followed by human amazement all the time. What can the politicians explain to the people at the moment for this Chimera- split prime ministership in Israel 2021? As much as it is important when unifying, so this will be at the time of divorce. No one eats half the apple and throws away the other half, when sweet.











Prince Louis, after the Queen's Platinum Jubileum concluding day sunday, after all was just a child.

7 June 2022

Prince Louis, or young Turk, and a four year old toddler, so many are saying that he had been the star at the Platinum Jubileum of Your Majesty's 70 year of celebrations. It is hard to believe but the Queen at 96 is his great grandmother through his father's paternal line. In a rare moment that was reflected infinitely in Prince George his eyes, when standing next to his great grandmother, the Queen, and singing 'God save the Queen' on the balcony of Buckingham Palace. He looked up to her and smiled at her and for one second this was a long and extensive smile for worlds to come, or perhaps going away forever? What the world could see far and close was the family of Windsor standing one last time of the Platinum Jubileum to herald the future of this family of kings, yes including young toddler Prince Louis, now only four years old. By the time he will become king, let's say in the year 2097, after his brother as king of England, again, let's say from 2057, with perhaps no small intervall of Queen Charlotte, Britain will no longer be the same of what we have witnessed on the balcony (1703) on sunday evening when the Queen decided to come up and wave to the people of Britain. How do the royalists envision the building block of the family seen sunday evening standing in close format of ruling future kings on the balcony? Sunday 5 June 2022 will be remembered as most memorable for it's warm and enjoyable moments during the four days celebrations. Watching the Royal family on the balcony closer one couldn't help but wonder about the future and if what we were looking at when focusing on Prince George and Prince Louis, that each will know a different era and time in the lifetime of the British monarchy. By the time their father (King) William will be in half midterm of his reign, perhaps there could be a monarchical or constitutional crisis for Britain outbreak, or that by 2057 at the age of 80 years old, King William will abdicate and instead let his son Prince George become king at the age of, let's say, 40?

The monarchy could get into more real trouble by the time Prince Louis becomes king, maybe at the age of 70? And God Almighty alone knows whether what was a glowing warmth of national affection climate for the Queen on sunday evening 5 June 2022, Queen Elizabeth II, and her family, and watching the young toddler Prince Louis play and being a child, that what we actually were looking at was Prince Louis and the last British king of Windsor. What the world had witnessed on sunday between the Royal family, Queen and country, God Almighty felt compassionate and let Prince Louis melt the hearts of so many throughout the world. Even as we speak people can't stop talking about these displays of spontaneous behaviour so many parents know when watching their children doing the same. Tantrums is the social name for it, I believe. Boys and girls can surprise their parents, school teachers, or just any adult, and there is no format for this surprise. But we have also seen when he was sweet, standing in the kitchen and doing some work on cakes with his brother, sister and mother, the Duchess of Cambridge. A photograph showing Prince Louis holding a sieve powdered by flower or cream, almost in a solitary frame. At 70 one day he might be king and only tolerated by a few dominion holders of the world and be the symbolic relic king of a time that was no more... Unless Prince/ King George will be the monarch to rebuild the monarchy at the age of 40 when he takes over from his father (King) William after a short remission. Here we are only looking at one projection when the life of the monarchy extends it's natural course in time. No one knows how the world will be moving within the coming time/ 30 years and if we will not know another WW.

Prince William sincerely believes that there is still hope and has said so in his speech on saturday evening mid celebrations to announce What a wonderful world. He should pray for hope during his reign, is what one could say while keeping globalism in mind. Yours truly is 65 and won't be here anymore to witness all the changes written here above, whether this is what will be or not be. Mind you, love that is good is still judgment like marriage. And the God of Abraham seminal is mercy.












"Shireen Abu Akleh is dead. Jerusalem is ours," a young settler was chanting yesterday on the Jerusalem flag day for Israelis.

30 May 2022

Listening closer the chanting against Ms Abu Akleh against Jerusalem and flag day of Israelis, now designated Right- Wing racists, this was astonishing and political. A young Israeli male was practically referring Ms Abu Akleh's death to a political dispute over Jerusalem as the city of Jews versus the city of Palestinians on flag day. Is that how these young generation of Jews will remember Ms Akleh's death in their future time? Politics between Israelis and the Palestinians seems embedded in the deceased journalist her death and burial in Jerusalem. No one at this point in the investigation however is asking the difficult questions and are, or that seems to be the case, quite satisfied with the preliminary results for the last three weeks (nearly). In the rest of the world in the public domain there are few people who speak and understand Arabic and it would make an interesting listening or reading if that had been the case. When you rely on the western media and their translations there is not much you can change or ask more specific questions. In Arabic Al Jazeera gave an interesting grilling of one of the young men at the scene of Ms Akleh's death, when it happened and as it happened. This interview in fact would suggest the bigger picture behind what drives the Middle East out of sight from the rest of the world. And you do not need to understand the questions, it was a grilling and you could tell. If so this makes Qatar the only party in the investigation that has a dead serious interest in the case of the killing of Ms Abu Akleh not to make it routine. Listening to this video clip on Youtube.com what it looks like is that Qatar considers more to her death as a seal of blood when not solved immediately. What could be the consequences when delayed and left to more popular belief, that Ms Abu Akleh was killed by an Israeli sniper rifle? It seems from the information on the company that Al Jazeera Arabic has earned it's high standard in the editorial business in the world and even when Israel is involved that it want to have a watertight case against the State of Israel it's military. And not just from video images where the military convoy can't be found or seen anywhere in other images shown in the here above mentioned videoclip. (https://youtu.be/fqdzSDDQZ-o) This reaches the world of diplomacy and politics in the wider region by the incense of, forgive me to say or put it like this, of a deceased woman.

What the world could see in the first seconds of the news of her death by gunshot was that her body was lying face down on the ground, in prone position. From head to toe, so to speak. She was shot in the left earside, expectedly straight through the medulla oblongata and instantly the light in her life ended. Surgeons find it hard to change a body in prone position to supine position when made ready for surgery on the surgical table. It is impossible to get a shot through the head by fire power from a 5.56 mm bullet and lie down in a fall of prone position. The study of falls makes this more and more acceptable that it should be investigated more specifically of why she fell in this prone position and lying down uniformly on the ground face down when we saw her in the video footages and that went worldwide immediately that day. There is no excercise of neutrality as to examine her body lying on the ground facing north. She was seen walking southwards just before the shootings are heard in the video. Expectedly she would be lying down southwards in a far more simple position, or hanging loosely one side or way. You have to change this lying down to a prone or supine position, by the pathologist, but she was already lying in this position by the shot through her head. (The ICC should take a closer look) On Twitter there are still many tweets with her face and sending messages of love and memories into an empty world without her voice and smile for the Palestinian people in Jenin and everywhere else in their world. She is missed every normal day, one could say. This is a mystery death that she was known to be a low- key/ profile journalist in her job, but that she belonged to a respectability of prominent journalism and that she was 'immaculate' or perfect in her role. If Israel wasn't the killer of Ms Abu Akleh, than what we are looking at is a 21st century killing in the Middle East and the first in or of it's kind.











Meaning 'domem, ne'elam, n'tul dibur' or speechless in Hebrew.

26 May 2022

Miss Shireen Abu Akleh's name won't leave the land of Israel even two weeks after her death when she was shot in Jenin, West Bank. Or, in Hebrew, Judea and Samaria. Her name in fact has risen in the rest of the world to meteoric heights since the moment of her death had sunken her body to a lifeless memory, since then. But let's be careful about the meteoric side to her name when she was fatally shot, by yet an unknown assailant or John Doe. Can we go back to the moment just before the shot, the last second when she was still alive and then follow the speed of the bullet motioning towards her ear and brain? Everything in real life as we/ she (knew) know it changes from there to slow motion and what we don't see are his (the shooter) eyes in the scope and aiming. In that moment what the shooter must have seen or looked at when watching his target move or standstill, was not his or her, but destiny in it's widest scale when seen through the eyes of humans and to take a life. One can still get that chilling feeling when or by mere reconstructing the intent of the killer shooter while he was aiming at her through his scope on the rifle. Was it a M16 sniper rifle? (HBV) Using the sniper rifle one cannot help the feeling and think why a journalist and isn't this type of gunshot meant for political leaders or prominent politicians? (I'm sorry for being sentimental and perhpas I've been watching too many movies, e.g. The assassination of Bobby Kennedy) Ms Abu Akleh has been reporting on the military presence in the West Bank for twenty years, why would Israel or it's Prime Minister feel the need to make a statement in this way and discredit everything else he is standing for in his 'change government'? That would be like taking a shot on his own foot, when especially as peace negotiator in the Ukraine- Russian war still ongoing in Kyiv. Two weeks earlier haven't the opposition fans of the former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, tried to bring an end to him and sent his wife and eldest son bullets in an envelope? He is now in Israel known to the opposition followers as Sheik Bennett or Sheik Naftali, a lover of Arabs in his coalition. These are Arab Palestinians, which are ridiculed by the opposition and call it a government of the Two- State solution. As an academic Ms Abu Akleh would or must have noticed the Bennett- Lapid government from afar...

What is most hurting post her death and in her death is the promise that has also died with her. Now a pure white (pristine) cloud above Jerusalem one will only see on 'a good day' in Palestine's youngest history. The rage in this aftermath is not the promising part of condemning the killing of her life and her journalism at Al Jazeera for twenty years. What makes war are irrational decisions and I believe the killing of Ms Abu Akleh was such one of a declaration of promptly going to war. A so called casus belli. But with emotional responses in the 21st century when even at a larger scale are not automatically jus ad bellum, we understand. So, what then should humanity do to show where their labour goes to when lawmaking as prominent law- makers? Cut the blue sky in two, one half for Palestine and the other one or half for Israel? That would have made it the easiest part of their job in a densed populated world of approximately 7.9 billion people. Disbelief I'm afraid is our new universal and not just between Israelis and Palestinians. But it is disbelief at any time of day that this conflict continues and with no one asking when it will end. The serpentine truth is that no one knows the answer to that question and frankly all we see is that it will go on forever and to eternity. Neither party or nation will give up e.g. it's right to Jerusalem or to share her. Which in Hebraic truth is that who wants to share his virgin wife with another man? Even when sometimes that man is king or a prince, if we know the story of Sarah and Abraham and the Egyptian Pharaoh. The God of Abraham made known to the pharaoh not to touch the wife of the stranger, Abraham, in a dream or nightmare. Palestine will or might have all the prominence of a king or prince over Jerusalem, but this might still be the wife of Abraham and will therefore be a nightmare if you decide your right to her. Just a simple story in the Torah or Tanach. On the other hand Abraham was the father of thousands and millions of stars in the wide heaven in a blessing by God Almighty. Perhaps that was God His first political decision made on the planet He had created for all mankind and beasts, and made it or called this the Middle East and it's peoples living along the four rivers from the spring in the Garden of Eden. Israel today however is not anything like the days during the times of the first and second temple. The West Bank isn't landownership by the ancestral landowners, as in England with kings and queens. It is maybe naive to say but the killing of Ms Abu Akleh could never have been the prime minister of Israel his order in the change government. He is now the most loathed man in Israeli politics and woe is him if he ever would embrace any Palestinian right or cause to self determination in the future! That would be another shot through the head like any other good or ordinary day in Palestine. Remember Yitzchaik Rabin? And I for one am not waiting for that to happen. 















Once you pull the sink plug string all the political body of water will go down (the drain). PM Bennett looks very much like that sink plug right now.

13 May 2022

Friday evening, Shabat Shalom, in Jerusalem murdered Palestinian Journalist, Ms Shireen Abu Akleh, was buried earlier today and laid to rest in Mount Zion, approximately at 16:00 PM (EU- time). The fatal shot to Ms Shireen's head angle was on wednesday morning, 11 May 2022. Mainstream media worldwide was immediately on full fire and flames over her death just lying on the ground next to a high wall. Death was instant, so the reports have said again today and there can be no mistake here about pronouncing time and death. Where Ms Abu Akleh was not known to the global audience in countries who also do not know Al Jazeera, still this news came to exactly them the hardest. Israel had shot in broad daylight the Palestinian journalist through the ear and head from the left side. A very difficult shot to take when her right side was facing street opening and you were able to have an estimate roughly to make about the alley and situation for the sniper. You also had to be able to point at her ear from the distance, and zooming in to fire the shot knee high. Where she was hit in the ear through the head is a clear picture of precision, one would be inclined to assume. Of course Israel was in the critical mass of the shooting at that very moment. It is known for decades to be the occupied force of the West Bank and no story without violence ever gets out from this place as the rest of the world knows it today. Prime Minister Bennett, still knocked out by so many political threats himself was not able this time to contain to a more diplomatic reaction from Jerusalem. It had probably also shocked him and he once again became a soldier in an invisible combat mode, this instant. The Foreign Ministry was quick in response and had posted a video on social media that went instantly around the global world. Hours later General Kohavi was more prudent and had flanked the Prime Minister for the time being with words of deep regret and that an investigation would be conducted whether the bullet that had killed the Palestinian journalist came from the Israeli side or perhaps in the more unlikely side of a Palestinian shot. On the other side where we could find masses of heartbreak and people crying out the journalist's name technical viewing do not mean anything. It is understandable and no one on God's good earth will not forget the power of this death that it brought something together we have not seen before in the struggle for Palestine and the Palestinian people.

But we have to do the ugly thing called investigating the truth on the moment of where the shot was taken, just as senior prosecutor Mr Luis Moreno Campo said earlier today on Al Jazeera. Whether Palestinian or Israeli, the latter the most likely, shooting with precision is referring strongly that this was a shoot- to- kill trained shooter. He must have known that she would be ambushed in the alley and out of nowhere the bullet shot came through the lively fir and his work was done in one shot. She then fell and was faced down lifeless on the ground, as shown timeless in the video footage. What makes this shooting or killing different from other journalists who also were shot in cross- fire by Israeli soldiers, the journalist on Al Jazeera asked mr Campo. Of course here is where it gets extremely complicated to explain, but surprisingly he did explain it. "If there was a plan behind it..." A political plan or political motivated plan perhaps? And what if it was neither Israeli or Palestinian but another party? Ms Shireen let's not forget remains the powerful story of this killing, which in the bigger picture was precisely why she could have been targeted. What reactions do you get with shooting veteran politicians in a corrupt world? The public is not a fool, one could say. But targeting an unarmed innocent press 'agent' and well known to thousands of ordinary people as most loved for her modesty and honest reputation, this is exactly what happened for the last 48 and something hours. Rivers and oceans only have that impact on humans. And the stories were all good, which no one could deny in the aftermath of her death the kind of heartbreak you can only get with the Kennedys. Whether Bobby Kennedy or JFK, his brother. The funeral was a miracle and also impressive at the same time. It would have been inhuman and a cruel injustice to have denied this household name to thousands of Palestinians in the occupied territories her last respect. Perhaps she herself would have not wanted it to be a State-like- funeral and with scouts' ruffle & bagpiping the invisible piper into the unknown path of death, with their judgement that is and will always be love and memory of Ms Shireen Abu Akleh. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett two weeks ago had been threatened with bullets and death. We can only hope that Mr Luis Mareno Campo will continue his search for the truth and perhaps the motive for killing an innocent 'bystander'. And in the time being let us pray to God Almighty for the prime minister Naftali Bennett.












11 May 2022 B & W Photograph tonight: tragic loss of life of Palestinian Journalist Ms Shireen Abu Akleh, today in the West Bank.

12 May 2022

Journalists on the front-line when in combat or armed military and police extreme presence have always been at this greater risk of becoming a random target, indiscriminately and unlimited of who or what is within the perimeter of 'proximity' moving or hiding, or reporting the news... ( Médecins Sans Frontières known organisation for helping people in conflict or disasters) These are the people who are duty bound and have ethical backgrounds how to do their job properly where it is impossible and inaccessible if you are not the Press (or medical teams) known in the International Declaration on Protection of Journalists. Journalists know how these protocols work on the ground and are aware of it's lethality when or if caught by fire exchange. There is no predictability how bullets fly and a projectile might hit it's targets close to vicinities often of the reporting journalists. And if one survives and later will be decorated heroic as a war correspondent when back at home. E.g. this comparison to Journalist Frank Gardner, BBC correspondent. "It is 16 years since BBC correspondent Frank Gardner and his cameraman Simon Cumbers were ambushed by al-Qaeda in Saudi Arabia. Gardner was shot six times and paralysed, his cameraman, killed. Now, he has gone behind those headlines to expose the things about disability we never talk about." At the same time there is no fooling the world whether this is military or Journalism. Indeed as one Mr Franks (BBC World News) said earlier today on the news, the death of Shireen Abu Akleh is a high profile death and should be posit to a high profile investigation equally. (In not to the extent of these words exactly) The West Bank had been Ms Abu Akleh's territory for decades reporting (Al Jazeera), and where Israeli Military presence is timeless (365 days). One metric millimeter moment is hard to replay how one bullet made the difference today in the West Bank and have put an entire Palestinian nation and friends around the world in mourning over the tragic death of Palestinian Journalist, Ms Shireen Abu Akleh . Was the bullet a stray by Israeli or Palestinian weapons?

It is understandable the Arab countries (including Marocco) to be in a state of aggrievance this morning watching the death laid to rest of Ms Shireen Abu Akleh, who perhaps had met with something fateful and which came out of nowhere striking her with a fatal blow through the head, by a bullet shot and sound. Her colleagues are all devastated, but the Palestinian people, men and women, descended into the endless abyss of their daily sorrows one millimeter deeper. Sacrifice comes to mind when only armed with a microphone and cameraman and we must keep remembering. British MP Jeremy Corbyn was one of the first politicians who tweeted his shock of hearing of the news that the Palestinian Al Jazeera journalist had just been shot through the (fore)head by... A strong indication is referring this incident/ accident of fire power from a rifle shot that it had been the Israeli Army who came to the scene with force and shootings this fateful morning on 11 May 2022. The victim laying face down after the hit. She still had the blue helmet and blue Press vest on her body when dragged out of 'sight' from the shooting. Who wants to get involved over the death of 'the Palestinian Journalist' and who was found near a high wall of stone and small path covered in evergreen coniferous boughs hangings? The song Une belle histoire by Michel Fugain comes to mind, that every individual in the rest of the world was shocked by the news of Shireen Abu Akleh being shot. Just her luck perhaps on a good day under God Almighty's heaven? The world seems at a loss for simple answers today.

Additional: let us keep equivalence in perspective that the poliltical climate in Israel is yet as we speak far from being ideal for any novice Prime Minister to deal with the sudden death of Palestinian Journalist Ms Shireen Abu Akleh out of combat mode. His direct approach should be one of strategy/ strategic approach.  
 

Ms Shareen Abu Akleh laid to rest today, friday 13 May 2022, in Mount Zion Jerusalem. 















And if Prime Minister Naftali Bennett falls and with him the coalition what then is the vision of the opposition?

3 May 2022

The coalition: Yesh Atid, center Left- Right, Blue & White, center Right- Left, Meretz, Labour, Ra'am (Arab Party), to the Right: Yamina (PM Naftali Bennett), New Hope and Yisrael Beytenu. To the Right and majority of electoral votes: LIKUD. A statue comes to mind if the former prime minister returns to govern with a majority: the thinking Rodin as Benyamin Netanyahu in stone deaf and stone cold to immortality. Just a small hunch that if Likud returns the leader will have zero vision on how to resume power from the present government/ coalition under the incumbent Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett. Two: could he bring back the deal of the century with sovereignty in the Judea and Samaria territories? Promise the world stage that he is all for the Two- State solution but cannot proceed when the Palestinians do not make or want peace with Israel? The world now also knows how broken the political system is in Israel and that there is no political argument for wiping out or off what used to be 'outsiders' before entering in the coalition with Yesh Atid leader Mr Yair Lapid, and all other smaller parties since last year in June 2021. Israel, as they would say in British studies political history, had come to a sudden change of events to a minorty government last year in June. No one had any idea what this 'government of change' was and why the kingmaker with six seats was becoming the Prime Minister of Israel. Now he is branded a traitor and thief of his voter's base votes and who did not give him the mandate to get into bed with strangers... Once again zooming in what you then see is another pain on the side of the opposition being ousted by this apparent small time boy. A boy playing it smart by entering a coalition with the Center Left- Right- and far Left, yes, very cunning. Everyone missing therefore the point that perhaps Mr Bennett was smart enough to do real time politics and bringing Israel to a new height where it had never been with first Labour in power during the seventies up to eighties before Likud. Up to 2021 Likud was in power, another and only big majority. When and where did the country had learned about forming a minority government? Was it ever conceivable? No, no, no, no, to eternity.

And when saying a minorty government this means that it had all the makings of it but not yet tested through real time and coexistence. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett was eager to do this and make a start as soon as he had taken Office. He so well has put it today in Rembrance Day of Israel that the Arab Party had it's first time new hope with it's coexistence and get out of their impasse or literally dead end street. This was a good offer after three decades of political and existential nihilism to Arabs or Israeli Arabs living in Israel as citizens. It doesn't say anywhere that the PM was introducing ambitions to change the whole of Israel overnight to a multilateral state of affairs between Israelis and Arabs. Apartheid, was it perhaps the wrong word being smoked everywhere in the world like cananbis and getting high? Perhaps the word was 'unilateral State'. Indeed, something went terribly wrong during the years of the bronze headed Mr Netanyahu, a deity of some sort to the loyal Likudniks. The new Prime Minister however isn't any less of a mortal gilded, be it in more modest terms of pure as silver. Soon also to be spurned by the Likud if they get their way to come back. This cult worshipping of Likud has taken too long a life span in Israel and has given nothing back to the people but sweet talks and promises. Israel as a nation is malnourished when it comes to politics as a national hegemony with either homogeneity or heterogeneity politics for all political parties. 13 May, this month, it will only be eleven months for this government with their mandate to govern in Israel as a coalition. Can it survive without the collaboration of Likud and their affiliates? Let's hope the Prime Minister understands this problem and will still be looking for congruence (in Israel ideologies non alignment and agreements) and try make it (riks involved)with Yesh Atid and his coalition partners his politics in the minority government, Israeli styling. Stability is the vision for his government, built by a minority of parties - not natural allies- in politics (Right- Left).

The Right- Wing Party must present a vision in writing if it wants to convince Knesset why they should return with a majority. They can't come back and get stuck in a deadlock again... Worshipping the leader of Likud in the thinking statue in stone by Rodin.
Additional (after Remembrance Day speech heckles of PM Naftali Bennett):
Can this be that the next level of his prime ministership is uitilities sector? The PM is more bureaucratic compare to Gideon Sa'ar technocracy: nature versus instinct.
On the side of the Left Center coalition Yair Lapid could still prove himself a cynic and Niccolo Machiavelli, creating a prince and not to have given him the political bread for politics on his journey. It is looking each day more as if the PM his story is grim, as in Hans and Gretl, leaving no bread crumbs behind to find his way back home.

(Political congruence and minority government can be studied on Internet)













It's not democracy, stupid.

28 April 2022

For the Prime Minister of Israel, unfortunately, it is and always will be democracy. As the situation in Jerusalem or Knesset is for Mr Naftali Bennett Israel is once more an entire whole and different story when it comes to Real- Time politics. What could the prime minister have done wrong in literally a brief period of ten months in Office as Prime Minister, if he is accused now of being a corrupt man who is using public taxpayers' money for fortifying his home security detail physically? He is a millionaire, some are saying in the comments below the articles in the Jerusalem Post this week. One it is State finances of which they are suggesting has come to light that the PM is acting more like a stakeholder and not as a man for the citizens of Israel. He is also not living in the residence of the State for Prime Ministers in Jerusalem. The PM also on wednesday increased the security issue at his home in Raanana, approximate 70 km outside Jerusalem, after his wife, Mrs Gilat Bennett, received an envelope with a single bullet and written threat, of which some are not saying what the written statement said. The atmosphere is surging with now everyone on the Right- Wing side to call for a return of strong leadership, as long as it is not Bennett. In democracies when this is happening by one Party with a majority of the people, (remember the duck house in Britain) that might turn into early elections or a resignation by the Prime Minister, especially when abuse of budgetary finances for ministries is clear proof against the prime minister. No one actually knows what State money was involved here, as it is in many democracies in the west mandatory/ statutory for a Prime Minister to receive a much higher fee for his service to the nation as PM, than the citizens. In Israel however the system is a broken system which the incumbent PM has inherited and can therefore only follow the mainstream wherever it comes and goes, yes, even in extraordinary expenditures over security for him and his whole family (wife and children). If anyone cares to remember was it not the same prime minister of which half the people of Israel do not see as their real prime minister? Ten months later however they can all have a peek into his expenditures, including cleaners, gardeners, pizzas, and more food. And there is murder too.

When we focus on murder of a prime minister who is the sitting PM of Israel after ten months, why now? A whole fiscal year one can simply assume this would have been a whole year in Office. It could be that the atmosphere is damping with smoke out of the nostrils like a wild beast from the deep because Idit Silman had just resigned from Knesset as Member of Yamina? On monday Amichai Chikli was voted down by the Prime Minister and his supporters in Knesset and will become a rebel officially, or was in fact immediately blocked as a rebel to join e.g. Likud. Ten months and the PM is already under scrutiny of finances he seems to have gone over his limits on several items that were not on the list, historically. Historically if this is true every prime minister who falls under the historical list should then be scrutinized by the same rules that apply heavily now more than ever on this prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett. You can't apply rules and laws that are standardized by scrutiny and historical in the present time only, or can you? The fault lies perhaps in this that Mr Bennett has inherited a flawed system when his predecessor was prime minister and never was altered or changed. One automatically uses the same 'system' in the next prime ministership, whether this was Naftali Bennett, or another prime minister. It could not happen in the same way e.g. in Britain or Holland (EU Member State). But what do Central Banks, the Judiciary and State Finaces have got to do with each other anywhere in free democracies? Let's hope that the Justice Minister in Israel, Mr Gideon Saar, and the prime minister will have another look at this issue of vital importance in a representation democracy, how to regulate budgets, State finances, and salaries of the Prime Minister and other ministers of Knesset. Someone needs to make this effort in Real-time once (upon a time), and securing Israel and the people against a corrupt government in future. It is especially important when for example an innocent but decent prime minister will take Office, under the impression that he will do good, but does not realize he is doing exactly the same thing as his predecessor. If the opposition get's a whiff of that they will bring it on against him and he will be found guilty by suspicion only or as the article in the Jerusalem Post yesterday said, yes, murder.

The people of Israel are the ones who keep on getting squeezed over and over again by their prime ministers... If ten months, then by what logic? And this was the easy part in the situation written here above. The not so easy part in a battle cry for the return of a strong leader on the Right- Wing side is that this name pops up everywhere you're looking, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. The impression one gets of the former prime minister at the age of 72 is that he seems very potent to come back to Knesset as prime minister. If democracy is the ruling measure for most countries in the west, in Israel it is the law of the Orthodox Jewry. Measure for measure, eye for an eye, hurt for hurt, and life for life, that is the kind of Orthodoxy close enough to explain it why democracy is but a cornerstone in the rest of the State of Israel in a historical corner at almost the timelessness of an artifact. The living law of Thorah is the only law in Israel that is real as life itself for the people of Israel. The left- wing in Israel however is convinced that these are not the real numbers to represent the whole nation of Israel... And this is what the government of change is trying to achieve or prove to Israel and allies around the world. Before 1980 there were militants and defenders of the people. Slowly the people of Israel were being recognized as the people living in Israel and not in Palestine that were called Israelis. After the Holocaust in 1945 being called Israelis was a monumental transformation for all Jews that came to the land of Israel. Jew transformed to Israeli is a deeply rooted understanding in the world of Israelis today who seem to think that the phonetics can only mean something antisemitic if you are addressed as Jews and not Israelis. The level above that transformation is paradoxically in the present time another Israel with only Orthodox Levitical Laws, as we know it from the Old Testament. Orthodox is analogue to radical laws, which were and have been upheld more than ever in history, because of survival and the new generation of Jews throughout the world. While the other survival struggling is also democracy everywhere in the world as we speak. If the Prime Minister had a weighing scale for each day to weigh whether it was Orthodox rule or democracy, he would have had a remarkable measuring instrument to help navigate throughout matters of State and religion, secular and socio- economics. Or the military and security for all of Israel. Perhaps it would not be such a bad idea, as one knows from the books of Samuel, Kings and Chronicles, that King Salomon has had a special inventory scribe to weigh everything in his stores by writing them down and name them. So we read that the King had only one friend. Let's hope that the same laws apply to contemplating doing 'no harm' to the Prime Minister of ten months in Office, that the Torah forbids killing in the commandment, Thou shalt not kill. With all laws there is no other to replace it or by parliamentary vote, as is today the case for even Prince Andrew, who will be asked to give up his title as Duke of York, so the article in the Guardian UK said on wednesday.












UK Ministerial code was never designed for Covid-19. Do we have something there with this?

22 April 2022

Boris Johnson now UK Prime Minister (3 years) is the great Robin Hood who delivered Brexit for the people of Britain and has since then processed it's exit from the EU with great determination. The former PM, Mrs Theresa May, was ousted by no other than the current Prime Minister, Boris Johnson. Learning from the past if we can still remember the days when the Tory Prime Minister Mrs Thatcher was ousted by no other than one in her own Party, Mr Heseltine, and make way for the next Tory PM, Mr John Major, what we than have to see or say is that the prerogative of removing the PM is in the Party's principle. Should not the same have happened with Prime Minister Johnson, to be chastised by his own Party as Conservative leader and Prime Minister, and request his resignation on breaking the rules during lockdown in June 2020? Instead what the world is witnessing comes across as peculiar, Tory Party Members voting last night, 21 April, on a motion submitted by the opposition leader to the investigative committee, let's say for a moment that his name is the sheriff of Nottingham, to ask the impertinent question who then do they want as their next Prime Minister. Have the rules also changed here over time since Theresa May? Some are calling defenders of the PM idiots or fools who are defending the indefenisible, that the PM has lied, lied, lied, lied, lied, lied, to eternity. The PM has broken the rules during lockdown and when everybody else in the country had followed the rules, even in times when loved ones were dying or have died. Also what the world has heard being said in the House of Commons this week, is that the PM misled the House. In the meantime power is surging on the side of the opposition, calling even louder than usually, for the Prime Minister to resign pronto.

Based on the principle for which Britain stands that here in the House of Commons MP's speak the truth and do not mislead the House. On which principle is the motion based to pull the government like the moon in this lasso and vote against the PM, incidently behind his back when he is on a trade mission in India and meeting with Narendra Modi, the PM of India? The PM has said that he has no problem with the inquiry and will answer questions. In retrospect: the PM has broken the rules during lockdown in June 2020, celebrating his birthday with cake and pouring drinks that weren't exactly (rembering Allegra Statton's words) lemonade or fizzy drinks. Other Ministers are saying that no the PM did not break any rules during this period. Perhaps it is time to mention the part which the opposition has not told the public just yet, that during the days between 10 June- 14 July 2020, the strategic change was based on easing lockdown. This PM had been against lockdown and must have let something of enthousiasm slip through his fingers to 'break the rules' and enjoy this moment of new normalcy again. The retail businesses were equally happy with easing the lockdown and children were going to go back to school soon again. At this point the question is what law exactly was law as the Medical law had not yet been developed on vaccinations, only ready by 30 December 2020. The world was taken by this nasty surprise Coronavirus pandemic in February 2020 and there was no government in the western half of the world ready to design the right law based on the medical International law and adhere nation and country to it at this time. The following year with the program on vaccinations nation and country were only then good ready to follow the rules as part of their civil obedience, also when this included the dreaded lockdowns. No business could generate any incentives after the first lockdown up to now when Covid-19 seems to be under control with the vaccinations and boosters. Astra Zeneca was the first to have been ready for distributing vaccinations to the world.

Could the Prime Minister really not read the scale of Covid-19 emergency in June 2020, and who also was hospitalized with the virus and facing almost his last breath on earth's green lands? Assumption today is that the PM has lied to the House. Firstly does that mean that the PM hates his job or loves it to bits? Why would he be in this self destructive mood and cut the love of his life from his side? Would he not understand that this was going to hurt him very badly? The PM has a blind spot for his job as Prime Minister. It is maybe the right time now to say why and reasoning should win a more sublime truth here and for a brief moment assuming that the PM did and could not have lied during easing of lockdown in the month of June and July 2020. Of course with putting weight on 'easing' of the lockdown. Like the apple here is where it has fallen from the tree and when Newton discovered the law of gravity. It is not a word of opportunity or opportunism by nature, when the law of lockdown is serious fact and easing is therefore only half serious a law? There is either lockdown or easing of lockdown, sec. The finger pointing is very grave if the opposition could e.g. prove that the PM has misled the House to have breached the law on three separate occasions, Health Ministry, Home Office and International Health and Organisation law. You can bet that the PM himself couldn't say what law was broken by him even if you would try very hard. It would be interesting if he could tell anyone what this broken law was. The rules were easing lockdown during the time when the PM had a party with a birthday cake and adult beverages. In abstract: what if the PM is not guilty of any wrong doing? Can the opposition live with that 'not guilty' verdict of the PM for the rest of the term? Conscience cuts both ways, like the sharpest and shining blade held by heaven's right or left hand. Do not tempt providence?

23 April 2022 additional: 20 May 2022 Fixed penalty was delivered yesterday at the PM's Office in DS N10. There is no PM's defense lawyer to fix him on this one, as it is 100% under lockdown law. That would go against every principle of the House of Commons on telling the truth. Why this tectonic shift from 10 June- 14 July 2020? Where the ease of lockdown was law for reopening the country socially and economically and 100% in favour of defense of the PM. 











With Covid- 19 was there a law against alcohol consumption in 2020?

13 April 2022

In memo: let us remember that in June 2020 the world had not yet been in this accelerated situation on Covid rules and what rules should be applied in the public domain, worldwide. Human as the social animal we are now, especially in the west, this wasn't easy to incorporate at immediate acceptance of this unknown Wuhan phenomenon. At this point there was not yet even mentioning of a Covid-19 vaccination plan/ program available, and there was worldwide skepiticism by the public and scientific experts when and where to make the changes for everyone's safety. But now more important is that due to this skepticism still out there in some parts of the world is that there isn't yet any empirical study on the effects from the pandemic on how this has affected humans in every capita on the planet. It could be that this is one of the reasons why the public is focusing on their representatives in government, as if that was their only reference to what law mandated the lockdowns/ partly lockdowns during the pandemic. Four months after the breakout of the pandemic in February 2020 in the west there could never have been an immediate understanding in the free world to change overnight from deeply social to complete standstill social life. Or to put it more crude: from deeply social to deeply anti- social. The latter also became part of the new 'social', as many had been called upon to help their community and keep the Covid-19 first rule 1.5 meter distance everywhere possible. June 2020 did not yet had vaccinations of which many politicians at first were also and perhaps mistakenly skeptical. Covid-19 did not exist and no one needed to wear a facemask then, so the refuseniks convinced the other side in the public domain. A hamster panic was the next thing or outbreak during these early hours of the pandemic.

In the UK 19 June 2020 has now become the doomsday for the Prime Minister, Mr Boris Johnson, when members in his government want him to resign for breaking Covid-19 rules on 19 June 2020... There was beer, lot's of it, and a cake for the PM's birthday, while the whole country was in lockdown and didn't visit relatives, or dying relatives. Everyone is referring to the following year what that grim experience looked like when Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II sat alone on the church bench at the Duke of Edinburgh funeral. Much was one year earlier still in confusion what they could expect from the public and treading carefully of not breaking the laws on constitutional grounds by imposing the Covid-19 rules. And yes everyone was hamstering, especially beer. (OECD warning during Covid-19 against alcohol abuse) The question now is: why should the PM Boris Johnson resign over 'breaking the Covid-19 rules' on 19 June 2020? From 2021 to the aftermath of the Omicron variant the laws were 'altered' to accomodate the new dynamic in social life, or from social to 'anti- social', and here is where no one should be making too many deep changes of what in a free world and democracy is considered a law of freedom, or be a totalitarian regime to 'unfree' people living in the west completely. There were rules for the public in the first eight to ten months when buying Paracetamol, oil, toiletpaper or fizzy drinks. But there was neither rule or law against buying alcohol during the pandemic in two years. Or a law against buying a cake for the Prime Minister during Covid-19 rules. Without this prohibition of alcohol law are we not looking at the real culprit being half a measurement? Legally the PM hasn't broken any law in concreto. He was allowed to drink beer and eat cake as so many have done during lockdown. Or find these two laws during Covid-19 lockdown, one for staying indoors during the pandemic Covid-19 and two the law of no alcohol consumption during Covid-19 lockdown.

However the Prime Minister is Your Majesty's High Office Civil Servant and should have shown more sensitivity and national solidarity for the people during International uncertainty and (part) lockdown in the months when the whole world did not had any concrete idea how dealing with the pandemic could be contained. An apology from the government and him is not compensating for their losses, this much seems to be true in the news today, almost two years later since 19 June 2020. But calling for his resignation is random paradox interpretation of the constitutional law that everything was okay to 'lock people up' in their homes and forbid any social contact, based on an 'invisible' enemy aka the virus. After all the variants during the last two years from the virus and the booster jab, after pharmaceutical names e.g. Pfizer, Moderna and the foreign names in China, Cinovac, and Russia, Sputnik, the public are now informed. We are now aware and the days of panic flea circus are behind us. It is time for empirical reviews on Covid-19 and it's effects on social life during outbreak. This magnitude was globally and impact was almost immediately. The least the PM could do is compensate the loss so many have felt and experienced during lockdown. With WWIII still looming above the PM's head (Damocles sword), who knows that he might make it back and to stay Prime Minister? The government is still the government at the end of the day no matter who is Prime Minister. Worries after Covid-19 are now Energy prices and poverty.















Prince William & the monarchy. Put it to a referendum, HRH.

5 April 2022

It could be very much the word of the day, or better put, the present day. This is not a writing for the monarchy, but a simple construction of two blocs in time: the past (39 years) and the future. One based on adverse moments and the next one is based on revolutionary times in the future by approximate. If we would put e.g. Prince William in this model we are than talking about the immediate future of his days eventually as king of England and the Commonwealth. Another estimation is his age now 39, but with relative good health to make it even into his nineties. Question: so why a referendum on the monarchy in England, now in the present time? The answer is simple: after the sexual abuse case of Prince Andrew (settlement in February this year), the monarchy has shown one very important new thing to an old and more restrictive time in the past, that the monarchy is now exposed to vulnerabilities. The Queen, Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, is at the age of 95, and critically meeting with the severity of why the people would still be needing a monarch after the demise of this monarch. Seventy years closing their history as the king's law in England and in the rest of the world how to govern by law and order and create wealth and parliaments, is quite an anticlimax if in a sudden temper of any future king the call for a referendum would be on his mind. But there is also wisdom in the words of HRH Prince William when he contemplates a new future for the monarchy of Britain, and taking the Commonwealth with this view in scope. His father, Prince Charles, the Prince of Wales, is firstborn and heir to the throne and who is at the age 73 today. There is no doubt that he will be king after the Queen, his mother, Queen Elizabeth II. And there is also talk of 'halfing' the monarchy and their representation in public life and domain, by either Prince Charles or Prince William. This discussion has not been official just yet and backed by parliament. One could ask where this will all be leading up to, as no such thing to the nature of embryo in the womb and the monarchy to half what is absolute. In the public domain the choice is even more simple: yes or no to the monarchy. And not blood.

In the world of the 21st century what the global community is witnessing today is e.g. the prospect of another WW, named by the US President Joe Biden just a few weeks after the war in Ukraine with Russia broke out in February, that we are facing a WWIII if Russia will use it's chemical weapons arsenal on Ukraine. That has left us with an urgency for quick assessments how then to rebuild the world after such a terrible devastation, material and immaterial assets completely destroyed by any imagination humanely possible. The monarchy in England could be seen or conceived as completely impotent and irrelevant to the people if, let us pray to God Almighty that this will never happen, the world self destruct in a WWIII. Will peace between Russia and Ukraine come to a conclusive beginning and end the war in Ukraine immediately? Former Defence Minister, Tobias Elwood, today on SkyNews said that what the world/ countries are missing here is the much bigger picture, why Russia will not stop the invasion of Ukraine any time soon. It is because of this crisis there is all the more reason for asking the people whether the need for another epoch of the monarchy in England is still relevant today. Prince William's concerns for the future of the monarchy seem very real and deadly relevant in a good time like now as to no other more prosperous time in a fictional future. Here is where the story of blood ends and will flow more gently into the vast oceans of currency, if wisdom should follow history. In memo: we are aware of the people and their deepest love and affection for Queen Elizabeth, grandmother to Prince William and Prince Henry (not in the UK presently), and all of the other families children. It just makes one wonder how if the Queen is gone her heirs to the throne would be impacted by her death. They have shared in her vision (multilateral by nature) and her reign forever and no one believes that they can have any realistic idea about a future without the Queen from one day on... The Queen her presence at Westminster Abbey Prince Philip thanksgiving memorial last week has been the most prominent moment in her life, and maybe that she must have realized that this could very well be the last time with all of her family, a family she bore herself and gave life to with her late husband, the Duke of Edinburgh, to be by her side, in simple sentiment put, for one last time. The day after tomorrow every day while still with all of England holds a final stage and end to all who love her as on the one side a chilling prospect, and on the other a frozen time once she will no longer be with her family, country and reign.

Urbi et orbi, God save the Queen.













Making Ukraine compatible

Additional 25 March 2022: for conditional peace the properties are military and political (political history Ukraine and independence) in March 2022.
The Russian- Ukraine dispute is independence from Russia, then in 1700 and in 2022 with a different generation of Ukrainians who seek to live in peace with their neigbours across the western half of the European continent, and do so also in prosperity. Russia however remains perpetually in it's own time- zone and wide expanse of Russian demographics. What does the independence means to the Russian President Vladimir Putin after the first attempt in 2014 by annexation of Crimea, and in 2022 in February (and still ongoing as we speak) in Ukraine Kyiv? In principle the invasion was again just another attempt to prove a point when there is actually none in any political stratosphere between the two 'independent' countries. Mr Putin seems to think that Russia is part of Ukraine and vice verse, Ukraine is part of Russia. Castling principle of chess. With great emphasis on it's historical rights. But where is old Ukraine to reaffirm the claim in this apparent territorial dispute of an older date than e.g. the present time Ukraine and now invaded by Russia? Can the X- or Y- generation Ukranians also make any other claims against Mr Putin's 'property' rights to Ukraine? The invasion is only the tip of the iceberg when you have a closer look at his reasons to keep on demanding how Ukraine should border with it's neighbours, west, south or north. Perhaps what we are not looking at is that Mr Putin doesn't want an independent Ukraine period. In our modern world in the western hemisphere many have come to a different understanding what can be acceptable to the rest of the world, mostly from disciplines in the global economy and standard of living for many nations. This has been years in the making in a globalized world and put in the machinery language of globalization worldwide. It is making good sense to continue along this path of life as it has also learned from past history that other ways have failed and should not be repeated again in future times. To a certain degree Mr Putin should understand the same principles for the greater common good among nations, if you care to stay bigger than earth itself. (Sea, air and space included) The Russian President was himself a global leader when in the G-8, before the annexation of Crimea in 2014, eight years ago. As a global leader it cannot be unusual for him to understand the balance of power among the necessity of nations leading together and going forward. Not backward. Going backward is either illogical or not quite right or motivated. This can make a suspicious point in the global sphere...

Equally the balance of power is also when Russia is part of the rest in the world leading nations. But it does not argue these reasons on the International platform, political or military. It's nature or character of diplomatic quiet makes a white noise along the line of aligned powers who have known for the last three decades the meaning of global consensus to one or two degrees during their time as leaders of the industrial nations. Ukraine could only be seen as a satellite state and struggling with it's independence with no clear direction found just yet. It can't have a global role among the leading nations, G-7, the European Union Member States, and Nato. This is looking from any angle that maybe the Russian President considers Ukraine an invention of what it assumes that that means a free Ukraine and people. Where the emphasis lies is another story and could sting the Russian President's ego for territorial supremacy over Ukraine as part of old Russia, in the old dispute when Ukraine first had declared itself independent. The Orange revolution has nothing to do with that, nor any other sequence of the revolutions that followed. From an ancestral viewpoint Ukraine could say that the reason for their independence was wholly in the fact that the ethnic distinction was part of the greater Slavic family, and not only in philosophy or poetry. The Slavic family is greater than Russia and the variety of ethnicities, could also be their view. Political and military independence however will be rejected by the Russian President, even in the present time. How many other ancient territorial disputes have come to the same crossroads in time? China, India, Japan, and now Russia. A conditional peace between Russia and Ukraine if carefully directed by an 'innocent' party or third player in the political spheres, this could end hostilities when there is still hope for resolving this ghastly war fog between Russia and Ukraine across their independent geographical sovereignty. And when it is said here independent or 'innocent party' this is meant to say with no relation to either Nato, the EU or G-7. President Putin doesn't like fudging mind bubbles between the parties in earnest, that perhaps this wasn't what they wanted or what they wanted but do not get to hear what should be said or done. After the battering on the economy and sanctions against Russia the President could be in an extraordinary nervous mood/ mode of thinking. A little paranoid but luckily in a touch of class on the side of the Russian President, but is something one has to step very carefully here with Mr Putin. Or he will let go and nothing happens. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett was the second man who tried to talk with the Russian President in the first week/ and half of the war in Ukraine 24 February/ March in Moscow. The French President, Mr Emmanuel Macron, was the first who had tried to end the war with his meeting with Mr Putin also in Moscow. Or let the Russian presidium decide on a vote who should 'host' the peace process talks between President Zelensky and President Vladimir Putin and where it should be located. In Europe there is no party who could take up the role of 'innocent party' to host or listen to either Russia or Ukraine.


We in the public domain can only hope and pray that this will come to an end very soon.












The beacon of light in a storm drifting or approaching.

13 March 2022

(23:06 PM)

In the news last week on the Jerusalem Post Ukraine latest had said that the Prime Minister Naftali Bennett had never said to the President of Ukraine to surrender. This was on wednesday or thursday in a developing story on the Jerusalem Post and corrected as fake news later on in the week. Last night on friday, 12 March, in a tweet by the Prime Minister (retweet) plans for new talks on ending the war or even peace talks in any way were suggesting that Mr Naftali Bennett, even under these unusual circumstances in which he had become the prime mediator between the two warring parties Ukraine and Russia, since a week ago when he promptly had paid a visit to the Russian President, Mr Vladimir Putin, in Moskou, that this was something he was committed to help continue bringing calm back. Ukraine President Mr Volodymyr Zelensky had suggested the talks to take place in Jerusalem. In Europe closest to the ongoing war zone of Russia and Ukraine a peace negotiator hasn't yet been appointed separately from the Member States leading nations and leaders, or to put it more concrete in the words of the German Chancellor Mr Olaf Scholz, that the question is who to appoint when he couldn't think of anyone else but the Middle East and more specifically the Israeli Prime MInister, Naftali Bennett. Ukraine was in burning flames and bullets were literally flying through and coming from anywhere you were standing or just looking. One could say one week later when thinking of how to 'entertain' any peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, that the prime minister of Israel had been the one to introduce the mediator role in the heat of battle and global crisis. Especially when taking the US President, Joe Biden, seriously how he doesn't want this war to escalate any further or risk a WWIII. (News online Telegraph UK and CGTN tweet on friday, 12 March) A few days later also country Turkey had hosted an emergency meeting between the Foreign Ministers, Mr Lavrov of Russia and his counterpart, Mr Dmytro Kuleba of Ukraine, for talks in Antalya in the same week. The talks however had failed and were inconclusive to play any part in specifics of details to the moment. Where the Israeli Prime Minister now seems stuck could be a number of things of either approaching or drifting, depending each of their own timing. That war politics are now changing the mood in the Middle East region he might be wondering when alone of what to expect next.

Israel is a different military and has not yet won a war based on shere theory and diplomacy, not in the Middle East region nor any more distant. Why have peace talks in Jerusalem, and not keep a formation straight line with Turkey where the diplomatic talks on a cease fire between Russia and Ukraine were first held, to keep it here rather? The prime minister under Israeli government laws has only one window of 'power' to enter or exit from, whether in Israel or regional, that in memo. The Israeli public is aware of the PM and his attempts to mediate a cease fire/ peace/ and or calm in the war between Russia and Ukraine, de facto a European (Union) war many miles out of Israel's local and national view, but in his coalition there seems to be complete moment of quiet, except when the Foreign Minister Mr Yair Lapid is announced to meet with his counterparts in countries close to the war in Ukraine, e.g. Latvia. Also in the same week last week when the PM had returned home from Moskou. And with his stance on Russia is the PM becoming more each day a beacon of light in the storm, that he cannot take sides for reasons of Defence and military operations in the sky of Syria when attacking targets of the Iranian proxy Hezbollah? That long term strategic importance for Israel's security and defence, this could be his reason, but with Russia and being the adversary to the global world today, the logic can only be that the PM of Israel is taking a vigilant approach and re- evaluate everything that is moving in the Middle East, air, sky and land for now. It is after all the same man who had said seven years earlier to a hostile audience at a conference (Peace Conference Haaretz) that in the region where we live all sides are watching one another, and pointed out that territory does matter to Israel and that when without borders vision is ten times more imminent. Where we stand today with Russia moving it's military closer (today) to Nato territory there is no saying how this will change the world in the next moment or tomorrow. Global consensus went out of the liquid window of peace and finds itself at the possibility of another world war. How can the mediator of the moment be drifting away from the scene in this global conflict, when he was the only man available to meet with a bullish Russian President in the first hours and days of fierce fire power against Ukraine? You can only be out when you have left the straight line in your own thinking format, one could say or assume. Nine months Mr Bennett has been prime minister of Israel since 13 June 2021, last year. And also Israel knows it's deterrence has always been on military strength and wars against enemies close or distant, but the war in Ukraine requires also military regional and global politics and when peace or cease fire this will be based on it's International fundamentals (mostly specifically) of war and peace. Failure doesn't seem to be an option the PM is looking forward to, is the personal impression one gets when reading his own words on social media. Or quoted by journalists of the Jerusalem Post.

Peace talks coordination something maybe to have in Cairo Egypt, between Israel, Egypt and Turkey as hosts? Showing perhaps the ability of leaders and attuned reconciliation when in a global crisis that is also having it's ripple effects in the home region and close to the warring region? I do not envy the Israeli Prime Minister, as this part of his job on three or four seats is similar as a walk over the Niagara falls. Something not for the faint hearted, strictly taken.













Ukraine constitution Pylyp Olyk


In memo 9 March 2022:



Ceremonial crown written history in Constantinople, a rival fundamental to Russia in sovereignty and State orthodoxy.

Requiem.









Volodymyr Zelensky's big battle plan.

7 March 2022

Democracy, hard to ignore the eyes of Socrates in Mr Zelensky's eyes when calling to the world how he is fighting the war against Russia and talking about the future of Ukraine. Has this been his intent all along in his election campaign and when he was elected President of Ukraine in 2019? Western values have integrated deeply into the 21st century now reaching different frontiers in 2022, but then meeting with rigid opposition from the Russian President Mr Vladimir V. Putin across the borders. Historically where independence in Ukraine is a vision (not yet formed from the liquid situation today) in a decades long struggle to divorce from Russia infinitely, is not to understand by the Russian President and what he considers the only reality for this old earth of all of Russia. It is also not a big surprise how reactionair he is reacting to the slightest of 'provocations' by Ukraine and their allies in the west. And Mr Zelensky for some unknown reason triggers the Russian President negatively, unlike last weekend when he met with another Jewish leader in Moskou, the Prime Minister of Israel Mr Naftali Bennett. With the Israeli Prime Minister the Russian President it is very clear how he tries his best to be warm and gentle. Why is this? The difference perhaps lies in the world itself, where one is playing Abel and we see the Russian President as his jealous rival brother or half brother, Kenan, and the other being more of his little brother Benjamin and the Russian President feeling that he was like the high bureaucrat Joseph in Egypt. Joseph favoured the youngest son to Jacob the patriarch. Mr Zelensky also wants the world, just as Mr Putin wants it be it for all the other reasons beyond imaginations.

We can also not deny Mr Zelensky's intentions to fight on for his vision of a country only he can see it's future, as all millennial prime ministers or presidents do in the 21st century. It is his age (44). The west also is not here to deny Mr Zelensky's wishes or dreams and that he may have all of it, something that could fulfil anyone dying's wish these days in the middle of the burning cities and their last breath in Ukraine. But in what way should he realize his big battle plan, roughly sketching it on the drawing board? But democracy is contagious... Could that blow over at one point into Russia? This is ruthless thinking and there is almost this sound of fierce clashes inside your mind rattling on, that perhaps it is exactly that what is making the Russian President rigid or frigid both in his role as Cain, watching Abel trying to curry favour with the global world in the west. Globalization indeed has matured exponentially around the world for more than three decades... The future of the next generations in 2022 already or most parts in the world have a majority voice how they would want this world to take the final shape or steps. And that can make old landowners like Russia outdated from all these new realities. China in this respect has been more closely in global developments, economics or technologies infrastructures, with their rivals or partners. And that in the end would leave Russia with it's monopolies around in the world behind a certain time and place in isolation. You can see the fire in his eyes when he insists that Ukraine should move out now, and let go of Russia forever... Mr Zelensky is still the leader of Ukraine and who would not want him to succeed with this kind of talent he has been displaying moment, after moment, second after second? We in the old democracies of the world are sentimental and feel for the underdog, at the point where he is being worshipped like the Cerberus fighting (clash of Titans). We should vote 'yes' for the Ukranian President to bring his vision of a new Ukraine to his part of the world. Democracy? Socio- economic prosperities? Freedom (statue of Liberty kind)? Or enter a marriage with Mr Putin with the promise dowry to let us keep our A.C. democracy pillars of society in the 21st century?










Ukraine 44.13 million.

1 March 2022

Horizontally the population of Ukraine in 2021 was estimated on a volume of 44.13 million people living in Ukraine. In 2022 on 21 February the Russian President, Luhansk and Donetsk, signed the agreements of breaking away from Ukraine. Fierce fighting is ongoing in Ukraine as we speak, and also the global breaking news is saying (news that is just coming in), that a Russian long miles convoy is on it's way to Kyiv. Architects and civil engineers should put the real situation on a maquette pronto, and decide whether their situation is now as it was before the Russian President had invaded Ukraine last week, but also how this is different from a battle or war scale in 2014. There were no houses blown up nor administrative buildings by the Russian army in 2014, as is today seen in a videoclip. On the maquette Russia (fiction) would still be standing, while neighbouring country in Ukraine is falling to shreds one after one, houses, buildings, villages, infrastructure, casualties and people their economy ruined to naught. 40 Million people in total distress is not a job to leave all this to chance and misfortune. What do we read on the maquette today between the two countries? First is what we are also seeing more clearly are the other neigbouring countries near Ukraine and Russia, to the west, north, south and east (the most attacked flank so far in Ukraine). Europe should be worried if it can still remember what Europe used to look like 100ds of years before the birth of the European Union. Ukraine and it's 44.13 million people having to face this unprecendented invasion by Russia within one decade and for the second time, is also Europe's problem and responsibility. It knows that would always be a collective responsibility and it should not try to make it alright/invisible with the white brush that sanctions will hit hard on Russia's economy to stop it's aggression. The European Union in fact was built for the greater peace and prosperity of Member States, as to lead by example in an ever changing world since the fifties. When reading the maquette on the table and watching one by one how Ukraine is being destoyed by the Russian invasion in the news today and for the last seven days, the need for aid to Ukraine is at the scale of 40 million people and how to protect as many lives as one can in the EU or UN. The balance reading with Russia still standing next door makes it a disturbing reading, when seen from this maquette.

It looks as if the EU has no time to be cynical nor how to keep itself within it's establishment and rationalize the east of Europe as 'belonging' to another history, time and entity. In 2014 the annexation of Crimea did not touch sovereign Ukraine and it's 40 million people. Geographically Crimea just lies next in between Russia and Ukraine and the sea. A war in Ukraine and threatening the lives of this scale of 44.13 million people is unaccepted in the whole of Europe, west, north, south or east. This war is ongoing, as we speak, in Ukraine. There is little chance left to think or say this is Russia's demonstration of it's military strength. Curious when taking into account his present targets in Ukraine that were blown up today... His Minister of Defense has also said almost immediately after that Russia is not interested in occupying Ukraine. The reality on the ground is deceiving in it's optics, almost an optical illusion, when seen from a vertical point (including sea, air, and deep space). No one has any idea from which dimension the Russian President will proceed his military plans. It is not inconceivable but some other architects of peace should also try to reassess or assess it's aftermath, if we come to this at all within a week from now. Russia is expected to break up from deep global economic sanctions imposed since last week. The moral line (intersection line) here is that Ukraine has arrived at a certain point in modern day European history. It's basic principle for joining the EU, under special circumstances of a brutal invasion by another sovereignty next door, is truly motivated: one it is a European country and second because it has 44.13 million people. On the side of Russia it is also the responsibility of the Russian President, Mr Vladimir Putin, to come up very quickly with a comprehensible explanation why he did attack Ukraine twice in a decade, one by annexation of Crimea and the other by an full blown invasion of Ukraine's territory. When or if this is something the president is reluctant to do he is losing the moral line of all that he says is what is behind his motive for 'taking back' Ukraine. Russia is incidently living on the same planet as the rest of the nations sharing this earth. It is absolutely the beauty over all when keeping this sharing in proportionate responsibility instead of disproportionate violence, one could argue with the Russian President. If he is fighting the world this is what he has to first do as it's challenger or father figure that he can also make it comprehensible and deliver a coherent course of action. It is not comprehensive enough in the 21st century just to state that Ukraine belongs historically to Russia.

Maquette- model (English).









The Russian President and his maximalist objective Ukraine.

24 February 2022

A full scale invasion of Ukraine during the night as in the news reports online today/ since this morning just shows that Mr Putin has no interests in abstract wars. Last night attack on Ukraine- fully blown missile attacks in three parts inside Ukranian territory- were his first strategic concentrations and perhaps is planning on going all the way to the capital Kyiv for his final conquest. But Mr Putin as we have learned from watching him closely is that he is not the man to underestimate when moving in battle or being in control distant or close on battlegrounds (Crimea 2014). Ukraine has that 'thing' for the Russian President just to trigger such a war at immense greater scale than what we have seen from him if not ever. He is out of the political sphere and is working on his own with his Russian army and military for his ambitions and carry out full assault on a neighbouring country. Eastern Europe with Russia on the war path echoes throughout the region every time this is happening, and some might even say that this is routine. The west cannot understand Mr Putin's appetite for swallowing up many Russian or ex Russian federations that he personally considers Russian property. (Neither can yours truly) Economically it is not how one runs his empire in the 21st century. How this is possible for Mr Putin and his ambitions in the East European region there is no one to make any sense of his impetus when Russia has a shrinking economy due to sanctions from the west. It could be an abstract that the Russian President might be aware of and can see through his many eyes on his peacock feathers, but his appetite goes out to the bigger things which stands above the ordinary Russian people. He is now sure that again he has managed to have created global impressiveness after the last time in 2014, when he had annexed Crimea.

In today's news on the Jerusalem Post it says: "Russia takes issue with Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights and Jerusalem Dmitry Polyanskiy told the UN Security Council, "Russia doesn't recognize Israel's sovereignty over Golan Heights that are part of Syria." The Russian President is moving within the circle between the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea even more quickly than what was already said or thought in a previous writing here. He is very straightforward and without any pretence or twist on the issue Russia took up this morning with Israel on the Golan Heights and Israel's sovereignty it denies to recognize. Also in the Jerusalem Post today one news reads that Israel was planning on intesifying attacks on Hezbollah in Syria, which could only be interpreted by Russia as provocation by timing. The Prime Minister in Israel has been up to this moment, since the breakout of the signing of the agreements with Donetsk and Luhansk by Russia as independent regions, on the wider sense of alertness, as this is important to keep a united front with the region it has committed itself to keep peace with Arab allies in the Abraham Accords and that could also suit the Prime Minister more at his best and to keep it for the time being his only best option in this crisis. It can't be that difficult to Mr Bennett once he uses the military diplomacy and an abstract of territorial integrity to be respected. Mr Putin today has also warned that anyone who would want to retaliate against Russia over his invasion in Ukraine during the night, that he will unleash a war that history has not yet seen before. Some write about the use of nuclear weapons and it's use by the Russian President a possibility and not a probability at this moment in time. In 2014 Mr Putin did give a signal out into the world, that he would be on the side of humanity and that the planet can only belong to the power who keeps it safe and inhabitable for all sorts of living creatures (as Mr Putin is also a fierce animal lover), but especially that his heart goes out to save humanity, if necessary from it's destructive self. Or, I am wrong and misunderstood some of the writings I read back in time in 2014. But Israel has a new prime minister and he has also met with Mr Putin last year in October 2021. If both men have a similar instinct and nature for the kind of worldview just here described, we might not come to that boiling point of an epic change in history. (But no one can say at the moment what that means in terms of a worldwide reality in this crisis)












Sanctions against the Russian invasion in Ukraine from Donbass in the east.

22 February 2022
(23:20 PM)

Big question: what are the Russian President Vladimir Putin his objectives after signing the agreements with the two breakaway regions Donetsk and Luhansk, last night on 21 February? And also what will be the new logic for Ukraine to decide it wants to keep it's independence from Russia longevity? Eight years was a long way to go for Ukraine and it is right to sweat in bullets over the threat of war against any Russian invasion any moment soon. A war hard fought in 2014 against Russian separatists in Donbass and long after that is now proof of the truth that Ukraine is serious about it's independence from Russia, but not only is this serious it is imperative to understand why. On both sides the borders are bloodlines and are still echoing of another era before the Orange Revolution and the presidents that followed in the line of modern day history between the greater Russia and it's apparent 'other half', when seen from one of Russian President Mr Vladimir Putin's objectives. One thing is what the world or public can say this time is that the Russian President isn't clear whether Donetsk and Luhansk are all that he wants, in comparison to his annexation of Crimea and claiming immediately that he had reached his goal and victory. Taking Donetsk and Luhansk within Ukraine's sovereign borders wasn't a moderate move, but was in fact a wide open move and clearly also that this was a wide scale military objective. Ukraine can't indulge this time in Mr Putin's adventures and military overtures with it's military response that won't scare away the Russian President like a scarecrow to scare away the black birds. Ukraine should decline the Russian 'invitation' of going to war, if Ukraine decides to fight back for it's lost two territories to Russia.

With this move we will also not know how it can impact the region in full circle from Ukraine to the Mediterranean Sea in the near future. One thing what anyone can expect from the Russian President is his eye for greater detail and time. The other big question when paying more attention to the full circle with the Middle East, Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Iran, that no one can say to what extent this might affect Israel in the future. The reason for it being the military of a formidable expansion (security & deterrence) in a history of 73 years in the region of the Middle East. The Russian President will not consider this one a detail for keeping it close in his vision/ eyesight. The message this time throughout the world of the west was very clear for Russia and it's two regions within the borders of Ukraine. Not just one, but two, can send out a strong message within the regions of the 'full circle'. Mr Putin likes to take and be in control of territories and not specific characters or characteristics. Let's hope so, for one thing this time is that we cannot believe that he is a passive man or President. The west with all it's imperfections at embarrassing large scales (Afghanistan last year in 2021) had been right about the Russian President and his ambitions to take Ukraine. The Russian President until 2014 was a formidable man and military leader, with status, I am sorry to say that this has been today in 2022 severely been reduced to the aggressor against Ukraine. Let me explain why. Ukraine has been independent as a sovereign country for eight years since 2014 and it has kept it's determination on the logic of independence through hardship and insecurity (unprecedented scale), and has not once slided to go back to the Russian fleshpots. Isn't how the saying goes, that blood is thicker than water or wine? The west cannot expect immediate gestures of economic and political grandeur from a young and juvenile country and trying to cut the bloodline with mother Russia and it's leadership under the incumbent President, Mr Vladimir Putin. The west is right to say Ukraine needs help and make it an extraordinary ally of the Nato alliance countries. This time the Russian President is not claiming that this is all he wants from Ukraine, two independent states, Donetsk and Luhansk. What then could be his real objective and end- game? Without disrespect.













Russia : USA/ allies west Europe and Ukraine.

15 February 2022

This 'Red Alert' of Russia moving it's military into Ukraine by stealth or overt advancing each and every day another millimeter close east, north and south, has been seen by Nato and it's allies as reason enough to believe and speak of a Russian invasion. That is reason enough and reasonably so. No one at this point is yet covinced that these rumours are accurately. Especially when the US Administration is still working on a diplomatic plan how to bring back quiet between Russia and Ukraine. The European Union has enough on it's hands with the financial story on rising inflation and now with Ukraine in a military standoff with Russia close to it's European borders. The chrome coloured window lens for the EU how to see the present moment evolving in Ukraine and the diplomatic talks with Russia. The colour of Orange goes back two decades since the first modern day revolution in Ukraine against Russian control of it's capital city and the people. In 2014 after the disaster of Viktor Yanukovych another period and president Mr Petro Poroshenko had become the new promise for Ukraine. The war in Donbass lasted two years between the Russian separatists and Ukraine after the apparent 'new time' in Ukraine under a new president. Nearly eight years later Europe is convinced another confrontation with Russia and Ukraine will be inevitable as soon as tomorrow, wednesday 16 February. Voices in Russia denied the story of invading Ukraine, and have said that their concern was the Nato- build up across the borders with Ukraine. (Not with exact data- information) The public or civilians living in Ukraine are asked to leave soon as possible, foreigners and many others, as this 'invasion plan' of Russia is ongoing. President Putin still is however a man who is doing his mathematics and military in one and the same breath, so the question is can the president really find any good reason for this invasion without having had the real numbers on a long term siege of Urkaine?

Free questions one can ask are about the wealth of Ukraine to Russia, and putting that next to the question how Ukraine perceives the wealth of Russia. If there is an answer here than it must be found in Europe and rethink how to keep a calm era between the two sovereignties Ukraine and Russia within the realm of diplomacy rather than a deep military build up. We do not know the answer but still remember the days of Yulia Timoshenko in the Orange Revolution, Viktor Yanukovych and Petro Poroshenko in the last century and after the millennium. Ukraine will cost president Putin a heavy price when Ukraine cannot produce any meaningful wealth for the Russian President. Wealth matters greatly in Europe and to Europeans whether historically or a thousand years ago. The problem with distribution of wealth as in so many other places on the planet, this is what can shift societies apart and for countries to go to war. The cost of one loaf of bread never again should become 1 tln Deutsche Mark! But Ukraine can be very well the tooth that is aching in President Putin's Russia for which he is playing the Russian 'aggressor' disguised in a dentist white coat when dealing with Ukraine. Tooth standing for Russian folklore as the hidden universe. (Hidden place of the universe, according to folktale) What can this invasion mean when in 2014 President Putin was unable to take all of Ukraine back? Invasion= nil, in 2022? It is perhaps too much to say about the Russian President, eight years later, that should his vision now not be deadly accurate? (Read article in the Daily Telegraph today in the UK, that the President of Russia has a visionary soul and the stomach of a thug) We need better instruments to control peace and war in the future, and good health. And not just how to whet your appetite for war and live in bad health each and every society. Globalisation started a promising path into the 21st century and building new infrastructure projects all around the world. War is the biggest waste of factors if you destroy bridges and tunnels, or connectivity networks across the planet, earth, sea and air/ deep space. Or the public misses the political and democratic point totally.
















Prime Minister Naftali Bennett spin on the economy and prompt measures, but at which mainstream level?

7 February 2022

A sound competitive long term strategies if the prime minister was pointing out in the article in the Jerusalem Post yesterday to more specific areas where the general sense is open and flexible to the national and domestic price index. But short term marketing pricing mixes in certain sectors could only mean public sector. And the short term future. This is also a first time for this government and will need the people for economic reform. Three decades ago with the so called free market economy isn't historically in any book. Where does the PM reforms date start? When looking back at five or six months ago this prime minister saw two main problems for a government that was to bring 'change' for the country and the people of Israel. The State Budget, followed by the State Economy Budget, and the second problem was the lack of representation of a working democracy for the people. From the domestic picture love for the country also meant to the prime minister openess, transparency, for local government and ministries to govern the people of Israel. Macro economics has little symbiosis with the domestic economics and wellfare of the low income people, and less with the other half of a few million people (Arab citizens included) living under the poverty line for a historic high. Recession was the PM's fight and that he had campaigned for and that he would want to reduce while being the Prime Minister of Israel, a short term in the rotation government with the Left- Center Right coalition. One thing however did happen for the prime minister 4 November 2021 when the State Budget had passed and a new day for people and government could restart the economy... In the middle of a worldwide pandemic with the Virus Covid-19 still raging on.

Seven months later what the PM now realizes is that Israel wasn't ready for a Singapore- like economy or prosperity island when sinking in recession in their backyard. He is also not privileged to rule as a majority prime minister with a national consensus behind his back and start to reform his new plans for social economics and continuity, if there is any future above conflict and military weapons for Israelis. Who can blame the prime minister at this point when for the last three months 'things' seem to be going back in time and remembering the 'fleshpots of the previous prime minister Benyamin Netanyahu'... Three decades of free market economy and a synthetic creation of global wealth for the nation of Israel has no written laws to be adopted by the government of change in 2021 to 2023 for the new prime minister, so it seems. Where does the new government make it's restart and can they find the legitimacy that the people of Israel stand behind them? In a democracy the new government would need the people to consent to reform socially or the economy, just to keep the measures to a minimum shock for Israelis and Arabs alike. The question raising it's obstinate head from this abyss is that the surface is there is no land or walls from historic times, just the use of land and walls. How can the pm explain this best in terms of real policies to the people? Change should not be a literal experience to their sentiment, but rather a continuation of Israel's democracy and living standards. It was also a promise made to the people since it's inception of Independence! Yes, there was 'free market' but where was the economy? Perhaps the economy was thrown behind the free market stand in a carton box and trampled later on by the feet on it's budgetary disciplines. Prime Minister Bennett however did take up the disciplines in the State & Economy Budgets very seriously and is also the idiot to do so, according to proponents of the 'free market capitalism' in Israel. Buy more and sell high and than extremely high, and only for real men? "Who is this prime minister," the opposition leader is still asking in a democracy and who could not form government for two years and four elections failures. The idiot they are referring to is no other than the new prime minister in a change government and having the first real representation of what a representative democracy means in Israel, to both, Israelis and Arabs. Right and Left, with center Right and Left. The economy is historic since 1948, 1970, 1990 and above. The IMF for the backyards in Israel next?

To be continued.











For Prime Minister Naftali Bennett the coming 23th of March will be another first time in his life as it was on 13 June 2021.

27 January 2022

At the moment the prime minister is still being viewed as the man who will beat the Omicron variant after Delta since last year in October 2021. The World Health Organisation however is not saying yet that the end of the pandemic is near in sight in January 2022, or that this will be in spring this year. The Prime Minister of Israel in his last statements on Iran and the Palestinian Two- State solution pressure three weeks ago, did made it his last words for the winter season on the issues of the 'free world' in the International diplomatic arena. That is for the time being, so one could say. Particular interesting was the perception by the prime minister on peace with the Palestinians, that this was his interest in a 'people- to- people peace', but also stated that nothing more was envisioned by him in the greater picture with the Two- State solution as was signed in the Oslo Accords then under former president, Democrat Bill Clinton. But what a difference a year has made in Israel and it's political realities after the former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, in his days as Head of State in Israel. Is the first quarter of 2022 quiet in the Middle East region between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea only imaginary to the outside world, e.g. here in Europe and in the rest of the world? For Prime Minister Naftali Bennett the time of the Guardian of the Walls it must be to him as if it were something of a long time ago now. But this was only eight months ago and when Naftali Bennett had not yet been inaugurated prime minister or a coalition partner to Yes Atid with it's 17 seats (and the rest of the present time government). Somewhere this middle- term it looks as if many had underestimated the stomach of the prime minister, and that he would understand or give it up completely and make a run for the Judean or Samarian hills forever. Instead the prime minister had made State visits within the region and in the International world. One should also notice that they were modest by definition, when compared to the more pomp and glory by the former Head of State, Benyamin Netanyahu. A remainder of what remains in a day?

The submarine affair didn't get it's vote from the present time prime minister, as this would have hurt his chances of getting the lost voters back in his next election... Extraordinary of this prime minister to be humble enough and rethink his come back into politics and to his Yamina Party. This is home and more than ever to the prime minister it is Israel that drove him and his heart to the status of becoming prime minister of Israel. He said it often enough that he believes in territory, real peace and inner strength. These are not only words to him and what he has tried to show to the people of Israel and the International countries friendly with Israel, is that he believes every word he had said in 2017 when speaking to a hostile crowd at the Haaretz Peace Conference. Inner strength, what was he talking about? Had Israel even listened to the prime minister, then the Economy Minister? In old England when in the Order of Chivalry one law demands to honour and respect 'the place of strength of this land'. (In the Order of Chivalry it is here the place of strength- not literally quoted) Some forget that Naftali Bennett had served as an elite member in the Sayeret Matkal. If the question would be whether as prime minister if he was a grand success the answer is clear: no. But today on wednesday 27 January 2022 'No' has got a massive different meaning when the UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson' answered 'No!' to the opposition's call for him to resign. When put on the 'no' next on scale with PM Johnson's 'No!' politics becomes more and more optical delusion rather than political illusion. To everyone else, that is. Will prime minister Naftali Bennett now get involved too in the Ukraine- Moscow saber- rattling? President Putin had refused to meet with the Ukranian President in Jerusalem for a summit of regional & partners in the coming weeks. Strategic partners could be proven much more difficult for the young prime minister at this time in his prime ministership term of two years. In his humility to President Putin the prime minister of Israel had said nothing more of it when he met with the Russian president last year in Sochi. Back at home as still is protocol the former prime minister still refuses to call Mr Bennett 'his prime minister'. But there is no doubt that in the flame of his heart Naftali Bennett will not give up on Israel and politics in the coming time. Home is where his heart is and also where his people live side by side with/ to him even when among the poorest. (His neighbours the 3 mln Arab population included)










What was in the news lately?

22 January 2022
There is no one at this point in the process what the other side might be coming up with next.

Prince or Andrew Mountbatten- Windsor maintains his innocence and he does not know who this lady is, he said in the interview on Newsnight in 2019 (Emily Maitlis).
(Andrew does not know anything about her memory lapses, and if she suffers psychologically)

17 January 2022 in the news Ghislaine Maxwell is giving up her battle of holding a list with eight names of other perpetrators of child sex abuse in the Epstein- Maxwell trafficking of young girls.

Also to keep remembering that the Queen's 70th Platinum Jubilee will be held in June this year. (Hard to say this will not be in deep injury over the civil case of sex allegations and trial of Andrew)

For the collective memory of the family Andrew Mountbatten- Windsor it is almost, forgive me, the right timing for the family doctor/ psychiatrist counseling in the legal battle strategy.

The other side will be hard on tactics and tactical moves. It is a fascinating story told by Ms Guiffrie and she is doing this, one has to admit, in a very brave manner. Like it or not, sometimes 'the enemy' can be admired genuinely for when telling the truth, e.g. on her experiences in the world of Epstein- Maxwell. You want to applaud her, but it is at the same time also important to be rational on defining her true story. What e.g. connects Prince Andrew to Ms Guiffrie along the thin line of truth, next to many other powerful men that she had met with during the same time when she met with Andrew? This thin line has to be distinct from Mr 1, 2, and so forth.
And is Ms Guiffrie genuine the real flesh to flesh story with regard to Prince Andrew? It can simply not be in such a high profile case be that all men are the same so one can pick and choose a fragment detail that is questionable on how this is related to the defendant. That is what the whole world wants to hear that he (Andrew) is guilty of these sex crimes 'exposed' by Ms Guiffrie, but in a court the truth must be lawful. (And humane, in the 21st century)

They are not alone and ask the difficult and hard legitimate questions. You have to do our advanced world honor and keep equality and egalitarian principles inclusive where and when you can. All get it all done in a quick- fit style, but victorious.








When was Prince Andrew ever a promising young member of the Royals?

5 January 2022

It is a sort of personal question and dating back in 1990 in the previous century. The late Tory prime minister Margareth Thatcher was still in power, The Berlin Wall coming down, and former Yugoslavia was splitting up in Bosnia Herzegovina and Serbia. In the US overseas Ronald Reagan was the 40th US Republican President and would soon be followed by a new kid on the block years later, Bill Clinton and Democrat. Where did Prince Andrew fit in all of these new times and the coming years? We only found out in the 21st century that Prince Andrew was a global trade envoy for the British Government during the times post Falkland war. But nothing more. Except that he is now in the public domain of more than 2 bln people on the planet as the defendant in the sexual abuse case in New York. His accuser is Ms Virginia Roberts and now Mrs Guiffrie, who lives in Australia. Prince Andrew got married in 1986 and was divorced in 1996. And between 1996 and 2015 he took up his friendship with Ghislaine Maxwell, accused on 29 November 2021 of sex trafficking young and underaged girls, more intimately as platonic friends and old school/ university chums. (Interview Newsnight with Emily Maitlis in 2019) What happened after that is talking to a cat entangled in a ball of wool with nails and paws. If any of these high profile lawyers would use simple grammar in the civil case of sexual allegations against Prince Andrew, how would they begin and what would be their first nominativus, followed by genitivus, dativus, accusativus and ablativus? Prince Andrew has said that he has no recollection of ever have meeting this lady and that there has not been any sexual contact with her. What then conveys the real message here from his words? Dativus, or ablativus? Is he then not saying that he is innocent?

For the other side the legal team will use a different order and include or emphasize most of their arguments in the genitivus and accusativus. On pure grammar in his BBC Newsnight interview with Emily Maitlis the Duke of York his grammar is clear, one could say, and he is therefore from this clarity as a clear night sky pointing only to what you can see, the many lightyears of the starlights in an eye's second. And not pointing out to the dark of the night, nor is he scientifically trying to say that he is explaining matter and distance. The media in Britain keeps telling us that Prince Andrew is arrogant, not empathetic, and is very much in love with the fact that he is a royal prince and member of the royal family with his mother being Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. When having a closer look one can see that the Prince is not arrogant, if his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell's boyfriend, had a blindspot with a great magnitude. We on the outside are asking the same question over and over about British males and females, that what on earth is making them chums for life? It's a rare phenomenon under God's heaven, you can almost say, while marrying completely different people and characters. It is not that strange that both people, Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew, at one point had come to the conclusion that there were no real promises they knew of that would come their way anytime soon. This creation later became the trio of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew for life relationship... Or, we are dead wrong and cannot untangle the ball of confusion or wool before our very eyes.

I like what Brendan O'Neil said earlier yesterday in a videoclip on GB Newsdesk about Prince Andrew. "It is a good principle to believe that Prince Andrew is innocent, even when later this would prove wrong and horrible." (Not literally quoted) Others have suggested in the meantime while waiting Judge Lewis Kaplan's decision on yesterday's hearing of both legal teams, that the Prince should now plant flowers and come back to his inner hermit. Britain 1990- 1995 can anyone remember what years they were? In terms of British politics, military operations in Iraq, the world and globalization, people fleeing Iraq and the invasion of Kuwait? Just sketching time here criss cross in a mind miniature of what time back then was. The Two-State solution between Israel and the Palestinian people and the signing of the Oslo Accords also had taken much of high momentum then. By Bill Clinton, prime minister Yitzchaik Rabin and Yasser Arafat of the Palestinian LIberation Army. I don't think that we should make a mistake here with Prince Andrew and forget that he was not only a member of the Royal family, but has also been part of the new world rise in globalization at it's beginning. Today it is fair to say or put it rather this way, that Prince Andrew has now been accused by a private person/ individual in the US, but that this is still a global matter to solve judging from the here above. Over 2 bln people on the planet now know his name and that he is associated with something very obscure and a killer of his character as a member of the Royal House in Britain. And despite his reputation as a womanizer before he was married, this prince is still a tender prey when reading about his fall as a paedophile... Historically have we not learnt from the ancient hataerae that meeting a member of royalty this is what you always read: "But you are a prince... Should you not do this sort of thing?" One testimony was heard saying that Ms Maxwell would order the girls not to look at Jeffrey Epstein directly in the eye. And yet, what Ms Guiffrie is calling the Duke of York is by his first name, Andrew. But then again who knows what sort of theatrics was their game.

No one is suggesting that Prince Andrew is a saint and that he did not had any sexual relations or women during this time. But what is circumstantial evidence and what is not but reality will be very hard to reconstruct by the Prince his legal team or anyone else in Britain. His US lawyers have made a shambles already with their argument on the signed agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and Ms Virginia Guiffrie after she had filed a criminal case against him. The document was signed in 2009. In some aspects of his life Prince Andrew now reminds me of Ludwig II of Bavaria and of his ending. Some have suggested the Prince should be 'banned' from all public life and live in a Colditz of his own. Ms Guiffrie said of the Duke that she had never seen anyone dancing so strangely as she had seen him do. This was before the sweatgate the same night and moment. It was also the same day after he had taken the children back home to the Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson. And then went back to his chum and close friend, Ms Ghislaine Maxwell, where he had met with Jeffrey Epstein and... Virginia Roberts (17 years old), at their place in London. But who was focusing in the global world on Prince Andrew and when in 1996 Princess Diane was killed in Paris in a car accident with Dodi Al Fayad? And also in 1997 was Labour Prime Minister Sir (just recently in 2021) Tony Blair's rise to a new era in politics. Who had ever imagined that the British monarchy would be threatened by a nymph in 2021/2022 and sounding like a siren across the ocean to bring down Odysseus. (Ocean could be symbolic for globalization) Close your eyes for a moment and imagine that Prince Andrew is found innocent on all charges made against him... And then ask yourself why that is impossible. One more last thing: when was Prince Andrew ever an opportunist and went to Jeffrey Epstein to enrich himself?

When did Prince Andrew also believed he had so much more potential and that he was a big promise / asset to the British monarchy? In his heart of hearts that is the question he alone can answer and it is a very important one as well if you want to clear your conscience or psychological state of mind in the present time. From any point in the present time at the age of 61 no one can say that Prince Andrew has ever thought of his own potential more seriously. To maintain his military service in the Royal Regiments it will be equally important to see his true nature and leadership qualities at these most adverse of times in his life and royal dutiful life. No one knows if he will ever be needed and send out to the Middle East for future military excercises or inspections. Presumably he is still innocent at the moment in time today. Why did the girl had to say that the Duke of York had raped, battered and abuse her? He was 40 years old when she was just 17. Andrew... It could have been role play and she would have been his teacher? And look him, not Jeffrey Epstein, in the eyes. A sort of disclosure movie. Say it again? Andrew... That doesn't sound very disgusting to me the way she is saying his name in the videoclip. But why spend so much time writing about Prince Andrew, one could ask. Ask 2 billion people why he is guilty.










31 December 2021

Brother Ghislaine Maxwell, Kevin Maxwell, today in the news, "Ghislaine has been denied justice, has been denied a fair trial and the presumption of innocence never existed." ABC News.



1 January 2022

Interesting presumption of innocence has never (been)prompted'. You are innocent until proven guilty. A technicality that was overlooked factor?

2 January 2022

Ghislaine Maxwell PR business for the 'Epstein empire' was based on a Quid pro quo construction.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









1 January 2022 Word of the day: birthday Brexit one year political history control.

1 January 2022

This extreme reality of historical departure from the EU is equally extremely interesting when facing the new future in 2022 and forward. For e.g. the simple reason that we have in the west the EU, in Middle Europe the Eastern countries and close borders to the east of Europe. The United Kingdom, Ireland and Northern Ireland, here is where the question makes it somewhat uneasy to answer in this new change that is today more physically visible compared to last year on 1 January 2021. We are not looking at the old European- UK hegemony again in 2022, as we speak. Or, some things will not change... What comes to mind are the military mechanisms between countries with alignments that make it impossible for any change here to the system for pan European without England's sea admirality. To France it is just a little more than convincing the fish that they are French and should stop at marine deep sea lines when meeting with English borders! All this is depending on how England will take it's sovereignty to the next levels without historical political extremes without the European Union. Is Prime Minister Boris Johnson ready to take Britain to that next level, and is the Tory government still relevant? Perhaps in principle yes, but when it comes to discipline a lot will remain unclear at this point in time. No one is waiting for having the Labour Party come to power right now before Brexit is fully established first and last. The European Union and it's 26 Member States to a certain extent have not yet seen this point of rebuilding the meaning of the continent without England in the EU passiveness. The east and middle Europe have not given the impression thus far to be part of the EU passiveness when it comes to greater integration for countries that want to join the EU Membership States.

Strategically Russia is getting closer to the Middle East and with China global investments in equally strategic regions, can the EU make it believable to Member States that it is independent and can rely completely on the mechanisms from an older date when e.g. Britain was still in the European Union? It is what the future requires when including expansion of the EU. One prediction, and even when baseless or naive, tolerance will be the real challenge and where or how to place difficult policies between candidate countries and the older Member States. Tolerance no matter how difficult was England's expertise and made it for all arbitrary mechanisms easier to understand. Life was more practical with the UK and the EU as partners in a historical political order. The question of dominance in the new culture of western nations is unclear of how and where democracy has it's pillars built, when it's not EEC or the Maasstricht & Lisbon Treaties. The meaning of sovereignty has still only it's old meanings in Europe and even now more extreme in the present time Brexit, and is by a more natural definition exponential but also timeless. Why is it always time that one overlooks? In time how the nations will divide among themselves the meaning of loyalties will remain a matter of greater concern, than when the time of the old world order was based on more simple and amicable agreements, especially after a battering of WWI and WWII. It is also still custom to adhere more to the Anglo Saxon world for developing countries and predominantly this has always been England when dealing with the far east and closer in the Middle East. Currencies may also become a bigger problem in time, or waiting for global inspansion through conflict and economies collapsing. Prime Minister Boris Johnson is only starting and from the here above it seems that he has no choice without a successor to replace him.











"When can I box?" Negative.

28 December 2021

Radio communication last minute/ seconds in the last lap excerpt: "What's the situation?" "The situation is that Verstappen has pitted. We would have lost track position here..." "Is he right behind me?.." "...With new tyres?.." "Copy Lewis, we would have lost track position if we had pitted..." And the rest is magical F1 history from Christian Horner's own words: "Max Verstappen, you are the world champion, you are world champion!!!" Does Lewis Hamilton have a point or case here why he has lost his championship at Abu Dhabi end world championship in Formula 1? It is interesting to say but thinking it that will not be a pretty girl or boy if this was Mercedes committing the harakiri seppuku on Lewis Hamilton, as it is a question made on pure instincts from the side of the driver while on the track and doing his last minute race against Verstappen (with the fresh soft tyres). This question only came up last night in a Youtube video on the mood in which Hamilton got himself with his own team. And like the team boss Toto Wolff himself has said in the interview he gave in a Mercedes video conference after the race, Lewis is a man of values, it is not such a surprise when Lewis Hamilton is questioning these values from his 'clean instincts'. It is to the public also a very important question from Hamilton and to hear this, as there was so much hate against Verstappen in the aftermath of the race at Abu Dhabi. And what if Toto Wolff is like Michael Corleone against Fredo, his brother at Moe Greene's casino:"Fredo, you are my older brother and I love you, but don't ever take sides with anyone against the family again." https://youtu.be/n640F0bID1g Can Lewis Hamilton take sides against his familiy Mercedes AMG Petronas Formula I industries? Bear with me, there is method in the madness of racing and passion outside the F1 arena. In the end of the day we are only humans and not robotic beings.

From the here above one can only say that the last minute after the 'Negative' from the Mercedes Team and not allowing Lewis Hamilton to box, with the safety car still on the track, the realization must have been one of a race becoming a side mission to Lewis after that. Or even to his race career. Has this happened before to any of the other drivers in a race? If not there is very little one can do to understand what Mr Hamilton is going through right now. Who do you talk to in a situation like this, a local lawyer or friend? Just like the divine comedy by Dante when being in purgatory, is a wild guess. Except this is racing Jet Set style with no one to show you any mercy. 54 Laps Lewis Hamilton had dominated the race, say most youtube video's when reporting the Abu Dhabi race finish. And only by a swirl of favourable windflow was Verstappen champion when he overtook the 7x champion of this race in the fifth corner. That must have felt like a star crash inside Mr Hamilton's visor and we understand. At some point the apex of fall and rise come unexpected or when least expected. The fans however will never let this one go quietly and perhaps they will keep on fighting for what they presume is right and what is or went wrong with the racing spear of destiny of Lewis Hamilton at Abu Dhabi. And then came the moment of truth and the appeal by Toto Wolff and Lewis Hamilton was dropped just after Abu Dhabi after the world championship 2021. And after this race one can only question F1 world championships in future and wonder what is racing when being in the Mercedes AMG Petronas group. Spontaneity and love for racing and people in this community can they be really like the rest of mankind? Well, let's leave that to Lewis Hamilton to answer the question and that he will come back to being the world champion seven times over in the next season in 2022.

Personally what I like about Lewis Hamilton is his purity of instinct when racing in a high speed car like in the F1. I can see why he is attracted to racing without having any credible visible proof of what he is then making everyone in the world feel when watching him. I would also like to see his eyes while racing if that could make you understand in what world he was born in. There is no doubt that his championships have been well deserved, but more so because he is the sacred flame of racing at high speed. Something not everyone can do even when trying your heart out. Many see him as arrogant, mistaking perhaps his introvert manners (mannerism?) as a champion and race driver in the F1 world. His responsibilities were even in the last moments of the Abu Dhabi race quite clear from his questions on the radio communication back to Mercedes... "When can I box..." "On fresh tyres..." Bad question perhaps, but would you ever like to be in that position and go from there to the eight championship in your career? I personally would have jammed the car, step out and walk away. What was the point after the restart for me to go on, as I clearly felt that the gravity was lost between me and my team, plus that my rival had just pitted and was on fresh soft tyres. It is a good thing that I hate the world of racing in these dog cages without any ergonomics (more like mimicking) for the driver in the foetus- position- cockpit. Nor are there any real speeding curves designed on the race circuits around in the world. They are just beautiful and zero topography. If the FIA has academic drivers in the F1 world the here above (ut supra) is poor manual reading and leaving the driver in tutorial despair while he had to win the rest of the last lap minutes... The brand of honour has been lost and like Cinderella who will find the shoe that fits?










The Naftali Bennett government second quarter since 13 June 2021.

27 December 2021

CGTN China Media on Twitter yesterday has said that Prime Minister Bennett of Israel was tested positive after a PCR testing. Today in the Jerusalem Post it is almost certain that the prime minister his daughter has caught the Omicron variant and must keep in quarantine. The JP in the news yesterday, sunday 26 December, did not mention that the test of the Prime Minister was positive. It definitely has said that the test was negative. Today however Likud MK's have called Prime Minister Bennett to attend Knesset behind the perplex walls and still to come listen to the ministers speeches. This was not the responsible thing to do, according to the prime minister. Israel and it's members in government or high office should know how this works for the people on the one side, and the other seems to be where government people are still ignoring restrictions and continue their business as usual. People also seem to be more risk to the virus averse in Israel. But others believe that that is just the other side to the myth of fighting Covid 19 and it's variants. 2019 Prime Minister Bennett had written a book on how to fight the pandemic by medical and social strategies, some have called later on that year the most stupidist book ever written. Today we are not sure whether the same people had any idea that for some reason the thing that is lacking are perhaps basic strategies for this 'new normal' globally. But Prime Minister Bennett seems to have been so far the only prime minister with the 'stupidist' ideas that no one needs to listen to or implement. He is also communication and technology minister in his present time Office as prime minister. Mr Bennett actually is the only Israeli citizen to think that the emperor is naked!

Another stupid moment in his short career as prime minister was the Haaretz peace conference in November 2014. What was it again he was saying? Territory matters, real peace (inclusive of Arab citizens) and inner strength based on solidarity. The hall was full of people heckling the Yamina candidate and minister (then economy?) and he nearly couldn't continue finish speaking on the stage. Strange how Israel imagines itself above the rest and when keep on thinking that all that it needs is to defend Israel. Which Israel is not defined in terms of territory, real peace and solidarity. Not in the military and not in civil greater Israel, as it is up to this day that many say in the military that Israel has no real borders within the armistice lines. Another strange coincidence probably is that this time it wasn't a colonial force from outside Israel envisioning the need for territory in Israel. Then still a political party third rank to the other major parties, Mr Bennett also did not know that this is exactly what matters in terms of territorial rights within fictional borders when there are no geographical borders. Plus having the 1967 grey area drawn up in shade lines as this is conflict (occupied) area. Yes, territory defining what is within this territory must be a stupid idea to build physical form and shape of the people civil and it's territorial right. Taxation laws could have been designed to be implemented on both sides of the borders. That seems to the observant's point of view as a good beginning of something in the future... Continuity and contiguity? The God of Abraham only knows how Israel needs to be defined through territory and it's territorial rights!

What do we think of the Bennett government so far is not very clear when one reads the news coming from Jerusalem. Everything seems to have stopped for Prime Minister Bennett after COP26 in Glasgow Scotland last October this year. It only reminded some of this moment when Queen Elizabeth II in her Christmas message again mentioned COP26 as important a milestone in the Climate Change Conference because it reflected Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, his life's work. Prime Minister Bennett his role can not be that of a more ceremonial prime ministership, is something of the jingle one keeps playing over and over until they understand that this is not child's play. Or, stupid. Israel needs continuity which does not stem from a letter once written to Lord Rothschild in 1948. What it needs is building physical proof of sovereignty, yes, and starting with territory. The military will always be right to defend also what is within that territory and it's borders (fictional or geographical- in the future). At the same time there is no time left to Prime Minister Bennett and start writing a white paper how to define Israel's sovereign borders and contiguity. Something that could inspire future generations to a different outlook when considering that the Palestinians have their own State nextdoor. Definition of country and people is defined not by personal will and view of an individual, but by a bureaucratic organisation and national currency. This is probably how neighbour country Turkey started after it's empire had fallen. But not in Israel where there is no one who wants to think about Israel in any other way than fighting Iran or attacking Iran by 'themselves'. The second quarter of the Bennett government will probably not last and it will certainly never become the biggest party like Likud. If this has any value perhaps Israel should never forget that before the Balfour Declaration there were no Israeli citizens in Palestine. Just Jews (as in Roma people or wanderers). Territory does matter, as Prime Minister Bennett said in November 2014 at the Haaretz Peace Conference.










After 13 June this year we now have come to believe Israel in 2021 has seen two different times in one era.

23 December 2021

In memo: Naftali Bennett took the prime ministership from the former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, on 13 June 2021. And on 4 November last fall the State & Economic budgets were passed into law for the first time since the last State Budget of 2018/2019 under the previous government. One could say that Prime Minister Bennett has taken the country a long way out of it's malaise into a more competitive new time for both the citizens of Israel and it's Arab fellow beings living as co- inhabitants in the same country and State. Why ascribe all these changes in Israel to the prime minister, who according to several die hard Likud Members, isn't the legitimate prime minister with only six seats and having in it's coalition a Party with 17 (now 19 after the latest polls) seats? This beggs for a simple answer: if he is not the prime minister, than who is? It would be strange to say that e.g. the President Isaac Herzog was elected in government and could take the role of PM when difficult issues were on the government table, or the Foreign Minister who is the man with the 17 seats in the coalition with the prime minister. We should also wipe off the rumour from the table that the former PM has anything to do with this confusion, who is the real PM in Israel, when so blatantly it was visible on 13 June 2021 that Mr Naftali Bennett was inaugurated to become the next prime minister of Israel. But of course, there is again something of a new malaise in the looming after six months today with the issue of Iran that is back on the table and with this obscure the fact that Israel is so much more than going to war again. And we are not looking, deliberately, to the private sector. The situation in Israel got very bad during the last election from the status quo under the Netanyahu governments, that this prime minister, Mr Bennett, had promised the people of Israel in the public sector under the Covid19 restrictions to help the people first. In his good heart of hearts the impression, even yesterday, one gets is that there is still something of that white flame and not to only spend good government time on Iran, if there is only talk. His words: "Shoot if you are going to shoot, don't talk," from the film, perhaps everyone's favourite villains movie, The good, the bad and the ugly. To the Prime Minister all we can say is equally quoted from the same film: "Blondie, don't die."

Are the 2 million people living under the poverty line in Israel now feeling any different than six months ago? And what happened to the other 1 million barely making it? On the Arab side Mr Mansour Abbas has just admitted to his audience (the Palestinians) in the Ra'am Party (?), that Israel should stay a Jewish State. This was at the beginning of this week, just before Christmas in two days. Ra'am also is part of the Bennett- Lapid government and coalition. Instead it seems that the coalition has moved to the bigger issues since the Vienna talks with Iran and the European countries plus one, the UK, last month in November. This week US United States National Security Advisor to President Joe Biden administration, Mr Jake Sullivan, was in Israel and had talks with Prime Minister Bennett on a joined strategic approach to Iran. The US was still committed to Israel as a friend and ally, the news read after the talks. In a press conference with Secretary of State Antony Blinken in the US, his words on US leadership in the world was somehow a little more nuanced, and easier for allies to understand this was meant to put solidarity back in the global political sphere. (On Youtube.com) Dry domestic politics in the US was high on his agenda in this press conference (economy & Covid19). There are two distinct differences when it comes to Iran, that one: the military strength of Iran is one issue. And two: nuclearization. The military in Iran has the kind of sovereignty that is legitimate in the International world from an earlier time in history. But what is bringing confusion to the International world and certainly more to the whole region in the Middle East is the nuclearization ambitions of Iran, with specifically having a Jewish State living in the same region. On the story with the Palestinian people and their right to the State next door in Israel, geopolitics here isn't the only answer to Iran at this level, or is it? How can we expect a fresh and inexperienced prime minister in Israel today to deal with geopolitical history and polemics in the military in a realistic manner when he is not a magician pulling white rabbits out of his 'shaky' coalition's hat? Mr Sullivan again has made the promise to President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority this week, that the US wants a Two- State solution. Next question is what the rest of the world believes at this point of peace and loyalties between the nations in the Middle East, one on the side of Israel and second towards the Two- State solution for the Palestinian nation (not people). Prime Minister Bennett next chess move has different levels of strategic weighing and observing and starting with the rotational government span of life of his prime ministership, or act boldly (with losing his most important chess pieces).










Mercedes has dropped the appeal.

18 December 2021

Officially Max Verstappen is world champion F1 driver at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix race 2021. There is no doubt in the spectator's mind that the decisive factors in this race were the last minute and it's 56 seconds. When Verstappen was behind Lewis Hamilton before the fifth he (LH) was still in the lead position from the window of winning this race the last seconds. Instead it was Verstappen who had took over the dynamic flow from the inside at the fifth and from there leave everything to chance, in fact still the chance on two narrow occasions for Lewis Hamilton to win his eigth championship. We as spectators can only watch the videofootage again and again, and see a clear winning chance that Max Verstappen knew how to rise to the occasion and overtook Lewis Hamilton as a chance in a million F1 years. Equally to the same chance it was down to Lewis Hamilton to do something from his instinct as a seven times world championship as the F1 race driver and take it back from Max at the next two corners before finish. Max Verstappen is right to say after the race that in the end of the day it is about racing, something Ayrton Senna could also have said. What happened before the last minutes after the safety car chaos with Latifi crashing into the wall is de facto unrelated to the end of the race seconds. What made the call made by Michael Masi wrong, according to mr Wolff, was that some cars were allowed to unlap and than seconds later were not allowed to unlap (restart?). It could be just the other way round. Minutes before Latifi had crashed it was heard being said by Red Bull Christian Horner over the intercom that he was praying for a miracle. After that all had ended up in a sequence of assumptions from that point. Tyre management from Mercedes was also overheard that there was no pit- stop otherwise they would lose track position, and hearing Lewis Hamilton clearly worrying about Max Verstappen having pitted and the fresh soft tyres. What do these two mean: keeping the Delta positive (Verstappen perhaps on Delta Negative?) and not to DRS in the last seconds at the last turn? (From F1 Glossary online)

If there was a wider problem at the FIA is it perhaps this that the drivers in F1 are becoming more 'tutorial' in the 21st century? "I know the car," is something you hear being said very often and than thinking what the driver could mean. Automobile Technical engineering and mechanics are two important aspects for any future driver to know and learn if the sports has to become a state- of- the- art and high tech driven world sport. Max Verstappen is the future generation at 25 years old, as are all other young drivers in his follow. We cannot imagine that the FIA is the world with a pedigree of sportsmen or race drivers at any point now and in the future. It only is getting bigger and massive. You can't be a passive race driver and especially in 'combat'. At the level of the military this is the moment you have been trained for to act 'responsible' and defend your position. When hurt you are still a soldier, taken apart from human civil life. I have only one question: when Max Verstappen overtook Lewis Hamilton at the fifth (apex) from the inside and wide (enough), would a trained and seven times champion not be triggered and 'come back' in terms of a fraction of a second? With the two last and only chances he had in front of him (two last corners). He wasn't in any immediate danger, on old tyres, or was he? This is all what the situation was after the safety cars unlap/ lapped and Michael Masi, in epic seconds. In other words it is for the fans around the world not what they see is what they get, but it is what we don't see. Listening almost seven days after Abu Dhabi to Toto Wolff in a press conference video on Youtube there is not a single doubt in your mind that we are not hearing his ethics of love and commitment for the racing sport and it's high standards. And his ethos approach to support as the 'power room' behind the drivers on the race track. Yes, true and an admirable if not formidable man. But out in the crowd still there is also a chance that someone has blood in the head for racing and then see that Max Verstappen only followed the law of mechanics and took the dynamic flow when it had opened it's matrix of glorious overtake to him at the fifth in the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix F1 Race championship. This championship was like quicksilver wit or strategic quick thinking by Max Verstappen. (5Th unedited)

The Grand Prix F1 global arena has said thumps up! for Max Verstappen as in ancient Rome. And leaving Mr Wolff to a Greek tragedy (Euripides or Pindar?) he is rewriting on his hero and his winged chariot.

"Creatures of a day! What is anyone?
What is anyone not? A dream of a shadow
Is our mortal being. But when there comes to men
A gleam of splendour given of heaven,
Then rests on them a light of glory
And blessed are their days."

Pythian












UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson: to party or not to party, that is the question.

8 December 2021

(23:24 PM)

Will it hurt? The answer can wait till morning in the wee hours of aurora in England across the channel. 18 December 2020 all of the UK had been under strict lockdown from Covid19 and was set to follow by all members of the public or in Downing Street Nr 10 and Nr 11. Will it hurt next what was said about the hour and date in Downing Street on 18 December 2020 when the mice came out for cheese and wine? Allegra Stratton, spokesperson of the Prime Minister, today was all in tears when she said to journalists waiting outside her home, that she will send her resignation to the Prime Minister over what had happened during lockdown last year in December. It was never meant to hurt the people who had lost loved ones, members of families and friends, neighbours and another lost life at the end of the street. This resignation does also say that there was a party, no not that. The leaked video footage of the party in December last year is what she is resigning for today. SNP leader in the House of Commons, Mr Blackburn, also today has called for the resignation of the prime minister. He was no longer a leader that he could trust, he had said. The Prime Minister was courteous and thanked the honorable gentleman for putting his view forward in the House and gave the answer earlier before, that to his knowledge there was no party in Downing Street 10 on 18 December last year and if evidence would come up showing that there was, that there would be serious punishments. How could this prime minister be trusted with Omicron (African variant since the first week of November last month) this year in December 2021, the Opposition Leader Labour asked Mr Johnson. But someone has to answer the question when there is serious hurt involved and coming from Downing Street Nr 10 (or was it Nr 11?). As far as the rest of the world knows Brexit and it's prime minister are not making up the rules on their own when restricting the people of Britain from parties or visiting relatives, dying or sick, elderly or neighbourly. Once the alarm has gone off , the breaking news is equally fast and introducing new restrictions and ways to keep everyone safe in the rest of the world, Britain and in the rest of the UK.

World leaders e.g. the US President Joe Biden and the President of Russia, Mr Vladimir Putin, also held talks today via Zoom on the situation in the Ukraine. The pandemic Covid19 is a worldwide urgency for nearly two years and many kinds of hurt (sick or death) show a meteorite path and trail throughout all societies in the world. And millions can still get their vaccinations plus booster (after six months). The world has 7.2 billion people living on the planet and the plan of vaccination by 2023 will have reached everyone, is perhaps what the future is looking right now. It wasn't just a party then afterall. And there is no time for playing politics with a virus that is omnipresence. The Prime Minister seems to be only busy combatting the virus at home in England and in the UK, and trying not to get the people in an 'international scare', at home, so to speak. That would be like sending the general home to let the soldiers do the rest of the fighting on their own, if no member of the House has any trust left in the prime minister. In 2020 he had fought for his life, just to put in here a feat of arms for the Prime Minister. He recovered and even again became a dad after that horrific experience with a Covid19 first wave infection. You could say that it was this that is believable to the people in their difficult moments vaccinated or not, and keeping them close to reality, and even sympathetic, to the prime minister. Prime Minister Boris Johnson does know how much it hurts or can hurt from first hand. The Dispatch Box is serious government answers & questions, but having had Covid19 is making it difficult for no one to believe that the prime minister is not being sincere. The mice will not return for more wine and cheese, one can almost feel hanging in the air somewhere, sharp as a blade... Next: to resign or not to resign, but now a little too late for Allegra Stratton, the PM's spokeswoman. We are not in ancient Greece with the sword of Damocles hanging above the PM's head when he has fought already for nearly two years against a deadly virus and it's variants. Or, Brexit laws in a state of emergency have changed.










PM Naftali Bennett the best hope Israel has.

29 November 2021

Plan B: can prime minister Naftali Bennett revolutionize the stance on Iran after talks in Vienna later today? What is the best approach as early as this week for the prime minister who has joined a coalition with the agreement of rotational prime ministership with Yair Lapid of Yesh Atid (17 seats after the last election in spring March this year)? The impression was that this prime minister, after taking Office 13 June 2021 from the previous government under Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, was always concerned how best to deal with the coming talks of tomorrow, between Iran, the US and European 3 countries. His intention was sharply focused on Iran and it's nuclear enrichment of uranium. But also the question was how to do things differently from the previous government, and how to rebuke Iran effectively if it goes roque and could use nuclear force on Israel. Without any strategy or plan the prime minister would find it hard to prove where he stands on Iran if he had continuity in mind. After his visit to Scotland in October this year he has used the opportunity to mention this issue with UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson in bilateral talks during the visit at the Conference of the Parties, Climate Change Conference. Also in August, a few months earlier, the prime minister had also met with the US President Joe Biden in Washington and had made Israel's position very clear how it was going to react to the talks if the US decided to rejoin the JCPOA. It had since then looked like the only rationality on the prime minister's mind... While he also had to keep a tight schedule on the prime ministership since he took Office last June. What the occasion was in his absence isn't relevant today, three months later. The only question is whether Mr Naftali Bennett is here to stay or will he leave the coalition, and is here meant as a rhetorical question. His answer tonight was wishing everyone in the world for all the Jewish nation a happy Chanukah and addressed the people as their Prime Minister of Israel. He is here to stay, so to speak. Tonight he will not be sleeping peacefully, or as long as Iran plays out the Cinderella to fit the big US and European 3 shoe and have all coming back into the JCPOA agreement the prime minister will feel unease or restless. This especially after what the previous government had nullified with the previous US Administration under president Donald Trump. Rebuilding isn't Mr Bennett's strong trait, so the rumour seem to go round.

Rebuilding a new position on Iran will be for the prime minister 100 times harder if he is the sole architect to this plan. He is not the most technocratic leadership Israel has in the present time, but he is the most technocratic military leadership or strategic thinking prime minister Israel does have at the moment. How can he revolutionize the Middle East with no history in it's private sector as industrial revolution e.g. when started in Scotland, England, Germany, France, the Netherlands and Scandinavian countries hundreds of years earlier? Till now the only revolutionization the Middle East has had was digitalization in the 21st century and the geopolitical strategic interests. In the new world order in the digital age what we are witnessing predominantly in our time is that technocracy is the best flavor of today in the global world. Prime Minister Bennett talks frequently in his speeches or briefings about the startup nation Israel and technologies. Is this a promise of his wider vision for Israel as the State and peoples? Sadly enough Naftali Bennett is the best hope of Israel and it's peoples if his prime ministership will last to it's end date in 2023 in November. If he also had made up a plan how to build up a new rationale and upgrade Israel's military deterrence against Iran, by 2023 it is the alternate prime minister, Mr Yair Lapid, now Foreign Minister, who will have to continue or drop the plan. Prime Minister Bennett his other chances are also looking slender if he wants to proceed a Right- Wing political career as Interior Minister post his present time Office as Prime Minister. Henceforth there is no Plan B on Iran. There is no prime minister who will take Israel in- and out of a strike of lightning military operation as a one- off, as this is something for the Defense Minister and his ministry. Under normal circumstances the prime minister should only keep himself busy with re- election and build on momentum up to that day. He succeeds and collects all victories in the military or politics. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett knows this more than anyone as he had served also as Defense Minister 1 1/2 year ago in 2020, before the present DM Benny Gantz became the Minister of Defense. Again, one wonders how the alternate prime minister would have done differently on Iran and JCPOA talks tomorrow in Vienna, had he been first in the rotational prime ministership and not Naftali Bennett. The Foreign Minister is expected to meet with the UK Prime Minister tomorrow in London and have talks with him on Iran. When the former PM, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, was prime minister here the benefit of a majority party PM was everything for one man and his country. With the new government you might say it is running the rule of power in a designer's or artist fashion from a varied colour palette. There is no coalition plan with the Head of State plan of assessments (published in the public domain) to take with in the blue dispatch box to Prime Minister Boris Johnson and discuss a position after or if the talks in Vienna would fail, or succeed. Succeeding is also the technocratic ambition of our time and century in high profile diplomacy between the G7, G20 (and global partners) leaders. And for one reason that there is no turning back now.










Prime Minister Naftali Bennett doesn't have a strategy on Iran.

24 November 2021

Starting home, the prime minister has given a speech on where he stands on Iran and expects that Israel will be ready if it has to engage in overt or covert operations against Iran. The speech was not published yesterday in the Jerusalem Post. Some comments made in an article quoting the prime minister's speech, gave the impression that they were happy with what was said by him in the speech. The public should always be first to be informed if the prime minister is embarking on big decisions or the making of it. Next week on 29 November the talks in Vienna will be about Iran and the sanctions relief, on the side of the Iranian delegates Al Monitor reported also on yesterday. Prime Minister Bennett however did come a little late with his speech, with which people can work with and find one answer that would be the right one in his strategy plan. Had he done so earlier this month the idea was to find not only one good answer but two or even three, as an exit strategy is also part of any strategic plan when military. In the article the author was convinced that Prime Minister Bennett did not had a strategy on Iran, and probably was right to point out to the Israeli public where the prime minister stands before he will carry out an attack on the Iranian site that he has in mind and on paper. Let's say he has all the planned operations on paper. Historically the prime minister can't do much different from the previous government(s) when it concerns Iran, and this simply comes with the geography that is Israel. Geography in his vision is a decisive and constant existential factor and you can't tell porkies to the public how this or that prime minister can make his own novel legacy, that under his command (the PM is commander in chief) Iran was neutralized and had to resort to ancient nuclear time again. It is especially important to this prime minister who has brought a relief to the people of Israel by keeping truth and clarity for his traits for being the prime minister after Mr Benyamin Netanyahu and his government. Naftali Bennett had the good taste of not lying to the people of Israel and also he has not lied about his intentions since he took Office, 13 June last summer. When on the State & Economy Budget this is especially true. He promised it would pass and this has passed into law! That he has made a few mistakes, not remembering the names of a victim and his father, but lies are still a very remote galaxy yet to him. For the public they have to find a lie yet on his first days and months in Office as their Prime Minister. He cheated and therefore he is a liar...

But by lying one can only mean when the man or woman has come to power as prime minister. This is why his message to the Americans in the Biden Administration was one of a simple and clear stand on the issue in the JCPOA talks with Iran and world powers next week in Vienna. Israel did not feel obligated to follow the same as the US and be part of the deal. The rest becomes retroactive from the point of view as country and geography. Israel cannot change it's long standing history as a nation living among nations that are not Jewish but Arab. Iran is Indo Germanic and calls itself Shiite, the only entity of their kind, also in the same region of the Middle East. It is absolute natural to the Iranians to be a hegemony when considering their size, language and population. And this is where the understanding is becoming each and every day in the present time an endless voidness of what Iran is trying to achieve, or what it's end game is. With a vast economic deficit what can Iran have as it's end game if it wants to avoid extreme poverty in the modern world in the Middle East? And there is a way for Iran to get at the point where it can make a difference and be the civilization it is saying that it was and still is. This is a unique factor for the Iranian people as it also is to the ancient history of the Jewish people: civilization. Any end game to every civilization is also how to preserve this great achievement. Okay, let's not go into that right now and come back and think with the prime minister of Israel why war with Iran is inevitable in the modern world. The answer is simple: there is no alternative. The list goes on: negative, negative, negative and again negative. What is positive isn't the military strategic thinking. Except that no one in Israel should be hurt or any of the IDF men/ women injured, if anything happens in a military-op. The US Democrats still have to resume talks first with Iran and doing so from a civil and military civil point of view. The prime minister Mr Naftali Bennett is one who is familiar with all this here above when he was minister of Defense. And he did mentioned the same civil issues he had followed in a class, when at the peace conference of Haaretz. One and a half year he will still be here as the prime minister of Israel. The coalition has a burden with a strategic vision on Iran, but this is not being heard as often as we expect to hear it from the prime minister. This was just a personal op.

"Fortune does not always cherish those who wage war." Film quote: The diamond sword, The Kazakh Khanate.










The monopoly of peace in the Middle East.

18 November 2021

Naftali Bennett still being perceived by many as the illegitimate prime minister since he took Office on 13 June last summer from the former Likud prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, hasn't had encountered his bigger role in the prime ministership as Prime Minister just yet, but is he looking in the right political direction? For certain he has been looking in the right straight line at home and getting the State & Economy Budget passing to law no sooner than 4 November two weeks ago from now. Beyond domestic politics Israel has been known over decades long the policy of dominating the region with it's military and to a lesser inconvenience the situation with the West Bank hasn't changed as well as with Hamas in Gaza. For the new Israeli prime minister it is not advisable to go on building his time in Office and reputation on pillars that are laying in rubble and debris from three decades of wars, that here stands a prime minister with history making in his own right. Naftali Bennett seems to have another worldview as he had put it in his own words when confronted with his first International call to the world, when the Mercer container ship had been attacked by an apparent Iranian drone activity. "There are no automatic answers to Iran, we have to look into the situation again," he was quoted saying in the news. This was well translated from Hebrew to English in the Jerusalem Post as it happened. Two weeks ago the prime minister had used again another 'cryptic' way of addressing the troubles with Iran in the north of Israel, and he was quoted saying that he will outspend Iran, also written in the Jerusalem Post. However what the prime minister is not saying is what he is thinking. The Middle East desparately needs a rethinking (a word also coined by Naftali Bennett). From afar the prime minister seems to be somewhat unrelated to the coalition with Yair Lapid, from Yesh Atid and also who is the alternate prime minister from 2023. The coalition is known to the national front and outside of Israel as 'the most diverse' of governments in all of Israel's political history. Naftali Bennet and Gideon Sa'ar are both from the Right- Wing and the rest of the coalition belongs to the Left and Center Left- Wing parties, with the Arab Party Ra'am in the ranks. After the first mandate under Mr Netanyahu could not form government after the last snap election, 23 March last spring, the Right- and Left- Wing parties formed government under the second mandate. One month later after the first mandate, and no sooner or later according to time and dates. But in Israel it is not the mandate to form government by either party who had won the most votes with the last election, but who is prime minister that counts. If not mr Netanyahu, than who other than the second biggest party win to be prime minister in Israel. Mr Yair Lapid?

The vote went to Naftali Bennett, who by then had been reduced from seven to six seats to ascend to become prime minister in a rotation agreement with Yair Lapid. This was indeed the second mandate in which both sides, Right and Left- Wing, had formed the present time coalition and agreeing that Mr Bennett would go first in the rotational prime ministership. When speaking on how the government of change came into an existence of it's own one can only wonder how this would resonate with the countries closest to Israel in the Arab world. Or how this would have been received in Iran. The monopoly on war had suddenly changed with no immediate replacement instead to send out a new or real message into and throughout the Middle East. Here there are countries not waiting again on the west for making peace, but they are looking forward to having a new era with a worldview to suit their purposes and prosperities. Perhaps it is not yet the policy we could call collectiveness at the moment, as the 'monopoly on war' still has it's regional importance to 'make history', so to speak. It is the inexperienced Israeli prime minister, Naftali Bennett, however who is having second guesses on the whole of the region and it's wars. There is a good smell that is coming from the west but hasn't been identified just yet. And this time what it seems it is not bloodshed or water but prosperity. From this utopian imagery could the Israeli prime minister be thinking the impossible and think of Iran? "Ibrahim Raisi eats rice cakes after he has butchered his own people and have a laugh afterwards," the prime minister had said in his speech at the UNGA end last summer. He felt empathy towards the people of Iran and it's children, and sympathy with all those who would want to destroy the shackles from the regime of the Ayatollahs. But what is his offer to Iran in return for these overtures of loyalties he is serenading the people of Iran with and coming from a world beyond? Loyalties could be a monumental word when he cannot get the same at home from his own backyard. And yet, if Israel and Iran would come to this epic moment in the history of the Middle East and looking beyond the monopoly of war, perhaps it is this man who could stand the only chance and seek to offer Iran the start of a bigger Middle East. Yes, the monopoly of peace. His offer seems to be that of the lesser man in Israel with two years in Office as the prime minister of Israel and not a party leader of a majority with 30 seats in Knesset. And neither will he go down after such an adventure as prominent in Israel's political history. But Iran should understand the sigh and sign of history here that the Israeli lion cub is thirsty and he can smell there is water here in Iran somewhere and not blood... The monopoly of peace starts with prosperity (if multiplied).










The chosen direction for Prime Minister Naftali Bennett will have to be rationalities after the State & Economy Budget.

6 November 2021

The country has now seen both faces of Elohim, one the morning dew and one in blood after the opposition and it's leader, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, couldn't vote down the State Budgets and had to now part from his time in Office as it's prime minister and leader of Israel. The State and Economy Budgets have passed into law until (2021) 2022/ 2023. And his face the former PM was that of blood and deep. With the current prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, the people will only see a lighter liquid in his face and some might even say that this is like the morning dew, while others may say that his face is shining from embarrassment and guilt. The people are still archaic in greater parts of rural and in suburban areas about time, history, the land, the people, politics and the IDF. Local newspapers will suffice to their daily needs if they want to hear, see or read something about what matters in Israel and what others in the big cities can buy from big countries in Europe or America. The G7 countries have no impact on them as these have in the rest of the world. Here time stood still like Carlo Levi (1945) in his book has tried to bring to the world of the living and the living dead at Eboli, Christ stopped at Eboli. A magnificent story (memoir 1945) and film. In the 21st century what one understands about the Jewish nation is that all Jews are rich. And the Palestinians are depleted from any life form or existence in the occupied territories and in Gaza. These have now become the greater intellectual stereotypes for Israel and for many decades it was the 'forbidden fruit' among mankind to prove otherwise. Even earlier last night a comment was written on the Jerusalem Post by a reader of the article on eco- friendly Jews in the UK, that it will not make any difference with the good- faith- look of the new Prime Minister at the Climate Change conference in Glasgow this week (monday and tuesday), 'we will not stop our hatred for you in the UK...etcetera', it said under a Jewish name. But the good- faith- face of the Prime Minsiter was genuine (see e.g. photo of him and the Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton, speaking visibly relaxed at the conference) and this is all that he seems and wants to be, and not just in the UK. President Vladimir Putin of Russia last month (October) also did meet with the prime minister and he too was unusually charming in his welcome in the videoclip everyone could watch on Youtube.com. Just like earlier in the month before when the prime minister had met with Egypt's president, Abdel Fattah Al- Sisi, in Sinai Egypt. This was hard work to do and not simple logic for any new prime minister to follow in the footsteps of his predecessor, and when not being the former prime minister, Mr Netanyahu.

The economy had stopped at 2 million people in Israel now living under the poverty line over a long period of time since the eighties. With the former prime minister the 21st century could only grow more steep into a much higher cost of living and not only for Israelis, but for the Arab citizens (approximately 2 or 2 1/2 mln) there are practically no formal living standards to guarantee any social or economic improvement in their segment either. Mr Netanyahu his vision for big social change for the other half of Israel was simply blurred when it came to the horizontal economy of the country. No one knows what the current prime minister is thinking a day later after the State Budgets (State & Economy) now passed into laws, whether he can or can not deliver the promises he made when still campaigning to become the next PM of Israel, last year until this year after the last election on 23 March 2021. Perhaps it would be better if Mr Bennett could rethink the meaning of change if only to put it to extensive test and wider scale in the long middle short term (and perfectly matching his two- years prime ministership). After the passing of the State Budgets this week, on wednesday and thursday morning, one expects that all the hard work combined with his foreign relations are now by definition solely his job to do for the country and people. It was motive (listening to his old videcoclips on Youtube 'Bennett vs Sebastian, or Hardtalk BBC with Stephen Sackur) for the prime minister to use his instincts (he is a commander in the elite forces in the IDF) and find the direction for his time as prime minister of Israel during the coming two years. At the announcement by the speaker of the Knesset on thursday morning of the passing of the State Budget, a glimpse on the face of Mr Bennett had said it all for people and the world that here stood a man still bewildered and in disbelief that he had a result and that this was a result for at least half of the ordinary population living in Israel. (The private sector didn't need political or economy victory in the State Budgets per sé) But there was clearly no visible victory smile coming from his calm faced selfie with his MK (Yamina) Idit Silman after the first announcement. Perhaps one rare moment of solitariness or nostalgia? To face up to a man like Mr Netanyahu in politics is one thing and another altogether to defeat the former prime minister at the State Budget voting to pass. Both can't make a victory to be another happy occasion for a Right- Wing man and party leader to a Right- Wing political party. And where did it went wrong to harvest something similar to sour grapes or the sting of a scorpion where the PM is now walking through the flames? Israel cannot remain a country with an incorporated only western democracy style of living, as clearly as the people for which that democracy was designed are not in it's welfare and that no one had noticed this before, until Naftali Bennett decided to let the former prime minister and his capitalism markets go and he himself could lead Israel back to it's fundamental principle... Socialism? Democracy? Perhaps the right term would be more of a social democracy and economics rebuilding. Or in his words: a meritocracy, before he became prime minister. And these are big words for the novice PM and a military commando in the elite forces. For politics and the economy you need nuance, and for foreign relations (regional or International) he would need to be straightforward. And that is precisely what is needed in our digital era. E.g. as a military man the prime minister is quite straightforward, and as the new PM of Israel he had demonstrated this firmly in the UK and had only represented himself not as a man of nuance politics. (He was unreserved to leave the Climate Change Conference if the entrance to MK Mrs Karin Elharrar wasn't fixed to allow her access and her wheelchair at SEC in Glasgow Scotland) His message on Climate Change could have only been de facto and based on technological advance of Israeli technologies, a very straightforward speech.

And yet, the true 100 years of Israel will still and more indefinitely remain a de jure archaic and Right- Wing society throughout any time and era, when you look more closely. 2 Million people (plus 2 mln Arab citizens) cannot buy westernized styles of 'living standards' that ordinary Israelis and Arabs see/ envision as life- long unaffordable accessories. To them life and realities in their areas are paradoxically behind in time as the land of literally milk (yoghurt) & honey products where a cheap price is the only affordable luxury.










PM Bennett should put into law the law of Transparency pronto.

4 November 2021

The State Budget in Israel passes into law at 5.30 AM this morning by 61 to 59 against and in favour of the coalition led by Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and alternate PM Yair Lapid. The time is now: 14:25 (Europe) and in Israel 15:26 PM while the voting is still ongoing as we speak. You would expect a speech coming from the prime minister after the announcement was made and the State Budget had now passed officially into law. The Jerusalem Post in an article today said (Gil Hoffman) that after it was announced that we have a State Budget it was the alternate prime minister, Mr Yair Lapid, who jumped to the occasion and gave his victory speech! Basic direction in Israel and it's political establishment perhaps it had been better a gesture to restoring a broken society and politics, to give the Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, this one prerogative to thank all members of his coalition and gave way to the alternate prime minister, Mr Yair Lapid. It is important to give the Prime Minister his chance to say something to the people of Israel, that e.g. transparency will be something in his government if in any way to prove that this is the day of real change and that the days behind us are now over. The country needs proper expenditures check and balances, and no one can say this more better than the incumbent prime minister, as he alone has the prime ministership to show his firm grip on State finances for the State, country and people. However this does not seem to be the case in Israel and it is possible that the 17 seats for Yesh Atid are now more valid over that of the Party Leader of Yamina, entering the coalition with only 6 seats and became prime minister by agreement with Mr Lapid, Party leader of Yesh Atid. There are two things to bear in mind: democracy and restoring politics that was broken to fragmentation as we have to witness today in the coalition of Right- Wing and Left- Wing parties, with also the Arab Party Ra'am. We must keep a clear focus where the motive (God of Abraham forgive us all) came from to take the prime ministership from Benyamin Netanyahu, leader of Likud and was in the last election the majority seats (30) in Israel. We do not take his prime ministership away from him because of victory and it looks as if the prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, has been clearer on this particular aspect of his campaign to become prime minister. This victory could only be the forbode of a crashing defeat for the coalition next by the Right- Wing if it has not been able to produce a united face to the people with the prime minister Mr Naftali Bennett at it's helm. Incidently it is important to bring back the moment when it was suggested to take the IInd turn in this coalition as prime minister, for Naftali Bennett...

rThe people of Israel living under the poverty line, Israeli and Arab citizens both, can they now 'see again' and open their eyes to see the Mediterranean Sea and sun reality?










President Putin looked keen enough to me shaking hands with PM Naftali Bennett.

23 October 2021

Body language between Naftali Bennett and Vladimir Putin has given new meaning to the diplomatic and military relation for Russia and Israel in the Kremlin, if we have to believe that this was what the interpreters and journalists make of the meeting yesterday and today. It can be no secret to the President of Russia that the prime minister of Israel has a new situation at home in Israel and maybe that a fifth election might be waiting just behind the door for Naftali Bennett. Yes, this is the same president of Russia who had annexed Crimea in 2014 before God and the world and now that has become something of a distant past in 2021. But Mr Putin can be dangerously polite and a charming host and it seems that he thought that this was appropriate with receiving Prime Minister Bennett in Sochi over for the weekend. A very rare moment for the Russian President, after years of revolutions with Ukraine, Russian separatists in Dunbass, Crimea, and the exit from the G-8, when Russia was still a member. For Naftali Bennett to meet with the Russian President at this point in time, just before the State Budget will pass in Israel, was as peculiar as it was a surprise. When meetings in the US are still ongoing on the Iran issue at the same time, you would say. But apparently the advise comes from his own government and the timing they had chosen must have seem right to the prime minister. Should this not have been to be after the State Budget come into law and only ten days from today? If not sooner. Russia, Iran, the Middle East and the US, and the EU, have not yet made quite clear whether this or that diplomacy may work with the Iran nuclear agreement and resuming of talks. Why trap the Israeli prime minister to go over to Russia with only Swiss cheese to be the present wrapped up for Mr Putin? The adviser's dynamics to Prime Minister Naftali Bennett can't take the coalition short life prospect over to the Kremlin for a serious meeting between the two Heads of State, or can he/ she? Hence the body language diplomacy of the meeting in Sochi.

What happens when the Head of State of Israel 'fails' to impress either former Chancellor Angela Merkel's short visit to Israel, or another G-7 leader, in Russia and the US? At the level of meeting with either G-7 or G-20 leaders in the world, in Israel or domicile of the leader, there doesn't seem to be an apparent harm to the prime minister. However when there is an International conlict of interest any meaningful diplomacy should match an equally meaningful prime ministership at home for Mr Bennett. According to the polls last week in Israel significant percentage of having the former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, was surging, while that of the current prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, was insignificant in a single number. In Knesset the former prime minister Benyamin Netanyahu also was heard over and over repeating himself on the six seats and illegitimacy of Naftali Bennett as prime minister, and he keeps on doing so with unstoppable sarcasm. Iran was the importance of the meeting with the Russian President and the Prime Minister of Israel, the JP said yesterday in Ms Lahav's article. So far what the world has learned from the current prime minister in an incumbency timeline of his prime ministership, is that he does not seem proactive enough on the world stage just yet. (At the UNGA also saying 'With a fifth election in Israel looming." Pointing clearly to the present crisis at home.) He is a realistic man and deals with issues one by one, is one impression. His strategy would be more the tempo and it's own temperament for each case that he is either following or studying, but acting with more prudency if meeting with it face to face. That is not the prime minister we get to see when visiting countries and Heads of State in G-7 countries. Within Israel's perimeters from a historical point of view Egypt and Jordan, or even to meet with prime minister Narendra Modi of India this month, the geopolitics and national interests have a different level of acceleration in diplomacy. Basically these are also non military. After the State Budget passing in November 2021 it will be for the prime minister Naftali Bennett a more meaningful premiership and to meet with the leaders of the world, whether geopolitical or regional. The impression of his meeting with the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, had now come a bit too prematurely and it can harm Mr Bennett's credibilty as prime minister of Israel at top level politics... Mr Putin had indeed been warm in his smiles and so was the Israeli prime minister when reciprocating. Even when trapped to look your part or role as genuine was an astonishing good fortune and it made both men look the right chemistry in an awkward situation. The Russian president is no fool not to know or see when the real bear is trapped.










The State Budget of Prime Minister Naftali Bennett

19 October 2021

By the new Prime Minister of Israel his definition of the change government with his coalition Bennett- Lapid the State Budget was for the State and it's government, and for the people, the Israeli and Arab population. The Ra'am party this morning (Gil Hoffman's article) is right by pointing out in Knesset what has happened with the Bedouins and their shortages when it comes to permits or electricity. Good government, however, doesn't start today. The MK in this party referred to time of gross negligence on the last governments in power as decades for not having done something about the state of these minority peoples in Israel. Prime Minister Bennett is aware of all the deficiencies in his government, that this was something his coalition automatically inherited from the previous government. It is how governments come to power and continue the democratic process of either a two- party system or central party system with a coalition. When the previous prime minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu was in power the State Budget was the goldfish in the glass bowl. All he had to do is sticking out his hand into the bowl and catch the goldfish, either to have it for souper or a snack. And that system has worked perfectly well for many decades. Both peoples Israelis and Arabs as a generation of young labour force have never been part of the bowl nor goldfish. And when asking too many questions on spending for any local project to empower the nation for either employment or starting businesses, the administration would simply say that the goldfish wasn't big enough for all. State expenditures and fiscality stayed for many decades an empty bowl with water. Prime Minister Bennett his government will fall if the State Budget does not pass into law in November next month. Both men speak English, but in Mr Bennet's understanding of the State Budget it seems that his English means that the State Budget needs defending. Without a State Budget there is no government. To an outsider no matter how remote or different from the Israeli point of view, one thing is clear that the prime minister of Israel wants a country that is working for it's people and in the worldview. How else can he command respect as the prime minister?

In retrospect: it is that time again to watch the videoclip of the Haaretz peace conference(2013) when the new prime minister had spoken of real peace, strength and security. This man is now prime minister in 2021 and awaiting the State Budget to pass into law in ten days. Where he is different from the previous prime minister is in his intention to defend. He is also a man of the people, what the opposition calls betraying the far or Right and their ideologies. Since yesterday the leader of the opposition came to his senses as if he had seen the ghost of Christmas, that it was time to stop boycotting the coalition. And forgot to mention the name of the prime minister of Israel. If the former strongman in Israel understands democracy and that Naftali Bennett has betrayed his own Right- Wing voters, than, in English, what you are saying is that democracy gives you entitlement and rights to use against the political opponent and in government. In Hebrew and Israel the people could get lost in translations and interpretations of how democracy can actually work and benefit longevity and sustainability of nation and State. Has Prime Minister Naftali Bennett now become the goldfish himself? With the intention of defending the State Budget prime minister Bennett will be able to bring some of the old pieces of sovereignty back into the country, be it at a slow pace and getting the young generation out of deep recession. All that he needs is manage to stay relevant in the change government Bennett- Lapid. It is to every decent man the kind of legacy you want to pass on to the next generation and of which his own children are part of. And why should he fail when he did not had the chance yet to bring the horizontal economy out of it's decades long neglect for the ordinary citizens of Israel? It can only feel more right to support this government and the prime minister, based on intention and relevance. Who has put the country in a state of insignificance and irrelevance, but more alienated the people from their political rights? The battle lines are in his hands only if he had the power to authorize change. Democracy will not die or bleed dry over change, from the logic in the rest of the International world. The six seats of the Prime Minister in the coalition with Yesh Atid 17 seats, Meretz, Labour, Ra'am and other Right- Wing parties, is not legal according to the former prime minister Mr Netanyahu. Mathematically the 30 Likud seats plus seven from Yamina would have kept the man with most seats prime minister. But he did promise to Bennett at one weak point after the last election 23 March earlier this year to become prime minister in a rotation with him. And so were others promised the same democratic right... Could we be missing the point, that prime minister Bennett is too inexperienced as prime minister and therefore will not be able to handle big government expenditures, which is holding the State Budget? The people of Israel are putting their trust completely in a different direction. Mainstream Israel and electoral wins go out to him who is on the global stage and drives fear into world leaders. Naftali Bennett is not that kind of man and has in fact impressed Iran very little with his rethinking the Middle East. The president of Egypt, Mr Abdel Fattah Al- Sisi, on the other hand was impressed and has rekindled the relationship with the prime minister of Israel afresh. The late president, Anwar Sadat, has come back in memory in 2021 for the Egyptian president. That was a memory of greater days when Israel wanted to create contiguity of existence in the Middle East, and now with the new prime minister of Israel make that relevant again. Prosperity is in the interest of the nations in this part of the world, if wisdom prevails over bloodshed. That will take for all who want to take part in the new vision a little more bravery than the usual way of killing your enemies first. Deterrence for Israel, Egypt, Jordan and other nations needs rethinking without harming self interest or security (national or international where the Middle East plays a greater part).

The State Budget in Israel has also another intriguing component: it's neighbours are keen to see what will happen next in Israel. The Middle East region is not a political battlefield or military to these nations. It is their natural homelands.










Minister of National Digital Affairs and Communication, the Prime Minister of Israel, Naftali Bennett.

7 October 2021

The Prime Minister his poll survey hasn't changed since he took Office in June, three months ago on 13th. Outside Israel that may look like strategy and political tactics, when keeping his eye on the continuity of his government and the coming end date of passing the State Budget. In Israel there is a whole different public opinion of this prime minister. He is a communication and digital affairs man, which in so many words mean that he is not a real prime minister. The definition of a 'real' PM is a man when he asserts power to the center or himself in a manly manner they understand. That is easy to sum up if he can take power of the State, Economy, Defense and International leaders of the most leading nations that inspire awe, e.g. the US, UK, China, Japan, Germany, Russia, Saudi Arabia (to a certain extent) and others in the far east/ ASEAN. Easy if you live in Israel among the 9 million people, Israelis and Arabs, to oversimplify the ministry of the PM by popular belief... The former PM Benyamin Netanyahu, has never had a ministry under him as vague as Communication and Digital Affairs. Let alone to talk about nation building, which is where Prime Minister Bennett had arrived on 13 June 2021, with his coalition. But that wasn't on the Right- Wing faction as he would have dreamed this moment when he could finally be prime minister of Israel and put his face on the Shekel and State Budget. It is a tiny bit of exaggeration here as in the State of Israel the Manorah is it's National State symbol of the Shekel (Sheqel 3000 years old). Unlike the present extrinsic monetary power of the Netanyahu economic global curve... It is only for emperors to have their head on the silver or gold coins, as it is still the custom for England with HMR Queen Elizabeth II and Pound Sterling. Instead Prime Minister Naftali Bennett had joined the Left- Wing and Center Right, with also the Far Left Meretz, Labour, and Ra'am. The latter being the Arab Party with it's leader Mr Mansour Abbas. In the prime minister's own words 'It was beautiful'. (The speech two weeks ago in the US what he had told the Jewish audience about his government and the coaltion partners) Also, if it is beautiful it is also mind blowing. One can only wonder what the prime minister would have in mind when he calls for Elohim to help him or the State to pass the State Budget in November next month, in 2021. And all will be forgotten what the former prime minister couldn't make come true for more than two years since the last time when the State Budget had passed in 2018-2019.

If the prime minister has to assert power or to power and take control over the State by serving the people in the State Budget, via ministries, this will not be noticed by the public per sé. It is not Mr Bennett's style to make a show of his talents or ambitions, is your first impression of him whether talking to the US President in Washington, or with the President of Egypt, Mr Abdel Fatah Al- Sisi, or when standing on the UNGA stage with his first address as Israel's new prime minister. His speech was also criticized by the media in Israel and the opposition. And that match is also found reflected in the polls after his visit at the UNGA two weeks ago. Iran and it's new President, Mr Ebrahim Raisi, but more the military commanders in Tehran, yes, could be one or two who would have certainly noticed that with Naftali Bennett that this was a different man standing on the world stage and talk about Tehran and it's people. What they must be thinking is not transparent to the rest of the world, but even less so to Israel and it's military or government. What Iran seems to be concerned with at the moment is improving relations with Saudi Arabia, and approaching the weaker nations along their periphery, whether east, west, south or north to Iran. But this a no- brainer, as we are not reading here about relations with nations between Iran and these 'chosen' or selected parties for the improvement of industries. Mr Raisi or the President of Iran seems to be missing the point on sustainability at industrial level and prosperity (I have said this before in another earlier writing). It is very low standard to stay on this path and create 'emotional incentives' through wars. Or, there is a magic lamp to bring prosperity to Iran from fighting wars and losing more weapons as they are built mostly from man labour and not AI robots. If, of course, we are not wrong. Iran seems to impress by restriction and isolation for over four decades. On the outmost west by the Mediterranean Sea is Israel. And with the new prime minister of Israel and the passing of the State Budget there is simply no telling what he might do in 'the next stage of Zionism'.

Post Scriptum

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett:
Minister of National Digital Affairs and Communication, the Prime Minister of Israel.










Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and Excellency at the UNGA.

28 September 2021

The intention from the speech point of view was perhaps meant to include the whole world and not just foe or friend, and Prime Minister Bennett from on objective viewing of his performance one can only say, "Well done, Mr Prime Minister." His message blocks were carefully directed into the cameras and one by one built in a fashion almost as 'child's play' playing the piano at the age of three. An Olympic archery style speech and shots point after point and not missing the set. There is also no one who can say that the prime minister made a 'competitive' speech attempt and to show the world how he is different from the former prime minister not only in one way. It looked as if he kept the issue on the Palestinians in an invisible box of integrity, with respecting the coalition partner at home, Ra'am, and bearing in mind where the US administration had been drawing the new lines for resuming the old idea of the Two- State solution for Palestinians and Israelis. The Prime Minister had addressed issues that were more directly aimed at Israelis or the population of Israel, as he had allowed himself surprisingly to say that maybe a fifth election was looming. This prime minister compelled 'his audience' to listen carefully to what he had to say. Was it feasible to put Israel back on earth and not isolated as a world of it's own for a very long period of time? It was a miracle that the Jewish nation had come back and make a restart in Israel, as also being an ancient nation. Underhands the prime minister has tried to legitimize Israel as a sovereign nation. And there was no other way after the many broken ways in which Israel has been known to the world for the last two decades with the wars in Gaza and West Bank. Prime Minister Bennett stood on the world stage as a man of feeling and deep sentiment as a young man and who was Israeli in the millennial generation, and being now prime minister. Brilliant streak or just plain universal truth, he had also said, that he was prime minister in his government by accident but with now a purpose to fulfill. He made people see his political badge in a democracy and it's alteration. Mr Bennett in the end of the day has no reason to feel ashamed of his speech at the UNGA, because he was both modest and to the point.

Israel should be proud of the prime minister they now have. It is what the UNGA always stood for that delegates act accordingly and be civil. They are representatives and one must show your 'world act' in a manner that is properly directed, as many leaders will hear and listen to what you are saying, especially with the undertone and urge for peace, and maybe for war? Israel might disagree and ask when and where in the speech was the prime minister deterrent e.g. on Iran? Expediency is the answer, which he had said not in so many words, but stated that Iran was weak and had a serious lack of water resources for it's own people and that it's economy did not prosper (not literally taken from the text of the speech). Prime Minister Bennett has tried to 'touch' the critical center of Iran's so called 'invisible' deficiencies, but that were not to him in Israel and as prime minister. Yet still Israel's prime minister has made an end conclusion that was both the zenith in his speech and an impossible way of thinking. It was how he ended talking about Iran. Mr Bennett understands that Iran is key to the region and not just in the military or way of destruction. One could almost go thinking why the prime minister of Israel had mentioned Iran and abstract potential in one sentence, as if the spider's abstract building means to take the quantum leap here. This was definitely a speech to listen to a second time. What is worrisome however still is the State Budget in his government to pass into law five weeks from now. Hearts and minds, that was probably the message the prime minister wanted to bring back to the UNGA, and after many years of wars and geopolitical discord between different regions and factions, to remember one's own words and geopolicies, he had to play Beethoven as a three year old on the world stage of all geopolitical universes. Past and present, present and future. Israelis on the other hand will call him bad names for being the prime minister on six seats and in a coalition with the Left and Center Left, an Arab Party and Center Right, and snob is another one too for his interconnection. It is not 'please like us,' in Ms Lahav's article today, but more imperative in proper English, 'Please, like us.' Because if you can't or don't want to there is something important that you are missing or missing out on. A golden chance to know Israel and the people of Israel.









Relevance is now all that remains for PM Naftali Bennett, after his trip to Washington last week.

29 August 2021

30 Seconds some are saying that they thought went 'out of signal' with the President, while the PM was still talking about the 'central meaning of the POTUS to Israel, for so many years.' The President was also dead tired with his suit still smoking from the flames coming from Afghanistan while Prime Minister Bennett was delayed yet again due to the terrorist attack in Kabul. The public can't see the relevance of the visit at such bad timing, they are saying in the comment box on the JP yesterday, 28 August and also today. Yes, you could say, this is what it means, Mr Naftali Bennett, to be the prime minister and not just of Israel, but to most countries with the same democratic system. It takes courage going to Washington and knowing you have not been Prime Minister for 20 years, but for two months just now. The coalition at home also had their first time experience with a level close to Washington and this administration. After decades hearing the former leader of Israel fighting for Israel's interests overseas and abroad in perfect good English no other Israeli has ever been abled to emulate, the coalition must have also been anxious what their prime minister, still inexperienced and not just yet the Statesman that he might become later in the year or next year, before leaving the prime ministership's office again, would do once he met eye to eye with the US President and be the prime minister of Israel. The heavier this will be for Israel going back to their daily routine in Knesset and overseas the US President with still on Afghanistan in the coming days that will also determine his 'maiden' (and that of Mr Bennett as PM) beginning with his relative late administration. The US President and his leadership are very much under global scrutiny by friends in the UK, and others who are keen on getting the Americans out of Afghanistan... Covid- 19 does not hold emergency for the moment as the situation in Afghanistan intensifies. To the US and also to many EU countries, war could backfire and shake up the new political and global order.

Tomorrow Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, will be back in Israel. (Later today. It is later after midnight in this part of the world, the European Union) Last year the Abraham Accords were signed this month, with former PM Benyamin Netanyahu, Israel, Bahrain, and UAE. This was after the Deal of the Century with former POTUS Donald Trump and Mr Netanyahu earlier in the same year. For prime minister Naftali Bennett, to impress the nation at home with a State visit to meet with the US President will certainly not be as impressive. Wasn't it Albert Einstein who taught the world about relativity through time and space? Time is changing for the global community and for most leaders who are in the Middle East or elsewhere in the rest of the west or far east. Or, maybe also in South America. What is their ambition? The President has said that they must keep focus on self interest. That is if this would have any chance of success to bring the world back closer to each and every country of friendly nations. He has also tried to explain to the world that it was the former president who had made the Taliban rethink their position. Former president Trump had another plan with his 'agreement' letting the Taliban do the fighting, so to keep American lives safe. This was a tough call for the Democrat US President of the US and how to explain the cause and consequences on his watch, what is happening in Afghanistan as we speak. It is not just any pressure when you have to deal with something that (as prime minister Bennett called it two weeks ago) you inherit from the previous leadership and administration. We can laugh at the 30 seconds of sleep or say that the Prime Minister of Israel did notice the president holding his head down, but he continued in softening tone speaking of the importance of the friendship between Israel and the US. The PM of Israel, from what we saw in this clip, he understood how tired the president must have been under International pressure on all sides over the evacuations in Kabul.

Tomorrow Knesset will not be open for meetings of the MK's.










PM Naftali Bennett wants to establish a new political order, it said in the NY Times.

27 August 2021

Iran, Iran, Iran. The PM (the NY Times) has said that this was his mission to a new political order (in the Middle East or) at home with the coalition. Deterrence is the right word, one would say, if he succeeds. Up or down the deterrence, something like this. The meeting with President Joe Biden in Washington DC was postponed yesterday due to a surprise terrorist attack in Kabul, and killing four Americans and dozens injured. The meeting was reset to friday today in the afternoon. Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, is nothing like his predecessor, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. The difference is that the former PM never indulged in visions or ideas as is this prime minister. Most millennial prime ministers and still young when taking Office, whether in Vienna, Canada, France, the Netherlands (incumbent PM), the UK and next to countries in the oriental or minor Asia, their vision for the future is the new image in relation to/ of the point where we are as a global community and reality. Who is the deputy PM of Israel? Gideon Sa'ar? In his absence the PM would have given a clear sign that the deputy PM was now in charge till he returns back home from the US. Why the Defense Minister, Mr Benny Gantz and the Chief of General Staff, Mr Aviv Kochavi, in absence of the PM were now busy drawing up plans on Iran and Gaza, and made it cloudy by suggesting that they were now in charge. To be ready is another thing. The deputy PM should be in charge, one should think. The US it was expected that this wasn't a good time to receive the Prime Minister of Israel and have him sandwiched between the ongoing crisis with Afghanistan and meeting with the president, Mr Joe Biden. Also, as I have said many times before, there is still the business with the State Budget to pass into law, nine weeks from now. But luckily the PM is holding up the moment and is going steady as he moves on. Whether this is in Washington and running the risk of coming back to Israel without having met with the US President, Mr Joe Biden, or continue being the PM for two years as was agreed with alternate PM, Mr Yair Lapid.

Diplomacy, the PM still is scoring high, that one he got to Washington, if so, had or has to respect the President's urgency with the global crisis ongoing in Afghanistan, and come back home. You can't do more than this under these unfortunate circumstances, as a foreign Prime Minister, even when from Israel. How the same score is looking on the other side is another matter, that there should have been some pre- courtesy to the visit, and say this wasn't a good thing on the timing and was to be given more consideration to postpone the meeting with the Israeli PM to another date and time in the future, when all this was safely over with the people stuck in Kabul. Diplomacy is timing in a crisis, one would think. Zionism in the US wasn't on top of this one, was the impression yesterday also. It was a bad moment for almost two weeks in advance and so forth. Today the meeting, so the press is saying, with the President and the PM will still take place. Iran, the Middle East, Israel's deterrence, and yes, the future are the reason for the PM of Israel why he has made this his first diplomatic trip to Washington and speak in person with the US President, Mr Joe Biden. There are some things you say in words, science, technologies, and relationships, and other things you are not doing in the same way as in words. And only politicians and leaders, Presidents or Prime Ministers, can do this sort of thing, and not the public. The public does not do diplomacy and show their worth. It is very critical for Mr Bennett as prime minister to make a point on his appointment in the coalition, that he is the leader in Israel under a new prime ministership after Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. Israel also happens to be the same country now for 100 years in this part of the Middle East and as a democracy is the only and oldest in the region. Where do we go from here in the 21st century, could be the question on the PM's mind, you see. (Population in Israel: 6mln Jews and 3 mln Arabs) Yes, his political order is badly needed.










PM Naftali Bennett's first trip to Washington is next week.

20 August 2021

While the world is dealing with an International logistical crisis in Afghanistan the US and UK are nowhere any time soon going to contain the situation and minimize the panic and dangers for it's 'citizens' that are ongoing as we speak. There was no real government, so one Taliban fighter said yesterday, in Afghanistan. And we can assume why there was no military force present either to stop the government from falling apart before our eyes like a mass sand dune. Why next week for the Israeli prime minister to go to Washington and meet with President Joe Biden? Iran could be urgent and a priority for both leaders to have this on the agenda for the prime minister his first visit to the Oval Office in Washington DC. And they seem to be urgent talks to have of what is still left of the Middle East that concerns both nations on either side. All going through the side door while the US and UK deal with the situation in Afghanistan, also at the same time when the prime minister will have come for his first State visit to the US. At home the prime minister seems to be defeated by the fight against the Delta variant of the Coronavirus and some are already suggesting that this is not a fantasy his opponents are pursuing against him, it is really happening. Incidently the PM had his third booster this morning and this was live to follow on the government's website media. Something is just not adding up here right now for the PM.

In ten weeks time the passing of the State Budget is expected to happen after 3 readings in the Knesset, on 4 November. Is he running this State financial ship aground, also as in Afghanistan but for different reasons, against a sand dune or hard rock underwater? The coming weeks are also the High Holidays in Israel, Yom Kippur, Rosh Hashana, and Sukkot. There is ample time for the PM to read the numbers in the State Budget and examine all of it within a few days or weeks. He can't rush the State Budget through Knesset and law and risk 'deceiving' himself and the people of Israel... His name has already been submerged in deception with six seats to become prime minister, according to the Israeli public, like a bad mikvah. The State Budget could be a factor of sovereignty for the prime minister to prove that he is not a deception or deceiving the public with a sand dune of mass sands. It is even more urgent for him to stay home and study the State Budget elusive numbers or forecasts at his new national scale. The Prime Minister has dreamt this new national scale in the State Budget, even before he became the next prime minister of Israel after Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, that the people of Israel otherwise would collapse.

The story continues.









The trident that is Iran and not Neptune.

5 August 2021

The Prime Minister of Israel should take his time before responding to the latest military provocation by Iran in the waters near the coast of Oman in the Arabian Sea. At least five levels were in this latest military provocation by Iran: G7 countries, UK & Japan; Israel, Liberia, and Romania by level close to the G-20 countries. As Poseidon this was very obscure when coming from Tehran. Under the previous government in Israel up to this moment two days ago we haven't seen this kind of provocation before, what is more reminiscent of times at Peloponnesos and Thermopolyae when the Persian king Xerxes in his hubris had decided to crush the Greeks at sea. The sea attack on this occasion was clearly, if the investigation by Britain and Romania show Iran was behind the attack, a provocation by Iran, that the outcome however will still be inconclusive. At least from the point of view of the five States. Israel will be required to respond at some point and do this with clear battle lines to discourage Iran from further such attacks, with a clear warning if especially connected to the State of Israel or a magnat Israeli shipping company. It would also mean that this was almost a clear deliberate provocation by Iran, if the UK, Romania and Israel were it's mind bubble of some sort of trident prodding in the Arabian Waters. Another signal could also be that Iran is not playing small time neighbourhood boy here, but actually is using a full image of it's military readiness at sea and also if necessary on land. The Prime Minister of Israel will have to keep watch over his back, the Mediterranean Sea to the west, and eastward or inland into Israel and it's 'land- neighbours'. This pure assumption that perhaps Iran was thinking about the 'rookie prime minister' in Israel that here is an enemy after their own heart? (With an extraordinary beautiful wife looking like a Persian queen)

Back at sea with it's International commercial routes in the waters of the Middle East, west, east, south and north, it is very strange of Iran to use military tactics and clear provocation on this occasion. If with a dual meaning the alarm has also gone off at some point, only we don't know what could be behind these smoke signals. Does it mean that Iran wants to up the ante on it's military power across the Middle East, as now the liberator of the people living here under the tyranny of the Zionists' regime (as many Iranians call it)? Iran should know how in ancient times all wars against Greece at sea how this went down in history as defeating the Persian immortals. It cannot afford to compliment the freshly sworn in prime minister of Israel, mr Naftali Bennett, on taking him to an invitation to war at sea. During the Iran- Iraq wars the battle was always fought inland and not at sea. How Iran developed it's warfare intelligence and military the global audience in the public domain will never know, except that it is not a laughing matter if Iran now has chosen a much more intelligence approach to go to war and include Israel indirectly. This time they are not using the guerilla warfare tactics like Hezbollah, Hamas and other countries deeply and to the darkest unsympathetic to Israel. The five States with two in the G-7 when at International commercial routes at sea, the UK and Japan, will excercise something of their own arbitrary rights before, as we expect, passing the rest of the investigation on to the Prime Minister of Israel, Naftali Bennett, and it's War and Defense Minister, mr Benny Gantz. Escalation dispute and point against Iran should be the investigative questioning of why it provoked basically the International world and it's regional world, G-7 and Asia Minor.

If anyone has another idea than let us know what the PM of Israel should now do.










What is the law of 'informed consent' to global industrialists?

2 August 2021

The public already knows that the global industrialists, or what some call the technocrats and globalists, have never said that they were physicians, doctors and nurses by profession. Henceforth Covid-19 does not exist and the vaccination programme across the whole world to battle the Coronavirus is criminal. In retrospect: we have a global pandemic called Covid-19, since 2020, this is approximately 1 1/2 year ago. The population growth of the global world is estimated at 7 or 8 billion people living or being alive on the planet as the Coronavirus rages on. This is a mathematical problem how to exponentially use medicine to 'help' 7/8 billion people to get the vaccine, is by definition an industrialist decision to make and take at the widest possible scale and to act promptly. The public disagrees and is saying in all it's protests unto the streets, whether in London, Berlin or France, that this infringes human rights and democracy or fundamental democratic rights. In the meantime 2023, the nearest future, the first result after mass vaccinations is expected and again the logic is that here no one is expecting just the medical facts, but the real fact will be the global economy. What can we expect from the public's point of view against all these industrial changes in the EU, Britain, the US, Israel and countries across the oceans? Between 2023-2025 the world will/ is expected to be pushing for the global change of some kind, but that this will not be like what we have known until Covid-19 first announcement in January / February 2020. This new introduction into the global economy, if technocratic, is looking very much to use the architecture of an alignment with governments with highly technological platforms to facilitate their logic. The public however will be coming back to basics and keep on trying to make clear to the world that this is illegal and against democracy as we know (knew) it. Why not 'kill the virus' and then go back to life?

The physician's answer simply is saying that in the medical historical books medicine was as scarce as living communities, e.g. in the days of Hippocrates. In the 21st century the growth of populations in the world became a burden of some kind to medicine and it's scarcity to cure people from illnesses and diseases. And medicine had to expand scientifically or artificially if it wanted to keep Health a medical institution for all peoples, and doing so by using the industrial idea of how to maintain it's services. Medicine and industries are our new global economic necessities, so to speak. Perhaps it can help to read about the subject in it's full logic what 'informed consent' originally means. And it is available on Internet. But we understand how this scheme of Covid-19 is not adding up to what the people believe, when the Nuremberg code is a reference to the use of medical treatment of a patient and the limitation of the method. (It is more elaborate when you know or read the law) Maybe it is because people do not see the connection between the virus and collapsing of the economy? That raises suspicion and when industrialists and their big names are associated with the pandemic, e.g. Bill Gates, Gustav Schwab, Bloomberg (Hoskinson), it is conspiracy coming out of the chimney and not the announcement of a new holy pope. No one can argue with the people on this one. But can they be more specific without the use of pseudo scientific proof why the virus is just a tactical move to bring down governments and economies? (With it's own architecture based on the Greek alphabet from alpha to omega of variants from the Coronavirus) Democracy is not quite what this is looking like, if you are not independent but belong to a 'federalism of States'... After Covid-19 to prove democracy will therefore become harder, as this refers to independent countries and democracies, e.g. Brexit, Israel, the US, Canada and Japan. And putting Israel in the group of the G-7 next to all G-20 countries (mainly in the EU). Germany and France are both G-7 and G-20 (representatives). This is the end of the world as we have known it up till now, is the end conclusion. The virus will long be remembered as that what has changed life and living on the planet. Adding to the new way of life the Health care of mandatory vaccines to keep everyone healthy?


Error Gustav Schwab- Klaus Schwab.










Naftali Bennett- Yair Lapid government today has defeated the bill of West Bank annexation bill by the opposition, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu.

28 July 2021

The total land value of Israel could be roughly estimated today at what price, basic land value plus commercial national total value, with including housing, private property and industrial land private owning (privatisation) or State owned by the government. And then alongside the old dispute of the West Bank, what is the land value estimation today and a estimated tomorrow values? To the Prime Minister these are not two easy questions. One has contiguity from Haifa to Negev, while the West Bank only has 30% contiguity also by a rough estimation. It is however the best instruments in this field and be the decision maker to defend Israel and it's 'original' rights of the land within the 1967 lines. The historic rights in their contiguity have stopped in time and cannot be determined in the century we are living in at the moment. Israel therefore has to resort to a design of preliminary injunction if it includes the West Bank as it's ancestral or historic land. That latter is becoming more of a greater inability to match the 21st century 'international public opinion' with a natural transition of a viable provision of some kind, that ancestral is the title to this land for Israel. We have no real data on how Israel is reaching a land deal with the settlers, based maybe on an estimated 20 % value? In Haifa or Tel Aviv the full 100 % would only go up and not be reduced at any rate under it's current, historic or future value. This point of view is not the law of Israel, but viewed from a layman's standpoint. And yet this policy could become the next big thing for the Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, if it were possible for his government to come up with the instrument to need and work with for the West Bank and it's 'occupation'. The prices of building homes do not go up plus on the land value. We are perhaps looking here at the cheapest way of living and what is existential... Only when seen from Haifa, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem or another city in Israel. If the West Bank belongs to the contiguity of the land between the 1967 lines, roughly are we looking at a price of an estimated 250 trillion US Dollars/ Euros for all of Israel?

Israel's mirativity: based on this different approach to the West Bank, if Israel does not state itself in the International world as 'to eternity', it's land value and total commercial value in terms of an estimated price of 200/300 trillion is now closely considered as it's longitude and eternity. Other instruments may argue this case, as one can expect from the International world. But here at least we can now understands what Israel is defending and also why this defense is on the right scale of all of it's existence. Without deception of any kind. In short one could say that next to Israel's military establishment, the methodological approach of land value and contiguity is on either side, proper Israel and the West Bank where occupied also is a supplementary of the 'historic' part of the Home of the Jewish people living in Israel since 1948. No International Law can assume to erase this currency and intrinsic fact of life in Israel, especially and more specifically the global standardized law that no land is free in our world. The Two- State solution for having a Jewish and Palestinian State will be subjected both to the total price of all land, with from this point of view only half has been estimated more properly and that this is only in Israel, by every second in every millimeter. Peace, yes, therefore comes at a price and it is a very realistic one too. The new prime minister of Israel, as we understand it, will be prime minister in the coming two years in a rotational government with Yair Lapid, who will be the next PM after august 2023. In a row of men in this government we have to agree that all are geared up with the military instinct how to judge time and their place in the present time history and of the present time politics, that to keep Israel sovereign should win on every level it loses, whether spontaneous or planned. Mira is a good message.










The Nuremberg code UK argument this morning on Twitter.

26 July 2021

A former UK nurse suggests doctors in the NHS face Nuremberg trials for violating the Nuremberg code after WWII. She has a point and her reference to the N- code makes a certain impressive reading, yes. But we are not in war time with visible military force out in the streets and putting people at gun point in clinics. All the medical experiments made by Nazi Germany on innocent people during the occupation of Europe were done in a war time. We are living in peace time for more than 70 years and a vaccine or virus, pronounced a global pandemic, will have very hard proof of a military occupation ongoing at the moment throughout Europe. That is the subtle difference in this Nuremberg code with 73 years later in peace time Europe. Also the atrocities then committed during the Nazi period had been clearly done by naked aggression and to serve no Health Care problem. To save lives during the Covid- 19 pandemic is another proof of subtle difference and fact of not violating what is now the call of the Nuremberg Code this morning. The atrocities as meant in the N- Code are beyond human imagination and were also done in stealth. Today all can protest openly and by assembly unto the streets against the vaccination against the Coronavirus, and to make their public point. When there is Police presence during these protests it is not meant to shoot to kill people who disobey the call for getting the vaccination or stay home. In fact it is the other way round, that the public can get violent against the authorities as they have always done in the past when the G7 meetings were held in locations somewhere in whatever country. The public is still right, some are saying, no matter if the battle against the Coronavirus is to save lives. There is no proof of the public's argument where they are talking about the part that is saving lives, only where they are making clear to the world that this is a violation against humanity and human rights. Once you are vaccinated this makes you part of the ethical group 'Saving lives', and it is a small percentage in comparison to the 'Nuremberg Code' group.

But let us pay very close attention to what the nurse has said and once again study the differences between war and peace time changes of this greater scale, an overwhelming one notably since WWII. There is no need to outsmart the Nuremberg Code, as we don't seem to be occupied territory of any kind. In a verdict against such cruel practices duing occupied force of any country or peoples, this has been done so in the aftermath of that war. When there would be an additional verdict on what then if the same happens during peace time, we would be in trouble to pass the vaccinations through the greater conscience of any civil society, rich or poor. Covid-19 has affected both sides on the greater scale: rich or poor. Nevertheless we should encourage everyone who has similar ideas to come forward and speak out their minds, whether in the UK, Israel, or anywhere else where people believe in a free democracy and it's parliamentary peaceful purposes. It is a good time for new studies to make while the world is trying to 'save lives' during the pandemic Covid-19. And when done honest the same group will also have to mention their real intentions, that this is not so much about violations of human rights, but the impact of the economy as this is clearly putting people out of their livelihood. Perhaps there are some who can make that economic projection and see a new world dawning after the pandemic is over, but he/ she is not speaking his/ her mind out in public? If the economic impact is higher than the dying people from Covid- 19, the end of the pandemic can only mean that we are facing some kind of 'reset' here, that is according maybe to these people. And if this would be to be replaced with some other global idea, they seem to be knowing already what that could be and that this is what they want to prevent from happening. A universal prosperity plan, maybe. A universal basic income, maybe. One is clear that this has no connection with the Nuremberg Code of human rights violations, but the rich who are getting very violent against anything 'universal' to serve the planet and it's humanity, after all the stealing of natural resources and other essential commodities to exploit to the point of modern day slavery in our civilized world and making it acceptable entrepreneurship or cleverness. There is also dire poverty due to deprivation of intellectual and technological advance in some places where time has been slow building a nation and it's civil life. And so forth. The new world needs good lawyers and journalism to explain to the people about the changes in the world and it's future that are inevitable. And why. And this can be done, even in the face of clever UK nurses crying out to the public how this violates the Nuremberg code and that doctors are doing the crime against humanity if they carry out these vaccinations.









Naftali Bennett and his initiative this week: invite to like minded countries to battle cyberattacks.

21 July 2021

Why is the PM not returning to issues much closer at home and the people, he promised to get out of their poverty and bankruptcy in the public sector, so many are asking in comments on the article this morning. It is however something much more relevant compared to Ben & Jerry's Icecream boycot yesterday. Worldnews right now has been too busy with the new Corona variant, the Delta- variant. And in Europe no one cares much for icecream, but instead let their children eat apples and pears. After these last 40 days in government there is certainly now a different man as the prime minister of Israel in comparison to the former man, Benyamin Netanyahu. 23 March after the election result with Naftali Bennett as kingmaker of the Yamina Party, the problem that was on everyone's lips was the menace that we call Iran and Hezbollah, and then followed by another problem how to restart the economy in the public sector and Israel's State budget. These would require some strategic thinking if the government of change wanted to keep up it's appearance high to the outside world, at least. Surely we all know by now what the BDS movement is doing and how it wants to achieve it's goals. Ben & Jerry's will not be the last of their actions at any stage now or in the nearest future. It is not a decisive factor to collapse the economy in Israel. The real question is whether Mr Bennett as Prime Minister is still able to govern in this Bennett- Lapid government for the coming two years. And more importantly how. The PM knows how to be an elite combat unit in the IDF, but let's say that government and to govern as prime minister is like scuba diving, what then could he do right now? Also in some tweets this morning we are reading about the prime minister's use of English speak and that this is more home speak than the formal ministerial language the former prime minister was more in control of. Someone in a comment wrote to call his mother, now. Senior Mrs Bennett knows that her son is truly and only Israeli, and so very different from her native language: American English. Where is this coming from the PM's Office?

At the moment what we are looking at from afar is that this government has lost it's kwan and must try to get it back a pronto. Iran is still here in the Middle East, remember, the second nuclear power next to Israel. It can only be more interesting militarily and strategically to have another look at the future if let's say Iran get's to the point of producing it's peaceful uranium quantity, and no real argument has ever been asked here why. Israel was 72 years ago wiped out in Europe as a nation among the more civilized nations, it does have a point to now secure it's deterrence in the only way known on the planet, the military deterrence. It has a good argument that being wiped out is not fiction or the everlasting melodrama of Jews. 72 Years was Iran wiped out by any civilized nation, among one in Europe? It's argument to have a potential built deterrence is not peaceful but therefore military offensive. You do not build peace with uranium. However Defense in Israel means keeping military deterrence and readiness, in contrast to zero defense reasons in Iran as a military deterrence, will still require deep and better diplomacy militarily from the new prime minister in Israel, and more and especially because the military is his field of expertise. If he cannot do this one thing right I'm afraid that sovereignty in Israel might disappear from the history books as we speak... Israel is becoming more and more a federal State, with 3 mln Arabs living among the 6 mln Israelis. Or, is the new world order with it's golden head thinking universal federalism will bring forever prosperity to the difficult regions in the world? The new age of Ben Bar Kochba perhaps has returned, but not as Naftali Bennett, I am dead sure. Now it is cyber security and a good initiative by the prime minister, under the latest spygate of Pegasus and journalism and maybe going as far as the president in France, Emmanuel Macron. With the former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, every day was dramatic for the last two years. With the young democracy and State of Israel it sometimes get's that way, as everywhere else when still not a member among the old democracies. Another question: what would universal federalism do for the Middle East in the future and in the rest of the world? Hmm... Universal Prosperity in three different continents? Perhaps, or, let Israel go to sovereignty on a private deposit of 1 to 2 or 3 trillion euro for the next 150 years and become a financial hub of prosperity and coexistence, yes and even with England as it's global financial and mercantile trading partner. What say you? There is a Biblical line in the Old Testament, where someone was told that now he was pissing on his feet / against the wall... What do you read today in your pissing when pissing against the wall in Jerusalem? Palestine or Israel? Additional and staying with the raw sayings of the OT, is this why the White House has yet to find room for the visit of the PM of Israel? I would have advised the PM that he stop chasing this woman, because it is taking too long. Ditch her. You are better than this, Mr Prime Minister. But that is just a personal op. 










Letter to the PM of Israel, Mr Naftali Bennett.

9 July 2021

Dear Naftali,

For the last three and a half weeks I have been watching you becoming the prime minister of the State of Israel, seen from Europe 1,888.02 miles to where you are. There are also many news articles/ columns in the JP, either talking about you or alternate prime minister, Mr Yair Lapid. But that is politics. How are you doing now? And what would be more interesting to know apart from your good health, is this question: are you happy now being the PM of Israel? After 15 years in Israeli politics and becoming a candidate for prime minister last year, are you now happy? When reading the news articles in the JP one would get the idea that somewhere you must have been rubbing the lamp of Aladdin and poof! the next moment you were made prime minister... Except this wasn't the magic you had worked for during campaigning for almost nine months since you announced your candidacy for the prime ministership, and replacing the then current and now former PM, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. After the election results in the last election, now it looks like the Aladdin lamp has tricked you or was rusty and turbid in the least. By the snap of fingers it has put you in the middle of a different dream and coalition, and not with the Right- Wing. What can I say but that it is the Middle East, and what can we expect but magical razzle and dazzle! No, this is not a Latma sketch. You are truly in the middle of a different coalition than you had in mind, as some are using in their political joust how you signed before your voters and the people of Israel this document against forming a government with Mr Lapid of Yesh Atid Party. Perhaps you ought to take some fencing lessons too, just to make sure their points of the foil will not hurt you. Are you keeping the lamp of Aladdin on the hip wherever you are going? Just keep remembering how the opposition has another magic: the genii and also the three wishes. One e.g. is to make the new government of change, aka Bennett- Lapid government, collapse as soon as possible. The two other wishes have been kept more privately, or perhaps there is nothing yet for them to find at the moment, like a strategy? Yesterday at a rally the former prime minister had been hearing say something to a heckler with dangerous thoughts, that he was planning on beating your government at the ballot box. Imagine that if you knew the future to those words! But you have changed too now wearing the 'emperor's clothes' of politics as the PM of Israel. The difference is that it is meant to make you feel body shy, while this was not the same for the former leader of Israel and Right- Wing. He was the perfect emperor, prancing and parading unabashedly for all the furore he could trigger across the global world. So Naftali, keep your eyes focused on the flying and many coloured carpets that are nearest or far from you, and for now to leave this to the more experienced pilot, Mr Yair Lapid. Before the election on 23 March three months ago, the former prime minister had also said that only he could fly planes. And not you or Yair Lapid. At this moment, do you think that he was right and what is the lamp of Aladdin saying to you?

Is there a saying about serpents and their poison in this 'wizardom', that sometimes if you listen very carefully that the enemy speaks wisely and better than your friends or family? Today in a phone conversation with one of the G-7 leaders you said about your coalition party and government that you have the most diverse coalition and you are working as a team most vigorously. That's good talk, and impressive. Perhaps sometimes you are not finding it very easy to be the prime minister of Israel and it could make you go crazy. Or not? To me, mr Prime Minister, my most impressive moment to remember of you will always be the Haaretz Peace conference when you spoke of territory matters, and that no one wanted more peace more than you for Israel. It could also have been 'in Israel'. And strength, was also something that you had said, before you were heckled and be called a war monger. Since then I knew, 'But that is a prime minister,' I thought and with a high degree of a strange fixation I was convinced to be right in the near future. The following year you did become the PM of Israel and the former prime minister had to step back to be the leader of the opposition. Has he left the castle Balfour yet? I wish they would knock down that old fossil and replace it with a new building. What would you like me to build you? I am just kidding. I can see that the far Left are also using some kind of magic. A crystal ball and with bright stars, and it has one or two zones in it, and sometimes three. While they are gazing at the far Left crystal ball to see where the future is taking you and them in this coalition, the answers are zone- confined. Is that good? Depending, if they want to help the citizens of Israel with affordable housing, social security matters, and access to goverment via local government. So now, what's next for you, Prime Minister Bennett? Shabbat Shalom. Yours truly, City over the top.











Week number 3, the Bennett- Lapid government are heading the 21st century.

29 June 2021

One can almost say about the Bennett- Lapid government, paradoxically, that it is going through a quiet 'baptism' of change politics, and are already have been (re)joining ranks with leaders in the region and also when rebuilding bipartisan relations with Washington and the US President, Mr Joe Biden. This was for the whole of the last week, and in seven days minus Shabbat. And the talk is now all on regional cooperation with the UAE, after today's opening of the embassy for Israel in this part of the Middle East, by Foreign Minister, Mr Yair Lapid, and who is flying back tonight to Israel from his two-day first Foreign State visit. In the US, outgoing President, Mr Reuven Rivlin, has met with President Biden in the meantime at the beginning of this week. Sunday is the first day of the week in Israel. A very impressive moment from the US President who had also said, and quite sincerely by appearance, that he was to also meet with Prime Minister Bennett very soon, which anyone outside in the rest of the world could see why this was a most sincere moment. Especially to friend or/and foe. Despite what many think at home of the prime minister, after the era of Benyamin Netanyahu as it's former prime minister, and how this is not easy to a younger PM with no grooming experience, let's say, for years, now is or will be the next Israeli Prime Minister coming to the White House as the official representative of the Israeli people and it's government. This year will be probably be a test to both countries and others in the region for what they are perceiving as the new way forward, dominantly from a US point of view. The time for pretence is over. Time however will remain a deep search, if forward is the chosen direction for the near and long term future in the region. And the talks will continue whether it is clear or not what to expect during the intermission and after... And only by comparison to the former era when the old world order was playing a key- role in the Middle East and had geopolitical interests in the region. Some even are saying that instability is now greater, be it in a somewhat new sum. The new government in Israel under it's new prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, will need to envision this one practically on his own, where these vanishing points of strategies that either had failed or have been successful, will lead to and how this can or will affect the present time of Israel as part of the greater regional issues. As written here above, this prime minister, was never groomed to become first minister at this point in time. But he might have the military instinct and that he could be nevertheless become an able Prime Minister and prove everyone doubting in him wrong. Let's hope this is his short term plan and thinking too.

Providence is another rhythm no one can precalculate at this stage for the Bennett- Lapid government. The biggest question on the platform of geopolitics is whether any peace agreement can hold, let's say if it will be tested by a conflict of the smallest of interest and change the political balance to a fracture. The Palestinian State is one such moment with some impact for the future direction in the region, and more so between the Israelis and the Palestinian people in the West Bank or in Gaza. Prime Minister Bennett, with alternate prime minister Yair Lapid, could be sitting on a time bomb they need to defuse first, before moving on to the regional strategic interests with other actors in the region and sharing of powers. At the end of the day sharing powers is what most of these countries need and to secure their role at home and to one another, when kept proportionately and within some constraint. The older States might hold on and out to keep discipline, as some might expect. Egypt, Jordan and the new allies who have normalized relations with Israel, are just a few of these examples. To be truthful, is anyone outside the Middle East thinking the same? There is no particular economic design for anyone to know what economic sharing does really mean between the countries who want to have peace with Israel. What used to be the military power in the region is slowly reducing to historical military presence, as the story goes. And the new history? Maybe we should leave the subject to the new prime minister of Israel at this point and wait what he will be building on in the coming weeks on this issue. Back at home in the Knesset right now he is being plagued by a few other issues, e.g. the Evyatar settler outpost. This would have to go through the newly- wed party consensus... Week 4?










Iran and Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett.

(Personal op unedited)

23 June 2021

Conventional wisdom will be key here if the Prime Minister of Israel has any interest topping his ante on Iran, under the regime of the new 'strongman', Ebrahim Raisi. Also in it is regional news in the Middle East that Israel now has a new prime minister, Naftali Bennett, and also that this is the real 'good' news is that there is nothing to fear from a rotational government with an alternate PM, Mr Yair Lapid, who will be the prime minister after Mr Bennett. The geography from Israel to Tehran now seems like a very distant new world order, unlike the one of the old world order of Mr Netanyahu, then prime minister of Israel for more than over two decades. And it is practically a regional new world order under the Bennett- Lapid government. Both prime ministers are set on the global institutions, e.g. OECD- today in the JP Minister Liberman to join the digital tax treaty, to become a Member and comply with more accountability and transparency for Israel on it's own financial institutions. This means not being part of a private G-7 leadership as a country in the Middle East, but to adapt to a different global level of partnership with the G20 countries. This drastic measure on the side of the Bennett- Lapid government was a strong signal to the rest of the world that perhaps this was the time for 'real change' of it's 'global leadership'. Mr Netanyahu never came this far in government and under his leadership to take Israel down this road. A lesser road compared to his galactic enterprises over 12 years as prime minister. Mr Bennett, now Prime Minister, in a new government under Mr Lapid 17 mandates plus the parties that are part of his constellation on the Left and far Left (Meretz & Ra'am), will very well know that neither men are G-7 leaders and that they will not assume power as if it were their liberties to do so. Bipartisan is not a dog bone you throw at the G-7! And when does it matter for the prime minister of Israel to assume greater powers if he has to defend the existential rights of Israel?

If the democracy in Israel has not yet subjugate to a symmetry of a two- party system with the center parties in it's State politics, the prime ministership Bennett- Lapid has been symmetrical divided over four years in the coming time. There is much talk on the side of the opposition, that e.g. the real prime minister is behind the throne of Naftali Bennett's prime ministership. That is as good as a public stunt and by no other than the former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. He has also said that Iran will celebrate the news of Mr Bennett becoming the prime minister of Israel, sworn in last week on sunday, 13 June. Prime Minister Bennett, if the former pm hasn't noticed, is now already a week the new Prime Minster of Israel and not of the world. Democracy is State Politics and not global politics (that involves military power). The existential threat that Iran poses to Israel, in the new world order that will be both on the Middle East axis as to the rest of the world, will at this point mean that there is no one yet to know what the future will be looking like or becoming. Out of spite for good old times sake, so to speak, what Iran might also do is ignore Israel for the time being until it has found new vacuums of national and regional interest. Some comments are saying that the Prime Minister of Israel will in due time always know how to respond to direct threats from Iran. He is a military savvy and who knows how the region moves from dynamic to dynamic, or dynamic to dynamics. In his own words a few years ago during a peace conference he said that 'At this moment this neighbour is watching what we are doing, and the next one clockwise knows what the other is doing, and so we are all keeping an eye open on what we do in the region'. In so many words and even more when you are living in this part of the world. On the global stage and bipartisan to the US it is not wise for the Prime Minister to make leadership decisions as if he were in the G-7. At least from the point of view when you put 2+2 together. The former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, is right to say what he has to say about Iran going to sleep quietly now under Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett. But in the military no one sleeps behind the wheel, some are also saying. The country is in good hands, and for a 'local boy' this was a nice surprise (to the world).










Perhaps it is not just huffing and puffing from an angry wolf, when it comes to former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu.

(Unedited)

14 June 2021

The Bennett- Lapid government should carefully tread on it's eggshells coalition in it's first hours, weeks and months and doing so because the former 'excellency' has still much currency in his 'staying in power in opposition' of this government. To cut through the chase quickly: what happened between 23 March and 13 June 2021 isn't just by chance, but seems to reoccur and has much of a phenomenon in Israel when you watch this ongoing political drama more closely. If we compare 23 March to March 2018, perhaps you might find something to explain why that was or could be more powerful than the apparent government coalition of the Bennett- Lapid, Right- Left- Wing democracy. The coming six months to 31 December 2021, actually seven months, it is almost certain that the government will not make it under the former PM's pressure, but rather to take a divert route and call it e.g. bad foreign and diplomatic politics (only). That too is likely to happen if Israel would try to alter it's perceptions on it's hardliner stand with neighbouring countries in the Middle East and the Mediterraenean Sea, from an old model to a new model of Military Defense in the region. The inception of the State of Israel makes it imperative to stay vigilant on all it's sides in Real Time. The founding fathers had made several inventions to maintain security for Israel and made it their primary goal to eternity. And to put it more simply, every Jew in Israel is born to invent new ways to it's security and keep it a policy that is unparalleled. In the meantime Israel's neigbhours have increased their side of 'military defense' and are trying to either become as superior as their neighbour Israel, or they are trying to show that they can match Israel intellectually. Sometimes an attack on an enemy does not always come from terrorism indoctrinations, but from an inferiority complex that knows no healing. Iran seems to fit in that category on both sides, Islam and Israel, despite being superior when it comes to their peculiar handling of private (investing) and public (domestic projects) sector issues in Iran. At least if we go back to the Achaemenide period when another nation of Indo Germanic race, well, we should say this politely, was their ancestor?

Back to the coming hours, weeks and six months from now. From here it looks like the former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, can and will tear up the 'paper government' and shred it to pieces very soon, one by one as if it was succulent as lambchops. The minister of Finance, Mr Avigdor Liberman, and Mr Gideon Sa'ar, what could they do if only in 2022 they would be abling the ministries and national budgetary new beginnings for the coming 'two years', plus we are now six months still in the old budget (2018)? It is a rough sketch in their field of expertise that they get here from a complete zero intelligent economic lecturing, but each election time after/ or following an election, seven months is like an eternity to wait for the following year. But of course the coming six months the government could make plans on the existing old budget, what should be there until the end of the year and starting on 1 January 2022. The so called fiscal and calendar year. Or, in the meantime the government could fall and collapse totally. Why Gideon Sa'ar is in this writing comes from another naive notion of changing the law on the date and forming of government if the first mandate would fail again. In other words, before Pesach and two months later after Pesach when the government is sworn in, e.g. in June to start a new fiscal and calendar year. If you have elections in October, the perfect date would be to start the new fiscal and calendar year in January. To keep it fixed this legislation will have to be reformed into a new law. Why? It is clear that the prime minister of the former government is riding with too much ease against the new government and is using it's coalition building as not as in a democracy that this is practice. Returning the compliment: it is not possible to revoke anything from the view of the monarchy. E.g. the Jewish Home?

It could be nothing but having a good look at this can't hurt anyone physically or mentally for the rest of their lives. Like Gideon Sa'ar said earlier today, that he is not coming in to break things, but he is coming in to fix things. It is perhaps time to immitate the founding fathers again from the economic doctrine and legislation point of view and do some inventions of your own. And as the prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, has said yesterday in his speech, that it is the Jewish Home and it's people that matters to him. Some MK shouted through the Knesset floor, "Go home!" to Mr Bennett, before the majority vote for his government and said this in Hebrew, "Lechi habayit!" It is humorous, that yes, Mr Bennett was home, in the Jewish Home (for all Jews and now Arabs). The Prime Minister stood in the right place, home, or in the Jewish Home. And so there will be more innuendo's or humorous moments with former colleagues in the Likud and the former prime minister. On the national scale the problems are very different from what you can call State Affairs, or affairs concerning the State mechanisms. And the shouting goes on be it more quiet and silent within their own coalition, that why a man who only got six mandates (7 minus 1) to be the prime minister. Pre- election the Likud and public had written dozens and thousands of words on this matter how this party intends to continue once the tango 'ken Bibi, lo Bibi' had stopped. The only hope for plans beyond the yes- or- No- Netanyahu- group, Mr Bennett was not indulging in the same music. His socio- economic plans to bring back some living standards from the deprivation in civil society living under the poverty line, became his only reason to join the Left- Wing, after failures of trying to work on a Right- Wing coalition with no other than the former PM. But what is true is that now the party has to look not for unity outside on it's exterior, but on the interior and look for union. Unity is sharing ideologies or philosophies, but a union has a goal. There is more of a different formula in a union of elasticity, because the economy is the bloodline of the country and it's currency. It is not unity of along party lines, but union, saying that we are going to take responsibility for this or that project, because we can't live on 'Yes or No Bibi' in this government. That is also neither democracy nor the economy cycle(s) of the country. But maybe some can live with the tango?










Last year in 2020 to this minute on 13 June 2021, a big scale of (in)difference for the Knesset.

13 June 2021

At 16:00 PM the new prime minister will be sworn in. His name is Naftali Bennett, in the bloc of 'change' with Yair Lapid, who will be next in 2023 prime minister as was agreed between the two sides of Right- Wing and Left (Center)- Wing. First things first. Mr Bennett has already said today that he will proceed with the policies of Mr Netanyahu, leader of the opposition, on Iran, but that he will seek more 'diplomacy to mediate', roughly translated, with Washington or the Biden Administration. These are the tweets of the moment coming from Jerusalem, the Jerusalem Post journalists. A year ago what did we think of Mr Bennett then and now what will be his worth in the being of the prime minister of Israel in the coming months and if all goes well up to his end rotational half in August 2023? Top adviser of Mr Bennett, Mr George Birnbaum, said last week on I24 that the Hand of God had been in play here to put Mr Bennett in the ascension position to the second mandate holder of Mr Yair Lapid to become prime minister, and adding here in this writing, has now touched the earth that is Jerusalem or Knesset. This can only happen to monarchs de facto. By 'hereditary' Mr Bennett is not English, Dutch or German, but a Jew and born in Haifa. There is nothing alien in his national identity to question whether this is right or wrong for any Israeli to become prime minister in a democracy, that was obscured for many decades under previous governments, until now at this moment. Israel should be celebrating the air of fresh air from an old bottle they had once cast their ballots in it's hollow body, and had send out into the rest of the world that the message was having a Jewish Home in Israel. But war changed the euphoria of having a Jewish Home to a military constant since the State of Israel was created by the people and for the people.

War is still what is shaping every day life in Israel and it's politics. We are hoping that this government will take more careful notice how the future will unpack it's new ways and policies, whether in the western hemisphere, the Middle East, or far east in the short term or in the coming two years. Mr Bennett, who then is prime minister of Israel, will go through the middle of this new global order and get to taste half way his term as prime minister, what this is like when you are the full term prime minister in Israel. Mr Yair Lapid, in August 2023, is expected to do his half rotational term in this government as the prime minister and make Mr Bennett, then, Minister of Interior Affairs. (AKA Interior Minister) War has become something of a higher continuity factor in Israel, especially with regard to Iran, Hamas and all terrorist related military proxies for the last 40 years. It is something everyone understands where Israel stands on this one. But softly softly approach is diplomacy with the US Administration the right thing to do, and respect how they perceive the nominal view of Iran at the moment. It was the incumbent (until 16:00 PM today) prime minister who had called for the Iranian people to stick with democracy when Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was president and during his re- election, ten years ago? Ten years later we are witnessing a new trend as we speak among the G-7 leaders, that democracy and diplomacy are back among world leaders. Iran will have to comply with global transparency if these are the plans the world leaders are having in mind and that they will keep an eye on the progress of their newest/ latest global projects. It is wise for soon to be Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, to act wisely and prudently here. Iran is the 'Byzantine complexity relation' for Israel and it's military. But to a higher degree to Iran this also goes the same way, if they have to admit who the proxies are, or call them Iranian separatists. Mr Bennett is known for his smart communication and is a High Tech businessman. There is a glimpse of these new designs in his government already beginning (article today in the JP) a new social service for the senior citizens of Israel to be interactive and get more in this way from their local government.

Israel time is: 15:25 PM. Democracy is the phoenix rising again from it's ashes into a living respresentation in Israel today this afternoon at 16:00 PM.









What can blow a hole through the 'Change government' in the coming 48 hours from now?

7 June 2021

We are looking for the Philip of Macedon to appear and address the people to keep to calm until the government has been sworn in on wednesday, or the day after, or even next week. News JP Gil Hofman just in on Twitter is saying that it will be later today when Knesset Speaker Yariv Levin will set the date. Yair Lapid, says the tweet, was looking confused. This vacuum to connect the coalition with the 'change people or citizens' hang above in the atmosphere in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv like a bad omen as we speak. Mr Netanyahu, who is still the incumbent prime minister, goes out to the streets to meet with people who are willing to go the extra political mile to keep him in power by protest... An isolated Yamina, first home to Right- Wing, are being pushed to the limit by Likudniks that they should give up their quest for the so called 'change' government with Yair Lapid. It is Spartacus versus Rome for Mr Bennett, or... the beginning of a young 'general' like Julius Caesar. But Mr Bennett is not like Julius Caesar as we remember him after the madness with the Egyptian queen Cleopatra and thought then that he was a god. In fact it is the man who has declined to take the prime ministership as first in this rotational coalition, Mr Yair Lapid, who could emerge to be like Julius Caesar when still in the senate and give brilliant speeches. The Republic of Israel, the incumbent prime minister is saying, is in danger with the Left- Wing in power, if they came to power and God forbid. The one who is still on a steady course is Naftali Bennett, staying put and holding on to become prime minister. Could he be Philip of Macedon and go on fighting for democracy and 'the people first' plans? The people who do not vote for the prime minister how many are they? They have voted for Yesh Atid, Labour, Blue & White, Meretz, New Hope, Yisrael Beytenu, Yamina and also for the Arab Party Ra'am. This is an interesting image or collage. What can the incumbent prime minister mean when he is telling his public that Israel is in danger of a Left- Wing government with the Right to help them?

As it is throughout political history in politics is subject to human behaviour and not just science. Do not be afraid to meet with the people you are going to help and change the situation in the country. This is not an ivory tower and to be like Cinderella in waiting till her prince comes and look up the tower where she is hiding her long flowing hair. It is looking to an isolated Yamina that they are going to have to climb something more steep than their coalition partners, who are also happen to be weathered politicians. What do they want and what is their reason to go the dangerous way and bring about change in Israel and it's political life as they know it? 48 Hours from now are very crucial for the coalition, for any Right- Wing political analyst could just blow a hole through these walls like through duplex. And doing so not by violence but from an analytical method and trying to find the real science here in this coalition. You go into politics because you believe in the system of the country, and to continue it's political process by law and order. And there is a perfectly good legal and scientific question here at play to ask what the political science of the 'Change coalition' is. It should certainly not be 'Yes or No Bibi', as this would prove too inadequate to meet the political scientific standards of our global time. The Right- Wing is deep government for decades and Israel is practically breathing it's air. The writing here could be wrong to suggest from the view of an outsider not living in Israel at the moment, that the most political scientific thing to do is fill in the vacuum by reaching out to the electorate you are going to give and bring change to. It is empathy with your electorate and you have to understand that they are just as vulnerable if this goes absolutely wrong. Israel is nervous on this side and on the other side they are void of reason. The question is who will do the philippic to put things straight again in Israel?

To continue the process of change in Israel the only way to look at it from a more animated way is to see Messala and Yehuda Ben Hur in the arena track for a last showdown in a chariot race for the strongest. Messala had used all the spiked tricks you could call dirty to give him the iron advantage over the honest race of Ben Hur. As was the case with the film in a global audience, this too with the political fight in Israel has a global audience of it's own to go with. No one thinks right now of Mr Netanyahu as Winston Churchill, a man the prime minister has tried to emulate all of his political life. Perhaps it is time to undo all great expectations of the one person that you really are, yourself, and become again what made you great when you were still doing politics and diplomacy as a young statesman on the international stage. (Every one still remembers the yong handsome diplomat, Mr Netanyahu. But...) Now mr Netanyahu is known as king Bibi and giving or rendering that as meaning to the Right- Wing. Indeed, you don't get any more Right- Wing than a monarchy. In the meantime the world is changing and who knows the idea of a monarchy in Israel isn't all that crazy if the plans are to come back to the new regionalism e.g. in Europe. The Royal Houses will get bigger regions to reign. Or go bankrupt as historical. For now we should keep things more harmonious between people and politicians. And let's stick to what we know best and make it the device for the change coalition under Bennett and Lapid. Yes, it is democracy. Unlike the royalists and their barrel of guns, the democrats have baskets full with apples and pears, plum fruits, apricots and berries. One holds death and the second life or the living.











Central Coalition Building Bennett & Lapid.

4 June 2021

The coalition is looking quite dispersed at the moment before being sworn in on wednesday next week. The best thing Bennett and Lapid can do is trying to keep it less mobile and make it more central in the formation of a coalition. We understand, that the Likud will do everything it can think of to torpedo (Likud terminology) the coalition and prevent it's sworn in. It is probably the prime minister's prerogative to fight back, except when this gets out of hand and turns violent against members of the public, whether in Office or out in the streets. Democracy in practice seems now out of practice during the fight to get back being prime minister. 2Mln voters in the Likud voters domain could make a difference if protesting on official basis. Last night 800 had protested outside of the MK Ayelet Shaked's home, that is making the math looking bizarre out of the 2 mln Right- Wing voters. We hope that things will calm down now and that the rest will go through official channels to fight the case against the coalition. This morning, or since last night, also the Likud has called for publicity of the coalition agreements. Why do things have to be this difficult in Israel's politics? Naftali Bennett who is expected to be the first in the rotation also said last night that he will remain living in his home in Ra'anana and not as is offically the home for a prime minister in Balfour Street in Jerusalem. We should remember that AIPAC already has congratulated the government Bennett & Lapid, and has said to cooperate with any government in Israel. Whether this be the incumbent prime minister or the new coalition B & L. According to comments on the JP articles this coalition is a monstrosity. Wait till you get a leader to introduce the monarchy through parliament, only to have it voted down and start the real nature of democracy. Or, maybe he has the ambition to be absolute and a rare appetite to get the monarchy through the motion in parliament. Also they will say that that will never happen. So, what is the thing that can only happen? There is no one who believes that this coalition is for the people of Israel to bring this part of the nation back to central government. How did the electorate get to this low?

Mr Bennett has pledged to keep his promise to Mr Lapid and that nothing like what happened to Benny Gantz in the Netanyahu- Gantz agreement will happen this time round between partners in a coalition. Prime ministerial powers can change a man from innocence to hijacking power from friend and comrade when power has reached unprecedented heights, even if fictional. This coalition to put it mildly slid into existence from humble beginnings, to bring back the nation to government and local government. The best proof we have for this is bringing in e.g. an Arab party who has set it's ambitions on improving the lives of the Arab population and it's infrastructure (economics or civil). The Bennett- Lapid government will have to keep the building in and packing out in a centralized manner or operational mechanism to avoid walking on each other toes in the coming 100 days after sworn in. The interesting bit from high expectations from this coalition are the socio- economic programs if they want to reach the public and build in this way consensus from the people. It is also no easy task when knowing in the long term that all may be reversed after the next election in four years to naught by the next government. This deception should now be considered and how to keep the public firm on their two feet, e.g. that all it gives you is still bound by short term solutions. Indeed to make this work in Israel passing a budget on short term programs and micro economy could be the blocking of the mini circular plans in this government to keep operational while in office.

And this is how many perceive government that any coalition should be the majority to be able to take the economy up mainstream and not to build any tunnel underneath it to suit the coalition. The public is right to ask who in this coalition will lead the country in it's complexity as an economic and global powerhouse. They can't go on forever and therefore will have to build only temporary camps or hub stations. And also, how will they sit as ministers in the Knesset? The debates will have to go criss- cross in the room and make a sloppy impression to the outside world in the whole of Israel. That is why to keep a central coalition building is crucial to public and the coalition for the coming four years. They should be sitting in the same building with all their departments on the ground floor and keeping the ministries and prime ministers of the first floor. Let's hope that in four years the country will be ready to vote for a majority after a hard lesson of keeping up the appearance of an unlikely democracy dangling in their faces. Where is the architect to build the two different levels of governing nationally and locally? The prime minister will take on the economy as well as Mr Lieberman, and Justice will be shared with New Hope leader, Mr Gideon Saar (ministry), next to Meretz Environment (?) and Labour also Justice, and being cross intersected by Mansour Abbas Arab Infrastructure. Yair Lapid will have Foreign Relations and Mr Gantz will have Defense. Continuity is not based on these ministries but on the economy, Defense & Security, wealth. Mr Bennett and Mr Lapid are in a tough spot to bring it to the public what they will do during their government about the private and public sector. We know that the latter is practically out of existence in Israel and making all Israelis the 'richest nation' on the planet among the nations. Basic economy is Maslov's echelon pyramid, but here we are looking at the richest nation in an upside down pyramid of broken echelons.

Can they do it?










There is no 'real' Jew but a religious Jew and soon will become prime minister/ head of state of Israel.

1 June 2021

If traverse on party lines and coalition timeline this new design of Right- Wing and Left- Wing parties to form the next government in Israel, the world might just be looking at the other side to the incumbent 'heads' of government, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, to the forming of a 'tails' government and be either unlucky or lucky. Chance has nothing to do with State politics and governing a nation. A little fortune however can't be that hurting much, especially when looking at the next head of State, if this will be mr Naftali Bennett. He is a religious Zionist man, still a young man 49 years old in politics years. If Mr Bennett becomes Head of State in capital letters or title, what we then have to remember is that only last year he was a man herding the sheep and now finds himself to lead country and nation in a coalition with Left- Wing and Center political parties under Mr Yair Lapid, and who also will serve as prime minister in two years time after Mr Bennett. Now we are collecting all bundles of 'ifs' as myrtle, as no one just yet knows whether that idea could become a reality under the 21st century Jerusalem sun and happening in Israel. You could also get a little glimpse or sense of a pre- Messianic time and a taste of the Messiah, who will bring peace and not war between the nations. The patriarchs, Abraham, Jitschaik and Jacob, have not been men of violence, except when the state of the Jewish people was threatened by hostile nations with armies. In 2021 can a religious Jew become Head of State in Israel? Some might argue and say he is nothing like a Right- Wing man and religious when forming a coalition with secular Jews. Right- Wing and head of state is a privilege if you are a Right- Wing prime minister and leading the party of the majority. In an ideal world of religious Jews that may be the case, but in the world according to International Law that could be seen as usurping the State for theocratic reasons. A whole different thing altogether. To stay closer to the Messianic era we must keep it closer to humanity. Now, how will this coalition of unlikely kinds find the right levels of working together on issues plaguing Israel for more than two decades?

Israel has a democracy. By nature this is Left- Wing according to it's first inception in ancient Greece and not royalist for the Right- Wing. After 72 years Israel has some idea how it works between the Right and Left in a system of collectiveness, that is by law regulated. It also generates the kind of broad consensus for any prime minister if it goes to work as a government. A government for the people and by the people, after electing their representatives. Mr Bennett in his speech last night said that Israel was in danger in a global way, which has prompted him to act and taking the challenge as kingmaker in his position. The prime minister however disagrees and responds by saying that it is Mr Bennett who is challenging the State and it's trust by 6 seats. It was according to the prime minister most un-democratic... In European parliamentary history, starting with monarchies and gradually becoming a democracy, by dividing State and monarchy (with one head of state), the idea of kingmaker could just be the challenge the State was needing (in Prussia). Enhancing or altering are by law not only ingenius, but legal genius. If it can't work than by God (By jove English) it should work, also by technicality. And that is just one example of how different it is for Israel and it's confidence in a broad fundamental legal base for change of laws in government and challenges. Who is against the State or the Head of State, there is a subtle difference by law. The Head of State being the king. But both men are right, mr Bennett and mr Netanyahu. One without the advantage over the other and the other having a greater advantage in this battle for who should be the real prime minister. The latter is only referring to Mr Netanyahu in this writing. But we musn't forget about the coalition head, which is Mr Yair Lapid, in this round. It is looking as if Mr Lapid is being the fortune maker of the two other men, one incumbent prime minister and the other who might become the prime minister in his rotational coalition. Perhaps this is happening too premature in Israel and that they should have had it much more later in our lifetime, e.g. in another 100 years. Because what we are looking at is a new political design when your backs are against the walls. And that the only thing here what is making it a political design is because the nation is in it, and not as what we have been used to for the last 1 hundred years when the politicians are in it. We can't put our finger to it right now, but who is saying that this political design cannot be tested in our common and 'old democracies'?

You can't keep telling the public or electorate that the kingmaker is not in a position of becoming prime minister in a coalition, and that this is daytime robbery plain and simple. Where is the voice of the State? The kingmaker can decline to become prime minister and keep his loyalty to State and government under different circumstances. Why is it then different for Israel and the prime minister, Mr Netanyahu? The people deserve a prime minister, says Mr Netanyahu, that they want. Just as simple as that when we are speaking of a democracy. And no one can argue with that. When considering the time in Israel since it had become an independent State it would be best to leave the matter at that and let it take hold of it's own fortunes. As this was exactly where it was heading before Mr Bennett had said publicly that he wanted to become the prime minister (from a majority Right- Wing position). There is no point stopping a herd of wild bulls coming at you, unless you stop them before they hurl down over the high cliffs behind you. In a mature democracy you also do not threaten the opposition of becoming a Right- Wing prime minister in a rotational coalition with the Left- Wing. (This is political mechanics) How does the saying goes, that you do not bite the hand that feeds you? Also, you are only the greatest ally of the US when you are a democracy before God and man. Just a minor detail... Mr Netanyahu is convinced after Mr Bennett's announcement on sunday evening to join Mr Lapid in his coalition, that this coalition will destroy the land Israel and it's people. What he has built, not least of the 50 economic reforms during his years as prime minister, will be destroyed by the coalition if Naftali Bennett joins Yair Lapid's forming of a government (mandate expires on 2 June 2021, tomorrow at midnight). In short for a long story is that perhaps Mr Netanyahu has much more now of a royalist and some may wonder who the king is that he is serving as such. Israel is not a monarchy, at least not through parliament.










The Jewish Home in the aftermath of this moment in Real Time will be a very critical and interesting moment.

15 May 2021

Instability came to Israel this year and especially after the political deadlock of two years in different cloaks, dark and grey. The greyest area is now ongoing, another war against Hamas in the south- west, and nearer to the capital of the country in Jerusalem in the east when the Israeli Arabs have mixed with Palestinians to riot against Israeli presence near and within close range, whether on the side of Al Aqsa or the Damascus Gate. Here the political deadlock has resulted in an even more deadlier gridlock, when Israelis in their confusion are watching the country coming to half civil unrest and with no civil battle lines policies to deal with this particular or kind of problem, and on the other side the political deadlock has had a severe setback when Naftali Bennett decided that he was pulling out of the coalition agreement with Yair Lapid, and centrist parties, when it includes an Arab Party. Mr Bennett has probably done the right thing to stay for the moment hands off instead of what he was known for to be hands on when it comes to the war against the Palestinians. In Lod he specifically called on the government to send in the military to protect the citizens of this town, which is clearly saying that Mr Bennett is back to being a clerk of some sort in the political process, that was blocked by the war that broke out since last week against Hamas. It is however a shame when Naftali Bennett would actually be the right commander (also knowing how the regional actors think across the borders of Israel) to handle this national scale of civil unrest, when during his campaign he has been saying it over and over how he wanted to build democracy and a different approach to help thousands of people to jobs they didn't have or wanted to have. With civil unrest here is where you need a man who understands the instability from the mindset of stability, or civil obedience from the mindset when civil disobedience becomes confrontational at a national scale. Mr Bennett had the political will and ambition to go to the nation, Jews and Arabs, and deal with this poignant reality of Israel today. It wasn't the perfect deal to join the Left- Wing and centrist parties while moving on his ambitions, but it was reality that was most convincing to this side of the political spectrum. No one honoured his ambitions, but instead subdued him to non active as a potential prime minister of Israel. Mr Benyamin Netanyahu on the other side is still the global leading man and is showing how to protect Israel once again by bombing Gaza and has said that it can take as long as it takes, that he will not stop. The International world is at this point while Israel and Gaza are in flames a silent partnership, from the active partnership that Israel has known too well for decades. But more so during the Trump administration. Turkey has called on President Joe Biden and the institution of the UN to call a stop to the bombing of Israel in Gaza. His argument was that this was in it's fifth day and night. Europe is holding up it's prudence and watching as the news develops.

It is a difficult situation for the prime minister in Israel at this point when civil unrest becomes disproportionately in the cities, while Israel is fighting in Gaza a 'disproportionately' war on the global stage and International laws. Hamas doesn't appear a diplomatic or political partner either at this stage. It is his first time and also the first ever civil unrest and flames for modern day Israel, who are the generation of the 21th century and saw prosperity it's biggest accomplishment as a nation and national prowess. All under one man, the incumbent prime minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. This is all true and we must keep a clear mind here. But right now as in the present time the same prime minister doesn't seem to be familiar with the national crisis of civil unrest of this madness and magnitude. Israel is a young country and democracy. Whether it was now or tomorrow, or in ten to fifty years, a civil unrest is something no one can rule out from it's territory or soil that this can never happen. History always is our best advisor and it knows the world better than any other human story. The aftermath of this moment therefore will be one that could be the decisive moment for all of Israel as a nation. There is democracy, sovereignty and it's design in this particular setting and geography, and reform of the political system. This civil unrest also is another new dimension to the future of Israel, how policies than quickly must be applied and deal with civil battle lines policies and how to protect the citizens of Israel, whether Jew or Arab, according to universal laws of humanity. Israel is learning the hard way, that is all. The question in this democracy is whether the prime minister Mr Netanyahu can see the writing on the wall. We need a very strong advocate of peace and democracy and if this wasn't Mr Naftali Bennett, than quickly we have to go to the country and people's man and his mandate. Like the president of France Mr E Macron called already to solve this peacefully, yesterday, it would only be in alignment with what Israel should stand for in it's most challenging hour as a sovereign country with a nation it has built for more than 72 years in this democracy, to call to the people and world what it wants Israel and it's population to do right now. It is no other than Mr Yair Lapid and this could also be his entry into the prime ministership right, and being a fresh strong appearance on the political stage in Israel and speaking about democracy, also a strong reminder to the rest of the world what the State of Israel in it's reality still is. No one is saying it is not difficult. It is possible and that is politics at it's highest level. Israel, make no mistake, has the will and history to act in a surprising way...











Loyalty on a hot iron plate.

11 May 2021

The emergency government, Lapid- Bennett, has not yet been sworn in and critique is already flying like magic carpets above Jerusalem how unable a Left- Wing government has already been for the last two days of violence break out in Jerusalem, Gaza and now this morning in Ashkelon. This is blatant arrogance and is unnecessarily coming at a bad timing this week, with negotiations ongoing between the kingmakers and Yesh Atid leader, Mr Yair Lapid. On the far left it is still a step by step moving closer to the center in this coalition, and discussing specific portfolios matters, or ministries. This seems like a slow proces of new consensus excercise to the Right and Left, and center. In the meantime Jerusalem was hit last night by Hamas and rockets, reaching as far as the Old City in Jerusalem. Sirens were heard and people had to run to shelters. The world has been calling for immediate deescalation of the violence by Hamas and have also said that Israel had the right to defend itself. A simple comment in the comment box on a JP article, yesterday 10 May, you could say nothing more than 'Megaphone: women, children and the elderly stay inside. On both sides.' De-escalation of violent clashes or presence of armed Police, while no one urging the children, women and elderly to go home and stay inside is raising questions how to define violence in general in this country between the two nations. Israel could get the blame for killing children, women or the elderly... It makes you wonder how often this has happened for the last two decades. Politically some are saying that Hamas is feeling a little bold by the idea that now there will be a Left- Wing government in Israel. Come again? When Israel, e.g., comes to a Left- Wing government in the Knesset, how is this a danger to peace? The ICC is under the impression that Hamas is targeting Israel for it's occupation in the West Bank, hurting civilians in Gaza and killing by random any Palestinian when crossing borders. Now there is a twist to the story. We are still hoping that peace between the nations can be resumed, preferably in a different manner.

The Lapid- Bennett government still needs to be sworn in, and it was plannning on doing so tomorrow or thursday, but will be postponed for reasons of the escalation of violence and situation at the moment in Jerusalem and Gaza. We must separate violence and situation, if some are saying that only the incumbent prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, can handle this kind of violence and know how to respond effectively as he has been the war prime minister for decades in Israel. On his side loyalty and on the new unsworn government on the other side, disloyalty from the MK's could be the hot iron plate on which they are pouring their hearts out. One nation, one country, one prime minister, or two, Right and Left are facing Hamas not as the great unknown enemy, but as the known enemy. The new government not yet sworn in does not need to invent the wheel for a second time, not in politics, not in the military, not in Security, and not in Big or local government. Both know the blueprint almost by heart. Left- Wing cannot be any different from Right- Wing in a national crisis when at war, e.g. against the Hamas or Palestinian rebels. Incidently, wasn't Naftali Bennett the shoot- to- kill- policy man a few years ago? On the side of Hamas, you could almost say that in this minute they have heavily provoked Israel, and if true, especially because there is a Left- Wing government in the waiting to be sworn in this week? The world media is everywhere and has tv footages of children right in front of heavily armed Police in the Damascus Gate sunday night. When children ought to be and stay in bed hours, let alone when the bullets could be flying around in a violent situation by provocation of rebels. There is hope at the end of this tunnel when one sees the prime minister in the new government as someone who will pay attention to these 'unusual' situations on the ground and change it to a stricter rule to save the lives of innocent 'bystanders'... And that could be either prime minister in this government, as that is what they would say about their children and wives, or the elderly. No one wants to role out these innocent bystanders as marbles unto the streets during heavy armed Police or the Military presence. We do the same in western Europe, and have done so during the first days of the curfew to battle the Coronavirus. Civil obedience could save lives.










Without Yamina.

(Personal op)

6 May 2021

Yair Lapid in a curious word said yesterday night that he does not rule out a coalition without Yamina to form government. That could go another way and not any less dangerous to the already collapsed government that is now ongoing. It also has been in the news (JP) that Yamina and it's party leader is getting a barage of criticism from many on the Right- Wing bloc, with even the prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, to urge him a returning to his traditional home for Right- Wingers. Also the second urging in the same line goes on that he should not enter a Left- Wing government because he was promised to be prime minister for two years in a rotation with Mr Lapid. A few facts:
1.
Without Yamina the term for Yair Lapid as PM will be the whole term of 4 years.
2
Without Yamina the term for New Hope and Yisrael Beytenu will be 4 four years in a Left- Wing Central government (including Arab Parties).
3
Without Yamina four years in a Left- Wing and center government under Yair Lapid as prime minister is a permanent 'impression' to Right- Wing, in- and outside the formation.
4
With Yamina and rotational prime ministership it is not only necessary to make this formation work as a government, but it is the only mechanism to make it work as the emergency government, Mr Bennett has been saying for the last week. It is by definition also a dual mechanism, one to Right- Wing and the other to Left- Wing.
Without Yamina Gideon Sa'ar New Hope and Avigdor Lieberman's Yisrael Beytenu would be crushed as a Right- Wing mini bloc by a 4 year prime ministership under a Left- Wing government in this crisis or any other one in the future, and will have zero exit strategy maneuverability after the 4 years term prime ministership under Yair Lapid to rejoin the historical Right- Wing bloc.
It is imperative for this formation to stay in a rotational prime ministership with Yamina and Yesh Atid over a 4 years term, or give the rotational prime ministership to Gideon Sa'ar.
5
With Right- Wing New Hope and Yisrael Beytenu, still the prime ministership will have to be rotational, or sink the coalition now as in this moment.
6
It is malkuthh for Israel that no Right- Wing Party can 'serve' the prime ministership a full term of 4 years under a Left- Wing Prime Minister. In Israel it is not only tradition, but it is representing the sovereign will of it's people and their sovereignty. In the greater conscience one could say that the sovereignty to both big parties in politics are the representatives of not only the sovereign (free) will of the people, but also that this is the sovereignty of the State, as in State Politics.
Party Politics should not be confused with State Politics. One is about the free will of the people to vote for their political party to have representation in this State and democracy. The other is sovereignty of the land and nation.

7
Remember: you go to the nation to get the mandate to rule the State and vice versa. Or State Politics versus Party Politics. Politics in it's capricious nature is paradox.

We have an odd situation and no matter how much clamour is coming from the prime minister at this moment against Mr Naftali Bennett, being still in a rotational agreement with Mr Benny Gantz, perhaps it would be more fitting if the prime minister remembers who had started the smoke first. Legally it still is a rotational government with Mr Gantz if no coalition will be formed by the end of the second mandate, given yesterday to Mr Yair Lapid by the President Mr Reuven Rivlin, to form governemnt, in a ceremonial and traditional way with prayer and blessing. In ancient times it was the Shekinah for State Politics and sovereignty of the people, then under the kingship of David. When Rehoboam takes on the advice of his peers (age), the people say, "What have we in the house of David?" In modern times Israel the malkuth is about State Politics and Party Politics, now squeezing the nation and their sovereignty in the 21st century. It is claustrophobic to go on living in the present time in Israel with a broken politics and fighting who becomes prime minister. The choice is simple: you either go to the State (State Politics) or you go to the nation (sovereignty of the free will of the people in a free democracy to vote for representation by elected representatives). No one goes back to Party Politics to rule State and sovereignty of the people. However on this bad occasion Mr Bennett did precisely that, but this was meant to bring back the nation home to the State. A very noble cause and one to temporarily overstep some of the set out boundries of this democracy. (That is why he moved 'intentionally' without the vote of the people into the obscurity in which democracy and State are becoming oblivious to one another like Nachson once did to split the Red Sea...) The emphasis is on temporarily. With any luck it can return to comprehensive government at the end of this term of 4 years rotation to either a Right- Wing or Left- Wing majority. Or, I am terribly wrong here.












Echad Medinat, Medinat Israel, a military thing from mighty far?

2 May 2021

Comment reading on the Jerusalem Post as Kirub: "Ms Hoffman should also know that Mr Netanyahu knows that in Israel God (the God of Abraham comes first) is first (Echad) and second the State or Medinat Israel. It is difficult to explain the ecstacy of this nature, I think." Democracy and the Haredim or Chassidim community in Israel or around the world are a differnt unity, but this doesn't stop here. When celebrated publicly this is a very clear other Medinat of the One, that would only be Ha Shem. Today with 45 dead because of a festival run badly at Mount Meron in Israel (thursday night), something one could see as out of spiral from reality on the ground, the blame becomes automatically one for the present time prime minister, or incumbent prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. In democracy or the Medinat Israel, there are many things to say about this prime minister and how badly he has managed both worlds for the last two decades (see writing of article by M. Hoffman today in the JP), but one thing will be there always even when mr Netanyahu is not prime minister. After 72 years in this relationship with Jews at large living in Israel, the Haredim only had found in the incumbent prime minister a spiral to get today where they are, free to celebrate something no one really understands around in the world. Between the Medinat Israel and Echad Medinat there is no one but Mr Netanyahu who seemed to have understood it is more than politics and laws of Israel to maintain the continuity of the State. It is ecstacy to know that Israel has a Echad Medinat community or State, and secondly by International Law is also a State for and of the Jewish people. The laws of the Medinat Israel are not ecstacy to celebrate Lag Ba'omer, but are for demoracy and to maintain hegemony in Israel. Warnings how this festival of the Haredim at Mount Meron have ended is indeed indicating that this was a tragedy and it came in a very bad timing, just between the end of the mandate for the prime minsiter and the second moment of passing on the mandate to Mr Lapid of the Yesh Atid Party.

It is here where Mr Netanyahu will be hardly missed when he is not prime minister again in the next mandate, in the Echad Medinat of the Haredim. No one also believes that we might be looking at a possible outbreak of violence or harassment of the Haredim, if let's say the mandate goes to Mr Lapid. God forbid! But what does matter now is that we are in the 21st century and will have to comply with all the new laws on the International stage, but more so home base. It is a mammoth task for the more objective government of Left- center and Right- Wing (if Yamina and New Hope will join) to create a central government with the inclusion of the difficult communities in Israel. At the same time it is not okay to let this tragedy go from the national mind of what has happened to the Haredim/ Chassidim, when they have lived a liberated life under Mr Netanyahu, but now will have to comply with the new prime minister of whom there is no such sentimental relationship to start with, some are saying. To blame and wanting to shame someone is another story. So, let's do this thing right and blame infrastructure as everyone by now has seen the narrow corridors only built to keep the cows or bulls in line before the entrance or exit entrances. Why this place was constructed without the open spaces for large crowds, since Mount Meron is the only location, and has been built like ba refet, this was not what you could call the right planning of construction. In many other places in the country the same problem is also there. You have to ponder over this and find out why and why not as it should have been. If neglected over two decades some government ministries will have to take some of the accountability as this was now brutally exposed how cracked the infrastructure is in fact. Both physically and administratively. Without the ecstacy of the Lag Ba'omer celebration there is no Jewish soul to celebrate with Israel. What may look to many in the rest of the world as a rave of religious Jews. Mr Lapid is treading carefully and should remember the words of the poet William Butler Yeats:
"Had I the heavens’ embroidered cloths,
Enwrought with golden and silver light,
The blue and the dim and the dark cloths
Of night and light and the half-light,
I would spread the cloths under your feet:
But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
I have spread my dreams under your feet;
Tread softly because you tread on my dreams."










It is time for the public sector to come back to the people. And it is Mr Bennett who is working day and night to continue with this simple truth...

23 April 2021

In the book of Proverbs it is said that you must buy wisdom if you don't have any for yourself. And wisdom to buy for the people of Israel, it looks like this will challenge the surpluses nationally and to a certain extent, if prime minister, his global allies. What did we expect before the election on 23 March, last month and post election in Israel? For Mr Bennett's Yamina Party as kingmaker in this last election outcome his first choice and most natural was to bring under his leadership the Right- Wing bloc, but couldn't with seven mandates and having Mr Netanyahu in a neighbourly Likud seats of 30 as his solar eclipse. Before the election you could have said that in the next election Israel as expected one can say will be more than just a vote for democracy and it's election system. In this tragedy in which the pandemic has put humanity collectively sadly it is the electing of a prime minister that now remains important. Also another side to this tragedy is that even with mr Netanyahu staying in government to lead Israel out of the pandemic, his body and familiar face will not be adequate enough in the long run to represent himself as the man behind the new world of vitality of an aesculapius. In fact Mr Bennett does have more of the features to be the aesculapius, and he is much younger at this stage in his life. Now after the election the diamond shape opening into forming coalitions have become also something of an eclipse, when and if Mr Bennett would keep his commitment and become a unity government prime minister, and preferably not as first half of the rotation. To become the prime minister in a unity government with a Right- Wing party and seven seats it will only be more prudent if the leader of Yamina would take the second round of rotational prime ministership in this term. And for one simple reason that it takes more for to be prepared how to enter and exit when the term ends in another general election. There is no reason to think or prematurely ponder on a second term of unity government between Mr Lapid and Mr Bennett!

Quite seriously and ultimately his next move and goal should be that if Mr Bennett can make it in the next general election and win a majority of seats with his allies and form new government, his first pressing issues may be the ones he could not answer immediately post election, now as a first or any first term PM. And concentrate on his exit strategy from the unity government with Left- Wing, Mr Yair Lapid in 2025. The kingmaker has lost significant ground now already by admitting himself to sacrifice his seats in order to form the coalition, he thinks, would be best to have a government and open for business again. After mass vaccination of the people in Israel against the Coronavirus the economy can restart even in this year's summer and recover by the end of the last quarter in December with high velocity than expected. That is if there is such a thing to restart economies in general after a national or global shutdown. Which half of the unity government will work on the economy restart there is no clear talk of this at the moment, also because the mandate to form government officially is still in the hands of the current prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. Another pressing question seems to come from the situation with Iran and the International world, the EU and from Washington. On either side of the rotational prime ministership the political spin goes round in circles, of how can either of these prime ministers make that global appearance like the incumbent prime minister, and drive fear into the hearts and minds of the Iranian war makers who have no other goal but to destroy Israel as it's main goal. How will either prime minister address the Iranian people and keep their readiness to destroy any enemy of Israel in one sentence in this global scenario of 2021 diplomacy? The new message in the Middle East is peace, if anyone needs reminding... Could there be any diplomacy point scoring keeping readiness and provocation, e.g. by any enemy of Israel, in a rotational government also in a unified political and military solidity when facing the International world? Both politicians, Mr Bennett and Mr Lapid, should in the end come to the conclusion that after unity it is important to leave a trail of balance in government for the people. How else are you going to come back in and serve a second term perhaps this time with a majority? And more important is how a unity government with Right- Wing Party Yamina will introduce the structure for audits in this government, one with Prime Minister Yair Lapid and the other with Prime Minister Naftali Bennett (second rotation half). Strangely enough some have the feeling it will work out fine and mainly because both men are deadly serious about Israel and the people of Israel.

Shabbat shalom.










Naftali Bennett is pushing through the ranks of politics with only 7 seats.

8 April 2021

If Mr Bennett forms government with the Left- Wing and will keep his party along the conservative line with carefully selected allies and former allies, seven is the number of seats to push for this bold move on the political chessboard. Politics is hardly a game of chess in real time, and yet moving should be as in this the rule of the political game, keeping the different values or ideologies of 'conflicting' parties perfectly squared. Under the incumbent prime minister it was felt especially in the public sector that the Right or Left Wing parties did not know or even could not run the country without a strong man in government, and who also was strong outside Israel on the global stage. Private sector in the meantime was blooming under Mr Netanyahu and to put in the prime minister's words, that Israel was thriving and a high tech start- up nation. Political analysis wasn't needed and has been for a long time non active under this prime minister. Now the world has some clarity what the political parties are trying to get to and that they are adamant to form the necessary 'coup d'etat', and if only to reassert from the political lows to a high once again after 72 years political history since the State of Israel was founded. A dog task, with all due respect to the virtuous, to fight for like lions or lion cubs. A split has also come with Naftali Bennett pushing through the political ranks between conservative and the religious Right and turning to Right Wing and Left Wing. According to Right Wing leader Bezalel Smotrich that could have or lead to repercussions in the long term and damage the core principles of Right Wing in Israel, but also when in relation to the State. Saying it like that it is putting another question forward and almost immediately, that the State needs no definition, or perhaps here is a suggestion being made on reform of State. At knife point (political knife point) what is more evident from the last election results and a prospect for having a new prime minister in Israel it seems that the goal here is to determine direction and meaning. Leading the nation out of their impasse is seen as a simple purpose on the outside, but in terms of reality it is the mother of all political realities in the 21st century global world.

Post last election no one is seeing anywhere the 'invasion of the Turks' theaterical story, that all you have to do is putting on clothing of Turkish soldiers on horseback and this will convince the 'enemies' who they are dealing with. The enemies will never know the truth that in fact they were not dealing with Turks, but with people deep in fear and distress dressed up like Turks. The tactical move worked and is a true story. But Naftali Bennett is looking beyond fear and is looking in his mirror reflex in the waters of Oz. What did the lion see? He is doing the unpopular decisions right now as we speak and must be having his British moment as if working against the king with Oliver Cromwell (Mr Yair Lapid) how to bring down the 'tyranny' of the royalists and Charles Benyamin Netanyahu I, just to use here metaphorically. Accidently Mr Bennett being himself a sturdy 'royalist'. As we are all witnessing it isn't only the prerogative of the British to have democracy repeating in history when in the making. 23 March 2021 this was Israel's first 'history repeating itself' while still a young nation on the global stage and in the history of old democracies in the world. And how much of it is democracy is in it's old uniform when fought out in Israel between opposing and conflicting political parties on a seven seat party, isn't all that clear but it could be very determining for the future democracy in Israel when done well today. If, of course, done with cheer from certain groups, in- and outside Israel. Acknowledge the knight by his ambition to do right and say yes he is pushing through the ranks for the better of the country and to retain as a democractic nation, but also to make things more fair between the political established parties. In memo: Zionism can climb up the Jacob's ladder of seven, especially when it is the Jewish nation as a whole. Aspera ad astra with seven seats to become prime minister some will say is undemocratic, unless when to bolt the horses to panic.










Bennet's war cabinet, if forming the next new government in Israel.
(Personal op)

3 April 2021

Mr Bennett, if prime minister of the next government, has two priorities for rebuilding public trust in politicians and political parties. There is his own vision and that of the nearest future. How will he achieve both at the same time with a cabinet that has attracted also in the last election some of the other third parties on the left? Israel has arrived at this point of real political height in a democracy that was frozen over in the last governments under Mr Netanyahu. The people and the political parties are now looking much more included in this model, but he is not going to just yet make it without true pledges. What he seems to know is that with Mr Netanyahu out of government, he is the new face and voice to convey the message of the future. The latter also being at the brink of a new era around in the Middle East and in relation to global leadership. Which are the new prime minister's big project and priorities and which are his national priorities, if he can make the distinction? It is interesting e.g. how the Biden administration is making a new approach in the Middle East and the Palestinian issue, but also when revoking sanctions on ICC members as outgoing Mrs Besouda, ICC prosecutor. If there is a new era in this part of the world what then can the new prime minister expect to see or hear? No one just knows yet unless interactive peace is what is on the geopolitical menu. It is of great importance that the new prime minister will take notice of the changes being made by the US administration by approach. For one reason that his government will comply with these different sets on the global political stage how best to proceed where the world had stopped during the Trump administration, where there was such a thing. The newly elected prime minister of Israel does have a vision rationality for peace with the Palestinian people and between Israel and Palestine, if one cares to listen to his speeches in a previous time during his years as a minister of Defense and Education. But when habit is his main adviser and that of his cabinet it might go the other way and he will have to parrot the former prime minister (by then). Such an image of a man with a vision for peace, at home and abroad in the Middle East, does not make an adequate rationality as he is intended to portray. In his first addressing of the people also it is another importance to inform the public of his intention and how he intends to centralize the incoming parties on the left to his right- wing cabinet. Daily life in Israel should not be again about, what you can't buy, dream it. What you can't earn, dream it, or, what you can't have, dream it. The frozen years are over in one strike.

The Middle East will be best served as an interesting partnership with different partners in the region, be it interactive or other. Israel has arrived with a crashing into the first moments of the future in this last election. It has also been heard abroad of how the political struggle was in fact a real one this time and not as many had said or thought of before the election, that this was theater and theatrical. A weak public now feels they are first and have reached the center of politics, a first time too after many decades of adoration for the man they worshipped as their prime minister, mr Netanyahu. Yes, indeed, Mr Netanyahu was a formidable man as the prime minister of Israel and also on the global stage. He will not be matched by any other next prime minister, even when Mr Bennett or Gideon Sa'ar would be the next prime minister. He was the unequal among equals prime minister without any doubt to say so. Even when sometimes it looked as if the world only wanted him to stop being the prime minister. Now, there is also this issue of State finances. In short there is the political architecture for the new government, and the second big priority would naturally be after this election State finances. How will the new prime minister make this differentiality with the former governments? There is news in the Jerusalem Post this morning that Mr Bennett is not as capable as one would believe to lead the people of Israel. Leading here is a big word when a frozen lake. Leading when the freezing is melting, now that would be something of a different nature to the kind of leadership that was never there. Mr Bennett should know the drill as he was a military commander in the IDF and would know how to deal with surprises during duty or excecution of combat. A simple protocol reading can sometimes do many wonders in these moments and then save the day. On the base back in politics it will remain a mammoth task to lead old Netanyahu veterans on the right when still mesmerizing in the Netanyahu democracy years. Change is unpleasant for habitual persistence. That could turn ugly or in rumours. It could also trigger either a new election or party leadership contest. For now the question is whether the political system is ready to support the weakest link in government to lead right and left and endorse Mr Bennett as prime minister. Or get back to the 'Netanyahu style democracy' model. After all it is primus inter pares. And there is also a battle line in politics, sir.










Deadlock or revolution in Israel after the election 23 March 2021.

24 March 2021

The politicial deadlock in Israel as seen by many around the world, but especially in the wider Middle East as it is now known, has become a life of it's own in yet another loss for the anti- Netanyahu bloc last night. The results are still coming in and will make by the end of the week a different balance, as hoped. This result has nevertheless sent out a seismic lightness throughout the world and the Middle East, that now Israel was visibly weak and isolated judging from the political infight throughout the election campaign. Weak and isolated, but as a nation and not as the super power in the Middle East region is now making a strange election aftermath convulsion. Under the leadership of one man, now for many decades, Israel did become part of the global world, and yet at the same time many in the nation have paid the price for his successes. It is easy to go back and talk politics from the pages of Mr Netanyahu's historical successes, he alone had brought the people of Israel. What will be difficult is updating the new challenges that are awaiting the people and politicians as we speak. But no one can say where exactly this point of view ripples across the country best and why. First one that everyone agrees upon is the ICC probe into war crimes that Israel has committed in the war in 2014 against the citizens of Gaza and post that war. Legally there is so far only mentioning of 'alleged war crimes' as the probe has not yet concluded it's findings. Israel is invited to respond within this month whether it will allow the investigation being probed by the ICC over these 'alledged war crimes' against humanity. Here there is no misunderstanding what this could mean for the country as a whole in the coming weeks. Readings from the minutes and hours today the country also has another apparent problem after last night's election results. Mr Netanyahu will need the parties of the Right Wing Bloc to help him get to 61 seats to form government. But here is also where the revolutionary road for Israel has begun.

The world has to admit that the election has exposed visible socio- economic realities of Israel, and that they are everything but glitter and gold. The people need their political parties to dig out the nation from the national fatigue and indifference they grew accustomed to from the eighties unto the 21st century to this day that life means zero and not ten. Where the country has thrived exponentially was at the top of the roaming economy over the head of the majority of the people of Israel, despite the good intentions by the current prime minister to make Israel great in the world. The Middle East has a paternalistic nature for each nation, Arab or Jew, and closest also to Turkey, who lives and breathes in the region as a leading man, prince or king. Sometimes one could say that it has no/ lack of maternal instinct, which makes it all the more isolated for Israel with still the maternal instinct and real motherhood that is making the nation what it is: Jewish and in the purest of sense. Mr Netanyahu has come of political age and again it is only fair to say that his time will not be the future and for a few simple reasons. His age, the power in the world is shifting from west to the Middle East, the millennium and all that has changed the world in the meantime (Covid-19 which is not a prime ministerial issue but a world medical and scientific problem), and also the shift in peace concepts east or west. The question of the new revolution is whether peace can make the difference in Real Time when normalization with the Arab nations in the region could have a tangible effect for the people of Israel (and vice verse). Scale is the reading to best approach this matter, e.g., how many poor or low income people live in Bahrain, UAE or Saudi Arabia? Peace, could this mean in the 21st century that the economy in the Middle East is not where you get your incentives from, but more where you inject or generate the balance? (For documents to read on this issue you can find on the Internet) From a paternal point of view a young man could never bring about the success the nation needed, and misunderstand time and revolution on the other side too. Once again, many young leaders are up front in this part of the world and some will leave the paternal elderly statesmen in the side flanks, for wise counsel and decision making. It is a unique system and no where else in the world do they have such one as in the Middle East.

Of course, there is no telling Israel how to run all the segments of it's society when being on the outside and looking in. One thing you can do is notice how the bigger picture is also it's greatest deception as it was during the years of Mr Netanyahu his greatest perceptions throughout time. What if we give up on Mr Naftali Bennett, now the kingmaker of this election result? Or, give up on Gideon Sa'ar, who has taken his defeat standing up after the result, for him a particular tough one to swallow? And there are those on the left, where you could help create templates for the people of Israel to come back into the real light without losing control over the public and their temperament. Many now see the left as people going or gone out of control and who are trying to eliminate good old family traditional life from the earth of Israel, e.g. LGBTQ rights and other minorities rights. Human Rights do not make anything subtle or humane when threatened by, anywhere in some parts of the world, but especially when related to economic issues. The secular part of Israel is the majority and is desperately needing a government for and by the people, or disappear. Sad but true it is looking a different Israel on the other side, the rich and powerful plus the Orthodox. And making the IDF the middle road between the two. We have to remember why Mr Netanyahu is also the hero of the people of Israel and that this was due to the brother the prime minister had lost during the Entebbe drama. Both are in the people's memory and it still is the most captivating story to the prime minister's personal history. Almost the equivalent of the saint- hero status. On both sides in Israeli society, the majority of the people and the rich/ powerful or Orthodox, the IDF has the face of the prime minister and his late brother sacred heroism that only in Israel you can understand what this means. The premiership is his rightful reward and no other will win from him this honorary mandate from his people as he can or does. But, democracy in most parts of the western world have known many fallen heroes and still it is democracy that people treasure. 'How the mighty have fallen," also is part of the cycle of life in Israel and it's old history. Or, 'Israel is to eternity' as it's only and first discipline.












Old world order was based on trust between the G7 leading nations. The trust is still there, but not with the same leading nations in the same order. Reverse order is more like it, e.g. for Britain.

17 March 2021

Ignorance should not be on the side of Britain, that should be on the side of the other side to England, if you hold the Brexit view of the world. It is the year 2021, five years later when Britain decided to leave the European Union to take back control of it's sovereignty as the United Kingdom. But the step has up the ante to taking back control now also of the world. It only needs to update security and the Trident missiles, according to a report review this week on tuesday, 16 March 2021. It has China, Russia and the region in Asia Pacific in the report, the world news has reported (Bloomberg.com). There is a sense of urgency also coming from this particular setting and also a surprise to it's sudden strategic importance. Perhaps it was a surprise that the world has gone forward and is at the brink of another strategic era that could perhaps become the new world order. And making whatever the old world order has been or was not the way forward. Six years ago to get out of the EU had not seen this coming and it was therefore almost the natural right and sovereignty to go back... To Britain? Mathematics did not come anywhere near departing from the EU how then the equation would be either in or out balance. Out of balance was based on a vision or visual assumption and could go without saying in the only direction of it's beholder. Many nations after the Brexit vote to leave the EU have now come to understand that there are no leading nations in a global world without a natural force that they should keep this evolution and be a constant part in it. Indefinitely but then for the coming century and not based on the next decade and followed again by another next decade.

Part of this new evolution & natural global force one should expect security also to be reliant on trust among the leading world in it's direction and it's leading nations. Now it seems too late to start revolutionizing anything at this side to make things more suitable for Britain's non-interdependence from the world present time architecture. Compliance isn't the admirality of what it used to be when rejected by the admiral to comply with any form or sight alien to the realm. Compliance one imposes now stands six stories high above admirality. It is a particular height when put in here or any urban planning in this writing and is almost deliberate. The old asymmetric global order is taking on symmetric new alliances, if any one can call this change of order from asymmetry. With that Britain is making a more asymmetric impression to international symmetry. (Wherever and whenever applied) E.g. the Middle East will go from these platforms to what is being envisioned through symmetrical and strategic peace, instead of war. One could say how is this changing based on peace alone if war was it's geopolitical only experience for the last seven decades? War simply costs too much and destroys human nature wherever it is ongoing in the world. Maybe it is harder to make it rain and meet with exponential natural growth, but this would be experienced better than war as an incentive. The return or incentiveis the new politics and geopolitical objective, so to say, with the Middle East at the middle for now with the Abraham Accords between Israel and it's Arab neighbours, also in North Africa, Morocco. Israel has a peace agreement with Egypt and Jordan dating in the old world order. Maybe the world was born Anglo Saxon and we are in for disaster when meeting with the transformation of men leading the world turning to giant serpents to swallow up people and nations.











Two different bodies, one is the election and the other the ICC, for the future prime minister of Israel.

4 March 2021

In less than 17 days Israel will go to the polls. If we concentrate on Naftali Bennett for a moment to become the next prime minister of Israel, this is a tight race for him to get to his number of seats to form the next government. On the other hand there is also the ICC investigation over which in this tight period of time to the election in less than three weeks that he has to deal with, and cannot afford to be agitated or irritated publicly when in interviews. That would display weak leadership instead of being a strongest candidate to become Israel's next prime minister after decades long in search for someone to replace the current prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. Mr Bennett in the interview yesterday evening, wednesday 3 March with Maayan Hoffman (JP), he had said that his vision for being the prime minister was to create a meritocracy for the people of Israel and that his goal was to get 1 mln people back or into work. Jobs, jobs, jobs, that was his main goal and election promise. Also to empower people and not dispose of them by some other way and make them redundant. It's fast food election promises, again, because of the time and timing in this snap election when the people of Israel are going back for a fourth time in two years to the polls. The ICC in particular comes at a bad time with the investigation into the war crimes of 2014 and now creating a dark shadow on an election campaign by mr Bennett to become the next prime minister. The work is getting harder even after the election and the next prime minister will be entangled in war crimes committed by the IDF, this according to the probe by the ICC, at such prime moment of his prime ministership. Yet, we can only see it inevitable as it is, right now. What can this new narrative be for him to get his defense up the level?

The probe into war crimes in 2014 similar would have to be answered in the manner that any prime minister would answer, that if disproportionate it is not only that the State of Israel should be defended, but that the military will always use it's force to answer these provocations. Disproportionate will than become the issue, but only from a different angle in whatever opinion, public or world opninion. The ICC has already stated that on both sides there have been war crimes committed and that this will unlock the investigation of the situation in 2014 for both peoples. The International World has also another component which the prime minister has to bear in mind, that the new world order requires a different set of competencies from all governments it beholds. Whether this is the European Union, the Asean countries or Bric nations. Answering to investigations by an international body as the ICC is not the end but start when entering the new world and it's future. If the new world order has set it's goal on higher justice for all nations, this will happen and also in Israel. And also build up strategic peace above turbulence abstracts. In a 3D animation the new world order is not play and fake, but are deadly serious in the world they are investing heavily to meet the demands of what the future looks like from their point of view. The ICC is only one of it's 'cosmetics', but will not be perceived lightly on the ground in practice. So, mr prime minister to be, please, waste not your strength and lose your patience.








Benyamin Netanyahu's end era as prime minister is near...

1 March 2021

Tensions between Iran and Israel are at a new high over the blast of an Israeli cargo ship near the coast in the gulf of Oman last week. Today Syria has reported and last night on the Israeli airstrike in parts of Damascus as a retaliation of Iran's alleged attack on the Israeli- owned cargo ship. Iran denies the accusation. Another pressing issue the prime minister has to deal with is the coming election 23 March this month. The country needs desperately an upgrade of government and function, this especially when the Middle East is synchronizing it's power and force in the region. Israel is not all convinced intentions are benign. Also another nasty shock last week on the Israeli coast was a mysterious oil spill that has caused an estimated maximum damage to the environment area and sea water for the public in Israel. All happening in one week's time could perhaps be indicating that the Middle East wants to be a player of change and a new future. Israel could lead or be a distraction of convenience to that new goal, is plausible under this new vision. The future of any military will be less on strategic surprises than one can expect in a region that knows the old world order well as it's second nature. Time alone will tell and for now we have to concentrate deeply on the election in Israel in a compound of three weeks time. And this is above all military simulations in real life inside or outside of Israel for the moment. The mood in the country is about something more conventional and how it perceives the next vision for governing the people of Israel. More specifically the most ideal vision is how to keep the system political and democratic for the greater public, also in an unfortunate time with the world pandemic of Covid-19. The Israeli public has made clear in some corners that a left wing would be better this time to win the election from the right wing and it's era in all Netanyahu governments. The more central you get the more the storyline changes to that Israel in a more ideal world would need neither to form government. What the public needs is a democracy and that this time the elected prime minister would be able to interpret the meaning of their rights how to be governed and needs to serve the people that has elected representatives to govern. However, this right is a balance of law and order of fundamental necessities: sovereignty, security, all in relation to true citizenship for Israelis and peoples of a different origin e.g. the Palestinians living in the State of Israel.

Both have been a problem for the last four decades State and citizenship in Israel in the Netanyahu governments, and it's low tide for inclusion of this new multitude. The International World investigates another problem of Israel when it concerns the West Bank and Gaza over the wars in 2009 and 2014 as we know from Den Hague or the ICC. The pressure is a complex one, for the State and also for what is still considered outside the State of Israel in the 'occupation' territories. If more closely one will have to admit that the State of Israel is more than citizenship of Israelis it is dealing with on a daily basis, as it also has a layer of Arab citizens under the same roof of the State. The State also has the occupied territories that are outside of Israel, according to the 1967 green lines, with another quasi citizenship of Israelis or settlers next to citizens of a quasi Palestinian State. The image is a disturbing reflection of nations being trapped in one hole together and cannot go either way out in the same land. And the same image has therefore created the disturbing reality of every Palestinian, man, woman or child, as 'guilty by suspicion', whether on movement or nocturnal activities in the most domestic motions, among the Israelis who are defending the State of Israel against any perpetrator and kind as criminal. It is imperative to elect the next prime minister of Israel who will be capable of leading the nation out of stagnation and design the model for a new nation with the inclusion of it's own Arab nation living in the State of Israel. Palestine and Israel for the moment are tied up in the ICC investigation into the war crimes of Israel against the Palestinian people in the last war in 2014, Operation Protective Edge. The prime minister has to make sure this will not downgrade Israel more than it needs to and make it imperative to upgrade not only the rights of citizens of Israel, but also the State and Military laws of Israel. He will know that the military of Israel has reached peak in having a surplus of advanced weapons and that this is making civic life simulated, and it's military is above simulation. Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu has unfortunately left out the upgrade of laws in Israel on this matter and now it is what the next prime minister will inherit from the gone by era of the Netanyahu governments.

To the here above this can only be Naftali Bennett to be the new prime minister and not Gideon Sa'ar, who is, with all due respect, not a leader in defense matters and sciences of the military. It is expected more of a man who is familiar with the military technologies and it's precision technology in military weapons, and by assumption that man can only be Mr Naftali Bennett. But if his name would be on the list and comprimised over the investigation into war crimes committed by Israel in 2014, we have to understand this from a military law point of view in Israel parallel to that of the ICC, as it is meant in good faith to judge and excecute good verdicts on private members in the State of Israel and it's ministry of Defense. Until now Israel has failed the investigations and some in the International World are adamantly convinced that this was deliberate and has no base of any principle on their side. Humanity is best served when the whole truth can be submitted here. The ICC desperately also needs to upgrade it's prestige for generations to come, that it is capable of submitting the truth before God and mankind and nothing but the whole truth so help me God. Israel is part of the family of nations and we know it is our natural truth to think so. It will not fail to judge and execute law and order for and on it's people, as it will be parallel to a deeper extent to do so on enemies who do not shy away from 'armed resistance'. But the military laws and order in Israel will have to be adequate to the level of future changes in all armed forces across the world. Mr Bennett's name on the list for now would be defended with and by conventional wisdom and not as is expected by cause only. But it is therefore also imperative to say with great emphasis that in a second round of investigation the impact of human suffering will come back to the table in the International Criminal Court and hopefully with more better judgement on the pressure on both peoples on a daily basis that is true and grim reality. As is known : peace is made with honey, and not with poison Ivy however stately by appearance.

Naftali Bennett wants to hold on to democracy.

5 February 2021

God only knows the people deserve it to get back value for their support for the Netanyahu government after decades passed way beyond most lives in Israel for the last thirty years. The deal is going to be a tough one, so the news said late last night, on 4 February. 48 Days and the people will have to make up their minds and stay in close follow of which political party will get their vote this time on 23 March 2021. How will it be different this time for the citizens of Israel? Government is fixation and magic at the same time, if they will elect a prime minister after their own heart. 270 Degrees will vote for the apple of their eye many are already saying with another fixation on the 61 seats in Knesset for Mr Netanyahu, while the other 90, shared between Gideon Sa'ar and Naftali Bennett, could end up in a clash for first on the side lines of this election. 4 Is the magic number. Will the magicians believe this time that it can be done to take Israel back to build up the government that it wants? And this would only be the legislative part of government to begin with. The other 'tender' half will be about people and government. The national mood could be different this time as well, some have tried to suggest on late last night too. If democracy it is Naftali Bennett who has been showing more consistency throughout the last six or seven months since last year and taking people back in nostalgia of what was once this country when founded in the previous century. How dit it work then for the people and politicians, and how can it work today in the present time when it is not quite interested in respresenting a formation of government between men & women of equal standing? Perhaps when not in Israel and Israeli we are not looking quite in the right direction when watching Mr Bennett closely. This time Israel has given the world a unique window of truth how Israeli politics works up to an election surging with good intentions and need to get to the public it wants to serve and keep from every harm thought of under the fiery sun at home and in the region. The world is to a certain degree also part of that defense policy. It could work to make Israel revive a deja vu of it's own self or political past image. How will Mr Bennett revive a dead stone to a living one? Democracy was never written in stone for Israel as was it's forebearer the Ten Commandments. Now we see a human face behind Israelis and their political ambitions after years of obscurity behind wars and fog with the Palestinian people. Tactical choice is always deliberate to keep focus not on the Two- State solution between the two nations at the moment. First the election and change of government, or... stay where they all started from.

Socially Israel is still a democracy... A hard working people still socially have a democracy, but employment during Covid-19 will take the center stage to both parties in government: people and politicians. No one knows where this 'future' is going and where the people will end up with a democracy that is only here for cosmetic reasons and cannot make adequate provisions for the people in these difficult times. Mr Bennett however is convinced that his politics could make a change. Basic democracy was never designed for employment in ancient Greece. Democracy was designed to keep law and order transparent and distributive in an apparent government. Israel does not want to go the same way for two simple reasons: over capacity (potential) of employment and military service. And these are not animated industries but come and go periodically in time lapses without a fixed point in any future. It is not the same for the bigger industries at macro economics level as I said before for the simple reason that they are the private sector. If democracy and public sector (employment and military service) are on Mr Bennett's mind he could make a big come back into government this time round the fourth election. He seems to have made certain for this the last two quarters in 2020. And his quality is becoming also much more clearer that if he knows what the people know where they want to start this time and come together in the end, he is also nearest to his true nature to be the next consummate leader of Israel. I have said the same about Mr Netanyahu for years. There could also be a blind spot for him in his mirror of political ambition. "Who is the most beautiful future prime minister of Israel? Is it I, Naftali Bennett, or Bibi?" Perhaps we must wait and see what he will say or do next in the coming 48 days. If he loses this time it will look as if that he might still be in and in rank with the biggest conservative party, Likud. Perhaps a boy's dream who is not hard enough in his heart to go against a legitimate majority when co ram publico. It might even be Mr Bennett's intelectual choice to take a seat close to his senior Mr Netanyahu and respect him till the end. In the meantime the people have their own timelapse coming and going to the same places and shops each day without change, whether in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Haifa, Hebron, Ashkelon, Ashdod, and so forth. In a new morning today there is also contemplation of Yair Lapid who could become prime minister. But this is not America where democrats can take the country or leave it to the Republicans.






Government continuity in Israel, the election Q & A.
(Personal view)
22 January 2021

With 23 March this year's election in Israel the people again will have their say. One: government. Two:... And here is where the Question & Answer become blockheaded. The people's vote goes out to the politician of their choice, something that comes instead of government and politics. It comes and goes unchecked how this is upstreaming to elect e.g. a new or incumbent prime minister in Israel. Also there is a small sense of complacency among the voters when going out to the polling stations, and this is not just in Israel. Israel has freedom and is not a military dictatorship to make the moment fluid in a general election. Once the political football is over the politician can go home to sleep and wait for the next day when they come for a first session of meetings held in the Knesset to open the government for business. And then it is back to the speaker of the House again for the next forseeable future from here. The people can go back also to work and their studies, and cars, trains, and buses also are going back to their stations and running up and down the country. This is continuity in Israel, for some logic it is true if a country has made all these policies for the country and it's citizens to go on living having normalicy of this or that kind. Policies and continuity here is where cosmopolitan Israel in the 21st century stops in Israel. Willingly or unwillingly, there is no answer for any present time politician to give the general public in and outside the country. With security for Israel in the region of the Middle East the new generation is the automatic pilot when standing next to the captain of industries or politics in government. It is a way of life and for most Israelis to feel great is better than those who speak of empowerment of the people. Have they not moved on for the last four decades under the current strong leadership of Mr Benyamin Netanyahu? The domicile of Israelis is now fact and will go on indefinitely.

Secondly also, Israel is not a broken society when seen on the vertical or horizontal timelines, but in fact it has done a remarkable job to get here where the nation can live in a secure land that is known to the world as the Jewish Home. The United Nations, the International World and many other organizations cannot blindfold the time when Israel and it's State came into the obligations of State- building and accepting the armistice lines or patition law 100 years ago. The Jewish people in their own right have also become part of the family of nations, and it kept in better or worse times it's democracy for indefinite time and excercise. And also to reject any other form of government, e.g. a dictatorship or radical leadership of another kind. It has with it's military built on security and will go on doing so for the long term of the next 100 generations, if God willing will decide so. Politicians who want to become Israel's next prime minister have an enormous interior and exterior office/ homework as how to deal best with these opposite timelines as time moves on into the future with speed. Will it take on a more global future or turn it's base unpside down, when speaking of empowerment of the people? They must be able to catch on with the rest of the country if improvement of lives and living standards are part of the election promise in less than eight weeks from the election in March 2021. What say you, citizens? With their feet in the past and heads are in the window of new opportunities in middle Israel for the time being, this seems likely the thing any politician legitimately can promise the people, if the writing and composition of summarizing by any politician is right. Gideon Sa'ar is on the list of Bloomberg (8) to watch for, so a tweet said from Bloomberg on twitter. The people of Israel may have another say and perhaps will go for the man who speaks their tongue, heart and mind, Naftali Bennett? The choice will be this time very much based on a 'petition vote' and hope for the best candidate to replace the incumbent prime minister and his government. He is still the man who have had both axis to live and work by, and taking a place above all in government and State matters right above the Y- axis. It is with sadness in the hearts of many if they will have to choose between the future and present time of Israel once this day arrives. How can the people oust the son of Israel of a Joab- like- man, who led them into the world without getting them harmed in any sort of other 'historical' way known to Jews? The younger generation however have a mind of their own and protest his present time in government with a consistency that is strange and unfamiliar to the older generation. The love and respect for Mr Netanyahu if possible could go on forever, which only makes it harder for any new prime minister to follow this tough act.

The political class in Israel of almost two generations behind the millennium is advising something different to all technocratic achievements in the globalised world for Israel, and to follow the conscience of democracy with which the country made it's first beginning in the land of Palestine, in between the armistice lines next to Gaza and the West Bank. Both are important to understand from here at this standpoint, what division and unite can have in common for Israel to proceed as a nation, close to neighbours (Arabs, Turkish) with governments of their own and the kingdoms or a lost kingdom. Israel in the 1900 untill 1980 was not yet a regional power and with regional politics for the Mediterranean Sea and land (Palestine now Israel), but only had become so much later on. It had since then into our time also been the responsibility of the military and top government, if you would face the Israeli public and then understand why so many are still living back in time as if this were before 1980. And doing so with great pride. The rest was not for them they must have thought at one point, so let the politicians do what they think is best for the people... And then suddenly there was high tech in Israel at a national level, new industries, the two- state solution with the Palestinians, and extreme poverty (statistics last week said about 2mln), and terrorism wars... Strategic visions do not mean anything for people living in Tel Aviv in derelict houses or buildings. It is the interior ministries they want to see and speak with, and that is why they stay on in political engagement. The Israeli Army is capable enough to deal with 'strategic matters' and they leave it to that. When the incumbent prime minister took office in the eighties the national security of Jews in Israel was still regionally unstable and the International World was also vague on many occassions. In comparison to Israel today what can a new prime minister do when the country is not in danger or a national crisis of any kind? He will have nothing to do in his office, but have talks with each other and too much free times on his hands, so they might say and think. "Any man can do this and it is in a way disgraceful. No, let us keep and stay with a man who really has done much of the work that was needed when the people wanted more security and peace." For the Jews in Israel no one can understand these attitudes with lack of inspiration and change, and when keeping to sentiment and sensitivities or insensitivities of old and new. Thanks to democracy and freedom, or the other way round. "What is the difference, Mr Bennett? What is the difference you can do, Mr Sa'ar? Or Mr Lapid, nice speaker in what he calls the opposition? (You have lost your opportunity and left the country in the hands of a more capable man, a very decision to make. Thank you.) And yes, there is also the diaspora and it's ministry, both not yet perfectly in correlation with one another. And also now we have to go back to the two - state solution with the Palestinians, since the Biden Administration is the new president of the US. And the sky is still blue... Boker tov, erev tov, layla tov, breaking wind in a free country, and so on."

When taking a peek into the neighbours territories most of it's presence in our time looks very much alike with what Israel once had in the 1900: building State & People. Naftali Bennett once in an interview a few years ago had said that the Palestinians do need some sort of central government and self rule. In 2021 this is still the depressing 'wall' of former times which are disconnected from the new Israel at a very large scale. Of course, Jerusalem remains a vibrant and interesting place in the world not only to the poorest in the Jewish or Arab quarters, but to many thousands of tourists visitors coming to Jerusalem each year & decades long. The question is whether it should remain dark and somber, or transform to a different viewing and open e.g. the Damascus Gate to all citizens and people in the world. It needs to be a living monument and not a dead memory if the future is about progress of human kind. With the new administration in the US maybe the two- state- solution should find new grounds to be based upon, e.g. reassessment. Israel already uses advanced technologies of applications, is the impression one gets in the outside world, and it cannot let the center of this place stay behind in Ottoman time. A reconnection with the old city of Jerusalem should be rethinking the architecture and infrastructure of this particular point on the map, one could say far and close. For politics and security the story is not as simple if defining the meaning of the Jewish Home once again in it's first moment/ notary first minute. In Israel you can't be twice the same virgin and first husband. Or, the second time than will be chicken blood. This is literally how you can compare the start of the two- state- solution, let's say if both agreed to live from a starting point on the same (future) date. Israel then will undo it's historical beginning and restart a new day in the international world, as in new universal & historic moment. It is on the Palestinian side a 'real' consummation of marriage, while on the Jewish side there is the same virgin marrying for a second time with underneath the wedding gown a miniscule leather sack of chicken blood and notably with the same husband, the State. (We, including yours truly, are after all ethnic of origin) Or it could be worse e.g. marrying an inflatable virgin doll made of 2050 high tech fibre. Traditionally, so they say, democracy comes not twice but once in a lifetime for any country when not removed by monarchy or dictatorship. The new prime minister does have a job and lot's of work to do: holding Israel's vast new world in one giant cohesion and secondly go after Israel's lost ark, the people of Israel and bring them into the new world of middle Israel... If anyone has a better story than please bring it on. What you learn from Europe is that any inheritance takeover is more than hard work, because you have to maintain your riches. (Book of Proverbs- A gracious woman retaineth honour: and strong men retain riches. .)

Naftali Bennett has never talked about democracy. Then what is it that he is talking about in his campaign to become first minister in Israel?

19 January 2021

Like the English say, there is method in the madness, than maybe we are looking at the same thing when a new election will take place in about nine weeks or less, but not necessarily in the same order. That is a possibility. This possibility however seems to be the needle jerk in the election chart, at least if you are Mr Bennett and Israel is your only possibility to become it's new leader. Here is a man when looking out to the people and their present state of national despair with the Coronavirus and the economic pains of every day losses, jobs, businesses, he is saying very much the same thing like most affected countries by the virus this is something the country should manage responsibly. In politics when translated to political speak the people are not inclined enough, one suspects, to then say that he is the right person to lead the country as it's prime minister. They can do the math and think the virus is a matter of emergency and crisis, but to be prime minister that will be here for a longer time/ term and it usually covers a many greater areas of which perhaps the good man does not really see or understand too well, e.g. what the need is of the people in Israel. Okay, so, it's a long term matter for his campaign that he should be looking for. Some might think that Mr Bennett is on a field trip with his pupils and visiting interesting places in the Negev and doing some sport activities, climbing mountains or high hills, under his personal coaching. Israelis expect more from their politicians once you have woken them up to it. Otherwise they want to keep things the way they are going under the current prime minister, or as many have come to know, as the 'crime minister'. It could be too late for Naftali Bennett to start a long term program in his campaign at this moment, eight weeks before polling day will open to all the people of Israel on 23 March. Yet, this could be a mistake when thinking about him as the unlikely contender in this election. He is adamant to become the next prime minister, so he is saying audible enough for the world to hear.

Also it would show good intention and manners if we do not step on any toes of Mr Netanyahu at this point of change, if there will be any happening already as we speak. Another thing since 2013, where is the vice prime minsiter in Mr Netanyahu's government to look for in 2021? It is a tough choice that both men, Mr Bennett and Mr Sa' ar are crossing blades on the matter of reform and change of the law in Israel, some of it judicial and another part would go into the term of the prime minister length of days once elected into government. From the people's point of view this looks like poking a dead animal on the side of the road to power and than say that it is still alive to kick start new changes and make life better for Israelis. But, not all is lost for political Israel. Ms Tzipi Livni said in an interview on podcast last week that Israel had a founding first principle of democracy and that this was the best way when going forward with new elections. True, looking back, Israel has a vertical line of democracy in Israel since 1900 (making). Let us also not forget that Mr Bennett and Ms Livni are old friends in politics under Mr Netanyahu and one can expect good tutorials in democracy to be their 'daily talks', if this would be true. He and ms Livni know the military machineries of Israel well and it's history in Israel. Those were the times when decisions were tough to take and make, or even break, and when democracy became obscured by the wars against terrorism at home and in the rest of the world. In politics diplomacy will have to make the difference when clearly it is out of reach finding solutions in different key- areas, like war and peace. Peace with the Palestinians is also a very critical key- area by observation. That would not be something new to learn for Naftali Bennett, as he has had his dose of Hard Talks over the last decade in the International arena in several places in the world media. In short, yes, we may be looking at the right young man to lead the country if he would fit the prime ministerial white gloves.

How would the vice prime ministership fit Mr Sa'ar? Just trying here to expand the viewing of how deep and far one wants to go to make or form government, hybrid or not, in Israel this time round the election. You would expect Israel to do better than a neighbour like Turkey, you know I am just saying when casually looking into what is expected to happen soon for us to know publicly. In theory it can happen either way for both contenders who will/ could be the vice prime minster/ deputy prime minister. Democracy is the ultimate answer to slide back into the sandwich of the fat from the political party coalitions this time, or go another way and fly off the plains into another globalization short term future, waiting to happen after COVID-19, while the whole world becomes a global unrest and skeptical more each day over what they call the globalists 'pet project'. Politics in Israel should not be from any height or view be the same, pet- or pilot project to form government and build Israel in a serious way for 'the people of Israel' (all politicians' say). Just following the unusual ways of politics in Israel and how democracy quietly came back to the stage in politics today, but moving toward the right- wing and not cuddling up to Mr Lapid on the left (whom it is a pity that he was not chosen to lead the government out of it's present time mess/ chaos many years ago). For the left democracy feels serpentine if it moves toward the right- wing, as the left would prefer it's serpent to be more manufactured plastic and fluorescent. At least with that you do not scare the younger generation of Israeli voters... Aren't we forgetting the candidate in the fifty shades of political grey, Ms Ayelet Shaked (alliance with Yamina)? She seems to be a consummate player here, and that is if Naftali Bennett is chosen/ elected to be either prime minister or vice prime minister, but also if that would be Mr Sa'ar. Democracy is sacred in the world, but piety comes with long standing as a democracy that has been here since it's beginning as the State of Israel. Also Israel has the military, religion and a democratic institution.

Between the main political parties Israel always get squeezed, and the people.

3 January 2021

Top view Israel: there are many grey and blue areas surfaces to see and motion remains constant even when storm or sirocco passes over and through the land. Only we are not talking metereological and the law of nature here, but about where we should be looking for new leadership in Israel. His eye is the eye of the storm, so to speak if Naftali Bennett is looking the current PM straight into the eye. We then will see the real maelstrom endless sight of what politics in the present time means in Israel. But the fighter has perhaps seen this high wave before and he knows that now he must become a big wave surfer in the face of the electorate adoring the ocean and it's long serving Prime Minister as Poseidon. His trident, unlike the mythical story of the god of the sea, seems to be holding an additional power that of which is invisible to his rivals. All the political battles of the moment up to the next election in March this year are good for public interest, in Israel and abroad, where people are judging governments not by strength of persons alone, but more by political wit... The latter will not find anywhere in the world in politics a cousin of what it used to be when governments were still excercising reason and defy or challenge all political logic by politicians or statesmen. Israel however is almost in a climax and is reaching or aiming very high in the political arena now to come up with a man to challenge a great Prime Minister the country has never seen before. Just in the nick of time when seen from afar, and also when the world had no other idea of what the differences between Israelis and Jews were. This can or could change everything in the political ring between the PM and his closest contender. The world always loves a good story, but when no one expects anything new will happen on Israel's political lifeline/ flatline they see a tiny blip on their geopolitical radar...

Naftali Bennett challenger of the blue sky on Mr Netanyahu's side and taking with him in his bagpack the grey sky on his side, can lightning really strike twice in the same place when time has moved on and the current PM as father time? In fact Naftali Bennett might not even get to the popular vote and exceed. We have now a clear definition of Mr Netanyahu as PM, but we do not yet have the same of Mr Bennett to be the new PM in Israel. Except for when it concerns the world how it is being perceived here when they now will be thinking that is it possible we have a real challenger to the Netanyahu era here? It is a classical sentiment and the best way to put it is that a challenge like this comes once in a lifetime and must be taken very seriously, as if the God of Abraham Himself saw it no other way if Israel was to be saved from disdain, the highest secret disdain where democracy in Gothic style is above all other laws in human history. If the challenge is here any decision that will allow the challenger to continue and pass on is like that of twelve wise men in the country. It is democracy that is the wisest answer and reason right this moment for Israel and they should take heed at this. No mortal or man can be Prime Minister for this long a term in office anywhere in the world, unless the secret disdain does not apply in the country. In other words: if democracy were twelve wise men in Israel what would be their judgement in the coming election? Can Israel and the people again be squeezed between the main parties in politics again? And perhaps it is this rule of democracy that tests the heart and humility of any mortal man/ woman when serving the country at the end of his or her time in government as Head of State. Mr Bennett may not have the blue sky on his side, but mind you he is the challenger to mr Netanyahu. A very serious move in a healthy democracy.

Part II in the writing here above the clear vision is that sovereignty and democracy are visible and not physical present, but that autocratic rule, visible or not physical, destroys here on both sides of the political aisle. Why would the Visigoth people only thing be knowing how politics works at the level of human nature in the selective universe that they alone know well? It is not a fair question also from any global point of view whether Mr Bennett can or cannot politically 'inherit' big cities in Israel and the private sector. Government is public sector in both up- and downstreaming. Also private sector can sustain itself, or to put it in another way the private sector sustainability is inherent to the nature of it's size and magnitude. As is with democracy that sovereignty is inherent to it's nature. Next door neighbour the Palestinian people who have mirrored the 'State of Palestine' after the private sector in Israel will also have to go to the people and adhere to democracy if they believe that sovereignty can be achieved more realistically and become a State and independent nation. The second unfair question is whether Mr Bennett could become PM in Israel in the next election. Question: is there any other man/ male in the Likud Party to 'inherit' the magnitude that the current PM has built over the last four decades. Answer: No. All those who have tried this in the past for some reason they have failed, knowing at the time that the choice was only to go for the better deal for Israel and always that it was the biggest and best. Democracy is a learned institution for a country like Israel with most politicians and behind the scenes politicians know the educated and academic value of this institution. Prime Ministership grooms prime ministers and democracy is the people engagement in politics as in Israel's political past. With at the same time keeping the private sector in capable hands in certain ministries. Having said all of this written here above is that no one is looking for a new king in Israel and crown him to depose the current PM. That would certainly make it wrong and deceptive when calling Mr Bennett as the challenger to the prime ministership in Israel and put a stop to the autocratic rule of Mr Netanyahu, who has enjoyed apparent much innocence of any wrong doing for a very long time in Office. It is time for the public sector to come back to the people. And it is Mr Bennett who is working day and night (news media bulletins or articles) to continue with the simple truth of old fashioned (since the State of Israel was born) continuity mechanism over stability mechanism (globalism) in the private sector (or what one could call the Netanyahu curve of stability for many years during his time in Office). We could be looking at a new political elasticity in the coming up election March 2021.








The voters must fall in love with Naftali Bennett, the Italian style.

27 December 2020

On the head of Mr Bennett however we do not find to see a fez, but kipah and which immediately disqualifies him as the Israeli Kemal Ataturk to revolutionize the future of Israelis from past to present time full stop. That could make things hard for the current Prime Minister, Mr Netanyahu. Another and most important sentiment with voters in Israel is the love they feel for the prime minister. One should hear them speak of Bennettism is good for the people and for politics, and even by a made up of his name should be on everybody's lips from henceforth (like for example bibi for the current leader of Israel). He who speaks right kisses the lips, says the book of Proverbs and in the campaign to become Israels next prime minister it will be literally and exactly what Mr Bennett should also do. The voters are thirsting for sweet kisses, but they have done so for the last thirty years in this and the previous generation with Mr Netanyahu. If Mr Netanyahu is the better kisser that will make it harder for Mr Bennett to catmouth his voters in his constituents at a broader level. Also it appears that Mr Bennett is not economic with 'harsh answers' to make an honest point. He knows he can score high when the world is watching and giving only good marks for his intelligent replies. But, he is going in and not going out of the woods, even with good marks on campaigning for becoming the next prime minister in Israel. Firstly he is thinking of rebuilding Israel from within and sovereignty should become a result of the first and not the second or last. In that particular order. If you take it the other way round that twist would cost him not only a many voters votes, but it could be a setback when people cannot make up their mind or think this they have heard before...

But Mr Bennett goes for the bold ideas. One for example is how to handle his own party, Yamina. Secondly he knows where he should be looking on the out for expanding his influence on voters at the center right- left and middle ground. If Israelis agree with him at a national scale away from Mr Netanyahu and his party in this election, that could put him in a timeline where people will notice him and see that he is genuinely the real contender to lead the next Israeli prime ministership and they will keep focusing on him from then on. This wont be the easy road for him in 'the land of Mr Netanyahu'... The king politician that all of Israel don't want him to go just yet. The hardest question is which end conclusion this election will give to the world when Israelis go back to the polls in March 2021. Over the weekend Mr Bennett has been demonstrating that he is ready as can be to become the next prime minister in Israel, and also doing this with determination (Ch12). What only remains to win the prime ministership is the reality visionary of Israel's heartland and derelict condition under so many ministries right now. Israelis want a better way of living and not just only under the Covid-19 pandemic. It has been bad for a long time going back to the eighties in every election over many decades. And always it is big government that wins all the votes and not the individual party voters. And also it is not because one renegades on sovereignty in the West Bank. Simply, when that should not be a matter of magic formula and dazzle settlers/ voters. When putting it to the people in a brief questionnaire the answer to the question of why they would want a new prime minister, the answer that always wins is 'we love you'. Love for politicians in these regions make or break you when loved or not. Take Mr Netanyahu who is familiar with 'sexy politics' and doing it like an old fashioned dandy, it never failed him. It is also possible that that day will also come for mr Bennett to adorn himself in splendidness and do the one man show thing. Is he handsome like Mr Netanyahu? You could put him down for a man of this century and call him a metrosexual right wing politician, which also has a particularity of nerdiness and is handsome in our time. And also, one more important thing is his wife (probably the next first lady of Israel) when standing next to him that here you see a portrait of a handsome couple. She is extremely beautiful in a rare sort of way. Very high society and yet it is the politicians that make up the voter's mind how to vote in the next general election in Israel. Political slogan, simply: "We love you, Naftali Bennett." Or drown.

When the waking up came it's realization was that all was short, opposing the feeling of what is lengthy.
(Sinai 1976 inspiration/ memory)
28 November 2020

We are here where we see the full future panorama. It is how far the mind goes, 180 or 360 degrees. And movement is at a complete stillness, earth, horizon, sky and sun. Illumination can teach you a few or two things when painted by the eye making everything look unexpected what will emerge or in a sudden stand before you like a tower of darkness. This has the earth all manufactured by mankind or nations in a sudden when you see it. Tempt not providence to the mere ordinary mortals obediently obeying as long as life exists, accepting fate from their Creator, God in heaven and to eternity. Exuberance is a feeling for the infant and youth, it is also called love at any age when you find it and keep you forever blind, timeless, and believing good will always overcome evil in the smallest, if preferred to detail. Make mankind look for merci and compassion, the trick of the mightiest and it will prove so in that sudden day... When the mighty decide to challenge Providence in ignoble hunt and the killing of Salem, when Salem assuming the golden cage is mightier than it's hosts of history. But it can never be reversed, once you challenge Providence and tempt it hard. It is the falling of the seeing going down with eyes open and bright too! For the cowards there is much bravery in their bright eyes, while the whole earth land is silenced. Who has discovered their secret malice and amulet of high fortunes? In fact as far as the zenith of heaven. The wheel of the prophet is Ezekiel and opening the prophecies of earth inch by ince, before God and Salem. The happening is all with spikes and against the people. Humanity, while hissing at one, ungodly how hope can make faith and isolation looking like something of a definite end. It is the end where Providence surprisingly may dwell and than what? Salem will rise!

Al Aqsa, Jerusalem

Personal op

21 November 2020

There is a straight line from Kotel to Al Aqsa line movement and motion on the surface where both monuments are standing in our time. It means when you look at from a surveyor's point of view it drops the elevation of bricks that are making the mount of where Al Aqsa stands today. And also the real view is flat and in the valley of this area and not on top of the mountain as is expected what the words 'Temple Mount' are suggesting for ages to anyone's imagination. This is the kind of view you need to build anything physical to the human eye into reality, if you have these plans.
Coordinates geography Kotel: Latitude: 31.7738 Longitude: 35.2338. Coordinates Al Aqsa: 31.7780° N, 35.2354° E. Geography coordinates: 31°46′41″N 35°14′07″E / 31.7780°N 35.2354°E / 31.7780.
State & Temple: sovereignty of Israel is a direct connection with the temple. In the present time nothing in Israel's infrastructure has yet been sovereign in terms of borders, State and International recognition of it's sovereignty as a people, nation and country. Israel is in desperate need of building momentum on it's own side in terms of the here above listing.
Note:
Jerusalem Talmud: “The (third) Holy Temple will in the future be re-established before the establishment of the Kingdom of David”. (JT Ma’aser Sheni 29)

Torah: coming closely to the meaning of the Jewish nation and Torah that is a binding relation for Jews, basically State & Temple are saying what it means when sovereign, that the kingdom of Israel must be built if it wants to do the right thing before Ha Shem, King of Israel and the universe. You could say that Israel needs policies concerning these sacred processions in the Torah into realities of stretch and extensive effort. If it fails to understand how close it will be connected from State to Temple in the near future of pre- Messianic time, the rest of the world will become stronger in denying Israel everything remotely looking like having a place of their own, or indeed sovereignty of land and State.
Natural law in the land of Israel: is there truly oil in the West Bank? Is there truly gas in the Gaza Marine? Perhaps a glimpse of what Israel could expect in a sudden chance of Mazzeltov, that this could all be true. And if so the International World will have to take the right measures by law and call for Israel's sovereign borders as by law and order, that is if it is meant for the Palestinian people to rely on oil & gas fields and to boost their economic and international status. That has also been the policies of PM Mr Binyamin Netanyahu, keeping the wells closed until a solution was found between the two nations on territorial dispute. Nothing can be left to chance, this is very important to understand. There is enough reading material suggesting how the PM has captured the moment and distinctly said that Leviathan and Tamar were Israel's gas wells. The Gaza Marine should stay 'dead' for the moment. It didn't talk of oil/ gas prices, as this is not the profile for a Prime Minister usurping Palestinian gas fields in the Gaza Marine. Occassionally this PM has shown himself a consummate leader in the right moments and throughout his political leadership for decades. Where he falls short is when not explaining his intentions or abstracts well to cabinet/ Knesset. Israel should stick to sovereignty and leave the oil/ gas fields to it's nextdoor neighbour. Anything else would be full of flaws why the gas or oil fields should stay closed...
Jerusalem: ?
What is a priestly nation? The Temple is Zion. (Zion is mountain) And beyond it is the Great Sea.

Diaspora: It is infrastructure that is love and might, to tell you where you belong, where you are living, about safety of borders and outlook. Infrastructure within sovereign borders are indeed beauty and physical might. This country that is home is not your home.

Can Mr Netanyahu proceed with the settlements in West Bank?

15 November 2020
(23:24 PM)

A five term Prime Minister in Israel and being in government 36 years can do or say the unusual projections or predictions with totally no real visual yet that is ready made and fit the goal or course of action suggested. And suggested is a careful word chosen that is not reflecting anything close to what the PM of Israel might or might not do/ want to do. It is November 2020. Next month if no budget has been passed (terminology Jewish news media) there could be new elections... Than maybe not. Elections after the fifth term of PM Netanyahu in Israel is to any historian following Israeli democracy a question level and sincerely wondering how this reflects on the country, it's people, the system of democracy versus parliamentary democracy, representative democracy, and so forth. It is suggesting high level politics in many ways without leaving the historians any clue. In other words when leaving the developed world clueless it must be corruption in a quick fit. 'Election corruption' can refer to deliberate holding on to the sitting Prime Minister for reasons we cannot find answers in the classical way. There was talk of a new prime minster for the whole of this summer season. The call in the meantime had turned to a holy belief and asked whether that this is what the people/ electorate wanted. Yes, to Mr Naftali Bennett, so many had or were already saying. This was clearly in the making of late summer 2020. But it was all designed on canvas, like the Rembrandt night watch. (Squeezing in the woke culture in Israel, but in Rembrandt style) It was going beautiful before the US election on 3 November 2020, only two and a half weeks ago. The world shortest memory had turned to either a mighty flame or the sharpest of swords in a night rage at the night wake and it was over. Once you created a masterpiece there is no second try and do it again. That was what the God of Abraham perhaps was trying to say when the second time He had created the Ten Commandments, that only He could create a masterpiece one time over. The election is some kind of Jewish modern day myth and we have to find out if this is serving purpose or ingenuity.

At one point you could say that Mr Bennett is not the strongest candidate based on party- strategy. He is the third party in this election, if and when held. Exactly, a weak beacon can tell you where you are lost and want to be found in the ocean. Also, what dangers is it posing to the (enemy?) ships that sail the seas? That could be puzzling in the Middle East and what they call a polarized Israel of and with only a fifth term Prime Minister more than three decades long in government. If Israel should go back to the Two- State solution with the Palestinians the beacon of light will be perfect to help lead the way to the oldest ship. But we have yet to wait when the incumbent President, Mr Donald Trump, will leave the White House in January 2021. And who does not love the Rembrandt Night Watch? I do now with every tear inside my head. This is what they call 'there is more than meets the eye'. The same can be said about Prime Ministers in Israel for the last 100 years. Among them many leaders and military leaders who at the time did not envision Israel where it is today. If Mr Bennett could become the PM of Israel on very short term, the first millennial and woke PM, his political fortune might only be that he is the weakest candidate to inherit an even greater fortune... Will that include parliamentary democracy? Will the people be informed properly throughout his term as PM in government? While the nations watch and see. No government is self corrective without the Head of State swearing this kind of oath of allegiance and in a constructive way. In Israel not many in the outside world know what allegiance could mean and if this is the same like their own back home. A fifth term PM knows and party leader of Likud. What also can be the meaning of the strange thing called 'Election Corruption'? (It has similar features as in 'dividing the spoils', to some nations) A parent would spoil a child and corrupt it's mind with many fantasies of being rich and famous. And that will be the never ending story to that child, unless a brother steps in and change the 'adversity' to happiness or logical approach. The country needs change and peace at home. The senators will answer the question and say, "What I have given the people? I gave them peace." Is this the conservative or liberal say, even when in Israel?

The new dynamic has begun for Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu...

10 November 2020

There is still time to calm the mood in which the Prime Minister of Israel has lately found himself in after the US general election, 3 November 2020 and presumptive presidency of Democrat leader Mr Joe Biden. A very assertive Mr Netanyahu gave his view on how he perceives what and where the PM of Israel must stand, that this was not in the US but at home in Israel. This was yesterday on tuesday. A 10 point score on transparency for the PM. Israel needs that transparency if it wants to point out achievement(s), accomplishments and change of time in the Middle East. Also what is clear after 36 years, as Mr Netanyahu puts it on monday to the opposition, there are two different eras in which Israel transformed to now a more modern day free world for the Jewish nation, compared to the more familiar perception of the Israel- Palestinian region. The rest of the world can make up it's mind when now looking onto Israel and see a country that is equal to the rest of nations where technological productivity and innovation has been globalised for the last two decades. In the Abraham Accords there is no mentioning of geopolitical agreements on territories, but on technologies and technology sharing. The Netanyahu era has indeed been an era of change and transforming Israel, something the next PM will not easily be able to catch up with. But the world has yet to come to this understanding and see where Israel wants to go with it's new image of technological superiority. It is here where e.g. the Biden Administration might also get stuck while driving an ultra modern hybrid Tesla car through the old mud, that the war with Palestinians is now outdated as a political win on whoever's side. Either the US, Israel, the Palestinians, or in the rest of the world. The International world also has a duty in the 21st century to alter it's ways on new developments, change and intention to make peace. If you stay with old views Israel then will have to demand it's territory as sovereignty and make this constitutional.

Mr Netanyahu is right to say that he stands with what is good for Israel, and not what Democrats or Republicans in the US stand for. He is probably referring to the different constitutions, one for Israel and one for the US. It is also true that it is in Israel's best interest to keep friendly relations with the US no matter who is in power and that Mr Trump has been the proof how far willing Israel under Mr Netanyahu went to be friends with, even when not Jewish. Mr Trump is and was the perfect example of the breaking of the sound barrier in the Middle East, in politics and geopolitics. It was not all bad that Mr Trump has done in his four years term in the White House. We should leave philosophies to the classics, Plato or Socrates, where they belong and are. Our planet has changed exponentially into a cyber world and global specter. It is our Frankenstein and without respect to have designed your own creature you are not going to be in world of glory for your work. Do Israelis want to go back to the polls? In principle, maybe. Or right, perhaps. If the left and right, like in the army formations, come back to common basis and also come out with plans how to proceed in future disciplines it might get something back from all that is in the new world. Basis meaning not all great things are on the green grass of the other side of the fence overseas. Maybe there are still some interesting discoveries yet to make in Israel where the families of Israel have returned home? Help Build Israel, sounds like a billboard sign where Welcome used to stand. For the time being in the coming days the animation is clear that Israel and the Prime Minister have other plans than to go on wasting valuable time on guessing games who will be inaugurated on 21 January 2021 in the White House as US President. One sovereign rhetoric cannot change wherever and whomever wants to change or refashion Israel, that you cannot reverse it's sovereignty (written or not written). The PM said that 'he stands with Israel' is the writing.

How and where to lay a wrath and welcome to our new brave world.

4 November 2020

A brand new day for Americans and the rest of the leading nations around the world. Yes, perhaps, all depending how and where to 'lay a wrath', yours or in general with no particular name on it, but will be nevertheless here to disturb the nations. Today's election results in the US had choked early last night (European time) in Florida, when clearly at 91% closed on Mr Trump leading and Mr Biden running behind. 51.2 To Mr Trump over 47. 8 for vice president, mr J. Biden, it is log off and go to bed and sleep like a baby. All the rest will be left to mathematics from there. We have to admire Mr Trump for sticking to his conviction that he was going to be the winner of this election, thanks to the people who voted for him and they did so indeed with love of the masses. It feels almost as if he alone has managed in the modern world to show the world, that you don't need to be violent and win an election, you don't need to coerce people to vote for you and scare them, while the rest of the world is locked in an pandemic no one can win. Mrs Melania Trump was right in her speech yesterday (CNN) that Mr Trump was trying to work hard during the first minutes of the announcement of the pandemic earlier in January, how to deal with the virus when everything else was still indecisive. No others want to admit how hard hit the pandemic made it's first impact throughout the world, that standard procedures would not be adequate. Now back to election night. It must be a very moving moment for the incumbent president, Mr Trump, to have made it against all odds and that he will probably be right to declare himself the winner of this general election. Now, what will happen the next four years of this second term?

We all had our Jodie Foster moment last night, as everyone remembers her support for Ronald Reagan as the Republican President of the eighties/ nineties. With this election the whole country came out with a blinding love for the incumbent Mr Donald Trump to be reelected as US President in 2020 (inauguration day in January 2021). And nowhere in the world has any leader shown openly his side of love and reciprocated with an even much deeper need for the electorate as Mr Trump. So much very impressive of the man many have described as a ruthless liar over the last four years. In other words for those who want to oust him out of Office in the White House, wherever you may lay your wrath as your wreath on Mr Trump his IInd term, remember that God hears, sees, and knows everything that you are doing. The next four years could become more mature and designed in a state of the art fashion, so that many in the rest of the world can understand where this is going and what future they might expect from the president. The promise of this president looks very much that he will respect the future. He knows how to look above ridicule from his own experience and this might be the advantage no other former US President had had to deal with before. Just maybe we have all become a little humble in the world by this election and that the outcome was (or will be) 'golden'. We promise to love and hold the president in his four years term, and doing so because who else has reminded the people that you should love your president and vote for him when there is nothing else left to give you some dignity left inside you as a citizen? (Words that have been said yesterday on tuesday in a different fashion, but basically was the same message CGTN tweet). See it as this that now people believe again in the humanity of the leader, and not in the inhumane shadow following most global leaders in the 21st century. But like with all leaders he too can be resolute and do the difficult things. For now we should leave that to the test.

The US/ Israel relationship.

(Personal op)

30 October 2020

Caution, there is always the elephant in the room who is watching carefully what is happening in the world. Much of it is the mammoth task it does understand this routine as it is ongoing, but when it comes to what most know as 'a bad timing' the trunk will not go up for any good luck and will call the situation unimaginable. Israel and the US have come the last few months close to that what was 'unimaginable' and have been doing so a little while longer than two years with the US President, Mr Donald Trump. Jerusalem is not outside Israel, we must understand, period. Or, do I hear well? Jerusalem is inside Israel from today on? On 3 November, next week, the general election in the US, so many are saying, will have or take out the elephant in the room and hide it under the carpet, if Mr Trump would win the election. Caution again. The US election is and was about the American people and Israel is in the Middle East. How American Jews vote belongs to the American people as one electorate. Israel in the meantime cannot participate any deeper in that decision, or risk something it wasn't meant to be and have. American Jews are by definition citizens of the US. The world is watching very carefully and is following the law of politics very closely, you see. If the incumbent US President will be re- elected this will be because the American people have voted for him, without any other meaning to the system of going to the ballots by voters in the states. Let's do this without any after taste. Israel also has citizens that are not born in the country of the Jewish nation and that they are part of the USA. If we want to have the world believing in the President his actions in the Middle East and in Israel for the last two years, perhaps it is best to watch carefully what the system was during this time. It is like dissecting a frog for medical studies and purposes.

The US administration under Mr Donald Trump has been extremely benign towards the Netanyahu government and it has given many changes to perceptions long old and stuck in the mud of other outdated systems, in the US, International Law and the UNSC. Europe has no chance of changing the course here, or Britain with it's constant reference to International Law and Armistice Lines. Independently Israel can always do with a good friend in the US administration and do this without holding hands. 1948 Or 1967 is not the year we are now living in and a friend understands time, the 21st century. This US administration also did exactly that when they announced the 'Deal of the Century' in January this year, but what happened then? A deadly pandemic had put the whole world in reverse and that including the 'Deal of the Century'. In July some have been waiting for the annexation of Judea and Samaria, as in the Deal of the Century was announced, but was followed by another month of postponement till the Abraham Accords with UAE and Bahrain were announced as another historic deal for Israel and the Arab world within seven months. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu wasn't just a PM, he was Jove sitting on top of the clouds listening to the harpist with golden hair playing mad jingles of coming elections. Where but home in Israel. No one in the world now knows where they should be looking for the US winner next week and this is odd. And also no one knows where to look for the Israeli government when hearing about another PM if Mr Lapid (Yesh Atid) will get his way next wednesday and call for new elections. Has Israel changed over the last two years and have grown more into the State they truly are? No one distant wonders too much about what State that might be, because no one has ever noticed the growing of Israel over the last five decades. We are but living in interesting times and if done properly independent Israel might still come to it's golden future after all it so much longs for to get this done.

The growth that Israel has been over for in the last five decades is now showing it's true mettle. If it could get the consensus it needs to form a new coalition government we could be perhaps looking at a mature Israel and it's politics... No, not really. Since Israel was never given the status of sovereignty within the armistice lines and without first accepting the Palestinian State, on skin to skin borders/ green lines, what we are now experiencing is that Israel was and still is more of a sovereign Military and has an internal democracy for the people that it protects and serves, officially. Who can say that the colonial powers had expected this superiority from a relative insignificant number of Jews in the forties, fifties and sixties, that one day security of Israel would be sovereign? Colonial powers always return where there is unrest... Technically speaking if negotiations between the two 'countries' Palestine and Israel are taking place there is no one who ever will accept the fact that nothing can only be done by the PM of Israel without taking with him the military authorities, simply because they are crossing the green lines. If, of course, sovereignties are clearly respected within the armistice lines. Some might say that this is why it is called occupation. Half products have that same tendency and it is sometimes also seen as the 'real deal'. The reason why it is called occupation is when Israel's Army will not be accepted as sovereignty by the International Law, primo. It is not so and Israel is by definition by the IL a democracy. Democracies and sovereignty go hand in hand in the State, which isn't in the IL in this writing without the status of sovereignty for Israel. We are in fact looking at a country with many rights to restitution since 1948, in terms of sovereignty, geography, and homeland. With the armistice lines all that becomes nihil and complex. That is denying Israel it's full independence and it is also putting it under extremities in the unclear case of the middle country between two different geographies belonging to one nation, the Palestinians. The US/ Israel relationship is one outcome for a happiness index number in Israel. It is certainly not fulfilling any true right of humankind for the people of Israel. Law and Order is it's true kindness.


The Temple Mount, not only a religious fantasy.

13 October 2020

5781 Will never be in the State of Israel the home of the Jewish people, as 54 years old. It is simple mathematics and not rocket science once you have worked out how much 54 is and 5781. One is written within the Armistice Lines and the other is written in the Torah and Tannach, the latter being the law for Israel forever. In the meantime the world outside moves on with or without the history of 5781 years. There is something of a thin line or golden thread snaking it's way into the 5781 existence of Israel as a people who have a dual meaning as Torah history and 54 years of a representative democracy. 5781 Are irrelevant to Israel and it's representative democracy and it is the logic that is the new religion for the whole world. Israel cannot disjoin from this reality from the logic of going forward and not retard to previous ages. The Temple Mount there is nothing wrong with having your children believe the mental picutre or it's digital version from their tablets or smartphones, from now on. But the real question should be, if Pesach, Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Sukkot and Chanoekah mean something it is always referring to a living time in the future and forever. Who will build the third Temple out of the digital and mental version in Israel as a living memory of what was and is written? And which generation of future Jews will take this decision to come to actually build it? There is no easy way to say this, but the third Temple would have to be built in a real environment, if anyone cares to imagine or know building a house, castle or anything from an erected point of view. It  is the living body that are the exterior and interior, furnished properly with regulations as a temple would require. It is building law and physics, wherever it's location is designated. A temple is clear the word for a building of some sort inside our natural environment. This 'natural environment', has it by any chance already been decided where that might be in Jerusalem?

Yes. If the current Prime Minister has gone too much off the wall from the Temple Mount or the third Temple, perhaps the idea of a new PM, e.g. Mr Naftali Bennett, who is religious as a pragmatist, the eternal flame of the third temple will be his torch and he will not be able to lie against the will of the Torah or Tannach, as there is no other home for the Jewish people than the proof of 5781 years existence. And not only 54 years of Armistice Lines designation as is also the same for the Palestinian people in the West Bank and in Gaza. One cannot only do what is written in the Torah by repeating the same old words daily and in good seasons, but fails to see that this means the 'golden gate' to build for the future. No, not the present building of the golden gate, when Arabs have buried their dead before it. In the Jewish religion the dead are unclean and no one who knows the orthodoxy of Israel's religion will think it is no problem for the Messiah to come through unlceanliness that is absolutely forbidden in the Torah. This fantasy goes on: interestingly enough in our 21st century is this little thing called the first born of Israel. If, the golden gate wasn't meant to be taken literally than it is probably a woman (virgin wife) to give birth to the Messiah in Jerusalem, and that this time it would be the first time that the first born males of Israel were truly born safely inside the people domicile of Israel. With no other nation to know who or who is not born in Israel today. Egypt, Byzantine and the Romans will cry foul from Hades this time. Mr Bennett will probably not be immune from greater government, but one thing he cannot do is lie against the Torah and the will of the third temple. Perhaps this is what distinguishes him most from the present time PM. Imagine that for a moment, that we as the nations that are not Israel will never know if the Messiah is born from the atrium of golden from a virgin wife in Israel until his time after bar- mitzvah.

The third temple is Israel, the true Israel, from the point of view here written above. It is not virtual, digital and a mental picture you easy handle by downloading the software or app. It's not a driver's license once you pass the exams and are authorised to drive a car or sports car. It is understandable of the current PM that he wants to keep Israel in the global order, but by doing so ambitiously he is losing the battle on the right of Israel and it's State. If peace can be made with Arab countries... The question get's tougher on the way to the infinity of peace. Peace by the Torah? Cabinet has approved of the UAE- Israel peace deal yesterday evening. It is not surprising that this makes any MK like Mr Smotrich (religious party) nervous and agitates the good man. A children story comes to mind: Open Sesame! There is gold and many gems too wonderful for the ordinary people to see in the cave of the captain robber in the story. Children love it, and not adults. They understand that to teach your children how wonderful the cave was isn't the moral of the story. In politics and in Israel the people are lucky to have a democracy and surprisingly transparent enough to the rest of the world what the people say, think or demand. Are they demanding a new PM and government? Even if that would be fictional, because the blessing of Mr Netanyahu is equally important... Israel is not like any other random country or democracy, at least not in details. Precisely my point why the third temple is not a mere nice picture in an old dusted book, but a detail with clearly the request to be built now and not leave this to the next generation Z of Israelis. Mazal tov.

Drive- by, the patriotic act by the President today, it's love or Covid-19.

5 October 2020

Fact: true that the love for the President in American politics today has been visually overwhelming by his supporters and admirers for the last 48 hours and was most impressive around in the world. What do people want, one could ask, after an almost blind adoration for Mr Donald Trump, US Republican President. World leaders also to anyone's surprise have shown an unusual sympathy and concern for the good health of the President when he was admitted to Walter Reed Military Hospital on friday, as a precaution, so the headlines had then said. Yesterday the media suspected that the President was in no safe condition yet, even when he had already posted a video on the internet saying that he was doing well and soon could go back to work yesterday on sunday. What love can do? And what Covid-19 can do is another thing (The First Lady, Melania, also has contracted the disease and was doing well, according to the President). But this morning on monday, 5 October, some are saying that it might have been a double bluff by the President on COVID-19 to gain sympathy (votes?) with the coming general election just a few weeks away from here. The world is holding it's breath and tight of what this might do if Mr Trump could not resume his presidency at the White House and has to 'resign'. It is all going to fast in timelapses of seconds, but the disease could be very real as he has said in his own words that he has a lot to tell us about COVID-19 and has learned from the school of experience what it means. But it was very interesting too! He always manages to tell the truth in tiny bits while he knows that the whole world is now listening to him only. The President has also been very gracious and kept saying that the people were showing their love for America. It is very unusual to say this when they are practically on their knees to this man, who only yesterday was the reckless denier of the Coronavirus for months. Wearing a mask was a political accesorry that he kept inside his pocket like a tight- fisted wallet. The vice president, Mr Biden, equally like all Americans who want the President to be well and not die of COVID-19, were worried, he and his wife. Mr Trump gave the world a hell of a scare and still they are very surprised.

Did the President played a double hoax on COVID-19 and his own illness? Sometimes only effects matter to see the northern lights. And one of such effects is also that no it's not real, but love for the President is. Why do they love him when he has done practically nothing for the American people whilst busy getting the world back together to glue and making peace? Should they not be seriously thinking now to vote Democrat for the man who is showing that he is the Party that wants to bring America home again? Republican or Democrat, it won't make the debt go away anyway... But now we know it is love that makes mr Trump the President of the US. Mr Biden on the other hand has visually a deep deficit to that effect. The plan to make America's future poverty slightly different from previous decades is showing figures no one is able to fathom right now, but that maybe if cunning from learning the system how this can be (re)built to make it better, than maybe the people can stand a chance and go back to stable incomes... Love here for this President is very serious indeed, because both people and Mr Trump have seen it's worldwide meaning illumination. We can't remember when that happened after the JF Kennedy or Bobby Kennedy's assassinations. In terms of reality, like love, you can't eat or drink this love that shook the political galaxy in the world for a moment. Did anyone think seriously that the President could have died from COVID-19? Well, yes, for one brief moment... That was what everyone thought and going down on their knees and praying that the President will come back and do the job he has promised that he would do, for America and the world. After this everyone else would stand in the shadow of this great moment when the world thought that the President of the USA, Mr Donald Trump, could have died from COVID-19. You don't learn this side of politics from textbooks or in scripts. It semblances nothing you learn from political science or theories and currencies. Also the financial markets went a little down on the first they heard of the news on the health of President Trump on friday. But that was just a snapshot of the moment. Big Kahuna question: can the President come back to the White House and finish the job (in his own words)? What will the fact be?

COVID-19, hoax or plague?

Personal op

27 September 2020

It is always important and interesting, both, to ask at global level with outbreaks of immense proportions and destruction, to ask the difficult question how to answer. The public may be convinced on specifics that there is no such thing possible in our modern world of hygiene and scientific 'deterrence', some can't even remember the last time when this had happened in our timeline since globalization, and yet here it is. COVID-19 will do just as well as the plague itself. I see no point in questioning it's nature from what is considered a 'real plague' sent by God to earth and plague mankind, after seven months later since it's global announcement in February this year. The logic to hold up here is that seven months later it still is destructive to both, man and economic infrastructure. And that makes rebellion only more useless, if infections will spread more quicker from where it might come or destroy lives. In between the present time and six months from now there is nothing making any sense either to the public and try provide to give the right answers how best to deal with the pandemic worldwide. The public also will not be able to reach the level of mediation between citizens and top to get the answers it wants on COVID-19, if there would be proof of what they see as a hoax. In the meantime one should pay attention to their own environment when someone is having a cold, because it has become part of regulation from a national point of view. This is where the hoax does not matter when COVID-19 might be internal of the apparent innocent cold of friend or family. Stay home and in quarantine. Is this what people call a hoax? To be more precise the hoax is called COVID-19 and it's nature is a pandemic worldwide. What it lacks is the killing of every first born, but it is nevertheless very serious and important to take this modern day 'plague' with common logic in an uncommon situation.

The river Thames is not turning into blood to convince the Prime Minister that he is doing the right thing for the public with another lockdown. We seem to be dealing with the fluidity of COVID-19 at a global scale and it's invisible 'industrial' form... (As many expect to see when saying the same thing that the virus is a hoax) What you can't see by form and it is a plague that is killing mankind you are then not dealing with a hoax, but it is in fact a plague true or false, and therefore requires civil obedience. At least to some degree if it saves lives. Six months from now government rules will or might get even more and more 'deterrent', which could border a different kind of 'war against the virus', but then that will be in a 'total' or global lockdown and will become inevitable. That in common language would be equal to a total war scenario in our modern day world. It is now moving free without empirical counterbalances of records, how to deal in peace time with a war of total lockdown fighting an invisible microbe. And when I say 'free' this means not only COVID- 19, but it's presence in earth's and mankind atmosphere. In the freshness of our memory having a cold is as common as eating, and drinking of water, but with COVID-19, be honest and report or tell your friends or family. We are living on the COVID-19 timeline everywhere and in all countries close enough. Can we ask the real question now, that in a brief period of time it might even become clear to citizens, especially in big cities, that we can't believe anything else but COVID-19 hysteria as the 'real world' we are now living in? Governments will be coordinated to security and impose x- strict measures on their citizens for fear of expanding the disease lifeline. It is, when seen from the point of any citizen, close to animation, 'The world and his wife' perhaps as in Donald Love in the GTA game III missions, but in reality the animation will last a decade long in the least, seen from the point of view of world domination through principle, ethics and even aesthetics.

Can Donald Trump become president again and win a IInd term at the White House?

14 September 2020

If the year was 3030 it is almost certain that he, the incumbent US President, Donald Trump, would still be remembered as the US President X- years and centuries ago. His chariot to rise was one other certain thing to be very true, when looking at his first term records. It was magical to see him go from one station to the next and always arrive safely in the end, and even outdo historic names like Judah Ben Hur, beating the Roman nobleman, Messala, at the race in the Roman arena. Also a fictional character in this historic window of the eye of the beholder. Who are they? Some would say that there are many who have the eye of the beholder when it comes to US President, Donald Trump. Also this might be important once the presidential election will be on this november. A good time for fall in the US and the bells of a promising Christmas for now are still looking good across the whole of America at the end of the year. The question will be whether Donald Trump has really made America great again during his years in the White House. It just keeps popping inside your head, yep, we were going to go somewhere as anyone can recall, after the Barack Obama years, have we arrived there, if anyone would care to answer? Ah, but that was such a long time ago and nobody knew then what they know now. Peace and laurels for the US President is one thing and another. If this was Hollywood Donald Trump would have won all the Oscars of the night, and that too. It takes many US presidents only all work and no ride to the stars when they held Office, from the 20ties up to year X, before the Clinton years. Donald Trump does it with the snap of his fingers. Amazing. He is awesome. He gave many back their leather shoes and belt and he demonstrated to the rest of the world this is how you wear your gear at the top. Before Mr Trump that top used to be the White House. In his days he has managed to turn the White House into the palace of the White House. He is the only one and from here there is no one capable enough to understand him or his administration. This is very unique USA.

Four more years and next he will open the sky literally with bare hands, again like a Biblical Samson who tore up a lion whelp by hands alone. In the background the soundbite goes as follows, "You can't beat me, Joe Biden, you can't tear up lion whelps, nor open the sky to the American people, and what's more important, to the world'. Mr Trump in everything, so far, that he has done is showing him as the natural man that he is in fact. But strangely enough he is not primitive, you would say. He believes in what he is doing and he is telling people that is what he is and would not want to be anyone else. It is crucial asking the question if he will be elected again, this time as president for a second term. Now, that would also be kind of big to him and his family, after the last four years in the White House grassy labyrinth. "I urge people not to vote for me again," he said sometime long ago, or just a while ago. When you think about that isn't it remarkable? In the end you just either hate or love him as the US President. And that makes everyone feel good having that kick inside. In 3030 everyone still living on planet earth will remember him as the only president who was the first transparent US President. And that no one could beat him at that. Whatever the President is thinking, doing or saying it is immediately on Twitter and for the whole world to read. Imagine George W. Bush doing the same thing! No, not looking great or so great does it? From a great distance one can also and only sometimes see that the US President is not taking his pride in vain or as the poodle prize on anything. He is kind of sticking to it and holding it very firmly, as the only true thing he knows in the whole of the universe. What if Mr Trump had been another Lyndon Johnson at the White House in the 21st century? Simple enough answer: he would not have known how to disco dance. (Oh, yes, I saw the smile and biting of the lips, Mr President) So, what say you? Four more awesome years of this man we call the US President, Mr Donald Trump?

The milk in the goat is overcooked, Naftali Bennett for Prime Minister!

6 September 2020

But Naftali Bennett is not the Prime Minister, not yet. The time for grooming to become Israel's PM after a decade of speculation is long overdue, that is when time is the distance between now and then. Seven years ago many had thought of Mr Bennett that he had a mind of his own, and was living in his own world if he kept the Two- State solution out of the equation at any time. Any novice knows the grilling of interviewers on the world stage. In 2020 this will not be the case again, one has to believe or at least hoping for the future Prime Minister of Israel that when speaking about Naftali Bennett one knows what we are looking at precisely, face to face. It is also always confrontational with Mr Bennett, in good or bad. That is what everyone is looking for in a friend, but can this be also true for what qualifies a man/ woman to be the next PM of israel if hypothetically the current PM would resign? In the 21st century it is known globally that no one in the world stops dreaming about making money or a business when you are living even under the poverty line. This daydreaming is partly human right and part the right attitude. Anything to remind the dreamer he/ she is not living in Real Time is almost a monster who slays the dragons in the dreams of the living. Real Time does not make real sticking politics as in the days when Israel was still a pioneer of politics and the military. For very much the same that bad rivalry in Israeli politicians does not exists, unless stones could speak. Mr Bennett is a man, so one can think, cooking in the goat's milk as time passes and the sky above Israel still will be blue for the next century. Belzael Smotrich, if English parliament, could have been the most unlikely man in the Knesset and would be much closer to the flames of politics burning in the State of Israel. As any moth would. But in the shadows of this flame Naftali Bennett his face and body language still is tapping for the chance of his life, and become the next man as PM of Israel. It is perhaps classical Greece and not Israel.

What does Israel need, he once asked his audience. "We need infrastructure for Israelis and Palestinians," he said. The answer was said twice and sincere, he gave that impression in the video clip (watch on Youtube) with the real borders of Israel. He too was dreaming for a moment that here he was representing Israel as the minister of Infrastructure and Transport, while being the Minister of Economics and taking decisions for the State of Israel internal and in domestic affairs. But this is Israel and horizontal social life and economics go hand- in- hand 24/7, and is perhaps in many ways like the State of Florida in the USA. Then and there Mr Bennett was still the rookie minister among the elderly statesmen and stateswomen, one has to assume and find no reproach here against him at this point. Others in the world do know that his name and person was behind the wars in Israel between 2007 and 2014. At times it is hard to imagine Mr Bennett being this avarice when it comes to war against the enemies of Israel, next door or remote. When listening to his old video clips on Youtube something curious is that you do find is the question whether this man who wants to be PM of Israel would be sitting here and talking the talk, but what if?.. Mr Bennett knows Israel, and not the world outside of Israel. Who knows Mr Bennett among the world leading nations? Maybe the rhetoric he then would have used was something of "I don't care about the world leading nations what they think of my country." Sec. And than you could take it or leave it. One wonders what the people of Israel would think of him after this reply, the ordinary people, Israeli or Arab. It is this constituency of frequency that changes Prime Ministers fortune, when a resounding 'Well done, man." When not and everyone saying by shaking their head, "Oh, man, what are you saying there? Walah. (Or, Oey! Oey! when Jewish)," that is the line that kills you if you want to become PM in Israel. While the currenct PM when he sweet talks his audience, he is capable of getting away with selling stones to the public and charging them by saying that they are diamond rocks. The audience may be simple, but when their leader speaks the speak of politics their hopes are high and mightier than thou, Mr Bennett. Answer to the Prime Ministerial question: can Mr Bennett become PM of Israel and of the citizens of Israel?

Naftali Bennett cannot become PM under the present situation in Israel with the commercial economy everyone wants. You cannot win a majority with talks about how to make ends meet and understanding the hardships in society when you can't cope with a strong economic demand nationally. Empathy takes you only to their front door and have chats with the people, but in fact when they really believe in you they want the ballot box to decide on popular and unpopular issues. What is the most unpopular issue in Israel right now in Real Time? The economy, and not Covid- 19 as many would think or say. The people don't want to talk much about the disease, but about the remedy. (This not having anything to do with medicine. Currency is another remedy) Coming back to Mr Bennett's own words he had said a few years ago, Israel needs infrastructure. One can only think in terms of a wider scale of many infrastructure plans should do the trick for him to get him elected as the next PM of Israel in the short term. Maybe he should learn from the fox, when Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan was Prime Minister. (Before he had ate his belly full with chicken and could not get out through the same hole he came into the fence- a proverb) Mr Bennett would be better thinking about setting up his campaign strategies out, but nearest to the fire as the moth, or Alexander the Great. He is not the man for any change of infrastructure between Israel and the Palestinians, at least not when he is still young, but maybe after the time when he has matured as a wheathered politician this could be the best moment of his life and fortune. The simplicity of what used to be 'the people' is over, when you look around as a tech company man and watching children at the age of five being the users of smartphones. And doing so in every home, rich or poor. If Mr Bennett was able to communicate to all levels in society he would make a rare politician and a superb Prime Minister, perhaps one we have not seen yet in Israel. But another chapter awaits him at the end of that corridor of power: how to assure the pre- Messianic time within the coming 50 years of the next 100 years in Israel, something Mr Netanyahu did not had to deal with physically. This alone is making the next PM, one thinks, the unique difference to have a leader in Israel who will build peace between Israel and it's neighbours, without compromising the coming of the Messiah. His support should come from the people, middle Israel and the upper echelons in Zion.

The Middle East middle ground politics is not the past but the present time.

24 August 2020

There is much talk about 'window shopping' the Arab countries to normalize peace with Israel, neighbouring country in northern Middle East, these days. It is perhaps rhetoric and it has replaced much of the older days politics in the region logic, from the US and the Middle East. In the newspapers online in Israel this week, or better, since last week historic peace deal with the UAE, the news feed has been leaving little room for the imagination on what the peace deal has achieved on the side of Israel and the United Arab Emirates. What was clear on sunday night after the historic moment was that annexation of the West Bank was off the table and the world, France President Emmanuel Macron, had welcomed the move as others also did on the same evening. The logic of the deal was that annexation was off the table and peace with the UAE and Israel had reached new diplomatic heights. Annexation of the West Bank cannot return to the table for a simple reason that peace in the Middle East between Israel and an Arab country is more than rhetoric alone in this part of the region. Countries take their geography in the south Middle East very serious and also if peace is to be established between countries. You could even say that Arab countries have a reputation of being meticulous when it comes to political changes or diplomacy. This is known in the world for many decades in the geopolitical history between the west and Middle East and in some parts it is still International Law & Order. The Middle East is playing on this occasion the role of the second global player, next to the US- Israel relation, and when annexation is off the table it will not likely return to the table from this point of view. Palestine or the Palestinian people could see the move from the UAE and Israel in geo- strategic terms as the united flank against annexation, let's say if another historic move of peace would follow suit. On the plus side the deal is followed by 'nice perks' and upgrading the military capabilities of the UAE with the peace deal with Israel. The next generation in most Arab kingdoms are a people for the future and future prosperity, which is good news for their people. In the north Israel is celebrating the peace deal and achievement as a political high score for the Prime Minister, Mr Binyamin Netanyahu.

Palestine or the Palestinian people had angrily reacted to the UAE and Israel peace deal of the century on sunday night last week. That of course was sanguine of the moment when announced and also to be the last to know (as was the Israeli government, said the Jerusalem Post later in the week). In the least to the outside world one could say that this was an interesting moment, when the Prime Minister of Israel decided on putting on his diplomacy cloak and disappear into the sunrise in the deep south of the Middle East to sign a peace deal with the UAE and than arrive back in Jerusalem on a flying colourful carpet with new diplomactic relations with an Arab country. We are in the Middle East and the Prime Minister of Israel knows that sometimes Israel and it's Arab neighbours are more ancient than the west and the International Law. Always and not only on this occasion we have to believe the PM of Israel, that he is fully aware what peace with any Arab neighbours implicates for Israel. In Israel there is logic and rhetoric, but also an appendix of Israeli logic when facing the electorate and the 'sovereignty party'. Are we looking perhaps at pre- Messianic times with the new diplomacy in the region of the Middle East? Similar to that no one in the rest of the world understands the Norse mythology of cod liver oil and Vikings, but have a much deeper understanding of industries like Mercedes Benz and Porsche. During the days of last week indeed so the narrative of the Two- State solution came back on the world stage, and annexation could still be on the table as a closed chapter in an Israeli political vision. The Palestinians on the one side and sovereignty Israelis on the other side should still believe that their politics still have a direction in these historic times between Israel and Arab countries even when not on top of the list priorities. The Middle East geography is a very silent and patient partner and so is Time. What Israel is praying for is that the Prime Minister should not be their Icarus and fall back to earth on his pair of wax wings. Perhaps it is best to leave this to time and see what will happen next after all rhetoric has died down and it is back to real time logic.

Jewish Diaspora 2020

10 August 2020

If possible, asking Mrs Imelda Marcos, Fillipino politcian and First Lady to President Ferdinand Marcos, how to fit millions of pair shoes into one shoebox, that perhaps could give an interesting answer how realistically deal with the meaning of the Jewish diaspora. Diaspora is a mythical word if the globalized world is the daily reality to many populations on the planet, and will also stay in the near future unchanged as a global world. The Jewish history from the time of Genesis and Abraham to 400 years in bondage in Egypt, and then the wandering years in Sinai before they had entered Jordan, we follow the universal story of how the Jewish nation crossed the Jordan and entered another territory called by Moses the Land of Milk and Honey. For many generations of mankind this story was never changed and surprisingly the International World and Law also made this a common use of the Jewish history since Biblical Times it's guiding principle how to interpret Israel and the Jews. The story of David and Diaspora is a complicated word if used as one and when explaining the return of millions of Jews from around the world to fit into the interpretation- box, by principle from the International Law, and can live in a bottleneck of 13 km between the Mediterranean Sea and West Bank, or choose the north, middle Israel, the Negev or far south in Eilat. The diaspora would have to come and live in Israel within the Armistice Lines, is another interpretation. Comparison: it is almost, and without becoming disrespectful to this serious call to nation, as if you are asking the Queen in England to come and live in a hut and then say that this is no ordinary hut, but Sukkot. We understand the story behind the thought and it is quite challenging for the human mind at any given point, but to decline politely and say that it won't work, please understand? First things first, when thinking about the- return- of- the- people of Israel- strategy, by what definition?

The covenant of Abraham is everywhere as a mark of the relationship with the God of Abraham. If correct this is also the temple for the soul of the nation and home for the Jew born and circumcised. A globalised world should be our answer and see the sea everywhere when a Jew is born unto the world. Mankind for many centuries have learned that we can live with Jews as nations and absorb one another and thank pragmatism for that. After 54 years of nation building in Israel conclusions have been made or contemplated if the diaspora is still related to Judaism and to be Jewish. In theory this religious thought remains a sacred longing for most Jews when educated in the orthodoxy of Judaism, that it would be the greatest (as great as Chaim) experience to be able to have a motherland/ fatherland for all Jews in the world in Israel... And the God of Abraham is all about subtlety when interpretating His Laws against the multitude of nations in the background. E.g. returning home to Israel will take a thousand years studies to fit into the law of making Aliyah for each Jew in the rest of the world. The law thinks in terms of boxes and not olive oil and lamp if entering back into the 'anointing' oil flask was possible and make abundant in the reverse order. The future Israel hasn't made up it's mind just yet on how to interpret the International Law of the Armisitce Lines in 2020, which is not the military and Defense of Israel, and whether the State of Israel is sovereign as this looks on the outside. The Messianic Law could change everything and challenge all realities on the ground, others might say. Let's put it in another way. Politically and Maritime Israel is land between the Mediterranean Sea and it's Arab neighbours, but still to this day what the world never sees is that Israel is also a Mediterranean Sea nation (Indo- Germanic) next to Greece, Crete, Turkey, and the basin of the MedSea. When coming home to Israel it is this mindsetting when the world will finally admit that Israel is the nation belonging to the Mediterranean father of the sea coast and is sovereign only by sea if the land fails it. It could make the difference to the diaspora to then understand the sovereignty of Israel is real and true as the Mediterranean Sea, which is the Great Sea in Biblical history. Returning home to Israel is saying that the Jewish nation has a motherland, and that west to Kotel is the sea.

Judaism is another subtlety of God Almighty, if Ezekiel says 'Your mother was a Hittite and your father an Amorite'.

A technocratic Israel and Prime Minister of Israel are the first steel plates for the next 50 years.

31 July 2020

Starting point: how do we understand this? For the last 54 years of nation and State building in Israel what we now see from here is that Israel accelerated it's Industries and technologies exponentially outside and inside it's borders with the rest of the world. The Netanyahu governments, both concentrations on State- & World politics, have proved their time and need on past generations and governing Israel from the moment of call for Independence. And then there was also a cycle of governments and Prime Ministers, pioneering their way into a world that was going to become the future world for the Jewish nation, home in Israel or in the diaspora. Globalization still was being a western vision of the leading nations only club, and not think it a wise thing to have members from new countries on board. And the world agreed silently or openly when at the UNSC or Human Rights Watch institutions. Britain had not been a new country when it stood at the UN determining what was right for a new Israel to be build nextdoor to it's immediate territories of Arab land. Britain has still the right of International Law to impose it's findings wherever necessary to arbitrarily take the big decisions in the world, on for or against a case under the apparent British International right ut supra. Errors are still arbitrarily when law of right says that Britain alone can decide to either amend or for eternal wisdom keep the law as it is there for ever. It is therefore for Israel a frustrating reality when having accelerated to a power in the region that would equal any western State, even above Sweden or Germany, in quality and quantity technology. But the current Prime Minister of Israel can see the mettle of what made him the longest serving PM in Israel, and what is also true for Germany and leaders of other EU countries when longest in Office. The problem is not only an 'out of date' Prime Minister in Israel as something unique. Unique is what all global leading nations have and are, when longer than 20 or 30 years as president, chancellor or PM.

It is time for Israel to have it's first technocratic Prime Minister, who will be able to speak out for Israel's total output as an industrial strong powerhouse in the Middle East, and it's impetus natural or artificial on the balance historical and future. Israel is a result- base industrial force and it is working hard on keeping transparency like any other major industry in the world a principle and it is also honouring it's commitment to keeping discipline in both industry and technology. As Prime Minister he will also be able or in his ability as technocrat to decide on the infrastructure of his country, north and south, and even deep south. Will a strategic sovereignty work, on Israel's territory next to a Palestinian territory, skin to skin? His foreign Minister should not be his foe but ally how to deal with the new challenges in International Law and closer to Israel and Palestine, the Arab nations and neighbouring countries. It is growth of Israel that is making it uneasy in a baby- tight wardrobe full of tiny ministries, to be recognised as a fully grown Middle East giant. A political crisis on sovereignty of Israel and it's right should not be the eternal error within the Armistice Lines, any technocrat would say quietly in his mind. Growth is sovereign and sovereignty and industry, and also it will be the best reference to State and the right to exist, especially when it's principle is a shared industry. When lacking the need for sharing this would mean that Israel would be autocratic and impose impossible laws or unfair deals with it's customers. Israel is not dealing in opium, it is dealing in intelligence and technologies to improve the living standards in all communities, even that of the animal world. The International Law should know about unfair competition and what this can do to earth's vulnerabilities. It is an error to stimulate or empower unfairness and exponential growth of wealth in one country more than others. The State alone can regulate it's total income and GDP in balance with the world. Israel has arrived at this point for the last three decades, and on the balance it is deeply depressing where the economy and nation building of the Palestinians have stagnated for decades. The Armistice Lines are not a technocratic invention and they error deeply in the heart of both nations, the Palestinians and Israelis. In our time it is even a betrayal of human intelligence versus an old and inadequate decision making lacking future process of growth and development throughout and with time. The Armistice Lines also have no elasticity for both nations to grow out of time, e.g. in 1900. A Prime Minister in israel and technocrat should have our vote a priori, achshav and right now.

On tuesday night the call for resignation of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is getting louder.
(Personal Op)

22 July 2020

The State of Israel and it's long serving Prime Minister, Mr Binyamin Netanyahu, are going through a Real Time U- turn during the Coronavirus crisis of Covid-19, but also and more importantly the question is whether Israel and it's government were ready for a national and international setback of this size. And not many are feeling sorry for the Prime Minister right now, and even at this hour when protesting outside the PM's Home at Balfourstreet. It is for a third week and reports are speaking of violence against the Police and journalists. Israel has become in every aspect of democratic life- style an ultra modern State and it is compatible with most countries around the world when facing the same problems and civil unrest by an angry electorate. We are not facing yet Israel's true problem: the International stage. Timelapses on the 'national' stage may happen and go, 24/7, where Israel has arrived after 54 years of being a sovereign State, are both surreal and real. Where did prosperity take the country to arrive here at the point of 'Back to the future'? Somewhere in the middle it's future got lost in the big fog horn of what Israel considers it's right to sovereignty and the Biblical right to annexation of Judea & Samaria in the West Bank territories. Like Napoleon Bonaparte, the Prime Minister's Waterloo moment was on 1 July 2020, a time we will see as the PM's mythical moment when this day went quietly and silently on and not a single green leaf moved in the fields of the West Bank.

The International world has left it at that when the day of announced annexation passed on 'peacefully' and no one got hurt as was expected that this would have been a day of provocation on the Palestinian's side. (In their terminology: a day of rage against Israel's annexation) And the Armistice Lines were left untouched by Israel. Paradox on the other hand does not stay quiet and many are wondering why the State of Israel is still in the dangerous political mode and can't get out of it. Here it is best to trust Big Data on this one, if presumption has anything to do with that sort of mindsetting. And here is where the real Israel begins all over again and real sovereignty is being questioned more deeply. Sovereignty of the Armistice Lines are one of these questions, when in particular with reference to Gaza and Israeli checkpoints on it's border with Gaza and the West Bank. Israel, let's say in theory, has learned to coexist side by side with two different borders of the same people in the same land as Israel, the Palestinians. A toddler of three year old has never learned yet the meaning of abstract art when he/she is doodling on a piece of paper and show his/her dad or mom later on how great his/her work is. You can then understand as parents the incoherent art work of your son/ daughter, but still say how great he/she did, if necessary to the International world too. Gaza and the West Bank are two incoherent doodles, unless they can show the world the genius of high level engineering to interconnect both sides, without polluting Israel's sovereign geography with traffic congestion and diesel. (Electric Cars are a thing of another world just yet in the middle of Israel) Gaza seems like what the Jordan Valley is to Israel, a strategic point or reference, and informally let's say, against the perils of the sea and serpent dragons in the air. Israel had learned to live with Gaza in the belly of it's coexistence for almost one hundred years, and no rational explanation was ever discussed on the matter since then. It is strange when Israel one day in the 21st century were thinking of tipping the balance and require 30% of the West Bank, behind the Green Lines, from the Palestinian territory and sovereignty. 30% Also

where people live and are here more for ideological and religious reasons. The serpent dragon immediately then appears and descends from the sky and warns arbitrairly against annexation by Israel, or it will eat it's State/ golden egg. The law of adjacency (matrix?) does not enter the vision of relevance of the serpent dragon at this point of political wrath and nor does it navigate the area from topview. The traffic pollution here is not what you would call a state of the art infrastructure situation, let alone a deep political effort to compromise and bring down the maximum danger to a point of near zero minimum, social and environmental. The question is one of arbitrary, that the world should take proper consideration on a proposal to reverse the here above. The argument in itself is inadequate for this proof, but it does say how the Palestinian State will in the future have to innovate and join the global climate change order to minimize it's sovereign space and air next to Israel. Which is by defnition of prove that Israel can innovate at very high levels and deepest in all technological sciences. Heartbreaking is still the humanity of the Palestinian people who would want nothing better than to improve standards of living and innovate. In a more harsh way to see reality of a nation going down the drain is to say that leadership of a different style is required badly for the Palestinians to understand why 'grandma has big ears and a mouth' when visited by little red riding hood. The Israeli army have a bad military situation dealing with in the meantime. And it is understandable why it is heavily restricted if 'interconnected highways' between Gaza and the West Bank are crossing over Israeli territories. These are not the 21st century solutions to minimize traffic congestion (as known in the European Union) and to keep a dangerous situation under control. Which Cartesian model are the Armistice Lines? The future Prime Minister of Israel should see beyond State conception.


Land and geography.

(Personal op)

7 July 2020
(23:52 PM)

Conclusion: sovereignty is geography, primary. Distribution of land is how far we travel from north to south, or west to east. Here sentimental is also value that we know in the 21st century globalized world as the political value. No other place on earth is this more evident that perception of politics is all that matters, as in Israel, Gaza and the West Bank. Another view can only be the rest from the reading of x-y axis or coordinates, but this changes almost with immediate effect that the sentimental value does not match in any way what it should have been from the start, e.g. when Israel was created as 'a State'. Last week we have experienced the meaning of this when the government was unable to apply sovereignty over the 30% in the US 'Deal of the Century Plan' by annexation. Britain would not recognize annexation if the Israeli government goes ahead with it's plan. We do not know whether Britain was referring to land or geography in the letter written in Yediot Ahronoth by the Prime Minister of the UK. A Jewish Home cannot be built in the land, often interpreted by England as estate or land of an estate in Britain, with the locals when outside the gate and fences. It is no surprise that after many decades that Britain is still referring to Israel as the Jewish Home, indirectly by insisting on the Israeli government to abide by the International Law... Where others understood the letter in Yediot Ahronoth as a gilded diktat coming from Britain, others took it for pleading. It is important not to misunderstand Britain when it asserts itself firm and decisive against what it perceives as just and unfair to e.g. another party or people, this here is the Palestinian people. We are after all living in the 21st century and not in the year 1900, where this Prime Minister had never been born yet.

But Britain could be right and see this sandbox of grave mistake on the part of Israel and it's too hasty a decision, if it would also give adequate reason for rejection of what it sees as wrong on the side of the Prime Minister's plan on annexation of the West Bank 30%. Israel is the middle of two, Gaza, Israel and the West Bank, with Israel in the middle. Britain therefore is right to call for a halt to the Israeli Prime Minister and give up his plans on annexation. After all what we are seeing here is not just a political map, but in fact we see the whole vision of the world in this part of geography that is not just sovereignty yet, neither on Israel's side or the other, the Palestinian people if pointing to the West Bank. In simple explanations one finds on the internet, law of geography and sovereignty should not be above natural law/ God His natural law. Land and sovereignty are subjected to infinite interpretations, free agreements between tribes, but Israel is a fully fledged nation after it's first days as a 'State' decades ago and now (assume?) has the right to motivate it's desire to determine it's geography and sovereignty. You can't reject the request for clarification on what exactly is land without sovereignty of geography. Israel has the right to live under God's natural law and boundaries of it's geography instead of above, mid-air so to speak. The historical 'land' is the joint sentiment of this geography, and strong as a bone. A sentiment also as strong as the prerogative of the young nation since 1948, aka the Jewish people. Parallel to the 'land' of Israel is another 'land' and of the Palestinian people, when we are looking ahead in ten years time from now. The nations in our globalized world will by then have this clear understanding of what is their homeland and decided by precision instruments without any misreadings of the past or in the future.

Britain should make the adequate amendments in a globalized world where the middle of Israel will be in the future, and that of Gaza and the West Bank on each of it's flanks, right and left. Where it is today for decades long, the impression one gets, is that this has been to both nations in the wrong direction. On the other hand caution is a divine law and to be able to foresee some of it's future consequences when reversed to not three but two 'lands'. This should be discussed more intimately between the Heads of government, Israel and Britain and to some degree the Palestinian leaders, and to be able to find the political and geographical median between the two peoples, one much older from the Biblical perspective, and the other younger from a political point, and the rest of the world, with brute force. After 54 years in Israel we are not certain whether it is the way to proceed with applying sovereignty in Israel by International Law. This could very well be that Israel has it's own State architecture Plan and would want to keep this vision it's sovereign right to eternity, and apply the law of rejection to every idea of change in Israel by outsiders submitted. It is the Nabot- style of right to sovereignty again rejecting Ahab's wish to purchase the land of the Levite. Incidently, Ahab was king of Israel. In the Messianic Law it is the promise for Israel to build the third temple before the arrival of the Messiah. We are sure that here we are not going to see globalization as we know our world and planet in 2020, but we will experience mass hysteria of all peoples and nations coming to Jerusalem to see the Messiah. Then and there will be no time for another moment of Miriam to show disdain to the millions of peoples and who will pitch their tents in Jerusalem. Israel will change again and be the place of twelve tribes, with banners and standards. What does stay unmoved is the geography even when in the arrival of the Messiah.

We need someone totally ignorant to write about the Palestinian & Israeli conflict, like yours truly.

3 July 2020

Annexation day in Israel over the West Bank territories Judea and Samaria did not happen on 1 July 2020. Britain to Israel in a letter published in Yediot Ahronoth yesterday, “I profoundly hope that annexation does not go ahead. If it does, the UK will not recognize any changes to the 1967 lines, except those agreed between both parties,” Prime Minister Boris Johnson said. The 1967 lines, in title of the International Law (League of Nations) do not provision the International Law by definition in a globalized world, where Israel is a leading nation and global leader of various sectors in the technologies that are of vital importance to the continuity of the world and planet on which we live in any Real Time present or in the near or long future. Israel should assert this answer to Britain and it's outdated version of what is country, nation and sovereignty in the 21st century, that it holds up the right to the rejection of the law. The Jewish Home was never passed as law by bill in the 1920ties or later in 1948 or 1967, and was therefore only conveyed as message (Lord Rothschild) that the government had officially agreed to Israel's demand of creating the Jewish Home in Israel. 1967 Lines in the International Law should have, if memory serves well, serious by nature and not adventurous, and should have blocked the message of 'conveyance' from the moment it became an informal agreement. Home for the Jewish people was especially emphasized at the time, but not by law or passing of a bill. There can be an enormous care toward the Palestinian people, also taken from various corners in the world, including that of the Jewish people, it is yet not adequate when calling for the State of the Palestinian people, e.g. in the globalized world.

The world is not entertained by annexation or rejecting annexation as serious as the here above is suggesting. Home for the Jewish people is neither entertaining, where acts are being performed by the Israeli government with wild animals. When there is a State for the Palestinian people, there is also one for the Israeli people, but only not in 1967 in the white letter when Britain had called not to have any prejudice against the peoples living within the Armistice Lines in Israel. If there are no sovereignty rights within these AL how can the Palestinian State appear then as a State in the International Law? Here is reason for much concern in our technological world and age, when every effort of nation or man is being rewarded a place of training for the future. The Palestinian people deserve a better right to the future in our globalized world. In the Deal of the Century by the US Administration of President Donald Trump, to both nations such dangling sweetness of dreams is being held up in the front and not rear, that it is possible to do this together. Is it not that the AL is holding back these two peoples to stay retarded in war and conflict, and yes, even gross atrocities of mankind? It is also not that the Prime Minister in israel is not paying heed to Britain's rejection of annexation, as a country, and as the Jewish people, once started off as the right to live in Israel and start a Jewish Home. But there is much more subjected to reeximination of the 1967 Lines. That is possible within the global GDP and in all fairness to observe in the Internaional Law. There is no sovereignty on either side, Israel nor the Palestinians, if the Armistice Lines or 1967 Lines are Law in Israel. There is no State for Palestinians nor for Israel in the laws just mentioned. In a globalized world alone are these ambitions possible.

Obstruction to Israel's rights to sovereignty will end no good for anyone. The answer is in front of us all along that Yahweh has blessed Jacob.

29 June 2020

The US Trump administration and special adviser Jared Kushner to President Donald Trump are making a historical move to 'open up the Middle East sky' in quiet diplomacy. Annexation is a pale discription compared to the vastness of what this next US- Israeli move will look like when presented some time later in the summer or fall. It's presentation awaits proper study for the next coming weeks and maybe months, which is a good sign in the camp of the architects of the Peace Plan. Yahweh has blessed Jacob, and Israel consists of twelve tribes, so designated by God Himself. Sovereignty is how the modern world understands law and order from an International institution. The decision of the Prime Minister, his speech is due on wednesday, 1 July, that sovereignty will not happen now and work in the peace plan is not ready, should be seen as a good move, if... The mapping committee are not ready and still are working on the borders of the peace plan/ within the peace plan. We now are believing in another part in Israel's modern history, that it is going to be ready to annex Israel's ancient historical places maybe in short term. Ulay... (Matti Caspi tone of voice) The prominent prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, have been telling us all this time and the answer was therefore right here and now, that God has warned all ancient nations near and nearest to Israel not to obstruct His people in the land of Israel. Tarshish, a remote island, did not hear and listen... It's king was a cherub according to prophecy, but it did not hear or listen and had to sink to the bottom of the sea by Alexander the Great.

Fighting Jacob's blessing doesn't do us any good when denying Israel to be a sovereign nation on it's historical ancient territories, unless one wants to challenge the God of Abraham. "Let Him," one can almost immediate hear them call to you and you would think how brave these people are, even valliant with no help from others. True, but what is written is that the God of Abraham in truth defeats His enemies. And the truth is the land. A settler leader today has called to Mr Berkowitz that let him come to Samaria and see for himself the land and it's depth, before deciding on the details of the 'neuest/ novel' borders on the map in the US peace plan. And study also is inclusive of participation by the Palestinian Authority and other actors who's saying are as important as that of a sovereign Israel. And would anyone go against the God of Abraham when His truth is Israel's real land and history? (Yours truly is not that brave) What also strikes me as a different tone by the PM is his call for enhancing peace. And also is this not showing a change of hearts by the PM and that he is now ready by intention to change the region for it's first Israeli rule and order? In all honesty Saudi Arabia was it not in the seventies that the kingdom had it's global rule around the world? (Opec) From an adverse point of view one could say that the Israelis are struggling with the world's view and Old Testament prophetic interpretations about 'the land of milk and honey'. For Israel it is the political silk thread that is it's world community opinion and this is constitutional, some may say. How many will understand that no one can say that the God of Jacob has 'stolen land' from the Arab nations are not that many people in the political theater, while in fact that is exactly what many are indicating by saying Israel is a myth. (My inner Greta Thurnberg would say, "How dare you take our future away, how dare you!) Annexation of Biblical historical territories to Israel by definition is double Dutch. What we in fact should be saying is that it is time for Israel to now move on to the next stage of it's existence and that the world must excercise better competences on the progress of peaceful existence between two incompatible nations in one central territory of the land.

Additional: Mr Arieh King, Jerusalem Deputy Mayor, is questioning the Trump Peace Plan, sweating this morning in bullets. It is what he perceives as a tragedy on the ground and it's current realities that will not make real a Palestinian State, short nor long term. 50 Meters on the map goes unnoticed by officials in regional and national politics, and the military presence is also there to keep civil life from military command on a daily basis and not helping pitch the right scale of territories within areas the DM is sweating over when talking about what people see as the future Palestinian State. Between Jewish settlement and the future Palestinian State 50 meters does matter in Real Time. (Article Jerusalem Post, 29 June 2020.


Document II, Philistia, a story.


(Personal op)

23 June 2020

Good choice of words by the Republicans in the US on tuesday morning today (The Jewish Chronicle, UK), that it is in Israel's right to 'fix it's borders'. There is a certain truth in the choice of words here, when being the people who build interstate highways and cities for centuries. And, also, as many would say, the US has put the first man on the moon, but who knows that in the distant future of time the first city on Mars can or will be built, by a greater US- led- coalition of nations... The land of Philistia and Ramallah, like cotton and blood, will stare at the past decades in melancholy and crazed eyes, of where did it go wrong with the Palestinian people' s story. Fighting is real static and not dynamics, especially when in a hybrid entity or state. Compared to Israel dynamic State, despite it's engangement in battles against the Palestinian people for decades long. Israel also did not maintain a complete hold off function during these 'static' wars in Gaza and the West Bank. Discontinuity made the military sharp and ready not only for combat, but everyone can do this and guess, that it was especially of great importance to 'understand' how to do the fighting and use of military weapons within the codes of the International Military. But not always can the military force succeed and minimize on excessive force. When the enemy holds a policy of firepower as the only solution in the conflict, responsible combat rules can fail terribly. The 'enemy' was next door and not in the imaginary distant land as far as the moon, if Philistia thought of shooting it's arrows at the Israelis and God in the sky. Again, fixing it's borders is what Israel should indeed do and in a manner that is clear to the Palestinian people, that in fact the Israelis and Palestinians are living side by side, and skin to skin. Is there a country who could tell the story different and say that Israel belongs living in the Mediterranean Sea? Israelis are not amphibians to live in a city under the sea and the Prime Minister is Flash Gordon Netanyahu.

This week one Fatah member had even called for a strategic vision of the Palestinian people, and that this was missing from the political authorities in the PA and his party Fatah. It could be the missing link in the evolution of the State of the Palestinian people. It is strange to suggest in a very critical time of the moment, near to annexation of Palestinian land to Israel, but the Palestinian militants are now sitting like mermaids on the rocks in the Mediterranean Sea and call the sirens. When Noah was building his ark the whole village considered him a mad man. Israel is or could be leaving on a fleet to sail into the future easily and knowing how hard it was to work on such a design when you expect the flooding of the whole world. (The Corona Virus?) Social engineering in politics and economics when staying behind, dry land is what you need and not a hybrid state where no one knows the procedures or simple rules. Palestinian academics have the cotton and blood of politics and geopolitics, and the nation is the smell of coffee in the mornings and evenings. And free will is triumphant, on this side of the 'fence', while most family men in Israel, deemed proletarians, have been confined by their State, Military, and Electorate, to stay at home and study deep into the nights and early mornings. Fighting men should have a distinct class of men and their families, wive(s) and children. In stead, and forgive me for saying, Hamas has given the world a different view of what they consider 'family life', that this is the nation to liberate. And as a result family life will have fundamental differences with the neighbours. In memo: men and women fighting the enemy Israel. Children and animals knowing the fears and horrors as a negative result. Here the gross deficit has been a bottomless pit for decades, while the fighting continues and equals the law of economics continuity on zero incentives. Ramallah can become a different state and there is an undying belief from Jews and Gentiles alike, that here is a future waiting for the people of Philistia and once again to rise from the burning ashes where there is still fire piercing through the blackness of the charcoal or political leftovers.

Annexation will break the hearts of many innocent Palestinian people, and is perhaps the wrong way to start anew the day after with lack of optimism. The nation's apathy or the apartheid of Israelis will make then little difference and impact to begin fighting all over again. The deliverer of Israel, Samson, on this occasion will not be crushed by the columns of the temple in Philistia and disappear. Institutions around the world, the OECD, the IMF, the EU, the UN, all had hoped for a better future for the children of Palestine West Bank and Gaza. It says so again in the Peace Plan by US administration of Donald Trump, that the Palestinian people could vie for Membership of the IMF, if certain conditions were met. Resume, but the question is how from here. There is tension all day today and anticipation whether US President, Donald Trump, will say yes to the Israeli annexation plan. From a stranger's point of view and when not standing on the hill of Ramallah or in Jerusalem on the Temple Mount, you simply refuse to believe that this annexation is the end to both Israel and the State of the Palestinians. It is depressing, defeatist and bad health to go that way when standing at the crossroads of the universe. And just maybe he (the universe) is standing on the step of the Damascus Gate, waiting. Agreeing to annexation from the US President is not an easy task to take in a lifetime by any living man or president. But whatever he will say one can assume that this will be in deep trust as in Godspeed. (Song- Lara's theme- by Andy Williams, someday my love from the movie Dr Zhivago) Seven days as in seven wonders


Document: Philistia, a story.

Part I.

19 June 2020

Minutiae on Ziklag town Philistine border with Judah in ancient Israel: "Biblical scholars argue that the town was probably on the eastern fringe of the Philistines' territory, and that it was natural for it to be annexed to Judah when David became king."
In the 21st century not many would be able to recreate the moment when Britain 100 years ago had thought of the armistice lines, maybe navigational as imperialistic Britain, amongst the many other empires, Ottoman, Russia, Austrian- Hungarian and to a certain extent Germany, and expansionist, but certainly not geo scientific in the GPS as the world knows it today from Google Maps on your smartphones. Also Britain being a devout Christian society and living post enlightenment Europe (Goethe, Kant, Hegel) excercised royal authority when words were more powerful than the dark sciences e.g. chemistry (with dangers of being an alchemist and witch), is 'more' than what we see in our time and that what we know in our global world when being official. If 1900, foresight of the 21st century would not have been a great help to the British officials who then had to understand and deal with this 'abandoned place' called Jerusalem and desert country of Judea. It was also what they must have seen as barren land (from a European viewpoint, renaissance, rococo and baroque) between two seas, one greater and deep, and the other rather smaller, the Dead Sea, and closer to the land of Judah, now the West Bank area. (The Danube it was not, coquette and pleasant pastures) Philistia or Philistine, the ancient city and country along the coastline, now named Gaza, one has to bear in mind that Britain had some sort of affinity with the Arab populations, long before Judea was in their sight, in the whole of the region in the Middle East. Names of cities and places in Judah or Philistia only inspired mirages of peoples and forgotten times that could be useful and perhaps set to a new purpose... They were in the least and at large the best Arabists of their time in 1900 and pre- 1900. Next to Egyptologists from France, Germany and maybe even Russia, one must take all these facts into consideration before pointing at the next chapter in 'Judea' after Britain had left Israel in 1920/ 1948 and the Jewish people behind to live in their new 'homeland'. What has become of the Arabs, aka Philistines, living in the land of Judea and Samaria, and are now the bearers of the name Philistia and Palestinian people? An easy mistake for any Arabist in the year 1900 or 1800!

On 1 July 2020 the land of Judea and Samaria, this is between the ancient country Philistia and the outer border of the land Judah in the east near the Dead Sea, are about to change the new coordinates into science and recalculations, it is exact science and not alchemy, of placing what is sovereignty of land for Israelis. It should be said that when we have another look on the ground the quiet instruments in deep space orbit around earth and it's atmosphere, with little or no relation to political and armed conflict, and yet it's accuracy is or could be of vital importance to Israel. Our time is not 1800 or 1900. Rational Science has taken over many disciplines and the world abides by their accuracy. It is what makes our world a system of law and order, globally. Britain is history and they have buried their sextant long ago in the sands or earth's corrosion. The ancient country Philistia by time has been 'pressured down' to size and peoples of a different kind in our time, kin to the area and region, but wholly different from the uncircumsized ancient nation known as the sea people. Gaza is a complete populated area and not called a country in the 21st century, next to the West Bank, also not yet (?) a country in the family of nations. What should the Prime Minister in Israel be thinking of today when he had been promising the electorate for some time that he will do something extraordinary for the people of Israel and incorporate land from the West Bank into the laws and sovereignty of Israel, an act that will strengthen the Jewish people for indefinite time? He has the navigational system for this 'piece of land' to prove that he is right, as this part was called in Biblical Times the land of Judah. Ziklag also was natural to annex by the King of Judah in ancient times, which makes it hard for the world to prove their own scientific argument that Mr Netanyahu is not right.

Mr Netanyahu knows that he is not right and also why he is not right, when he can prove that the navigational system in 2020 is not what the British officials had been using to determine the country for the Jewish people as the Jewish Home in nineteenth century Palestine. The 1900 British 'navigational system' by power of the word is outdated and accuracy is therefore that the armistice lines map for only any treasure hunt would be adequate. After WWII however there had been better instruments, e.g. theodolyte, and there was no need to continue the old view of 'Palestine' until globalisation long after the millennium had become the new era and global acceptance for technocratic solutions everywhere and in every field, land, air and space. Incidently: Israel did not thrive either by the law of economics from it's occupation in Gaza, despite busy hubs of 'black markets' businesses, also with the Palestinian 'entrepreneurs'. Our world needs desperately a rational solution in the Middle East, one that could bring some form of normality in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian people. But the question is difficult to ask when on neither side the Israelis nor the Palestinian people have any idea what they are looking for when they call for change. Change of sovereignty? Perhaps, yes. But not in the same way of the outdated map, armistice lines, of Gaza, Israel and the West Bank. The map of natural law goes even deeper, that e.g. there cannot be anything built in the 'space' between Gaza and the West Bank that will not go through Israel's earth core territory and sovereignty, or aka the land of Judea/ Judah. When the West Bank would be the territory of the Palestinian people this also will have the same earth/ soil law, that earth's depth underneath is Palestinian sovereignty. With all new navigational systems one can see why Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is checkmate as (black or white) king in the corner between rook (Gaza) and knight (West Bank). And the nightmares of many decades of wars and bloodshed are soaking in the old map pre or post- 1967 of Palestine, also comes to mind...And they are pointing at the State of Israel and not at the map (a blood State).
Post Scriptum: the here above is meant as fictional.

New development around topic annexation in Israel could be a game- changer, if...
Part I
15 June 2020

In fact Israel alone could be the game- changer and stop annexation for a few reasons that are, historical, terrain ageing residual, future expansion/ contraction of area from Gaza, Ashdod, West Bank and the Dead Sea. Historically this is the agreement in the Oslo Accords, and signed more than two decades ago. What is the point of revision of the map in the 21st century after 1948 and 1967? Revision in the region ut supra is deadly serious, and is also the splitterbloc to both nations, Israel and the Palestinian people. From a Two- State solution to the parallel State situation (vertical) in- depth of the new map (fictional without Gaza as Palestinian territory designated) runs more fluidity in vertical innovatives between the two territories, if in the future image of the physical changeon are: the west side Israel (filled with Gaza) and on the east side the West Bank. It is Gaza that should be the 'removal value' in the map situation as is now a given datum and reality, and even as very basic stuff. Another 'wrong' by Israel, except for annexation, is that world opinion endorses the middle of Israel (Ashdod), between Gaza and the West Bank, to be it's territory, and not Gaza and the West Bank or to annex parts of the West Bank. Use of land between Gaza and the West Bank in abstract is also Palestinian land qua sphere, atmosphere and air space. Out of the reality scrum revision could remedy a few points there and create with it after serious revision e.g. the road to new political theories and infrastructure, and military situations. It is a deadly revision project to reconstruct in the given world opinion if continuation from the 'old map' will remain indefinitely and stay, aka status quo. What is the point that the world is trying to make, even when the danger is now that Israel in fact can annex on the basis of the historical Two- State solution map (post 1967), if it is also allowed to use the abstract 'spherical' territory (Ashdod) as sovereign land to 'proper' Israel?

There have been dramatic changes throughout decades of purchasing land by Israel for Jewish settlers and more newcomers in the future. This land transforming is constant and one would almost forget that here is the place, in Jerusalem, where the Messiah is expected, a divine revelation of God in Heaven! Mentioning of Jerusalem as the place of Messianic building and religious experience for Jews is another part of annexation and to this extent exclusive to what is now happening in the West Bank, nightly or daytime hours before 1 July 2020. The Messiah is the law of peace, divine peace, but it is also suggesting God is King on earth. And more specifically in Jerusalem, Kotel. Outside Kotel religion is universal terrain, by divine justice and is bound by social mapping. Back to the terrain Gaza, West Bank and Jerusalem, here we see no social mapping, but in fact what we see is the future reality of two nations at their wit's end, with the one more stronger with the smart technological military power and readiness to defend it's 'abstract' territories, while the nation on the other side tries upholding a political banner and is desolate. The Palestinian people are a homogeneous nation and pushing them back inch by inch is not a political point scoring for the forces that are moving in this direction. Humanity here is blinded by rage and despair, clearly, and not by a peaceful solution in sight. Again, what is the point of negotiation between the two sides when the historical map is not revised and not leaving Gaza out of Palestinian territory?
Sunrise in the east, Red Sea, and setting in the west, Mediterranean Sea.

Part II

President Mahmoud Abbas (PA) has called for a higher level Security Council Meeting on 24 June, next week. This timeline is pressing both nations to come out against annexation on 1 July, two weeks from now, with stability of the region within Israel and the Palestinian territories, but also in the greater region across near neighbouring countries, e.g. Jordan, as an urgency and priority. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, the media reports, is ears, mind and eyes for the time being on the issue and he is not releasing any plan or detail out in the public just yet. This is Israel. On the side of the International World, this includes Jordanian King Abdullah, UAE, and other regional government actors, are also voicing their concern if this plan of annexation by Israel will go ahead as planned. But one group in particular has been ignored so far by the International public and audience. Nearest to the European Union is the UK and it's Jewish population (Jewry). To this group the plan of Israel annexation of the West Bank, 30%, is more critical than the judgement of Paris (apple of Hera). They are looking in every direction and see either judgement or repercussions for whatever decision they will be taking and help solve the 'beauty contest' of the three divine bodies on this political pantheon between Israel, the Palestinian people, and the International World. How will the 'Deal of the Century' become like Zeus and choose the winner? It would also be undignified for the Palestinian Authority and incumbent Mr Mahmoud Abbas not to be heard at any level of negotiation and to ignore at this critical moment his call for the physical State of the Palestinian people in the West Bank. It is perhaps his moment of real testing as representative President of the Palestinian Authority. And what no one still can't see is the apple that is the region where it has fallen off the World Opinion Tree in the Oslo Accords, and it is slowly disappearing into gravity leaving only judgement behind, and future repercussions. Annexation by Israel has become an epic battle for sovereignty, either by Israel or by the Palestinian Authority. As for the Israeli Diaspora in the UK, the apple of judgement lies in your lap, and is maybe uncomfortable when dealing with incredible scales of myths and it's elusive aftermath (antisemitic poison).

Middle of country area Israel (impression).

10 June 2020

Military technology 21 century and not as in the 20th century. 

1 Accountability

2 Transparency

Gaza and the West Bank are suggesting 'the Middle of Israel' and as a given oppostie to be timeless and also opposite territories by any logical or standardized land building principle. E.g. when continuity of land for Israel must flow from north to south in natural free way and not stop in the middle. That would force one country to stop at one point and start again in the same country but not before first passing through the other country's area in it's middle country area. 

One logical solution in our time can be built: Gaza and Israel should be submerged as one country area, next to parallel Palestinian land/ country area on the east side, this is the West Bank.

Ashdod or the Middle Country's area is the central of Israel and is clearly showing it's physical logical flowing (from north to south). 

Other: to create Ashdod into a deep circular wall or area and only accessible to Israel, would create a future illogical and vulnerability for not only Israel, but also for the Palestinian people. 

Important: the International Law & World- peace of land, air and sea must serve the conditions and be the logical solution and not frustration of that peace. A parallel State in a country area that is built free from the State next door, also is creating the image of safety nets of infrastructure that cannot go wrong in our advanced technological era. 

30% Should 'compensate the error of 100 years, on both sides. 

Logic of flow Israel: vertical flowing from north to south, when with middle of the land.

Logic of flow for Palestinians if Gaza is starting point into WB, is creating visually an immediate critical mass in the middle of country area to both nations and all logic stops horizontally. From west to east (West Bank).

(information should be available e.g. the International infrastructure building code; and studies are also available on discontinuities and distribution calculations)

Israel's vulnerability has shamefully long been underestimated, but in fact is of vital importance for a quick review.

9 June 2020

(Image map of Israel red lines drawn by author City Over The Top to illustrate present situation of territory Palestinian future State)

Prime Minister, Mr Hammad Shtayyeh, today has called for a course of action when Israel will go ahead with annexation this summer in july 2020. And I copy: " If Israel annexes part of the West Bank on July 1, the Palestinian Authority will declare a Palestinian state based on the armistice lines from before the 1967 Six Day War and call on the international community to recognize it..." The PA Prime Minister in one stroke from his lion's paw knocked over something from the very hill that he was calling from and standing on and now rolling down like a heavy rock to the feet of his opponent, the Israeli government under Mr Netanyahu and Benny Gantz. Apart from all the rights that come with modern day rights to land, air and sea for a people or nation, indigenous or hybrid (Roma/ Sami and Aboriginal) in continental models, one simple look at the map of the territories the Palestinian people and their politicians are vying for is not the most logical or realistic view to have, equally in modern day geological lands and people. All Jews, so they say in the Jewish world, should get behind the countries that do not want Israel take more land from the West Bank and Palestinian people, land that was known as part of the Israeli peace plan to have instead 'land- swaps'. Both nations are too civilized and are living as part of the global world in the Middle East. Annexation cannot be taken or seen as any opportunity or excuse for ending the 'status quo' in favour of the Palestinian people when peace is the basic stone of their State, next to neighbouring country Israel. The opportunity is peace and done so with the greatest sense of improvement of living standards for both peoples, Jews and Palestinian flows. One look again at the territories on the map of Israel (holding in mind the armistice lines), still it is peculiar how one is to see this strange landscape for the future Palestinian State, outside of Israel's boundaries. Or, to put it more precise, the Palestinian State next to the Israeli State logic pic.

The International Law and World are serious institutions, but now, how do they perceive International Law from a country that is cut in half, between north and south, having another State running through it's middle, and continuity starts again on the other side, e.g. in the south? Israel has proposed 'land- swaps' instead, but no side had paid attention to the call of reason and logic so far, or as we understand the reason for annexation next month, maybe years after. Gaza starts at the coastal line with the Mediterranean Sea on the West side and in a large curved roof or terrace to the West Bank in the east, would become the future Palestinian State territory, when looking at the map of Israel. A gullible Israel has always worked hard on 'sharing' with the homely neighbours, the Palestinian people, in an obedient fashion and it has listened to the rest of the world too long and often. In fact land of the Palestinian people intersects through Israel's middle and this no sovereign country could say it is peaceful and creating peace for the two nations. Cutting through the middle of a country is an outright infringement of sovereignty and should be considered a military right to defend it.   Just to humour oneself: if the NI could move to the middle of England, the whole problem with mainland Ireland would be solved in seconds what long time history could not achieve. And also to remember President Eisenhower and 1956/1961 defense interstate highway system through middle America... Something (divided and in opposite direction highways) also or should be built in modern day infrastructure in London, Piccadily Circus! (But it would be seen as infringement of sovereignty) If only to stimulate modern technology and state of the art infrastructure.  As road and civil engineers would say, 'bigger is not better, but better roads' (documentary film, Building National Defense Interstate Highways 1961)

As the here  above is saying, what the PM of the Palestinian Authority is suggesting is not even a parallel State next to the Israeli territory, with Gaza on the west and the West Bank in the east near to the Dead Sea.

The story continues.

Binyamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz, 1 July 2020.

28 May 2020

The coalition: government of mr Binyamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz, after the last election 2 March 2020 and government formation sworn in 11 days ago, 17 May 2020. Focus of the Israel government: annexation, the West Bank and East Jerusalem and the Prime Minister has promised that this will happen on 1 July, five weeks from now... And as if the plan of annexation wasn't already complex, the plan of government is that in eighteen months Mr Benny Gantz will lead Israel as Prime Minister instead of Mr Netanyahu. Anyone familiar with the wheel hub technology would be able to predict that another outcome might occur once Mr Gantz becomes Prime Minister and leave the tyre of Israel's political Juggernaut to Real Time politics. The world cannot have a peek on the inside of Israel's political future at the moment. What the world just can see is that the Israel government is planning to go ahead with it's annexation of the West Bank (30%) and East Jerusalem. And seeing in politics means that Israel has been from the day of it's announcement annexation plans transparent co ram publico in the world. Some compare it's plans of annexation to President Putin when in 2014 Russia took claim of Crimea, in an instant. But with East Jerusalem Mr Netanyahu had no choice but to 'inform' the world outside of Israel what his plans for the sovereignty of Israel will be if he had won the election. The West Bank is an older version of annexation. Good governance comes with quality of content, which is transparency and accountability. No one can accuse the Israeli Prime Minister, no matter if it is against better judgement, of being inadequate of good governance, even when it is a difficult topic for governments around the world to understand the point of view which 'bedevils' the Prime Minister. Jerusalem is the Holy Place of the Messiah and that could mean the only de Jure law to apply neccessary annexation in East Jerusalem by the State of Israel.

The paradox is with annexation policies and it's oldest definitions, holding the 'king's law' as the kindest and mildest of forces in the world, e.g. if one holds England dear and near to the heart. It holds also truth that England like no other country did do the world and humanity honour, e.g. abolition of slavery, and made human rights abuses it's continuity of the best there was to offer, being it at a different time and age, even until globalisation. But time is different now in the 21st century. History does matter, indeed. It is precisely from that understanding where Mr Netanyahu now stands alone against the world, as if the Messianic truth holds a vision of terror and not of peace. The God of Abraham also in this vision has never mentioned anything more than a particular area where the Messiah could be expected. E.g., Kotel and in a straight road leading to the Damascus Gate, would suffice the King of all kings on earth and in heaven. The other areas are there for a universal standing invitation and many may come to do their prayers in Jerusalem in the truth of scripture. The Israeli Prime Minister has been long enough in government or near it's perimeters to understand what is moving mankind in Jerusalem and about Israel's history among the many nations in the world. And that is also inclusive of the kings and princes of the same world. History is for all of mankind and only a prerogative in this context for as long as we live. And the Messiah is the religious context of all of mankind. We must believe that or fail a moral duty towards eternity and it's good promise. Also, this is one intention the Israeli Prime Minister cannot tell it as a lie and deceive the respectability of the many nations that come in all earnest of their hearts and minds to Jerusalem to pray or on pilgrimage. But another season of terror awaits Israel in the shadows of the above vector, if annexation of East Jerusalem will be nullified by the International Law, when putting it blunt.

In eighteen months Israel might become a different place if Mr Gantz replaces the Prime Minister as it's next PM. The West Bank could put more emphasis on a de facto 3D- political animation, respecting all disciplines in the International Law, the rights of the Palestinian people, the Military presence in the West Bank, empowerment of people both Jews and Palestinians, and other more principled and detailed administrative applications to keep both nations active and dynamic and not passive to violence that is running down many for decades next to nothing prosperity. It is a positive idea to see the next decades to come with more 'peaceful' social infrastructure in the West Bank or in Jerusalem between the two sides, Israelis and Palestinians. The first cosmopolitan was in Egypt, Mesopotamia and Turkey to a certain degree during it's relation with Sophia (from Russia) and some European countries. And no one should forget the other Arab nations close to Israel's borders, land, sea and air. What the world thus far is looking at is the plan of Israel to go ahead with annexation, said by the Israeli Prime Minister, Mr Binyamin Netanyahu and coalition partner agree, Mr Benny Gantz, but also the world and governments who oppose annexation. We are in fact looking at 1, the historic 'annexation' of East Jerusalem, and 2 the political annexation in the West Bank. It is the story as being told by Biblical Scripture and it is for people to understand, whether rich or poor, working class or elite. This de Jure law of the Messianic message of peace stands, for once, squarely above that of the de Jure law of the kings in the world. When peaceful annexation is just a terminology for use by human beings and promotes honesty, impariality and what is reasonable (from or within designated law perimeters), it is the paradox that is complex in Israel, Jerusalem and the West Bank. For now many have said their prayers for the Messianic truth and the world should either listen or de jure dismiss this historical request.

Note: 1 July 2020 the Republic of Israel will go ahead with annexation of both areas, in East Jerusalem and Judea & Samaria. East Jerusalem falls under the unique law of Jews who believe in the Messianic truth and promise, while the West Bank is based on prerogatives of the Republic of Israel, in principle, but it is also keeping the country's integrity with the international world on a very serious base of agreements. De jure it is not in the territorial dispute with the king's or any other law. Unless we are wrong. 

Globalism, why and what different from resolutions.

21 May 2020

After the millennium it became more clear why globalism was the necessary way to convey the world into it's final future idea or ambitions. From the view point it was first more of a wider concept, a wider view, anything to what the world had been up to then and is now, pointing only to how the nature of humanity and it's environment is changing and creating much room for expansion of scale as perceived in a smart economy and political vision to reach globalization. Three decades the world order extended it's global wish and will to end or combat inequalities of horizontal economies and social life. After the millennium such global vision could not rely any more on an older worldview of the forties, fifties and sixties. No resolution against globalization was ever taken and in the best interest of humanity and a sustainable life standard for all therefore became reality in the widest sense of the word, technically and textual. Globalism also became the new legal power and the longest (by intention). Longest when facing the future, by nature is always indefinite. Another aspect of it is that it doesn't hold meetings on it's forwardness of existence at any International institution, which is giving that impression where the word Hedonism stems from as a byword or reproach. Contrast to what the monarchy holds in the same realities of globalism. Monarchy is also the place where many resolutions are being lived up to or taken as legal derivatives, being it emotional or intellectual. We all make our fortunes one way or the other via subtleties of the law or commanding order in our world.

The danger from the point of view where the longest view is historical and e.g. a monarchy, viewed by the world and it's humanity as the most regal and legal, when it holds this parallel view of globalism and industrial superiority as separate from the people and their interest, much can go wrong from here. In 2020, two decades after the millennium, no one is sure about the meaning of globalism and it's nature for a future prosperity for all of globalization, while what they are stuck with is what they have known all of their living lives. At least with that they can go a far way back, let's say thousand years? But the story of globalism does not end here, but in fact wideness is where it is and it is therefore everywhere. Also, when taken more closer, it is exactly that what is the longest resolution of freedom and the economy when put next to monarchies. But does it have the same rights when not industrial? Natural rights are the privileges of monarchies, is still what is the only supreme law mankind has ever known thus far on earth. In every day life nothing of the above matters much to the public, close or at large. 2020 Has become very much the consumers' economy, locally, national and globally. It is only when matters e.g. sovereignty of a State, in this case specifically the State of Israel, is vying for 'more land' in the West Bank, when globalism is showing a vertigo of rights and limitations, even if it has designed a document called 'The Deal of the Century', that it cannot go anywhere except for the abyss.

Is there a part III? History has certainly played the trick and not in any way deliberate, that Jerusalem should be the religious platform of many nations and therefore cannot exclude but one nation, the natural inhabitants of ancient Israel, if religion has priority, the Jewish nation. By courtesy of Israel if reversed Israel does protect the rights of all religions in Jerusalem, but have a few or miniscule cubic metres to keep for itself as sovereign to the Jewish religion, the Western Wall or Kotel area (which extends to the Damascus Gate by ancient writing in Manasseh). Globalism can make the new changes for Israel once it goes the way of the future and change designated places for cosmopolitan infrastructure of the area for all residents living in Jerusalem and in the world when coming to visit as tourists, e.g. the Damascus Gate, if    e.g. in a newest and state of the art architecture and replacing the Ottoman outdated walls with it's dark entrances that only invite medieval darkness. Freedom and the will of people are a strong factor for most changes in major cities around in the world. Plus there is increase of populations also playing another factor on the face of our planet as long as we know it. The world should not be playing with words about subtle differences of globalism and the law of kings. The economy is the lifeline of the future. Once you cut it off in two you will get the idea. It carries off much weight for people and living in Real Time, and not that this should go to the past as well and sustaining 'dead worlds'. International Relations is the ministry overseeing most of the world and it's current affairs, for public and official. Dismissing globalism would be synonymous for abuse of 'old' power without the diagnostics of realities in the world today in it's internal. The monarchy was always there to remedy the ills of the people, e.g. greed and false witnesses.

But there is no one who is saying about Israel's annexation that this is a simple act of retribution by Israel and it's government. In fact it is a bitter struggle to keep up their right of existence in a free democractic world...


The worldview of annexation from Israel, the key-word is transition and geopolitics.

19 May 2020

This is certainly not the microscopic view with sovereignty over Jerusalem, with enhancing the religious/ orthodox presence or dominance across the new threshold with the new government in Israel. In simple words if democracy has been shifted from public political forum, central politics will be needing serious hearing of what the public would want from this 'pateranalistic' government. The State philosophy instead is reaching for annexation and worldview. Curious how governing is back in every day life in Israel after eighteen months of 'political gridlock'. Israel however decided to reverse all, or risk all, by unpopular excercising the new powers that sovereignty over the West Bank might bring home to Israel, about 30%. The International public is still the strongest voice against annexation as the Israeli government is intended to go forward with. But fortune, if you want, can decide more effectively when it carefully reads this petition of the Likud Party and Blue & White Party, as stone reading from stone, that annexation by Israel is holding up the right if geopolitical the country is a permanent Member State. 54 Years of a 'border to border' conflict with the Palestinian people the Two- State solution also has seriously failed on their side of the argument against Israeli ambition to annex part of the West Bank and now leaving 70% to the Palestinian people. And for the simple reason that the Palestinian people do not represent their nation as a State on the geopolitical map, as it still is not a State. Or, we are seriously mistaken.

With the new government in Israel if this pushing for sovereignty would 'fail' it will be for the International Law much of a relief that it then can proceed again with normal ties and policies in the Middle East, and most specifically between Israel and the Palestinian people. Geopolitics will not enter the argument at any point. But Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu told the public only a day or two ago that he had worked for three years on this particular plan of annexation and the public that voted for him have no doubt that he is telling the utmost truth. Jerusalem is like religion to the Prime Minister and he will not commit sacrilege and break up the Biblical and historical truth of the Jewish people after crossing the sharpest of blade and political and geopolitical threshold. It is his personal political palanquin, for two. The Israeli public might want to hold a 'vocal referendum' on how the Prime Minister is intending on applying sovereignty in the West Bank, and what that may mean in terms of the worldview, if we take the short human view and memory. The longer term most of the work will be built on transition and how to balance prosperity from silver to gold, and from gold to platinum for the Palestinian people. We also expect the 'Deal of the Century' to then be the closing part in the plan to both domestic and external rebuilding peace with the Palestinian people. Israel has come a long way since WWII and it has matured in 72 years. Also, it knows the mathematics of politics and how the system works and not only as a government of the Jewish people, but also the military and global participation. It was never just buying sovereignty.

Without analysis every decision is cliché.

13 May 2020

England: the House of Lords politicians on tuesday night call for economic sanctions against Israel if annexation will proceed in July 2020. Sovereignty in the West Bank disputed areas becomes a dirty byword to Britain, when dealing with the public domain of Israelis living in Israel, but also this is intimidating as a warning that is beyond interference in a sovereign place like Israel. The neighbouring countries in the European Union, Member States, are still divided on the same issue, but Mr Josep Borell, EU High Representative Foreign Affairs and Security policy, has given much to timing and is going to be ready when and if annexation by Israel will be taking place in eight weeks time. The platform for annexation is about Israel and the Palestinian people, a total of 72 years, and a dispute over sovereignty on 'both sides of the land'. It will take the widest of analysis in this century to refuse or object/ reject annexation in a developed economy versus the favourable entity of a peoples, also inhabitants in the same territories, and cannot identify defense of a vulnerable State if Israel is physical present and the other State is fiction or non- existent. The world is everywhere bent on doing good and justice wherever it can if a people is being supressed by another neighbour, and that is in terms of percentage not any bigger than the defendant group. Who or what is doing Britain's arithmetic on judging in a far outreach and when it is another sovereign country? And what is more is the strange aspect in this objection against an apparent aggressive country with the latter keeping still and quiet as the story develops. Israel with trained self composure is keeping up with the story from Britain and is not deciding on anything, nor in writing in the online newspaper The Jerusalem Post, what Israel's decision will be on the matter later on this year.

Britain is well aware that the people in Israel are the coherent conscience of their State and democracy. It is not as simple as imposing a threat of sanction to help out friends and people in Palestine Israel by undermining a developed economy, in and outside the region. Annexation of Crimea by President Putin is by definition also not a Middle East problem, but it is more of a European Union problem and Nato. What Britain is saying the question here is also whether it speaks as a leading member of Nato, the G-7, or world leader. Is it legitimate to say that the world is looking at a different world leader? Surely, the Palestinian people deserve better. Without proper analysis by the House of Lords in Britain the world is not looking at a decision by intellect, but rather more a mission in first person... Neither peoples are primitive by disposition for to be unable to comprehend where the west is trying to push the annexation into, into the public domain of a global audience that again Israel is a country with little or no imagination what annexation means in International Laws and therefore must be halted, preferably by 'civilized' rule. In fact what Israel wants is complex and a challenge to exhaust the intellect of most older democracies and even the International Law. It is the Leonidas versus the Persian empire genius, that even when you loose your princely head the Persian empire goes back home with a nightmare. Here we are paying no piper for a fictional battle against the 'invaders' of the Middle East, when in scene. Peace should come between Israel and the Palestinian nation living in the West Bank, but without genius of peace we are not looking at a success story to all sides, in and outside Israel.

The fictional truth about Israel and the annexation plans are still the natural future of the State.

12 Iyyar 2020

The artistry of sovereignty in Israel including Judea and Samaria, are either going to be the best art- work of this century, or the worse fall ever for the people of Israel. Equally on the other side, e.g. France, Britain, Germany and other EU countries, but also some Member States of the G-7 countries, will have to create institutional transparency to overcome prejudice and disrespect when and if the decision against annexation is the only outcome out of the longstanding confusion in this part of the Middle East. But confusion is a deception at this scale and from an oral point of view when it concerns the Israeli people existence in historical Israel. The Torah and Tanakh are proof for what you could call 'oral sovereignty' of the people of Israel, in contrast to what is the written law Internationally. Or to put it more popular this has created deeper sense of conscience in the people of Israel and their identity as a nation autochtone to Judah and the eleven tribes to specific areas in the Middle East before entering the land beyond Jordan. In one day both books, the Old Testament and New Testament, are not written as or in the sovereignty of International law, but will always be read as the oral laws of order in society or community written. It may be unconventional wisdom, but asking a young child, boy or girl, to explain a simple sum how much 72 from 1000 is when substracted, the answer is 928. From the 'babe's mouth' the truth is being told in our world that Israel's State would lack 928 centuries of being a sovereign nation in the written law. When coming back to annexation in Israel, or between Jordan and Israel, the world is looking at a nation that cannot win it's argument in the face of much older States and sovereignties, known to the International world as going back as far as the year 1000. Proceeding ambition to annex territory in Judea and Samaria would also become an aggression against the existing authority of law and order when seen as the simple answer of the child, that Israel is not much older than 72 years as a State and therefore cannot overcome the older nations and sovereignties as old as a thousand years. (This is not only an example of the fact)

Now the question is whether the pawn can put the king in checkmate. This of course should be a fierce debate under Israeli citizens and many will choose freedom and democracy as in 72 years since the State of Israel was born. And to most of these freedom loving Jews it is impossible to look forward to a future of sovereignty with a more nationalistic conscience, and that life in Israel would become more theocratic or caste of Levite priests running the government, that is in return secular. Yes, that would be unusual for a people who remembers the Holocaust and the next generations that are fully aware of life as a Jew is difficult without being reminded in one way or the other by the rest of the world. And also, how can a young State of 72 years old win from older nations and sovereignties in the world? It is rather a sad story when critically looking at the choices when having on the one hand to authoritarian rule of the priests and their sovereignty of thousands of years, and the world in a secular mode of life next to all democracies in the International world. The will of a free people could make the walls of the castle or fortified city of David again fall and let in the 'Babylonians' , as well as the Romans and Byzantine. That would mean inherently that Israel is rejecting the God of Abraham as their king once again, and want a king like other nations as in the time when Saul became king over Israel. In neighbouring country Palestine Israel 72 years of Israeli State and nation building, the world is right to impose laws between the two 'sovereign' nations and would want to see more equality rule as the only Just rule to secure peace for now and the future. Which is the king that is now checkmate?

Death & the economy= COVID-19, one thing about the pandemic the international world agrees on.

6 May 2020

It is since this morning clear that the scientific world community and political leaders in the global world, are asking whether the virus was technically possible to have been manufactured in Wuhan China, before it spreaded in an outbreak / pandemic across the globe since October 2019. The question: in a matter of three months after Wuhan's first seconds of the outbreak of COVID- 19, why this transmission moved quickly over to Europe in Janauary 2020 and than one month later, in February, to the US. That was a considerable high speed of the virus. The request for investigation by some of G-7 countries, including Germany, Australia and others, comes at a bad time for the world medical health organisation(s), as the vaccine is still in process of development. At the moment it is priority to get the vaccine if stability in the public trust and health wants to return back to some sort of normality and not to divert attention to political and a uniform action to investigate why COVID- 19 blew over from China into the rest of the world. The public will not be too sure why the pandemic of a microbe should be investigated, more specifically than e.g. Ebola or SARS. And bearing in mind that this investigation is not a tiny instrument, when facing China and it's high tech industries. That is the kind of prospect and exposing China & it's industries to a vulnerability nobody would want to see in a volatile moment when the pandemic still equals death and public life change, and a too slow restarting of the economy. And also what is more damaging in this picture is the synthetic of the virus when pointing straight at the Laboratory in Wuhan and the date. It is perhaps simple observation, but maybe COVID- 19 was in it's origin still more Asian (affecting also neighbouring countries Japan, India and the African continent) and not where it was scientifically traced, and maybe, even by accident.

The gravity of COVID- 19 is now pointing at being attracted to be the center of attention and is looking for the centers in the world geographies (new word). On a bigger scale the COVID- 19 virus, and this is an if, might be looking for it's natural substitute and is finding this more and more in close density areas and communities, but than quickly moves on when this adventure fails. But the devastation remains behind and resulting in death and costly damages as a result of insecurities and uncertainty. Medicines and vaccines all doing too little and too late back and reverse in time. The silk thread is truth, but the truth of what nature conceals in COVID- 19 and before it multiplies more widely, before or after touchdown, is most imperative and not what it is leading people to believe once it is gone and has moved on and is unstoppable in it's synthetic life. The investigation is a mission impossible and it is showing the world a more animated iron fist of COVID-19. UN 'weapon inspectors' will neither do any good or better as it is not compatible with a revolutionary disease/ virus as COVID- 19, aka the Coronavirus. The next stage of the pandemic is where we are now at the moment and public debate on lockdowns or easing restrictions are returning to social platforms and in the global news. But one thing is being said here and another in the world by global leaders, is that the virus should be investigated. At what proposed scale when only by cooperation? The Lab engineers would probably want to work from the microbe and study COVID-19 it's movement, in and outside natural order and than investigate. In the meantime the World Health Organisation is keeping the public up to date with advise on how to keep an environment sterile for as long as we have to stay in and keep the social distance uniformity of 1.5 mtr. And this is important, let's say if the investigation has to prove anything how the disease was defeated by medicine and vaccines. Any other investigation without defeating the virus has told the story too prematurely, one could say.

127 British politicians in a letter to their Prime Minister... "Using Covid-19 as cover up by Israeli government..." Are we reading this well?

3 May 2020

The annexation of Judea and Samaria are in the US 'The deal of the century' pointed out as 30% of what is now Palestinian territory and it can transform to a new format in favour of Israel's sovereignty in Jerusalem and adjacent territories as soon as conditions are met by both peoples, Israel and the Palestinian people. Globally the world is now dealing with the pandemic COVID- 19 and the urgency to combat the virus in global efforts, either by private groups or the G20. The World Health Organisation calls for the fight against an invisible enemy. And who should the public listen to when no one knows what the virus it's precise nature is, and not even to experts in the scientific world? Not yet. When a group of politicians in Britain write in their protest letter to their Prime Minister, on the annexation plans of Israel 1 July later on this year, and are mentioning the COVID-19 in relation to the Israeli government, are we then reading well that this protest is oversimplifying the virus to a different standard in Britain? Are we misunderstanding Britain's intentions at the center of the pandemic as it is still ongoing, and are we not understanding well what the protest of solidarity with the Palestinian people is trying to convey? It is public secret that the International World is against annexation by Israel of Judea and Samaria as early in a few months in July 2020, but we are also seeing from simple observations that the first quarter of 2020 is far from simple, and is in fact very complex. The pandemic of COVID-19 needs a comprehensive study and also will have to result in the end to the same standard, and doing so country by country, community by community. Israel does not give the impression that the virus can be manipulated in a way convenient to a certain purpose, that is political and military. The Coronavirus is an invisible enemy of all human kind and also it seems to create other effects and is very powerful. One is death and the other is the economy.

In short all countries are in a very complex situation to combat the virus from within the community and at a national level. Even Britain knows that in the present situation their government is dealing with more than one complexity at the same time as dealing e.g. with COVID- 19 and leaving the European Union by the end of this year. It cannot afford to create a disposition of International importance to Israel, the Palestinian people, the European countries that are also against annexation of Judea and Samaria, and itself or running the risk of becoming a tiny Trojan horse in the protest. And not by intention, as Britain has taken the lead of protest against annexation by the Israeli government in the territories of what is designated as Palestinian. This territory and over Jerusalem was 'taken' by war in 1947 and 1967, is what most historical reports say. Israel was not a State at the time, but was designated the Home for the Jewish people. Making war to claim a place for the nation after the Holocaust in Israel/ Jerusalem was an urgency under these circumstances when the Arab nation was anything but benign towards sharing territory with the Jewish people returning from Europe. In a civilized world many consider such a 'return' as invasion or instrusive. In the future of the State of Israel this is how the narrative still goes around in the world and especially in the Middle East, that how can 'invaders' get sovereignty in Israel above the natural inhabitants? Plus, in Jerusalem. That should be considered a serious breach of International Law, and privately maybe also saying that it is due to Israeli Chutzpah. Only, the disposition, or one can call it fate, wants Israel and millions of Christians to want the same thing in Jerusalem in the 21st century right now, and that is to build the third temple to herald the Messiah His coming. It is highly selfish of any International World to deprive these religious magnituteds of their religious right, that is a basic fundamental and universal right in the International Law. Or, we are seriously mistaken.

Economic response EU is a competence quite mazed.

13 April 2020

It is the room for error and bad timing when reading and looking at the communication from the European Union on it's response to COVID- 19 on 8 April 2020 that is making the impression to the outside world one of complete void. Laws have been in legislation from 1 April 2020, and meaning that we are living in the time when the pandemic is still battering the world and is in other or some areas more deeper, e.g. Italy, Spain and Portugal. Interesting is the time of response and legislation to help Member States from this EU communication. After COVID- 19 has flattened to nihil by that time reverse of the economic package now set out in ad hoc legislation will also, as the pandemic, be 'flattened'. In it's communication when reading carefully the EU has done everything possible under these difficult times when public life becomes part of the economic collapse during shutdown. With EU funding during COVID- 19 one of it's communications also is clear on how to keep surveillance upgraded by individual Member States, aka competences (interpretation?). This crisis is teaching the world one thing and very important too that trust between countries is the silk thread and best at this time. Who wants to drain the sea must have millions of buckets to help each other get it dry. In propaganda terms one will also say that if the land cannot take much of the sea water, than what? Fortunately we are not draining the sea here with the pandemic worldwide. Even smarter: or create another sea. In flinter thin lines one remarkabe communication was that all sectors in society of each Member State, meaning specifically private or public sector, are included in the response package from the EU as is to help the vulnerable in society. Civil life should not lay bare because of COVID- 19 as far as this EU communication is concerned. We should recommend this reading out in public and try to understand COVID-19 is not a 'trading instrument' when in the European Union. Or be mazed and not watertight.

COVID- 19 and the EU

7 April 2020

The EU should become a very clear symmetry in response to Covid- 19. Member States should ask what did we do well, and others why didn't we do so well during the C- 19 crisis. Four weeks since the start of the epicenter outbreak with the disease what we see is that the EU is more asymmetrical than usual if Member States are dealing with a problem larger of scale. It is and was it's first large scale problem as Member States quickly had to respond to a global microbe outbreak in an instant moment. Some say that the global financial crisis was about currency and capital, something entirely different with a disease of uncertain and unknown origin. The intention behind a concerted effort should not be that nothing can be done unified as Member States, or having others go in circles with baseless assumptions or projections and see failure of the European Union act as a vital group of 27 to ask questions how to deal with the pandemic. There was a starting point at the beginning of the outbreak and designated as Day One. If from this point the EU went zig- zag and out of sight from the basis EU institution some need to apologise for a panic that was inevitable in it's first minutes, but than quickly had to change to 'leaving no one behind' attitude as a Defense. The lesson here to be learned is that the EU without Britain is another institution from any perspective by Member States, as Britain is not in the EU and has to deal with the Coronavirus in it's own sovereign way. In deep sincerity one could think and say how Britain is badly missed during this pandemic, and that if they had been in the EU that perhaps most Member States would have seen the more panoramic view of the pandemic. It is routine if the EU Member States have seen panic without Britain in the EU. And routine is the mutti of all squabbles and cannot be the worldview of the EU during the outbreak of this virus.

Our worldview as EU citizens have also changed since the outbreak of COVID- 19. Solidarity has come closer to our doorstep than during the financial crisis in 2008. We are proud citizens when living in a Member State that is doing well during this crisis and that despite the greater difficulties your country is showing capability and help sustain the need for safety and care (medical). But it is also sustainability that is shifting high levels of solidarity at the same time when it comes to the EU economics. We see this is happening in Italy, Spain and Portugal. And with that the EU design is particularly showing it's waters are shallow and not very deep. Decades of EU integration and union Membership with no answer during it's first pandemic between the Member States is an unrealistic outcome and it can send out the wrong alarm and impressions worldwide. Once more countries should critically ask why did they do well while others didn't. One Italian minister went even as far as saying that the EU will fall into bankruptcy without a sustainable answer to COVID- 19 by all Member States. Citizens do not want to see that happen to their home- economies in every household. The Italian minister said that that was also dangerous. The EU establishment is about respect and is rendering (egalitarian?) respectability to all it's Member States. When European countries imagine the future without the EU the dream is wonderful to 'get back' your respectablity as a sovereign nation and little realises that this simple dream is a trillion euro dream! (Per capita and not any citizen has that kind of money) A dangerous adventure to be part of the EU is now behind us. It is time for the EU reality and take it out of it's Euro- area infancy and doing so with what Europeans truly are to understand, maybe in hedonistic terms: Iuno moneta. Or it is this quote:
" Hyperion, leaving twilight in the rear,
'Is sloping to the threshold of the West."

Name: COVID- 19

31 March 2020

The whole industrial world and global public life have been labelled: March- April- Pandemic. And for Europe, and not just the European Union alone, March- April- Epicenter of COVID- 19. All citizens in demographics around the world are now asking the same question: will this pandemic stop, soon or when? In a nervous twitch between brightness of mind and human inquisitive nature some are also inclined to find the solutions they need in a more holistic view. That becomes social media feed and believable by many other holistic makers. COVID-19 is terrestrial and a datum est. Faced in a mirror reflex you could say that earth is looking COVID- 19 straight into it's eyes and that on both sides the only response is nonresponsive. In human language to translate the disease the World Health Organisation announced the outbreak as pandemic, and urging all countries and peoples to follow certain guidelines to mitigate immediate affect of widespread of the Coronavirus. Where did the virus come from has been remodelled by masses into questions and graphics, in the meantime. Also in confusion many asked what it exactly was, e.g. maybe a bio- weapon microbe with an unknown destination? The COVID- 19 pandemic outbreak has given us back our human nature and emotions, now almost synchronized, country by country, peoples by peoples and government by government. We are in lock- down synchronisation in response to the disease spread and it's spreading. The world is also desperate to contain the disease. A more important red light is that who ever is exposed to the virus will die as a result when not properly 'quarantined' immediately in hospital and receive medical treatment. The virus has a dynamic rate of high density and is expansive. We are all exposed to the virus 100 %, minus when we make it and recover 50 % (approximately). COVID-19 outsmarts earth with it's rapidness even more, is what the experts are trying to find out around the clock and are making overtime.

There is no simple story to answer all the questions that we might have. The only answer is the name of the virus and what governments can do to help it's citizens during the crisis. Government guidelines are that people should stay in, keep a 1.5 m distance, and avoid social contact. You must do whatever you can to save lives and that of your own as well. From that point all global experts are staring at wallpapers the size of a canvas and blinded by the sun on: C O V I D- 1 9 D A T A. The public at human level are also staring at bulk information streamings, as a result per capita. It is being said that it is in the interest of both government and people to keep the balancing act of 'herdimmunity' and social distancing. More specifically it is by assumption to keep 'herdimmunity' and social distancing, as there are still many people in densed population places, India, big cities, and gatherings too in many small centra closer to home who cannot deep up with the formal discipline. On the other hand no one is abandoning the other and in places where the lockdown is not full circular many official managing teams are stationed to keep people to stay alert. At another rationality level when the industrial world falls silent in the cities, major or developing economies, impact is right at the center of life and making it very critical reading what the Coronavirus as a consequence reflects, and not just in one place or country. In other words there is no time for sleepwalking for any government dynamics. COVID- 19 comes with a full package against the industrial world and human spaces with indiscriminate force. The world needs help from all sides of the globe to break up the mass (estimated force) of the pandemic, efficiently and also high velocity logistical expertise. Is lock- down the only way out, is the question many 'proactive' governments are asking.  Wuhan China, where the pandemic first hit, is advising not to stop going to work. Keep the social distance, and avoid contact of any kind, from grandparents to children kissing their parents. Mass religious events, Mecca and Israel's Pesach, have been cancelled this year. And from there the list goes on worldwide. Now the question is: what is or could be the next COVID- 19 chapter?

Mr Benyamin Netanyahu has won a strategic victory in last night's election outcome.

(Unedited)

3 March 2020

A strategic victory for a right- wing government can mean two different things in Israel, one internal and the other can only be how the country will convey International politics on a global level. It has sovereignty in the corner of it's eye and also peace with the Palestinian neighbours should not become an Arab constituency under it's new plans. Here are a few great points for Mr Netanyahu if he succeeds in forming a new government this week or as early as possible from now. But we are not going to give up on the Israeli nation and have a little faith be it with firmness in it's leader and Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. For one reason that he knows what he is representing and that this victory is his greatest challenge yet and it does not come with a bag full with goodies in it on the short term future. For this win time was or so it seems on his side and rightfully so. Israel has never been before in a unique position where it could make clear to the rest of the world where it is standing on many issues with regard to governing Israel and making real to promises on sovereignty to the electorate who endorsed for Mr Netanyahu to come out the victor in this election, over Blue & White Mr Benny Gantz (next to Mr Yair Lapid). In many cases a right- wing government does not herald good tidings for a country in bad need of peace and stability. That for Israel has not just one meaning, black or white. The global world has not yet given any reaction to last night's general election outcome in Israel as it has sobering thoughts on what could happen to the Palestinian people that are still living under poor conditions and that they haven't seen any improvement over decades. The blame goes out fast in full speed ahead and leaving high dust clouds behind where there is little visibility for some of the people living in these areas. And the blame crystalises on both sides where and when war breaks out every time one would look up to the sky. It is a different story for Palestinian academics who seek rewards (Dutch: gun factor) from Israel, in terms of high social standards and access to a better living condition for people (regardless of social status/ rich or poor), and that here tough love isn't just a phrase on both sides.

What good is a right- wing government in Israel planning on doing? If the world knew the answer to this question still no one would or could understand what it means. The world outside Israel and Jerusalem is holding it's view of a long time experience in these regions and what sovereignty means for Israelis that this could become a much harder stance on annexation issues by Israeli politicians or the man who has nearly established his own (Nehru? Or his political years) dynasty in the political arena of modern day Israel and who is now slowly moving majestically toward empire and rule in Israel. The dream of Zionism is now majesty if Mr Netanyahu holds government in his election win last night. And the majesty is challenge. A challenge also for the Palestinian people has opened with last night's election outcome. We are truly living and breathing in interesting times if Xiansheng or Lord Mr Netanyahu will change Israel forever. The future is all about competing worlds for sustainability and prosperity, all inclusive by country by country. Seventy years of war against Israel for land and a place in Jerusalem is proof that the Palestinian people are more than their distant neighbours do understand political effects with and from a global mindset. Palestine for the Palestinian people is part of a global mindset (not a remain as some say) and there isn't just one remedy to heal it's hurt or sorrows if it takes the wrong curve and could lose a strategic peace with Israel and political freedom in the whole of the region. In the Middle East for seventy years there are new global players who would want to prosper continuously and in the future. That is a tough bastion of countries that go endlessly by their reputation to be the old global leaders in the region and who need a country like Israel beside in their club. The world has to wait and see how the government in Israel will take on the challenge on it's own narrative that sovereignty is key to lasting peace in the region. Emperors in ancient China would admire Mr Netanyahu and his valour to take Israel to the height of the sun, but they also know that China can also mean tender and fragile when a giant Ming vase. For now in mortal language we should not give up on Mr Netanyahu just yet and expect him to come out in pure genius soon.

Israel is now, achshav, first (in world priorities).

15 February 2020

The mindsetting of Israel as a first in the world is different in 2020 when compared to 1948 when the State of Israel was in it's infancy and to rebuild it's nation. How and where that nation would rebuild itself was never much clear a destination and the place, in the rest of the established world and what was left of that after WWII. Rebuilding Europe had priority back then where most big cities were bombed and buried under high hills of debris and still smelling after the dust of war what was left behind. Sovereignty of each and every country affected by the Germans during the war was a divine right of nations and at whatever cost be restored to it's former glories. Home to the Jewish nation took secondary importance on these lists and priority was given to the Nuremberg trials and creating new beginnings and ways to combat Jew- hatred as unlawful indefinitely. Israel looked then more like a temporarily solution for survivors of the Holocaust, if and when keeping it quiet or hidden under the 'sandcastle' called Palestine. But all in good faith and gentlemen agreements for nations. There was one more great importance on immediate priority on the list, that was Germany and it's economy. If strong Europe and rebuilding the neighbouring countries that would make a good first start after the war. If weak Europe would collapse and maybe stay beyond repair for decades. The rest is history... Except for Israel and the growing out into a State and having now the most powerful military force in the Middle East. After last month's release of the US Deal of the Century with annexation and the Palestinian Statehood introduction time or timing for the near future history between the continents and the International world it is becoming very clear where Israel would stand when continue with expanding sovereignty in certain 'disputed areas' for decades. If International Law first began after WWII it has or should have a date reference that Israel is now severely challenging to a mandate and change it's destiny for State and peoples. Are we looking at the causarius of the International Law or at a causam ( cause/reason/motive, origin, source, derivation, responsibility/blame, symptom)?

A great example of causam in the International Law is not only about time and timelessness in Israel's defence, but also it is taking out the significance of what it is derivative when change is natural and 'unnatural' (with neighbouring Palestinian Statehood and not peoples) in the same timelapses since it was first made into International Law. Sovereignty for Israel depends very much in the International Law for validity of it's existence indefinitely. And also from any regimental point of view that without the concreto design of a clear validity the State of Israel is not clear what military the nation has built over the same time in decades. By assumption with Israel being a friendly nation to the rest of the world we are certainly looking at a valid state of military affairs when saying that this is and could only be a symbolic military force, but saying so because all of Israel is defending it's land and as a people as citizens. The world has never gone into the extra mile on this issue since the quiet migration of European Jews after WWII of survivors of the Holocaust when moving to Israel and creating a 'home' for the people of Israel. Sovereignty therefore is a very complicated case for one Prime Minister alone to stand in between the modern world and his nation keeping life lowkey in every day living standard, and with in his side the far- right wing of extreme religious Jews who demand an extraordinary military expediton from a government in vacuum. Israel's army is also the people and citizens of Israel's army, with no particular military hierarchical institution. High rank military or further up in the cyber world the military is another hardcore level of it's defence of Israel and to keep security of the utmost priority eternally above all living nations. From the simple observations here above it looks like Israel is in need of the highest calibre of people and have a look again at the causa/ causam and causarius in International Law versus the State of Israel. Achshav almost at it's melodic is another meaning when saying that Israel's danger is now or forever hold it's peace.

To be continued.

The impossible between Israelis and Palestinians is a challenge.

12 February 2020

What could change the Israelis mind on principle and egalitarianism? A divided Israel is also in the side flank here as infinite force driving here and there in Israel's society for more than decades to the point of crossed- eyed how to perceive normality and the abnormal normality in their living spaces between Arabs, Palestinians and the new generations of Israeli young citizens. Palestinians are also 'normal' people that are fond of drinking coffee or tea in the shade of ancient old trees, if nothing 'abnormal' has happened during the day or night. Family life is civic by definition in any place in the world and is a right by International Standards. A whisper calls for something and tells this region: we all have a duty to maintain in this world a little happiness for all and for some go even further. But in Israel it will be a little happiness when in politics, the military and also between two unidentical nations living side by side for more than a series of decades, long before any politics was born unto this region inside and outside Jerusalem. The State of Israel after WWII became reality and it was the spikeheaded spear of destiny for the Palestinians ever since. How the world is looking at peace in the whole world is by discipline and watch where they are keeping their eyes on in fixed terms annually. You get the reports each year or in ten years periodicals. Israel and the Palestinians go beyond International publications and periodicals of any kind. Both nations are ancient (in theory or not), one being the people of Israel and the other Caanites or a remnant of Caanites. What are we then looking at from here in the 21st century in a world where even animals must have rights to exist humanely? No one will know how to begin answering this question, accept for Israelis and the Palestinians. The big surprise in our modern time is that now we would be looking at the truth.

In theory Israel is divided between secular and theocratic sentiment Jews. The Palestinian people are not a theocratic nation and are not seeking to allign with regimes in the rest of the Middle East. The world is convinced that the Palestinian people have a regional identification for Statehood and it will allign itself with democracies around the western half of the planet. Let's go even further and say e.g. that Israel would be also part of that 'western half', than it is highly likely being a close neighbour of the Palestinian people, democracy and dynamic secularism could be the vision on this stage to 'allign' with or seek it's alliance. And the vision get's narrowed down by fantasy when it could become more realistic, notwithstanding that in every paradise things still could go very wrong. Humanity is never void of schemes to bring down rivals or Caesars... Allignment would also mean that if Israel is the Republic of Israel, the Palestinians are very much looking here at the same State model of becoming 'pre-nuptial statehood' a Republic State and in later voting system that may come to change, God Willing. One universal question is: when will the violence stop? Both nations should realize how closely related their relation to the region they are not only in the present time coexistence but more that they are inseparable indigenous to the region in- or ex situ. We musn't lose faith in both nations when coming together in private and resume peace talks and full cooperation, and if possible the creation of a new infrastructure can be feasible in the near future. Old views of wars and violence have no theoretical value in the here above. But Time is pressing hard in the world today, after the release of the DoC in January 28 this year. Another argument we often hear is that Israel is opposed to the Two- State solution and it wants to do everything in it's power to thin- out that possibility to a nagging point. Half here is true and the other half is that Israel after the universal betrayal of the Holocaust is right to be prudent about it's future as a State. In 30 years time no one knows whether the Palestinian people could grow out of their miserable existence into a thriving nation and ally to Israel, side by side, doorstep to doorstep in the Capital of Israel, Jerusalem, in a new timeline.

What we also shouldn't do right now is lose trust in the International World. But academics can work this thing out in high cadres. The Middle East future blocs in real time for now are animated into: Israel & Palestinian, Jordan, the Arab nations and Egypt across the Suez Canal. In the north of Israel with Lebanon and Syria remain in an unclear situation as we speak. The military in Israel are symbolic to the State of Israel, by any definition since the Holocaust and not by conquest. "Israel has the right to defend itself" was a much loved slogan among the global politicians over the last four or five decades, in memo. In 2020 one could almost say that the same slogan has become something in the spirit of schizophrenia for some when not knowing what to support on the side of the Palestinians and leave out Israel to be on it's own in the global world. Also peace has become delusional in the Middle East between Israel and the Palestinians. And then last but not least on the most prominent Jews in the world there is much proof of the desire to build or help build a Palestinian State, or they are proponents of the so called Two- State solution plan. A cynical world is still in disbelief and fails to see the intention behind the peace building of the two nations is quite serious. Power can match all challenges and do 'abnormal' things in order to expand normality. Al Aqsa mosque is one such 'abnormality' and yet it leaves a certain openess to normal life and living continue. And perhaps it is not written well in English and only in accents in Arabic or Hebrew, but the people living in these regions and places have a way to understand the nitty- gritty of life on both sides. For now this writing is only fiction and imagery from imagination (especially architecture from a picture of Rawabi before construction of the megacity and Kotel as situated in the deep of the hill). If reality it might bring a shock to the present time in the world, that Israel and the Palestinians are the only two nations that can bring the kind of peace that they want to design in an upward move, X & Y.

Error: Canaanites


Jared Kushner, king of Middle East plan between Israel and Palestinians.

2 February 2020

The Middle East, Israel and the Palestinians have become an interesting region after the Deal of the Century was released on 28 January last week. From the overview, to any outsider, it is suggesting a few changes of ideas and goals on both sides and a third player, which in this case can only be the neighbours in the Arab countries, that are unfamiliar in the rest of the world to hear and read (those who read the plan online). Palestinians and Israelis are in limbo over certain segments of the plan, if not 'ero- romantic vertigo'. On both sides, the Middle East and the rest of the world, there is also a new situation picture of what the plan might in reality bring. It was set out in technical details on security and State- sovereignty (Paletinians). Before building the material for construction was ordered, so to speak, and what are the parties involved not or  to do with a roof of this extension? Outsiders might believe in grabs of land is a free stunt in Israel to anyone who will be first in the morning to get his piece or plot before evening. Peace in our century does not mean any of those things, but what it is whispering in the Middle East is something totally different socially and in terms of region economics. You do not set out an elaborate plan for the region and peace between Israelis and Palestinians without a further vision in terms of prosperity on all sides, if the rest of the world is also moving on in the same direction. That bigger picture before the Deal of the Century was not envisioned before with previous decades of the road to peace between Israel and the Palestinians. Simplicity is king in the Middle East and the king wants to stay in his castle for another thousand years, if the world lets him. Reality on the other side isn't what you can call quiet and a reliable partner with much predictability in it's natural ways and order. To keep the status quo on the Temple Mount was of great stature how this was put forward in the plan of the US in this particular age and deal. In Judaism it must have been monumental and an obelisk of surprise to the Palestinians and Jordan.

Economic sovereignty in the Middle East, one of the genii's mirages is but a dream some would want to say and see go back into the bottle and stay there. The Middle East in future will not be disconnected from the network with the rest of the world is not a dream for the weak- or faint-hearted this time with the Deal of the Century. The US is on the right course and security of Israel might just be the reason why prosperity in the Middle East is absolutely necessary. Where you are going to have to look for the reason in the plan is what prerequisite it is for any next stage. In the next stage the Palestinian people are playing enormous a role, not of size and nation magnitude, but as the key to the castle. World opinion is the root for all in the natural order of humanities and between nations, without putting this or that nation above the other. A dangerous thought for Israel as a whole when exclusive by race and economic supremacy, andif anti- Semitism is the root of all evil in humanities. Military Security for Israel is therefore the other necessity some might see as a non necessary evil... If the Palestinians should have a State Soveeignty the world in all good faith should render the service to the whole deal that it must accept that having a currency of their own is also or therefore vital for real sovereignty. And that is not only impossible it is also unacceptable as everyone knows to rules in International law, that the only country that would be in a position to render/ host such a service can only be the country that is larger in the territory, Israel. In other words of simplicity that only Israel could fulfil this unimaginable and make economic sovereignty in the Middle East strong as the US, EU, ASEAN and in the rest of the world region economic blocs. The Palestinians are important and should take sovereignty the only path forward  for it's nation. (Turning the gun into a plow)

The largest ever project for the Middle East: the deal of the century.

28 January 2020

Internationally some may think it a bit exotic, not realistic and also what others might see as the hasty decision of the era. In Jewish language and maybe symbolism Jerusalem has reached the age of eight days to celebrate a national Brit Milah. And it's happiness now wholly is relying on a future of very extensive promises. Jerusalem, you could say, has now been for more than seven decades inside this motherland of the Jews feeling and hearing about it's fate, sometimes in mute distance anxiety and at other times friendliness from the union between nations and Israel at top level relations. One golden rule from the past has always been that the State of Israel will in the future be the highest model of achievement among world leaders how to make peace on earth between nations, and in the Middle East between Israelis and the Palestinian people. Content of peace has now suddenly become dangerous. And that is not referring to the Deal of the Century, strangely. Where the danger is pointing at is very simple when you do not have the future system (globally or Internationally) to sustain the mere dimensions to which we think the future of Israel is expanding. Seven decades of rebuilding the world after WWII most governments and countries saw it different on the world stage and no old system existed just yet, before globalism in the eighties. On the other side many Jews are asking what was the difference then, e.g. if Israel wants to transcends into the new age of tomorrow? One right is true for the Palestinian people in Israel that maybe their State will be another challenge if possible to build a minor cosmoplitan area between the Damascus Gate and another fictional point physics. In the Deal of the Century something might be revealed on the future system within the global community and what is for the Middle East their new challenge.

The world needs redefining it's meaning, globally and International (Mike Bloomberg saying the same yesterday in Florida about America), especially when historic. Many in politics today have to also realize that with technologies, high tech or advanced, everything is possible outside textual / literacy politics and policies in the real or global world. Expansion also is a very costly prospect for Israel in the long term and looking on the balance it is 'nothing to gain' from in the first of it's existing years. In return at this building point the Palestinian people gain something of a spielraum paradox for to set out economic and political strategies of their own to take control of the areas designated to them in the Deal of the Century, to new formats. In other words next to a political forum for the Palestinian people one other forum is equally important. The economic forum. This fits what describes Jerusalem the best is compassion for mankind. Many Jewish institutes and universities are already working with Palestinian academics on peace in Israel and how to live side by side in a world that is unfamiliar to the rest of the world, but is home base the only way forward for the two nations. Defiance of warlords is another thing. It looks on both sides the hardest thing to do with one controlling while the other side is planning on out-growing. The world fortunately believes in both content wise. How for the EU it will go with the Deal of the Century is still unknown, and also no one is yet saying anything in the rest of the world, and even may think that timing seems oversimplified if at this pace such important changes in the 'old system' will take place in the Middle East in Real Time. Regret is still that the world wasn't prepared just yet on this occasion. At the same time many Israelis are terrified at the mere size of the new or greater Israel, when tomorrow the Deal of the Century will be announced or revealed at noon, 28 January 2020. Israel's enemies alone can feel a little bemused the first time in thousands of years or centuries.

Holocaust remembrance day, a rhetorical farce in the madness.

24 January 2020

Conditions theories for another Holocaust in the future is what should be on every Jewish mind, rich or poor, in a natural ending. The force of life in a study of cycles and with humanities as mainstream of the living can be both offering a glimpse and declining it will ever come back again in the century of modern day life. Millennial presidents are technically speaking less de facto above these modern day abstracts and sovereignty to taking it up as a real condition and to be in Office, and so will have to wait in term to only win elections and stay in Office. The question of tackling anti-Semitism globally can impress only and make innocent by-standers of presidents and other government officials around the world. And from this point everything is possible. The Jewish world is in the present day an established world on the balance and most of it being felt in gobalism fluidity or global industries, technologies and sciences. Basically some nations in great astonishment are keeping the same questioning over why and how this is possible as it leaves out great continents to lag behind even more than decades ago, or so it seems very quickly. Human is playing tricks with it's own mind and take the experience very individual up to a point or boiling point. And sometimes right in front of the noses of governments. It is that strange thing again of not punishing Kane but protect him 7 times 70 from being murdered or killed when the crime is beginning to show resentment towards Jewish industries and prosperity. Abel, the flower and loving gracefulness are in every cycle again the Jewish race and their bliss, perhaps to show humanity how it should be done when born unto our world?

But 7 times 70 also could be an occult for atrocities and deliberate assault without prayer (Kane) to God Almighty! It is lacking the struggle of nobility and divine Justice, that many affluent nations would want to take refuge to... But again, why a Holocaust and slaying of Jews? The Kurdish nation have a song/ poem saying that every first born male or son are for the slaughter. Israel was humanities first born in the garden of Eden, if we read it well in the book of Genesis. And just maybe this is still news and the same cycle in life, GMT. Humanities cannot keep on doing the same mistake every time we envision the end of times and follow it's itching. Just plain and simple without the pedantry of centuries long words on nobility and mercy, or even right to possession. If nations want to build another nation in e.g. Jerusalem against the walls of the Western Wall and Jews and do not implicate the deep political compromises and look for a viable design, perhaps we should stick to home base conditions and find just another century of eternal wisdom in this broken tooth in the universe of Jerusalem (Russian saying where the universe keeps it's secret). Fallen from grace is also for kings, 7 times 70. Anti- Semitism is hooliganism at it's worst and it has no intellectual right for existence. In that same category like murder or envy. Humanities is coming back to anti- Semitism with a new downhill ride and it is destined to go the same way and remarkably using the same battlecries and howling against a mythical Jewish moon like black and white wolves. Humanities is being squeezed out by the Jews, universally, so they say. Earth will be scorged by Jews if you don't take action now. Without being a soil expert or engineer of earth that's mainstream for racism against Jewish prosperity. Also naive actions by the mob without being top economists and understand mainstream economics and globalism finance. The Holocaust Remembrance Day on 27 January next week should be less of a farce internationally.

Condition translated to English from Dutch and Swedish to illustrate it's complexity if in  'natural ending' of cycle.

De derde wereld oorlog is op voorwaarde, en in onze tijdgeest onderhands (Zweeds: Tredje världskriget är betingad, och i vår tidsanda privat).

Error scorge- scorched.

Jewish sentiment turned into 'Das ist dein sieg', in Europe.


Niebelungenlied: "In ancient tales many marvels are told us:of renowned heroes worthy of praise, of great hardship,of joys, festivities, of weeping and lamenting,of bold warriors' battles—now you may hear such marvels told."

11 January 2019

Two ills are making public opinion in the world confused again. It is Jews and the rest of the world. And propaganda can start anywhere, even at the dinner table between spouses with one demanding more silence at the table, while the other wants more conversation. Between nation and nation the sawing of seams will come out in different tones and patterns, antisemitism or anti- Israel for reasons more obscure than human nature. And Jewry with it's recent history is an obscurity in equally recent history e.g. in Europe. It is called 'heimat' or 'monetary heimat', a meaning close to nothing sentimental and luxurious. Money goes beyond blood and is now even made timeless for the next hundred years or so. Germany understands 'sieg' and how you must cross the waters and perils to reach immortal fame and victory, which can only be given to a born victor or victorious race. After WWII European Jewry perhaps have just done that and then the misunderstanding comes back from Hades to hunt down the champions. Human nature can turn against itself most appalling, with names like antisemitism and anti- Jew in racists flames of old... Europe also has never changed. It only became more extrovert over the last four or three decades with globalization and the European Union. Someone ought to tell them in tribal speak that this is inherent to the natural order of Nibelungen, when the victor has crossed the lake of war and battles this was to be payed in riches and name, if in memo when looking back at all Germanic tribes in history. 'Sieg' is justified according to Germanic laws!

But Jews are Jews and with that comes ancient history, Israel, the patriarchs and ancestral peoples. The God of Abraham perpetually turns the Sinai into the Red Sea with a peoples what was then not known yet by the peoples living in Europe. On the next stage the change of course came with the story and life of Jesus (by Jewish descent) and death as Christ in a much later time since the Exodus from Egypt. Europe was born under Greek and Roman empires and kingdoms e.g. Persia, Babylon and Egypt became mainstream flows into Europe and from the Middle East, aka the river Tigris and Euphrates as places with major references throughout the ages and the ancient world. Israel is now home to Israelis and has grown into a formidable demographic in the world today. It has turned the region where we find Israel on the world map a conquest of it's own, and religion in Yahweh or the God of Abraham is and remains the silk road for and to all eternity. It is also the place of ascent for many mysticism of dominant religious views, and competing here can sometimes be of a more destructive nature. Human nature is still subject to extrovert exaltations over who has divine rights in another kind of home, named in Hebrew Babait and with no direct relation to the German 'heimat'. Except when listening to Haydn's 'Die schopfung'. Jewry in the US or in Europe/ Britain will have to be able to make a great distinction between Babait and heimat, if and when sentiments will again become torched with anti- Semitism or Jew- hatred. Where you meet with the eye of distinction comes in immediate haste the racist's view, as in eye for an eye. The God of Abraham, one can say, only made the world extensive and planet size for exactly this purpose, for all peoples in the world to be it's inhabitants first and last to find God. Whether in Haydn's Die Schopfung, or Das lied von der erde by Gustav Mahler. And time will be split again one day and in the colour scarlet or violet red in opposite direction for Jews but also for all believers to Jerusalem. That is a nice way to keep the individual longing and hoping for eternity at one particular address.

Iran, test of rationalities.

9 January 2020

Perhaps with the new military action by the United States in the Middle East against Iran a few questions also opened 'inaction' for some, e.g. in the European Union. Member States slipped into vacuum from world opinion as an active actor in military operations on the global stage, not of the inaction itself, but rather because this was a sudden change of realities of military action. European Member States could from this vacuum only be questioning how to act properly, this time without the Defensive military of the United Kingdom/ Britain, and if fundamentally the European Union could become the Defense of Defensive Military platform. The war & peace issue is a big ambition and one which will have to be addressed long and short term, as many are already pointing in this direction (Israel). The world cannot do without the offensive military of the US, for a proper balance and in cooperation with the defensive military platform, e.g. the EU. Peace can be maintained in the ways the world has become accustomed to for the last seven decades. Iran now has not taken the bold step of challenging the US and it's allies on this occasion, by new actions of retaliation on the US- base facilities in Iraq this evening. One thing seems to be happening non visualized at this hour, that it is not only strategy that is unclear (Dutch tweet NOS), but what is more unclear is where the vacuum is coming from. The week started off with putting Brexit leaving the EU later this month on a nursery rhyme, Brexit, Brexit (Tiger, Tiger) moment in comparison to the sudden killing of the Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in the first week of 2020 and with Iran being on the brink of opening assault on it's enemies...

The old world order was a fine one, with the US and it's offensive military power in the world, and Britain on the other side holding together with the European Union rationalities a defensive military management for many decades. The question for the EU is now whether Brexit also means putting the EU in a center of it's own military center politics. (Which isn't yet here) In ancient times the Babylonian king, Merodach Baladan, wrote to the king of Israel, Hezekiah, to form a defensive and offensive relationship with him, the opposing party to Israel and vice verse. Vacuum in the Middle East but also in the European Union on military platform issues, are two ends reaching out to each other and not for the better, if the world wants to maintain a power of stability and alliances. In 2020 for most EU- ministers the public's impression is one of being a global power without real action when it comes to the military. And this opinion can hurt the EU if it appears so that with Britain in the EU most EU Member States were sovereign in collective efforts when needed, military or political. To solve Iran as a military problem for the west and the EU Ministers isn't just a priority in this case alone. Defensive military is a long term solution to similar cases everywhere in the world when involved with an ally as the United States. No one can estimate the formidable enemy in the future! But EU ministers can be rational, decisive, and be experts in due course in a Defensive Military sovereignty. You could say it is the path forward in a 'coming apart' world. Brexit can be still a happy occasion for Britain this month and the EU can still be happy to work on the future of the Member States. The balance should not be a vacuum and stay this way.

Between A - B the Euro area has a treaty with the capital letters L & M.

(Personal Op)

24 December 2019

If the science of economics is determining in both directions, horizontal and vertical, straight lines to create dimension and space impact will do the rest. There is much criticism how the Euro area is failing to be as convincing as two decades ago when this was referred to as the extension of the ECC, only with the intention of Member States Union. After the millennium the single currency, the Euro, was introduced with the speed of a rocket lift- off and has since then accelerated quietly or maybe out loud at times infinitely to a greater level of center economics and globalization. A simple idea how to start and where the center economics would become first and deep surge of growth was to create fiscal spaces, equally deep dimensioned, and leave the rest to gravity. At least for the time being in the state of a yet primary state. The Euro had no story in the European Member States at that stage, either. When looking back or peek back to the last two decades on how the Euro area prolonged to the present time and has become a global currency the middle isn't any longer the point from A- B, but is strangely enough stuck in the middle of A-B. Which now has created a new theory of the science economics/ EU- economics. The Treaties do not and are more political strategy based to hold the EU together as a Union of governments. Perhaps in the new theory there is place for another treaty where the reading can only be about the future and not just that of the EU. And what is unclear in terms of real wealth the question was never asked whether this was historical or exchange mechanism. National currency has the tendency of keeping the money tight in, and with the Euro it's imperative is to keep it fluid and finding therefore in the present time a compatible magnitude in the globalization area. What does all this mean if it has a valid component in the writing above?

Stack all the money in point A or point B, and you create no room for space (fiscal traps?) and central exchange stations/ cells, but what do you create? One can see where this could lead to and take us to security and concrete politics and policies. It has been here for so long no one can remember any different, than that our world was concrete in all it's ways, industrial or global. Three or four decades ago not many had even seen the future but in abstract only. We now know that the future is palpable and real as water, bread and living. Decisions are almost being taken literally by the people and for the people, if the cooperation with industries can find any added value at multiple levels in world economies. Political Parties in most western countries are the strong pillars of preference in this process of changing the world on what we 'really' have and what still needs to be done. Not many are convinced that the world needs more large scale projects to sustainability. Yet, demand will remain continuous and repitious as we grow in the world. And now the EU has joined the race if the single currency can meet the demand of global growth, but also it is looking like our EU Member States are going to have to come back to the center economics at level A-B, and not B-C, C- D, and so forth. Science always makes that discipline and go back to the starting point. It is the only way to look up and see why it is called the future. After the building is finished you will see it's true height when standing in the central hall looking up. The single currency was built to be that way, a new money with no historical background or national constrictions. What is the next Treaty?

The political lab of errors is pointing to the Labour Party and UK.

17 Dec 2019

On 31 January 2020 the UK will leave the EU, with or without a deal by the end of the same year, was announced earlier tonight says the Daily Telegraph in the UK. The political reality is slowly transforming to a new one and what you are taking with you in your ministerial bag to the EU next month is still a secret. EU ministers are anxious what is in the bag, in the meantime, but will welcome any sort or form of building plan for future relations with the continent and UK. Appointing new members to the cabinet by the PM in Britain today and yesterday does send out a significant signal to the rest of the country and to the EU how decisiveness is key to the whole package and what it means to the people of Britain to leave the EU when more than a mantra, first and last. That understanding is going deeper if this means speaking as a sovereign nation. Going to the EU next month can entirely mean something else once you set your foot out of Nr 10 Downing street! And for a simple reason when in memo a general election win is a political win. In contrast is a political loss still a political matter, essential to the mechanism of politics win or lose in the country. The Labour Party failures or collapse in the last election still are and remain part of the winning process, that if the country needs to leave the EU both political parties will do this for the nation and Britain's future. We see this only in business when one party has won the nomination to lead the company for another definite period of time and oversees from top to bottom where it will set it's periodic goals for the whole of the company. The future however remains not in their hands. You could say that Labour in Britain is as much a winner if the UK will leave the EU next month in January 2020, but has in politics at home suffered in this election a crushing defeat. Or to put it simply, that a triumph in politics of this magnitude as in the last general election for the Tory Party could not have been achieved without the Labour Party and it's leader, Mr Jeremy Corbyn, in opposition. It is the EU where it will matter how the nation can do as one, or be operational as one, and that doesn't look like a Labour error will be very helpful this time.

The people have done for the country what they could, full stop. Leaving the EU, the country will now have to be tested on how to do (in return) for the people, which is the unusual political situation since the Kennedy speech in the USA. Between now and next month on 31 January 2020 is it true about the Labour Party being lame and limp as a political party (biscuit) in Britain? In the aftermath reflection what Mr Jeremy Corbyn did during campaigning was extraordinary to sacrifice his political arms and legs on the pyle and just to prove that this is what Britain needed. But it could have been worse for Mr Corbyn if he were the dad seahorse carrying strange eggs in his pouch! The general election was held when the people of Britain were in a national fatigue with politics and politicians since the referendum in 2016 to leave the EU. And they have been clear on this on many occasions in the media or onsocial media for the last 36 months what sovereignty means to the nation. But winning the election and getting there was imperative and perhaps equally important. Now some are convinced that Labour could have done more, e.g. listening to the people of Britain... The Tories are now the party to have listened to the people, is what some are also claiming. In the middle the general election was laden with + & -, highly charged. Next month Labour is in a political position of becoming 'the coalition party' (rather than opposition) if the country wants to leave the EU as one nation. And that may now be just naive thinking at the moment and thinking now only where the party has gone different from the Tories in the last general election. One error to make is to say that the Labour Party is different from the UK, since the UK is leaving the EU. No one would want to make that error now and there is simply no room for blind horses.


India is catching flies, giant ones.

14 August 2019

First it is the continent from any point of view and primary. Secondly it is the people of India or the continent that are it's natural citizens. The continent has strategic value for the rest of our world, adjacent to oceanic life and coordination of higher plains atmospheres. Congressman Rahul Gandhi is addressing some of these issues in the present government of Prime Minister Nahendera Modi as we speak. According to the congress man India has desperately been left behind since the seventies in terms of applied science and excecutives. And from a global point of view India has been photobombed with industries before it could venture a leap into the rest of the world and become even part of the G7 countries, next to Britain, Japan, Canada, The EU, The US, Italy, Germany and France. India holds a seat in the Group of 20. Ten years on it will be every country's future that will either represent or demonstrate something of the new atmosphere in the world, a more cleaner if not greener world. Emphasis on the bigger scale of this wide view is first on cleaner, one would say and think, when e.g. the people and nations on the other side have more than adequate all existing technologies that is making sense and also is the logic for any future vision of climate change in every degree of each continent of our planet. When private persons are making these arguments or points one has to bear in mind much of these arguments come from low- key observations and not industries, rivalry or competition. The world is holding percentage wise an estimate of 101% existing technologies to build or rebuild earth, sea, air and planet in our time. It is naive to think that we are still living in the seventies and have never heard of wind turbines offshore or inshore!

India as a continent in the far east needs a particular addressing of it's position and how it takes it's sovereignty to the next level in this century. We live in a transparent world and it would be unwise trying to pretend otherwise. Directly to put it plain and simple no nation is here to either serve one or another, but find in the global effort of industrialized countries the right global format of higher purpose and goals how to serve the future and planet. Some believe it is this that is the target for 2050, that earth and it's global environment is cleaner and greener. 1995 Queen Elizabeth II endorsed the use of Internet throughout the western world. Connectivity from behind your desk at home was introduced after the millennium in the EU. Maybe we like to believe that fast technology also means fast from static Time. We cannot expect to see applied sciences in rural India at the same rate or speed and when still coping with mud and mudslides on a daily basis. Daytime is almost at a mass difference in India from the rest of the world when going to work comfortably and getting back from work safe home. Infrastructure in India is also not adding up in the same way you have in the USA or Germany, and maybe Russia or Japan. Poetic Justice resides in the public domain and is invisible and without intention. It is the inspiration from our existing world in this century that remains constant and it's outlook is optimistic about what it has achieved so far and this far in time.

A continent like India answering for the planet biggest questions.

10 August 2019

Just a tip of the iceberg, 2000 meters below surface is an astonishing idea and try to explain 1% of India's evolution deep surfaces. The world is desperately in need of answers and projections to keep our planet safe for at least another millennium. And that would be it's first global vision of such an extent mankind has ever performed above all inferior thinking, e.g. how to design a racing car or house. How does one start in India and envision it's thousands of square kilometers in another time and place on the face of our young planet? Space technologies have been used in similar ways to study Martian soils and surfaces, and even below 200 meters. The first answer mankind is looking at is that earth has closest to Martian surface and at a deeper level something similar to India and it's centuries long problem with the continent tectonic timeline. In other words, one drop of Martian water could equal that of India's 2000 meters below the surface moist or age. (Age contains below earth's surface not time but water or moist. A simple idea taken from trees and tell how old they are by visible rings.) This unique geological nature of India is what conceals many answers for the planet that no one has yet discovered, unless where the effort is collective partnerships with experts all over the world. Indian Space Technology is a big indicator of where the country is now heading to and that it is building a new India in close collaboration with global leading nations. Will it solve the problem of free floods and floodings in many districts in India? The future contains a full live planet by vision and global effort, starting approximately in 2050. The pressure of it's imagery will be on demographics and consumption and can hurt countries like India hardest and fastest. Parallel to

what most countries in the world expect to see in 2050 and not in abstract, is that a continent like India will  then have to deal with a stronger time and fiction. Perhaps at this point in the writing here above the question has not yet been formulated, let alone knowing where to find the answers if the Indian continent is holding many of the planet's answers. Gravity is our earth's common fix point. In India the continent's force is water flooding. This second answer is pointing clearly to a fire and ice situation and could explain why the planet is resistant to places like the arctic and India's monsoon floodings, when seen from any layman's eyes or point of view. Deep below the Indian's surface is it like any other place on earth, plain and simple homogeneity? The earth is quietly moving from place to place in India without any science or human involvement and perhaps doing so in time cycles. The world leading experts and scientists, one has to admit, are doing a superb job to make India their priority and give it their full support of time and technologies sharing. Political peace in India could look very much different if the continent was tranquil and steady going as a hegemony natural force. If any definition of the continent would be named under it's present time, India would be defined as the most inaccessible place on earth you could find. It is hard and stable one day and fluid the next, making in between the nation moving about like neolithic or paleolithic fossils, to explain it's continuous reason for existence in their traces. New technologies also will make the top more richer and the poorer more poorest, long term thinking. India is beyond prosperity, and this is something the rest of the world should learn from.

Britain needs a Mcenroe- style PM to say 'the ball is in," to the President of the EU Commission.

25 July 2019

They have been here before, and it's called leaving the EU. That was three years ago, and here we are again in July 2019 and with a new Prime Minister in the UK. He has promised the British people that the UK will leave the EU on 31st October later this year and he is looking straight into the camera opposite him, when speaking e.g. in the House of Commons, earlier today. He has smashed the ball across the channel and said it was in from today on. Of course, he wants power and he is wild- eyed about it to have and get it. Also, since morning till dawn he has managed something of an impossible number one as PM on day one, to now have many followers in the media flocking around him like pink sheep. Pink is the new neutral. Also when listening to his opening speech in the Commons today, words like making Britain the greatest place on earth, came as alienated as from what is real in Britain and Westminster, if anyone can remember that there is where he is really heading to in the end of the day. Mr Johnson also had a few key points that he wanted the world to hear and see how it should be done when you are Prime Minister in the United Kingdom, in 2019. Most of his key points were about the future of technology/ technologies in Britain, this was good for business and trade, and indeed the people of Britain and in the whole of the United Kingdom. Something of deeper vision than what Mrs May had done before on many occassions and failed to convince friends and foes in her party. On a deeper sense of politics democracy was mentioned only once and loud and clear, and the world around Mr Johnson spearheaded him into a new era of new optimism in Britain.

Is the ball in or out? Brexit is still in, depending of course on which side you are on and looking out from. But it could be out if the umpire would say so. In three months time the big plan is when this Prime Minister will be delivering Brexit and astonish the whole world as a result they were waiting for since June 2016. The EU's playbook is entirely dismissed somewhere in the middle and there isn't a choclate factory in there either called Mr Oompaloompa. Not one debate in the Commons is the proof of this new Prime Minister just yet, that he is the man who knows what it means when taking Britain out of the EU. Also even with a majority in the next election and new Tory government, Brexit still means Brexit in the end of the day in plain language. Could it be that this PM is trying to convince people that he is going to discover the wheel, something of a marvel he has seen or envisioned? The miracle of yesterday was that he did convince anyone who listened what he had to say as PM, that technologically he will deliver the wheel and that he will be the driving force behind this wheel like a juggernaut. And perhaps conquer India, Malaysia, all of the far east and in all lost worlds in ancient times. Yes, yes, yes, Mr Prime Minister. Britain needs to bring back it's greatest moments in history, when sovereignty was king or queen. If that is the kind of Brexit Mr Johnson wants to bring back in time, he will be our time lord and a very commanding one. Unlike Mrs May who will be remembered as Dalek and the good forces have eventually overcome her and to send her back to the dark Remainer ages where maybe she first came from... The sanctity of the body of politics is now finally animated into real life.

The expansion of politics, with no particular starting point.

1 July 2019

The first place where you will be looking is from a human point of view, and then imagine the fiction you need to employ a clearer view of that what is not known for a hundred years but unknown. Plain enough language, but with more to it when put back into gear. The world behind us is known, hundreds of years, soaked, drenched and absorbed by the many centuries since then. No future can grow fast enough and make seconds or minutes run the rest of our time and world. Or risk bad returns, or even serious setbacks. First is this choice whether human wants to start from a particular time and point, e.g. where new ideas are taking off, or where old ones are drained and have become dysfunctional to the kind of velocity you need to stay in perfect synchronization. The world is in an unsual visualization of what the future of our planet might be looking in e.g. a hundred years from now. It's world population and global technologies are an immediate blow out and fluid. It is also unusual to have any world leading nation containing this kind of global fiction in the 'real world' perception of the modern nation or human being. At least from a strategic point of view. If also the world behind us was more homogeneous and not heterogeneous, let's say as in the present time, who ever wants to lead our world into the future will then have to know what society in time will be looking like under it's new regime. Most of all it is therefore not only an expansion of business plans, but an expansion of politics that need to be appointed as a designated society. How this purpose fulfills the living of any community is another factor.

Imagine a world built on heterogeneity would be of mass appeal, yes indeed when societies globally can participate inclusively and break away from traditional homogeneity in the past. It is perhaps already a vision with what most globalists are working from and with great emphasis on immediate change. Can Europe inside the EU change to the level of heterogeneity? Can the Middle East or the US and the rest of the world synchronize and do the same? That answer always comes with a perfect match in business and it's expansion and showing just half the talent of a world eager for greater talent and compliance. The human eye has raised it's levels to greater heights of the vision set out by the new kind of globalism in our time. Traditional politics in a political world are slowly in danger of becoming 'empty buildings' and are losing something of this one real human involvement in any kind of society where humans are better represented than in the world of global business, only made by autocratic tinted corporate laws, by the rule of one. It is the soft pillow with which you smother the premature born, if politics was ever premature in the world! But it wasn't and it's proof is a living testimony of time and not fiction. And yet, here we are in another living time and memory in 2019 and not 1920. The question is, do we have a world leading nation? (Many probably can remember Britain's 'regime'- and regiments- in the early days of 40, 50,60 and 70ties throughout the whole world as benign and severe when challenges were made against man or creed) Society or the Polis is not fiction, it is the purest of realities to man, child and woman, healthy or sick, deprived or wealthy, and also our natural allies in animals and vegetation. Here we find ourselves back in politics... Only the expansion of politics seems a greater mass to deal with by any nation or creed.

3 July 2019
Notes: heterogeneity will decide the future society and expansion of politics. Our first natural experience after experimental years and decades of globalism this direction was revolutionary and including bigger themes e.g. evolution and ending a millennium.

The institution of the human as a global being.

14 June 2019

Scale is an undefining instrument if demographics means many and not a single person defining what is human or humanities in our century. After globalization human was transformed to more or multiple collectiveness and full participation at multi levels wherever this was and is the organisation of institutions. Society is designated place and time, and with another ticking clock above for inclusiveness. As you go on reading where our living memory is leading in this new embodiment of the scale to which we belong the closer you are getting to zero being fully aware of an even more subtle reality many seem to collectively call or name as 'the environment'. It's purpose is empty, versus the greater purpose (government?) of one or two groups, while perhaps tagged as multileveled and timing as each period is another multilevel and specific timing. Let us assume big data is perfect and microscopic of abstracts, the question is whether this will show any effect to any individual specifically in relation to the human as the living being of the group in society by definition. The reading goes on and to put it even more clearer human is not related to society but only represented by a collective sense of community and can even elevate to the global community channels and systemic systems. A second misconception inherent to the level of individual aspect and specific in the here above is the community in society when related to the global sphere by definition. Once again human is the missing link in the 21st century.

If memory serves our common sense well human is related to reference and value, in micro- and macro economics. Little reference is being made with regard to purpose and ideological, whether simple or rich, 'factum est' to what degree when free and in motion. Life and being alive is fundamental proof to such a degree of human and being. This is part of the institution in relation to the rest of the world when human (or living other creature). Humanities paradoxically does not design the living homo sapiens, but sciences and prove that when regarding human references or values one needs to take society as it's starting point, and then next is the government. Vertically what the understanding then would be in here is the economy, regional and at national level becoming an industry instead of horizontal flat headed politics and social engineering on little islands of misinterpreted human design. At the Human Rights Watch human is related to humanities and singular when represented in their reports. Remoteness is also significant to what and from where it is reporting on e.g. human rights abuses or even success. Where it fails it's institution is when human is related to the global being and is living in dire deprivation and a victim of the collective rationalities that are most in their disadvantage rather than advantage, by definition of experience as a whole society. In conclusion: human is not collective by definition. Generation Z seems to prove our generation wrong, while e.g. anti- semitism is tempting fate once more about being human or part of it.


If not 'The deal of the century', who will be the architect of a new Middle East?

5 June 2019

The argument predominance is still that the Middle East belongs to the past cultures and ancient history with no modernisation, whether politics or social, prowess and to make adequate changes to the present system. The world of business outbalances any other need exponentially, and is doing so for as long as the region has existed. The 'Deal of the century' can only be a threat and feared like any new idea in the story that advances with the power of wind and dust, and destroy a peaceful kingdom to the last person and inhabitant. If it has political and social components. Mr Jared Kushner is right when he answered the question whether he will be trusted, and said that he wasn't here to be trusted. In here something more prominent is being suggested, that e.g. the 'Deal of the century' isn't for what it may seem, but it is and was meant 'For the century' in the Middle East. If not so the Democrats in the US are right to ditch the plan to the dustbin. The EU is more prudent and perhaps is contemplating a little more on the 'Deal of the century'. Rationality has always been a trait to the EU's inner-core on Foreign diplomacy and relations. That is also how intervention can be the basis for deeper process and proceedings. One day soon the Middle East sooner or later will have to either go there or lose momentum for a sad and much longer time. Diagonal or asymmetrical, much in the 'Deal of the century' could provide what no other architect has done before or even tried, to create with earnest something of a middle ground and expect to breakthrough, yes, perhaps through the centuries?

Technically Mr Kushner is again right if the rest of the world could help build segments and understanding through greater collaboration between nations. Especially this is vital to many investing corporations from many different countries that the Middle East should not only be business friendly, but should semblance the top fibers of partners' countries. Israel underservedly get's the poodle prize for being the giant standing alone in this field and not enjoying a deserved reputation as a political, social and scientific society for the future of Israel and partners. Most Arab countries are still suffering from political and social dwarfism, that is not related to Israel, fortunately. Unfortunately it matters to the rest of the world and the future of the new Middle East, to both sides, Arabs and Israelis, if the world has any chance of success in the present state of affairs. Europe is not doing well either, next to Brexit in the UK, nor can any other part of the world excel independently from the old globalization world order just yet. One cannot help wondering what a 'Deal of the century' would look like for the whole of Europe. Mr Kushner believes that e.g. the Palestinian people need some 'self determination' and that they have the right to that particular part in his plan. After land, State, and independence from Israelis in Jerusalem were promised long decades ago to the Palestinian people. It's not difficult to understand why many of these people thought that their diplomacy had reached with time some legitimacy and maturity over the years. Sadly some might also see that that isn't how the world perceives growth of industries and change for the people. If an electorate there is responsible leadership, instead of individual prosperity and turn a good idea to 'self determining' individuals living in bright or broad daylight plutocracy among a desperate nation, for peace? The 'Deal of the century' could be a straight line of politics and reform, cutting the Middle East down the middle for good. Technically it is not impossible or in theory. But with magic of the Arabian Prince it would be better and a success.

The empirical question of who knows the Middle East best a simple enough question to ask.

24 May 2019

In this region Time is a complex image. What defines the Middle East is another imagery that has left the west for many decades in the state of autonomous rule rather than cohesion of any kind. The best test to take is from it's future image in e.g. ten years time. In the present time nothing is left to chance and one get's some sort of 'sixth sense' that is convincely putting things or geography in sequence or order. From this point the US President, Mr Donald Trump, has cleverly made his shortcut through the static Middle East timeline and he came up with the answer of dynamics. What the Middle East would now need is dynamics. And business needs to elevate up to the highest level if the plan has any chance of success, let's say in autonomy? LIke with so many industries around the world perhaps here too many have already gone bust or to industrial wasteland. Employment in many Middle East states is also an unknown figure, but is presumed to be fantastic when compared to e.g. Europe or the US. In ten years time fear is that nothing will change here in this part of the world, which in fact would mean that business is successful, if paradox is the natural component of the Middle East reality. The fact is that politics alone has managed for many decades to make what is impossible in the Middle East a possible dream (of the centuries). And with politics governments rise or fall, something most electorates know and stay in that hope of change (maybe for the better things to eternally come). Business does not induces hope in the same way that the electorate dreams, whether small or smaller than, or even when smart. What will the Middle East be in ten years time?

The peace plan was once a projection of many nations, e.g. in Israel and with it's neighbours the Palestinian people. But what the Middle East perceives as the peace deal of centuries, we will never know if there is any such a particular idea or 'dream' among the nations in this remote region with extensive lands and private ownerships. The world is not staring at it's selfreflection of what matters of State mean in the west, but is rather content with Foreign Policy and representative of their State. It is what defines the Middle East the best to the rest of the world. And there is a price tag to every change and in time, we all can see this is what the century holds. Peace and stability can be confusing when reading it from a business paper and is omitting precision with regards to many socio- economic conditions, climate change, employment and future industries. And so forth. To most regions in the Middle East confusion works magic and it's environment is more magical when nothing happens. A dynamic plan would encourage or empower people and many are poorest to learn new skills and come out of their 'remote societies' into the deal of the century civilization, or it would not. Mathematically it would have to deal with Middle East mass. The Middle East, also, in many ways is a different region in comparison to India and China where new economies are doing well in terms of sharing scientific disciplines and lead by principle. If indeed the Middle East has turned into a global power region place, for war and politics will have to be decimated and restrictive only or utilize. Some say that Iran is obstructive to regional peace and security. And that Iran's dominant definition of the Middle East is to annihilate Israel or it's existence. Astonishment is an academic understanding and annihilation is one such understanding. And another such one is that the universities in Tehran perhaps have never heard of Hiroshima, which everyone will doubt in the 21st century. Annihilation is most astonishing if it matches high moral grounds. Peace?

Israel is now fully transparent to the rest of the world. That is a shock to the old system or world order.

13 May 2019

72 Years is a long way to get here and become a global leader without official recognition by the G7 or G8 in the present time. How a small entity of immigrants from either Nazi Germany or Post WWII have turned Israel into the zenith of Jewish industrialists throughout the world is almost at an embarrassing realization, or surprise, for many who have been in the imaginary of helping Israel to build itself from the point of deprivation to the condition of a full operational state. But success on the part of israel too isn't without a shock of it's own and it's effects. E.g., what are now the people's expectations of the State of Israel, being Israelis and working class? In what part of the 'peace process' are they actively taking part, if the world view can only envision how life should be lived in 'their' part of the world in Israel? Israel's subconcious is a a new kind of shock and it's success is sometimes not helping with the interpretation of what the future might hold, for a new success and it's people, all yearning to live a normal life or living normal lives. The Android wealthy and other business platforms in Israel are fully connecting with the rest of the world. And their family lives are not in the public domain. The rest of Israel with smartphones, paradoxically, are connected to family members overseas all around the world. The State is where the healing of all their ills and worries lie, or are expected to see miracle cures. Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu is the builder of the brass serpent set up on a staff and where they can come and find healing of all State related matters. The outside world is connecting to Israel for other reasons. It's world view is where Israelis do not tend to look as war & peace territories are on a daily basis in the rear and not up front to their faces, as is the State of Israel. It is motion that speaks louder in this part of the world for Israelis, than e.g. words of peace and a solution to the people next door in Gaza or east Jerusalem. That is another part of Israel and the nation of Israel. So, where are we now in the year 2019 and expecting to hear about the 'Deal of the century' the US President, Mr Donald Trump, is planning on publishing 4 June next month?

Another look into what the transparency of the State of Israel and it's nation are building in the 21st century is both unknown yet to Israel and the rest of the world. For many decades there  have been many interpreters of how the world is viewing the existence of israel and it's related half successes with the peace efforts and the Palestinian people. There is no other simple way to put it, but when looking at the upcoming decade full transparency from the side of Israel as a global and regional leading industrial nation settled in the Middle East something will have to change in a partnering world with Israel. If fair and friendly, on both sides of this round table. Israel has shown that they are as orthodox as any other nation when it comes to business and success. And that with global success comes global security incoming and outgoing. Fortunately it is the kind of logic best understood by most industries and industrial nations, even when change can be excruciating when frustrated or misunderstood. Looking back at a few decades ago there was no one who held it possible that this nation 'again' would rise to these extreme heights of power in a rebuilt world after WWII. And dependency was secured from the biggest countries at the time. It was a good start and mankind felt safe for a very long time in human history since 1945 with the biggest countries. What then went wrong after a long time of prosperity and cooperation only in peace now showing a reset of this kind, or complacency, sending nations to sleep or sleepwalking and outsmarted in this century? It is not a simple two and two problem or reality put together. And where have all the critical minds gone to and (re)building reflection on their situation? We assume it is Israel and the Jewish nation's fault when not thinking deeply about the era ahead of mankind in general. The State of Israel is capable of becoming part of 'our world'. If such designation is meaningful and has ever existed. The question is easy, what is 'our world'? And  I am stressing not demonstrating that this is the 21st century. 

What can PA President Abbas offer Israel in yet another 'armed' provocation by Hamas over the weekend?

6 May 2019

Some restraint by the President was shown yesterday on sunday in news reports in the Jerusalem Post, and around the world in other reports of the conflict, e.g. BBC News online, New York Times and the Washington Post. Bloomberg.com and perhaps many others in different corners of the world reported the ongoing story as is in real time in Israel, between Gaza and the IDF. President Abbas is also, perhaps, feeling isolated from world opinion at the moment and is making noises of distress, saying that the conflict started on saturday morning was due to Israel's PM Benjamin Netanyahu's policies and the US President Mr Trump with his 'Deal of the century'. If the IDF will intensify it's full force tonight in Gaza, the situation will become 'standard procedure' ending up in despair and death. Of course escalation is extraordinary, especially by provocation. But also it holds no deception on both sides of the war or conflict. If 'we want peace' to materialize between the two nations, factors or new ways of getting there should be designed and urgently. Mr Abbas has lost faith in the US- Israel relationship after 'The Deal of the Century' was announced earlier this month. What he is not saying is what his side could offer the US and Israel, but was rejected, and then put forward another argument in world opinion sphere. This is hard to see where the present time is going to take the President and make him a valuable partner in the 'deal of the century', not yet published until late June next month. In this negotiating room an offer would be best served as the only weapon in the world of politics at home and globally. How the PA is failing not to panic under psychological fears of being dropped out of the deal, comes with lots of 'name calling' and anxiety much too premature. Israel is a partner local and globally. Nobody wins if either side fails to see where the other is standing and in what capacity. Egypt or the UN cannot do their homework properly from that point of failure escalating only in conflict and the military responses from Israel. A full ceasefire could bring some solution tomorrow morning...

To be continued.

Palexit, an equivalent of Brexit for the Palestinian people, from Israel.

17 April 2019

Just to picture an idea what will happen if e.g. the Palestinian people want to 'exit' from Israel and 'take back control' of their own laws. After (now) Prime MInister Benyamin Netanyahu has asserted himself to take control over Area- C in the West Bank, and preferably all of the areas, A and B, the question that is on everyone's mind will be one of grave concern. First the political economics of the Palestinian people can't measure up to this kind of friction and not self destruct from within. The Middle East has become over the recent years a platform of many industries, let's say that this is 90%, and leaving 10% a political outlook, e.g. for the Palestinian people. Economics does matter around in the global sphere. If a target would be set out for an economic outlook on the side of the Palestinian Authority, and let's say this is in ten years time, that could give an indication where status change can make a difference. Or, collapse. It is not any different from the current problem the Brexit saga is experiencing with leaving the EU, be it that Britain differs only in the matter of the monarchy and sovereignty. On tuesday Federica Mogherini, EU Foreign Affairs HIgh Representative, has said that the Two- State solution for the Palestinian people will continue as this was the view of many high ranking senior EU politicians. The plan here is to reject any 'Deal of the century' plan of the Trump administration in the US. There is always a diplomatic cadre for a difficult situation in regions of conflict and war, and this is not unusual for the EU High Representative to air her view on the matter of Israel and it's plans to annex the West Bank.

In reality the deal of the century plan is suggesting only a plausibility on the side of Israel, now also being the captain of industry and global leading nation, next to it's Arab neighbours. It is the conscience of Chaim/ Life itself where all the change is planning on happening and it is natural for the Palestinian people to be anxious about the meaning of this deal of the century. Putting it popular the historical error lies with the terminology of choice, that the US President is bias toward Israel. The future is not a false start, not for Palexit and not for Brexit. And maybe this is only a simplification of the complex theories that have been there since the forties, fifties, sixties and upward, on the problem for the Palestinian people and Israel. But in the 21st century the economic outlook is speeding by in the meantime. The global world is at the brink of a new order, one that has never been before when life itself is challenged. It can go either way, visually direct or invisible. Here the oulook is a sophisticated high tech world and it needs the kind of velocity to stay on a 24/7 operational and infinitive. Israel can do all that on it's own and stay a global leader in the real world at the same time... And than there is also the legal term for Human Rights. It will be a terrible mistake to make a people defenseless, while pursuing an ambitious peace plan between neighbours and nations. In the 21st century continuous wars make that aspiration almost impossible to track and device only by human intelligence. And where it is possible security plays a major role and has the kind of prerogatives that is not in the public domain. What chances are there for a Palestinian nation in the 21st century at the speed of a fast changing world and exit from Israel?

Brextension

30 March 2019

After yesterday in Britain and not leaving the EU we now will see a Brextension, replacing Brexit. This will become the living proof of an extension to British sovereignty and it's political establishment. After May this year that might further extend into another extensive period of short time, and then maybe again. No one knows it's interior and one can only judge from what we see and hear in the media about Brextension. And it is a hard exterior for many to break through it's walls, sometimes being even massive walls. In the House of Commons we can only see a sliver of that arena and counting fall and resignations. On the side of fast thinking there are some who already know what Brextension would be needing if it still wants to deliver what the people voted for in the referendum, now an echo. It is perhaps sensible thinking not to call yesterday's failure, not leaving the EU, for now a collapse of government and it's parliamentary debate system. A system that stood for truth and decisiveness, legitimacy of law making throughout the Commonwealth and in many other institutions across the globe. Prerogatives of a sovereignty, just to sum up a few. Brextension isn't the same thing as Brexit would have been, had it been more determined from the same sovereign point of view. Tactics and strategies of political plans and proposals for the coming time don't ad up convincely and are making the public go quietly and distancing or even abandoning the idea of leaving the EU. It is no laughing matter when you're British or a British hardcore politician, Labour or Tory. Perhaps today they might even realise what went wrong for the last two years, how unashamed politics had become and leaving the country out as if it was something to trade with. Underneath this hard exterior another Britain is still alive and is speaking in political dialect of how to keep Britain sovereign, despite it's public adversity.

No one wants to vote for the PM's WD, only there is no one saying what they could do instead. That is playing ground with no clear reason for doing so. All this playing ground is barren from no real ideas and the political power to take decisive act or decision. Something the Irish backstop would be needing, and the rest of the UK. But all that we are hearing are names, lists with names, and names again. Even not leaving the EU ended with a name under it, that of the Prime Minister. Parliament has become a name system parliament. Another such name is Geoffrey Cox, the Attorney General, in the Commons yesterday, when giving his political statement. What is the right of Britain that no one can analyse properly just yet in the country? If the system is broken than say so. In other words Brextension is made up from illusions and delusions. But no one is saying it likes to be in the same shoes as Britain today. It is a strange thing to say that today after yesterday's failure Britain has become much more like Tarshish once they were dammed in/up by no other than Alexander the Great. And when that happens there is no need for your armies and military power. In the eyes of the world Brextension is another cosmetic way for the British to demonstrate what they were once, and so on, and so on...

Brexit countdown and standstill. Full stop.

(Personal op)

12 March 2019

The best way to any new episode in the Brexit story is to watch for all options coming to a final end, end by end, untill the apparent date of leaving the EU on 29 March, in two weeks time. It is becoming harder every minute and second, and to speculate where or what will happen, let's say if nothing changes in the negotiations after tomorrow, on tuesday 12 March in Brussels. The meaingful vote, as written in newspapers across Britain, will also be tomorrow  evening in parliament. The people's vote has redesigned Britain's fundamentals in political history completely and it has given the country the kind of shock to the economy and it's parliament as never before. Truth is not what anyone will be looking for right now, but what they are trying for is even, or, is looking even further away from anything similar to that truth no one seems to know where to find, and give 'the people what they've voted for' two and a half years ago in 2016. It's point now is being strategically deployed by phantom 'Aye' sayers to Brexit, and maybe thinking that this will soon be over if they kept their eyes closed enough. It is a grim countdown from here anyway.

Brexit is happening in Real Time. There is no victory speech and for some reason to any outsider in the public domain it is not concerning them effectively. Actually, we have lost the whole plot altogether right now, too. A small island moving like an enormous large beast in oceanic proportions is or seems a private event to most people around the world. Britain never before had anything 'geopolitical' to do with and in the rest of the world. What it is doing to the reality at international level, also, is becoming the place where no one is looking for any answers. Let them sort it out among themselves, perhaps is the best public policy to adhere to a while, and see if the departure from the EU was more than just trade agreements or politics. NI is the sliver in between. Any one is convinced in Britain that nothing can be done in the coming last hours of this debacle, with inevitable outcomes to ornament a lost victory over the EU in 2019. This shows that leaving the EU was never easy for Britain. Something to say about proof is still a written history in this story and should be remembered in living memory, globally and nationally. What could have made Brexit different at this stage to regain sovereignty for Britain and the United Kingdom? Well, as pointed here, now no one will ever know.

Part III

The Jewish history in 50 years time, and in a straight line, might be different than the plans as a nation in 2019.

1 February 2019

Israel has become the regional 'world economy' of the Middle East in one decade, or the past ten years. It is very much what identifies the Jewish State and nation in the 21st century almost all over the world, by foe or friends, and sometimes even by former adversaries, e.g. the economies with less output on their own, or just maybe are not being able to synchronize in the same way an andvanced economy understands the present time or future. It doesn't mean the same as being unable to create wealth and lack efficiency in what the economy of a Middle East State would call or see as their prerogative. With the arms sales and inherence to religion, it has become much more of an innerstate and not quite what might be conceived under the circumstances as a 'world vision'. We must go back in time if political science can be formalised in any sort or way in the Middle East Region in human memory or history. In the seventies Egypt and Israel in 1977 had made peace, as then the late president El - Anwar Sadat came to Israel, which one could see as the first day when politics was born among two great nations in the region, instead of two great warring factions. Here a different lesson was taught to Israel then as it's neighbour Egypt on the eastern side came to demonstrate to the whole world, that it is politics that can do the impossible in our world, now and forever. Sadly enough the late president of Egypt was assassinated in the wide crowd in his country later on in october 1981. Hardly anyone noticed how the region had transformed since then, from a business platform to a more political infrastructure to suit every major player calling for peace, even no matter how small some of these allies of peace have been in the past and still ongoing. Democracy then wasn't part yet of any peace process between the State and it's citizens or subjects when speaking of the kingdoms in Arabia. From all this Israel was keenest to establish itself as a player in the Middle East, with peace, democracy and a new world view in the seventies, eighties and ending with the path to globalization in our time. Now it is time to look back at why Israel and it's closest neighbour, the Palestinian people, are still facing the same disturbing factor in their effort to succeed with the peace process every western economy seems on having, in terms of decades. The Middle East is de facto a rim of nations living close to Islamic prophecies and wealth generation. It's State conclusion is wealth and being wealthy, and for Israel it is world political stability. Will the phoenix rise again in the Middle East and change it's future to taking out all disturbance from what is called peace?

Part II: The Jewish history in 50 years time, and in a straight line, might be different than the plans as a nation in 2019.


29 January 2019

Filter politics, like any other virus, needs to be remedied. The political importance of any future, east, west, south or north, across the global spectrum, will require higher discipline and logic of any nation or State, or becomes the last country, place and it's community lagging behind. Two realities are in Israel, e.g. the Jewish nation and it's close neighbours, the Palestinian people. And there is an additional 'end plan' by this theory & model in fifty years time, and see the new Israel idea on the style of peace with the Palestinian people, indefinitely as a modern day prophecy when walking up the mountain and not rolling backwards again. It's nature was conceived by many States in the world who wanted the peace process to proceed, with an 'end plan' to the Two- State solution, for both the Israelis and Arabs, also indefinitely. With the Middle East democracy is not the same as in the western half of the world, where e.g. democracy is indefinitely the best civilized reality to live in when counting each and every head of their citizens. Future time can therefore make things more complex for the Middle East as a whole, and on the side of Israel with it's neighbours the Palestinian nation, indefinitely is another planet beyond the big moons of Saturn that are hard to pull by earth's gravity alone. For many reasons also that is why the Middle East is partly a prophetic reality as well as a big business Mekka to the world to procure big projects in engineering or architecture. The digital age is 'definitely' in it's presence, both to the 19th up to the 21st centuries, a full scale cooperation in this part of the world. The young Palestinian nation don't go either way, 'indefinitely or definitely' and are staying in pragmatism politics and argue their cause from baseline. Fifty years on from today and staying here on the baseline will be cost effective, but can only go up and still make it to the top of the region and it's global mechanism. Stability is another magnitude. There is also another way looking at future modern history: deception or cleverness have no human spine. It is cast iron and it's spiral upward is embraced by a cold remedy or brass serpent. The world can only see black & white, rook (Israel) standing by rook (Palestinian people) (endgame?), and think from their think tanks that one cannot see beyond the Partition Law or Two State solution, right now. But if there is any such possibility under the universe maybe one can see beyond the old historical papers of dead centuries?

The Jewish history in 50 years time, and in a straight line, might be different than the plans as a nation in 2019.

28 January 2019

The Middle East in modern history, about 150 years, will by now have come to some understanding about the region's weaknesses and strength, that this isn't quite the global dream they once envisioned, whether as autocrats or autonomies in smaller places. Israel is now a fully respected neighbour, depending on how you are looking at it, macro- or micro economics. Israel is no more of the refugee- status it was when it first started with building the State of Israel before and after WWII. And in 2019 the plans for more building of the State of Israel hasn't changed since then. It has been the strangest phenomenon throughout the entire time to the autocrats of the Middle East when looking upon this time, to see how Israel in many ways have changed this region in a more co-ordinated part of the world, e.g. by partnerships, stability mechanisms, military cooperation, ministries of defence, the peace process and autonomy for the Palestinian nation in Gaza, and security for the Jewish people in Jerusalem. Modern technologies can go even further and turn the Middle East in another Silicon Valley, could be one way of the future vision? The world needs a new narrative, and perhaps doing so in five volumes of success. When did it all started going for the Middle East as a region, e.g. 1970? That would mean the world outside Israel and it's neighbours should work on modern history rather than keeping a blind arbitrary vision of the Middle East. Success is a strange reality in our world today, not with e.g. Britain leaving the EU... The global democratic proces will lead by example and which was it's oldest intention. Nations and States alike. Realists views are more different and some even say that the global economic climate in the world is more destructive and it undermines democracy more immediately in some parts in our global community. In a straight line Israel will be a whole different neighbourhood in the Middle East and to the rest of the world, and for one reason: Modern History.

To be continued.

UK: Withdrawal Agreement loses by 230, 15 January 2019. Leaving the EU will be on 29 March in ten weeks time.

16 January 2019

Speculation is spinning like mad in the UK today and surprisingly also in the EU what might happen next, let's say if tonight's vote of confidence (Labour) in 'this government' will win. Or, not win. The Prime Minister will stay on, if she can, but maybe what might happen next after the vote is another question on everyone's lips at midday today. But as things now stand this tight grip Brexit has on the continent across the channel isn't what we had expected yesterday or the day before that. Some were even upbeat and jubilant, making others seriously wonder why. Things after all could go very wrong... And so it did by 432 say 'No' to the WA. With all this all vision has also collapsed. And if that turns into a 180degrees crisis, can anyone predict what that might mean to the rest of the 180 degrees? It's not clear what the EU official meant by "It's the same storyline, Germans come to the rescue." Diplomacy is sending out a very nervous signal unto the rest of the world today. And the fear is a 'No Deal', something that terrifies much of EU Member States at this hour. In character we don't see much of the EU when it is nervous, but right now it seems that they are slowly beginning to understand what it means to rule nations and not just people. Of course, there are a few suggestions so many could make right now and also know that this at the end of the day might change again, as things are now very fluid. Yesterday Britain was still a contestant, but today it is using a different weapon of choice that will very much be aiming at the centre of all things in the world. And that weapon is named: how to be British (and what that means ammunition).

What can Britain do when it has collapsed standing up? The EU has even urged the UK to stay in the EU, this afternoon (Mr Donald Tusk). He was not only being sincere, but he was also urgently speaking of this only outcome. To make any sense of what is happening in Europe today one should stay calm and collective, as most Europeans are phlegmatic when it comes to a crisis of this scale, especially when so close to the definite leave of the UK from the EU, and the European Parliament Election, 23 May. Brexit could be the passion some might want and need in their own backyards, a negative effect of austerity and prosperity that never delivered any incentive for millions of Europeans back home, is another worry. And that might change the slogan from the EU to 'My Europe' and 'Our Europe', which will be a dangerous sabre rattle in our modern day democracy and globalization. However that isn't yet a reality but another speculation or fantasy, at this point. No Deal in Britain is bad for Europe and also for Britain, all depending what vision that would hold when you're British and a British MP. Having said the best of the moment one should also bear in mind that the EU has strong arbitrary powers. Also and again not something we know how far reaching that might be when a 'No Deal' would be triggered by the UK. In the last three decades we have witnessed the fall of the Berlin Wall, east and west Germany unification and the period in that aftermath, but also the peace agreement for Northern Ireland in a paradox was necessary to create self rule and a sense of sovereignty here. How things got so wrong after the millennium and the influx of people from foreign places over the last ten years, this is the question that is not giving anyone any answers for what the EU really stands for. Western democracies should stay strong together in a globalized (centralized) world, if they know how to contain modern day challenges or disputes. After tonight in the UK there isn't anyone in the rest of the world that could tell you which political and economic vision still stands for the EU. Are you worried?

In a few weeks it is time for Britain to be more extremely civilized...

11 January 2019

What Britain wanted is not happening, e.g. leaving in an orderly fashion and divorce itself from the long lasting relationship with the EU, for four decades long. It is in fact saying today on the radio (BBC 4) how less tolerant it will become, and that no one should underestimate how extreme things will get in the days ahead. This is parliamentary speaking and not a report on street crime. In the middle of Europe it has been for the last 72 years unacceptable at ministerial level, under any circumstance, to become extreme by announcement. How does this reflect on neighbouring countries if let's say they would be hoping for a Brexit at this point to see in high peak, and not in a very low one? It is the EU who has to deal with all propaganda on how it is dominant and wants to keep dominion over the other Member States, leaving no room for seconds to set their contemplation on Brexit apart. Each Member State will not risk their fixed position in the EU, at least not by senseless extreme announcements coming from neighbouring country, Britain. This was set for a time with high expectations, that once Britain was leaving the EU, to set out a few practical views and also expecting to see them making an attempt toward a serious direction of choice to ease relations by the stop in the European Union bloc as a 'Member'. It is this direction that has gone totally ribbled in the meantime and therefore creating lots of distorted images in the background with Labour and the Conservatives living apart in the process of Brexit. Mind you, when you say Brexit this will get a whole different meaning after the stop in the EU and starting a new life outside and becoming global again. It is that where no one is looking, if becoming global again is feasible without the EU.

The rules will also change as soon as Britain will leave the EU, but outside the EU is not the only 'outside'. From this point of view Brexit will also becoming global again when 'leaving the British parliamentary infighting', as is now the case for two and a half years since the outcome of the referendum. With less tolerance in Britain the chance of a renaissance in the global world that seems unlikely to be a real chance, if it means we are looking at a possible regime that echoes of traits similar to restrictive behaviour in 'a civilzed government'. What is the open society high standard of living that was once Britain's idea of happiness and a global- sized modernization? What else can they expect that allies will do but offer a critical eye that is both fitting and caring for the future of European nations living in peace, even when adversity is making it quite difficult to maintain that course of line. Love for your brothers is honouring each and and every one during the Brexit process with a critical insight on the matter that will and could affect national interests and sentiments. One cannot undo civilization in one minute that took hundreds of years of careful and serious construction. The EU also has to deal with the same people and nations in it's EU- bloc and keeping it's eye fixed on it's position in the world. A practical solution isn't the option right now for neither side, not for the EU nor for Britain, when the latter will be leaving this year in March. Instead what we see from Brexit is that what you see behind the grandeur of what Britain was is now becoming painfully transparent that it only knows how to soldier (badly) in a crisis as big as leaving the EU. Actually there is no point in marching and demonstrate to neighbouring countries how they kick and scream in parliament. Times have changed and equality is sacred...

The Euro and potential of EU Member States, in a few words before the end of the year 2018.

29 December 2018

Not many are found of the Euro, let's say outside the EU, but maybe also within the EU Member States, when still stuck in the 19th century. The one thing that could bring about the real vision of the European Union in testimony is slowly moving an isolated vitality from it's twin- sister, the political and economics life of EU politics. Optimists can still say, yes the Euro is still here and pushing it's head far through the fleece of the future and go up in the 21st century. To understand and develop some love for the Euro it is maybe wise to also explain it's real meaning as the single currency many Europeans and big financial markets across the world see as the best idea to buy big projects or participate here in a global way in upstream economies and industrial leading global industries. The world outside the EU is as usual the big business place to be and it requires great potential. The EU Member States have known for decades quite the opposite of what should and could be great potential in each and every Member State. It is still sitting there somewhere and if the 21st century is a promise of the future, who knows where they eventually might get in a surprise or sudden moment. The momentum is still waiting for this to happen, in good faith and fortune. But the Euro has built itself around the ECB Hexadron of monetary and finance policies with little relation to the EU Member States political spectre, at least so it seems when some have openly or hidden reservations on the future of the euro. Why was it designed and what for was the single currency designed for? If Europeans had any vision at high level politics this was meant to have the single currency to create greater potential for the Member States after the time when it was conceived and toiled on by the euro- architects of the seventies and eighties. It was done in cold and hard calculation and maybe done so in the wrong century. The 21st century more likely would have been a better time for the euro to enter the EU as the single currency for each Member State in the EU. Why some would say that is because too many noises are now being overheard how the euro is suffering a premature death and very quietly too.

The end of the year is drawing quickly near, in about 72 hours from now (22:58 PM). For some mythical moment the euro actually has something to celebrate: it's 20 year existence since the single currency was introduced to replace the sovereign nations currencies. (Some with expiring dates) Sadly enough this birthday boy/ girl is sitting and celebrating alone and is still waiting for it's potential. From it's high window ivory tower it is also hearing things of Britain or Brexit to leave the EU next year in March 2019. And than ask what did go wrong with this great invention that it is, by vision. Also at a different level immigration and masses of migrants are making their entry into EU Member States unstoppable, for the moment. They are also getting sandwiched between the euro and EU individual Member States. So, what could be next (we are near there at the end of the year in a somewhat festive mood)? Nexit, or the Netherlands leaving the EU? From an emotional plan or theoretical point of view aligning with Brexit, that could look/be plausible. From the 21st century and the euro being a decisive factor for buying and selling in a big world, it is unlikely that the Netherlands would lose their greater potential on Nexit. They are known to be a very ambitious nation and who are able to do business in a global way. But no one can do this thing on their own and cohesion would mean a deeper look at the European Member States vision how the EU should go the other way into the future, near or in terms of decades. Brexit is a complete different story in all this, when it is now looking for the right deal with the EU, as a non Member State and a currency of their own. When it comes to the currency issue of Britain one has to soul search on this matter, whether in it's conscience the UK should join the euro or not. If big business or global business in the 21st century will be more accessible from the euro standpoint of view one needs to make leave or stay more comprehensive and clear to the public and Member States that are in the single currency. It is tempting to say that the right place for Britain is outside the EU and that it should never have been part of the European Union, up close. Not because of the sovereignty issue alone, but more as a discipline based on the pound sterling. 2019 Is the year of curiosity and it is keeping many busy of how things might go once Britain decides to leave the EU, on nothing more than a piece of paper that it is leaving  the EU- bloc of nations. No one has any answers just yet on all these issues, if they were here already. One is for certain: how much can sovereign currency buy in global business and big projects?

What changes on the world platform can we expect from the new year in 2019?

26 December 2018

A strong quiet wind is blowing out this year's last week in December 2018 and it provides a good listener only with a chill of what may come in the next year, in 2019. The US had a brief shut down of government a few days, but is now open again for a telephone call from the US President, Donald Trump, with a boy of seven years old on the subject of Santa, whether this was something the boy believed in. The President was talking smart with the boy that if he believed Santa really existed it was marginal, 'don't you think so?', the President was heared over the telephone asking the boy. This could fool anyone about the real things that matter to the world when ending the last quarter of the year. But it was a nice change to an otherwise monotonous and half predicted ending of the year for global leading countries like the US. Actually there are no wise words to say about the year 2018, at least not from ordinary people, e.g. how the world has conducted it's business in politics and financial markets on Brexit, Italy and the adventures of world's number one's wealthy investors nations or private corporations. The pushing force isn't coming from our man- made world, so they see or think. What is causing global quietness at the moment is due to other alien forces caused e.g. by Brexit somewhere in Europe. And no one can imagine what a 'No deal' means right now and in this moment. A week ago it was deemed impossible... Will we suddenly stop buying Nissan or Hyundai electric cars if Britain leaves the EU next year in March 2019? Global logistics will not suddenly halt because of the UK leaving the EU. The world will still be in dire need of fresh and sterile instruments or disposable industrial goods. And tons of it each and every day. And yet Britain takes it leave from the EU very serious on sovereignty, maybe not knowing that it might have taken them to build up sovereignty for hundreds of years, but now are risking to be without real power for four hundred years.

Fundamentally the world was built on a few new world order global goals and idealogies after the millennium. It is now what we call reality across the western hemisphere. One would think that if the British sovereignty could have any meaning on top of all realities in a perpetual moving world, this of course can puzzle the mind for a very long while and not finding any answers of logic to their move. These accumulated realities diminish every bit of a real sovereignty, known to us as world power in the nineteenth century. That today isn't what the generation in today's world is calling smart living standard. If they didn't had Smartphones in the 19th century, that wasn't a smart world. And then the younger generation would ditch it as waste of their precious leisure time. So far that is easy to understand, not looking any further into the deep of the world beyond hipsters realities. In older worlds it was believed and said that the gods are not merely satisfied by eating flies, but will one day in time come back to claim their right to mankind and this earth. It is this that could make God in the earth look the other way and let the sons of God devour the pieces of spoils they will demand from Him. It's a long shot to say this, but there is a mysterious quiet going on in these last days of the year 2018, as if 2019 could become the moment of truth in the whole world in one strike. Where ever the first blow will fall it will be in the short and long term bad for the world. And to the sons of God glory doesn't matter, but what they are and what is moving them. If Brexit is moving to them, who knows! (Brexit is being confused with anthology) To the younger generation you could put it this way, "It is not what sovereignty can't do for you, but it is what you can do for sovereignty."

The failure of Brexit to exit the EU.

9 December 2018

In plain language to put Brexit into a 'world view' (looking up in dictionary) one has to say that the question is actually 'what went wrong' here. Now Mr Heseltine (The Guardian this weekend) is saying how the forgotten 'youth' will never forgive Brexit. But Brexit isn't a youth's point of view, according to senior politicians at parliamentary level. A weak minority doesn't own macrolevel industries, at least not in Britain. It looks like a purely coincindental choice of campaigning to stay in the EU by saying how the younger generation will never forgive Brexit, without explicitly saying what Brexit has stolen from them. Paradox keeps surging when Tommy Robinson's own younger generation will be marching out today or this week sometime how to keep Britain out of the EU indefinitely, and saying how Brexit will be good for the future of Britain. Here the logic seems to be 'giving back the younger generation' something that was stolen from them. From an even more plain view as in common sense Brexit is failing to meet the high demand for a talented government to exit the EU for the right reasons, and not just to exit with a bang and showing the world that this is what makes Britain great. Neighbouring countries in the meantime have learned to see where this failure is coming from, and not understanding how Britain did not see it before, that Europe is a different heritage and when it is on it's own that they will be forced to think European on a daily basis. That is it's imperative side of things that make the stay in the EU not a diverse thing, or even variety of things, but an essential understanding of it's own. Be it a slightly more nominal view in the long run. Britain made a terrible mistake by calculation.

What one can see from the EU- Member States bloc after the referendum result on Brexit, is that now nations here are more independently thinking about their status in the EU, and for some reason find themselves at a level they never saw before, as things were then more Anglo Saxon all over the place. No need for white silk confetti in their eyes, please? E.g., who is saying other EU nations don't have the hardcore sentiments about sovereignty, compared to a Brexit from the EU? But it is time, the 21st century, and other key factors in globalism now thirty or more years old, make it a political and imperative economic infrastructure, that many EU Member States must alter their sovereign views to a more relatively closer way to the EU for prosperity success. These are big political decisions, and changes. Word that is going through the corridor of power in the EU is egalitarian, which we in the streets never use when following Brexit exit from the EU. Now it looks like Britain miscalculated the sense of what is European and what is EU, without Britain. On the issue of a second referendum, especially when this is something the next generation of Britons will decide on and defining the whole of the nation as the people of Britain this time, one can't help to feel unease about this choice of weapons and keep Britain back in the EU again. Also on tuesday the vote on the Prime Minister's deal will be in full swing in the House of Commons, 11 december, with many to believe it will be voted down, by either Party, is showing something strange here how Britain is unable to send out the message of a great Britain getting out of the EU and triumph. The deal is logic, because it represents exactly the opposition in parliament. What can one do but listen to all sides and get on with the deal. When they voted to leave it wasn't the people's job to understand what will then happen with NI. Leaving would mean involving the NI and the people of Britain didn't mention this part in the referendum in 2016. But this is Britain and divine intervention might make it rain with possibilities where it is saying why Britain should really leave the masses of the world and go back to a vortex of it's own making away from the 21st century realism. Every one now is waiting to see what will happen on 11 december this week.

Expansion comes with a price. So should former G7 country Britain know, or not?

29 November 2018

During the transition period Britain is expected to stay in the European Union, and device an orderly exit by this time when it is over. Or, face a longer period after exit- day. What is the problem with Britain and government today, still planning on rejecting the 'only deal' the Prime Minister was able to scrape from the bottom of the EU? The thought on different issues came up since then in government, and more so within the PM's own Party, that Mrs May was a stubborn woman with no sense on sovereignty, or the British people. She is still determined to 'deliver the deal' that is in the best interest of the country, she is saying at every chance she can get or put her hands to (perhaps hoping it will all turn to gold for Midas). In fact she is right, when looking at the cost of expansion around the world. This is not  fiction in our world today. There is exponentially big money in all global projects and investors are not looking behind them, but what is in front aka the future. And maybe this is the part that Britain is not really related or familiar with, that in fact the future does exists. That existence is not a playground for people going back in time and then hoping the future will explode in the faces of their makers. Only to come back 'home' where we all really belong, to be sovereign and staying here. Economically that would be less costly when everyone could go back to their Florin coins (just to use an example here), or pennies from beyond Brexitavalon. Politicians are screaming out against the PM and even the late Mrs Thatcher can hear them, and perhaps shaking in her grave with her head at them, thinking in celestial terms how she was ousted because she wanted to keep sovereignty the thing that Britain needs most, but then what happened...

Mrs May is now trying to keep the country together by facing several points in the new center of Brexit, when facing the world, exactly with that what Mrs Thatcher was ousted for and the Conservative wanted to keep in (Michael Heseltine). It is empirical to see it this way and trying to understand why the withdrawal deal is most a 'gesel' of earthly forwardness and consistency in our time and as the world is. (Gesel, a Dutch word) Mrs May is a modern day British Prime Minister, having inherited what was left from broken governments and in time in the UK. Many say that this is not true and irrelevant, but if there was only a PM who could take Britain out of the EU that this would make it all worth to get rid of the present time Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May. Than so be it and let Britain have their PM who can leave the EU with 'No deal' and draw the sword from the stone/ rock once again. Excalibur was a myth and not fact or truth. To many Brexiteers that is also the way where Britain is going is very much the same place as in the story of the Excalibur. The story is not real enough when it comes to global realities. These are all forecasts and why would they make a mistake when it's their own money? The EU is a trading partner and that will be good for the UK. But the EU is also trading with the rest of the world, through the EU. Something tells you immediately here that you are facing a fraction and not a dilemma line between the two worlds or magnitudes. It is not something you think about in political terms only, which is what Britain does best, so they say. What can Britain do to make the world great again? Will it also exit the G7 and G20? The BOE is probably right to predict a different picture than parliament in Britain among the politicians, that right now a 'No deal' would be bad for Britain. But, at the same time this is also true that when the transition period will set in, that also no one knows how that will develop in a new expansion.

Sunday, 25 November 2018: Britain got it's intellectual freedom back. Time to do a unique Brexit and enhance relations with Asia.

25 November 2018

It sounds a little premature upbeat to say that in this stage Britain will bank on it's uniqueness now leaving the EU in a legal binding agreement sunday today. 27 Member States have agreed and signed this agreement of withdrawal, also today. Mr Claude Juncker has discretely said to take this agreement as it is the only possible one the UK will get from the EU. He was also deeply saddened for this moment, as anyone can remember two years ago, was the impossible moment no one had thought they would witness in our time in this century. While very much is staying the same in the EU for the UK, what is still that crossing red line is the referendum of majority votes to leave the EU. It doesn't seem to be only the red line you can think of, it is in fact what changed and changes the mathematics of this divorce, on the side of the EU- UK, but more it is going to matter in the coming days where parliament wants to put this fraction red line in it's own history books. From here alone it will get the meaning as many see it, that this withdrawal was a thing for 'democracy' and 'national sovereignty (Michael Portello in This Week last friday night)' they say. Interestingly the future is not quite dead with all it's economic setbacks for the short term, and maybe extending into a period of more economic uncertainty as a whole. We must look again and see where the fog is now coming from, instead of staring at it as long as we can remember in literature, old songs and poetry. To the east the fog is saying that now Britain can show how it can change relations with the Asean countries and make London a unique place for them to come to. This way you enhance even more than you expect, once it is built. It can change the chances for Britain in the period after 2019 and this will be a unique experience altogether if it does actually happen. No, not a Mekka for the eastern nations in Asean, but more like the 21st century for good relations with the far eas, which is by value now only in it's infancy by optimism..

Also this will be not only for good relations, but it is unique that Britain has found a way to raise itself again from the Brexit ashes, and now could find in extensive sincerity how the world is working from core mechanisms to unique ones. The world also hasn't been in this situation before, as everyone knows by now. The OECD, WTO, EU, USA, and Asia, all are still perplexed and believe it only textual for the moment. Visualization of the result will and must follow later on, starting preferably tomorrow a pronto. Brexit has got to be at the top of it and move on. Still standing could create more vacuum and from what some have said, that could also mean a very costly vacuum. In the long term all these realities will become relative, maybe from some points still negative, while others are upstreaming into a better position as never before. If you look at balance in parliament, in fact this is the real balance when it comes to scale economic models external to Westminster. What happened to the old British belief that 'fortune favours the brave'? Can one really look beyond Brexit at the moment when the agreement has not yet been approved of by parliament? But then again they can't afford to be so shortsighted and stick to the old ways forever. A new hierarchy of future Brexit is about people (system economic casualties), employment, the economy tiers for the new Britain, good relations with trade partners, and a transforming Britain when dealing with industrial giants and countries. What are you, Brexit?  Man, or mouse?

What was said in words is much more silent today in Britain.

20 November 2018

BoE is backing the PM's deal, it says in The Guardian online. The Pound is a serious sentiment for Britain in the midst of it's current crisis between Conservative MP's. After all, the Pound will be the 'real' future for Britain after leaving the EU in March 2019, and should be strong enough to remain sovereign indefinitely. And politicians seem today aware of the situation in the long term. Where the holy grail of the voting system can be a depressive experience this is all something else entirely different. e.g. from the troubles of the Pound, imaginative or by calculation. The Prime Minister is not ousted as was promised this would happen by the weekend. It is now tuesday, a few days later on and all the smoke has gone out. Also the position these Tory MP's have put the Prime Minister in wasn't high social standard discussions or done so in civilized debate. It might even be said that here is what we saw the 'real' character of British politicians trying to oust a PM in the bright of day before God and men, and to the world, because she agreed to go on with the withdrawal draft deal and wanted the country to understand her. That attitude taught the world nothing good and decent about people leading the country as a government. In stead they went back to evolution and became the Brexitsaurus they really are when fighting for their ideologies. Again, the world doesn't seem to do ideologies, and it barely deals in rationalities. From this point for Mrs May this seemed the only 'rational' reason why she wanted to go ahead with the deal. Nobody said this was a good deal, except for those who said it wasn't a good deal in digital wallpaper style and you can take your pick. The EU will finalise the deal with the UK today, so the papers say. What you can say about the Prime Minister is that it is extraordinary she has come this far and she is showing courage in the face of becoming a Brexitpinata for her MP's in her own Party. While all are ignoring the most important of all things, the Pound, that is the only future for the British economy and people.

Another more strange thing to say about Brexit is that this is also showing the inability of the British politicians to naturalize with the rest of Europe as another European nation, while not being on the EU Member States continent. Mr Tusk is right to say that he wished it rather would have been a non partir for the UK and to stay in the EU. The dynamics of the EU will not change in the face of Brexit. All Member States are determined to see it through and get over with it. And that being a whole different situation for the UK to sort things out among themselves once and for all. Not quite so, because Britain cannot veto itself in or out, as when it had the right to do so being in the EU and not like the other Member States. Perhaps this is put incorrectly, but the incorrectness is the system of this kernel about veto rights, and it makes the whole idea about leaving the EU terribly impossible. And not the Prime Minister, when thinking that nothing is backing her up in this mechanism. You could say in plain English and human language that the rights and powers Britain had on the balance are now up in smoke, and now it stands on it's own to be British and with no EU rights to enjoy the powerful exit from the EU they had wished for to demonstrate. Someone should be looking at this if political history would mean anything again in the future as big as this. The PM standing on the side of Brexit she has been facing powerful institutions in the world on these negotiations for the last half year. And the IMF is one such institutions, who adviced against leaving the EU. If you don't pay attention to these warnings your conscience isn't one of a PM, but of a reckless person doing reckless things. For many countries in the world they would not want to argue with the IMF. In their best interests they listen... Has the Prime Minister in the UK listened?

From Brexit to Brextinct.

16 November 2018

So, Mrs May's Brexit deal (withdrawal) is bad. If bad is also transparent enough this means the people can read it and what this means in terms of democracy is that it isn't something the Prime Minister is hiding from the people. Under the circumstances, chaos and panic, this looks good to any outsider who doesn't understand what deal is really on and why. At ministerial level many MP's don't want a 'half baked' deal. So they say. Journalist Tim Stanley clearly favours a 'No Deal' and is washing down the present deal Mrs May and the EU think it's better than a nothing deal. (Tim Stanley on QT last night) What the journalist did say right was the procedure by which these impossible deals demand from both sides, the EU and UK, that it is following a step by step process till the end date next year when Britain will leave the EU. Here is nothing wrong with what the PM has achieved so far, one should think. But the 'real Brexiteers' say she must step down. It's not good enough, because the deal means that Britain will stay in the EU and doing so without the right to have a say over it's decisions within the EU. The deal seems constructed this way for a few reasons and it is looking only fair from the point where the UK simply doesn't know where Brexit will take them if 168 countries only would listen to the EU and global leaders across the planet. Britain should ponder a little deeper how it will construct the next step and envision this relationship. Is there another construction waving in the air from the side of her rebel ministers? Mind you, there is enough air but nothing waving like a format on paper how to undo Mrs May's deal.

Labour is standing on high heels screaming for change. It is about work, labor, the economy, and poverty related issues the UK is dealing with according to many constituents holders in the present time. But where is the construction plan to get out of the EU? And why say you want to deliver Brexit when you're trying to say the opposite how bad things will be without the EU? From, maybe a naive point of view, anyone watching this hell and cry time in Britain today, you might think and say that Britain has lost all understanding where they are now and where they would want to go in the short term future. Under these circumstances Mrs May's deal is not looking bad, but is on the contrary a good deal so far... Taxation, Labor and industries, these are machineries that need time and being very difficult to exit from the existing EU rules, it also needs deeper studies and a new constructiveness. It is after all politics and science. When Tory rebels can do the deal and want to be Prime Minister in the boil of things they will be harvesting only boil. Labour would want the people behind it's way of delivering a Brexit they want, which looks more like a Brextinguisher policy maker for all, as they understand this will be good enough to fill in the space with white foam and noise. The EU wants to get on with their job and they don't want to lose any more time than necessary on Brexit. The EU from now on will go on the asymmetrical road away from Britain, but just keeping them close enough, if equality has anything of meaning to both sides. The only way the deal Mrs May has come up with can be watered down would be another construction plan and starting all over again and losing time in transparency and not just translation. And guess what, surprise surprise, Labour Jeremy Corbyn is saying that Labour does have such a plan. That would mean ten points ahead of the Tories who are calling for the Prime Minister to step down. And they can also smell blood when calling for the people to decide, again. Only one problem seems to arise immediately: they didn't know what they were voting for in the first referendum. How will they know now? In balance even the Tories didn't know what they were voting for, with one difference today, that in all modesty they do now have a little idea through the draft deal Mrs May keeps to her bosom as the most poisonous viper ever in British (political) history. And it is deadly, too.

President Donald Trump lost logic and coordination at one point.

7 November 2018

Somehow the Democrats have managed a soft landing on the president's turf last night and then they took over the House by a few more seats than they had anticipated or predict. This midterm was electrifying, especially at a time when the president was not concentrating on several issues that matter to all Americans and not just his die hard fans. The Democrats seemed more coordinated and are learning from past mistakes far more quicker than the Republicans, who still believe in old rationalities in America's political classes. The future will be different, also because in the rest of the world this change is a certainty that that will happen. Where president Trump fails his promises is perhaps due to lack of empowering people who desperately need to come back to society and be inclusive by employment and income, or wages, all hardcore issues the president has lost the logic over and if you look more carefully, he even has squandered many good chances to help America become great again, homebase. Our world needs good coordination by 2021, and from what certain people in the Democrat Party are doing and saying, so far, this looks more something they can deliver by discipline and not principal only. But there is still some time left to the president and if he could come up with better social programs or anything similar to strike the right note with the presidential race on all Americans, there is slightly still a chance for him to stay on and say hail to a second term as president, be it a weaker voice and in distant galaxies. The future is all about logic and coordination (if cohesion is what the plan is elsewhere in the world). What is the definition of 'America great again' and 'Americans', mr President?

We must wait and see.

Will the EU miss Britain's arbitrary mind in the 27 Member States?

19 October 2018

This answer was expected for the world to find out and see in March 2019, what will now be extended into a long wait hanging above the cliff near it's seas. What we see is a territorial fighting about a 'backstop' involving Ireland, and also pointing out in a direction that is no surprise, or new invention by any standard. Another thing: there's quite a lot of talking going on the theme in these negotiations between the EU and Britain, bringing all serious efforts to a low when all you can say that it is someone's fault. We believe that these negotations are very high profile, and don't play sharades in a lofty room hanging with illumination from chandeliers and than shouting 'Booh!' every time you catch or feel someone, also blindfolded. Jeremy Hunt,the foreign secretary, is right to say this morning that the EU is more united than the Tories, back home. Can we see this as the last convulsion of British arbitrariness? From the EU's side things couldn't be or look more brighter, when facing a golden future without Britain after the 2016 referendum to leave the EU. And perhaps that is right when Europeans can sit and talk together about all the things that they understand and not feeling too much of the need to be the arbiter in the room, and fear this or that EU- country will veto it's Member States slightly. There is much chance it might use their power of unity against a Member State political faux pas only lightly. And this will preserve energy and continuity. The EU, when golden, the future of the Member States will loosen the Anglo Saxon spirit from it's cohesion and replace this with the one they understand best. And that is what the end will be like and become. Also, perhaps this was from the beginning a European dream and never the dream of being Anglo Saxon. It's a mere suggestive thing or subjective. If Britain leaves the EU it is doing so on a democratic vote and understanding of people, regardless in which age or time we live in. Democracy was once perceived as indefinite and everlasting as long as the world will be inhabited by people (and animals). But what is really happening in the Anglo Saxon camps?

The camps are: Labour, Conservatives and Liberal Democrats. Or to put it correctly, they are Labour and the Conservatives, and in a small part also the Liberal Democrats. And what is it that they are exactly doing to get the deal they want? The deal in itself is British and not the EU. When EU Member States are also bound by sentimentality about Europe and the EU, Britain is lacking all that at the moment. There is nothing elastic about this very moment ongoing here. Some even think, well then that is the end of the story. Hopefully they are still in politics even when things look to no avail at this point in the fight over sovereignty. But that is not true and this is creating some sort of English fog in the eyes of the EU. Britain was never only sovereign in the world, but was a leading nation in the whole world. It takes one to know one, doesn't it? Where it get's tight for Britain is it's leading role in the world. Once that has been 'cut off' it can stay sovereign. And everyone can guess what that word now means for Britain and why it is hurting. You can loose a leg over this topic and there is still no answer, one that would suit Britain. Today the world is it's own judge, jury and executioner and it is more capable than ever before to move on with life. They don't need to be Anglo Saxon for that anymore, and they don't need to play medieval aristocrats in the sixteenth century, living in castles and dreams. The global world wants a golden future and this demanding is coming loud and clear from all sides in the living world. But the punch line is this, humanity needs a good arbiter with great understanding of it's habitat and specificness, something Britain has always been good at in the greatest sense of humility, and not always in the inhumane way it is also known for in certain circles...

What will hurt the British politicians and it's government is not the EU...

6 October 2018

At this year's Party Conference the Conservative Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, has promised the people of Britain that austerity has seen it's final days and it is or soon will be over. There is no national level the public has heard of before or know of, that in Britain the Conservative government will change Britain for good, or at this point is indefinitely, and by magic wand will let go of the most hated tool in governance, and was the only perception of 'real politics' in British recent history. The outsider remains unknown, or maybe the elephant in the room has finally got out of it's confinement and broke away from it's captor and has turned free into the streets of London. Austerity was it's name and it's construction was all of it's own ivory. The EU isn't the problem, despite what many will say, new and old politicians alike. What seems to be the problem is the childish way of the British government, Labour or Conservative, who are failing to recognize the real problems this country faces in terms of progress and development in the 21st century. And this is deeply regrettable to old friends of Britain, who in their turn are also facing the common world's view under immense global pressure and it's Go- systems. Most countries in the EU and the west are heavily contemplating the time of the future, and they seem to be on the path of a new revolution theory and reality, with no relation to Brexit from a pure realistic point of view. No one knows whether Britain's view of the world is the same as their 'allies' in neighbouring countries at the moment, and this get's the EU rather stuck in between lifting up- and - down the elevator. The UK Prime Minister will not be able to dance her way out of this problem this time, or soon, in the next month in November. Our last global quarter of the year is crucial to the Prime Minister, if she realizes they are heading for a big surprise, aka the 'Ghostship' of 2019.

But Britain is on the war path, instead. (Britain, please, lower your swords...) And there is no real friend left to stay with the British people on the other side, when they advise not to 'stir the barley' if there is no 'war on the outside' of the island. Panic is also not a good adviser on the side of the Prime Minister and her cabinet! "Where is the traitor? Yes, yes, have you seen him? Where is he? Under the benches in the House of Commons? No? Or yes?" What can the PM's next dance be after the EU in next negotiations next month? "Love will save the day," by Whitney Houston? Too many questions are being asked and few or little answers is what we get, in England and out in the streets, home, abroad and beyond. Bravery is not the same thing as in the years gone by when Britain fought it's wars against all kinds of threats in two World Wars. Trafalgar Square and the Piccadilly Circus are an example of the bravery England now needs to make it the centre of the global future and it's participation as a nation next to it's global peers. (The infrastructure at the centre of London is too outdated, as any one who stands in the future would see it) Strangely enough the Conservative Government, if changed, is exactly what the PM of Britain says, the only Party for the good things for Britain. It is because of this concreteness we are worried that here is a country who used to be the world leading industrial nation is losing incredibly fast all it's former glory and triumph, for a mere thing or old dusted thing called 'common sense'. Even if all industries in the world would move to England, the answer still is the global future. And in the global future all institutions are already here. It is to no avail thinking about good memories we have with the British people, in the world as we know it now. Paradoxically we need to be more deeply related globally in this century, or face the reverse logic of all bad outcomes and un-smart ways, even for a great country like Britain.

Love Will Save The Day

Whitney Houston

Sometimes life can make you crazy
It can really put a body to the test
You try so hard to make sure everything is right
And you find you've only wound up with a mess

It's a common situation
Even though you feel abandoned and alone
Child, you ain't the first to experience a hurt so
Don't panic when you bit the danger zone

What you need's a little change of heart
Forget this fear and frustration
Love will always play the greater part
When you battles wear you down
Here's my advice

When you're feeling down and out
And you're got troubles on your mind
Love will save the day
When you're feeling full of doubt
And fear has got you in a bind
Love will save the day

When your world's falling apart
All you got to do is say a prayer
And love will save the day
There's answer

The unknown industry of demographics in the 21st century.

1 October 2018

Society becomes the natural place for demographics in our time. This particular vision hasn't been done or here before, let's say before the millennium, when there was still an older vision of industries automatically being integrated into and by globalization dynamics the world over. Where this 'phenomenon' of a shift is evident we're witnessing instead of more integration into the bigger world, a system that is pushing existing industrial expansion to a downward end and start all over again from, let's say, a zero point. Scientists may have noticed this new phenomenon only lately, but were maybe as puzzled at this as any other global system expert in our changing world. What did change isn't merely your perspective, or the global strategic policies of any field, or even if true the industrial input inadequacy you can only find 'at home' to match a more global demand indefinitely. Two worlds are set apart, one on the global stage and one for home, at national level. Interesting enough to have a closer look at the second in this parallel viewing, where we see a strange visibility of what wasn't there before, e.g. when demographics was an industrial factor of unknown destination and therefore making it a complex understanding how to deal with this at best, statically and dynamically. Of course, by now we are all seeing microleveleconomics emerging from the ashes of an old system come back, and it is providing no explanation. Many know how the 'big world' exterior is now operating on a world- level scale, and is also doing so from an interior point of view. A castle is never build for two persons! (The higher and massive the walls, the bigger the interior and it's stores...)

What if at microlevel we have two industrial fields, with one for all existing industries, and the unknown to be the place of living and it's space? If there is no mediator- line in between, what will these industries have in common or not it will not trigger the economic needle to make a start movement, either up or down. Demographics in most societies today on the western half in economies of the west are part of the 'living industries', labor and income, next to the existing industries that are not 'living industries' based, but technological and automated into globalization in the 21st century. (In 2018 most of globalization was replaced by a global future) It is this 'living industries' that are not part of the global corporate world, inclusively or prioritised. This is but a simple assumption still, and not a scientific model to fit a particular purpose in the theory or question. At the same time it is true that the global future is not handing out leaflets how to access 'the castle', unless when perhaps a knight of economics of the 'global future'... It is however a magnificent finding if society can upheave this particular complex understanding and bring it to a bigger world, as science and academic achievement of people. Truly, the global future will always favour the brave and intelligent and do this for one reason alone. World supremacy has never had a finer or more delicate touch ever before, as well as being sophisticated in all it's systems at the same time. E.g., from captain of industry to General of industries. In a three steps staircase one can sum up the industries on a national ground are, demographics, existing industries and the cycle upwards into the global world, half being visible and the other half staying invisible.

Global Fiction.

19 September 2018

Model of Real Time in the global fiction can have only one outcome, once. 'Once' in system lingo is quite something else when globally! Inside the bigger picture you can find extensive maps of demographics, some even get close to explain ground level situations, e.g. how infrastructure is doing in a particular place and time, donwstream or upstream. Another model will then have to be put in place when explaining down- or up level flows, if whether they be inside active Real Time, or outside. Try explain Global Fiction from any given point seen from the top (imaginary) or down (reality) where true reference only ends in product abstracts, is very much another reality in most places across the world. The question is whether Global Fiction could be another name for global macroeconomics (or metrics). Time is quick silver to any global fiction model, if the question is: does it exist? Let's try the amateur observation on the subject for a moment. "Why does it happen?" And not just 'What if?". In the extension of the sentence the question really is this, "Why does it happen, the global fiction?" A positive starting point also could be that global fiction means positive fiction. And hereby opposing or offering a natural line of opposition, if the product is but a thin line snaking itself across the globe, half unreal (long term) and half real in the short or shortest of term. It stands above global finances and global currencies.

Our human natural ground is blocked as an interior model and reaching as far as the imaginary view of an exterior world. Or, to put it in another way, 'Why did it happen?' being the angle ring microeconomics level, versus the 'What if?' at macroeconomics level stainless steel ring fence of global concreteness. Impact driven economies, or worse when becoming small islands of critical centres (even when not in a mess), is the best stretch for now on the subject of Global Fiction. It could pull the 'kite models' inward and maybe put in place a whole new defensive economic and philosophical policy, where it cuts more deeply on the side of the 'Why is it happening'. GF begs a different approach of how not to stay out and how to stay in inside the infrastructure of global financial systems. On the positive side the understanding one should explain of how this would work between the two worlds, it is perhaps the focus of where the world is going and wants to be in every bloc of time. One keyword therefore cannot be opposing the world of 'Why did it happen?' against 'What if?'. Positive is a good whisper when it is mandate, yes, indeed. The world expanding exponentially was last seen before the global financial collapse in 2008. It is Global Fiction in 2018, a making of ten years introducing better systems and technologies in a different magnitude, as it's only choice to handle the biggest world ever in history. A macroeconomic question: 'What if?' if it really  works  this way?

Turkey's unique ability 'skin for skin' growling when in crisis with the US administration.

15 August 2018

Rumours in the present situation between countries Turkey, Italy, China, Russia, the EU Member States, e.g. Germany, and the US are saying as much as that first all participants in the world capital markets should understand how pressure only works for currencies and not politics. It has taken Turkey longer than expected how to fix the loose terms in their economy and also politics has failed terribly to inform the Turkish people at large, naming time and date, with anticipation to carefully deal with future, this is a few years ago up to now, let's say if it will come to another crisis moment, either in international politics or economics. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has gently put it the other day, that he is capable to understand the situation in the Lira crisis, even today still dropping fast, but can see how the US tries to manipulate the capital markets against a long lasting ally and strategic partner, for political reasons about Turkey's refusal to extradite the US pastor, Andrew Brunson. US President Donald Trump only warned Turkey yesterday of a possible long term way of looking at this, and it can go either way, good or ugly. (Not literally his words) But what a unique situation this is too for Turkey, managing once again in recent history to put itself at the heart of the world economic and global capital nerve- centers! It is to some extent plain thinking on the part of Turkey to use this chance as it's right to re-establish assertiveness. It is where everything becomes impossible and can never be understood by the so called 'outsiders' of this stratosphere from top to bottom economic strength, per country or place in the rest of the world. The President of Turkey understands more, one would say excessively more, that global politics always will have a finer nerve for political situations in countries close to it's own sphere and that it can only answer to leaders with leadership skills how best to be a man of his people while he wants to maintain to be a strategic partner, preferably with some understanding, with e.g. the global powerhouse of all world's lifelines in the global economy. After all Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan is a World Economic Forum veteran.

For Turkey however nothing is rational until there is a crisis, but then becoming too late for getting down to the right way of action taking, with minimum harm or self harm. This crisis is not any different and by now is resting in dead waters with the global capital markets houses. It doesn't mean that anyone should underestimate Turkey for it's ability to meet the US or EU 'skin for skin', even if it never makes it and fully transforms. We must admire the Turkish nation for trying anyway, where most Islamic countries never go systematically in difficult relations and with partners far greater than Turkey itself. The parting shot is shooting itself in the foot if things really would go bad for Turkey. Italy came without cynicism on sunday last weekend to render some last minute help out with the dropping of the Lira in Turkey and failed to complete it's full attempt to calm down the turbulence of a currency that was clearly white pale at the bottom by sunday evening. All this doesn't concern the US President Donald Trump in the least. And this is how it goes for some uneasy and others dead easy. In fact despite what the rest of the world thinks of Turkey's President, mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, it should be noticed that once again this man is at the middle center of world affairs and he is doing it with a brave face. And how refreshing that is in a world with no time anymore for fundamental or primary needs of individual countries and people. It is also true that mr Erdogan cannot fight unpopularity of his presidency in Turkey and foreign ministries abroad, but where he is now standing amazingly is next to his nation and his right as he put it in his own words, a strategic partner of Nato, the EU and US. Friendship with Mr Putin, the Russian President, could be Turkey's divine challenge of all times, including his own presidency timeline. The story continues.

How is innovation different from pre- historic time?

2 July 2018

It all comes back to the arena in war, economics, politics, governments, World Cup stadiums (stadia), medicine, families, and so forth. What we have not heard of before is the business arena, but here specifically is always mentioned as the business centres. If innovation has anything to do with it we have so far thousands of years never thought of changing the concept in this great world theatre. Also, it isn't because mankind stayed unlearned. On the contrary, mankind went to the moon. So, what is the question here about innovating and innovation? Actually it is somewhat worrying when or if this goes on for another century long, that in fact we do not understand how to innovate but only alter things or change the design. Big cities keep the same idea and they are the loudest when speaking of innovation. Lot's of taxpayers' money go to 'innovation', yes, that as well. Horizontally the only experts on innovation over the last century and not centuries have been the people designing houses and bridges, sometimes changing basically from old core mechanisms to technological new instruments. If science alone stands out to innovate at a constant rate, how do we perceive this in the world of business (without the noise of selling big in the world)? Ants too create arenas... (All they collect goes to one particular address) Human behaviour and innovation, one can only say, do not make a symmetrical match when it comes to change or changing the world. Politicians are stuck and proof of that, especially in our time in 2018.

What can we do about the arena in our mind and innerself? We should stop at some point going all to the same point in any perspective one fine day and make a real new idea our innovation, don't you agree? Perhaps it's not in our genes to do so. Who would say or know this for a fact, let's say academically? Take for example unemployment. This is one of a world- wide problem, and standing high next to poverty. Data or system engineers found the only solution and made it quite elite by moving the arena away from business and said that in our century we need business centres and platforms in the whole world... The mind arena only visualized with our eyes and intelligence? How far does this thing go in the 'real world' and how low does it go in the 'nether world' at street level communities across the globe? The pressure is on politicians to give all the answers when industries are living on and in borrowed time, plus profits are becoming with every second peanuts. Religious people believe in aIn another world we should get rid of the arena. Messianic second coming, but what can mankind be waiting for if they haven't changed the arena (arena space) since pre- historic time? (The evolution excluded) Another question could be that maybe we simply aren't that smart to be different from pre- historic concepts, e.g. two cavemen come together in one place and discuss the position of the sun or moon, and called it the place of two since then. Innovation from this point of view would or could mean that it isn't a concept of place and space, but of instrument of measure. Btw, the cavemen, so far, where truly clever by pointing in measure that this is called the place of two out of their community. We on the other hand go on as clever by aping them to eternity. In another world we should get rid of the arena. 

Synchronicity and Syria.

16 April 2018

Was it a bad deal for the UK to get involved in bombing Syria on the 'alleged' chemical attack by President Bashar al- Assad's regime on his own people? The UK PM, mrs Theresa May, is in a rather awkward military political corner with her approach to joining the US and France with this military operation. It's perhaps even more plain and simply to put it. E.g., that no one should ape the time when the war started in Iraq back in the nineties, completely under different policies between NATO allies. Times have changed and dramatically this is true for Britain. Britain will be leaving the EU in march 2019. Where the Prime Minister is standing in her government is still uncertain, if one takes the rumours seriously that she is incapable of keeping her Party happy on Brexit, while putting Labour on the opposite looking like a Party that is going more every day into  timbo or sidetracked with  anti- Semitism, or even this, not taking military action against Syria. The Prime Minister is in no shape to ape Tony Blair (Iraq era) on bombing Syria. Nor is she strong enough in government to take action in Syria in the same way that former Prime Minister, David Cameron took a stance on President Bashar al- Assad a few years ago and saying that the west should concentrate on removing the President of Syria. Again, times have changed for Britain... And it changed for the better, so we have to believe. In a way, theorhetically, Mrs May could all along be right to take action against the Assad regime for the crime against a defenseless people and call this a military action. A chemical attack is plain murderous and not military. In military science the west is very well familiar with the devastation of such use of military weapons. But the UK is a different military political ally today to e.g. France, who also is taking part in this military operation. Are we talking about synchronicity as the new military tactics, let's say because Britain has changed it's political and legal meaning in the EU?

Later today the Prime Minister will answer Questions from her MP's. This should be seen as an important debate, as this is Mrs May's first military action on International level. With Russia in the backstage of Syria this military operation was indeed the most tricky thing during the Brexit period of devolving or leaving the EU for the Prime Minister. Without the synchronicity, which by the way does not exist, Mrs May can feel a little misplaced or unease if she will be grilled by a Question time today. And her answers, so far, seem a little feeble too, that Britain felt it had to act against the regime in Syria over the suspected chemical attack on innocent people. Her intentions might be instictive in the way that she has responded, but the action as a Brexit country should that not be more of a Britain in a new executive of political military correctness? These seem very complex legal matters from any innoncent bystander or observer's point of view outside the world of politics. Syria is provocative, and is doing so for the last six or seven years. Who is still counting the years? Republican President Donald Trump and his decisiveness on Syria wasn't the big surprise, as any US President would have done no less and do the same. It is after all true for all chemical weapons that this is on international law level  a very specific use to win wars. Why the President of Syria, Mr Bashar al- Assad, took on this specific use of the chemical weapon, was criminal and at the same time a very strange choice in timing. If Britain is leaving the EU it does so legally and that would make France her EU- ally in all future military actions in the world outside Britain. War is not trade and is under different International politics. Unless it's synchronicity and not an alliance where the synergy is the dominant factor to take an allied approach on International level. The world has created military science, with the US as the dominant force behind all these new technologies. It only seems right not to forget where the world is standing and how to build new relationships with continents that are undergoing a few major changes in Real Time. (The EU has signed a deal for a military of it's own Intel)

Balance on Brexit timeline, a weekly routine?

29 January 2018

Watching the UK Prime Minister on monday today there is this feeling that Mrs May sits and waits the decision the EU is handing out to her, earlier today and will continue to do so sometime later in the early evening. Mr Barnier is very clear on two points in further negotiations with Britain on leaving the EU: it is the starting point and the actual time when Britain leaves the EU. In short there is no much room left to the Prime Minister for any chance of a spielraum during transitional time, but she is left with something of hope that this period will coincide with the Brexit timeline automatically. In these vital moments and minutes the UK should lose no opportunity to forge immediately the best deals with country A, B, C, D, and so forth when it wants to overcome loss of time and money. Is there a plan ready for the UK to indeed bank on real deals, and when not that it does not 'interfere' with EU policies across relations and it's territorial 'waters'? This is the way forward, or one of it's ways. If or when during the transition the balance changes, from day to day, or week to week, this might cause the EU to become nervous and on their side they may be also changing time on certain policies, being cautious and finding no time to waste on uncertainty that wasn't their 'breaking up from Britain', but the other way round. We must wait and see whether Brexit can be strong enough dealing with complex time issues, in terms of minutes and seconds when leaving the EU.

Whatever Mrs May will be receiving today from Mr Barnier the question at home will be whether the Prime Minister has delivered the 'Hard Brexit' she spoke of during the last few months after the Party Conference in October last year. To many Brexiteers it may not look like a hard Brexit after all, later today. This is a tough time for the Prime Minister too, but she is not allowed to cry on anyone's shoulder as if she was a scared little girl of twelve years old in the kingdom of Narnia. Brexit could be hexed and Mrs May was unable to break the spell. Why does 'grandmother' has such big teeth, she could ask Mr Barnier. (In the wolf his mind bubbles he answers directly that they are big to eat you) But seriously, Mr Rees- Mogg only said this morning (Bow Group tweet article) that he fears a Brexit in name only (or BRINO), if the PM won't deliver the Brexit she promised months ago last year in 2017. In the meantime the stars are ominous in the evening sky with Mr Jeremy Corbyn rising closer to the Brexit orbit, and is ready to take over the Prime Ministership from the Conservative Pary, the sooner the better. And just maybe the Labour Party could deliver the orderly Brexit for Britain with more of the softly softly approach, intellectually more suitable to the EU Top- men. If balance should be sought in 'gentleness', reality should be found at this end as well. In the big world the news goes on and Frankfurt is cutting ties to Banks that enable Israel Boycots. This might be very much Brexit in the season of the witches and how to get out is a complete other story on the political champion of Brexit when inside the belly of the wolf. Balance weekly is like leaving pebbles behind on the road when getting back you won't get lost in the global woods. Mrs May must be thinking more on the lines of how to carry a giant stone on her back and deliver first to finish. Not Mr Corbyn. Brexit get's every one in the mood and inspires wonderful stories to write. It is true, at least from the point of view of balance.

A brave change and inclusive government in British politics this week, and pioneer. But true, reconcilliation has yet to digest and change sovereignty for the future.

10 January 2018

British politics only changed yesterday and it's impact is already focusing on diversity itself. Mrs May will be remembered as the Prime Minister who has said that she wanted a government that is reflecting the British people in the 21st century, to put it simply. But some might say that this was a highly unpopular decision to take in the middle of a crisis, when e.g. Britain is trying to win back sovereignty from the continent that many know as the European Union. When Britain was still in the EU as a Member diversity or populations on the British Island was never a priority and it was left in the mainstream of every day life and living experience for every free person and citizen. In government the 'go system' for politics alignment with the EU remained the old style way when Britain was still sovereign... A paradox was now fallen and as from this week when we in the world think of Britain, we will now have to think Sovereignty that went diverse and it is reflected in government, a Conservative government first move ever done and made in British political history. Mrs May predecessor, the late Princess Diana, has always welcomed and championed the idea of a more diverse Britain, and in fact she went a little further by giving all peoples in the world hope on 'inclusiveness', then still being a kind way of including everyone in the human race. Her son, Prince Harry, will soon follow in her footsteps and will be the first royal to marry a citizen of the United States in America to become his spouse for life. Megan Markle is of mixed race. In five years time what Britain is now defending is a new sovereign way for the future, in which Prince Harry is the champion by example and doing this in a very serious way. What more can we need than to see Britain succeed to be British for all the right reasons given by God Almighty and to live a sovereign's dream of the way life truly is given to us in the 21st century, a diverse (some will say and poorer) society and that this is a global phenomenon.

Some elites in Britain may think otherwise... And in a way they are right, for what does the monarch say on this new diversity in British government? A sovereign's dream is never the same as the rest in the world. Justice and God are a sovereign's conscience and in prayer no one knows how they dream about people and subjects living freely in the country where the monarch holds majesty over. Sovereignty indeed, ideally, is a dream come true when it reconciles peoples. In these early days of the British government's diversity Conservative Party, there is no such reconcilliation yet digesting across all over in Westminster. This rare thing will come across some parts in government as dishonest or in elite terms as a popularity stunt. It cannot hold without the proper instinct for government and peoples. When looking back in five years time at this Conservative government and this Prime Minister, the best thing we will remember in the world is that she has not disappointed the human race and what it deeply believes in when speaking of peace. You must be wise, or indeed, wiser. It is time for grace and change, one or two things only Britain can convey at this point of reversal of fortunes. For too long now people have been kicking against the monarchy for all the wrong reasons, e.g. when money is involved. While in fact the monarchy is still established by the Grace of God. Who else then can unite and reconcile the people and the world? With lack of sovereignty, I personally believe, there is lack of good and compassionate justice. This is not a writing about the EU and Brexit. It is a letter of feeling, when remembering the God of Jacob.

Rough Sleepers in Brexit estimated over 13.000. Either too stupid or stubborn to take partisan action by government people.

23 December 2017

4000 Rough Sleepers in Britain reported in a tweet yesterday. No hangar free to give these people some shelter during Xmas time and the new year's day? This morning another estimation was reported, something over 13000 will be sleeping rough in the UK this week, the end (economics last quarter) of december 2017. In the House of Commons everything is being done according to the Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, every week since november this year. It is an alarming number of people who are out in the streets and will not be able to quickly find a roof over their head before Xmas day next week. Both political parties seem to be fighting the other battles at a national level, and some even say also on an international level. How this is going to happen there is no one really to tell you aything at the moment. We don't see anything shifting or changing yet. Except for this strange phenomenon on the streets in Britain, e.g. an increase of rough sleepers. No one is saying the accommodation should be a lasting deal with the homeless, that they can always get accommodation during the rest of the year at emergency places across the country, but they can find harbour in days when it is proper thinking or action to render some humanitarian help to those close at home in their hour of inhumane circumstances during the holiday season. And, yes, there is also another reason to make this an emergency in Britain. Brexit is full of slogans to make a better future for the British people, but putting Brexit first and forsake those in need is a controversy no one outside Britain will forget. EU Member States might do well on the humanitarian side this XMas, and maybe every other time during the 'festive' days. Who is better off?

The Prime Minister needs sound and quick advice on this particular issue. A country to spend in the future billions of pounds on Defence to keep Britain (and allies) safe can't afford to let down a few helpless people out in the streets this year. Brexit starts here and now, and not in some other day ten years from now. It's a long and hard process, but Christian charity is for all times, one understands. These homeless people need immediate care, is also something people around the world can read in the newspapers. You can die a hero doing what is right for Brexit and in the end you haven't done anything to help others in distress. Judgement should be pure and more puritan than that. Can the Prime Minister forget the Sherry for a moment and go help people who have zero future in Brexit? Funny how we think of just stuffing ourselves during the holiday season and never think how it must be for those who have lost everything and do not even remember where that comes from about human dignity. Their nails are blackened with dirt and next to litter they are trying to find a place to sleep. Heaven! What a strange world to be in when it never happens to you because you are the smartest and most beautiful and your relief is superb wine... Bipartisan action in Brexit is one such sound judgement, if you want to risk being called insolent or impudent to call for from wherever you might be. MXMAS, Prime Minister Mrs Theresa May.

Brexitecture.

19 December 2017

Today the UK Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, promised to soon deliver another major speech on Brexit with explicit mentioning of the vision she is about to launch as her 'Brexitecture'. All that she needs is to find her Bezier curve and various fields will automatically be open for viewing. There was once a time when Britain wasn't fearful of the future and it's enormous speed. Jaguar (Daimler) heritage (peronal favourite Jaguar C-type) is classic proof of British made industries made successful. Austin Rover, Rolls Royce, and sometimes even it's finest dairy products were made into a worldwide almost 'overnight' success. E.g. Kavli Cheese. Time in it's reverse doesn't feel void of British finest in the world as we know it. Where it did end that will prove a little more trickier in the 21st century than when it's meaning was 'Simply British' to most out there in the world. You could say that the Prime Minister was a child of time when Britain had a blue steel vein of invincibility and nothing could make it fail by 'simply want'. One can only hope and wait for this third major Brexit speech and take on the challenge of a more liquid Britain she has to make solid, and starting with nothing. The new global industry is about how to buy the future world. Prime Minister Theresa May should say her prayers qickly before getting onto this vast moving imaginary pontoon boat that only sails the seas and oceans of impossilbe dreams and visions to go round the world, together as wealthy nations. Jaguar Daimler's is now but a tiny dot on the global map that only hobbyists can spot with the naked eye.

The public will not know the truth about the Prime Minister, why she is hugging trees on the continent where they promise a good deal is just behind the woods. Continuation for the EU 27 Member States will simply continue and it will hold this as it's diplomatic force above the leaving Member, Brexit. From this point of view the EU still hasn't found any reason just yet to believe what independence means when envisioning is the one thing in 'your face', than when it wasn't there before. Someone ought to say it out loud, why is this wrong to leave the European Union now? All political powers in Britain have been too much an emphasis over the years on why it should leave and this made all politicians focus blindly without vision or a clear idea on what exactly they will be finding once this moment would come or happen in Real Time. Was it ever conceived as a worst case scenario, let's say twenty years ago, ten years ago, or even five years ago? There wasn't a politician who had to tell anyone where Britain would go without a 'deep partnership' with the rest of the EU, or clear deals with the rest of the world... Brexitecture architects will have to find a point of reference somewhere. E.g. the ship would already have to be in the dock to leave the EU with all important cargo, ten years ago. Due to lack of preparation for a leave from the EU the world will be watching a Prime Minister who can't sail off from the continent without a ship and fill it up with all that it claws back from the European Union and bring back home to Britain. Who will pay for this voyage? (A maiden voyage, the first Prime Minister in time when she took back Britain out of the EU, to sail back home with everything that was Britian's, on a ship named Jaguar?)

DUP waiting for Brexit government and PM to come back with plan.

7 December 2017

On wednesday on PM's Questions the resounding word during questions was constitution(al) at this session of meeting. Only of course when it falls on deaf ears. But let's not go there when you don't know anything between Britain and the UK. On a more 'personal invention' there is always a plan one can come up with, that is if politics have anything to do with science and intelligence. Maybe the problem is just where you're standing and when looking up to the European continent from the shores of Ireland, and not per se invisibility or visible control. Somehow you're expecting smartness from Europeans more than at any place home in Ireland (north or south), and if you are suspicious you might even think this has something to do with the ocean or the salt in the sea. It is true, there are smart machines to replace the human touch in these difficult and most complex circumstances, which the Northern Ireland, Mainland Ireland and Britain are one. But placed in the EU makes the machinery a lot more bigger when it comes to integrity of territorial control and accessibilties. Time is catching up: a strategy only means what usually is happening on a two- way street. Deeper cooperation is also based on this two- way strategic planning, but especially when the UK wants to leave the EU to make a fresh start in the global sphere. We are looking at a possible mix of the two, deeper cooperation and strategic plans for future relationships in this corner of prenatal Brexit. It is not so smart to be in the EU and do 'old politics'. De facto the plan also does not need to be set out solely by Britain, when the DUP and the Republic of Ireland are in partnership with Britain. Sometimes you just wonder why the EU has to be so blunt in this matter and keeps on separating things. Maybe because it's main drive is to make coherent or unite?

On monday next week the PM in England is expected to visit Brussels again and come up with a good plan to get the final deal in phase I over certain issues and then move on to Level II/ Phase II in the discussions with the top EU officials. But the PM won't have a plan. In a previous writing I mentioned something about the EU Member States that they need no introduction and explain who they are and which country they represent, when e.g. being in the EU (and have to visit summits). In comparison with speaking to the public. People should not push Britain to come up with a plan where they do some sort of intro on their existence, and then formally request whether this plan will be sufficient to let them 'exist' as the UK outside the EU. It doesn't seem like a wise decision this morning to question sovereignty. Jerusalem will be the capital of Israel (west of it according to President Donald Trump of the US) and every one is happy about 'the move' by the US President. It is also not something to be questioned when the President of the United States has recognized the 'de jure' of the capital, in Israel, and with this presidential act has overruled any former agreement or law against the capital, now of the Jewish State. It does put some peoples out in the cold of political progress for decades and get it into a survival mode system. In Europe federalism is the new way for the future of EU countries and perhaps more will become Member States candidates as time progresses. In the nature of changing Europe and European life and standard, it is no surprise many will be 'shocked' at the latest move by the US President, Donald Trump, that if this is legal that this could only become hurtful to the Palestinian struggle for having a peaceful relationship with Israel in Jerusalem and beyond. It is understandable to have Jerusalem more officially in the State of Israel after it's last experience as a nation in Nazi Germany, and to make it more like a close link to the 'land of milk and honey' promise to the people of Israel history in ancient Biblical land. But it is not bad to be careful too, 1 degree per hour if to move a bridge (ChinaGTN videoclip on twitter) The UK insists it wants to keep it's sovereignty and that was never a personal invention of the British. Or was it?

UK budget 2017: what was that about the whisky?

23 November 2017.

Let's hold that thought for a moment, the only strong blip in the UK budget 2017 today. It doesn't take any expertise to read into the words or text of the UK budget 2017 set out earlier today in the House. Why? Transition time will be a dertermining factor later on and it will probably revise the whole plan projections in this budget. It was about reforming or planning reforms, the Chancellor said. That was not only wise to say, but also easy to listening, or accessible to anyone listening. Will this government really get sentimental during this time of the year, just before Christmas 2017, and much later on, after a dreadful december month with EU leaders or negotiators, quickly get back to their usual hard face, and change all over again? In Mr Jeremy Corbyn's words: nothing has changed, not even when the Chancellor was saying about the 28 Million to help out rough sleepers in the streets of Britain. By what year? A few interesting noises came through the atmosphere in the House of Commons while the Chancellor, Mr Philip Hammond, was delivering his speech. Mainly from the Chancellor himself. He seemed dead serious at times, e.g. when saying that he was listening to voices about the UC and that this needed attention, of some kind... It was the kind of budget you expect to hear from the UK, matched by the kind of response from the opposition. The Chancellor was a man who had seen the three ghosts in Britain's own scenario and version of Uncle Scrooge. Productivity, UC and the future of Brexit. Result: a turkey for everyone this Christmas, plus there is also promise of making whisky less expensive next year, by 1, and something. "Merry Christmas, mr..." The Chancellor jokingly said. Giggles everywhere...

The red cherry on the pudding of the budget speech 2017 was Mr Corbyn's last punch, that this government wasn't fit to rule. Not his government, but the one opposite the house from where he was standing. Some criss- cross arguments Mr Corbyn made were well placed in context of this budget, even to outsiders and people who can't understand why politics in Britain had turned flat key on the hearing. But you can't judge a government in a time like now when facing an incredible turn of the century, where it has never been before. And it even gives more weight to the budget speech, by trying to get it fit into the big hole standing up, instead of laying down and face magnetic economic doom at the end. Others say that the Chancellor has no big ideas, or didn't put them down in his budget. It could be that that was part of his idea on Technological revolution and era. It's hard to say when you're not an expert on government and government finances. Maybe this was the best he could do at the moment and turn the softer cheek of Britain in Brexit timeline to the British public? His appraisal of grammar schools was almost touching. He wants Britain to stay at the top of literacy and education, skill and computing. Mr Hammond has displayed an incredible tallness in the House today, but what he also did was showing the British audience that swallowing standing up isn't all that bad, or was it? He does not hide the future but embraces it. Hot or cold, no one can just yet tell. It might just be right to say that Brexit's start is a slow one, but than suddenly will take off like an economic juggernaut to the sky where the limit seems to be natural law.

Grammar  or math schools?

Monday morning Rotterdam: definition cabinet minister in the UK will be kernel in Mrs May's government.

13 November 2017

MOV (My own view)

Parallel vision of a Brexit- EU axis is not the natural visual as long as both sides move alongside on straight lines of their own establishments. No one is expecting at this stage that they should move more than 45 degrees toward the axis, let alone to go all the way outwards 360 degrees in equal sharing. In the latter that would still mean staying 'what brings together that belong together' (Mr Claude Juncker's words on thursday last week in the news- Syndicate tweet Javier Solana). Mrs May, the UK Prime Minister, is definitely looking more each day as if she is dwarfed by the last two weeks of sleaze in Westminister and resignations by cabinet Ministers in her own Party. Is the kernel that runs through the veins of Westminister and Conservative ministers running out of control for Mrs May, is probably what one is wondering. Politically at home Mrs May is getting smaller or becoming very quickly the incredible shrinking woman in Westminster. That is making the itsy bitsy spider look much more of a giant problem in her vision and she keeps running across the room with no exit door to a more safer Britain and Prime Minister. Who was that that once said, Prime Ministers don't do easy? But there are limitations to every difficult situation when a large scale problem emerges and is requiring a national response from all representatives in government. Theory of war cabinet: if Mrs May is devoured by failure in talks with the EU, is there such a thing as a Prime Minister who will be able to pick up from where the PM has left or has fallen off and elevate the parallel vision of Brexit and stop the bleeding?

But we might be wrong here. To the public and at large overseas the problem isn't everything that fits the Brexit - EU deals as ongoing, e.g. trade talks today with EU ministers when there is nothing to trade just yet. Also ministers in cabinet are not being grilled over definitions of what could be a Brexit minister and a former Brexit minister. Time is essential in the new approaches, if the PM has set any of that on her mind for the coming period, till december 2017? Perhaps the time has come to find quick 'replacements' (Persian immortals?) who can pitch this thing, instead of nose diving the whole idea of leaving the EU in march 2019, at 11:04 PM, every time the EU retreats to it's own HQ top quarter in Brussels. In the public's eye the landing of the module on the moon was straightforward and a smooth path, in real it wasn't the case. The lunar module had to land on a calculated point, excercised in countless lab- simulations on earth NASA. There is a calculated point for the Conservative Party if and let's say Mrs May cannot make the full trajectory and settle calm back between Brexit and the EU. Senior cabinet ministers, Home Secretary Ms Amber Rudd and Minister for education Ms Justine Greening come to mind and to be the pilot to lead Brexit new path to continuity alongside the EU, and moving in flexible time east and west towards prospect partners in the rest of the world. Like Mr Boris Johnson, Ms Rudd and Justine Greening are global experts on the geo political mindset of the EU, static and active, and also now with Brexit. In other words technically Brexit is feasible. And no one needs to bite the dust and avoiding poison. The Brexit- EU well is a right to survive throughout time and future. If not, well than humans are not as good as they think they are at big sky and earth politics and economics.

Error: Mrs May is not meeting with EU ministers today but EU businessleaders.

Brexit needs 'skilling- up' workers to match better pay.

22 October 2017

The workers output in Britain is at it's lowest and it doesn't qualify automatically for better wages, to assume that work is paying (not part of the argument made by Secretary General OECD, Mr José Angel Gurria at news conference with Chancellor of the Exchequer in the UK, Mr Philip Hammond, last week). Brexit isn't the problem, from what one can understand, because Brexit is 'unknown'. Brexit is in fact the new page for Britain when it leaves the organization of the remaining 27 in the EU- bloc. And that is pointing to so many new ways no one can even try to estimate it's full impact on society or in the rest of the neighbouring countries. The 21st century was the new age in politics and global changes throughout time and space. And that was or seemed was the intention of this organization, with the scope of honouring countries by 'inclusion' and not 'exclusion'. This understanding should exceed all previous and almost 'outdated' systems and think tanks, or refreshen them up. The magic word is 'up'. Mr Gurria made many sensible noises trhoughout his speech at the news conference last week. He almost said that Britain had reached the point of basic economics if it wants to increase economic productivity, starting to educate workers how to deal with time and systems, some are even much older and outdated. Britain needs skilling-up. As a result the economy will get different results than are now published in the survey on Britain's economy by the OECD. Actually in parallel view Brexit would need a pronto to match that review in a survey on Brexit economy now and tomorrow. There seem to be three blocks: one economy as is in previous decades, the second is dealing with the present time, and thirdly another economy will be the one in transition, if anyone believes in culmination (theories). We have to acknowledge the great frankness and effort almost 1 1/2 hour news conference explaining basic principles and theories over Britain's and Brexit's future, made by the Secretary General. Except for the part of what matters at the end of the day, e.g. people. Mr Gurria knows than any one else, from an organization as the OECD, how to value people in economics. It is human capital and seldom is related to high productivity, e.g. when machineries or best technologies in the world, in the end of the day will only 'pick- up' the 'smarter than' bits. This is the century to make people redundant like never before. If gaps are in the economic output a clear fact, maybe one needs to address the formula of productivity x human capital and sectors. Demographics always are another explanation to get indepth not only in the present time, but more certain it is something of the new necessity, on one side the ongoing world as we know for 40 years EU integration, and on the other side a variable of Brexit in the making. Mr Gurria is right that Brexit can be done, and why not. But it can't be done in one year time. Mathematically that is only making common sense. Also, it is 'crucial' to listen at a high constant to both sides while the process of Brexit is taking place. And yes, it is a political and economic change to mainstream economics and policy making in the 21st century.

The sins of the last government, fiction.

07102017


What the world is now witnessing from a Brexit England this calls to mind that old idea of what should have been but never was or came for England in the 21st century. Most people agree that Brexit means hardcore leaving the EU, an economic and political giant in the middle of western Europe in Brussels, that this on the balance meant that Britain must take back it's political and economics from the EU. And we follow mainstream politics blindly, when it comes to the rest outside Westminster, or Brussels. But the age has grown over the recent months a lot more darker for a Brexiteer government, under the current Prime Minister Mrs Theresa May, and once again nobody had noticed the obscure changes here. Than look again. Across the Thames parliament is burning it's canvas and colours are drooping down in many, red, blue, orange (for the London sun) and green, wherever you can find any place in your imagination for the oaktrees and their lost meaning, unless you're a hobbit. England is Brexit and Brexit is England, can anyone understand this? In the Conservative Party for these last few days some have come to believe they witnessed the Conservative Catwalk in stead of the Party Conference in Manchester Central this week. Who will it be, if the current PM has or wants to leave government? A handful suddenly is appearing just out of nowhere into the hands of the magicbox that doesn't have any magic left in it, with names of people of various backgrounds and Party belief. Yes, why not Mr Boris Johnson, or David Davis, Ruth Davidson, or Amber Rudd? The odd one out is Mr Rees Mogg, despite the Moggmania they have crowned him with these last couple of weeks. If superstition is near parliament and a cat walks under a ladder, please, God help us if Mr Boris Johnson would see this! You wouldn't say so, but this man seems to hide something from the public and it isn't crime, but it is vulnerability. Like a cat fearing to stand in the waterbasin, it very much looks like Mr Johnson has the same problem when it comes to Brexit or the EU. Another contender, Mr Davis, hmm... Could he inspire fear in the opposition, at home and abroad? Maybe. He could be a war minister and graphically tackle the EU, over... exactly what again? And so forth, and so forth. People want to see vision of how to get out of a situation where your full embodiment of making history was all yours and no one else's. Europe did create history throughout the EU, first starting as the EEC in the nineteenth century. 'They promised you gold and myrrh...' (Life of Brian scene) Unfortunately Brexit is quite meaningful in other senses. It cannot have or create a vision, since that would mean giving reason for war (not literally) and no one would or could be Prime Minister on his/ her own from that moment on. You would have to find allies in Labour, who you do understand why it isn't always money that matters to them, but a genuine need to stay inside the historical importance of the EU, and see walking away as unacceptable. Which Prime Minister could forge such alliance with Labour if it comes to the actual leaving of the EU, some expect december 2017?

Leaving the EU speaks for itself, that a. you need strategic views of what the future should be viewed as, to friend or foe. It needs a strategy close to our century and the next. What means historic peace from there, back and forth? And how will it deal with the pressure a Brexit imposes on other neighbouring countries, far and wide? Etcetera, etcetera... In seventy years time the International world does have some idea what Britain meant overseas and always had a positive impact on the nations in time of peace and prosperity post WWII. 'Poor Mrs May,' what can she do to help her country reach the future out of the EU by the end of the year? A woman who came close to the flame of EU integration into Europe, but then turned away and did something no moth had ever done before: reverse (evolution of course). Why, why, why, Delilah? Leaving the EU will be a thing of Biblical proportion, in a way, yes. It is perhaps even religious to preserve the sanctitiy of the State why she or any other Prime Minister will be executing such a departure from a historic EU body, established by democracy from all Member States, it is maddening. Unless, it is exactly that what proves everything that is wrong in the world... Which by definition is a sinful act against God. Maybe Christians believe in their 'primitive' roots still that God preserves life and prosperity, human life and rule. Why 'tempt providence' so bluntly in the face of humanity and eat all without giving it's poor their piece of civil welfare, emphasis on fare/ fair? Does civilization mean deprivation for all? Such beauty of thought indeed is only found in God's heaven, and not in England and the high moors in the 21st century. Brexit is also the anti- climax in the long run to the EU, in stead of the anti christ. But here we are, meditating over nothing just yet, and guessing that it could be this or that, while all the while Brexit simply means 'bye- bye Brussels'. (Introducing some 'toodeloo' ministers) Actually some are right about Mrs May staying in government to see the Brexit transition through. This will be the last act of a 'sinful' government, when time and prosperity were lord and the sweetness of humanity was forgotten. And more, the love for country and countrymen/ women was even buried further deep without buying or selling. Mind you, all this as here above written, could have been the writing of a drunk who had a few too many in a lonely corner somewhere in a distant land. It was a vision after all! And then smash to the ground with a smack.

What is the global effect of loneliness & isolation in the 22nd century?

4 October 2017/ 10:07 AM

In a straight line from a reference point in our century the answer is hard logic. Loneliness and isolation will not only be reflective, explaining and analyzing society for civil reasons, or attracting third/ sub-parties every short term at convenience from an organised point of view, personal or private, but it will enlarge itself even more in the future and be bigger than the burdens of currency, the economy or life and death. In fifty years time loneliness & isolation will have a global effect and it's continuity is kryptonite. Perhaps no one will know by then when or where this had started or what caused such a hole in life with immeasurable width and depth and to bring to mankind a strange side effect for many their personal lives in every part of the world. In 2017 there are already significant signs of a strange future that is inevitable as global produce means not to be less but more and of extensive more global effects in general. We also keep forgetting how restriction becomes the imperative tool in many parts of the world. Why still so many believe in 'having it all' and being happy, well the answer is negative. Destruction has only become more civil than ever before in the history of our living planet. Our care today goes out to the elderly, the vulnerable as the young, the sick and dying, or even a more remote phenomenon of people being disabled all over the world. This wasn't always there as in the 21st century, is where society's first and last mistake is making an instrumental error. The bigger square will never match the miniature one, when first it had made it's start at the beginning. And in the future the square only gets bigger than life- size by structure and innovation. Loneliness & isolation exceeded massively alongside it's parallel world of a bigger world and 'more prosperous'. Industries will be essential to long last in the near and far future to match 'what it exponentially eats' and not 'what it gives'. Another question one can critically ask is how will mankind survive living as his/ her usual tiny cell of life in Real Time in the next future of global effectivess monopoly?

The EU is about Member States with each his/ her own vision or speech lectern.

28 September 2017/ 22:27 PM.

The President of France, Mr Emmanuel Macron, is an exception to the rule of EU solidarity when he calls for a bold step in the future by setting out his vision for the European Union in his speech on tuesday, 26 september this week in Paris, Sorbonne University. Almost at a parallel speed Germany's election result on sunday evening/ night, 24 september, but in reverse, created new dynamics in German politics for Mrs Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor and on her fourth term coming back to be in government with her CDU Party, if she manages the scrum around AFD, the winner of the night in her new coalition government on the very short term. This is not a complicated situation on the interchange super highways from any historical and political viewpoint, but it can get that way where Brexit is moving out from a secondary road to leave the EU Middle Centre establishment, and getting underneath this heavy work of 'road networks' with a very small chance of getting back inside through traffic congestion (with no possible solutions just yet or before 2019). The European Union has over five million Europeans living in adjacent segments of this establishment and going as far as Middle Europe and if you think that Turkey will join the EU 27 Member States any time soon in the near future, (bold vision?), EU demographics will expand exponentially by 2029. Mr Emmanuel Macron's vision had great magnitude on tuesday when he eclipsed the old and new visions of the European Union in a two hours speech a few days ago in Paris, France. (The old visions being the Maastricht and Lisbon Treaties) Forgive our disability to read into the EU Power Politics of the 21st century, but the Maastricht and Lisbon Treaties were they not the most profound and deeply political visions set out for the EU and Member States, indefinitely? (Except where date of expiration existed) If the future is about solidarity, which indeed it will need at some point according to plans to get Middle Europe interested in EU Membership, Mr Macron will also have to create a parliament to hear all 27+ Member States to set out their vision for the EU and it's future establishment. The ECB does not have exclusive rights to decide the political abstracts of politicians and governments. Vice Verse, no politician or government has exclusive rights to the ECB economic realm. This is how most of the older generation of Europeans remember logic of the EU vision to include nations and their governments as a deeply political institution. Like France and Germany the future is imperative by both countries and it's leaders to understand where this vision, ut supra, will be taking all EU Member States by 2019 and beyond (as for now 2029).
And maybe no one has said enough yet.

To address the new anti- semitism why does it always ends up in anti- globalism?

27 August 2017/00:26 AM

The first question should be the one that no one is asking when it is clear that the world is in some sort of crisis, but doesn't know where to start with the idea of addressing the problem and call for a meeting among the nations to once again have a deeper look into the state where e.g. globalism is showing signs of decline or ending and if this could be a good projection of the future, or, if there is going to be another moment for the world and start all over again in a new time. The second question answers for itself in the running of the world as we know it in Real Time. Many countries are convinced that the problem starts with migration, and putting much pressure on the western economies with no room for fluctuation up the world economic spiral or a promise of future prosperity. But the problem doesn't end at this end. On the other end there is still no ending of the wars post Gulf War or bombing of Kosovo era. Mathematically the war theatre extended itself quite multiple across the world in several odd or unrealistic places with some ending up against a higher wall of constant loss of lives and homes, or home towns, and leaving ordinary people in total devastation now and in the future. This calls for the human emotion on a multilateral basis and logic. It was globalism that started all this in the first place when the world wasn't just yet ready to follow more integration for  unified operations against poverty and starvation of the so called third world nations. Times two or three decades later have changed in our time, now 2017. We wanted to see complexity and then it finally came when England decided in the 2016 referendum to stay or leave the EU, that it will leave the EU. In it's complexity the people are being squeezed in like sausages animated with a zipper to zip it up. After all, you can't have two forces facing Brexit alone on it's own standing in the wider picture and praying that in the long run this could prove all were wrong to think a fracture can only mean what it is saying. In fact fracture means globally something could change and heal the nations again. E.g., let's say addiction to money and freedom with all that money have made many a lot weaker as nations than first thought, after 2008. Unfortunately this is our real problem as resources are dying fast and sovereignty is cracking up each and every day as we proceed to preexist as the human race of this planet. Some might even say that size of territorial sovereignty was an agreement long ago when first established, to preserve a peaceful fairness among the nations. How far Brexit can get through the big stomach of the world in our time with this  old agreement we have no idea if such possibility can overcome tensions of the complex nature as suggesting here above. And adding that the new semitism is confusing real power and sub powers collission in the global sphere of the world(s) that we now live in... And also this is not just found inside the EU.

The MH17 military metaphor. A modern day military abstract still unresolved.

15 July 2017, 12:24 PM

Europe in July 2014 between Ukraine and Russia there was fierce fighting between the forces known as the Russian separatists who cannot be identified and the Ukraine army fighters. But the story changes here when the MH17 passes through the fighting zone and in a matter of seconds was shotdown from the sky and killing 298 civilians from different countries, with among the nations onboard 198 Dutch citizens. This made instant world news and the abstract of war was changed. Why the MH17 was boxed in and shotdown by a Buk Missile, either belonging to the Ukraine army or Russian separatists, is forcing mankind to think again how in modern day warfare world security becomes fragile and red hot wired if in an instant a plane is shotdown and killing 298 people, who were passengers on a commercial airliner on their way to a holiday in Malaysia. The Russian President Vladimir Putin on a winning street with the annexation of Crimea and a surprise move against westernized globalism kept all hopes of a change in the present global system extremely high at the time. Also in the public eye all global citizens thought this awesome man indeed would become our next strongman in recent world history to make us free again from the tyranny we grew accustomed to live in for the last three or two decades of globalism. These are not imaginary facts of one person in the global audience, but they are true whoever cares to go back and find the truth once again. The MH17, in a way, also is part of a particular time and place in the Russian saga in 2014 'How not to surprise the west'... We are now in a process of finding the real perpetrators of who or why the MH17 was shotdown from the sky and resulted in a deadly ending for a nation and it's people. How do we get out of this 'unjust war' with a pragmatic new world metaphor like the MH17 and turn this back on the road of what is known in the military and it's academic literature and codes of conduct as the just war theory? It is a desperate move, being part of the scale in which this investigation must not stop but continue and offer future generations why the west is different from the east when it comes to war and it's war zones if this is Europe. The European mind favours the sword and it's theory of cutting on both sides in combat. In future time there is enough theatre open for debate and justice, but not in the ordinary sense of conscience to one individual alone but in a national and international understanding, helping here both victims and nations. The fighting post war MH17 shotdown after Ukraine is worth every bit of reason in any man or woman who is taking part in explaining this strange collision between one fighting side and one civilian side. A brave nation will have to take on debate and never stop it's conscience to honour it's name perpetually with the way in which we are watching time changing in our world and it's conventional wisdom is fading. The MH17, unfortunately for many, is a lasting memory and a reason for everyone to believe why we should pay heed to the 21st century. Monday is 17 July 2017, a remembrance day for the Dutch people to remember it's tragic loss of citizens where all fighting ceased to be and stayed in shock for a while. Fighting did resume and still is ongoing, but without any particular heroism for Russia or Ukraine.

It is perhaps cliché to say, but isn't Europe always saying, "We are all Europeans.", when it's hurt by grief and in it's own skies?

Error: shotdown- shot down.

The European Union

25 June 2017/ 11:56 AM

The first decade after 2008 global financial crisis is one of business and looking for new ways to generate even more business. At times people here or everywhere have been even wondering what did remain of the 29 EU Member States political and monetary institution during the recovery years in the Banking business, between september 2008 and June 2017. The ghost of Business Banking Investment Lehman brothers taught the world an important lesson how not to get a kick out of champagne again in another life when the chill is definitely the way to serve or preserve, and one more thing don't ever forget that here there is no crushed ice. And, in a way, the EU still stands for business, e.g. it's dealings with the Ukraine accession to the EU list of future candidates to join the European Union. It is called good progress and a strong formula for success for all next generations of Europeans across the continent and leaving no one out in this progress of an even greater union among European nations, east, west, north and south. It is business almost 7/24 on the outlook if yet another Lehman Brothers collapse might happen again and this time take with it the remnant of something more valuable that wasn't in the writing of money. Italy already is there trying to dream it's way out of it's Banking crisises, and perhaps soon will pay with vipers to meet global demand or a global demanding world. In England, now renamed Brexit after the 2016 referendum and it's outcome to leave the EU, people still see this as part of big business only when Brexit means leaving the European Union, while in fact the Queen, Queen Elizabeth II, just the other day last week in the Queen's speech has spoken of Brexit and bills to complement parliament when leaving the EU. The European Union is serious business and the European Parliament, like Venice, upholds serious masked balls. It is also intimate...

Intimate is the new word to describe the world of great powers, now almost equal with the older system of monarchies in western Europe, the ones best known to the rest of the world. A monarchy by definition has godly powers to reign a nation and execute laws. But the intimacy of the monarchy was hardly or seldom known to the general public, by what or which grace Your Majesty was king or queen of the nation. Here in Europe all monarchies descended from Christianity and had a lasting effect on the people, high, mighty or low, that this is a holy belief and the church has the power to rule by will of the king or queen and it's nation. It is not a dream, fantasy or personal idea of the individual. But actually it is quite serious and not anything like business. A dynasty of business may fall, and another will take over almost immediately and no one will even notice the difference in the public at large. It remains nameless. We can't say the same thing about king or queen in any country in western Europe. The queen or king, when fallen, Christianity also falls. And that is serious philosophy, morality, virtue, religion, just to name a few by example, for every monarchy the people of a nation have known for centuries long post Byzantium empire. Can a people be without a God? A God in heaven to protect king/ queen, country and men? It is perhaps an old view, but arent't these the Queen's or king's men? And, isn't peace the road to God in heaven? The only negation of war, according to history in our time. Hmm, all that money can buy?

Italy exchequer paying with vipers... Where others might come up and pay out with beasts from hell, when looking any deeper in the exchequer's treasury box. Big business Lehman Brothers was once triumphant, as many can remember the day they found out and leaving the EU Member States in white panic.

The world's responding to Turkey's President, mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

18 April 2017/ 01:02 AM

President Erdogan yesterday to the crowd said, "The story of the referendum is over." And he added something like, "What is ahead of us is what matters now." The world can't beat that, if Mr Erdogan actually means what he is saying. The question is what are we looking at, following the world's responses, in the US and European Union, with Mr Jean Claude Juncker saying earlier yesterday to wait for the results of the OSCE, a monitoring group for security and scrutiny of State and electoral affairs in Europe. It can't go wrong from a starting point with constitutional changes on the 51. % 'Yes' vote in the referendum on 16 April 2017. Some are believing e.g. tonight that the outcome in the referendum can be cancelled if 48 % (the 'No' camp) insist on fraud or flat out rejection of this outcome in the sunday referendum. At this point there is simply no telling whether the world is watching a country fall on it's own sword, or that it is ready to challenge God and man. Throughout the years many have come to love the man who is now President of Turkey, because he is that political animal to understand what political Turkey means, and what is different in understanding what the world thinks of Turkey. At the same time in his more mortal ways he is just a man like any other, especially when in Turkey, and that sometimes he has displayed irrational behaviour as a character trait for a man in power. And yet, when spoken to with the proper respect his Office deserves, whether as Prime Minister in the nineties or after the millennium, something triggers him we all find appealing to be subordinate and chosing wisely to be peaceful over violence. If correctly remembered it was David Cameron, later Prime Minister of England, who then had advised/ persuaded Mr Erdogan to stop the war against the Kurds. And Mr Erdoganm, then in his early days as PM, respected the call for truce. A very big thing and gesture of political submission in a time when cooperation was a discipline among the G7 and G20 leaders. He is now President of Turkey, the same man, capable of uniting the poorest and unable to unite the top tier in Turkey, as shown in the 48% who voted 'No' in the referendum, held on sunday 16 April. But the world is equally an important voice and when pointing out to Mr Erdogan what the new strategy will or could mean, after the 'Yes' vote outcome, that usually means 'they are serious' enough to be there in full presence.

To be continued.

The Netherlands will go to the ballot box on 15 March this month. Another general election will decide in 2,5 wks...

03032017/ 12:24 PM

Party election campaigns or in a general election are very heavily laid back in the Netherlands, that is if tradition has anything to do with it. That won't be any different in two weeks time, and going for the same subsonic flight through the motion of political battlecries between ruling and partisan parties. The crowd is rooting for PVV Mr Geert Wilders, the inside ring of disappointed voters with the side, most people see they should blame for changing the country into a more oblivious place found on the face of the planet. Historically and traditionally the Netherlands is a centred country, let's say, among the many other EU Member States, inside Europe, or even outside borders long ago sunken deep into the oceans of time and it's strange lapses during the years in previous centuries and more recently also the few last decades. Globalism had made it's mark on all European Union countries in a new (20th century) vision that would serve the nations on the continent and even beyond. The incumbent Prime Minister, Mr Mark Rutte, is no stranger to the current changes of his time, after the millennium. If we leave out the political hysteria surrounding Mr Geert Wilders of PVV for a second, there are few important moments the present government did give to the people of the Netherlands, without much of a whistle. He has managed to stay in government while globalism was zig- zagging across the turbulence of wars, e.g. in Syria, political changes in East Europe, the unrest of Russian involvement in Crimea, and for the last year in 2016 the European Union dealing with Brexit. If Bloomberg.com is right, that the whole world will be watching the general election of the Netherlands coming this month, the reason for staying on with Prime Minister Mark Rutte is only making more sense on the points here above mentioned. How did the country and the Prime Minister do, e.g., when MH17 was downed by Russia on 17 July 2014? In politics even Mr Geert Wilders would have to recognize the enormous pressure on the Prime Minister, then,  and allow himself to find something praiseworthy in Mr Mark Rutte during this tragedy and International crisis. There is still much to mourn for, if every slain victim of the MH17 was remembered for ever. However, we are now living in another time and the country is upbeat for another general election in March 2017.

The Netherlands is a EU Member State. If the whole world will be watching that piece of information could be a good starting point to know, before getting yourself into the extensions of political climate and their parties agendas/ manifestos. Holland, not in so many words, now wants a place in the world it deserves, rather than to adhere to the global vision that is much plagued by changes in the world, in Europe, the United States, the Middle East and in countries where the rest of the G7 resides. There is also much uncertainty as we speak that is ongoing in the Netherlands. Unemployment keeps a negative record, whether this is in the private or public sector. When projected we all believe the balances of the day. In other Member States unemployment remains records high, and rising every minute. Could we blame this phenomenon on the flood or influx of disbandoned people from Syria? Our sins weighing much less up against these peoples? National health and the new world are one thing populism will not be able to change the system. Welfare as the Netherlands traditionally and historically know their systems is dropping cold on the people, especially when having a look into the world of the elderly/ grey area. Prime Minister Mark Rutte is right, suggesting that his country should change the trend of populism and putting it to a stop in this general election. The costs may or are too high for following this road, is perhaps where the unknown factor of the future might keep it's head hidden just yet. The general election on 15 March 2017 is putting a few things back on the global stage, and deciding that the Netherlands has an obligation to stay one of the big democracies in the European Union, and can't back down now to leave human fate, whether in the Netherlands or fleeing a country e.g. Syria, in ice cold waters to drown to death, or keeping policies in dead waters when humanitarian. Seventy years ago it was their capricious temperament that had helped out many of the Jewish people to escape an inhumane fate in Nazi Germany. It will be interesting to hear the people's decision in the coming general election, and if they massively will vote for Mr Geert Wilders, or something else will happen that we don't know yet by what format.

My vote goes out to the Animal Party (Party leader, Ms Marianne Thieme).

US President Mr Donald Trump, America's 45th President.

22012017

Saturday, 21 January 2017, was inauguration day for America's 45th President. In terms of coordination, the ceremony had a corner or perimeter of a few thousand people who were curious enough to attend Mr Trump's inauguration day and sworn into the White House, and also to listen to the 45th President of America his 'sombre' speech. On the enlargement of this campaign, kickstarted one and a half year ago, the world has lost the point that really would make a more fascinating writing, on how a man of free enterprise and global business had paved the way up to Capitol Hill as the first 'ordinary' citizen to become the United States President in 2017, and not a man from a political dynasty or pedigree in the establishment. In this enlargement too it wasn't a bad choice for the American people, who voted for Mr Trump, when looking back, now to welcome their President to the White House. Good weighs on people's and the media's mind very heavily and is the only magnitude America's 45th President is now facing with some unease to the point of blunt annoyance when misinterpreted or deliberately going on like a hype especially designed against Mr Donald Trump. The fascinating thing is a political matter no one actually is mentioning so far, that Mr Trump is not an independent political Party, but that he is actually a Republican and that equals automatically statemanship. The President's first day now points in a whole different direction in the 21st century. Many in the world are saying the same thing that the United States President, Mr Trump, isn't the man who will bring stability back home to Americans, nor can he in his 'freshman' state of mind, use his ability for a more sublime rhetoric with nations around the world. That, so they say, can have a damaging impact on the very short term in terms of foreign politics, and with leaders around the world who are experienced in the war and peace talks of diplomacy. This could be a misleading picture sent out in the world about the new President at the White House. In stead the media is describing the President of the United States in 2017 as a temperamental man, with lost impatience on lost issues, and that he is bad tempered to act presidential, perhaps as perfect as the former US President, Mr Barack Obama. Nevertheless seems like a consolation of undo for nothing, if this has any real meaning in America's present state of mind. "We know the people are fed up with the present state, we know what they want, and do we want the same thing too?" Btw, not a President Trump quote.

When looking back on the first days of Mr Trump's campaigning, there is no one who would seriously say that here is a man who is necessarily a bad choice and will be a bad president. He has to cross that bridge alone and perhaps he will forget about pizzazz (and twitter.com) in the meantime, just like many of his predecessors had done so before him. To remember what's best in this US President one can only say that his 'good' will all go to being an American as only he knows it. But, even Mr Trump also realizes that 'American dream life' has it's limitations and you can't get it out anymore unto the streets like it was many decades ago, e.g. when the President was still a young boy. Ideas are now run by the cyber age, the poorest in the world are connected to the rest of the world, empowerment of nations are still on the rise, despite the rumours of collapsing governments e.g. Syria, and also the military is a sensitive weapon to all leading nations in the G7, or what is left of the global group called G7. It may be an all American dream to go fly fishing when the summer is hot, people can eat a warm meal after a day fishing, but in relation to the world the United States needs to be a global power with no relation to fly fishing as an American. In the 21st century America is not paying attention anymore to the fish in the water, but to the hook to catch big fish in greater waters. And this is also pinpointing the big pic in the places where the present US President is being caught on camera doing the opposite of what should in fact be his Office, by not getting too close to the media and hype surrounding his personality or family. Being in the White House isn't about profit making and ptiching products to sex up the sales. The people would want to see a president being capable of understanding not only their lives, but in general to see through falsehood everywhere else in the world, socially and in economics. People have the tendency to see results, or drop your presidency by ridiculing you for the rest of your sitting term as their President. The bridge to cross after one day in Office, to Mr Trump as US President, is a long day of great wisdom that the first step is always making the distance shorter to get there...

Matteoangelo, Prime Minister of Italy has resigned.

05122016/22:45 PM

In Italy yesterday and tonight it's difficulty lies with the meaning of reform, or in Italian reformo, if that means transformo, in English transform and transfigure. Historically most politicians have been or were familiar, or have been quite informed on what it's real meaning might be, officially when meaning reformabit. That could inspire the entire nation where diplomacy would succeed and be an electorate success. Unfortunately Italy instead got caught in a time column of it's own by whatever external or internal political timelapses It has had downstreaming for over the last four decades. Prime Minister Matteo Renzi in his Sistine Chappel ceiling issued the first stroke of his 'real' political landscape he intends on keeping while being the 'ousted' Prime Minister of Italy as the world in a global perception has witnessed this event. Italy remains an obscure partner to the rest of the European Union let's say if the coming election decides on staying inside the egg shell of an overaged basilik with no particular overlord politicians to yield the sceptre of economics and organized government in the 21st century Italy, or Rome. The Eurozone should hold it's flanks on the right, left, centre and rear in full strength, and as is in every high game the wrong move to lose your banner, one by one. Transfigured to the present time, the outcome of the referendum held on sunday 4 December 2016 should put one or two things in a new direction and give the people the general mood or sense of maintaining it's sovereign integrity over the European Union 'forever' expansion. But it isn't doing just that, is it? The far right is expected to rise by 52% of the majority votes if Italy would go to the ballot box today. That might be enough electoral win for the anti- EU movement and with a David's slingshot move out of the European Union's single currency. Matteoangelo still is painting shadows he thought what was right for the country he knows too well. (Forgive the theatrical name of Prime Minister Matteo Renzi in this writing) But Italy should know better how to engage itself into changes with neighboring countries in Europe, e.g., France, Germany, Austria, before sending out Cinderella to fetch the shoe that fits her. If the Euro breaks up it will come with extreme force and velocity down on whoever it will hit, indiscriminately by logic. Here, with it's alien powers, it could transform Italy for always.

Tonight many in the rest of the financial world 'squawkboxed' the news already, by experts in the political and economics world in RT.. Tomorrow, 06 December, where and how Italy can 'go reverse' on the coming future of the people will be the most intersting time as one to watch for the coming 24/7. In the meantime Mr Renzi will be finishing his new inspiration where politics and economics in Italy did stretch at arms length to come close with... The work isn't finished just yet and we must wait.

The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, and his positive action thursday today.

01122016/ 21:27 PM

For the last 24 hours there is a positive noise on reducing air pollution in the city of London, from the mayor of London, mr Sadiq Khan. In the Daily Telegraph online news this came as a suprise news, almost out of nowhere blowing the dust in many old system industries' eyes, that the mayor of London is set on changing the toxic question for Londoners when health relating issues should be back on the environmental agenda as a priority politics. The technology for this change could be in the future and how plannings of preserving what  is in the people's best interest may develop in particular regions, in London or elsewhere in bigger places with higher levels of air pollution and congestion problems. Maybe it wasn't quite what the experts had in mind, but shouldn't infrastructures be built to help reducing mass pollution centres or points, e.g. tunnels and parking spaces? To build a more healthier or cleaner future this is perhaps the new innovation the world might be waiting for, a challenge of the 21st century most countries would find necessary to help build. Closest to the new technology for a cleaner environment are E- cars/ vehicles, or power driven vehicles, to start with. A technology with a high ambition such as E- cars will also require sophisticated systems to build an infrastructure especially designed in all big cities, in Europe or across the Atlantic, and maybe even in the Asean countries where they battle the smog in thick 'cloud dust' in their cities, with appropriate answer to this question, and on how to tackle the big environmental issues on the planet. It is the time we're now living in and not living out of. Plus it is also a bullish question bigger than the mayor of London, Mr Sadiq Khan. Thirdly, and it is also the best revolution to save the planet from natural disasters and use serious high tech instruments.

Mr Sadiq Khan tonight has issued an alert of high air pollution for millions of Londoners and it will stay until friday night, tomorrow. One of the principles of globalization is that innovation is the highest achievement in the world, above war and finance, because it drives the mechanism of not only incentives but also it is what the world requires most to continue in an everlasting higher pace that was never here before.

A much less appreciated Mrs Hillary Clinton throughout the year's presidential campaign 2016 is showing her true mettle tonight.

07112016/ 22:27 PM

Head in your hands over this presidential campaign? Not after tonight you will. Early predictions show a lead by the Democrats is surging and that Mrs Clinton is in the lead early tonight. Suddenly when it hits you it is all beginning to make sense on all the reasons why soon you will have a 'real' winner to become the next president of the United States. In these last hours no one can afford to be cynical, when after all the term to make America great again will be to both sides indeed the only way forward if Americans decide that it is time, well, to be Americans again. It won't make that much sense to the rest of the world, but to have a madam president in the only country on the planet where that was never been done before it sort of is refreshing to many across the world. One thing we have to give Mrs Clinton, is that she is her true mettle for a bit of time very close to the White House. She has that kind of voice that tells you that she is serving both the people and the State, sometimes trying to do even both at the same time. And that is a mammoth task for any madam president and to be American. But Mrs Clinton fits that shoe quite well. Firstly forged by the former US president in mid nineties, her husband, Mr Bill Clinton, and than going back to the time when the incumbent president, Mr Barack Obama, became president in 2008. Mrs Clinton has been sandwiched in between the two last decades in the political establishment as the only woman who should or could run for president in the United States, if only a man like Mr Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, would let her to win the presidential race to the White House in 2016. On his side this presidential race was all his to become president, while the Democrats had a side to this as well. Why we will never understand Americans and their political system is done to a very simple reason. We know too little of the history that did make America great, once, as it has always been their greatest tactical move always. In the world we think it was strategy, especially with the world at her side. Mr Donald Trump was wise to say to do it the same way again, and make America great again. But can it be done twice in one lifetime?

By tomorrow we will know the answer to that question. Maybe it's worth to stay up late for, anywhere in the world. You simply cannot miss this one time when a male dominated world is going to choose a female president for the first time. We in Europe can now do the American saying: we've been there, we've done it, we've seen it. The monarchy taught us that side, how can one put it, like totally forever.

The Russians have lost the battle on overt military operations long gone...

28 October 2016/ 22:46 PM

In name the President of Russia, Mr Vladimir Putin, has made a comeback on the global stage over the last few days. Aleppo in Syria is one on his mind, but his bird's eye view is far reaching beyond this horizon. The west in turns, one half this day, the next half the day after, and then repetitiously on continuing shifts, is saying that it is keeping a firm eye on how the Russian President will encrypt his steps of war and peace through a military mechanism that only the Russians understand. It is important to underline this part in Mr Putin's excercises of going to great lengths. How he envisions the present time and relations between the west and east in Europe, Syria and ending the war, are again in discussion at HQ Nato this week. It has even been said yesterday in the newspaper, Telegraph UK, to refeul battleships with controversial destination and coming from Russia will meet with a certain arbiter of the same kind, that whoever wants to refeul the Russians (carrier group), will trigger International marine and other laws to affect crime and punishment. From this line it is quite serious for whomever is mentioning the Russian President again... Aleppo in the meantime is turning into a blood sun slowly setting to obscure the future of it's own uncertainties, but also having been let down for much too long in ISIS' name. Mr Vladimir Putin always surprises the world every time he reappears on the global stage. In this old style presentation of his command he is excercising something more constant, if anyone would like to compare the Russian President to e.g. the western modern military outside all of Russian territories. Old style today also means overt. And in mathematics overt could very well define or determine equal to peace or it's force to make peace. This of course is the pedant side of the Russian President. Or more seriously it is rather for the author writing the here above, ut supra, a fact.

For the last 48 hours it is the Russian President's latest move that is making the west see sense in Nato again. How and to what extend it will be now or the next time no one can say at the moment. The world may very well be ending this era with a sabre rattling here or there, if the new one is capable of having or giving more confidence to the nations of the world. It is not a hungry one, too far out reaching one can only hope. On the ground the angle is the most far reaching of it's kind, in   between  the ditch, the land and seas, and waiting to reach God Almighty in the heavens... Some will disagree that world's 'perfectionism' wasn't the real intention of globalization. And yet here we are in an almost perfect new world.

Error: refuel

Let's go to the unknown and tell the human story in microseconds.

10102016/ 11:05 AM

Earth's population growth has risen from 2013, 1.8 billion to 2016, 7.4 billion in the present time. The rise is not a race against time, hardly, but is very optimistic by 2030 it can rise to 24. plus billion people, say experts. Total growth by expectation in the near future hasn't gone for margins but total existence of how many humans by then will be alive to inhabit the world. It is a staggering fact of our species just to pop out into existence one day, unlike the chrysalis, dying almost immediately the next day after popping, incidently or by predestination, also an interesting thought in classical times, and still stay in the lead over the primeval forces even to this day, invisible to many or not by data. Ancestral home now seems quite a distant place in our human paleolithic memory. We also speak several languages more scientifically in comparison. Here is the proof that evolution was our best way forward, out of the 'oeh- arrh' battlecries or speech of the stone age. Complex military weaponry as in 2016, one can say, hails to our species for having transformed the human story into a more distinguished species that has ever lived, not only longer than any other, but deservedly was given the rare ability to capture the universe into it's own hands and change heaven and earth. Our time knows a population growth annually to over billions of people, by merely under one percent. In ancient times these were figures one could only see with bare naked eyes shining as countless stars during a clear night, the forbode as they said of 'good times' to come one day. In science there is no room for bad omens, e.g. the big beast of rationality. And yet it is their every day struggle as experts how to explain these microscopic beings (compare to the total growth of all peoples in the world) in a more representative way, as to ad value to each being as such. (In economics we're through with added value in the 21st century) Another fact of life to the scientists is also in no matter how you turn the angle, the human story that includes all living peoples, remains the supra sonic highway of a straight horizontal existence. Anything else beyond that is beating the sound barrier limit, if there is one.

In what ways are we done yet? Anything else, e.g. politics, if explained in nanoseconds, soon will get into bigger forces of Time, we can only wonder 'then what?'. Thanks to primeval intervention from divine name and greatness, our life span isn't any faster breathing with some good upbringing, especially when having or fostering rootless families. (See more:Mathematics and the Roots of Postmodern Thought, By Vladimir Tasic) On a cold winter day without home heating, passing time literally comes through icicles and human natural warmth, like a meteorite leaving a white cold tail behind your bones, before the repair is done. It is inspiring too, and your intention can go to unknown territory almost automatically to keep warm, even when the world quietly keeps it's growing pains in the grass, or future. Some things we outsmart, and yet the missing link still is or could be that humans have no vertical story born into existence by carnal ecstasy, than only through the eyes of concrete. Between a 53/73 storey building and raising a family of 2/3 members time get's strained enormously without any patience. It could also be that humans are simply trapped by an apparent inability that is human nature under any condition, primeval or the present time in the 21st century. Yet, there is no stopping any human aspirations. Under any nanosecond we seem to get or having a billionth chance of succeeding. Watching from afar even in the US today picosecond runs through the veins of politics the first time, for having soon a president after the presidential election in November, with a woman laeding the Democrats and a man of deep controversy running for Office at the White House, Mr Donald Trump. A trillionth of his life chance to become President of the United States can make it possible to happen, if, as they say, human history has ended for good. Fortunately or unfortunately, all humans think this is a joke. Be it a- millions of dollars- joke. Mr Donald Trump has cleverly used his cosmetic politics in the right place and century, and he is now trying to move time as well in his own aggressive suave style rhetoric, to change America for Americans only. Something he is not is the self styled Mrs Hillary Clinton and her power for negotiation, even when under heavy strain or national scrutiny. Time is changing the meaning of International law, from it's beginning to infinity. Actually it should be multiplied by discipline of multiplicity and change to International Laws. Our generation and population growth is still young, at least when projections of 2030 show you a different root and rising. You don't get here normally and to see our world and their latest machineries. Let's put it in another way, it was just one of those days, you see.

Tablet: U- turn for your personal WW (worldview) Stop or Go.

13092016/00:21 AM

It is the perfect product into any kind of new century where apps and technologies make 200 % of the worldview in any population area around the globe. Soon everyone will want one, imagine that. Also what is new in our globalized world is that no one is an individual anymore, at least not in the homo sapiens way we had two decades and before that so long ago now. Apps have made it possible 'to leave no citizens out' and have managed to give everyone there own share of 'individual globalism' by the click of your mouse or touch swipe. You, that is by definition the great new feeling or vibe to give union of unknown or immeasurable connection with the rest of the world, from any point where 'you' are. Just make it Stop (in red) or Go (in green). This is the kind of weapon 'You' (icon) have been dreaming of, to have access just as much as any top man or woman by any hierarchical level to get to the center of the world. It's magic of being the center of the world is surprisingly not scientific as in scifi magazines, but it is something else beyond human order worldwide. One or two relics, to vote is one, are to remain here. Just in case the top man or woman get's a blockade on the way to the towering office above the clouds, and the question raises up to points, burning points, and a possible meltdown, he or she will not stop glancing at the tablet and give their personal vote: to stop or go. Whatever this may be in the situation.

No one is thinking twice at a swipe. How can you imagine the future next to ours or our world and it's cities built between earth and skies? In comparison to previous worlds and decades humanity has turned more robotic in our time. (During Vietnam it was Full Metal Jacket) Wherever 'you' are looking there it is, a simple philosophy that killing one man/ woman will not bring down the buildings he/ she has built in the cities. It means you are also smart and deservedly it is your right to the end. Where civilization is a primitive piece of earth at the other end in your worldview use the button for imagination on your tablet. it works like the weather. And stats will do the rest. These are interesting images and balances. If you're deemed small or too microscopic doing business comes with no big gain or revenues in return. And yet wealth has never had it so good before as it is today and will still be here tomorrow. Seriously, are there still people out there who want to change the world? (Even volunteers) In our worldview today technologies have built you a small universe on your tablet. World leaders are using it, the big industries, heavy or gas, and so are the many more users at home or in the cradle to play with it. What we need is to just enjoy the ride that is taking us as far as we can Go. And not Stop. It is a new custom that every major city in the world should be more stereoscopic and not controversy as the individual leadership vision of only to please one's own or backyard. Where do you want to live?

What will be Donald Trump's next faux pas? By 2020 every global citizen will be crazy?

28082016/23:43 PM

The Republican nominee, Mr Donald Trump, is getting at a point where you have to cut the jelly from the fishes, or in this presidential election 2016, it will be the bigger fish, Mrs Hillary Clinton. Because this is US politics, and US politics started way back in time in long gone days, when men had long beards and women hair-bristles around the mouth like a bad kept moustache, but back then were considered natural beauty to capture a man of means' heart. There are many ways to look forward to the next US presidential election, two months from now, and cross your Republican or Democrat fingers. Who wants Mr Trump to be president are much different from those who want to see Mr Trump to become the next Republican President in the United States. And that would just be normal Party logic, had it e.g. been another name or man to win the next presidential election. Mr Trump decided he wants to stay, by giving in into another hard look at the moment's race to the White House. One thing Donald Trump has to realise, and doing so faster than fast food on the dinner tables, is seeing that unfamiliar thing he made for himself during campaign, that something he started off last year in 2015. Some think or say, perhaps most do it by saying things behind his back, that Mr Trump is an inventor of sliding backwards to impress the world and the American people. You only need to win ramming in those behind you, while escaping your real rival. No one knows what the Republican Party nominee is doing, as we speak. But his supporters say that he is the man who made it this far by being honest and speak out his mind in a free world. He has become the protagonist of US politics in 2016 and his end mission are days numbered, also a Trump- made invention that isn't holding anything together in his 'good name'.

His next faux pas might be that by 2020 every global citizen will be crazy, just like anybody else, if his speech goes well with the public. His public is measured by two months from now up to the White House. After the Presidential election everyone will stop saying that his speeches are both bizarre and interesting at the same time. And some are already looking forward to that stop. If you were a DT supporter your citizenship after the presidential election in november this year might become your ticket to somewhere in what others call reality check time, or you get somewhere where not even Mr Trump ever before saw in a nightmare. But that's okay, everybody get's them, a nightmare, he might be saying by then. He is articulate always in every surprise speech he is giving. We are looking here at the extraordinary of this general election and having a man to go this far to prove only one thing to himself and people around in the world, that he is Donald Trump, the Republican winner of the next presidential landslide... It is a bad dream, so many abroad are saying. This man is crazy, but not according to global political analysts. They in fact are quite sure that here is a man who is doing well in a world without any real leader as red blooded as someone in America alone can be. Mr Trump is not crazy, he only speaks Crazy much better. Just like Cal (played by James Dean) in the East of Eden did speak Crazy better than his big brother Aron. This presidential election is becoming more each day a thing of self righteousness going up to meet with the heiress of politics, from the time when her husband, Mr Bill Clinton, was the Democrat President unto the present day of political US dynasty being the only one in the world of it's kind. And who is saying 'freeze!'?

Global exit strategies systems

16082016/23:46 PM

The best way to think GMT is now. And the world slowly moves on UT. Deep skin one might think this has nothing to do with any individual life of either human or animal, concrete or sands. The stake ever goes higher if you care to watch out for the signs when they get or come out in public, mostly done in singular terms and trying to avoid a mass chain reaction. It should have been stakes, but then again it isn't. Global exit strategies systems wherever they could or would exist are here for one purpose only. Some might think in theory terms of reconstruction, which btw was always going to stay a conspiracy theory mass product. In our consumption- mad- era to have one or two conspiracies' theories is considered logical and etiquette as a sigh or sign of the times in which we're now living. Bit by bit there is a sudden need to change the original meaning of not only humans and animals, but also of countries and old wives' tales. The heavens are turning S- shaped. Actually, no one has noticed the change when it did come down upon the nations. Politics just opened up it's matrixes to welcome the new age... Henceforth we speak of global exit strategies. It is not yet fact that this system indeed has been tested to the executive result of absolute beyond any doubt, that the way forward for the planet is to take the exit very serious, or be crushed by the stone age of your own choice. How can we then visualize the meaning of the global exit strategies' systems?

The answer to that question is quite very simple when you ask yourself what level you are in or on. We are in fact looking at a very strong earth of many nations that are not living in obscurity from the western side of the world anymore, but are now in and out living at very high top roofs, above what they call having at Home in comparison with years before globalization, and what is the best proof of a 'good world' when you can stay on top next to nations with a great advantage historically. There are also strong economic realities that go along with this theory and conspiracy. Here we have no idea about what is truly fact or fiction, or if fiction has become truth and will breed itself into more truth, let's say by tomorrow morning? But what exactly have we given up for reaching to the skies? Our horizon is like God Almighty on earth! It is absolutely the normal thing to ask if exit from the global strategies' systems is realistic and could bring back reality to a smaller portion of goods and distribution of food to people and herds of animals. It is cynical but these have become the dark side of our dreams, so it seems. Officially the textual side of our world isn't in the individual's best interest anymore, let's say opposite to what they say in politics and when they have to go to the polling station. It isn't money but consumption that is the big beast the world has a hard time dealing with in our time. And it is crying foul that exit strategies should be one global system, where every problem that the world has will be punched into the system and with the result determine whether you are eligible to have or get your bread crumbs. The system takes a global punched card for determining your individual need. Inconsistencies are taboo. 

In the news today around the world: N I C E, France.

15072016/21:31 PM

81 People dead, and another 54 are critical between 'life & death', the newspapers around the world are saying this evening/ tonight. Nice, France, since early morning has been the point and place of another terror attack of citizens and tourists. (Including children) One driver, one truck/lorry, and a load full of 70/80 Km p/h, drove in unto a crowded place full with people who were watching a fireworks display on the 14th of July in France. No one suspected any terror attacks during the Bastille day in Nice, France. Now the driver has been identified, and in the news, mostly online to the world and newsreading audience, there are links to radical Islamists found on him. His nationality was Tunisian, aged 31 years old, when stopped and 'shoot to kill' by French Police men.

It is yet again going to be a lengthy time before things will be normal again for Nice and in France, so soon after the last terror attack in 2015 on Charlie Hebdo. When reading about this latest terrror attack, on the blueprint, if you want to make any sense of it, there is almost the sense of feeling as if the driver and lorry came falling out from the sky in a sudden and dropped itself on the crowded place, in order to kill people. In theory if you rewind the route of the lorry, when did he accelerate to stay long enough unnoticed by the securities in France, traffic CCT camera's? Sudden seems either too short or long off the screens for creeping up on the crowd, while they were watching the fireworks display, some families with children. No blueprint of top security is looking good in any western country when this kind of attack and impact has taken place. It is in fact looking distorted and horrific.

Breaking News from Turkey tonight: coup is underway to topple President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

UK: II referendum rejected.

09072016/22:49 PM

What is the bad news? Officially that would mean, the rejection of a II referendum by parliament, the first referendum and it's outcome still stands. Rejection of a IInd referendum so soon after the first one also means what is now ongoing in the UK at ministerial level, there is something now much bigger happening. It looks like Westminster has gone from academically formal to a mere informal sort of sportsmanship of leadership politics. Officially the UK doesn't have a Prime Minister, because he has resigned on 24 June, last month. Also, officially, the UK is still in the EU. Which is probably the reason for Mr David Cameron to attend the NATO summit in Warsaw this weekend. The world is transforming alongside all this very quickly to put things back into perspective, and judging from the photoshoot including the president of Ukraine, Mr Petro Poroshenko. This logic is only good news after BREXIT, last 23 June 2016. There is simply no time for cynicism, Party contests between MP's in Britain after the leave EU vote majority in the referendum, and keep the world hostage for much longer. It makes no sense to say it but there is need for an old friend called obligation, if only it was meant to keep the global community functionality to run itself. Once it can complete the transformation plans starting at the top we will automatically witness how the world has expanded for the better and secure an even more greater future on the planet.

It is what the world has chosen for, even before Brexit. And only time will tell why it complicated matters in our century and with this created quite a stir among the leading nations and leaders of the G7 and G20. The year is 2016 and no one can say whether the world will remember this year's achievements of having to deal with an enormous challenge in the global system and it's power fields, the day the UK decided it wants to leave the EU. From top to bottom I think we felt something, shimmy shake. Can the next Prime Minister of Britain lead the country out of it's 'Sleeping Beauty' politics and put back Britain at  the centre of people and democracy? By any standard in political memory Britain never had to choose to stay 'out of the world' via the EU. To any Prime Minister that is what it is, no comfort from Prime Ministers and governments of the previous decades will do the advising to lead Britain into an new era of politics in the UK. And there is Mrs Theresa May who might win the leadership contest to lead the Tory Party, the country, people and government. Ministries like Defense and Foreign State of Affairs are for the moment unspoken of, to stay with logic. Sometimes you just make a wish to have someone writing about the transformation in Britain and what it needs to go through with it, by God Almighty, if the world state requires to go that far. Top columnists need to stay focussed and write about great things when it happens. (It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light . Aristotle Onassis) Are they perhaps waiting, and facing in the wrong direction?

There are things the public do not know about Jerusalem

3 June 2011

(Five years ago , the world as we knew it- 27062016)

Land swaps is exactly what it means. So is returning to pre- 67 borderline. President Barack Obama has once again made that very clear after the speech given on 19 may 2011 to the AIPAC audience, when asked the question to explain how the Jewish people in America and around the world should perceive this kind of message. Israelis and Palestinians should decide amongst themselves to return to the negotiations and deal with their own problems. The US will only play the role of mediating through the process and the White House can only keep on stressing that this part  is an  essential force, and  that in this way Palestinian Statehood doesn't need to go through the UNSC in september, unless the coming fifteen or sixteen weeks a Peace agreement between the two nations still hasn't been reached.

That's Washington Politics as the world knows it since WWII. Today in the 21st century it has moved a bit and is now reaching out to all nations with great visionaries for the future. The US is unique in this, compared to the Soviet era. The people in the world know where they stand with the United States of America and they firmly believe their cause will be fought in justice and democratically. Millions of people are not very much convinced that's how democracy works whatever the Presidents or PMs say. Time changes and putting increasing pressure each day more and more on people everywhere and also on the leaders of the nations. Including all international bodies representing justice, democracy and world economies. We have an incredible need for the planet's wellbeing and that the leading nations indeed take responsibility by all nations based on humanity and common interests, far from even the slightest irresponsibile blip in the system. But something unusual is happening this spring. The Middle Eastern countries are in uprise against old rules of governing a nation or peoples. The demand for change is the youngest revolution in our time in this part of the world, and it wants accountability from their governments to be their first mass protests legitimacy. No one understands how tall the order for that change is in fact. But what if war is still going on in these parts of the world, with very little chance of finding any change being made on democracy?

In september 2011 the Palestinians will seek Palestinian Statehood through the UNSC and challenge the United Nations on grounds of history, economy, social hierarchy, population and achievements over the last decade. There is no denying any justice to their plan of Statehood as a sovereign nation, next to e.g. Israel and other neighbouring countries. It is time to accelerate Palestinian sovereignty from here and to honour the promise given by the nations to one nation with basic believes such as universal human rights and peace with not just Israel but also with it's nation. The room of nations is not a war room where tactical decisions are taken and so it will not do on this day. And yet there is an incredible piece of Middle East Political History that will not pass the crititcal eyes, especially when in favour of Jerusalem staying in the hands of the people closest to Israel and the rest of the world. Like Goliath, the unclean giant Philistine hero, once, so will now the Palestinians tremble like David before the sight of Israel. Which is never a good thing to begin any court case in Israel over land, peoples or Jerusalem. Public opinion is showing direction of a possible war again between Israelis and Palestinians after september 2011... And it will be again about the land swaps and return to the pre- 67 borderline. PM Benyamin Netanyahu in his speech before the US Congress, has already promised the world audience that he will make no concession with regard to Jerusalem. But not all can be decided military if the court wants to hear the argument for recognition and establishing in the 21st century what Israel's ambitions are for the future of Israel, it's peoples and existence. And this will be hard for Israel to do when defining the need of Israelis or fight of the Israelis as a nation standing 'alone' against the free will of the Palestinians who want no more struggle in every day life, but longevity of life and security on their side of what was formerly known as Israel...

And who will remember on a day like this about the poorest in Israel who do want a future in Jerusalem and be Jewish? The public is unaware of the underlying problems the poorest in Israel have in their every day life for six or seven decades now. They have never been able to rebuild Israel and maybe desired no more than just to be left alone in peace to live the rest of their broken lives close to home where you can say your God's Name without fear of horror or persecution. And these were many survivors of the Holocaust in Europe or Germany. In stead these were the people who were treated like Vietnam veterans back in the seventies in the 'master and servant' line of Israeli  politics. Work can be therapeutic or re- live again under much safer circumstances, but an entire nation in the age of retirement  there could have been very little desire left in these broken eyes to suddenly dream of an everlasting Zion and Jewish State. For the rich of the Jewish nation this dream didn't go far enough. When speaking of politics before 1948 under and after British Mandate, these were the people who would turn the country of Israel for one purpose only: to serve the Jewish nation of Israel. Ever since that became more and more louder reaching the far ends of the world. But in Jerusalem (Tel Aviv, Beersheva or Eilat) the Jewish nation living in endless past nightmares all their lives, and staying poor, is not represented by any politician in the Knesset. And the Israeli Parliament knows that these are  not  the people who will be representing Israel at the United Nations and defend their rights as Holocaust survivors, with no education or lack of it, and ambitions to take away Jerusalem for political reasons from the Palestinian peoples. Any one else would have spotted the peculiar clothing and history in these peoples, that here is a people who is nothing but Jewish and has the right to see the future of Jerusalem to be peaceful and not turned into a warzone. Where else can they live? In Great Britain? Germany? France? Sweden? Denmark? China? India? Mecca? That is the look of the (Chassidic) Jew without compassionate grounds.

The academics know what they want. But the UN will need a 21st century political stratum if it wants to see democracy is reflected in both nations and in accordance with the nations in the international body of Universal Peace and Justice.

It isn't hard to understand Britain not wanting to become de facto government.

21062016

The de jure rule is now hanging there in the balance on a red silk thread, always is the ancient path to wisdom and virtue of each and every nation, east, west, south or north of the planet. It is as the old saying on the coat of arms, that fortune favors the brave. In 2016 fortune however seems to favor only the bravest in the world. And leaving the old brave fortune to retire. In the world of men it is ambition that inspires or conspires (e.g. in reversal of fortune) all the century old plots, statesmen, up to modern times rationality, and stateswomen. Where is the EU starting point in these high towers of men and countries? It will be a problem story to make or break when you tell the future this is where the EU has put England during the 21st century, requiring no Cicero or Seneca to master a new dimension in Statesmanship, and then find in the treasury the heart of men with extreme grand schemes to lead the world, to convince to 'remember that thou art mortal'. Julius Caesar and slave alike. The EU is clear on it's economic plan, a grand scheme, and not to confuse history deliberately, rightfully has this earned right to do so, after building peace post WWII in Europe and among the European nations. It was then considered the impossible dream and reality, but now is and has become convincingly evil by detail. As is the case for all mortals, king or pauper. (It is sheer hypocrisy to say or think in a moment such as this one before 23 June, 48 and plus hours from now, before the referendum in Britain whether to stay or leave the EU, men are mere 'slaves' of the EU) Having said this, still there is one little detail left on the plate of sacrifice to the European Union. It is not hard to understand Britain not wanting to become a de facto government and country. If you can understand this one slightly insignificant silk thread in the great spider's web of the 21st century there isn't any reward to do so. If the Stay campaigners mean what they say why they want Britain to stay in the EU. Equally it is clear that the 'Leave' campaigners are moving without the proper statemanship in quicksand too. Both do not offer a grander scheme of solvency for the whole nation and make stay or leave a commanding British invention for the 22nd century and to lead the rest of the world. Like boatboys they float on their own British made flotilla's on the Thames like spoiled little children who want their candy. In fact Europe is becoming of all this in a crisis they didn't order, even if it was on the menu.

At the same time we can criticize Britain and forget about post WWII remaking of European history with a clear British dominance of moralities and laws for mankind as we now know today in these several generations by trust and reliance on one another. And not just in NATO or the United Nations. You might even sink so low and spurn the monarchy, while this is Europe and all European nations have a small little detail of ambition and high strife to protect their monarch and their house by law and hearts of all the king's men and horses. There is where Brexit will take the people, and there is where the 'stay' camp will take England and it's multiple inhabitants. Immigration or migrants do not tear up the de jure right of the monarch, even if the Exchequer tells you so in the annual budget. These are people who come in on fishermen's boats, something that isn't telling you the truth about the real wealthiest of people in the industrial world. Supranational is a mere beginning to these wealthiest of men in the world! Yes, but sometimes combating nuisance for any government in the civilized world isn't a polite business when it requires logistics and accomodation indefinitely... Britain is standing closer to history in this moment it didn't realize for a very long time in memory.

Britain will exit from the EU on 23 June 2016.

17062016

This natural order for Britain's exit from the EU is quite the opposite to what the EU considers it's great achievement since WWI and WWII in Europe and having united the European nations over decades long hard work on Peace & Security. Science might give you the answer what it is that defines 'natural order' and abstract order. Half way every EU citizen has learned a few new things for the last three decades as Member States. It is almost certain that today abstract order of the European Union is natural life to 500 million people living as citizens of all single currency countries. Also, Member States signed up to the single currency, followed by it's policies in a new instrument that remained invisible to the nations at home. (It could be that the 'new instrument' was the Big Banks industry) At home no citizen can feel security visibly. It is mainly governments and politicians that are known to be the key figures as Member States, but when facing the national platform politics they hold very strong and powerful positions as representatives of the electorates. Was it any different for Britain during the last three or four decades in parliamentary history? And this is an important question to ask government and the people, before voting in the referendum on 23 June. The local farmer and his sheepdog are finding it quite simple to vote, by natural order. He is after all English and probably so is his sheepdog. Abstract natural order is the scientific name of another institution known to everyone as globalization. England could have invented the sun if it had that kind of hubris. It was there when the sunrise was first. (And so is the rest of the world and in every country)

In six days time Britain will exit from the EU and we will forget all about it two months after 23 June. And yet it will be rather strange for a G7 country, a great player on the global economic platform, for aiming quite low this way on the national balance... Thirty years ago it was unthinkable to amend laws in favour of globalization, being above the will of the squire or gentry. Sixty years ago 'who will pay for the squire' was a perfectly natural question to ask, locally, in the community, and in parliament. Maybe even during PM Q's time. Like love this was the PM's always 'last concern' of every day in Office. The same question will now get a different answer in June 2016, if this writing or theory in the madness of Brexit is correct. Technically it is this Britain that has changed quietly and unnoticed under the noses of the people of Britain. It has been done so because it was meant to transforming to a greater good and freedom of all  people. And Globalization helped transforming these new instruments of equality and deeper integration of a democratic globalized world. It is partly true that the nations 'do not do efficiency and history' per sé in our fast world anymore. (Writing in the NY Times article yesterday, Britain's dangerous urge to go it alone) In the meantime we are humbled by the appalling assassination of British Labour MP Mrs Jo Cox yesterday by gunshot, twice, and then later died yesterday. Security was savagely breached here on politicians and government officials lives. In a time like this the people need to trust their government, security and democracy in every civilized country. Why break the abstract natural order and leave people pining for the sheepdog and natural order, where father/ husband and children in an ungodly way will eternally long for his wife and mother to his children in a place where home used to be?

Prime Minister, David Cameron, has said at the G7 summit in Japan, that he is not a closet anything...

27052016

Will Brexit slow growth or will global economics be the heavy weight of that? If Mr Shiller is right, reading his article earlier in the morning, shared by Hnr Mr Javier Solana, the global financial crisis can only be triggered by it's institutions when everything else fails the system. Human or machinery, who will say. The point of the UK's referendum in itself is a failure of some kind, and yes, therefore might bring slow growth to the end result of a calendar year any time soon. But is that a problem or mechanism? What will happen if Britain leaves the EU is a matter of mechanism, at least from a naive point of view. In reality, as I have said before in my writing yesterday, there is no separate 'staying in' Britain and 'leaving the EU' Britain. Countries in the G7 are magnitudes and very decisive factors of the global economy. It is a pity the law of transparency isn't far reaching enough, that when in times of general elections or a referendum, it should not be static accessibility to the public but dynamic. (Or fine the countries who leave out that important transparency) What is at danger of losing e.g. in a BREXIT win no one actually can tell or won't tell. Brexit' build- up one singular voice all through the whole way up to now/ today, and it is not making any sense by leaving out the 'staying in' Britain. It should worry some people, that here politicians are failing the people almost in a blinding light of sheer neglect to leave out the fact of Britain will still be the same after the referendum of national opinion.

I wonder which is more dangerous, to point out that stay is good for Britain or to leave. Where do they see the difference for Brexit when stating that leaving the EU would trigger slow growth around the world, by the G7 leaders this morning? That would only suggest how global politics do only business with 'groupies'. (The global system machinery doesn't do groupies either) Historically Britain's membership in the G7 group wasn't an appointment from the magic hat by the magic wand (woosh- kaboom!) to be one of the 7 leading nations in the world. It is the moral of the country, or each country,whether G7 or G20, that these are extraordinary units to fit in the machinery of mainstream global economics and technologies. It makes staying in the EU or leaving the EU a minor radar to monitor events and progress of the people, chosing economics or politics at home. Nothing will change Britain as a unit, a country or leading industrial nation. Big business in fact is saying this all along, since no big Bank will make investment in groups of people; they need bigger securities, as I understand it. (But even bigger securities are only Banking policies and not parliamentary democracy laws) It is also called the law of transparency, something in the 21st century each and every country has to comply with. BREXIT is England, surely the OECD and it's Secretary- General Mr Angel Gurria, know this? The G7 suggested that the UK Prime Minister, David Cameron, might secretly support BREXIT. He should not do so secretly but openly, in opposition and as England, that that is what staying in the EU can only mean. Another example of Stay or Leave: if war broke out today in Britain, who will fight for England? (The economics or politics?)

Dutch referendum 'No' outcome has left the EU spooked and busted by a 'leave note' that the house is haunted and not for sale.

16042016

The EU never does surprise shocks and is more unwilling to receive one, especially when the Netherlands de facto is one of the 28 European Union Member States. It's 'No' to the Ukraine treaty deal with the EU, one could say, has been the kind of input the Member State has rubbed the EU under it's nose. In return the EU did not sneeze but held in the tickle quietly and silently to block any opening in it's operating power centre it holds as the European Union. The world media kept low and respected the sophistication of quietness. (In the Washingpost last saturday Ms Anne Applebaum wrote an article/ column on the Dutch referendum, saying it is Russian propaganda against Ukraine all over again) The agony goes on and on from here and no one knows where exactly it is going to end up. Yes, it is a bit curious that no world media, e.g. Bloomberg, had written on the effect of this referendum in the Netherlands. In a blur of thought some had quizzed the Dutch, percentage wise, whether this had anything to do with the downing of the MH17 in july 2014. 32% Was the exact number. No other prominent member of the global society had come up with that amount of number, as written here above, except for Ms Applebaum. And that I'm afraid is very serious news.

The International preliminary report clearly said the MH17 was downed by a Buk- missile from Russian separatists during the war in Ukraine, the Donbas region. 'No' in the referendum cannot come across as deciding on military matters, but can only refer to the treaty deal between Member States of the European Union and the Ukraine. This shows a head to head argument that is leading going nowhere in the 32% of voters putting the preliminary report in jeopardy by creating a different and more personal report from the one in close cooperation with the International teams of investigation. Ms Applebaum doesn't make mistakes, but could she be wrong here by a mere rash or itch of the moment? And neither can we say about the Dutch people in the 'No' camp that they are 'sleepless in the Netherlands' (Seattle), that is if they have a 'deliberate voting' number of a prominent 32% cast (political readers) in the ballot box on the referendum Ukraine- EU treaty deal. All one can say is that this referendum outcome has set the world media flat on it's stomach or back with not one iota of writing or mentioning. Another theory: had they said 'Yes', how many would have been there saying 'No', let's say in the 32 %? 198 People died on the MH17 and who were Dutch citizens. This will go down in history as an unfortunate tragedy during the war in Ukraine Donbas and Russian separatists in July 2014. That is death & pain, and not propaganda. Adding to the above here: the Netherlands is a Member State of the EU. Compared to the UK, who is not a Member of the EU, but a sovereign State. It is ill advice not to see the difference.

Donald J Trump in last 24 hours from cult to virus

04042016/22:22 PM

And the message: move away now or quick or you will become infected with the virus that is Donald J Trump. Every American has the right to be warned as a citizen of the United States. Read all about it, in the extra's. As a complete stranger to Americanism or the US one can only say that the glass is half full/ empty when it comes to what the 'establishment' is saying at the moment, e.g. that Mr Trump will never become president, because/ as long as Democrat President Mr Barack Obama is popular, 53%, say one article in the Daily Telegraph UK. Like peanut butter the truth on Mr Trump's ignorance as a politician (let alone a career politician) is sliding smoothly on the bread and butter people without wages in America. It is offensive at times to think the man you want to be president could be so blatantly ignorant on world affairs and global politics. Could it mean that the truth is more sublime, for example that this man is probably not the kind of president of 18/19 or 20th century, but more the president a 21st century US 'could' be needing? Simple test: who is the most 'honest' man for the last 20 hours today in the world, after a leak of documents by  M& Fonseca came out and shaming a few prominent men in the world? Is Mr Trump among one of these men today? (Don't know about tomorrow)

And if you want more complex you can bear: it is not fair to compare Mr Trump to the incumbent US president, not at this point. It seems rather desperate, one could say. Mr Trump goes as far as the running Democrat Mrs Hillary Clinton. And from there it's called the race to the White House. Fair and square. But where the establishment is right is the painful truth at this point in the race for the Republican front runner, that perhaps he is having a giant sandwich between his grinding teeth and chewing on. It's hot dog time. But then again it just might not be. Mr Trump is not very good on world affairs, as they say, but he can be surprisingly discern and making his word a pristine truth. Up to now it looks as if he is enjoying a harmless adventure, which is dangerous to oneself if you want to win and become president and being a Republican US president. The time of obscurity is not over yet for most of the Republican Real time... Now what is that? Mr Trump's keyword might be to unite the Republicans soon at one stage, showing his quality as... What can we say, as the US president? By another good look at things this is not looking good for the Republican front runner man, Mr Trump. Ouch! How can he be chosing the bad timing over the right one? A simple answer: he is ignorant.

Why would you like to hang out with a man as ignorant as Mr Trump for much longer, the voters might think or say. He's got the muscles, the money to cover for much of his 'big talk', and he is harmless, or innocent. In the wild west days he might have even made to be sheriff of the county, but president of the US in our modern day world... Big question, big risk, everything big else very much like big America itself. It is no wonder how much bigger statemanship means to this country! (Compared to western Europe) And so on goes the story of the man everyone loves to hate at the moment. One thing you can be sure of is that he is no Waco Texas David Korash and never will be. Underneath all that rough exterior is a decent childlike Mr Trump who believes he can make America great again, or better. (In Europe he would have been a petit prince rebel) He doesn't know anything on Nato. Isn't that a good thing? But he may learn faster than today. Make himself a competent US president for the coming five years. Maybe yes, or maybe no. Autmatically assuming he, Mr Donald J Trump, will never become president is more than ignorance alone, wouldn't you say? Because how hard can it be to attack the Republican front runner man if the whole world joins you in this scrum? And that is what good folks understand, may it be a dumb or landslide silenced distance anywhere in America (in whistling winds and thousands of tumbleweeds  zig-zagging; the story on Republican Donald Trump, whistling winds and thousands of tumbleweeds zig- zagging, a novel maybe).

The serious undertone of BREXIT is parliamentary democracy in Britain and the people's voice

21032016

In every referendum, so it seems, it is rather unintelligent not to include the people's voice as the public and mandate e.g. to stay in or leave the EU. The only political groups can't decide for the people. Just like the government can't exclude the only real meaning democracy has or can have. And BREXIT is nearly there, in three months time decision time will be made on 23 june. Another thing also seems to be having a serious undertone, and if you believe the newspapers in the UK staying in the EU is a demonstration of that serious undertone. It has the EU- benefits and reform of staying logic in a blind stare on what the future return might bring or mean for Britain... Here is the odd thing: parliament hasn't spoken yet. Outside of the UK countries are speaking of the UK leaving to sending shockwaves through the global economic system, at least for a while, while others predict a natural partition from the EU and then in a decade's time this might in a sudden become awareness for all to see. But if correct what exactly will there be for everyone to see? Benefits, oh yes, of course. Economic benefits surmounting above every skeptical private person's expectations, where? In parliament?

The EU has made history inside history pre and after WWII. Where we see this in a more clear fact (ad acta- they say that nobility had no monopoly in warfare or battles) is a tiny residue of the military power of old monarchies in Europe to have failed humanity, their own, in a culmination of atrocities across the European continent for much too long (WWI). It resulted, as we may say today in modern day life, in something useless and a terrible waste. The institutions did not hold at the extreme ambition of one nation/ race or monarchy, but only drove the people further into the abyss of nowhereland and in endless bloodbaths or revolutions. Military prowess and power was the only legitimate proof of supremacy and that of the nation it nurtured at it's bosom. The hearth of the people, so to speak, was it's military. Then it's benefits, for every country, welcomed the diversity or by small agreements in high places accepted this old condition of the nations as the legitimate/ judicial powers. Europe at it's best was better served in this kind of history, one can say. Does the European Union would want to go back in time to find the 'old benefits' and prosperities' agreements among European nations? Or to put in another way: do the people in England want BREXIT or stay in the European Union? 

The EU total population in 2015: 505.11 million (EU stats)

Devastation in Ankara will lead Turkey to banishment.

13032016/ 22:52 PM

Turkey tonight is in a critical mass. A bomb exploded in a dense area in Ankara leaving 34 people dead and a dozens more injured by the light and blast. You have two ideas: has it got anything to do with Turkey's mainstream politics, or was this a military intro on faraway overstretched policies in a three months timetable/ schedule? Many suspect this had nothing to do on both of these issues. Maybe there is already proof that the bomb blast tonight in Ankara was rather 'incoming' than 'outgoing'. At what point is Turkey making a big score in the global economic sphere? 2016 In Turkey is making a parallel structure, with one side you have bomb blasts across main cities in the country, while on the secondary side you have high towers of finance and trade ongoing in their daily business in an unstoppable timelapse. People cannot make intersections across the overview. Except for the EU and it's dealings on sent immigrants back and forth in the lower streets of the European Union, when crossing from middle Europe and beyond.

It's freezing cold and people come into Europe, men, women and children, in great numbers or flocks. And the United Nations are too distant from these particular 'marches' for freedom from war and more human tragedies in Syria. (In other details one could say that Syria's expansion is coming through it's refugees in thousands into Europe) This is the 21st century 'epidemic'  in the European Union and it's partner countries across middle Europe. The road to Istanbul was a fable in the cold mist of march 2016, but who knows what it might bring when spring is back in the air. It is the way the mind of hope works and not knowing about the death, violence and smell of gunpowder behind the high walls of Turkey. It looks as if the whole region is becoming an expansion gone wrong totally. Does anyone honestly recall Tunisia and when the Arab spring had it's first shot in the air?

Turkey is still a democracy all be it a dying white and black swan. That is if it concentrates only on the song.

Power to power: Banks and politics

08032016

Central Banks and politics may have one or two things in common. The 21st century not many are too sure anymore, whether this is the old system or that which replaced the central in both Banks and politics. Here is the naive view: it might, and then again it might not be so. Who exactly is saying the naive thing in today's news and where when pointing to a possible stay in the EU or leave the EU, when this is e.g. England? From the Central Banks point of view it can only be the UK, and not e.g. the other Member States to follow suit of the UK. Investment Banking is the global order, something else compared to central government and Central Banks. But that too could be only from a naive point of view of any outsider in this world. No one has any idea what money actually means at top level or any Banking platform. True or false. One month ago the prospect of a possible BREXIT of the UK was more tranquil on the surface, without any other possibility to stir up the deeper currents on how serious money would change it's fate, if this would really happen. It is happening in a real scenario. And, to some degree it is also exciting and a remedy to put the EU at the challenge. It is the sort of psycho- drama that goes with the territory, one could say.

Are Member States up for/ to it, once BREXIT is confirmed on 23 June 2016? Can the monetary union truly be challenged psychologically, politically and confrontational at the same time? We love a good story, so please... Power to Power, where Central Banks do politics, e.g. the ECB, and in politics where the electorate is doing it's saying or voting. When looking from the outside in the image that comes to mind is Antoni Gaudi's must see tower building project. With the 27 Member States this has been for the last two decades in perfect lines with a symmetrical  building -up  of the European Union, with little or no irregularities of a renovation contract. (From any male point of view) Today's news on M Carney's treble speaking to cabinet ministers in England comes like a tumbleweed in the big storm one expects to see in three months time, if BREXIT wins the people's vote. The European Union versus Europe, or vice versa, either way is the promise of another titanic event since anyone in our generation of leaders can remember. We wish them Godspeed on both sides. It won't be wise to drive a wedge between the two champions at this point in the process at the upcoming battle to stay in or go out for the UK.

Europe is 'uneasy and elite'. One must try to find a simple solution...

25022016

One projection in the present time future of 2016 is e.g. what if Britain stays in the EU, and then we leave out for a few milliseconds the other dark side of the vector, what if Britain leaves the EU full of probabilities and unknown possibilities. People as we humans are do not think in projections but politics. Our view is only active under certain points and in realtime 'speed'. People in politics want to change our view, and say, for example, that in the referendum things about governing will become clear or a lot clearer when the nation goes to the poll, in Britain's case this will be on 23 June, summer time. End of the story. The rest of the European Union, consisting of 27 Member States, are simply 'uneasy and elite' and have no other projections for the future in their establishment. A close definiton is seeking other answers, of why they are uneasy, primo and secundo why they are elite at the same time. Of course, you want to say something here about the EU and the leaving or staying of the UK. And by the look of things the need for reason and answers is from the politician's view not underestimated, if sphere counts for anything in whatever point there is to take or make, break of solidify. All mass center is put heavily on the voter's outcome, if politics is going to make a meaningful direction.

Where things are going to stay for 100% solid, fortunately or unfortunately, is the side where the EU Member States will be standing to represent the European Union timeless 'normality'. It coincides very much with realtime, and not irregular or broken by any point from within. What if the UK would stay is another meaningful question, also in numbers. (Or just in theory) From the side of numbers it is impossible to consider a different view, where it is a logical step for the UK to leave the pedigree numbers of the EU at any time soon. Just to make sure we are still stalking or talking politics let's stay with the numbers and not reversing these, if peace time should continue. In the 21st century a World War will not start in any conventional way but about 'numbers'. It represents all form of life, including the lifeline of the world economy. This would mean a child is playing with fire... (And you know what Father Mobutu once said in an BBC Interview to be a good and loving parent is not to say to the child that it is allowed to play with fire) Is this the 'easy' solution to all UK's problems the coming time? Then explain first why reflexion politics is such a high priority for you. Where there is truly dark matter like the moors, would be the natural road to leave the EU. No one wants to go back to the marshes is a simple enough philosophy at the bottom. Too many shiny high towers worldwide in the balance of things are telling you the simple truth about our world as it is, in numbers too great for digits. The big world is about alpha, beta or gamma magnitudes. Mr Cameron is aware of this magnitude, because if he is not he has never been a real Prime Minister of the UK, a global city (word said on the BBC UK evening news two days ago).

The EU has other reasons to be 'uneasy and elite'. Also not to be underestimated in the bouncing of things.

Sometimes it is what you belief (in) is worth fighting for. Disbelief is complicated along the same path.

21022016/22:34 PM

Everyone is convinced the UK has got it wrong. But many also believe the EU has the same problem, only bigger, among 27 Member States. In dreams and visions, EEC or EU, decades of making unrealistic changes in the end did miraculously pay off, you could say today. Europe in it's present time does look like what the next generation of Europeans are looking for, the instant future (Instagram) and the fast history to record in each selfie for no particular future in mind. It is difficult and very complicated to understand why the world is set to go on in ways beyond anyone's expectation or imagination, something that was never done before and perhaps won't change for a very lasting time. Is it history? We are not that generation of people anymore. If you belief it is all about today. And that is fine for every individual, here in Europe or overseas in the US. But that isn't what they used to call politics. Britain is the only country in the world where politics and history go hand in hand for as long as the 19th or 18 th century generations can remember. Which  in itself is a great deception in realtime as we know it now every new day. Brexit seems to suggest that politics will again 'make history'... It's a very brave question when you ask, exactly what history are you talking about here? World markets are run by world powers, which the EU happens to be one of. And that makes it the easy part of the question to answer. What does remains after this easy answer is bigger and much more complex by a nice 360 degrees view. Mr Cameron has got one good answer for Britain and the British people. The people will decide on 23 June later this year how much of that is precisely what the Prime Minister will have and offer.

Britain is stepping out of something and is happy to keep it's offices at the EU in corridors and halls. "Special treatment' in the corridors and halls of EU power is a good home to dwell and have 'representation' teams in the building of this establishment. You won't get 'special status' and walk through the door for meetings that concern only the 'insiders', who will be having world level meetings at pace. It is now only theory, but politics will have to go. The EU isn't a dream or vision anymore. It has stopped being unrealistic, perhaps since today. And this is the interesting part we have not witnessed before, that so much contested the power of the EU and this was done by each and every high level one could think or do, and yet it's reality has reached every core of society so real that the world can only say one thing: "You're awesome!". (Michael Hall's voice- movie Game) We eat and breathe EU environment on a very big scale, every citizen, animal or alien nation. Can anyone make it go away now? Well, that's probably not possible from a human point of view. But what if the heart and mind of any human's belief would prove otherwise? After all even God Almighty was contested in His heavenly powers too, since day 1. But it is disbelief to think that human could be Boris Johnson or Michael Gove. From a personal small observation view, the curious thing is that it is the Prime Minister David Cameron who will make a lasting impression.

If the EU has found greatness today Mr Cameron's role in this hour, even when defeated in the house of greater EU powers, will never be forgotten where he in the end came to put his heart on the line for Britain. But here is the curious thing, he did also stuck out his neck to all Member States, for he is simply not a hard man and needs friendship among peers and colleagues he has come to respect as persons, even when disagreeing with them over politics or monetary economics. He has that softly softly approach, roll up his sleeves when with the people in British society, fishermen or industries he has visited during his time in office as Prime Minister, and so forth. He is not the wimpiest of Prime Ministers the country has known since Margaret Thatcher, contrary to what many will make of him in 'history'. There are times he can be very callous too, when among the men and women he considers his equal, is quite fair to say now. Actually no one ever thought of him that he would do it. It was probably what he believed in that the future Britain should be part of the 21st century in peace and not war with the rest of mankind and the nations. It is the only way to go and take on the next decade with sincere mood and show that a day's defeat is the best tutor for a much bigger challenge tomorrow to come. If this is all daft writing or simply the wrong theory, the Prime Minister will be tagged for life of something no one can say what that might be.

Our century will be remembered for the refugee crisis from Syria.

13022016

There is no one who actually understands what is meant by 'the situation in Syria', outside the region's sphere, downtown or up your street, whether in Washington, or Hungary. (Obviously you can't say here Germany, the UK, Denmark or Sweden) Who is your friend? Russia, the US, participating EU countries, Australia, the United Arab countries, Jordan, Turkey, Syrian opposition to the Assad regime, Iran or ISIS? The answer is easy to find and visibly to ssee, when thousands are fleeing the country from the scrum of friendships... Usually bombing means a political disaster for diplomacy, if you care. At the beginning of peace talks with Syria, two or three years ago, all sides have been 'entering the dragon' without contest or challenge in one particular side or the other. This was 2013, 2014 and 2015. Russia is out of the G8 and has narrowed down the size of the G7 to go back or step away from Russia. In other words politics and diplomacy will match some other form of organization within the Russian leading group of one nation and it's partners, period. If the curve bents to the other side or in reverse position, there is bound to be a automatically changed way for the future time. Of course, that's easy to say from your armchair observations, while the tragedy of such play is causing a nauseating millions of people to flee the center of the region. And they will not be welcomed with an equal of millions homes, financial aid, or comfort. It is a disaster story, and even a tragic one to go from riches to rags. Syria has always been quite affluent in it's days before the civil war broke out five or six years ago. And the president of Syria, Mr Bashar Al Assad, was considered a man to be proud of, a sophisticated man in a family the country has known for so long in history, after WWII. But in our century he will not be remembered in princely ways ever again. Today he is simply the red devil holding up his trident to poke his people in the deep side, as deep as the seas.

Question at this hour can only be an alarming 'What is the remedy' to stop the hurt in Syria of many thousands of ordinary people? (And probably shooting them in the back when they flee to unwelcome countries elsewhere) This is not an okay scene to any well thinking human being anywhere in the world. It is appalling and a complete failure of human basic intelligence. Let alone on rationality for leading nations. It is also quite obscene when everyone from their lazy couch can watch children drowning in the seas when they are crossing the perils of the tide and deep waters. Some of us do not watch it and also do not find it hard to have some sympathy for the country with the biggest challenge to the situation. At least that is moving to the anti climax this kind of situation is leading to but then ending differently in realtime. And who is saying that no one cares for the drowning multitude of fleeing people? When they are being received in great hostilities, just think again. Do you know the less dastardly solution to both sides of this border and stop the hurting? No one can actually. Another option maybe? Like e.g. what? A big white flag waving above Syria when all of the warring factions have stopped and the end is over? And just maybe the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, knows what it means to stop a war of complete annihilation... (Rember the Russians who stopped the Nazi's in WWII)

BREXIT... RE-BREXIT

06022016

This new FOCUS- POINT is the new lead in EU- TECHNOLOGY POLITICS. That is if they leave the older version of BREXIT- TECHNOCRATIC invention, which basically is (was) run by people. We are not sure whether President of the EU, Mr Martin Schultz and UK Prime Minister, David Cameron, know that too. It's an open question you could leave blank for the moment. Another example: take e.g. Grexit and where it is now standing after the last election, in September 2015, one can say that they are on center ground of the RE- GREXIT. You see, it works, this technology. Even when information technology doesn't have any records made in this way. Basically we can anticipate at this point what if Britain leaves the EU, what might then happen if Time get's in the way of it all. You might sense already some loss of Time without pin-pointing it out with a finger and stop this time consuming, that is always what the EU Technocrats do best. Public interest could also get to a new low because of all this loss of time, in the meanwhile. Okay, let's give this disign a chance and a peak down this path of EU Technocratic politics, and say that this is where the RE- BREXIT drops in and widens the political EU scope by seconds or greater friction. Will they be ready for this kind of reading? England just might get there in time, you see. There is a good chance that they might, if we put it more carefully.

The RE- BREXIT might be picking up some signals from former EU 'EXIT' countries, or anticipate some more to follow, but that this is not going to affect the process for the RE-BREXIT STRATEGY LEVEL(s) into LEVEL-s(peed). How much Time do we have to get to this point? If Britain in a referendum (expected to be held this year in the summer) and the people of Britain say they want out of the EU (100% want out), the RE- BREXIT will be just around the corner by an unknown equal (number) of another 100%. That is as far and much as we can go today. Why would Mr Martin Schultz want to let people do all the hard work in our modern technological age? How do BREXIT and RE- BREXIT potentially differ from one to the other? It carries both mass and weight of electorate versus the STATE split in two different directions (ambiguity). No, we are not making this stuff up as we go along... (Can't help a snigger here) Back to serious Technology. RE- BREXIT will be the dynamic for BREXIT. Simple enough? How fast is the EU and how much faster can Britain be, would be the next test analysis (or what is known under the new technology terms the 'new conservatism data/ technology'). We will of course miss the show of public political wrestling between the government of Britain and the political arena of EU countries. Also, if old politics is savage, anyone like to tell us what the new one is called? Stuffed animals comes to mind, from a private emotion.

Accept this as theorem 'Yes' or 'No'.

Israel anno 2016 (fiction or realtime).

30012016

The 'outer' of Israel, in fact would be the only real position for anyone the right place and overlooking in what present situation this country is presenting itself from or to (the outside world). Curious point of view, if you have no face or form but just a terrifying appearance from the deep darkness behind you. (Reading in the Book of Job is not so well known when meeting with a 'dark' strangeness/ stranger) In history this ethnic people lived a life of mirages, fantastic stories, imaginary myths with no particular purpose, and it was pretty much wayward from other more real people, natives who lived long enough in these Middle Eastern sands; these were the nations that had built kingdoms of lapis lazuli or high walls of turquoise laid bare in golden rays to worship something bigger than the sun. WWII (proloque WWI started even earlier), put the world to a complete halt, and was once and for always over and out, not ever to speak lightly again about this nation we know today as the Jewish people, or the people of God Almighty. Why most nations in our realtime pretend they understand history of this magnitude, so different from the grocer's on the corner, we must think here that 'Jewishness' was the only pearly gate for anyone in the world to be or not to be human... Be that human without greatness. If hypocrisy could get any deeper in hell they would let it do so, again and again.

Unfortunately greatness was all that they could have become, lingering on to reason we always see happening under strange reasons for living and having what no one else can have. It is envy to know that the Jews have become so diversified in our new centuries it makes one dizzy on their heights of achievements and universal presence in all nations or countries. They are today's most heterogenous society among all nations, more than Arabs will ever be or become a thousand more years in the future. And that is their problem, and for others as well. Our old world is used to homegeneous societies with no room for exponential fully or overgrown profits and revenues. In this class the Jews, simply said, do know to deal with the kind of nature or natural laws of capriciousness, and make it still their work and commanding it. It is unusual for anyone to get to this level of education, but our world today shows a sophisticated spear of destiny pointing in a specific or certain direction... More globalization today or tomorrow? In Israel not many Jews think big of who they truly are in the world. Like many other nations in the world, most of their lives are run by government. And this could go either the good or bad way, if regimes are in power. It is what one should suspect, if intelligent and as great as a nation they say that they are... If proven wrong, still it should stay as suspecting how a nation was shaped to itself in our time, the kind of history that everyone knows is real. But, Israel itself has handled the making of the Jewish nation in the 21st century asymmetrically from the heart of it's existence since the ending of WWII.

It must stay clear that Israel is heterogenous from the root up and will never be like other societies, homogeneous. it is not a failure or monstrous idea, but a slight misunderstanding in the execellence of the human spirit. And we are the human spirit, because we live or die. It is quite high standard to understand our human hearts and minds in the proper ways. It is not a mystery when Israel and it's armed forces therefore adhere to politics and policies supremely heterogeneous, and doing so at their own peril or challenge. In other ocuntries the armed forces are having many sorts of nations to promote equality and humanity differently. Not many can say the same of the armed forces of Israel. Equality and humanity therefore was never included to lead the army to battle or out of it. We do not live in a world where hating Jews is our natural thing to do. But we are living in a world that is free to participate in all interactive ways innovation of the 21 first century. Law and order has become today also greater in many new ways from a technological point of view. One thinks that peace is out of fashion, and yes, that may be so. War is the blue dream with no blue print, so why pretend there is one and leading people to their death? Mentality is a stubborn failure when it takes millions to their death. Peace should make it's calculations more prudent for the coming decade, one could say. But the world keeps struggling with idiocy like who is more smart than the other and thus wasting valuable time. (Something on a more personal foot that I have learned from a community center, that the formula to stay fit is simple: frequency, intensity and time. Why not global expansion?) Israel anno 2016 is wasting valuable time. Truly, that is quite a waste.

FP Shimon Peres historically can be seen as Boaz and Achin. After him Israel will only be the present time memory. It will be for the first time also an empty place, being second greatest after the late Mrs Golda Meir.

24012016

Theory can only say that the rest of the world outside Israel is not a similar thing, as e.g. the west, and specifically the US, if a man like Shimon Peres his time on earth comes to a natural end. As the Former President of Israel is ageing and experiencing most recent heart problems, the world must be keeping close watch on these latest developments, public or not, and pehaps question in every credible way if this could setback time for Israel in a post Shimon Peres era to a new man or minister of Cabinet in his place very soon. That is a legitimate question for the present time Israeli government. Countries with monarchies understand what this problem means, when the king or queen has passed away. It is never an easy task to find credibility in the world in the greater conscience of the country and throne in his or her stead a.s.a.p. the following day. Rather it is all becoming an obscure time for the people, without king or queen, not knowing or knowing in political milieus, the time for citizens should be protected and harboured. It will be in Israel's own interest to do the same for all the Jewish people it harbours and protect, to make them understand what it means as citizens and what to expect next from their government and Prime Minister. We are witnessing a very high level of command in Israel change...

The worldview of Mr Shimon Peres to both enemies and friends alike is still up to this day making an incredible impression, that here is a man who knew how to always keep a mundane distance in everything that he does or has done for his country and people. This impression of Mr Peres has never waned to a low pit, knowing that despite Israel's more agressive stance on Palestinian assaults inland against Jews, he maintained his credibility to an outstanding leadership of conscience, and be the prince of peace, or negotations, some more charming than the other, but alas always ending up in tears on both sides. There is no other like him in Israel, one can now say, when looking back on Israel's existence after WWII. Mr Peres, from afar, seemed blessed at times, keeping both history and the present time realities, a worldwide view as his personal care or caring. If the world can say the same of Prime Minister Benyamin Nathanyahu, some may already know that answer. In our ordinary world, at least, that is what we might think. While others might believe in a Byzantine II conscience in need of a balance to be revived is highly ideal or would be considered so.

On saturday the US President Barack Obama is wishing for a speedy recovery of Mr Shimon Peres after last thursday's reports of a heart attack / pains in his chest the former president of Israel was having. It is the preferred way, for now.

With the death of 298 on the MH17, accountability and transparency of armed forces, Internationally, is the one military mechanism no one understands, at this point in 2016.

09012016

The Asean countries in july 2014 (The China Times online newspaper) not only strongly condemned the dowing of the Malaysian MH17 Boeing, but they insisted equally to let the investigation not be hindred in any way. That can only mean an even stronger indignation was felt throughout the ASEAN countries when the MH17 crash in open air was confirmed on that tragic day. Two years later, or nearly this year in july, the public's interest did not wane and investigations are making progress, inch by inch, before reaching end conclusion by October later this year. In Ukraine (Kyiv Post online) this week the independent newsbody of Bellingcat, from heavyweight journalism, have said there is reason enough to file a law suit against Russia and the Russian President, Mr Vladimir Putin, about the MH17 crash. This could mean a breakthrough beyond journalism and politics, and is or could be meaningful the coming months when investigations will deepen on the specifics of the downing, moment and fact, of the MH17. There is a winning side to the tragic loss of the 298 passengers instant, accountability to put it simply. At least from a civil point of view. When it does get into difficulty military transparency is another thing. And that from the G7/ G8 (when Russia was still a member) point of view.

Let's just start with Russia, the US, China, Japan, Germany, and go from here to the G20 nations/ countries. And next adjacent to the International cooperation on Global Security and national security Defence historics, the MH17 to this background is rather squeezed in and also finding itself out squeezed. Investigation can therefore not be seen as lightweight, but is rather very heavyweight, way and above observational journalism. To bear in mind, the MH17 and the death of 298 people happened in one instant, exploded and fell to debris with such high speed or velocity, nothing else was possible but a tragic blow to all, passengers, families and countrymen/women. From here it doesn't seem that consequence alone can be the issue, but rather a more complexity of collapsed cooperation of or between the leading world of nations and their military responsibilities. Global security for the MH17 did not experience security on 17 July 2014. (Altitude at 3000 km or above) To put it simply: the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, and being the second largest armed military in the western/ middle western world, is holding position to some point in these territories...

To be continued.

Turkey & Israel Middle East may be different from the region inside Arab Middle East, on the threshold.

27122015

In a way it is a stumble to now quickly make a deal of normalizing relations for the good of everyone and everybody in both countries. The Middle East has been battling energy demands before, a clear cutting away from Opec nations' oil reserves or production. Russia, on this occasion, has made some advantage during the last decade with who to supply and who not, with it's policies or political presence through trade and partnerships. Once Syria is out of the way... No, that is unthinkable. How Turkey & Israel envision the Middle East will be the next important step in political understanding at this point, that at least the agreement should be that political strategy and stability is the only lasting normality short or long term between the countries. The world, as former Prime Minister of Turkey, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, knows it has evapourized under much pressure from the global financial crisis to the annexation of Crimea, last year in 2014. In the year 2015 Turkey is much closer of coming back to it's own centerground political strength, because outside it's government the world has changed. Last year it was crystal clear that Turkey needed to be a bastion of political station, and that it could do so. It's an asset the country needs to revive, now very short term. Israel may take that as a goodwill gesture, if let's say, Turkey would like to share this asset as the political strength of an old understanding. But, then, look again.

The Middle East also had it's own changes and shifts. From the military viewpoint in the west/ Nato, there is only one way doing what one must do in these regions and win hearts and minds. A political relationship wasn't first priority, which is now exactly the strange new thing countries Israel and Turkey will be needing. If life should go back to normality another global initiative should become the new imperative, if only from a point of view of respectability. The Opec countries need some guarantee that they will also be included, which is not priority at the moment. Speaking of shifts, this is such one. Somehow one can only go the other way, in thinking why the Middle East now needs a sudden political input from, both, Turkey and Israel, before the new year 2016 has ended. On some other occasions when Turkey has triumphed in past history, there was always a parade of men and white horses. This time it is not going to be the same thing, to be careful here and say, that what is priority is to keep the threshold inside, but in close relationship with Israel and share the new political view in a vintage way like. From the Middle East own point of view, there are Opec countries, Russia, Turkey and Israel, the Palestinians, Jordan, all participants in the Middle East having a political vision of their own understanding and making. It is going to be very interesting the coming time in this part of the world to reach the threshold. If not,  people  in Kurdistan  will be looking at a thousand years of struggle, and IS ' presence  will still dominate  the news for a few more years. 

Belief: local globalization

18 December 2015/ 19:58 PM

Sugar, coffee, tea, salt and potatoes, a much more demanding distant cousin of grain and it's economic surplus all over the world, is becoming once again last to finish in the global race for local globalization. The view is hardly something new to oversee what future decades might have to face, when for e.g. world populations rise at staggering numbers, or even slightly over 8 billion people. By that time, who will then come up with buzzing words, such as the famous 'It's the economy, stupid.'? Also, who will chose a president, when facing a deteriorating world, in this great future to lead the nations or what is left of the G7 or G20? The race to end poverty in it's infancy started a few decades ago. Two, if you chose technological precision. When taken far back in time this was a different outlook and working together toward prosperity, then, especially was a hard lesson learnt from World Wars. Technology is a thing of the 20th century, followed by globalization is a thing of the 21st century... Sugar, coffee, tea, salt and potatoes, why these foodbanks to share and is a distribution in our time for metropolitans and cosmopolitans across the world to help out the poorest in society?

A visible number of shadow citizens are growing exponentially each day in December 2015 under most Christmas trees (in front of parliaments). In most of the generation today are people who survived the previous one, with much more ease, when at least bread on the table came from a steady job and democratic decision taking at very high level in politics. Globally. After the Holocaust humanity became sanctity at least in seven different places of sacredness. Also, the world ascended as the United Nations for ever and to keep Human Rights a first right of all living beings, to be universal. If this were a Greek tragedy of the human condition in the 21st century it would be called the Hell of all echoes. (Even reaching as far as bottom low where all Roman marble ends in favor of globalization/ global capitalism) One can only pray that the cynics won't go extinct all at once much too soon. It's not the economy, stupid. If the world had any scrupulous left inside it's heart of globalism the irony would only get more frail and in the end lose itself to unbridled tyranny at a mere whiff of defeat or loss, one can only assume at this point of hope and hopelessness. The question is a simple one for every deprived human being: what else can we suggest that we should do against such vast adversity? Dog eat dog? (Of course, things could be worse)

Written politics will soon be a thing of the past, plain and easy said and done.

21112015

This saturday morning a serious threat was made in Belgium. It has put the country on such high alert in a way that politics is now loose bricks, which for a capital like Brussels or other to most Europeans is the heart of stable politics. And one of the bricks is saying as much as high alert does equal something, isn't it? From the terrorist's point of view only a coordinated mass is their target, at this stage of the high alert. In the news on the bomb alert no one knows yet where it's 'incoming' will be or come from. Technicians and experts are working on it and this is ongoing. Maybe the Germans are right, that ISIS for some reason has managed to take Europe into a 'World War III' mode, with no particular outcome or wish. No written politics can rub it's nose in it. And even if it does to stop the new generation of our time from acting like underdogs is hardly transparent. ISIS is for the young 'brave lions'. No wonder NATO will or can not deal with this enfant terrible group of masses under the name of ISIS. If the United Nations today is right, e.g. that ISIS should be destroyed structurally, it is in fact going after fresh youngsters, the citizens of 2020/2030/2040 and 2050, at least. A savvy high tech sort of masses.

ISIS, does it want a World War III called The Battle of ISIS? God forbid they can fly warplanes or Fighter Jets! And God forbid that they could do harm 20 or 3000 feet high in orbit. If they are mainly ground force soldiers or armies, defeating them is or will be technically feasible. For when it comes to high tech war machineries, e.g. submarines, the imminent threat will then become highly worrisome. It is no particular genius for anticipating what the 'enemy' has or hasn't got at the moment, from the public's point of view. But it is citizens mainly they are targeting. And they are pushing citizens hard to only see fear for living in public. A disrupt city or capital in Europe's western half is costing millions. ISIS seems to have a very good idea on European cities... They seem to know about all European establishments, that this is a bureaucratic system, and that people here live of paper power only. Why that is the inspiration for their advance from Syria, Iraq and Kobane, into Europe, well, who wants to solve this wide open mystery? But conviction can be a deceit, if we are lucky. (This time)

There are few military basics before physical war

15112015

The nature of war, as  the attack in Paris on friday night, is leaving not only a trail of the massacre, but more that here we see no form or fact in the attack itself. At least not at this stage. The dead will be mourned by masses in the world, but especially in Europe, as a last respect to bury the nation and it's victims together for one moment. Some in solidarity, some just clinging on to doing the decent thing under the circumstances. And IS wins the day. First to establish the basic or classic idea of military sentiment in Europe, one has to understand first the reality in which most Europeans see this in an old hierarchical way, and never in isolated war factions with ample real power to overwhelm a great majority, politcally and proceed with a little plan of it's own, e.g. for decades to come? Europe on these basics has infinitely strong convictions on the nature of all military institutions within the human body or organization of it's greater extensions of the military arms' length. From Prussia to Russia. ISIS does and never will fit that category of traditional arms in Europe. Of course, dead for a long time. The world is new and we are facing every day life on a different scale. In big cities and in remote places where we have never been. ISIS would want to win, but it is making basic mistakes, or... Maybe not.

ISIS has seriously made an attempt with it's attack on Paris' streets on friday, 13 November. By low standard or high profile attack? War and what is military principle are two different levels. Europe may very well decide not to go to war and still it's contempt could be felt throughout all nations far and close, that this wasn't military and should not require a military response. We must show consideration in Europe today, especially after such a massacre, plus it can happen anywhere at any given moment. This is one thing Europeans are good at. The question however is: why did IS take such a low profile / low tech attack? (Compared to a more high tech war that this would not have only been synchronized in Paris into miniature factions, but surely would have taken a higher platform to synchronize a 'real provocation' in the world. By multiplicity and complete it's goal) Why does IS only make it low profile? (As if not to want to win anything for itself...) From this point of view IS seems to undermine it's own goals and beliefs. Is it possible that the world is dealing with a self defeating extremist's army? But no one can believe that in a world like ours in the 21st century satellite age. IS should also know when it comes to Europe to win it has to be Atilla de Hun, and it should do this hierarchical. Otherwise it is just senseless murder and prolonging no such thing as the caliphate in ancient times.

Error- hierarchical

A neat win for AKP in Turkey tonight

01112015/ 21:02 PM

This was a great move and all sand trails of the last five months since June earlier this year seem to have been erased delicately from sight. Now the President and Prime Minister of Turkey are both sharing the reputation of the comeback kids, declared almost dead by the last election in June 2015 only to resurrect with a mythical rise from it's ashes like a phoenix of a scantier royal blue... And yet, what exactly are 'we' celebrating here? Maybe the real importance can only be found in a question inquiring after the age that the world is now living in. And that is good news in Turkey tonight. It dances next to the sword, first on the left, than the right, on and on... With tonight's election result the electorate has given the HDP a battle scar of 3% less votes and putting it back into the 10%. That wasn't the plan, at least by logic. Or more, by the makers of the logic. And that is a big thing in itself if it means you have to take a step back in time or plan. Underdevelopment of a people in the 21st century is a betrayal for all nations. The use of nations or good people used to be a classical thing in fighting a war, pagan, unholy or profane. But that was based then on the king's law, when there was no parliamentary democracy yet. For some odd reason tonight Turkey did actually won by a great advantage of being Turkey. It's temperament sizzled through the old veins of the country and it's people, with quite relative ease. And as a result of that it's triumph became an apparent great swim in mighty blue animated big oceans...

Elhumdullilah, yes, Prime Minister.

1 November 2015 in Turkey should have been a sobering day in politics, not this somber mood the country now seems to be trapped in a killer blast

11102015/23:02 PM 98

People have lost their lives, and counting over 100 more to be heavily injured. The twin bomb blast at the railway station in Ankara couldn't have come at a 'better time'... But why? A highly organised peace rally, with permission from the government weeks before, why did it took such a twist in the middle of the crowd on saturday, 10 October? In fact the newspapers online around the world, CNN, BBC and Daily Hurriyet, called this attack the deadliest in modern history for Turkey. The outside world simply cannot understand why this is happening in Turkey, e.g. if Iraq, Iran, Gaza or Yemen have been known for killings by bomb explosives/ explosions for decades. Distinction by bombings is a tough one to define in the sands of these killer blasts. Only, people are losing their lives can make the difference. It is therefore imperative to hear the words by Turkey EU Minister Ms Beril Dedeoglu today, that one explanation tonight should be having another look into the tragedy on saturday in Ankara. PKK and ISIS are not the only influences of terrorist's attacks throughout the Middle East region. For another reason this is particular important to Turkey, is to establish why at this time and in terms of measurment this bombing at the railstation in Ankara was meant to damage either the military or political temperature before the snap election on 1 November 2015 with great impact. Putting the Kurdish HDP not only in a painful, but also in quite an embarrassing situation...

The coming three to four weeks from now will be hard to tell anyone's story. It is the political distinction for Turkey to make it hard. When leadership skill could dominate politics and economics in the past, that is now not what is required for any success up to the coming election and it's national mood. Here we have a highly disciplined people who are now facing a much more bigger challenge when the nation get's in the mood of highly undisciplined anger on both sides, Kurds and the Turks. To some this might be the perfect bed to creat opportunity and become the love child for the future leadership of some kind? The Prime Minister, Mr Ahmet Davutoglu, known to the nation as a decent man, has done the right thing, by calling for a three day mourning of the dead killed by the twin bombing on saturday, 10 October 2015. After a few days the sun will return in Ankara and the HDP in particular will be heading for a great difficult time in Kurdish history to take part in the next election.




It is so unlike, in popular terms, Vladimir Putin to enter Russian out of space territories

06102015

The Russian President, Vladimir Putin, also, as unlikely so far in his action- characteristics since 2014, is admitting there as been an error in navigation, the Kremlin said yesterday. Half of the world is ignoring what is happening in Syria anyway, while the other half cries out loud enough on this topic, that Russia has entered Turkish space and it wasn't or looking like any error in navigation. But why fight other people's big battles? If true the Russian President isn't very good at vertical military combat. Nato Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg, in his report today, may have a point to say this has happened before... The world or public opinion not being used to scrambling military facts, for now, will continue believing what world governments and G7 countries do in any change in the game of war, whether close to home or in remote places, as is now ongoing in Syria. Sweden in 2014 experienced rather a strange encounter with Russia close to the territorial waters and since then have been calling for a change happening and it is not premonition. Again, if this is true, the Russian President is most indicisive about Russian air or space territories, e.g. when it's convenient?

Vladimir Putin is struggling with his power when the fighting is earth- bound and for the kind of horizontal warfare he would need legitimacy, which isn't where the Russian President is strongest/ the strong of the two super powers. This, and perhaps a feeble test of lies, is perhaps why one can be absolutely sure he is not the man the world is talking about, when referring to him as a violator of air space, whether in Turkey, Sweden or England. Unless there is another theory, for example that the Russians are now fighting an inside- out war model with synthetic results as a recipe for disaster... (Results like these have not been seen through simulation, one can only hope so) Anyone remember the arms race not so long ago? For a super power like that of the Russians and Russians+ the moral view must always be about the future leadership for any Russian President in the world, let's say in the aftermath in Syria?  That is a closeness of great importance and magnitude for the Russian Present, Vladimir Putin, not to make any unfortunate mistake at this point.

To be continued.

Intersection in politics is suggesting the worst outcomes yet to come

25092015/23:49PM

A few quick snapshots of the day: Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, twice today, changed his view on Syria. The US and Russia can discuss Syria, and are waiting on monday, 28 September, three days from now, on the UN speeches by International leading nations first, if now there will be a next move or level in the Syrian conflict and it's political deterioration for almost four and a half years under President Bashar Al- Assad's rule. (Four years all this seemed not to have a President at all and be completely without any rule of government) It is no surprise for Turkey to feel as uncomfortable as the go- between man and sqeezed in between the super powers who's plays and end games are now way above yesterday's 'brave new world'. Once this will be over the question is who will end up on the dump place. Did VW made a stupid mistake on the emissions tests? (Le bien le mal) Thank God for tomorrows! If there is a serious political solution in Syria's scorched earth still hanging on there, that would mean someone isn't doing it right just yet.

Speaking of 'end games' one should comply with logic. And how clear the logic to that 'end game' you will get isn't really that clear, is it? The number of refugees to take in Europe by the EU Member States is fixed at 120.000 , x 5? Another number of EU citizens also is in it's present state more than over five million. It is no wonder new Member States are feeling excluded and agitate in explosive ways to protect their lifeless personal state and bare wages, which are not entirely far from the truth. No one is taking the political solution from here serious enough and instead they turn against all 'free people' coming from Syria to live under a different... rule? And this logic is extending each day to a new one, sometimes an even bigger one, e.g. Russia must be kept as a negotiating partner to maintain some sort of normality in the world? Turkey can see through one eye straight into the dark patch, while keeping the other open to wide open spaces at Incirlik...

Hounds of European-Unionville

17062015/23:28PM

It is time to check out the meaning again on Blank Cheques. You are supposed to understand two things here: no numerical value and the signature. Check. The European Union has difficulty in deciding which and where to put their signature, or either the numerical value, e.g. this is to help the refugee crisis in Euroville of the EU. (Euroville, mind you, isn't the same as European Unionville. Something happened a few layers back in time, let's say a hundred weeks ago? That is chasing the hound and the wind but being slightly unclear on the reason why gear up in hunting sportswear, very official, on this path. England in it's own bizarre ways chose a different man in opposition to be the leader of the Labour Party. From what one reads on Twitter or Face Book, this man JC is not James Dean. You can't expect him to crash the ride that was given to him to win God knows what. Ed Milliband had it more in him and he in the end did make that crash scene replay. And the howling get's worse in Euroville forests. Refugees or migrants from Syria are being packed in different places across European countries, while the EU is trying hard to distinguish itself by holding a deliberate standoff between Member States, budget- wise, logistical wise and diplomacy. German Foreign Minister of Defense, Mrs Ursula von der Leyen, must be sitting there at home or in the Bundestag, hand in hairs, feeling what men usually feel at major crises: impotent. "This is unacceptable," the German Minister of Defense said in an TV interview with Christianne Amanpour on CNN, on 16 September 2015. But here she is omitting a very important chance or leadership role where Germany can make a true difference. Strategically one expects the Germans always to be on sharp by change of major crises. We were wrong to assume that they were better at shooting the hound than the ghost hound. (Mind you, the Germans always are having a good laugh at Sherlock Holmes! Sherlock Holmes only pretends he is aristocratic.)

It is rather funny once you can see the colour of money coming through it's color transparency on the BC/ Carte Blanche, that demographically money is buying nothing. When the huntsmen are on it's trail the fox only digs his hole deeper behind the fence... This must be very hard core problematic for any EU Foreign Minister, Defense Minister or government, when dealing with new demographics when not having been able yet to cope with it's first protegé, of their own nation? Europeans have the ability to be successful in 'protecting' displaced peoples by alarming multitudes, and they will do so again, now above ground. But that isn't the answer. Neither will the answer be e.g. to depose President Bashar Al- Assad from his 'reign'. The influx of people from the Middle East fleeing the President of Syria, and coming by thousands into Europe, means it will change demographics in these 'tight' places. (Actually, no one has ever witnessed a living toolkit/ box of aggression through innocent human beings) Meaningless to say this is why one should keep on repeating why Europe is dealing with a complex society problem at the moment, and that most big countries or Member States are in this straightjacket with the helpless endline or deadline staying dead. In chemistry at least it stays dead that way. 

In small print we all need a bit of luck sometimes.

Globalism + has gone into global confusion for the last two months

13092015/21:53 PM

Why people act as if the plight of refugees, from border Turkey with Syria, isn't anyone's problem but their own, but still are being watched by International media corporations, as if this was the best marathon walk a human had done since ancient Greece. But it isn't that kind of marathon. Rather, it is a very disturbing influx of people by thousands of them that went from Syria/ Turkey, by foot, boats, and walking across bare land, or should one say barren lands, to get there... There isn't a political there, mind you. The story of the Holocaust was mentioned in one writing by Anne Applebaum, very briefly, comparing situations with a Jewish past in memory, but this isn't the Holocaust either. In fact this is the 21st century, as I have said too many times in earlier writings without getting through. Europe, of course, is astonished. When it has to cope with mass unemployment figures or statistics of it's own, taking in thousands of refugees wasn't in the economic planning for the last quarter of the year. It is good manners to take in a desperate people, fleeing the unknown for exchange of the known, e.g. democracy? The International world isn't at fault, except for people demanding and crying for help in western democracies, an upgraded system with lot's of modern days ideas how to not mistreat your fellow human beings, regardless of status. The United Nations hasn't announced a special meeting yet on the refugees' emergency in Europe.

When one confusion follows the next, e.g. the Middle East and an ongoing chase of war in several parts in the region, one wonders whether globalism still means nations' cooperation and peace not war agreements. The United States claims it is defeating ISIS in Syria. The UK last week had drawn up a plan for sending in their military to fight ISIS. And Turkey has two million refugees fleeing from the war in Syria living inside it's borders. There is a link somewhere, seen by  so many  in the public opinion domain. And is not a  story of nomads when painting art. In fact this is a global security problem. The 21st century nations and International institutions for Human Rights have so far not made it's potential clear on both sides, governments as well as the plight of human walking catastrophes being right on their shores and under their bruised noses. (Europe and the EU in specifics have other confusions of their own to deal with at the same time) In stead people are being kicked and thrown out in an entertaining format called Youtube.com. For balance and control of the situation we have seen no other scoring points above zero tolerance and compassion here from any International Institution for Human Rights, e.g. from the United Nations. It is not just about the money within the EU, isn't it? Sweden has in an unbiased manner been far more better by enforcing something more humane helping the refugee crisis that took Europe by storm. (Mass strom) The 21st century should have given globalism more sterile peacefulness and not global confusion across the globe.

The 'dead end street politics' for Turkey is just starting to show. The first signs?

23082015

Next week Is meaningless, with all due respect Mr Prime Minister, on, what is known among the Turkish electorate as 'snap election', this seems very much like the PM's private limousine driving in reverse that no one really understands. A man standing by the casket of his brother spoke enormous truth here, that the change of hearts in government has killed his brother today. Fallen soldiers always refer to government more personally from beyond the grave when the family in bereavement clearly disagrees with his/ her dead relative. Only this time in Turkey the political establishment seems on suspicion in the dead end street in which no one can hold anyone responsible for death or life as normality is a way of continuation for all GMT- living. (Or UTC) Up north in Lebanon tonight the army was in clash with rioters and giving yet no clear reason communication of what caused this sudden roar in the city. In the rear the war between ISIS and PYD/ PKK are not moving ground for one inch away from the war that was started earlier in the year. The Kurds are in this head and tail (map- wise) if to win the war. Has anyone any idea what the Middle East is looking like in the present time? Some of us remember it's 'face' from history books or ancient years ago of visits. The dead end street might be a reality of super highways built over the decades into a different region that no one will recognize from nostalgic years ago. Turkey's snap election buzzes off like a factory alarm in the middle of all this and no one lives above suspicion of anything else...

Times are changing and there is no time for living in conceitedness. It is particularly true when subjected to these changing times. (The military terminology: asymmetrical) One wonders what went wrong, and if Turkey has misread it's own making after Ataturk. In many times the country has always blocked adverstity out from it's territories, or very playfully introduced the velvet glove of an egalitarian society and made this the first try of what later became the decadent idea in European societies, under names after their own perception and nature. In a globalized world that won't be enough in 2015, and with special reference to the September 2015 snap election call from the Prime Minister, Mr Ahmet Davutoglu. This horizon won't be sliding off in ascending order if the war will be getting closer to home centre ground in Turkey. Here there is too much blood in the dream and it is hurting society suspiciously very much like in decades before when there wasn't a peace process between Turks and Kurds agreement. (Belgin Akaltan's article in the DH yesterday said very similar words) HDP Selahattin Dermitas today called for an ending to the violence by no buts and ifs. Timing is not on his side, where there would have been plenty of time to hide the blood under the dust of his shoes and surrenders (to the electorate of 13%). Cohesion might play a big role in the Middle East soon. But one wonders whether Turkey can comply and be a virgin of it's kind, and overcome constrain.

A dysfunctional EU/ Europe longest burden.

22072015/18:58 PM

East, West and now South of Europe this year again have become visible how and where political arches have or were built in the good name of post WWII peace. Europe's integrity over the costs for this new Europe,   then, as someone said today to me, have always had the long strategy vision over short term gain and projects (his idea over big projects like shale gas). This way every European remembers Europe best. Europe's other (shortest) memory happened only two weeks ago. Greece decided on having a referendum and let the people decide in finer detail on the future of ordinary Greeks whether or not they want the third bailout or the second bailout- plus. In only 48 hours ago, on monday this week in the evening when the Banks reopened, some global economists predicted that stability had returned from the abyss. Greece, in other words, is ready to sail the big seas like IMF, ECB and Euro- group again. Be it that Greece is holding 2% of the whole EU economic union fleet, a small raft/ boat floating... It is this stability the very sort among stabilities that is very short term vision/or a project. And, one more thing, a yoke was born with a capital D. Democracy?

The descriptive Democracy is by 2015 not only a written agreement between nations and finding to heal the burden of war and time in all places and traces of WWI and WWII, but  also has become one single signature or  the single currency for EU nations. This millennium goal was more than a descriptive form of Euro- Union. In fact it was prescription other than what the EU in it's infancy had been coy. By law this means that to stay in the European Union Membership a Member State enormous effort would have to be on the economy and how to get here without fuss or low friction. So, why Greece, Spain and Portugal? It is not meant to ridicule but isn't this the same problem Walter Disney was looking for when he asked the same question why Donald Duck should have three nephews? (No one in our time and living memory have any recollection on Donald Duck having sired his own offspring) The EU is a monument and showing human nature in a brilliant light of greatness from nations and people. By 2010 the capital D was very clear this wasn't going to be Democracy but rather more dysfunctional. In 2014 Russia and President Vladimir Putin was it's first challenge whether the EU could be diminished to a lesser super power that had been equal to the US for decades. And now Greece there is still awkwardness among top decisionmakers that this time law and order is another Damocles to cut both ways through peace. The 21st century isn't symbolic anymore for predicting future promises. East, south or west.

'Greekment' a peace deal still fragile as a result of five months crisis

14072015

It has been an emotional journey for Greece and the Greek Prime Minister, Mr Alexis Tsipras, in this block of time from February to mid July 2015. In the end peace has won the day, let's say had it gone the other way on sunday before cancelling the 28 Ministers of the EU Member States. There is blame on Germany's role in the crisis over the Greek debt and it's mentality in global economics. Today no one actually knows what the Germans understood from the Greek debt crisis, starting with a $1.7 Billion tag and got worse from there. Figures have changed and are now more accurate in the third package for debt relief. Who knows what is coming next? A week ago the Greek Prime Minister had his hands full with gold dust, plenty of possible scenarios for a possible Grexit, and all Member States with similar longings to say 'OXI' to the European Union further establishment, somehow didn't quite match the outcome of this last sunday. Time is of the essence and it still is a miracle how the Greek Prime Minister has managed to avert tragedy from total collapse. What was important in this crisis one can only guess and the public for now is safe. And when you say safe one has to measure out the urgency in France's President, Francois Hollande, that he was adamant to keep Greece in the Euro and EU. And when safe at level III it is only interesting to read around in global newspapers that Germany wanted to humiliate Greece rather than helping it. The public has no business arguing this one.

In today's news some are convinced there is something of a deadlock among the EU Ministers/ leaders how to go about the next momentum if and when it comes back in this magnitude of the Greek crisis. These Ministers are actually wanting something from the EU? Brussels is perhaps too close to home? Okay, why not move the EU HQ to Berlin as a great reminder of the change of Europe after WWII? We have little understanding how great a contempt EU Ministers have for war or world wars. Exactly, and this is also why it is  a blinding deadlock when pushing Greece toward it's total collapse, in public opinion. The International creditors will be moving on and like time they don't stand or sit still. What do they do for literally 'lost time'? One can only guess once that here the bill is one of punishment and reward if done correctly. (Some take punishments too personal) Like the EU so will the International creditors keep their focus on how to peacefully avert any such Greek crisis from the platform of the EU, and exhaust all Member States' abilities to maintain the order of the day in the true spirit of social cohesion and not fracture. Once they get there human nature has overcome another episode of primitive thinking, the one side when going to war is the only last resort in great conflict. Will the public know what peace and the European Union mean in the future?

A small country with the using of an even smaller word 'oxi' put the whole EU system in the defensive with tonight's result, a win 4 No

05072015/22:51 PM

SO: it wasn't silly after all, or to put it as elequent as the Germans did last week, it wasn't as stupid when the Prime Minister last sunday, a week ago today, called for the referendum in a strike of 'madness'. Tonight reality got bigger, and let's not forget that this time it was it's first since the EU had introduced the 'new Europe' to 500 million people or citizens. Greece took a leap into blind faith and fate with this referendum to say 'No' and no more austerity coming from Brussels. Now it looks  Greece has given the EU and the Grexit- idea new scope.

68% To 36 % is extraordinary for a stupid call... How did he do it, is perhaps what other exit countries might be asking tonight. At first it was laughter, but tonight another belief was born from the Greek root of no, oxi, into western Europe. And they have done so without any military threat. Bravo! France and Germany tonight have taken up the negotiating gloves and called for an emergency meeting/ summit on tuesday, 7 July. This fallen green leaf wasn't by any chance from a living tree? But still this isn't really where one would like to go with the 'No' win from this referendum. The body of this 'No' will switch from money to politics very quickly, because it has given the EU asset which it didn't had before. The switch will be the real negotiator one can believe that will happen. All is down to human logic again.

Greece should put it simply and re- establish it's relation with not only the globalists' Bankers, but also with hard core EU

3072015/22:53PM

If unintelligence becomes inevitable for the next 72 hours in Greece and putting the people and government to the test, and this is the hardest so far, there is very little point tonight to formulate any sort of future with Greece right now. What if and a lot more times asked again and again today, in different parts of the world, Greece would vote 'No' or 'Yes' on sunday, etcetera? One thing can be said or learned from here is that what if we asked the big question and than the bigger one? Can they afford to lose Greece, let's say from an International point of view? This one is easy to answer: yes. Another question to follow this easy one is to ask the bigger question. The mind can play many more tricks on the public's view of the whole idea about Greece becoming bankrupt if they say 'Yes' or 'No' in the referendum on 5 July this sunday. Hard core reality is not our making. Did the Greek Prime Minister, Mr Alexis Tsipras, thought this thing through, as some believed this was not done overnight but thought through over five years after the global financial crisis in 2008-2010? The public doesn't mind, we believe anything... Yet, why kid ourselves? (This is Tier I question) What is it that we are missing here? Democracy perhaps?

Perhaps the Dutch are right to suggest- not literally-(article NRC 'Dear Greeks, our thoughts are with you, by René Moerman) this only Greek affair is a first time in modern Euro(pean as in new people of Europe) history and that it will need support from other Europeans when or if Greece has blown the last candle on this 'black cake' and turn dark completely. The public will be exited or hysterical, and then again maybe keeping calm and wait on the next news from the Prime Minister before they can move on, as normal as they remember how it was the day before 5 July 2015? It is just a small question to ask by little people. At the end of the day it doesn't get any bigger than that too for the little people. The bigger question one assumes will follow: why did the Prime Minister of Greece take up shields and fight with giants as tall as cyclops, the ancient stories no one ever mentions these days in Greece or global village outside of Greece? (Except for academics) And, will the Greek people still believe that the Prime Minister, Mr Tsipras, is their mr Right in politics? Remarkable as only human can get this answer too is a big roasted yes at least for one day.

Intelligent history is being made often in places where no snake will leave it's old skin go to waste. There isn't much money in this, but where for example the Russian President, Mr Vladimir Putin, couldn't come, for some awkward reason 'little Greece' has managed to stand right there at the heart and centre of the European Union without any military might, like that of the Russian President. And as they say in Dutch, 'That, speaks volumes'. And not because Greece could touch the global financial system, or even that of the European Union. The Greek Prime Minister for some obscure reason has put his finger on the European Union's heartbeat to make it either stop or say halt. (For a second?)

The beloved father of the Turkish nation and politics, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, for 13 years long is taking a step down for the 'New Turkey' today

08062015

Slightly visible a moving Mr Erdogan called today for responsible and realistic evaluation of the 7 June 2015 election outcomes, and to keep a healthy view above all as a nation. (In so many words literally) His exit as the only Parti was torn away by 12/13 short of seats to be and stay the largest majority in Turkey and in government. It must be a humbling experience for the President, the same man who made history in recent times as the man who overthrew the military almost single handedly (with help from former friend Mr Gulen) to re- establish Turkey to benefit all and to live more free and promote the individual voice in the country. That is also the message of the HDP, the individual voice of 13% has made today's stunning victory the new voice to stay here with much conviction and belief that this is the future, also a very realistic one too! No crocodile tears from Shimon Peres in Israel after what happened in Turkey, praising democracy once again from a higher and global platform, I presume. (Mr Shimon Peres on global paltforms of the Middle East Peace Convoy, as is Mr Tony Blair of the UK, former Labour Prime Minister in Britain, and Davos Economic Forum) It is of the utmost importance to give Mr Erdogan some credit for his 'good deeds' in difficult times and also when it was the trendy thing to do joining global public opinion... Mr Erdogan chose to show his 'good side' and made peace with the Kurds, once Britain insisted on doing so.

Mr Erdogan then became the hero of his nation and Turkey everywhere in the world became a welcome member of the human race, next to all great nations, the US, European countries, the EU, and going further down in upward memory. The country one decade later is looking onward in today  as a confused peoples how this has happened and what democracy actually means with a future in which the Kurdish people's parti is now a big share in Turkish heritage or maybe even political heritage. In other times this would have been a great share in civilization of any country, to make edequate provisions for another nation as a political entity (not enemy) and share everyday normality in politics as the primus inter pares next to the old peers in Turkish old political establishment. One has to respect that of the HDP, and welcome it's representative equally with a great amount of self respectability. The marvel in today's midday dust/ high noon: could this moment have been the same in the Middle East happening somewhere else close or far in parliament, government or regime taking place? One thing is not going away: had Mr Erdogan resigned in December 2013 after some of his cabinet ministers were found guilty of high profile corruption, today would have given less 'pazazz' of any election outcome.

Conservatives over all majority win minus one seat on friday morning, 8 May 2015

08052015

Who is keeping focus? In Scotland the SNP and it's leader, ms Nicola Sturgeon, interesting win of 59/58 seats and wiping out of Labour from the political map in the country, is a stunning result from last night's votes in the general election 2015. Focusing on individual players/ political actors, Mr Nick Clegg, Vince Cable, Danny Alexander and now even Mr Ed Miliband, will be out of political life in the next government, a Tory government, leaving Mr Cameron a free hand to run the country with a one Party Head of State in an unusual manner as never before. The public could be in a nostalgic mood on friday morning today, as in previous decades was the case for such a cast of government, either Conservatives or Labour. Except that today is not the past in previous decades. If correctly Mr Cameron is on his own facing Scotland in a new coat after last year's referendum for Scottish independence. You can be cynical and even go as far as saying that Scotland de facto now has it's independence through the ballot box, and without firing one bullet. Mr Cameron's victory has just given a change of course to the Scottish battle for independence, and it is quite clear as that. A clever precalculation no one could have predicted or seen, as the choice two days ago was to take the long term approach and lot's of mud fights in stead. The nostalgia was great, a momentum high and hooray for Mr Cameron.

Master and servant: what it means if the Tory victory has a story today, this can only say that the master is a civilized man and doing it extremely well to hide behind the facade of an incredible unpredicted victory for the Conservatives. (One can only praise wide awake men like Fraser Nelson of Spectator to now and already making this point how Scotland has indeed roared like a lion (Mr Salmond's words this morning) in a very foggy battlefield with only Mr Cameron and the Conservatives to face, one on one.) Anger, so they say, can be civilized... Or in plain English, there are more ways to skin the cat. Scottish independence had lost the 'Yes' vote referendum 18 September 2014, but now came back ten times stronger in the General Election 2015, almost as if it was a promise made before God Almighty. This is politics, but we are not living in the past anymore. Mr Cameron had a difficult time for the last five years in a coalition with the Liberal Democrats in government, changed from the old system into the unknown systems and in close relationship with the present global systems, this isn't going to end because of an over majority win by one Party, as good a friend it might be, that won't do it. (By assumption) Mr Cameron can't be having a plan ready for the short or long term, already tested and now a green paper, as for example the SNP have done for the last five years. First a tortoise and now a lion, the SNP came through now and this can't be reversed. (Or I am terribly wrong)

Mr Miliband will have to do a lot of procurement

04052015

On friday morning starting early as can be in the present time a Labour government with Ed Miliband as Prime Minister will have to announce his vision to the British voter and all of England in the very first seconds 'good morning' speech. Mr Miliband will have to face the hard choice he has made to be the next British Prime Minister, a job he said for years in opposition he was capable of, and that success for the people of Britain is exactly that where he will be standing on friday morning. One of the people, a diversed society and a very 21st century man, now Britain's 45th PM in 2015. Friends and foes, they will all agree that this has a nice ring to it, it is what the public in our time and age likes to have or see. With Mr Miliband in government the whole idea on progress and future make sense of it all, after years of humiliation and cold prejudice. Mr Miliband, welcome to the British landscape, in politics and it's economics. He and England will make history together. Part of his bio- pic as Prime Minister could be both loved and hated, is a good guess as any. In his vision it will be imperative to bring the gap between England and the diverse societies scattered in Britain down to a much narrower gap. But then again how far will fortune favor this brave man?

The Tories of course will take their place again in opposition and sit the long four term Prime Ministership out in another mindset than for example what happens after friday in government. The people are left at guessing on the mindset of the Tories, and will be doing so for a long term to come. It will also be a goodbye to Mr Cameron and Mr Nick Clegg. The red carpet, they predict, will be for the SNP's velvet feet to tread... Many journalists' predictions are that the SNP and it's present leader, Ms Nicola Sturgeon, will be doing a lot of that, treading softly and lightly on the new government at Westminster to suit their own ambitions. Scotland, the old highlander, is back in government and who knows raises a toast already in the primary hours to polling day. One cannot stop arguing what might be or come from this 'unholy' matrimony with Labour leader Ed Miliband on the one side and SNP leader Ms Nicola Sturgeon on the other side. Was this part of Mr Miliband's vision? The lady is keen on the new husband, so they say, and does not think the Scottish people will forgive him if he elopes with another... The father has the last vote on this one, and he is a stern man in politics, both in Scotland and in England. Beware of the wrath of the father, is a friendly warning or equally stern one to utter? For this new age Mr Ed Miliband is the next global leader in Britain and in government. His choices and two very hard ones can be expected.

British political DNA with Ed Miliband in it and David Cameron on the rim, who could be the parents?

28042015

Let's not be pedant about this, the general election on 7 May next week could be the last serious round to both leaders before becoming something of a memory in their time. The energy put into this election will be having it's own momentum if either of the two main political leaders has made it. But, let's put it this way, it won't be the end of the world and with the last man standing epilogue for Britain. In fact, that might be just the challenge, that is natural and the force of life the country needs to go on, as is the case for our living planet everywhere you're looking. Also, would it not have been a little curious if the end of David Cameron was that the end of the world are hand in hand with the incumbent Prime Minister? Public opinion is moment and yesterday, both. Except for when there is actual 'passion' left in British politics to continue in the force of life and do what is natural for politics and politicians, to be or not to be, just to make things a little more interesting for e.g. a Labour win and comeback in British government. Who do they love more in British politics? Not politicians, do you reckon? Exactly. And precisely that is why Mr Miliband could be the next British Prime Minister. Many good marriages come from inconvenience more than what is considered convenience. The English way.

But what is this mystery with Mr Miliband creeping upon certain voters out there who would want to vote for him on 7 May? Perhaps it's a simple question to answer: who do you love more, Big Banks or the money? And then you can/ could get the raw deal to cut it on the bigger half of the election results, because no one should exclude anyone or any other political party in this election. There are no strings attached and no suggestions what Mr Miliband wants with Britain in a world where ideal can meet the buck. (While Mr Cameron is playing sharades with the public and his loyal party voters) Ah, yes, and what about the SNP hissing through this campaign, not seductive but haughty enough to make Tories and Labour understand that Mrs Sturgeon means business with Westminster this time? But once again, the world will not end here. That's a blind illumination on a mass scale. The whole idea of victory, for Labour and the SNP, is pointing in that direction where there is life after David Cameron in government. The people should vote with their hearts, and vote for Ed Miliband. After that no one can disrespect Mr Miliband and shouldn't do so. In politics not women but men are subdued to men, if the nation is too prominent to be jealous of a clumsy but devoted man to British politics. (Similar to women's nature when too prominent to be jealous of another woman, when egalitarian)

According to many Labour voters in self exile the last L- government wasn't right for Britain... This is the trick: Labour is always right for the country, but British politics isn't necessarily right for everyone. Labour, Liberal Democrats or, the Greens? And pelize, Mr Cameron cannot bring back industrial Britain wealthiest industrialists without a good business deal for the people. Is there such a thing left in Britain? And where exactly might that be? Unlike that nice Mr Miliband, who knows his pigeon holes, this line of promises is long term Labour policies and getting the voters to believe the money story. Which by definition is the winner's story in any election. A wonderful thing our future world, isn't it? Mr Cameron so many times has been there too. Thanks to 'your vote', and 'it is your vote that counts in this election'. (Actually really low profile PR) There is a rumor about Mr Miliband that goes round the world, that he is not commanding enough to be Prime Minister. In a personal opinion I would go even further and say that Mr Miliband is a reincarnation of an innocent prince who believes in the madness of the world and that he can make this right, naive as it may look to his step sisters and step brothers, giving him at every occasion the green monster's eye or evil eye. His potential is to be Prime Minister of Britain in 2015, a very real chance.

Why Britain thinks there is still time to come back from this century is quite remarkable a talent to have, aka as being British.

17042015

Last night's TV debate (BBC One) and hosted by veteran Question Time, David Dimbleby, if anyone could see a future (in a few measly weeks time) with Ed Miliband as Britain's Prime Minister, the rest of Britain must be dead or lying dead somewhere in the country. It didn't make it easier to understand with the SNP, Nicola Sturgeon, to blate about how to loudly and clearly support Labour becoming the majority party in this election in May 2015, (not May 2016!), if only Mr Miliband would accept. Powerplay can be at times a very attractive game to play in politics, but this time it was deprived of the usual 'looking good' aspect in it. If Ukip leader Mr Nigel Farage wasn't so keen on immigrants not serving democracy well in Britain, perhaps he was more Prime Ministerial material for once last night in the debate. Be it a Prime Minister for Britain. It is not very clear what Plaid Cymru has done here during the televised debate last night for Britain/ the British public, but one get's the impression that their representative has made quite an impression scale- wise for Wales, being a tiny little hangar in British war politics, at war with itself. As an outsider to Britain, what issues have these politicians of the future in the UK truly offered the viewers? Except for Ms Sturgeon's policies on housing, to make this something available but also to protect these policies, there wasn't anything new in the whole evening of this debate.

(Of course Ms Sturgeon is right on the policies to change for housing, it is EU material too!) If Mr Miliband becomes the next Prime Minister in Britain in this election next month at a 51% chance, it might be that the same chance will swallow something of his intentions quite quickly afterwards. It is not that Britain is bigger than America, as in days when it stood as an equal super power next to the US in former decades, or that it needs to be like the US to become bigger, but there is also the fact that Britain has a very poor idea of what could make it great again, if only they stood up and try making up their minds which way was leading to that greatness. In many ways a small country like Holland isn't anymore behind compared to Britian, where it is standing on it's own within the EU, one might think, and not figure out for themselves (as previous was thought) that the 'outside world' does matter to the Dutch, even if that 'outside world' means business with neihboring countries like Germany. It is in fact the outside world where stability will be needed to make the economy in every country recover from the shock to all systems in 2008, is probably what one can say about the outside world. The economy wasn't addressed, Danny Alexander Lib Dem, said last night. How has the British public been hypnotized by politics for the last decade? Only five questions were asked, addressing popular themes and not the economy. Not in great specifics. Mr Miliband has a school boy's dream to become Prime Minister in Britain a pronto. And that is as close as similar to David Cameron he will be. It is the elderly Statesmen any debate on Television is what the people miss most, but then again, who cares! It is also what the future Prime Minister should know.

The Kurds, Turkey and Israel ceramics

07042015

If anyone could promise Statemanship in the Middle East the miracle here then would be to split a perfect sirocco in different parts and designate areas closest to it's herald democracy. You can't cut the sirocco in half, let alone to do this in parts, for each Middle Eastern country after the millennium on short track record of reform policies and with a serious inclination toward democracy... In Saudi Arabia already the idea of demoracy has been outruled in favor of the Sharia Law, a law tested not only by time but with a profoundis deeply rooted in the centuries long gone since OPEC thousands of years later. It is mostly Arabic spirit to trade dates for gold, and gold for dates! This is democracy stretched out over many seas and many distances, east, west, north and south to the center from where all Arabic people celebrate not democracy or Statemanship, but a diety in the heavens and in paradise, and who is the prophet Mohammed's own universe. This reward from 'Allahu Akbar' to the prophet is what the Arabic nations see as the path to heaven and paradise for every Muslim on earth. The west and it's commercial democracy or democratic Statemanship are shadows on the wall, dancing and moving, like demons do to excorcise goodness on earth, and prefer to keep living in a world of pretence.

In any real Statemanship in the western democracies 'pretence' is good for the political soul. It's ember musn't die, you see. Like any mask ball it is not the mask that bears the soul of power, but who is wearing the mask. It could be the king, or queen, a foolish prince, or someone more unstable than the rest in the room? And God in heaven alone can bear the divine sword. Not a mortal soul, not any. Instead came down the princely talents of Statemanship. Sin of course is where all things extinct must come to plead, bid farewell, or die... One should study the west and from where democracy actually is a derivative to be either held, sold or beg for mercy. Statesmen put their heart of flesh literally unto a cold stone but still live happily or gracefully, so they say and make us believe them. Chastity belongs to the regions of greatness in politics, if done correctly and well. Knock on wood and see if truth will follow you or 'them'. This anecdote isn't in Arabic, Hebrew or Turkish. But, you see, truth has deep wells running through all veins of the planet. And it has reached into every corner of society worldwide in whatever place you might think humanity is present. Globalization is the great connector, you might say? Will you say so when true? For six months the Kurdish people have felt this fibrillation coming to them and they except this is the miracle they have been waiting for to join all nations under the Statemanship of western countries, e.g. the United Nations. Like Israel and Turkey, the Kurds are part of the ceramic nations in the Middle East. History must change in this part of the world, or at least seriously pretend.

It will be interesting to see how Israel and the Kurds will develop relationships beyond and within the diplomatic world, and which political strategies both countries will try to attract Turkey or repulse the whole idea maybe?

A higher cadre of people need to speak out why Mr Netanyahu has their votes to form the next Israeli government again...

19032015/ 22:05 PM

Solitude make way of another (fourth) term for Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, as now it seems that the leader of Israel has changed his mind in a blunt manner to support the idea of a two- State solution for Israel and the Palestinian Authority. This is the era of Benyamin Netanyahu starting with a clear struggle on honesty before the victory of the election and in it's aftermath. His battle scar is his promise to the people of Israel and who voted for him now lacking all behind the electorate truth, and which has gone viral for the last hours or so across the western globe. That's one side of Israel that we know well enough to either write or ponder on for the night. But more important tonight is the latest idea of Mr Netanyahu to take Israel out of the ordinary politics, into a more cosmetic continuity of Israeli future politics under his rule of governing. Where is the other leg of his political body when clearly that he is alone and doesn't have a brother named Esau holding him back? (Actually it should be Jacob doing the holding back) Or maybe, is it customary for all military leaders to make the same mistake when living the power in a real way or experience, away from the ordinary people back home? People no one has really ever heard of, but they are Jewish? To the world it is a normal process to have a look at politics in every corner of the world and how this fares when men/ women take power. At times we can get disappointed with these leaders when we have to idolize them firstly and secondly dismiss them as wrongdoers or simply turn evil. Maybe Adolf Hitler had that same problem when Nazi Germany spun out of control in his days of frenzy?

Technically Mr Netanyahu asserted himself quickly after so blatantly he had spoken out against the two- States peaceful solution, 48 hours ago, one should think. Not many do so or have done so in the past, when all eyes are set on the freshly elected man to lead the country again. We have no idea why the victor of this election in 2015 wants to bring back peace from behind the skirt of the people who voted him in to sit out another term in Office, and why substance of that peace isn't gone from the table since 2009, he said himself tonight on CNBC, as was quoted in an article written in the evening. A handyman needs a good tool to finish his job polished and well... Odd to think of Israel as Mr Netanyahu's Israel, that too. Or he is a sinister man who cannot leave the glamour style Premiership after decades of being in politics and close to the eternal flame of greatness. Should he distance himself at one point in the near future from politics, a shallow wind get's out of it's horn and sweeps the land clean with no one able to catch on and keep it inside, e.g. within the borders of 1967? Who can the people around in the world ask? The electorate? That is if they can tell the difference with Kim Yung Un and Mr Netanyahu. From their point of view China is as big as the Israeli government. And, what's the difference?

For now Mr Netanyahu has all the attention he needs in the world, at the White House. It is prestigious, at the center of the world and thanks to God Almighty for being Jewish. People living in remote places in Israel and under minimum wages, also happen to be Jewish when not Palestinians or Arab minorities, but who are not known Jewish people at the White House. And never will be. They have Mr Netanyahu to be their representative in these lofty places and palaces. But they have DVD's and watching movies like Mr and Mrs Smith... Hollywood actors. What has the world to fear of the Big Banking Industries from the Jewish nation? The Jewish people in Beersheva don't go to Mars when elderly. They stay affixa humo to their 'retard' lives in nothingness and die in oblivion, just like all of mankind do here or there in any place in the world when on welfare . We do not understand the quiet or silent tyranny of every day politics in governments like that of Mr Netanyahu. His cadre of high profile journalists are like him Jewish people who are proud to be Jewish and serve the State of Israel. And the world is becoming more and more anti Semitic, they claim in every word they utter through their anima or writings. And everyone is doing their job to secure the existence of the Jewish people in their homeland. That is prep and pep- talk regime. If the Benyamin Netanyahu era is on the horizon in Israel, in the mornings the eastern sun is the true Israel, reminding all living beings where they are and in the evenings under the galaxy of millions of stars where they will never be or go, except when dead. And also perhaps they are dreaming a dying dream that Israel could or is bigger than one man at the helm in government? Sayonara.

If European history taught us one thing it is that here no one does friendship. Signatures are the best proof of a lasting 'proposal'.

14032015

Vladimir Putin in Europe is a signature of great significance, is something non Europeans will find it hard to understand or go from here to infinity and find no answers about it's meaning. In Europe no one has to state to it's citizens that Europe is white dominated, as this was and is socially unacceptable and considered anti social if making an obvious thing as race play part as the country's elite. After WWII many had learned their lessons and for decades have been vigilant on these issues of what is black, or white, what is one European e.g. in Prague from the one in Sweden, and so forth. If this ladder took Nazi Germany up to the sky in the forties, after the war in 1945 Europe had razed it's sideway for a lasting peace between it's nations and never again looked behind to this day. What is now happening in Europe and specifically in the east with Russia is getting to obscurity for the last ten hours or so. The Russian elite military or political will be up on their feet, if let's say the rumor on Mr Putin proves to be true, that the Russian President has completely disappeared from the political scene in a sudden. Accountability must soon follow, and that means a painful decision for the Russian elite, to announce Mr Putin's demise and who will be replaced by an interim. Transparency is not only an imperative but advanced and has a technocratic side to it. Reality plays hard ball in these matters all over the world when given the slightest of chances...

What can the next signature be on saying what  unknown consequences of this moment can be or are? You have to be a Russian expert on making any mental analysis what you think e.g. how the Russian response will be if the President was 'murdered' by way of 'sudden death'. First not only bereavement is part of this process but then we also are looking into a personalized Russia made by the 'late' President, so to speak. In his worldview the global audience has never been this close to Russia and with Mr Putin as the central point in the zenith. Surely nothing can be so dramatically have been done as to destroy the Russian President by way of 'undoing' his existence before our very eyes? And why? In politics it is still custom to parlez with leaders difficult or not and come to some sort of agreement or fabricating one, simply because we are in the west and believe in parliamentary solutions between nations. Rationality is one sided when leading the country as it's leader. In opposition 'crazy' things do happen... (Murdering the President elect is one such crazy thing to do) Europe does not unfold itself as a luxury good when in the mood of mentality at war. But what it does turn into is something no one likes to know or remember (shooting of Franz Ferdinand by Serbian colonel- rebel). Does the global audience have any understanding what Europe truly means when at war with a 'foreign invasion' to alienate Europeans?

One can only speculate on the Russian response from afar for the moment. There is also military routine excercises even in State emergency 'events' such as the murder of the President. But in the second stage one expects the Russians to be more assertive or aggressive, and go for deploy. In the meantime in public the interim will address the world and Russia to maintain some sort of national and International calm. After these public appearances the world can go back to normality and talk about Toyata or other market sales/ buy deals. Dimitri Peskov, Mr Putin's spokesman, he will understand the routine of business as usual from the globalist's point of view, as he is doing for Russia very much the same thing today. It is only logic to the rest of the world to assume that finding another esoteric or ascetic- face/like President like Mr Putin is going to be the toughest thing to do right now. The Russian President understood what sort of treasuries you get from mixing tack and whackiness in this world, and also to be merciless when perfect in the military or in political risks. Perhaps President Putin was secretly the most egalitarian President in Russian history, if not the first ever. In politics and the military at home to stay conservative all the same was never a problem to the President either. (I would be quite moved by his absence from politics and 'our global audience') Mr Peskov is right, this isn't funny anymore.

Take a deep breath, Ukraine's fighting has stopped for a day yesterday, sunday 08 March 2015

09032015

In the coming period there are some 'memorable' moments in the global system to remember, not as the usual cotton but as cotton still soaked in a bloody time after Russia's annexation of Crimea. After the day people remembered the disappearance of MH370 yesterday, this was the first in a 'row' to the next of more unpleasant moments when for example in Holland people will have to stand together remembering the MH17 victims when their plane was shut down from the skies last year in July 2014. One year later the world has moved on also for Ukraine, Russia and the EU Member States. Of the United States for decades long we know this moving on is constant and doing so from the top of the world view at various levels in government and senate politics. No ordinary lives were stopped from moving on, except in places where teens were shot dead and causing government officials embarrassment over the rule of law in white supremacy or democracy... The lessons in the 21st century are hard to learn from, almost as hard as any previous century, so many think and probably say quietly. And quietly she goes, east, west, north and south in the world, the course line in global politics. Others are convinced this is the sign of the times and normality considering the enormous size in which all global citizens have grown accustomed to for the last two decades to get into the spiral of this test of time, in every stone or fibre of it's making. And it's making is the future tissue for all nations so far, unless there is another?

The quietness between Russia and Ukraine, on the one side, and the US and EU on the other side, is freezing over almost literally. Over in these regions of high time politics and military political chit chats between the two sides there is simply no simple message getting in or out, over e.g. where the next move will come from and in what way of mode. This is not important to the constant in which we are 'accustomed' to live in as global citizens. Some article yesterday mentioned Serbia and the ambition of a greater Serbia that went wrong for almost a decade long war on the Bosnian people, and here we see how the leading command of nations wants to do politics now again in Ukraine, or to be more precise, between Russia and Ukraine. This is not EU- style war with Russia by far! In a commanding position it is imperative to get things right first and last, and not as a citizen who can get things wrong by turning every page in the newspaper. Military politics is not the same thing like a newspaper, one can safely assume. (Phew!) Neither is it true that the wars in Ukraine, here or there, are bubblegum wars. Chewing and spitting the war out after a while... But Europe has an old foe when dealing with hypocrisy and than cast a vote. After the chocolate bars in WWII no one did look back on the military in Europe ever again, studying why we call kings and their kingdom a monarchy. We are not dealing with an ordinary idea in Europe if it get's itself entangled in the mood of war over right from wrong, nor is it easy to wash off from their hands the moment blood is sticking harder than political writings on papers, agreements and so forth, if this is the blood of high profile people or will be... Somehow that is the fundamental right to a human being since the cry of Abel to God Almighty when earth screemed murder over the death in this brotherly fight. The future will not be different and no human life will ever get to the point of bloodless murders thus scientifically declared non= existent. What happened in Ukraine and to MH17 has deep forensics still in the memory of the deceased their families. And it matches all sophisticated military in the world.

Thanks the world is moving on and doing so quietly.

Error: screamed and not screemed

Peace in Anatolia

02032015

In the world of serums (sera) the serpent is the most wellknown for his deadly poison if the victim has been bitten once fatally... From the second bite a miracle from mankind's Great God, that is the serum to help heal the same victim seconds away from the first bite, that is theory and proof. Peace in Anatolia after timelapses from 12 October 2014 to 01 March 2015 is showing similar traces of the bite prior to the first one last year. Or something like that by far. Praise for Mr Ocalan his self reflection as well as praise for Turkey's President Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan for Turkey's compliment over the weekend on the call for peace between the two nations, just at a moment when nations are plunging to chaos elsewhere nearby Anatolia's hilltops. It is rahter clear where the two parties are heading if peace as a result from peace would come to this place where both nations have tried other methods without much success as hope now is offering, according to many 'hail peace' journalists and writers, historians or other. The leader of PKK has one understanding of the future for his people on the one side, while holding accountability and transparency of peace and democracy over the head of Turkey, shall we say not like the sword of Damocles but rather the Jedi- sword? And there is enlightment too!

Is this another political risk for the Davutoglu administration in Turkey? Within Turkey's political hierarchy the peace invitation to both nations could be a challenge nation- wide. Or even nation- wise. This is Turkey at best to remind also it's own how bureaucracy must be at the heart of politics and stay there. The State has a long history of fundamentals and foundations perhaps at this stage not ready yet for rebuilding? With the laying down of arms on the Kurdish fighters' side with compliments from Turkey that can only mean a slow pace in the process for reconciliation time and also Statemanship drive on both sides, if leaders have to decide on a step by step peace process. This is anything but poetry or emotional satisfaction to both nations. Turkey's political mechanism is still the oldest system in the country and it won't be an easy inspiration to quickly create something else instead. To teach the nation that Turks and Kurds have more than the same vowel in the middle from now on is hard ball and pehaps is even as hard as stone in the nation's memory. The other side of the coin in Turkey's present time political system this country is also facing the plunge next to it's allies in the International arena of global politics, with no ending here on e.g. the war in Ukraine, war in the Middle East, and the ulitimate desire to all Islamic States or small self made Islamic States in the world, and so forth. At the moment it is not clear which priorities the Turkish government will address as first and which one as it's  last for 2015. Is there a 2016 possibility to get the Kurds peace process as main priority in Turkey?

Ukraine's future in the long run falling prey to obscurity

01032015

Ukraine and the present time President Mr Petro Poroshenko have become a mixture of longest memory and brief with the government elected Mr Poroshenko since May last year in 2014. It was a country at war when this president took office and was inaugurated weeks later after the May election in Ukraine. After half a year again the same President now holding office is still 'at war' with the Russian seperatists in east of Ukraine, where they say that there is clear proof of siege ongoing in key areas inside Ukrainian territory. By International standard there is a loud echo of breach of laws making, if Russia would excercise it's historical power plays on neighboring countries and being indifferent to the specific order of what the west sees as post Soviet rule in the region, and considers this another clear breach, of Russian deliberate refusal to comply with International order. This perception perhaps has been here with the west for long as the Cold War and it is making no way for any new approach or contest. But whether that should be International order for tight laws on wrong and right is another question at this stage that may remain unanswered. Perceptions seem to be side effects to this war in Ukraine if called by any day a war today and tomorrow tensed relationship with the west. Mr Poroshenko, still an inexperienced government Official as President, no wonder is slowly losing the oversight of politics at regional level, but more on International level.

For a brief moment the President already had found himself lost in the 'fog of war' last year between June and July 2014, after or pre the first ceasefire agreement between the warring factions in the Donetsk region. The newly elected President was seriously worried and in this part of the world that is a very bad sign to be put in the 'arena of war' with all gateways shutdown and while the lions come out. European history is based on a war presumption that have created nations and countries, monarchies and people. It is an old saying by Heraclitus that the father of nations is war, if done so by noblemen. In the 21st century all the privileges go to the top of the world and make our world look as if it was not running by it's axis, but by tribes of trillionaires and more imaginaries. What have imaginaries to do with politics and the military forces in the world? Perhaps we should leave that to the 'don't go there' policies and get yourself seriously hurt. Democracy in Ukraine was the Maidan dream, in many ways a sensible choice of dreams and unfortunately not a very good choice of weapons to be in an everlasting duel with motherland Russia. To all inexperienced Presidents like Mr Poroshenko, a country at war either with itself or neighboring country should base this on principles first and make stonking hard shortcomings like inexperiece irrelevant to the need of a people and government. Without principles Russia is obliged to go for one on it's own terms. Mr Vladimir Putin his choice of weapon, surely, can't be that he will provide the learning of principles in former Soviet republics like Ukraine and play God Almighty on the Russian side of earth?

In blatant ignorance one can only assume that principles are better for Ukraine, than for example US sent military weapons and a forced relationship with former allies on terms alone. Is there no one in Ukraine principled enough to make cooperative or cooperation east or west and EU in the middle Ukraine's true desire for freedom and prosperity? If the West or EU would fail to oblige is another story (not relevant today), should be Mr Poroshenko's inner politician thought or Presidential act of trust for  country and government (people).

More like invitation to Russian infrastructure in Europe is the right opinion and not as article Wapo suggesting this morning, an invitation to Mr Putin in Ukraine

25022015

Lice in the skin of the bear isn't funny, for the bear. Is it to the lice? Science doesn't get that far into the microscopic details like that of lice and their 'unbending' mood for bear- skin. (Unbending not my choice of word) If Russia was the bear, as universally is accepted around the globe, the lice therefore must be 'the other side'. Logic in our world today is so often praised at the highest level e.g. economic forums, but when it comes to the Russian standing in Ukraine that logic evaporates to red hot chaos and a running round either avoiding or approaching this or that direction. Russia's infrastructure in Europe is getting little by little with baby steps closer of being crystalized and hardened everytime Mr Putin is convinced about his path to the rubicon of his vision. That of course depends on Mr Putin's character or temperament. Is he a military strategist or born military conqueror like Hannibal? It is looking bad this morning through the fog of war, and especially when US Secretary of State Mr J Kerry has said today that Moscow is lying to his face over Ukraine and the Russian presence on Ukrainian territory. War can sometimes be like eating out of a tin can, but this one is certainly not sardines. Content- wise the war tin can in Ukraine is a bad idea and the west does not see Russia with an infrastructure large or small size. If this country can be reliable to partners or countries and treat them as sovereign, this will be a sneak preview of what war actually does mean to his side...

Also, if his side is convinced that the path to the future of the world should be a new one, that too could be a military choice by law and order, one that was never necessary for 70 years. At this point we are more convinced that countries like Germany, France, Ukraine and Russia are keen on having the Minsk II agreement fully implemented inside deep warring territory between the two sides. Why the cease- fire is failing the west can ask the public and find out why... Russia will run a tight security and make this the Russian logic when times have fallen into chaos with no solution yet on the horizon, east or west. He is defending the Russian speaking population from something there is no textbook explanation for in the west. There is only assumption and wrong energy. Or should we seek for 'synergy force' in the Russian military? If so then we are dealing with a Russian President who is at a different level in the military than first thought of. And no one but Mr Putin can see 'Hadrian's wall' in the next move.

US and Russia contesting strength like a Rubrik's cube for juniors

15022015

A very simple question to ask is who get's what from having Ukraine? The US and it's global free trade world e.g. could help Ukraine breakaway from old Soviet style politics and military readiness, if attacked by the west in Europe or overseas, while Russia if it would get Ukraine could bring back an old dream in this part of the world where the west is excluded instinctively or naturally. And all that is making Ukraine relevant in the war situation the country is now in at the eastern front. But one knows when we're talking crumbs while world leaders are head of nations used to swallow up tons of tuna fish like white or black whales. If Mr Putin wants Ukraine that on the scale of relevance is scoring very low points, if one imagines the US is scoring high and doing so constantly. Vice Verse this is the same idea or picture you will get and leave it at that. Relevance in Ukraine is the new mystique Russia is doing and the US is proposing. With the new ceasefire friday last week in Minsk and it's effect today, almost 24 hours ago, the coming time isn't making any rational sense on both sides. Isn't it clear enough where this tactical move is leading from both super power blocs in the world? If there was no Ukraine, theoritically, the world would now be at peace and continue as it has done for the last seven decades. With or without the Cold War. Personal thought tells you that something is going on here and no one knows exactly why the US is involved or why Russia is eager to get Ukraine. We will never know why even in our age of transparency and social engineering era.

One can only believe in peace if real fear of the 'other' had been present, e.g. in the first years of globalization two decades ago. If this theory is correct the question one should ask now is where the fear has gone to, leaving Russia out from the G8 and continue as normal back as the G7. How is Ukraine expected to build a new world for it's government and people, now fleeding, on a. a peace deal with no fear of the 'other' in it, and b. when both sides are fearless of the 'other' in A? We, in the world of global freedom, have nothing to fear of Russian invasions in neighboring countries. But in Europe that changes politics in a house of mirrors where such things as prudency will not win from it's European nature. This may come to that where Europe decides it will determine what destiny is fair to Europeans and which is ill fate to it's millions of citizens. The military is deeply legal in a crisis when the continent is in fear of being driven apart. (Remember Waterloo 1815) Another question is whether Ukraine holds such big giant cards in it's none existent democracy hands at the moment. And what is fair to the US and it's allies? Socially that would score close to nil. In terms of global free trade we are still looking at a favourable very high score for the Americans. And that includes even when the most unpopular of times for the US and world nations relations. But the US is not the land of immeasurable opportunities any more than Russia is to it's own people and neighboring countries. What happens when the 'world war' is over, even in Tolstoi's War & Peace? For tsaristic Russia the war scene in it's end always is tragic and deeply painful, and melancholy too. But you have to understand the four seasons first and spring for the living, not like autumn for all war heroes in fall.

Ukraine remains in a position where it cannot toss the coin, here or there.

Road Sign: See You Next Time Earth 200TH MILS

04022015

Two visuals are presented here: one is that taking off from this place is near the road sign, AIRPORT or SPACEPORT, and secondly when earth is the next stop from this place you are bound for leaving the unknown for the known, overthere on the other side of the apparent darkness all mankind take e.g. Mars for. Being here and there in Real Time a living being and probably human if you were born once in Oklahoma, a place not among the stars where your present human body is now living, isn't this the feeling of conscience? Are we there yet? And if so isn't the law for conscience transforming from the ancient Hebraic laws 'Eye for an eye' to greatness for greatness? The new Hebraic visionary law for greatness on earth and beyond our stars. It's a settlement, if you like, it's a score what was once unsettled with the stars but now in the final stages of our century getting settled. This could be a whole new meaning to the extension of man's limits and outer limits. Are we perhaps overlooking something, that what if man's greatness cannot be challenged anymore? In Realtime relevance laws this living planet called earth for thousands of years in fact have been outdone, and this is especially worrying when the future is now one out of 'eternal' reach. To the ones left in Oklahoma this isn't exactly fair play and honest to the bone of man. The law should we still dream of upholding in it's eagerness for more has out great itself without adding distinction to man's law or nature of order. Or maybe there is a different interpretation without getting too much on military supremacy?

We are not thinking the astronaut suit as last remains of a melted human body inside and behind the darkest of shields hidden in his space visor. The question is what should the world be thinking, if still a thinking body at the top of world leading nations? The International law for Space Exploration has been for seven decades the work of an International Team highly qualified and had degrees in responsible sciences on their shoulder, or as we know now their Major Tom Shoulders. In 2015, especially after last year in 2014 global politics changes in the G8, by law are we still looking at International laws and International Team efforts? This human conscience is going beyond a seven decades long International cooperation for nations, Space or other, but is it really? The free will of man is lawfully bound to earth's International order. If 2014 has changed this order one can only guess about the nations where they will find their reason and argument to keep Space in cooperation peaceful as it has been there for seventy years in names like Y Gagarin, N Armstrong and John Glenn. Russia is thinking big in this final stage and nothing is apparent anymore in this intention. That is the meaning of War and nothing else like ISIS and it's unlawful (purely criminal) killings of global citizens...

What is keeping you busy this morning today?

26012015

A month ago, 26122014, we somehow had a few answers in name only what next year in 2015 could be the breakthrough moment of the first month in a new year. We are now getting close to month II, February 2015, and we are now getting more and more convinced that 2014 is a dead 'great' beast, just lying buried in someone's backyard and that we have all forgotten it's existence was ever there. Even Mr Putin, the Russian President, seems to have run out of ideas in 2015, but is stubborn enough to want to impress with repitition of the previous year. War also has gone off and no one is stepping on that road for now. There are sporadic incidents ongoing in places like Syria, Iraq and Ukraine, where lessons are hard to learn that the west is only interested in triumph and not which front has more casualties than the other lists. The world has a very good reason to continue it's oldest tradition in the war game, for that is where it makes it's war currency hard for the rest of the world. This is hard realism for any personal fight or a struggling country like Ukraine for freedom and democracy with Russia, and continue it's search for western partnership with e.g.the US and EU. Of course, from this point of view, the Russian President can only see that this will be a matter of time schedule. In Russian no one knows what that means in translation.

At the end of tunnel nr 1, January 2015, Greece is entering tunnel nr 2 with a promising election victory for the Syriza Party. We will be expecting another election win in England very soon, in May 2015. Also the US is looking for a new phase/ face in 2016 at the White House in the presidential election upcoming. In the Middle East a troubled Turkey in august or sooner this year election fever is looking very interesting on both sides, home and abroad, with the Kurdish Peace process gravity in this election. It is as if Turkey will either choose to go through the fire with a humbling experience in all it's political history in recent decades, or something else might happen in Turkey's fortune. Be it a very dangerous path when that miracle is needed... Saudi Arabia too was in the news this month and mourns the death of their King Abdullah, 89 years old. A fortunate people when natural atmosphere is the way to go and establish the succession with another King out of a pantheon of 32 (?) brothers. To put it cliché the world is in a relative quiet sphere today, when compared to last year's Maidan protest in January 2014. And when things become repititious this is not exactly a power boost for any world leader in top mint condition.

"Here beside me, Holy war and holy me," are my lyrics and an interpretation

(Original song Duran Duran Ordinary world)

17012015

When we say 'our world' do we mean the Middle East is included? Basic human instinct says it all more direct and true: our world means the west and the Middle East or far east is never included in this mind pic. And much shaitan and haram things went down that one- eyed road into the western world. Shalom and Selam ordinary twins by birth are still fighting over who is older and therefore who has more rights to control the other. The Middle East 'our world' practically does not exist per se as 'our world' in the west is well defined by time and now a global system. A great magnificent world like Saudi Arabia floats on it's own time and era after many centuries real or imaginary. Followed by so many other 'worlds' beside the first one. Also examples of fine worlds in ancient history painted in heroic stories of wars and bloodshed, but it's human survival has therefore become a greater sort among modern mankind. Peace is like blood, family, the image of Allah is great. Or when Jews in Jerusalem the God of Israel is great and not as imperialist as modern Jews have a tendency to portray Him.

The modern world is not a gift from heaven or God, Allah, and therefore how do we live with this haram or shaitan, be it that he is well dressed and speaks wise words? The modern world will also not be found in the Quran if well observed from logic and the rex regum textual logical point of view. (All inventions in one's mind) In fact the Quran is humane and only dealing with holy matters of all people on very simple virtues to be kept alive and well. For rich and poor, scholar or simpleton, the Quran provides all these answers and does not have a grey area with Allah, put aside only for the great warlords or great men. Real time is another thing. Peace is a need even for warlords if only to prove they have achieved great things and keep the 'enemy' away for a long period of time! 'Our world' cannot only be seen through the monocle of Saudi Arabia 'heavenly peace' kings and princes, as much as we like the idea. A long awaited developed world and it's industries worldwide say something else, that this is what peace is about: to work and prosper together. Here God is truly great in Real Time. And why shouldn't God be our emperor? A dragon, Leviathan or Great Seraph? No one is saying that He is literally present, but they do believe that money is 'holy me' wherever I lay my head. Like pop songs, simple pleasures, like smoking from a water pipe/ Hookah (Persian) in front of your souvernir store even when no one buys and just passing by. But what about the Christians? Like brothers do cousins you have to treat with suspicion or respect but balanced.

Peace, Selam and Shalom, 'our world'?

Post scriptum: women differ from men, true. But two men do not go to paradise when taken strictly as in Christianity, Jesus and the robber Barabas.

Invasion of Ukraine and Germany by Russia seems quite far fetching...

(Unedited)

12012015

First thing you should do is to establish whether that idea is fit for the time we are living in, and if it has not been done before. It could be particularly a problem for the Russians, if that was ever a plan, to start building the plan from the palm of their hands forward into Europe via Ukraine, and create a bridge for only strategic purpose. Ukraine as a starting point leaves nothing to the imagination of the builder than take it as the first pylon. The rest is either disciplined or multiplicity in details. Good for the Ukrainian PM A Yatsenyuk this morning that he has cleared his comment earlier during last week, that the Soviet Union was ready to make such historic error or move. The need for an ultimate purpose isn't just there yet, from the Russian point of view. Especially if the bridge should remain invisible from visibility. It is in our world today especially hard to imagine a war at world scale with all the networks in communication and technology that are omnipresent as the world has become bigger by nature and outgrew all other greatnesses. Transparency seventy years ago did not exist, and nor was that a policy in e.g. European history. War still then had a blind eye and it was a very deep abyss.

The ultimate purpose also should worry the minds of another possible world conqueror and then how to reward those who stood with him on the bridge. War has it's eyes now opened wide on the plains of the world, in the sky, on land and in the seas or oceans. There is simply no shift possible level- wise or variables. Mind you, this would also be for a first time that religion is not envisioned to get to the other side of the bridge. We have deep political reasons for this time and if ever the world goes to war over dominion and mastership. When times had changed after WWII, religion and race were the 'master's' key weapons. It still is, even when clearly no war ever wins here. If ever the Russians would cross that bridge and invade Germany via Ukraine, the end of globalism would be tested to it's outer limits, one can only assume for now. And the nature of this war bears a different banner on it's men/ women (21st century) if the purpose will be the final contest between the world super powers. Ancient history tells men/ mankind about such a human trait (recessive?) and it is the worm of war feeding upon even more greater times and wars.

Good thing is the news this morning, that the Ukrainian PM Mr A Yatsenyuk took out the error of his comment on the invasion of the Russia story.

End 2014 transition into 2015 broke off the speed of things all global

05012014

We are now facing the architecture of a magnificent high wall and a miles long curve on top. This is the road leading to a new highway built in the future. Perhaps the last attempt to create more 'open space' or waiting on for the next pylon and turn again, next year in 2016. Each pylon weighing tons of massive stones raised above sea level to reach a certain height over 3000 km? From the right into a straight line one turns left 3/4 quarter and follows another straight line. And so forth. The world has stopped the war on the plain of 2015. This real effort came quietly through the new year's eve night and turned it's headlights off for a while as part of a special training and no harm was done. Professionals seldom make any mistakes. Five days already and the world has now a small success putting the world back on track as all nations know it. Apparently this was a joined effort by the leading nations and other groups around in the world. Actually a muffled applause for real effort is in order here. And now we must move on and can do this without too many unexpected tremors or sudden shocks of another change, perhaps made again by Russia?

But the new highway is there for a reason too. The future awaits not one nation but all nations. Terrorism is breathing through air, land and sea, but has learned to comply with the new environment and situation they are in as well. High and powerful machineries too are there for a reason... Good lessons to learn or know? There is no point crowing from your crevice like black crows do when ominous tidings are about to open up the air space again. Or maybe not, because 'new skies' above on the road to the future the promise this is holding can only mean a United Effort by all leading nations. One sole purpose is that it is doing so for the reason of all mankind and friendly governments. Is there a point to go back and restart the dispute all over again in any place where war has been for the last 12 months in 2014? Stay with the new mathematics and engineering formulas (e.g. S=T/ System=Time). International leaders must make an effort to believe in the transition, or made to. (And preferably not at the end of the new highway) 2015 Below on the secondary road election year is knocking on many political doors this year. Where do global citizens live is another thing of this architectural wonder. Governments, Banks and politicians have some idea where exactly they want the planet's and human habitat viewed by both on top and at top level (no rotation and questionable when emergency is on). Is this familiar to you when comparing to the place where you were born a long time ago? That to me is a monumental 'NO'.

On the new highway to the future it is not hard to see the red reflection lights are on brightly through the nightly darkness and so far only is looking promising from the point view of the massive stone pylon, crevice, top or bottom.

2015 Most honest year. Snapshot, yes.

29122014/ 20:31 PM

One myth buster: people are afraid of people and not machines. And there is a very good chance that you will never get there, not even in 80 days. But of course you don't want that universally full stop. In stead what most people can do when qualified is to look for a job, the starter's position, and get the latest mobilephone. You have to make that one phone call on the basis of a 24 hour chance/ chancelessness. And you worry about global economics in decline or recession. In fact that might be the reason why you are worrying sick over a job at the local Call Center in a big Company plan. The top best to describe is e.g. where you are standing and where you see the physical top of the building opposite you. But that is OK when all the rich kids go there too for their first work experience. Is there a way to find out who owns the place? There was a time far back in the eighties on company names and owners that stood for public and the press. And what was the worst that could happen to the owner in a clear case of negligence across land, sea or air? Fair trade agreements is the real history behind all economics for the past two decades or even three decades ago. Now in our special year of 2014 one can only fear death or sickness. Machines will live on and outlive mankind. And can a machine give you an honest world too?

Test results are diabolical. Everyone should have one at home if you want to be in control of life, marriage, children, in a direct line with the place of income, aka the company you work for. Unfortunately to start a family the only social standard required here is first to select a partner based on a warm emotion, love and preferably mutually, and appeal. That btw is the only emotion shock/ shot you will get to try once in a life time! The rest of adult life is based on vitamin shocks until you drop dead in a bowl of spinage. Machines in a sense are immortal in reflections. But that depends on human scrupulous or pathological desire to be superior over all giant machineries in just a flash and fraction of untaped/ recorded seconds. Another lonely hero who has left the planet for good? That's why in all honesty it should be better to stay and keep things simple. Human transformation, from human to monster human, always is and will be a startle if in a position to simply murder you out of vision or visual. (Mostly measured by adrenaline) Your murderer (or mine) could be the Zodiac, seen but never been found. The y- ear 2015 our supreme fear, I'm afraid, can only be honesty.

"On Dec. 14, 2014, an incident unlike any we've seen previously in Turkey took place: The police raided the offices of Zaman -- the country's best-selling daily newspaper -- arresting the editor-in-chief, Ekrem Dumanlı. That same day, police also arrested Hidayet Karaca, the general manger of a leading Turkish television and radio broadcaster, the Samanyolu Media Group. The arrests, which were apparently triggered by accusations that both Dumanlı and Karaca were “seizing state sovereignty,” have shocked the world. As to what legal grounds for these arrests there really are, this remains a topic for widespread curiosity." Quote from article in Today's Zaman online newspaper

Abshalom, Abshalom...

18122014/ 22:18 PM

There is a curious royal story in ancient Israel about the favourite son of King David, Abshalom. If norms had been invented then this curious story might have been different and not ended in death of the young prince. The King's justice was literally taken out of context, but maybe not. It is hard to tell thousand years later why Abshalom petitioned and stood by all rights and wrongs in his royal father's kingdom. And his popularity was surging by the day. Every morning till evening Mr Abshalom listened to people and their cries, and spoke justice for everyone... If only he would be king! Imagine the freedom all the poor would enjoy and live truly of the king's justice for a fact. Abshalom should be king, at some point... The king in his royal chambers summoned his military and wise men on this issue in a prompt manner, after the people were in the mood for their own ancient style revolution and that there was word on how Abshalom, the king's son, would be a man thousand times better than the king to sit on the throne. But there was a little triviality also troubling King David... He loved his son and was in fact impossible to excecute what the final decision was from this council meeting. Abshalom was his beloved son and the king's own flesh and blood. Why have him killed?

Today in modern day Turkey it looks like the editor in chief at Today's Zaman could suffer similar consequences for his newspaper and their journalism justice and free speech democracy. It is right by many standards when properly aligned with the rest of the world in for example neighboring countries in Europe, or more specifically within the EU. Norms were born not only yesterday in Europe nor in Turkey. Where is the original sin for Zaman coming from? Turkey is a civilized country, a member of Nato, a country with a decades long list of political changes, and economic changes too. It doesn't make sense for this cosmopolitan city, Ankara or Istanbul, getting the present government stained all over their official cloth with 'tears of justice' against the President and his political Party. And the situation in it's turn is getting to the level of a nightmare hanging with it's head in a thicket... Past image: side by side President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Fethullah Gulen stood by this high tree, and they watered the tree in friendship and love for Turkey, that it may always stay a free country. In another story analogue one can now compare Mr Erdogan to Messala and Mr Gulen, the scholar, to Judah Ben Hur. (These chariots will screech)

But there is also good news for Turkey. Mr Erdogan is a strong man of character, said the Russian President Vladimir Putin in his annual news conference earlier today. There is bound to have an anti climax soon in this story as it develops in confused Turkey.

Time, in it's modern version, is quietly running and not showing any shifts going down or lower...

(unedited)

12122014

Questions about what is the big plan and how to start the new year from 1 January 2015 on new issues, let's say among global leading nations and G20 nations, we see no movement coming out to tell the public or global audience just yet if there is such intention. The US President for the last week or so and the CIA report on torture technics were on the latest news but it didn't reach any major change in the global community to follow opinion and action to be next. It was according to world newspapers a very interesting lead for the interests groups in their research what the government was or not involved with during a period of time in the last decade. Specific mention was made on that with a date- reference by one government official or higher, and said that 9/11 was a critical time in global security and where it had affected certain populations in great cities like e.g. New York. (London on 7 July 2005 can also be seen as a global threat of the same global security) Compared to the Norwegian government bombing in 2011 there is no proof in the International World whether the global security threat was related on this occassion or singled out off the big plan on G S. For the last decade many unpleasantness was partly necessary as so was it's tackling of the problem on these global challenges. And a new adversary was born...

The question everyone is feeling but probably not saying out loud, is whether in 2015 the world will again find itself at odds by fresh challengers or not. In theory G7 and G20 leaders might address the issue on Global Security in the new year and slightly shifting onto the top level in much closer cooperation and start the whole process anew. And that from any citizen's view is quite the distant view anyone unfamiliar with global issues can have. Some nations or countries are counting on their new initiatives. The Kurds, a nation in the Middle East now very familiar in global terms, have or are intending on having a council on oil revenues and the business. In EU territory a new council of 'TransAtlantic leaders' was introduced two days ago, a reading from a tweet on Twitter by Anne Applebaum. The old and new generation of leaders will host the group, was also announced in the article. For Game Technology timing naturally is running slow toward the end missions, going either with a surprise story ending or accelerating the Bang in the big end. That's only Game Technology (art)fact. (GTA Games are my favourite) The International systems in the world cannot do the same story ending at any point in history. Global computer Engineers are inclined to believe you can do that if only the 'other side' will fall back in one piece and no one gets hurt. If Britain seriously is contemplating an exit from the EU, when in terms of system engineering, we will have a story end and looking back with a certain melancholy. Or, you could get something much more unsophisticated.

The work in our world has a chance if it wasbuilt on building blocks and not action targets.

08122014

First one must ask whether the present time is going as planned (?) and what is still relevant in terms of decades or periodicals. The last month of 2014 december isn't revealing too much on best results from G7 or G20 cooperations throughout the year... In fact expertise is relying very much on questioning the ups and downs in 2014 if they are expecting to hit any thing for the coming time across the threshold after the end of the year, e.g. where do we go from here on these fundamentals? The Russians, one could say, now have a pretty good idea of what it means when the world ins't leading from the White House like for example a decade ago in prime time changes, or as we know them under globalism. Perhaps this image will last a longer while as it has had all the shockwaves it needed to create a chart of it's own shape. That also could be the answer to follow the holes and keeping your eyes fixed on zero fixation going anywhere. There is also much tranquility in today's dynamic world and all that we can see from the whimpering of nations' flags, still standing high above the pavilion at e.g. the UN HQ. Maybe due to fierce weather conditions the winter darkness is playing tricks on how people perceive any surroundings not familiar in their own personal 'cubicals'.

The nations, who are we calling 'the nations' in and outside the world of globalism? No G7 meeting will ever be exiting again like the ones in gone days, now seem distant and vague in the selective memory of what used to be a gateway in 'open democracies' in the western hemisphere. But maybe there is no need to go on and on limbo dancing underneath the global pressure each and every nation is now facing, that who wants to follow the giant arrow in the economy is going to follow the red one. And that is the only deal in town for a number of fundamental reasons. It is not what the world once was, but what the world has become. Immeasurable at the center and again immeasurable from the center outlooks. If you are in it, nation or government, the dream having something there of your own would be an impossible success story on recovery. This goes back to Kane and Abel. Every inch in the world today screams out globalism from the grainfields and is infinite in it's presence. Grassroots democracies in the developed countries are doing so for the last decade in a simple formula: reform. And the younger the generation gets the louder will their blood scream to the global platform for change and freedom. (Take Burkina Faso, Kurdistan and Ukraine) A successful world has been given a new moral: only the younger generation has first rights to decide on what world they would like to live in. Senior citizens everywhere are being retired to become the ageing populations with second rights and deeply rooted in an equally ageing world. Unless there is a twist of fate.

Error cubicals= cubicles

Up to now only smart wars have been in the last decade. It is time maybe to fight a stupid war the coming decade?

30112014

Stupidity in it's absolute pure form is the zero-MASS-zero, if you put it like that. Mathematically the zero- MASS- zero form or shape won't give you any trouble analyzing the outcome on nothing when successfully put in as functional in your purpose. In smart wars the idea is always to clearly get something back from the aimed target or operation logic. The world governments firmly stand behind the smart war model as it is always returning home with results and information how to do the next time if e.g. efficiency is required. The Iraq wars, Middle East diplomacy and wars, failed governments in Eastern Europe and also where governments fail to introduce successful democracies from a home- base autocracy/ theocracy. You can see from the here above why the world should comply to smart wars and not stupid wars. Smart wars give imperatives. Compared to the zero- MASS- zero war. It is probably safe to say that because of the smart war imperatives there is great hope for the planet, with leaders paying (willingly or unwilling) equally great attention to the outcomes of each imperative and studies the detail. In these hands we should thank God Almighty for the work these men and women do. A stupid war still could be a long way end if they want to go that way!

The argument: but what if all imperatives are dead? In that case there is always a setback first with opportunist countries, e.g. Russia, overstepping basic understanding to find way to pave the path of war through time and fall. It is nevertheless scale- wise a great opportunity war scene. On the side and if anyone cares to have another look at the year 2014, you might ask yourself the thorny question whether Russia has already introduced the zero- Mass- zero war... But why when on this side of the Atlantic the zero- MASS- zero war didn't look stupid? (Why a stupid war can look sophisticated in the hands of a clever man like Vladimir Putin was the remarkable military thing) As a result does anyone have an outcome report to read in the closing state of the year 2014? Senior politician Mr Javier Solana in his optimistic style of writing yesterday is convinced there is harvest in November 2014 accumulation, politics and the military. And when I say optimistic, here that can only mean a quick prayer but not Roman style to salute. There is no reason for pessimism, the honourable global politician has said in his writing. Money, I'm afraid, good Sir, has had the same master for the last two or three decades. Reason for optimism in myths can only be when the treasure guardian is a serpent too great for ordinary men to fight it. But maybe the global politician is as heroic?

One good thing has come from the latest tragedy in Ferguson. In one of US newspapers online a writer in his/ her article called Ferguson a symbol. Interesting idea in our time, because so are castles. Anyway, good luck with the zero- MASS- zero war for now.

 

Preliminary signifies great importance and patience, but even greater when it comes to MH17

12112014

19 July 2014 Passengers Airplane/ Boeing 777/ MH17 from Amsterdam on it's way to Malaysia was shot down at an altitude of above 3000 ft in the region of Donetsk, Ukraine. This massive injury has cost 298 passengers their lives in an instant from the (equally) massive blast that had hit the plane with extreme velocity. Five months later in November the Dutch investigators are still under pressure to bring this investigation to an end of the preliminary report and proceed unto the next level on detail and reconstruction. It is not the kind of pressure you want to take home where families of dead relatives are waiting to hear the latest news on the findings on 19 July in Ukraine, but especially emphasizing the reason for why this tragedy had taken the lives of their loved ones away from them in an instant. There is a profound legal desire call on all sides, and that includes the Dutch government. It is also tremendous government frustration why it is taking so long, according to news articles this week. The need to get the investigation done in the rebels- held region makes it harder on the investigation, technically and also on accessibility. But the politicians and especially the Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte are right that here it is caution that will give sanctity to the intent and conclusion of the next level before the aftermath can be proposed to the public and criminal court in Den Hague. This morning Reuters Online has said that the Dutch government is cautious and cannot say at this point whether Russia or Ukraine could be held responsible for the shooting down of the MH17. It is highly sensitive information at this time and one must keep integrity for the time being as the only weapon against the alleged or presumably 'perpetrator' of destroying so many human lives in a fraction of missile seconds. Christmas up coming makes that extremely more painful for family members of the deceased victims of the MH17 tragedy.

First: there is no 'metal perpetrator'. Perhaps a malfunctioning radar system could have been the reason for not reading above 3000ft on incoming or outgoing 'enemy' planes? All radar systems for future military operations should be able to distinct with godly precision or engineering sophistication. And for the Dutch government to reconstruct the emotional reconstruction of the passengers safety that changed to a living nightmare or hell from a sophisticated military weapon is not going to be a rush thing but rather that it could take more time and study of all findings, technically and politically.

Peace + nations are done with deformed and other crazy reincarnations

08112014

It is taking certain nations a long time to move from peace- nations to the more upgraded awareness for not less but universally demand for peace with a plus sign/ symbol. Mathematically the universe means magnitude or infinitely unending, if and when the human mind can go that far and return to mankind with a new message, that basically human is akin to everything alongside the lines of infinite and magnitude. But do we need a peace+ in this world a second time since 1945? 2015 Could become the year in which global politics reincarnates itself again on a simple basis that without it only wars will replace the present system and leave all earth's populated and overpopulated nations to a negligent state in self sufficient nowhere lands and islands everywhere one can set his/ her eyes on. Also, and all first borns of Egypt will scream in the streets when the dark cometh down again upon the people... 70 Years the nations battled against universal injustice and abuse of power, and then look again at our present world view. All politicians in prominent places have locked out all the political insight from within and let the wolves pass by their door, marked by the lamb's blood with the senate's truth and justice. And today how much do you earn for your hard work and world? A box of paperclips costs as much as an hour wage, after tax reduction. And civilization has been reduced to forced labor in very big cities or towns you can only be thankful for that is not in the slums where you earn the same a long day's hard work on dumps coming also with high and low economic peaks. Progress is universal if you are smart enough to catch up. Smart slums perhaps now also do management and pension schemes for the young children when retiring at the age of 15 years old! (Age problems comes sooner in these places and it is inhuman to expect these children should go on working till death)

In the days of Pharaoh the king said to his court magicians that the Hebrews should make bricks out of straws and without a minute rest. In our world we see why such a thing is politically and economically not feasible nor is it and was this rational thinking and decision taking by the king. (Rumor has it that pharaoh was jealous and enraged against Moses over the queeen Nofretari, his royal spouse) But our world has leaders who run a smart and rational world! Love and jealousy they leave to the opera and theater. But in the G7/ G20 love and jealousy do not come in the picture. And when the season get's closer to the Christmas Holidays we become very sentimental and like to think of this world as a good place to be and live in. And we eat the turkey after the man of the house has said his Christmas eve grace. That is just going to make it fine over all global unrest and worries. People have condemned the world leaders many decades back and forth. This time makes no difference and it will not change us. (Us being here the global view at the very top) There is no vigil service held for those who die in the wars across the world, politically or in wars against common enemies. Let no creed be forgotten? That is the strange balance of peace+ and peace- nations, the world just moves on as if it can never be stopped even when half of the world lives in this lunacy of stopping the world leaders from wars. Maybe the time has come for nations around the peace table to find a definition of Foreign Invasion and see for themselves if they are still there or not, far away from it. That of course if they are not too busy with their Christmas shopping in the end of the year, next month in December. On the scale of 0- 10, I wonder how the world citizens would score in the world leading nations for having kept their faith in governments and their leaders. (If I got 5 and not pass in full honors, I will understand. Economics I failed on the same score to pass the exams and get my second year course) The Peace+ nations are a myth in 2014. From here where I am sitting and writing it looks very much like the Peace- nations will slide silently into the new year and get back on their feet and start all over again. Pharaoh Rameses lost his first born and the Red sea had swallowed him up in one gulp down. His kingdom had come to an end forever.




Escalation on 6/7 October three weeks ago in Turkey was fortunately blown off leaving both Kurds and Turks to discover that they were naked...

03112014

The peace process lies in tatters, naked and no fig leaf to cover a shamefulness on both sides, why they as responsible representatives have let down the people with each their own interests at heart, one settling of dispute would have been welcomed by moderate Turks, and for the Kurdish people living in Turkey finally getting something in return for 'long overdue' hope, something Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom last week has also said about recognition of the Palestinian need for having a Statehood. Instead what we see in Turkey is that for the last two decades the government and it's ruling Party have been chasing the wrong side of their dreams, to be part of the economic global powers, whether Asean or Bric, G20 or Davos. And always the Former Prime Minister, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, returned home after meetings with foreign representatives, actors in the global economic world, a hero when coming back to Turkey. It is especially shocking to discover in 2014 to some serious politicians or private persons in Turkey to read the balance state of affairs, which only came to more light after the civil unrest between Turks and the Kurds over Kobani. Can Turkey continue being homogeneous in a low tier economy, while the rest of the world and neighboring countries are far more expedient in driving heterogeneous ecnomies dynamically and up to date? It may have misjudged it's own adaptibility to intelligence and the military. That may have given the impression that Turkey could not do or go wrong at any point nor has it a controlling power to check on government and knowledge, let's say if in a crisis be this at home or internationally. Kobani taught the government a valuable lesson and perhaps the hard way. On the whole nothing extraordinary to other countries in the world, developed or developing economies.

Vain glory is fantastic and a rare form of self flattery. The President of Turkey, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, three weeks after neurotic search of a solution at home with political and terrorist prisoner Mr Abdullah Ocalan, the Kurdish leader of PKK and outlawed terrorist organization in Turkey, the US and EU, to calm the situation in Turkey between the two sides, self flattery has left very much his sugary coated lips and using instead more hard core language and shooting blanks. Once a humble man and politician, now a man of vain glory and standing in it like a golden statue with a stare in the distance and no life in it can be found. That may seem a bit harsh, but in reality if he is a caring man the future is cold and stone dead for this term in office for the President and even more closely if mr Ahmet Davutoglu remains Prime Minister after the 2015 elections. Kobani is not in their blood, period. But unlike the Kurds Kobani flows deeper than that. None of this will change the Middle East and transform the region into a Turkish- Kurdish paradise of scent and flowers. There is Iran, Syria, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Marocco, Algiers, Quatar, and the tribal nations (Touareg) living in the shadows of the awakening in the new world order...

Mr Erdogan gentile moment of 'she loves me, she loves me not', unfortunately is the peace process/ resolution process he seems to be tearing up, piece by piece, till the last and perhaps saying... Inshallah?



Silence before the storm, but with Turkey in today's news (HD/ Z) it always is premature

26102014

Two and a half weeks ago Turkey was still a country of the 21st century. Two weeks later no one knows whether the same country can be seen as functional or dysfunctional after that moment when it almost sank into a bloody civil uprise between the Kurds and Turks. This was in the first week of October, two weeks and a half ago. And now there isn't anymore time to waste but seize the momentum and continue... But starting where from exactly? Kobani, Syria, Iraq, Kandil, Kurdistan, Iran or just Turkey? Seven fingers on each hand no one was born that way in the world. Unless of course seriously deformed. And yet it looks as if Turkey has no other choice to make but to come up with seven fingers on each hand, whether in politcs, geopolitics and a military alliance in Nato's mission against ISIL. Or decide in the short term which fingers to cut off. Maybe start with the ones longest enough in outgrowing the neigboring nations? Turkey on the exterior is still a country with the longest relations in the west, Middle East and beyond it's own borders. And some it even outgrew globally. Then what exactly happened two weeks ago and made it look like Turkey had lost it's head in one instant? Public opinion will be convinced that the Kurds were on the eve of a breakout and be free to go anywhere... Kurdistan was and is still in heaven. The Kurds had no where to go to but to return to base in Turkey. And do so for a number of reasons: social inclusion and the peace process born under the government of AKParty. During the last two weeks the government and President in Turkey have calmed both storm and sea, and did this at rapid speed. Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan supervised the latest measures the country had to take in precaution in case there will be a repition of the same 'uprise'. But all these significant measures have another meaning once you can't get out anymore from the symbolism these arms bear. And if any Kurds die or in masses, no one then needs to tell Turkey it's name and what this will be called.

If looking to Kurdistan for other news on the same situation, Kobani seems to be here their priority concern. Building a State, nation, and a political body. For the last days there is news coming across the world net or social media on Twitter from Kurds.net, that Kurds are in a state of soul searching and reassertion. In many ways there is great need to address the most fundamental issues in State and Nation building. And like Israel in 1948, built in the 'promise land' for sentimental reasons? Or maybe for semi sentimental and latent reasons Kurdistan can emerge for always as a country with independent rights to humanity and race? And even become the hub to minorities in the region that we know of: Yazidis, Assyrians and Chaldeans? And that is getting half way there in midair, seen from it's heavenly origins. Looking to the long term of the Kurdish people and their origins this ridiculous idea of State building in fact is a serious ambition of a tired of fighting nation, and in dire need of real chances to face the future in a pre- dominant Islamic world. It's very survival package should come from institutions like the UN and not business deals over oil and their revenues. When going through these channels it can only increase the chance for the people's aspirations of forming people and State, and is always the best guarantee to arrive half there. These are western principles and have a lasting impact discipline. And it may digress again under pressure of reaping the benefits old ways?

How will Turkey now envision Kurdistan?







Every storm approaching has an eye. Turkey's political eye in the Kurdish storm is certainly on it's way over.

24102014

On Kurds.net this morning from EKurd academic corner, Mr J Dworkin, Obama and the Kurds, a frigid marriage, has taken a very clear view of the present mechanism relationship between the White House (and administration) and the Kurdish hype of the moment, political and military approach. It is no bread & butter understanding on the pace of the political process, if Washington does not really want change of the product they are after in the Middle East, Kobani and Turkey. At least not on transparency there is no particular disclosure of any US intention. That can complicate matters for Turkey in a fragile state of urgency on the peace process it once had in mind under the previous Prime Minister, Mr RT Erdogan, but also the present situation doesn't reach any further than a three decade old paper between the two sides, Kurds and Turks living in Turkey. Whether this is convenient and suits the Turks or AKParty is another matter all together. Decisive factor is only what it seems and not by fact. A moment like Kobani makes it the eye in the storm which can do strange things or go either this or that way. There is a different outlook possible e.g. that not all is negative and could even get on a positive footnote from now on. If of course regional peace among rival countries, Syria, Iran, Iraq and Turkey reach this agreement, that the Kurds must be able to live side by side with the modern nations in today's world. But are the Kurds strong enough at this point, just when the global community has taken interest in their presence as a people emerging as a nation? Global attention can it make more vulnerable or strong, is also another question.

We can't be sure if this problem can be solved solely by Turkey and the Kurds who live in the country side by side with the Turkish citizens and population. Percentage- wise, maybe there is a chance of that. But without Syria, Iraq and Iran, plus the present State in exile by the aesthetic name of Kurdistan as centre politics of the Kurdish people in every essential of their needs to become the nation next to their 'brother' nations in the Middle East, how can Turkey play out this diplomatic course the Kurdish 'problem' it gravely needs to be addressed with? Nation building also will need humanitarian support, from the UN and nations in the west who are familiar with the mechanism of new nation and peoples emerging on the global stage. And that is a mouthful of political programs, conservative and opposition. Even within the Kurdish own overview of population and demography. No one can get here by poster hanging democracy worldwide. And if Turkey decides to leave out it's own inclininations, e.g. Cynicism, what you might get in the end could be some of the answers needed to put the Kurdish nation officially on the Middle East map. And not just in Turkey. It is also true that global prosperity in it's efforts to harmonize nations may get the opposite effect and harm where peace is fragile by nature or racial differences. The rich uncle spoils your kids rotten and what you get is a conceited spoiled kid to deal with in the end as parents... It doesn't even want you for his parents anymore! It likes having breakfast at the Hilton Hotel and so forth. Turkey for the time being is the Kurds peace process adopted parent. And it fears conceit of the Kurds with the latest on their sorry state in Turkey from the global stage attentions. We should be grateful to Turkey for being unable to lie about this fact, for that would have been more worrying if they didn't act real or natural. What it now also fails to see in it's little jealousy of the 'Kurdish children' of Turkey, is that Syria and Bashar Al Assad is not really the problem for Turkey. The Middle East needs a new level of regional peace. And it should be able to deal with prosperity of the richer nations more reformed when considering the coexistence of minorities in their new design.

To be continued.

Kurdistan, Kurdistan...

16102014

Name your list: PKK, PYD, YPG and KDP. End of history. 50 Years a shimmering nation broke out in the early days of Middle East civilization/ renewed days after WWII in 1945. From the slumberness in time to stand up in a time less oblivious, the Kurdish nation pushed itself out from the stone they came from into the living world of many other nations, who seem to have been there longer than ageing time. In modern days politically the Kurdish nation does not yet exist. The 19th and 21st centuries have a difference of opinion when it comes to the obscure beginnings of the Kurdish people and their race. Another fact in our century is that the Kurdish people were noticed at a particular time in history by Britain and France. Eager to do business and have riches like the rest of that time in the Middle Eastern 'lesser nations', there have been Kurdish business or trade representatives and like merchant captains they handled all business deals for all... All of Kurdistan? But that's not the point here. And if there is a point to make, is the world holding a map with the list of names, as here above, or will it do the political thing and start from the beginning when world monopolies have met with the Kurds at one other stage, according to western civilization? It is not just Turkey's problem and how best to deal with it's neighbor the Kurds. It is also no wonder why the Kurdish people are now fervent seekers of their rights alongside the diagonal line in the global communities, and are depending very much on this global support from the west and it's modern days nation building sciences. Like 50 years ago the Kurds have become captains of politics and also can do business like their International peers in worldwide nations. This is showing a competitive side to the Kurds being part of our world in the Middle East or elsewhere not many associate quite so quickly with this nation.

Instead to cut off their supply of whatever line they are demanding or requesting, the rival words are briefed in abbreviations of their various 'terror' groups, be it moderate or outlawed. Another rivalry in global terms also plays a key role to nations in the region and outside where global economics is not as dominant as it used to be e.g. In the 50ties. It is best to serve political progress cold or worse through death tolls, like for example in Iraq in the beginning of the 90ties, and now in Kobani Syria in 2014. No one is too sure along these lines and if the Middle East can come back from the war debris it is now causing on all sides, even by random factions they build up from small scale numbers. The idea of a new Middle East is fast and like fast food is better to chuck out if the feeling is not too good or it tastes bad. To Turkey the psyche of the Kurds de facto always ends up to be PKK, if we believe what President RT Erdogan has said for the last two weeks in the face of a possible Kobani massacre. But one thing the Turkish government is right about, that the Kurdish peace process is a very serious process for both peoples, the Kurds and Turks. Yes, Turkey has presidents and prime ministers, a parliament, a nation and even the second largest army in Nato. But the question isn't the same for the Kurdish people to become like Turkey and seriously challenge the political system of Turkey. The Kurds seem to have captains and once their nation is established not just through business, but get the political body to build a nation, then of course the stone from which they came from will have it's inscription and make a sovereign impression on all. Inshallah.

For now we should go back to the list.

Military operation to save lives as well as eliminate the enemy's stronghold can only be done by the military strict conduct

11102014

Plainly said we are looking basically surface based: see grounds, people, maps, aerial or flat, packed together in one countryside. Politically this is different and the countryside in view has names, divisions of land, territories and where they belong. In every day lives of residents living in these areas can only be memory based. Or in other words when attacked by 'foreign' invasion, armed to kill, on the vertical line these people will flee the scene as their only natural response and leave all memory behind. What happens if they can't escape the enemy and turn in body nuggets all over the place? This is what is expected in Kobane, Syria, at the moment, if the military will of the coordinated allied forces keep their eyes fixed on battle lines only and not moving. Perhaps, and true, that that is part of the military thinking on the front, silent or active. Memory plays another key role, because if this fails like Srebrenica, the world will remember how it happened and why. For days delay political leaders behind the battle lines, on all fronts have held several urgent meetings with no solution just yet. The US, Turkey, and also in Europe. ISIL is moving tactically and advancing fast on the people of Kobane, the news in the world keeps telling the world audience. What does really matter minute speaking are a people trapped and with no one to actually come down to save them. Even if the military can go places... This, what the world expects the allied forces to do: they are more advanced, have been in training for most of their young adult lives, and are the legal force behind their weapons. Does Turkey have this kind of authority within the alliance too?

The machine of public opinion is assuming that Turkey is unnecessarily obstructive or stubborn, and is wasting very valuable military time in the Nato alliance. Horizontally that is correct. Vertically we have two levels and it is not clear yet which is what and where Turkey fits in this tower. Or, politics is impotent while it should be more potent to face the challenges ISIS has inflicted upon the west, Middle East and it's people. No one has any answers, except for the public. The United Nations, well, let's hope that soon they may have an answer to help avoid the grim outlook in Kobane and to deal again with another humanitarian catastrophe. The strange thing is that something is pushing to clasp Turkey into a massive lock, but is something you can't see when not equipped properly without a 360 degrees view of the situation. We are in three or four days delay and should be thankful for that. The massacre plan on Wednesday 8 October did not happen, which we can assume was a big win for the Kurdish resistance backed by US air power/ bombings. It looks as if Turkey is facing this battle on it's own, and not because the US will not back it up if necessary. At least we expect the decent thing will be done in the end. But a battle scene in graphics of the 21st or 22nd century perhaps is what Turkey is not very comfortable with, for that is what one needs to encircle your enemy. In a first experience Turkey would be taking enormous risks if going to war conventional or the real general style...

The next generation of military engineers is on the other side, waiting to come in and show how this should be done. If Turkey saves the lives of the Kurdish people, they are in a humanitarian crisis, that will boost the political powers for Ankara in the face of the world. But if they fail prospects are that this will be the end of all credibility for a potential strong country like Turkey. The future is not holding any 'openess' toward countries that fail important political and military challenges. Challenges that are vital to the future of the region and generations to come. You can't keep a 'host country attitude' in the face of a geopolitical problem like ISIS. And unintentionally, because the Middle East is not the Western G7 countries, Turkey blindly follows the host type of attitude in this hour of great humanitarian need of the Kurds. It looks like there is no time for reassertion here either. Kobane to the world view looks like a tiny little place and easy enough access to come to aid the Kurdish people living and now trapped by ISIS within these 'tiny' walls. Evet, evet... (A hot cauldron for Turkey?) In the light of truth: Turkey could also take the challenge as a personal one if the pressure on Ankara remains stampfooted by the west. Turkey's deputy PM has already said this morning, newspaper online HD, or asked whether Turkish soldiers are mercenaries. One thing is clear, despite Turkey's 'inability' with 21st century battle schemes, politically it is showing determination and strong commitment to uphold democratic principles or a bureaucracy that is close to theirs and the world's intentions. I don't think this system will be easy for ISIS to bring down soon!




05102014/23:48PM

Schlieffen plan forum discussion fragment

“If there was a legitimate alternative to the Schlieffen Plan, it had to offer at least a prospect of victory in the worst case scenario: that Britain must declare war on Germany and send the BEF, that France (not Germany) invades Belgium and that Russia makes an all-out attack upon Germany (not Austria).”

Turkey

A short description of Turkey's role in the allied forces against ISIL October 2014: Turkey is a Nato Member since 1950. If not longer. With the pressure off Turkey it has pledged to join the US- led coalition to destroy ISIS in Iraq. As a member of Nato emphasis should be on the coalition and objective, and Turkey whether not or soon to be enaged in this coalition to fight terrorism close to it's own borders and aiding the US/ Britain militarily from Turkish soil, isn't a country without these obligations, as it is known in International Institutions. Questions must be answered, based on accountability and transparency International laws, could be Turkey's priority at the moment and not as suggested to be reluctant to aid the US- led allied forces. When Ukraine's Crimea was annexed earlier this year, as a Member of Nato, Turkey had also kept it's distance from rushing too prematurely into the conflict that was then ongoing.

The east versus west, or Russia against the International world, did not include Nato Member Turkey at any point in february or later, e.g. May or June. The Tatar question, as Vladimir Putin would put it. ISIS is a worldwide threat and parliaments have taken the vote on the mission against this 'barbaric' group of assassins and murderers. Like Ukraine nor is Iraq a member of Nato. But Turkey however is a member of Nato. Historically it is therefore also monitoring it's role when military involved, on a national or global level. But now ISIS is on it's front doorstep trying to stamp out the doormat of peaceful nation, Islamic or globalist. The world can be relieved to know that Vice President Joe Biden tonight or earlier during Sunday has apologized for speaking at Harvard University USA, 2 October, against the former PM of Turkey, now President, Mr Erdogan, to have personal word from him on to have let in too many people... Spreading the wrong information is fast and before anyone can turn his/ her head, the global audience may catch up and quickly renounce Turkey for being in cohorts with terrorism or terrrorists. Not by association, as one would see that as too much argument and intellectual. Fortunately all that is now history, after Mr Biden apologized. How did Turkey get into the twist of the ISIS – plan that the world now wants to end in Iraq?

It is a bit nostalgic, but like Britain in the Schlieffen plan, perhaps Turkey could also easily now get itself unwillingly in the 'original' plan with perhaps a similar outcome in the fight against ISIS, home, border, and in Iraq? But question is: who to blame this time for his arrogant suicide?

Read article NYT, Pakistan's lesson for Turkey, today, 06102014

The big story of globalism continues

02102014

In Hong Kong protesters are refusing to go home and are insisting C.Y. Leung, top executive of HK territory, should resign. As far as sentiments the global audience can only see the pattern here, for example first we had the Arab spring, and later the Maidan revolution followed 1/2 years later. This is becoming all too familiar now to the world and some may even call it a reshuffle in the world or governments, that are still old style run States. In the west people have moved on since the 19th century. But there has been just one moment this year when we all turned our heads and looking back to a long gone time in February 2014... The Russian President Vladimir Putin and his annexation of Crimea had put some fear back in the heart of the west again, and no one had any idea then what this could mean per day or months later. I'm afraid Mr C.Y. Leung in Hong Kong will not have the same effect on us, when it comes from 5314.96 miles from where you're living. His decisions and demands of the students in mass protest will remain here within their territory like an old sausage on the ground. End of the story. (Compared to old sausage on your lawn) Our century for the last ten years in fact was precisely what they called global security, that is if ever a nation or group would emerge from the 'dark corners' of society this would be dealt with and quelled. It's stop has to be effective. And efficiency meant that there are clear restricted areas in our new world where only world leaders or leaders in governments can come on strict protocol. Why would students want to defy these walls of 'high voltage' securities and get killed? Now today in 2014 it will be impossible to transcend human lives into a full blooded revolution and to be ready to topple governments. After a while it dies down again and there goes another 'spring' of people who wanted to risk everything...

A genuine revolution as in War & Peace (L. Tolstoi) alone could jump out of the pattern and affix in our century that has not been designed for. And that can be anything, locusts or human. Perhaps this is true or not, but one thing we can now say is that globalism hasn't yet met with it's nemesis and that this might not even ever happen during this century. Unless, of course, had Scotland left England on a 'Yes' majority vote in the referendum held on 19 September 2014, two weeks ago. Something that Dr Henry Kissinger in an interview with journalist, Newsnight BBC Two, didn't believe it would have caused greater damage to the rest of the world. People would not understand this and not know what had happened. Only some damage was 'normal'. Maybe years later only then the world would have come to see England in a different way, perhaps change of perception would make it like Ireland to the rest of the world? Is anyone asking what the 'good' in this was? Ah, yes, taking Scotland to sit in a very high ivory tower, but now we're only guessing. And maybe no one is asking any questions political or individually, because the paradox here is that good and bad forces of globalism are all contained in flames of their own and they are keeping a very restricted line of world from public domain control. So, to put it simply, why hunt down the beast of nemesis around the world?

Hong Kong, ISIS, the Middle East, Ukraine, Russia, Crimea, Europe, Scotland, England, and then going back repititiously to the Middle East, Ukraine, Russia, China, Japan, for variety, and back where this was started?

Panic is not a good adviser when the world is slipping through your fingers like water or sands

27092014

February early this year if anything annexing Crimea taught the whole world it was this that the world can change. Perceived or imagination, say what you like, but the President of Russia Mr Vladimir Putin in his attempt has put a halt to further expansion of globalization in his part of the world. Ukraine in September later in the year is now saying that it can work out something with Russia, if peaceful and that Russia will at least pretend to follow the new principles set out by the government in Kiev and stop the war on both sides. This danger can now safely be put back inside into the freezer while the world moves on. In the same month September 2014 another rare moment was there for the global community to witness or be part of. England and Scotland have been very close to ending their union of 307 years with a vote on independence in the Scottish referendum. If the panic as meant in this writing was not seen before Vladimir Putin had taken Crimea in February, after the 'No' vote on independence in Scotland that was clear white light or illumination across the sky above in this part of the whole world watching. From the paleness of these living daylights to the Middle East, the global leaders are moving on and did so with extraordinary speed. The Islamic State, so they said yesterday in the UK Parliament, poses a great threat to the rest of the world. It is legitimate for the US- led coalition to start a bombing campaign on ISIS on the ground, close to Syria and Turkey. This may be honest politics, considering Iraq is 'a Nato Member', and also on legitimacy by western nations and governments. But what should not be there is the pale morning to do so in the name of power and to protect humanity. Russia will not go away quietly as long as the sun shines, Ukraine's problem is still ongoing, and Scotland and England can't continue in the same old way, politicians on both sides now say. One can only wonder what priority is being given on 'real danger/ threat' by the world leaders at the moment.

Sooner or later Russia will have the upperhand again by regaining strength from mistakes, technicalities, in western nations and how panic becomes the only rule of law, for example that Iraq asks for help and Ukraine earlier has begged for help, which in reality makes no sense if both countries are not Members of Nato to help out in one area and not the other one. Imagination or perception, Russia might add, can you seriously believe that we do this more than the western nations? ISIS seems to be feeding itself from the change in the world and it understands what is wrong between the east and west. Mr Putin in politics can lie as much as he wants, but to say the same about his military intentions is every man's dream of a true leader and who deserves their respect. With his military Mr Putin is deadly serious and he doesn't waste his soldiers' lives. Outside Russia this doesn't impress anyone and public opinion will still go for the free world and democracy experience and it does matter a great deal to us and fortunately for every one. But the change of the world is now unstoppable. If ISIS believes in a true leader above itself, like e.g. the Russian President Vladimir Putin, to be their strongest ally in wishes, change and the world, than this is going to be extremely difficult with air strikes alone from a worldwide coalition of Nato Members to wipe out the phantom of ISIS from a great height. Some Members in the House of Lords spoke of the world to take great care of the future in the region where ISIS poses a threat to the people of immense diverse interests on a daily/ day to day basis.

The overview is now putting extreme pressure on Turkey at the moment.



Looking back on Friday 19 September yesterday a world crisis was averted

20092014

The 'No' vote where this is going to take England and Scotland for the coming days or time, to be honest, isn't any of our business, as the world crisis was averted and now has been put back into the sack/ bagpipes where it belongs. A number of things could have happened had we been living five hundred years ago, or even two hundred years. The PM in England, then, would have had to be questioned over his private liberties and why he made the promise for the referendum in Scotland, something no Statesman would do if wise. Wise being here not the same as universal wisdom but one where only the Prime Minister of England can go: wisdom from a smaller universe for hundreds of years called Westminster. This, was it from the Prime Minister or had he been advised a word in his ear? Surely if so that adviser did he/ she not know that to give such a word in the Prime Minister's ear in fact was the wrong thing to do, having the Prime Minister of England believing to take liberties freely and out of sight from HM's government and institutions? It would have been days of trial and not debate as is now the case after the 'No' vote for Scottish Independence. As was the proper thing to do, only half the wisdom being served under the crown, the First Minister of Scotland, Mr Alex Salmond resigned after the outcome later in the day yesterday, and with this taking the storm out of the cup. A brilliant move to save his and his hnr colleague in Downing Street 10 face?

Scotland has not only lost the 'Yes' vote and get independence on a very high platform, but it has also lost in terms of peace. And that is a very serious case for the Scottish people if they are among the 1.6 mln who voted for independence. Is the crisis really over where the world is kept out? HM the Queen in her statement yesterday has tried not be harsh on either side and make this as if it were that we lived in the year 1500... Time will heal the wounds, people and country, if that be and stays the United Kingdom. One can only wonder under these circumstances what then the promise on more devolution can mean if the PM in Downing Street could only be speaking from where something alien had just tore away his limb and trying to keep up a brave face. For God's sake, did you not see a world crisis at your doorstep if it had been a 'Yes' vote for independence of Scotland? The PM is acting rather self employed at the moment and as we speak make more concessions without being accountable for what he is actually doing. Should there be an English Parliament with only English MP's and laws? That is the Republican question, which in Westminster would be a strange fire to quell. Both in England and in Scotland, and failing to see Wales, Ireland and maybe overseas in the Falklands. In other words this could turn some heads and take the fire to a higher platform of independence to uproot the republican from the monarchy, and safely put it back in another environment. Persumably and throw away the key. Will devolution go so far and name a Scottish war minister?

If the Prime Minister resigns after 'Yes' win, parliament has mechanism to do so. Serve HM's government in all

17092014/ 23:51 hour

Scotland's First Minister Mr Alex Salmond in his final hours toward independence is a proud moment that will exceed all predecessors for the last three or four decades in recent Scottish political history. His bravery and that of the whole 'Yes' campaign for independence from the UK can be seen and even considered as outstanding as it is a bit of both to swallow that Great Britain has been the fatherland for longer than 300 years and now will have to let go of the fledgeling State that Scotland has become in our modern times. If PM David Cameron by tomorrow at the same time now, will be shedding a tear of regret that will be more like complimenting the First Minister of Indpendent Scotland than regretting the end of ties with the Scottish people. The Prime Minister is a man in High Office and subordinate to serve all in HM's government. We cannot expect anything less from this Prime Minister who is the leader of the Conservative Party and has done so conscientiously over the years. But his Party may not think so if tomorrow Scotland will get independence and break away from England indefinitely. “Eton, did it not teach the Prime Minister at a young age that England first, and last?” And of course, it was uncommon for any British Prime Minister to make 'concessions' that cannot go through inside Westminster first and last. Westminster does not have a new mechanism even if it would want to do so. The Prime Minister is on his own and in a position, well, rather like sitting in the duck house.

All this can be over by tomorrow night.

My oriental world vision tells me quiet is not always a good sign in 'divided chaos'...

15082014

Mainstream media newspaper online WAPO article on situation in latest of Ukraine, for example, reporting today that Mr Petro Poroshenko's diplomatic decision for a ceasefire in eastern Ukraine in Donetsk could be his first public failure over Russia's intenstions that are more obscure and deeper in the peace agreement that was reached shortly after the Passenger Airliner MH17 disaster. Concessions as the west and mainly the US would see this indicates slightly toward making concessions and pleasing the Russian President Vladimir Putin if the same is translated in Russian and not surrender. If the west would misread these concessions made by the Ukraine President at this stage in the war against the Russian presence in east of the country, that would not be the kind of message you would want to send to a battered ally by an already armed conflict going from worse downhill to literally too bad to handle. The President must have been caught off guard by mere routine and familiarity what is common among eastern Europeans and in politics. A deadly moment for the west, but inevitable on both sides, Russia and Ukraine. From here how to uphold the ceasefire without diplomatic capitulation seems like the west only problem and what seems to be a difficult choice to make on these borders. A helpless novice President should be impressed by the enormous advanced technik of his Russian neighbor and their armed force. That is only natural. If not impressed this would have given NATO and allies to believe this is going too easy and can't be right. We are living in dangerous times and let that not fool anybody.

In England, a few hundred miles from Ukraine, the world is anxiously waiting on thursday's result, whether the Scots will get a 'Yes' vote on independence 18 September 2014. Another few hundred miles from the UK in Iraq even more obscure places are being named and what some of the peoples do for a living. On a day to day basis these are peoples living in remote places with no relation to the world outside. Except for countries in it's immediate region. What the global audience has heard and read for the last two months is the news that this terror group is a ruthless and monstrous people and calling themselves the Caliphate of the Middle East, in a straight intersection line across the region from Iraq to Syria and Turkey. The US and allies will soon formulate it's mission and send a possible armed force on to these places where the ISIL/ ISIS/ IS is keeping it's elaborate hideouts. The UK has lost another aid worker, and also like the American journalists earlier this month was beheaded. The chaos in our world today doesn't seem to be by definition anything like we imagine the modern world should represent. If Scotland get's it's 'Yes' vote on Thursday from the Scottish people, the UK and in Europe something of a downhill spiral could get out of control, and this is just a mild expectation/ estimation. And quiet will not be a good thing either for the nations in the G7 or G20.

To be continued.

Is there a plot in the 'Scoottish' Referendum?

12092014

Times before 1707 perhaps a plot in a 'Scoottish Referendum' would have or may have implied a plot only to kill the queen. We are so fortunate now and live in the year 2014 for eight months and nearly two weeks. Unlike the plot to kill the queen today that is nothing so dramatic. The Scottish people who can vote 'Yes' or 'No' are only making up their minds on several social issues with no ending on their side, so it seems. Westminster ministers and Prime Ministers are travelling ministers in gondolas, doing their ministery jobs on the Thames and are doing so for many decades and long gone. No one also seemed to have been bothered much about this situation where the poor are getting poorer compared to the rich only getting richer in England. Scotland is hypnotised by the bit of the serpent's (Taipan?), to a tune for the Scottish people to stay apathetic towards their own destiny and lives for many years. Will the future make any difference? The hipsters in the country seem to believe it will change for the better if they vote 'Yes' in next week referendum. While opportunity is better served cold on the 'No' vote side of this referendum. A nice club when they come together, England and Scotland, in the company of so very few... Or the E- S Bs. History is developing as we speak in quite a unique sort of way into intrigue, one could say. After all this was never going to be an easy way out for the Scottish politicians. So the question is why did they pursue this 'glasnostic' future from behind the old castle of Westminster? For God's sake, man, glasnost is not a religion!

If ignorance is a bliss than this is what you see, that England is as much guilty on the Scottish want for independence. Why did the politicians in England not stop the whole business of separating from the United Kingdom and give the Scots the thumbs down? Ah, yes, democracy. English parliamentary democracy has demonstrated to the rest of the world that here in England ministers still do honor their degree of parliamentary democracy and not only in terms of Scotland. Let's keep the debate alive and not dead, if possible for a very long time. Factual, keep the debate as long as we 'both shall live'. And God bless HM Queen Elizabeth II. I love it when a plot falls together without the bloodshed in it. Like glasnost the Scots have the right to be dazzled by everything globalism offers in the world. The business climate of Scotland remains attractive to big investors, even after 2008 global financial crisis, for oil and fisheries. And above all the politicians in Scotland are respected by globalists by experience and practice. All well and good in this buisness lexicon. In terms of global economics and taking the third quarter of 2014 we are not sure what Scotland could really offer that would be more heterogeneous from other EU countries and to step onboard in the global regime economics. Austerity isn't a joke, as far as the latest news on EU recovery. Austerity seems a good prospect from the point view of the Scottish politicians elite group. We know how to build longer tunnels than the Euro- tunnel, if there is dime to be found in these depths... And they are all smiles. But why Scotland?

Scottish answer to the plot perhaps is that 'Scootland is graite, just too bloody graite!' (Scotland is great, just too bloody great!) Res nullius versus what?

A sigh of relief, the world silently fell on it's own again this morning

06082014

Pessimists can see in these words another shock in their already fragile system, and agitate. When the world falls silent on it's own it is a sign that things turned out to be good and that ordinary people can catch their breath again. In English one would rather use the phrase that all pieces fell back into place. After Nato's summit for two days the impression now that we can get is that this is what has happened. All pieces fell into place again, thank God. Russia, for some unexplainable reason, decided at the last minute deal that peace would be better if Ukraine agreed to the Russian President's proposal of a peace plan. In fact, that is like building a high obelisk in the right place after reading the surveyors reports. And the obelisk, in the public's eye, is never anything important as building a house or office tower. Something that would be considered by people related to prosperity and employment. In the military building of an obelisk is of vital importance to the contractor. If Russia wants the rise of it's symbolic height in the 21st century, building peace with Ukraine was such a good engineering object to build. Other than that it is quite meaningless, in a practical way. But no one wants this to happen to the peace plan with Ukraine that is reversing all stories of the last five months of fightings between the forces in Ukraine and 'volunteers' on the side of Russia. Countries in Europe are also being forced by Russia in a friendly sort of way not to turn politics into war or war into politics. On Monday another list of 28 names will be added to the sanctions of the first round, in order to win on points if the knock out stage of Russia is to be averted. Peace get's very high scores after the meeting Nato held in Wales in 2014, if the Russian peace- plan works for Ukraine and the western leaders.

But being optimistic that from now it's all down to business as usual for politics and democracy, it is equally important how fast the west can now identify it's here and today in a constant reality that still is and never has changed their point of view. The Russian President is experiencing a rather unusual thing here, one can say. This was or went a bit too easy and it is Mr Putin's eye- job to find out why. Crimea was first, and now peace with Ukraine, two very significant shifts and moments in the entire history of globalization and globalism... Literally Mr Putin has been a naughty student and tore two pages from the present time history book of globalism in the United Nations library Reading Room, and which is no complement to the founding fathers the Russian President considers to be from and being the rightful heir. If Russia still holds a permanent seat at the UNSC. And what is worse, the young master didn't act upon instinct of pranks, but of arrogance to impress his peers and not the girls. It is this nature in the Russian President that if no one else but me finds so scary in him. Out in the west today there is caution and anticipation, whether the Russian President might move on to his next move and startle the global community again any time later this or next week. Let's hope not. After six/ seven months of the Russian standoff with the west we need our normality again and eat our strawberries. What there is more to say?

The feeling in the world today is that it got bigger for two...

03092014

Late at night and still no news analysis from Nato's discussions held today in Wales England. This might be just curiosity on the side of global audiences here in Europe and across the Atlantic. For whatever the reason of interest in world affairs Nato has not made public yet to what degree they have discussed action against the Russian President Vladimir Putin, if action is the right word one can use for X- sanctions on Friday. Of course there are statements after the meeting on the first day. PM David Cameron, French President Francois Hollande, and from an extension room even the Ukraine President Mr Poroshenko gave short statements to journalists about the first day discussions. In east Ukraine the people are confused over today's ceasefire and to still prepare for even greater armed conflict with Russian separatists on their territory. But enough of stories on the ground or news around in the world. Time is slowly changing and what politicians are afraid of at the moment is not Russia and the ambitions of the Russian President, but what is more frightening is something totally different. The world seems unable to stop this 'opening' of it's arms to another super power next to globalism. Thus far not many at the top had deemed this a possibility. 2014 Now has changed that view and is already in it's third quarter of the year. The Russians would like to do something different for mankind and the future. Europe is a starting point, by tomorrow a seven point plan for peace with Ukraine. It is probably for the best and can give enough time for the west to decide whether to stay in this conflict short or long term, or agree to the Russian President's demands to share Ukraine for the weekends. Opening Ukraine for business on working days seems like a good start, might be what the Russian President has in mind...

How did the Russian President, a former KGB Colonel, get so close to the center of globalism? Much of the west was pushed out into mass unemployment, disrespect for workers' pay and pay- rise, or needs to be long term employed; in short many have realized too late that globalization wasn't the icing on the cake of global prosperity. It was only there to serve itself and protect what it wants in personal profiles in every one their world of many corporate hierarchies. Ordinary citizens lives like peanuts were bottled up and in the end can only be thrown away as over mass production no one actually needs. Except when you're homeless. But that was the life all globalists and sub globalists had chosen a few decades ago. These are most problems of the west. No, not quite, says the Russian President. Unemployment is a disease and can deteriorate many good people very fast. Russia does not give the answer for mass unemployment, and neither can it give the world a freedom to choose between right and wrong by law and order. Can we understand where the Russian former KGB Colonel is leading to? Partly, maybe. But that wouldn't be Russia. If things go this way for much longer the world one day soon will wake up and realize something has changed. Law and order from now on is Russian bureaucracy passive and actively. Globalism may still be there, if it keeps their side under check. You know, if all this is far from the true Vladimir Putin the Russian President is just puss in boots. And one more thing when it comes to Jewish Big Bankers: Europe might not be one as nations, but primary they are not Jewish Big Banks. Sounds unfair? Nations never get up to hold the world hostage than under the impression of unfair dealings with nations. Disloyalty or betrayal of trust. High treason if you must. (The latter can be pardoned or forgiven e.g. by HM's grace)

Has Nato got more commitment from it's Members today? (Yesterday: 00:24 after midnight already) We have to wait and see tomorrow what this will bring us.

Turkey, surely, has been more than a negotiating party for the last decade?

31082014

The Middle East at the present time in it's unusual character can be a good indicator rather than 'trusted' guide in global politics or inthis particular region of failed governments and 'outgoing' presidents. Can anyone seriously now predict the years ahead here in the Middle East and if it still will be part of the wider relationships with e.g. the USA, the EU and still can access clubs or groups that are capable of holding on to the future our global community plan that is equally also or happens to be the never ending story? Israel and the present government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also is facing the same questions in the political and military, whether he will be capable not to let Israel be out of it's basic need for peace in Israel, or that he will take his country's future out of it's 'mild' excesses political and military. What we do know about the Israeli government is it's dynamism and active interest in the region if it can safeguard it's people and their lives at different layers in society. A decade ago, like in neighboring country Turkey, to set out a policy or choices and policies packed in or out, was never more deeply questioned by government or neighboring governments. This idea has changed. The whole of the Middle East and with Jerusalem as it's point of assembly for nations across the world and especially in this region, isn't considered a remote partner any more. We have all witnessed what war can do in the Middle East, but envisioning peace instead, politically and military, that Jerusalem not only holds the center of all religions, but could also hold the center of a United Nations for the Middle East nations table of conference, is one of the world's lost treasures. One can argue such a vision, that this can't be in any near or far future true in nature...

The Middle East to both Turkey and Israel the need for change should stop only being one of the military forces blurred vision, by bloodshed and atrocities, and should take on the 'Cinderella view' of the road to regional prosperity. Many princes have tried before and always the closer to peace they came the more thicker the bushes were grown with thorns. On a more personal basis one needs to ask whether German Foreign Minister Mr Frank Walter Steinmeier of Germany, or Norway, can bring to the Middle East the positive shock in politics and diffuse the present time powder keg situation. Turkey wants it's own changes modelled any time soon or preferably the sooner the better, if the Middle East in some miraculous way could 'be coerced' to come together and listen to reason in one of the present 'Turkce' tones by the government in Turkey of Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu. (Turkce in Turkish) But, this Middle East pantheon is the blindest of visions ever written, as the here above. The West believes globalism has more potency to offer in the world and wants to manufacture the tools to that goal a pronto. And also what is more important security and peace are for future politicians to embark on a whole different world and especially in the Middle East. You could say more specifically in the Middle East... That I'm afraid is another thing to ridicule faster than a flying saucer at the moment, when the situation in neighboring countries close to the borders have a particular flavor in mind when it comes to solutions. Like a proper Jewish wedding, the Middle East is now foot stamping on it's own glass. While Turkey celebrates it's own dancing with waving ceremonial swords.

This was worth to try and write about the changes that are blinding both countries Turkey and Israel, holding on to democracy and modern day democracy as identical twins. To be continued.

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan

28082014

Turkey and their new President, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Former Prime Minister, have today celebrated his inauguration in Ankara. On the side to this day by tomorrow at the same time in the evening also the new Prime Minister Mr Ahmet Davutoglu is expected to be sworn in and complete the presidential ceremony... AKP has prevailed after a long hard summer of strong protests behind them. Time however remains in these places but a short while before something else goes wrong again, partly because 'the opposition' in Turkey finds it too abstract a government if the AKP remains dominant in the country as it's only cultural heritage in the political arena. The rest of the world is just vague about the ceremonial change of hands, as they call it in Turkey, and rather keeping themselves busy with matters closer to home, wherever that may be in the global community. To the G7 world leaders and many in the G20 this has not gone unnoticed. Except where armed conflict, e.g. In Ukraine today with fresh fightings or reports of a new Russian invasion, have kept the President or Prime Minister from attending the ceremony in Turkey of the first elected President by the people Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The world's sabre crossings perhaps are best to keep far from the dinner table of the President of Turkey for tonight... And that is only polite.

By now many are wondering what sort of Prime Minister Mr Davutoglu will be if his time comes that he is his own man to lead the people out of the adoration time when Mr Erdogan was PM. The country with abundant sources to create a more sustainable economic climate, even when global economics is showing serious fractures in Europe and elsewhere, will be difficult to differentiate that from the former government under Mr Erdogan. The people of Turkey and especially the working class and small business men/ women, equally will find it hard to give up the hope and love for Mr Erdogan, let's say if any quick prosperity never arrives. While in the meantime the rich only get more rich and keep on following the lead in the world outside Turkey, e.g. the USA? Are we not underestimating the government in Turkey over the future that yet has to be made and be? A strong possibility that that is true. The US this morning in a very clear message, Jen Psaki spokesperson for the State Department, has said that now and in the future Turkey is expected to work closely with the US. That probably goes way up to the White House, one can only assume. (And the US is also not being aware to appologize for not sending it's usual two Officials to attend the inauguration in Ankara today) Mr Davutoglu and the President of Turkey Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan in terms of diplomacy have a sealed fate at an early start soon if it maintains relations with the US and Nato partnerships. Next year in 2015 if there is going to be any broad change in opposition or the present formation of tomorrow's government, the people will still have to wait a while longer on the new promises. But for now many can go home quietly and go to sleep with the safe thought that Turkey's President is their beloved leader who will not betray them, his people. Only Erdogan can achieve this mass adoration in Turkey when the moon is still bright and big in the night sky of Istanbul, Ankara and now Konya too!

28 August 2014 Inauguration ceremony President of Turkey

29 August 2014 New Prime Minister of Turkey sworn in

Without too much realization global community is now One

19082014 (Night)

From the pointless phrases on globalism is Jewsih and the rest gentiles, clinging on to old hierarchies, democracy and monarchies, one has to take it that the end of the 21st century is slowly drawing near, and of course leaving us with one serious winner and the other a casual loser. Cowboys and Indians are piling up to do the cavalier thing and get into the duel for their very life or death championship of the world legitimate supremacy. Not a single Knight comes forward, I must ad! Have we learned to see things going the wrong way for as long as we can remember? 1950 Seems like a good start to tell us what we need to know in august 2014 beyond the past of 19th century. The USA was the front runner becoming the world leader of the many nations we have later seen in another group called the G20 and G7 (G8). Something in between WWII and 2014 was realized as never before, let's say going as far as 1930ties. That lesson in history of western nations and deep into the 90ties joined by Russia and other East European partner countries, is what became known to the rest of the world as globalization. After the millennium the expansion into other regions of the world also became a sensible choice for governments and their leaders to make and get over the obstacles that have been there for too long without any sight on prosperity or be up to standard. In Europe there was still the matter of the single currency to resolve at the start of the millennium!

These are the giant arms of globalism picking up by arm's length each and every new chance the country they see fit to join a healthy economy and mechanism to maintain only more greater goals or deals. We can now easily say this story was a great success, especially when social media was introduced in the late hours of end nineties. Our planet didn't look the same since then and this today is what we can safely call the global reality of real every day life for all the world, living with each other in Real Time, sleeping and going to bed together almost at the same hour, second or time. Intra/ Inter- connectivity transformed more than just being online to be connected. We have literally gone from obscure to illumination at one point, and actually not so long ago. Data and technologies were introduced by globalism and created the all hated word today 'globalization'. Jews have everything to do with that, if you remember well what today's fights are on the subject. Of course it is looking very much like all the jobs go to the Jewish nation across the globe's own correlations, while the pieces of branches go to the 'gentiles'. If Daimler Benz had done the same thing throughout it's life and industries, that in every city or country these designated work places were meant for German Executives, the people would have understood without saying. Rolls Royce almost worked in the same policies. If we could only see that globalization is the same like Daimler Benz or Rolls Royce, only bigger and is global, nothing then would be wrong. Industries always have a trail of blue blood in their steel veins that most countries rely on very heavily economically, politically and socially. This in 2014 has badly fractured and the 'global factory' is about to be closed down.

Maybe it needs a Renee Zellweger to come and help saving the G- Factory? (Movie New in Town)

Make a free website with Yola