iF

Word of the day: occupation. The land of milk & honey is occupied.

(Personal op II)

12 March 2024

Still no hostages returned to Israel. This is the strongest message yet to Israel during the first hours of Ramadan, the holy celebration for all of Islam in the coming thirty days till Aid al fitr. The International World badly failed the State of Israel by not doing more for the hostages taken by Hamas in plain daylight terror. Collectively, in fact, they are striking out the meaning of the land of milk and honey from the Biblical learning and elite who were brought up in decent families to recite the promise to the people of Israel, by the God of Abraham before crossing the Jordan river (executed by Joshua much later). Not returning the hostages by Hamas is not good for politics in the general sense, but now seems that this is the way 'politics' is being done par force between Israel and a terror organisation. Hamas seems to understand that to keep a whole nation captive by their refusal of returning the remaining hostages was the best way for them to prove their stance and point in a making of their own 'history', and preferably with the whole world as a witness. How things have changed since 7 October for Israel and Israelis, because what is even more dangerous is this new word dripping of antisemitism since old when Rameses I refused to 'let my people go' in age and time. We can't make up these world known facts throughout history as we know it, and not as Hamas is creating a new reality by calling Israel the occupation regime and that Jews should not inhabit any Arab land, dixi (as I have spoken). The Prime Minister of Israel Benyamin Netanyahu in the meantime has a country and people to run and keep safe from further harm and massacre. The danger of this ideology by Hamas is that now antisemitism is dripping with milk & honey from everywhere in the free world against Israel, and from afar it looks very much that this will continue until Israel will remove itself from 'the land of milk & honey'. (Or from the promise: Exodus 3:8, and Numbers 14:8) Inflaming therefore the danger of worldwide antisemitism intellectually against every Jew as the occupier of the sovereignty where they are domicile living as members of society, rich or poor. Why else would Hamas believe that they are victorious in a world of free democracies that are against violence, rape, and other atrocities in society? Yes, there is military occupation in the West Bank and has been there for reasons only Israel has anwers for and that the Palestinian people have been living under this occupation justified or unjustified, a justice that was never examined against a background of the promise to the people of Israel in ancient times to live in the land of milk & honey. It is politics of the 21st century that is making the world order in our time, so many are saying and with that Israel has been proved to do it badly after 75 years as the State of Israel living in the region where an only Arab entity lives as the indigenous people of the Middle East. The military of the Israeli forces however are a separate ministry from the political establishment, if the world can remember. The difference however in the war after 7 October 2023 made a change in this approach by the IDF, that it was Hamas that first attacked Israel.

When seen from any kind of scale the future for Israel and Israelis is in danger to become a different country than thus far was known to the people as Jews. That is if there are no political remedies found quickly enough. You can't stop stressing the fact on why Israel still hasn't got any answers to solve the problems e.g. they are having with the Palestinians. 75 Years of State building for Israel isn't enough to realize the meaning of territory and land sharing with their closest neighbours, that happened to have also lived long enough to claim legitimacy in certain areas known to the Israelis and Defense as proper Israel. In Israel politics and Defense do not look the same today, but in fact have become one under the new circumstances since the attack by Hamas on 7 October, now more than five months ago. Hamas cannot stay in power and call itself the leader of their nation's politics and welfare. They should be disqualified to do so, as they have shown poor taste in affiliation with other terror institutions across the region. At the end of the day it is bread and butter to Hamas and not in the same way that we ordinary citizens know in the European Union. Hamas has been pampered by investors with billions of US Dollars and Euros. When the Prime Minister of Israel sips champagne and eating Beluga caviar for breakfast he will be summoned by the Attorney General to explain where all this pampering of life style is coming from. Let's hope that the US President can still notice the difference, too, in terms of a democratic government that is functional and not all dysfunctional just yet. You can't do that with Hamas and call them for rebuke. It is good to know that the President will never leave Israel, as that would be leaving the land of milk & honey. And Joe Biden is too strong a Christian not to understand the significance of the prophecy that he was brought up with and make that his lasting covenant with his religion. (At least in spirit) For the moment more than five months after 7 October Hamas should take responsibility for the bombing in retaliation of the massacre against Israeli citizens. And not releasing the hostages is proof of that unwillingness and to stop the bloodiest war since we can remember in this conflict. I will ask again: where is Kfir Bibas, and his four year old brother Ariel Bibas? (Don't let me ask again in our civilized world) It is not just a question, but in fact it is the only military answer to the war. (Poetry of the Torah: the Prime Minister of Israel and the Defense Ministry are perhaps crazed by the meaning of the land of milk and honey, changed to the land now of milk and blood, a rape and slaughter of its own people by Hamas in Ha Negev) What can we believe the future will be looking like in the long term for Israelis and Palestinians? The world has its own answers to that question.

mct

m

Demonstrations in Tel Aviv are perfectly legitimate demanding the release of the hostages. Demonstrations against the Prime Minister's government is another thing at this point in the war against the terrorists that took the hostages.

18 February 2024

Yes, Mr Prime Minister, after five months (nearly) the rationality of war against the terrorist Hamas organisation isn't looking all that expedient, and to celebrate your extraordinary bravery amongst mankind to keep Israel and its people safe from all harm security. Five months after 7 October 2023 this was always going to pose a problem for the Prime Minister, as he has to continue his legitimacy for continuing the war against Hamas, within the limitations of the International law, the Military Laws, and how to deal with the epic meaning of 'never again' to hurt the Jewish race, whether at home in Israel or elsewhere in and around the world. These are his tall orders for which perhaps Mr Netanyahu alone was born. So, what will be next for him to do, if he must continue to go after the 7 October terrorists and without release of any hostage? The next level in the war against Hamas in principle need some unusual solidarity with the Prime Minister, this is when you are in his war cabinet, or when you want to end the war. Is there a rationale for the next level of the war to stop here and now? On the side of Hamas it is perhaps sensible also to take a closer look at how they have done so far, and if indeed the war is pounding them where it hurts. The loss of many Palestinian lives should by now five months later hurt them and cause grievance among the top leaders in the organisation, if hearts and minds love and serve their people. Would victory after 7 October make Hamas any less haughty, when in fact that they have done something no Arab nation would have ever tried to do and attack Israel in its sovereign land? And will they give up this victory? Prime MInister Benyamin Netanyahu should know these answers and be mindfull of what a trapped Hamas could do next, let's say as a parting shot of all or nothing. The hatred is a long time sentiment to Hamas having lived in the same territory as the rest of Israel and Palestinian people, and also knowing their moment to strike at the heart of any given moment in Real Time where life feels normal. Losing their victory of 7 October, imagine what they would do... Or could do. This is not Europe (or Alaska), this is the Middle East. And its tyranny is not democracy and there is no other Prime Minister to understand this as the Prime Minister of Israel Benyamin Netanyahu. And from this point of view, free style or not, I see his point.

Democracy in Israel isn't part of what the Palestinian people are calling 'occupation'. From 1948 onwards it was and is always the military or defense of Israel, that is now becoming or is proof of a system that is outdated under a new world order for all and most democracies. But the Israeli Prime Minister original sin is that there are no concessions yet on his part to make or take and make it work throughout the region between Israel and its Arab non democratic nations. It might never happen, or it might only happen one day that 'normalization' with its Arab neighbours will accept that differential is key to a new way of coexistence in the Middle East, all depending what Israel has to offer its neighbours. Jews might induce political science into the region and shift their fundamental ideal sense of life, the Arab nations might believe and think among the millions of the citizens in these societies. It is political instability that is most feared among the nations in the south. As they have already witnessed what is happening in the north, in Syria and Lebanon, Irak, Libya, and there in between into Afghanistan. No one is looking to e.g. Algeria where a republic is doing far more better than any other Arabic country, even when excercising some form of democracy and economic prosperity at a global level. Just to illustrate in snapshots what Israel is facing when it is trying to integrate into the region as a neighbouring country of Jews, the military security of Israel, and an open democracy in Israel and to the rest of the world. Hamas is trying to overrule the heart of the problem and turn this into a fight against Israeli occupation in the West Bank and Gaza. And it has chosen terrorism. While the real problem is when will the terrorism stop and transform the living of the Palestinians to a more cohesive way of life, without terrorism? Personal note: I have supported the former Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, when he became Prime Minister, and chances are that he will return to politics and this time out of necessity as the interim prime minister. But what happened after 7 October it would not be gracious to say that support for the incumbent Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu is wrong or evil. It looks like an impasse where Mr Netanyahu has now found himself, without the release of the hostages after five months of war against Hamas, but that that is unusual for the Israeli Prime Minister is a warning most inclusive and when taken in view of the whole world. Military Law may judge him harshly, but this is Israel and the Jewish Home. In fact he is most unfortunate today and fight a war against Hamas that could be dangerous at any given moment in time, and still innocent for its mere size of the few hundreds of terrorists in their organisation. No one is suspecting that these small numbers could be lethal when trapped by the IDF.

ctaytelbaum

Israel,

Military hierarchy is closest to the cycle of life.
(A personal study)

12 March 2021

(Adding 13 February 2022)
How to explain the military hierarchy in Israel in our new world order (compare old world order 19th and 20th centuries) there is a strong inclination toward the future war mathematics and be in full compliance and alignment with the natural order of this century, above all observations, past and present time. Making also Israel the first military in world history starting at a later date in 'time history' a global experienced military.
The military nature of Israel has been decided dominantly by the armistice lines during the British Mandate in 1947. We are observing: one middle territory, one by the Mediterranean Sea in the west, Gaza, and one between the river and land in the West Bank in the east. It is still unclear whether this can be seen as a sovereign land and geographical territory, to be either Israel and the second for Palestine and the Palestinians. In memo: the locals or Palestinians (later on in the 20th century)have been so far without any military armed forces during the years 1918- 1948. Post 1948 to the present time now the locals have been in alliance with armed neighbours in formidable ways and still are having common interest against the people of Israel. If we observe more closely it is not known how the people of Israel are being considered up to this time. Had they been a neighbour? Jordan and Egypt are neighbours and we see that their military forces are respected by both nations! Israel's military from the first day on to the present time has not been officially recognised by neighbouring countries or outside the Middle East as a legitimate military force.

Military law without the military hierarchy in Israel.
1948-2021: The military industrial years of Israel are having the reputation of a military of great strength and most advanced technologically. And by military hierarchy the International World has a de facto and de jure memory in the architecture and are holding this as the only true nature of the military, but is especially in wars the sacred rule over life and death, or in life and death. Nature has no reason in war, only life and death and the military.

The sacred rule for the military in Israel.
The sacred rule for the military in Israel is to bear the memory of the first days when at their arrival in the land in 1947, and then when defenseless without tank, rifle or armed force, it is therefore based on the nature of complete defense.

Time is infinite for the Middle East by one dominant religion and its religious view since its origin after Egypt and pharaoh, later also known as the river beyond Jordan. Adjacent to the same period and time was also another religion and known to the world as the Ten Commandments and written by God Almighty and His servant Moses for the people of Israel. In reverse we are reading the people of Israel now once again, thus twice under the universal memory of all the living on the planet. The religion of the people of Israel also holds two other books, the Torah and Tanakh, that are by definition not de facto or de jure laws for its military as it is always the case for the 'good news' from God... With a specific forbidden in the Ten Commands to kill thy neighbour! Or coveted thy neighbour's possession or wife. Note: there is no greater military hierarchy than the words from God Almighty in the Ten Commandments, as this is what brings strife and war time and again, century after century to covet thy kingdom or land and take for wife.
In 2021: a burning question on all sides in the world is whether Israel has any military judicial body of science and history. Its testing ground e.g. are Gaza and the West Bank, for this very particular question. And if so what its fundamental findings are, when not British (from the British Mandate).
The choicest of land can neither be aquired by war or peace, it is the land or West Bank between the river and land in the east, and between the sea and cities in the west is Gaza, and with Israel as its interior of State in the middle. This is the judicial body thus far from any organisational or administrative given viewpoint in Israel. Separately it has no other judicial power in the military in which its reason is clearly that it will hold sovereignty over these territories in the east and west, a reason based on its Home land. Instead its reason is that these territories are ancestral to the people of Israel, before the State of Israel was established in 1948 and again in 1967. The International Law point remains unchanged and upholds the time after 1948 as the land of Israel or the Jewish Home, and as a witness by nations in the 20th century.
The Palestinian people living in the territories of the West Bank and in Gaza share a similar fate to their beginning as a formed nation next to Israel, also in 1947.
In terms of religion on both sides, Arab nations or the Jewish people living in Israel and have naturalised over eight or more decades exponentially, one cannot make the other desist, but if one exists so must it be possible for the other. Islam and Judaism.
Judges and Jury: decide if the military has what is called the architecture for its military hierarchy in Israel and by what reason(s). Here no outsider can clearly see your memory and universal right to hold up this memory. And to keep Israel in a judicial body for and by the military the need for a universal memory must be to eternity. Wisdom alone can do this greater work and keep past, present and the future for Israel sovereign. It is the test that was and now it is the test to come, when relevance makes irrelevance, and irrelevance makes relevant.

Additional to the nationality of Israel:
I am the Lord thy God
Thou shalt have no other gods before me
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image
Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy
Honour thy father and thy mother
Thou shalt not murder
Thou shalt not commit adultery
Thou shalt not steal
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour
Thou shalt not covet (neighbour's house)
Thou shalt not covet (neighbour's wife)
Thou shalt not covet (neighbour's slaves, animals, or anything else)
You shall set up these stones, which I command you today, on Mount Gerizim.

More study Israel, personal views march 2021:

III
Ut supra:
Israel is not depending on the International Law to find the military philosophy of its land and people, but is heavily depending on natural law. Its definition of natural law when seen from the International Law is: behind the 1967 green lines, to the west and not to the east as it is here where the Palestinian people are referred to as the people of Palestine in a future Palestinian State. Israel is therefore an interpretation from this perspective seen as the natural law for Israel and its people to inhabit the territory given to the Jewish Home, year- 1948. The natural law was and still is bare of any meaning before the Jewish Home in 1948 (1918) and only was created in such a way that it did find a place in Palestine by the law of partition (Britain). This also was the beginning where Israel (re)made history as the Jewish people and the Jewish Home and alienated Israel from its past history in the Promised Land of the Jewish people with its origin in Abraham who had lived in the land between the rivers in Mesopotamia (what is the present day Middle East). The armistice lines, the 1967 green lines and law of partition, are referring to the natural military laws of Britain and not Israel, and also with the prong of these military laws annexation of land or territory alotted (foreign land and territories to Britain) to stay and be it's 'natural law' to the day it ends.

(Interesting reading: occupatio bellica- "When the term
'belligerent occupation' is used in its strict sense, its key distinguishing
characteristics are that it is (a) by a belligerent State, (b) of territory of an
enemy belligerent State, (c) during the course of an armed conflict, and (d)
before any general armistice agreement is concluded.:" However, the term
38 In past centuries, the term occupatio bellica sometimes carried a more extreme meaning, even
implying full acquisition of sovereignty by the occupant.
39 The definition is adapted from those offered or implied by Graber, The Development of the Law
of Belligerent Occupation I863-I9I4 (1949), p. 5; Fei1chenfeld, The International Economic Law of
Belligerent Occupation (1942), p. 6; von Glahn, The Occupation of Enemy Territory: A Commentary on
the Law and Practice of Belligerent Occupation (1957), p. 28.
at Columbia University Libraries on January 22, 2013 http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/ Downloaded from
262 WHAT IS A MILITARY OCCUPATION?
is often used more broadly to cover wartime occupations of neutral
territory; occupations following armistice agreements; and even occupations after the end of active hostilities)

IV
The 'remake' of Israel in the promised land (1948) is but fiction of a people who by choice of their own free will have chosen this land and have made it their own Jewish Home, a very possible underhands agreement one can assume.
If so, natural law can therefore only accomodate the natural inhabitants of Palestine, in essence which stands above all fiction of having or owning the land to make it a country forever.
The International Law and the military law as here above written or designed are not the same natural law Israel has in mind. Israel in the 'new motherland' for the Jewish people by law was trapped in a fishnet of 'creeping annexation' to 'facilitate' the people who had survived the Holocaust and wanted to live in Israel. These 'new people' since have been living an animated life as a result of the British operation: armistice lines, behind the 1967 green lines and partition.
The International Law should understand the difference between the natural law for both peoples and why it is more complex to determine the territories for both peoples to live side by side, one right and one left of Israel, as the future Statehood solution.
One could also say from the International Law point of view, that how is annexation not the natural law for Israel, given that it was by the British military law designed and designated the territory between Gaza and the West Bank to build a Jewish Home/ later on known as the State of Israel?
This perhaps is also what makes sense why sovereignty was not in the Jewish Home conclusive.
And if so Israel and its military are now being viewed as 'mutiny', except here the armed force is 'foreign' and not regimental men or prisoners of the British realm.
The British extensive law and arm of sovereignty underhands had as if leased this territory to be inhabited for its 'goodwill' as a reasonable fact of Britain, with a people in destitude and trying to flee the memories of the Holocaust atrocities in Germany and Europe. (E.g. Ex Gratia) Other than this there is no other law.

2021: Israel and the State of Israel are a nation and void completely of any animated history and are considering to live in the faculty of a sovereign nation and not as fiction above the true inhabitants of Palestine, known as the Palestinian Arab nation.
If Justice prevails the victory of the moral is that one nation can live in the West Bank and in Gaza, while the middle country for the Jewish nation lives back in the Jewish Home. This becomes the universal memory from now on Israel & Palestine. (Minus the appendixes of the Ten Commandments, Torah and Tanakh in Sinai thousands of years ago for the people of Israel). But Israel has objected and cannot forever hold its peace on the matter of Israel and the Jewish Home, by natural law.

What is a provisional order to both Israel and the Palestinians?

25 January 2024

There will be a lot of homework to both nations after the war, when and if this has concluded. But especially on the Palestinian side, thinking e.g. on rebuilding the Palestinian people, reforming their political meaning and standing in the world after 7 October Hamas' atrocities, against the people of Israel, as a sovereignty and innocent civilians on the soil of proper Israel. You either take it or leave it, but it will not be the right political direction for reform. Nothing about this war will be over soon, especially with the hostages still in the hands of the terrorist organisation in Gaza. The Palestinian people also need to rethink their stance on what exactly future they are planning to have in the West Bank and Gaza, and not to make the mistake as Hamas, that all what is needed is blaming Israel for the 'occupation' and being an apartheid regime, now for decades is what their claim is saying at the ICJ, the Peace Palace in The Hague. What the world knows is that there is more than the opportunity against Israel, that only through wars the Palestinian people seem to have rights in the International world. It belittles the International world and laws. The true reality is bigger, because not only are the Palestinian people not a 'defenseless' people anymore, after all it was Hamas that had won the last election and seventy % of the people had voted them in, and what made the anti climax ending in another war against Israel from an offensive they have never had before in previous wars. There is a global aspect playing here and it is holding the future to both peoples hostage, as nothing comes to progress and nothing about peace seems achievable. The Two- State solution doesn't glue fast enough what is breaking down every time another war is on and ongoing between the two sides. The people of what is now Palestine for Palestinians are at an industrial scale part of humanity, by numbers alone they are standing at 4.5 million approx. Together with Israel for some reason they have intersected with Israel, at a different time in history after the Holocaust in Nazi Germany, and when also became a developing people in what now looks to the world a serious violation of all basic human rights known to the new world of high social order at the ICJ not to be recognized as a State. But history can go deeper: what basic rights does Israel have? The best after the war is over perhaps the Palestinian people will try to reform their politics and government and rethink the realities they need to build on and rebuilt. In the end of the day the only reality to both peoples that matter is by which basic rights are we to become neighbours, when e.g. there is no law of equality between us?

The hearts and minds of the so called 'resistance fighters' will not abade by the new future attempts for the Two- State solution, nor any other solution where politics and geo- politics could find a workable beginning of new ways. The Hamas ideology is clear: Israel doesn't belong here, not in the Middle East where Arabs are the homogeneous people. It is a workable ideology to Hamas and it has been so for years since the millennium, when still thought of a background freedom fighters for the Palestinian people. It is not only in Israel where politics stood still or was moving in directions where the people felt no relation with the power of big money and investments, the change from local to global government under the current Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. In the Palestinian government after 2010 politics had not been moving equally to Israelis and their government, and regional stagnation became the new normal. Except when it came to population growth and this putting the Palestinian people on a global scale with over four million people. (With two million living in Gaza and in societies all over the world a few more millions) And that is putting pressure on the Palestinian people to rise to the occasion, especially when we see what happened after 7 October in the whole world and supporting the ideology of Hamas, to free Palestine from the river to the sea. Hamas never thinks  in terms of population growth and the global importance of this, especially why there are global standards of e.g. human rights. This responsibility has never made it to any peace table between Israel and the Palestinian government. Whatever it was it never did happen, just as simple as that. The future will also take Israel to some of its own homework, and they too will have to work on their future and the future of Jewish people who come to live in their fatherland. If the Palestinians lose their chance to come back and to rebuild their future it will truly be a sad day for their struggle, as this is never reaching the disciplines as in the rest of the world on how to build peace with your neighbour, especially after devastating wars. What the ICJ can expect is that to build peace will be natural to the Jewish nation and even is inherent to the nature of their history. However in 75 years the lesson learnt differs from the basic meaning of peace, that somehow it can only be when the basic principle becomes the ground principle to make it lasting. It isn't between the river to the sea, nor can Israel think lightly of its future generations to excercise their homecoming to Israel.

The offensive by Hamas' terrorists on 7 October 2023 must become completely outdated and undesirable the way or road forward to the new situation after the war. To some point that will be considered a betrayal of old comrades in arms and the 'real patriots' of Palestine for the Palestinian people. There are many who will never fall out of love with humanity, whether this is in Gaza, or any other part in the world where only 'freedom fighters' are running the country. And this will take time to change to a parliamentary system of governing. The only hope is out there whenever and wherever people are in need of remedies to clean up the violence in their midst, but it is not impossible.

What is a provisional order to both peoples, Israelis or Palestinians? If only based on relevance as written here above the public will not be properly informed as to where Israel alone is to blame for genocide at the ICJ (court ruling later on today for this case) after 7 October 2023 when Hamas has breached Israel on Israeli soil within the Green lines. The context should be in detail that when looked in time to both nations and the right of existence to land, what case would than be more appropriate and decent as part of all humanity? Israel must speak, and the Palestinians must also speak.

11 January 2024

ICJ The Hague.

The logical order of trial:

1 The initiators Hamas,

2. Israel retaliation for the terrorist attack and hostage taking of Israelis, including an infant 7months old.

Conclusion? Israel is not the initiator of the 7th october 2023 massacre and rape in Ha Negev. However on the matter of humanity cause celebre is cruel as it is absolute truth but should not be on trial separately against the State of Israel. 

Conclusion: at this point to come to the ICJ with a case against Israel over genocide seems wrong to bring this forward as conclusive of the war, when the war has not yet ended before the remaining hostages are returned back home in Israel. 

The UK general election 2024 clear direction.

4 January 2024
(23:13 PM)

There is to the Right the Conservative Party, and to the Left/ Centre Left the Labour Party. And we are all looking in the wrong directions, when on the outside looking in and this includes the people of Britain. What broke this country, on the side of the Conservatives over 14 years? The Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer might not know the answer to that question, but the Labour Party will know what the answer is to that question. It is probably in his own interest that Keir Starmer doesn't know all the answers, but when facing a new opportunity for his Party, he seems to be in the right place, time and position to bring back a Labour government to power and be the prime minister. And that is his answer and a powerful one too. It means that all Labour and Keir Starmer's answers lie ahead of him, not in the reverse but in adversity. That's one. After today's announcement by the Prime Minister Mr Rishi Sunak, on the time of the coming general election, half in and half out, adversity is all for Keir Starmer lying in wait in both this or that half in 2024. What is a working assumption? Is it not the same thing as the situation is liquid? Or toxic. Also today the clear direction for Keir Starmer, after his new year's speech in Bristol this morning, has been a very clear call for a general election, now. His mathematicians can see that they have the right numbers for a general election victory, if it was held as early in May. But the Prime Minister isn't clear when he will call for a general election, that is giving the voters the impression that his numbers are not just ready yet. Sometime half this year, how can you call it mathematics when there is no exact date? You can say that the voters are not confused by the Labour leader his body politics and politic this morning, but it is more that the Tories under Rishi Sunak are not getting concrete answers from their government. Whether on this or that subject. In fact the Prime Minister is determined to deliver on his promises he had set out last year in January 2023, because the people of Britain what they need more than a general election was stability. Why do they ask what Keir Starmer will do on his first day in government as Prime Minister? When you can do stabilty in the last quarter of your term, when in its fourth year. So far what we have heard from Sir Keir is that to him it won't be talking to the voters what the Prime Minister is doing or saying in the last term of the Tories in government, before they announce a next general election, but he will be asking the voters tough questions, e.g. to believe in Britain again. And that is not 'aping' the Tories as it would have made a cacophony to the voters that are hardcore Tory voters, and who believe in Brexit. Socialist slogans are cheap, then.

This is election year for Sir Keir Starmer. He has gained position from a remarkable sort of way, where he has not only become his own body politics in two years campaigning for this year general election and to become prime minister, but that he has made so far the only difference and effort to distinct his Labour Party from historical Labour. If it can be done by him and his Party in terms of a new future for Britain he is making a clear direction ready. And that feels a bit unusual after Brexit had given all of the Uk the idea that taking back its laws from the European Union was going to bring changes, and perhaps not only in Britain. Lets hope that Keir Starmer has more to offer the people of Britain on his first day in Office. A grand secret could only be that a Labour government understands its own and the people of Britain's future in a world with new generations, industrial and human lives. The world's future is all about inclusiveness for its new generations of the living humans. And so can the living young generations of Britain be inclusive and not out of anything, what was Brexit. Sir Keir's mission starts now: the battle for the general election 2024. But we understand the message that the Tories are using tactics over strategy politics. And they are closing ranks, and it is also as good as sacredness. Compare: when it was about Brexit had they not had a clear direction that delivered the landslide election victory in 2019? This year they are suggesting how to do that again, by bringing stability for the people of Britain. A political victory is not to bring stability at the last minute, as one has to see the books and than decide the magnitude of prosperity over a full term in government. The Tory way, so to speak. It is something the former Chancellor of the Ex Chequer cannot (pretend) forget. Is there still a transparent government in Britain? But, again, lets blame the Labour leader Keir Starmer for not being clear for what his Party stands for. To outsiders there is a good chance that Keir Starmer is the right man to become the prime minister at the next general election, and for the simple reason that he has no choice but to be the future of Britain. And that is the opposite and real opposition to British tradition whether in politics or life.

Word of the day: the Palestinian people. The Palestinian people should disengage from Hamas, a & the first principle.

1 December 2023

Israel and the Palestinian people share not only the same land but also if one can remember history, when this is set to time we are looking at the same lifespan of both peoples. One as the Republic of Israel, and the Palestinian people till to this day as being part of the land behind the Green Lines in abstracto. And than something with a massive scale happens in Israel on 7 October 2023, when Hamas suddenly had erupted as a freak natural disaster on the people of Ha Negev, within the Green Lines living in these areas as home to Israeli citizens, and that has changed the 'end game of wars between Israel and Hamas' forever. After seven days of a temporary stop of violence by the IDF the war has resumed since today once more, with of course this time with no end to the conflict soon and nor the devastation of the killing of civilians on the side of the Palestinian people. This is level one. For level II (from an outsider's point of view) the big question is still how will the two nations live side by side again in the same land and with the resetting of time? There is one thing one understands is that the two sides with their global supporters would want to have a Palestinian State today, and others on Israel's side calling for something else with no close relevance to a Two- State solution. Maybe with some independent voices calling to first stop the hostilities, let's say, for a number of years, on the sideline. It is not jumping/ hopping or leaping your way out of the devastation in this last war since 7 October. Again the International World is missing the point on both peoples if there is a good chance to believe the truth lying under the decades of rubble in Gaza and in the West Bank, that both nations do not think like the rest of mankind in a modern world. At least not as ordinary people, whether Israeli or Palestinian. And then here is where the root of this sin of war is also strongest, one as in 'holy me, holy war', and the other as the dominant and determining power to keep Israel and its people safe/ secure. 75 Years the world should stop thinking this is where they can make the difference, and decide who is right or wrong in this conflict. Hamas knows his people and that the sin of war is a holy and self proclaimed prophecy they want to maintain as long as they are breathing. And that their people have no other security, that are both Arab and Islam. This sentiment there is no modern day democracy that can admit its inadequacy and know what the Palestinian people really need after 75 years, of what they call 'occupation of their land'. And yes, objectively and not subjectively, one can understand the need to have one's own security and in a language natural as to their heart, mind and skin. Of course, it looks like the Palestinian people are wrong in the end of the day, but what the next day is offering from the side of the International World is no security at all. Here is where you might think that if US Secretary of State Antony Blinken is working day and night on finding back the balance in the Israeli- Palestinian conflict, it might just make it and build on a different future than so far what they have promised in the world of diplomacy to the Palestinians. Both nations and States (one artificial) are in desperate need to conquer a 7- decades long conflict with no ending in any plausible rationale that will benefit both peoples.

Religion is another factor, and it is not meant to be prejudice, but when taking Israel and its Biblical claim to the land, there will be need to make this religious belief a sovereignty for and with its people, even if the world turns into a scientific planet of giant electronic gadgets. Is there such a claim by the Palestinian people and following the writing of the Quran, e.g. that they must live and never leave Jerusalem? Unfortunately for Israel this writing was even written before the 'occupation' since 1948. And this 'occupation' was Israel's first time, too. Nevertheless however difficult the truth for Israel and for the Palestinians histories, the binding with the land for the latter is the political will of a people and freedom of/to nation building, and this, we presume, as a right of first serve (mindsetting). The question today is how will the political body on the side for the Palestinian people disengage from the violent 'security' against the occupation, and to take on the route into the world? The Prime Minister of Israel Benyamin Netanyahu, by now should know that his clever politics over the tens of years did not result in a more secure future for Israel and Israelis. Here too the question will be a political one when the ordinary people of Israel will believe that they have rights to a better standard of living in their own country. And that they don't need to exit the land for a better future elsewhere on the planet, as a Jew. If this had been the national truth that Israel was their security and pride (as seen in the majestic eyes of the hostages Rimon Kirsht and mother), perhaps 7 October would have never happened in this part of the world in Israel? Where can we find hope for the future of Israel after 7 October 2023? Some might say this is pure hubris, considering Israel doesn't want to have a Palestinian State next door. After 75 years, yes, that looks impossible to both sides. But are you certain that this will remain the same one hundred years from today for optimists (as yours truly)? And one more error: Hamas are not Nazis. They are riders on the storm, and believe in rape & violence whether friend or foe. No German needs/ wants to look like Hitler, because you see the simple truth is that each individual German is teutonic German. As is the order of the Levites: the tribe of Levi can only be the tribe of Levi under the standard, as is for the other tribes under their standard. All this will be back one day in the future because it simply has to if they want the Messiah feel at home in Jerusalem. There is no point in the present time also to emulate the Jewish aristocracy in the rest of the world. Israel has ordinary people to govern up to the poorest, and is a written law for these people in the State of Israel to have and know. (That is what makes all the difference when seen from the point of view, e.g. nextdoor, as Secretary Antony Blinken mentioned yesterday to the PA where their future lies in three key areas) In the coming fifteen years there is much work to be done in a place where the primitive root of the languages are making prophecies of their own and that it comes to live in some strange truth or way. The west does not have the same problem as it has had its own experiments with the alchemy of changing the physics of State and nation, land and sovereignty over many years of toil. Why push it down Israel's throat to return to the Two- State solution, or the Palestinians to become as by the magic lamp in three wishes format to adhere to a modern day Palestinian State with hybrid laws that does not make them feel Arab nor safe?

Israel- Hamas war 45 Days, the first half of the end.

Outsider's view.

20 November 2023

In Israel 45 days of the Israel- Hamas war is only the beginning of what will be seen as the final days of the end of what has been again another war with Hamas. Israelis do not tick in the same way as we do overhere in the western world. Their sense of time is always parting somewhere, especially today after Hamas has infiltrated a swathe area of land where security has been for more than 75 years. One terrorist act and the whole world is calling for a cease-fire now. After 45 days on both sides the war is getting more complicated as we move on to the next hollow day, with no hostages release being made a specific demand by the International world. Specific is all that Israel could do with when talk is about the hostages and which is understandable. It was the burning of a baby, beheading of another one, that made it impossible for the Israelis to reconcile with a pause of ceasefire, which in their timing is the worse offer one can make right now. Here in the world of Israel it is for the government even more abhorrent to be asked to make a deal of prisoner swap. As a result more Palestinian infants out of the incubator were rushed to a nearby hospital in Egypt, just across the border with Gaza. The burning of an Israeli infant does not work well for Israel as going against the dust or ashes to be demanded a ceasefire by the whole world. Where will judgement come from when it does come from the east? For Israelis this will be like no other time and day in their lives, after 7 october 2023. To us the rising of the sun in the east will just be another day as usual. According to the brilliant Al Jazeera journalist Marwan Bishara anyone speaking of 7 October should shut up. His priorities are the Palestinian children dying every moment and for 45 days. The Israeli apartheid regime and its military are bombing Gaza like others water their waste every morning. And the whole world is right and stop Israel now... But in fact no one knows what the IDF Commanders and the government in Israel are thinking, as we speak. Their worldview as one can expect was broken at one point on 7 October. What the experience for them must be is that there is simply no love for Israel after 45 days of bombing Gaza. It is hard to imagine what might happen after the second half of the end becomes the new reality for the Israelis. Will they forgive us?

If you isolate the bombing and thousands of war casualties and deaths in Gaza, there is another case where most prominent eyes are looking at the moment. And to your horror this doesn't include the burnt infant, or slaughtered civilians of several kibbutzim, nor does it include the stern fact of Hamas' infiltration of de demarcation line. When settlers build their homes in the West Bank every metric land is Palestinian and cannot be left at random and to take it. The crime here is that Hamas has also committed this time an act of some crime against the State of Israel's sovereignty. The world however prefers a ceasefire rationale and that it be implemented pronto. Where do you stand is the new political reality of all of humanity for support and helping Palestinians with their fight against, 1 the Israeli occupation since 1967, 2 the apartheid regime of Israel against the Palestinian people for 75 years, and that they will be free from the river to the sea. These are not important questions to answer seperately and take them to the International Court in The Hague if a cease-fire can be implemented today. In fact the ceasefire will say it all. There is no question about the hostages, what then will happen or what the Israeli government should do. That is what humanity calls the justice system, as is the case for statutory rape that can be settled in any G7 or G20 country. What can be settled for all the victims in Israel on 7 October 2023? And who will they be pointing at exactly? (Hamas is an organisation and technically it does not releases semen inside the vulva, compare to the case where the Royal Prince/ Duke of York before God, Queen and country, had to pay millions in damages for his 'crime' against a minor and that no one in the world/ public opinion had taken their eyes of his 'semen out of the vulva' and condemn him to forever stripped of all his royal titles to save the face of the monarchy in England, and why we now see the act of bravery here for England) There is not even talk of responsible or collective responsibility in the justice system of public opinion. How can one not deal with the first part and minutes in the war, where victims of a battery of heinous crimes by Hamas were made with immediate speed without recovery, especially in cases of manslaughter and excessive force of killings of innocent civilians? This evidence or lack of it by burned/ incineration of human bodies doesn't seem to alarm anyone else in the world, as much as it alarms the whole world about the deaths of Palestinian children and women completely wiped off by Israeli bombings in Gaza. To Israel it looks like they had given up on public opinion in the first week of the war already. War was never a design by Justice as was Peace. Today it is peace that makes the king a lasting reign for always on earth. Heraclitus however believes the archaic ways of war:“War is father of all, and king of all. He renders some gods, others men; he makes some slaves, others free.” ― Heraclitus, Fragments. (Quote) Hamas was king for a day on 7 October 2023, and Israel became the defeated 'gods' of war since 7 October 2023.

Israel cannot win the war if there is already talk of the cost for this war against Hamas. An estimated $20 billion. We do not know whether that exponential amount of money includes the rebuilding of the lives of the victims now living in Eilat in a Hotel resort. The future is today and this is no way to start your first day. In conclusion of this writing one can safely say that we haven't got a clue what Israel is thinking in the first half of the end in the war against Hamas. For some it would be hard to forgive what Israel is doing and more so why the military has a security policy of wiping off every enemy to the State of Israel. But there is also no one who is curious about where the world stands with forgiveness, as wasn't this the Christian wisdom that it is easier to forgive what you love and harder to forgive the one you hate/ your enemy? In affairs of the State what difference would that make without a ceasefire?

Timing is now everything for Israel.

12 November 2023

(20:22 PM)

Israel is at war for 35/36 days today against Hamas' stronghold in the northern part of Gaza. All world leaders eyes are focused on the situation in Gaza and the people of Gaza. Perhaps not as when Russia invaded Ukraine and immediately had triggered a Nato response and swift action from all the Members of Nato. This was only two years ago. In other words once you have another closer look at the world today and with the latest war in Gaza, the ordinary taxpayer isn't quite sure to tell what is happening and why it is affecting everyone in the world's greater and major cities, whether Israel once again has gone to war against the terror organisation in Gaza Hamas. We don't know anymore who's land it is when there is another demonstration calling Israel to stop the bombing of women, children and Gaza. While in another demonstration people are calling for to free Palestine from the river to the sea. Many have already reacted against these chants by protesters in the G-7 countries, or G-20 countries, that this was clear enough language against the State of Israel. Time's up, so to speak. Of course, all depending how long your lifespan will be after the war and to see where it will leave Israel and the Jewish people living in Israel. But from anywhere your point of view is taken the answer is where no one is looking. Will Israel still have a State at the end of this war and will it still have a future? Time is everything for Israel and it isn't Real Time where one should be looking at here in this writing. There could be a moment's inclination to think of the word Mishna, another one is to pay attention to more closer is the length of time of the State of Israel, 75 years/78 years, and also what timing Israel should be looking at tomorrow. We know that governments come and go and that even the smallest of Island in the Pacific Ocean still in terms of time has been here for more than 150 years. It is therefore imperative not to take the wrong road here for Israel, if that could mean to prolong the meaning of the Jewish State. Next time when there is a party in Jerusalem between the MK's and Prime Minister, the toast should be (like the Persians on Nurooz day) "Jerusalem, a thousand years! Hooray, hooray, hooray!"

The Mishna of Jerusalem is that 75/78 years of having a State as the Jewish Home for Jews wasn't just a first time politically, but in fact the Torah does not deal with a Jewish State in Jerusalem/ Israel under a Prime Minister. The Torah knows the kingdom of David and his genealogy after him into the last scion of this State of Israel and Judah. There is such a question for Israel today and to ask or pray to the God of Abraham, that from this infancy in modern times 2023 whether Israel has reached a thousand years, or will it be looking at thousand years in the future. Time as such is a wider scale, while Real Time for the Prime Minister or any prime minister of Israel will only be looking at the next one hundred years in quarterly turns, 25 years, than 50 years, 75 years and up to 100 years. In the meantime 'from the river to the sea', is also out there and when one takes it very seriously on this side of Palestine, there is no one who wants to ask what that could mean in terms of politics or geopolitics. And the only way for Israel to understand the phrase and what it allegorically holds, is what is so difficult to understand to the rest of the world. What can it symbolize? Let's hope that there will be people in the G-7 and G-20 countries who can answer this question more seriously if they hold the future deer to them. After all durability is the political elasticity to all nations, in war or peace. Israel is not just an oral existence as too many have been holding on to in their closet. Their republic was in fact a written State. The other part of the Mishna what can it also say about time, the kingdom of David, and the future of Israel? David of course is a good name to start with the State of Israel and will remain so in memory, by the few hundreds, thousands or tens of thousands forever. It is what Israel could do very well with again and live by a name first and last, to be a living testimony in the State of Israel's memory, starting from 1947/1948, paid for in a monetary system first time, and always to remember these founding principles in the State of Israel. The name of the Prime Minister however consummate and immeasurable is not the name to be a binding principle for always and keep Israel its name as a lasting contract with its people. It should also be a name for the people of Israel to know and recognize as true and truthfully as is the word from the Torah. The next one hundred years will be critical for the people of Israel as their institutions should now be State, Religion and the land. All beginnings are feudal de facto, and for some also de jure. Let alone when prolongation of the country is in its own good name! The world needs also to respect this name calling. Without these institutions there is no guarantee the slogan (from the river to the sea) will not win its momentum against a 78 year old State and falling to the rubble of those without names.

Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu is having his haystack problem as we speak to don't let it catch any fire further as it burns up in gowing high flames, and is determined to win the war against Hamas. And Hamas has managed to vocally delegitimize Israel's existence and the Jewish world domination on a global scale for now.

The US does not support the call for a ceasefire in the latest war between Israel and Hamas.

31 October 2023

It is a hard understanding and for several reasons why not only the global public opinion would want an immediate ceasefire right now, but also that it is becoming more audible at the UNGA for nations to want the same. It is particular a hard understanding for Israel to accept this offer when the moment of war is still ongoing and is not considering to stop the erradication of the Hamas terror organisation, with especially reference to the horrific attack of 7 October this month it has committed in proper Israel, meaning within the demarcation region (since 1948). It is also true that what the world is missing and doesn't want to hear of is that here in the present time Hamas has committed one. a crime against humanity when they infiltrated the demarcation region and to not only kill people, but also has abducted more than hundred people from their sovereign territory to a place far or near outside these borders. Yet, it is saying from the side of the Hamas murderers, that this was against the 75 years of Israeli occupation and its violent regime. Two levels of mission and objectives doesn't make it anymore complex to read from Hamas' point of view, if ever there was such a view. Israel has a very complicated war this time on their own side as Israeli citizens were killed and than abducted from a region where seldom since 1948 Hamas had come to destroy Israel's occupation. Why they chose on this occasion for this particular strategy and in the manner of brutal war tactics of other Islamic terror groups in the Middle East, we do not know this yet. To make the claim against occupation is basically a political argument. And this is important to understand more critically, because it incites hatred in the rest of the world against Israel as if it were done with more sophistication by Palestinian politicians e.g. in the spirit of Turkish poet Orhan Pamuk, or Czech Statesman/ writer Vaclav Havel. And when taking a better and much closer look at the whole occupation argument by the hundreds and thousands of protesters in the present time and around the world, the Palestinians have not made any more extensive study since the millennium and published whether there is a future vision for the Palestinian State and how they would conceive such an architecture with Israel as their next door neighbour State, one that has a volatile history of self- preservation of not only a political scale but also at the scale of exponential loss of humanity during WWII. There is no evidence of human sentiment for Israel by the Palestinian more sophisticated activist or politicians, let alone empathy in a moment of war clearly caused by terror. Terror by and on their side...

The result of such historic lack of human sentiment by the poltical elite among the Palestinian academics is regrettably lacking their counterparts in Israel, who paradoxically as we can say have tried to do just that against the odds and what the Right- Wing governments so far have failed to achieve over the so called Oslo Accords. It is complicated as it is for a society volatile in itself with a new generation of free democratic principles and living next to a more theocratic regimes rim of nations. No one is also claiming that politics and economics in 2023 are any easier or becoming so with a future outlook towards 2050 (almost the Zagger & Evans in the year 2525), or maybe skip the apocalyptic era by a new kind of miracle. There is much more to do when focusing on the future between the Palestinians and Israel. It might be still possible to build this architecture of a new state of mind with partners and to appreciate rather the stranger than a failed brother as currency in the bosom to help the Palestinian people have their State and government next door to Israel, the latter also vying the future world with great eagerness to thrive and be more prosperous than in the past when Israel was conceived as the State of Israel in 1948, and had to fight to get here where they are today. In the meantime Hamas cannot be part of the deal to build a future from the ashes of many decades of war, either against terror and the other fighting occupation. But first the basic nature for this is that you have to want it, believe in it, know it is more than just possible and stick to the winning argument of coexistence. (It is this what the UK Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer will or is expected to suggest against the global demand for a ceasefire with an unpredictable partner in this war as that of Hamas) From within the Palestinian political faction must come a clear and stark rebuke, just to make the difference and adherence to differential politics and military matters. The first being a matter for civilians and the other the military, incidently a political power and arm of the Palestinian Authority government (quasi state of affairs). Israel cannot do this alone for 75 years to fight terror and being the friendly landlord, with a reluctance to let its taxpayers feeling responsible. It is this why perhaps the US will not accept a ceasefire in the latest Israel military- Hamas terror war. If Israel fails to help out in this latest war and save the Palestinian people of Gaza, it is because Hamas has never made any structures of safety nets for its people, making it now look like that they are beyond help. Surely Hamas cannot think to have all these people emigrate? It is some way related and in others it is not, but a wonderful book called Christ stopped at Eboli and written by Carlo Levi, could be something for the Palestinian people to read and than decide whether Hamas is the banker of their lives.

The world has changed since 7 October 2023.

23 October 2023
(17:46 PM)

Vertically when seen from the Zenith of wide heaven 220 people and a thousand more when dancing at a desert music concert for the young, it would take the zoom-in mechanical lense to use enormous miliseconds high generated power if you wanted to find this specific location moment and people. And for the government of Israel and the military this moment is now feeling something of a similar sense, e.g. that perhaps distance marks the whole of this massacre right in front of their doorstep, so to speak. The only excuse was that horizontally there could not have been any pre-knowledge at the time when it did happen, when innocent civilians (non combatants) were caught and chased around like wild animals, slaughtered like running cattle, and butchered as waste of animals, in the South of Israel in Ha Negev. Firstly, we in the rest of the world and especially in the west to hear of this on the news and on Social Media, this time wasn't like all the other times to hear of war between Israel and Gaza. The motion going through this time on the 'same news' of years and decades, was heavier and it took a while before we saw the realities of the moment displayed all over the place on the global media platforms. We got an aftershock, that this was true beyond any human doubt. Or rational doubts. And then followed disbelief beyond the normal proportions, since it had happend to Israel of which no one would have doubted their military superiority in another now distant time. All condemnations following from governments and their spokespersons felt to the rest of the world probably like they were only mimicking the condemnation of Hamas for its barbaric attacks... On Israelis?! Kibbutzim, Mushavs, the smallest communities in the South of Israel?! After the first bombings fell upon Gaza equally almost immediately after the first moments the global society had seen images of the massacre going viral around the world, what made more headlines were the Palestinian people as visual casualties from the aggressive bombings by the Israeli IDF. And the massacre itself of the Israeli citizens trapped in blood and limbs cut off on 7 October 2023 in the kibbutzim fell to a lost of signal and we saw nothing but a big cloud of blank space, so to speak. And on the sixteenth day it even fell on deaf ears of some policy makers and world leading nations. We can't even make distinctions at this point who is lip servicing Israel and who is genuinely appalled by the massacre.

You have to wonder where did Hamas changed their pattern of combat against the Israeli occupation (since 1948), by using war tactics of hostage takings, beheading infants and parents, people of different age range, young girls for either rape or kill, and young men torn to pieces by hand granades? This was Hamas' first time to fall upon civilians in Israel from 'close range'. Was this not a calculated proximity in military terms? And would that not make it a level of command of specific observation and study of the enemy? This is why the best thing for Israel was to wholly rely on the US for support from the first moment on. Again, the main question is, what happened to Israel on 7 October 2023? In the blink of an eye so to speak. Are we like that, fall upon our enemies with brutal or barbaric attacks to make a democratic political point in the 21st century? And than act surprised or in shock to have all of Valhalla fall upon us with their armies of javelin throwers from the kingdom of the dead? Perhaps it is the paradox that is king of the moment here after 7 October 2023. However no one is expecting countries like Germany or Britain to send out the message into the world that this was neither political or professional military of Hamas, and should therefore be considered of this barbarism to stand trial post war 7 October 2023 at Den Hague. Even after elimination by Israel. After 55 years of occupation by Israel the Palestinian people or Hamas should prove where Israel had done the same of beheading a child 'in front of the whole world to see / witness'. Would Israel get away with such an opulent barbaric act and have Israelis dancing of joy in the streets of Tel Aviv how Israel was a victor of showing resistance to its enemy? And then, would the civilized world have given Israel all the humanitarian help it needed? Jew hatred is retarded and no one should automatically assume that Germany will enjoy quietly this sentiment of barbarism against innocent lives and Israelis and above all who were citizens. Perhaps this little story is a personal view, but what remains true is the grammar of reasoning through the madness in the global sphere and media that is keeping on going out of spiral as we speak. We do not hear the political 'elite' among the Palestinian people who condemn this war for its barbarism tactics.

The world will not be same again.

On Social Media today,

23 October 2023.

mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

Word of the evening: the world has changed since 7 October 2023.

Post vertalen

Within a decade you have to face the nearest of future for Israel after the latest war in Gaza on 7 October this month.

18 October 2023

Of course there is never something called a 'Future of the country Minister', not in Israel and not anywhere else in the world. And it is for the simple reason that no future is as straightlined or geometrical. For most of the time when envisioning the future of the country the network will be set in terms of scale and strategies. For many decades this has been the only way how the 'Ministry of the Future' could and can approach what is as abstract a thing as 'the future of a country'. Also, when considering the future of Israel, what is the global future? Nearly one month ago what was clear on Yom Kipoer day, is that the Prime Minister of Israel had come back home with the good news from the US, after meeting the US President in New York, when attending the annual UNGA speech, that normalization with the Saudis was within reach... Many had thought this was meant for the coming months and maybe concluded even by the end of this year in December 2023. At home after a tiring 20 something weeks of national protest against the coalition under the incumbent Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu over the judicial reform, finally the Prime Minister had found an offer they could not refuse on either side of the Knesset, opposition or coalition. In his briefcase he had brought back democracy, so to speak. This has proportions of an ancient Egyptian myth, but it was only when he opened the democracy package whatever followed became a horror or perhaps has epic proportions of a new kind of ancient plague. Everywhere they came out of his briefcase like scarabs and crawling all over the floor in his office. And no one knew what had been promised to the Prime Minister nor did anyone knew what the scarabs were coming from. Days later came the intermission. Hamas had opened up a whole new war scenario with his raids on innocent and non combatants in the South of Israel, in kibbutzims, mushavs and other Israelis living in these areas and remote from the big cities, e.g. Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and Haifa. Perhaps the scarabs had self destruct whilst they couldn't find any life in Real Time in another century, and no one thought about them when the war broke out. Now you can wonder what myth will stay behind after the war and if there is any which one it will be. The future of Israel?

And if so you need to ask the inevitable who will then be its Prime Minister. After all, there is no chance for the people believing that Prime Minister Netanyahu is the last one turning off the lights in the room of politics before leaving for always? And because of the latest war against the Hamas in Gaza and their new war tactics to abduct Israeli citizens, kill them by command and plans, rape, murdering women, men and infants instantly, the people of Israel will now see an obscure time ahead and without hope perhaps thinking that there is no such again on God's good earth under the sun as formidable a prime minister very soon after Benyamin Netanyahu. He had also turned the future and democracy to scarabs when he had last saw it with his own two eyes. It was indeed a black page in the young history of the State of Israel from 7 October 2023 to the present time, literally. During these days we have also seen next to the Prime Minister another Prime Minister, now the former PM of Israel, Naftali Bennett. The people who have become the victims of Hamas' war tactics, to inflict mass damage and with mass impact, and then leave it to the 'others' to take it from there, as to obscure maybe their whereabouts and all cover in military gear, these people will only remember the man who came to do the comforting and stop the demoralizing of the citizens turned warriors. And who he has praised constantly as heroes on Social Media. They will remember the deep traumatic Real Time when they wanted to be heard by members of Knesset, and when there was no answer of their captured loved ones by Hamas. The coalition was silent, until today with the arrival of the US President, Joe Biden. Can anyone say they are making history here? Israel's future needs a prime minister who believes at least in democracy and also what it means for the people who should and will nver recover from the traumas after this war... What did they, their loved ones, die for? And that is a political right in question that needs immediate answering. Israel has a representative in parliament who was democratically elected by a majority of the people of Israel. And that is or seems an enormous and tall order from where the PM is now taking his stand against Hamas and destroy the terrorist organisation he has long fought and sought to end for decades. (Today especially with reference to this aspect of the war in Gaza against Hamas the Saudi Prince Turki bin Faisal Al Saud made a strong case against the actors of peace in the Middle East, by claim of some sort in relentless wars)

Peace is like democracy ending in scarabs. Except for a renaissance of Israeli democracy and healing process for the families who are now traumatized by the butchering of their loved ones, infant, brother, sister, father, mother or grandparents, or neighbours, in the coming decade, let us not forget that the chosing of a prime minister to lead Israel and the State democracy is another priority. He will also need to believe in their welfare that this is unusual, but it will have to be indefinitely part of the 'constitution' in Israel. (From the tax ministry point of view who will then design a model for exempt of mean taxes on land and rebuilding their lives- something Israel is already looking into) The future prime minister will have to remember in case when this happens again, that the people of Israel have a new law during war time to protect 'their future' interests. It does sound a bit like tedious bureaucracy and not very 'future like', but sometimes that can only be designed for rural places, small communities, and never 'foreign' (proper Israel). In fact they remain sovereign Israeli citizens in all metrics of the country. If that isn't justice you have to ask again then what is. The civil trust they have known all their lives as Israelis will be gone by now. Bring it back? Yes, and there can't be any delay or doubt here. The coming decade how Israel will shape its future there is simply no saying at the moment, with the war ongoing as we speak. The plans we heard of today are about 'going in' into Gaza. Others are getting the heebie- jeebies whether the strategic plan is to clean out Gaza from Hamas' battlestations above and underground, and maybe for lucrative reasons to turn the whole of Gaza into a second Florida by the Mediterranean Sea. With casinos and all that. If the environment is safe for human natural habitat and their health.

Do you think it is impossible? Do you think it is doable?

Hamas euphoria: 700 Israelis dead in Israel in one day.

9 October 2023

Palestinians everywhere in the world took to the streets to celebrate the end of apartheid Israel. These were unprecedented scenes to the world and it had put the powerful ally to Israel the United States under enormous pressure how to critically respond as the situation was unfolding from bad to worse. The bigger question of course on all people minds will be whether perception has changed on the geopolitical side and to maintain the vision of a Two- State solution for both nations, Israelis and the Palestinians. 

A clear vision now blurred with blind vision and bloodshed, clearly. 

What was Hamas' apparent euphoria over the weekend to turn the south of Israel to ashes in many kibbutzim in the Ha Negev region will soon turn back to heavy blockade in the next few days, as Israel is expected to defend its people from more surprise attacks and infiltration from what is now Hamas' killer or dead squadrons. Intention has been blown out of proportion either here and there over the weekend, with no one understanding the confusion of so many deaths on the side of Israel in one day. 

The Two- State solution will change by perception. And the answer will be a harsh one as well as tragic, that here we find Israel at the crossroads with a long old story told on what is to be believed is the Promised Land. It is not the same understanding as in our secular world of two thousand years old. Hamas and the Palestinian people do they have a promised land too in their euphoria to have now beaten the apartheid Israel occupying Palestinian land? 

Biblical scripture is epic where it states that the Jewish people have been imposed by such a law that cannot be transformed to another law. There was however only one solution to meet certain world standards and with determination live up to these politics. A difficult process then follwed over the last eigth decades in the land of Palestine for both Palestinians and Jews. Often resulting in bloody wars and terror. And terrorism was born. 

To all the good hearted Israelis the tragic fact will always be this harsh answer not to be able to really help a people believing to have the right to the same land as what they know is their law to build in the promised land a race and people according to God Almighty His command. The people of Israel do understand the misunderstanding, but the paradox is stronger and impossible to reverse. 

The International Law does not agree with the vision and Biblical rruth visionary here written ut supra. But there is simple no euphoria on the side of Israel even when stopping Hamas from the terror it has been imposing on Israel over the promised land for decades. It is in the architecture of the land to build perpetually till the time has come for the Messiah to come. 

Politics may only give to both nations some respite again and/ but no one dares to ask until when again before the next war between the two nations living in Israel? 

Yours Truly,

MCT............................................................ 

What has the Prime Minister of Israel Benyamin Netanyahu left to offer Israel, one wonders.

29 September 2023

He has done well, one can argue, after his diplomatic trip to New York last week for the annual speech at the United Nations General Assembly, on friday 22 september. His best of course was when he met with the US President Joe Biden to have a private meeting a long way still from the Oval Office in Washington DC. But it didn't seem to bother the Israeli Prime Minister all that much for the moment. In fact what we have seen is a Prime Minister who was still at ease in these familiar corridors of the global leading powers in the world. The feeling is here immediately why this time however it felt also a little different. Perhaps one should take a closer look at the bigger picture with first having a bipartisan discussion with Elon Musk on the stage on Twitter Livestream, and then followed by two days later that the Prime Minister held his speech at the UNGA, in the morning New York Time. The US President Joe Biden had also managed to squeeze in the TV broadcast meeting with the Prime Minister, before the friday UNGA speech. There was a social democrat Benyamin Netanyahu when asking about people losing their jobs by the masses if AI had become a danger to jobs and employment, and put forward a pertinent question to the panel, of high tech global innovators and technology designers, how they were planning on dealing with that real time problem. The Prime Minister had a sliver of scrupulous in his line of question, which was a good surprise and statesman like. If only it had not been September 2023, one year almost since Mr Netanyahu took Office as Prime Minister once again. At one point in the conversation of transforming the world to AI for the better of mankind, the Prime Minister made a consummate point of the level of military AI. Once again he had managed to engage in a conversation not many in the world can say after the Prime Minister of Israel, they have also had. Outside the Freemont Tesla Factory, as Elon Musk had noticed, were people protesting the arrival of the Prime Minister and his visit to meet with the billionaire. It was Air Time versus Real Time for the Israeli Prime Minister, something which he handled very well and doing both to be the cursed and blessed as Prime Minister in a democracy as that of Israel.

Back home the Prime Minister and his wife, Mrs Sarah Netanyahu, had arrived safely from the Stately trip to New York, just in time for the evening of the beginning of Yom Kipoer. He came back and had given the people at home an ultimatum of some kind, and where both sides his own coalition and the democratic opposition against the Judicial Reform for ten months could not say anything. They were perhaps lost for words on this occasion, having given to each something of a present. One to swallow the stone, and one to keep the stone. Except where powerplay comes in. Here is where the question is a critical one to ask whether the Prime Minister still has it to offer Israel a future. After the 1980ties if anyone can recall, yes, he did had to offer the people of Israel something better, new and wonderful. A future, one he calls free- market economy. It made him immediately without any doubt the most revered man in Israel and one that had not been here before. Democracy, democracy, democracy, democracy, the only line he knew and had to offer the world, that Israel was a democracy as any other democracy in the new world of globalization. Mr Netanyahu had since then dominated the global scene as we know it today for decades long as first a diplomat, and than the Likud leader before he became Israel's longest serving Prime Minister and stayed for decades as the only politician that was born in Israel to rule the most powerful nations. It was him who had given Israel a sense of hegemony in this difficult region of the Middle East... The same man in fact now called by his nickname 'Crime Minister', by the people who are protesting in masses the Judicial Reform proposal by the coalition. And, like a father to his children waiting for their presents from abroad, the Prime Minister came back flying with all the diplomats in his Party, and this time on a fiery red flying carpet. The Prime Minister had brought his people a large gift from Saudi Arabia, that the time had come to bring more prosperity to the people of Israel. It was for them, their children and grandchildren. Once again Mr Netanyahu will offer Israel something better than what they are having today. The future, more prosperity with Saudi Arabia to normalize relations, and change... Yes, true. The people have something to celebrate that from this moment on they can travel visa- free to the US. But it doesn't look too good politically when the whole point for the Jewish Home was to make it their sovereignty one day. In the whole colourful embroidery of this sovereignty the hidden treasure was to build and create a sovereign people as Jews in their homeland. Sovereignty apart from International architecture of law and order, to the nation that is Israel is the needle and thread to make it their finest, and very delicately done so by the women and men of honour. If a class system than so be it. Once sovereignty disappears there will be no one else to blame for this. In Biblical terms the story is simple: remember Esau selling his birthright for a bowl of broth. while Esau was Isaac's beloved son. It is time again for the Prime Minister to think about the choices that he has to make for the future of Israel, with bearing in mind it might not be selling his birthright to his brother for a bowl of chicken soup, but to a foreigner. In the story it is written how Rebecca hated Esau. Maybe it was written and hissing  in the stars as a warning to all who lead Israel from then on? You do not get anymore right -wing than Rebecca, or more left -wing than Isaac.

One year later there is no one in Britain who can say now that no one knows who Keir Starmer is.

24 September 2023

This week the media was busy trying to trap the Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer, and his Party to a 'diverge or conflict', with their 'leak' of a videoclip in 2020, when the Labour leader had just finished his campaign to become leader of the Labour Party. It was from 'leak' to weak and not lead, this time. When the Prime Minister announced his 'ditching' of the net- zero plan in 2030, also during this week, every one had expected Keir Starmer to come out to defend his Party over the 'not returning to the EU' early Christmas jingle. He did however opened a can of big worms on the other hand, when he told the FT that his Party when in government will have to look at the partnership review in 2025 when this will come up. It was also the first time the people of Britain got a real glimpse of his real face... And than it was waiting time. Around in the rest of the world Britain also held the annual UNGA speech, this year by the Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden. And it was a very serious speech on Artificial Intelligence and the change it will bring for humanity and our living planet. Especially the part in this speech that was not only serious but very interesting to hear today was about the risks of AI. Where it was weak in the speech came from the Deputy PM himself, sounding a bit too arbitrary when life and humanity itself might lose their natural instinct and elasticity. In the domain of natural life the world has learned that progressiveness only comes from the mind of nations if they want to change the world for the better. Where arbitrary once stood has now become another era, perhaps one that is gone for good or just got lost and make place for a new one, that of AI. The Deputy PM Mr Oliver Dowden however has managed to make the case for more readiness when the time comes for a next global review on Artificial intelligence. Why was this speech important and it has to a certain extend overshadowed the big worms out of the Labour leader can, or other review on EU- British partnership, or short for Brexit last week?

There is a maybe somewhere in this here. AI will be the future that no one has ever seen before and scalewise it is imperative to begin now understanding where or what it may bring with it as we proceed. Risks, but also intelligence sharing is at a new universal level. Will it change not only humanity, but will it also change the way of how mankind perceives the art of war and peace? Here the Tory Deputy PM has certainly made very good use of the most important topic at the UNGA 78th session at the General Debate. Labour cannot afford to ignore this future, when Britain/ the government has now already made very clear on the global stage what it will be for the coming decade with a new technological universe. One might argue why than has the PM backed down from the net- zero 2030 plan, if the Deputy PM has held a speech long reading on AI? It is of course also important not to forget to be more accurate by asking why the DPM did not mention Britain specifically. So, that we would have the British view or scope fully to understand. As top industrialists and inventions, the DPM did say here that it was British and happening as we speak in Britain. Personally you would rather stay with the PM of Barbados with her speech on sustainability, as time is never catching up for the Americas individual nations to fully be a partner in their apparent prosperity... And the reason for that is because the Messrs of Barbados can only have the nominal view of what is natural in these places in the world for as long as the start of the 20th century. In the west slavery of humanity has become more cosmopolitan and acceptable by income or/and unemployment. It just is making the Labour leader looking like the man chasing rare butterflies in a prosaic Butterfly Garden.

Stability is crucial for any future government in Britain, Tory or Labour. And this strange coincidence having the same task ahead can it be fate or accidental?

"Nobody voted for him," Keir Starmer today in the House of Commons.

13 September 2023

Strictly speaking at this point in time and the campaign to win the next election, it is not the time to call the Prime Minister as the man nobody voted for and that he should let the nation have their say on the subject. It is the point to take very serious, because the Prime Minister is the Conservative Party that he is leading and planning on winning the next term to stay on as Prime Minister. Keir Starmer should know how he politically stands with the Conservatives. The time to belittle each other during PMQs is now over and behind us. It can't be for the Labour Party and to win a big vision or future next, that the Labour Party's leader, Sir Keir Starmer, has won the election from a man he calls 'Inaction Man', or Toy Story IV. Or, kicking the dog while lying down. Once you are weak to lead the UK and stay on as Prime Minister there is a peak or breakpoint, and only Labour has that position to then make its move and come back, and do the admiralty thing especially when British. Where Brexit has taken the British people needs to be pointed out exactly and in an exact manner. Before God Almighty and the people of Britain. Or it will be unforgiven and impunity of a political sort might follow suit. Sir Keir needs desperately to aim a little higher, if he is planning to stick with the previous plans to remedy Brexit. The Prime Minister and his Conservative Party are responsible only when the opposition can seriously show the British people why and asking the question how did it happen that people responsible for the country can make serious mistakes, as not only the Party leading the people, but also in the rest of the world as a G-7 and G-20 leader. That is not unusual in a democratic country to pin down the coalition for their political mistakes, which one was Brexit. If just to make a start in your argument. Addressing the Brexit mistake can't be dubbed by the Conservative Party for the same reason at this point in time Labour's way of political opportunism. Did Tony Blair had a strategy when he had won the election in 1997? Wasn't it substance versus power politics that made him win the general election?

What is clear about Keir Starmer's way of winning is that he is determined to do the job. And that the Labour Party applauds him openly as the next prime minister of Britain. Except that the public is asking the simple question: applaud on what exactly when no one knows what Sir Keir stands for? The hard answer must at the same time come from the same public. And so they will do at the ballot box in 2024. Mr Starmer's own political reply three or four years ago was then a lot more adamant on why he thought that only Labour can win the election to lead the UK, back into the world. You might wonder why the same man hasn't been able to come back on his previous years as a man being determined to fight back politically against adversity, after Brexit. What is the glimpse of the future today, Mr Starmer, if one would ask the leader of the opposition? Don't stay the paper tiger thing being the Public Prosecutor in a moment like now when so close to the coming up 2024 general election, hmm. Remember where you've put it away and save it for another moment in time. Addressing the Prime Minister at PMQs and by taking him seriously, also as leader in the House of Commons over Britain, is a very serious way to show to the public that he is Prime Minister too over the Labour Party. Of course and unless the people of Britain see it differently and vote Labour. September 2023 shows a very strong case to tell the world that Labour does have a glimpse of the future that is nothing more than a reasonable offer to tip the balance, in favour of the people of all of Britain. As to many it is as clear as the sea that Labour will have to inherit very much of the same Brexit system out of the EU and its global historical partnerships. So many times said before in these writings.

Settler's violence in the West Bank, they are not taking the moral highground. But Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu can.

25 June 2023

Settler's violence has spiraled out of control over the weekend, once again. Even when the IDF chiefs and Shin Bet yesterday late in the evening have called for immediate to stop the violence in the West Bank. Let's concentrate on Israel: Head of State is Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. A Prime Minister that was elected to govern with his coalition in the State of Israel. This, after the former PM and Interim PM, Mr Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid, had resigned in November 2022, triggering another election. Now, eight months later, or nearly nine months later, and this is important to understand, one wonders whether Israel does have a Prime Minister and in control of his coalition partners. It used to be his thing, keeping control and not only in Israel, but everywhere in the Middle East and globally. Some may even wonder a little more, asking, what is the State of Israel for if there is no clear role for the Prime Minister and his authority. His coalition partners on the more radical and extremist side neither give ear or thought for the Prime Minister as Commander in Chief of Israel. To be a little more precise, how is politics working for the government and its Prime Minister's cabinet? And to leave it like this, whollly up to the settlers, that would make it look like the Prime Minister of Israel is not in charge, not in politics nor as Commander in Chief. Politics clearly are giving red lines boundaries to the West Bank, even according to Israeli laws and not only in the International World. Also, civil disobedience screams loud and clear out of what the settlers are doing. And we haven't even addressed the side of the Palestinians! But, as the Biblical wisdom says in the Book of Proverbs, violence breeds violence, I am sure as heirs to the Torah and Tanach, surely this doesn't read do what only kings do? Interior Minister Mr Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Mr Bezalel Smotrich are ministries and should be part of the law of accountability, as much as Israel has been transparent under the former prime ministership of the Change coalition of Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid. "This is not who we are," the Army Chiefs have claimed yesterday. This should echo across the country and people, and memory.

We should instead be looking at the best days for Israel and Israelis, as suggested in the prelude between 2021-2022 by the coalition of the government of Change. Life has only one straight line, whether you are rich or poor, e.g. in the Middle East, or in Israel. A very serious question next to ask is: what Israel are we now looking at if ministers can call to the people of the country to e.g. kill thousands of terrorists set in a domestic scene? Israel has the most organised army and is also known to adhere to a strict and orderly way when in combat situations, foe to foe. If you care to read the military law of conduct when conflict or in combat, are the settlers fitting the profile of professional killers? Professional killers require discipline, technological skills, decision making and how to make it safe back. Watching settlers using weapons and randomly shooting Palestinians (and not stones) in the fields or streets, that is not trained professional killings. But, at the same time it is important to know the reason behind these scorched earth killings by the settlers. Wrong, this can't be tolerated in Israel's democracy, nor is it the right way forward to solve this lasting problem of who inherits the land of Israel, Jews or Palestinians. In the big cities there are other disruptions between the government and the people of Israel, over the Judicial Reform the government wants to go ahead with even as we speak. Of course with violence going out of spiral it is no suprise that the International world finds principled grounds to condemn this violence by the settlers in the West Bank. From any outsider out of the box thinking, no one wants to play Delbert Grady in the men's room having a talk with Mr Torrence how to rebuke the child when unruly... And to correct him. There are two scenarios from where the Prime Minister stands: 1- as Prime Minister in a democracy, and 2. as Prime Minister in changing the Judicial system. No one knows the answer accept the grim visual of political avarice. What will become of a nation that was considered not so long ago a civilized world/ society and the only democracy in the Middle East against all odds? And not only so, but Israel has laws, both civil and military, an exotic but working bureaucracy, and state of the art technologies. Horizontally the people of Israel should have been in a more advanced way of living standard, more healthier and being partner to worldwide other living standards. When you have a thriving economy as Mr Netanyahu reiterates in his video interview last week, the living standard in Israel should have higher rates when using global data or statistics. This is why the here above does not write about Palestinians, who according to universal understanding have 'global citizenship' to live in Palestine till the time comes for transformation to the State solution between Israel and Palestine. A very difficult understanding starting from the place of history of Israel. Democracy offers the least violent solution, and religiously the least flexibility. And if memory has anything to say, how will it be won by violence from the settlers to give a distinct law of Ha Shem to last for all times in Israel? Are we looking at a new time in Israel where the land is lack of want for prominent and learned rabbis? Imagine Gideon... Fighting like Jason of the Argonauts to repossess the golden fleece. Minister Ben Gvir or Minister Bezalel Smotrich, they are neither Gideon or Jason of the Argonauts. In the time when Israel had no kings.

UK

9 June 2023

Boris Johnson resigns as MP.

Excerpt letter of resgination published in the Guardian UK yesterday:

"Our party needs urgently to recapture its sense of momentum and its belief in what this country can do.

We need to show how we are making the most of Brexit and we need in the next months to be setting out a pro-growth and pro-investment agenda. We need to cut business and personal taxes – and not just as pre-election gimmicks – rather than endlessly putting them up."

Comment MCT...............................

(Boris J realizing his mistake as PM openly for not having delivered what Brexit was for, or as he had made the people of Britain believe it was going to be after leaving the EU. His time and luck were up/ over at this point in time, as so near to the next general election. Here he is as much as admitting to having not been the PM he and everyone else thought that he was. He should have been and realize the industrial plans to make Brexit work, but didn't. Now it's too late, as not only from his irrelevance as PM, but because the Conservative Party now has a new Prime Minister. Why was it necessary for Boris J to point out this particular failure when he was PM?

It could be that he now can see a Labour return to power hanging over him like an ominous dark cloud, and perhaps that Labour was now in a much more favourable position (time) to deliver that Industrial Green Plan for Britain/ UK? Here you are reading something also of a despair to fix time, or to put it more simple, that Boris J wants desperately to turn back the clock. He has underestimated Labour deeply. Luck/ Fortune clearly has changed hands and is giving the Labour Party the chance to come back to power even more convincing than ever before in time. This is how I read his words from the letter of resignation, that this is how the Sun King time has ended for BJ.)

June 2023, the Tories are not giving up.

2 June 2023
(00:35 AM)

This one writing will require a little more sketching where the Tory government after six months with the new Prime Minister Rishi Sunak are now, and where you think they will be going for the next six months up to December 2023. It could be that the world might still be amazed by another Brexit surprise no one thought possible, or that the Conservatives will stick to the gameplay of rolling on the 'pick a straw' politics/ political mechanics, that has become something more of a trend rather than real change. On the other side parallel to the Tory government you have the opposition Labour Party and its freshly minted leader, Sir Keir Starmer, in their flank, perhaps running the same campaign to be the next government in the UK, but not all on the same plan. Since when did politics in Britain became a matter of planning the future, as if this was never here before? What are they talking about, if anyone can tell you? Anyone living in Britain and being British, or just anyone randomly in the global audience. The visual is clear on Labour, e.g. that it isn't going anywhere even when trying hard if to win the general election next. Change the focus and than ask if anyone can tell you anything on where the Tories are, e.g. at this time of the whole year in 2023, and where they will be in the last quarter of this year. But that isn't British politics, not one but many will say. Where is your plan going, Mr Starmer? The Tories have no plan, they have action. And they are telling you one or two things. Politics and Brexit equal something that is sacred and this will bring them back to govern for another term; it is classical democracy dipped in the waters of the story that is England. Globalization still has to make the same match in time, and perhaps it will outlive this part of England one day. But that time isn't just now. The British people are not to be underestimated and from the Tory point of view, they will understand the hardships that is plagueing the country as we go on. The Conservatives are counting on them, once again. They will not buy into Labour's new campaign for staying in Brexit and out of the EU, technically. With EU technocrats there is always only one way. Question: was Britain ever a technocratic country and people?

It is confusing that technocrats only do diplomacy and politics, whether this is the monetary system or large scale democracy. And technology is what industries need around the world, across the whole planet. True, Mr Starmer and his Labour Party have never been prepared to rise at this stage into the race to return to power, as they almost went extinct from the political scene after the last election in 2019. Everyone with the slightest dislike for the Labour leader in his new role as the next prime minister of Britain/ UK, can tell you what they see as possible and impossible for Keir Starmer. Surely it can't be this big and only he will lead it to the calm waters with the rest of the world? When they heard of Labour's plan they knew for some reason that this was way off traditonal politics no one will ever do or understand in Britain. A plan, what is he on about, to mimmick the speak of the people living under the poverty line. Yet the answer cuts here like a red meridian through Real Time and its determination is to keep and stick to the focus of the plan. In fact, without any sort of planning, sketch or design, Brexit will collapse as a country. The western world is globalized and it will not collapse, unless it is WWIII. Once again, let's repeat it: globalization will not collapse and for the simple reason that it is not a war scenario, as would be the other side to the coin in a WWIII scenario that is not based on globalization and prosperity. There is no point telling people they can overthrow the plutocrats. Power to them are like sparklers on a very large cake that they can only enjoy sparring with. It is an intriguing world apart living among humanity, something you still can't get used to in our century. The next question is how all this is related to the UK. Strategic? Just yes or no. It was perhaps never like British politics to do strategic thinking or planning in a Brexit Britain, as a country and kingdom maybe and just maybe it should have done that? What do you think, isn't in the British people's interest. The people want action, and now. Also it fits the nature of manliness a lot more closer to Captain Mainwaring and Private Pike. This is what you get as the best of British, seeing it differently. Globalization, well, maybe the Germans had started that too! Deep inside it is what Englanders think about globalization, that it is inherently more German than Anglo Saxon and therefore cannot be made completely Anglecized, literally meaning to make English in nature and character. Is Mr Starmer the globalized UK Prime MInister material, inherently German industrialist vision and worldview, or is he going to be in the end a humble Anglecized opposition again?

Post Scriptum: why not go to the general election today? Judging from the unpopularity of Keir Starmer, perhaps it can be the chance/ plan to realize and giving the Conservatives some respite on what went wrong for six years behind us. As it is being suggested, the Conservatives do have a plan... It could be part of a whole new beginning in the next government. Having said this logically that will make no difference to Keir Starmer, having now been developing into a serious contender to become Britain's next prime minister and knowing tacitly how to win an election, strategegically and tactically on all realities facing the future of the people living in the UK. And isn't it what the Tories are saying that they will come back and govern another term, because that is what the people of Britain consider taking back control? 

The Tories have got it wrong... Another term to stay in power next general election is one example.

13 May 2023

The method is easy to understand where the Tories got it wrong this time, taking out the parts and put on the mat, but building back the parts within their Party is not exactly what it now feels like when memory doesn't help and serve you. On the other side of the House, yes, it seems like Labour still has massive work to do equal to the massive scale of the job they are trying to build in the coming months up to the general election in 2024. Question is, is that bad for Britain or for politics? Political history might give you some answers, but when facing the future the question here is if the way forward for the country and its people to once again is having smartness on their side. It is therefore imperative not to vote for a Party that has zero progress/ progressiveness, and that wants to keep things in control for reasons that are half outdated and half only relevant to the wheels of power. Hence the idea here of the mechanic repetitiously take out the parts and then building them back in, if there are any witnesses around to cheer them up. For example this morning the Conservative Party is whispering the name of MP Priti Patel over something like... No, it couldn't be that, e.g. to lead the Tory Party? Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister, in last week's loss in the local elections, all depending on how you look at it when that was also a victory for the Tories, still believes that as prime minister it was all a bad dream. It is what he does best being comprehensive on politics after another bad day for the government under his Party leadership. Plus he seems harmless enough and no one will believe another Party that hasn't been in power for thirteen years. From behind his blanket in the dark he is playing house and flashing around the light within the perimeters of the thick blanket political universe in search of new stars in the galaxy. Who do they then have to become interim prime minister and lead the Tory Party to a victory at the general election in 2024, as promised? Parliament, parliament, parliament, echo... The Tories seem bereft of male political heirs to the prime ministership in Real Time 21st century. The road to another general election seems from this strategic new point in Time barren of male heirs, and one wonders whether they will make a woman the caretaker prime minister, that will dimish collaterol damage let's say when they lose the election?

There is another reason why one should move to Labour at the next general election. How to save Athens is to cast the ballot and save also with that the strength of the people. In today's speech at Conference this early saturday morning by the Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, Labour is trying to say exactly the same thing to the people of Britain, almost in Hellenistic classical politics. "We must not be tyrants or become tyrants..." (Not Mr Starmer his words, but by listening this morning to the Labour leader speaking). He knows the modern definition of what the tyrant against the people means: poverty rapid growth (negative growth in economics). Even passive anarchy when and where people have to fend for themselves, put in plain language. If the future doesn't change here people will end up stealing for their basic needs with those in charge selling it back to make a hard profit on apple cores for simply that it has seeds... How did it get to this with the country Britain? Under the Elizabethan II era we had a very sophisticated nation in the people of Britain, teaching the whole world how to behave in the global humanity sphere and defining all that was exquisite, even in politics from the Conservative Party. Mind you, Labour wasn't then any less inferior to the Conservatives in sophistication under e.g. Neil Kinnock. Britain, a country that was uniformly also proud of its military. They certainly now have to deal with the problem bringing them down on their knees or backs and try dull deception. People in the end will see through this deception of 'hard work' on the same old car every day. Why not try upgrade the industries and build electric hybrid cars, like other G-7 countries do e.g. in Japan? The Prime Minister Rishi Sunak only seems to understand money and comes short on monetary policies that this part if you don't get it... Well, he should know after his job as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Come to think of it, who will be the next Chancellor with a new interim prime minister? Lets hope for the good of the British people it won't be a Chancellor of the Exchequer saying to the people, 'go steal your eggs and bacon'. Technically that would not be good if you align the phrase to another, 'Take back control'. Sending the people in close range revolt territory. Okay, come to the end of this writing, perhaps the Tories should bring in Ms Penny Mordaunt to become the interim prime minister up to the general election. She seems to be on the right track with the strategies of the Tory Party, after all she is a veteran politician and served under great names. Her inclination goes forth to keep the Tory Party relevant, dignified, and also in stern unity cohesion. And doing so by demonstration of reasoning and Conservative discipline. The Conservatism of tomorrow should not get it wrong on a rising Labour Party under Keir Starmer. Does Ms Mordaunt know?

Labour morning after local elections yesterday, 4 May 2023.

5 May 2023

Good. Time ahead on stability mechanisms (EU/ US) and reversal of EU - UK relation: reconnect. Good for the people (young) expectations! Something badly needs to be done on the demand side, where for example the Brexiteers/ Tories have not managed to do much work over the last six/ three years by leaving the EU. The people are drying out on their resources in the meantime, of whatever is left since Britain/ UK took itself out of the EU greater bureaucracy, and if memory serves them well they will remember once more why then it was said that there was no transparency being in the EU for any Member State, e.g. that it is not in the Maastricht Treaty even when returning back to rejoin the EU. 1. You can't have the Maastricht Treaty without the Lisbon Treaty 2. or vice verse. 1. You can't have the Maastricht Treaty without the Lisbon Treaty or vice verse. Labour has to decide when in government whether they want Britain to rejoin/ reconnect to the Lisbon Treaty, the Maastricht Treaty, or Treaty of Rome in 1957, where all Member States are de jure and de facto Member States. The people of Britain were told that they were never in the EU. Intrinsically they were in the Maastricht Treaty through the signing of the Lisbon Treaty. And they had time on their side when fortunate 'not to sign up' to the Maastricht Treaty... Rejoining or reconnecting will therefore be to the Labour leadership a mammoth task, all depending on what is best for Britain and the future of the British people. Also they said at the time when they left in 2016/2019 that the EU was monstrously undemocratic. If Labour should make a start up to the general election and win this, perhaps the Labour leader again will have to remind himself the humility with which he entered this dragon's den: the cost of living has become impossible after 2019/2020. It is what people's expectations are at a time when they vote Labour in the local elections of yesterday, 4 May. Among the younger generations there is also this immediate need of rejoining the EU, if the Labour leader, lacking in charisma according to many, wants their vote at the general election next. What are the people talking about that they did not have when they voted for leave? Patience therefore is a virtue and first things first: to get Mr Starmer into No 10... Why time is dangerously close and fluid (seminal) to have that general election now and no more delay on the cost of living crisis could be perhaps in the aftertaste of Labour's gains over the Tories strongholds wins today. The Brexit car has been parked six years and only now and then been driven around the country to deceive the people all was good on course, and than come back to park Brexit behind No 10. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak now weeps crocodile tears. Either it is your Party or not, prime minister or not. You go together to the trenches and not be victorious only when you survive over those gone. The Labour Party, well, the show must go on. At least for the moment in careful good plannings to reconnect and bring back stability in relations outside Britain/ UK. There is no time to lose dancing a raindance around the budget and its constraints till 2025. Or that the Chancellor Jeremy Hunt is set on sending people the wrong smoke signals, again that Brexit' benefits have not matured because of global factors e.g. Covid-19 and the war in Ukraine. Why try confuse the public against Labour?

Today is all about the preview of how Labour could be doing once the general elections come as they may. If correct the whole world has watched this happening from every corner where the results were followed, that Labour and the Labour leader did very well, with one or two surprise winnings in Tory key battlegrounds. But the next half of the next twelve months Labour will sail a different canal and disembogue into the seven seas when becoming the government. This is the most critical part of Mr Starmer's journey, after being defeated in the last general election, then still with Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the Party. And the latter did not had any congratulations for the Labour leader yesterday either, via Mrs Corbyn when by her described in a tweet to have symptoms of mythomania. What can one say when a Starmerite to that but 'I will defend thee, sire'? There is another aspect to the envy joust by some, whether this sudden rise of Keir Starmer had anything to do with privileged treatment or not. God of Abraham in His infinite mercy knows where this silver lining must have come from on this occasion. It wasn't the usual but looks very much like the unusual places: politics itself and how British politics works for hundreds of years, monarchy or parliamentary. It cannot have been anything but strategy, for its nature is most prevalent throughout this campaign, and that will next be flowing over into political infrastructure. No mortal can deny that or making an a-political statement. One can assume very safely that the Labour leader could not have done more while getting to the local elections firstly, and maybe that he will now find more spielraum to do his next part in the coming time on what the people's expectations are. If you cannot see the trajectory of timing here it means you are not thinking or are unable to think. In short: it comes from thinking and not privileges. (As privileges are acute - acute angle- and impulse) Even creating a little breathing space in the process as it goes seems to be found as well. Politics and policies could make it and create a little more openings for global trade policies perhaps?

The ballot counting continues throughout the day till later today in the evening. Other Parties have done equally very well too, Lib Dems, Greens and Independent.

Saturday, 6 May 2023: Coronation of Charles III.

One purple drop on the Royal Tapestry turning dark green leaves alive and in good health once again.  

Can Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu morph from Mr Security to Mr Stability after Moody's 'stable' downgrade?

20 April 2023

It now seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu has bounced back from total national debris over the Judicial Reform push by his government and coalition partners, to a remarkable quiet for three weeks after his visit to Britain and meeting with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak at Downing Street No 10. This political sigh of relief was adequately enough to get back to the negotiating table between the main political parties for several days during the last two weekends. Talks between the opposition and coalition were held at the Presidential House of President Isaac Herzog, and are still ongoing behind the public scenes, protests that are still seen in some places across main cities in the country. The short blitz with enemies in the North, South and middle Israel, abruptly have ended as in a second after a full weekend of firing rockets into Israel, this time damaging properties and what was clearly an attack on Israel's sovereignty. After 75 years of independence sovereignty means that Israel had passed all claims of the State through International institutions through the United Nations Security Council. It doesn't need to excercise these claims again once more as history goes forward in its oldest mandates, or at least from their point of view. During the last three months and especially during the last three weeks this month, April 2023, the urgency to remember the State once more has been massively excercised by the people of Israel who demonstrated against what they perceived as a danger to democracy in Israel. By no other than the present coalition in government with some of the coalition partners zealous enough to radically change the Judicial System, they say is not adequately taking their side of welfare seriously enough. While the opposition claimed there was no trusting them, with no concrete proof of the exact reasons to mistrust their brethern. The Prime Minister got squeezed in between the sandwich and especially with his presence as a global leader as longest serving Prime Minister of Israel, didn't make it any easier for him to defend his case for Judicial Reform and why this new concept was better for democracy. The protests have not stopped and the people are still coming back, maybe not by thousands at the moment, but still in clusters to give plenty enough to keep the protest ongoing. On the outside of Israel the public will now look away and deal with problems of their own again or continue with their lives. For the global audience if something isn't in flames life just continues.

Prime Minister Netanyahu this week in an interview at CNBC (?) once again has made very clear that he was looking for a wider consensus with and from all parties involved on the Judicial issue of Reform. While his role kept rolling on in other State obligations, e.g. the Holocaust Remembrance Day, and last week end of Pessach. And all eyes were on him from every corner in the world, yes that too. But especially from the Middle East and more specifically Iran. A visit from Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi in exile and his family didn't make anything any more easier while in the middle of an 'all fronts war' from Israel's borders a week ago. The Prime Minister must have been looking through a giant prism he had not seen before in his life time as Prime Minister of Israel and recognizing that this was different from rockets being fired into Israel, from Lebanon, Syria, Gaza, and terrorism in Middle Israel on the West Bank and inside Jerusalem during the Holy days of Ramadan and coinciding with their own Jewish holidays. Comparing when Naftali Bennett was prime minister in a Left, Center Right and Left, extreme Left and Arab Parties, coalition controversy then had nothing as inflammatory as this time with a national coalition of Right- Wing and extreme Right- Wing Parties. Moody's intervention was the first warning how Judicial Reform would have a negative impact on the economy in Israel, and than came a week ago with a new instrument to downgrade Israel from negative to stable this time. Something the former prime minister Bennett never had to experience with his coalition and rotational agreement with Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid who had the second turn to hold the mandate to form government. Fine, but what next? Main interest is still who will replace the Prime Minister, let's say within the next six years. To use the Prime Minister his way of saying things, you can't have a short or long term of drip drip turns of prime ministers when in Israel security is a serious theater of war 24/7. It is not a selling point as selling aero dynamic engines to fly planes or racing sports cars builders. Neither is the State of Israel a yacht you sell from one owner to another. It is here where the Jewish history has always had a difficult time transitioning power or rule, as no one wants change of ruler/ ruling by a familiar old friend, brother or prime minister in Israel. Or, everyone is king or commander. Israel if now to make a different new history for the nation the Prime Minister should worry how to select his successor, or... Leave everything to destiny? Perhaps the best way to decide the future of the State is by changing the law? There is a great need to see a yes overwhelminggly here, and also a need of the masses to say no. With the democratic voting system at the base of society to remain in Israel.

Prime Minister Netanyahu surely is the most unique leader in Israeli politics, now 75 years old (soon). But no one knows if he could become even more greater. Blades crossed for success. 

A simulation of war in Real Time: Israel's calm.

13 April 2023

The Prime Minister last night celebrated in Hadera the Moroccan Jewish Mimouna celebrations with his Likud MK's and friends. Also present was his wife, Mrs Sarah Netanyahu. And the rain and cold outside too marked the end of Pesach for Israelis. There was a disturbing scene of people being dragged out of the tent where the Prime MInister had attended the Mimouna festivity, a man and one woman. Will they still continue with the protests against the Judicial Reform, even when new negotiations have restarted tonight at the Presidential House of President Isac Herzog? While inside Hadera Mimouna the Prime Minister gave one of his last swan's song speeches, but a very moving speech to 'unite Israel' under his command, and the Lord God of Abraham. This was an absolutely rare moment to hear the Prime Minister reciting Israel and eternity in one breath at the same time. He could be compared to many famous statesmen and even Othello from the play by Shakespeare, at least for one night only. By what torch of light had they found this man in Israel thirty years ago? And where has the magic of this torch gone to and then never came back to find a new statesman in the same league as Mr Netanyahu, for the nearest of future to lead Israel once again? If you wanted the warring lords think that the most feared warlord wasn't dead, how will you win your war against him? (Film Kagemusha, Akira Kurosowa) Israel is making no mistakes that anyone can recall, but not having someone to replace the Prime Minister soon, could be the first and most important strategic mistake to make by Israel. In the news last night in the JP a piece made this question and answer on what the enemies of Israel are or could be thinking after the rocket attacks last week, from Lebanon, Gaza, Syria, and violent unrest in Jerusalem and the West Bank. Also the funerals of a mother and two daughters, put even more hurt on the side of the Israelis living in Judea and Samaria. It has made multiple ripples quickly multiplying across the Middle East about how the enemies had surprised Israel and its Prime Minister, the man that made the world tremble for many decades. And no retaliation from Israel... Their timeline seems unmoving.

For the sake of eternity it is perhaps wise to be mindful of the protesters and their safety. One drop of blood or hurt a hair's breadth, and who knows this could trigger an enormous war scene at different levels all at the same set timing, specifically planned for this moment. This is set to go into all the mechanics of war, square I, square II, square III, and so forth. It is not very believable to the world that Israel could be in this position one day. No Israeli should be harmed at any time now. This was a different story altogether last week when civil war had nearly broke out between the two political parties, that even Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu had warned for not to engage in fratricide. It could send the wrong signal to places where the rage is classic more than the Prime Minister's rage? Even at a minimal. Another classic is never to attack your own in the face of enemies who have no restraint to 'finish' the job for you. In short, the article (Walla!) in the JP was right to caution for anything that might shake the barley prematurely. How it is unbelievable to speak or write in these terms about Israel and being at the center stage of a probability of war, and that this time it could seriously hurt the citizens of Israel. The God of Abraham will not hurt Israel, and there is nor Right or Left political Party to be the jewel in His eyes above the other, is perhaps simple logic. The times and century have changed to act more regimental at such a new way to wage wars. We still do not have anyone to replace Mr Netanyahu, and no one knows what the long term objective could be for Israel's enemies. Especially after their mini phyrric victory last week. In other territories the world is also hearing of alliances being tested in their own waters, while the test is expanding also more in other areas on the planet. There are two sides at play here: one- the gods are athirst (Anatole France), and two- the geopolitical military law and order. But not for the Prime Minister of Israel who has three parts to remember where he presently stands, that Isaiah 13 may not be his reference.

Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu: "We are being attacked on all fronts," he said this morning, sunday 9 April 2023.

9 April 2023

The most critical time will be the coming minutes, hours and days what the enemies of Israel on all fronts will do next. There is not much time left when also the people are still protesting the Prime Minister his coalition in the meantime, as if the enemies are taking a break after their assault or concerted effort to send a 'strong' message to the Jewish State. Prime Minister Netanyahu for Security briefing has also called on the leader of the opposition Yair Lapid today for a meeting and discuss the present danger security situation. Yes, the big question is what will the enemy do next? Deterrence seems lost among the nine million people (Jews and Arabs) in Israel, and this is not an assumption with the Prime Minister admitting being attacked on all fronts in Israel. It has always been Israel's policy to rely on itself during wars and it will do so again today. Yet still this is not helping the Prime Minister much, from his own words that his country was being attacked on all fronts. On saturday, 8 April, the US had send to the Middle East in a show of force their submarine The US Florida to emphasize their presence in the region with immediate effect. (JP article on saturday yesterday, quote: The USS Florida, which can carry more than 150 Tomahawk cruise missiles, moved into the region as part of a broader move by the Pentagon to beef up its forces in the region to deter Iran-backed forces from carrying out more attacks on the U.S. and its allies." Also another article on the same day had said that a Russian warship was noticed in the port of Saudi Arabia. Some fear the trident pact of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Russia might stir a little dust here. The thought can cross your mind how fast the apparent seven million Jews in Israel could withold a coordinated force of professional fighters 'teasing' the Jews living in the Holy Land of old. Israel could expand pronto their deterrence, but who will keep it sustainable in the meantime? Come stand together with Israel and calling Jews all over the world to come to Israel? That is one move, but the second move becomes complicated at home from wherever these new reservists will depart and serve the Holy Land and their people who are living in these lands.

Will the enemy back off now and go back looking ridiculous back home? What could be the long term strategic objective, you could ask. Secretary of State, US, Antony Blinken, has called today (error: on saturday to the UAE) for calm between the Israelis and Palestinians and not to escalate the situation, and that the US stays committed to the Two- State solution for both peoples. What could Israel be prepping up for at the same time if the enemy rejects the call of the US State Secretary? In our world that isn't an option as this would be the wrong option. It is the committed to the Two- State solution for both peoples, in which one can read the whole situation, that e.g. no enemy can change the geopolitical world order unilaterally. It is probably also the best thing to keep life as normal as possible, and talk politics against the coalition under Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, even when the country has a national security problem right now. The Prime Minister is still the only credible politician and Statesman the country has and can command the best communication at a time like they are experiencing today on all fronts. We understand the Prime Minister almost at immediate speed, something that is needed in times of dangerous situations. There is no such thing as Israel and Israelis for its enemies, only Jews living in Palestine, 'orginally Arab land', and also is revealing at this point. We have to thank the US Secretary once more to make clear that Israel and Palestinians should get to the global order of things and negotiate once again to build their futures. This Holy Land, with the single heir to be the people of God Almighty, the God of Abraham is Israel, the elevated name of Jacob. At the same time we also are grateful for democracy in most parts of the world and its disciplines against taking up arms against one another for a mere gain. In an ideal world, yes, but even when that doesn't exist in Real Time in most parts of the world, and with gain only inside their mind scale. Why so much contempt for democracy in the world? Stealing from your own people is not aristocratic and neither majesty void of excercising disciplines of soul and mind. Neither is trampling under foot the only policy to 'wake up' a nation from its young State. And even audaciousness is met with international disdain. The Prime Minister of Israel will know the answers what is best for his country's future, now more than ever in the awakening spirit of Yom Kippur 1967.

Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu has found his own Massa and Meribah moment.

30 March 2023

Pesach and Israel today are moving in opposite direction and not even in parallel worlds. The Prime Minister is taking all the blame for this unusual u- turn, is what some might say, as he is still the only one to lead his coalition and government to calm especially not after the violent mini revolution, but before the celebrations of this year's Seder. The Jewish nation in Israel has never been here before in national disunity as a people, Left and Right, and citizens of Israel. There are also not many options open to defend the Prime Minister at this point, except when thinking more seriously how he has managed to 'stage' a revolution that brought Israel in a deep spiral of political magnitude without knowing its turn out in hindsight. The cries of newly born infants do not know where they will be standing in another 25, 50 or 75 years from now. All thanks to one man and no other than the incumbent Prime Minister of Israel in 2023, Benyamin Netanyahu. All of this is also a bit of a paradox when saying that if it wasn't for the Prime Minister no one would have looked the other way and see what the people and country need most in the present time. And it isn't easy to claim that what the Prime Minister did, paradoxically, in fact was a good thing for Israel. The push from his coalition under the prime ministership of Mr Netanyahu made it possible for Israel to see straight again by waking up the nation from political apathy. This can't be said often enough. 75 Years later the country had seen many changes and had so far always been steadfast behind their leader, which ever way he manoeuvred his governments. Until today Israel looked invincible to the rest of the world, and not only as a people. The wars against enemies to the State of Israel are proof of what made Israel known worldwide as invincible. Today however the world now also see that Israel is a political disunity. And that leaves not much hidden for a nation with political weaknesses and complacency. Mr Netanyahu for some mad reason now has changed the worldview of not only Israel, but that of the rest in the world, too. The question however is still whether the Prime Minister can carry the costs and burdens of his own push for Judicial Reform.

Perhaps he is not the man, even if he is the one who has shaken up the nation with this madness (method in the madness) to change Israel for the better and to expand democracy. While using his staff to hit the rock at Meribah for a thirsty nation (the coalition), he had not expected to drown in the water pouring down like a sea on him. This was wrong to do, and that may be the ultimate thing to see in a later judgement. Historically Mr Netanyahu's statemanship will be remembered by the crying babies today in their parent's arms, that this was the man who brought Israel out of their slumber into a reality of new unity. It was never going to be a unity again from embrace, but currency. Let us take for a moment, theorhetically, that he does pushes forward for Judicial Reform by reason and conviction, why would it be a bad thing? There is also no misunderstanding in its current form that any reform is not good, but bad in fact. When had the people realized that they were and are a democracy and unity in one breath? There are many saying that Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu is a poison machine, and not many have said that this was their life supporting machinery. The Judical Reform took part of the poison machinery off from them and then boom! It became in an instant all balagan. But what is more important with the 'bad idea of JR', is that historically Israel should change. The nation, children and grandchildren, will need a different place and writing to live for the rest of their lives as Jews in Israel. As citizens, and not as subjects to a regime of brothers above brothers.

Prime Minister Netanyahu should know that citizens pay taxes and therefore have the right to speak out against as well for their government. In times of war they speak up for their government and leaders, and in time of peace/ civil peace they speak against their government over any change in the system that will disrupt their lives as citizens or taxpayers. Reform systems will always come down on its citizens, but especially when they are living in a sub democracy or fully matured democracy. You can't hide this truth from the people, whether secular or religious/ orthodox in a society as that of Israel proper. Another important part of this JR is unity transformed to objective laws. Like President Joe Biden genuine presidential and paternal concerns yesterday were indicating, is that democracy should have values. And also it needs proportionate representation of some legitimate kind when the country transcends into new laws or political reforms. A young country like Israel, can it be really ready to up its scale this high? The future in the global world today is also about Green economy. All here written ut supra was it not for Mr Netanyahu's mad idea for Judicial Reform, who would have looked this way? One other important aspect to the revolution in Israel and its laws, that no one in our part of the world can say a thing of what is happening in Israel. To many democracies in their ethical prudence that would be unethical to do. One can only tremble in the distance and thinking quietly that nothing goes wrong during change of regime in Israel. And adding here to this is that Jewish ethics will prevent friend and foe where they alone decide the fate of the Israeli nation and country towards the centennial. 

Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu in London today.

24 March 2023

There is only one system that works, especially in difficult times, and that is democracy. Israel is presently blinding itself on two systems to work for the nation and State. Or, as some say, working on democracy with the Jewish State at the center. After 5000 years this democracy is the first in all of the Jewish history. If expanding or changing this model in the present time, to the rest of the world it will simply say there is only one system it knows for all nations (geopolitics) and that is democracy as 'we' know it. The London Jewish demonstration against Prime Minister Netanyahu when visiting Prime Minister Rishi Sunak at Downing Street No 10 today, have expressed solidarity with the people of Israel to demonstrate against the Judicial overhaul the Prime Minister is 'pushing' for. There is another side to the story here, when the world has noticed also the presence of Palestinian protesters chanting 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,' standing right opposite the Jewish protesters chanting for democracy in Israel. This should have been a day for democracy and the State of Israel, and if so the right to protest by its nation as at home in Israel. One wonders, are there two systems of democracy fighting for State and nation in the London protest against the Prime Minister of Israel's presence at Downing Street? You can't help but feel the perilous situation at home now becoming more important to maintain Israel as a continuous nation and State. It is best where it understands why this is in their best interest as a people. The trick however will be how to get there in confusion and party conflict, where it has no historic data for a big redirection that the coalition is seeking. How can it become law where legislation of this change has not yet been tested before?

But in life and especially when it concerns humanity tomorrow is always another day, whether peoples or nations. If democracy survives another day too in Israel now at least we know that the people have fought for this in a singular manner and alone.

The world cannot deny that this is our first time experience of Israel's live democracy broadcast.

16 March 2023

Today in Tel Aviv protesters are marching once again in great numbers to the streets in very impressive masses, and in some new extraordinary ways no one has ever witnessed before anywhere else in the world. A mass of protesters all in red were seen on the road (bird's eye view camera) marching calmly in columns demonstrating (maybe) both civil and the military. A red line snaked its way on a main street, was another such camera top view. The people are rediscovering what this country's spirit is really all about when awake as a nation. Political reform equally also was its shock to the system. Globally there is no country that can say that this happens all the time in Israel and it is nothing new. Fighting for democracy is not your every day scene in the Middle East as the world knows it. The last time this had happened was when Iran had deposed the Shah, Reza Pahlavi, from the scene as their sovereign ruler. Some say that Iran was heading toward democracy in the seventies. In stead what we have witnessed was replacing the Shah with a theocratic regime and now lasting for the last five decades. But in Israel the longing is to stay an open democracy, giving people the luxury of deciding their own fate and destiny, as they have been having for the last 75 years (April this year). And there are more unexpected smart 'uprise' against government decisions and proposals, e.g. Judiciary overhaul, we will perhaps be witnessing in the coming days. This keypath makes writing and typing even very unusual when you are used to using the same words/ jargon/ writing style for Israel and its politics at other times. What we are not hoping to see is street protesters getting injured or harmed by the Police or Secret Service/ Military. Blood does not make it pretty and neither does bloodshed of civilians and citizens. The Prime Minister will be back from his short trip to Germany Berlin last night later today in the night. Are there more important things on the agenda of the Prime Minister? Captain (of the Lord's army, Michael) in the Judaic world is a divine word and carries lot's of weight when used to describe the nation of Israel's Head of the people. It cannot simply slip your mind or fingers, one could argue gently. While many renounce President Isac Herzog's call for emergency to halt the process of the Judicial Reforms for now, Israel wasn't without the captain so badly needed in this moment. The coalition are rejecting the President's proposal. When did Israel stood as one man and nation to salute to its Independence and democratic beginnings? What the world knows and certainly after globalization, is that Israel was the strongest military in the Middle East and had used disproportionate force against the Palestinian people. Its leader and prime minister was no other than the present time Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu.

Instead we can witness today a people hearts and minds marching against the same man as their Prime Minister, not because it is a personal rejection, but rather because it is getting clearer of what he is the bearer of against the nation. One of bad tidings, is not a bad suppostition at this point. One can also notice that the former glorified prime minister is getting more and more isolated from formal colleagues around in other parts of the world. No one however feels at ease with caging the tiger right now, even when it's a showdown and surrounded by young and elderly lions. And the lion of Judah will defend its creed from the tiger that eats its mother and young. It is possible that today what the world is witnessing is still the symbolic mass of protests in Israel against the coalition ambitions for change to the 'Basic Law', and that we will have to wait to see what will happen the coming weeks. Perhaps there is no point wondering why Prime Minister Netanyahu took to this path of agitation at his age of 74 years old. You just fail to see his reasons behind the Judicial overhaul in relation to the span of life of a man at his age. Surely this can't become hereditary and passing on the 'dictatorship' to his sons and name? From the present time reality no statesman can do such a thing and than get away with it from a primus interpares position. Well, let us also not fool each other, for who knows what is in the heart of a consummate leader like Benyamin Netanyahu and where no one yet on earth has been his equal. It is honest to just tell the truth, that if possible and only for this reason, yes you will do such a thing only to make it hereditary for your own sons and a massive dowry to persuade the people. You overthrow the will of the free people and subjugate their free will to your name and scions, and assemble councils to eternal concessions to all descending from your name. It is possible if the myth of the lost tribes is true. Why can't Benyamin Netanyahu come back and just being Bibi, the people of Israel their prime minister and idol? And why would the Prime Minister would want to become Benyamin Netanyahu of Israel? Parenthetical: If this man Benyamin Netanyahu would have been at 50/60 and call for a Judicial overhaul, an instant cold fever would have taken hold of your soul immediately in a globalized world or any other ancient or antiquity world. You sometimes get this reaction also (half the fever) from men who are favoured by circumstance and fortune to become prime minister. In Israel let's hope there is such a man after Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu.

Additional: the lesson one can learn from the Judicial Reform chaos in Israel is firstly, that change to the supreme system of Israel Basic Law should be considered on objective motives rather than personal motives. Judaism will gradually be a decisive factor in time, e.g. the hereditary rule and supreme system, to be one whole society as its own living in eretz Israel; next the part of secularism dating back in a new timing in 1948 and is determining the Jewish people living in Israel as their ID. The latter being recognized internationally as the global identity for all Jews. (Not officially here) This little worm that is Israel/ Jacob in the end might be the mechanism for more rain in the future yet unknown. Paradoxically to admit this from an outsider's view: what a shame it is not Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, so we could have witnessed in our time the true meaning of Jews in the world. Mr Netanyahu came close however to Lord over Israel by law of Judaism and be the overreaching nation for which the covenant of Abraham was sworn between the Divine and a mortal race. In the writing here above, who is like Benyamin Netanyahu? It is confusing that the Prime Minister is pursuing personal ambitions accompanied by personal motives, and leaving the nation to fight for what is common sense in the world of today, in name democracy and its ground principle named the State of Israel. You cannot win over collective political right in this democracy by division to the basic systems. Even when equally in Israel there is also Judaism and still is 'homeless' in the State of Israel. Homeless, because it is not fateful either in ascension or descension before the God of Abraham. It is this what one can assume is the eternal questioning and kernel to the problems in Israel, from Jew to Jew, from secular to religious. 

Labour will sustain the highest growth in the G-7...

6 February 2023

If constant and Labour wins the next general election Keir Starmer will become the first Labour Prime Minister in Brexit to speak at the United Nations General Assembly, make his point and issue to address the whole world and nations about how he sees his government working together at the G-20 and G-7 levels on his sustainable growth. In March 2023 Mr Starmer is not yet the Prime Minister and will have to wait a while longer before he can address the UNGA, and to make his mark on Brexit distinct from what the world perceived from the Tories since they took back control from the European Union. To get a glimpse what that may have been like for the United Nations General Assembly, listening to the former prime minister Boris Johnson it is perhaps a good idea to listen again and than see the difference a speech from Keir Starmer will be like to hear. It will not be a personal message this time. Talk of benefits for leaving the EU is something you can say to the British people, but addressing nations benefits are referring to facts and figures. Hence the meaning G-7. Or economic analysis purely made for listening, e.g. the ninth of Beethoven. All distinguished gentlemen and ladies at the UNGA. Last week many in the British media public have criticized Sir Keir making pledges on sustainable growth and highest in the G-7, that he cannot explain where the secret source lies for this sudden growth the Tories had not seen. Two months in the new year 2023 there is not one Brexiteer who has seen the secret source for growth just yet. And why would it be there and they haven't found it? What they did see was that the benefits still had to come, maybe tomorrow, the next month, later this year in August, or at the end of this year? The Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has made new pledges again today to excite growth and benefits only Brexit could give the people of Britain and at large in the whole of the UK. And what were the pledges after 2019 when they won the general election and their impact?

Another criticism on Keir Starmer after the Windsor Framework last week on monday, was that the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak had pulled the rug from underneath him and now he was lost. Why would anyone wanting to protest Brexit now vote for Labour in the next general election, while they could easily return back to the Tories? It looks like here is where many underestimate what the electorate can or cannot do when they have decided to fight for their own lives. As Brexiteer and fierce leaver the Prime Minister had suddenly realized that in politics nothing works better than a dose of dualism politics, especially with an old ally and friend as the European Union. Maybe what these people meant was that the Prime Minister had stolen a little fire from the Labour camp and use this for his own Party. (Others may use the phrase taking the wind out of the sails) And replaced the empty spots with something called soot. But the Labour leader did not make any comment on the criticism from the media or individual activists. Instead this whole last week was full with the news on Sue Gray and her appointment as Labour strategist/ Chief of Staff, with nothing official just yet at this time. A year ago Ms Gray headed the Partygate Investigation during Covid 2020 and 2021. It is no surprise to bring the investigation forward with the new office, if becoming Labour's Chief of Staff. And timing is no secret... When the army of the dead of Dunharrow in Lord of the Rings rise. Next: the big question. Can Keir Starmer become prime minister? With the Prime Minister growing giants in his backyard everyone seems to think that impossible for the Labour leader the way things are going at the moment. Except where logos is lacking in all these new ways of the government and under the Tory Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. Ah, what is politics in Britain without a little Greek myth where it all once had begun under the earth's sun and still may surprise who will be the last blonde hero/ Apollo of Brexit come the next election. In Cupid's revenge?  

Medienat Israel, adjacent to a new Messianic vision in 2023.

27 February 2023

How many Israelis have a say in their future during the time of transition of government under the coalition of Likud and the religious / far Right extremist political parties? 9 Million is not a fictional number of people in this nation, and if you want to know exact more information the search engine Google will tell you a precise demographics. Something must be done and until the last Bennett- Lapid government there was indication what needed to be done scraping here and there for that new approach. There was also something else good about the idea of working together with realities between the Jewish and Arab populations that make up the State of Israel, 3 million Arabs and six or seven million Jews. The former prime minister, Naftali Bennett, was committed to create a hegemony from all fractures known to Israel over a few decades, but did not succeed to bolt with this hobby horse, the way democracy is perceived in Israel by the current government under Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu. The question is: what was the plan for bringing on to center stage politics a Right- Wing government under his leadership? 74 Years (this year a celebrated 75 years) all prime ministers of Israel since inception as a State for the Jewish people, were all elected by the ballot and democratically. With the burning tyres in Huwara last weekend one may ask the question now whether the future will maintain the same inception for the next 100 years. And that is Israel's only hope to stay relevant in the global opinion. Changing the global opinion can be a very cost negative on the national balance, if you renegade in the middle of the process / world order. The idea is almost a Messianic sense of reality to have a world order based on peace and stability for all nations. In this Israel is not the only country and testing its limits, where perhaps another and different prime minister of Israel, with greater ambitions for the country and its peoples, would try put his determination and will to the test of time now and forever. Brexit, like Israel, would also like to survive on its own rules and laws. Here the process of change, from the EU, is still ongoing after six years, notably in a much bigger world order in 2023 (compared to the old world order of the fifties to the millennium). The future and globalism are becoming more as we proceed its forwardness a titanic struggle as we speak in Real Time. And the war in Ukraine isn't making it easier for the west to hope, that this time rebuilding the nations and democracies will take them to the zenith of prosperity e.g. in 2050.

Part of Israel's unrest in the West Bank is not what is the part of Medienat Israel and its democratic future. The latter will require high standards of disciplines and rational thinking, as security and the military are a constant of rationalities 24/7 to eternity. And with the good nations, whether in Israel or Britain, fanatic or extremist ideas only reflect a segment of society by free will or randomness. Technocracy under these circumstances simply can burn out and leaving no trail of memory behind, what you might call in classical terms 'prosperity'? Israelis living under the rubble of poverty's shame we will never know or see why they remember that this country was once a blooming desert lilac flower and with good fragrance, in a fairy- tale like past. What do they want in the new government under ministries with Ministers like Itamar Ben Gvir in the interior security secretary? The whole world knows about the problem of the Two- State solution and the Oslo Accords. We do need a prime minister in Israel to deal resolutely with the problem once and for all, in stead of lingering on and on in randomness and free will. Again, the Declaration of Independence was meant to put Israel as a nation living in Israel, and the writing went even further, and universal. The way to do that is written in seven decades of State building since 1948. Minister Bezalel Smotrich and Miniser Itamar Ben Gvir will see Israel from their perspective or perception as a singular right to sovereignty, where this sovereignty clearly has no meaning to the rest of the world and in the global opinion. In territories like Judea and Samaria the world's supreme vision is one of demarcation, which they perceive more specifically as designated territory each with a side and name. Claims of ancestral land and its meaning can only predate from the modern century and not ancestral land in ancient times. The Palestinian people fit this category of global standard where they are the new peoples in a world order memory/ data. Ancient Biblical memory makes mentioning of most nations known to this day in the Middle East, with no specific mentioning of the Palestinian people living in the land of Milk and Honey beyond the Jordan River. Nevertheless the Messianic dream for the religious Jews in Israel is existentialism and belonging to a whole different order, and that is independent from the new world order geopolitical spheres. The Messiah is a very serious dreaming, too. And it is hardly disorder or disorderly without reins.

Sir Keir should change the Party hierarchy old Labour policies.

18 February 2023

Antisemitism is one point and compromise of Labour policies are both unthinkable in British politics and its parliamentary system, either Conservative or the Labour Party. Now with the EHRC report, (an inquiry into allegations of antisemitism in the Labour party) under the former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, it caused Mr Starmer some of a deep embarrassment at a time very inconvenient as he is expected in certain circles that he will be the UK's next prime minister. And from his last speech last week on thursday there was clear visible proof on his face and in his choice of words that this was making him uncomfortable. How could he make good now and bring back trust between his leadership and the Jewish community, must have been weighing heavily above inside his high head. Partly because Sir Keir was one of the closest loyal to Mr Corbyn for at least the last decade. Let's not forget that Labour has been in opposition for thirteen years! After 2016 all of Britain also went through a new phase in the meantime and in 2019 Brexit was finally 'done'. How much did Labour had something to do with leaving the EU doesn't say in the EHRC report, as it clearly has something to do with the negligence of watchful eyes e.g. on where Britain then stood as a society and in its politics. How can this be relevant? From the point of Sir Keir, leaving the EU had put much of staying in the EU as his most engaging work, and not on Jeremy Corbyn. It doesn't put that emblem of politics/ political battles on Mr Corbyn, but rather much more on Keir Starmer. When this EHRC report came out and its findings on serious emblazoned antisemtism during Jeremy Corbyn's leadership, the media has tried to put the simple blame on Sir Keir Starmer. He wasn't the right person in the present time to champion the case against Jeremy Corbyn, by pointing his finger resolutely at the former leader. That was blatant arrogance, some have said. Now the question no one is addressing is what was meant then by antisemitism in the Party under Corbyn.

Antisemitism under Jeremy Corbyn for over more than a decade in the Labour Party was defined by the lack of British politics and fighting the issues for the British people at home. There was a complete diversion from what mattered most to the British people and 'working class'. This is Labour's law: a constant for fighting for the people. If you now move away from this constant and diversify from law to personal taste of politics and choice becomes evident, no judgement will come as a surprise when asking why did Labour politics lag so much behind over a decade long? That Israel is an occupation power against the Palestinian people? That the Palestinian people have a right to return to Palestine? And that the West Bank and Gaza are brutally depleted from existence? Sir Keir has also said in his speech on thursday that there will be no place in the Labour Party for racism, without mentioning any specifics against any peoples. He might also be very smart, if this is what you might say or think. Why did the former leader not have used the same smart politics and refused to go that way, universally known as basis/ basic equality and rights? Labour had not only transformed negatively on the matter of antisemitism, but also as a Party for the working men and women in the whole of the UK. It is therefore a little unfair to put the blame now on Keir Starmer who has to put all that (the latter) back into the basket as the eggs are scattered all over the place and rolling everywhere against time. In 2014 incidently the Kurdish people had a mini uprise in the south of Turkey and parliament or the House of Commons did make an issue of the new Kurdish problem in Turkey and cried for helping the Kurds. A decade long? No. I must admit that I am not at all familiar with the Party antisemitism problem and the tragedy that this was possible in an advanced economy as that of Britain. There are also ordinary British Jewish citizens and during this decade did not had the right to be in the Labour Party, for being Jewish and that Palestine was occupied by the Israelis. It says something totally different in the Balfour Decleration, for Israelis having the right to live in the Jewish Home. Jeremy Corbyn should not hide behind sane politics about the Two- State solution for Israel and the Palestinians, when crying to free Palestine from occupation. Something the Palestinian new generation are shouting from the rooftops in New York and London, that they don't only want half but all of Israel. Are we in G7 Britain? Are we living in the most advanced economies in the west? 

Additional: on 'Not the Andrew Marr show' founder of EHRC, Sir Geoffrey Bindman, has made clear a point today on the report (an inquiry into allegations of antisemitism in the Labour party) not to have been interpreted correctly by the Media, and had it not even made any mention of Jeremy Corbyn per sé behind the allegations looked into (2 cases out of 220) during the time that Mr Corbyn was the Labour leader.

What was said and done are in total a different reading, when de facto the real question in general is not relevant to the allegations. Labour is a political party in the British parliamentary political system, next to the Conservative Party. (UNION in memo keeping the political parties in check and balances)

In concreto: during this time (13 years of Tory and Brexit (6 years) governments) it is important to answer a simple question: where was the leader of the Labour Party when the alleged antisemitism had taken place? Historically Labour is still the Party for the working men and women of Britain (UK). Free Palestine and to put the party to fight for a Palestinian State, in concrete what does this mean for the macro or micro economics of Britain for the last decade, but especially since 2019?

Fiction: and what is the answer had it been so that there were people fighting for a free Jewish State- without definition- in the same Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn?
Under Keir Starmer the Labour Party will have to make a hard effort trying to get the economy working again and once more do the hard battles on trade, as 'Out is out' is what Brexit means to the rest of the world. Historically these are the battles now missing from the Labour Party in the last decade, by the Labour leader then under Jeremy Corbyn. No one remembers Tony Blair as prime minister delegating his job to others in the party, nor did Neil Kinnock.

Question: where is this going with the allegations on antisemtism after today's correction by Sir Geoffrey Bindman?

Free opinion: Labour needs to listen to the disappointment of Brexiteers throughout the country.

4 February 2023

Many of ordinary people who became Brexiteers in the 'Yes' vote to leave the EU in the referendum in 2016, more each day in 2023 are realizing that one Brexit was a two level system, with two the people did the right thing in complete civil obedience and voted the nationalistic vote to get out of the EU. Theirs was the level of the sense of belonging to Britain and wanting the best deal for them as the British people. Their vote to leave the EU is without too much politics to say, that they have chosen the 'right deal' as only they understood, plus flavoured with the sentiment of being most patriotic also a sentiment they haven't excercised since WWII. They have never thought that they were politicians and decided leaving the EU, is what you can hear sometimes during phone- ins on Radio programs in the UK. Where Brexit has failed and now more evident than three (economy) or six years ago (as politics) is that the success of Brexit has left out the base voters' level who in blind trust helped exit the EU politics (from politicians). It is here where Keir Starmer and the Labour Party will have to deal with a very sensitive issue where and when these Brexiteers (the people) and in their wounded pride must make it clear that Labour stands exactly with them in the same place: a battered economy. On the social side also offering a way out of their disappointment and make their side inclusive to what Labour is planning on offering the country when coming to government. The next general election is crucial to their change of hearts and minds, that the general situation is imperative when all work on the same goals. And only a Labour government can offer that inclusiveness, not the Tories. And there is also a financial picture what and where costs will be and go to, like every rebuilding is more costly so will this be. A promising year after the first year in government should buy everyone some time and respite, that is when everything goes accordingly, scheme and time. Keir Starmer is the new Duke of Wellington (Waterloo 18 June 1815) and understanding how the ordinary soldier's mind works and ticks when facing heavy rain and deep mud while the enemy approaches faster. Labour is the tradition not only of the working class/ people first and second a power in the 21st century to bring back the sense of Britishness in industries.

Brexit on the level of politics and in its survival mode is proving to be inadequate to reach out at this point to the level of Brexiteers with a self-worth for having left the EU as a nation and people. Perhaps that is also evident why Labour could win the next general election with a landslide if able to unite all sides as a nation. Something so much easier to think and write on paper, less so when remainers and leavers have become oppositions of a violent nature. There is no blind eye to point out why Keir Starmer hasn't been able to connect with both sides just yet in a full way. Some might see in him that he is too posh, and even saying it out loud when getting a stage. Here is where Mr Starmer could make a difference if reconnecting Britain also means what was lost at home as a nation. Because the ordinary Brexiteers should not think about the Labour leader of changing their civil obedience to 'civil disobedience' (in a manner of speaking). The economy is at the heart of Labour's ambitions, the Labour leader just said the other day in one of his speeches. Equally important is inclusiveness of all people in the UK. Can Sir Keir prove it? Can he prove that? The people are the very hearts and minds of political power and just to remind you that even Brexit could not have done it without the 'Yes' vote of these ordinary people. It was their big day to be part again of the kingdom and a Tory government, and feeling they too had the privilege for once to stand side by side with the lords Brexiteers in government. On the realistic side when it is politics and their class, on both sides there is arrogance and where that is natural. Or defeat in another Reform Bill 21st century? Peace and stability should start first at home especially when divided by a system now found out half empty on the side of the loyal and good people, and half full on the side of those who promised the people asses milk. (Life of Brian, Monthy Python, 1979) It is Mr Keir's moment to say 'Yes we can' to the people of all persuasions in the UK, even when that may be a little too idealistic where the country is now a broken system (according to many experts). How does one knows whether Labour is the only Party to come out of the Tory survival mode? Political providence, maybe? Democracy multilaterlism? The salt of earth? "Awake, my spirit. Not Greece she is awake," Lord Byron quotation?

Keir Starmer, the knight in shining white (or what) armor if Labour wins the next general election.

30 January 2023

Let's start with the 'what armor'. What is hard to some outsiders is understanding why the government under the Tory Party keep saying about the leader of the opposition, that he has nothing underneath his sleeves and to lead a complexity like a Brexit government under his leadership. Does tradition in British politics mean nothing anymore in the present time of 2023? But they also do know ('of course you're not idiots') that no government can have other objectives to lead Brexit, not on the Tory side and not on Labour's side, if they want to move on from the moment where six years later they have arrived. Fair point. And yet the mechanics of future time/ timing doesn't quite works that way- translated to human logic. Every second shift can mean a difference and change units of time and situations. Had this never been the case that would mean that Britain is still living in medieval times and castles. Six years later one can only think back after 2016 and see two different territories, one negotiations after leave, and secondly and even more pertinent was the plan for moving on. Just for legal reasons alone made this the only way out. Once you're out of the womb you are on the planet size world. With a wide heaven hanging above your tiny head strategically forever (as long as you live). And what are the chances for you to go back 'inside'? Size- wise, that could have been a possibility to go back, if only... Nature works outwards and not inwards. Except when it concerns your anatomy. Memory- wise maybe? It is no different when getting the objective memory- based and try getting the EU to be interested again on what offer Britain has and cannot make, under the objectives of government and Brexit. Why do many see this 'return' process as treason of the sovereignty of Britain? People everywhere (Chancellor- Jeremy Hunt's- fifth point) need good utilities growth. One thing peculiar here with that: for growth yes, but by what model? The Labour Party's message for growth could create new channels for certain businesses in the public sectors, no matter how pedant that sounds. 'The working class' needs redefining the tier economy where they dwell. The Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves is desperate to get to work and make the country shift an inch into growth, is what you can understand from all the speeches and articles written by her in these last two months. Question is: where does the white knight in shining armor comes in?

The unique thing for Mr Starmer three months ago in November last year 2022, after the new Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was sworn in, is that there was an exchange movement at the same time when that happened. The Tories could not afford to have another prime minister in the coming days (then), weeks, months, was just the dominant sentiment after their third PM in one year/ six months. The day and time for a new general election therefore was fixed to be held in 2024/ Jan 2025, and which therefore meant that the Labour leader had two years to work out on all complexities and campaign for the next GE. The first government in Brexit was the Tory government. But not the second, to the Labour Party this would also be their first in a Brexit led country. Keir Starmer's luck couldn't be more favourable and to use this as his chance to make history. For one simple reason: he can go to the people and say or ask the question if they want to get another four years of the Tories in government with more or less the same policies. Since when are Tories known for changed policies? Or stay with a future that has no conscience for the working men and women. After all the Brexit vote was a peoples' vote! And then came the black knight to champion the will of the people and fight for their rights against the EU. How many of these people were ill informed no one still knows. Yes, my liege... But with Brexit the people can't see the wood through the many benefits of trees before their living eyes, is very tempting to put it here like that. The green woods of the champion, former prime minister Boris Johnson. Well, to be honest, Brexit has a dead conscience. If it had a future the world would have envied Britain and crawl before you like Smeagol, with a fierce and ugly intent. In fact the sentiment is sadness how a great country confused itself with gods of tempestuous winds. Or, leaving behind their noble father of reason and fly like a temperamental Icarius to the sun with Brexit wax wings. And here is where the white knight in shining armor comes in and will pick up the pieces, with a heavy heart. He knew about the warnings in 2016, those that where of pure logic and reasoning. It is a bit much to ask at this piece of 'voidance moment', but can Sir Keir Starmer bring back Britain in a traditional history for the British people and in politics and take it to new heights? The inclination towards him will be a negative whisper and comparing the good man with Oliver C. How they are missing the point badly here.

The Israeli Far Right- Wing on Shomron and Judea sovereignty...

(Personal view)

18 September 2023

If so as in the here above that this will represent an asymmetric view of Israel and the Palestinian State, as the State of Israel and country versus the Palestinian State descending into new regression.

With especially the Israeli Far Right- Wing in the new government protagonist view is simply, that Israel has twelve tribes and one being the Benyamites and Ephramites for Shomron and Judea.

But we are living in complex times and no country will be exempt from its own destiny or future. The leading world has become the nature of all that we understand in the world, home, close or in dangers.

Shomron and Judea sovereignty are the asymmetrical new view. It has ancient territories to the tribe of the Benyamites and an ancestral essay c.q. Tanakh dictation, perhaps for too long out of the autonomous time.

Nations and national movement however did come and went through another time (AC) and had 'pitched their tent' where life and their living was closest and natural pastures to them.

One such nation now lives in Palestine in a bitter and interchange by bloody confrontations divide of uncompromised conviction by one over the other, prime to and after the Holocoust when the Jewish people immigrated from Europe to Palestine.

Israel on most of its fronts has given its own response in the region they live in, between the green lines (or behind) on the issue of uncompromised divide, and when confronted with the Palestinian resistance and their determination to 'take back control' of Palestinian ancestral land.

Peace has never been this uncompromising before in the youngest of history in the 21st century.

The symmetry of a Two- State solution to the problem between Israel and the Palestinians in theory did impress as the finest solution to a 'worldwide problem' in the diplomatic and political relations world, but has always been in Real Time another truth.

Peace as a worldview will need to be reviewed once again how best to live as nations on the planet. And these are the rarest of specifics to human kind.

Conservatism will extinguish if it doesn't update the system.

(Res Nullius)

10 January 2023

Yes, we are referring here to the UK and more specifically to Britain and the political parties. What for example the people are hearing of these days, from both parties, is that constitutional reform is high on the agenda, opposed by one and introduced by the other with great speed. Traditional Tory and the Labour Party are becoming more and more distant memories in the 21st century, especially after the millennium. The UK needs change and that is the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God. It also may not be relevant at this point to say who is right and wrong. Father Time can know that answer. In the end we will still just be mortals and people is a little boring maybe when we keep reminding ourselves, and if paying the bills to many in the country are still making sense these days. About the update on the Conservative side in this writing one would have expected after Brexit that this was going to be done, e.g. a simple update from where they stood pre- millennium and post millennium. Much have changed since the year 2000. Politics would not be the same again after that. It is also true especially for where the Conservatives stand now, with Brexit getting each more day complicated to run its business in government. Had they not expect that shifting the system back to the UK from the EU would change things in Britain? Many asked where was the model for a Brexit system, (presumably the old system pre-millennium was maybe in tatters but functional) and clarity on whether to stay with the old system. (Brexit could very much have been inspired by time and post millennium) And no one didn't get an answer. The only policy was to keep Labour's political expediency far from getting into government and keeping the popularity of Brexit ongoing. What is different here is fairness as once (1850?) to always keep both political parties in balance, based on continuity for the country (as most non- political entities) will remember and understand. And that was the real heart and mind old system of conservatism for Britain, democracy and political parties to represent their respective offices. After the millennium demographics have grown and outgrow the old system of absolute rule when politics was tolerated as good when Tory, and the working class when tolerated as opposing the Tories in government. Here the parliamentary truth was then something of a high moral and Just standard. The Tories in 2023 don't even seem to be familiar anymore with that older system pre- millennium. They and the Labour Party have become much more of the post millennium global political project. And making with this move that reform is the dominant factor and underlined in all things global and at national level for governments. Is constitutional reform bad or good?

Had the Tory Party worked on its update of the post millennium 'older system', everyone would have known whether CR is a good next level transformation for the country. Changing, as one expects, the constitutional laws is a very serious move and secondary that this move will be long term and can't be hold in either political party territory as a garden plastic toy windmill in your hands no matter how flamboyant the colours. (Take it that garden here means the English political garden at Westminster) The only political power for the Tories, as what many see in the news / media, are pointing fingers with empty indexes on political Tory Party change, and they are pointing to Labour and leader Keir Starmer that he and the Labour Party 2023 are hiding an obscure agenda against the 'British constitution of unwritten law and gentleman's agreement how to govern fairly in British politics'. Fair being not an emotional experience, but a political scientific continuity. Now, is that helpful? Not if they can't put Brexit together in writing or a writing of new intellectual deeply founded properties and principles for the British political system post millennium. And what it means in the 21st century future. The Labour Party will move on as everyone now understands and it is clearing the way for the next Labour prime minister, Keir Starmer. In fact much of that campaign is already underway horizontally and expected soon to rise more vertically. And do the people really understand the meaning of constitutional reform? The truth of that CR was never tested in Britain as an experiment or simulation. Where does the Tory Party stand on constitutional reform (proportionate or disproportionate)? If you are going to cling on to something it better make sense and common sense to the general public. What looks more preferably in January 2023 is to keep Brexit in an updated form or kind. Just plain and ordinary so that even dogs and cats can read it. Because the truth is that without such an update the British old political system will become extinct from the reality in Real Time. And it will leave open greater opportunity to fill the gap (in memo: a break or space in an object or between two objects) for a new Labour Party to get into No 10. And for one simple reason: truth of Labour will be on the side of Real Time.

Post Scriptum: I am 65 years old.

To be continued.

A quick snapshot of the speech by Labour leader Keir Starmer yesterday, 5 January 2023.

6 January 2023
(00:54 AM)

No deal or deal? You have to contain the urges not to panic firstly with the speech made by the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on wednesday, wishing the country a Happy New Year, and today with the speech by the opposition Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer in ULC Strattford. And it is panic going deeper, because it was quick and fast delivered by both Party leaders. One concentrating on his five plans most people in Britain and abroad (Bloomberg?) have been hearing for the last two months since he took Office. And the other the Labour leader trying to put the emphasis on a new plan from the new Labour for a greener future. And the heart began to beat a little faster, not knowing where this was or could lead to for the opposition leader on this afternoon. He is on to something, everyone can see this through the fiery eyes in his golden head, a body language that is more expressive as a leader ready to go all the way to the end with his policies, intended to make life and living a better way for the people of Britain. Love for the communities comes through proper legislation and government, is what one could pick up from the tone of his voice and words of comfort. Is this the same man some have known as the new Labour leader for two years, post Jeremy Corbyn 'era'? Most of the people in the room must know that answer. He wants to make a fresh start, somewhere in the future time. His speech should make or be different from Rishi Sunak as he is not in government, but the Tories. It is only deliberate when you hear or read that Mr Starmer should have all the answers on 5 January 2023 only the prime minister can give you. Rishi Sunak however did make new pledges with his five points plan to tackle inflation half (no particular time), and four more or less of the same. Nr five was about tackling the people in small boats coming to Britain illegally. These are government priorities for the whole year in 2023. What panic means is that it is almost a chemical response of neutral flow to your head, as these theater performances by both leaders have been nothing more than a civil approach to real problems. Except that one leader, opposition leader Keir Starmer, should be talking 'cheap' to the future country Britain, now still a far fetched fiction, to become prime minister, to many. Even if he wanted to make the economy move and would also know how, this isn't the moment for all that. And that is making you panic. Had it been a chessboard game and match, it then would have been easy to move your piece manually or take it from the opponent. Manual is not doing the trick here.

Brexit had also come up in the Keir Starmer speech, something Rishi Sunak doesn't need to mention in his New Year's speech. Love, Mr Sunak said, was what families needed to be reminded of during the harsh winter and at other difficult moments. The industrial strikes scarcely mentioned between lips and nose, but he was working on it. And we believe what this Prime Minister is promising, because he wants to be held to account if things go wrong. No one feels tempted, only temperamental. The country was in good hands with Mr Sunak. Hands of gold. You don't feel any panic or exitement after his speech. He is not campaigning but be in government. Compared to this the speech made by Mr Starmer was one of careful vitality. Promises do that sort of thing to a human being. Going even deeper the panic gets white: where is the elephant in the room? That what pays the bills, families and industries. Is he the man that the people of Britain will trust to vote for him/ his Labour Party to make the economy a true partnership between people and industries, locally and nationally? That is pride for communities, you could read from the tweet by the Labour leader yesterday on Twitter. In short, where is Mr Starmer not being clear on his plans? Who is laughing when saying or mentioning Mr Starmer as the next Labour prime minister? That will never happen in 2023 comes the echo from afar. The political mathematics are giving the Tories a comfortable sitting till the end of 2024 and can find these rumours about Mr Starmer becoming prime minister only tedious and ridiculous. If the general election was held today, well, that's another story. But no worries for now... No one needs to make any future predictions where the Brexitnomics will be in five or six years time. It was all inclusive in the Brexit administration from day one that they would only subject their life and duties grooming the parliamentary horses. No, not true, will they say. Brexit has a definite system: independence. By nature a herbivore, and feeding itself on black or red berries gathered by the people who work in the fields. Now a distant memory.

Okay, now why would Keir Starmer be the best man to be the next prime minister in Brexit Britain? There are many sophisticated reasons and also there are many older reasons and even ancient ones when it comes to a 'decent wage' and decent living standard for the citizens of the UK (equality). Socialst elites, that's one way to put it by the public, or what hubris does this man has to think that he is seen by some people as the next Labour prime minister? (Too premature?) He hasn't even overcome his anxiety or shyness properly (unlike Rishi Sunak) and he wants to take a straight shot at the biggest beast? (Regimental) His premiership in this 'short' future projection could only be true had he been more of a visionair like Tony Blair (former Labour PM). And not 'banking' on Tory weaknesses and than take his shot from this position. With Tony Blair, who knows what it means to take down a strong Tory government by the overwhelming majority of the vote, could teach you one or two things you didn't see or know before. Now, having said all of the here above writing the concluded end here is one that is looking at the odds. Men and women are fearing Keir Starmer, for his government hasn't yet been in power, the power that corrupts (passive or aggressive), and at this point he is still too weak to convince the crowd of his 'good intentions' and strong will to govern fairly. This was not in their calculations on the other side of the Tory river Styx. All in the name of Brexit High Office Administration, the people still might come to identify their trust and political will here. Time is now ahead of everyone, galloping in circles, small and wider and wider at horse canter speed. Canter, horses, speed, at ease.

Lectori Salutem

Still what is spooking the whole Labour introduction into the new future is that the politician born yet has not happen in the meantime since a whole new approach kicked off two months ago. It is time for the Labour leader to change teeth and say or remind the English electorate how this started off on day one for Labour as a working class system. It has no equal and other like the Labour Party design. A unique system, next to that of the Tory system. This the politician or Labour leader knows, that the Tory and Labour systems are not compatible and cannot be, where the people need to excercise their politics and rights, also occasionaly revolutionize. Labour can make room for the people in its Party. Yet, together the idea remains this 'that England is our home. And we are HM's government.' Mr Starmer, with permission, must save his political Party, the century in which we live, and clean up after the Tory Party leave government. "Labour has a system, what is yours, Prime Minister." Just indulge me.

European socialism in Israel after tomorrow will become history.

28 December 2022
(23:25 PM)

Tomorrow, 29 December, Israel's new Right- Wing government will be sworn in/ inaugurated in the afternoon. No official time or hour was given yet tonight. After 73 years a hot wind / sirocco came by, in Israel also called a Hamsin, blurring the vision of the past when the State was born in 1948 from a socialist father and mother ideology/ idealism. Until 1979/1980 that socialism was known to many Israelis living in Tel-Aviv, Jerusalem, Haifa, Beersheva, and other smaller towns, a socialist democracy. Here is where the principle of freedom to all living citizens in Israel were domiciled as where home was, some still survivors of the generation of the Holocaust survivors. Time stood still at the fresh water to irrigate the land and many new settlements of kibutzims to grow their crops, vegetables, oranges, olives, and other healthy stuff. Animals in the refet were treated with extraordinary care to give milk and revenue through enterprise for small factories. The land was deeply receptive to this unusual good care, now not more than a tale to tell grandchildren if they are interested. But that is not so and has been for most of the later generation in Israel a backwarded beginning no one wants/ wanted to know or hear about. All wanting something better, like their American or British cousins. Change in Israel wasn't a political wish, but in fact all wanted something of the same life others / other Jews had and were born in. When listening to MK Smotrich today from his oped in the Wall Street Journal explaining his deep sentiments on aspects of Israel and its land, he was explaining something similar. He was born in / into Israel. Recapitulate: born in Israel's socialist democracy, not in England and its parliament where for every citizen that is a natural beginning to remember as long as you live, but between the desert dust of the south (Sinai, Ha Negev and Beersheva) and weed (Arkovit). The Palestinian people have always been present close and peripheral from the Army's point of view. Israel is Asia Minor if you simply see it from a visualization of topography. Also horizontally there are many languages spoken on the ground realities in every day life of Israel, but especially in Jerusalem and Beersheva. Then came Ben Itai.

A sophisticated young Israeli who spoke Hebrew and American (English). His eyes alone could tell you, the world and people of Israel, that Israel will no longer be the retarded country so many had thought it to be. Israel would do away with the shame of Golda Meir when she had thanked the Argentinians for their royal donations and humanitarian aid to help the Jewish nation in Israel to overcome hard times. This cloth of majesty is what Mr Netanyahu took over his shoulders and since then had brought the country to a democracy and life style of the modern world no one had ever dreamed of before his time as Israel's ambassador in the eighties. What happened to kibbutzims or moshavs after the rise of this mysterious leader called Benyamin Netanyahu in Israel we don't know. Somehow they still are there and living in the same place but only not doing what they did between 1948 and 1980. Mr Smotrich however did bring back the nostalgic memory of what made him think and envision his ideas for becoming a minister in the coalition tomorrow after sworn in. He is a religious extremist... Interestingly his intellectual properties are what he and his older generation of Jews had also thought. The Army has its elements in his reasoning with exclusively the vision it held then and is still practicing against 'the invaders' or the Arab speaking nations living in every part of Israel. In the 21st century both nations have dominantly and visibly become more indivisible, and at times more segregated than ever under unpleasant and mass destructive circumstances. To be in Defense and Economy / State Finances, is a rare combination when you are not dealing with procurement, but with security. The economy one assumes has something to do with domestic policies, the people of Israel cost of living, local or national productivity, all economic principles included, streaming through the system that has been in Israel for longer than Mr Smotrich's life. Could this be the proof for his economic outlook on day 1 taking up his position as minister of the economy/ Finance that he is having plans 'to better' some of the sectors and segments in every day life? The ghost of memory, perhaps. He is also planning on honoring the meaning of democracy by strenghtening where broken, just as his predecessor the former PM Naftali Bennett has tried before him. Israel in its waters or salt was born from socialism and not capitalism. Or, elitism, for that matter. The people fleeing Germany and Europe were dead serious about tilling the land or Ha aretz. How is Israel Right- Wing and since when did it become the trend to speak of your identity as a Jew in this manner? The military had a specific outlook and whoever was serving in the army for a long life career was in fact the only Right- Wing element in the new Jewish Home. The hardliner and last of the clan of Right- Winger was Menachim Begin. He only spoke in socialist symbols/ symbolism, the kind of language too abhorrent to the ears of the USA, then. England was in fact more tolerant and not sensitive to the old and former prime minister his accent or socialist heavy dialect, be it more diplomatic hands- off. The future in Mr Smotrich's mind is built on his plans, and the other facade will be done so by Mr Itamar Ben- Gvir for the incoming government tomorrow.

Both will have handsome looking papers to sign in into their most coveted ministries tomorrow. Technically if the God of Abraham wants a semi orthodox judicial democracy in Israel, it is now.

Reparations 21st century

19 December 2022
Title: Suriname with Paramaribo as its capital

Trident point of reparations from 1600 to 2022, naming Holland the party of financial reparations for slavery/ ownership in the former Dutch colony of Suriname.

The new civilization:

Uprooting a whole part of a civilization from its origin and timelessness and geographical domicilie/ domicile is considered and seen as a serious crime against humanity and its basic universal rights.
Human trafficking is not import or transport of industrial logistics.

Luminosity Reasoning from civilization to subjugate a 'distant' civilization dominates the idea of being real on one side of the taken argument over the other 'without argument' and who were 'void of theoritical thinking' to assume.

Early humanisation on humanity and its latter definition later on in the centuries of the future e.g. 2022 made an even more dominant claim and discovery of subjugation on these 'distant civilizations', that is one for the 'illumination world' and the other without law of physics or scientific usefulness.

If these were people, that could only be by 'christening' from the 'superior eye' that can make distinctions and that meaning of 'all other' is lost otherwise... Therefore it is to assume that no 'hearts and minds' were born under these circumstances in early 'human trafficking' of 'slaves' from their place of natural domicilie moved to the world outside and beyond to be recognized as homo sapiens and universal.

Can the claimants- now named citizens of the Netherlands- of financial reparations pursuit have any chance of being rewarded from the standpoint of African and Asian slave import during the EU Member State as 'colonisator' of Suriname, named the kingdom of Holland of 1600-2022?

(Slave import must be distinctly a fact from slave ownership during colonisation)

Conclusive in the present with time: Holland is a Member State of the European Union.

Additional historical facts:

colonial powers or the trident point in Suriname predates from 1600 - 2022, 

1. The Kingdom of Spain
(With short intervals Portugal and at much later state France, both countries had taken the course of neighbouring territories in France Guyana, Brasil, Argentina, Martinique, Guadeloupe)
2. The Kingdom of Britain
(under the first administrator of Suriname Francis Willoughby: Francis Willoughby (Suffolk, 1605 - Caribische Zee, 23 juli 1666), 5th Baron Willoughby of Parham)
3. The Kingdom of the Netherlands
(under the builder of canals and plantages Cornelis van Sommelsdijck: Cornelis van Aerssen van Sommelsdijck (also: Sommelsdijk) (The Hague, 20 August 1637 - Paramaribo, 19 July 1688) was the first governor of Suriname after the establishment of the Society of Suriname in 1683.)

Suriname during this time of colonisation was still known to be the 'unknown colonies' of the greater powers and realms of Europe due to its 'size'. In reality the geographical size of Suriname had been no more or less eversince:
Location: Northern South America, bordering the North Atlantic Ocean, between French Guiana and Guyana. Area: 163,820 km² (63,251 sq. mi.) Terrain: Varies from coastal swamps to savanna to hills.

A christmas nightmare' new definition in the UK for The Labour Party.

14 December 2022

No, wrong, it's not the Tories. So, what is it then, when sitting comfortably by the fireplace with family and friends this Christmas at temperatures below 0° and playing guessing games (for politicians and their families)? I'll give you a clue: political party first, patients second. Okay, it's the strike tomorrow, twelve hours from now, the Labour leader of the opposition said today in the House of Commons during PMQs. What you love about PMQs are always the answers by the Prime Minister after asked the question by the leader of the opposition. But what was feared that PM Rishi Sunak would do this wednesday had just happened in Real Time today. But what we had not anticipated then was Mr Starmer's blunt responses after answers from the Prime Minister in his marine blue suit across the floor. This could be the time maybe for outsiders to make up their mind and decide whether the last PMQs for the year was satisfying and if they had seen any sign of the 'sign of the times'. If not we have to seriously go back to the drawing board and check what went wrong. Mr Starmer did make a good but peculiar responding on what the choice for the PM was, meet the nurses and their pay demand, or as usual politics first and patients second. We can't do both on either side in the House of Commons. One is industrial ethics for government and one is medical ethics. The Tories are known to be the Party of business and industries. So, again, how can they switch from tradition to ethics and thinking about what is happening to patients. Labour can turn the table around and play Russian roulette, but the gun will still go off in either their faces to decide what to do about the strike for nurses on pay demands. It was Labour's Christmas nightmare, said the Prime Minister to the leader of the opposition. And Mr Starmer in another question said about the PM that he will curl up in a bowl and go into hibernation. The Home Sec didn't get the joke, but the PM was smiling as if listening to his father and feeling cute.

But we also love it when the questions are asked by Keir Starmer. Yeah, yeah, yeah, they cheer when his name is called by the Speaker of the House, Sir Lindsay Hoyle. Mr Hoyle clearly was in a Christmas mood today. He mentioned Christmas one or two times when he had to call order between the parties. "I know it's nearly Christmas, but we don't want to get into the..." The rest was not audible during listening to the PMQs from the side of the audiences. To set aside the HC for a moment, the strikes are very difficult to understand on the outside and when not living in England but e.g. in the EU. There are multi level policies moving in a giant serpentine (Leviathan) movement through the whole action than on the streets. Above the heads of the strikers snow and cold are feeling quite legionnaire and coming down any moment now hard for impact. Industries and the Medical Health Services are always anchor chained by on the one side industrial ethics and laws, with the MHS (Medical Health Services) network of medical services ethics and department laws on each of the disciplines they provide. Here the social care picture is not defined by per person/ patient. Nor is it by providing services. The Prime Minister his favourite argument always is referring to numbers or digits that may look to outsiders as dodging the questions, but are in fact the very name most industries understand the best. So something has to be worked out for the strikers, fighting their rights in a democratic society but de facto is an industrial strike and not going on strike for more care for patients, e.g. because people are dying in very high numbers from Covid-19. The PM has also said that his government was setting up diagnostic centers to ease the burdens of patients and the professionals which was a soft score and very effective during PMQs this afternoon against the Labour leader Keir Starmer. Where do both leaders stand legally on the present strike actions? Or, face off? (The trains are also on strike on the same timeline) When Keir Starmer addressed the House and thanked both houses for their work to keep up the democracy he reminded everyone at home and abroad what valuable good was more prominent than doing politics alone in solitary will of one or the other/ next leader to be Prime Minister.

Labour MP Angela Eagle (Wallasey) called for a general election and roared with unusual cheers from a large part of the House of Commons this afternoon. Labour is moving from years in the waiting to a battle cry mode. We could be wrong... Or it could be an omen for Rishi Sunak and his pantheon in the Tory Party. Time is not on  the PM's side on this one.

As promised last week Labour came out with its plan today to change Britain.

6 December 2022

Gordon Brown (former Labour PM 2007-2010) chairs a special commission in the Labour Party and who was the speaker of today's launching new Labour 40 points plan. It is clear that from the Commission's Chair the hope is very strong to see Mr Keir Starmer as the next prime minister, he said so himself today when Keir Starmer was making his speech and end the afternoon in the Nexus hub of innovation building in Leeds. Questions by several journalists (TV and Newspapers) asked about how much in the plan was real or realistic, e.g. when is the Labour leader thinking to start with implementing change to the current system at Westminster. Unfortunately the Labour leader answered in another question from one other journalist that the time for consultation will not be on the first day for him in Office at No 10, but to deliver. Mr Starmer was in 'good' company when he stood there and delivering his speech/ and answering questions. In the House of Commons asking the PMQs another whole different future awaits him answering questions from the Tories in opposition. These are not new points in the plan and in fact what the people heard today had more of a powerpoint document presentation of what the intent was, either for today or tomorrow, or maybe in time. But something was missing and also in previous speeches or published documents of what the Labour government would do when elected. If new to say the least the people expect to also see an appendix with a cost calculation estimate, as these new changes will be costing quite a penny. And they will also be new costs.

Has not Brexit made the same mistake? They only told the people what they will take back each week from the EU of their own money and never said how much the new administration will cost to stay out of the EU. The problem is that no one wants this to repeat itself again, when Labour seems to be in a very unique situation presently and that this Labour leader has been already making all the right moves for the last four weeks. How did this happen from the ashes when Rishi Sunak his appointment as Tory PM did not cause/ triggered a general election after all? Here he is going strong and accelerating two months later and coming closer bit by bit, brick by brick, to Downing Street 10. He might have a unique destiny after all. Again, the plan announced in the afternoon today (yesterday 5 December) has a few good and strong signals and changing the present time system, decentralising, might give it the boost politics in Britain and the UK need desperately because it is strong on relevance, but the realism of the system as English, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales are another beating in the hearts and minds yet to all the people old and young in the UK. E.g. changing the House of Lords, that could be typically English, distinct and different from Irish or Scottish. To make a comparison in Israel between the nation as Jewish and the Haredim as the religion and its orthodox leaders. The beautiful dream between the pillars and pristine white marble is to change the State or civil society for the better, almost in every democracy. But now the archaic question to the Labour leader is whether England fits between that dream and the white marble. Industry too has a vital history in the ancient worlds and made it since known to the world what makes people, country and nobles survive in time. And there is nothing immoral about industries and the building of industrial empires.

However the crux of the story still can go only one way: to the first born (the land). Britain desperately needs that conversation to have with the Labour power house Members (John McDonnell, Lisa Nandy (Shadow Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities since 2021), Rachel Reeves (Shadow Chancellor) and others, the promising of the future PM included, about how to do the cost of their plans. When the Tories will be out the new realism is that there is no more money to make reusable. And there is also an ugly truth when something to build is new: half of the money goes to building and construction of the foundations. Mr Starmer has a moral obligation to all of the here above if he will be the next Labour prime minister. And he is still born out of the same assignment the teacher has given the mandate to: Tory or Labour they will both have to do the same assignment/ exams. So far he seems to be doing alright on his own timeline, and has nothing to worry about being bullied to give his answers to the Tories, underhands. The world does not evolve around the UK as strong when it was part of the European Union and Eurozone. The war in Ukraine and the Russian President Vladimir V. Putin continue living dangerously armed against each other, Israel is getting a more radical government if the former PM Mr Benyamin Netanyahu has formed a coalition this week, and the European Union has the ECB. Incidently the European Union did do some good work in the distant communities in Britain on waste management, soil symbiosis and the environment reusable projects. And more. If Keir Starmer/ Sir Keir Starmer will become Prime Minister in the next general election it will be a mythical day for him to rise as the phoenix from the ashes being in the wilderness in British politics.

Rishi Sunak came back and strong this afternoon at PMQs.

30 November 2022

We're way beyond PMQs now and both leaders are clearly felt this afternoon in the House of Commons, and both also have been addressed over EU working laws by the leader of the SNP, Mr Ian Blackford. Beth Rigby (Sky News GB) was right to comment on this afternoon's PMQs that here there was some new development between the leaders, Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer of Labour. The Tories came out strong on legislation poignantly to note as well, e.g. violence against women and girls and how the PM will do something about this problem, which Mr Sunak with the reply answered that it was important to keep monitoring the problem and put in all the technological devices in place, CTCameras, streetlighting, and more. Sexual violence against women as a result of wars in conflict zones also came up on PMQs today. But let's not lose eye on what was really on the PM's mind this afternoon, that Mr Starmer's leadership is also beginning to take form or shape while still in the opposition front benches. That could be seen as some good news for Labour, and all the more so when Mr Ian Blackford did make specific mention of both leaders in the House to address the issue of Brexit and 'out Brexit' (Keir Starmer). The minutes are moving about the House of Commons like spermatozoa and swimming in the orb of Westminster during PMQs more fierce than usual. Can this tension be the forbode of better tidings in the political arena in HC, between Starmercus and Sunakcrassus? What can the Labour leader next do and make it his side for helping vulnerable communities or the vulnerable groups more? He can't go back now and again be pushed back to man or mouse as the future PM. For today Mr Sunak/ the PM has survived triumphantly, one can say. He did however for a moment made a nervous e-motion on standing and saying to the Labour leader from the dispatch box that he will not be the leader that he think he is... already... Perhaps referring to Mr Starmer becoming the prime minister? Best thing to watch out for by Labour is that the leader should now be careful not nibbling of the campaign cheese, but put more meat on the table from now on: capitalizing on the instability of deeper issues in legislation or the simplest of laws. Violence in general against vulnerable groups has become basic law in society and a slipperly slope to tackle, and that human nature in politics have institutional flaws all political leaders know. Labour leader Mr Starmer should make clear that he knows when they work and where they are not compatible, or let the Tories like Jove steal 'Europa' from his side of the House easily.

If Mr Starmer is taking some form of becoming the next PM as early as the present time this notion will not go unnoticed and he cannot turn back now. It is clear that Scotland (SNP) and Wales are both looking for more meat on their plates from the next winner, with the SNP being very clear this midday about independence on some new prospect as if the SNP leader of Westminster was talking to one girl but looking (flirting) over her shoulders to her hnr friend, was the impression. England!

The UK: three months from now after the government's autumn budget.

28 November 2022

Last poll Labour is still ahead with +/- 23% in this week snapshot poll survey and expecting that this will continue along the same straight line in the coming time/ last quarter of the year. Perhaps even going deeper into the first quarter next year up to February- March 2023. Mr Keir Starmer, one can say, does not have any worries in the polls to drop any time soon and giving a lead back to the Tories either in December 2022 or January 2023. That is not good news where movement of dynamics is vital and life for Britain to do the economics of high performance the global industries want. Crisis is bad for Britain when politics collapses, but quiet movement is even more terrifying. On the other side of the 'quiet' black river (perils underneath) stands for now the prospect of a new time and leadership with the Labour leader Keir Starmer. To him the river looks never ending at this point, if true that he might be the next prime minister. The other reality no country in the west can do without is that politics is pure reality to every living being, human or animal, next to life. So something has to continue on the platform of macro politics. But the decision has not been made yet by the people whether they want him to be their new prime minister which is making every effort to promote him either premature or unfounded where we are today in the month. The Tories cover all of it almost at 101% where Britain now stands, for King, country and people. Their seats are firmly in the written realm of His Majesty's law and order, but especially after Brexit that is now more complicated to explain. How can Mr Starmer prove that he too is a man of the realm conscience and lead the people through with his Labour Party and a new government? Six years later many in the Brexit conviction have 'come back home' and reversed their national identity in only British from instead being European through the European Union. Brexit became free on its own and was going to face the world alone, if necessary.

It is no surprise that Keir Starmer and his Labour Party are facing the difficult task of what to create to get Brexit moving again and if so what else to do but create a Frankenstein approach. Nay, say the doomsayers, he will send us to run for the hills and not the castles and empty our pockets skint. It could also be seen as a sell out of Britain with a pathological excuse of 'we have no money left' and putting the country up for / to collateral new laws of land value physics. De jure Britain is still a wealthy country and nation from the intellectual property of monarchy and parliamentary democracy (hundreds of years through wars and learned men). And there is no such opportunity in Britain known as bad foolishness/ folly. Yes, so why not take it to the world that Brexit stands for Britain being true to its sovereign and sovereignty? In modern day politics equality among men is a strong principle in any decent society and democracy. And Labour is part to that equality for the equal amount of time and history, one could also argue without too much pedantry. No one neither can change Britain through the grease in the political machineries of the 21st century and change the system to a Labour regime for indefinite rule and time. The industries are the responsibility of good governance and economics. Now then what is or could be Labour's approach to this global problem metrics in Britain in 2022? Well, the shoe does fit the man and Labour leader to become the next prime minister, but will that make him happier and glad to rise to the occasion when that time comes? If Sir Keir Starmer was planning on having an idyllic life in rural Britain with his family the truth is then that politics has long left its classical arena/ theater of Arcadia. His approach cannot be leaving the wilderness in the concrete jungles in Britain for having a wonderful life elsewhere next to fluffy animals and country rich breakfasts. The coming time will be hard work and impossible to bridge the many challenges internally and externally for any new Labour government as the traditional architect of and in His Majesty King Charles' III realm. To remember the Late Queen Elizabeth II life well!

Israel: coalition talks again have hit new lows with MK Itamar Ben- Gvir faction abandon negotiations tonight with the Likud Party.

20 November 2022

When men are equal in politics the political truth is still an ancient root of strife between all men, and even more so when in politics. Are men in this 64 seats electoral win in November 2022 win equal, could be the start question before continuing the even more difficult questions about what government is written in the Torah and what is the written government of the Jewish Home after 1948. MK Bezalel Smotrich will not get Defense or the ministry for Finance; Israel has not yet come to the point of becoming a regime of religious leaders versus the 'persona non grata' governments of the 75 years past history of democracy. And remember, that even so we are still in Israel and the Torah also will still be there. One technical error in Mr Smotrich's idea is that post election this is his demand to want the ministry for Defense, what wasn't prior to the election heard of yet. Had that been so between Mr Netanyahu and Mr Smotrich a closed deal, his backtrack on the promise of the deal would have made him a liar and cheat against the partnership to win the election fully Right- Wing. This same question goes for all the religious leaders who entered the dragon's den of Mr Netanyahu 2022 election fight, without the proper body armour of solid deals. Perhaps some men are more equal than others in governments in the western world, but in Israel that doesn't fly the political and colourful kite. No one can even begin to imagine mr Smotrich being photographed from the top hatch of a submarine to promote the Israeli naval force. As the Minister of Defense after the last election earlier this month what could Mr Smotrich promote his command on land, air, sea and space? According to some people the rookie Defense Minister Mr Smotrich has the West Bank in mind and to legalise some of the controversial areas, A, B and C, and either go for half annexation or the full papers on all three. Annexation is subjected to the understanding of gaining territory. And with that you will not be able to stop the law from slipping into the realm of where this law came from or had originated, as it is only drawn upon the law as in the British King's law. The question therefore will be whether the annexation is law that had originated in the Torah.

Can honorable men do politics when clearly the objectives are from the point of view in the Torah? E.g. finance, the military and judicial system? Oh, the Haredim, Chassidim and Orthodox in Israel are certainly in desperate need of finance (who controls the books and not overcooking them), the military (the Levitical right) and the judicial system (comprehensive change to the present time system to safeguard security for the religious men, women, children and their communities). In a comment someone wrote that Mr Smotrich is an honorable man and straightforward, especially when it comes to discipline of principles. In the previous government despite being good friends with Naftali Bennett he did not join him when the latter was given by Mr Yair Lapid the chance of becoming prime minister in June 2021. Which, if we now understand more clearly, wasn't all too strange a wisdom, for one had the courage and principle of doing good for all of Israel, while the other wanted to do good according to the Torah. The Torah by nature is absolute religion or God. The God of Abraham, Jitschaik and Jacob. It is also easy to identify who the State politician of the moment was, from the grand vizier vision (Foreign Minister) of the Torah. Both men stood on different levels of importance as the most principled leaders of the 21st century in Israel. And the hairs on their heads are still enjoyable as youthful. The world of Mr Netanyahu is not compatible with the worlds here above, at least not at this time of his age. In previous years gone by his radicalism to serve the people of Israel and bringing this on the world stage effectively and stern, Ben Itai did convince many on the Right- Wing that he was their leader and elligible for crowning. Since then his era had begun as the sole leader of Israel and chosen by the people with a timeless & absolute majority. Civil life had begun to come out of its socialist democracy for the first time in Israel in 1980. And Mr Benyamin Netanyahu became its emperor. If MK Itamar Ben- Gvir will leave the coalition talks or retreat from forming a coalition with Likud, his action can only be read as one of a man of his constituence. Or a political protagonist. Question: realistically can we have a real beginning with government and Torah vis a vis democracy in Israel over 100 years? (Presently 75 years old)

Israel election 2022

3 November 2022

We have a clear victory. The former PM, in 2021, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu will once again become prime minister in Israel after counting of 95% of the votes last night. Mr Netanyahu did not fall short in this election of the expected seats to form a strong majority and secure his comeback. But there are other indications to suggest that with the likely partners to form government some in these factions could prove to be an exposure of highly controversies, that may be on the balance contradictive in any healthy democracy in the 21st century. Israel electorate system has its legitimacy in the democratic rule of law in its young history. That is to make it productive for and by the people. Also these are the founding rules based upon by the democratic principle as in most western countries. E.g. the US, EU and the UK. Any u-turn on the State of Israel democratic foundations could only lead to a national wounded pride. Mr Netanyahu has a considerable age at 73, and it is perhaps prudent to say that with this election victory October 2022 he has shown equally the same amount of haste towards the finish. The question next is therefore of paramount concern whether his next step to the prime ministership will bring him to his final destiny as Statesman and the greatness that he so desires.

It is imperative for the next Israeli Prime Minister also to understand that 3 million Arab citizens are a political mikvah for the democratic State of Israel and bringing with that the most basic of humanities to the entire land and institutions of Israel.

Thank you, Mr Bennett, for a time in the garden of clouds above in your Israeli blue sky.

1 November 2022

Last election had your name Naftali Bennett, not on the national ballot, but on the excercise of what was probably a last time in Israel's 73 years of democracy. To many this went unnoticed in its first days, than months. One year later in June 2022, this year and not long ago, four months ago to be a little more precise, the force majeure of your premiership as PM of Israel had come to a crucial point and resigning was its only alternative you had left, and again, under unusual circumstances. Today with the fifth election the country is casting another round of ballots, with what you said earlier today to be a time for you after a decade in politics on the sidelines. A quick review: you didn't stop the war in Ukraine when this was at its fiercest ongoing in February and March in the beginning of another new year. It was never said that you had the ability to do so, but remarkable was that in a scenario of WWIII, probably it was wise to trust better your inability and meet with the Russian President Mr Vladimir V. Putin in Moskou. Weeks since the invasion in Ukraine perhaps timing was everything, for an Israeli Prime Minister. That is exactly what it was and is now and perhaps for always for this very reason, that here we have a moment in modern day Israel and the global world (with WWIII) when an Israeli PM had tried stop the war and not as the world is used to from the wars in Gaza and unstoppable fighting in the West Bank. But maybe that isn't what we will remember too well from Israel in a WWIII moment of global despair that could have gone out of hand in its first weeks. In Israel a power struggle was then unleashed by different factions, and also within Yamina, against your prime ministership, with reasons that do not matter anymore today. You had been accused of doing too much global issues which were of no concern to you de facto. De facto, but every prime minister could make it his / her (e.g. Ms Liz Truss as UK Foreign Minister next to former PM Boris Johnson) concern for exactly the same reason as the President of Turkey had done in March after your visit in Moskou, to fight for a peace resolution. There was never any time left to you for the next year of your term as Prime Minister in the rotational agreement with Yesh Atid leader Mr Yair Lapid. The chance of the people and the cost of living for so many left behind for decades, and only buying choclate bars sweets for their grandchildren as the happiest way of life in modern day Israel because there is no money for real gifts and a healthy standard of life.

It would have to take courage for standing by your side, Mrs Bennett, children and family (senior Mrs Bennett), but also the whole team that stood by your side during your tenure as PM. How will today go without you in it to win just enough seats to pass the threshold with the 3.5% (not exactly)? Democracy today has become a lot more constraint with the war in Ukraine in the global world. It even might lead to going back to basics in each society in the west, and perhaps in Israel too. The parties today vying for premiership in Israel to be the next PM may too be in the same position as last time, when on a second mandate given to Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid, the only chance to form government became reality. Reality then was all about rebuilding society that was broken under the heavy pressures of Israel's vertical economy of three decades. Roads in Ashkelon still need repairing in Real Time reality! A whole facade of new office buildings have covered the skyline of Tel- Aviv for the last three decades, but when looking down what we see is debris of derelict and waste of properties and lost of land value. The only winning argument was to make Jerusalem the capital of Israel and all will end well with the nation... It is heartaching to see you on the sideline and watch politics unfold today or tomorrow morning. Again a new day in Israel? Of course, as any Israeli would say. But not all hope is lost as you are still a younger politician with the experience on your resumé as PM of Israel. Is there a comeback plan on your mind and now run for another time? The God of Abraham alone has the courage to stand by you next time and make you water the garden of clouds, perhaps? What I hold as a standard of gold of your prime ministership is that the only Jew that has tried to say halt to a war (WWIII), that only few have written in their names, prominent (Emmanuel Macron President of France before you and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey after you) or not, and they should be remembered. Leaving here out a single name and place to have said the same only a few days (in parliament -Dutch) after the war broke out in Ukraine, that perhaps it was the time to also think about the rebuilding of Ukraine and (post war)peace.

From the outsider's view it is your Israel in the garden of clouds and blue sky that I will deeply love if you are its Prime Minister once again. Or forever hold my peace until it goes extinct.

The UK has a new Tory leader and Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, the former Chancellor.

24 October 2022

The news this afternoon on Sky announced the majority of the votes were on Rishi Sunak as PM and not on Penny Mordaunt, MP for Portsmouth north. We can all use a bit of respite from the 'chaos' of the last five weeks with the former Tory PM, Mrs Liz Truss, and hoping now that things will come back to stability for Britain. The Tory Party is uniting behind Mr Sunak to be the Tory leader and next Prime Minister, so they are saying for the moment. Voices who did not vote for Mr Sunak's nomination as leader of the Conservative Party in Britain, and who had preferred to see Boris Johnson come back to lead the Tories, are eating their words somewhere quietly in the corner. In the year 2022 when there is something else going on in the world, the breaking up of global consensus, and the war in Ukraine now also having a crisis with winter heating for it's battered people, Mr Sunak makes paradoxically the world much less wounding, as this is also a historic moment for the whole of the British empire and modern day Britain. The progress they started after the millennium has made good for a change and giving not colour or race a chance to become prime minister in England, but also because he is a dominant model of the new world to honour meritocracy as a good way forward. The question underhands is still whether the greater Britain, N I, and Scotland will unite behind this meritocracy British Asian PM. If the same had happened in peace time it would have been completely superb on England, is what one can try understand correctly before talk of racism comes to mind. Unfortunately Mr Sunak did not become PM of the UK under more peaceful circumstances. The talk is now about Goldman Sachs and Mr Sunak being a GS- man to be the Tory PM. Others are trying to put their concerns in a different interpretation this morning with the nomination of Rishi Sunak as Tory leader and PM, and they are saying that there is more than stabilizing the domestic need that he has to prove. He should also be able to deal with the rest of the world on the war in Ukraine and do this effectively. He is not David Cameron who immediately established a war cabinet after his victory as prime minister of the Conservative Party in 2010.

Mr Sunak was Mrs Truss parting shot one could say. The former PM has also congratulated the new Tory leader vis a vis PM just now in a tweet and said that she will support him wholeheartedly. Ms Mordaunt in similar tone has also welcomed Mr Sunak as the next Tory leader and vis a vis Tory PM. It is not such a big surprise it wasn't Ms Mordaunt who won the 100+ votes to be PM. But with caution one could be very much convinced or tempted to choose Ms Mordaunt in stead of Mr Sunak, of whom we don't know his military background. Ms Mordaunt, still, would have made a better military leadership in the difficult time against an adversary like Mr Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, partly because ancient Hellenistic (democracy) nature always chooses the female military strategist to win battles. Of course, the war in Ukraine is not a direct confrontation for the west or UK with Mr Putin, but the point is nevertheless very important how to sharpen and wet it. One thing is right about the appointing for Mr Sunak's prime ministership as Tory leader, hic et nunc (here and now), it is happening in the first hours of the difficult winter and cost of living for people under the fuel poverty, in the UK and EU. It would never have been a good strategy (even by GS standards) had it to be three months later / in February 2023. Or even three months later after that. The EU continent has the same problem as the Island the UK. The sort of leadership what is required at the moment is that the leader shows a steady and straight line that is in no other way competing with the straight line e.g. of the EU to meet the plans on how to battle the Russian President Mr Vladimir Putin in his every new move. No one is saying that Ms Mordaunt is Winston Churchill and who will bring home victory over the adversary for the UK and Europe, nor is it expected of her to be the Duke of Wellington Waterloo 1816. Also, there would not be nothing wrong with the fact that she is English and could win momentum against the Russian President, as both racism and misogyny are taboo in our parts of the world. But with Ms Mordaunt as PM and the war in Ukraine, we can't help thinking a little curious how this would have challenged the Russian President his fancy enormously. For now it is over with the race for the next Tory PM and from here we must move on. In a battle and battle plan there are many levels either of defeat or victory. Unless you know how to beat the opponent or adversary by one line by scribe. Prime Minister Mr Rishi Sunak is a pragmatist and he could go very far if his peers will allow him to do his job. Time is ticking.

The future of Britain after the September mini- budget 2022.

18 October 2022

Now that this is over, as Tobias Elwood last night said, it is time to do the politics in Britain again. If the Prime Minister and her Chancellor could convince the Tory Party and the British people of this clear new path set out yesterday in the House of Commons by the Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, she might win in terms of political mechanics a second respite for now, or in between now and 31 October. Difficult when Labour keeps hammering on for the PM not to have a mandate, and therefore making it look like here there is something clandestine about her being the British PM after the ousted Mr Boris Johnson. Of course this may be the case to find weaknesses in her government and blow a hole through it. From our part in the world in the European Union we all knew that sooner or later this would happen to Britain, as leaving it wasn't a give away present and shouldn't be. You have to earn your name and status as Prime Minister and sovereignty in the only way known for hundreds of years, the British way that is called England. Prince William is right, the Queen is sorely missed when especially we are now beginning to slowly realise there is a real difference between the present day Britain and the Britain when the Queen, Queen Elizabeth II, was still the living monarch of the UK and Commonwealth. Always a mouthful to say or mention, but de jure that is the truth. Britain's new future has come any way and lets hope it will not be self defeating next year after April 2023, for the most vulnerable. There is something of a war logic making it impossible for most countries in the west of Europe and in Britain/ the UK, to imagine continuity will go on as we have known for decades and perhaps even since after WWII. The new imperative could be that the global powers will have to change either from clockwise to anti clockwise if Russia continues the war against Ukraine and retaliation in the west for standing by Ukraine. Britain to a much greater extend will only become more involved as a G-7 country and NATO major ally. These are future costs for the economy and military. In fact these future costs will have to be covered by all NATO Members. There is no time to waste on fantasy economics between the end of 2022 and 2023. And wars at a WW scale always make sovereign States a little more poorer (in the end after the war), is also another fact or aspect of the war logic. The cost of living therefore can only be variable and vulnerable, one could say.

Coming back to the 'failure' of Prime Minister Ms Liz Truss, who many see as one only following orders, could she have been misled by her Party when she was selected over Rishi Sunak, the former Chancellor before the last Chancellor Mr Kwasi Kwarteng? Let's hope not and so avoid this character fault in modern day Britain spiked with meanness and a tendency to tear up everybody from limb to limb, right there on the pavement in the street or Downing Street 10. Perhaps good manners have now transformed to a more callous political nature. Especially after leaving the EU many saw the path to sovereignty literaly in the palm of their hand and had decided to squeeze it all out from where ever they thought it came or was going. The Prime Minister Liz Truss wasn't yet the PM after the referendum in 2016. The new path isn't one too for historical Britain, except for the diehards, so many are saying. Open up your eyes and it is welcome to the rest of the world as it is in Real Time. And, yes, who would have thought in 2016 that we would have to go to an economic war against Russia in the year 2022? What one also doesn't realize is that no country in the west (EU or UK) of Europe can do deep political and economic reform when all countries are still not sure how they will cope financially at a later date in the year or next year, e.g. after April 2023. This is the moment where Britain shouldn't be making too many deep changes, especially when next year there will be another snapshot and review how to proceed under whatever condition with Russia. The world has forgotten what war actually means to the ordinary people. For now it is expecting to maintain the welfare in which you are living, as the right to existence (Human Rights) in a developed economy as we have in the EU. God forbid that Russia decides to continue till 2024! The echo in the Kwasi Kwarteng mini- budget was for the next two years economic outlook, which in fact would have to be paid for by the rich as no one under the poverty line has any money to contribute to exorbitant costs among the Member States of NATO. In which case if the EU stops paying up for the lives of its citizens we will have no more EU solidarity. It is therefore for solidarity reasons not only the EU but Britain too making the war logic work for the coming months, and not trying to build a tower of Babylon in the meantime, for the future of the UK.

In times of war no one is building new homes and city skylines.

The next election in Israel without Naftali Bennett on 1 November 2022.

1 October 2022

We can still remember the shock when Yair Lapid and Naftali Bennett decided to form government in May 2021, after the second mandate was given to the Center Party leader Yesh Atid. How could a third party and its leader become prime minister and lead a minority government with seven mandates? The next shock was even greater, that this inexperienced young prime minister would stay in de political saddle for a whole year when finally they got to him from the opposition bench. No working together on a national agreement for the settlers in the Judea & Samaria areas. After Mr Bennett's resignation one now wonders if that apparent victory is making any difference in the present time on both sides of the political aisle. In fact like Joseph Mr Bennett and now former prime minister of Israel has been thrown into the pit where his brothers had left him in complete destitude and to be eaten by the jackals and other predators of the desert. Some have said there is no miracle for the former prime minister to get out of the pit and make a comeback to politics as a political leader, let alone to become prime minister again. The 72 year old opposition leader stands a better chance, the polls are saying. It is as if the memory of the government of change must be completely erased from Israel and the political state of matters or things in the whole of the land. Should anyone dare to speak of Mr Bennett as the one who did the right things when he was prime minister, not from an audacity viewpoint, as climbing to the prime ministership with seven mandates, but how he was actually far more a capable young man to excercise courage and take the government out of its colourful slime (to the outside world) into a living reality. It wasn't realistic in its overview as are always matters of State when timebound. Change needs planning and executed in times of planning and stages. Perhaps his first year was turning slime into bricks with a handful of political straws, and getting ready for the second stage of his term to utilities. We could then have witnessed at the end of his term a cumultative following year with the new prime minister in the coalition agreement, Mr Yair Lapid.

But Mr Bennett will not return to politics the writing on the wall is saying. It is going to be an interesting time for either politician on the Right or Center Left to win the next election. We will have no Right Wing leader with seven mandates this time to save either skin. Everyone seems to be counting on Ayelet Shaked to join the Right- Wing. In Israel this is what is making politics and is also called idem dito politics. We have no idea which part of their words/ promises to the electorate will bring change for the millions of Israelis that were left cold by Covid-19 and the time before the pandemic. In the rest of the world the war in Ukraine is raging on and bringing many to their wits' end, with Russia behaving erratically; you don't know anymore what to make of this war except where it hurts the citizens of the European Union. In Israel Naftali Bennett had decided in 2020 that he wanted to become prime minister. Many then had blamed him for usurping the prime ministership from Mr Netanyahu, who had the first mandate in the last election 23 March 2021. Now in reflection of the prime ministership of Mr Bennett one can safely say that perhaps it was still the right thing to do and cut the umbilical cord to save either the mother or child from a morbid death. It wasn't the right time for feeling and trying to show the people what politicians should do for the people they want to lead, and not anything else. E.g. how to maintain that powerful idol worship of one man only. The latest was Yair Lapid at the United Nations promising the world a Two- State solution, which was taken by Mr Bennett as Alternate Prime Minister not as something logical. In an ideal Israel what should they be doing if they want to continue as a democracy? One thing good came out from Mr Bennett's time as prime minister, that however hard you try to make the impossible work this wasn't going to be repeated again for bringing in an Arab Party in government or coalition. In fact the beauty of it still is looming in its aftermath of Naftali Bennett as red vermilion political colour, that he was the right man for the government of change and simply because he alone had the courage or lion's heart to go an unusual extra mile in the 21st century in Israeli politics. He wasn't thrown out for corruption and stealing money from big investors. His prime ministership characterizes him as a simple young man who believed that all of Israel should try living with reality as it is. And not living in abstract politics whoever takes the glory of the day.

It is unforgivable that no one had the decency to wait and see his next year of his term as prime minister. It may be the timing and yearning for another election with the opposition leader to make his comeback kid moment again? It is a political theory only known to Israelis, yes, perhaps. In politics the yearning however is waiting to see its next prime minister rise up and that he will be capable to deal with the rest of the world as a Statesman or leader of Israel. These are two different yearnings. One can deal with the world even in a WWIII scenario and the other can continue the status quo, something Mr Bennett never wanted to do. Hence the proverbial the best mate is ashore. Now we are hearing from different corners in the Jewish society of political reform in Israel. 100 Years from now maybe then Israel could be ready for political reform after it has accepted the full emacipation of the Palestinian people as a people and not a political rival in Knesset. Why is it universally that cleaning up to many people or nations is a menial job, and yes, even in politics? And the dirtiest job was for Mr Bennett to show how politics should be done without champagne and expensive gifts/ cigars. Or making eyes at strange women and fall into their traps. (Naftali Bennett was the first 21st century Israeli prime minister without divorce and who was a decent family- young- man as prime minister and not a womanizer) His best moment when you could appreciate Naftali Bennett as prime minister was the moment after his resignation to pronto speak to the New York Times. If you ask why the answer is for you to find out for yourself. That had established something that never may find an answer in our time, but that this will always matter why the former prime minister immediately talked to the New York Times when he resigned. In the ideal world of Israeli politics it is remarkable there wasn't a place for him as prime minister as first among equals in Israel.

Ok. Mr Bennett won't run this election was his statement today. Timing however is pressure.

5 September 2022

On sunday a few thousands had called the former prime minister to return to politics and run again in the coming elections 1 November. Mr Bennett, Alternate Prime Minister, has declined the invitation and decided to take a break from politics after a decade where he had been Minister of Education, Defense and economy Minister, and from 13 June 2021 to 22 June 2022 Prime Minister. Nothing unreasonable said here by the former leader of Israel and moving on. However time is pressure and pressure is timing. The European Union is slowly creeping into a WWIII scenario with the Russian President, Mr Vladimir V. Putin, from tomorrow tuesday to shutdown the Russian gas flow to Europe. Wasn't it Naftali Bennett who flew over to Moscow in March after Russia invaded Ukraine the Donetsk and Luhansk region in the east and across border? His initiative and mission was meant to calm down the sides without prejudice for either one, the perfect negotiator in a crisis situation, seen from our part in the world in the EU that was going from worse to bad with fierce armed fighting between the people of Ukraine and the Russian army. Turkey had mediated quickly after Prime Minister Bennett's blitz visit and later meeting in Germany the German Chancellor Mr Olaf Scholz to report on his visit to Moscow, but also did not succeeded to bring the Russian President to the table in Istanbul and to meet with President of Ukraine, Mr Volodymyr Zelensky. Peace was the immediate talk in these moments of mediating and negotiations between the forces and diplomats in both countries, Ukraine and Russia. This week and six months later when the nuclear threat by Russia had stopped and instead was hard hit by immediate deep sanctions from the EU and confiscation of private wealth of Russian oligarchs living abroad, on CTGN a tweet read how the Russian President Mr Putin had been close to peace negotiations in April, but was quickly thwarted by the UK then Prime Minister Mr Boris Johnson not to continue talks with the Russian President. Peace looks now impotent from any viewpoint when we are facing an economic WWIII scenario and prolongation this coming winter, and with only one way to go in defeat to the Russian President in the Kremlin. The EU ends in a tumbling poverty abyss and it hadn't seen this one coming, last February, March, April, and May.

The quiet question to ask is whether the Russian President had listened to Mr Bennett, then Prime Minister of Israel, and maybe was prepared to enter a model of Pax Ukraine- Russia peace agreement, if the conditions were set right for both sides. It would have been a military victory to stop the war for the whole world, then. Yes, the nuclear warheads were ready, was the threat of the Russian President agains the west if they would try him. And as if another adviser had said to him to look no further but to Russia and it's gasfields, the Russian President Vladimir V. Putin then had changed his tactics and has now entered another phase of stopping as of tomorrow supplying the EU with gas and fuel. And we have no idea who could make Vladimir V. Putin to change his mind... (Except world domination?) Is there another leader in the world to convince the Russian President that in fact his actions are a crime against humanity? De facto putting 447.7 million EU citizens under extreme fuel poverty and bankruptcy is an act against civilians, which is not a battlefield where the military fighting is taking place. But apart from the living standard collapse in the coming winter months, there is also no mediator to meet with the Russian President to speak on behalf of what can still be done to go the way of peace or truce. Mr Bennett is adamant and will not come back to politics, so he said yesterday on monday. (Time and date in the meantime is 00.37 AM and 6 September 2022) Opposition leader of the Likud, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, is getting geared up for his fifth time in two and a half years to once again rule as prime minister of Israel, as is also the incumbent interim Prime Minister, Mr Yair Lapid. According to the reality in Israel Mr Bennett is out and his former ally Ms Ayelet Shaked will not continu as Yamina but as the Zionist Spirit in the coming election. Pressure is timing and if the EU indeed will slide deeper into a WWIII scenario there is no one on our side to negotiate with the Russian President this time. Or will Mr Vladimir V. Putin want to talk to an Alternate Israeli Prime Minister, who incidently till today did not change his stance on the Ukraine- Russia war? Kosovo has been the blinding fact for Europe that a Nato joint action among Member States and their politics would once again be successful. This time the war between Ukraine and Russia changes that military perception that the EU is in a true war and civilians will become casualties of the war. Are there first casualties and officially counted as war casualties, by renegade or deserting (if military in the M and L Treaties)? Peace will now be a three pronged trident negotiation if with Ukraine, the EU and Russia. Do we have anyone in the European Union to negotiate these peace conditions?   

Why would Israel not be right to scream danger if the JCPOA 2.0 deal will be signed by the US?

25 August 2022

1. Hezbollah is a Lebanese Shia Islamist political party and militant group, led by its Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah since 1992. Hezbollah's paramilitary wing is the Jihad Council, and its political wing is the Loyalty to the Resistance Bloc party in the Lebanese Parliament.
2. "Hamas considers Palestine the main front of jihad and viewed the uprising as an Islamic way of fighting the Occupation. · "Hamas is primarily a religious ...
Military wing: Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades
Chief of the Political Bureau: Ismail Haniyeh
Deputy Chief of the Political Bureau: Mousa Abu ...
Founded: 10 December 1987; 34 years ago.

And x more proxies that are Iranian affiliated over more than decades long ago. Israel has been virtually hemmed in from 1948 to the present time still by the same proxies and their names. Without any end soon in sight. It is not just overreaction reactionary from Israel if the JCPOA 2.0 deal to their mind is a bad deal. After 74 years Israel is still a juvenile State in the Middle East and only are holding the hand of democracy or the only democracy in the Middle East when moving on as State and people, now a nation of nearly 9.5 million. Much of the State when looking back in time in 1948 wasn't yet what one could call a formidable demographics of Jews living in Israel. Iran practically did not yet exist in the Jewish people living memory newly in Palestine view, then still Persia and under the Shah of Persia, Reza Pahlavi. After the seventies much had changed in the Middle East and the Shah of Persia was exiled and has died outside of Iran soon after that. Where has it all begun when Israel decided that Iran had become a great danger in the Middle East (starting with the question since the eigthties)? After the Iran- Iraq war? If memory serves you well than perhaps it was the other way round, that Iraq had used chemical weapons on the Iranians. Google it: "After the war, Iraq—pressured to own up to the attacks—acknowledged that it had "consumed" 1800 tons of mustard, 600 tons of sarin, and 140 tons of tabun. All told, according to Iran's Foundation of Martyrs and Veterans Affairs (FMVA), the chemical onslaught killed nearly 5000 Iranians and sickened more than 100,000."

All the here above is very clear... According to the latest news from Jerusalem the former prime minister senior Mr Netanyahu has explained his three- point plan to start a campaign at International scale to proof to the world that the JCPOA 2.0 is a bad deal and that the world must not cave into it and certainly for the US not to sign the deal. But how does one proof this formality against Iran when the JCPOA 2.0 (replacing the JCPOA 2015) that this is wrong? The Yair Lapid- Naftali Bennett (now Alternate prime minister) are still fighting to bring their concern and reasons against signing the deal to the table of high diplomacy at the highest levels, US and EU, and are getting the attention over their latest statements in the newspapers online. There is also something of a prestige element to the latest efforts or last minute efforts, especially when this becomes news through Politico or Wall Street Journal (Yair Lapid). The US briefing last night (European Time) briefly mentioned the JCPOA and the US concerns and timing. For Israel this time the political fighting will not take place in an arena and boxing ring, but it will rather delicately take place in a fencing hall, where Mr Lapid has or could set his foot on the mat  of either the US or EU with a yes or no question on Iran's record of governance and stability. Classical style and for gentlemen. Especially with a 15 milliseconds foil- point and touching the underarm protector of the head of the EU, Mr Joseph Borrell. Is Iran considered a stable governance and country? To put it differently: Paris will have to choose between Hera and Aphrodite which one is more beautiful and yield the apple of gold to either (never neither). Eris, was the goddess of discord, is where you could say the EU is placed instead of Paris. In the reward of love/ Aphrodite was Helen of Troy, but (to use here one of the famous phrases of Mr Netanyahu) who cares that she was married to Menelaus... It was the myth that counted. With the JCPOA 2.0 the question is if there is a twist or discord here and especially if it will yield any golden apples. And for whom. Is it said in the deal or agreement when signed, that this was for the industrial economies between the partners? Or that the scientific program of nuclear energy and capacity IAEA will be for peaceful purposes? That could come out straigth from the conservative mouth of Hera or maybe not?

Israel has a good and alerting point to be concerned as Iran was never tested as a military deterrence by the world powers, as was Israel since it's inception as a defenseless State in 1945 after the experience of the Holocaust in Europe. But political etiquette does require to handle all political arguments up to standards and must do so in formal language. The JCPOA 2.0 (or JCPOA 2015) is after all the most prominent political argument of the century twice this way. And now calls for appeal, by Israel and it's government, Interim Prime Minister Mr Yair Lapid (secondant Alternate Prime Minister Mr Naftali Bennett). 

Press Conference Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and the German Chancellor Hr Olaf Scholz, tuesday 16 August 2022

18 August 2022

German Chancellor Hr Olaf Scholz underwriting the importance of the use of the termilogy, 1. Holocaust, 2. Apartheid, after press conference in German to Bild. At the softest the Chancellor had found it unseemly on both points. And said so publicly in the public domain. Which was then translated to English to 'disgust' at the softest.

On both points the German Chancellor is right, 1. the Holocaust and the German guilt that is eternal. And 2. Apartheid is appropriate when only referring to the laws Act of South Africa on race (not by high- tech science DNA, but by appearance on pedantry- purism- science).

The PA President however wanted to make his points known either to the rest of the world and specifically in this part of the western world in the EU, points that have no similarities to European citizens daily lives. It is easy to understand his references on the doctrine of apartheid, as this was the main defense as a political argument of survival to the Palestinian people and mostly after the millennium in 2000. A doctrine as everyone knows in the European Union is never self taught absurdities, but a specific study on politics and political arguments at Universities taught. There is good reason to find deeper reference here in the above to explain the timelapse confusion with one meaning over the other, as if to explain a way of survival when completely depleted or void of any 'normalcy' reference to life, land and borders and complete loss of entitlement. Civic life is to understand here not as apartheid, but by reason in a civilized human environment then to call it otherwise without challenge, e.g. as the learned Hr Scholz put it... for this situation?

Perhaps referring to the geography of two peoples: Gaza and West Bank (Israel middle) land congruence and contiguity (movement and people) since 1948, which makes it for every accidental passer- by very inconvenient reading or orientation (even by satellite stats- seconds- minutes).
If irrelevant to ask this means that the question is without competency of any explanation of reality from the point of land orientation. From 1948 on reality still is only terror, on both sides. Or, dismiss good and well when bureaucratic and human conscience (including auxiliary help).

Or, the world internationally accept Palestine by title ad aspera ad astra is Israel.

Ukraine- Russia war 2022.

11 August 2022

Ukraine- Russia war: a three minutes quick shower and a direct charge is €1,00 on your (what used to be monthly) energy bill. Cooking and heating next winter will be exponentially steep... It throws to pieces what your consumer's window used to be before this month, August 2022 and the rising oil & gas prices. In Europe this is not incumbent to what most energy consumers, e.g. the European Union, know how to measure in their organised welfare system, let's say since WWII. Last year's final annual energy bill and the year before that, and to put it more exact, even the years before that, nothing variant or 'variable' exceeded the monthly energy bill. Unless an individual choice of increasing your energy consumption was evident, perhaps a new born in the family and keeping the child warm from cold nights in the winter. The mass of industries are calculating their own survival during the Ukraine- Russia war that is still ongoing between the two countries. But how will the consumer survive and keep up with the industries and the other mass of every developed country in the west of Europe? It is becoming in the end of the day to now seriously begin to ask the only European question that no European either dares or wants to ask, that whether Vladimir V. Putin is European by blood. Rationality is begging another question how this man can be Russian- European by blood, e.g. more than Joseph Stalin, who after all did make that ad hoc pact with the US to help Europe getting out of the iron claws of Nazi Germany and to save Europe. Here the Russian President is missing something very essential to his birth and right as European or Russo- European. First in February in the last winter days, the beginning months of a new year, the war was 'defensive', according to the Russian President. Ukraine in the eastern border needed saving from Nazi Ukraine, so he had said in his announcement for invading neighbouring Ukraine. Looking back this is all a bit confusing that the Russian President after months of fighting Ukraine he had to suddenly act against the European fundamental structures and say that this was a military decision. Has the war now become a novel way of fighting a military war (against Ukraine)? In other words the military force in Russia when trapped has no other way to win than to be creative with their 'defenses' or going deeper to offensive?

If deep offensive how is this military when you decide the novel tactics of cutting off gas supply to the European Union and outdo Joseph Stalin's reputation as despotic overnight? Mr Putin, we are still in Europe, remember? There is no fooling the old guards that your tactics are European and traditionally military. It is certainly not in the European mentality present to mix arms with irrationalities and destroy Europe. Adolf Hitler was the last tyrant, who with arms had mixed blood from his bloody ideologies. The era after WWII has now become part of a universal understanding for humanity that preventing another WW is a civilized understanding too. After the Russian cosmologist Mr Yuri Gagarin, the world had opened up even to more better ways how to cooperate in greater ways between the world powers that are right here on earth. We understand also while taking quick showers and the cost of rising prices are immediately felt on your naked skin, that Ukraine is not just an objective by Russia for invasion. On the balance here in Europe and history the only understanding is that as a result of loyalties we are now balancing the economy on basic aggregate systems. That is not possible when connected to the global world trillions of $ economy machineries. And perhaps what we are thinking as the ordinary citizens of Europe do not make the whole story here (in this writing). The nature of the war between Russia and Ukraine is becoming via novelty of war more of a personalized than historically just war. Our loyalties because of Europe and it's post WWII hegemony among the 27 EU Member States, I hope that they will see where this war has become irrational and personal for Mr Putin, and how it would have been rationality if... (No example in the present day and time) It is disappointing however when most people admired the Russian President for many years as a 'negative' hero, who at least would and could deal with the world 'rationally'. The economic shock imposed on Russia and it's retaliation of cutting off gas supply to Europe in return for many will be seen as very little 'elevated' and putting the military experience for Russia unto another level for the 21st century has badly failed. From, of course, not only the Russian navigating point of view. Why did some of us look up to Vladimir V. Putin all these years, even quietly or distinctly quiet?

A direct debit system is not fundamentally the European pay system, but is in fact much more a system in Britain.

Post Scriptum: I have the full trust that our government EU Member State will continue it's high level of discretion. 

In memo: the Maastricht Treaty 1992
Lisbon Treaty 2007
Treaty of Rome 1957
And so forth.

P O W E R

29 July 2022

Every adult starting from the age of consent to maturity is thinking alike, and that each within this group across the globe can tell you what that means when they say: power controls everything. We all do so in human speak. You can simply not see this in terms of an atmospheric statement and referring to something more extraterrestrial. In fact P O W E R is exactly that. Who controls earth, sea, sky and space? You, the ordinary citizens? Yet we are talking here the time of the Cold War. Power today has now been transformed for decades to 'What controls earth, sea, sky and space'. We are simple people after that. Or maybe say we are simple people behind the great atmospheric 'earth, sea, sky and space'. Human lives in the tail of the great new meteorite world and goes where ever it takes us, as we would be lost when cut off from the meteorite while travelling at great speed and force forward, as the meteorite would also lose some of it's way travelling through the atmosphere without it's tail. If we would put on a balance scale the who and what is controlling power we will find this rarity of truth that there are people behind power and also there are ways to do this 'distributive'. The people or citizens in each constituence of 'distribution' are called the electorate and they will mandate the 'Who are controlling earth, sea, sky and space' powers. Starting from this point you will not get any happier as it gets even more complicated along this long journey of awareness. Power today, yesterday, or tomorrow, in fact is just the tip of the iceberg. A fully automated world without people controlling it's powers will make an odd existential human sort on the planet. The interesting discovery will therefore only be that it is not who controls power, but what it is that these are when saying 'who is controlling power'. If on the scale next to existential human sort, we can say the other kind of controlling powers are the uniform human sort. And only for the last three or four decades when the older power control laid much more in the hands of empires and ancient time. And yet here we are believing that e.g. the act of murder of one citizen in our universal world will make a second difference to tip the balance of active or passive distributive power. Or, even genocide.

Justice should it be a matrix and match our artificial intelligence world? Imagine future fights about what is real and what is unreal/ artificial, even when in a murder case and case of a murder. And if that is already happening for the last two decades pain will not be more than a disposable instrument stuck inside the human body from when time was still Real and not artificial. E.g. human belief or disbelief. In Real Time the world has not changed since WWI and WWII, or even before. Our history is still very much alive as we see it, whether through education or other archaic form. You can teach your children about the world of the dinosaur or Stig. This is very much still believable and alive... Globally, yes. These are the stories so much more stronger than the meaning of blood. Cancer, Covid-19, a homeless man/ woman bleeding in winter times on the streets in the snow, diseases, blood loss on the operation table, blood flow through the hospital drainage, and a million more examples will tell you why stories like Narnia are more true and considered education in our civilzed world. (Only to grow up and later become a politician of waste management) So, what is the point for this writing as the here above? Human is becoming authentic(ated) as the lesser power and is slowly not accelerating ascending into power, but descending downwards the spiral of losing more power every day as we proceed to live our lives on this planet. Name one man/ woman who has changed power among the uniform sort of humans holding that power? It is 'how to protect the world' what makes power. And that is now also shifting slowly to 'how to protect earth' power. It is frustrating growing up in a world first as the human by birth, and becoming the 'inhuman' body when growing up. What was that ol' song again, They shoot horses, don't they? (Racing Cars) Or die young like James Dean.

Israel versus Hajj Mecca

20 July 2022

The instinct and nature of this rebuke requires an official apology from Israel.

There should be an official apology by... one with the better instinct and who is hands- off diplomatically: Naftali Bennett.

Israel and it's ancient religion has both acknowledgment of theocratic conscience and the cosmopolitan worlds. 

Yours Truly,

.....................................................................................

American interests in the Middle East at Press Conference earlier today was the US President Mr Joe Biden's message from Jerusalem.

14 July 2022

Watching and listening the press conference today 'from out there in the world' gave the impression of the US President, that he was doing well with remembering every word in his speech and answers, and on one or two occasions also repeating his words/ stance. No one could say that the President was cognitive at loss at any point while speaking and addressing the issues for which he had made this visit to the Middle East. And it was the Middle East he was trying to make clear to everyone in the room present that this was his mission to bring peace and security for Israel and the countries in the Abraham Accords & for the region. Interim Prime Minister, Yair Lapid, one has to say, was never hessitant at any point when discussing or stating his stand on the views of the State of Israel where it concerned security issues and in greater cooperation with the new partnerships with their Arab neighbours, south or east of Israel and it's borders. But it will take more than diplomacy on the issue with Iran the Prime Minister said. The President in his speech said that he believed diplomacy was the right way and policy to advance stability or other. One has to say being on both sides clear where they stand today's press conference was highly political from the mere presence of the US President in Jerusalem Israel and talking these important points with the caretaker Prime Minister of Israel. And not to sound too critical of the President the question is what concrete measures could one define as new strategic vision? The Abraham Accords had a momentum before in 2020 when then the former US President Mr Donald Trump and former prime minister Mr Netanyahu had signed this normalization agreement with four Arab countries in the Middle East region. Also to meet with the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman Mr Biden's predecessor Mr Donald Trump had met with in March 2018 at the White House in Washington DC. Tomorrow on friday President Joe Biden will fly from Israel to Saudi Arabia and meet with the Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman. After today's press conference in Jerusalem this presidential visit was to secure the friendship with Israel, talk about Iran and Israel's military edge and security (securities), in a manner of courtesy toward the Israelis in a higly personal fashion. And also concluding with the signing of the 'Declaration of Jerusalem' between the two countries. The President in the last part of his speech this afternoon once again told the press and public in the world that he was still committed to a Two- State solution for the Palestinians and Israelis. And, for democracy in Israel. Yair Lapid as person and prime minister in the caretaker capacity has made a similar political and stately commitment when answering an Arabic female journalist her question on the Two- State solution. "I am committed to the Two- State solution, as this is the will of the majority in Israel," the Prime Minister said.

The death of Palestinian journalist, the late Ms Shireen Abu Akleh, was carefully sealed off  in Prussian dark blue from the press conference on the US President's visit in the Middle East to promote the political and strategic security interests of the United States to a wider cooperation and integration. The US State Department Spokesman, Jake Sullivan, in a briefing one day before leaving on the Air Force One for Israel accompanying the President, had confirmed that the family of the late journalist had been invited by Secretary of State Antony Blinken to the US for a meeting with him on the issue of the briefing on the conclusion of the USSC (with two ex or present time Nato ballistic experts on the expertise team examining the bullet that had killed the journalist on the fatal day when she was found dead / murdered from angles of intention by the IDF) why that this was inconclusive. There was no judgement attached to what the USSC called inconclusive, Mr Ned Price had said in another briefing in the previous day, on monday this week. Today in Jerusalem while the President is in Jerusalem the people's voice hangs over everyone wherever they have placed billboards crying for Shireen's justice (justice for Shireen). This is highly moving when coming from a people and the late Ms Shireen's family with young children (one niece) by her side after her death and one brother, longing to live in the same rights as most nations in our universal God given earth. This also requires an extraordinary will of sympathy in a conflicting time and place where peace is scarce or void of existence. The US in this administration reflected (world media) equally has shown to great length it's readiness to help the family as best they can if that could pass for a small consolation where others e.g. American veteran families even do not get the place or time with the US President. Except when visiting the bereaved families on certain occasions. The future and if there is still a future after the war in Ukraine with Russia, and also when an Israeli caretaker prime minister, Mr Yair Lapid, has shown enormous courage today by reiterating his standing on the Two- State solution at the press conference in Jerusalem, after Mr Biden's visit as the US President should be a memorable moment for the whole of the Middle East and leave behind a sparkle of legacy of something better than just goodwill behind with the people. God's universe comes to mind.

On friday 15 July 2022 the US President is expected to meet with Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian Authority in Bethlehem/ East Jerusalem. At 13:00 PM there will be a press conference held at the presidential palace (?) of the Palestinian Authority with Mr Abbas en President Joe Biden. 

US President Joe Biden on violence (in West Bank) of last month that has cost many lives, Palestinians, Israelis and Americans... The killing of Shireen Abu Akleh, the Palestinian journalist who was doing her work and telling the stories 'that sometimes are overlooked', the President said. He has also made very clear on her legacy to continue for 'so many young people' what she was doing / has done. (Brief P C quotes) With this it was important to notice the stressing in the President's voice. 'Her death should be accounted for', one can take as a presidential pledge for further investigation for Ms Abu Akleh's death. Talking at a press conference as the United States President in the 'occupied territory' West Bank about this topic on the death of the Palestinian- American journalist, and doing so before God Almighty and men/ mankind was yet his strongest and most brave signal given from his visit to the region in the Middle East. Brave for breaking with golden rules (e.g. not speaking about Ms Akleh's death during his visit in Israel & Middle East) and let the silver speak. According to the media and it's prominent guests Mr Biden has not made any new pledges to the Palestinian people with this visit. His commitment can only come, one can understand on the outside, as President of the United States and leader of the free world. And he has played what seems to be his part in that with great humility today in Bethlehem/ West Bank, East Jerusalem, and from viewers- angle also showing diplomatic sensitivity by removing the Israeli symbol or Magen David flag for a moment's 'silence' from 'The Beast'...   

Yesh Atid in deadlock again after the next elections the polls are saying today.

4 July 2022

Head to head the Likud and Yesh Atid will go against each other at the coming elections, 1 November 2022. 2 November, neither party can form a coalition and than it is back to history, at least when seen from election day in Israel for the last two years. But history happens on a daily basis in Israel, sometimes getting on or off the bus, you could say that, yesterday, especially in politics, never is relevant again for the rest in Real Time once we know who will be the next prime minister of Israel. The people of Israel always seem to hang on to their political umbrella during the 'political season' and only tomorrow is on their minds. On a national or half national scale when voting for the Likud, but more for the leader of the opposition, in the current interim government under Yair Lapid as interim prime minister. What could tomorrow mean to Israelis when put into sensible terms? Under a new prime minister, e.g. this is Yair Lapid, the drawing board is empty. He doesn't seem to have the future time prime ministership yet on his empty sheet, as he was never before a prime minister. By a genius stroke he manages to draw a line, straight or vertical, diagonal, or square and his premiership is born literally seconds later (future timing architecture). He may then think how easy it was but never saw this before. Easy, yes, but not when empty and you can never see the future without the white sheet projection first. This is not the Israeli way of becoming the new prime minister, you could argue. Have you seen the record holder of prime ministership by Mr Netanyahu? He can huff and puff badly in the face of Mr Lapid, if he choses to. His campaign for the next election is already going into second gear, F1 style. Mr Lapid cannot still be in the paddock examining his car and racing plans, or can he?

There is a lot at stake this time, a fifth round of elections within two years. And that is not on the side of Mr Lapid, unfortunately for Mr Netanyahu, as I understand it. That is why Mr Netanyahu is trying to create a 'milkgate' against the previous government under Mr Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid, then as alternate prime minister. Against Mr Netanyahu what 'gate' can one come up with, just to return the compliments? Zero thought, at least for now. But it can be done when we think hard enough of one, if we can use choclate paste or toothpaste as the unhealthy products for the poorest Israelis. Mr Netanyahu incidently keeps on mentioning 'Aravim', what does that mean? 2/3 Million Arabs are part of the Israeli society and are working also in Israel. But as 'none' citizens of Israel there is no bureaucracy to keep track of their existence or communities and so are the invisible economic factor living in Israel that no one seems to notice, except when terrorists. Again this is all but economic and bureacratic fiction, and not vision. Will the opposition leader bring the 'Aravim' to Knesset again, as did the previous coalition under Naftali Bennett and former prime minister? Except, that Mr Netanyahu like James Bond only shakes but doesn't stir his political cocktails. If there is another deadlock, some are saying, he will be in dead waters too if he cannot form a coalition for the fifth time. It doesn't mean that, to borrow the former prime minister's words on Iran here, automatically Mr Lapid will be able to form a coalition either. Ffff, this is going to cost the people of Israel. This parliamentary system is becoming too costly for the people of Israel to keep their mainstream politicians live off well on their 'innings' during election time. Why not take the short road to recovery and have another try with a new system in forming unity governments? Looks cheaper on every side outside of Knesset, don't you think? (In the background hearing Mr Lapid answering this question, "I think so.")

Israel needs an economic defense system based on future time. Past time is already dead as many Israeli citizens are living under the poverty line. This economic defense system is to upgrade this part of society to middle income, before evaluation. Valuation would be better, if worked out it's effects and effectiveness. It is not on the to do list for Mr Lapid when thinking of campaigning against the 'milkgate' man, Mr Netanyahu. Mainstream politics in Israel can only be about Mr Netanyahu and that he is to be worshipped as man, politician and a consummate former prime minister. If Mr Lapid wants to put the poorest societies on the political map the experience can only be a surreal landscape painted by him, and ending up being called an artist with artistic talents. "Israel is nr I high tech giant in the world," is perhaps what the opposition leader will say to all Israelis on TV and making a scarecrow (or van Gogh when cut off his ear) out of Mr Lapid's 'Israelis living in the millions in poverty' and being abandoned by the other candidate who portrays himself as the man of the people of Israel and the 'Aravim'. A true Lawrence Netanyahu of Arabia. The boxes on the table are empty but well wrapped by the opposition leader in decorative political and local wrapping paper. Or maybe not if there is where he will pull up some cards with writings on them and saying, 'Milk, Housing Prices going sky high, the cost of living and tax payers' money that Mr Bennett stole from the people of Israel (leaving out the bit for security because I wanted him out of my way).' The trick for Mr Lapid will be to bring along some boxes of his own, or furry foxes with messages in their mouth and saying ventriloquist style, 'cunning, cunning, smart, smart, dishonest, dishonest.' Is there hope for Israel under the sun?

Nostalgia of Naftali Bennett in his first weeks as prime minister of Israel, summer 2021.

First quarter to Israel's State budget proposal after 12 weeks.

3 August 2021

The coalition government Bennett- Lapid perhaps will now understand why Prime Minister Naftali Bennett had said before at his inauguration, 13 June, nearly two months ago, to put ideologies aside for the sake of the country and people of Israel. It was the State Budget and how this was the only way to bring back some of the weakest sectors into the world of the living. Mr Bennett has made great sacrifices since then on his part being a Right Wing Party and entering a coalition with extreme Left- Wing groups, one center left- right, and the Arab Party Ra'am. The Arab Israelis are also making up much of that 'weak sector' and now has been estimated into a currency for 51 Bln NIS in the State Budget. The Housing, Health, Social, Military and Economy ministries are the next in line or a straight line. The timing however will remain restricted to historical data and numbers, with an actual shift to see it move out of recession at perhaps zero % growth. This is still looking very low- key at small government and not at big government overviewing. Under the Netanyahu economic high laws for macro economic growth this new State Budget is but a dripping of waterdrops into mainstream economic cycle and what was then based on dynamics and not static intellectual economic laws and that are basically also more automative. If you take the bullish side to the domestic size economic situation of any country this will go in all sorts of directions with little progress of any kind. Just as much as staying bearish will or could harm the people if this 'out of the povertyline' remains with zero chance of growth. The Bennett- Lapid government may fall flat on it's face with confetti raining down from it's own economic mind ceiling and celebrate this special occasion...

It still will be however a celebration. This government of Right- Wing and Left- Wing parties have also managed to expose the weaker sides in society at government level, something that used to be in the backyard of the people's ownless places and living 'environment'. There is nothing more fascinating in politics than to help the working class, which by definition is always the most impossible mission you can excercise as a politician or Prime Minister. This Prime Minister, and alternate PM, both have set their (campaign Yair Lapid as interim prime minister from 22 June 2022 starting this week with global strategic issues and not domestic measures to drastic changes) hearts and minds in the right places of the people and still have very little success so far. It takes more deeper planning to put back the domestic issue on the table and make it by mandate (fictional or real) that it will benefit the weakest societies in the country. The military and it's Defense Ministry will still have to rely on it's long historical budgetary constructions. This also means that it will very well stay balanced with a promise in the new State Budget of the Bennett- Lapid government. No one has yet come forward and call the budget approval on sunday, 1 August 2021, a mockery of the government of change. The former PM, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, did say how this budget will harm people and went as far as calling it an 'Abbas tax' (where it will hurt most). The former prime minister his understanding of the economics in this budget by the new government is simply: the people of Israel will pay more tax to finance the Arab Party Ra'am and his programs to transform the ordinary Arab Israeli's lives. Please, Mr Former Prime Minister... Acting like a stepsister in this 'Cinderella fairy tale government of Bennett- Lapid' is unbecoming of you as opposition leader. It also was an attempt to scaremongering to the people of Israel, with a straight poker face. The former PM deserves a medal of bronze for this attempt. After 12 weeks, Prime Minister Naftali Bennett will have to come up with his first quarter snapshot of the budget he wants to put into law after 31 October in the coming fall. 1/1000 (Promille) growth? Still, that will be something to celebrate...

13 June 2022, save that date to congratulate Prime Minister Naftali Bennett on monday.

11 June 2022

For the last half year the only threat that Prime Minister Bennett has been hearing and facing was that on a daily poll Likud was close enough to the coalition with 60 seats. All that was needed was one defector to sent the coalition go back home for good. 35 Seats were kept above the head of Naftali Bennett like the sword of Damocles by Likud and sometimes even made phantom swings with the Yamina defector Idit Silman, unofficially. One more wish to be granted by the political genii and Mr Netanyahu is back in town to govern the country by a landslide majority this time. Well, this is the Middle East and miracles do happen sometimes. Or, from time to time and than we see a mirage or the mother of all mirages. Which brings this writing to the question on how the incumbent prime minister perceives his readiness in the short term to attack Iran and how he will up his next level of leadership as Prime Minister of Israel. Both ambitions now seem more likely and within some reach in proximity. In the article by Jacob Katz the day before yesterday the question was what strategy Israel had for these overt military plans on Iran. A plain and simple question to ask. The answer is, or one of the answers, to better ask what strategy does Iran has for it's ambitions in the region. Another answer is that no one has ever been looking into these ambitions before by any Israeli leader or under the leadership of e.g. the former prime minister whether Iran was having anything more up it's sleeve than proxy wars north and south of Israel. That the former leader of Israel had expulsed Iran from the JCPOA was the completion of Israel's ambition in the region and to show global leadership in the rest of the world how one should be dealing with a roque State and regime in the Middle East. If anyone is listening to the talks in Vienna and kept up with this process of returning to the JCPOA Iran is nothing more than a phantom in the opera and only singing it's aria in Italian 'returno, returno, returno' and waiting for the curtains to fall. In the meantime Iran is making new friends and signing also new agreements with Venezuela as we speak today. The President of Iran seems keen to advance geopolitical alliances in South America on a proforma basis with US sanctions against both allies in these agreements. We must always be optimistic and see that this is the future where the world will be going, or drown in it's own wealth...

Does Iran have a strategy for it's ambitions in the region of the Middle East too? On the extreme side this answer is simple and let's call it the operation 'Kings of kings'. A young Israeli prime minister in his first maiden year to lead Israel and it's people under some extraordinary circumstances, when his coalition is close to fall by sixty seats of the opposition Likudometer for the last six months, (66... just adding another 6?), Iran is seen as the octopus just sitting there and waiting for to be hit by Israel. Not an unfamiliar picture for Iran after decades of military tactical hits on it's territory. A little deep swim with proper gear for scuba diving in dark waters under the sea where the octopus is in his natural habitat, this could change the military optics if one was to determine how to envision what it thinks. And not only geopolitical and geonomics camouflages. What most people are forgetting is that the Middle East is not Middle Texas where everyone speaks English. What did Afghanistan taught the world and geopoltics? In this environment the octopus is the most natural and at it's best when peace is what it will promote in the region as a new theocracy of peace and peaceful alliances. Who is contributing more to this theocracy of peace in the Middle East and who is not, that could be perhaps what one can see as the future ambitions by Iran as a long term strategy. In the present day this could still be looking like a baby octopus. A little lesson on what the octopus does when threatened: "If threatened, octopuses shoot an inky fluid that darkens the water, confusing the aggressor. The octopus can also change to gray, brown, pink, blue, or green to blend in with its surroundings. Octopuses may also change color as a way to communicate with other octopuses." Does the Prime Minister of Israel recognize the defense of what Iran does when threatened? Or, will Prime Minister Bennett become the King of kings himself to match with Iran's old natural understanding? To Iran this has always been The Kings of kings. Showing that Israel's prime minister does contribute something to the Middle East and to make peace with it's enemies Sadatseque- like and kill off the raging fire of the peoples and Middle East populations believing that Israel is not contributing to peace in the Middle East and uphold the theocracy of peace. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett his next level of leadership is about making alliances and how to maintain good relations with foe and friends at, paradoxically, a global level. Everything Middle East goes through the mainstream of geopolitics in the world order. In his first year prime minsitership Naftali Bennett has learned how to dance the rumba with the regional leaders of Arab countries, but now it is the Argentinian tango when taking his first year alliances to a more 'expanding' year in his leadership as prime minister.

As Prime Minister of Israel Mr Bennett has shown in his first year that leadership is all about resilience when nothing is going for you or even loves you (nation). All his plus points are hanging on the palmtree and surprisingly these dates are tasting good and sweet in the land of politics in Israel in 2022.

There is a small chance for Prime Minister Bennett to become the caretaker prime minister until the next elections.

1 June 2022

But not in the present time political landscape, when thirteen days from today Prime Minister Naftali Bennett will be in that famous chair one year, and when two political landscapes were born on 13 June 2021. Nothing has been the same in politics in Israel since then, this especially to any outsider's eyes and ears. It is mostly from this side where we see or have witnessed the new prime minister of Israel making a difference where there was none ever designed to the formation of Benyamin Netanyahu's governments for two decades, directly and indirectly dominated by him. Yet many in Israeli politics say that the government of Bennett- Lapid will soon collapse and fail to present the next budget before July this year, according to Justice Minister, Gideon Sa'ar yesterday. But many more in Israel are never aware of the mechanisms shifting or big shifts that take place while the country goes to bed and sleep, and waking up as in every other normal day for 74 years. On the balance of this new national scale Prime Minister Bennett out of 'face value' moved a millisecond of what has been the total government political accumulation under the former prime minister, Benyamin Netanyahu. Not many people understand these mechanical shifts of mass. And yet here is the biggest loser in the present time coalition that people seem to see in Prime Minister Bennett at close range, and are always ready to shoot from the hips at him with their disdain and discord/ strife. To the world outside of Israel what the prime minister perhaps has tried is to excercise something of an impromptu balance of civil obedience and service friendly government. In other words try for the healthy democracy bigger picture, adjacent to the democracies in west Europe or perhaps even in the USA. Israel's oldest and longest ally. How do Israelis in general read politics today? Sunday 29 May this week, the first day of the week in Israel, could not have been what the prime minister has in mind as a representative democracy in Israel. A hate- fest is what countries overhere (Europe) are banning everywhere where they take place. To us fascism or racism is sinful or a deadly sin. (Seven deadly sins plus one)

To support Prime Minister Bennett who had immediately condemn the segment of racism in the flag parade in Jerusalem one has to applaud his decisiveness and acknowledge his leadership as a different class or rank compared to the former glory years of Mr Netanyahu. With this condemnation he is also making a point of good conscience that is non existent on a day like flag day in Jerusalem among the younger generation of religious Israelis. In the long term nothing much has changed under this prime minister from whatever view you take on the other side. The killing of Palestinian Journalist Ms Shireen Abu Akleh is still under investigation and at this point is inconclusive. Why her name was defamed by the young settlers during their flag march in Jerusalem isn't very clear. Unless it is that a dead Ms Akleh had taken Jerusalem for one whole day away from their 24/7 attention. Another shift in world opinion might also be their reason for displaying open or public anger at her over this? In 20 years time they will be older and some might even become politicians in the future, next to also another new generation of Palestinians who are eager to conquer their place in Jerusalem. Where is it that we are not looking in the bigger picture 20 years from now? By 70 Prime Minister Bennett will then have seen enough of the world and Israel, and probably (probability) will be the only man in Israel who is qualified to lead the nation back to sanity. It is then what will be left of this day to go back to and find nothing in the pots of 1948 or 1967. The settlers are Mr Netanyahu's creation of Israel, as to prior to the eighties this community was not known, that Israel will be the dog bone in the pot or pulverized to dust forever if they don't want unity in Israel. Now is the time, as the PM so rightly is saying (his speech on Jerusalem flag day evening). I believe this is what you can call that the son is the/ his father's dream come true, true and instinctively loyal (even when it hurts his own Party): you pledge allegiance to the whole of the nation and country when going to the Army. Another shift perhaps?

Jerusalem Day, 29 May 2022.

02:27 AM

29 May 2022

Here is where Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and his coalition will be heavily tested tomorrow when Flag Day for the nation will march from West Jerusalem into the east side through the Damascus Gate, and from there to the Western Wall, Kotel. Israel and top officials are on high alert tonight in Jerusalem. In the rest of the world all eyes will be on the security measures that the government has taken to secure safety for all who will be in this parade and flag waving festival of unification. This generation of Jews living in the land of Israel should remember the day of freedom and liberty (symbolism) in a free and safe way, when Jordan had to retreat from east Jerusalem and stay back in it's own boundries after 1967. This is part history and to a much greater extent also reality of Israel today. A reality that no one can rush through when reading the history of the people of Israel after 1948. This history is complicated and not suitable for the faint hearted to read. It can get gruesome and bloody at times. With e.g. the Palestinian people. Where we never are looking is through the fire and blood of the Israelis why and where this rationality of safety for Jews living in the land of Israel is the only way forward and nothing more or else. In the end of each day for Israelis their voice is still a minority voice, when the nature of their 'homeland' is not homogeneous with the rest of the territory close or next to it. Much of the flag day in Jerusalem is just one small explanation within the much greater picture of a universal dualism that is both Israel and the Palestinian people (since the millennium a datum est). The threat coming from Hamas on saturday for tomorrow's flag waving parade of the Jews in Jerusalem has reached something of an ultimate voice against the people of Israel living in Jerusalem and elsewhere in the country, in between Gaza and the West Bank. Israel and it's military are the occupied force and is keeping the Palestinian people severely oppressed under Israeli occupied rule. Realities are tight screwed for the Palestinian people from birth to death (sometimes short lived or extremely short lived), under this occupied rule or violence. For the last two decades there has been no progress or a complete deficit on the Y- axis on the peace process and it's two- state solution between Israel and the Palestinians. Just a memo to squeeze in here to remind you that there is such a thing as exactness.

Flag day, West and East Jerusalem, the Jewish nation, the Palestinian people and another memo: "On 29 November 2012 Palestine was granted non-member observer State status in the UN. The General Assembly proclaimed 2014 an International Year of Solidarity with the Palestinian People." Isn't this the same as wearing a pair of fine leather vintage shoes and standing in water? And a bit of Kafka, that in whatever mirror you are looking you only see past images of people murdered, sometimes in cold blood, and demolitions of dereliction housing rural 'estates'. Or camps. Israel equals cruelty and Hamas wants the world to stand with it on flag day in Jerusalem tomorrow to denounce the Jews their celebrations. A battle cry or ad absurdum... The absurdity is where it all had begun, in 1948. What is the two- state solution based on except what we all already know when signed in the Oslo Accords? The world has never witnessed the beginning of a two- state solution between Israelis and Palestinians in the last seven decades. A simple reason could be that Israel does not want to excercise it's right to existence through an International Law Code, and secondly in the longest remote the Palestinian people alone were party to this International Law Code between nations (in theory) and only briefly. The question however is that the International Law was deemed inedequate, one: because the existence of Israel depended on another reason by theological law, and secondly for the Palestinian people the problem here was that their existence stems from Arab roots and who lived for hundreds of years (assumption) in the land of Palestine. The Ottoman empire may have let many Arab tribes come to the country / into the territory to live but mostly to serve the Sultanate in Turkey. Turkey must know it's immigration policies among the indigeneous peoples across the lands in the Middle East, and if any had migrated or stayed a displaced peoples. Occupation of Jerusalem started with the Ottoman empire in Palestine land, de facto or perhaps not? Jerusalem like the silk road with Marco Polo, was such a thing or place with phenomenon, that kingdoms had always wanted this silk road of ruling from Jerusalem as kingdoms. The Damascus Gate in fact is de jure (artificially) still proof of the Ottoman Empire in Jerusalem to this day, through which Palestinians parade with their Nakba day, and the Jewish people the youngest 'rule of law' for many decades also parading through the same road on their flag day.

Jerusalem itself means history by definition, some could say from a Biblical point of view. In fact more precisely Divine History. Kingdom after kingdom was here to stay as the rule of law of the lands in between the hills west, east, north or south of Jerusalem. The kingdom of David, Solomon and to the last scion of the Davidic bloodline and with that ending the meaning of Israel and Judah in these lands. In modern day history the armistice lines decided it was time for a new world and history. Israel will be in between Gaza and the West Bank and live happily ever after with no fuss or unnecessary complicate matters for the last one ruling (occupying) in Jerusalem. How did their idea work for the better of nations and the world in retrospect of the beginning in 1948. Images are flashing through your mind of day to day killings for the last five decades, on both sides. How did their design contributed to the evolution of peace and peaceful solution between Israel and the Palestinian people? Occupation is inherent to eviction and vice versa, and only instrumental in war and not in peace time. (It is a Prussian invention by it's imperial generals) The term is illegal to use when you want to promote peace and especially when to start a peace process toward the two- state solution. The term is also discriminatory against another people when saying it and meaning eviction. A pure humanity question: "Where do you want me to move on to?" (Something I read in a comment on the Jerusalem Post) But isn't peace boring, boring, Boring? (To put it more banal, and a tedious modality to human nature) Others are flat- out saying that Israel is an apartheid regime, making here with this a political statement that is also constant. Tomorrow the Republic of Israel is celebrating it's victory day in Jerusalem and is doing so for 34 years. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and his coalition will have to prove their mettle tomorrow and safeguard the lives of their children when they parade their flags and chant 'revolutionary' singing, loud in Old Jerusalem, east of the capital city of divine Jerusalem. These are the human ethics one can find in Spinoza and Elias Cannetti writings. But equally so in Arabist's libraries when humanity is dissected with surgical tenderness and great wisdom of medicine and cure. Medicine started with the world of ancient Arabia. I pray to the God of Abraham that PM Bennett can keep his military and coalition in a hierarchy mode tomorrow and succeed, to be celebrated later on his first year on 13 June as first prime minister of Israel. Fifteen days from today.

The Palestinian people need protection, or P R O T E C T I O N?

20 May 2022

The video images of last friday when the funeral of the Al Jazeera journalist, Ms Shireen Abu Akleh, was held in Jerusalem are still today nine days later impressive to watch again this morning. One voice was overheard saying during the 'raid' on the Palestinian crowd outside the hospital where the funeral procession was to make it's way to the cemetery in old Jerusalem, that this shows a disturbing picture of the realities by Israeli security forces wherever they appear and that the Palestinian people need protection. That could not have been an after thought of making an overstatement or exaggerations. Anywhere else in the world when a nation cries out for protection of another entity that is alien to it's nationality by imagination alone one can almost immediately see the mental picture of political or military intervention. The same mental picture becomes however a distorted reading or visualization when that other entity is Israel. For decades the leading nations did amended that distortion by introducing under former Democrat President Bill Clinton the Two- State solution as to draw the line somewhere between the sides and peoples. After two decades and especially under the former prime minister of Israel, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, and also a failed attempt by the Palestinian politicians, the impression of that Two- State solution to the conflict now very much looks like the Two- State solution of an ongoing armed conflict, as was in the eighties in the South American Colombian FARC forces. How does this read today in your geopolitical memory of that time? In memo: " What is the FARC fighting for?
The FARC and other guerrilla movements claim to be fighting for the rights of the poor in Colombia to protect them from government violence and to provide social justice through communism. The Colombian government claims to be fighting for order and stability, and to protect the rights and interests of its citizens."

When a Palestinian journalist or local politician is using the words, "The Palestinian people need protection," while watching Israeli Security Forces beat into a mourning crowd on Television, on News Media Stream Worldwide, your inner gut tells you immediately that he was making a geopolitical cry for help in a moment like this one when the death of the slain journalist her coffin and pallbearers could not reach the hearse in peace and solemnity. Israel does not condemn their actions of Police or Military brutality is what all Palestinians claim and doing so for seven decades. It was therefore paradoxically a historic moment with the Israeli Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett of the government of change since he took Office as Prime Minister last year 13 June 2021, to have mentioned in Knesset that it is imperative to get to the truth of who has killed Ms Shireen Abu Akleh, or in his own words, "Who has killed the Palestinian journalist." When did former prime ministers in Israel call for the truth of any investigation in the murder of a Palestinian woman or man, or child? Also it is important to emphasize the second half of the procession of Ms Abu Akleh's funeral towards the Mount Zion that this part was without any disturbances from the Israeli Police or Security Forces on the proceeding crowd. A Police helicopter kept hoovering above the heads of the crowd and that was not meant as 'voyeurism' by the Police, one can only assume. How would the former prime minister have handled this part of the procession and funeral? One comment on the Jerusalem Post said that it was an insane day the day that Ms Abu Akleh was shot dead in the head. (Reports last night on CTGN mentioned that the shot was taken in the back of her neck and not as we have heard all week that it was a shot taken through the ear into the head. Still what is not being said here of which ear, left or right)

At this point even if Prime Minister Naftali Bennett would have visited, the place where the journalist was killed, in person that his new ways of handling difficult matters would have come too late at this stage in the 'armed conflict' between Israeli military forces and the people of Palestine West Bank. It is the son that waited all these years to see his dad is a good example how the people would have felt like had the PM of Israel visited 'Jenin Street' after the killing of the Al Jazeera journalist. Globally everyone is keeping his/ her critical eye on Israel, especially when the Police has halted the investigation into her death last week 11 May 2022. The story doesn't end here for Israel and neither for the people of Palestine. One wonders if in 75 years this will still be ongoing beyond our time and generation. Both a beautiful people and blessed to live here in this part of the Middle East, homogeneous from an Arab perspective, and heterogenous from the Israeli perspective. Syria nextdoor is neighter giving any better example how it is governing it's minorities, e.g. the Palestinian people. Bashar Al Assad is far more concerned with his high society life-style and the beauty of his wife. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett in comparison has the humble ambition of making Israel beautiful again and has ample time for Mrs Gilat Bennett, who is an extraordinary beautiful wife and first lady. Next month if the coalition holds up like the pallbearers at Ms Akleh's funeral and the PM can prevent it from falling to the ground while being politically beaten by the crowds in the opposition or even by his own coalition members, perhaps what we will then see is a political procession with what makes Israel also a very solemn nation as once was the case during the Holocaust in WWII.

What can the golden scale of ancient laws for all who live in the Middle East do here for the two peoples in a future Palestine between the State of Israel and future Palestinian Statehood? P R O T E C T I O N is for both an existential imperative, compared to what has been protection from the mouth to the people modality. Or, tell us what protection should be, pro- tekton?

Additional (personal op): Palestine has to address it's industrial vacuum (historical) if it wants to have the industrial nations to impose sanctions on Israel. In terms of industrial points we are looking at a leading nation when it comes to Israel. Sanctions should remedy the party of imposing sanctions via the G7 on another party if that levels it's own industrial world/ industries. Political philosophies (friendships) are not competent for industrial laws of sanctions in a global economy. Except where it sanctions for remedy.

Astaghfirullah, Shireen. Astaghfirullah. 

Nakba day in Israel for the Palestinians.

15 May 2022

After reading President Mahmoud Abbas statements today in the Jerusalem Post in an article one can than only comment that If that is true and the only Palestinian ideology it leaves no 'wiggle room' for the other party in the end (Two- State) solution. Article written by Khaled Abu Toameh. "As Palestinians mark Nakba Day, PA President Mahmoud Abbas vows to continue the "pay for slay" program where the PA pays Palestinian prisoners and terrorists." Can Jerusalem become the capital of a free Palestine? 1948 - 2022 What the world has seen thus far is that Israel has altered some of the President's writing and reading, when becoming and were in the making of the Jewish Home, later known as the State of Israel. The armistice lines had a demarcation effect on both peoples since then and went often enough hardest against the Palestinian people and unstoppable. This bleeding goes both ways and no one understands why the world is silent, or is supporting the people of Israel and it's 'methods' to maintain this territory as their homeland geography. It has never served the real purpose of both peoples, when looking back in May 2022 on Nakba Day. One is losing the argument, and the other is not anywhere near of winning their argument. With the death of the Palestinian journalist on wednesday 11 May last week, this became even more relevant the question and asking what is the fight for if both nations want to hold on to Jerusalem as the capital of their State or homeland (future Palestinian State)? The terror of military violence against everyone living e.g. in the West Bank is now being interpreted as deliberate because they are Palestinians, as is the same for Gaza. The Palestinian future State is now looking even more remote than in 1948 when today one is looking back from 15 May 2022. The science here can also not be simply 'Rage only'. And yet 73 years later what many also are witnessing is that there is some coexistence between Israelis and the Palestinians with visibly a meltpot of both going about their daily business each and every day as normal. If you are ambitious you can always go into politics, since it is nothing new how to get what benefits you or your families over those who cannot change or want change their 'living standard'. There are mules that speak and there are mules that cannot speak in business and politics normalcies in these remote places on the planet. No nation is immune here from the set of realities coming from minds as old as simple algebra. If A and B cannot live together, we will do business and politics in between and create another circle where the intersection will serve only those who are here in it. Nakba Day is far from these business micro societies and also doing politics whether deep dark or in broad daylight in local markets with stands selling vegetables.

The Israeli Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, had done the right thing today by keeping a down to earth strategic statement and not throwing more salt on the wound of what happened when the Palestinian Journalist was shot down by a bullet. Her death has sent a shock through the entire world and the mourning can still be felt in the western countries everywhere today. The Prime Minister mentioned to continue fighting the terrorism from Palestinians on Israel or Israelis, but he kept completely void of the murder of the late Ms Shireen Abu Akleh. The pressure on Israel is worldwide to investigate what had happened on last wednesday and if the bullet came from the IDF and not from the side of Palestinian 'gunfire'. Judging from the quiet by the Prime Minister today in his statements one cannot help noticing his careful treading and strategic words. Can the public assume that Israel is conducting seriously into the investigation into the death of the Al Jazeera journalist, Ms Abu Akleh and more so into the circumstances in which she was shot dead? And the question to keep on asking is whether this is pointing to a bigger picture or plan. There is no chance the Prime Minister can bypass any possibility whether it points to the IDF, Palestinian gunfire, or a private hitman (danger money). Like Oedipus it is him that bringeth the disease for his sin of having consummated the prime ministership in this fateful moment. He would then be in the same danger as was Ms Abu Akleh on wednesday 11 May 2022. And it is looking very much like a plan to create a massive attack that has failed or been foiled by a twist of fate, with the whole world witnessing the death of a memorable and beautiful person and was shot dead for nefarious reasons/ purposes by something or someone obscure. Only to bring down Prime Minister Naftali Bennett? The world is still watching the same video over and over when the military and Police rushed into the pallbearers holding up the casket. The obscenity was not only senseless, but it was also deeply obscure. At this point you would also go mad had the casket of your loved one fell to the ground. Fortunately the pallbearers held up and we must see this as bravery. Politics in Israel is anything but united at the moment and if rumours are right it is the former prime minister who is planning his comeback and who wants to form government under his leadership. He knows the Middle East as his backpockets and he knows to do the donkey speak. And who would not want to believe him? Even yours truly sometimes has that problem. But in hearts and minds I honour Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, for knowing how to keep his talons hidden. (Japanese/ Persian proverb when the kite/ hawk knows how to keep his talons hidden)

6 May 2022 Naftali Bennett Prime Minister of Israel (11 months).

“Israel is not a state of all its citizens… [but rather] the
nation-state of the Jewish people and only them”
Message posted online in March 2019 by Israel’s then prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu

Question is what could make the Likud come back to power and want to end the incumbent PM in Office his term and government? Fiction: bringing real change to the old laws of security for all Jews living in the State of Israel, as here above, or is it that the current Prime Minister wants to change the laws. Which laws? Israel has no written constitutional law, but what if that would be put to a written constitution related to time?

Is the PM doing something what is considered a danger to the 'constitution' as Israel knows it for 74 years? And with this risk something of a backlash from recent history as an 'Apartheid state'? The Prime Minister is in danger waters over something with death threats against him and his direct family members in his household, like Rabin.... Rabin's wisdom: "You start with the Right- Wing, and end up Left- Wing." Reasons for change of laws and the 'unwritten constitution'?

However that will seem too quick to change the 'apartheid laws' designed by Benyamin Netanyahu at this stage of the prime ministership by the incumbent PM Naftali Bennett. E.g. how to integrate security without 'apartheid laws' in Israel is one such problem with a young democracy 74 years existentialism.

Clause of time and emergency: divert with immediate effect to 'apartheid law' when threatening of State and peoples domestic or out of it's perimeters. Without inclination or impulse keeping the military over civil order/ rule permanent, and avoiding the bitterness of a new rule and only military.

Monday or tuesday next week, 9 May 2022, two votes of no confidence will be submitted to Knesset against the government of Naftali Bennett- Yair Lapid.

2 May 2022

Former Excellency, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, the II nd mandate given to Yair Lapid after the last election on 23 March 2021 was legal. It is still the case today on 2 May 2022 and will be here until the next election, the prospect after the term of the rotational agreement between the First and Alternate Prime Ministers, Mr Naftali Bennett and Mr Yair Lapid (now Foreign Minister) will end in 2024. 

Any argument to bring down the coalition government of Israel, aka the Bennett- Lapid government, must prove the second mandate to be illegal and therefore nullify the Prime Ministership of the present time Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, with immediate effect. 

t.t.,

..............................................................................................................

Additional: t.t. Latin totus tuus/ tota tuus.

The Jerusalem riots friday 22 nd April on Temple Mount in the Al Aqsa Mosque made a mockery of Prime Minister Naftali Bennett.

25 April 2022

After the last election when at almost similar outbreak of violence during the holidays of Ramadan Naftali Bennett, then, was not yet prime minister. He was a kingmaker with a meagre number of seats to perhaps still join a coalition with Likud, on the first mandate, or... Break with the political tradition of the Right- Wing and make the crossing over the perils to join Yesh Atid Center Left and the far left parties, with including another kingmaker under the name of Mansour Abbas, the Arab Party. Prime Minister Bennett had become the frog on the back of the scorpion slowly drifting the journey into the unknown 'other side' of the political spectrum, then still a mirage. And he survived as both would have drowned in the perils of the water, frog and scorpion, had the latter made a fatal move to still 'kill' the frog for his dinner. When Naftali Bennett was inaugurated on 'pain of death' in political Knesset by the former and ousted PM Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, 13 June 2021, he must have realized for the first time how the terror wasn't over, but that he was fortunate that the scorpion thought he was crossing over the water and not sands. The mind of the scorpion can be tricked by it's own lack of 'frog instinct', who incidently can live on sands and swim in waters. Politics everywhere in the world is losing purpose and control within their own ranks, or Parties, without any logical explanation to the trend. It is in the UK not any different with the Prime Ministership of Boris Johnson, now also fighting what they call the 'indefensible' on the Partygate scandals (multiple Fixed Penalties Notices). For Prime Minister Bennett another miracle also became evident during his ten/ eleven months rule as the new prime minister of Israel. The frog had turned into a prince, some say or think just like when Saul was king, that Naftali Bennett had become the new king David. Envy follows his trails, and in every step of the way, as no one wants the new king David to rule Israel. Many are still longing and craving the fleshpots of the former Israeli Prime Minister, Mr Netanyahu. He is the father and pharaoh of Israel in the 21st century. Just this weekend on friday 22 April during the holy month of Ramadan for all Muslims in the world, voices were very high to have the former leader back in the prime minister residence in Balfour Street, Jerusalem. We know after a toxic moment on friday and saturday that this time with a new prime minister something similar and familiar was prevalence of former times and had the symptons of identical and the same scenes.

For the last ten months it was Prime Minister Bennett who brought relief back to Israel and it's image on the world stage, speaking more attuned with G20 democracies and that he even went as far as meeting with the G7 leaders in a rare act of the first among equals. The world did not treat the Prime Minister with skepticism or suspicion as he was on missions of patching up where the former Israeli leader had left... E.g. the Middle East regional leaders and the US President and Democrat Joe Biden. Perhaps there is no textual proof for all this while happening in the last ten or eleven months, as the prime minister had suddenly accelerated in a whirlpool of new experiences and impressions to deal with on almost improvise and adapt moments pronto. Cop26, meeting with the Russian President, Vladimir V. Putin, Egyptian President Al Sisi, and official meetings with the US Aministration at the White House. European leaders when offering to mediate between Ukraine and Russia in a WWIII scenario two months earlier this year, the prime minister had also met with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz as soon as he got back on the plane and leaving from Moscow. These feats of arms of the ten months prime ministership of Naftali Bennett, in memo: six seats kingmaker, are the proof of what was never imagined by the former prime minister when he thought of flying the plane and had said that no one else was going to do so like him. Not Bennett, and not Lapid. (Now Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, and Foreign Minister/ Alternate PM, Yair Lapid) The problem for any Israeli prime minister, indeed, was the global stage. How does one represent Israel in a dignified and statesman- like manner? Dozens of Israeli leaders can overtake leadership to rule as prime minister in Israel, as they are all qualified to address the people and issues in Hebrew. This was evident in the last seven decades with Ben Gurion, Golda Meir, Menachim Begin, and several more others. The other kingmaker in the Bennett- Lapid coalition is Mansour Abbas, leading his faction into Israeli politics and in the government of change. It is this aspect of the coalition that has now made a mockery of the Right- Wing man, and prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, who has let slip away the liquid of energy between his fingers when violence had once again broke out during the holidays of Ramadan and Pesach on the Temple Mount, the third holiest place for the Muslim world. In the ball of this toxicity confusion the prime minister had or seem to have let it slip his mind that he was being conceived by the world as the high profile mediator between Russia and Ukraine (WWIII scenario), and therfore had to show some diplomatic restrain when speaking with the Secretary General of the United Nations Mr Antiono Guterres on the violence breakout on Temple Mount last weekend. His diplomatic visagiste perhaps had also left this blank as only the message or warning against terrorism in Israel was primary. Blank or incandescent white light illumination? And then he woke up and ordered another white light blankness on sunday to let no one enter the compound of the Temple Mount except the Muslim worshippers if they can be or keep peaceful on the premises of the Al Aqsa Mosque. On the Right this illumination did not go well down and again they are downgrading Prime Minister Bennett, and doomsay him to downfall and other electorate contempts.

The electoral question for Prime Minister Bennett today is to stay prime minister at what perils? Love cometh in many ways, but woe if it cometh through a capricious nature of making this young man stay as prime minister of Israel, as is the necessary evil of prosperity that is money/ the ancient Shekel for Israel. What he has had in his hands is a prime ministership of a sovereign nation and was aligned with the world for a moment. The world in all it's present time cynicism took him on board and found in him something believable, predominantly based on his ability as six seats prime minister. But this is Israel and many decent families and people are almost extinct from the embers of it's real meaning as humanity and people of the Jewish race. King David his people, and not Saul his people, I can assume in our free world. Isn't the parent (Jew or gentile) who loves his son also the one to chastise him diligently? But more so because his son is a leader with rare qualities, and not like the multitude. How many Naftali Bennetts are there in Israel? How many Netanyahus are there in Israel? This is not the electoral answer and balance, but it is the kingly weight of what is spurned silver and what is not. Kotel is your castleground. Just take notice and make a reconciliation gesture to your neighbours in the region, once again, because they believe no one else. Peace is a terrible burden in any time or epoch when forging the blades with promise and keeping your word. As so did king David when taking up the burden of kingship.

Can Prime Minister Boris Johnson still inspire his Tory Party?

17 April 2022

Who is Madame Bovary calling for operating on a healthy body? According to the government ministers within or not in his own Party the Prime Minister has broken multiple laws during the Covid-19 days in lockdown. He must therefore Go! The law that the PM has broken as in Contingency Plans (future calamities), the Health Ministery (massive outbreaks on a global scale) and Home Office to fine everyone breaking the laws during these lockdowns by law. Was there a law or rules dealing with the International pandemic, incidently just months later when the Prime Minister himself was thought to cough up blood from a Covid-19 related illness weeks earlier in April 2020. In fact let's be happy that the PM could attend his birthday later on that spring and still be here with the living among us. Looking back Covid-19 was and is nothing incidental, but in fact still is raging on across the western half of the world. Some are eligible for a fourth booster this year, at a mandatory pace but not by law just now. Rhythmically the Prime Minister did 'break the law' that he had imposed on the national scale to only weeks later celebrate his come- back to life birthday from Covid-19 hospitalization. When I say rhythmic I am saying human. All warnings came from the World Health Organization during the whole year in 2020, 2021 and still in 2022. Was there a law the WHO had advised governments across the world to follow in 2020? In short one could say that the Prime Minister might have broken his own rules / measures against contracting the virus or having herds of immunity spreadings, but breaking the law that could never have been there and not in the UK alone, but everywhere for all governments who did not know how to deal with the virus just yet at the same time when the PM had 'broken' his rules. Wisdom seems to have changed it's face like Janus in the aftermath of Covid-19 since it's first outbreak in February 2020. The bigger question is who can replace the Prime Minister while battling for his life another time to stay on as PM? If he would go his prime ministership has been but nothing more after Theresa May than a Pyrrhic victory with Brexit. Be it in the rhythm of an extended one- night- stand.

The Prime Minister is also not inspiring after his leadership on Ukraine and Russia where the war is still ongoing. "Let's talk, let's talk business." (Quote from the Godfather Moe Greene at the Casino when meeting with Michael Corleone) No one is seeing confetti but only white feathers showering down on the Prime Minister, but call it right and beautiful as it snows on him gently in the world's oldest parliament. Why not say it like it is, that the Prime Minister is not inspiring the nation from breaking the rules on Covid-19, nor is he a formidable commander in Chief inspiring his ministers with the Ukraine- Russia war/ invasion. He is only acting inspirational and doing what other countries are doing with sanctions against Russia. From 24 February on when Russia invaded the east region and tearing away two independent regions, Donetsk and Luhansk. But what should the next prime minister be like or is expected to act like? And can the next prime minister guarantee to be inspirational? So, how do they do it when zero inspiration is the horizontal line and can't find the next 'investment' to inspire? Two zeros are better than one? When the former PM left it was zero plus for Mr Johnson. And that was a good feeling for the people (68% Tory voters still want Boris Johnson to stay PM), which he delivered the end of being in the EU. You can talk all you want but the Prime Minister will have to go, I can hear people whispering or saying out loud. The law is absolute if there is proof of law. People with large families had to stay away from each other, but work from home wasn't yet a rule in June 2020. Families as large as twelve people would look after each other and get into quarantine if one was ill/ caught the symptons of Covid-19. No 10 could be defined as a workplace family, just measuring up to the rules set by the PM himself. It was different if the PM it was his fault why so many had died. But that is just what they are perhaps trying to imply and not saying so.

The skipping of stones on the political water surface is causing lot's of ripples and going wider and wider each day and with every call for the PM to resign for something he clearly seems stigmatized for to be a loud party- animal. (E.g. dancing on tables with the Israeli now Foreign Minister, Mr Yair Lapid) But whether he deserves to another term as PM is by law only if there is an election. Who can't live with that? Laws they are saying is for the ruling class, and the Tories are always about laws. And rules? Who are for rules and measures? When do rules and measures become law in society? There is a third way looking at a glass of water critically when you include top and bottom view. The promise given to Mr Johnson is yet another 'bulk' of fines to expect in the coming time. Why do they insult people who can think at the ballot box? What if the people of Britain think that the PM is being treated unfairly and just want his demise as the Tory Prime Minister? A whole different case if the PM was smelling already after defeat, of course. He is not on the next winning formula after Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February nine or ten weeks ago. But who is? With the only vision for the PM to resign no one can call this or hardly the winning formula for Britain, one could say. And who loves the PM, like some who had loved the former US President Donald Trump? Another example some might say that this is exactly what has also happened to Right- Wing Israeli former Prime Minister of Israel, and to be ousted by a hybrid of political parties left and right, middle and far rightest/ leftists. No, with the Israeli former PM he has been in power for more than three decades and 12 years in the same power as Prime Minister of Israel. The inspiration however came from an unexpected corner from a third party right- wing man (unloved by the majority) Naftali Bennett and joining an unusual alliance/ coalition with the center left and right, and far left. That was inspirational to put the country back to the people Jews and Arabs alike in a new future and time very much like ours in the west. Time changes politics and vision how to govern in the future time. Prime Minister Johnson will quickly have to find his inner Naftali Bennett and bring change to the dead stalemate of 'nothing new under the sun' for the Tory Party. Inflation? 'We've been there, done that, in the thirties,' some might say.

PM Naftali Bennett his government has lost it's majority in Knesset this morning.

6 April 2022

It has been an interesting ten months since 13 June 2021. PM Naftali Bennett by now has learned something of being PM, that what he has done to use his kingmaker position in a coalition with the here above mentioned (Jerusalem Post article comment: "Lapid doesn’t want to be PM he could have been from the beginning of this government but he is scared too be found out that he is very very limited in knowledge and decisions making he is just good talker nothing more."), he was never going to be able to overcome the lack of support of a majority in his own coalition, nor survive without the majority vote of the people. But one thing is sure how this man survived public opinion on the global stage as Israel's only reliable PM in a world crisis (WWIII), at COP26 standing with his energy minister and he stood by her, and making also regional friends with those who have been neglected before, e.g. Egypt. His legacy was introducing a new impetus in Israel's politics after the former prime minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. He can't and couldn't do more than this. Or perhaps, sink?Also true is that a world war IV is unlikely to happen in our lifetime again for any next prime minister in Israel. We should go back in memory ten months ago for a brief moment: if anyone can remember at the beginning how former PM BN had said that no one could fly the plane, and certainly not Bennett. He alone people wanted to talk to. Pfizer... Now it is domestic politics that is the banner to blame Mr Bennett for. Perhaps it is PM Naftali Bennett who can now say or returning the compliment, who can fly the rocket? I wish that he would quit and leave everything to go back to 'normal' and let the people decide. Just for the sake of democracy. Love, referring to Mrs Bennett in the article 'Bennett neglected his home party and paid a heavy price - analysis' by Herb Keinon this evening, indeed as now in this crisis will certainly not do much for the PM. And as for maintenance which is incidently also not in his hands, from day one. The government would fall apart the first week. Yes, that too. Is no one keeping the logbook?

Other comments: Idit Silman has saved the nation of Israel today by resigning from her post as MK in Knesset. Making that a 60-60 vote share between the coalition and opposition. That would make alternate prime minister and Foreign Minister, Yair Lapid, automatically the prime minister before the country goes back to a new election. One opposition leader was ecstatic today after Mrs Silman defected to Likud when she resigned. Mrs Silman was a Yamina party and coalition acting whip for this government. The former prime minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu congratulated Mrs Silman on her excellent choice and welcomed the MK with a hug, so the news in Israel says. Why now? One, the former prime minister had been 1000x stronger last year when Naftali Bennett became prime minister. Indeed, it was he alone then to fly the plane of Israel for decades and with a man like Mr Bennett what could anyone say at the time? No one had imagined that the next prime minister with a six seat minority in the Yesh Atid coalition, Central Left and Right with Blue & White Benny Gantz (and other third parties) would take himself around earth's and Israel's orbit to fly his rocket/ Friendship (John Glenn) quite a few times around. The former PM expected from Mr Bennett not to know or do more than what he already knew during his years under his governing power... But the government of the coalition of change did not fall after two weeks, nor three or six months. It lasted up to today, in the tenth month of this prime ministership. As an outsider and not living in Israel it is not hard to see why Benyamin Netanyahu is still the strongest party and leader that the Israeli people want. Ancient Greece was run by monarchies, the military and the polis. Religion and ancient religious views never claimend in any part of their history the dominant role, as their pantheon existed very close to democracy as they knew it. Anyone remember the olive branch? Disputes in politics or glory were fought by a delicate design to suggest a more subtle idea behind natural perception. Athena had won such dispute with the olive branch. It is this design of subtleties that makes democracy the only design in human perceptions as the architecture of the true polis and the city's strength. It leaves nothing to coincidence, or even fate? When faced with a status quo either Left or Right in government, the question than to ask is why leave the rest of your city to fate? But we have to stop this silly talk here, because in Israel the people have only one leader and are yearning for his comeback now as we speak. While Prime Minister Bennett was prime minister in one word that he might have seized the day? (One day in politics) And he has to thank his 'unlucky' stars for seizing it decisively without much bravado.

Prince Andrew, Andrew Mountbatten- Windsor

Personal op

27 March 2022

Five weeks later: Camilla Tomei (Royal correspondent Telegraph UK) a few months ago (2021) said about Prince Andrew and his 'fallen' reputation as a royal/ member of the monarchy, that even if a child would fall into a river and he jumped after her to save her, that even that would not save his reputation again.
In March 2022 with the ongoing war still raging on in Ukraine against the Russian invasion on 24 February 2022, with the EU, Nato and G-7 countries heavily involved to resolve the war, what if Prince Andrew would in a separate case now save Europe from the river Styx as acting special peace- council for listening to both Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky? (Flanked by two secondants of independent offices)
In review of Prince Andrew and his fallen reputation in public life, humility could prove in our difficult time that perhaps he is the right man to be the peace separate envoy if everything else fails and to meet with the Russian President Mr Vladimir V. Putin and President of Ukraine, Mr Volodymyr Zelensky. So help me God Almighty God of Abraham.

The Royal House in England does not have a historical line with Ukriaine.

Note: PURPOSE: The purpose of the Council shall be to promote a collegial exchange of information and ideas, (personal additional) or keep forever silent by military (sacramentum) oath. (Sacramentum also referring to the Prince his settlement case, the classic meaning that can be applied to both, plaintiff and defendant at law). For any Christian Faith that can only have but one meaning: to suffer of either one's own or consequences of another human or stone. Prince Andrew is a member of the Chivalry Order Red Cross. He is in the present time a private citizen.

Peace talks are expected tomorrow in Turkey Istanbul between Russia and Ukraine. Or a cease- fire.

Prime Minister of Israel, Mr Naftali Bennett, has been admitting his mediation efforts with the Russian President and Ukraine President on a pace by pace approach to restore calm during the first weeks since the war broke out on 24 February last month. His main focus is now on immediate humanitarian aid from Israel to Ukraine and the special interest for helping the Jewish communities.

Ukraine insists on it's sovereign borders with Russia. The 21st century is a challenging moment and time for the global world, with especially no suitable peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine just in sight today or just yet.

Memo (the stone): remember that for Russia nothing has ever replaced the meaning of the spoils of war.

Fiction: if Ukraine would be the spoils of war, the quesiton equally to Russia or it's present time president, Mr Vladimir V. Putin should be put this way, that is it not for blood to decide the spoils of war? Tsar or tsesarevich, the first born? Ukraine in our modern world can only see Russia as it's equal without tsar, politically and militarily (historically too). Leo Tolstoy once has written that a noble man can only be when from nobility.  

Error: UK Royal Correspondent Camilla Tominey.

The head of President Volodymyr Zelensky must be ticking with sounds of the Newton cradle tonight.

16 March 2022

(00:22 AM)

One: not in Nato. Two: (not) in the EU Membership. The other element in this swing of causa causam war that is still raging through Ukraine in cities and streets, is the Russian invasion. And also the latest news online one can read are saying everywhere that Mr Zelensky will continue fighting back the Russian military presence wherever they might be, as continue talks on either a cease- fire or peace settlement, something unthinkable in the first week of this Russian invasion. Up to now the biggest test in the International community must have been the 'no- fly- zone' above Ukraine request from Nato. Modern day history with all it's emphasis on military politics and theories, ehtically or moral, fiction of the 'no fly zone' could not be the realistic test in the war between Russia and Ukraine, whilst against the background of the global world. 30 Years ago humanity in much of the west, but also in Europe, had never before had the experience of developing social skills and that this was scientifically for it's own good and beneficiary for the future time. The world then had discovered war and poverty were now for good a thing of the past centuries. In Europe and beyond. And thus globalization could begin. In neighbouring country Ukraine 1991 was intellectually in practically a civil war of crying for it's independence from the USSR. (See information on Internet) When will it stop, is a question when read in Ukrainian or Russian language perhaps is very different from when reading and understanding this in English, German, French or other. The multi- levelled of independence in Ukraine have only taken on different fronts of wars and revolutions during the years after 1991. And the remarkable middle line has always been joining the European Union Member States at each and every turn of this revolution theory and belief. The world media has taken the President of Ukraine, Mr Zelensky, in February and March 2022, to be the face of yet another struggle against Russian ambitions and military invasion to stop Ukraine from entering the alliances of Nato and the EU, and is once again stopped... While in the rest of the world and on the planet there is only one turn around, by gravity and that humanity are now more social animals.

There is however one obstinate reality that is calling for a more extensive examination of the independence this country is fighting for since it's first moment in modern day history and in the previous century. For some reason the country seems desperate to convince the world it's natural ties are with the rest of the EU, and that here is where Russia comes in (between) and always (so it still says) will come in at the same point over and over. What intellectual argument could convince President Vladimir Putin that Ukraine is saying 'no' to his advancing to retake Kyiv? Parallel to Mr Putin's war against Ukraine there is Nato and it's major ally the US, and who has been building up troops alongside the Ukranian border, according to the Kremlin in February 2022. With Ukraine today still asking for weapons from the west to help the fighting groups or forces of Ukraine, the military objectives are becoming more unclear than when in the first hours of the war breakout. Or, could this be true that the globalized world had met with a test to it's strength and allied powers? The last world war was in 1945 when that had ended. World War III/ WWIII yet again could prove all of humanity that our living world and planet has to learn the path to a new and more improved world. Just as it has survived the International Financial crisis in 2008, and had rebuilt trust among the global corporations for the last 14 years and where we are now. Let us also not underestimate the world powers and the military machineries (including theories and analysis), but that they have perhaps now followed tendency and cause politics before it's true natural strength of keeping all of humanity safe. There are too many people fleeing Ukraine and this is causing too much human suffering so close to the European countries their doorstep. Peace and Independence between Russia and Ukraine, yes, how much more suffering of displacement of human lives and the most vulnerable (and this includes the future). Independence is the writing of the Ukranian author and who wants all copyrights for whatever may flow from it... Surely not war? Peace is the imagination stage, except...

12 Hours ceasefire Ukraine- Russia today...

9 March 2022

Repair a powerline in Chernobyl or getting the ministries for plannings come to the table and talk about how to rebuild all the cities destroyed during the outbreak of Russia's invasion now reaching it's fourteenth day as we speak, the question can only be if that means a prelude to calling for a permanent ceasefire. Will Russia observe this temporary ceasefire, as the Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba of Ukraine requested earlier in the morning? Had anyone mediated a ceasefire today he/ she could only have suggested to rendezvous at a later date in time, next year in March or April 2023, to resume the official ceasefire & study of Russian demands between Russia and Ukraine. How much damage was done during the war for the last fourteen days between the two forces, with Ukraine also having foreign legions help fighting? 2 Million people have already fled Ukraine to unknown destinations and leaving behind their reasonable lives and livelyhood, but should return back to their home country pronto and without delay to end their suffering. President Volodymyr Zelensky will not find any reasonable excuses in the aftermath for the displaced people that would make any logical sense of why people had to flee the country, while he had called for fighting back the Russian aggression and invasion of their sovereign home Ukraine. And that can take time for 2 million people to return, because they are patriots? It is equally for the Russian President Vladimir Putin also ending with no reasonable explanation where Russia stood in this war and make it an acceptable logic. Everything had happened so fast in nanoseconds and before anyone had called 'sanctions' the world descended with enormous velocity upon Russia. Boom! And a rally of back and forth commenced between the super military powers, in terms of threats. The nuclear threat coming immediately from Russia after Nato had signalled to be ready at any time to help Ukraine, could be one example of how extensive the belligerence of words had already crossed too many redlines in a short or brief moment in it's first hours. The global community was holding it's breath.

Ukraine has an interesting geography from the bird's- eye view. Fifty years from today it is not impossible to see Ukraine through the kind of transformation eye in a new generation of Ukrainians, Russians, Europeans, Asia, the EU, in evolving communities and developments in new global dimensions. It's location is set perfectly well at the heart and center of the Balkan in eastern Europe. Today Samarkand is the perfect example of that transformation. Ukraine could be the next Samarkand with it's historical society orthodox Christian and mystical relationship with it's neigbouring nations, close or distant. It should bank more on it's favourable geography for it's future. From a global perspective to rebuild Ukraine half cultural in it's ancient history and the other half to accomodate the west, or east, west, south and north, this too is not unthinkable architecture and engineering. For Russia the time however is now to take Ukraine for it's bride in the orthodox belief, that e.g. it's blood runs through Christ not devided but as one, like Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden. I do not think that the 21st century will ever come to understand the Russian President Mr Putin. Russia on it's own is half the conscience of this blood in Christianity. And only if Ukraine returns or is returned to Russia it will be one and 'let no man apart them'. It could be, was the president of Russia born a tsar his ambitions would be legitimate and sacrosanct but more as almost holy. No, we will never understand the Russian President his ambitions to keep Ukraine in his orthodox Christian mysticism. The Pylyp Olyk constitution of Ukraine was restored by former President Mr Petro Poroshenko from 2014 to 2019. Mr Volodymyr Zelensky became his successor and was elected President of Ukraine. Something of tactics?

Peace apocalypse: day 8.

3 March 2022

East, west, north or south, this morning the cold winter wind of March 2022 is blowing in all cardinal directions as if the world is watching or living a new experience of global compass in a future geography born from the massive war ongoing in Ukraine. Russia is particularly found of this new evolution some are saying that the Russian President had planned many years ago, to be more concrete even before 2014 when last he had paid a blitz visit to Ukraine and annexed Crimea. In 2022 one can look back on 2014 with Russia taking Crimea as his first column of victory after Georgia. Peace remains it's observant status for a while and scratches behind it's ears over Russia, if the way it understands has truly any relation to the basic principle of the apocalypse. President Vladimir Putin however is missing the point on the evolution within his own Russia, outside in the neighbouring countries (former Russian federations) and across the continent in West of Europe. Countries that are further away, across the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, and the Middle East levant, have been Real Time realities he has no personal relationship with, but has only lived with for his other more private interests. Private here meaning that the President of Russia or Vladimir Putin has the equivalent of planet earth. There is no other man on earth who has the appetite similar to that of the Biblical Leviathan, and swallow the world second by second if it could for a hundred years. Former Secretary of State to the US, Mrs Madeleine Albright, was right that the Russian President does have something of a serpentine and was cold in his character. In his younger days we have to admit that the President also had a remarkable appearance of chic masculinity (debonair), just because of all that cold appearance and mostly expressed in his characteristic walk. Apocalyptic, could the Russian President Mr Vladimir Putin really fit this prophetic dimension in the Christian Orthodox faith? Yesterday and again this morning today the world calls on Russia to stop the war in Ukraine and against the Ukrainian people, and that all UN Member States are calling for immediate peace.

Can Israel or China help coordinate the plan for peace talks or stopping the war in Ukraine between Russia and the people of Ukraine? This is a tall order of deep levelled coordination, first with Ukraine as invaded sovereignty, and Russia, and the people of Ukraine resisting it's lethal invasion. But also the picture and trail of destruction snaking through Ukraine from east to west as we speak is still ongoing. Kyiv at this point seems to be the end of the military expedition going through middle Ukraine in bits and pieces, but nevertheless at either an appointed or calculated scale for advancing into the capital city. China in it's own territories does have the tacit knowledge how to visualize a war of this scale and could see how to strategically work on a peace plan to immediately stop/ halt all hostilities between Russia and Ukraine. That is alltogether a whole different story for the prime minister of Israel, Naftali Bennett, if coordination of peace between Russia and Ukraine should come to a cessation of hostilities. Equally it is an important step for the new prime minister of Israel to make this or his effort to mediate a halt of hostilities in Ukraine work. Instinctively he is still the military man from the elite Sayeret Matkal and could detail effectively into the plan if indeed coordinated with another country/ China. Where China is hierarchically more structured of geopolitics and wars within time scales, historically and the present time, Mr Bennett infinitely has willpower. (According to most psychological scientists, willpower can be defined as: The ability to delay gratification, resisting short-term temptations in order to meet long-term goals. The capacity to override an unwanted thought, feeling, or impulse.) In his seven months old prime ministership since 13 June 2021 willpower is what has been his leading guide and to overcome all contempt by the opposition under the former prime minister, Mr Netanyahu, in public (Knesset). Comparing Mr Volodymyr Zelensky as prime minister and president of Ukraine, Mr Bennett is not loved by the world, but in fact is hated or despised at home in politics or by the people. The world is deepening each hour as we enter deeply into the cold crisis of this war and it's nuclear threat, sea, air or land, this is what Prime Minister Bennett is immediately facing without a peace coordination plan with his allies (not yet a reality) and bring a halt to the war globally now suggested to become WWIII. Seven months to be the accidently prime minister, a kingmaker in the last election, and a coalition partner with Yesh Atid, Mr Yair Lapid, in the second mandate after the first was given to Mr Netanyahu and who had failed to deliver a coalition with Likud and partners, are we not looking in the wrong direction for brokering peace at a high global and apocalyptic level at Mr Bennett?

(CNN) Christiane Amanpour has pleaded for Israel (and China) to try help with resolving the crisis in Ukraine by becoming a peace broker. This was last night on the news in world media. Was Ms Amanpour thinking of Naftali Bennett when she mentioned Israel? And yet, God Almighty might produce with the novice PM of Israel and the right team of experts on peace and structure in cooperation with either China, Turkey, or both, to perform this global miracle just yet. These are also the countries that have kept a low- key near to zero condemnation of Russia's invasion of Ukraine on monday last week, 21 February, and could from this apparent neutrality do the impossible peace apocalypse. To be continued.

Error found of- fond of.

Another 'quiet' night in Ukraine in the eastern regions...

27 February 2022

Technically all diplomacy has failed without anyone asking why. The International world is supposed to do things differently from anyone violating the world order of freedom and democracies. A very clever young man has risen from Ukraine to Statesman and defending the country (40mln people) against the 'aggression' of Russia, eight years repeating another invasion. Mr Volodymyr Zelensky is delivering salvo after salvos of instant brilliance, e.g. to stay on fighting with the people of Ukraine on the ground, whether in the capital of the city where parliament is, or in the east, north, south or west. He has also managed within minimum of timing to digitalize all his pleadings for help of the Ukrainian people in their peril and dangers from Russian assaults and violence. These people are now a displaced people without any insurances on their basic human needs, some of them extremely immediate. The rest of the world is either in denial or still in shock what has actually been the reason for Mr Putin's sudden aggression. It is nowhere mentioned what has triggered the Russian President for his actions that would have always been resulting in disproportionate military actions. The military build up on both sides, West and Russia, is there for years and has also been there in an open window. No one on either side has kept all the operations a secrecy or diplomatic secrecy for only the military powers involved. This 'open secrecy' by Nato and it's allies, with next to it adjacent the Russian President Mr Putin, is well known for many years and was perhaps one of the reasons why so many in the public domain thought of these 'operations' as military excercise drills. Until two or three weeks ago, that many began calling for the west to do more on holding back the Russian President and his military 'build up'. It was disturbing...

Ukraine, technically, one can say, conveniently falls in between the two powers. It can also be the nature of what is now known as the new world order in residu from the old world order. Mr Putin is giving very strongly the impression how he still believes in the old world order if anyone would care enough to listen to his words in the statement he gave last monday evening before signing the agreements with Donetsk and Luhansk for independence from Ukraine. From here everything began to roll into invasion or a massive invasion by Russia. Now six days later there has been two or three attempts already made for negotiating peace talks between Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky and have failed. It should pain Mr Putin more for not being able to preserve Ukraine from destruction, as we all know this that Russia is historically prone to classical sophistication of bureaucracy as once was Prussia. And than there are those who jump to conclusions how this war should be fought and at what impressive scale. The International world is failing itself at a global scale that what it did not do was to use it's judicial power or prowess for resolving this 'sudden' crisis with a former member of the G7 when still the G8 with Russia. Instead politicians were allowed to play judge, jury and excecutioner, without minimum regard for the nation's right to self defence and sovereignty. Discriminately. Russia, to put it more banal, had to be summoned by the International Law first, and if it would decline the 'invitation' than to impose sanctions on it's self imposed exclusion from International Law. It is as if the world can now self rule in all greater institutions and use the world social media as their mediation channels of legitimacy, and this is done.

But the use of force by nuclear weapons would mean that Mr Putin has been quantum leaping in his plans and strategies already before he invaded Ukraine once more and again in the same manner. This is why it gave the other side much ammunition to talk of the Russian President's 'next move'. To put the Russian President out of the world of family of nations is simply justified, according to law and order, so it seems. But there is no victory on either side if it has to come to the use and force of dangerous weapons. No civilized world wants to go there or build their future generations from the debris of such an aftermath, with no other match in history. Mr Zelensky is right that this is better fought in the International Court of Den Hague when and if this war will be over. And not only is he right but to put this idea forward at the timing of his country being in national crisis and despair, he is also right to bring Ukraine to the world's attention once again and with live-proof. Why did diplomacy and International Law failed? It would be easier to explain or say that it is no surprise why the call for peace talks between the two warring parties have failed in four days since the war had started/ Russian invasion of Ukraine, if we can take a comparison from a much more ancient history between the young king of Israel, David, and Goliath the challenger and Philistine warrior. Both men are very proud and very hurt too. Both men want to maintain their right to sovereignty and how to govern their country, Ukraine now specifically and more unique from the older and more conservative place Russia. Now it seems that the world is watching a titanic fight without a cause. As is all military violence and the show of contempt for law and order. Russia is part of the global community and it's historical rights are inadequate to meet the growing demand of it's next generations. Mr Putin, perhaps, in his hearts of hearts he knows that too. The EU is right to point out in their statement how dependend Russia is on technologies for it's future. The International Law must help preserve that future and alter it's laws (pedantically) if it wants to conform to a more uniform worldview. And one more important abstract for the Russian President is that his understanding should adapt to the idea how judgement of earth is not by a judgementality to judge the earth, as there always should be a balance of power if superiority is a goal. At 69 and all the wisdom the Russian President has accumulated in 22 years, why not adhere to abstract as well as objective laws?

17 February 2022
(Personal opinion)

Rationality financial settlement Prince Andrew

After Prince Andrew settlement on tuesday this week what remains is the arbitrary of the numbers of monetary digits. A literal £7 mln climbing slowly up to £20 mln for the last 48 hours. Arbitrary could also be the disclosure of Prince Andrew's name over the period when the civil case of sexual abuse was first filed by the plaintiff Ms Virginia Guiffrie- Roberts. Lawyers on Ms Guiffrie's team have repeatedly claimend to have represented many vicitms of sexual abuse/ rape by powerful men, and keeping the arbitrary of non disclosure of their names to the public. Or the settlement payment number. In Prince Andrew's case this went beyond discretion and disclosure from day one in 2019 into the rest of the global world. It says in his lawyer's statement to meet the demands of settlement with the plaintiff, both sides this week in February 2022. Also, what there is to remember since the filing of the sexual abuse case against Prince Andrew is that this had been done publicly and had lasted till the day before yesterday, on the day of settlement. In concreto or abstracto disclosure of name equals the scale as if of reimbursement to Prince Andrew, or he is now in concreto the victim of circumstance twice over with the settlement payment of £xx mln.

Yours truly,

.........................................................................................

Tort law
Post scriptum: or change the law fundamentally from Proximate Cause to Proximate Injury (of words and deeds that do not suit human nature ut supra- lawyer's heaven) by vague intentions...

The UK 6 February 2022.

6 February 2022

The public, the public, the public. 70 Years with the reign of one monarch, Queen Elizabeth II, it is the public in the UK and Commonwealth that remembers her the most today. At 95 Your Majesty is still looking her best and sublime, everyone can see that around in the world. In the waiting there is another age and generation waiting on the next monarch who will reign and be the monarchy's next defender of the Faith in England. To many it is not an attractive idea that is relevant anymore is what you are also hearing. The people are disappointed with the monarchy after the apparent scandals with Prince Andrew and Prince Harry of these last two years if you synchronize both to time and place, and rumours. Princess Diana somehow was also not forgotten somewhere in there with the scandals that have plagued the monarchy in England in the last two decades. And what can the public do to make things right again for the country or UK? It is hereditary to have another monarch after Queen Elizabeth II, not constitutional as leaving it to the vote. People in the 21st century are just looking through it with eyes of transparency and are thinking why this is still the need of the public, or, why should it still be needed to have a queen or king in the UK. But that is the law between crown and the people of Britain for more than a hundred years. Fact is more than hundreds of years. No republic has survived that long just yet in the rest of the world. And just maybe that could be the answer to the phenomenon of having a monarch so many still love, especially in Queen Elizabeth II. She is the oldest rule on earth and has done this with the strongest will over strife and controversy. How do people read the history of monarchs and despotism in our time? So we have learned that there is a civilized way when reigning as a monarch and Defender of Faith.

To the wider expanse of people and nations transparency is still the issue. And what will happen with the civil case of sexual abuse against Prince Andrew later this year in September? And following in his footsteps there is also Prince Harry and his marriage to Ms Meghan Markle, an American actress. Here some might see the shift between the Defender of Faith and the monarchy, dangerously moving away from what is bound by a regal oath, as was again sworn by the Queen today in her statement on 6 February 2022, to honour the service to the people. It is the gum acacia keeping Britain together as a nation, that is in a place of it's own in the middle of the seas and wider oceans. The colonials can only remember England and the monarchy from the time of the opium wars and say it with an English accent, as if this is proof of distinction in the International world in the many generations thereafter. Love for the monarchy in England has come with many sorts of nations and distinctions to honour the Queen as the last monarch of the oldest order from another world and in history as they remember it well. Some of it was good, and at times there was a conflict of extensive great interests, e.g. independence. After the millennium most nations did end the regimental partitions of the old rule by the king's laws in many places, now countries and a people with a voluminous independence from Britain 'overseas'. With love for the Queen it is also just a little more than thinking of Britain and it's monarchy as the country and people of only bacon and eggs for breakfast (at Tiffany). Or, Prince Andrew and Virginia Guiffrie, or Prince Harry and his 'Me-Time' work ethics. Could he mean with his 'Me- Time' not work ethics but work ethos? Now, what will it be for the public for the next one hundred years in Britain and the monarchy? Prince Charles will become king after Queen Elizabeth II, followed by Prince William, son to the late Princess Diana and the Prince of Wales (King Charless III). In today's news there is much focus on Mrs Camilla Mountbatten- Windsor Bowles. Queen Elizabeth has approved her to be the next queen- consort if Prince Charles becomes king. The hyphen or hymen of the monarchy is there in it somewhere.

In the news there are people who still talk about the photo of Prince Andrew with Virginia Roberts (Ghislaine Maxwell in the background) this week.

3 Februari 2022

One can look at the photo of Prince Andrew with Virginia Guiffrie/ then Roberts having his arm around her waist, and still don't see what is real or not real. Maybe we should be glad to see a photo that wasn't more compromising e.g. kissing. That kiss could have had many consequences, if you remember Greta Garbo in the movie 'The Kiss'. Then it was murder by her jealous and older husband. Imagine what a kiss could have done with Prince Andrew in a photo with Virginia Roberts. Lady Victoria Hervey this week also talked about the photo and defended the Prince by saying that she had found proof of the 'original' photo and this was one of Virginia Roberts, with a steel blue coat hanging over her right arm instead of Prince Andrew holding him around his waist. By now we all know that Prince Andrew will not win in a public court as this case is clearly based on 'Hear Say' and is expected to be confrontational at one point. He will 'hear say' from the legal team to Ms Guiffrie (concrete Mrs Guiffrie) in court that this is about a minor under Federal Law in the US aka the Child Victims Act in New York. That will be confrontational enough for Prince Andrew and his legal team, and not win against Ms Guiffrie. Could he try the Den Hague Convention in a higher appeal? Based exactly on what, might you ask. Science? And also that after this case has been reached a verdict by the International Court in Den Hague (e.g.) from now on the change in the financial and other private global industries will become very restrictive, as to avoid something similar happening again. Men can also become victims at these informal gatherings and where every man or woman is above the age of consent. Or, will they be terrified to trust their own world again, for fear of having talked or kissed a girl and be named ten years later as a peadophile or pervert?

It is to both sides equally important that victimhood can be to both sides where men are men and women are women. Fear of prejudice against males for being a man is also another way of doing not right but wrong, a priori, if ten years later he will be named as a probable suspect of paedophile sex or intimacy. This could ruin businesses and to women too. Maybe from now on the scanning after underaged girls or apparent girls above the age consent will become more rigid, thus in a way is a good thing. The financial industries at global level attract politicians, business men/ women, academics and professionals, but also as we now know with Prince Andrew, aristocrats. And will taking photos be banned from these informal meetings or gatherings, any photo? No one is saying that the prince is innocent as he can't be when having been in the same place and time during the 'time and place of the crime'. In higher appeal this will show a different balance that Mr Mountbatten- Windsor, then called Prince Andrew, was also a victim of circumstances. Or it is that yours truly is being naive and so is the reasoning. In a public court with the 'Hear Say' the law is that visual evidence is not allowed, because the law is in fact law and reason. What one can only hope for or expect from a higher appeal in an International Court is that it will be less 'Hear Say' and more of scientific inquiry and evidence. And carefully reconstructions. When genocide is committed in a remote part of the world thorough examination of the atrocities are being examined, but also what the definition of genocide is or could be when the perpetration is immediate and concrete proof and fact. In the scheme of myriad of realities nothing can be ignored or underestimated that out in the world there are swathes of many people living daily in victimhood of some kind of perpetration, be it concrete or subtle. No real victim of child abuse should become a victim of any scheme underhands or criminal. Prince Andrew in his own words in the Interview with Newsnight Emily Maitlis had also said, when told by the interviewer that many girls were now coming out against sexual exploitation, "And rightfully so." He was unambiguous adamant, was the impression. But the other side of the plaintiff are suggesting that Prince Andrew is accountable for what he has done to Ms Guiffrie. It is in the public's interest to get this thing over and done with as soon as possible. We can't go on forever living in suspense and dualism and killing common sense.

The writing on the wall for Andrew M- W.

(Personal Op)

25 January 2022

Queen Elizabeth II stripping Prince Andrew by law of his HRH titles in January 2022, thus not only in law, but also as the here fit mencio inferius text suggesting the tradition of the court- martial law in the British Historical system for the Chivalry Order.
History Britain Chivalry Order: "The British system tradition of court- martial: "The closing article, which was article 167, read:
These Articles of warre we have made and ordained for the welfare of our Native Countrey, and doe command that they be read every moneth publickly before every Regiment, to the end that no man shall pretend ignorance."
Yesterday, 24 January, on Youtube.com a videoclip Royal Juice today mentioned about the cross examination via videolink with Prince Andrew in his trial later this year in September, that he will be asked also the question on his private parts besides the question of intercourse.

Let's hope his lawyers will then go for a secondary witness, and preferably a third. (Based on readings on management and competence of witnesses in a civil trial/ case or proceedings)

England should have more on the legislature e.g. in adultery cases and proof (as in India Evidence Act in the 18th hundred by James Fitzjames Stephen?). It should find basis enough to overrule/ contest the witness and accuser being in one and the same person in the civil case against Prince Andrew on sexual allegations. If no witnesses are to be found the 'object' will remain in the quiet vacuum where the weight is silence as golden. And the accuser as light as silver speaking and win her case against Prince Andrew. In short that is saying that this case by Ms Guiffrie was won in a very light way from the man born a royal in England.

But in another case the writing on the wall may take a turn of fate and be for the plaintiff instead, and lose the case of sexual abuse, against Prince Andrew. Time up to his trial in September is not only expected, but it is a mechanical ticking of the clock for him as well as for the whole of his family. As the moment approaches the hand can only get heavier, for one reason that there is not a soul in the world outside Buckingham Palace who could know what the truth is on the side of Prince Andrew and to have been 'presiding' with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in the same world. By definition: their world. At home where the monarchy resides for hundreds of years, Prince Andrew also has another 'trial' waiting for him, and where he cannot make use of a secular legal procedure. It is the Order of the Chivalry of which he is a member. What can this mean for the Prince if the Order is still in use or active? See here above what that meant in 1800, if a case came before the court- marshal. Prince Andrew would have to say to the court of the Order that he has not or has acknowledged Ms Guiffrie, as she has acknowledged him. He is a servant of God in the midst of the Chivalry Order and of Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, his royal mother and cannot 'play ignorant' (before God and nobles). And let's say for fictional reason that he is guilty and also found by the Order they could 'cut his bloodline' from the monarchy and make him a common soldier to the end of the world. If, and this is a big IF.

We cannot know and should await the moment of truth later this year, whether the writing on the wall will be innocence or guilty for Prince Andrew. Would the world stomach something as shocking as that?

Latin phrase 'mentioned below'- fit mencio inferius.

Iran & uranium enrichment

11 December 2021

Of this certain public interest in 2021 Iran should submit it's scientific paper (study) why the uranium enrichment 20% is .... for peaceful purposes in Iran. Can it also publish the end date of this enrichment for peaceful purpose process in addition.

Peace is an international effort.

Yours truly,

.......................................................................................

Poetic democracy in the 21st century.

23 November 2021

Why is it called 'the people' in a democracy? Two things are here important to mention: numbers and architecture. From 150000 Athenians in Ancient Greece Athens to 7.9 billion in 2021 facing earth and the global community, from where democracy was once perceived, it is now to say that it had risen from the 'myth' in ancient Athens to a greater system in statistics in the world as we know it today. Our memory in the greater collective public view when there is talk of democracy is in many cases the same, that the perception is a written paper or document with a starting date and it's permanence has no end date. Democracy in our age means almost that it is indefinite and does not expire. And we also have more buildings to prove it: parliament, debate chambers, ministerial halls and the place where they have parliamentary debates daily or every week on a designated work day. The architecture of minutes and hours that modern democracy invests in 'it's people' is the only reality one has to speak of history or more specifically parliamentary history. Ancient Greece Athens and it's democracy, due to a much milder climate perhaps, has never had the same architecture and institutional buildings, castles and other fortitude places, that we know existed from a much previous century before our time. The system of central heating the ancient senates had been of a much more complex system to keep it's central places warm from the cold in winter and between the thick walls with high or wide open spaces or gateways. War alone could bring back the senators from recession in winter times to debate on the crisis in this cold theater of 'parliamentary' debate. (Mind you, the economy in every time and place was always part of the debate and the senate, democracy today.) Another aspect of the architecture in comparison to ancient Greece is that globally we are not symmetrical as an expansion across the planet, but asymmetrical and exponentially in every metric stretch. Ancient Greece was not a people who were adhered to asymmetry, but thought of order and organisation in symmetry. Formation of battles has strong references to symmetry than asymmetry. And it's architecture is the living proof of this assumption troughout it's history. One can say that democracy at a much smaller scale to ours in the global world, had a much more greater transparency in these ancient cities of Greece because of it's symmetry order. And this is why it was 'the people' in the democracy when 'facing' the senate in the political theater instead of what many of our time see or has any perception what democracy is. Ancient Rome had later taken on the same approach and created a special forum for the petitions and for the people to be heard or spoken to by an administration or administrator. Not many see the forum as the place where the administration is the speaker who was an administrator as it's special representative. What we always see and think (read) is that here is where the plebeians came to listen or have their say against a law or order... It was more. It was the administration in power.

In the first conclusion in this writing one could say that it is the global world today it's time to teach the ancient world about democracy at a larger scale without mythical assumptions and symmetry. 7.9 Billion people in most parts of the world greater cities democracy and cosmopolitanism make that a union of global proportionalities and significance. Poverty in the greater areas do know proportionality and significance of democratic rule and rights, but without the serenity of improvement in terms of real income and living standard. One could say that here poetic democracy is living in poverty and knowing that better is 'overthere' in a fictional place where democracy should make the difference for all peoples, or stay forever in the state where one can only envision that the grass is always greener on the other side... Sweden is taking one step further and wants to hear from the citizens in the global community how they see the future of democracy and wants to hear their voices in whatever form or writ. (Tweet by Margot Wallstrom yesterday on twitter calling for ideas, any idea, poetic or other academic (basics of humanitarian) art to talk about democracy) Democracy is a long stretch in another aspect where illiteracy is normal and natural life, e.g. the Amazon indigenous people, and doesn't include proportionality or significance e.g. of what it calls adequate in certain communities and with living conditions alien to the parliamentary lives of other citizens living in the same country and being used to staying eternally remote from what is considered impoverished to eternity. (Take e.g. Carlo Levi's findings in his book, Christ stopped at Eboli) With literacy comes strife within the community and when creating a network of low-key bereaucracy to meet with the standards in a remote government or governing body. Time is existential to a slow running administration as one can only imagine, when compared to the democracy in a cosmopolitan or metropolitan city often too remote to reach or stating the case (for Sweden the Sami, and Roma people in Europe). Name a few other countries: Egypt, India, Peru, Brazil, Africa (Prince William has warned even today about the surge of the population growth in Africa in the Mail UK) and other war torn countries without ending the conflict. The question is not a poetic one from the point of view of democracy if there is any future still going through it's fundamental understandings. True, but humanity cannot be inspired without poetry as even in bloodshed people still write their songs and poetry, and we need challenge. Challenge is indigenous to all of mankind (or even an animal seeking it's next meal in the natural wild, from lions to the itsy bitsy garden spiders). What does the global world think, and change the ancient world to cosmopolitan democracies? What is then the end purpose to this challenge? Serenity or unity, we will not know when at the age of over 60 in 2021. But when still young to meet the next generation, perhaps that they will know...

Iran & Israel detente policies with the new Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett.

16 November 2021

The JCPOA is the writing keeping the Israeli prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, on a quiet diplomacy mode with the US administration when US envoy for Iran Robert Malley was in Israel on a visit this week on monday and did not had a meeting with the prime minister. The Prime Minister's Office close source was pointing to a protocol between the leader of Israel and Office of the US envoy, that this was not a snub but a strict kept protocol by the PM's Office. The US envoy will take up the message with him back to the US Administration and from that point it will be up to the next level of talks if Iran returns to the negotiations in two weeks in Vienna. The Administration in Iran is expected to also have received the same message from it's news resources how this was being conducted while Mr Malley was in Israel and did not meet with the prime minister of Israel in person on a one on one meeting. Naftali Bennett, one can say, is in a rather tight wringling on the JCPOA talks with Iran and the US and it is looking from any angle that the prime minister is not in the mood to change rhetoric from the previous governments in Israel on the new US talks to restart with Iran. It was possible that the PM had a slight different intention at the beginning of his prime ministership after 13 June in spring, and that now that had changed to instinctive rhetoric not to give more ammunition to the opposition in Knesset when they bring up the Iran and JCPOA subject during their fierce debates against the coalition, but especially against prime minister Bennett. For a split second Iran must have had a moment of being caught red handed, but that it is now absolutely sure they are in the clear here... Because what Israel is opposed against in the JCPOA is aligned with Tehran's own detente policy and it is looking from a more remote point of view that they were happy on the same issue when the former US President Donald Trump had ended the JCPOA for Iran. According to Defense Minister Benny Gantz, while the PM was meeting with the US President Joe Biden in Washington in August last summer, Iran was going to acquire the bomb within a month (expected in September one month later to the visit of the PM in Washington). However that now nearly three months later seems to be the doom prophecy of the Defense Minister or it was too premature to make such claims to the public. Perhaps the Prime Minister is better off by saying that 'We must keep to a very puritan attitude towards the US JCPOA approach and the Iranian response in two weeks, if e.g. they will restart the talks...'

We also have to agree with Prime Minister Bennett, that Iran should now understand it cannot keep up the policy it is holding for decades that advancing with the nuclear program it is for peaceful purposes and that this is exactly why no leader of Israel will ever agree to Tehran's nuclear argument. In the same period of time after the ending of Iran in the JCPOA an opening for new logic was created to leave Iran alone and free for aquiring just that what Israel sees as the wrong moves from Tehran in the region and against Israel. Historically the nuclear non proliferation agreement was built on decades long strife to have countries agreeing on not acquiring nuclear power weaponry under a set of International detente policies on nuclear power countries. Israel can only sleep tight at nights if Iran could be put back into reining in by returning to the JCPOA is more top level logic, which the US Administration is trying to communicate to the Israeli PM. That would also mean for the PM of Israel to have the upperhand and keep a close eye on what Iran will be doing next and in the meantime, e.g. not breaching the JCPOA policies and face another time of sanctions. It is in reality a more complex understanding for the public to comprehend the voluminous chapters in the JCPOA talks and outcomes to both parties, the US and Iran, but what this can mean to the Israeli Prime Minister and the people of Israel. Indefinitely Israel has the right to defend itself and from all the kind faces of Naftali Bennett as prime minister of Israel, one is also meant to use proportionally or disproportionally force of action if threatened. After five months in Office one can only say about this Israeli prime minister, that like Iran, he too has no automatic answers, as he had put this three months ago when the Mercer Container Ship was attacked by drone activities from Iran in the sea region of Oman. But he is still the new prime minister of Israel and not the consummate man that his predecessor was with especially Iran and it's ambitions to acquire the nuclear bomb and destroy Israel. In the detente policy however it is stated historically why there should be an agreement to mutual interest of countries with nuclear powers. It is destroying immediately what would be seen as conventional deterrence and also life on both sides of the spectrum. As the prime minister of a Left- Wing and Center Right and Right- Wing parties in government it is maybe prudent for the prime minister not to get too close to the role of a majority party leadership which can only be the legitimacy for that consummate leadership as Prime Minister and the military commander of the IDF and it's ministry. If true than here is where the former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, will try put the new novice prime minister and sandwich him in between his time in Office and make it believable to the people of Israel where the leadership should stand on the JCPOA, and not with the quiet diplomacy of an illegitimate second mandate prime minister on the Left- Right Wing. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett however is still the legitimate leader in Israel after the former prime minister could not form government on a first mandate. It is an absolutely frustrating time to the PM's advisers when you don't know how to keep strategy and tactics on a only one to one communication with the prime minister... The question is whether a rotational prime minister can consummate a higher level of detente policies.

4 November 2021

State Budget in Israel passes into law at 5.30 AM this morning by 61 to 59 against and in favour of the coalition led by Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and alternate PM Yair Lapid.

Astaghfirullah, Abu Yair.

Yours truly,

..........................................................................................

Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett. Part II.

9 September 2021

Egypt is innovation. Israel has the technologies. Climate change middle long term targets in a letter of new potential and intentions. The Middle East historical political relations have long been expired and the change of leadership has contributed not less but for more regional integration between old and new partners, on peace and not war again. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett has only two options: motivational and potential from his personal point of view, which for now can only be in the short term. After two and a half months in Office every long term plan will only make it to survival if it can be drawn to the present time when Naftali Bennett is prime minister, and not wait until he leaves Office in 2023 to pass on the prime ministership to Mr Yair Lapid, now the alternate prime minister and Foreign Minister. Instead what the public thinks of the prime minister is that he is the bus driver of a coalition on the bus for a ride to it's end destiny in this government. Perhaps some even trying to get him under the bus, while do a fly over in their fighter jet in triumph. With the State Budget this year in mind that would not be on either side of the aisle the wise course of action, when Israel has managed in 2021 to muster something of a democracy from a diverse coalition not many know in their political dreamings or memory (especially when it concerns the people of Israel and their political nostalgia). Prime Minister Naftali Bennett knows one thing that now all priorities are eyed on the State Budget, and if this will become law seven weeks from now. The Middle East has done with global ambitions of becoming global players in the region and playing it literally out to 'the people of the streets' to keep on having faith in their leaders or kings. God had given them the stars and faith to leader and the people, even when the poorest and living in questionable conditions... Pennies from heaven? Iran with it's 82 million people among the countries in the Middle East so far has been unable to tell it's people the same story. It's perception of the world is not about the west in the hemisphere, but staying much closer to the regional 'geopolitical view'. And it has a strong sense of hierarchy with this part of the world that only they have been living through time and place almost for thousands of years. It is Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, who had given the idea of Iran as a country and regional power of deterrence in it's own right, more of some thought and he seemed to have been motivated by Iran's ways to rethink Israel's strategic approach to Tehran, if or when to retalliate. But the offer is constant much and still too negative and he doesn't seem to know what to do, on this side of the angle in his approach or strategy.

The PM's motto of Israel doing good has yet to set in for the Israeli public, or the men and women in the streets. Every quarter the polls are held among the people of Israel (the poorest?) and ask about their prime minister whether they prefer him or his predecessor, which never fails to give accurate statistics how the country is run by this or any prime minister, while in Office. We are not sure whether the President of Egypt Abdel Fattah Al- Sisi is keeping updates in the same manner on the people of Egypt (including the poorest). It does not seem like much of a topic during high level meetings to have talks among the leaders in these parts of the region and yet... The economy is a multilevel structured plan if two partners seem to have advanced ideas on the mechanism of exchange of goods or services. Without a clear defining economy between the two partners, when not macro level, when and where will it be the incentive short or long term in the cooperation? Long term memory of the past has shown especially in this region that to be on the same side as the west in global economic relations, the macro level economy has had only one major partner. Israel under the former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, for decades long has demonstrated this exact fact and it went unnoticed like a falling star during the deepest of nights in the Middle East night and deep canopy of brilliant little distant stars. Prime Minister Bennett has much home work to do if he wants to build on a real partnership with the President of Egypt, Mr Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi. If not at Macro level (without e.g. the US and EU), can this be a fruitful adventure for the prime minister of Israel to keep it a horizontal timeline with the next door neighbour on the west side of their coast (east when in Sinai). Industry is a result, if the plan works well for both countries. Naftali Bennett should also be understanding that this is what 'motivates' Iran to become a regional power, that here the economy has no macro level power or leading country in a foreign land. Two and a half months, nearly three months, for this prime minister the political adversity has not let him alone with new challenges at the domestic level when he went to the US to meet with President Joe Biden at the White House. In Part II Prime Minister Bennett should continue the evolution of his prime ministership, even when challenged and leaving him alone behind in the deep pit in the desert and only accompanied by God's wild carnivore creatures. He is a fighter, this was what he used to say during campaign before becoming prime minister.

Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, is still shaking the dust from the previous government and becoming a pauper.

13 August 2021

Nearly mid August 2021, and ten more weeks before the State Budget goes to law... Or maybe not reaching the light of day from an obscure time of the previous budgets since 2019. The PM will have a very hard time changing his status from 'pauper prime minister' to the formidable man, as was the previous PM for many decades. Two decades felt or was like an eternity and Israel went on forever being the land of Mr Netanyahu. The people will never say the same about Naftali Bennett, a decent family man and evolutionary about the situation in the country where he had found it. Finders keepers? From afar Israel still is looking disorganized under this prime minister. A lack of sources or resource perhaps could be at fault here? Inherent cooperation, so they say is his problem and that he does not know who to please anymore for staying prime minister. But he did make a difference and the world now knows about politics in Israel can be a dangerous game, even when a prime minister appears weak and powerless. Had Naftali Bennett been educated at Eton and be great at cricket as a batsman, still when in Israel and being the prime minister after mr Netanyahu he would not make it and become the new love of the people. In fact they would even hate him more for snobbery and being snotty compared to the former strongman in Israel as the real man & prime minister. He had no automatic answers on Iran and a sudden thunderbolt struck the region of the Middle East, upping the new economic level of how much richer do we become when killing each other? In fact the prime minister never said this, but you can imagine what it would have been had he said it and it was formally confirmed. Iran would have been in shock, that here was the first prime minister of Israel who had said to stop and think about Iran before retalliation. Stop and think?

Last week and even this week there have been rumours of the return of Mr Pink Panther himself to become prime minister again, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. He could indeed make that happen when the time comes and vote down the State Budget. A real tally ho! moment that would be for the former PM. Well, mr Bennett his family lives over in Europe/ the UK, this could perhaps be a lead for his new career to come over and live here with us and his lovely family? A king Richard I (Richard the lionheart) staying out of England, but this time an Israeli prime minister who was defeated on the passing of a State Budget after a few months in Office. Perhaps Mr Bennett has more worth living outside of Israel and could prepare for a return to the 'island' that is Israel in the Middle East. Who knows, with the right people by his side this young prime minister was destined to be the first ever real talented to govern the country towards a more prosperous Israel, and post Covid-19 era (expected somewhere between 2023-2025). Isn't it heartbreaking that for one brief moment the prime minister had been thoughtful on how to deal with Iran differently in stead of just chewing old gum and make it military and geopolitical bubble gum (Bozo)? The Prime Minister doesn't seem to be strong on revolutionary ideas, but from his statements even when brief or briefly it is the impression that he has an instinct to be an evolutionist rather. Peace needs evolution and especially when this is the Middle East and the 21st century. Staying within the green lines, again, not revolution but evolution that could have given us some kind of answer to the Two- State design, you see. The military IDF needs a large scale overhaul said the PM, something the kibbutz Nirim had lamented and mourned over when one of it's members had become a casualty of bad and old equipment to defend the people in Nirim and he had died. His late father , Mr Moshe Etzion, never recovered and has at the age of 88 taken his own life in a very dramatic scene, over the grave of his deceased son at the cemetery in kibbutz Nirim. Evolution plays a greater part in Israeli politics or military, both at home and in the region in the Middle East. Plus this is the only real invitation to the neighbours to help create this evolution and change, softly softly with baby steps. The era of baseless revolutions is over, and now especially with Covid-19.

If you want Elvira, take her. Frank. (Movie Scarface)

Ebrahim Raisi, no detail plans (82.9 million people) or economic outlook for the time being.

6 August 2021

The simple answer: 82.9 million people, including the now freshly chosen President of Iran, Mr Ebrahim Raisi, do not have any detailed plan or economic outlook how to move out poverty from a 'prosperous' Iran. Reverse psychology is highly needed in the plan, if the economy must be widened at some point to let everyone of a certain age/ group live when properly calculated (metric system) in this system. This is however not a writing on the economy from an Iranian or outsider's point of view, but more like an attempt to bring closer another view under attention. This is unusual as no one does a personal approach with a distant land and peoples far beyond the seas, unless you are compelled to do so for a strange reason. Strange e.g. to ask is what is prosperity in Iran in 2021 and in the short or long term? Iran has no friendly neighbours or relations with any other country in the Middle East, except when military. But then again to have a good fortune with military 'expeditions' the neighbours will have to see it like that, or at least praise Iran for it's military successes in the region. The praise is, from a personal point of view, almost at a zero low point if not non existent. Mutual interests are it's only success and this proof is historical true all for many decades. The Iran- Iraq war was never about 'sharing the spoils' in it's aftermath and was more about the negative deficit to this or the other country. There was simply no recovery on either side since then. 2021 However seems now more promising, if we are right to say that the new elected President, Mr Ebrahim Raisi, has promised more 'prosperity' for the people living under the poverty line trap. Does Iran perhaps believes it has to go to war, here or there, and make it his best incentive to prove to the people across the national spectrum, that he is the strongman to eternity for the Iranian people of 82.9 million?

Iran's logic: it is not what you can do for the thirsty lioness and being without water or a watermelon... If a miracle she will remember and you will have your field and acres filled with watermelons, so sweet the whole country will feel blessed. These are all difficult decisions to take without a vision anywhere in the world and for every President or Prime Minister. A German fairy tale on the other hand had found the solution to a hungry wolf and it was better to feed him with stones to fill his appetite or hungry belly. Wherever you have a real time economy they will prefer the latter story to deal with an impossible expansion of people and prosperity. It can match the conservative thinking, while resort to a short and private presidential repose... And there is no such thing in the economic science to be a doctor or physician for all the ills of all 82.9 million people. The President, Mr Ebrahim Raisi, could only find his answers in a prosperous Iran, but the question is how. If only prosperity was the lioness again, and there was enough water for one wide mouth to quench it's thirst? A few nautical miles from Iran there are some movements in play in the Arabian Waters, off the coast of Oman. Next to prosperity Iran seems to also be needing to adhere at a certain point to it's worldview, if Tehran would give it's accord. The international world is rapidly changing under the pandemic worldwide and most civilized countries are expected to end the Coronavirus also at a certain point. In the global community Health and Covid-19 have become a medical reality for all who are in it, one half vaccinated and the other half not yet vaccinated. Prosperity in Iran will come under a heavy test also (and all neighbouring countries in the Middle East region), whether Covid-19 will make or break you, so to speak. East, west, north or south, the question now on everyone's lips is what is global prosperity?

One timeline?
Note article JP, 5 aug, (Lahav Harkov) on prime minister Naftali Bennett's view of the attack on Mercer Street off the coast of Oman, 30 July 2021.
"Bennett does not want Israel to have automatic answers and for the battle with Iran to follow a set protocol, a source said. He wants Israel to be unpredictable. “The number of open accounts we have with Iran is high, and we have a lot of options in retaliation,” the source said."

Do we really think we can go back to the time before Covid-19?

24 July 2021

There is one thing about demonstrations saying when against vaccination and lockdowns, that this is a political protest. And when only e.g. in France or Germany what you can't say that this is a worldwide problem, period. As we speak there are protests ongoing now in London and the world public can watch it live on Youtube. One wonders whether we are still talking here about a virus or pandemic. Right now there are too many people around the world against the vaccine, and the other half already vaxxed to have done their responsible civil duty. The civil duty here has two sides: one is that you are vaccinated against the virus and the other is that coming in contact with the 'unvaxxed' could be harmful to you from catching the virus, but in reduced percentage compared to when you would not have been vaccinated and catch the full 100% virus. For both citizens or people without the vacinnation makes a terrible colony of infection if others would come in contact with this, when close within it's vicinity or perimeters. It's a blueprint if you read it from any statement or explanation how and where to look for the virus or it's vicinities. This wasn't the way of life before Covid-19 in the world. When is that world going to come back, can be the only civic question at this moment to ask. And how is this question relevant to the nearest of future, let's say the coming three months and after that another three months? And so forth. Another factor with Covid-19 is that not many are aware of the width and synchronisation that is ongoing as we speak. We're so very wrapped up in our own face masks and following the rules that there isn't that much time left for a wider spectre viewing. The wider viewing is political and is becoming more each moment a civil unrest. Now, what happens if we put down the shades?

The future after Covid-19 is moving fast and closing in on everyone in London, Berlin, Paris, Sydney, Delhi, Israel, South America and North America, just to name a few countries. Immunity from the virus at the end of Covid-19 could then only mean that the new day dawning will mean something that will be here and that never was before. What is it that from that day on it will be here and all people are vaccinated? The question also then to ask is what will we be living for after Covid- 19? When you do this by date and time it usually means that there will be in the end the required result. And also, when you have had this vaccination worldwide, mandatory or compulsory, this isn't a local or national only thing anymore. End of the political story. And a big hooray! for the Global Health Organisation. And the global economy could altogether disappear into a constellation of conspiracies that were either made up by people or 'snooping' journalists. Maybe give earth a new name? And humanity. It is when the remaining millions of people who are not vaccinated from the other 3/4 of all vaxxed populations will become less and more less each day of 'the heard voices', we will know what it means to live in a world after Covid-19. The seasons, winter, spring, summer and fall will all still be here and that is a comfort. Or that could mean a whole new pandemic during the cold seasons. Where will you still be able to order a pizza from and living under the poverty line? In the year 2000 remember how plutocracy was just a byword or nickname for the absolute rich. The same word in a world after Covid- 19 isn't feeling like the same thing, or is it? And all protests on black & white archives will tell of a world that wasn't and won't come back. You also won't talk back like that and say 'what is the silver bullet'? It is remarkable to live in a world in Real Time that will not know life or death, young or old, but only be the middle age and that is not a GTA Game called Liberty City.

Perhaps we are caught having underestimated the world and his wife.

The world remembers Naftali Bennett before 13 June, three weeks tomorrow on sunday.

2 July 2021

There are many things to say about the deficit of democracy in Israel, especially during the Netanyahu era and all is or was true up to now. Also, there are those who are questioning the legitimacy of Mr Bennett's prime ministership, at home, that is in the opposition and a few dim voices within his own coalition party with the Left and Center left. The world in contrast takes a whole different view. One such point to their interest, depending where and which part in the global world they are living, is that this has never been done before only on the ticket of kingmaker and command the respectable office of prime minister by tactics alone. Extraordinary is perhaps what they might be thinking, because, what if... What if democracy were not there? Next the idea expands to their own presidency or prime ministership, that what if democracy is not their walls and fortress? Would this be more malign, could they be wondering right now. What has happened in Israel did become something of an interesting running of events, slightly different from the turning of events. Mr Bennett, obviously, has moved on turning the event on 'running of events' within the system of a democracy, dead by the last man in government and a super power at home and abroad. It could only end up tactically without bloodshed, assassination, and also a single bullet by the military. This 'turned' out to be possible and even benign. A benign coup d'etat? And we should not underestimate the news here, because any good observant who has followed the change of government in Israel, even members in the public, will be shaking with their head and think or say how impossible and yet this has truly happened. Today we can say that the former prime minister was ousted by an unusual vote. Had the State be without a democracy the same model for this 'ousting' would have been malign, also without the bullets by the military. The fact is that democracy should be the State's system or break up in two from an unusual vacuum in the middle.

Mr Bennett is a wizzard in tactics and he has impeccable timing skills. First waited on the former prime minister to form a coaltion, who had also offered Mr Bennett to be prime minister after Gideon Sa'ar, Benny Gantz and himself, approximately in the last days of a four year term maybe a few months, weeks or even days perhaps? Belzael Smotrich of the religious Zionist party had declined because of the Arab party that the former prime minister was flirting with, and did not join the coalition of Mr Netanyahu. Now the story goes within the Likud that Mr Netanyahu should have made efforts to pass on the leadership to another Likud member and prevent the Left from forming a government. (But the conclusion of forming government has already been, on 13 June 2021) This had then given Right- Wing party, Yamina, the 'grand opening' to look to the Left and center Left for forming a government and so avoid a fifth election. These seem to look like political mechanics and mechanisms and only seen from the point of view when a democracy is the system of the State. And it isn't easy without a union of democracies in the region to find moral political feedback or backing up. (This is not the EU) In fact reality was that Mr Bennett therefore stood alone in the middle of the raging flames coming from the opposition, frawning eyebrows from abroad, and sympathy from only family members when he was sworn in on sunday, 13 June, three weeks ago. Today now all this is looking so much more different, but in the world's eye view it is not over yet. On their side of the world the fear could be how to prevent this kind of 'benign' coup d' etat from becoming their nightmare. In some democracies there might also be the same fear to have a tactical democratic move, like in chess a move not known yet in the game, that is being looked upon as a system unknown. As long as the will of the coalition is ready could be in another scenario without a democracy something of a truly 'white light' and bring down a long standing strongman in power. Israel innovates truly in every field, but has now outdone the rest of the world and the old democracies with a whole different mechanics in politics. Mr Bennett has only used his ticket of kingmaker (next to another kingmaker Ra'am). Adjacent to a new political mechanism in a democracy here in Israel are we looking also at a slight glimmer of eight years coalition government between Right- Left and Center Parties of stable government? Just a rhetorical question. Additional: Mrs Bennett, First Lady Israel, rehearsale- motion picture for first visit of the US White House:

E-motion picture
Entering Walk JFK (mental pic): Dominique the singing nun
Office: Living doll Cliff Richard
Dance: Wonderful world Louis Armstrong
Swirl: Bird Dog The Everly Brothers
Favourite film/ musical: West Side Story- America
Goodbye: Carol Neil Sedaka

The Balfour Declaration, 1948.

24 June 2021

The Jewish wanderer has been through many an epoch, era, centuries and in the present time also through many decades, years, days, hours and living minutes. It is half idyllic, half bestial, maybe a mythical creature of great proportions, one could say. Six million in the 20th century, two million in the eighteen century, and many more millions perished before the birth of democracy in Athens, in ancient Greece, was conceived by another peoples with deep relations to the Middle East and the Mediterranean Sea area. Israel today is only a miniscule reflection of the remaining 6 million Jewish remnants of these vast numbers of Jews throughout the history of mankind, since we have become familiar with and known. Remnant is not exactly the whole truth, when related to the future they are the new generation of Jews alive. And so are around the world so many more put in this rare condition of being and existing among the family of nations in a rather large portrait of the new history where we are now. Heraclitus of Ephesus would call this the cycle of life and water streams in the river. But one thing remains Jewish and is not Heraclitus, and that is that home is not where you stare (at)... As one would do watching the millions of stars in the night sky. Here is where Abraham was born too, incidently, in a promise near the Great Sea (Mediterranean Sea in the west). Hence the argument that still exists today is that this nation is not the birth of a political agreement between peoples and it is confusing how that is just the thing that got stuck the hardest to it, since 1948. Some proof and consolation that we have is that there are also other nations out of the birth from a political treaty or mandate, if you can think of one good example. That here is not the issue. After it's 100 years, why are we still speaking of the 67 words document as the most valid piece of paper ever written in the history of nations? And why not take it and fold it into a prop piece of paper and dispose of it forever? Or, walk all over it with your shoes. For some reason bio- technology comes in short when we need the exact proof (mutation) of a nation and it's authenticity. What we can know and find out technically is who the father to a child is.

Who's father to the child that is Palestine? One speech is in Hebrew, and the other in Arabic. Perhaps that is what it is, simple logic from the God of Abraham. Are Arab scholars the same in Jewish scholars, and vice verse? Where Persians know that they are not Hindus it takes the Arab- Jewish version a little while longer to find out who is who and why. And yes, this is exactly in the circumstances in which the British Mandate was originated, having then been the only colonial race with tacit knowledge how the races here in the Middle East, far east and also across the Mediterranean Sea were moving. Palestine in it's unique settings with many old peoples from Arab tribes, created the right atmosphere for the British to keep a lasting impression 'declared' somewhere and something that would stay as written in stone. If then the Jewish 'wanderer' had been present it was certainly not a very significant number to the British at the time. And yet, in another part of the world, the Jewish 'wanderer' had risen to full height in all kinds of societies up to the neck of e.g. nations in Europe and their monarchies too. And then as if a meteorite had dropped in from the sky: the Balfour declaration was born. "It's a boy," someone had said of this birth, but he had also said immediately after that, that he did not like the boy. Something ungodly about him, perhaps? We could say that his mother was democracy... But his father, the king, wasn't in it to recognize it's birthright right away after his first cry. The only present dignitary was it's Foreign Ministry and minister, who had been given the message that 'The King had sympathy for the boy it's birth and that he should have a home in Palestine, provided that the nation living in Palestine that are not Jewish be treated fairly by him." End of the King's message. With no seal. After all, the boy was Jewish and to become a wanderer isn't strange in these neighbourhoods and to him, or was it? And his mother, after all, was only a nurse with nursery rhymes of democracy, that cannot make kings or princes. Unless, when violent uprise from the earth and ravage 'the blessed' in heaven(ly) England, or other?

People now want peace from the Balfour Declaration in the 21st century, for Jews and Palestinians living in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. And this is the narrative that is growing to a universal understanding in the human heart and mind as we live on this planet we call earth. Can Israel disappear as the kingdom of Parthia, Carthago or Sidon? It is tempting to the nations to think so, but not saying it out loud for fear of being anti Semite. Time and time again the Jewish wanderer has been a victim of either democracy (Nazi Germany) or another political hegemony in Europe or Eastern Europe. There agreements were always coloured by politics with nations, where ever they had domicile. And, when a kingdom, Jews decreeing what can and can't be, e.g. in France, the end always ended up in an anti- climax. And the wandering can start all over again, be it in a new time or age among the nations it faced. The Balfour Declaration will not change the fate of the Jewish wanderer, but pretending is bliss for the ignorant souls. Politics is the cycle of all futures and for the past two hundred years in our world. Palestine will be grinded by it's wheel too, so some are saying. The question now is where will it be plausible for Israel to cease to wander and how can this plausibility be as sudden as a meteorite? Some are wondering about their reluctance and even go as far as thinking that this could be guilt. The kind of guiltiness or guilt tripping you can only have when you have deliberately committed a crime. Israel needs a different sentiment to keep it's identity as the Jewish people of Israel: intention. Balfour's ommission is intention for the Jewish people in one line written with 67 different meanings, also making the letter a white paper that never will become green on either side. The Middle East is dominantly an Arab region and has an authentic atmosphere that is not Jewish. Perhaps it's meteorite was made out of rituals with the God of Abraham and the throne of God is Jerusalem? Like the Romans and ancient Grecians had for military reasons rituals to please their deities before going to war and destroy the enemy. Until the time of Solomon Israel had not had blood on it's hands again, like David his father. It is unimaginable that the Jewish wanderer would suddenly now have any kind of right to sovereignty in Israel! This even when his mighty industrial head and body cohabiting pefectly well and naturally with the rest of mankind and it's might. Another aspect to Balfour is that the Palestinians, let's say in theory, are the rightful owners of Palestine and it's legitimacy is beyond dispute... The other side will always take it. Just as any illegitimate child (boy) would do to heirs and their rights. He is by chance and fate Achimelech once again. The boy's name thus is not Balfour, but Achimelech, the illegitimate son of Gideon.

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett is now officially the 'Shopkeeper' of the government.

16 June 2021

In opposition the longest serving prime minister of Israel is the 'Shopkeeper' on the premises across the street. His products are still bulking out of the walls from his long serving store in town. He knows the people and the people know him. What can a shopkeeper sell with only eight products? In this town he was the only 'real' shopkeeper and there was no other like him. 20 Years the people came to his shop to buy their stuff, from children toys to aspirine, and all other groceries they need they find in his store. We are in the Middle East and this is the image that is stronger than the digital age in the rest of the world, because all shopkeepers know this feeling in the same way described here above. And every shopkeeper in the Middle East will also do the following, concentrating only on the people that buy their stuff. End of all visual and vision. Across the street they never look, until a shopkeeper 'opens up business' and occupies something in their vision across the street. Vision stops with the people buying their stuff and then full stop. It's a simple image to draw the line of the street in between the opposing 'shopkeepers', and yet no one envisions that far when living in these regions that if you would look across the street maybe that there could be a building waiting for you to expand your business? The new shopkeeper is now saying to the other across the street, that maybe he should watch what he was saying and using this tone of voice as if he now had stolen something from him. "Now that you see my shop, you see the building you could have had and expand your business and wealth. Your visions come too late now that you realize that you had all this time living here in town and you never looked any further than your own doorstep for customers. You didn't see any customers on my side, walking in and out of your second shop just across the one that you now have, bulking with all the stuff you're selling for many years. Expansion is not your vision and dream, but now you are accusing me of 'not having any real products but eight and that I will never have anyone to come buying from me'. It is not what I don't have that is making you angry, but it is that your dreams and visions only came after you saw my shop." If the Middle East had only lions it is no wonder they were also born blind as they stay small and never are reaching adulthood. (Lion cubs are born blind)

Officially Naftali Bennett is now Prime Minister and Head of State. 48 Hours after he was sworn in we can believe that this is not a joke anymore, as the former prime minister had said about the Prime Minister on sunday and weeks long before that. There are still some rebels who are using this opportunity to litter the government with their pamphlets and placates against this government and the Prime Minister. They are acting like the angry citizens against the government and it's new administration, and of whom they are also saying that it is false and based on lies. Everyone remembers that Yair Lapid had the second mandate to form a government, after the first mandate and Mr Netanyahu had failed to form a coalition. The mandate does not lie. And what are lies in Mr Bennett or Yair Lapid? The lie is a political paradox, that in fact it is a lie that Mr Bennett is the Prime Minister, but that in fact he should also be the Lord Treasurer and called Head of State, which no one is doing outside his government. Unless this is not the law in Israel just yet. Mr Bennett also does not think himself to be an English prime minister, Sir Winston Churchill, whom he admires blindly above his own founding fathers, Ben Gurion, and others. The current Head of State in Israel doesn't do the theatricals of being in government, a government that was brought together in a coalition to serve the people of Israel and not to be like the previous government investing at a multiple level in heavy security for the citizens of Israel, and only because of Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas and other terrorists that no Israeli can recognize, but the former prime minister of Israel. He knows his people and the people of the Middle East. And they know only him in this town. And maybe that has worked in the Middle East as it is something of their own vision... But the new Prime Minister wants to see and do things a little more nuanced and will start at home first building simple strategies to reach out to the public and citizens. The people are the voice, or vox populi, (vox dei). He needs to get to that budget passing, or build a budget strategy for the coming six months fiscal year, and starting on 1 January for the coming year then. He is doing some brilliant moves too by empowering certain MK's to the ministerial jobs of Minister and ministries, Shirly Pinto with a hearing impairment and the second Minister of Energy, Karin Elharrar with muscular dystrophy. All good efforts to keep this government as a positive message out to the world, that Israel has arrived at this point in time and it's parliamentary young history.

And no one knows how hard it is to bring the presentation to a representative democracy close to what things are truly real in life for all human kind. We should applaud democracy quietly and it's ruffle should be noticed, yes even for a country like Israel deemed an apartheid State and a brutal place to live in when Palestinians or Arabs. Change from Israel is also reaching the shores of the other side every day normal and normality with the Bennett- Lapid government, where here there is also a diverse people in several European Union ministerial jobs or even being a prime minister of a Member State. The last one we can remember in a wheel chair after a shooting, was Wolfgang Schaüble, former Finance Minister of Germany. Even known as a war horse in a wheelchair. But we are here in Europe and not in the Middle East where representational democracy is scarce and based on strongmen and strongwomen, over the more pacifist (by consuming only) and non combatant people (not serving in the military). And the total sum is more than ten millions of people living at the bottom of the strongmen hierarchies. Here elections are of imminent importance to keep some idea of civil and civic life together, or drown into the sea of peoples. Here it is also an unforgiving and ungrateful task to be the president or prime minister. Some should find out why, whether this is tribal or monarchies in some parts of the region. No one knows where to put the emphasis on in the Middle East, except for religion. Investments do not go into civil life or society, as this is being looked upon as western and corrupt, and many are asking how they can survive in the future without building simple infrastructures to help move their lives out of the masses of social and progressive economic deprivation. The shopkeepers always win on this side of the 'forum'. Because it is the will of the people. On the other hand it is sheer hubris to think that we have the answer for a magnitude like the Middle East in a jiffy. There is simply no democracy to deal with this kind of fluidity of peoples and millions of lives. The best place to start the future is therefore only home, especially when you have seen and done the other side thoroughly already. This was certain the case for Israel under the former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu.

Jericho.

9 June 2021
(23:53 PM)

Prosperity is an annual result by law and accumulation, incidently also by law. It could not be any different in Israel today after 72 years. As soon as a new government is announced, last week on wednesday night, the anvil was thrown out of the window and smashing all glassware, ceilings and windows. On tuesday, yesterday, the first plans were made public and what was expected from the point of 'People first' had u- turned in 'favour' of the Haredim. Favour, well if you change this to work and education there is a sensible point to it. The Haredim must learn a few basic skills and come to terms with the general economic cycle of the working people in the rest of the world. And today the story continues to another part we did not see yesterday right away, that this was necessary to deal with a certain deficit in this sector and cut the funds these parties have been getting from the Netanyahu government, for over 12 years. Yesterday the whole world could read the article in the JP that the new government wants to open shop on Shabbat. The Transportation minister and ministry will also change the laws in Israel to new ones and pass it by law and public order. The designate prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, who seems to believe in logistical solutions has no objection if these are the new laws to be introduced for the Haredim sector and the change of laws. Mr Bennett is not the same man he was before the election result on 23 March two months ago. But if he is doing logistics and cut the Torah believers in black & white in half in his first hours during grooming his persona to the prime ministership this sunday, he will be remembered to have 'dismembered' the religious parties and fragmented their existence in the young history of Israel where it was prophecy come true under Mr Netanyahu, who in his 'greatness' had granted them to live free and undisturbed in the State of Israel. Curses are in order, but are we looking at Jericho? Potentially we are looking at a man who is doing remarkably well as a designated prime minister in a coalition with the Left- Wing parties as being the Right- Wing. When he is briefing the public he is giving the impression that he knows what he is saying and why he is doing this. You could even say that he was articulate. For a man who was kingmaker yesterday and tomorrow prime minister in the new government on sunday, you have to admit that you were right the day you thought of him as a future prime minister of Israel. But no one knew then why.

This is what Mr Bennett his government with Yair Lapid will inherit from the previous government, under Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. Let's say that Mr Lapid and other Left- Wing parties make up an electorate of 1mln20thousand, New Hope, Yamina and Yisrael Beytenu have been as independent Right- Wing parties still in the same bloc as Likud's 2mln voters. (Including the religious parties) Interesting number are the people who's votes were not there, approximately 6 mln people, of which 2 mln are Arab voters. This is the real biopic of the prosperity in Israel electorate composition. Also approxiamtely 2 to 3 mln people are living under the poverty line, or are becoming part of this 'minority' segment in society in the coming five years. We are not making illusions how the rest of the people on the Arab side are living... Israel has a 9 mln and something population. And it is collapsing as a state of the art country and with it's expensive cities? In a more cynical way one could say that the Two- State solution is the only solution if that would mean for the Arab population in Israel to use their right of return to the motherland. But that is only a scenario of Machiavellian proportion, where only the State had the right to construct schemes of survival of State and the prince. And what could even be more cynical is that the Left- Wing+ Right- Wing government will get the blame for these radical changes, in the end. While nothing was left out to chance and let it come to this to ask for any sort of humanitarian help for the people of Israel living under the poverty line, 3 mln Jews and maybe 2 mln Arabs. This is why one can say that it was and is probably a good thing that now we are looking to a prime minister with a thing for logistics, also a very 21st century way to deal with difficult situations in a country. (We saw this happening during the Covid19 outbreak last year in Holland. The Dutch prime minister and his government team quickly built their plans into sub plans logistics. And they started at first with very little they had gradually built up to extended medical equipment distribution at a national scale) Mr Bennett and his government team will also have to define these moments of national emergencies, when he is or will be sworn in on sunday this week. One thing however will remain the status quo and treated differently. The Haredim.

Prosperity was thrown out of the window, the anvil of what was the Netanyahu governments over 12 years. The years when this prime minister was loved by everyone in Israel because he was the man who made people feel equal in his country and that no one stood more than the other when he was in power. Mr Netanyahu could have had a landslide victory with 6mln voters who would have voted for him in any other scenario. (The Arab population excluded who are voting for their own Arab political parties when an election is held in Israel) The national budgets go also to the ministry of Defense and personnel on a perpetual basis because it has a high and superior degree of productiveness. Are we forgetting something in this writing as here above? The coming days perhaps. We don't realize how far wide this is from the solid government Benyamin Netanyahu that was and now will come to an end, before the new government and only a few days away, could be sworn in. Many are still remembering how Mr Bennett had said on a few occasions not to enter a coalition deal with Yair Lapid, because he was a man of value and that Yair Lapid was a man of the Left. While campaigning mr Bennett was a Right- Wing man, and not a kingmaker as after the election result on 23 March. He is being accused of smoking a cigar from both ends. He had also believed to form an alternative Right- Wing Party to Likud and become bigger this election. Who knows that he still would have been the next prime minister in a Right- Wing coalition or majority and be the prime minister he had dreamed of. Instead he has to set up a brass political serpent to heal anyone from the snakebite they have suffered during the Netanyahu years as prime minister. This includes the politicians on the Left- Wing. No one could fly the plane, except the prime minister. Not Bennett, and not Lapid, he then had said in (an orange ornament background)interview before the 23 March election. And last but not least: democracy. A fox came walking on it's walls and it fell apart. Some things need to be preserved as the Shabbat or risk heavy heresy and mortal sin. Other people who want to go to the beach on shabbat are not in California or Florida. That is Israel and it's great sea (Mediterranean Sea).

The story continues.

Why, why, why, Delilah?

8 June 2021
(21:24 PM)

The Haredim and the law are one thing, money is another that is not the issue here today after hearing the announcements in the new government Lapid & Bennett. Keep Shabbat open for business and traffic, except in places where the religious Jews are living, as to avoid deliberate offense to the community. It is interesting that at the same time designate prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, his response to the new agreements in the coalition on religion and State relations, his performance was quite prime ministerial already. He will be a strong prime minister and one of a specific character, that is half Right- Wing and half coalition with Yair Lapid and the other far left parties. Including that of Ra'am. Two years and being the prime minister in a 'change' government in a surprise change to the system of when Likud was government and the State, is becoming more visible and almost easy to visualize from here and today. What we have in Mr Bennett is not impossible anymore to imagine... But bring change to religion and it's relation to the State of Israel was in one word the wrong move for any Right- Wing prime minister perpetually, whether in a temporary coalition with the center Right and Left and other far Left parties. Perhaps this can help to imagine one second if the same man and prime minister would have done and said the same had he been the Right- Wing majority party. This is quite a long sheet of thin ice for Mr Bennett, to put this issue first on the table of agreements with the rest of his coalition and expect the religious parties to play nice. In other writings on this website the suggestion was that he should make the second half his prime ministership, and now we can also see why that would be much more in his favour and especially after four years from now. Mr Bennett is under a lot of pressure, one can understand as this goes without saying when taking into account that he is Right- Wing. If the far Left would have to compromise on gay marriage and freeze it in as only a temporary agreement, this would have already been a burning issue the party could not go back on. With religion in Israel and it's State related law, one can only see that this is impossible to reverse it's hierarchy. Gay marriage does not stretch out into State law for now in Israel, but is only complimentary and specific to local government. It is not a surprise when the religious leaders of several parties have reacted indignant to the changes the coalition wants to make e.g. to opening Shabbat for business and traffic/ transportation. And partly the leaders are right.

During WWII in the Holocaust the essence of religion was also banned for the religious Jews and made saying Kaddish even more profound then and now to understand the need for prayer and Elohim, before going into the hell of their atrocities. How secular Jews died in the Holocaust this is not relevant to remembrance of all 6mln Jews, but death and life remained solemn of meaning since then to all survivors and the next generation of Jews. Change Shabbat in Israel in 2021, even a gentile would know that this is the holiest day to Elohim Avram. This heritage can only be called unique and it is a prerequisite to a promise of the coming of the Messiah that this is the meaning of Israel. No one is suggesting that Israel should become a theocracy at this stage in the 21st century, when the whole world is changing to a new world order and democracy is pertinent to keep or maintain. But to kill off it's religious symbol that is Shabbat would not be a good thing for a Right- Wing leader and prime minister in Israel. Not even a bold Mr Netanyahu has dared fate through korban, but has almost made a bold attempt to act like he was korban tamid to the people of Israel. Mr Bennett, to be honest, has the mettle to become prime minister when you are listening to his responses on these particular situations with e.g. the religious leaders of UTJ and Shas. The coalition Lapid- Bennett should be what it says by formation, a coalition. It is important not to hurt a friend's career when he has already been deemed by his Right- Wing voters a man who speaks with a fork tongue. If the majority of seats comes to Yesh Atid it is Mr Lapid who is first prime minister and second Mr Bennett. The public will wonder why that hasn't happened and then democracy will not be as smooth looking like polished cedar or acacia wood.

News briefing this afternoon Mr Yair Lapid said that this coalition was built on trust.

7 June 2021
(23:37 PM)

The vacuum is no more but watertight on a thermal moment earlier today. Mr Lapid also took questions from the press in the press room. No hymen came in between answers and questions, all was done and said in a good format. The public can't feel and say about today that the coalition, while waiting to be sworn in, did not once address the public during the most nerve- racking hours, when it was considered a dangerous situation to support the coalition government of change. The date for the Knesset vote of confidence is set for next week, 14 June. In the meantime when reading comments on the JP articles this evening it is very distressing when one comment reads that Naftali Bennett wil be shot. Your vision moves entirely skew to one side and the earth is flat again. Especially when your hero is Bobby Kennedy and always are watching clips of him and his speeches on human rights on Youtube. If anything would go wrong it won't be hard to see another Bobby Kennedy, but we are not going to give in to this kind of threat that clearly has passed the redline. Let's stay clear headed and keep to what Mr Lapid said in his newsbrief today. This coalition, he said, was built on trust and he was not expecting any broken promises from any member in this cabinet, and also not from his friend Naftali Bennett, the one who will go first in this rotation as prime minister. And in Gil Hofman's article in the evening how the cabinet formation will look like if sworn in, the vacuum on that side also is looking quite tight on the cheese. This is exactly what proves the need for change what has happened over the weekend, Mr Lapid said. He is addressing much on the memory of the nation with a fine instrument and doing this very skillfully. He is Mr Reason and the alternate (both with veto powers) prime minister. He also knows the caves of Negev, Sinai, Megiddo and Masada as it is distinct when in the army of wind and sound. In Israel the people listen to the sound of nature very deeply. Any politician who knows that will do well when facing the world and home, or take to the stars and fly off the political train and rail more simple base. Likud is expected to trash the newly wedded government before and after it has taken it's oath in the Knesset and walk the political aisle. But remember thou art mortal, said Caesar his watchmen walking behind him and repeating this chant.

After 72 years the Jewish Home is a gift again to the nation. And this coalition under Bennett and Lapid are determined to bring it back to it's former times by 'restoring faith and inclusiveness for the people that are waiting for change', according to mr Lapid. The South of Tel Aviv e.g. needs immediate attention and a clean break from poverty and crime. Housing that is renewable or sustainable for the minorities living in social anarchy unvoluntarily by nature, but once it sets in as secondary nature over a time lapse of x many years the environment of inhumanity here feels terribly humane... These and a few more other pathological social and economic fractures by poverty and lack of progressive change (!), over 2 mln Jewish people next to 2 mln Arab citizens, here is where change is needed asap along the vertical lines of local government. PM Bennett (after sworn in) should be remembered for his reform and good works. And here is where technology is only an educational tool rather than one that will do the social rehabilitation. All seen from a social nightmare. And the nightmare will stay this way if a sudden war breaks out again between Israel and Hamas, leaving all the good work behind that never was or will be in our lifetime. One wonders what the prime minister, Mr Netanyahu, meant on sunday evening when he mentioned the deep state in one of the news studios. That didn't sound like a glass of clean drinking water. Also water is a basic commodity throughout the land of Israel and is in many ways a question of whether it is enough for 9mln people short and long term. Sooner or later the big infrastructure projects (energy) will come knocking on the prime minsiter's door, alternate or not. Gaza needs to be rebuilt and Egypt last week has sent a heavy convoy of machineries in aid to help the people of Gaza. The coalition of change will have it's hand full on the ground issues that need attention and to be done as we speak. But it hasn't been sworn in yet.

UNHRC latest yesterday on the Israel- Gaza war this month, arms embargo and permanent probe of crimes against humanity in Palestine.

28 May 2021

This is unsettling when the latest from the UNHRC is a binding resolution, that could result in several meanings on the International stage. Or become the long awaited conclusion to this conflict between Israel and Hamas, whether this is in Gaza or the Palestinian people in the West Bank. The nature of the UNHRC call yesterday was not as in previous resolutions, each time a war between Israel and Hamas had ended. A definite nature of stand was introduced this time round and it has also been very cautious, especially when referring to Gaza as an integral part of the West Bank/ Palestinian people in the West Bank, e.g. when Norway respresentative specifically mentioned the construction to bear this in mind when starting the rebuilding of infrastructure. Second where cautious: mentioning Palestine as a democracy. If these were the points in this resolution they are indeed very serious. How can the world audience see it clearly what the UNHRC is de facto saying or suggesting, e.g. that if not met with compliance in fact the resolution has deeper consequences for that party? Humanitarian aid, food, medicine and water supply have also all been part of the resolution and is expected to come into effect immediately. The democracy of Israel has been left out during this UNHRC session. Nor has it said anything on the military precision of the IDF in this operation Guardians of the walls, as if to avoid Israel's military scientific war machineries. In other news articles (JP) some have mentioned that this was ferocious and unusual precise. But here, yesterday, at the UNHRC the emphasis was on civilian lives and in particularly in Gaza. All members present at the UNHRC were uniform in their final statement. Where all this becomes a little confused in the public domain is when the arms embargo is called for, even before the initial probe of war crimes by the IDF will take place in June, next month, when the new prosecutor will take office at the ICC. The public can also be encouraged and see it entirely different, that the matter now is extremely urgent and cannot bear any delay to start in the present time: now. When the world can see images in the news on operation Guardian of the walls there is nothing different than from images in previous wars in Gaza between Hamas and the IDF. Rubble and debris, and where you can see one man getting his haircut in the middle of all this. And yet the astonishing is missing.

One: if Israel has ceased to be a democracy than it must play or dream it and go on animating it's debates in the Knesset or parliament. These are state actors and should never stop doing what they have known doing most of their adult lives in their democracy. The military is physically more real and is a national reality for all Israelis. Without a democracy the physical reality of it's sovereignty in this territory is a hierarchiacal movement and should keep it's strategic borders within a national frame.(A military hierarchy also is the least heterogeneous, but is in fact the most legitimate homogeneous) Whether far or close to any danger. The UNHRC also made a call to go back to the 1967 borders and that Israel should stop the settlements and for a completely withdrawal from the West Bank, also called by it's Hebrew equivalent Judea and Samaria. A complete withdrawal by the IDF in Judea and Samaria, including the settlements, that would also mean the end to this 'round of democracy' for the Israel we have known for 72 years in the making. Also another missing point from all of the here above writing is that no 'ally' had ever told Israel that keeping to democracy and it's sciences one day could become vital to remain a State and nation in Israel. And maybe, like the case with small infants, the calls just fell on deaf ears? Especially when on the furious and fast merry go round. The prime minister put all his belief in the (Indian) juggernaut of the global economy and free market economics, and never wanted to come back to a State where public sector had dominance among the so many Israelis who had stayed behind in time when everything was still light industries and oranges. When building a military strategic sovereignty the people get the soldier's wages and public sector by a magic move revives. And it is bad. A benign bureaucracy after a short while jumps the knee and turns malign. While in the meanwhile theater continues to keep the State of Israel in a mock democracy and praise it's herald of another time, like the Kabuki. (Kabuki play are sometimes used in political discourse to describe an event characterized more by showmanship than by content.)

Layla tov.

Do we have a symmetry in the State of Israel?

26 May 2021

Adding a little mercury symmetry might just be formed in a natural way and show us the rising of it's new fluidity between the political parties in this particular timeline. Time here in the Middle East can mean a number of things and criss crossing the networks of their different timelines, while in the meantime also the rest of the world is trying to find synchronization from where they are to a remote place that is Israel. Communication however not many see that this is worldwide and remains in the domain of technology. It is important to keep remembering how the world actually works, if making or taking stands against Israel when criss crossing the world and using the usual channels of the media from free internet services. While maybe others are concentrating and keeping focus on high level technologies where the real threats might be or come from. In Israel, so we believe, these levels of security are a every day business and not be underestimated. They have helped built the global architecture of security technologies, was what the last decade and even the previous one made the world audience believe. Democracy in Israel was once a starting point and much later on became almost at the brink of being pointless under the heavy weight surpluses of global success and new industries. It is the new industries that are here key to what Israel calls State, democracy and success in one prime ministerial sentence by the current prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. A world he helped built almost at automated speed. "We built skyscrapers Israel never had, we built cities Israel never had, and we built democracy with Arab parties Israel never had," could not have come at a better time today, but forgetting that Israel never had all this before because it simply did not exist just yet 72 years ago. Mr Netanyahu is in politics for more than three decades and leaving a few measly years to the 'older' Israel when he was born. This mentality is what made Israel great, should be the real question.

When we say democracy the prime minsiter knows how this works best, that without a symmetry of a two- party system, with the center coalitions or auxiliary parties in case when going to a coalition or when in an emergency, democracy is unlawful. Unlawful and while in Real Time has many nuances, even revolutions or blocking government to be formed. Mr Netanyahu is a consummate leader and he knows his country and how this works with the rest of the world. He cannot let Israel bleed dry before he recognizes the need for the real democracy and to maintain a healthy government and it's stability. The left are equal partners, the right are equal partners, to the State. But where it does make a uniquely other nuance is when the more dominant party of Orthodox Right and Religion merge privately to make a public appearance as the only rightful State of Israel against the rest of the world and not just to minorities and Arab citizens. In a young country with a novice democracy (reverse in canine years) one could almost say aloud that now is the time to break with the tiebreak of past and present time, and rejoin the fundamental lines of what the founding fathers had built in their time. That was not even 1 hundred years ago, if we can recall. The future of Israel lies in the waiting in lion years, every 25 years of rebuilding and enjoying the process as it is ongoing. It's democracy will be built on democracy's first principle: a Jewish Home called here the State. The second principle is a Jewish Home called here the State will include it's citizens by a second principle of inclusion, Jews and Arabs alike, but also when from more distant lands. (This is conceptual and not de facto) And a third principle, and a fourth, and fifth, and so forth. But when in government and serving the State of Israel the first principle is mandatory to all Israel's statesmen and stateswomen. Religion in the State of Israel is adamant to maintain it's symbolism is alive and attested so throughout it's historical truth as is written in the Tanakh and Torah. (Here something has to be made into secondary lines to the mainstream lines of democracy) Once again, private wealth and defense goes to the conservatives, and macro economics goes to the democratic left, when seen from right- wing. Incidere: subordinate is what will occur when defense is being 'argumented' by the conservatives that this is not something for the Orthodox Jewry. Staying rather defenseless is what occurs as insuboridnate, but in the Middle East is divine when staying defenseless as neighbouring nations rather see divine right as to destroy their enemies. Israel has these great talents and will provide them in the future. Whether in Hebrew or in English, or any other language if so requires the future State of Israel.

This written here above is by estimation and not thought of as law or order sketches.

Battle Stations, Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Gaza and East Jerusalem.

Personal op, unedited.

12 May 2021

The mandate for the Lapid- Bennett government ends on 2 June two and half weeks from now. What was going to be a political process now feels a military excertion on how both candidates for prime minister will react the coming days during the crisis with the war in Gaza (as we speak is still ongoing). In a way it is a military test, one could say. Also because Hamas and the Palestinian people, especially across the world in diaspora, are calling for Israel to withdraw from their territories in Israel. Right- Wing and Left- Wing + Right- Wing clusters & Center are right now in the same national crisis as we speak. The ICC today has also jumped the neck of the fighting factions, the Hamas and Israel, that this could lead again to future war crimes probings on both sides, as if we were already faced and in the aftermath of this war, the sword of Jerusalem and Guardians of the walls. Mind you, the aftermath of this war will be very decisive for Israel and the Palestinians as cities cannot be rebuild on rubble and debris where sovereignty is or will become for the first time an International question. (CNN in today's writing on it's website already mentioned about the hopelessness of the situation that is ongoing for two decades in repetitious turns and cannot go on in a civilized world just on and on. Should Gaza become part of Israel, is what the writing teased itself with for today.) Perhaps it is the translation of the State of Israel and Israel's sovereignty that is confusing in the Arabic language and cannot be translated as well as kingdom. There must be something different to their perception of The State and sovereignty, maybe since ancient times? What can our novice prime ministers do with the incumbent prime minister of Israel to quell this ridiculous war outburst out of nowhere and surprise Israel? Israel in it's retaliation turned the whole country to battle stations and fighting Arabs everywhere in it's cities. According to the writing on CNN this was a surprise for Israel and Israelis, that a 'Palestinian insurgency' took place this time 'co ram populo'. This is why the question on sovereignty makes it a little different this time as they have chosen clearly to fight Israel in it's 'inner cities'. Or to put it differently: civil strife inside a country by it's nation will be quelled, but when by 'invasion', can anyone tell you the rationality for this action against the external force of insurgency inside the country? We have to be very happy that Israel has not yet taken it's full right just yet to 'quell' the insurgency. Unless, Israel has no sovereignty.

Can this war be won by a 'guardian principle', let's say that the International World is rational enough to see the truth and scale through the needle's eye? This would put Israel years back in a retarded place among nations, if so. What is happening now isn't what you expect from the International world to see the Jewish Home burning and not in self immolation by inner strife, but it came from Israel's old enemy in Gaza, the Hamas. Perhaps Mr Naftali Bennett was right when he had said a few years ago during the peace conference at Haaretz, that the nations 'surrounding' Israel know exactly each what Israel is doing and they are never sleeping. It is this axis that makes things always battle/ combat- ready or what the world calls deterrence, to keep your country secure and safe. It moves like the windmill by wind powers, now gone turbulent and blazing fires through Al Aqsa. It is difficult to see what one can do under these circumstances, except hoping for de- escalation if only to stop the madness. People in Tel Aviv were luckily still enjoying their coffee on the Rothschild Boulevard last night, while near South Tel Aviv there were burning vehicles, one bus and many cars. Late yesterday evening in London the demonstration of Palestinian people could also have been an encouragement for Hamas in Gaza, that the world is standing behind the attacks on Israel to free Palestine. It doesn't seem the wise thing to do right now, whether protesting or quiet marching through the streets in silent protest. Hamas can be encouraged, as would Israel if the people took to the streets to protest the rocket firing of Hamas inside Israel. It is not what you do in civilized countries if you don't want to throw oil on the hot plate of war between the two nations. It is hardly something to be jubilant about, let alone to be taken to the stage of the International community as if the world only stands with Hamas. If you do so this is called incite to war. And are you inciting for war in the Middle East, in Israel, that Hamas should continue it's noble fight against Israel? Israel then would have to defend itself and this time it will be at a wider scale.

Are we thinking a coalition in Israel of Lapid- Bennett will be something of an evolution?

9 May 2021

In one strike: Mr Bennett should than now retreat. The people do not see the emergency in this government. Punto. Perhaps it was conceived on a deception, and to deliberately deceive the people of Israel. Some are even suggesting about Mr Bennett, that he is getting something from joining the Left- Wing as this was his ambition from the start of his campaign since last year to become prime minister. There must be proof of that somewhere whoever has kept records on him and his campaign from 2020 to 23 March 2021. How the outcome of the last election would be there is no one who could have predicted that Mr Bennett would become kingmaker. He has used this unusual situation to his advantage to become prime minister, but than under a Netanyahu government, as it is still known and named. The Likud is another thing. But then things got very mixed up after the last election, if the kingmaker would join Left- Wing under Yair Lapid, if he would get the mandate from the president, Mr Reuven Rivlin. The Mediterranean Sea and sun could make you forget that you were in Israel during this period of time. But reality will not make it go away and make you forget that here we are not in Italy or Greece, or Switzerland. This is Israel with a beginning since the Ten Commandments were received on mount Horeb, before Jews were scattered around the world and across the seas of time. In the 21st century it only looks like Israel has never existed before 1948, and not even in 1848. How is this relevant to the present time in a global world where Israel is known under another name? The startup nation does not refer to the Biblical exodus from Egypt anywhere in corporations or the absolute wealthy among the Jewish nation. Right- Wing and Left- Wing, who are they and what does it all mean in our time?

On a personal opinion. The archaic understanding is that Israel is Holy Israel's El Be CUDšU and will be for all generations a lasting understanding. One cannot separate State from religion in the Anglo Saxon way, e.g. as is in England and where the monarchy plays a sustainable role. This road becomes more difficult as the nation expands demographically and economically with a big government to meet every day practice of government and coexistence. There is simply no quick fix to this surging problem and that will also certainly not be found in unstable coalitions, whether a formation from Right- Wing to Left- Wing, or Left- Wing to Right- Wing, unless there is a keen interest to contain both sides with a center of politics in a written constitution. Israel after the 20th century perhaps came too fast with a meteorite speed to the top of the world, globally and technologically. The Left- Wing in an emergency government should also know that whatever was there to find or do that this was and has been done already by the incumbent prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, when this comes to big government. From what we know from the articles in the news online in Israel is that the emergency government intervention by Bennett- Lapid, is that Mr Bennett has no intention of a 'mutational' (Y-net?) government with the Left. His goal, as far as the impression and on his campaign was since 2020 to become prime minister, was change in social infrastructure and providing 400 000 people with/ in 'amazing' jobs, he has said (of the latter) in interviews. One can only say that here we are hearing a very low- key plan that he wants to work on as prime minister. When he would join the Left- Wing, on a cluster- based Right- Wing with New Hope and Yisrael Beytenu, after the March 2021 election, it looks very much different than what people are now saying publicly in popular political belief. And the part that makes it probably very difficult to accept in this is that here we have a young man, also Right- Wing, who has made the boldest move (ever?) in a young democracy and say that he can become prime minister as the kingmaker. Some are privately thinking that he is doing something very dangerous. Could this be to all democracies in the world a bad example? Esepecially where unstable. Where Michael Heseltine failed, who had been in his time been considered the boldest ever in a live- democracy in Britain, now Mr Naftali Bennett, and from what it looks unintentionally, made not only the boldest move, but he has put into live- democracy in Israel 2021 the need for alteration when a political bloc has been locked with it's horns in a thicket. When did that happen lately in a democracy?

But if popular belief and the people of Israel do not need an emergency government, Mr Naftali Bennett should retreat from the coalition with Left- Wing Yesh Atid, under Mr Yair Lapid. Dangerous is not what it should become in a civilized society.  

Prime Minister is the prize in Israel 2021.

26 April 221

Unofficially: will it be Naftali Bennett, Gideon Sa'ar, Benny Gantz, the incumbent prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, or Yesh Atid leader, Mr Yair Lapid? Officially: it is either Right- Wing or Left- Wing for that prize of prime ministership in Israel 2021. There is so much talk about democracy, election outcomes, the people of Israel, the political parties (some of which the date is not known), and about the man that no one seems to want when outside the ballot box. The man who knows that if you have a worldview it is democracy. From years of experience with the International world, this is US and the Middle East, there is something no prime minister of Israel can ignore at this stage. Where even there is no democracy possible one will still 'do the worldview' in democracy speak/ language or lingo. It can be very confusing when you can't follow quickly in the footsteps of the mainstream. Mr Netanyahu on democracy holds all the cards and hasn't opened his hands yet to the other candidates, men who only understand domestic politics and policies. And who want to become prime minister. It seems from this point of view that only Mr Netanyahu knows where light and heavy industries go out and in day and night, especially when all the people of Israel are asleep. He alone stays up night or day for Israel and the people. And this is what he has done as prime minister of Israel for now three decades, representing the people of Israel in the world and on the planet. Nachon. The story in politics has changed in 2021 when after the fourth election the majority wasn't a parliamentary majority, but an electorate win. This could serve as a serious indicator and for the fourth time in two years, that perhaps the electorate does not do the parliamentary vote, but when coming into the arena of parliament it is the Knesset that serves the State of Israel best. The State is a prize bigger than being prime minister, as it consists of people and representatives, and giving the people their worldview: Israel. At least seen from the outside when looking in.

We are in the year 2021 and can't be said often enough that Israel in this region is the youngest and only democracy, when comparing it's neighbouring States, the Arab countries of very old generations. It is not interpretation alone when saying this, but fact and above all it is historical fact. Today not only is politics reshaping, but also time and ticking again in the hearts and minds of it's people. In the end of the day what the PM should do is keep in mind how he should stimulate continuity for Israel and the people living in this/ his country, that could only mean coexistence of a people or nation. These are very serious politics and in a democracy it is vital or capital in terms of constant economic cycles. It is therefore that a man like Mr Bennett is more proponent to these rationalities, being on the point where he envisions input and productivity for the ordinary man/ woman with a job or trying to hold on to a job. His revolution is soft and non violent, which is the people's heartbeat when worries are on a daily basis, and how they can go on living in Israel. Home Security and defense are also part of his expertise over the years, and he knows something about the world and their view of Israel, friendly or unfriendly. (If anyone cares watch on youtube some of his videoclips in English) When it comes to settlers and Judea and Samaria a national unity government will not be able to provide all the answers on the short term, logically. Mr Bennett today was right to say that the differences are not small in this formation of government, with Left- Wing Yesh Atid, Meretz and Labour. At this end of the stick it is one place where Mr Netanyahu has never been too close, but only intermediate between government and the people. There are many sayings when habit takes over real life...

In short we are only looking here at two men, but there is another and another, and another in due time/ course. Some are even thinking of giving Mr Sa'ar the portfolio of Education or Defense. The ambiguity here is that Mr Sa'ar is capable and could rise to the occasion, as everyone already is expecting that he would do fine. While on the other hand he has not served yet in a Left- Wing government. Mr Benny Gantz has a roman vecu of his own, for last year's failure in a rotational government with Mr Netanyahu, and his long life experience as Defense minister of Israel. If you read the Jerusalem Post frequently and over a period of many years, something will tell you that in a crisis as now ongoing between the political parties how to form coalitions, perhaps Mr Gantz cannot become prime minister at this later date. But no one underestimates his determination to do it right, is what you could also say. Like overnight Israel and Israeli politics have become a very interesting venue for outsiders and everyone is now thinking what the next thing will be in Israel, whether Right- Wing will again form government, or that the Left- Wing will do it with Yamina and (reading today) New Hope, the Right- Wing parties. Some find it even impossible if Naftali Bennett, then, would lead this Left- Wing government as first and in the second half taking over by Mr Yair Lapid. From the symmetry of democracy one cannot go beyond the line and call it equality of any kind of system. The world holds this one in a very watchful eye, as the election was transparent to the world. Nine months ago Israel was still an Apartheid State, to many in the world! The leaves on the trees, how quickly they change colours. Maybe Mr Bennett wants to leave politics altogether, he and his wife and children? (What a shame that his wife will not become first lady of Israel, an extraordinary beautiful wife, mother and woman, and standing next to a man who almost looks as one from the Bourbon family of Spain)

A little more on Mr Netanyahu, that now he is a man who breaks your heart when thinking that life is but a dream and so are all it's fancy ways. He is close to what Agamemnon and Menelaus were in Sparta in their time. Two great men and king warriors. The people worshipped Agamemnon, so it says in the annals. How will Mr Netanyahu be remembered in history? On the world stage he will certainly be remembered as the most feared men and as a Jew Israel has ever had in recent history. What to do about the man with 'kingly authority' in more ordinary times? This is a big decision for the political rivals and parties who believe that this man is also undermining Israel's democracy too badly. At the same time Israel is also his home. The people of Israel in this generation come from another generation who were from Europe mainly, but they are also not a generation who are fully submerged into the new people/ Jews coming to live in Israel in the 21st century. We are sometimes missing having more understanding on this subject and a closer look at the 'Israeli mentality'. For temperament war is good and vice verse. But for peace temperament changes to discipline, which is always harder when the people are used to temperament. Not from a psychological, but from a logical point of view. The people believe that Mr Netanyahu now is looking desperately for a Trojan horse, or a bad apple and slightly poisoned, if subtle the better. Last night the latest bulletin came from Gil Hoffman (JP), and he wrote that Mr Netanyahu now desperately wants to have Mr Bennett and Mr Sa'ar on his side in Likud. The problem is what can a national unity government offer the people in 2021, who have two worldviews: one is Israel and the other is naturally the US? And for how long will the national unity government rule the country? Some might ask whether if it is possible that you can prolong a coalition of this sort. That would make Israel a very interesting place in the near future if we knew the answer to that question. How does one call such a thing? Egalitarian?

Where lieth the survival of Israel in politics after the 23 March general election?

30 March 2021

Prime ministership is always high office in any western democracy. You simply have no higher one above the prime minister when not in a monarchy, e.g. in Britain. In the Middle East in Israel one could say after the 23 March election this year, that now there was something of an interesting development happening after this fourth election. Two men went after the prime ministership in the last year, Mr Naftali Bennett and later in the same year in December 2020 it was Mr Gideon Sa'ar, also a member of the Likud Party led by Mr Netanyahu, who is still prime minister after the fourth election. So, here we have an interesting angle in the old political machinery of Israel, surged during the Netanyahu governments now 20 years old. Luckily Israel's politics was born parallel to the building of the State of Israel in the forties, fifties, sixties and seventies. In the meantime the world had changed and global leadership was born in a new world, where Mr Netanyahu was introduced as Israel's ambassador to the US and also held a seat at the United Nations as a representative of Israel's foreign affairs, especially in the US. One could also say that the world and all political machineries were basically in the west a democracy. How it was perceived by others is now history, e.g. China, Russia and North Korea. To most in the public domain we have never thought that any different relationship with Israel wasn't part of 'our reality'. Israel also had a particular understanding with the rest of the world that it had the right to defend itself, a relationship that went on for decades and of which Mr Netanyahu was also part. The world had simply changed and made the old world of short memory. What is interesting with this last election held in Israel earlier this month, you could say, holds both views when there is yet another big political crisis back home, that the old world view isn't what the new world view will be in the very short term. It would call for urgent reviews. The prime minister should see why and also understand that the old strategic cooperation between nations had simply matured or expired. And no country at this junction wants to reverse the future vision. It is almost a gift from heaven if you understand how both men, Mr Naftali Bennett and Mr Gideon Sa'ar came close to this future vision and now want Israel right there too, if only things were more politically stable and had a clear direction within parliament in Israel...

The Israeli electorate might disagree totally with the view here above written. And not knowing also that Israel now had a unique opportunity to become the democracy it always had vied for, under any former prime minister, to put Israel not off the world, but to maintain it's presence at the heart of the western world. The next prime minister of Israel and especially if this will be Naftali Bennett will have to be able to understand all this. It is a good thing for thim to understand the main principle of the new world, that it is new and is by nature a new vision for all the transatlantic global leaders. Compare violet shoes when treading. Back home the only radical step for the new prime minister to make will be the poltical machinery and rebuild on good promises made to the people of Israel, political parties, citizens, public sector and private sector future agreements or reviews, and more importantly how not to go back to the Netanyahu years when politics was a mere satellite in orbit above Israel. Everything about the prime ministership indeed is high when in Office, but when going against the order of this high office, whether intentionally or unintentionally, the ranks will go to the people and ask them to cast their ballot who is for or against the intentions of the prime minister. It is never a clear thing to any member of the public what these intentions are or will become after winning yet another election. Also it is or could be that the prime minister is indicisive and could leave matters out of his hands and is floating, but floating here on higher grounds. Two men who asked the people to cast their ballot on these presumed intentions of further damaging democratic rule in Israel, are Naftali Bennett and Gideon Sa'ar. In the Middle East in Israeli democracy this is also the equivalent of a lost generation. If this goes squarely wrong for both men, that daredevils are not being viewed as honourable, Israel will sink to the abyss in it's political machinery, one that no one recognizes in the rest of the world. Mr Yair Lapid has said it during the last year and especially in the first two months this year, that he does not find it important to become the prime minister in Israel, but want the State to come back to life, (probably meaning: from a long sit on the back bench of parliament as if it were the janitor (word play genitor) of politics in Israel for decades). Mr Netanyahu is still the most favourite and popular man in Israel in politics and in government. Hence the question in the title: where lieth the survival of Israel in politics?

The International World and ICC case in Israel and Palestine.

(Deus ex machina-The device is associated mostly with Greek tragedy, although it also appeared could appear in comedies- high profile court cases. Versus- Volenti non fit injuria (to a willing person, injury is not done. Up the ante.)

8 March 2021

Israel must face the music and dance, is what many now see as a possibility after the election is over and we will know who the prime minister will be for the next term of four years. Also it is already clear that Israel is in the mood for neither, dance or music, but in fact is displaying a much united front against the decision of the ICC that this case is wrong. How do we proceed from this point to get where the International World and ICC will say this is as far as we can go, it is after all a court case and is subjected to interlocked integrity on conduct of the case and it's findings. We are not sure whether this is how far things will go in this case and from a few highlights around the newsworld one can even sense that this might lead to the worst case scenario, something that would take Israel by surprise after more than seven decades long having the right to defend itself. Right now what seems to be the real critical center of the case against Israel is that it has been heavily compromised by some of it's military and this goes as far as the current prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. How did the war in 2021 have comprimised the State (West Bank) and military (Gaza) in 2014? Israel doesn't seem to have a defense on it's middle ground! It is still geographically discontinued by Gaza and the West Bank to be a sovereign State, but also this is precisely the same problem the Palestinians are having for many decades as a fiction of and over reality. The International World is convinced the wars fought over territory could have been avoided if Israel would halt it's occupation in Gaza and the West Bank indefinitely. It does not do so and insists the West Bank, or Judea & Samaria, belongs to ancestral land of the Jewish people. It is by definition so thus a matter of re- annexation and not annexation.

War crimes in Israel are now making it difficult to understand for the International World if Israel keeps on denying and that it is a wrong claim and is antisemitism from a different and more darker angle in modern day history, when the new world order is busy cleaning up the planet and it's natural and social resources for people and animals. Are some trying to say that here we are looking at war criminals and profiles as that of Mr Ratko Mladic, Karadzic and Mr Milosovic of Serbia? Both were tried by the ICJ in Den Hague over the genocide and massacre of Srebenica in the former Jugoslavia. In the relatively long experience of the International Criminal Court in Den Hague war crimes and atrocities during conflict and combat an investigation into war crimes also has sometimes more than two parts; most familiar is: one military and the other pathological report, if e.g. on sexual or rape claims by victims of these war crimes. If so the ICC also knows part II can only be investigated and tried with the assistance and help (?)by the PTSD syndrome expert(s) and who will know how to draw the distinctive nature from the military and mad dog in wars or places in continuous armed conflict, who never see or have seen the meaning of a cessation of hostilities, or truce, in this part of the world. The ICC also is saying it has jurisdiction over the territories in Palestine or the West Bank, with reference to the case against the war crimes of the Israeli army as it's principle basis or judicial umbrella. A State however does not have displaced persons and living under occupation, as this would indicate the State has fallen and taken e.g. as in Crimea by Russia, also in 2014. How exactly these nuances are inbuilt in high profile in ICC cases is an important part of making here a diplaced people by only having a State for fighting effectively for their case. That in itself however is administratively more complex and is confusing people unnecessarily when not properly explained through communications, public or offical.

But we do have to pay careful attention and observe, and not underestimate the International World and the ICC/ICJ judicial body, clearly when we do remember Srebenica. The United Nations Security Council works under obligation and (by) dissent from all nations or members and parties, and serve the International World wherever possible in greater conscience of all mankind. Another question with much urgency is this whether the ICC would halt it's investigation if Israel now decides with immediate effect to have another round of peace talks with the Palestinian Authority, e.g. after the election on 23 March this month. It is a faint option under the pressure of the ICC case against Israel, but nevertheless peace is a legal instrument and can be used if it can stop the music. With the coming election on 23 March, two weeks from now, the next prime minister might also be a name on the list of peoples to be investigated. And if this man was Mr Naftali Bennett, he could be remembered as an affect of this list as the shortest serving prime minister of Israel, for one day? That would do enormous damage to his year's campaign, built on an honest first time, since he went into politics and served under male and female his senior for the last twenty years, but now would have to see it all go down the drain and turn to freezing water. And making with that the worst day in Israel's political history. The ICC came as a complete surprise to many with it's February announcement of opening the allegations of war crimes in Israel against the Palestinian people. Conclusion: what could be the ICC plan? One: A Palestinian State for instrumental reasons give a very untidy impression, clearly to the International community, and cannot be fixed quickly in a snapshot in time to help a wounded people. Two: Israel does not have a State and Ministry of Defense of existence based on minutes and seconds.

Personal Op

ICC has a hidden agenda and is antisemitic.

5 March 2021

The indignant party is not in the mood for communication or to listen what the ICC, an international judicial body, is addressing with the investigation into alledged war crimes by Israel on the Palestinian people, the future two- state solution nation, also by International Law so recognised as a nation. In the world we now have heard on different channels, in Israel and abroad in English, that this outcome of the investigation, should be rejected. The ICC and the international community seem to be in another notion to this rejection, and say that rejection is what they would like to hear in court and not out in 'the streets'. For any legal case in the world everyone is familiar with court procedures, that this is meant precisely for that matter and mood between parties, and that in court to stay civil as opposing parties is the only right way forward, and settle the matter. According to the ICC there is much desire to 'end this cycle of violence' between Israelis and the Palestinians, and perhaps the Hnr Judge, Mrs Fatou Bensouda, means that the ICC can come to settle the matter once and for all. How the ICC works is available on the Internet and the world public, if it wishes, can inform itself. Now, what is the most pressing question Israel is answering with a resolute 'No' into these investigations? Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu has told Fox News that this was about fake wars, referring perhaps to Operation Protective Edge in retaliation to the murder and kidnapping of four Israeli youth on 13 June 2014. That raises your eyebrows whether we were living in the same world when the war was on in 2014 against Hamas in Gaza, or that maybe the prime minister is right that nothing of that has ever happened and therefore is a fake war. Even more surprising with a reputation like that of the Israeli PM, being always on top of every interview with his diplomatic savvy, was now on a display of obscuring the truth and reality on the Operation Protective Edge war. Fake war is for children's books, when we see hordes of men on flying carpets above the minarets in Baghdad when fighting the evil Javar, also a magician. It begs the question whether the next prime minister would be more concrete on matters of State and Defense, or wars.

The matter of wars in Israel has always been more complex to understand than e.g. when a war breaks out in another place on the planet. Syria and civil wars have now become after decades almost out of world opinion's sight, for example. And displaced persons is a world wide phenomenon of small or greater scale. But it is being monitored by the Human Rights Watch, and other institutions to keep their eye on these movements between people and parties (some armed and some in power). Is there any rationality in the rejection by Israel of the investigation into the crimes against Palestinians as war crimes? Judging from the beginning of the State of Israel in Palestine Israel has a good chance with a certain rationality and could even surprise the International Community that this was one of law and order, historically and in the 21st century. With more specific emphasis on the laws that were made in the 20th century, which make an intriguing reading so now and then. E.g. the military order (seen and read from the internet) on 17 December 1967 makes an interesting reading, when the name of the West Bank was replaced by Judea & Samaria. In 2021 it is called the West Bank and not Judea & Samaria. It is especially interesting to read the date that gives only one impressive reading, how time must have been very different with regard to the West Bank, and 'sleeping' over it for a very long time. It is no wonder why there is more than only confusion here between the two peoples over the same territory, which was clear in 1967 that the name (annexation) was changed to Judea & Samaria. In military expertise everyone knows that this was an act of annexation and if opposed (prohibit) should have been stopped the minute it had changed the names. The ICC cannot turn back the clock im 2021, unfortunately for the people of Palesine, who are now trapped by fighting time and struggling for the future.

Operation Protective Edge has been a war in retaliation to the provocation by Hamas. Technically Israel could therefore not have been a. the aggressor and b. retaliation of military force in one mass, but seen from this image that Hamas was the aggressor. Justice is for everyone, and sometimes, if you forgive me, is also for the strong.
This writing is a personal view.

120 Years of democracy in Israel.

14 January 2021

Not to remember that Israel has a making of 120 years (1900) of democracy could be/ is a mistake in any coming up general/ snap election, in March 2021 or the next. It has a precise date and place in the short and long term point in history when and where it began. Israel is not located in the European Union, but it's location of geography is the north of the Middle East. A region without neighbouring democratic nations for more than a thousand years. The upcoming general election is very important to keep the making of Israel in mind and serve it's memory once again. The current Prime Minister, Mr Netanyahu, did once remembered the beginning of it's founding principle of democracy and how it was wrought for since then. And he did serve to his best (in the 20th century) and not so best ability (in the 21st century) Israel and the people of Israel for the last four decades, with small intervals of forming other designs of government in a democracy. E.g. coalitions. But in the end of the day Israel still remained and is a democracy. A wealthy democracy when compared to the first immigrants who came to Israel to build a Jewish Home in the 1900. Today when the outside world condemns the prime minister of Israel and it's government where this is going wrong is it's perception of timing and time. The present time is the decision maker for most cases brought against Israel and it's recent history as the 'apartheid' country against another country within the same geography that is Israel or Palestine. It is the armistice lines and continuous landflow discontinuities that are here timeless confusion for many decades long and no one to bring it to a definite understanding of land and country. Had it been waterways this would have been less harder to solve maybe. Why the election of March 2021 is important has everything to do with time and timing, again.

There is talk of a new prime minister with only two names on the list, these are Gideon Sa'ar and Naftali Bennett. The latter has been very much brushed aside by the publicity of the first man and who is a Likud man and has a place next to Mr Netanyahu for a longer period than a millennial memory can serve. In politics with first principles in it's democracy the last thing that Israel needs right now is a name of a member in the Likud party, standing skin to skin with the current prime minister. The world has an old tendency of watching elections with the line of honesty and integrity in any future leader of a nation and in Israel that would be Naftali Bennett to become first minister if elected in the 'new elections'. These are government and State matters highest and lowest. What we should not forget however is that the current prime minister did follow a global set of ambitions for his country and followed his instincts to bring Israel in alignment with most modern days democracies in Europe/ the European Union. The monetary success was and came under his time in government, in comparison when the Israeli Pounds had been circulating in the old economic system in Israel. And it is also precisely for this reason that the prime minister should pay heed and remember that Israel is still a unique democracy in the Middle East and still is in alignment with modern day EU democracies not to pay careful attention to it's future. Another 100 years of Israel would make an astonishing place in the Middle East if it would still hold on to democracy, close to what you would say of when France was still a virgin and young democracy. Very vibrant. But no one knows where the global world will then be with remaking the planet and in what year, place or date.

Of the first man Mr Naftali Bennett one can say that he has been an apprentice in politics next and close to Likud and other political parties, next to his own, for more than two decades when he was too young to lead the pack. His integrity as many videoclips on Youtube show is that he has kept a low key of interviews around in the world news media, meetings with people, and also that he carefully had played with the thought of once becoming prime minister in Israel, or one day. Mr Sa'ar, with all due respect, is an interesting break, but you can't be a last- minitue- man in a serious change of hands in big politics as the legacy of mr Netanyahu. Of course the understanding that is now going around in the world is that there is too much infighting between the political parties right now in Israel. In fact in a healthy democracy such infighting is imperative to it's nature. Where the incumbent stands is not an easy height of power to take over in a hostile manner nor in blatant hostilities when political. The military is another thing, when you are in South America, in 1930/ 1940. South America countries have moved since then from military dictatorships to modern day democracies. Many ascribe these positive changes to the policies of globalism in the world. But why Naftali Bennett when he cannot produce the majority to win or that he could rise to power from his third party base? He should become prime minister because he is the face of democracy. Remember it is time and timing. The country must reconcile again to it's own democratic beginnings or first principles very urgently and seriously, before they can move on to the next level of Israel & the global leadership it needs for the technocratic balance of it's future. Why technocratic and not just government and functioning? The word in our world is alignment. In the EU many countries have lawful democracies and to this extension abide by it's making. Israel should never lose this argument. If we lose this argument in the coming up election the momentum will not be a great one for the history of Israel and it's democracy. In stone it is a tame lion lying next to it's demise with probably the head of Benny Gantz only to humanize the memory.

Bennett: "I want to be prime minister of Israel." This was December 2020.

7 January 2021

9 Mln people live in Israel, of which by estimation 500.000 could be considered the richest and are owners or have to some unknown degrees ownership of many industries in Israel. Mr Bennett would 'inherit' 8 1/2 mln people below any 0 tier system. That may be a little overestimation of the problem that would be facing this new prime minister, but in reality not many are able in the first or second tier- city- systems of the 8 1/2 mln in the present time. There is much fiction ongoing here, that e.g. many do qualify to be living up to 'high standards' with regards to income and living environment. We see the urban areas of the major cities in Israel and comparing the new cities with the old, but cannot see exactly what the meaning should be or it's definition. To become prime minister after the longest serving prime minister in Israel you need to stomach these statistics, mentally and physically. The people may be profiled as numbers, but in reality they are the living people to attest the city and country as a nation. It is not just a military nation, as many would say or think outside of Israel. Rich or wealthy people is limited to a number of people/ families that is shockingly a small number compared to the citizens in the rest of the country and where they are living. What can Mr Bennett do for these 8 1/2 mln people directly after being elected to lead the country and the people of Israel as their Prime Minister? When you say sovereignty makes the difference in his campaign it's proportion is to be sought in terms of Biblical times, when crossing the Red Sea. And perhaps asking the same question where do I take these millions of people, my Lord? Let's take them to democracy, it is a temple we have learned to see at the Acropolis in Athens once... Many thousands of years ago. And can the people of Israel breathe through this strange air and oxygene of another people that are/ were called Greeks? Democracy is still number 1 in the whole world in our time in the 21st century.

When you make an election promise to 8 1/2 mln people with zero prospects either you are a callous man/ woman, or you are being very naive. The incumbent Prime Minister should know as the current serving prime minister and also doing this for decades long. He knows Israel inside and out. Maybe the stones are answering him and tell their secrets how to maintain lordship over 9 mln people, day and night. (Yom-yom we ba laila) It is obvious that Mr Bennett is a politician and horizontally he just might make it to win back democracy for the people of Israel from the incumbent pseudo- autocratic ruler Mr Netanyahu. It is only when Mr Bennett looks up and can see how vertical economics and the economy works that he will have to continue in the line of the current prime minister, and survive the line break at any point in reality. What it looks like on the chart is simple visualizing. The economy rises per second and hour, and democracy is a nice myth to keep the poor and poorest on a happy index with daily kafé Turki or with suger (sugar) and cigarettes. Ken, ken, but there are also vaccins to make the people of Israel happy this year throughout the pandemic worldwide COVID-19. Yes, indeed, this man Bennett could make all the difference if he knew how to create a new Israel not for the ultimate rich of Israel, but horizontally for 8 1/2 mln people. Once you are also on the campaign trail it is hard to go to meet with ministries at the same time. The electorate has to believe that here is a man with Israel written all over his face and physical presence. The rest doesn't matter and let Israel stay where it has been for the last four decades. 8 1/2 Mln people need a government that is working for them, day and night. Who wants to be in his shoes?

But the night has a thousand stars above Israel during the nightsky. Thousands and thousands of stars in fact. Mr Naftali Bennett's name should change to Abraham and count the countless grains of sands or stars in the night. One by one, and by name. Power is poison and time and again Mr Netanyahu told the people to watch him drinking this poison, because for the simple reason that he won't die or fall dead. For this man even poison became sweet to consume and all men feel like naked men, ashamed for being the weakest in the land. Mr Bennett said that he is not afraid and will fight this old tradition of power in israel. Leonidas thought himself also invincible when confronted the Persian emperor, Xerxes, but then didn't live to tell the tale thereafter. At this point you simply do not tell the people there won't be a next king in Israel, or Agamemnon (with a fictional Menelaus and Helen of Troy to defend). Israel and the people had Mr Netanyahu to be something of a king in the making and going to it ultimately. You might believe that the people were prepared to go all the way with this, even when that would mean to hear only his voice in this and the life after this one. Who is Naftali Bennett to the people of Israel, who is only a mere politician and mortal? It is when you cross the Valhalla the mortal knows true greatness when the human body and soul is food for the other world, a banquet if you want to. Remember the story of Leviathan and the righteous men of Israel? Mr Bennett should go back to his drawing board and design his political kingdom with an interior of 12 wise men to lead democracy, and also he needs to design an exterior to lead 12 ways to secure and defend Israel against... The fall of Israel?

What can make Israel more right wing but a new design of government.

19 December 2020

After the eighties a gradual change happened and the people of Israel voted for Mr Netanyahu to become Prime Minister and he was piercing like the Jewish Lancelot putting Israel's national fate in a forever first from now on. The worldview of what Israel means to the rest of the world has since then only been right- wing and inclining to the center right- left when in crisis. When in 2020/2021 one would ask what the design was the answer is always democracy. And a democracy is the equivalent of a functioning government and the people it governs. Israel is an interesting place we all quietly half envy and half condemn (for alleged war crimes). Now we must take a closer look at the part of why it is envied mostly by many politicians across the world if there is any change of design happening as we speak. The capital of Israel's frame by condemnation has not been always right about it's democracy and national identity as the Jewish State, they are a lawful democracy after all. Perhaps it was and always has been Israel's problem when making the meaning of democracy a country of opportunities for all. That did not work, clearly. Reality was and is always the military strategic vision and politics to keep the country safe on all sides from enemies, starting in 1918 to 2020. That is what is making the Abraham Accords more than what you could call a world event to the Israelis and their ministers of Knesset. It is not making it any easier on the right- wing, nor does it look as if the left can suddenly adapt to these non- military visions of Israel (unless peace is another military vision). However, to keep the military edge is vital and will remain so, some have said in newspapers for the last six months. The design of why Israel should remain right- wing has come between time and changes and is feeling tightly squeezed into a new corner where democracy is not and will not be adequate enough. Perhaps it would be best if the right- wing was moved back to the days of antiquity?

Much is wrong with the democracy in Israel as a worldview. Cooperation with the US has been seen as a marriage of convenience for decades long since the forties and it had it's peaks and lows from time to time, but not in the 21st century that wasn't so. When living in Israel one thing you must know and that is to rise to the occassion and up the ante whenever and wherever. No other Middle East country has the kind of obligation to the US. At least not as a public domain, but maybe more in quiet diplomacy. What we are also witnessing from the world of quiet diplomacy is how Arab nations and kingdoms have been thriving throughout the decades and enriching the world with a productivity that was always top diplomacy between e.g. the US and the Arab kingdoms in the Middle East. The rest of the world has done very much following the same pursuit. If Israel was lagging behind one should look again and know that democracy is a very principled discipline and it is never hands-on when it comes to freedom and equality, but hands- off. Was the Prime Minister aware of these constraints of Israel, as if he had found the reason for greatness and finding it through the apparent smallness of his beloved democratic Israel? It was time to change to diplomacy and strategy, may have prompted the PM at one certain point in his political career. Today he is known to be a despot and crooked. One wonders if lions are criminals for the kill they make to be fed a proper meal or a great proportion of that meal. Can eagles be seen as dangerous to smaller animals? This has Biblical references and also strangely enough is the right- wing ideology of Israelis who indulge in extreme thoughts of sovereignty. At the same time, like lions, the big male chases all little males away not to consummate marriage with their mother. That be the mother Israel? And Mr Naftali Bennett cannot wait until he will be the mature male to consummate in political life in Israel at a later time in the future. If the temperament is right in his mind and heart he is ready, sovereign and political right- centre wing. Where the left has been lagging behind is social politics of which proof in most residential areas in it's big cities are one of the present time not being represented as a democracy held in awe by left parties politicians. Being right- wing is a design, not an ideology if David was truly king in Israel. Now democracy is king of the people in Israel and it is it's worldview like nowhere else in the Middle East. A true mirage of envy how these Jews have come to this civil design one can only compare to the west and ancient Greece. The mirage is always something you want and can see when delirious with envy, if this is State, democracy and civil life, next to superiority of the military. Israel's right- wing (inclusive of center government) must work on up the level where diplomacy and democracy can be engaging and entertaining the bigger world that is Israel's worldview.

As I see it, Zionism is the institute for Jews and right to assembly.

6 December 2020

The right to assembly for Israel as a nation in our modern times you could say that this is Zionism, an institute for Jewish rights (assembly). Unlike the bureaucratic meaning as the right to assembly only for citizens that is in most democratic societies known by government and people for peaceful demonstrations or protest. Zionism by definition is not protesting or demonstrating against any government, but is assembly of the nation Israel as a total entity across many regions in the world, and not just as in it's geographical limitation of land and people. Stigma wants it that the world should see Zionism as the organisation of global leaders and that specifically that they are always Jewish. There is no distinction made with regards to matters of responsibility, accountability or transparency. The world holds it's view of Jews and Zionism as the secret group of Jews if and when holding power. Legally it has or bears no meaning to the greater world and nations as being part of an extraordinary law of people and nation. Force of the will of nations indeed is straightforward and was always meant to challenge time and the time we live in. On the ground where the nations would challenge a people as in the same with Time seems from any good heart and mind impossible to conceive. It is almost invisible that most nations to some extent have the 'right to assembly' as a small (Papua New Guinea) or great nation (Germany) and belong to the generally assembly of nations, quietly or audible, when represented by the elected representative. This is most and best understood in the Anglo- Saxon English, indication of civilization and humanity... Geographies hold no barriers in the assembly. The assembly of nations is here to inspire ethics and morals on topics like 'belonging' and 'right of place to live' as a nation with no specific numbers given to it's population, small or great. Also this is part of 'enjoying' the arbitrary powers from the assembly as it's legal institution. In case of misconduct by a nation e.g. on it's own population the arbiter will have immediate effect of sanctions or other. Zionism and it's nation (a greater number now in our present time after WWII and the Holocaust), if death, will stay in it's magnificent golden boat a myth and Acheron, alone, and with no relation to definite time of the assembly of nations, if life. And death must not seek life or to live among the assembly of the living, if you put it mildly. Zionism has put the emphasis not on the river of Styx, the boat or death. Gold is the answer and it is timeless. (Compare to Nazi Germany putting nationalism as emphesis on the right of the nation- assembly)

Part II of history from the point of view where the right to assembly is International Law and complimentary when missing to some extent national strength in the 21st century global powers, the question rises on both understandings, Zionism and assembly of nation and rights, whether this can be at any stage said that it is complementair in our age. It's starting date in Zionism yet is unknown or going down to an obscure beginning when the State of Israel was not yet born in the nineteen or twentieth century. A quick look at Israel when started in 1948 or even further back in it's time, the people assembled to a handful of Jews where there was immediate need for politics and governance over a few. The identity of the Jew became the Jewish nation by the coastal land of the Mediterranean Sea, and located in Tel Aviv (named first after another name). It was by definition a Hebrew nation and the language was Hebrew in writing and speak. A strong indication toward ethnicity of another sort next to the Arab population also inhabitants of the land in it's early and also later days (see the Palestinians). Palestine had been in these early hours of the State of the Jews been under the British Mandate historically and in agreement to guarantee that the Jewish nation will do right to it's neighbours... The right to assembly did not coveted any total land, but was in fact bound by partition in between two other 'rights of sovereignty of geography', Gaza & the West Bank. Zionism has been in a rather tight spot since then how to make the nation of Israel a people with the right to assembly. If there was one law on the western half, the same could not be said about the eastern half of the land. This went on in more conflict and bloodshed became inevitable much later as the world moved on to the next decades. And as the world moves on with esprit toward the future on this planet, one could ask where the need is to review the assembly that binds nation and nation or a nation to the land of it's geography. Israel is struggling with this vacuum and can either create it's right to be a place for Jews to live in Israel, or take it's right as a nation on the international stage as a nation's right to assembly, where stately manors in the middle of cities can connect to embassies and government's institutions, where also the people can live in full awareness of not only being a Jewish nation and ethnicity, but also are in their right to assemble all rights known to mankind, ethical or moral, to an indefinite time. Many still are living with the one human idea that Israel will come to an end if not soon than at some point. It has been the point that also made religion rise again in the land of Israel with each interpretation making a definite end in Israel and Jerusalem. End here is sanctified. And epic in stories like Gog & Magog. The story is more simple in fact by looking at people and humanity. And this relates to all creed and all kind in the International Law. Why is there a greater need to keep calling "Juno Moneta!" (monere)

Is David for Likud, or for Blue & White?

15 November 2020
(22:57 PM Europe)

To answer the question whether King David would choose Likud we can almost see why that could never be Blue & White. His priorities in ancient Jerusalem or Likud today are very similar of a national undertone, while pursuing foreign relations with nations close to Judah, e.g. Achish of Filistia (with the latter ending up giving Ziklag to David). Israel in 2020 has achieved a strong position in the Middle East and, like David, e.g. could win every war designed on the planet/ worldwide to combat antisemitism, and yet it has stopped Israel from war for the last four years, with threatening names of operations. Israel is not a war- zone any longer, but has come to taste the leaves of the tree of a lasting peace in the Middle East region. There was an independent move in this from the PM, Mr Binyamin Netanyahu and showing the potential of Israel and that it was committed to this line of progress. Anyone trying to reverse the realities by which globalization works/ tics is not showing vision of progress, or is a very low potential to achieve that progress in the least. Europe has done it before and called it just. Compared to ancient Israel, David too had maintained independence throughout his reign in Jerusalem. The military by his side, Joab and Abner (before he had died by the hands of the stronger Joab) were standing by David left and right on his side. And more important he was submissive to the Levites as we know from the story of Nob. In the last moments of David's life his son, Shlomo, built upon his father's legacy and dream to build the God of Abraham (I believe that is what He must have called God) a temple that in the end had given him the most centrist idea of his time and at a very wide scale too. As far as Sheba (now Yemen, I believe). Also, as he was close to kings and princes he was also close to the people in the same way. It was his choice over death that made him eternal by not to kill the anointed King Saul when he could have done so easily while laying fast asleep and not knowing that David was as close as his own face to him. But what if the future of Israel in our century goes back to political school third grade?

Antisemitism will not go away either in the year 2020 and reverse back to 'normalcy' with the many nations who clearly have called for the Jews being the spreaders of COVID-19 and more why economies are being made redundant in ways that are similar to a World War. Only this time it is not their call. These are not isolated cases, as perceived by the masses. It is hard to pay attention at all when Israel in a twist of fate answers these questions and conspiracies with a determination not going to any kind of war against whatever peoples or nation. It is imperative to see the irony with a deadly seriousness, that one must stop saying how Jews are planning to change the world as a total homogeneous nation. Different factions in the Jewish society today aren't any different than France between Jesuites or Huguenots. It could also turn bloody and be seen as part of natural outcome as in any other nation. The world doesn't seem to be prepared to envision the 'real Israel' in the world. Or, Jews for that matter. What is long overdue e.g. isn't this the call for a new Prime Minister in Israel? And as former PM Ehud Olmert put it to writing yesterday in his column, the existential threats of Israel are not brushed under the carpet (interpretation of his words) by any new event as a country and regional or global economics. You could even say that Jews living in Israel are isolated from the rest of the Jews in the diaspora, and not just the nations in the world. And because of the 54 years of conflict with the Palestinian people there is little sympathy to look more serious at the 'existential threats' of Israel, that are not made up by the people of Israel. If the Vice President Elect, Mrs Kamala Harris, is planning on going back to the days of 2010 and call for going back to the table with the Palestinians and the two- state solution, in fact she is failing the abstract that time should have put the Palestinian people where Israel stands today. To undermine talents on both sides, which in the deal of the century was clear by the Administration of President Trump how it would have been possible on both sides to build peace and prosperity as nations, isn't going to be very helpful. It is not about which Administration it is when speaking of good relations with the US. Prosperity is essential to both nations in the land of Israel or Palestine. When did the global political vision came into existence?

If Israel stands alone and on it's own above imagination some might go on saying that this is unacceptable. Under the ending of the second industrial age (globalism) when in fact the Jewish people in Israel have overreached the third industrial age entering a fourth term? Another reality is awaiting in Palestine that here too the rationale is not going back to the days when Palestinians were deemed 'only terrorists'. Watch this, the Middle East is awakening. In the desert there are Bedouin peoples with a distinct social awareness already living and putting pressure on society as a whole everywhere, that they too have become inclusive and some in Israel or Knesset. With this showing that Israel basically has the talent of creating a much bigger platform for Israelis than just being Jews. And maybe this progress has gone too fast for the last decade when the country was hardly known to the rest of the world as a platform for multiculturalism over the accusations of barbarism. It still is far from being perfect and as every developing country knows that will take a long time to perfection. After wondering how the King would have wanted to identify with it is probably also wise to remember Havel and Kenan. Kane and the curse on the forehead should help remind people about the feeling when happy that Jews hate or fight Jews. Or happier when Jews keep Israel floating. The two- state solution is based on the armstice lines for Gaza in the west, Israel (in the middle) and West Bank on the east. And making history from a strange logic unless divided by a few thousand square meters small plots of land. 77X77?

Rothschild.

(A personal op letter)

1 November 2020

The Jewish Identity is now far more important than it has ever been before. What has changed is servitude. Jews in 2020 are becoming increasingly more aware of what it means to be Jewish among Jews, and secondly, what it means to be Jews in the world. Kings serving kings of the middle ages have fully exit the time behind us. Behind that wall of time was it 54, 100 or 5000 + years when the first Jew, Abraham, opened his eyes to the sky and saw nations of stars then still shining brightest? The only way to answer this question is not by large innovations, but by acceptance of Jew with Jew. "Where do we accept or practice acceptance of 5000+ years of being Jewish," that should be the central question in 2020. Who serves and who rules whether in ceremony or highest order, rank and station, both have deep memories when still a people of the world. In the memory of nations when outlining the Jewish people or a Jew specifically there is very sharp contrast to what any Jew his/ her self perception might be, even when dual of civil identity. It has never been questioned whether that was honourable or not. To many the nominal Jew is Semite and this goes beyond skin or colour. In the meantime when coming back to the central ground of the Jewish nation with an only Jewish population behind every table and on every seat in the grand meetings, is this vision or truth?
These are the q & a's when Jews are Jews in one place anywhere in the world, but more so when in Israel. There have also been words on building the Third Temple in our time. It is the physical structure to congregate the Jew with the Jew in a world that was established 54 years ago by hard work and wars (including many failed attempts of peace with e.g. the Palestinian people) in the land of Israel as we see or witness on every shabbat evening till the next day when the sun goes down, in Jerusalem. Congegration will remain an indefinite reality from now on. Other: and how do simple or ordinary people manage their Jewry in Israel if the welfare system in Israel is more periodically every fourth term than e.g. permanent? And also the forgotten people in society, disabled or other, when they are part of the Jewish nation and not represented by quality and specific care systems. Of course it is true that they too can look up to democracy as the brass serpent that Moses had set up for the people to cure them from snakebites, in this case from 'political snakebites'. But there is a hard deficit of many in Israel, by name and rank... The here above writing begs the question if the Jew would understand these words and the world it wants to convey as a nation and people. There is no other nation who can understand, you see, and they will see vacuum for weakness.

Additional.
The need for change in Israel will require a government and Prime Minister with an eye for understanding where his generation stands with the nation and country and if it is not too late for self reflection. The so called 'father figure' State of Isreal, like in so many EU Member States and other overseas countries e.g. Canada, it is now ready for a 'brother/sister/motherhood' State model of Israel. Former Defense & Education Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, has been surging in polls taken since august this year and putting his party Yamina from third party to close in on the bigger parties, now by 22 seats. On the other side of the domestic political fence the grass for peace is getting from greener to greenest, while the 'horses inside the stables are starving' in two parallel ways: the economy & socially. COVID-19 doesn't seem to have an expiring date anywhere in the world as we speak. And if you ask the people of Israel how they would feel about the Third Temple in our time, right now they will only say that that is not important. First time history for Israel and Israelis in the homeland of their own are not finding the prospect of the Third Temple important is alarming among Jews and to the rest of the world this would be the sign of 'not feasible' for the great ACT. In fact the current PM, Mr Binyamin Netanyahu, instead is the Third Temple for the people of Israel at the moment and has been idolized for many decades by Israelis. In the present time the worship of the PM has turned to a poison apple in the midst of Israel. Like arrogance so consensus has given up on the PM and he will probably go the mortal way and find wisdom in his old age and retirement as PM, if change might occur and gets his blessing. Zionism? In conclusion: 42 Then Job answered the Lord:
"2 I know that you can do all things,
and that no purpose of yours can be thwarted.
3 “Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?”
Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand,
things too wonderful for me, which I did not know.
4 “Hear, and I will speak;
I will question you, and you declare to me.”
5 I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear,
but now my eye sees you;

6 therefore I despise myself,
and repent in dust and ashes."

Israel, ancient fate, massacre of princes, and royal.

27 October 2020

Where do we start? The Law of Leviticus and ponder on the fateful days of Nob, David, Saul and his Edomite friend, Doeg. Nothing in the modern world will ever resemblance ancient Israel that well again if they keep getting it wrong in Israel and it's political and perpetual nation building. For the present time it still is only about the Promise Land, since the days of Deuteronomy when crossing the Jordan River. Much has since then changed in the world among the nations on the planet that we call home for all mankind. Book by Book, when taken out of context, one could say that the Promise Land wasn't real and physical, but a fable to hold on to the dream. In fact Deuteronomy was and is nothing more than a book of military conquest and expeditions under the commander Joshua. It's substance comes close to that of the kingdom of Parthia, depending on theories and opinion after it was made oblivious forever. Where then did the House of Israel end as a nation and stopped looking westwards? Israel to the west will border the great sea and into the north. Abraham was to look in Genesis to the west, and not to the north, south or east. Finally when David as King of Israel came to the tower of the Jebusites it became clear as first timer why the fable of the promised land had made the journey from the River Jordan into the land of the Canaanites. Something had to change, something of which no nation in our time can explain. In the meantime the House of David was already known to be the place of massacre of princes... And the God of Abraham was it's fate, fateful or royal.

What had to change here in the 'fable' of Deuteronomy land of a promised milk & honey? There was no real sign of transition as Philistia remained firm in it's place as land and geography by the Mediterranean Sea, next to Canaan... To the east was Jordan or the land of the Moabites. The promised land was of complex land forming in between these indigenous peoples. Why was this 'fable' of the people of David going to make a 'change' in the place called Jerusalem? The world does not make use anymore of military conquests for at least a thousand years. It will fail to look beyond and use the book of Deuteronomy as the map of Israel and Jews living in 'Palestine' for thousands of years. By this time Oerkasdiem was already out of sight to distant memories. It was actually here where the mystery of Yahweh's presence was revealed for the first time. Royalty may stem from this moment of 'first' revelation to a mortal in this region, of the God that had created Adam & Eve and the garden of Eden. In the Books, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers that kingship continues, but discontinues after the Book of Deuteronomy. The people of Israel reject God and wanted a king set over them at one point and this was highlighted with the person of Saul. Like so many nations, the military conquests can make all the diffence to a nation and it's building! (Heraclitus) The people chose the military kingship over God sacrale kingship and since then fell into the 'way of the nations' in a 'promised land', something only the military and it's kings could provide for the people of Israel. Nothing has changed since then when one would take a closer look as is  the situation still in Israel. If not secured by the military there is no land of Israel and also no nation to maintain the fiction. In the present time the State of Israel fatefully still is the place of the fable known to the whole world as 'the promised land' of the Jews. This way is just one of plausibility when looking at the meaning of what the promised land can mean as it's history in the Biblical sense of no other than the Book of Deuteronomy. The world also has much buried the Books of Leviticus and Numbers, in which the God of Abraham cleary had set out the jurisdicitons for the land of Israel by the Great Sea or Mediterranean Sea as known in the present time. All Jews are diaspora and do not live anymore in the sacrale kingdom of Yahweh as was written in the Books before Deuteronomy. One glimpse of hope therefore will always be the Haredim, who are like the brass serpent set up by Moses to cure the people with snakebites and snakewounds to be cured. Every time when you see the Haredim the Jews feel that they are still somewhere in the right place among Jews. It is either true as claimed here or badly inadequate a story.

England.

19 October 2020

Achievement is a rare thing on God's given earth. From the beginning of time into the many futures that we have come to know, one constant such achievement has always been first and last for every man's duty, is sovereignty of land or nation. We all forsake humanity at one point when temptation is the blinding guidance to achieve greater things here on earth.
It is God's grace if England will not forsake; the king of England (now HR Queen Elizabeth II) has many laws under the heavens, wide as our knowlegde of earth and wider, e.g. land, air, sea and space. On this planet we mercifully call home one request to make specifically on God's good earth is that we must always remember the future and not only the past. And more specifically is to only remember the future in our time, that sovereignty was not only given to us in it's many aspects of life, but has also been given in wider division of all land, sea and air.
It is therefore a great temptation for a good people and country to change that division of earth, if understanding of God comes first and last. England is our good country and people, and we pray that it may never be tempted inexpensively and forsake the will of God Almighty in these specifics. We also pray that it will do everything in it's power to always undo wrong, if or where it has e.g. not done right. It is what God has given is the issue in here as the writing here above. And indeed that is also a serious challenge in our age in the 21th century. Sovereignty of land and it's evolution are man- made.

God save HR Queen Elizabeth II and her government.

If Naftali Bennett... Reminding Don Quixiote windmills?

9 October 2020

With the US presidential general election the Middle East has 'closed shop' until after 3 November and the world will know who the next US president at the White House will be. The western hemisphere is not close enough to Israel, like Florida. But it is meant all as the polite abstaining or refrain from political embrace for the moment between the US and Israel. Again this name comes popping up who will or might be the next PM of Israel, while it is obvious by 22 seats for Yamina who will become the new contender. After 54 years the old Zionist idea how Jews should be remembered as Jews has eroded for much of what it used to mean and be with the first stone that was then laid as the State of Israel. There is no proof of any other story to bring Jews from Caucasian land to Israel than what they have been told and hearing for most of their old and young lives. This should change. It is important to create Israel as the future State where the Messiah will be crowned God is here or King. One thing to understand is that in Israel the Jew is first Jewish and secondly his or her skin is fair or dark. Going back home and continue to live your Caucasian life is not making any of this easier for the rest of your life as a Jew living in another place you call home. But who will pay for all the new Israel and it's ancient sovereignty under the name of the promises made and written in the Torah or Tanach? To democratic Israel none of that is priority. It is what the world expects from Israel to be is what matters first. One day, who knows... The windmills of Don Quixiote might be in the hands of no other than a dreamer or wild idealist among the Jewish nation, but like the story on the windmills there is no 'sensible' Jew who would listen to him. End of the story. No, not really, when you are Jewish. Jews should dig a little deeper into their souls because that is how it was told and written. If not, well, look at it in this way, they will never be Caucasian either but in myths.

Naftali Bennett is a promising man to become PM of Israel a pronto. He is young and fresh, just what the country likes, young goat's milk to suckle from. But also suspicions might rise against him by the elderly gentlemen in Israel on the religious side. He has often enough show a knack for power and ambition to go his own way, led by his natural personality. PM Binyamin Netanyahu, wrong as he may be right now for Israel, once he was capable for parking his ego away from State Affairs and keep his 'ego' private. With Naftali Bennett time has changed and being a more pro- active Member of Knesset from the small Party Yamina, he is up- front and confrontational at times, sometimes at worst times. As defense minister e.g. his shoot to kill policies and that included women, children and more. The world will not forget him already. But wisdom in Israel has other priorities and the moment is today/ hayom for trying to get there. Level by level great expectations are back in Israel to undo the story of Kane and Abel, who has the ominous mark on the forehead... And the God of Abraham had said to Kane, after he complained to God that people will kill him, that if anyone would seek the life of Kane they will be punished seven times and even more. In Israel the windmills of laws and order will be different. At one point it is even expected to again having to deal with a little corruption to salvage power and control over the people by, yes, even Naftali Bennett. But we musn't give up now. To lay the first stone of the third temple is high time priority for Jews in the 21st century. Jews among Jews should understand that there is no other future more dignified, or drown in the land of strangers head and tail.

As things now seem to say that Naftali Bennett will become Prime Minister might make you burst into laughter. There is still the current political system known by the world as the State of Israel in portfolio until the Palestinian people also have their State, but there is certainly no law to extinguish Israel's existence as a nation. This nation is also part of the 21st century as it is part of the ancient history because of the third temple. Mr Bennett cannot alone do this great thing. And who will not help him sins against the God of Abraham, one should think immediately. Religion in Israel is not a piece of paper written in invisible ink. The writing is very clear and it wants to be alive as a living miracle among mankind. Many Christians have similar texts too in the New Testament. Unlike Zen and Buddhism that are teaching how to become god himself. But first the Middle East and than Israel and the Palestinian people, which has now the look of the wheel of fortune that changed the storyline here, that first Israel and the Middle East, and next Israel and the Palestinian people. But the God of Israel is unlike the wheel of fortune, permanent and forever. Period. Lord of the castle is home and hearth. For Jews scattered among nations it is confusing when owning both properties as hearth and home. They have become Zen believers, or Vishnu and Buddhism, that they are god himself by meditation only. A little boy in Israel called David made an example of what Israel means, and from reading Kings or Chronicles that was an everlasting promise, that Israel will never be without a man on the throne of David. Politics, or windmill, when Israeli, is still the one man (one nation) to sit on the throne of David. It's leader is therefore not a joke or byword to make fun of at a crucial time for Israel. He also very movingly made clear that his money is where his mouth will be, and not asking for support of the more 'god himself' Jews. Or to be more precise, the Zen Buddhism Jews. Had I been Jewish my heart would certainly go out for Bennett and not Netanyahu this time. Mr Netanyahu his name will be in the walls of Israel and politics for a long while, he was afterall a strong leader and Israel was the apple of his eye (he killed his enemies). That apple however is now looking bad under the new circumstances, especially when another Jew is like him ambitious to be Prime Minister of his country, Israel. Here is where the US becomes the biggest windmill.

I guess the US President can forget the Nobel Prize for Peace after tuesday presidential debate this week.

1 October 2020

Well, what can we say when not being or living in the USA, e.g. in Chicago mightier than thou (Queen Elizabeth II of England) and where husbands are Klingons and not ordinary mortals, but living a few thousands nautical miles away from here? The President was not doing all that bad on corporate arguments, talking to Pfizer and J & J, first, before taking decisions to the public at home and as the leader of the world on COVID- 19 vaccines, but also did he answered straightforward and said that Obamacare wasn't good for the American people, that it was too expensive, but that he wanted better Healtcare instead. He never got a good chance pitching those ideas a little deeper than a few centons at every try and being interrupted by the Vice President, Mr Biden, or Mr Wallace (the moderator) to stick to the subject... Also what went equally wrong for the President, when seen from home in a distant land, was that he also 'joined in' the interruptive style of debate, if you can call it style. The President had a lot of pertinent questions to ask the VP, not answers, and that made him look aggressive. Speaking to the American people one tends to come on the stage with answers, a slight differential. On sincerity I must say it was the President that won the debate, even when genuinely making that horrible mistake about the Proud Boys. He could have been more diabolical and hide his true feelings from the American public and the whole world, by e.g. talking 'honest diplomacy' on the subject and ignore the moment. He is still the man of peace and in the Middle East, and also a nominee (Sweden) for the Nobel Prize (Laureate) for Peace, if you can remember. But one can assume that the President will work this one out by himself when he realizes that you can't do the speak of nonsense answers (stand back & stand by) on your first presidential debate night in 2020. 2020 Is a whole lot more different than previous US presidential lives...

According to Bernie Sanders this morning on Twitter he called the President a racist and xenophobe and called for him to resign in the coming election, and that the people will or must do this by voting him out. No one can change the system and not even Mr Sanders. Or the President for that matter. The system is 'mightier than thou' to the rest of the world, as they see it. Question and this is a very good one, can the President turn back the clock on the Proud Boys faux pas? He has been here before when Mr Trump was not yet the President of the USA. Or was this the first time that he was associated with the far right? Many would say that he did stupid, but if so why take him seriously as if it were a matter of blood and saliva? In the 21st century one would almost say that this man is the true American spirit, stupid and undiplomatic about his stupid comments or when speaking to fellow Americans from the world stage. And then, what you can also notice when not American is that he did keep his debate in some kind of format, maybe the Trump- format of style and presidential debates. He also did not come across as the 'Know it all President'. There was plenty of room in his 'rantings' where the VP could have pinched him often enough. These were the lost chances, one could say. "You don't talk to the companies, you don't talk first to Pfizer and J & J," the President asked the VP. Aggressive would be, in my opinion, if the President would come across as looking like he wanted to punch the VP. But you know what the saying says, that boys will be boys. It is over now, because from now on it will be men will be men.

Yes, the President at times was churlish and discourteous to Mr Biden. It was particularly bad taste, I would say very bad taste, to mention the VP his son on a national TV presidential debate. Or, that the VP had done very bad in school. Here the issues on the future of America and the American people got totally lost. It is no wonder people around the world are keeping the Proud Boys 'Stand-by' misspeak (not yet confirmed by the President)strongest in their minds. The future of America surely can't be about saying to the public that the Proud Boys should stand back & stand by. It also feels that the establishment in America considers this as seriously aimed at the safety of the people and constitution in general, and therefore equals mortal sin. The President is American and one can only expect him to do the right thing next and not act spoiled for too long now. Had he given the VP more time to have his say on political issues and content today his chances might have been more brighter if the President had said the same things in last tuesday debate. In the 21st century President Donald Trump is right on top of his Office, you could say, 100%, and zero on public sentiment. He is a Republican and should take the country and it's industrial future to a safe shore, see that the economy doesn't collapse under the global pandemic COVID-19, and use the proper channels to help institutions for the public and people, which he did slightly try to mumble through on tuesday night through nose and lips and which the public didn't hear well. He is doing for the economy nothing less than what President Ursula von der Leyen is trying to do for Europe in the European Union, on sustainability for the EU during COVID-19 and keeping the economy open. But true is true that when the American people are taking the President his words on the Proud Boys very serious, that he, the President, must be absolved, by the people. What could happen if the President wins another term? Another thing is that what you sow is what you reap. Even for presidents in the USA.

2020, A good moment to establish world's greatest magnitudes, war & peace.

(Personal op)

8 September 2020

Most great things come in pairs, so some say, if conventional wisdom tells them how to judge mankind and the making of a living planet. War & Peace have always been here since the day man had begun his journey throughout the tundras of the wider expanse near and far on the horizon. In the 21st century however one thinks different and say that the economy is the new magnitude and decide to either go the path of war or peace. Just one thing, with the global economy the question is whether it is possible to study balances and imbalances when there is either too much conflict and out performing peace, or just the other way round. Neither is good when you have too much of one or the other. And here is where the economy even when globally does not seem adequate to decide about the world's oldest divisions by war and peace as the perfect symmetry. War invites war and peace declines. Vice verse, when peace invites peace, war declines. In the 21st century many would say that is a strong situation to be in, and the stronger side decides. When looking back at our world there is only one thing indefinitely and it is nothing other than war & peace. But some nations have been clever to see, what if one would go beyond indefinite lines of global limitations? Assymetry seems handsome and clever in today's Real Time, and it is fast with solutions on the axis of perhaps what you would call private monopoly. Studies of war & peace in the natural order would find, by assumption, more certainty to deal with the wider scale on the basis of time. It is therefore interesting how the world will see it's next 100 years and again deal with war & peace as it's oldest instrument to maintain life and the living, whether in peace or war. When allied forces go to war it is peace going to war and doing good to bring back balance home from war or conflict. The next decade is also the perfect harbour for the question on world peace and war. And which nation is to be trusted completely.

Interesting to see whether specifics on both magnitudes, war or peace, how the development in the coming decades will interchange. Especially when one is assymetrical and the other system is symmetry. For the last one hundred years the world had been in perfect balance on both, war & peace, on global level. The next 100 years to maintain that balance could be the vision of this generation, if the next generations and their new experiences will not differ much from previous decades and centuries. E.g. all military are trained to kill and die in combat situations, globally. And more specifically, how does an aftermath look after conflict, in small or major battles. Also there is this issue on nationality, east, south, north or west in the western hemisphere. War & Peace can only be once or one time in certain regions on the planet, or taking much up of Real Time in one area. Time alone cannot give the answer to peace treaties for any much longer when depending on how wide strategic peace will expand in the future. For the last 100 years humanity never came second in it's old mechanisms, if one wanted to win his/ her case. One could say that human capability ends when humanity becomes second and not first to create peace and thus command a new way to see how war & peace can be truly magnitudes. You can just sit in a corner and hide from when religion, or Brexit for that matter, comes on the world stage and the only question you can ask is whether peace can also hurt so premature, because it is precisely peace that can create a more complex stretch to the existing perimeters of world peace. In other words, that for every alteration the balance of war should expand at the same time. Mankind is leading a fascinating lifestyle at the top, one could say, where ordinary people (as truly yours) would get sick and throw up (nausea) at seeing the sheer dizzying height of power and it's meteoric sight(at starting and not end point/ tail). One other such convulsion could also exist in Real Time if e.g. the Jewish Third Temple would be built in our century and bringing down much of the meteoric sight of war & peace in our world. Or, I am seriously mistaken.

Re- energise the Two-State solution, the time is now.

14 August 2020

Exit strategy at an important step in the latest Israeli diplomatic achievement with the UAE yesterday, is for the Palestinian people both contradictive and to a certain extent cynical. But we must believe the bigger picture here and soon hope for visibility what this means or could mean in terms of serious geopolitical relations. Annexation is off the table and no one is sure whether this is replacing the 'Deal of the Century' with a new 'Deal of the century' diplomacy between Israel, UAE and the United States, on different grounds and a piece of paper. After this you feel like a student of politics online. In this big picture an equal large telescope of focus is the next thing one should possess if getting through this new deal is your interest or curiosity. When it comes to real facts and politics it will be a different story to examine and not to do this without the proper attention to what has happened, if nothing changes the fact that the Two- State solution is not off the table, symbolically. Peace should always be a politician's road to the future as a Prime Minister and let no sands come in between the path of wisdom with the kingdoms in the south of the Middle East. The northern part of the Middle East and north- east are not this benevolent toward Israel and send them sugary dates as gifts from a newly forged friendship between Israel and an Arab historic neighbour. Tourism, Security (e.g. against Iran), opening of flights, technology and Health are nothing new to the kingdom. After all, here is where hawks and rare breeds of eagles are having a hospital and clinics of their own)

It is not insulting but Israel is forgetting to have a look in the mirror which is called Ankara or Istanbul. One or few more steps, as President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is viying for relations with Arab countries almost based on a 24/7 ambition, the Prime Minister in Israel will soon be doing the same sports. Elderly Statesmen have a thing for hunting sports, as it seems with President Erdogan. One could say that these are also the last fringes of high Office and a long serving of public life. And that is all a man's prerogative at that age and status. In the meantime what is void of a man is the State and the nation if, he/ she, has to govern. In Israel this is also how to deal with the two- headed monster called the Two- State solution between the Palestinians and the Israelis. An article piece in the Jerusalem Post today is suggesting a 'comeback kid' for Naftali Bennett, and perhaps slay the dragon or monster. After that he may be crowned king Naftali Bennett of Israel in the 21st century. Oh, yes, he could become the first Bill Clinton of Israel... Speaking of the 'comeback kid'. That is quite a suggestion and it came out like the living daylights out of nowhere as in old issue. Well, who knows, we live in cynical times. And no one knows what Israel wants at the moment when Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is apparently failing their issues at a national scale. So, what is it? Opportunity knocks twice for Mr Naftali Bennett? At a more personal level Naftali Bennett is the kind of man you will support whole heartedly and be a very hardliner supporter of the candidate PM. Fantasy or real time, in both. But what if that fantasy is disturbed by a visit of a man in a dream, that you must be careful who to appoint out as the next Prime Minister of Israel? You will hate him or your dream / fantasy because of one's own self deception, and wisdom must prevail. The man in your dream spoke with a golden tongue. While the God of Abraham maybe has  assured you that Naftali Bennett is the next PM of Israel and is called Aleph IV. Aleph V is an infrastructure design from Jerusalem to connect the West Bank and Gaza, in an artistic private view, as is Aleph I, II, III, IV. It just tears out your heart, doesn't it?

And if the news wasn't a bombshell enough last night between Israel and the UAE, brokered by the US, Mr Bennett has used a few cryptic words on sovereignty, 'That this may come from other places'. Will the future PM care for his own idea that the Palestinians must have a central government (or other collective) as part of a greater bureaucratic vision between Israel and Palestine? Here this would be considered the way forward for Israel into another hundreds of years, instead of looking back through air and say 3000 years Biblical history. En- shalvah, en- shalvah. To come back to the Jerusalem Post piece of today on Mr Bennett, this is the man the future Prime Minister of Israel. And grooming the new candidate wasn't exactly the current PM's priority in his busy schedule right now. As a soldier Naftali Bennett has served his country well and his name then was war monger. One could seriously ask whether if it was too good to be true, that he is the future PM and is a bit of both worlds, at every level in politics and Israel's security. But what most will be missing and mistake his fate for is that he will not qualify on a much bigger scale when talking to presidents, kings and princes who have a natural detest for 'war mongers' or men of war. And then acting as a prince of peace could eventually fail the newcomer on the Israeli national & global stage. Men in uniform in a silhouette is the shadow that some might still see, while perhaps Mr Bennett in Tuxedo has been long already PM of Israel, is the thinking here. Back to homefront: if Mr Bennett does not know how to lie to the people he is certainly the only true future PM that one can see right now, while in the shadow of the much older Mr Netanyahu. And for one reason only: he is Israel and Israel is him. He moves hearts and minds, he is the wolf who has eaten the chicken but now will cure them as a qualified physician (btw a Scandinavian children story, the wolf who turned to doctor). Or, all this talk might be the biggest irrelevance.

Ghislaine Maxwell, innocence will proof great effort.

1 August 2020

Mind images of a sex offender can play several tricks with your mind, even when by suspicion. For the last two decades this particular crime against minors or children (as young as 10- 16 year old) became a global online problem, in most cases where grooming is involved, or visiting porn sites on the Internet with paid viewings. Of half the last decade now all of what used to be in a 'user friendly' internet zone activity has been under tight control to keep the public safe, as well as keeping companies clean. To which of these crime trajectories can we imagine both Mr Epstein and Ms Maxwell belong? It is by definition a serious crime... A few striking points in this storytelling drama by both people and then also by their victims: why an anti- climax in an apparent tasteless 'Cinderella' story? Young girls, like princesses, were taken away from their families, this is also known as coercion, and brought to a fictional place called the home of Mr Epstein. We are adults when reading the papers and stories as they are unfolding about the sex crimes of Ms Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. What is then striking is that this was a handsome couple committing heinous crimes against 'children' by using them for sexual pleasure and introducing them also to their friends. It isn't Ms Maxwell's Boogie Nights when now in a federal jail in Brooklyn since her arrest last month in the United States. But she pleads 'not guilty'. To be honest, Ms Maxwell is extremely attractive even at 58 in the present time. And so was Mr Epstein before he died in his jail cell. And both very clever... The blind question is therefore: why come so close to the public and the center of the world out with a story on sex with minors over two decades ago and are bizarre with end nor beginning?

The public will never be able to recreate and understand what happened at Virgin- islands, except when the names of powerful men are named in the story. Names of powerful women were not named, which is keeping only one name to be female in this ghastly business of trafficking young girls in their teens. Powerful men do have great appetites, is a wellknown fact since ancient times. And how much is true can only make limited reading when told throughout time and centuries, whether in Greek or Roman (Latin). Boys and girls are never safe when Caligula is emperor and around to play with them in a setting that was designed for playing doll house. In the 21st century you could even get arrested for living and eating with a inflatable doll at your table in the privacy of your home. Casanova is also a reminder, of dancing with a mechanical teen doll (music by Nino Rota) in the film by Federico Fellini. How do powerful men approach a young woman in these private settings of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, when in fact there are dozens of women who would die to sit and keep them company, anywhere, and only implicit intimacy or sex? Powerful men also are clever men, but why then do this act of public stupidity to face a young girl as young as fifteen/ sixteen or seventeen, naked before the world, the White House and God? Why do they insist on a story that is in fact only half the product when compared to stories of the abducted children/ girls in the US in the nineties? Here we see girls re-emerging and come forward with stories on how they were trafficked to powerful men and stark naked by Ms Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. Is it perhaps the reverse psychology at very high level that no one would ever believe their stories because they survived?

I can imagine that Confucius would say about Ms Maxwell, poetry on Ghislaine Maxwell proof of great effort. Her story is a product some are buying and others are not. But the same goes for the most powerful men and the obvious trail they left behind here at Mr Epstein's private Virgin - islands. Why taking the thrill of a great risk to have sex with a young girl in her teen has for many reasons the kind of transparency no powerful man or husband would want to expose to the rest of the world. Death or missing teen was fortunately never mentioned in the crimes committed by Ms Maxwell and her long life partner/ boyfriend, Mr Jeffrey Epstein. When a girl at fifteen or sixteen and from an economic deprived background, this is not exactly a stable background and have them sleep with men of enormous fame, fortune and power, one would say. Perhaps it would be better to be more critical of what defines powerful men in this story, before the public can play judge, jury and executioner. On innocence the world understands whether true or not in the end the right to liquidate the perpetrator of a minor, in this case by law. No powerful men would take on such a risk in an open globalised world for the last two decades: 1 the law of transparency and 2 the law of accountability. Lawyer, prince or pauper, this is not Louis XVI royal court (Mary Antoinette) or the imperial Tiberius Caesar divi Augusti filius Augustus, who loved his little fishes... Ms Ghislaine Maxwell is an Oxford graduate, she will be familiar with such academic history on powerful men and douce perversities of the ancient world. Why then go down the Boogie Nights sleaze of picking up/ out young teenage girls and under age from low income backgrounds, to fulfill the needs of naked powerful men (including Mr Jeffrey Epstein)? An inflatable doll may have been mute, but a living doll is another story. Truth also is not a commodity and use of controversy.

The story continues.

Pre- 1967, Israel's Minister of Strategic Affairs, Orit Farkash- Ha Cohen, has some idea of what that could mean in July 2020.

(Personal op)

17 July 2020

Her vision: 2020 is the year of delegitimization of Israel as a sovereign State and democratic State. It gives the impression that the minister is in search of State Politics and a wider State World Politics of Israel, just when it is not looking particularly good for public relations the way that Israel is being represented on certain platforms, Jewish and non- Jewish in and around thew world. Can it be saved in the nick of time? Not many want to go back in time when it comes to legetimacy and sovereignty of one's country, nor as is in Israel's case, would anyone go back before the pre- 1967 days of 'none Jewish State'. The Holocaust cannot be stressed here enough, before the 1967 days! Israel is now a fully fledged capital society, rather than just idealist from the years 1948, coming to Israel from a more socialist freshness and fully breasted flames for rebuilding the Jewish Home (apparently in the British Mandate said) without looking back and turn Israel's fate to a pillar of salt once more in recent history. On the British side nor did King George take any more notice of the Jewish people returning back to a homeland that was empty of their blood and industrious fate, and take care of what was proportion and what was not. The International Law clearly is glued to the idea of the Two- State solution, based on what the British Mandate and government must have submitted as legal and closed that it is a document to eternity that Israel remain within the pre-1967 (or 1948) lines in Palestine. British Jewry cannot live in delusions to ever change this rule of law, either. And they are being closer to International Law under the crown than any other sovereignty in the world. Where Israel is today is not State Politics with a traditional Israeli Law, but in fact it is without any State Politics, let's say if the 1967/1948 Armistice Lines never did recognise the State of Israel.

Minister Orit Farkash- Ha Cohen in her strategic vision for Israel's future will in the end find the problem of the pre-1967 Two- State solution model, time and again back to deal with. How can she deal with post colonialism, in terms of enhanced strategic vision? Where are the problems north of Israel, and what are the problems south of Israel, those are the democratic questions before ending up in military actions necessary to take every time an enemy steps forward one step at the time. Mrs Farkash will also have to take in another magnitude of portion, which the world is reading as occupation by Israel in Palestine, if this will ever be as the new beginning of a dream or reality. Israel is out of the dream period for decades after 1947. Another impression is that Israel does understand the new socialist dreams of the Palestinians and they also know from own experience that this will take years to come to build a State for the Palestinians to start anew in an old model of State- building. Here is always where Israel is denied the right of expertise on politics and strategic vision. On the same timeline of the Palestinian people, neither is Palestinian forgiveness growing on the lemon and olive trees. Minister Orit Farkash- Ha Cohen and King George V seem to have something in common about Israel, no reference point to what the STate of Israel means. The Romans, Byzatines, Knight Templars came only as far as Jerusalem and built their cities in the old city many times over. The Armistice Lines are as far as the Negev/ Ziklag region and are comprised of Gaza, Israel and the West Bank. Unlike India, Bengal, Alexander the Great did made his reference for the people/ natives of India, which gave them some advantage on Britain deciding on sovereign territories and partitions. 1700 One could say that the Indians had a scholarly idea of what distribution of land meant, we have to say.

To make a long story short: can anyone imagine what Israel would have looked like today had Alexander the Great came to Israel and with him his three historians, Aristobulus, Onesicritus, and Nearchus, not to build cities like the emperor Hadrianus, but to map out the land? Would he have mapped out Gaza, Israel and the West Bank as two minus one on his military expedition? It would have at least given the region the logic and symmetry it needs today to establish Israel's sovereignty and State & World Politics. The world has had it's eyes only fixed and fixated on the Jerusalem area with Al Aqsa mosque universal center and the West Bank and the settlers in Areas where it is designated by International Law as Palestinian land. In Germany 'meine heimat' is related to blood. In Israel 'meine heimat' is nothing less of meaning than to blood and the covenant with the God of Abraham by blood of circumcission. These are the only two countries and nations across the planet with blood and heimat in one sentence as a race, even when it is in our world today more used in a vague way or mythical story- like way. But it has one thing that it never loses it's appeal to the archaic nation living in these places. In politics mostly also associated with the far right. But, heimat can also become treacherous when a State and later an empire. Blood then changes to murder. Minister Orit Farkash- Ha Cohen should know how this ends up in the books of history and world, in case of murder or treacherous heimat. We are nations of earth and memory.

Land of the bloody bridegroom is a lasting covenant with Israel.

6 July 2020

Memory is Israel or just Hatan Damim (bridegroom of blood or father- in- law of blood) and never again remember. Why won't the God of Abraham not remember his own feet in deep blood of circumcission? Zipporah is not with us in the 21st century to give the world and Jewish nation this answer, cryptic of meaning as it was on that day at the inn while God had deadly intentions and to kill His only friend or darling, Moses. That is what Israel is inclined to do just that and 'throw the blood of circumcission' at the feet of God, and, maybe, Moses too, and say "Dost Thou remember the blood of circumcission, Hatan Damim?" So thus returning the compliment. Around in the world Israel is facing another fifty years of more or less the same situation, or come to the end conclusion of submitting to the International Law what it never wanted to happen and see, that Israel is void or will be void of State & Sovereignty. In another fifty years that would turn Israel into 100 years being the Jewish Home since 1948. What would a 'good civil servant' or volunteer civil servant say to Israel about the prospect of another century of void State and Sovereignty, inflated on the other side of the balance? All eyes are to the ground of Haaretz, indignant, and cry the battle cry to Hashem, only less subsonic than when going to war to defeat the enemies in armed conflict, that "Here we are again at the same junction of time and question... No, that is more affirmative in our days, and they speak out frankly like in the days at Meribah. 3000 Years of showing respect to the God of Abraham has now become a rather deep prayer by the Jewish nation. Kings do not raise theire voice to Him, but the people and army commanders can question HaShem more certain in their issues, one would think when in distress over Israel's existence here on earth, achshav, hayom, zero dakot. From the grave there is laughter from the Philistines. Amazing.

When not in my personal interest still I see the question. Laughter too is in my blood, but the choice is common sense and from the human point of view why laugh when you are unable to be God Himself and pin- point Israel to Africa and say that this is very clever? Africa is a wide expanse of neutral territory and from a linguistic point of view, could offer more to diversity or a homogeneous from heterogeneity of some sort. Next to Zulu or Swahili, Hebrew is a welcome family in Africa philologies. Without a fig leaf or whatsoever to send Israel out 100 years from now out of Israel to Africa, 'never' will stand in between alive like the angel at Jericho. The memory of Israel is not written in a 'Bluff your way out or in' book. The Philistines are convinced that is just what Israel today is doing on monday, 6 July 2020, and keeping face or stiff upper lips. Shum davar. They know shum davar, klum. And when I say Philistines, what I mean is Philistia when Achisch was king, and when Delilah had betrayed Samson. In our time Delilah would have been send out naked unto the streets, as Samson was heavily betrayed by her. But, thankfully, the God of Abraham is a Holy God and His punishments come differently, a way more consummate. There is also no word from the US President, Mr Donald Trump, on the Deal of the Century. Sovereignty over Jerusalem is a dream over and now moving with the white clouds in a summer's sky. In the rest of the world in the meantime everything has gone back to business as usual and Ghislaine Maxwell is now global news.

The story continues.

Eight more days to hear what decisive factor the PM will use in this final episode of Israeli sovereignty, yes or no.

(Personal op)

22 June 2020

1947 Israel battled for a Jewish Home, in haste from Nazi Germany and soon after the War in 1945. Pesach is the reminder of the Jewish people, the Exodus when Moses also then had left Egypt and Pharaoh in a hurry with the thousands of Hebrew 'slaves' to a destiny unknown through the Sinai desert. Forty years after these wanderings the final frontier with the land of milk and honey, this was the first time and moment when the people of Israel, after receiving the Ten Commandments on mount Horeb, that Israel as a nation was to enter the Jordan and cross. 54 Years later perhaps it is in the destiny again of Israel when the PM of Israel is 'overseeing' the Jordan and it's Rivers and see what not many understand, the land of milk and honey. It is a simple story to repeat and tell the children of Israel... With one difference: Israel is in the 21st century a super power. And also it can do tricks like Bill Bixby from normal human being to become a Hulk when angry and surging with indignation. Eight days from today is not a laughing matter or the stunt of a one trick- pony what will happen in Israel. What can the PM see as the land of milk and honey in Real Time 2020? Should the PM listen to the people/ country and see the milk? Or will it be honey and the Messianic law of sovereign Israel that is the making of humans and flesh? The people of Israel are standing in front of Ritzee once again with pharaoh vast approaching with a great horde of charioteers. And the PM feeling like Nahson and he is saying that he will be the first to lead the way into the path of ancient wisdom, that is the trust in the God of Abraham. The US does not do global and geopolitics in the format of the God of Abraham. It is here to work with what the International World considers to be universal law for all peoples. Or, to be more precise, Jews, Christians, Hindu, Zulu, Shinto, Buddha, Islam, and the list goes on. It fails, just like Pharaoh, to see the meaning of what Moses once said, "Let my people go, Rameses."

Jerusalem is a city of diamonds, illuminous when the sun is at high during the day. In dreams and visions of the beholder, but there are few dreamers knowing that Jerusalem is in fact political and universal the moment the Jew can see it is illuminous and it is the city of diamonds. You need to remember Jerusalem, says the Thorah. And to this Prime Minister, one assumes, that it seems that he does remembers the city of the Messiah more closely than his political career. The country believes in Real Time or something to make it right for everyone. But do they want to stay with alternate PM Mr Benny Gantz once he is or will become Prime Minister of Israel? In a next life, maybe, when he will become Joshua and will say to the Captain of the Lord's army, Michael, "Art thou for Israel or the enemies of israel?" Mr Gantz seems like the sort of man who will take off his sandals to the archangel, Michael. That is his charm. Fate on the other hand does not need a charmer, or snake charmers... Not to kings and Prime Ministers in Israel. To explain the Jewish soul of Israel to the world is not relevant to the outside world, it has no political relevance, many are thinking. The big Banks in the world are what we can understand and then understand this industry as Jewish or/ and the Jewish soul. If the Jewish religion would be a city of money distribution in gold and silver, would that make a difference? If one would follow Mr Netanyahu into the Red Sea, the cowards (including yours truly) would follow suit... Perhaps. Is there someone we are missing or has been left out of the political scene since the rumour of annexation commenced? Who will pray for Mr Netanyahu on the high rock to part the surging sea? We can say with ease that it will not be Mr Lapid, or he will say the wrong prayer how the government is like Ali Baba and the forty thieves and not working to open the sea, but they are there to say in concerted ways, "Open, Sesame!" Audi luxury cars then appear. (Or, villaVolvo)

The United States could change the scene and go for no or yes to Israel's plan to annex some parts of the West Bank and Jerusalem. We do not know what to believe anymore. Milk and honey on the one side, and blood on the other side, is not what Melchizedek perhaps had in mind with the law on tithes. Mr Netanyahu has managed to become legendary in this epic battle here on earth fighting for the Jewish nation over Jerusalem and Israel, against what conservative government England (Balfour or Peel) in 1949 or after had decided that the Jews may live in Israel, in the words of HM, the king. It is either that or this, that Mr Netanyahu will be remembered as Bluebeard on both sides, the Israelis and the Palestinian people. But, who we are forgetting is the God of Abraham and if He stands with Mr Netanyahu. Unlike when the International Law had to deal with Nazi Germany after the war, they are not saying the same thing about the God of Abraham when it comes to Israel and it's ancient wars. Before battle the enemy get's the first signal, by horn or spies, that e.g. the armies of the king are approaching. These are the so called 'preventive' battles, in my view. The Holocaust was not preventive- based. And, also there was no war or battle scene/ theater designed there. By the first signal the military battle is recognized and it is an imperial signal. Latin: imperatorem vidit inaudito exemplo Germania primium. The Holocaust, in comparison to the God of Abraham, has never had any first signal on the battlefield to hear or see of Nazi Germany coming through the thick walls of high land bureaucracy. It was a stone's throw through the window.

Protest Israel annexation 1 July 2020: need of proper attention.

13 June 2020

The Oslo Accords: future Palestinian State will be over the territories, Gaza, West Bank and (East) Jerusalem. Protest today: Israel is apartheid, separate, building separation in Palestinian territories (ut supra). A proper protest takes another look at the map of these designated territories and it is clearly to be seen that Israel will be sandwiched between the territories of Palestinian Statehood, if Gaza and the West Bank are the same in the Oslo Accords, signed by the PLO and Israel two decades ago in Washington DC. Apartheid saying clearly the one that is sandwiched is the victim and who is cutting up the 'chokehold' to pieces to get through from north to south and not east to west. Yes, it is that difficult a situation and no intelligent man or woman would be able to create an alternative on the ground, but rather ignore the whole and shout it is apartheid on the side of Israel, being on the north- south fluidity of land. Timing is also another sort of defense on the apartheid on the side of Israel, that when causa it is deciding to annex as a consequence of the given situation. Annexation or sovereignty in the territories for the State of Palestine by causa is apartheid, as illustrated from the Oslo Accords, and not of consequence, a 'minute' later in Real Time (endless or infinite). The world in our time is now trying to force Israel out of it's annexation plans and it is not examining it's causam for protest, but it goes straight to conclusio and the case, they say, is won by public opinion 3/4 of the planet. Apartheid is serious in the 21st century and that way is the only way to have a another close look at all of it's digressings, and save lives in the short and long term on both peoples' sides.

The struggle of the Palestinian people resonance throughout the making of Israel and it's State, is dating back in time more than 100 years ago, starting with small dosages of skirmishes, petitions, pleadings even with the International world end nineteen century and thereafter. Gaza, the West Bank and Jerusalem were not mentioned before and this had waited a different time in the future to emerge from universal existence and more specifically in miniature inside of Jerusalem. How many people know the map as it exists of Gaza, West Bank and Jerusalem in Israel? 100 Years ago the same map probably had a short, or indeed the shortest, of vision and saw no greater future in foresight and keep the geographical or topographical movement, that could shift over time when drawing by experienced professionals, more in- depth. Time was then yet too young everywhere and feudalism too was everywhere in the Middle East, Europe and across the seas. Yet, still, then deciding that Gaza, the West Bank and Jerusalem to come under the people of Arab- Palestine and not Israel Palestine was fatefully the most wrong decisision in human history, and in fact has created a timeless size of murderous crater between Gaza and the West Bank, on account of both fighting peoples. This fighting has created a monstrous image of middle Israel, for being the strongest military in the Middle East region, and perhaps with the Palestinian people being looked upon as the 'monstrous regiment' in returning firepower.

It is the strongest military as people now see Israel that is planning on annexation of the 'novel' people in Gaza and the West Bank territories on 1 July, in two weeks time. England holding it's breath one more last time in the hot khamsin winds of the Middle East and is keeping still over what the causam is. The pain of this 'apartheid' will end itself and that maybe the answer to destiny's question on who or what is entitled to absolute fortune on God's earth. And whoever holds such a view is more worth than an army of civil engineers who could have turned the murderous tide of violence in the West Bank and Gaza to a more ordinary and every day life and living for mortals, also living on God's earth in Israel. For this we must understand the hubris of a nation and when it keeps crime the only chance of pointing it's bayonet or sword at heaven's naked body. It is perhaps a nation dreaming in Grecian audacity over gods and destiny to create another world rule or polis, one that perhaps comes closest to eternal peace? The other side of the divine vision is that England could stop the eternal accusation against Israel, or it has neither understanding of what map it created when saying that Gaza, the West Bank and Jerusalem is Palestinian territory, or was then Zeus while drawing the map. How a doodle by a minor god has made Israel, the Palestinian people, world and the God of Abraham look like naive props in his 'divine comedy' play. Annexation should be considered under any circumstance in wherever on the planet a wrong course of action when modern day democracy is the country's institution. And Israel is showing enough through it's electorate how people see or perceive this national move on 'their behalf' against a people living next door in the same country. They live in astonishment and are blinded by it's burnished golden sun rays decade after decade. In our world the proper protest against annexation should be that wherever a war breakout happens, firstly it's imperative should be examining whether the region is similar to that of Israel and the Palestinian designated territories of Statehood and compare apartheid. For now, no one has the answers except for civil engineers and their apolitical interpretations of land, people and logic.

Are we being overtly overcautious about Israel and it's annexation plans this summer, 1 July?

8 June 2020

There is anxiety in the waiting or building up to the moment of announcement by the coalition government in Israel, and secondly there is also cold panic for most Israelis who do not see any 'global outlook' from their point of view, that annexation would or could bring more fragmentation to their every day lives, once again. But there is no word from the country, be it through government communication, or political parties, how the citizens of Israel should perceive the move of the 30% in the West Bank and the north of the Dead Sea (Jewish Chronicle article today). The country is not in a Purim celebration mood, getting dressed and change to carnaval costumes and sing happily about the defeat of Haman, the Amalekite, by Esther and Mordechai in Persia two thousand (?) years ago. The 'Deal of the Century' is in the 21st century and the decision is for Israel to take if it wants to move on with annexation, and also keeping to the letter of the deal making that the imperative of understanding is the 'global outlook'. With Covid 19 the world has witnessed the heterogeneous need for getting better organised in the future with epidemics and diseases how to combat and doing so by global effort. Health Care Industries acted with Covid 19 as a homogeneous forefront against the disease and has succeeded only to a minimal before easing down restrictions last month. This has changed the world and the new normal is now all about keeping the 1.5 mtr distance 'social living standard' between two or more people. And for the simple reason that it saves lives. The global economy slowly is picking up where it had left before the pandemic was declared across the world in the west.

The question is getting closer to it's climax, is Jerusalem part of the annexation on 1 July 2020? Also in the Jewish Chronicle today in an article on Zionism, the author had put much emphasis on the heart and soul of the Jewish nation is where it mattered. Israel and it's political (or military) actions were secondary to Zionist Jews around the world. The Zionist dream is about love for Israel in purity of the clothing Zerah Yisrael. That the rest of the world and most Jews should understand why the interior of the nation matters. Where the exterior hardens more or most is of another world, perhaps the world that is the global outlook for Israel? The Zionist choice is which it's member would find more noble in a 'bad time' like this month when Israel will take the decision to further expand it's security and future by annexation of the West Bank, 30% de facto. Any outsider would say it is neither nobility or love if one agrees with Israel as a Jew abroad with it's plans on 1 July. The International Law and World have their own levels of studying moves on their various platforms (legislation?). To put it bluntly, it is love for the State that is the noblest and Israel does need to stay a peace- loving nation and country. If the Palestinian people in their own view of a global outlook make their case, perhaps it could find new cooperation on all sides, home, next door and in the rest of the world at a much rapid pace. Globalism is a constant process and assertiveness.

For now not very much can be said by anyone outside of Israel. The sovereign will of the Prime Minister and his government have the mandate to take action at this level of the country's priorities. In what way the International Law sees this is another global outlook altogether, many are saying.

With sovereignty in Jerusalem Israel has triggered a secret passage into Jewish history.

1 June 2020

Critique of Israel and the government, now under Mr Netanyahu and coalition partner, Mr Benny Gantz, is a public secret in the world if Israel proceeds it's territorial ambition in East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Time is of th essence some are also saying, and specifically meaning that timing is making history in Israel. Perhaps there are a handful of Jews who believe that where it is wrong to apply 'sovereignty' in the West Bank, that this could mean something else in Jerusalem in the long term. In the coming four weeks prior to the original date by the PM of Israel annexation is due on 1 July 2020... The public however are saying that it will not be recognized as an official announcement, but more as a vocal announcement without the participation of the Palestinian people. Why the Israeli public sees it this way could be a sign of the times, when Israelis want peace and continuity as a nation and preferably on all sides of their borders and outside with the rest of the world. That may be the worldview of the generation of Israelis in 2020 and also making that their wider view of belonging to the family of nations. They have a point, as this wish comes and goes everywhere in the rest of the world in the same way too. Some basic views and values are inexhaustable the invention and nature of most peoples living on this planet, people who want to be free from war and violence indefinitely. The State, and especially in Israel, strategically and part outlook is warning not to take that view by randomness, and that the full scope of any outlook is an entire different story. 54 Years of experience has taught the nation and it's professionals never to cease asking why and answer why this high and massive column of dust is always there in the air between Israel and the rest of the world. Today it is the most beautiful success story that Jews now can be having a wonderful life in a country that is their own and still building a greater future. But what when the future in Israel is also the past?

When the world is against annexation of the West Bank by Israel, the PM and his government are not looking gentile in the eyes of the world. It is occupation and wrong, say even many democratic Jews around in the western world. In modern day history of Israel the democratic Jews also are making a very good point, but are also failing to produce the right laws to build peace between Israelis and Palestinians in the disputed area, where the PM of Israel is planning on annexation. Four weeks is short notice now to start with providing laws that will change the mind of the 'belligerent' Prime Minister and to retreat from International critique and annexation as a first sign of peace and willingness to change. As the people of Israel have a wider worldview so is the Prime Minister, but not in the same way. We assume that the Israeli Prime Minister has a global view and is seeing this from a strategic viewpoint for over decades. And it or that leads to no particular secret passage of annexation in Jerusalem, which is the strangeness in the whole nature of Israel and being Jewish. The PM becomes the salamander and may pass through fire without hurt, but when disappearing in thin air while being alive it is only when he will leave out the unique opportunity of annexation of Jerusalem and making this part in the land subject to Israeli sovereignty and the State. The time is equally playing a unique role on this stage, as now Jews have for the first time a home in Jerusalem to be free and live up to their religious ways and customs and now more than ever would be ready to remember peace with the God of Abraham. Could it be that Israel on the one flank has ancient history, and the other flank the modern day Israel as the whole world sees and knows her? It is in the interest of Israel to ponder a bit more deeper on how to become a dual State, that is a bigger project and absolute Jewish. When reading excerpts of Mr Netanyahu's book, it is what he dreams to be absolute as a Jew.

And to aquire status of the long term State through dualism the only secret passage is not through India, but through Jerusalem. The Messianic promise has for thousands of years been told through oral communiques from Biblical prophets, that the Messiah will come to Jerusalem. Peace will then be restored within the gates of ancient Israel. In our time everything should be law and order if it changes public life socially and intellectually. No one lives alone by oral law and order, except when the public 'goes to war' with the State through peaceful demonstration or protest, using the law of right of assembly, as is now excessively happening in the US over the killing of a man and the rage of the public against this killing. If the public is convinced that the motive had been racially the State is in a very difficult position and must do what is difficult in these circumstances. The law is king in natural life for human and animal almost in the same way, except when that natural law becomes more abstract than vocal. The Messiah is not only vocal, but in fact is the supreme law in Israel. Taking a closer look it is standing above the nations on the outside of the Jewsih land and their laws for peace. It's meaning in the Messianic Law therefore is peace as law, and not by divine law alone. In modern day Israel the people are similar to other nations and it will be no surprise to reject such 'peace or law' as half of the State of Israel to be half supreme law. (Compare to the kings in Europe, who are both king under God and parliament. It is thus very serious) The question now is whether the PM is the right man to design such State architecture where there is the State and House of Israel, next to the comptroller who knows both by inventory. And is Mr Netanyahu the man who will also both love and understand the people of Israel, even when they are against him? (Remember the story of Shimei and David) The lion of Judah is a lion's cub in this awakening of Jerusalem under the sovereignty of the State of Israel, but who is now also triggered by the long sitting Prime Minister who brought his country from 'out of the woods' into the illumination of the global world. Annexation of Jerusalem is a priority that is based on the fundamental law of a Messianic promise of peace in Jerusalem, and not just an oral promise of a beautiful life as a Jew. How the West Bank will thrive under experts of law and order in the world and in Israel is another history in the making. The Prime Minister is 70 years old. Yes, timing does matter urgently in 2020.

To the walnut garden: Politics will change the court and who will then rule Jerusalem?

17 May 2020
(23:17 PM)

Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu fifth time PM in Israel, in coalition with Mr Benny Gantz who will become PM after an eighteen months unity government have a deal as of today when sworn- in. This is making the new government an interesting political unity by any curious or innocent observer outside of Israel and perhaps who is living in a remote place... The European Union, the rest of the world, the US, are reading the plans from this freshly sworn- in Israeli government as a format for disaster or serious breach of the International law. It is out in the news, mostly online. If the population of Israel amounts to more than 20mln citizens it was perhaps this gamble the PM thought was worth to take and make it more practical for the rest of the world to understand why Israel should come to expansion in it's own right. Mr Netanyahu has full visual of the total nation that he is leading, and than also is no stranger as a Statesman to the rest of the region, even in the conflict with the Palestinian people that is still not ending after more than forty years. Where it get's complex is when to explain the dynamics to the outside world with little relation to the Hebrew or Israeli political arena, despite it's many English, French, German speaking and other Members of Knesset. The Zionist dream is wonderful to Mr Netanyahu and sovereignty over Jerusalem must be his moment 'To the walnut garden'. Seldom is it public display of a Jew who is proud to be Jewish in Israel, and to be it's Prime Minister, if could be, forever. Ultimately he is paying the price for his Jerusalem dream of sovereignty, when some will be saying that the future without the International community and their approval of sovereignty in Judea and Samaria is most impractical and could lead to a break- up of Israel politically and in geopolitics. Israel is or will now be living its identity dream to the full, because for the simple reason, that politics will always change the 'court' and who then will rule Jerusalem? It is impressive when a Jew is asking that question and when he is the PM of Israel. He is not asking to be PM in the US, EU or in Britain. That is not the same thing.

With this new government it looks very much like the PM in Israel is changing for good all confusion about sovereignty in the world. For the Jewish nation the end of Auschwitz is the walnut garden in Jerusalem, a strong wall, not only because it is what was left from the second Temple or Hadrian's city, but more because it is a wall in jerusalem's most Holy place that is synonymous with God. And if the Prime Minister of Israel can see through the maze of daily life as a Jew living in Israel, this is very serious living and he will know all the sacrifices he has made for his people, who in their turn also have made many in the same way as the PM, especially during the time of Nazi Germany. What did Christ mean when he asked, Lama Sabach-ani? The PM does not want to be in that position in Jerusalem, but he knows as a Jew what it can be or feel like in a crowd of anti- Semites. And what is Justice and what is bait, the distinction should be made by the Israeli public and not only for the politicians. Mr Netanyahu in a coalition with Benny Gantz, a top IDF- man, one can only see here that these are a consummate leadership duo and that they have an idea why Israel should move out of the hostile communities that are not an inspiration for global peace and prosperity in the future of our world. The mere fact that Israel did not do this by kneeling down that doesn't mean it is wrong if doing it standing up and follow instinct of acquisition, one could say. But in theory of war and not peace, it still would be possible if the International world adheres to the 20th century that it remains unchanged on Israel's sovereignty. The peace definition in our 21st century: the future industrial peace is a global understanding and must be unrivalled.

Part II: Sovereign state of Jews and Germans in Germany 75 years after WWII.

9 May 2020

COVID-19 has given little reason of remembering the end of WWII in greater celebrations this year on 8 May 2020. It is also important to 'remember' the health regulations at this time when the virus is still in high density areas in many parts of the world and also breathing, meaning that if scientists can prove that this is the case with the Coronavirus. In Germany on friday Herr Walter Steinmeier made a brief reference to the dramatic impact COVID- 19 is having and making in every society, but that in Germany it is particularly affecting the economies of the people with jobs and that are facing an uncertain time and fear of unemployment. That can in Germany rapidly increase from ten to the next day into thousands. Fear of despair has always put Germany in a certain pattern one can with relative ease compare to WWI and WWII recidivism, when masses had turned against the Jewish people in angry or hostile mobs for loss of jobs. Mr Steinmeier his present day concern was clear from his speech on this remembrance day, that fear was again on the horizon for the same mobs and their hostilities, and only related, also again, against the Jewish nation. Israel in the same timeline as with the rest of the world on 8 May have been busy finding a system in which they could at least contain COVID-19 until a vaccine was ready to defeat the virus, maybe next year in spring... 8 And 9 May will be remembered by the people of Israel and doing so in somber loneliness, an article in the Jerusalem Post wrote. In 2020 one can ask if remembering the end of WWII still has any relevance to be celebrated among the nations that had forced the German military to capitulate. 6 Mln Jewish citizens of Europe had perished during Nazi Germany to ashes. It is alarming that history has ears, eyes nor mouth on the real relevance of remembering the end of WWII. Here lies the conscience of all political Europe during the German occupation in the forties. There is no smoke without fire in the tipi of the old politicians and keeping time as blind as Justice itself. Israel has in the world today a whole different scale of global force than in the time when they had lost status, rights and citizenship overnight from high standard living to 'lowkey standard' of living in Nazi Germany. What do we remember, or, what should the next generations of Jews and Germans believe what relevance it has to remember soon to be a hundred years when WWII had ended?

A short description of what the future might be looking like for Germans and Jews, both forming independent States in 25 years time, will only by then be about accumulation. Sometimes Germany is forgetting that it is the much older State and in terms of economics this might just be the time cycle of a too mature time, and accidently coinciding with the unfavourable present time and now dealing with a pandemic at the center of the world that is damaging most major economies in the west and also in the developing world. Israel when being the younger State has fresh energy and is inspired to reach maturity perhaps fifty years from now. To the observant viewer of what we call globalization Israel might appear in much more a favourable situation and it's eagerness to move on could be misunderstood as juvenile and misplaced enthousiasm. History never favours the brave, but it is what they call in English it is fortune. Herr Steinmeier, forgive me for saying, should empower the German people and explain about depressing the economy only when defeatist. Perhaps bravery is when the people of Germany would transform and extend constituency thinking to a more deeper cooperation with another, let's say, brave State like Israel? Humanity in the 21st century is giving many the opportunity to dare how to dream, connect, and invent, much the same that other Member States in the European Union are doing at different levels. What can the 'old empire' offer the ordinary German citizen when there is army nor the active military? Der Kaiser imperial army once consisted of Germany's finest soldiers and class of men. The SS, I am sorry to say, has been anything but imperial, if birth, blood and nobility has anything to do with it. Political Germany in the present time is having great difficulties when taking on the burden of holding together the EU project, while at the same time it is trying to keep democracy in Germany inside globalization in balance with the people of Germany. To put it more popular: it all comes down to maintain a balancing act on a very tight rope, back and forth. Just one more thing here to ad: Israel will be here to stay a constant contender who can seriously do business and open up cooperations between peoples, nations and societies. Historical boundaries should alter into common good and in this final destination find a much more wider interconnective or mechanism that could be fairer in the years ahead. Now, what is fair can only be defined by the State or it's politcs, whether in Israel, Germany or other Member States.

75Th anniversary of the end of war in Europe.

7 May 2020

History can be indeed sinister as was the Holocaust. Mr Gauland should know that perhaps this was the fate of the Jewish people that they have always been a sovereign nation, even in Nazi Germany. Recommending bravery for German soldiers who fought in WW1 & WW2 is an unusual request in this imperative done by any German in the 21st century in our time. It is more unique if Jewish citizens of Germany were remembered as brave when civil obedience was changed overnight into a nightmare write- off. The International Law also deserves some respect and some disrespect in both World Wars for it's opulent impotence during the days when sovereignty meant not savagery but intellect. And many Jewish citizens also did share the same values of intellect and respect for their heimat in Germany, almost at it's tenderest from the hearts and minds, and who have served Germany well. That is the Germany from a German point of view that went up in smoke and has never returned at least to show contempt over the German atrocities without the slightest of understanding why and how this could have been possible. Mr Gauland is only trying to keep on the Holocaust going on renewing the pledge, but now doing so as the Holocaust of the living. The world of Jewish haters prefer the oversimplified hatred for Jews and around the world to create a much more extensive reach into the world of the imagination, that e.g. Israel and Zionists are a covert organization of collapsing economies. Most EU countries are running the show of surpluses of trillions of Euros, that which never reaches the 'ordinary people' (low- income) in Member States. One cannot discuss and see vast majorities in Germany's cosmopolitan cities from a social based community where unemployment could be hardest to upgrade. It is exactly the upgrading when Germany speaks of the Holocaust and Jews in general. But then it goes all the way wrong, again.

And, again, the Jewish nation is sovereign. Is that what Mr Gauland is trying to say and remember? That would be brave.

If annexation too premature on 1 July 2020, will Israel overlook too many simple basics and their relevance?

4 May 2020

There is another way of looking at the reason for annexation of e.g. Jerusalem, now dubbed the undivided capital of Israel. Can an estimated worth be imagined in our time how much that would amount to when appraised? It is also the place old enough to remember the patriarch Abraham, or even King David, after he had conquered the Jebusite tower in approximately in the same area as where the Westernwall stands today. This is a blinding truth in the face of most nations who visit Jerusalem throughout the year and doing so for decades, but in another way that is also happening when top dignataries from around the world come to Jerusalem and attend a global meeting between leaders and world leaders. The city of Jerusalem looks nothing like the rubble it was in the forties and sixties, post two major wars on the claim of territory for the Jewish people as a united nation under the canopy of the heaven in the Middle East. And their only identity was branded under Nazi Germany as Juden and the yellow star of David, which until this day is still Juden and David to give enough Jews the collective memory to adhere to into eternity. Ashes to ashes. From the ashes now has risen the ambition to sovereignty for the Jewish nation and the will of their collectiveness, but now facing a capricious Phoenix who's stare at Jerusalem is 'unforgiven' or cold in judgement. A country like e.g. Britain assumes that this they alone can understand, both, it's stare and glare. How can Britain stop the ambition of the nation in their rise to sovereignty over Jerusalem, when the flame of history once was held in the face of the Jews by Nazi Germany and branded them Juden? Germans make no bureaucratic mistake, or did they?

We all come donw a little premature if Britain objects to annexation of Judea and Samaria, and not succeeding independently to explain for what reasons this objection is holding ground against the people of Israel, aka the Israelis. It bears no extraordinary reason to do so, as Britain knows very well in deeper and more classical details how sovereignty actually works in it's forms and dynamics, absolute or delegated. The other side behind the Phoenix's back would now be that the Prime Minister in Israel could give up his ambition on annexation. A nominal incentive would be seen as in favour of the Palestinian people and humanitarian sufferings, or a success for Britain and allies 'halting' this carriage of injustice in human history by a people who are supposedly the better example of what humanity means under brutal circumstances. A lecture with a grandeur cinematic effect, of course with popcorn and a cold bottle of Coca Cola, and maybe impressing only a dead Hadrian underneath the rubble of Jerusalem's street infrastructure. Personally, I prefer the Nazi Germany branding: Juden. And for the simple reason that it was bureaucratic and correct. The yellow star of David is putting everything right for Israel today wanting nothing more than changing the yellow star of David to the read seal of David, in Jerusalem. All classical studies at Britain's universities, whether at Oxford, Uxbridge or Cambridge, did not prevent bureaucratic SS Germany and halt the extermination programme on Jewish citizens (some even high born elites). You can almost hear the white dove of peace ringing from your ear and fly off, by the wizzard's wand and say loudly, we prefer Germany's bureaucracy when it comes to pointing with the utmost precision to the Jewish nation as Juden and the star of David is yellow. It is called, in bird's language, sovereignty. The bird here being the Phoenix. It is therefore either that Germany was right, but decides to continue it's way in a rather more obscure way, the style of German mythical self, and can go along with Britain's intellectual 'desire' for humanity and peace for the Palestinian people, or that Germany stops right now and adhere to it's own language and say that this is not right, and that the Jewish nation is a sovereign nation, whether in ashes or in life. And also it is fact that Germany knows or should know that ashes is serious blood. As perhaps did Adolf Hitler also knowing what the world will never know is that the Jewish people are a sovereign nation. Jerusalem is the star of David in the sovereign and bureaucratic colours of the Juden or Jewish nation. Germany should understand this myth and change of colour from yellow to blue.

Universal control rationalities and realities.

16 April 2020

With the pandemic of the COVID- 19 the world has learnt in a short and brief time of ten weeks that the virus stands as the present reality ratio in all of our planet and it's habitat. It also has split time and speed perceptions within many countries and communities where the virus came first and second as the epicenter of the Coronaspread. Europe and especially within the European Union many Member States in April this month are having their first test as individual Member States of the universal control of rationalities and realities how to cope and battle the pandemic on the doorstep of Brussels. The natural and only answer is that in the end of the day Europe is Europe, and not the United States, China, India, the far east, Russia, or South America, in Peru. The Coronavirus however is breaking bad with all traditional thinking and time. It is easy to see why some are suggesting an international healthcare system at this point to contain the virus with immediate effectiveness and efficiency. In many ways that isn't the new way what people and governments see as a problem after three decades of globalization. The problem is speed and timing, and coordination from country to country and a good starting point, western hemisphere from the rest of the world. Nations do get that bit of the architecture of universal control and how to work together especially when there is e.g. a global outbreak of a pandemic. What they do not get is the bit where they have to do this within the shortest period of time to contain the virus at national level spreading to local agencies of vulnerable groups and local economies. What is the universal rationality of a global economy answer to these national questions in many countries around the world?

Another question one could ask is if this is human possible to live in a world with a universal system for all mankind and a globalised world economy. (And make sovereignty a relic of the distant past) Humanity will need a different kind of universal control and here belief is that it can only be done by a universal reality that is the measurement of all living beings, man and animal. The material life is measure for the economy and global coexistence, people depend on it's progress and developments. E.g. the digital world and age. The world is a story being told every day anew and that is not going to change by political science, technology, and economics. And the story is being told in many different places across the planet in a myriad of countries that it constitutes. The future is universal memory already and had started with globalization after the eighties in the 20th century. And to many that was the perfect dream and promise for the 21st century, everywhere in the world. If correct, we are it's tail in the meteorite powers of this universal control of realities and greater rationalities of the system architects and executives. Covid- 19 explains much of our global systems that transparency wasn't the strongest response to the virus. Each EU Member State could only do best a pronto when kept lowkey at a national basis and staying close to State owned frequencies how best to communicate back to an anxious public. In the Euro- area many Member States did well and have been more than able to handle the crisis smart and intelligently. At International level or at high EU level the universal control of realities is a whole different story. It will e.g. cost the EU a temporary economic package of more than euro 2 tn to help restart the EU- economic bloc after the Corona pandemic. We understand, the human ambition is finest when all can be contained as one full circle, and delicate too. Reality is it's weapon.

In ten years time, 2030, long after this crisis with the Coronavirus in 2020, the EU will understand that mechanisms do work.

11 April 2020

Italy was right to question the Dutch government for their apparent charity, a gift it has not to pay back, if the EU Member States are bound by the EU political mechanism. Member States of this calibre, Germany, Holland, France, know better how to at least not only show solidarity but also working from a reality when this is ongoing in a pandemic, or as the media calls it, a humanitarian crisis. Where do Member States want to be in five years time? Some are getting the impression that the EU has no smart answers to the problem in which some other Member States are in right now. In fact, the smartest came from the Dutch side when measuring up to the monetary union mechanism. But outsiders are reading more in to it, that for example where Italy is imploring the EU to listen to their need, and not in terms of charity, but in terms of right of each Member State in a crisis like the COVID-19, every EU mechanism, political or monetary, should be put to more stress under these circumstances. If the virus would relapse this might become fact that the EU would than certainly collapse. And not the individual country as it's Member State, e.g. Holland? Or Germany? The future is a very serious outlook, from here. And all EU citizens need their country badly not to collapse from deep recession. Ten years from now the EU will still be here and perhaps have a rebirth of realities that could offer Member States protection and safety when another 'pandemic' might return to the EU scene. From the same political mechanism Italy knows that the Member State Holland and it's minister of Finance, Mr Wopke Hoekstra, was right when seen from his side of things before getting the whole circle in this humanitarian crisis and debt relief in countries in the south with the north reservation together in deep measurement. Detail did matter, the Minister also made that point very clear and maybe with a slight bit of sharp emphasis. What remains an important question at this critical time of total loss of signal in the EU, from each Member State the future will be an important question and the answer is: where do we want to be in five years time? Scarcity should be wrapped in gold leaf and not in ruins.

Symbol COVID- 19 retreat evolution.

6 April 2020

It is an reverse evolution once in aftermath, aftershock and the afterwave. These will be their medical termilogy once the Coronavirus will be reversed to retreat. We do not see or agree with this view at the moment when there is yet no 'flat curve' reading of the disease on the Health & Social Platforms around the world, but also we should not misread country by country future potential in the same moment now. Starting with a new global symbol for COVID- 19, this to help us remember the critical moment in global public life, which is social and economics. Until now we have seen public life as a parallel world from the economy. There should be a symbol to translate COVID- 19 to the dualty of this period in Real Time, when Public life went global and that this was both social and economics. What also to remember is the monitoring of a three -split- level architecture in the Health Service almost fully global, on communication, information and Smart technologies. Definition on all three levels was identifying at which scale we had infrastructure, viewing, Internet connectivity, and speed, back and forth between government institutions and the public. Four continents, Asia, Asia Minor, Europe and the United States in a fifth dimension transparency have all tried and are still keeping close track with the developments of containing the virus and at the same time staying in close policies with the public at large how to mitigate infections and increase immunity. One institution that we do not mention is the Human Rights Watch with a watchful eye through the 'fog of the Corona War' can at this moment be where the tribunal of the disease will in the end be summed- up, and maybe start from a more centralised global sphere how to review COVID- 19 and Global Public Life. The future consists of a Global Public Life that is from now on equal to social and economics infrastructure, and not as we have had for the last three decades of globalization and historic pre- globalization. The symbol has to be underscoring the new future, after COVID- 19.

The polis has only one pillar: society. And today this is not about Israel.

26 February 2020

Mr Bloomberg today also has said (Twitter tweet) that God has given Israel to both nations, Israelis and the Palestinians and the question next is whether he has a plan to do the trick. Let's say that in theory Israel is today very different from e.g. 1948 and 1967, one thing most nations in the International world still can't see and to even a critical point deny, it can only say that Israel has had a nihilistic State- building period approximately for seven decades. Factual that is not a real fact and does not come even close describing the reality after 1967 in Israel on the balance. The best way to understand this line of thinking perhaps it is better to have a look at the current situation of the Palestinians where they are today and why time is speeding by and Israelis growing impatience is reaching a peak the International world has not witnessed before. Can Israel go through with annexation and the building of homes in Palestinian designated areas? The answer is a simple yes and no and depending where you are looking from. Global politics and geopolitical Israel has become a nation state, after 1948 and 1967. No is for those who understand the Middle East from an ancient wisdom, that here is a region with a composition theory of it's own and only counts for the Arab nations in this part of geopolitical memory. The idea of the polis is what humanity would call a man- made invention after the wWII when Israel needed to have a home for those who survived the Holocaust. But the Palestinian people know that is not entirely true even by distant rumour. A people called the Jewish people have been living before in these areas and also in Jerusalem when their king David built his kingdom in a time BC. Why did they return after 1948 to Israel and take over Jerusalem?

Arrogance is perhaps a good answer what made the Jewish people go and live elsewhere in the world as a free nation. In Palestine, as people call the land of Palestinians in the 21st century, some get confused and live in an self image of humble people with no traces of arrogance in their questions on why Israel should live in these places as a indigenous people side by side with Arabs who have never left 'home' or Jerusalem, just as siblings fight over the right of the older brother in the estate. But it did not remain in quietness of the mind and soul of the Palestinian people and that took it's toll as an International dispute between two nations (informal). And peace is failing at every shot to take for the last decades in the 20th and the present time century. How the world was built from city- state to nation wide state building not many remember that we had no other system to build nations at a wider scale in time long gone. It did good for the world to bring about nations and how to organise a world without the means or tools for making it stand together as a whole, or in coherence and later hierarchies. People and humanity took this model after ancient Greece humanity studies of city and people, state and the affairs of state. Including the military where and when part of the system. In short this has not stopped at Jerusalem in the 21st century. If Israel has qualified for status as a nation- state when the past of city- state in 1948, it has pure grounds for sovereignty when being the stronger in the place where it has built it's nation and peoples by discipline of the State. Palestine if by any right as a people to become a nation and member of the International world, it is only fair to say that it should vie for a similar path of discipline. And also starting from scratch, e.g. city- state status. The polis is a natural ambition for any peoples with capabilities of this unique understanding. And we believe that the Palestinian people have adequate brilliance to succeed their quest for long term goals in let's say thirty years time. They are a natural people and have an understanding of Jerusalem of profound fondness and need. A need that is most dishonoured in the rear and front, with sideflanks of their own confused generation. If they do the math fast enough, so to say, they will have to recognise where the big mistake was made in the world and that Israel has every right to stay where it has built a country and State, and it is sovereign by right (polis), but which doesn't say that another indigenous people should be expelled from the same 'estate'. The plan to keep both nations in honour of the International world is the burning flames of Hades for it's leaders and Prime Ministers, and also in every degree to the rest of the world. This is just adding salt to the popcorn in the head. 

The International law and Middle East 2020

5 February 2020

World opinion knows a few big words as how to say no to the Deal of the Century or prosperity for the Middle East Plan in the future. Annexation of territories by Israel is one, and the other that is mentioned with prudent approach is a Palestinian future Statehood. What remains remarkable in the US Plan for the Middle East and more specifically between the Israelis and Palestinians is that Al- Aqsa remains unchanged in the present status quo, making Kotel a defense in it's own right. There is no annexation of Al- Aqsa, in concreto. In ten years time this quantum leap for the nations, Arabs, Israelis and Palestinians, might by then become more cosmopolitan and an economic bloc that is based not only on cooperation but also on a goodwill factor having the region a flourishing oasis of many existing economies. It's output could be exponential, by simulation. Instead people are now affixed to the 30% annexation in territories vital for Israelis in terms of security, and another 30 % input to create a Palestinian sovereignty of territories in close proximity with that of what is Israel's sovereignty by annexation. The rest of the world is sticking to the International Law for answers and saying it will study the plan more in detail before final words on the issue. One will be of interesting reading where it states in the deal of the century that conditions will be created for the Palestinian people to join the IMF, if all that is required for was met in the coming near future and long term. That, informally, would literally kill off the decades long prejudice in world opinion of Israel being the larger territory and deliberately is holding back Palestinian sovereignty as their neighbour in the same territory. Ten years from now is a long and narrow arrowhead up to that point in the future. What are the priorities that Israel envisions are looking underlined very heavily in red if this is about security and defense, from a ministerial point of view. And the Palestinians also have priorities starting with defining the meaning of 30% land and the use of that land in the long term, and perhaps they are also trying to find a way to explain why this is their only reality chance in the Deal of the Century. For both nations it is going back to the drawing board and come up with visions how to live and work with changes they have been ill prepared for on the Palestinian side.

The plan is feasible and is designed perfectly for the Middle East, a Semite people, Jews and Arabs, to stand next to nations e.g. Japan, China, India or Turkey. Where anti- Semitism is more idealogy and an institution of the deeper mind is not present in this bloc of Asian and Semite nations. A certain direction is not pointing to west to the Middle East, but the other way round with Israel as it's major host in the region, next to Saudi Arabia and Jordan. And that would change the future perception of the Middle East in the rest of the global world significantly. Point today is where and when annexation will start in Israel if or when it becomes policy. Will that become normality in ten years time and if so where are the Palestinians by that time in the plan? Prominent Jewish people are positive about the Palestinian people joining the family of nations in our century of advanced and enhanced global social engineering and perhaps are finding it hard to think of going back to the reverse. At the same time love for Kotel in Jerusalem is equally of global importance that it will stay untouched by violence and wars, and maybe being greatful for the plan of the US Deal of the Century to have specifically paid careful attention to keep the Al- Aqsa mosque area open to all faiths where people can come to pray peacefully, leaving the Kotel- area standing in it's well and old way a princely thought for the Jewish nation. It is an ideal situation in the plan if all can come to pray in these places without fear of violence or harassment. This picture has something close to what people could perceive as peace. But will that last long after the generation of people that build it? The State of Israel cannot know a duplicate of another Holocaust again in the coming future. Anti- Semitism shouldn't be the Holy Grail for the nations. It is Israel's decision and vision that matters for now.

28 January 20209, release of the Deal of the Century for the Middle East and Israel.

29 January 2020

Two entities, the Middle East and Israel, undivided from the two points in this viewing, one being the peoples of all creeds, Arabs or Israelis, and the other seen from the executives in governments scale- wise. This morning and in the next few coming days on both sides after the release of the Deal of the Century so many are now asking where or what it is that isn't in the deal. At the same time looking for all the wrongs it might obscure at this moment in every day life for both nations, the question more important than rejecting the plan is where is the hypocrisy in all this? The Temple Mount when taking a closer look and listening to the Prime Minister of Israel, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, yesterday during his 20 min speech in the Blair House in Washington, clearly stated and said that here the situation will remain the status quo, which can only point at a first time in history or recent history in Jerusalem that this Israeli Prime Minister with great precision has made a very prominent move and with regard to the future of Israel has set out a new outlook for this and the next generation for the Jewish State and peoples. And this had to be watertight if the ultimate goal of the PM and the US President (team) are hard enough to stand time and challenge. If you reject the plan there is a strong argument and the world should see and read it, as now the Israelis and the US have released their side of the argument yesterday in RT. We are witnessing a different US in the 21st century. The Deal of the Century does not deserve to belittled when the argument from the other side isn't able to pin-point the full volume of backfire of the plan. The plan requires a whole set of polite conversations and negotiations from both and all involved, so it seems to any outsider's ear/ eyes.

At first sight the plan is looking good and the maker of the plan has certainly used the math of differentiality, for many still not clear as we read in the news how different groups have reacted to the Deal of the Century plan. Are we looking at a prism never seen before in the days of the Middle East in recent decades with the new US approach to the side of conflict between Israelis and Palestinians? Independence to Israelis is not a novel thing as this would be harder for the Palestinians to demonstrate at this moment. The momentum got somehow lost for them apparently from the deal of the century, but could only be by gross assumption. Humanity has a myriad of stories to tell when it comes to natural response to change and how that impact is unknown when not implemented yet at any stage in their existence. The world studies are pointing endlessly to what natural mistakes can do and what they cannot do in the middle of change. The Deal of the Century has created for both Israelis and the Palestinians a kind of change that still is feeling unusual, while at the same time it is making or trying to make conflict redundant with minimum damage on both sides. This is also not the time to give up on what both sides would want in the future of their state (status quo or not). The world promises a new time of smart technologies and sciences for the future. Why would nations want to knock it down to size and say about the old peace plans that smartness had nothing to do with peace between the Israelis and Palestinians? What the world has heard so far isn't all that difficult to understand. On a daily basis it will prove to be harder, naturally, that this won't be as romantic as patriotism only. Expansion of territory by annexation e.g. will in the long term be heavily on the ordinary Israelis in terms of taxation, while the Palestinian people are exempt from the burden. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. If the Palestinian people reject the deal of the century and make it transparent what they mean than maybe it will stand a chance at dropping the plan with great effect.

Britain/ UK will leave the EU: Tories landslide win of 365 seats in the last general election yesterday.

13 December 2019

The first part on Britain and second part on the UK, Michel Barnier EU special chief negotiator is going to have to keep on doing the math on both factors in parallelogram after last night's Tories victory in Britain/ UK. The result from this general election was quite uplifting as it is workable in full circle, or 360 degrees. The Labour Party came in short last night with 202 seats of an offer and also short of the same majority needed to form the next government of a straight line Brexit. It does make clear that Labour had perhaps in mind to solve the British nation's problems, but it did not build it's promises on how to solve the difficult relation with the EU and Member States in it's aftermath. A general election can sometimes be the only chance for clarity on difficult issues, especially in which the country has been since the referendum in 2016 to leave the EU. On top of everything the Labour Party leader, Mr Jeremy Corbyn, was also accused of being anti-Semitic almost in the classical sense and it left him with no room for escape during the campaign up to the general election. No one knows how the EU Ministers are now viewing a Labour loss/ win and Tories win since last night. Brexit can now happen and that is all what matters for the coming weeks and in next year to 31 December 2020. And perhaps that puts a smile on everyone's face, that finally Britain has given an answer that is doable to leave the EU and also aspiring new relations around the world. And, also, much of the EU is the global view.

By definition many say that the Jewish electorate in Britain are very happy with the last night general election result, as they have been in fear of a Labour government under Jeremy Corbyn. Another definition of last night's result was symbolic old Tories/ Conservatives who have won the election by a historic landslide first time in modern times Britain. The future of Britain is shifting the old dynamics of society quietly and is becoming inflexible at difficult times, e.g. with full independence from the EU from next month on. Exclusion from the world stage, some are wondering, is a question that needs to be answered and properly addressed between nations and countries. And it also needs special attention if the outcome is going to be a success at the speed in which the global world is planning to maintain in the future. A slight glimpse or blib in the cyberspace world by a fly is a very fragile thing, so to speak. And also spectre is everything. Back in the 'real' world it is politics that has the deciding vote and not high tech (global technology). The next level strategy, let's say by estimation, will have to be a match between Britain and the EU/ global world a pronto or the so called frictionless divorce and to avoid a costly dead end.

The city of David, in modern day real time.

20 October 2019

Time is standing still in ancient Israel and it's dynamic goes against all rational realities of our world as we know it in the present time. A present time of many centuries and decades. Going against hard currency, where we are looking from an outward position to the future, there is no gold drachma or sesertia to bring back the imperialism of their time back to the world stage. And also the will of nations end up almost every day in the same place despite many attempts of redisigning globalization. E.g. Brexit is to a certain extent proof of that assumption and is very much showing on display how to retain sovereignty the hard or hardest way when related to the future, let's say after 31 October in one week's time. Parallel to Brexit's struggle over sovereignty and democracy a fairly new idea has emerged from the dead horizon of the Middle East as we know it. The capital of Jerusalem seemed a few months ago like the thing to be ridiculed based on International law and what is known as the institution of the United Nations General Assembly. Since then many also have spoken in unflattery words of the President of the United States, Mr Donald Trump, for the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Basis ridicule never has anything to do with high standard argument or logic, at least one assumes when in cold intellect. This time the reading is not on the wall in Babylon for Nebuchadnezzar to read about Israel's sovereignty and getting drunk on wine from a sacred vessel from the destructed temple in surging flames in  Jerusalem, as the parallel stretches more deeper into ancient Israel's existence. Time is the diaphragm high sound wall between what Israel and the rest of the world see as the right to sovereignty for the Jewish nation. It is not relevant to world history as modern day 'Internationalism' on geopolitics on the ground, and perhaps air and seas. This is only getting more interesting when attempting to proceed a different course through the middle of time on this particular subject. Why sovereignty for the Jewish nation in Jerusalem?

When looking for proof of existence it is everywhere and nowhere on this planet. And continuity of life, animal or human, is inhibit into life and death cycles, but lately also in man's inventions. E.g. democracy, right to assemble, the forum, economy, politics, global politics and economics, and so forth. Where everything goes wrong in error is when man decides to become sovereign and is doing so by 'proof'. Very seldom is man going to war over life and death cycles, if this is correct. Only at street level that kind of proof is making hard evidence of death or life cases on these crimes versus civil law and order. Britain can proof to the rest of the world that it has sovereignty as standing for centuries as a monarchy, as is the same for many European countries. And the world is blindly accepting these laws as they exist for now and forever. "Long live the Queen!" Three thousand years ago the same was said about David, king of Judah, "Long live the king!" In modern day realities the latter is much resounding to modern day mankind as an imagination story being told here instead of an orthodox and religious fact in ancient history... Again, when correct, all monarchies are 'ancient' history, just to make sure. Proof of sovereignty is not a laughing matter or for ridicule. Monarchy is an origin (to match heriditary) and it's length of existence. It was believed that it was never about stables and horses of the king and the right to tax the nation 'fairly', in order to maintain a formidable force when the nation was in trouble. Or, the king for that matter and that the nation could go to war (on horseback) to fight the king's wars. "My horses are your horses," the king of Judah, Amaziah, told the king, Jehoash, of Israel. Proof is not a castle, it is blood.

Biblical blood is not an assumption but is in fact the excavation of time and can go even more deeper in orthodoxy of what is said about Jesus of Nazareth and his future reign. Here is where history is sandwiched between an old and new orthodoxy, that the kingdom of David is watertight proof of having already been in existence and was destroyed. The future kingdom of Jesus (book of revelations) is still to come and is expected to happen in a future time. In other words when we come back to what is heriditary something is lacking from the point of view in the new orthodox kingdom of Jesus, but is everywhere present in the time of David and not lacking (or die of want- psalm 23). On both sides of the sword we can find bloodstains of kingdoms, one old, as the city and kingdom of David, and the other as the future kingdom of Jesus, a return Messiah. It is a stake with incredible sharpness between what the world now believes to be proof of Jesus and what Israel wants to establish in the kingdom of David. The earthly question is whether we respect the Bible and that answer can never be a 'yes and no' answer. On a daily basis all orthodox Jews are holding in their hands the kingdom of David when they say their prayers. A kingdom notably that was never made by mankind but by God Almighty in the heavens. In the end of the day this comes down to simple logic and a down to earth belief in Biblical truth as is written in the Old and New Testament. We understand the need today in the world for socialism, democracy, republics and sovereignties. To squander all this at the point of no return (just to humor) is pure heretics as so many peoples lives and livelihoods are at stake. The simple answer is that the world cannot be allowed to disorginize it's entire global system in Real Time. Equally is blood impossible to stop creeping where it wants to find it's ancestral lands.

Phase V: MH17 face down on earth, 17 july 2014.

17 July 2019

Stats: 298 passengers on commercial airplane MH17 dead. Location: eastern Ukraine, Hrabove, Oblast Donetsk. Identified as Malaysian airliner from Amsterdam Airport to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, with passengers from the Netherlands, Britain, Australia, Canada, and Belgium. Blanco.

Military: Russian separatists inbuilding forces april 2014 in territories east of Ukraine. Destination: unknown. Ukraine forces take hold of territories, between april and august 2014, in heavy combat. World opinion: blanco.

Politics: President Vladimir Putin annexation of Crimea, March 2014. Mr Petro Poroshenko becomes President of Ukraine, June 2014.

World Opinion: Russia expelled from G8 and now becoming G7 in spring 2014.

Military: fighting is heaviest and fiercest in july 2014 in east Ukraine, air and on the ground. On the ground: restricted area and designated war- zone. Lack of transparency: air restriction not known/ mentioned and therefore is still wide open for discussion, after the shot down of MH17.

17 July 2019: national mourning day in the Netherlands and honouring 196 identified Dutch citizens and their families.

Error: blanco and  panoramic black.

Mrs Ursula von der Leyen lucky number this evening, just let it not be seven.

(Error: Mrs von der Leyen speaking in Strasbourg and not in Brussels this morning) 

16 July 2019

It is clear enough this morning for no particular reason that the European Union is trying now to bounce back on a one way- system of democratic system. Mrs von der Leyen will not change that, unless of course she can help build a better system and make it more dual, one internal democracy and one external 'walled' democracy. Her statement this morning as candidate for the President EU Commission top- job, has been a timid one, diplomatic at times, and even softer approaches were made toward ambtions that are now unfamiliar to the German Defence Minister. She wasn't in a critical stage right now, but will be later on today in the evening, so some are saying, perhaps among the 15.4 k viewers of her statement in Brussels earlier today. Or, we will miss out on critical altogether for indefinite time. And she did not even blush one time or moment! Some MEP's had expected to see a different kind of EU Commission, when speaking candidly about blushing... To the center here in the European Union the Balkan countries are contracting more and one believes that this will make them overrule the candidate before them, who has in her speech considered 'attractiveness' of goals setting out for the future. Among them delay of time was given to Brexit, if for a good reason. Period. Solutions were brief and social at extend. However it is unfair to central politics and Mrs von der Leyen when the top-job isn't yet decided until later tonight and to put her under public pressure, frankly quite naked without authority.

In the future of the EU a 'walled' democracy can only mean one thing: full transparency, which the President of the EU Commission will have to decide on what material she will be needing to build the wall. And, perhaps, she has already done so in this morning statement. She comes at a time when the top- job means a fine mousetrap and the decisive factors are a gentle squeeze or burden. The EU is committed to stay a transatlantic alliance within NATO, she also has said. Male and female service personnel were to be respected for defending Europe, the place of 500 mln people by counting... A historical starting point for Mrs von der Leyen since President EU Commission, Mr Manuel Barroso, in another historic time and counting 350 mln EU citizens. Our world needs to become an emission- free- world by 2050, and she also has said that the planet should become a healthy planet, and perhaps has also understood this is a fight against concrete and sands, e.g. Germany is built on concrete and India on sands. Mrs von der Leyen instead is only seeing trees and forests in a futuristic ideal world and being unable to undo the past. She is making today however a pretty sandcastle princess and will materialize later on tonight to be the EU Commission President in 2019, and that she will unite the EU Member States for the coming five years. Or, put to music, Mrs von der Leyen can be compared to the epic journey of the Erlkönig by Johann Wolfgang Goethe.

Wer reitet so spät durch Nacht und Wind?
Es ist der Vater mit seinem Kind;
Er hat den Knaben wohl in dem Arm,
Er faßt ihn sicher, er hält ihn warm.

Mein Sohn, was birgst du so bang dein Gesicht? -
Siehst Vater, du den Erlkönig nicht?
Den Erlenkönig mit Kron und Schweif? -
Mein Sohn, es ist ein Nebelstreif. -

»Du liebes Kind, komm, geh mit mir!
Gar schöne Spiele spiel ich mit dir;
Manch bunte Blumen sind an dem Strand,
Meine Mutter hat manch gülden Gewand.«

Mein Vater, mein Vater, und hörest du nicht,
Was Erlenkönig mir leise verspricht? -
Sei ruhig, bleibe ruhig, mein Kind;
In dürren Blättern säuselt der Wind. -

»Willst, feiner Knabe, du mit mir gehn?
Meine Töchter sollen dich warten schön;
Meine Töchter führen den nächtlichen Reihn
Und wiegen und tanzen und singen dich ein.«

Mein Vater, mein Vater, und siehst du nicht dort
Erlkönigs Töchter am düstern Ort? -
Mein Sohn, mein Sohn, ich seh es genau:
Es scheinen die alten Weiden so grau. -

»Ich liebe dich, mich reizt deine schöne Gestalt;
Und bist du nicht willig, so brauch ich Gewalt.«
Mein Vater, mein Vater, jetzt faßt er mich an!
Erlkönig hat mir ein Leids getan! -

Dem Vater grauset's, er reitet geschwind,
Er hält in den Armen das ächzende Kind,
Erreicht den Hof mit Mühe und Not;
In seinen Armen das Kind war tot.

Legislation, Legislation, Legislation, is Mrs Ursula von der Leyen's vision of the future of the EU.

11 July 2019

What does it mean, the rule of law, according to MEP's yesterday in the European Parliament, when asking questions to the yet still nominated president of EU Commission. Reference was made to many specific areas of this questionnaire by MEP's. Any observer when watching during conference was only watching Mrs von der Leyen answering as brief as possible the difficult questions, but without losing sight and emphasis that here was the nominee for leading the EU's Commission as it's next president. To renew Europe many MEP's have suggested change from older systems and in some particular areas what would that change mean, by others on the platform. The German Defence minister wasn't ready to play out the role of the architect she was commissioned for and explain where and when the new levels of the 'rule of law' or legislations will become the new settings, or indeed the new EU embodiment. Something went loss in the chemistry between the nominee EC President and MEP's at the conference, or perhaps it was a case of saving the best bit for the last person conference. Who would have thought that Mr Claude Juncker's face would be missed, making or invoking more excitement during the EP's sessions of questions. No, not really. But something by unknown definition was certainly missing in yesterday's MEP's questions and the blue presence of Mrs Ursula von der Leyen as unofficial EU Commission President. The future is another story.

The German Defence Minister was right to say that her nomination still needed to be confirmed by a majority, and that that was her reason for being present at the conference between the chair and MEP's. And all tricks were premature to get her to committing herself to proposals or aspirations by the representatives in the European Parliament. Ideas on Brexit and invisible borders in Ireland, have been mentioned but with a loss of purpose in a few seconds time for answering the difficult questions on this issue. Wiggling her nose neither brought back the EU magic to life, if the EU citizens knew what that magic ever was. (From series Bewitched) Ms von der Leyen is by another 'angle' (her terminology) the global vision of Europe inside the European Union which no one represented nor gave the impression that the EU had arrived at the point of no return from the global world. Climate Change and it's goals she is set to get on with and focussed on 2050, inspiring the younger generations of politicians what to focus on when envisioning 'the kind of future they want to live in'. Time is acting as interim president at the moment. Mrs von der Leyen was polite and acted adequately as best she can be, if let's say, her nomination to lead the EU Commission was proximate. Still, it was nice for anyone who wanted to take a peek inside the EU parliament yesterday during this session of MEP's questions to Mrs von der Leyen 'in the chair' across the floor. Legislation is a promise, when with precision by EU politics or EU self criticism?

The EU and top jobs.

8 July 2019

IMF, Christine Lagarde, and German Defence Minister, Ursula von der Leyen, will be the next to lead the European Union, as president of the ECB and president of the EU Commission, replacing Mr Mario Draghi and second Mr Claude Juncker. The surprise with the German Defence Minister was loudest, in terms of when the news came out and her nomination to head the EU Commission was announced. Ms von der Leyen wasn't a surprise in terms of her nomination per se, she is qualified to be close to the EU and being in her natural environment as the 'Eurocrat' many say that she is. But when to replace Mr Claude Juncker and become the next EU Commission President, several rules to the game were either deliberately non-communicated to the rest of other candidates, or it was meant to demonstrate the willingness for change and leadership. The EU is only about leadership and has very little relation with less. Ms Ursula von der Leyen is also the German Defence Minister. If Ms Christine Lagarde is to replace Mario Draghi at ECB she is immediately being looked upon as the right candidate and European for the top job as Managing Director of the IMF. From another point of view one can only say how both nominees for the EU top jobs were decided upon are that both women are Europhiles and not as some say 'out' of democracy or out of the blue. The institution has quite an extensive internal... Which also means that treating Mr F. Timmermans (The Netherlands) and Mr M. Weber (Germany) as outsiders in some newspapers online isn't what the European Union is saying about it's own hierarchy.

Attached to the top jobs at the EU now is the question for who will follow Ms Lagarde as Managing Director at the IMF when vacant after Ms Lagarde leaves the IMF. Some believe that too will be a surprise choice we have to wait and see if and when that happens.

The International world is believing to do things differently in 2019, top view.

26 June 2019

In a snapshot of the Law & War conference with Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan, a glimpse of the new century in politics and global security issues are getting to see a wider opening in it's specter over deep historical facts of war & peace across the global world. It's representation is fairly young, e.g. Mr Jared Kushner, the US President, Mr Donald Trump's team and administration, on peace in the Middle East, a vision and new way into the future for the Middle East region. From Mr Erdan's point of view the global world is inviting nations on contemplating what the future may or may not expect in certain unforseen ways and happenings. War in the future will change itself, so to speak. The question is whether the nations are ready at this point for his approach to the International law & order, that for many decades has served it's purposes well by International establishment and institution. Some difficult decisions, whether regional, national or international, are still subjected to law & order, what are mainly international basics instead of global aspirations to renew world order and it's adjacent international partnerships. These new imperatives prove to be more of an idea how to achieve peace in the future world, if let's say if countries and nations could present their vision of 'the world today' and not yesterday. And another big question added here is whether that would be possible without exposing too many details that are or will be too sensitive in this new understanding, and what is not, to hold the whole truth. Perhaps it is time to pay once more careful attention to what the new leaders of the future are already doing and saying in public.

Many nations are still asking the same question when did the world changed? Sub- crossed by the question where did it all go when addressing or referring to that other world of which many have seen disappearing like the fog between their world leading fingers? With the US President his peace plan for the Middle East next month something is already revealing of the time ahead, that if the Middle East region can meet up the challenges by approval of the Arab nations to the plan, that the next chapter from this will soon follow the natural mainstream global invitations... (Unspecified) Some even deadly serious, as one can assume. In our present time what lessons are also there to be learned in any ideal world where democracies mean freedom and trade means the world economy? Humanity itself means being at war with itself, approximately on the same timeline in our ideal world. All new starting points are mainly also jacking up after announcement has been made public or is published, to many this is still a depressing way to remedy political or economic situations in particular parts in the world. And the Middle East is not any different here. Can humanity change it's design? Our design has been transformed to go viral and leave behind 'the world that never was', so the story goes even in the medical world. The International law and order isn't subjected to a referendum, by and for the people or global citizens, and to change or look for a mandate of change to it's specific laws for international order, one may ask indeed in what world we are now living in and be safe from harm or cruelty of all kinds, e.g. who is friend and who is foe. It almost seems that before Brexit the world was all inclusive, and now it is only more exclusive with no real specific. Another snapshot might help.

The US- Israel relationship 2019 rationalities include the region and worldview, of Israel?

28 May 2019

The Middle East region is looking particularly bright, when e.g. Israel and the United States are once again energized with constructive plans to boost the 'peace environment' in Israel to further extension, if possible. Another way of interpreting this relationship is the 'environment of war', that remains at a constant adverse to any suggested permanent 'peace environment' e.g. between Israel and the Palestinian side. And then the worldview remains unchanged, that to Israel no US administration can bring real stability here to the region or the Middle East. When Israel was in it's building a State for Israelis or Jews after WWII, it was doing so in it's utmost humility, next to the rest of the established western world. Another rationality was at the time dominant in the world, with regard to Israel's right to live in Jerusalem and returning to Israel, which also at times had undermined the country heavily. Not many remember the world of the fifties, sixties, seventies, and so forth up till the millennium, whether this rationality was also meant to keep Israel safe from alienation in other parts of the world. Now all that has changed and the US President, Mr Donald Trump, understands that. As is Jared Kushner, the architect of the 'Deal of the century'. But if anything our world needs today, besides transparency or big data, it will be the direction of how wealthy nations behave in the near and long future. Humanities are already changing their living standards and life conditions, when healthy and rich, to precision sciences and their disciplines. Notably lead by Israel and the US. Peace and the 'Deal of the century' are desperately needed in the Middle East and to be translated to the worldview of a very near future, e.g. in 2020. It's a new race against time, is anyone's guess.

It is the change of the worldview that signifies the meaning of the 'Deal of the century'. And for that there needs to be an implementation time. For now this improbability is what signals the negative effects in the region as not being able in both political camps, whether in Israel or the US. Without good analysis there is no one who can actually pinpoint their individual point of view nor standpoint. The Arab countries are a culture of old views and unchallenged for centuries. Expecting to change the Middle East could be the one challenge to be met with extreme skepticism and underhand cynicism. President Trump and his team of experts on the subject are therefore and maybe tempted to halt the plan, at this point in time. For Israel that might be yet another moment's delay for the future it wants to build on new rationalities and for Israelis. The question is once again which political match to maintain. It now looks like a match made in heaven, with the US President, Donald Trump. 2020 Will be decision time on both sides, is what the papers are now saying. There is a slight hope that Israel will exceed expectations, if it retains it's hold in the fields of political science and scientific research. Time in the meantime runs through most of all living societies, and not through 'dead societies'. After 72 years Israel has now become a living society, next to it's fifty year old war with the Palestinians in a 'dead society'. Once again, wealth needs to work together from a deep political alliance in the world. War in civil societies need to be structured and proof their principles on violence and crimes against humanities. Dominance goes hand in hand with rational behaviour and it teaches de facto subordinacy. The Middle East here is looking at being a different region and more of a 'peace environment', and not by fantasy but by a deep political subordinacy.

Israel's perpetual military is the present state of mind and captivation of it's people as free Jews & citizens since the 19th century.

7 May 2019

From 19 to the 21st century top there is reason enough to believe that the wrong view of Israel is not an isolated case in the raster today anymore, but in fact that it is telling the rest of the world about a whole different set of order of nation building and continuity how to preserve it. The annual Economic Forum at Davos, since it was founded in the 20th century by Klaus Schwab and hosted/ participant by former PM of Israel, the late Mr Shimon Peres, didn't just happened accidentally. Israel was shifted from the world's view of being an isolated place in the Middle East with it's ancient city of Jerusalem as the religious center in the global community, to a strategic entity in the 19th century to what Israel is today a magnitude in many global institutions. What we also see here, ut supra, is the reason for it's military as Israel's dominant natural order to sustain the people of Israel, Israeli citizens, politics and world affairs, e.g. peace or war. Or, be it economics and technologies. It is therefore rather confusing in world opinion that this machinery and institution is putting Israel in most of it's reviews outside 'natural order' in complete disorder, because of it's now almost 50 year war and conflict with the Palestinian people and Hamas in the West Bank. And no one seems to understand either where the future of Israel will be when staying on the outside of all other outstanding achievements for humanities back home and in the world. It is home where urgency of achievement is imperative the most. In June 2019 the US administration under President Donald Trump promises a deeper sky or breaking with old or maybe outdated promises by previous administrations in the United States. His call is the 'Deal of the Century'. Next to the industrial giant Israel to Palestinians the President's promise seems like a lack of seriousness in what they would see as their natural state of mind and 'order'. But the miracle cure, as some may say, and saying this her with permission, between the two neighbours Israel and Palestinians, would mean de facto more austerity for one and to the greater good for the other.

The people of Israel are deeply divided on some issues where they will find longevity of sovereignty and how the state of mind for being Jewish is going to be preserved into the next of generations of politicians and the military. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in brief words after the cease- fire over the weekend with fierce attacks on Hamas (700 rockets were fired into Israel's south since friday and lasted until mondag morning at 4:00 'o clock) has said the most mystical of words on what was now required, patience and judgement. Mr Netanyahu is Israel's Prime Minister for an extensive period of time, but he is also a world leader in both the Middle East and the west across the Atlantic. He has a formidable team of people around him on a daily basis as long as he can remember. This is the true Israel and it's citizens when sleeping safe at nights from all the horrific memories for some and world opinion against Israel, Mr Netanyahu alone knows how to bear responsibility for what is still called the State of Israel in the 21st century. But it is barely flattering than maybe only in a glimpse of old words from the Tanakh. Ben Gurion Airport in the meantime is a busy center for more new tourism coming to Israel... The Palestinian people in poor areas are lacking electricity or clean water, but also they will have to wait perhaps half a century longer to once see a runway with their national flag taking off to the sky and travel abroad economic or first class. Or see a school for agriculture. Humanities do not mix well with disorder of deep violence. Reciprocity is only a mild way of starting off and go somewhere from under it's small umbrella state of mind. The reality from minute to minute life in Jerusalem between the two nations, perhaps is a whisper of distorted prophecy that is neither a compliment nor cheer for progress. The question Israelis and Israel is now asking is one of Oedipus to his blind seer Teiresias to tell him who has killed Laius... This syndrome hides everywhere when people are blinded by greatness. And maybe greatness is incestuous by nature and not religious.

Annexation a nemesis for Israel's PM, or US Republican President Donald Trump?

3 May 2019

Holding the future model in the MIddle East as the new evolution of peace plans, this coming from the Trump administration in Washington, and at home in Israel envisioned by Likud and Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, it looks like something is ballooning above, at times even out of touch or reach by any 'real time' system which the world has been accustomed by for many decades. Annexation seems to be an old plan and it is only functioning as an agent of infusion equally in this classical way. Perhaps this is one reason why 'the deal of the century' holds a different vision and promise for peace in the Middle East and equally become the nemesis for both, the US and Israel in abstract. In the world no one is holding their breath. If annexation it is that Israel wants, than let them have it, laidback and with coolness of mind is what the world might say. Israel holds monopoly of most policies in the Middle East, anyway. A lethal way of putting it when no one actually can discern at the moment what both administrations are planning a pronto. The peace plan is not something like e.g. an industrial revolution when light industries technologies took over the heavy industries many years ago. That changed the world within a decade or so. Industrial revolutions are also non military. When Israel is fundamentally a security- based country, and living a minority or small hegemony in all of the Middle East, questions you should ask will therefore have to be very specific and very Jewish too. This last question is what holds discrimination against the whole world in mind, being it the deep classical mind in world affairs and international historic facts. We are looking humanely at this picture or biopic of Israel's existence in wrong or right classifications.

In one line what is Israel's definition of history no other than the Davidic lifeline to eternity. And to put it even more crass is to say that we are living in the 21st century with vivid imagination when it comes to religions from all corners of the world in real time, that why not hold this radical view as point of reference for the Jewish nation. Industries and politics can be managed when correctly implemented. Posisition of race is another wholesome story. Regrettable, Israel does not hold both views in their argument when dealing with their long old nemesis over what is their territory and what is not. For many decades the only radical view has been that of sovereignty and a priori denied by the many opponents of this idea. It is not to question the US President and Jared Kushner, top advisor to Mr Donald Trump, deep intelligence on these matters, and yet it isn't radical enough where Israel has never dared to go, nor the US. Israel's sovereignty seems vital for any new plan in the Middle East. It should be at least a revolutionary plan the world should get used to and not just for 'sentimental reason', but more because it is responsible governing that requires a more deeper talent of Israel and to a certain extent of the US. It is not finalised, but this at least should be their main concern. Where does this or Israel goes after publishing the 'Deal of the century'? And how does transparency of military cooperation between the two countries become cooperative with the rest of the world? From a historic point of view this puts Israel at the heart of sovereignty and necessary to be strong enough to uphold such military global transparency. In comparison to England, the military and government. Now, of course the US has it's own political realm to think about and fight it's party- politics domestic battles. It is also classical standard for US politics on how this might fluctuate throughout time in the short or even long term. Israel's future is too big to let it's nemesis become a trap and fails again afther the 'deal of the century'. Somehow it is making no sense to see the tortoise can win this race from the hare by cleverness alone. But in human terms the PA feels disqualified already a priori from this deal. A real sovereignty for Israel alone could become the true guarantor of the military power and stability for any Israeli government in the present or future time. Or, stay the envy of the world indefinitely.

To be continued

'Deal of the century' US interpretation raises for skepticism as the latest global initiative by US President, Donald Trump.

15 April 2019

Skepticism is the probing of the word in this long-standing case between what matters to Israel inside it's own borders and what is or has been for many decades the aspirations of the Palestinian people... The Kushner- Trump plan for the middle east will soon be published, but from most news bulletins in the Jerusalem Post today there is already indication of a change on certain technicalities and detailed changes to the former 'peace plans' by previous US governments. European prominence from all sides in Member States reacted this morning in a letter (The Guardian UK) and call for the EU not to abandon grave concerns in this 'Deal of the century', as they now see is the US administration interpretation bias in favour of Israel. Or that in the least this was a latent bias in favour of Israel. Putting it mildly, that would mean moving the Two- State solution to the other side of history. That is one way of looking at the new 'Deal of the century' and the other is more complex, as there is no one at the moment with full knowledge of what Mr Netanyahu is planning with the annexation of territories of dispute, if let's say sticking with the oldest interpretation from 1947 and beyond. Israel in terms of political heritage accumulates from 1967 into the 21st century with enormous speed and global influence. It's expansion by nature is based on progress and excercising a modern day / state of the art democracy in the Middle East, and with this approach trying to reduce conflict to a method of the past. It is looking as if the Prime Minister of Israel firmly believes in his own actions and projections of what must be the future of Israel, for Israelis and their Arab neighbours without specific distinction.

Mr Kushner is saying about the 'Deal of the century' that this is workable under the new changes with what the world is now considering the new reality. Whether in the Middle East or globally. How Mr Kushner is planning on catching up with the fast thinking of the western world in Jerusalem, and not only for the Palestinian people but also some Israelis with small businesses and in low income areas, time is probably the only factor. Another question here would also be whether sovereignty of a more extensive model will be in the long term workable for both neighbours, Israelis and the Palestinian people. Maybe Israel has the answer and it can think of technology to make all of it possible, where for example people are failing. Europe however and Britain might be thinking that this isn't the right way forward, and getting stuck in old interpretations, when e.g. the United Kingdom was a global model for western democracies and sovereignties. We might even say that in these interpretations the UK isn't known for being bias in favour of Israel, but was and has done so to keep it's Uk sovereignty in favour of what was then it's global ambtions. In memo: we have to think in terms of the X- generation and not the Y- generation when it comes to interpreting lawful texts from whatever charter and not to forget that we should be aware of Britain's sovereign power throughout the world. Israel, then, could not sling a shot at this Goliath and Philistine princes of the UK! But having said all this, what matters today is where Prime Minister Netanyahu is planning on taking Israel unto, whether in the present time or in the nearest of the future.

Also, the 'Deal of the century' should be challenged in parliament or at least in the House of Commons in the UK. It is both the right thing to do and most decent, if Israel has any legal right to be part of the human race, strong or weak. The Palestinian people alone are not weak or less stronger. With greatness comes also weakness as all former empires know from their own war and political history. If the world is capable of impartial arbitrary it will not be difficult to see the merits of a new Middle East plan, the Kushner- Trump plan, and what can be done under the circumstances where autonomy for the Palestinian people will be more faster in terms of growth in it's fundamental struggles to catch up with a neighbouring power in the global sphere. On both sides patience is a virtue. On the other hand the 21st century is no guarantor for success, and with it's constant change in the Middle East, failure of the plan might also be a possibility if not plausible. The Prime Minister of Israel isn't new to the world and he alone can measure up to the ambition he has set out for Israel, that now is the time to move on, on a bigger scale. But that story hasn't started just yet, as no one knows what the 'Deal of the century' will be setting out throughout the region. If the President of the US is saying that his administration will not go on forever on 'peace in the middle east' without any chance of real peace, we have to believe the President. The probing of it's terminology also will have to be studied on both sides and inspire ambition and not war. Europe is no stranger to the global world and neither are the Palestinian people (with giant steps) a stranger also in here. Like Mr Kushner is saying, it is a plan that is workable with strong emphasis on work.

Brexit: if parallel was a choice.

5 April 2019

Between the two worlds, global community and Brexit/ Brextension, it is now going to be certainty versus uncertainty, if let's say talks between Labour and the Tories will fail again for some idealogical or non practical reason as where things are now standing. It is what certainty is telling us that makes it for anyone who is trying to understand the Brexit plan of Britain even twice more certain, that this cannot be a good change for the UK to leave the European Union on the mere basis of the referendum in 2016. The British parliament has now little authority over certainty in the global community, or EU, with the uncertainty they believe that is best for the British people. But perhaps it isn't logic the UK is looking for right now. On the other side it also means the end of our world as we know it up to this day. Less freedom between the Member States and the UK will mean friction till the day it is normality. And speaking about normality, does anyone has an answer in parliament what that would mean? Mrs May is asking for another extension today in a letter to Mr Tusk, President of the European Council. Labour is disappointed, say the papers in the UK tonight. And Mrs May is walking the tight rope between the two worlds, and possibly with the rest of the world as waiting around the curve somewhere. All three in different three-way junctions and barely touching Brexit at any point. Someone should ask why, if momentum is crucial to Britain. Going back in time when David Cameron had called for holding a referendum on leaving or staying in the EU, we know that Mr Cameron, then Prime Minister, in the face of great uncertainty industrial or social, he was right to 'resign' himself from government. Or to put it simply, Brexit needs a Brexit Prime Minister, who at least would understand the world, the EU, and the future of Britain in a world they are leaving.

Another question: why is a no-deal impossible? As far as we in the public see it, Brexit has no literacy just yet. Disruption alone isn't the real reason when you think more closely of why even the Prime Minister isn't getting any closer to 'delivering' what the people voted for in 2016. Mr Barnier was right to say this week that leaving the EU was bigger than Brexit. Also, it has become clear that Brexit was bigger than a popular idea of public cheering. The Tories are also a minority compared to Labour and it's supporters thoughout the country and we can already see that they are leaving no stone unturned to get back in government, is what many are convinced is happening as we speak. No one knows the truth right now and what is shaping Brexit, the leave from the EU. One can only believe what you see, and here is where it is at the moment, a fierce and grim Britain feeling cornered in a no- deal scenario. There is also a good chance of the whole thing to collapse. If 99% is for remain in the EU, and 1% for leave, the UK knows what the answer is, even tonight. You can say that the uncertainty is built on 1% leave and 99% remain, which also tells you that the uncertainty factor could also not have been supported from any other Member State with the same 1% leave and 99% stay in the EU. A simple enough reality check, maybe.

Britain leaving the EU on 29 March 2019, still two hours to go before midnight.

29 March 2019

If before midnight today Britain in a sudden would still decide to leave the EU, the exit plan of two and a half years and it's infighting of the main political parties in parliament will then be looking like it had been part all along of the plan. There is still hope, this time in terms of minutes and seconds. After midnight today, on 30 March 2019, failiure will stick to the British government as a whole like blood, a tragedy beyond rehearsal, that this country and it's political system has failed it's sovereignty. A plan from a failed sovereign system will not be able to take back control when it's strength and arm has been cut off. But not everyone sees it this way, and we follow the popular version of every day politics as it goes, viral or not. The question is what did really happen in Britain today? It is perhaps wise to understand the meaning of sovereignty in Britain first. Secondly what is new and also equally important is to understand the EU and it's global tendencies, but this time not for the bad reasons the exiteers adventure. When Britain decided to leave the EU in 2016, this was, what someone earlier  also said today about triggering article 50 and Britain's right, putting the people and government on the same (time)line, but with the difference that it was government to take this right and deliver Brexit. That didn't happen today, which in so much language is saying a very simple thing, that the political power and sovereignty of debate system in Britain has collapsed. And if this was the first time in Brtish political (and sovereign) history, what can it do to design a plan from the 30 March 2019 and May in eight weeks time?

Two years ago failure of the political system should have been clear and enough to challenge the deadline set out by the Prime Minister. About the external pressure, e.g. the EU, that was always going to be part of leaving the EU, a datum est. Instead what the world has watched was a political system divided two main parties in Britain and then created a sort of free style chaos from the moment the referendum outcome was known. Labour is somewhere in the periphery of this chaos and opposing with relative ease what the Tory government is offering the country and it's neighbours in the European Union. If Labour would now win an election, in the end it will also be facing the political system in Britain, that the people want to leave the EU, and deliver what the Tory PM could not do. From every position in a modern democracy wherever you're looking there is no move that you can make independently and leave the EU, uscathed. Friday, 29 March 2019, was no ordinary day for Britain, and then to see this day go empty handed into the next day, 30 March. But then again maybe it was the most ordinary thing to do. To put it simply, not leavers or remainers, Tory or Labour, was important today, but sovereignty. There is no one who took the plunge to save it, one could say, and leave today. Easy enough to say, yes, perhaps so.

Prime Minister, Theresa May, wants to proceed with her (sum- zero) Withdrawal Agreement. The EU is astonished, say today the Guardian/ Daily Telegraph in the UK.

19 January 2019

Nine weeks from now and then we're nearly there, on the 29th of March, when the UK is supposed to leave the EU. This is getting the UK in one of it's most dreaded moods, on one side the remainers, and then on the other side 57% (Conservatives- backing 'No Deal') saying they want leave. That isn't clear enough from the EU's point of view, right now today. The WA isn't going to make it, again, anywhere near the UK or in parliament. But everybody wants something from the present situation, and treating it like stock or commodity in the financial markets, for 99 %. Also, we read many different views today on Brexit and a 'No Deal', if there is where the Conservative Government is heading to. Germany also today is pleading for Britain to 'ditch Brexit' altogether, for sentimental reasons, but is also pointing to a more important aspect of the Membership in the European Union mechanism. Yes, mechanism, is that clear to anyone at this point (or ever)? How does the EU citizen see this mechanism by which so many lives are dependable or interdependent in their every day life, and up to the future? Perhaps the answer is in the tooth of this universe is hidden in the mouth of not Atilla de Hun, but in someone else outside the box of the EU- mechanism. (Universe of tooth, btw is a Russian proverb) Brexit is unsolvable, ironically being said there when having a closer look when associated with solvency. Then one needs to think where you are standing when talk of Brexit is ongoing, let's say if you are in the EU or in the UK. That would help you understand the meaning (textually) the first principles of the EU mechanism, yes, that too. It is rather interesting how Prime Minister Rutte of the Netherlands, and Annegret Kamp- Karrenbauer, soon to be Germany's new Chancellor, are both expressing real concerns out in the open about the prospect of an eventual irreversable 'No Deal' Brexit, which at the moment isn't right now what the UK wants to hear or know. Could the EU- mechanism have anything to do with that?

Baseline indeed it is the EU- mechanism that either contract Member States together to the tightly held center (where ECB is again another level of mechanism), while outside the box of the EU, now leave- country England is making this a 'corrupt' (not confusing with criminal act) 'real value', by turning everything to a probable value for the EU, in relation. How dealing with this theory should go best forward seems rather difficult, e.g. when the UK is getting to it's own 'real value' with leaving the Economic bloc indefinitely very soon. It would be dangerous going this path without thinking of the baseline mechanism in the EU, in speaking of 'true value'. In between the two sides probable values are something new when looking at the situation properly, separately from the real value. The people have chosen to leave, and the UK has taken a democratically decision on leaving the EU, in order to stay a democracy the British people are very proud of, even when adversity is pointing to a more naked Britain, stripped from all political and economic ties with it's close neighbours and friends. How will this plan be that the PM is working on this weekend to present on monday, 21 January, to parliament? Was it plan- B? If the voted down of the first WA will not see any changes in it anyone can take a wild guess and foretell the outcome once it get's through the Parties and will be ridiculed a second time. And what can the EU do when to respond to the 'new deal'? Without a 'real evaluation' no one can know where the EU stands on the issue of Britain leaving the EU, and just maybe it has come up with a rather ingenious thought over NI. Mrs Theresa May, with the pressure in the back of her mind on the dealine, must have incorporated the same idea too, only more smarter...
Brexit is likely to succeed, being over optimistic for a moment, but what if that will only be in the art of reason by man and politics? The EU has real value and it is having a difficult time with probable values, triggered by Brexit. Where do we put priority next and on which side is that more of a majority speaking?

In global affairs sometimes a strong opponent, e.g. Brexit, can make it look bigger.

14 January 2019

Britain is at the brink to make things in global affairs look bigger, and not only for the EU or the rest of the western world, but in many ways this also applies to the UK. It is not unfamiliar territory for the UK to get there, since it has never been away from our world and become a distant country in e.g. Siberia. Where Britain has been for the last hundred years or so it is still affixed to the same place and in the same region. But time has changed much of the region and new ways were designed to rule the world in which we live, in the EU and in Britain. On the balance of golden standards for most leading industrial countries we are now hearing of a low point that Brexit is heading for, if and when it leaves the EU. Sometimes these are obscure words in the hearing of ordinary people. Who and what do we trust when living in these regions, that are presumably receptive to big changes like Brexit. All will be apparent to some not being immediately British at this point. If a 'No deal' will be triggered, let's say tomorrow when the House of Commons will vote on the WA, than time is up and this will even obscure a lot more for the coming days and weeks in Britain, but also outside Britain for e.g. the EU. The UK has another thorn in it's side with the EU over the NI backstop and this is pushing skin deep on the manege a troi with an impossible situation of 'who comes first'. It is silly to suggest the NI should hold a referendum on the matter, whether it wants to stay in or out in the UK. But in the end that solves nothing and for simple reasons, that e.g. NI has a right to be in the EU as well as staying in the UK. This could take more time that the suggested timetable in which the WA was drafted for immediate effect. Brexit has made it unthinkable for the world and EU that they can offer the world another view where a western global leader will now be moved aside and than to move on as if it were never there or here. But Britain too is confused and this is creating the impression it isn't capable of zooming in/out it's control it wanted to take back so badly from the EU. It is now 'staying out in the EU'. 

The economic factor of the global world is one indicator to get some idea of what Brexit could mean after the UK will leave the EU. And there are several views (mostly financial markets) that make it decisive and critical for Britain for holding on to their sovereign right of divorcing itself from the magnitude of global cooperation among nations, of which the EU is also a major partner. Another factor in the same cooperation group is the logic of countries drawing toward the center and not the other way round. Brexit doesn't make that impression of following logic in the eyes of so many other countries around the world, and this perhaps is what makes it difficult for even G7 country Japan to accept the outcome of a possible 'No Deal' (Brexit-) in the UK. Tomorrow is the big day and the plan to turn Brexit in a Brexit+ country is far from reality right now and in this hour. In theory if it succeeds with it's evolution from the world and global economic relations, than Britain will be expected to run itself on it's own, but not as a smaller country, could be the only vision seen at the moment. At some point soon it will have to be able to 'join' with the EU on the same bigger logic (mechanism) the EU- bloc is used to and will continue to do so after the divorce from Britain. Some believe that is not what will happen as the UK will find itself a smaller country outside the EU after 29 March. It is time to be realistic, but whoever wants to stay in Brexit with a 52% leave nation and stay sovereign in the western side of the world will be doing the impossible and maybe is blessed to succeed. Britain is a modern day stratocracy and if discipline is part of the nation's blood the myth by which it is born with still might do them honour before God and man in the very short future or long term in human history. The Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, has to do all this here above after tomorrows vote in the House of Commons.

What is wrong in the half of the Conservative Party with Brexiteers and what not.

13 December 2018

The meaning of what is a 'good Brexiteer' and what not is now more relevant today than yesterday, after the vote of 'No confidence' in the current Prime Minister, and Party leader of the Conservative Party, trying to vote down Mrs May and that  she has won. Perhaps if it had been a bit more 'hands-on' with the deal for leaving the EU, but Mrs May chose it wasn't the time for that, but let's get on with a more relatively good deal for the moment and make it 'hands- off'. What that means in terms of maintaining sovereignty as a nation and kingdom became the point of immense frustration and disagreement for the last two months among members in her own Party. How does all this look today? And not every one get's it, that half of the deal is about industries and the other half is about sovereignty in the UK. Something that isn't about 'self' rule but a written law. And so more blind vision on the EU is becoming the only reason for many Brexiteers to leave the EU. With strangely enough so are the people of Britain thinking in the same way. It is going to be interesting having another Prime Minister and who will be delivering Brexit, while reading the time the world is now living in. You can see why the need for change is imperative, from a British point of view. No one is saying that leaving the EU would be the easiest thing to do, at least not today. All that was needed is saying to the EU 'we want to take back control' of our own laws and money. That in short for sovereignty and industries. This unique thing about Brexit is now becoming more and more visual and is reaching new grounds in world history, whether you like it or not. Sovereignty get's a different meaning from the previous decades when it was secondary to primary goals in industries and later in the nineties global industries. It was never sovereignty reaching thus so far... Or, was it?

The answer is 'No'. Sovereignty is keeping politics at home in government and industries, global or national, have been for the last four decades out of sovereignty politics and very active outside of Britain. And leaving the EU it is showing just that. You don't take back control and money, had it been from home- base only operations. Another sticking point could also be how to go about your affairs without hurting the EU, when let's say, your position is the rival one or will become the rival one in future. Much of our future life is about global reality and fiction, and also the living standard of many peoples. The new way of life is giving each member of humanity the 'self rule' or 'sovereignty' to be part of the rest in the world as a member of global society, or in their own region and community. These rationalities are the new realism and no one in the world would try to change these new rules to the global game. It is also what is the most valuable constant and is continuously. From the point of a British sovereignty there is no chance of reversing that fortune of the masses in the world, but still Britain is saying that it wants to take back control of it's money and laws. All this was the Prime Minister's job to deliver Brexit, or a good deal from the EU, to the people in Britain. She wasn't honoured for her efforts, and not even as Party Leader. (It wasn't a school field trip either, mind you...) With Brexit now every one can see how deeply political the EU is in meaning and it does not deal in private persons interests. And perhaps Mr Juncker was right to say that the future of the EU will be about cohesion, because with England leaving the EU what it needs or will be needing is a more outlined profile of what it is or has become in the 21st century. Thus making all sovereign nations reciprocated when staying and not leaving the establishment. That is if they can define the meaning of what is or should be reciprocated in it's future treaties. For now it is going to be interesting to see the next Tory Prime Minister delivering Brexit.

'No deal' is a political rabble, 'Yes deal' is a clear strategy. But, this is Britain and it is outside the EU, technically not just yet.

30 November 2018

Or to put it in another way very naively, when 'No deal' is X, and the 'Yes deal' is Y, how many seconds does it take one to see why the one is better over the other right now? Okay, let's say the political babble or rabble that is now ongoing wants to go for a 'No deal', or stay in the EU, which doesn't make any sense when the referendum is a democratic and political fact. Also, when saying to stay in the EU would make things easier not to leave the EU with a 'Yes deal' to reject, you are slipping here on quicksand and it isn't solid ground to continue any debate that keeps repeating your words in many different ways when you hear this from others. Again, this is the way for Britain in a deep crisis and it has no talent to leave or stay in the EU for now. Is it this easy, the real battle (for Britain)? Could they be bluffing about the 'No deal' that this would be the better deal in the end for the British nation? Sometimes you can use words like that when you are a champion on equality, social politics and policies, public sector and so forth. The British nation equals sovereignty, in reality or Real Time? This country has let down too many people and actually it doesn't really find a reason enough in it's conscience to have another good look at what went wrong in the system, that is now weakening in fact every deal possible with the EU to make for the future of Britain. The 'No deal' becomes the bonfire of vanities in political Britain, which is reflecting 'the expensive sins' they have yearned for over the last four decades. Yet they say it is for the good of the nation and they respect the outcome of the referendum in 2016 to leave the EU. So, what is it waiting for right now, before the 11th of december? A miracle?

On the other hand Britain's isolation from the EU and the rest of the world (on trade deals), is what can worry other nations and make them quite nervous. To countries outside the EU the world is watching something happening to Europe they might have once dreamed of if that were possible, or in their ancient wisdom perhpas thought that 'what if' that happened in Europe and Britain leaves the EU, what then can we say about the world in it's making? Two things come to mind when remembering the impossible ways that came (sometimes suddenly) upon a nation or empire: pride and conscience. If Rome falls it is pride, not conscience. As was the same before them with the Persians in Persepolis and the Medes. Older than these also were because of pride they came to burn their own amber of extinct among humanity and the world. Today it will be no different and this is the same for Britain or Brexit. Sovereignty is something you nourish and the people do not reflect this in the UK to the outside world in the present time. How do they live on is a matter of dead time and they stay right there in their own world as long as they can remember. It was forever had not the EU opened the borders and introduced an entire different reality within and outside the UK for these people. That wasn't what politics did for them and in time this prove would become the 'trap' for the UK, telling everyone how good the people of Britain had it under this government or the previous ones. Freedom of movement had opened a way for people to look for work abroad, mostly ordinary people. Politics in Britain had never opened borders for it's people to go outside the UK and look for a job. Thus today the 'No deal' can still resound as the days of old when Britain was an industrial power in the world... The truth can only be this, that in fact the people of Britain had prematurely enjoyed prosperity of some free kind, but that this was never given by the government in Britain. Leaving the powerhouse of this kind of freedom will come down very hard on the people of Britain, while now it seems political Britain wants to point the finger & laurel headed at the EU with a 'No deal' they are fighting so hard for and to stay sovereign as a nation and break the earth under the EU nations feet indefinitely.

Modernization never did come for the British people from their own government. This was parachuted by the EU on many occasions for decades long into all societies across the continent and in Britain. It is a long story from here when going back in time and see why the 'No deal' could be dangerous for peace or a peaceful exit from the EU, socially and economically. And also not to forget for the upgrade momentum of years living in a more relaxed society than they knew when sovereignty was there only outlook. This is the new generation and not the old. It is politics that want 'out of the EU', which is why the cost is too high when coming down on the people. Maybe and just maybe the 'Yes deal' the British Prime Minister is trying to get through the parliament is holding up the 'way that Britain' got used to in the last two decades, from the ordinary point of view. At the same time it is also keeping a modern day Britain alive while the future could still hold the answers it would need in the long term for a real settlement with the EU for good. And that is just maybe. In the meantime the world will move on and it won't look back to a fractured time between the EU and UK, when the time comes. What the nations in the EU have experienced throughout the two and a half years of Brexit will be the interpretation only, which is based on value and relativeness. Anything else beyond this would be plainly said brutality and selfish, when fully knowing the economic dependence of unity and stability that goes or comes with the territory... But, conscience is turning men into lords in Europe and that may trigger another kind of history in our modern times when neglecting or ignoring the chance of this new hubris blue birth. The nations might not be able to resist the temptation of creating a new Europe altogether, bearing the blood of their conscience high and princely to lead the nations back to their place of origin. This is either true, or this is either false (hood). But then the kaisar will have to retreat in all his might and armies and perhaps remembering God of old, leaving all logical systems behind to be ravaged.

Mr Barnier's words yesterday "The EU is falling apart...", quite unusual to say, after approving of the draft Brexit' text on leaving the EU.

14 November 2018

British Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, slightly slid into a more comfortable position yesterday from Brussels, after the draft of the Brexit text had been approved/ agreed by the EU top man, Mr Barnier. (Top men) 24 Hours before the PM was looking more nervous and her speech didn't leave much room for a good deal sooner than the date they had set in mind. But it wasn't as expected and what came sooner than expected was the approval or that the text had been agreed by both the UK and Brussels, that next year Britain will leave the EU indefinitely on 29 March. This time it looked (to any outsider) that Mrs May had finally got what she worked so hard for, and getting the EU to agree upon anything the Prime Minister had to offer on the divorce. One wonders why Mr Barnier, EU top-man, afterwards said that the EU is falling apart, or will be falling apart. This was Mrs May's Brexitloo, unexpected and effective she had won the day and even managed to make Mr Barnier think again, about the EU and it's future. How straightforward is it when this is not Waterloo, but a war in theory? No one can say. A deeper fortune whispers in your ears and blows up everything in the 21st century, that a full participation of e.g. EU Member States are at the brink of yet another change, but unfortunately not because of Brexit. Their deeper visions are the rationalities by which they seem to decide on the exact meaning of each and every individual plans they have under the title of a cohesive future in the EU, and as a Member State. Most plans have been conceived during the last five or six years, being often left on their own to participate more home base and adapting to new social policies and politics where they can. Brexit happened in 2016 and will take effect in 2019. Two years do not win a war of any kind in the greater magnitude of all things concrete and realistically.

Can we then say that the British Prime Minister won something unexpectedly, something also that she deserves at this point and to make her even more inspired to get to the final hours of this wretched time, and that this Brexitloo victory was a moral win? She stood by the window and saw that the rain would be difficult for a hotchpotch army to get out and win the war, just there over the hills... It was the logistics, perhaps that worried her the most... And, convinced that it won't work, she battled on and waiting to be defeated, like the man on the hill 203 years ago, when suddenly the sunlight had caught her eyes and she saw the green leaves in Brussels' tree of life move and it was suprisingly a good omen. And then they agreed. Wellington himself could not have done any better than the Prime Minister in Britain today. That is if Britain cares for their military history and take the lessons seriously. The question now is what does 'agree to' now means in terms of leaving the EU in reality? At one point you have to say that the controversy is not the breaking up of the EU, but the cohesion of the EU as expected after 2020. Let us remind ouselves again, in what time are we now living? It is perverse to live with ideas of winning wars that make no real realism to others or people. Black and white miracles do not come out of a shoebox and will let you lay your sword in the waters (ancient king of Ashur in Lake Van when fighting the kings of the region) of a greater force. It is even dangerous to even tread in these waters, that is the living source of others where they have found the kind of prosperity that was never there in the first place to reach for in hundreds of years. This is the kind of misunderstanding the future is not about. At least, seen from a simple point of view by any individual. Their logic is not reason, it is mathematical. And they say only the clever ones are going that way or tread dangerously in quick sand. Don't you just wish Mr Barnier had used a more upbeat word on staying in the EU, for the other Member States?

What future is Britain looking for in a Brexit- free world?

22 October 2018

We are sort of naive, depending on where you stand on Britain leaving the EU. That seems identical to the Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May's position, if here is where you are at this point. The toughest deal would be the future, and on both sides this is not showing any visualization where realities are involved, except for night vision when it all get's green inside the Prime Minister's mind. Yes, perhaps. Angel Gurria, Secretary General of OECD, said earlier this year at a lenghty press conference that no one knew what Brexit meant for the moment. It could take years on the side of the EU and also on the side of Britain. Now it seems that Britain wants to do it in terms of seconds and get on with it. As a free fall? So, the thing missing most about Brexit would be by now the future. Is there any in Brexit on that subject, in case you're dealing with the EU? A responsible Prime Minister will beget an equally response from anywhere in the world if Britain was convinced, that this sacredness about the future will be every one's responsibility from any senior politician's standpoint, because that is what high profile diplomacy is good at in the western hemisphere. Trade might get outdated by 2020 or 2021, maybe. Britain however is convinced that trade is all they need to consolidate by March 2019 in some way, vaguely. The EU is also part of the vagueness it makes from Brexit and it's relationship after the breaking up. And who cares as much as politicians whether Brexit will mean Brexit, or if possible that the EU will continue to move on with it's plans for the future. Something is missing here when you think how deeply organised our world was before Brexit. This much is true that no one knows why Brexit doesn't make it to the EU with it's negotiations on leaving. On the other hand, every one knows it can't be left at this hanging and dangling on the side with it's head next to the body of world diplomacy.

There is something sacred about the future and where the world is right now this is calling for the right sacrifices you can only make when you understand the impossible and that is what you must do. What could Britain's sacrifice be at this point, let's say if it had one (to make)? The change is not a far away dream, e.g. when countries decide that in this era they should act together as individual countries and in their wisdom try to understand the future as a political hegemony with able actors in each their own ability. But here is where the rest of the story get's more and more obscure in naivety and is getting lost on the radar every time there is some progress in the right direction. If Britain could say that the only deal here to make was that of the future and that here is where all natural understanding of governing should go, you can't miss too hard on whatever the deal might be. Isn't this the only responsibilty for people in government, in whatever time we're living in? Investors don't do the future they can't see or touch. The question therefore is what could Britain offer as palpable to the EU, and hopefully vice verse? Britain wants to have a new house and it will cost exceedingly much more than what the previous buyer has paid. In the real world as seen by the EU and Britain, it is nothing as feeble as buying a house. Yes, Minister. Leaving the EU has put a hold on the future, mind you this was a very costly thing to do. Another is doing the impossible and softly softly sustains relationships, when understanding that the sacrifice made here was doing exactly what the world now needs from all sides, is to do the impossible. To put it briefly, the future is impossible. In past decades people were no different at a national level. The unique thing here was that all countries (e.g. in Europe) were having unique talents of their own and collaborate with neighbouring countries to expand on these industries. This was what made the small world a global ambition for more cooperation. Some distractions will always be there to disrupt big projects. One last thing, the Prime Minsiter of the UK is not a queen hobbit. At least, not just yet.

Global extension, can it be done horizontally from any given point in Real Time?

15 October 2018

Velocity is 'outgrowing' many societies (west, east and beyond) by it's enormous speed and not leaving any trace of it's true destiny behind. The world is bound to believe that this is the way and natural to a great force of any kind, and always must be respected. It is very high tech thinking maybe to those who understand the makers of this 'alienation' that is necessary in the modern days of our world. Also here the instrument is global industries and not humanity. Back in the industrial years of the past the whole revolution for prosperity was humanity and industries. Today you're looking at a world outside this common view and the images are not by any political or economic standard simple to understand where and why these changes were made when they (peoples or humanity) are left behind. Old formations like countries, governments and societies they still have a 50% share in the living world, next to the global world's 50%, when put in basic marketing and quantity is more than quality. But it is something more than just basic marketing, the 50-50% is also the very precise way of understanding where and what not that should be done to get the balance tipped, in order to create a 51% global future by the 1%. Can we say that industries will always be a constant number for Quality when globally? And can we also say that when humanity cannot make that balance tip by 1% quality (of any kind), it is also failing it's quantity side? Many know that horizontally it is almost impossible to ascend into speed or velocity without a lift-off to 'get into orbit' (in a manner of speaking). Mind you, the sky's 50% (compared to earth's 50%) isn't the same thing to humanity. And neither is rivalry the solution for tipping the balance.

In the last quarter of the year of 2018 maybe the best question to ask is how relevant a global extension would be from a horizontal (even macro- economics) point on the global map. The global future has nothing to do with imagination or lack of it, as some might think who are desillusioned or have lost the plot altogether at this point in 2018. A simple observation on the subject could tell you what might happen when nothing changes here between the two sides very soon or in the near future. Earth's political map is about peoples and income or employment. But that other thing about countries is prosperity and security for generations to come, if precision has anything to do with it and not wealth or financial institutions. The answer get's more cruel to hear in the world of multiple realities when peoples are stuck or get stuck. (This includes many companies, professionals, and governments) And it get's even more strange once you have figured out of how many nations show no lack of ambition to keep the world a living planet and industrious. In fact what they are saying is that the world should be prosperous and fair to every one, political or economically. Now we have a few words here that not everyone knows quite well what they mean, because with a worldwide ambition to live on the planet and continue to work hard for this prosperity, how can one then explain why they still do not make the extension into the global future? Something sinister must be going on here many in the public sphere would say and think, without considering the fact that the world is not running on a slow pace (historically) in this century, but that everything in the world is running on velocity. It looks unbelievable, but yes, money get's faster and faster every second of the day. This is all fourth dimension stuff and one can only dream so far! Another dream can also be this one, that the 50/50% might never get that 1% to tip the balance and change the global future into something more of it's natural self belief of global prosperity.

Cohesion, or future projection (EU).

10 October 2018

The future of the European Union (regions and communities), 2021- 2027, will be the future of a 'new' cohesion, is what Mr Jean Claude Juncker said two days ago at a meeting in Brussels. In this speech he also mentioned a few projects and policy changing (migrant policy) goals to meet at the end of 2027 some sort of result of the EU new policies in the new European Union cohesion. (Bloomberg.com earlier that day in an article amplified on the specifics of the speech, e.g. what will be expected from 'economic migrants' in Member States and how these budgets will be spent) The European Union in a single voice has made very clear where and when it wants more integration among peoples living in Europe and mainly in EU Member States... The Euro area will be altered if these new policies will take on effect and will be in a better position to sustain more growth by cohesion. It is nothing new to EU countries when projecting future expectations and setting them on a higher first next to a secondary of muteness (politics?). Any one who listened to Mr Juncker's speech/ addressing of change at EU level (policies?) will be surprised at the repititiously choice of words, cohesion, and wonder whether this was overhere in Europe or beyond. But one can only guess and try to find the answer on why Europeans should hear about another union above all other existing ones the EU has already provided for. It is rather puzzling, you could also say, when especially the world is moving at global speed in a complete different way or direction. If there is such a thing as global future the EU can only go one way up by any projection of it's own future. Individual Member States like in a comet economy are like the economic hubs travelling on the same timeline in one life time (span). But then cohesion would only slowdown travelling time, as this is to intrinsic politics a sovereign word and not global or the European Union. To put it more simply one can put it like this, that the global world is all about 'When I can do it, so can you.', and the countries listen. And therefore by doing so creating with their listening a vector economy, and also while being a EU Member State.

But no one doubts Mr Juncker's words and long life experience as chief of the European Commission. If the future is about 'cohesion' you can expect nothing less. Ad acta. Having said this, the future is about greater magnitudes in the global sphere and when the world is an inclusive part of it, so are the responsibilities equally of the same size and realities. Many countries in the world and EU are fully aware of the global future and it's magnitude, and they want to follow it not down but up. And this too is the reason why it can only be a vector economy between the global world, the EU, and individual countries in it's periphery. Also this is demonstrating another effect not every one can see through the public human eye, but it is nevertheless the existing part of life as we know it by abstract: our perception of the world is determined by the global sphere and not just by globalization as in previous decades, or even under the Lisbon Treaty. When not in the older generation (X), the younger or Y- generation are clearly here to meet with the world at it's own level or platform of changing life and the young. (Being here the younger world) Of course, vector worlds have been created before with one difference this time: it is size and reality. And size nowadays can be a very abstract thing on the one hand, but in another way it can be very deep and indefinite. (Some might even call it an accumulation+++) What this means in terms of future migrant politics at EU level, we see another vector as necessary to pitch or throttle where economies are existing and calculation will become quite legitimate by 2027. The understanding is quite sincere in a way what the EU is now proposing Member States can expect in the coming years and near future. At a global level also a new idea of flexibility will or could open up more transparency issues and problems, let's say when or if these would occur. Could cohesion in the EU be about the here above ut supra?

Israel 2018.

29 September 2018

Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu 73rd session at the United Nations General Assembly has put a rather dull emphasis on the State of Israel and in some way has put this in a rehearsed manner to remind the world over and over again how Israel perceives it's international obligation for peace in the world and in the middle east. Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu is a man of action, and what he misses out on at the UNGA is action. The State of Israel doesn't belong in the sphere of action, at least not by definition. What Mr Netanyahu actually is saying is that historically no one can deny the Jewish people to have a Jewish State and to live democratically side by side with other democratic states. After 72 years after WWII this historic fact is not merely an aspiration anymore. And you can either take it or leave it in the 21st century. There is no misunderstanding in our world today about the fact that here we are witnessing today the Jewish State to see a nation of unlimitted potential for sustainability of it's people and country, and also to provide the same for many more of the Jewish people globally. How did this happen still bears the historic memory of Nazi Germany, in which Israel is always reminding the world each time again how it is because of this 'worldwide' annihalation of Jews during WWII, that this is why the State of Israel should continue to defend itself against it's enemies, be it politically or militarily. Mr Netanyahu is in politics, and also in the ministry of Defense. But perhaps the Prime Minister of Israel is only trying to say that this is unique for the Jewish people and still is today for having a State of Israel in the middle of all mankind in the future, starting 72 years ago.

At the UNGA 73rd session Mr Netanyahu also said in his speech that no one should think or contemplate to outsmart Israel, e.g. Iran. While at the same time he was offering the Iranian millennials an olive branch of solidarity to fight the Iranian theocratic regime (four decades ago old views), and in which he is making clear how Israel is an ally to all those who seek peace with the Jewish State of Israel. The Prime Minister mentioned the progress of peace between Israel and the Arab nations, and how Israel is promoting by peaceful means to forge alliances of proportional peace with Israel. He was standing side by side with the US President, Mr Donald Trump, to make this peace effort feasible for the future generations of nations in the world, if listened carefully to the Prime Minister at the UNGA. Israel couldn't be greater in our world today is also what one can hear in his speech, without pin pointing too much on how, where and when in the visible picture in his mind. In the end the only question for this Prime Minister will be whether he has worked toward a greater Israel as was his ambition since he became the President I of Israel. After all he has served under a great man, Mr Shimon Perez, Mr Rabin, and he was a young disciple of Y. Shamir and Mr Menahem Begin, all great men and Prime Ministers of Israel, when Israel was in progress. One man alone helped build the State of Israel in the world where we are today and have little or no memory of Mr Netanyahu's climb to his greater Israel. It is most humbling an achievement the world hardly recognizes outside Israel in 2018. Why did it happen that despite Israel's promotion of peace around the world and in the middle east, that this is not fact as other countries perceive the meaning of peace? The United Nations Generally Assembly is always the last place to look.

We have been waiting for flexibility, porous and not yet set out in solidity.

Rosh Hashana, 10 September 2018

Six months since the beginning of this year in it's first and second quarter what used to be a vacuum is showing in small quantities something of a flexibility to test society's ability in most worst case scenarios in the past, and how to come back and face the future. In every second there this future is present and relevant, 24/7 and in terms of technology or tetrabytes. Much of this memory is in real life experience sovereign. It releases no flexibility from an engineering point of view, and neither does it deal with the vacuum it creates across many parts of it's trajectories, situated smart and constructively in societies the world over. Flexibilty therefore can be seen as testing a testing ground if there is any substance that will attract the right or even wrong broadvision quicksilver of the present time and nearest of future time. The world opposite can go to sleep or in terms of this century technologies go in 'sleep mode' time. It's easy the way the Gen Z generation global outlook has built- in a world in 2018, randomly chosing it's starting point, of a fixed point at every end they anticipate by logic and human instinct. We expect to see instinct to be something wholly different than in previous centuries was the case. This comes all to what is happening in six months time and if properly observed through the Swiss holes in the cheesy bits of any system of memory and technology, flexibility indeed is testing these minds either deliberate or not, let's say where the minds are still operating in classical terms and outdated technologies. Political systems are by definition 'classical' terms, as is sovereignty to be a system of a very old world 'how not to make war, by nobles and kings'. The stoneage of that time does not provide a future of this kind, run only on memory, 'Zetabytes' (just to coin a word in between).

Another question runs trough the same globmem (global memory bot) is how compatible this is with the International laws, all legal systems known to countries separately from east to west, from north to south, and criss cross. Sovereign nations, to say it non scientifically, are not running a separate unit in the system, logically, but they do so practically and in greater ways coming close to reality without real time. The vacuum therefore here is where to put the ministry of defence and holding society together before it can go into a 'bad mode' that will be expulsed by the running systems of Memory. Memory is sovereign, you must remember! Legally our world is changing but not in the classical sense, as many forefathers of nations (Hegel, Kant and Heidegger) dreamt the world and humanity would find in idealogies of a more 'divine' balance. In order to keep it fresh flexibility has been put to foil the vacuum of the present system starting at the value of nil. But it was praiseworthy that here and there flexibilty could become the new system how to deal with vacuum of any kind outside the logic of memory and systems. It also may remedy all non scientific maturities society stubbornly wants to hold on to and help build a better system, with new legal insight or a deeper version of what our world now needs most, and to win the day in a century that we are not seeing right now at this time in full circle. Humanity is in itself inbound by nature, but will change in the next generations as fully 'outbound' and globally perhaps be standard memory. The world desperately needs flexibilty right now, whether this will mean legal propaganda or protest when structured as a society wanting to setting roots in the future.

God giveth life and He taketh life.

9 August 218

While the living this paradox of death and life comes and goes in and out of ages, centuries and time. It is also without any political or economics meaning across the face of the world. Humanity is concerned with the living in every given future second, minute and hour, week, month and yearly basis. What is history remains a parallel view and is not speed or velocity basis. But we do want to understand why we should have a perception of the present time and how planning the future can effect human lives in general or out of the ordinary, e.g. displaced peoples that is now ongoing in Europe. Let's call this the horizontal understanding of all things in general or generalisation. Economics makes such personal viewing almost imperative to every living human being, as this is globally the first and last essential for all coexistence among the living man and animals. World climate change awareness is our new vitality not only to keep the living creatures well protected under low emission 'contracts' but this programme also focuses on the environmental and natural resources future economics. Globalism perhaps has come to a strange understanding, that to human nature, that if the future is divided fairly among all the economic assimilation could produce astonishing new ways of life or living for many and not just the few. No one has ever seen this being done yet and no one can say whether the impact will be dramatic in terms of loss of any sort, or improve the living creatures that we are by alteration. The times for 'undivided wealth' is over. While not the living any more we go with a paradox unto the nether world and confusion in the soul with prolongation of something that we have been while living, while at the same time we worshipped nothing. Is this perhaps the result that we are looking for in the end of every life or living thing, preferably not all at the same time?

Horizontally if you leave for one continent this will be like entering a hundred years industrial future time, and coming back home sets you back a hundred years older. This 'kind of world' is also called engineering and the architecture of a future no one has ever been capable of building in any tried time before the 21st century. It's sense of prestige reaches it's zenith of all possible understanding done by human and machine and it will not have the likes of it beyond these abstracts ever again. At least not very soon. This sounds like a good idea and plan that we now not only have monetary union, but soon will have economic assimilation legitimacy as well, if possible. In the cedar trees of Babylon there is much place left for assimilation of peoples and birds that migrate, and all this belongs to the king his royal gardens. Maybe, if we have a new king of the four corners of the world. High Tech can only do homogeneous (mixture?). Our classical world used to be a hegemony of different peoples and states for hundreds of years. It isn't competent enough to rival the new world, so many have come to believe in progressive thinking over reasoning. But let's take folly for our new friendship and shoot our arrows to the clouds above from the top roof of the castle and think that the imaginary ending of a metallic (word in Erlkonig, Michel Tournier) world is necessary in order to save mankind from their terrible hubris and what's more to lose his soul. How we do underestimate the human soul and it's salvation conscious from any height or low! It is this that maketh the Lord God taketh and giveth new life to any given cycle possible under the heavens, and new worlds. It could be logic and if so this was first thought by Heraclitus in his fragments, some ancient works by a thinker no one seems to remember or know of. But what flows into the river always comes back in cycles. Yes, just as simple as that. "Im seine armen das kind war tot." Johan Wolfgang Goethe quote from the Erlkonig.

Politics is the word in London today and the US President, Donald Trump, was it's top head.

13 July 2018

No one really knows what England thinks of Mr Trump visiting the UK, very briefly, and why it sparked a heavy protest in Regent Street to say that the US President was not welcome. In his own words all rumours about his State visit to Britain prior to his arrival was fake news. But diplomatic etiquette at Westminster did give Mr Trump something of a 'special access' to the country and if correct the US President is no enemy of Britain, even if that means his opinion differs a little odd and not necessarily in a political sense. You don't do global politics in 20 minutes. Why he did come at all is not very clear either, if all you have heard him say was that Brexit was in a mess. Duh! That was not a very high score there for the US President to do what only he could have done best. Are we watching some sort of decline that we know nothing of between the two countries, that the US and Britain today are two very strange friends, or they have become two very strange friends? Half of this is true, because in Mrs Theresa May's case she is handling an impossible situation at home, and Mr Donald Trump is the President the US has never had before. In what time are we now living in the world? Politics needs solid infrastructure under it's feet. In previous decades politics also meant watertight and keep it's kernel running at a worldwide scale, from country to country and beyond. There also used to be a 'bigger picture'. Now we're only getting smaller pictures and at a constant. It is this constant that is dangerously slowing down fast to water in our world of politics today. Solidity doesn't come from political pooling and than run off again to visit the next stage- country in your State visit.

The world is now talking about a baby blimp as a protest to Mr Trump's visit of the UK and the protesters seem to have made their point with this inflated reference to the US President during his visit in Britain. It certainly wasn't meant to flatter him and we can all hope that he does have a good dose of sense of humour and reply with 'That's also what people did with Richard Nixon, so nothing original here.'. Speaking of originality... Not much was left original in England for the President to visit and see. He comes and goes to London or Scotland very often each year, or when he can. He is a global leader in business. The American people seem to think of him as the one man at the White House who speaks their language and that is what they wanted from a President for many decades long. Maybe he could do the same for Britain one day? Maybe a plan to transform London to a state of the art global centre, and not only financially but make it attractive for future generations. That would sound to many as the business plan that Britain needs to work on, or stay excentric and old. Mrs May, the British Prime Minister, she still believes in leaving the EU next year on 29 March 2019 in Real Time. At the moment that is a bit flat, perhaps what the US President really thinks of Brexit? Maybe the President has also noticed a peculiar thing of the British people when they protest in the streets, that here people mean depth in the whole plan of London's infrastructure. He should know being a tower builder of office skylines back home in the States and where people are more animated than real people. But for now his visit to Britain is over and he arrived in Scotland sometime later today. Standing next to Mrs May the President reminded some (I think) of Richard and Judy. Only, in politics it is called diplomacy.

Europe is facing a puritan crisis.

10 June 2018

No, this is not medieval times or a renaissance of the past when Europe was in a zealous idealism that Christianity was the path not only to purify souls of all sinners, but more it was the way to reform all inhabitants in the land. In fact, we are living in other times being it still in the same place and countries with the subtle difference on European hardcore values that are now being chewed on, little by little, but fear that this might become the national crisis in the long term, economically and socially. And even Christianity will not be able to bear the consequences any longer after this moment occurs without ending or solution to the problem Europe is now expecting to face soon. That is not a very clear sign in the European Union Member States just yet whether the problem is or could be related to hardcore Christian values. For God's sake, people are not grasshoppers or locusts to plague these countries! Countries around the world are all represented at the United Nations and are incorporated in International laws or Human Rights laws, also very often underestimated by a world audience. It is both the political and monetary stick which are deeply integrated in all human life on the planet in our century. Why pretend differently? Exactly, it is this pretending that we are obliged to and need in protesting a more bigger core value of life as we know it today. You could also call it the individual testing of it's future in a world that is also unsure where it wants to lead all countries and nations. Our world is still looking for freedom, human dignity, and the simple right to exist. Ideally existence is connected to values of the human free will...

Our European intelligent executives are finding it difficult to deal with definitions e.g. of influx and invasion. They all underline the fact that there is significant disruption and dispersed peoples now living across all over European Union Member States, and if economic long term perceptions are very much staying the same, a result from the seventies, eighties, nineties and twenty or twenty first times, this will cut deeply in societies, especially when burdened by extraordinary low employment in even the bigger states e.g. Germany, France, and Benelux countries. More importantly the sign of the times on closing borders will also mean a closing on security issues, long term, with quick solutions being largely overestimated. Or to put it more popular, our political and economics Mexican wave in the European Union Member States can only create a momentum of it's own, but the next day this will all be over and never leave the arena we think it's visibility is dominantly present today. It is not just Brexit and Italy, but it is rather expanded into the other Member States where the world is not looking or paying much attention. The world is a global audience with a mindset going forward in one way or none. Another question to this phenomenon is how much Christianity and it's purity could be the harbouring thought of dealing with both humanity and our world. In the meantime local government is subjected to time pressure issues at home and basic disruptions in every day life of mass individuals. Another definition is very troubling on the local government's mind but they haven't found it just yet.

Mr Vladimir Putin's blatant arrogance, a nerve wracking experience for the inexperienced.

28 March 2018

The Russian president Vladimir Putin has got himself in a hot iron ring with his closest neighbours and apparent allies in Europe this month. And the more you hear about it the less you understand what is going on, and why diplomacy in most EU countries have now joined the UK in the diplomatic war of words against Mr Putin. Brexit has taken second place and it is, so it seems, the best way to put back the union- coalition between Britain and the rest of Europe in this relationship for a while. One would almost forget about Brexit at the moment. Muammar Gaddafi was the last dictator when the west had found a singular enemy in a mouth to mouth 'advertising campaign' (military campaign) against all that was real policy and that never saw the daylight again since then. This never goes away how in a crisis or bad situation politics can make strange bedfellows or have a military or diplomatic pillow fight with a particular unpopular man being at the helm of the State or government. It is getting more complex every day in the eye of the public where Mr Vladimir Putin is desperately failing the trust of nations. It doesn't look like it is going to end very soon, as every day another country is finding ground reasons enough of expulsion of Russian diplomats. The whole process of expulsion seems the hot oil on the hot iron that is building itself each day forward to a closing ring. But no one should feel sorry for Mr Putin, as it is being told that here is a president who still has the blatant arrogance of staying on as the Russian President and who is planning it's future with the rest of the world. Syria, one would think, could be very much on Mr Putin's mind, indefinitely?

What happened in the UK with the death of a former spy and double agent was an indiscretion of diplomacy that came in a bad timing out in the public domain and world news. Hanging is out there again and comes in the mood when the country wants to prove it still is in command of how to run a country in the world as the friendliest nation. This didn't happen when, also a former spy, Mr Alexander Litvinenko died in 2006 in London UK. And eight years later the Crimea was annexed by the Russian President. Of course it looks like the cat that is in the bag is scratching the texture open and ripping it out, only in some other time when it isn't clear any more what precise role the Russian President still has in Russia and in the world between allies. You might ask yourself whether Vladimir Putin his days are numbered and that he is buying time to go down gracefully. For the UK's Prime Minister one thing is sure that if this goes bad for her she will not be able to convince the world outside Britain that this country works with and on trust with it's partners or allies. It is neither the new politics of inclusiveness. Of course the thought of murdering a former spy will always be a test of discretion to any country, home and abroad. But pointing out in blatant arrogance to the president in Russia shows a strange phenomenon in our world, how in the world of politics and diplomacy this is turning to a more and more popular scenes and not real diplomacy, which is difficult and has less public exposure. The question you ask your ungodly conscience in the 21st century is whether the new normal is or can be the killing of a former patriot or citizen accused of spying and being a double agent. Why not go back to 'stoning Brexit', Mrs Prime Minister? Mr Putin is nothing more than the incredible shrinking man nowadays. It will soon be over and Brexit will stay, if one remembers correctly last time this was said.

Mrs May the UK Prime Minister isn't someone you disrespect.

7 February 2018

But we are not in Athens when Statesmanship was still a diamond in the rough. A strongly polished Mrs May for some mysterious reason comes closer day by day to reinventing Athens in 2018 after Christ, with a few minor changes to the stage. Technology, industries, import/ export services, infrastructure, both landslide and digital networks, a divided cabinet and what some call a dysfunctional government (Labour, Mr Jeremy Corbyn). What is keeping Brexit inside Mrs May modelling of the rennaissance Athena in Real Time Britain? Easy to look at, in the same way as when watching the F1 races in Dubai, that e.g. Ferrari is doing better than the Mercedes Benz Team Group, simply by speeding by your box (or underneath it when you're in the tower). A divided ruling cabinet and dysfunctional government, from the opposition's point of view, is exactly (could be) what is transporting ancient Athens to Britain, that if the Prime Minster stays on this will only ad up to her name and Office, that her belief is a long track of what is making politics essential to any life- time among humans and in time, and is standing now right in front of her eyes, and that she is beholding this view as a guiding line in a planet size reality in the present time. She is speeding by in unearthly mass and gravity and Mr Barnier next to Mr Claude Juncker, unlike the Prime Minister, are in full control where Brexit is pitching to land safely, for men and machine. Let's say the things we write but not saying.

What would Athens say if the opposition keeps telling the Prime Minister that her government is dysfunctional? And what would Athens say to the PM when her cabinet is divided? It would be very much the same as going to war, but having this debate first before it is definitely decided by a majority when to signal for attack, by legislating or implementing another rule in the theater of politics when ongoing as it happens. Westminster might be the oldest democracy in the world, but Athens is it's beginning. Or as the joke goes, 'if you don't like duck, you're rather stuck with duck.'. (Fawlty Towers) Politically the Prime Minister can't be sacked, nor can she be ousted, if technically it has anything to do with the logic of the political system. Blank here goes black and white straightaway in your mind and saying that is not true. One should learn and understand politics first. No enemy has that time it wants to spend on 'learning or studying' how Brexit politics is named and by what lost inheritance. Banging on the drums is giving that impression how hard so many are doing what is right for Britain, while others think they are all still very much in the mist. Mr Barnier is not convinced that Britain has a plan how it wants the deals with the EU in future relationships, was said yesterday in the newspapers. Mrs May is not reckless and whether the EU wants to spew out Britain from it's forum democracy and trade after the transitional time, one Brit will always be greeted with respect and this can only be the current British Prime Minister, Mrs May. The vocals are up to now still good between the two sides, but no one can say if this will still be in need of a more deeper or higher equalizer...

What is the international body of democracy?

2 February 2018

Forget IDEA, at least for the moment. In a complex world the idealism of having a world- wide based platform for democracy and it's ideologies, perhaps it is time once again to remind the public where and when this meaning alters from the classical view to a more technical one when at a stop or change. Wherever one is looking we are in the 21st century in the present time, if you are alive. When dead time becomes timeless and there is little point to include 'the other side' to it as part of the process of democracy as experienced in many mature countries, e.g. in the west. Direct democracy also differs from indirect democracy body the United Nations, or indeed IDEA. A good example for direct democracy is the EU. Also, uniquely, it is the only existing multiple platform for democracy in the whole world, and not what was previously thought that this is perpetually only the place for the United States of America. They look similar, but with looks like it will stay. We have witnessed the EU gradually becoming the multiplatform for democracy it is known as today, and that with this the history in Europe was changed, after the nineteenth century. No one can argue it's legitimacy on democracy anymore, except of course when you protest the EU as a democratic establishment. It only takes one citizen to disagree with what the EU 'stands for'. The public seem to be lacking judgement, that the EU is the European will of Member States and was built by high profile politicians in the last century. At a time when the United States is changing direction with President Donald Trump, Europe remains the same and will keep steady in this course. So (also small observation), what is going wrong at the moment as we speak in Europe?

A soft whisper can tell you that it is Brexit. Democracy has split, but not split up, and it is making a two- pronged visuality to the rest of the world. Exactly, yes, but what does it mean when the international body for democracy only means to build infrastructure? One can imagine how the British Prime Minister must be feeling right now, that this is the aggravation she is now in and that Brexit is a very serious change in the world body of democracy. Many in her government/ cabinet keep arguing about TRADE deals with individual nations, within and without the EU, and the infighting is not surpassing logic in any helpful way to Mrs May. Had the main political parties come to a new logical system, during Brexit transitional time, perhaps it would sustain the country and it's government, that now it was time to move on, finally. Mrs May's government is now instead looking for a way 'to punish their children' for a feared defeat on Brexit, like parents so often do. How that is the right attitude when world democracy is in fact 'out there' is a thing the ministers can better answer for themselves. Britain as we remember is a sophisticated country and it's democracy is even older than when the EU became the new reality in the European history. The Prime Minister is living her days in Office in sheer aggravation and it is strange to her for being a peaceful human being and very pragmatic.(Impressions). In Real Time democracy cannot only be implemented, but it also needs other technical systems when e.g. a country has to split- up from the system, due to a democratic outcome by the people in a referendum. For if that does not happen it means, and unnecessarily, that you aggravate the world body democratic system. Independent judgement should arbiter in this case whether the decision can stop the aggravation caused and that democracy is proving to be subject to a constant process of change throughout time. Again this is idealism and from a human point of view. Anything other would make it invalid, one should think. With Brexit the EU is forced to be judge and 'excecutioner'. And that would be the wrong message to send out to the public at any given time. How can the Prime Minister of the UK succeed and give her government the international standing that Britain needs?

Globalists are not intellectuals. "I apologize," always seems to be the hardest words.

27 January 2018

It takes a good intellectual to make any distinction between 'I apologize' and mannerism. Much of the apology in the last decade are more of the latter... The US President, Donald Trump, said in today's news that he is prepared to apologize to Britain over the tweets (Britain's First) and that he didn't know they were racists. After one year being in Office we are now getting to know the US President is capable of intellectualism and that he is for the first time not too fast with his choice of words. He is 'prepared', was said. That immediately is striking the balance in relations with the UK and put it back on track on the 'stronger as ever' relationship with Britain. This is what Europeans understand better, when in Britain. In the present time intellectualism is the way forward, let's say between e.g. Brexit and the EU. And between the EU and Europe. It would be embarrassing if it would all come down to economic and psychological pressure to make and take decissions that are important, again, to keep relations in terms of reality and factual. The question is this: can the real world handle the future without understanding where the human intellect will want to be and go next? Many seek it in politics, governments, politicians and still this isn't the answer to every one's satisfaction. Brexit wants to succeed, the EU wants to expand it's expansion plans, Russia is alarmingly holding steady on power in certain regions in the world, the Middle East is an oasis of dangerous mirages no one really understands, and in the US not all Americans know where central Europe is on the global map. All machineries are doing their logic to keep everything together and in balance, but there is not an individual who can operate this thing on it's own, not at any time.

Mr Michael Forsyth on Question Time last night in Britain said, "Just as the President of the US wants to make America great again, so wants Britain to make Britain great again.". In an ideal world that is the diplomacy that is required amongst equals and is very peer- like. Imagine that, it would be heaven if the future could be the guarantor of high profile diplomacy and style. It is sad to hear of diplomacy failing, e.g. the Presidents Club scandal with sexual harassment stories crawling out from it's front door and getting into the public places of Great Britain. Saints and sinners of the lost decades, well, that could be apologetic at this point of reality when women have come against sexual harassment in high places. But what did someone say about the time we're living in, last night either on Question Time or in This Week? The point is this, who are globalists? If they were intellectuals what apology do they have for failing to make eating and drinking functional and let no one starve to death? Homelessness isn't something you do away with for donating money. Globalists are builders of great cityscapes and each and every day the reality is this that these are the ways in which they shape the world. It is a perpetual spin of life at their level, costing very little, at least when having the kind of money all packed and stacked up in these cities. Intellectuals can only try to do the impossible between the two, people and how we live in the world. In this way, like eating and drinking, the government has a functional job to attest real life and real people. Why do some think there is a vision into the future only proves that if they are true politicians they are living outdated dreams. Someone said last night that time has changed. And that will never be an apology.

Cough UP, Ukip leader, Henry Bolton is staying as leader of the Party.

22 January 2018

But actually one can only want to write the same about the Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May after her sunday article in the Observer last weekend. Britain is spitting blood, wondering whether the public will pay much attention to the personal failure of Mrs May leading Britain out of the EU, so far. Labour leader, Mr Jeremy Corbyn is smelling like any good shark that blood is in the water and it is that of the opposition, his arch enemy the Conservative Party, aka the nasty Party for much too long. Mr Corbyn's memory goes a long way back since he was a young man and inspiring to so many of his 'believers'. The question is about change, it is also about the EU. End of the story. A long and very extensive 'No' follows and it is the never ending story casting dark shadows over Westminster and the government, horrors beyond belief. In the country no one has noticed these foreshadows of utter darkness just yet. The people want businesses, and they want money. Since when was this need a bad thing in our century? In previous centuries more money could soil your name into something vulgar, when not being a gentleman. But who cares now? Is this really all that the Prime Minister can do and write about changing business attitudes, after ten years? Everyone else is going blank, pfff... Let's stick with 'yes' and 'No'. Something is trying to create a friction of the century from Brexit and they are failing to make it thunder. No one believed that Brexit could and would happen in this life time. And yet, here it is, says the Prime Minsiter of Britain. And, Brexit means Brexit.

Brexit is good for strategy, it is also good for... snap, snap, with the fingers. What was that again? On the other side of Brexit a new life on the planet begins. A new sky was ordered and it will fit in our 21st century sky like a wide expanse of blue solar panels. The world will see it happening, how this great thing was very easy to do and no divine intervention was needed. The Prime Minister is suffering from an illness or is prophecying at the same time, 'that we will make it work for Britain and the people of Britain, and leave the EU'. A sublime truth, for prophecies. But since this is about politics no one has any choice and they will blindly accept where politics will be leading the country and it's people/ citizens. Why is the EU being looked upon as the green eyed monster with jealously looking eyes? A tectonic shift is taking place with Brexit while everyone else is sleeping and smelling the roses. In fact, the only one staying up looking alive is the Prime Minister and one can see the fear in her eyes every time you watch the news. She knows that the iceberg is real and not invisible. No wonder that Mr Henry Bolton and his love life is more interesting nowadays to read, while Britain's strategies one by one are either falling or failing in the present system. Also, Germany is looking much more interesting from the other side of the fence where the grass used to be green. Germany is now looking greener. So, why should the PM go? Mrs May  seems to be waiting till midnight... Has she been dancing in her shoes fitting for a princess with regal powers, or will that happen after her political midnight? The EU Member States are watching like hawks and they are not eating mice.

There is a war fatique prevalent in the world, but it could also be a superior weapon...

6 January 2018

Knock on wood and Thank God, but we're getting there when world leaders admit there is no 'peace' in going to war, and neither has it been productive years when thinking in terms of one or two decades. But, where do they 'kiss and make up'? Some are desperately looking and doing their best to find that exact point in their every day of decision taking and making. Here 'some' are a reference in top war industries and governments. In some parts of the world, e.g. the Middle East, between countries Russia as peace maker and Syria as worn out by it's civil war already lasting nearly a decade, the war juice is over. Hands up, no one understands where war is leading to if honest overview across the globe has anything to do with the new world order that no one is 'knocking on it's door' nowadays. Times were once good, starting with Desert Storm in Iraq. Time and not God was on all sides in the allied countries. Plans to rebuild Iraq made good intro demos and democracy was the new craze for that time. Change was a global vision and it made world/ geopolitics look quite sexy. From 1990 up to time after the millennium, what is now the impact pic? High profile wars e.g. the war in Bosnia between Bosnians and Serbs should also not be excluded from the list when things did go right for countries in the west and across the Atlantic. All foreign relations had a ministry called Ministers of Foreign Relations/ Affairs, and what they did it looks very much lean that no one remembers. Foreign Ministries are in amnesia. Except when Tony Blair, one very sophisticated envisionair British politician, who also was Labour Prime Minister, and who was passionate about politics and global development, decided that his time this round on speaking out against Brexit was his cue for a comeback rich kid to dazzle people again. He has done the bravest thing here. But success is another thing against bravery of his sort.

Whoever wants to know why this piece is called the war fatique, just check the latest effort by e.g. Mr Vladimir Putin and his ambition for peace in Syria. It looks like the Russian President isn't satisfied with the quiet down of warring factions, and is now looking to create a new kind of fluid. With this peace in a toxic place the question remains to ask where all the war criminals are. A strange phenomenon but it is true that no one is feeling the need to trial any one in the 21st century, except for private peoples as citizens. They do say something will continue to maintain justice and security in the world and across all governments, but they're not convinced it is doing good to all citizens in the world today. Maybe the angle for war is in this, that with a war fatique it isn't wise to wage war anywhere in the world. And how to revive it doesn't look promising anywhere without the strong allied forces that previous centuries used to have and know. War then becomes fast residual and fainting. Millions of citizens across the world are still convinced the war will happen and they are finding reasons in world economics and vast populations living under the poverty line. One last effort to reanimate the world of war industries: the EU Armed Force deal. If that became official in December 2017 it must have gone lost during Christmas and New Year's Eve. There was nothing in the news about the signing of the deal in the news on this one. And now comes the question we're dying to hear: is this peace? Will in 2018 Peace in the greater parts in the world find peace to be relevant to life and living on the planet in the present time? For now it's better to stay with Mr Kofi Annan, former Secretary General of the UN words on the present day in the world: "The world is in a mess."

Jerusalem has many names and none is secular.

19 December 2017/ 23:54PM

From a civil engineering point of view Jerusalem wouldn't qualify as a capital of Israel, and this goes over several norms of building a city safe enough for driving cascades or parading in presidential cars. If anything from the Old City will be incorporated in the new plans of the capital, this is unsuitable terrain being above 'street view' and it doesn't accommodate as well as a horizontal lining of infrastructure with maximum insight or view from all sides (by citizens or diplomatic)  . The hills are too high for roads & discipline viewing. Unless one builds elevator tunnels to stack a few limousines before getting out at the right platform to travel on into the capital Jerusalem. By then Jerusalem isn't merely the capital of Israel, but a world capital situated high above ground like Solari's Hexadron. This height is only from a civil or architectural principle view and not a sacred plan to build the Eternal city of the Lord God Yehova because of the prophecies in the Tanakh that the Jewish nation must always be prepared to expect the coming of the Messiah one day. And like mount Horeb it is the same for Jerusalem, that God Almighty, Elohim, must descend onto the highest peak of a mountain almost as high as the cloud Cumulus (1000m above ground). All of this will be hard work for the future if it is what it will become one day. Today is not that day just yet and we fall back flat on our face unto the ground and keep our eyes fixed on the human mind with great ambitions to be a matching force in time as the Jewish State, and long overdue, some may even say. In short to say is that the human ambition doesn't knows limits or limitation.

How can I compare thee, Oh Jerusalem? To Damascus? For that long straight street to meet a higher standard among orchards and early peach blossoms in spring? We are only visioning in memories when Damascus layeth in ruins. Whoever this engineer might be to build a capital inside Jerusalem for all of Israel in the 21st century will know that Jerusalem is not the same thing like building a city in the west or any part of the world, with the sole purpose of dominating the sky and people that walk the earth beneath. He is going to have to be something like a magician when dealing with the place of ancient worship for all religions in the world. Eventually he might come up with a comprimise or plan and to build a combination of both worlds, the diplomatic and religious world. And that is only the building prospect and perspective. On the side of politics and governing the world has well to known a few answers that are neither solution nor a definition of what it means for both nations to live in Jerusalem, the Jewish and Palestinian people. In Real Time the Jewish State isn't just a house that was built to harbor a few people in it and leave the rest to fate and it's making. We have to admit that the Jewish State is now worth quite a lot more after a seventy years making of Jewish history rennaissance. The Question here is by what divine proportion should such a capital be build when it is not the same as Beijing, Texas, Brussels, or Delhi? Politically Peace is almost the necessary evil in the Middle East, or like Swiss Cheese, as the only thing that still is holding up seventy years of heartbreaking diplomacy between the two nations. But, once Israel has set it's mind on what will be their next ambition for the Jews living in Israel there is nothing more to say or ad to it. There is always to offer peace enhancement for the Palestinian people after Jerusalem has become the capital of Israel?

To be continued.

Level II: Damian Green blurr of future Brexit industrial vision.

2 December 2017

This isn't the same thing as showbizz. We must leave out the pop corn & soda this time if a cabinet minister in the UK has been found 'guilty' of downloading thousands of thumbnail pornographic material on his computer in his office. The cabinet minister, Mr Damian Green, also First Secretary of State, has denied these allegations as the investigations are ongoing at the moment against him. On a saturday morning no one is thinking of porn this early, except indirectly when  reading in the news online that Mr Green has some backing up by his colleagues in the Conservative Party that came to his aide in these difficult moments. Not to say that this goes for Mrs Green and their two daughters as well. If all this is true, allegations dating back in time as nine years ago, it will be a great shame to see him leave office. He is the sort of minister standing at the soapbox in the House of Commons you only need to see once and you will remember him standing and debating in the House of Commons for the rest of your life. It is exciting to watch him answering PM's Questions. (Especially when grilled by someone like Mrs Thornberry in opposition, Labour) You can almost hear them 'cry foul cry foul!' to tell you, "It is the elephant in the room, stupid, can't you see?". On the focuspoint we see a Mr Green as a Tory Minister, and he is backing the industrial plan for Brexit later on once Britain is officially out of the EU. What he isn't is also clear, a black & white focus minister. Many perhaps think that he knows his onions, if they have read his books on the topic of economics and what this means in times of change. The MET isn't that interested in Mr Greens competencies and intentions for leading the industrial new age for Brexit's start (date?), but whether he is the sort of man who can represent the Church of England...

It is interesting how the newspapers and these articles mentioned the 'element of surprise', by saying this is a feud ongoing for nine years, but only now was found as serious allegations against Mr Green. Parliament is a strange place to choose for one's private 'voyeurism', since no one has a 'Kennedy Room' here in the establishment at his or her disposal. Watching intense porn for hours is not a rational experience where your hands stay cold and your body will be 'undercooled'. (Compare to overcooked salmon) In 'teamefforts' sometimes once in a while one can make mistakes like watching porn on the workfloor, but certainly it is unbelievable to watch porn on the 'worldfloor'. (It is only boys' talk) And then again, nine years ago the world was in a different stage of success across the global spectre. There was nothing puritan in the evolution time of making success anywhere and everywhere. And coming back to this particular line of thinking, that is exactly odd to put porn and the dirty word nowadays 'downloading' on mr Green's head in another timeline. Watching porn is a very exciting heterosexual activity and very different from getting immigration on the retina of your eye in very serious proportions as in networks. Logic does not combine the two together as in shoelaces. The year 2008, 2007 and 2006 up to now has been marked as the time when Mr Green has watched intensive pornographic material on the internet. A time also when immunity could be bought. (Senator Geary in Godfather Part II). Sex mad people get quickly caught somewhere in the middle, because the 'syndrome' doesn't stop anymore just like any other addiction. Mr Green can impossible still have that much cool in him to be a Tory Minister, a man for handling difficult issues, and also who seems at the soapbox the flesh and blood of a true compassionate human face.

The story continues.

UK Electorate skeptiual (new word?). Like saying we have the military of tomorrow and will start training them today.

27 November 2017.

Oh dear, oh dear, the Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, is in big new troubles with her plans to change the future of Britain overnight. What has happened to a country, formerly known as the G7 industrial leader among six other permanent Members, including Japan, Italy, Germany, France, Canada, and the US? The debate on the industrial strategy plans are ongoing as we speak, now Live on the Daily Telegraph UK. Fix point: the European Union. How does one focus (hocus pocus, pilatus pas)on this problem in clear simulation and not in terms of political gain/ strategies? It is understandable for the government and the Prime Minister that this is not the sort of Brexit they had in mind when the people or electorate chose to vote 'out' of the EU in June 2016. But then again honesty can make the Prime Minister look very lonely and vulnerable as a politician to lead her country out of this miserable curve going downwards, each time more and especially when announcing publicly about plans to 'change' Britain. Another moment almost at immediate speed just tells you that Britian is failing to prove it's twelve points plans under too much of it's voidness that were created along the way getting itself into the EU as a none permanent Member State. The whole enterprise of that u- turn brought forth some sort of enormous 'grand illusion', that a. the richer would get richer, and the poorest would in the end survive this change. Over decades long it bubbled only bigger at the top UK government and businesses, and not realizing how much indeed was for Britain and how much for 'business'. If you put this together in one piece it only get's more messier. It's not the economy or money that are priorities in this industrial new plan set up today for the public to glare upon. The EU has machineries to do all big data platforms, aka data infrastructure global scale. When or where does Brexit split from the EU?

The Prime Minister doesn't have much time left before it is another moment to have talks with Brussels next month, the end of the year in december. She is lucky that we are still in november 2017, and not a year later this time when nothing will be the same again like today. Because the EU is moving on and one has to imagine where that might be next time today. Both things can be done, that it is not only where the UK will stand (negative) in a year's time, but also where the EU will stand at the same time (positive). This is the new economic view and it won't go away as long as Brexit insists on existence. That in itself is mammoth task, because you can't only do the EU and each Member State individual in overviewing the balances, second by second. If the EU had to do the same that would probably make people in Britain understand why Brexit is not in the positive field in this picture, but wholly negative. And that is what one can only see as the bleeding point in Mrs May initiative today with her plans to bring back the dog bones home to Britain and eat it. Macro economics has become over the years, from an EU point of view, (theory), a multiple platform. If you stand against this vast complexity of computing you are not only standing alone, but time will also not be at your side to congratulate you as a winner. Britain now is seeking safe territories and wants to feel the wet earth underneath it's feet, like the 19th century, something everybody understands. These from another point of view where the world moves on fast in mainstream global economics is like watching someone doing a GTA (V?) Mission, the animated version of real vast industries and the power that they hold.

The cargo ship Daisy Lee is in the harbour. But for now it is only animated stuff or industrial vision. And a bonus point if you have already done the mission yourself or stopped right there if you feel that this kind of danger is unfamiliar territory to ordinary mortals.

https://youtu.be/jI53zVIXczc

The EU's big surprise: it has great potential!

25 November 2017

Respect, for Britain leaving the EU. Eighteen months later the EU is witnessing some clearing of the fog on their own side, plus it is finally getting over the emotional idea that sentimentality with a country is basically a bad omen and will once come back down on you, if let's say this country has world-ly powers. There are some small signs that the European Union is moving on and it has upgraded with immediate effect the matter of an EU army package deal that needs to be signed officially next month, december 2017. This is every philosopher's dream come true who wanted to see Europe and enlightenment, an ideal that Johan Wolfgang von Goethe would have applauded far beyond from where he is now. Europe wanted to have an intellectual Europe, where it's more 'enlightened' citizens could mean something for the nation and protect all from being scattered like lost sheep in rustique pictures that can make life difficult for the herdsmen. And the meaning of war, what was that among ministers in parliament? Again that particular fire is  rekindled again in the 21st century, after a long hard 'strife' of EU Member States coming together and to find a different way representing their European vision and union. This was meant to be a political and economics union and not like the enlightened Europe of intellectuals, one would say, had in mind.

Now with the leaving of England this has put some light on the EU as an independent bloc of European nations that need no introduction period to prove their existence. That problem seems to be entirely the UK's problem today, having created the image of the world's richest nation, on a sixth place in the G7. Europe will have other problems if e.g. this fracture of leaving becomes another opening in the EU Member States skin... In this century the EU has great potentials, if geography will be taken seriously and not just for expansion reasons, the nationals living in these places respected, and giving more political freedom to citizens. Again, Europe in it's Wagnerian self has a barbaric nature, to be honest, but when not being barbaric it is possible to see the illumination so vividly described by their Saxonist philosophers, that humanity is a heavenly key. Maybe key to politics, and key to philosophy. It is certainly not the key to economics and nor is it a natural ally to economics. Another problem given to the economics is mass refugees and the latest influx of immigrants covering wide ranges of space and need for 'key factors' in each Member State. Was this a promise of good policy tactics? We are now fortunate not only to be able to speak in English to one another in the European Union, but ministers can be emblazoned with good fortune and think things through if and when to act bold or with humility. After all, we are all subjects of Time.

Science: home.

(MOO, my own opnion)

14 November 2017

Britain/ Brexit will be under special conditions, or it can be, to be included in the EU Defense Strategy package signed yesterday in Brussels. We can do home science when reading the news online, that something is changing Europe from a fundamental peace agreement post war 1945 in November 2017, 72 years later. This indeed is the 21st century, reference of era is imperative when making changes of a different scale, than e.g. political or economic changes. In politics and economics the laws for improvement and empowerment in new areas is nothing new in the world. There is constant need for improvement and it hardly ever interferes with security or top security, if timelapses have anything to do with this as a proof since WWII. What exactly has changed in Europe over the last three decades? Constant improvement and EU enlargement have been key issues and accomplished since the single currency in 2003. The single currency/ economic measure was and still is indefinitely holding on even through difficult times, one can say, close or distant. And the ECB at the same constant is showing that they are a tower of strength to keep hanging onto the Euro, as successful and in timeless continuity. The EU economics is the new politics in Brussels, and vice verse when it comes to politics. Brexit is unconditionally squeezed out, or it can be squeezed in again, when theory wins the argument for staying in or out. But this is all politics and economics, for better improvement of living standards for the European nations. Britain placed in central EU countries, even when in the middle of the sea...

In a military vision, set out by Italy, for Europe, e.g. the EU nations' bloc, and signed yesterday in Brussels by only Member States, excluding Brexit Britain, the question of peace is now being taken quite easily, and somewhat too easily, if compared to a more and deeper necessity as Britain being the most and more sophisticated armed forces in the world, next to strategist Italy, also a very sophisticated military visionair. Too easily, yes, one could say that. Post war 1945 peace was a technical and necessary step of an undertake and stop the guild of nations who were under pressure by Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler. Men of good upbringing and sophisticated backgrounds, in politics mainly, were a selective group to undertake a full measurement against future atrocities or wars and intolerance against foreign invasion of any kind, and obliterate under the sky and on the face of the earth random or specific hatred against any race or creed, that from now on peace is fundamental and will always be top priority and not secondary to politics and economics. The public had or got the impression that any sophisticated army could be incorporated by a sophisticated government only. No European nation, on the continent or not, was excluded openly or bluntly, unless hostile to peace in the world and in Europe. But this is all sentimental garbage now, when in the 21st century, leaving behind the end 18th and 19th centuries. A sophisticated army will always abhor atrocities and deliberate acts of violence in civil life, anywhere among allies. Mrs May is right to emphasize that Britain will still be committed to keep security of Europe at it's heart. (Yesterday at business dinner in her speech against President Vladimir Putin of Russia) Defense is not spoils. The public thinks of defense in a very serious way, unconditionally.

Can Italy alone as the EU Member State now do sophistication of military envisioning in a 27 EU Member States bloc?

In the global effects arena of world economies or big G7, now Westminster sexpool.

7 November 2017

In the public domain, in the UK or across the world, one can only be puzzled over Westminster's latest sex harassment stories that are still coming out, piece by piece. It looks as if this is the Prime Minister's latest attempt to show that Brexit is making progressive steps for any future outside the EU, for when the time has arrived to move out indefinitely. The sexual harassment stories about Tory Ministers, officially still ministers representing Britain in the G7, seem to think that personal or private behaviour does not look so bad in the big picture when ministries outperform on the platform of prestige in politics and economics at a global level. One can get away easily with a bit of flirting, harmless naughtiness, or sometimes even asking for sexual favours from your staff. Be it non verbal outskilled the verbal world. The Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, has tried for this new approach of her cabinet, and she claims that this will be the fresh start for a Brexit future if cabinet ministers can follow the same line and guidelines she is planning on putting forward, in her own words, for Conservatives and other colleagues or Party Leaders. One by one she is moving the pieces, or ministers, zig-zagging from position to position, like a game of ministerial chess. Ministers as the bishop, private offshore assets of Queen and countrymen/ women as the queen, and Brexit is getting the rook, only moving horizontally or vertically. A Brexit Conservative cabinet in the UK as we still know it today, is set to be looking a bit less corporate, but will now be looking more like a real government in Real Time when this is in March 2019.

It is quite worrying the touching of a knee, alleged groping of Labour ministers, one or two, rape allegation even by one minister, that these have now become such monumental errors and misbehaviour by MP's in parliament in the UK, moving aside the zero prospect of a Brexit future to second place. The public doesn't understand why the EU and UK are being civilized about the deals between the two sides as light as a cracker, e.g. when in fact the UK is left without any friendly access after Brexit into big businesses. A fictional economy thriving is what one can only be thinking this is the only option left to the UK from March 2019 and ongoing after that. Friends are hard to come by when you are falling apart... Structural or not. Something no one will see happening in the EU Member States bloc, at least not for the coming decades. In stead, the EU seems to be putting forth an ambitious plan to continue it's expansion outside the EU, with several partners across the world. Continuation of expansion is the EU's golden hard head for the future and it's business in time set in another plan. And one can only guess the outcome of that, that here there is no plan of deficit readings by it's Member States and continuity is the invention they are planning on elevating up to the nex level. (Something that is different from where Brexit is upgrading it's political systems) And in chess the EU is moving it's pawns quite skillfully... One question will do: will Brexit economy hold the same living standard, e.g. parenting leave, women in work, as when part of the EU as now? We all know in the world that the UK has every intention of keeping civilization upbeat in their country, but in the end of the day it is the economy, again...

Mrs May coughs, but was it the same for the content of her speech?

06102017

Enough said about Mrs May's speech misfortune at Manchester Central, the Conservative Party Conference 2017. This morning in the newspapers online the 'honourable outsider', Mr Grant Shapps, calls for Mrs May to step down as Prime Minister, and said that this can't go on, burrying our heads in the sands. It was Mrs May coughing, but no one is saying that her speech also had a coughing fit problem. And that under the circumstances is good news. What did they expect from the speech that wasn't what they wanted to hear? They didn't want to hear that the Prime Minister made a sober impression, the speech wasn't opportunistic and it couldn't have set out the strategic vision of a Britain that doesn't know yet what this historic meaning could be for the next generation and time. Britain was in partnership with the rest of the Europeans for 70 years and it changed our view of what peace and war means for a Europe that is united in the face of danger. Post War (II) Britain, and also the rest of the European Nations, had come to some understanding to change history for always: no more war! It is easy to say that Brexit is a political change, while any good man/ woman knows it can't be easy to a Prime Minister who has no previous experience with such historic changes and no vision of new dynamics and strategies settings having been made yet, and tell the people of Britain how safe it is or will be to leave the EU. Most governments in Britain followed the old rule of being part of the EU, even when not 'in' the EU. The world then was going one way if you want to call it that. Opportunity was great for everyone and every minister enjoyed a number of his/ her own share of, from and in it. Why is Britain leaving the EU after a visible succesful union of European nations and Britain for seventy years? What is it's historic reason or meaning for leaving the EU? Mrs May, the current Prime Minister is sandwiched by that 'unknown' piece in the puzzle. And again she will be sandwiched even deeper when the time comes for her to actuaaly show she has the guts to leave the EU and take Britain across the seas and ocean where it has never been, namely the ocean that is defined by historic new meanings. Her speech at Manchester Central this week was'n coughing up strange noices, as was the misfortune of her voice breaking several times during speaking. But reality check is now pointing to be asking a very serious question on the whole, that if the Prime Minister will be forced to leave in this obscure moment, who then will be taking her place with a new Othellian- like vision?

In other corners of British politics week, first to 6 October 2017, there are whispers of bringing on Ms Ruth Davidson from her role as Conservative leader of the Scottish Tory Party to Westminster, and also contemplating the possibility for her to become Prime Minister, and therefore take Mrs May's place in stead. It is rather tempting in the 21st century to have a millennial become Prime Minister in Britain, had it not been so that Britain wants to leave the EU. Miss Davidson is known to have been an ardent supporter of staying in the EU with the referendum in 2016 when the British people voted 'No' and leave the EU. She would have made an exciting new Prime Minister had Britain stayed in the EU and the sky above Britian would have been roaring with her witty style of debating. Unfortunately Britain is making history and it will need, at least for the time being, a Prime Minister who is prudent and will watch her step carefully on both or all sides when moving forward to new historic meanings for Britain and the British people. Ms Davidson perhaps has lost her head in time and doesn't pay too much attention to the rotational speed of EU political powers and global visions. This is very real time and the only reality that all EU Member States live by, but also in the rest of Europe, including Britain across the North sea. Opportunity doesn't knock for people like Miss Davidson all for nothing when time get's corrupted. But it is a nice change, or it could have been a nice change to have a young dynamic millennial at the head of the Tory government and lead the way in the true spirit of Nelson to sail the new seas. She would have been a fine Nelson. But this is not the time she will make her maiden voyange to slay all the beasts in the obscurity of the deep oceans and come back a hero of the British nation... The economy heroism like every other millennial is tempting to believe it is in your blood and streaming wildly. Yes, you could even take on a whole chunk of the future, when given the opportunity. In politics the ships are still old and the vision the sailors hold is one of danger and peril. Navy heroism isn't what they will recall best, when having a few drinks more than the usual. Back to business in politics. Mrs May is a prudent Prime Minister and more importantly she isn't doing it for the money. She is not the Prime Minister pinata at the moment and doing it for money. She even lacks that opportunistic twinkle in her eyes that is saying, Oh yes, I will lead the people of Britain out of the EU, and I will catch the rainbow's pot of gold at the other end and doing so single handedly. "Come yeah all with me and follow the trail of gold dust!"

What's left of globalism is a skeleton of political and diplomatic mime.

13 August 2017

One first Act is that you see a man appearing on the stage from the left and a second man appearing from the right. And then there is loud music, national anthems, one American and one North Korean. The crowd is bemused and is listening because of polite and civilzed reasons. This is the artistic view of what reality could have been if it wasn't how two presidents are acting on stage in the theater of war and peace. And if I am correct globalism should be about political and diplomatic (where democracy is complicated) peace and not war. Perhaps it has failed the critics of politics and diplomacy how far off globalism has come and is slowly burying itself under it's own rubble. The world is silent enough, except for in Virginia, Charlottesville USA. White supremacists are going to the streets and the world should hear about it. It is now global news. A van or other four wheeled vehicle plowing into a crowd has already been either a strong indication or evidence how soicieties around in the world are changing their perception of what used to be a peaceful society, thanks to democracy, parlementairy superiority and nations who believe in a civilized world. What is happening in Charlottesville is dangerous to both demonstrators and innocent bystanders. Demonstrators can be shot down, and innocent bystanders can become the victim of circumstance and brutality. On the other side of the Atlantic in Europe there isn't much that can be done at the moment. Politically it seems that Brexit from the EU is the new diplomacy and as long as there is money to pay for it's theater it can or will last as long as it takes. There isn't any date where it's expiration date is a clear deadline. What else can one say except for speak your mind on what you hear, see and keep silent on. Act two: the monkeys, hear, see and keeping stumm. Globalism isn't bound by any law and isn't ever going to be on trial, let's say if one critic asks why national governments have come to a stage where they are acting like political and diplomatic janitors nowadays and keep up the appearance of a running world in western society. For example, the cold war is over when globalism meant two superpowers deciding peace or war in the world, with in between all countries working toward a peaceful side, and not the side of the adversary. Europe keeps stumm and is taking note, like good secretaries when e.g. President Donald Trump in the USA and the North Korean Kim Jong Un are in a belligerent brabble over who will be first to reach the sky or bring down Babylon's tower, here globalism isn't in a stage act of arbiter or Judge and to warn both presidents of breaching peaceful laws and pacts with previous governments or other official authorities. It's our international security and it should not fail to protect both demonstrator, protesters, civilian and citizen. We know, president Donald Trump is the president in the White House and he has his own diplomatic advisers. And the choice of weapon? It should not even be mentioned in a civilized conversation what that weapon of choice they say will be.

For the time being the Middle East is relatively tranquil in august 2017. Turkey is showing it can be contained and curbed if tensions are too high and there isn't any incentive left to feed the lions and foxes with. In Syria we have no idea of what is left from it's shredded infrastructure by war and influx of people leaving the country in masses. Globalism has had it's days already in the Middle East when the Arab spring in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya criss crossed their blades for democracy and stopping globalism in their interior ministries. Who is your brother? Russia? The USA, or Europe? Who is on the stage except for the skeleton of mediocre political mime.  AKA as phillipic.

The Queen's speech: Brexit in the Queen's English...

21 June 2017/ 19:05 PM

This has been a long and hard contemplation having to hear and see the Queen, Queen Elizabeth II in England, addressing both Houses in Parliament and the people of Britain, in a comprehensive mood in the queen's speech today. What was to expected, perhaps may have been heard by the Lords and House of Commons, but also people and government in a first time post Brexit was also respresented, as a reminder of flashing the beacon lights in a time England has never seen before. 'A bill to complement parliament, when leaving the EU,' simulated throughout her speech today this feeble flashing. For some, one can maybe only say how much she is missed when younger and more vibrant to address the nation and House of Commons. It was England then, and a global understanding around the world. Others may have been attending the Queen's speech for totally different reasons, as negotiations are on their way to exit the country indefinitely from the EU in the coming recent history of Brexit and the the rest of the world after leaving the EU. The Brexit talks are hard and complex, and if anything isn't put right in it's first move to exit from the EU, what then can one say about the future of Britain's economic and political definitions in the world? In the old system the people still think that the Prime Minister of Brexit, Mrs Theresa May, and her opponent, the Labour Party, will reinvent a political fire by two party- system sticks and flare up in the transistion's abstract how Brexit can be best governed. Brexit will start with a starting point at zero, as a demonstration of the meaning behind the hard and complexity of talks to leave the EU, by value. And Your Majesty may have been very much aware of this new England in her Queen's speech which she gave today in the House of Commons. But, maybe it was also time again for a new generation in which the British Monarchy will retain it's sovereignty and it's Christian values, if to match an uncertainty of incredible great magnitude facing Britain today or tomorrow. In the House of Commons the queen, Queen Elizabeth II, was still loved and admired for her presence at the age of 91 years old.

Queen's speech, 21 June 2017, Brexit.

A consummate leader, Zbigniew Brzezinsky, died at the age of 89 this week.

29 May 2017/ 20:02 PM

As top echelon global leader, the late Mr Brzezinsky, will be leaving the world an immense surface, which he helped created, designed, commanded and controlled over many years for decades long. When laid to rest, a final prelude is start to begin in our young generation at top level, for another period of time, unending, one believes. Time since 2014 was different if the coming world remained close or closer to the surface in every and any direct way, or what the late Mr Brzezinsky would have called, it requires specifics to command the world, and see what is essential in global logistics, political or military. It is such a man now leaving the earth and the world as we now know it, from afar or close to the center, whether accessible or inaccessible to remain so, timeless.

A surface of natural order? A surface of unnatural order?

Once you have seen this view of the world today it provides automatically serene answers to measure and controlling it, while at the same timeline of the paradox relaxing many individual powers, each and every magnitude, government or the military, to stay in lengthy sessions of time or timelessness. It is here at the peak of all his accomplishments a leader like the late Mr Zbigniew Brzezinsky will take a second place, next to the late Mr Shimon Perez, Israel's only great 21st century leader, and like the falcon of royal Egypt fly into the setting sun. God Almighty alone knows these men and their true place hereafter, while earth will not stop a second or minute to give praise to our own world leaders, continuous by keeping it from falling apart.

Zbigniew Brzezinsky leaves no bitterness behind to the larger global public. A silent departure befits a man of his stature and what we cherish from now on is unsure, or, whether it is peace or war at the center of the world.

An inaffective (non operational) EU Military HeadQuarter should point to accomplishment and not build-up.

20 May 2017/ 19:28 PM

There is no doubt that every European Member State in the European Union would want a secure Europe first and last to the extreme to avoid war wherever possible, as Europeans are geared up with natural fear of World Wars starting overhere in Europe at almost every turn of the century, so to speak. But then there is fortune to drive a wedge between the two almost at a constant of magnitude, e.g. if there is receptive climate at this point in 2017 to actually have something of a military HQ in the European Union, at a cost of 5 Billion euros by each Member State, annually, and secondly the BQ (Big Question) on the Union itself as a economic champion in Europe to lead by example. Fortune in terms of revenues still has not equalled high returns as far as EU memory goes for most big Member States, but even in terms of low returns when it concerns Member States behind the big six or five. But it could be the public's wrong perception to make up such error judgments by observation, for EU leaders do consider control as an impact of 360 degrees reality that is making this decision for a EU Military HQ imperative, a decision of right timing. Velocity of change is another imperative, something an important ally as England and Brexit England makes a terrible loose end in the altered desire of Europeans for peace... Germany and France next to Britain are the oldest in that category and have deep understanding when the military is initially right and ultimately can backdrip or drop, depending against what background or theatre of war. For the last two decades in Europe the European Union architecture were the Lisbon and Maastricht treaties with no public mention of any date to initiate in future a military build-up, as it's extension of European Union Security, a HQ on overseeing missions. In the public eye political and monetary union were goals to enlarge accomplishments rather. NATO kept in it's place in the global eye of the world and was considered a safe organization to all it's Members of old and new generations. Is humanity changing the very meaning of peace in Europe and global peace with new diversities and making overseeing impossible to retain under the outdated system of keeping friendly? In Europe to maintain peace is a godly decision of nations and preferably to destruction by war. It is unclear in 2017 to discern why in the European Union endemic change to security is now resulting in name of a Military HQ to oversee missions. At least from public eye level.

To be continued.

We're always wrong about Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan

16042017/23:45 PM

Theoretically the votes outcome in this referendum in Turkey are basically genuine, if it is 51% of a high turnout in favour of giving Mr Erdogan greater powers as president. Once you start well with conceding defeat, the rest of the world will have to accept, that the 'Yes' vote won the referendum, and not the 'No' vote. That's clear fact and not abstract politics. What is now happening in Turkey is far more serious than we are used to think about Middle East policies, or geopolitics. The Republicans are making history, some even say since the days of Kemal Ataturk in 1923. And also in a way it does matter to the rest of Turkey's alliances to the 'outside world' where their NATO ally or EU aspirant candidate is going to put the country and if that should 'fit the shoe' for the newly fresh Republican State of Turkey and it's president, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan. In his victory speech tonight in Instanbul there was a quick reminder of what Mr Erdogan called 'respecting democracy'. That means the world is looking at a possible model in which Turkey's president knows what that requires if you want to stay or be in power as it's president. You can't stress the presidency at the moment long enough in the last few hours of his victory in the referendum on constitutional changes/ amendments he wants to bring 'back' from more prosperous times for the Turkish people. Rather a sad way to see a reverse time in Turkey, from having played a bigger role as aspirant global leader, seen from strategic Turkey, coming to a more relic time and to unite the people under these changes. Mr Erdogan is not the US President Mr Donald Trump, but has been in the power center of the world from the days as mayor in Istanbul, until today he is that same political animal. You could say, for flattery, that Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan is the Turkish Tony Blair, and must watch carefully how global politics is not a thing to play with, as did Mr Blair. Tomorrow when the country will wake up to the new change in Turkey's nostalgia politics and powers, another shock will probably have the people wondering about the situation in which 51% said 'Yes' to extending more governing powers to one man, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The rest of the world is the den of the lions and for some reason we all believe that they are fierce. If Turkey will be prosperous under the new constitution that will be a blessing for people and president. But, there is a slight suspicion that one or two things are mixed up here, and that Turkey will soon learn the free ropes of it's own claims. Unlike Brexit, these are people who are used to be closed in and know the deal about that. Turkey, on the other hand, is and has always been from it's former glory days a people with a God given understanding how to be expansive and keep on expansion for it's own legal reasons. Again, the Chinese proverb works like medicine through our time, that whoever is cursed is living under or in interesting times. The president of Turkey will need lots of good luck with his 'greater vision' for Turkey, if not fortune. A presidential system has only one obligation and not like the politics he knows when Mr Erdogan was Prime Minister, and a G-20 country. Power is what e.g. the President of the United States has.

To be continued.

Why nearly after three years of invasion of Crimea the west has to leave Russia alone.

28032017/04:29 AM

Russia presidential election is due in March 2018, and not until then. But yet this was already out in the news this week, with Russian President, Vladimir Putin, getting ready to face his next race of another presidential election soon... In Russian time, it couldn't be soon enough, is one impression one gets when reading the news. In global time, the story behind is only viewed and analyzed by a group of people with much interest in Russia, and it's president, or, maybe Europe as a whole tickles their fancy for each and every specific reason. It is true, Europe is not at it's best these days. But so is elsewhere around in the world. We just have to check daily balances and make up our minds on issues coming close to our own lives, when at home. When looking at Kim Jong Un, at this particular point in global recent history, there is no certainty of telling which is which, or whether the outlook comes from North Korea and that it is taking the country to a closer range within other territories, or that the west wants to be on top of every effort made by the North Korean leader and his outlook.(We are living in interesting time, as the Chinese saying goes) Now, where does this leave the rest of the world, near and far from North Korea or the United States? The best thing that comes to mind is to name our impression on the state of the affairs in the global sphere, the strategy of sandwiches. Europe is here on top of that list, being sandwiched in between one end and that of another one, not all three dimensional just yet. We have different views on this one, and one is another word for one dimensional. BQ: a slight suspicion is asking seriously or synthetic seriously, whether as a result from the invasion of Crimea in 2014 by Russian President, Vladimir Putin, the time has come when there is nothing else to make of Europe and it's eastern neighbors, or maybe, if we lived in a different time, to see this quiet confusion as a personal homage to the Russian President, for having changed and reshuffling of politics in Europe, as a new starting point into more confusion to reach the ends of the world. Before the invasion of Crimea, much condemned by the International world, no one can remember or recall to have seen Europe silently convulsing under it's own weight and pressures. One such pressure is keeping the military on the edge, a new cooperation between Nato allied countries and European security forces, if there is such definition and specific. Another sandwiched 'outlook' is Brexit, right- wing populists and elections held in Germany and in France this year. (In the Netherlands formation of a new government is fully underway after the general election earlier this month) Yes, 2017 becomes the strangest of years for big establishments around the world. And they are old...

Curious as it is or sounds, the global world is the big hot- dog sausage we all need to chew on from time to time. It is easy and it is fast food for everyone with a clear and healthy appetite for survival. Countries, governments, Banks, Businesses, in whatever mainstream economics, in 2017, should review their competencies on loss or gains. You can't think of putting it in another way that will make sense technologically or that would be practical thinking. Peace should also be reviewed in the same way and expand on competencies. Why else would globalism fail or praised for it's existence? In stead all global issues and insecurities are a direct effect of the Russian President in Russia and when following his movements. It's not what you have on your plate, stupid. It is what you don't have on your plate. But will the Russian President remain in Office after the next election held in March next year? And so many dogs are barking in the meantime. In fact, the war with Russian President, Mr Vladimir Putin, is over. He is back as the strongman every journalist in the west likes to see or call 'the one to look out for, because...'. Journalism has now become the dullest of games for juicing Mr Vladimir Putin as still the most dangerous man on earth to mind. All, of course, depending on his love for hot- dogs or sandwiches. No, in reality, the Russian President is a sagacious strategist, and he is one very sharp dressed man when it comes to military operations in his territories, or what he considers as his territories. BQ nr 2: is Mr Putin winning on dissecting globalism inch by inch (millimeters)? Leonid Bershidsky, in one of his columns last week on Bloomberg.com, wrote a very curious other thing, that e.g. no one should try to cheat on globalism. Simply because you can't. Peace has lost it's senatorial meaning since Plato and we are only getting to see it in our days, in a new century. But, we are living in interesting times, as the proverb in Chinese merely is suggesting, from one blind side in the eye of the beholder. The European Union doesn't like to be sandwiched and lose it's mustard coloured sausage. Brexit slowly is becoming close to a sigh under the bridge and the future of England isn't anything like Venice, in Italy. And, then, all European Union Member States, also, stay on the outside looking in. Or was that staying on the inside looking out policies?

Planet Earth.

22 February 2017.

Time is catching up with the future and treading the big mill we now know the world is renamed into, and to also emphasize it's cold steel blades wider than in previous decades. Our heroes don't need designer's shoes, they need wings and learn how to swoop down on the crowd from anywhere at the top. When Kofi Annan, Former UN Secretary General, and Former Dutch Minister, Ruud Lubbers, were the first leaders in the new globalism of late nineteenth century, Time meant going clockwise during high noon, fast or slow, to build a world from a G7/8 and G20 point of view that most nations understood as the best plan to generate personal and collective incentives for at least 250 years to come. In the public's eye this was our time, in the least what would become our world too... 2017, Let's say when seen from the millennium on, in the end, only brought us closer to a few loss of details in the global plan of it's younger days. General demand seems to only go one way and it is demanding that whoever wants to stay alive and live must learn to accept the new global leaders, which no one ever saw before being groomed for the magnitudes of their tasks and no one will also ask why. You have to try once in your life time to do something right, or wonder about the more critical changes today, that freedom isn't necessarily only free speech, but in parliamentry terminology, freedom also could/ would mean knowing who is leading the country, and to display in modest terms to question the abstract world where all the leaders have gone to, and in all fairness of reason, to ask who our new leaders might be, once everyone has joined the global idea of planet earth. War & Peace, once a magnum opus to historically great minds and civilized populations among the nations of all of earth, has been changing hands with a complete technocratic world, and leaving peace only in the hands of technocrats and technologies to create the new world order in a technocratic peaceful planet earth. The new war & peace history can only go to the winners of concept engineering of global transparency and to keep the whole of mankind to 'pre-meditate' (anticipated plans) terrorism or acts of crime against humanity...

The millennium in our days meant not to restart what was finished, but what was a definite finishing line between the two worlds, old and facing the new onward. Once it was generally accepted by all global leaders, US, Canada, Japan, France, Britain, Italy, Germany and Russia, then under the Perestroika & Glasnost years of Mr Mikhail Gorbachev, the new power boost was consensus, politics descended suprisingly easy on this global glasnost, and then slowly coming to the rest of the nations, known as G20 countries, and even going beyond... World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland? A much faster Technology was the only answer to help synchronize the big ideals and business visions of the future, if logic human or robotic could be truly replaced for indefinite time. A greater challenge was born since then, but the greater public didn't had the same sharing technology just yet, if anyone remembers when for the first time a PC could be connected to the World Wide Web/ Internet during the mid nineties. The system in the words changed politics, governments, the electorate, national health and education institutions, all fundamental and basic needs of everyone alive and living on the planet. (The same goes for endangered species of animals and industries that process food for both animals and humans) In the world the new human had to be made redundant and become more socially active, where logic should be preserved through special designed social and digital programs, like billions of marbles, and help sustain life in general everywhere in the world. Today it is rather difficult to say that we are astonished at Time and how much it has been catching up with the future. The future has a blunt and sharp point to accurately instruct 'safe' ways from now on. 'Discontent' also will get a new definition somewhere along the way as the world progresses with living in the future. That might be the military, if advancing?

Big Questions require Big Data, and Brexit is one BQ

30012017/ 01:09 AM

Global political meetings, whether held in Washington DC or in Japan, to Big Data all Big Q's will have to go through the same system and family tree. A world without Big Questions would not need BIG DATA, in reverse logic or global psychology. It would be insane trying to go that way, when e.g. our humanoid and robotic world does not equal the going back journey in time. The British Prime Mininster, Mrs Theresa May, has been in a titanic struggle with President Donald Trump over old ties that just do not die, but should need some sort of restart or restats. And that is looking from a Brexit window basic memory, and what is covering almost the whole world's surface. Big Data isn't research anymore, as when globalism was in it's cradle and rocking the nations softly softly toward the future in the present time and 21st century. But of course you could say that this is only one part of the Real Time global politics, and is finding itself almost at a constant, to have it's leaders doing the Big Q's in public and they are trying to keep up the designated pace for each one of them when in public life. A fact of life is also that no G7 country can re-invent the past nor the future with a big nomen datum est in glossy globalism RT. Mrs Theresa May, at this point, is trying very hard to avoid the past, which she is wisely doing, and is even trying much harder to introduce the meaning she thinks Brexit could be, and not only to her, but also wherever she thinks that home is in Great Britain. A simple idea comes to mind, that Mrs May should have a collision with promoting the new Britain, as a G7 country and leaving the EU as a long time partially X Member State, alongside Sweden and Norway or Switzerland. Now, we have seen that Britain is trying hard to seek 'new alliances' last week by two State visits, a. one in the United States, and b. one in Turkey. The US President, Donald Trump, luckily has managed to keep away his 'oops!' and 'downs' usual self in this meeting with the British Prime Minister. It isn't what the world is waiting for anymore. Global groups like the G20 or G7 have seen and been there before the new generation. Our world leaders are not millennials, for a start. Call it history, or basic research, it is a fact that most world leaders are part of the X- generation. And if correctly, that meaning is still relevant in the Y- generation. Another Basic Q is the one every one wants to ignore out of politeness, that when it comes to finance or monetary policy, how much will it cost to maintain both generations in this world format?

The inversion of peace is a problem solving machine, with only lab accessability to scientists and rats. If e.g. on the menu bar Syria needs International help, and going through the proper channels means Big Data, with logistics and sending or having troops on the ground, or even mentioning of the present time countries in the war against terrorists, this all becomes only a decision for the lab to make. World leaders from the X generation are out on this one and they will serve the greater good platform at any time or date. But one thing is true that industrialization started globalism, whether in Britain, Germany, France, Canada or Japan, more than seven decades ago, after World War II. The word SMART strangely enough has gone obsolete since the last global financial crisis, in 2008, between the industrial leading countries. We cannot even begin to suspect why our world has gone this way, as if it's success came too premature. The shoes don't fit, or are too tight, when e.g. it comes to Big Questions like Brexit. Now either the US or Britain are in the International store of politics and are trying to fit into size 38, for Mrs Theresa May, while President Donald Trump is mocking his own feet to the salesman. We're in weird science days, let's say if success did in fact came in too premature for the globalists. (Salesman of shoes, Michael Moriarty in the film Born too soon) Another problem also occurs immediately when for example most countries got jammed in the doorway of the nineteenth century and stayed there to the present day, thinking it will all go away as a bad vision the world would not be able to handle what it is asking for to have or get. And that is another Big Question, as to ask what exactly can the world ask for to have or get in our Real Time as it is? Britain is first, it wants Brexit. To problem solving machines that would mean dealing with the EU, and next dealing with the fact that Britain was and has been an industrial leading nation since the thirties. Germany made sure it was always going to stay a country to revitalize and modernize all industries it counted for. The point now to make is what industries can be left to the Y generation and build on a future that is going to be their SMART world? Transparency is simply not docking the system anymore when it comes to global politics. And here is where some are sensing it will cause harm to mankind if Big Data can only be a problem solving machinery, in stead of ironing the robes of success for some time longer, to order rank again with respect for all talented men and women who want to maintain the Big Data as a world success. And no one will ever find it in the big flames of wars no one really gets.

Monarch demise, unite.

07012017/ 13:48 PM

May God in heaven grant Your Majesty the Queen of Egland, Queen Elizabeth II, an extension of serene life throughout the rest of the year, and this is still the embodiment of what unites the people of Great Britain and beyond, e.g. in the Commonwealth countries. For most European countries, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands and Belgium, the year 2017 has come to a point of 'retirement' years ahead for the older generations of kings and queens in most of the European countries here mentioned above. The big question however still is, out of the world of big Banks and business, deep social and economic changes in this century, or greater abstract powers worldwide, when the monarch dies, what will the people do to unite? A terrible fact of reality is predicting a different act on the world stage each kingdom will have to face on it's own, and union isn't the kind of logic and empowerment it used to have decades and hundreds of years ago. Also the crimson of kingdoms acting as a whole in the region, European or beyond, isn't one accurate historical fact to most European kingdoms. Beyond all kingdoms there is vast logic and reality of what did unite and what didn't. No one likes the world as it is today, and everyone is keen on having the world design back to it's former self, let's say in theory, just as it was a few decades ago. Now there is enormous wealth and it earns it's right by making a point of it's globalization and how exponentially all peoples, and kingdoms, this was a result to benefit all of mankind, the one kind of 'good' under the heaven of God Almighty, as only He could have dreamed to once see the world and it's inhabitants living. If selfishness is evil, sovereignty is by large it's supremacy of evil, and a deliberate act against mankind and God, that here is a people still living in barbaric belief having it all to oneself and for itself only, what in fact was flattened by globalists, and create a new world order to unite all of man and woman to equality, or governments and kingdoms. Now most countries have greater economic powers, and they are privileged to submit all economic and social deficit in one barrel e.g. at the European Union, to solve and implement (endemic and systemic). Kingdoms in future will contract to illogical pieces of power and the right by hereditary and in some cases confuse the nation over which way to tip the balance of this ever growing demise of power, facing in the end a slow death, and not a slower death as was expected in the 21st century.

Thank God Almighty that we are still here in one piece. To renegotiate sovereignty loses the logic of a restart in the kingdom by whatever measurement parliament will design or when even try for innovation of new rules and treaties. What is being said today is that to retain a world of extreme wealth, opposing extreme poverty, can't nourish ordinary people and low income citizens in the end, perhaps from now into every future decade. Extreme wealth has given all nations and governments adequate accessibilities to be transparent when it is all for one, and one for all, among the top of corporations and law. But it was trust that was most hurt in the global financial crash in 2008, up to now in the present time almost nine years later in 2017. Peoples are no fools, neither are nations and certain mainstream politicians in politics. If there is anything to learn from the government of Mrs Theresa May in England, one can see why nay Brexiteers differ very little from yeah Brexiteers. The symbolism of Brexit lies for the time being only with the people who voted to leave in the referendum last year in 2016, while leaving reality workers no real argument to leave the EU, the only institution of unionship among most European countries and sovereignties. And they are extremely wealthy under the banner of this union, is what most people believe. In June 1815 the Battle of Waterloo once it had defeated Napoleon Bonaparte the new look of European countries were given each a portion for being part of the allied military of the Duke of Wellington, then Commander in Chief, to lead the princes, kings and queens of Europe, whether on the battlefield or at home, to victory. In our century a worldwide discipline of equal portion when truly equal overrules all old sentiments of provision and dividing the  spoils. If the logic is right all portions, symbolic or not, now resides with the extreme wealthy as partners, or maybe even with Banks. For the electorate, the people must have the right to maintain the democratic right to vote what they believe is wrong or right in every society with aspirations of staying wealthy in the real world, and 'beg' their way out to maintain also the right to be treated as human beings and having the right as such to live and dream. Whoever would want to prove how to remain a united kingdom among the many sovereign nations, e.g. in Europe, will have to come up fast before this decade is over with a real offer that in every kingdom that 'no one should be made perishable' (unfortunately this was said by Adolf Hitler), nor should mistrust be among the kingdoms, for now and for ever. It is that age that is now terribly itching everyone in 2017.

The US and president- elect Mr Donald Trump

21 November 2016/ 00:08 AM

9 November 2016 had only one answer for America and Americans, that Mr Donald Trump is to become the next or 45th US President in January 2017. Foreign policies and politics on both sides of the Atlantic was unusually hysterical in their predictions on what might happen or be there with Donald Trump as 'our' next president. This week we are in it's second phase, post presidential election 2016, with another group of experts saying or  trying their best to make Mr Trump 'sound' like the exchequer and not like the President Americans are expecting to get when he will be inaugurated next year in 2017. The question is, what is there to think about, in terms of spending billions of US Dollars on a so called 'post election think tank'? The public need to know what sort of man will he be at the White House from January 2017 on to a four year term, let's say, into a deep 2021, for a number of good reasons. Mr Trump has won the presidential election and came in with an apparent landslide over Mrs Clinton, the Democrat leader, 276 electoral votes, as the only Republican nominee and no other. But this has changed in America, or you could take the other road by saying that this has changed America, after 9 Nov 2016, that billionaire Mr Trump had run as an independent to win the presidential race. Why so many national or international newspapers think that this win to become the next president in the US is not complex enough, at least from any world's point of view, so many are left feeling that this is too remote for anyone outside the US to understand to begin with. Let's leave it at that, one might think and from here can ignore the real true meaning behind Mr Donald Trump as this general election winner, and who is a Republican, is a blockhead that can only refer to the system and not a person, or president- elect. The truth is, according to one US newspaper online, WAPO, America is the biggest military in the world and is running a very sophisticated government system. The president elect in his victory speech mentioned something of 'working together,' or, 'that we must work together'. Was Mr Trump trying to be an intelligent next president that night, or was he trying to circumvent all circumstances for his unusual win and was set to go for the biggest job a man can have in this world, is to become the US President in the 21st century?

Unlike former Republican US President, mr Ronald Reagan, Mr Donald Trump will not be the war horse or negotiator president that one expects him to be. In fact, one can be inclined to think about the next one hundred days that Mr Trump may yet has to find a good starting point somewhere in between the present time in which he will inherit the presidency from the incumbent president, Mr Barack Obama, and his own future once he is augurated in January next year to become the US President. Here it is custom to think in terms of logic for the coming time and not speculations like all people outside the world of power politics in Washington. Europe e.g. cannot let go of logic for the moment and leave it to suspicion of US politics finding it difficult to lead the whole world again, short or long term. Incidently the pressure Mr Trump is also facing is how to maintain peace with and among the nations, which can only mean a bad call in his first one hundred days since he won the presidential race for the White House and is going to be expected to become President Donald Trump, US 45th President, January 2017. It looks like once you can get through the man that he is or saying that he is, that Mr Trump will be able to come to you in the same manner, whether at home base US or outside in the rest of the world. After all, all you need is an anchor to anchor a big ship still standing in deep waters. And that may not look like much at face value, or as in the case in Mr Donald Trump's biopic as Mr President. Some kings are as weak too! There is a great chance to tap dance out of this ridicule by the media in the US on Mr Trump and his ridiculous golden laurel on his head with the presidential win, but it is one the rest of the world can't follow by doing the same and run their own serious households in earnest. Once the people have spoken democracy again is or becomes the formula for the next term of the world's presidency at the White House. The American people say that they want Mr Trump for president, and so they voted for him. The voting system, of course, being the kernel of sophisticated government systems.

Brexit poodle prize or grand prix.

03102016/20:39 PM

Britain's Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, finally has given up the soft nerves of delaying and invoking article 50. This was tough on Mrs May after Former PM, Mr David Cameron, handed in his resignation from Parliament, soon or in the next day after it was clear that the people of Britain wanted out of the EU. Mrs May now promises by March next year in 2017 Brexit will get on with it's divorce from the European Union, be it through article 50, or just to jump. It is not going to be easy in a world that has grown so dense and even getting it's density sticking out of the 'old clothes', arms, legs, head and toes. The Prime Minister still is and seems right for the job she is now doing for a hundred days. Europe is also changing. New countries, e.g. Ukraine, Poland, with the exception of Hungary, also seem to be holding key positions in the European future. Peace, war and the military, are on a gamble as if deciding on what future Europe and the European Union should be the way forward, equally goes parallel with significant changes in the new century. In fact, contrary to what citizens think, each European Union country did not decrease on it's potential for the last three decades through globalization. It is time to admit something real did come out of from globalization and that today no country is left behind in it's 'real potential'. That isn't making it any less harder when negotiations should be about keeping the union together and not for short term goals, but more to maintain position and real worth. Mrs May is leading Britain and the British nation 'out', but not necessarily from it's potential. Distinction may be yet the hardest of nerves, but in the long term this might just be the right material to build the future with steel and not straw. Earth after all isn't the planet Straw. In military terms no one should also feel obliged to set it alight. In other words, potential, per country, is the new commodity. And the economy for so long now has been thriving on these new waves of cost effectiveness, through e.g. having it all at your doorstep, compared to the former days when money would be spent on 'getting it' to bring home with you.

Brexit, let's say if it jumps from what I have just said here in the above, will have to bounce back and try again. Any obscurity may seem wise in the old statesman's eyes, and pray to God, but it should follow expansion as the foot soldier, even for a while. And with some English bravery no one will think it hard on the nation for doing so. If only one could see in the future, having made the right choices and sacrifices, that this will work and help build the world. It is unique to have individual characters, when holding worldviews from nation to nation, country to country, and people to people, something that shouldn't be drained and leave an empty vessel behind to lay waste in a private or public wasteland. Half is admitting that no old industry could be rebuilt and that new ones will stop at nothing to process. The European Union alone can't help build the world. (See 'global strategies') It has done so already, when started at the EEC and the famous six. It has in some ways earned it's golden plates or sun discs, it is as everyone perceives it, that now you and I are living in the world it helped created with the single currency and it's Lisbon/ Maastricht treaties. It will be sheer madness to reverse the magnitude of this world or part of it. The top EU brass seem to think of a future in which Europe and Europeans will share equality of existence with more integration in 'unknown' areas, which btw is a surprising rationality in the time we are now living in. Peace among EU nations is an assessment made by individual Member States, and they are competent to do so. There is no way to turn back, but equally going forward isn't less cost effective to any party in this rationality. And on the plus side it is and wasn't a military achievement up to now. Brexit is a suggestive change, an experiment, and also it will be based on non military achievements by the British people in the 21st century. Europe breeds politics at a natural pace if it wants to, as it is convinced this will educate the people in more kinder ways for good or bad times, if and when they occur in your human lives. Do countries need to go out from intelligent beings to a more cosmetic humanity as if we were born out of egg shells? If the EU has truly power and force this is the time to make that even bigger. Brexit triggers potential and sharp divisions. If the grand prix and not the poodle prize.

Poodle Prize compare to The Glittering Prizes.

Shimon Peres dies at 93 years old in Ramat Gan, Israel, today.

28 September 2016

If brief and said in a tweet sent all over the media, one can only say that Mr Peres was a man of immeasurable vision and strength. In his power entrusted upon him as leader of Israel and a world leader in a much wider sense, it was always his prerogative to rejuvenate a tireless effort perpetually and know no stopping from here to eternity to achieve his goals. The world is familiar with the struggle of Israel after WWII and the Holocaust in our recent history, in the 19th century. Seventy years on to fight for peace is indeed a legacy with which the Late Mr Peres shall go down and be put to rest the coming weekend. In Israel's heart and mind he will be remembered for the hawk he was nicknamed later on in his more mature and senior life, but holding in awe in older age a more significant symbol to war and becoming instead a dove of peace. Some controversy might occur during his time as PM, or even as President of Israel, ways of the Statesman and his shadows to follow him wherever he goes. A good statesman never dies alone, one might say or believe. It is in his conscience as a mortal and in the solemness of one's death.

The Late Mr Shimon Peres in every each way during his life as Prime Minister or President of Israel was a vision of the world, an extraordinary nature for any man or statesman, as if there was never any doubt in his mind that his decisions have always been the only decision and make even the impossible seem possible or to be truly physically possible. It is a great life to exist in an even greater life for the Late Mr Peres, during his life. It is possible that the Former  Prime Minister and President, Mr Shimon Peres, will also be remembered in that extensive way today.

Exotic environment Hangzhou, China, to inspire G-20 nations and leaders as 'top few' this weekend.

04092016

Outsiders might think it unsettling to have a G-20 summit set in an remote place like Hangzhou in China, a place where economic miracles still dazzle the population as a people. It was an interesting choice, almost at the point of instinct- driven if senses are dull and uninspired, as many have been for a very long time in this G-20 group of nations. Back home Hangzhou will be remembered most for it's great beauty and natural habitat, something of an inspiration some countries have lost their way with, e.g. green projects, coherence intensities, and the force of growth in a great visual show or magnitude. The G-20 group in Hangzhou 2016 will not be about mother nature's hierarchies, something essential to the Chinese in all stages or plans for the future of China, one assumes. It is the breaking of the noise and frequency saying that one can assume that this G-20 summit will have to talk about renewal of cooperation, with or without Brexit at the table, represented by the new Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, between the top few now facing the worldview quite differently. The trial lasts only as long or short...

Big Q's: is unilateralism dead or still alive? As is expected by most attendees something will have to point in that direction to cope with the short term inconsistencies in many countries, all sorts one can imagine or know for fact, and other more pressing issues, let's say if the electorate fails the government again, e.g. the Brexit saga. Also another issue seems to be imperative at the table is to ask whether globalism can still dazzle the nations back home. Perhaps the choice for Hangzhou in China was meant to clear the view on the most pressing matters of the hour, here, and when going back home where reality has become the common understanding of bandwagon politics. Turkey's President makes an exception here and it's Foreign Minister today has given the green light for to build a new promenade alongside the coast in Uskudar and replace the old architectural plans. The Bosporus river again will be a magnificent trajectory of water and land on the shore in July 2018, according to Daily Hurriyet newspaper online. Hangzhou great waterways, could this have been the inspiration to the final touch for Uskudar? Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan always inspires big projects, is a known factor in economics and globalism.

To be continued.

The present state of the world today

01092016/11:38 AM

When everyone seemed to be against many changes in the world, e.g. the last two/three decades, is now globally accepted as 'It's okay'. That leaves not much left for imagination on the rest of this side, wherever that might be. Perhaps this is the age all pessimists and optimists have come to some understanding. Brexit is one such understanding, and having the same said about the EU. The war in Ukraine is under some control by the looks of things day by day, and Russia is the forgotten world not many are bothered to ask anymore if the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, is still dangerous on the whole of the balance of the world. Balance is being defined in kaleidoscopic colours and portions only some can understand. When you are in the group it means we  are outside and can be pushed back to way outside. Journalism hasn't so far got that problem. Why are we now okay? Much of the wars in the Middle East are contained by public opinion and the press, well, that is to make the difference in 2016 in this particular visual area. We are not looking at anything new for the moment, period. When Italy, last month, was struck by a heavy earthquake and counted 275 dead, the rest of the world kept low and the tragedy was treated with city prudence and calm. Actually the world is right, that everything is okay when no one or nothing is more extraordinary than our every day perception. You can't argue with normality that is no threat to world or humanity.

Eye- level view: something of a force is keeping the global economy ongoing and it is making no one nervous much bigger than today or yesterday. Buzzwords like politics, England, Scotland, the EU, elections, Nato, Turkey, Isis, are still out there in the news, but when put on a bigger scale they decimate almost instantly to zero meaning or outdated. Imagination of the world looks more each day like something went finally right for mankind and to beat that you need disorder of another age or time. (To some maybe even another god or prayer) The fish are still in the ocean or rivers, and the baits are still selling by bulk on demand. And who doesn't like fishing can always take up some other interest. But that comes as a warning in this century. Think long term and do not invest unwisely. You might end up accursing the world and not your losses or risks. Warnings from more experienced people in the field are your closest friends, much better anyway than those who want you to succeed. You just have to look up and e.g. see what a man doing well and have success like Mr Donald Trump is now having when wanting to succeed more to a greater extend. The world is not okay with that, so they say. When the system is more prudent than any man, well, you can guess what is next. Thinking as in pondering over have seen better days in the late seventies and eighties, but it never brought you any closer to having 'the world is your oyster' in the palm of your own hands. Our 'Okay World' is now something less global man- made and transported to a Zagger & Evans song, in the year 2525, when some machine is doing that for you. Brexit leaving the EU: that's okay (vector sign).

"I'm on holiday."

(Quote from series Fawlty Towers)

24072016/23:37 PM

I have been watching the world for seven years in several streamlines, timelines and also mainstream lines. For more information see my website: cityoverthetop.yolasite.com, what used to be agentstripp.yolasite.com

This singular activity has now come to an abrupt end. The worldview seven years ago in comparison to the present day worldview in 2016 has become more automated to former systems or it's hardware. We are now living more abstract than ever has been there before. Which individual totally outside of the world's view stratosphere system can exceed this far on his/ her own and not fear some sort of fatigue or collapse from exhaustion and die a lonely death afterward?

But once you are going uphill and touch the blue sky, sometimes even unintentionally, this for some reason will teach you a few things why the world is an immeasurable size of reality, and that there is no way you can do it's reality checking on your own. And then it breaks your heart, literally, to get there where it all will make sense in size and fact, that your world isn't exactly what the world is. In a strange way it is breathtaking. (God Almighty forbids that is literally meant!) And then you know for eternity that the world didn't build itself, but that it was built.

Demo3graphics make it more confusing when pact together in big capitals around the world, or when moving 24/7 everywhere in the world in one look. You won't find another one like ours in the whole of the universe, so we're saying and convincing one another through lot's of ways or popular media/ mediums. Soon we won't have one grocery store left around the corner except when it's there to ridicule our primitive lives, that we used to know as the greatest thing on earth. From an owners point of view.

I think I did write much about the world and not per sé that much about governments and politician leaders. Unless, of course, the G7 or G20. And perhaps the rationale behind 'now leaving it alone' is another surprise logic in my writing. As was the 'inspansion' writing for years, really.

The rest of mankind are now the hero for just continuing living and being here. One last thing I have learned: going to war, sometimes, isn't a thing of bravery, but courage where it is impossible to contain the level of courage a living understanding. Especially when it is on God Almighty His turf, e.g. the sea, sky and deep sky. Why it is to some a thing of storming in or extraordinary bravery I will never understand such hard invincibility.

The world is different today, compared to sixteen years ago, or before that.

Mrs Theresa May becomes Britain's next Prime Minister in 78 hours.

12072016

The best way to approach this is to say that logic, once again,  has prevailed  in Britain, at a difficult time when transit politics is based on 'real' transformations and can catch up at the end of the day(s) ahead with mainstream global networks industrializations. Mrs Theresa May in 78 hours will become the UK's next Prime Minister. By wednesday night, Mr David Cameron said, who then will be former Prime Minister of Britain, we will have a new leader to lead the country. It has taken many to believe that the choice of the hour was a surprise and they also named a few of the reasons in major newspapers, of why Mrs May should be the next Prime Minister. One, at safe distance, can only assume it wasn't so much a surprise, but that Britain in one millisecond took a deep breath and decided to seize the day, and having the good fortune to surprise. Once the political parties and leaders come to terms with the task ahead of them, changing Britain, it will be less of a menace  had they e.g. stayed in the dark like lost individuals who only know how to accuse and pointing fingers, astonishingly. (Perhaps mad is also a good choice of words) Brexit won't be the easiest of tasks to any Prime Minister. And yet by some strange paradox everyone can be convinced for the moment to say that having Mrs Theresa May to be Britain's next Prime Minister, a pronto, was an excellent choice and it has the right seizure to deal with a capricious nature of leaving the EU politics and distinct a British future away in perhaps a more 'stolen' opportunity, one that wasn't yet forged under the heaven?

It appears, if you read the newspapers (online) in the UK, that Mrs May will also be a Prime Minister who puts a great deal of an effort into the country's strategies, political, economics and security, as well as the greater strategies by already having in mind how to lead politics with the EU after and before Brexit becomes officially sovereignty again. She is capable, Mr William Hague says in his column in the Daily Telegraph today. (Headlines say it all sometimes) But the point here is bigger than mentioning her virtues and pragmatism during the Remain campaign, is that above all Mrs Theresa May is being respected by parliament to be the right person who embodies every logic of the moment, whether the country has been on the remain or leave side. Today she is England in Your Majesty's Queen Elizabeth II government. Of course, if indeed she is the right person of that embodiment to lead Britain out of the EU, for remain and leave English voters. And one has to admit, that will be quite a burden for the new Prime Minister, looking pristine for now. And yet, it is the surprise that is making some very nervous.

\

Leave the EU is serious business, in the 21st century. But so is sovereignty finding new definitions, also in the 21st century.

30062016

In it's own right the UK has become again a sovereign country, after forty years having been (and this is important to understand first) there with the European Union as part of the EU from the start since the EEC. Where the 'angry' voters' vote went on thursday 23 June 2016, by a majority of votes of 17 miln +, between the high platform of the above and where every day life in our time 'remains' mostly in the EU, some now see why that wasn't adequate enough for serious politics and governments of 28 Member States to divorce the UK, and vice versa. Strangely enough, also to many others, they say that it does matter where the voters 17mln + is taking the UK, e.g. out of the EU, and into, let's say for reasons of theory, the global world? True, there won't be an easy solution found right now, when standing on the hills, to point out which way is the UK now going to go by a mere glimpse at the whole world. One definition of the 21st century comes seeping into mind: globalization. It's orb has been the making of nations in stages, each period names are known to most governments in the EU, now Member States, and outside the EU, the UK, Sweden, Norway and Denmark. And yet here we are now facing the divorce of the UK from the EU, a long battle and breath of unpleasant discussions, frictions and barrels, top to bottom, with lot's of fiction, and speechlessness coming from both sides, the EU and UK on the other hand.

Technically divorce doesn't have too many meanings but one 'out' way, as getting 'in' is always suggesting a complete different way. It is no one's interest to sit too long on a bough that has been broken in two, with the EU holding one end of the stick, and the UK, well, holding the other end of their stick... (Or, sceptre). If the EU was a technocratic society by definition for decades long, no one can expect it to be too emotional with the leave of the UK from the EU at the moment. Here we are looking at architects of the EU in a position very much the same as looking at a derilict flank in the establishment, many could see it coming. (When derilict experts or reports from experts) Also by looking at the making of the EU and it's physical facade in Brussels, well, what does it stands for in the world besides being a great powerhouse of governments and politics? Democracy is the big question for the EU in the crisis of Brexit, yes. There is no sane way of explaining the insanity of the moment that Britain chose over staying with this powerhouse to infinity. Britain is not our adversary of the 21st century, yes, that too. It was the EU next to global leaders of the G7, deciding in recent history of nations, that the world should share responsibilities and tackle global insecurity. A sovereign Britain is expected to maintain that responsibility and it should also keep world peace in it's tender votes of the best part left from the Remain camp during the referndum in June 2016. The EU has only gained more speed without a fifth wheel and should be able to live with Britain by it's side as an open new society or country who wants to keep sovereingty and technocratic relations with the rest of the world as the new way of sharing great responsibilities among the G7 and G20 nations. (What say you?) Is this possible? We leave that to the new Tory leader who wants to be Prime Minister very soon in the coming days.

German Foreign Minister, Herr Walter Steinmeier, first to speak of peace and prosperity after Brexit. That is a good start this morning.

25062016/ 10:12AM

God Almighty forbids that the world forgets it's own prayers for peace and humanity in our time. And here is exactly where the world is finding itself early this morning, which way to go from here where the UK stopped it's Membership of the European Union, on thursday 23 June 2016. Up to now world peace has been in translation speak a united nations commitment of the global security age. We have been living in better times from nation to nation, government to government and people to people all over the world. With the departure of the UK this global gridlock of world security isn't the same 'shared vision' by nations pre- Brexit, the moment of true decision made by Britain to leave the EU indefinitely. That could mean access to a world platform of the G7 group isn't right this minute priority to maintain a united front of world peace, but soon that might become the biggest question in search of an answer, from the UK and from the EU, as well as the United States. How other G7 leaders will react, e.g. Japan, there isn't any hint yet given by Transatlantic and great Pacific world leading nations. The new Prime Minister of Britain can't keep Britain out from the world peace vision for very long. If Germany already as first country and nation in the EU is calling to maintain peace and prosperity in the Europen Union, usually that means something more urgent is or should be on the table a pronto (delivery courier style).

To the Big Six EU nations, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Belgium, Italy and Luxembourg, Post war WWII in particular has left it's stamp of world peace and greater importance across Europe as a necessity of lasting cooperation. We are in no doubt that this is what Mr Boris Johnson in his speech on the next day after the referendum meant by the noble idea that the EEC once  had, but now wasn't right for Britain. Deeper translations could go as far as 'than now what'? The EU also in it's present form has fully matured to govern the Member States without the need of a new treaty, which makes it even more complicated to understand when you are the public face, because both treaties, the Maastricht and Lisbon Treaty, are inherent to world peace and it's 'never again' vision. A new treaty would mean somthing totally different today. This is also where the wound of the UK Brexit is deepest for the EU nations and Presidents of the EU and EU parliament. How can the big six EU nations reconcile with BREXIT so soon after the divorce from Britain? Optimism to work harder together with Britain on redefining World Peace can't wait any longer than is necessary, for some strange reason. It is here where Britian's exit is also feeling quite odd, even when natural to leave the EU, of why it did not want to continue it's relationship with the European Union any longer. The big six are 'world peace nations' of post WWII and will now have no choice left in this moment to say to one another again, that after Britain left the EU this is the same 'thing' that has been there for decades. Britain on it's own timeline should now go faster after it has lightened up the ship at wreckage point at high seas in the tempest.

23 June 2016, UK referendum polling day stay or leave the EU.

23062016, 09:56 AM

The labor of love has two outcomes: conception and delivering. It is the time for the UK to decide today all day till 22:00 PM in the night which is it going to be, as one can say that the future of a new Britain is to be seen as conception if they stay in the EU. European Member States were left standing on the side of these pangs, but today are witnessing how the birth of a new Britain and nation is born in the political delivery room at Westminster inside walls. Who is in this jubilant mood to see the new nation of Britain's future? If it is not stillborn there will be a cry heard. A big cry could also mean we have a twin split outcome of the referendum. Life is certainly not ordinary and dull today, for Britain and the European Member States. If the birth is stillborn that would mean the Leave EU has won. All will soon be revealed later in the day. A big day however for the whole world that is witnessing something impossible made easy and turn the page of history. The European Union today came to the point of breaking the necks of it's own Member States by this 'great adventure' of the referendum, it allowed Britain to have. Either way is now a process of change, perhaps one badly needed for a long time after the global financial crisis in 2008. What did the monarchy do to upgrade itself during the time when changes were made in highly political charged treaties with the EU? Industries stopped for some inexplainable reason no one thinks twice on accountability for lost time today. And especially not a day like today. But it was there, this big life question for politicians some three decades ago. Yet, here we are, now facing and all the money they made (btw a song by A-Ha, cold river). It is a quiet day too, resentful and yet upbeat. It is particularly also the same for many EU big countries to have excercised calm during these last few months in an unarmed fashion. What exactly was so disarming is hard to say. Europe's west has come to an end. Subscription to wealthy nations has expired. It is time to create more power and having Britain on this side of the change will be a rare package or bundle of joy. (Or ode to joy)

It is also rather a strange feeling of unease that is being released as the cortisol hormone inside the skull of the EU facing either to have or loose Britain later today. The push to have an Anglo Saxon judicial overview in all lawmaking of the EU outward and inward is electrifying with some control from a remote control panel by future nerds. What the EU will become is left to the imagination of the future if Britain stays or leave today. Unlike people like former Labour PM Tony Blair, bad imagery is sensational and inspires greater worlds to conquer. England's sheepdog is crying to the moon and has got it bad, Elton John style singing his Elton's/ Eton song. And yet, the day isn't over yet. World politics has gained it's ground well deservedly. What else can one say, honestly? If anyone would put it to music they might need a music conductor who knows all the right tones and notes of disharmonious inspiration and bring it home to harmony. (A noble man to make something so heartless to truth and fantasy) All Anglo Saxon laws originally are from Britain or British- made. Leave the EU might pull all the threads with it that led law confectionery across the entire world. Sweet things were made of this, as we all know for hundreds of years. If any country decides to leave the administrative rule and it's legitimacy time only get's more confused by that leaving. You have to figure this one out by yourself, that leave is a fight for lunacy but in fact could trigger (invoke) the smallest of International lawmaking from it's origins to collapse. Technology alone isn't Law. But, let's wait and see (for some from behind the taxonomy of strange bushes) to have one last word: goodbye.

Where there is human measurement there is only human measurement.

19052016/22:36 PM

Mainstream global economics is a leader spider upstream force 24/7 inside time infrastructure. It also is the feed stream of all countries leading or industrial. If you don't know me by now you are not in high tech industry, and you can't start now. Technology in dog years is ageing each decade and will reach maturity when the era ends, or can do a parallel move and create a whole different window of investment where you can grow your moneytrees, if sustainability is what you or your country needs. It is top quality and honest business with great pedigrees of men who have been here for a longer period of decades the world's/ global family man (The world and his wife, something Anne Applebaum would know is fact- GTA III, Donald Love). When you keep refering to these men as business leaders you are inclined to think that these are cold men with a 24 karat diamond hardened opinion how to lead the global economy indexes. The greater public hardly knows who they are and what exactly it is they are doing. It was easier to know about Adolf Hitler and his speeches, whether on the radio or national posts of masses. But this is Nazi Germany and greatness was measured in strange ways, as if to say that all wrong was part of their greatness. (Most people however will remember AH as a boyscout in brown khaki short pants and having illusions of greater grandeur) In our globalized world there is nothing to hide from the public and yet by what measurement do we measure global greatness today?

The British Prime Minister, Mr David Cameron, is one example who's cheeks turn red pumpkin when trying to explain to the electorate why Britain should stay in the EU and not out. (Britain was never in the EU) The thing most people do not understand is that, like that of the business leader, government and people can make a hardened opinion too. It doesn't need to be chased like the cursed hunter, Le chasseur maudit (poem and music by Cesar Franck). Let's just make a point not many consider important when in the ecstacy of e.g. the Brexit prophecy, that global business, love or hate it, is making a very logical point on global business and money. No company will risk losing a billion per nan0second if that is the stake going high, once, twice, trice and sell. It isn't refurbishing your livingroom either while waiting. What is the point of getting aggressive to leave the EU without offering a time of transistion for the people? Thank God Almighty for the UK referendum when you think how it brings out all things unsaid and unknown to the rest of the world, e.g. where global economics stands and where big countries, a G8 industrial leader, stands when holding a referendum with a big trading/ political bloc like the EU. Not only NATO matters, but the G8 matters just as much. (Without Russia's re- entry it is still called the G8/ G7, just to confuse fat cats) But there are different views or versions on BREXIT. (Michael Bloomberg has written his knightly version in a column at Bloomberg.com today)

No one is listening, but the US President has spoken a bit of many times this week/ last week on the UK leaving the EU.

11052016/ 23:45 PM

Democracy is becoming lately something of a drama queen. Why there is no pathos in this melodrama is hard to say at the moment. There might still be time for each side, leave or stay, to change their minds. It is after all only politics and not war... This week the UK Prime Minister, Mr David Cameron, contrary to everyone else has put on his WWIII top hat and the public was able to enjoy this moment too. A replay of the thirties England isn't the future anymore. At least, not from a global world's point of view, starting home with economics. What does socialism in Europe mean today? German or French democracy are changing their tone, followed by other individual Member States, with most of it inspired by the 21st century policies on border control and issues of bursting these by 'running feet' of masses of people. (So they say, and they aren't our children...) But that is not what President Barack Obama is saying when addressing the issue on the UK leaving or staying in the EU. His eye is set on the ambition of the global world. Half is duty- wise, while the other half is business as usual. No machinery will stop by itself, whether leaving or staying will be the choice of the British people. The people cannot judge for themselves which institution should stay or go, at least not as well as the United States President. So, (small observation), where does that leave you if you are going to vote on leaving the EU?

Centralized governments have only one particular place here, aka the center. Veteran politicians know this, it works only against the people if democracy will change it's appeal on going back in time, literally. The EU nations have reached the end of the EU Union and are saying that now is the time where the people will amass together against centralized governing body we know as the EU. In the faculty of the EU there is no place for far right or far left, for the simple reason that the European Union was founded on a different notion of human intelligence and sense of uniting the nations for common purpose. And then maybe this incubation period of confused nations and minds was the kind of logic most of these politicians have anticipated long before it was agreed upon to start with the EU project, a few decades ago. Time alone will tell, if the living memory of nations will make it that far in the nearest of our future, e.g. 6 weeks from now? The other logic where man started off as the creature of higher reason and reasons will be strained quite hard if 'the mobs' decide enough is enough. History basically is self taught. A regime can only breed another regime, and so forth. Tempt not providence, always a warning before you do something and not after you have tempted providence by promptly doing exactly that. The EU has tempted all faith and fate. Now is not the time to cry, at least not without national remorse. We have not even begun to address the real issues, e.g. the Military?

Two major economic forces, stay or leave EU, will determine our future in the European Union

22042016/21:52 PM

The European Union if succeeded in anything has given Europeans more immediate access to an overview, one exterior and one within, it did not had in the  eighties or  seventies, and before let's say in the fifties. It also proves one most expensive view many EU nations have paid for to get. And things are only starting to get interesting this year in 2016, let's say if the UK decides to leave the European Union 'special status' in June, eight weeks from now. BREXIt is not contributing anything on the 'overview' of EU nations, but what can they say IF Britain stays in? Staying in doesn't have a clear defining moment yet since Britain was never 'in the EU'. European Nations in the EU or Member States do not only do economics, but they have politics in their overview and exterior political high walls to remember where exactly it is they are standing. It is better not to be squandered on Brexit for the time being, one could also say more carefully if choice will take the lead over assembly of people, maybe at one point? Logic says that it will, while the high order of the day says another thing to the people. A much shorter version to make up one's mind is simple: the EU Member States have been sweating bullets for decades over political integration, which is not the same as having an economic union with the EU without the political commitment agreement of being an EU Member State. The British 'sleepover' is long overdue and on it's own it is deteriorating the 'real European' union, so to speak. Overlooking the rights and wrongs here whether within or exterior- wise, you have to say that this is where the high pitch to leave the EU is most strong. You can say that this is the metronome to send the wrong signals out. Industrialists might have another view and raise the stakes even higher...

The people on the lower Delta, the Netherlands, are also slowly getting in a changing mood after the referendum on 6 April held earlier this month, on the EU- Ukraine treaty deal/ agreement on Trade; and they are saying that e.g. 'Nuexit' could go even further down the path of leaving the EU. One way or the other this special outlook, overview, within the EU and being in constant motion with the EU exterior as full Member State, may come to some as a surprise 'outlook', but in fact can only say to what extend the Netherlands have taken their commitment of the European Union and are now enjoying maturity or seniority of an extraordinary political paradox as a Member State. For many years no one has ever thought much on this side of the European Union, that power breeds power and going into far extensions within it's own ranks. The Netherlands, next to Germany and France, is part of the same rank. Pain and death, e.g. the MH17 and new visions of an independent Netherlands, have put the Dutch on a higher platform inside this political EU paradox, but who also have been showing that they can show restraint even when being tested by great misfortune, as the world has witnessed in July 2014, and staying loyal to basic politics on a wider scale in every day life as a Member State in the EU. Brexit is the banner for Britain. Nuexit will soon become the mood changer for politics in the Netherlands, if it can move the 'leave EU' to more center ground politics. Industry and privatization may come back to haunt this vision one day between now and a decade later. The Netherlands quiet maturity in the recent years are interchangeable, being first and than second again in a constant with Britain, also being first but has been many times over the years in second place to the Netherlands.

The lord of the castle might ditch all extraordinary plans and overrule will be another day in EU politics daily business.

Gold & silver

10042016/23:01 PM

Sometimes gold & silver do not speak, and if they do, rarely, they are never speaking the same language. It is the rhythm that goes round 24/7 global communications and leading the way of live- networks. War and peace can not unsettle what gold & silver can do. Perhaps it is in the metrics or instruments. It can also be a thing of timing. Imagine for a moment what happens next if you're wrong on timing. But an even bigger problem is what do you get when one timing was just too right? That raises the standard for gold. Silver can only look in disdain how it has taken centuries long to get here but cannot reach a more competent postition to gold. It is also the world of the G7 group or ripple group (actually is a real understanding for business & trade). Our world needs a chronicle writer speaking in volumes and bring down the new world from the heavens. Leo Tolstoi his War & Peace had something of the secret intention of bringing earth where Russia is to the highest of heavens, for trial and merciful judgement. The global world isn't in the business of art and music on the clavecimbel/ harp. Or it's not as playful as kings in their estate labyrinth of ecstacy.

The golden rule: no silver in the world can buy you diamonds. Which is slightly different when it's the same for gold and you can get a diamond or two... Why would we, in God's Good Name, underestimate the diamond holders and the illumination rod they are holding? Once triggered you are setting something off in your own time or timing, and then you do get a result or magnitude. The planet and it's inhabitants were never really prepared for a new world. In an old saying it says that lies are catching up with the truth when it's sitting on the peak of a giant rock. No bureaucracy is holding it up, mind you. "I dont tell earth rational or irrational lies." God only knows where the latter came from. Normal life and living goes by the hear, see and no speak idolatry of succes. It is connected to the WWW but it isn't really saying anything else. What e.g. is the 'unconnected' space we call the world? In the world of business it would be gold to have such prospects, just only to introduce more connected www by simply calling itself: www.moreconnected You see, there you have it! You can't win with spurned silver in the 21st century. For some strange reason the architecture never holds together what gold can do, deep or surface.

What do Martians think of Donald J Trump becoming US president in november 2016?

27032016

The question at first or face value seems bonkers. Closing borders on the other hand doesn't. And so is space station MIR. Also, let's not forget NASA explorer space travellings. Martians might get into some sort of anxiety over closing borders policies by Mr Trump, thinking perhaps that they might be next. At the start of globalization it was meant for the world to 'open up' all that governments and nations up to this far had kept very protective about and then had to let go all of that at this point. Our world at 'this point' is the balance of all 'open' countries in one on the sharp blade. It is the top view with globalization. (Actually a sword sharp as this shouldn't be bare naked in a museum or it's shaft) To ignore these simple facts in the real life of our century isn't very strong a point, you could say. And, maybe naive, there is a good chance that Mr Trump is globally aware that becoming president of the US that also includes globalization universally. Something Mrs Hillary Clinton and the former Democrat president of the US, Mr Bill Clinton, having been knowing that this is what is rocking the cradle, in America, overseas and beyond. They call it politics. And we assume silly that Martians do know that too about the Clintons. They might even be calling them jokingly the earthly Klingons. (LOL)

Many are being kept in suspense by Mr Donald J. Trump, to see how the Republican candidate will alter his presidential canidadcy before the general election in november this year. Two things are constant in this race: the people and statemanship. And more: it is what defines the right to rule and vote. It is the place where the money goes into the big brass and shining bottlenecks. Or giant brass vases with Mr T's initials carved on them all in stylistic Saxon style. Make America great again, it does tonerings out big now. Even our friends on Mars can see that. A man like that will earn his stripes, they might even ponder on for a while. But is he the kind of General we should fear out here? If so, then what is that he might oppose? There is one rule for illegal activities on the US border with Mexico, a country in terms of G20 group a country of the future, and there is another rule for Mars. If Mr Trump understands all about Trade and it's International laws, groups like e.g. the Bric and Asean will not be unknown territory to him. That   is  only healthy assumption at this point. The Martians are now debating this if Mr Trump is the man to salute to or not. Is he a better commander in chief than for example Mrs Hillary Clinton? It is  on mars for the Martians a bit like a scratch card lotto.

The fun bit of  the global economics century is now really over. Only, no one knows whether this is via Y or X definitions

15032016/22:16PM

Coordinates are complicated matter and thickness if no one seems to know why in a sudden things have stopped and that whatever is continuing isn't what anyone had in mind or created in development. Is it the global economy? Sometimes what is most underestimated are factors when in early start and when half way almost dead, because it might just have fallen off the system again and something new regained power or impulse instead. Please, know your own world... Fine, what could be the immediate relation of the 'fun bit' that went out of global economics with let's say the dead end of this moment? Speaking of impulse, what is keeping the new impulse from starting all over again in the world as the nations now know it? Impulse, e.g., can't come from... Yes, what? The nations used to have the answers at the economic forum in Switzerland, Davos, on a yearly/ annual basis. The talk is now only about Syria, Isis, Vladimir Putin, and terrorism. Fear only scores negatively. And if that is the new factor going round in the world one should not be surprised why there is no Y or X answer in mainstream global economics.

What do people want? A presidential election in the US has a few answers and by the look of things it is looking for Donal J. Trump for President this year in november. In Europe people are looking for BREXIT or stay in the EU, in the UK, 23 June in summer solstice. The EU is looking from a people's point of view at the influx of immigrants (not officially)/ refugees (status) coming in from Syria. Mr Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, today has said it will take out it's military from Syria with immediate effect and is doing so according to the mainstream media in the western world. It isn't a wonder after all why the global economy finds no new impetus to put another level of wider economic future plans forward. You are lightyears away from last year's definition of global stability. And even further away from the previous year, in 2014. No long life learning lesson left for the world anymore then? Perhaps we're wrong and who knows that our world came at the point of breaking bad for deeper reasons, deeper communication and constituencies. Deeper because they are brand new?

DJT is a con man. Why not start treating him like a gentleman. Rather sooner than later.

03032016/21:59 PM

There are two things the Americans should ask after Super Tuesday. Do we want Donald J. Trump or Hillary Clinton for President? To the rest of the world that seems like a very complicated question, while it isn't for the Americans. Does Donald J Trump have the qualifications to become the next US president later this year in November 2016? Compared to Mrs Clinton we might find the answer much easier to give. The billionaire Mr Trump (Real Estate Moghul) up to now is still financing his own trail or campaigning. Like the real American dream he is a self made man who came first to beat the top richest and also he is able to stay rich for decades to come. If translation means anything in his campaign this is the right way to point his finger at any 'real American' and then say, "If I made it, so can you.". That is the part no outsider gets. If you are paying your way up or in politics that means in more simple words that you are 'them' out there in the land you want them to vote for you. From here under the US blue sky anything is possible. Mr Trump embodies that promise from zero to American's golden future. If only politics wouldn't get in the way!

When looking at Mrs Clinton one thing we do know for sure is that she can't do tacky. She can't afford to look untidy as Mr Trump's hairstyle does have that inclination when exposed to strong winds in his high tower on the balcony/ roof terrace. The White House or Washington DC also have something in common with Mr Donald Trump and his billions of Dollars. And, you can't find any whiter than Mr Trump as a representative of the forgotten America and Americans. (In politics that can go in two ways) Some say he is a con man, and others call him crazy. If he is a bit of both he is carrying his concraze style of living in confectionery foil and wrapped up like a sweet he likes to distribute among his supporters and voters like he was throwing money at their feet. Something you would feel and find it hard to believe at the same time when the atmosphere would start surging. Non of this is what Mrs Clinton can 'offer' her constituencies. She is the global and American politician who can't do sweets and crazy. What promise is she offering to Americans who have been buried under years of unemployment? What American dream can substitute for that by her running for President? Oh, yes, she might give the world back to the Americans, 'bring it home to you'? (Song quote by Paul Simon, I do it for your love)  

Prime Minister David Cameron: the staying in, well, you have to say/ admit, is a very big plan, isn't it?

28022016

(Article by  David Cameron, Prime Minister UK, on Facebook)

Mr Cameron moments as opposition, when Gordon Brown was still the Prime Minister, to the time when David Cameron became the PM, is a box with modern day democracy in Britain and how to achieve this set of rules by closer partnerships with Europe and the world. He is right to point out in today's article on all these aspects in twist and turns how Britain has played a dominant role on what he calls the UK accomplishments of the 21st century. He has also emphasized the relationship with the EU and making crystal clear to the people of Britain, that to vote out could fracture this relationship deeply and it may not recover in the short term on regaining dominance again like in previous decades, e.g. when Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister. The conservatives are still the opposition to Labour, by definition. Will that still matter after the outcome  to stay in the EU? This is a big plan what the Prime Minister is asking the people to vote for. It's future is set on the long term and no one is asking any questions whether this will be for the good of the nation or nations. That so much is questioning the moral of the change in politics or the political establishment in the UK. But this also will affect the rest of the 27 Member States in the same way, that with Britain officially staying in the EU by democratic vote in the referendum the EU has truly expand...

Basically nothing will change much as Britain has already been in the EU for decades, or in other words the design of the EU in it's present way/ form can only stay altogether in one place with no particular haste for the coming ten years, by logic. The EU will probably concentrate more on expansion and how to maintain itself in power and governing with the Member States of 28. (After 23 June when the result of the referendum will be in favour of staying in) But, say what you like, it remains an incredible big plan for Europe if Britain stays in. In theory Britain will leave behind for indefinite period the primitive state of politics and adhere to a more savage time in modernization of big democracy rules. (Savage here being in the optimistic sense and not negative) Can the world live with that? In the world of modernization the answer is a global Yes. And that includes the people of Britain as well, whoever is in employment or business. Democracy serves all people at mid level across the whole world, if this is what people demand by any means of living standard and the 'moral' of making money. Politics of the 21st century in it's architecture and social cohesion will slowly leave the big stage for a more smaller scale of every day life trajectories' societies. Yes, Mr Cameron can see why Britain would need to stay in... But it is the plan and the mere size of it is what he is not telling the public about, just yet?

Imagine the world without politics.

07022016

Making human the renegade mankind, the kind that would want to flee to Mars or Venus, leaves everyone out of words for as long as it takes our century. Then again words are dead long gone. Primary you could say words are without a soul, if you can't put it in writing of some sort. Compare: business ethics just don't go far enough. But, of course, we knew that... Many people blame the computers for sitting at home, in your office, in every corner of the mechanic store, or to buy a pencil with a code. "Beep! That is 25 cents, ma'am." (Cents are coded numbers at a constant too) Personally, I prefer the much more sensitive and honest lines in songs and lyrics, the kind of thing set to music. So that I can't get confused visually and emotionally. One example: none. At least for the moment where both sciences, Engineering and innovation, are deleted completely from the mind. Thnx to God we still have a world that is visibly environmental friendly to the millennials, and harsh like hail from a Biblical plague to that other group... (Oh, I get it...) Words of wrath can hurt sometimes, but especially when in our Realtime (or space). Fine, what is the solution for the city planners and municipalities? Geometry, property lines and labels? A jargon that no citizen speaks is giving directions only to public facilities. In between one does get lost on the way to -the- loo, you see.

Don't you see, economics isn't mainstream media, but it is a language or speak to tell you that some lives were born this way, while you were or are not. (Compare: hearing impairment) Whatever they are doing, tossing or turning, saying or spitting at, what they get in return is always making them richer than the minute/ second before. Whether at home, on the squashfloor, or busy socially, money is what they are making and getting more and more out of this world to live in skylines close to the blue heaven. In Europe when they say 20th century or 21st century, they mean exactly what it says on the big sails. Overhere words are still considered highly social and very high standard of living, and not just in songs or lyrics. But that was 20 years ago. Compare to the US, words can be quite a trick or treat experience in the new generation, if they want to be the 'new millennials'. Who to respect after you get there? A computer room wide enough to build a phantom country that isn't as retarded as 'words- class' (once considered a caste for only white politicians)? All this means that adult males and females above the millennials don't do words and not even trying to avoid... Only, when joking. Who has the last laugh now? Naming babies is also best found when called e.g. Ben, or Jeremy (We are eating tonight at Jeremy's), or Luis. All part of the sales during that time of labor, when Brixton Hicks comes in like a fiery meteor of sharp fire and from the heavens... to bring you into the world. A Human  cry so tiny in a body  between night and day, or sky and earth, delivered in a green operating room or theater, there in private on the 30 something floor.  It just breaks your heart, doesn't it?  Or you think that you are god.  Or to put in millennial speak, "Hey, dad, your eyes are leaking.". (Or gossip speak: "You know, when my sister was born my dad cried tears.".)

Local is now global quiet transformation, where the wet green grass is greener.

03022016/22:49PM

It is not familiar to think outside any architecture, time or place, that our living world at eye level, new born or just joined in the rest of the human race and our younger generation of mankind in the 21st century, that something unfamiliar is now present everywhere and so close you can touch it (on a wide screen). Of course, we will need more oxygene, in case you are wondering where billions of people and other living creatures will find sustenance 'walls' or 'oxygene pannels' that is for everyone... But that is still a long way to go when extreme. The future is like living glass before your eyes and nothing will stop 'them' from not trying to break it. (Them, let's say for argument's sake, is uniform) And then your life stops. The living always seem to die abruptly, short briefing funerals, and they will be keeping more distant from you everyday more and again more. And yet others can't see it happening just yet where we are watching the fish in the large tank swimming, where life used to be crowded with shops and warehouses stores. Banking isn't personal in our century either for you nor me. But who can explain it to your grandchildren watching the world through a dome of crystal ball gazing?

The only false pretence is the human sickness and disease. If you are a doctor you can write the truth, about condition or cure only to keep normalcy hierarchies. Innovation nurses will all surround you, and the tone of voice will automatically guide you. Do we want a future without life's simple pleasures? (Or find it in a music box, called Johan Wolfgang Goethe, Hegel or Kant) Data repulses on small scale diseases. We have become so tiny in our simple lives, cold, fever or measles, cancer or heart disease, compared to children who can be seriously ill and be in danger if shows that you belong to young parents above Tier I. If law and order will be lost in translation one wonders whether the quiet transistion of global forces into all lives and levels has found something other than data to keep human lives outside like cargo boxes. Box on differential numbers from crate! Or you can take the more ambitious road to the meat markets. Do we really want to understand this world and why it is reaching eye to eye with you? You see, this is not criticism spewing, as written here above, but it's rather a surprise responding earlier today. And you don't need anything special or specifically to think about. It is a quiet transformation and you can't literally see it happening. Perhaps a visit to the park in Madurodam (Den Hague) could help regain some of what life once was, before we saw the green grass that was wet and always greener on the other side of the living stained glass in luxurious green?

World War II References could be passé in ten years

28012016

(Heraclitus of Ephesus (Ἡράκλειτος, Herakleitos; c. ... War is the father and king of all: some he has made gods, and some men; some slaves and some free) From Wikiquote.

In ten years the world itself will be the giant monument of remembrance and still standing between the blue sky and all the land on the planet. Our monument is enormous for all mankind. The truth is the needle pointing to the sky, day or night, like that of an obelisk. Who honestly remembers the Punic Wars, or the Rubicon? Or, indeed, Rameses I armies drowning in their royal army chariots in the Red Sea. But we are always polite when remembering the dead in all great wars, to have been the real heroes of freedom for next generations blood lines. This is why we should always remember the fallen men and women who in the face of terror and flames from hell did lose something of the mortal clay we are made of, but by memory will not be forgotten. In our time of globalization prosperity it is of vital importance to have these monuments of war rising above the crowd in a still fashion, living quietly side by side with the living. Our world is a much healthier place, one might think. It is all cliché now to say that science and technology have very intelligent ways breaking down human diseases or catastrophies. By that same measure putting pandemics to pre- calculation on the list of pasé or presently updated. Much of our 'human wars' meet the technologies or science disciplines of control and balance in our time. If this would go wrong, we will have a disaster at our hands, yes.

There is no trillion dollar (tin) man on earth who will want to pay that kind of money to fail his machineries, or buying default machines. Investment is vertically only possible to maintain what was built and expanded. Expansion comes with not only a price to pay but it does redirect for many reasons how life should be lived by standard and going even to a very high standard. War is not necessarily very high standard living, but is socially bringing down low and to deprivation, or the so called choclate wars even when real people get killed. If we can find any moral in human action, that is. Unfortunately it is the way of life in some parts of the world still. Here is where people, even this morning, make the resemblance with WWII, e.g. on the refugee crisis now troubling Europe/ the EU countries. It is a catastrophe, out of control, technologically and scientifically, one would say. If put back on the scale one wonders how much of high standard social life weighs at this background on the present crisis zig zagging from Syria to Europe, and going back and forth on even a bigger scale of politics. I think the lesson we have learned 70 years ago from WWII is one that tells the story of how we must feel contempt for all atrocities committed in wars and in anyone's good name. The US promised a new human kind, one that was much better and always will be, after WWII. Since then all nations followed these programs obediently and with great vigor inside their bones. We must remember all who gave us the kind of freedom beyond the acts of gross atrocities. It is quite noble, you see.

Turkey and global markets visible triangle trains

16012016

Global Markets in the Middle East are presented in daily charts, a list of countries on potential and demand seen from this side of the future industries. Turkey's high performance visibility doesn't make it to the list, as just yet or for now, but it has submitted itself to approach a few requests they say might change the country's future, independently and relying heavily on it's invisible standing it has in the world. The Middle East is not unfamiliar territory to the Turkish government or it's foreign policies. Eurasia only becomes home cavalry and financial maintenance, as many other traditions do so when required. The present time government seem to be aware of it's sides, flanks, weaknesses and sometimes in sunny Istanbul when the sun rises in the east, it can believe Turkey 'still got what it takes' to do business in the region and outside. It wants, e.g., to normalize relations with Israel, something even written today in the Daily Hurriyet (Verda Ozer), newspaper online. Turkey still has rational reservations about Israel, but the President, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, is convinced to win in this game you have to give accessibility to the people, as they come first in good or bad times. Politicians in foreign or neighboring countries don't make much of an exception here. When coming back to the global markets daily, weekly, monthly or quarterly charts, one seriously has to ask why is Turkey stepping out here? And in 2016 things will have to become more final by elimination of all dealings, trade or commerce, en route.

There might be a miracle cure around the corner in the President's or Prime Minister's eye, but at this time in the decade and year, one thing is clear, that now they will have to make credibility a hard fact, or it's softer kind of to make darn sure there is such a thing available. The country is waiting, but neighing perhaps in a different direction, and creating their version of continuity and growth based on basic logic and decades long of experience how to be a nation and people. Militancy isn't something to be associated with to reach top performance on the global markets. But true also is that only top people will take decisions for the coming time this year. And the longer it takes, the more it fails it's people and their ambtions socially or politically. The people have learned in the past what short term decisions mean for the Turkish nation, and how long term goals always looked much better governed in a crisis. If Turkey insists on Eurasia's visible powers and also having the other side with it's invisible powers in the global markets sphere, isolation from mainstream economies in the rising region will make a strange spectre in the end, by end 2016?

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the first Middle East political has- been...

20122015

Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, President of Turkey, as central figure of the Turkish government and demographics of 74.93 mln people (2013), in his present time role, mediator or negotiator, has done the astonishing thing of staying in rather than out of government politics, as many did not expect to see again. But it happened, the AKP won a decisive victory in the last election held this year, in November 2015. Officially it is the Prime Minister, Mr Ahmet Davutoglu, who has been designated the leader of the Turkish government and people of Turkey. And to the International world this fate of Prime Ministership is the only legitimate representative among his peers or equals around the world. Turkey, fortunate or unfortunately, has that position in the world. Also, it is precisely the disposition to make both, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the President and Prime Minister, Mr Ahmet Davutoglu, from a political point of view, irreplaceable. Turkey is on the new course of politics and becoming a political hub Internationally, for e.g. the war against ISIS, peace or war in Syria, withdrawing it's military from Iraq and be a representative in the G20. The need for keeping the domestic kettle on the stove top during the earthquakes surrounding Turkey will require strength and endurance of strains, e.g. 2mln refugees from Syria. Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan is known to be a strongman, fiction or in real politics.

Another strain overhead Turkey's angle is the United States inability so far to deal with a Middle East that is loose as sands or a political quicksand box. 2016 No one knows yet what challenges might emerge from here to eternity of stubborn wars. You get stuck somewhere in between regions and myriads of strangers everywhere you're looking. All these different factions of fighting groups or armies is becoming harder and harder every day. (In hell you are a minority as king) Why do results get so negative in 2015 no one knows. The year 2016 the need for positive results could get better and should be. Last night the first start in that direction was deciding on President Bashar Al Assad, whether he should go or stay, or rephrase the question at some point next year again. Political street talking it all comes back to negotiation and mediation. Turkey is in for a long night yet to come. And there is no time for a political has-been novel or memoirs just yet. Here this blank place on the shelf will be reserved for the time being and remain empty or filled with the number of people still admiring Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan from all places, friend or foe.

CLIMATE CHANGE, in the end, got smarter.

13122015/ 20:14 PM

The public will record this momentum as one of a first time smart move made by the G7 and G20 world leaders in Paris December 2015, where previous summits failed, but now have seen reason on Climate Change issues the whole world seem to agree on, that the time has come to answer a few deeper questions. The Paris summit of 2015 marks a beginning, at least from that point of view, that human life has a choice to decide the fate of all habitat on the planet. Mass technology control anti climax is ready to bring Climate Change out of it's chaos to a higher platform, and step by step will apply the living part in an update status, as from January 2016. The public is on a new belief and will see how far advanced the smartness of the Paris Summit deal will keep it's pledge this time. Leaders of the G7 and G20 also seem to be upbeat about the new deal. It was either 'CC smog or fog of war, e.g. in Syria'. Or to put it simply: the craziness for global industries has got to stop and reckless profits in greater responsibility to bring our planet back on a smart course simple use in stead of chaotic global waste. Good luck!

It is that time again, the final quarter of the year 2015.

03122015/21:43PM

From a private point of view, when you lose interest in the affairs of the world the most appropriate thing to do is to ditch it. Something no government can do or say, at least not out loud. Last night in the House of Commons, the UK, decided it was time to take action in Syria and start their bombing campaign. No lost for words here or there somewhere, if you dare to speak up... Also President Barack Obama in an sort of unusual manner for the US President, said late last night that Turkey should shut it's border with Syria. Perhaps we're wrong, but this is not the moment to ditch the world just yet. What might commences from Syria in the last quarter of the year 2015 very few can say, if it matches anything within the perimeter of future plans. Tonight all eyes are on Vladimir Putin and Russia. Mr Putin seems restless, indicisive, vague, and slightly neurotic. The President of Russia is not sure what he should make of the downing of the Fighter Jet by Turkey, a global trade partner in the G20 group. This is not making it easy for the Russian President when speaking in public to show that he is still the strongman in Eastern Europe and has everything under control. But we are not to be fooled by his apparent confusion over Turkey. The future seems to be in a much harder mentality than was expected two months ago, the Russian President might be thinking now.

Syria for now only means confrontation frontiers to change the history of all military memory and create the latest concept of war and warfare, just to make everyone understand these new guidelines. Future generations will benefit from the changes now making the first steps. In fact a very selfless act of super human understanding. There is no tag for sacrifices from the top view. The world should understand this great need more than ever before, in WWI and WWII. Basic human rights will be better after all this, one supposes. We are assuming that is what all governments, G7 or G20, want. When there is shortage of rationalities in world economics, a gaping mouth of thousands of square miles to feed our planet and habitat, it usually means we are living in unknown times. Your good names are worth nothing after a black time. The question, a mere human one, is this: what if no government wants any of these pitch dark future plans and would want a different outlook for generations to come? Syria is not the answer, nor is ISIS. Procreation is our only option in the final end no matter how you are trying to change things. The human species does not stop in Syria, but will continue and then what?

The Super State that is the European Union

10112015/ 22:29 PM

Individual Member States still might have the nourishments of having the European continent divided into blocs and far Right resets, and with that ignoring the existence of a EU machinery setting it's own time to infinity. Divine rule is one, or used to be. At every appointed time or moment you might just get yourself a gun and shoot yourself in the head. Politicians and their special missions or showroom prominence are another story. The world is still a better place having elected leaders and statesmen/ stateswomen. It makes up for at least 80% of natural force and life for the rest of us still alive or living, that your country rationally still needs you. Who is it this time to convince us? If there is a political system, can that now be the Super State or European Union? A few years ago in one of previous writings I did mention something of a twin EU or Super State. It was what we had come to believe in one singularity at the beginning of the millennium, now extended so far it looks like it has dwarfed every individual Member State, from west to middle Europe. There is no rivalry Super State. Before WWII there was always this competitive drive of each State becoming bigger than another one in the same region. The world and Europe aren't like that anymore. And, Russia is too remote...

There is another way one can look back now at the Europe of multi- super states/ countries, and now look again to the present day. By a clever design instead all Member States were elevated to live a better and more sublime governing body, if... Let's say, the first moves in the game to have it all were indeed only done by prominent individual men and women. Why not leave the right wing blocs to history books or e- books online? (Steam engine boats have a similar fate) Europe will survive living on borrowed time. Helmut Schmidt, 96 years old, has died today. Theoritically there isn't any proof of men in his cadre could have been wrong to strengthen the European nations to become the European Union where it has arrived today. Brussels is now for good in your backyard, sir or madam. It has land, maritime waters, deep and shallow, skies and universal rights. And all citizens are breastfeeding the next generation to do the same. Is there such a thing as universal truth? In a way it is looking back at you from a much wider world and you know it too! HS knows what world he has left, and why all or the rest of us are innocent bystanders of the European Union. The Cold War is all about two Super States.

Error: theoretically

Another black day for International justice, 13102015

14102015

After today's revelations on MH17 report, Dutch authorities report, the heavy weight of inconclusive deterrence in fact has changed the criminal nature to this violent error of events. This is strange as well as true, that for now the criminal nature is sublime in two ways, one being the International case in designated courts adjacent, but also a crime against the sovereignty of the Netherlands seems to be in order.

Order of sublime criminal nature for deceased, e.g. is something similar being put to rest as a sublime and extraordinary citizen of the Netherlands.

On a national basis all citizens of the Netherlands are very proud of their government for the sensitive way this investigation has been conducted by their teams, in the field and far beyond the political stratosphere, in 2014 and 2015. This is a lasting impression for any wounded community near or far in our world. De facto one or two transition periods did take place, one being pre- Poroshenko and in it's aftermath after the May election in Ukraine. Investigations of this magnitude that is reaching far beyond politics and the military, war and peace, there isn't any doubt that to have come this far in the investigation and publishing the report findings, one year later after the fatal crash above Ukranian territory, are both an incredible achievement in recent history for the Netherlands, and secondly is also astonishing.

International policies have changed since 17 July 2014 for Russia and the Russian President, Vladimir Putin. There is need to cooperate with the Russian President on Syria, the Middle East and the war against ISIS, the terrorist group and their personal armies. Ukraine and Crimea are officially a forgotten time in the future politics of the present time and next year. In the length of time this will be especially difficult to any criminal investigation, e.g. on the MH17, to proceed with.

Can it be done? If so, it will be the first case in modern day history to have a staggering conclusion of an International anti climax in our half of the world of this proportion, and with the memory of 298 Dutch citizens, and more, from Britain and Malaysia to mark or carve in stone.

Vladimir Putin by now knows loyalty grows on him

04102015/20:21PM

2014 For a starter was real. Period. The Air Strikes in Syria after his speech at the UNGA, well, could be either fiction or real. In the middle of all this the United States doesn't seem to control the scrum of happenings in Syria at the moment. Who wants to get out? Well, since that would cost another 60 Billion Dollars or so, perhaps it's best not to ask that question. But don't let it fool ya. Things are not humorous when Syria is the target place. According to one US high ranking staff some days ago this 'showdown' was missing IS to target and that the Russian air strikes mission was highly questionable. It's screaming of something is really quite mad. What is Mr Putin doing in Syria? If you know the answer please write it down on a piece of paper and send it into the world, for reasons of sanity maybe? Prime Minister David Cameron is right in his interview on the Marr show this morning, to have said a few unkind things about the President Bashar Al Assad and calling him, what was that word again? (The butcher) With all this the pressure is growing on Mr Assad and he is beginning to talk on the situation and even the military actions from the Russians. One thing is sure that by staying here you are bound to get burned alive.

Mr Putin has no real worries for now. Something did happen back in the year 2014 what was raw and real. It is this success that should worry the west, and it is not because the Russian President Vladimir Putin can win the war in Syria. On the contrary, his closest allies may by now see this too and take a step back in diplomacy on all sides. But having the Russian President in close relationship friends the year 2014 is what they need the most truth from. If war in Syria won't go anywhere, success on the other hand can be a very strong force to hold on to, short or long term. Mr Putin seems to be good at this, so it seems. He is taking his table manners in the war room quite seriously, as his leadership etiquette? After all lead cannot win the gold test! Politically the Russian President also seems to force this down on his one time 'against Hitler' allies, who wants to stay in in Syria? Please, understand, that after Voltaire no one wants to see another revolution and have democracy in stead rising from the ashes like a deformity we call the phoenix. When will IS be defeated? Pick your date. 2020 Or 2030? By then one can only wonder what boundaries the Middle East citizens will respect.

Or, follow the return to the wife of your youth and fountain?

Crossing of blades, may the sharpest of them win!

28 September 2015

One wonders whether the crossing of blades over Syria, it's president Mr Bashar Al Assad, ISIS, among world leaders should be taken literally, especially when facing the world from the United Nations General Assembly hall. Perhaps it's just a new circular of how world leaders share their perceptions in war torned places, over distressed peoples, uncertainties, and how conflict is getting dangerously close to citizens in tight fisted democracies around the western half of the world. United States President Barack Obama will make his view clear in his speech at the UNGA this morning (GMT). A few frozen hours later the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, in turn will put on his best diplomatic effort, what is expected criss cross in the world to be his show on the global platform as a world leader and that Russia can still lead from behind as the global player everyone is talking about... But the conflict in Syria is a deep one for topic. Also Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu will share his side of the 'unstoppable Assad regime' wider points in the speech that he is set to make, later today or at midday. The world of leading men at the UNGA today is truly a meeting among the top, each giving their own views, and who are without any ordinary vision to deal with large scale conflicts in the world. Most global citizens expect their leader to come home with a lot more than just another agreement how to arm the opposition in Syria, or other.

If we are not taking this literally, how then should we take it? Also, who doesn't know this that the Russian President has instruments of his own, be it politics or military? (Public opinion not being it's strongest) On the balance of power it does not matter whether Mr Putin is successful or not in this conflict, which is so hard to swallow, paradoxically this time, not only for the Russian President but also the American President. That's just one view, if you can call it this. The real winner, also a paradox by nature in the region, aftermath or not, will be Turkey. It's citizens and government barely can live up to that day, but one has to believe things going beyond a man- made conflict, and then it will be time for peace again. For decades country Turkey has shown it can be a great drive of force when peace does make sense in the world, top or bottom. It is the little giant who comes last, because it is not willing to tear down it's country to pieces nor are they inclined to do this. Force is another story altogether. In Syria diehard politicians now also should speak up, or they will be looking at a long path of oblivion and see how their country loses it's bastion and bricks soon. This total mess in Syria and the deepening of the conlict cannot go on forever over the heads of many intelligent or brilliant academics in Damascus... Mind you, Syria itself shouldn't look defenseless if it strong-holds a world conflict.

To aggravate an already bad situation one should start talking beyond Turkey and now Syria at war to fight IS

18 September 2015/ 18:48 PM

President Bashar Al- Assad four years of unmovable standing for some strange reason is now paying off, that is if you are the President of Syria. A very resolute Mr Assad dropped in with yesterday order to bomb IS as his only target. This in concrete writing is clear enough military and not  politics... Four years is a long time for digging oneself in the sand and utter not a word of choice or side. This is both cunning and opportunistic, as any clever politician might see in his calculation of the present situation. On the other side of the border is country Turkey, struggling very heavily to cope with it's politics and crises, it is not the same chance compared to Mr Bashar Al Assad's military advantage today. It is  the same situation when in the same region, the war against IS. What can the public say after yester- and today's bombing/ Air Strikes from Syria's military on specific IS targets? It is also similar to great generals, let's say if this campaign of bombing IS would be successful. Unfortunately the political platform in the world is not determined that way. Politics dominating the global view and viewers will only have to be diplomacy and to be successful if ideas win over ideals or ideologies, be it west or east. Turkey, despite it's narcissistic tendencies or inadequacies, is the greater diplomat for having sat this one out and has been dealing with a very complicated problem for it's people and the two million fleeing Syria for the last four years. It is also dealing with new rationalities, emotionally and socially. But then again, we should not underestimate the President of Syria too much for his 'shortcomings' in the International world after the bloody civil war for four years ongoing.

The US, Germany and Turkey have been in close contact for the last 24 hours, or your guess is as good as mine. Russia is considering to have or do the same with Germany, and so on. One article online has already stated that Russia just can't make things better by starting another war somewhere else. Writing 'I love you' on a piece of paper, and than throw it into the dustbin is to others a standing invitation once when found... There is no surity or security guarantee once you get your mind set on the finding. (Even when unknown) Turkey for example knows how to maintain it's people under very difficult circumstances and not getting itself in a situation of civil war, in fact it even abhors the idea! Mr Bashar Al- Assad on the other hand can't say the same thing. If one can guess this thing right, now it seems that Mr Assad could blunder when entering the political arena in the International world. To name a few facts: Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan then might come back to the stage as a coherent piece of military and old politics, if this means saving Turkey and it's shredded democracy. Mr Erdogan has years of experience in different fields in the military after 2002. But all the same, Mr Bashar Al- Assad's order of bombing a common enemy, both at home and in the International arena, was a very impressive move.

Magnitude is sanctity, like our earth and world

02092015/ 21:01PM

When speaking of size there is never any mention of form with regard to certain E- blocs, e.g. the United States bloc, the EU bloc, far, middle and Russia blocs. Let alone thinking here is where Earth's Real Time is ticking across our planet. We like to think that will shrink down the size of what is controlling and seems everlasting over the heads of billions of people living in the same places as the Earth Blocs. Both the public and every individual living being, all earth's citizens or members of the same magnitude or size we call our world, have long gone discovered what really matters in the 21st century, and that this was not the global audience. Yet it's the form of normality life and life- style of our time. It does make you feel to be living in a world that wasn't there before in all living memory. In today's life all people are now living way above norm and coping very well, so the experts tell you every day. To be on the magnitude side, yes, coping is what we do best when this is in our interest. And when not the idea is still magnitude at the end of every day, like the sun going down and moon appearing in the sky at nights. All in every season or just above the meridian lengtitude (actually longtitude). You must understand that this will never come to your hand! Earth today is not a piece of land in different strokes, or candy in a child's monarchial hands. It is quite more than that, if it's called earth.

If this is correct our world, now a true fledgling of time and all that we know as night and day, has become also truly universality in real- time. And it is written so because fledgling is something controlled. We have never seen a world and earth in self control. Which is the thing controllers would have wanted to have/ see happening in their life time. Actually, that should be the ultimate desire of a total cleansed body and having it clinically all to himself, size, magnitude and sanctity. If something would change this earth it would be self control, not to control earth by it's size. We are now also way beyond ordinary sanity or insanity. How crazy are you? Can you do crazy? And no bleeding on your own carpet, please? Emulating insanity of the XXXX- kind will be at your own peril... Many seem to believe Mr Donald Trump is heading that way and will free fall at one point during midterm season. Fall or rise, this is the way where life is mere cosmetic, celluloid. God does not do judgment in the world magnitude, only sanctity. A big city is only one when it's closed. Let them do the window shopping, whoever they are... We have the buildings, towers, and when we decide it's night it is truly night, and lost the credo for all life here on the planet. Sometimes it just makes one wonder, what exactly is the new world of global 'self control'? (The Martian self control) 

Financial meltdowns become glossary for freshmen if this continues

27 August 2015/ 21:45 PM

In short the story about globalization started with most successful economies in the world and ended with global financial meltdowns, first in 2008 across the European Union nations, G8 nations and G20 governments. Seven years later the message goes about how most economic blocs across the globe again had to deal with the next meltdown and this time from a magnitude country like China. Something of a magnitude you can't brush under the carpet, when a. you made a mistake by dwarfing the Chinese global economic meaning, and b. failing to impress any one this time, at least where China has made partnerships in the global economic machinery. This has got to stop. Successful economies are good for globalization, as one feeds upon the other and vice versa. You must remember the days when certain places in the world were subject to brutal exploitation by the west, and why. Weak governments and ailing economies are what you can call an ointment... Is this really the global vision of tomorrow's world when all countries balance in the same position? (Technically: endemic or systemic) Leave all the meltdowns to freshmen and be real for a change without any superstition on too big to fail Banks and governments.

The teaching of global financial meltdowns is very brief: it doesn't remedy anything, nor will it open new fields of innovations without 'systemic trust' economies. One such field e.g. is Russia, when G8 became, now a permanent idea, G7 again. How good is interdependence and when will it end? Once China became the global player of the 21st century this is one proof of an ending to classic ideas like exploitation, whether this be India or maybe even the BRIC- countries. The world leading nations have truly a new idea about their standing in the global systems, which is the legitimate place for globalization and whatever next level it wants to have. Above all instincts when the future of globalization should be more than just another way of tyranny, big questions will have to answer bigger themes. And trust is a danger when it's lost in great magnitudes. (Unless skyscrapers can be erased and built again in other places/ foundations) You don't need to be an academic to understand the meaning of the wor-l-d location! But what and where is the remedy? More global financial meltdowns can only mean more glue. And also fear of future breaking points. It seems that big Banks do not fail only from a naive point of view, because in this purple snail way no one will notice the change from globalization to personalization. And are you in it, G7 or G20?

Turkey perhaps in state of Machiavellian quiz for next level of rule

19082015/11:37 AM

Soft cushions and wars don't mix very well in Turkey this morning. For a number of reasons this morning isn't much different from other mornings in the general public's eye, and yet recent weeks have been unusual in mainstream life and politics the country hasn't had or known in decades. We can only assume truth from afar and view Istanbul or Ankara in discriptive ways, unless another realtime experience is more solid. Which are the people who are on top of this moment and can make some sense from it all, war or peace, in Turkey? It's a good start by listening and then listening more closely, way above rumors of coup d'etats and civil wars. Also there is a certain Prince in the country, still unknown, but rumors have it that he is in charge, de facto or de jure, and will determine the rule of law and country's laws, either onto or to the next level of government's rule. A peacock is shrieking with an echo coming from all sides, and some even very strange if this concerns the HDP and comrades dispersed everywhere near and outside the Turkish borders. It won't get to a climax in the coming days. And people fear the worst possible outcome in modern day Turkey, where most people have forgotten what it's like to be at war, in the same manner as Frank- Walter Steinmeier, Germany's Foreign Minister, said of Germany and Europe last year, 2014. Who will favour the Prince? That is the Machiavellian Quiz for Turkey to answer under extreme heavy pressures of political change.

The future is on a not to know basis, so it seems for the last two weeks, or even for the last month under negotiations how the country will form it's next government. Fortune has nothing to do with it, if we believe the story of the Prince. And if we believe Niccolo Machiavelli 'snapnotes' (Quiz online), prowess is in the hand of the Prince. The country had gone beyond interesting times, embroideries of political cushions (national and international) in the last few weeks, with even one occasion where the country called for curfew in the eastern corner. (This was lifted soon the next day) Where Turkey seems to be at the moment slightly is a curious point of standing, if for example it invites no other response or responses... We buy landscapes in people's trade, or even own a few governments. But what is the truth realtime should be a lot more trickier where governments are the only law, as if, well, by e.g. inheritance? Yes, even democracy. If the country is in some kind of transitional power difficulty, will Turkey save itself and with that the international cushion diplomacy of the recent years? Remember the saying about the hand that rocks the cradle? On day 23 August 2015, Turkey will have it's next government on the table... And that for now is a clear pattern.

Turkey's vulnerability isn't one of peace but politics

09082015/ 20:58 PM

Woe is me, say one part on this side, and woe is me part II say the other party on the other side. Or, to put it to a bigger theme or test, one is a reborn nation and the other is just born. How will the Turks and Kurds keep differences and subtlety if the political bloodshed of these last few days between PKK fighters for freedom and the Turkish military are exchanging hostile fire from positions and situations of war scenarios? For some reason public opinion hasn't reached the point yet and pay close attention to what is now ongoing in Turkey (and the Kurds), at home and in other regions in the Middle East, as anyone would pin- point these places with great accuracy being Iraq, Syria or in Kobane. That is the view of the world, watching on the global map on movements and mobility of the warring sides in every part of the world. This is not a personal message outgoing or incoming by standard. We are sentimental fools if still there is some interest for specifics and other peculiarities from these movements, whether in national or International politics. Turkey has reached some of this level during it's long standing alliance with the G7 (then G8) and G20 nations, let's say for the last decade. It goes without saying, that Turkey has been and is always  a good friend in the western half of the planet. It knows how it's days and nights have their own mechanism in a leading industrial world and how politics have developed over the years, east, west, north and south. At home Turkey and it's citizens top tier to rural areas are now facing a critical question, on e.g. why a sudden grip of vulnerability has seized the day and is trying to take the country out of it's sockets in 2015.

The need for peace with the Kurdish side of people living in Turkey, isn't the way to go forward, let's say if there is hostility within this perimeter as one physical place of war. No one knows yet why hypocrisy is taking such a lead on both sides, not because the need for peace can be broken, but more because the imaginary is bigger for the moment. And this could escalate infinitely into a replay of e.g. the Iran- Iraq war? (Replays come from books) Another question is whether the Kurds from a 'Stateless' position in the beloved motherland of Turkey could command the end of their history as a rebel nation, that this propaganda now must find a rational end. That isn't a fantasy or story to follow if Russia shows an example of how to first act boldly against the west, and then choose an end of it's own to settle down for now... Revolutions by nature are loose ends, like bricks of stone. The HDP can lead in mainstream politics the making of their own political history in Turkey, however painful it might be in the coming time, but if it wants the rest of the world to know it's pains this is the only valid way and not the other dead end politics. And yet, war is like an old song when the old politics are the playbooks of war. Economics on both sides could also play something of a big role, that here both sides are facing difficult choices for the future and it's pearly gates in the Middle East.

Smart World Architecture & Engineering, a whisper of titans (Telaim)

04082015

It would be an unforgiven thing to remain ignorant of the fact that the world has changed and has become indeed a very Smart World. Zionists and globalists would agree with anyone to write such no- nonsense stories, in which we include an International apology for not having done so earlier, that here we are in a world together, nations and governments, people and all living things, without even to know about the smartest people who created this age of smartness for all. Wherever you are looking smartness is there and present everywhere, within a hand's reach and useful around the clock, each and every day for the last two decades. The new institutions for smartness are stations around the globe. You can't and won't miss it. In the age when we are dominated by Global Banking and Banks, sometimes it is hard to understand this greatness of man behind prejudice and old foes, e.g. envy. Smartness & Envy is quite a global snake fight and it will never match. If we say that there are a handful of dynasties in the Banking Industries, in control of mainstream earthly finances, and they are Jews, it is clear that we fall short of matching with anything else to come close where they are today. And we never ask forgiveness falling so short in great inadequacy... Let's go to the moon together, to Mars, Jupiter or Venus, building bridges of the shortcoming illusion of global endeavour and entrepreneurial spirit of nations, as has been done so for the last hundred years. Mankind, they say, should stay close to it's humble roots...

What is the next step in our Smart World and it's architecture & engineering? The economy device of Super Smart will make Super Rich comes to it's end game or mission, with astonishing facts like this one, that super smart was meant to make super cheap from the old monopoly only found in this world among kings, princes and potentates. And yet we get this all wrong, again. The honourable men or architects of our Smart World have no individual view of the world. Mankind should comply by his/ her own individual perceptions of the world and beyond all it's abstract realities. But now that we are 'family' in the global system created by the Smart World Archtitects, yes it is our business too to konw not only in which world we are living mindlessly and why it's services are only to make things better for everyone here and overthere in the rest of the world. Forgive us, and answer to our rebellious calls. Be it in the need for governance, employment, mainstream economy, learning or education, humanity and chance (not challenge). A ban on all restrictions we can't do. In this at least both sides seem to serve one another at one point or maybe two. The next level in our Smart World, let's say for now, is unknown, unborn.

The world knows when it's beaten.

24072015/ 21:34 PM

It is unbelievable but two weeks ago the European Union, IMF and Europe all three stared into the abyss of Greece and a possible exit from the European Union Membership for the Greek people. Today, some two weeks later, this heavy blip of mudslide between Germany and Greece, Greece and the rest of the European Member States, and the IMF, took an even bolder step than e.g. the referendum earlier this month to take a big step back and where it now stands far behind the lines of the last offer that was given to Mr Tsipras, the Prime Minister of Greece. And that is good news if you are an expert on future polemics. As for now it won't matter for the rest of the year in 2015 whether Greece had stood in high hills over Europe and looking as far as center European Union by just one eye. It's scope has grown bigger for the last two weeks of negotiations to have that third package deal from it's creditors and International creditors. By law this means that the Greek Prime Minister has put back his country at the foothill of another deal that will cost the country it's 'royal robes' of crimson. At the end of the day the only thing that matters is the Big Picture.

Peace in the 21st century after 2014 and 2015 will go down in history as very serious, and it doesn't need  to give you any good reason. One future polemics is clear: these challenges have failed their own sense of supremacy and super powers. And for now they can be dismissed indefinitely. In 2016 the world is moving on and mainly in the United States, where the Presidential Election is due on the big stage of the world once again. It is to the American every day life important to get on with their own lives and choose the next President in 2016. From a global point of view here no one will be looking back to Greece or Russia by then. Names like Mrs Clinton, Jeb Bush, Donald Trump and the other candidates will dominate the news and politics upstream and 'make America great again'. (Slogan Mr Trump's Presidential challenge campaign) In a way the truth is said here perfectly well in this Trump(eteer) slogan. Once the mission is over there is no point doing it all over again. The world knows when it's beaten. Things can go back to normal and business get's on as usual. Who will make America great again is the next spreading of new themes that are needed around in the world...

Alex Tsipras, "Dear Creditors, ...".

13072015

It now looks as if the Greek Prime Minister, Mr Tsipras, is ready to show the side he hasn't yet shown in his ability as Prime Minister of Greece, that he has a hidden talent for engineering the euro inside the Greeks' every day life, and that he will not stop at this. A grand gesture from a man who was caught seen at the T- junction of a no return to austerity only last week. Between driver behind the wheel and passengers opinion on return differ. It is something of human nature lowest order philosophy that anyone can drive. How hard can that be? But it was hard this time for Mr Tsipras and get to turn back to his 'original sin' with the austerity programme and the creditors... And to find out what their mood is like this morning one can only read the short article by Paul Krugman, NYT, the killing of EU Project. (Killing the EU project) To put it to translation, for Greeks and Germans, the creditors now make up their own Grimm story. First of all, if you have any decency in you, you do not call creditors the witch in the woods providing lot's of meat and choclate for the Greeks, only to have them later served as grand private dinner/ souper. Creditors are a real magnitude and the hardest of realities in our time. Countries should be able at basic value be able to show reciprocate meaning in the present time deals, especially when the EU project is the empirical.

Where the 'boats of money/ ships of money' may come from or go to isn't the king's prerogative anymore. It is in fact by example and how to undo the king's ways. Yes, Mr Tsipras is our modern day tragic hero with a biopic of his statue in Athens, covering his privates with a green leaf. In this way to the people in Athens/ Greece there is no better translation of what has happened in Greece today, and to his arm's length the EU. The global stage is not for amateurs or wannabees. Once you have deepen the rif inside the impossible of the creditor's ivory den, as they indeed have killed many elephants, your way up again will then not be a surprise if you end up where you started from. It's basic physics: the world is a round planet. Ten years from now how public opinion will look upon today's 'grand deal with Greece', who likes to speculate is more than welcome, or maybe not? It looks as if this lesson to be learned to the next generations will differ from what the older generations make of it, as it goes. When the world of converting died in Europe or was designated inferior to the single currency more superior abstract being, the magic of the euro was born every time you bought a loaf of bread, thinking in self mind bubbles that this goes everywhere on the continent in the same way. Now you magnitize.

Mr Tsipras should magnitize from his few choices: economics and social history.

What EU reconstruction would mean in ten years time...

10072015/23:13 PM

Tonight, tomorrow and on sunday, the EU will face the unusual task of facing the other side of a successful euro in the Eurozone and established by the European Union Member States for sixty years this year in 2015. Many older politicians have said approximately the same, all senior members of the political establishment in Brussels and in European countries. In a sense this is not strange where Greece is now standing that this has gone into an uncontrollable spin out of control at this point, where the country was forced to take a desperate measure for measure action when it called last week to have a referendum and let the people of Greece vote. The EU is constructed that way for sixty years. And with it the heart or root of this evil did not die out. For example, should we blame the International creditors and the ECB? Is Greece really to blame? Technically the real question remains untold and isn't there yet to really be in control of the EU without one country having to go this far, as is in the case with Greece from the start, almost as if to say that this will root out the evil plague on ordinary citizens or people. Is it true about austerity being too severe a punishment for the EU success and it's single currency? If so that isn't going to look like a good promise made with the introduction of the euro. Neither is it lightweight to move away from other ways to deal with this problem.

Going back in time the EU construction is simple to follow/ trace back. Member States have been before the Maastricht and Lisbon Treaties not so long ago sovereign countries. Sixty years after WWII senior politicians were inspired and willing to build another Europe and leave the image of war behind for good. That alone was a tremendous cost for which the names of politicians who signed into these changes and challenges facing sovereign governments and people also have been real authorities in their own right. Others followed and so did time. A new generation of citizens were born and by the time the millennium had arrived what did only matter then was the euro... From 2001 to 2015 the Euro in it's infancy has already incredible powers as a young currency. What is always impossible with gold and currency is to be young and powerful. What happens on sunday if Greece accepts the tough measures imposed on the Greek people we are almost sure this will not be the end of that. With an outdated EU establishment of European Union politics there will be no solution found under these rules indefinitely. The EU should know this. It is this construction in the present time that the EU cannot really help solve the problems of a crisis like the one they have with Greece. (And in the worse case scenario countries that could follow soon)

Sovereign politicians from an era after WWII is most referred to by old ideologies. This is their expertise and the EU won't change anything in this world. But what if the EU reconstructs and creates politicians everyone could recognise miles away that these are EU politicians? They could lead the generation and next one out of the outdated EU establishment, while also keeping close contact with the institution fundamentals. He/She will speak the lingo of these present and future generations. Would that be a solution to the problem for any Grexit or Brexit with only following old instincts that the young currency surely cannot be more powerful than for example the Drachma or Deutsche Mark? (Something young generations will have no relate-theory or reality with)

It is rather old to follow political genealogy in Greece before midnight tonight

30062015/22:28PM

Everyone knows what's going on here and why people are restless and not only the people in Greece, but in other camps too. EU Finance Ministers are having a telephone meeting at 19:00 hours this evening first on two main issues, one a debt deal and second the deadline with the IMF, and also a third one on the referendum this sunday 5 July. The world in a nutshell is witnessing a day of wonder for the last few hours, this again coming from the same man in Greece who seems to be in his misfortune still the hero that we have all been waiting for but didn't think this would come so soon. Secretly all Europeans with their hearts in Europe are going to support the Greek Prime Minister's bold actions in a few days  time, one  when dealing with  the  calling for a referendum and now today, the second, asking the European Rescue Fund for another rescue package, which has been unfortunately rejected by Germany. Mr Tsipras' nightmare is the majority in Europe, as they say in Belgium, the federal powers in Brussels. It is not the money, so it seems.

The Greek Prime Minister for some reason either has miscalculated this highly calculated elite institution in the capital of Belgium, or he is fully aware that he cannot do this in one strike or alone. On both sides of the table there is a clear exchange of proposals and conditions being communicated for long now and that will not change at the short term with a quick solution. The people of Greece still believe in their Prime Minister's role as the government who can deliver the deal they would like to see, but when going any deeper in debt with external institutions over this many remain uncertain or even amazed why nothing can be done really. People do not really know the majority and that in fact this is instrumental. In less than a week a referendum in Greece against austerity measures has no political impact without the Greek government resigning. And that is just one example why no one understands Grexit from a serious point of view, if it is possible to challenge the EU and at the same time create more nationalist sentiments among it's battered citizens. It is Mr Tsipras' call and toss the Drachma's fate single handedly any time soon in a few days time.

We all know how this Greek tragedy will end, when honest as a fly on the wall tonight. Is it too soon to say or issue a warning not to envy the Greek Prime Minister on his erratic behavior for the last 48 hours or so?

Much further away from union is disunion

25 June 2015/22:42 PM

A good starting point, as if it's only possibility would be lost or found, is to say in politics the west can only start off from constitutional law (and echoing order). Disunion on the other hand is empirical. All depending whether this truly originates in the west and in politics, making it's appearance not a quiz but fact of life, is that polemics? Take for example the European Union. How many wise men/ women created a polemic of their own before they campaigned to the EU citizens where all of the EU was originated from and why? Politicians always could count on strong support from the European Union that there are two institutions for back-up, the European Parliament and European Commission, and perhaps since then have ignored the white paper of Member States too often in favor of having all projects in portfolio rather quickly green tagged... No relevance was ever sought in this as the EU Member States increased over the years more rapidly, as in a sudden? From a historical point of view there was a strong beginning for the Union by all Member States, less few than today a decade ago. Even less more before the millennium. Union Membership over the ages of 'disunion' was proof of another world possible in the same place and time, while no citizen had to go to war but could sleep at nights and only wake up to a better future indefinitely. War was over and union membership became the fact of European Union life. Can anyone then explain these new meanings of Grexit and Brexit?

Technically speaking: what is so wrong with a strong Union Membership within nations of the European Union as now perceived by the rest of the world and it's own citizens? There is a universal example of what might be the problem. The United States of America does not have a white paper for constitutional matters, especially not after the revolutions between north and south. Agreements should be honored after wars and revolutions. Can the European Union say the same after WWII? The agreements only came after the single currency plans, all in a civilized manner between governments and their Prime Ministers. The European Union also never did lead to form a constitution at the European Commission, within the European Parliament or indeed within the European Union. Also, behind the scenes, there wasn't any talk either of disunion and a bringing down of the single currency, the Euro. That is clear enough for now if theory wants it's citizens to believe the present time in opposition, that this is only natural politics and nothing else to bring about danger over Europe or a collapse of immense disproportion. But we will one day understand why this danger is quite realistic, if let's say the constitution is in the way and remains so. (Ms Applebaum in her article in the Washington Post yesterday is right to suggest, that it's not the economy, stupid) Grexit or Brexit is a dangerous game or risk, it seems. Don't you think so?

The future as a reality global pic will split in half at one point soon

13062015

These are just small cause and effect shocks, e.g. Britain having it's way out of the EU, or Turkey's prelude of it's own Turkish spring if not this year at some point in the immediate future soon. Also in the news are two major happenings the world is expecting to see, a new US President and Mr Putin in Russia giving up some of his political and global potency, voluntarily. China, Japan and India once great expansionists in the far east are now trying to find new ways through tight inspansion. In Chinese heaven that still might be an option for more Chinese cultivation and civilization. (But it is not a sign on the calendar and in their zodiac) Is there any understanding rising above the global chieftans' tipis that isn't just smoke? The world has plenty of sense, it's instrumentalist nature leaves no vacuum open (article America's foreign policy recovery, Ms Applebaum, 12 June yesterday, Washington Post suggesting otherwise, that nature abhors vacuum), and never in human history did man come so close to his own greatness, self or inherited, as today in this era, in the 21st century. A criminal world, one wonders, could that have made the planet a celestial body in this universe? Isn't it true that our roots are still primitive when we die? The mechanism goes on and on, from every new generation to the next. Jews, Chinese, Japanese, Turks, Mongolians, Africa, nations and countries benefit from these mechanisms, natural or artificial, one could say. The world has a perfect balance in the 21st century, no doubt, thx to it's global technologies and sciences of machineries. Globalization is convinced of it's own nobility, that the world was given 'the best education' in all parts of the planet we call home and earth. Violence wasn't necessary, but in some cases one had to draw the lines on a massive scale where transgression is expected or calculated. This is all true by far and near, and many interpretations come and go from the very generations they generate through technology and invention, and yet still where is the world of man without trust?

In good partnership WWII ended with a quest for world peace, and especially in Europe, to make a more lasting expectation of life triumph. Yes, as simple as that because it also meant a blessed life for good men and women. But human is his worst enemy, always in the end of every downfall and world war. The fish or bait, who or what is guilty in the moment's violence when the fish is hooked? (And later eaten) In every corner small or great, the world and it's populations have greater needs in terms of consumption, whether water, food or cleanliness. Who is providing this expectation of life in our world today? Local government for some can see the big picture, while some are caught up in navel gazing endlessly, dutifully doing the best they can to serve their community. No one is dealing in sands if the standard of living is solely a decisive factor for the wealthy... But the poorest are still in the stardust of 'their expectations' and God forbids that they should stick to this a longer while, for a hundred years more? The driving mechanism can automatically spew out the bits and pieces in society and leave everything up to the community self services and their organizations in and outside governments, but the paying out will still be in sands and not money. For a while this story went well in the last decades, just before and after the millennium. These were also the golden opportunities for all global citizens and businesses. And today they still are. Or are they? In Europe you do not simply push one button for in and the other for out on the same machine, if you believe the outcomes on EU referendums, Ukraine was the last country in this line, and then find in terms of human relation no similar monotony, only to lead the country by parliamentary outcomes of votes and elected Prime Ministers. Something void get's in the way like a bad and old wind. To take the short cut through reality 'takes' in the world today one can only say trust is not invented by the same men as they have largely done so with money. And 'to have' that money is the only government the electorate is now believing to be the true democracy, and make everyone a happy citizen. Apparently democracy, e.g. in the west, does not come with violence. The wind and storm have similar a nature. All a gift from God Almighty perhaps? (Except for trust, as in to win trust and deserve it's medal)

Turkey tonight: one wonders whether Mr Erdogan will be remembered as the Statesman he was when Prime Minister

07062015

In Turkey tonight primary results are showing of a political win/ victory for HDP against a slight drop for AKP, the oldest Party for decades long, or it feels that way. One could say that Mr Erdogan and his AKP were going to be the millennium Party for a very long time in human memory, but more so in Ankara, Istanbul and many more home regions to see the AKP golden age. HDP has put a stop tonight in Turkey's political ambition with a reverse of all Mr Erdogan's great expectations changing the system of a highly organised worldview of democracy, to a presidential model 'carved' in his own image. The public is not informed enough how governments and politicians get to change one minute today and tomorrow see a new chance. In Turkey that will be harder to find out and after tonight's HDP victory crossing the threshold of 10%, there isn't in any way outsiders can predict anything yet from what happened to a country that was close to it's own goals but now has to be the spectator in their own political arena. It is not going to be easy to change from dominant politics to a more subordinate nature of events when politics change, and the millennium is gone from all of it. But perhaps the miracle went both ways for this nation and is cautioned about it's own destiny tonight. Turkey is more stronger, because it is a nation that understands how to be subordinate and for the good of everyone that will now be more than ever necessary. It is the time to show grace to the victor and respect the overtone of this election, that the HDP wants something more substantial from government and country, and doing so with 'open eyes' to get there in the end.

We have another tale to tell the future generations after tonight's victory for the Kurdish people, might be what Mr Dermitas must be thinking when watching the crowds in the country that was only a few hours ago the 'old home' he remembers as the 'old Turkey'. This must have been waiting for the Kurdish people since millennium Turkey was on the rise. At least if you believe in accumulated wealth and other wonderful standards of living that were born in the year 2000 everywhere in the rest of the world, and even for Russia and it's ambitions then to be the G7 next partner, later known to us as G8. HDP former shadow is distant memory after tonight. And the Middle East can only be flabbergasted. The year 2015, like in the UK and now in Turkey, made rather very unusual steps to introduce a different approach in the world many governments have known for the last seventy years as 19th century coming to an end in the 21st century. When HDP in Turkey in the 21st century can cross the threshold of 10%, that is a fact of global life that it is here now and for always a change in all systems in the world. Globalization will now come in humanitarian power/ empowerment and go for the standard of living to finally eradicate the 'old ways of the world' to rule man on earth and all human lives.

With a long experience of historical meaning Turkey is not lost entirely yet. But in what way it can rise to the occasion in this 'new Turkey' no one on the outside can say. Chivalry, as they are known horsemen, can still make a surprise here out of nowhere?

What can any outsider in the global audience say about Turkey's upcoming election?

28052015

The phase in Turkey's upcoming election is quite mazed. There is some balance of the old book playing politics versus the expectations on creating a new one ongoing as we speak. That is if you're right and your information is not just speculation or suspicion. And many voters are hanging there in the balance between the two forces of what the ballot box might get out of the bag in this election. There was once a joke or tale to tell during election campaigning, but that is now over. Elections are the perfect brooding places for what seems darn certain and what may not. The HDP is one of these at this point, but that may go either way after the election as things are yet not to visualize when the clear victory is announced on the next day after polling day. The global audience is neither here or overthere, just the International community is expected to be close and monitor the counting of votes when the polling has stopped. This is the evening for Turkey to step into a century of their own making, or continue on a trimmed version of the old rule...

There is enough time, so it seems, to transform the present time general mood to a certain sense of sincerity of people and politicians. And some even wonder about Turkey's future, that if a decade ago Turkey was the sick man of Europe, what now? A decade ago Turkey did make history! (Just like so many have, e.g. the EU, England, Ireland, the Bric countries, the Middle East, the far east and Russia) Politically, globally or NATO, one day in the last decade you could be hot, and the next you're not. The face of global economics isn't into all that 'old way' anymore in the year 2015. But which future and roads will appear at this side of the horizon isn't until the end of the year going to be as clear. And that is based on wild speculations. The world is not in the mood for war and antagonize without finding a very good reason to break the rule of any kind. This is also top level thinking, one might think. And like the Russian President is now showing, that scouting is better than creating hostilities between the leading industrial nations, so will the Turkish President or 'next government' have their own scouts and scouting politics to follow in line next.

If the whole system in Turkey's political sphere is critical and loyalty might be squeezed out or too much, there is simply no telling where or how this will end on 07 June 2015.

Turkey: with three main players in the coming election the people are in a vulnerable mood, that could lead to being just inclination

19052015

There is confusion this afternoon in Ankara's news media over headlines in the Daily Hurriyet and the President, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and why this was highlighted on the national touch screen for the Turkish voters who will go to the polls in three weeks time, 7 June 2015. One particular headline is causing much havoc: why did Daily Hurriyet address the issue of 52% and Morsi in one sentence in quite a highly charging manner, asked President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in one of his speeches/ rallies over in the weekend? The mood in the big cities, Ankara and Istanbul, has been in an odd sort of mood for the last 48 hours, and making more than the two ut supra cities nervous and with people leading up to the polling day in even a more vulnerable mood. 40 Million followers are expected to vote in this election. The question today at this hour however is not dealing with polling day just yet. If Morsi is sentenced to death in Egypt, it will be perceived by certain political figures in Turkey as a particular bad omen or shadow casting on the general election day. There is simply no light brigade explanation tolerated at this hour by 'these prominent political gentlemen', to put it rather oversimplistic. And quite right so. Time and aimed targets are pressure power, as everyone is expecting to see with a rising HDP in Turkey. And three weeks are suddenly not distant or overaged anymore.

The miracle could be already taking place and e.g. tell the Kurdish population this is your chance in a million, one in it's kind and that will not be seen for a very long while again. It is the old struggle in society where authority lies with national government, between terms & terms, perhaps long expired, or revisited in a 'now or never' other term, known or unknown? Turkey is an old political establishment, not perhaps as old as England's, but it is and was here while the generations of today were still unborn in the stars. Senior politicians throughout Europe and Asia Minor have seen where politics can take you, as the President, the Prime Minister, the Military regime, World War I, World War II, and the monarchy. Why do they let the people be squeezed out or inside a trap that never allows time nor fact to define what nature it is exactly playing out through electoral battles or fights, in each and every civilized country? And the Middle East is highly civilized, despite the dome overheading most of it's existence with negative democracy, either by choice or self will, in just a few men... The HDP, unlike the SNP in Scotland, also isn't that prepared, to a. take on a divided Kurdish peace plan among it's own people, and b. being ambitious on more global recongnition as a people and race, and reaching out to a final stage in the process of this making. Politics is science and not just inclination to be in politics. 10%, Or slightly above or under, scientifically makes a good case and challences all systems in Turkey, who in their wildest of stately dreams never had tought that one day England and Turkey would be put on the same block by a heavy cement of miraculous change... 7 June 2015, yes, the country is nervous.

Global threshold wide curve

12052015

Space on earth is our living memory of a world map and primary when called geography. By the time you get older with miles of time lapses behind you there is another memory level trying to reach you or when ambition is your thing, you will get there to it and face the earth on your own in a mass crowd of billions of other people. Life is free and knows no boundaries from where you are standing... A given point in the universe or man made universal system? 20/30 Years ago before this phenomenon of globalization and the global forces of economics and social media/ engineering, memory of man was his only freedom and universe. You reach for the stars on your own and not when you travel around the world in space inside the cabin of the ISS. But can that have only been the American 'dream' view, let's say since the sixties? It is only today that many got to learn about the European view and it's sense of freedom that isn't quite in the same way e.g. America is experiencing as threatening to world security. Paradox or contradiction of laws and freedom go in hand in hand very comfortably over in the US, while in Europe that is not the case. Freedom in Europe means a political agreement with civil life have come to the memory how law and order can organize basic life and high standard living as most fundamental in society. It honors the 'happy index' on terms and balances one can always find in the sense of freedom within the frame of mind by politics or standard of living. Globalization was the horizontal order of economics and the global need for security and peace, seen from a European reaching for the stars attitude or mentality in certain circles of life.

Outside these descriptive texts on memory and globalization no one had thought of a global threshold holding all global infrastructures inside a wide curve that will not let anyone cross that line, senselessly or even wisely. Globalization has now an unknown side or phenomenon. The best example of the day is the last general election in England. But more what that could mean for Britain if e.g. it wants exit from the EU as soon as 2016, or Scotland, if the Scotts decide that their living memory should not be any longer extinct from the side of life where globalization offers a better future for Scotland and the people, and also is the natural force in which most countries will find themselves in ten to twenty years from now. The Scotts have a vision in which they feel it is theirs only. Enough with the childlike talks on Nessy in the zoo and in other ways the English are used to make up fantasy stories about the Scotts and Scotland. There is more to the Scotts than meets the eye in the monster of Lochness. The Scotts have a national plan for their economy and, this is important, becoming a global citizenry that might bring everlasting development to Scotland. It is the way if you want to join the universe in the future. All magic beans to England for the moment. In the meantime no one in the world can see any danger in the general election 2015 outcome. Like Mr Henry Kissinger said last year in 2014 Newsnight interview, after the referendum on 18 September 2014, 'it can be noticed that Britain has changed, but that wouldn't be a problem'. Imagine: can Britain change the global curve of the wide threshold in it's present glory?

You don't really want to do this: congratulate the Tories with a 331 seats election 2015 victory

09052015

The public sphere get's wider and disappears in mainstream politics or economics to remain insignificantly small or tiny as a drop in the ocean. Where the Conservatives today are is the here and now, at least when Mr Cameron is the leader of one nation and government in the UK. But first things first:  an inquiry into the exit polls and why this wasn't near the outcome of the 2015 election. Experts will be asked why they took fixation on numbers over real calculation numbers, something like that. Maybe. As a true result of their predictions three prominent members of parliament in big political parties had to resign. Isn't that serious a 'miscalculation'? Now it's down to voter's behaviour. The voters did want an overall majority of the Tory Party. Plus they wanted to vote Labour out. And with that keeping in the SNP in Scotland as a major big winner in this general election in the UK. A realistic pic of how voters do make that important choice when it's a general election. And also they are very clever at almost the same level as polls experts. After the election there is no looking back on pre- election weeks of campaigns and sweeping up the crowds to get to the polling booth on the fixed date. 7 May 2015 did come and it produced the kind of miracle that England was or has been waiting for a very long time. Now, two days later after that election, this miracle is opening it's wider view and some are worriedly asking whether Mr Cameron could be really happy with the results he had hoped for.

Europe: will Mr Cameron hold on to his pledge having a 2017 referendum on the EU exit or stay? The second: can he contain the Scotts not to go back on 'their' pledge not to have another go at the referendum lost in 2014? From the overview this is going to be a typical UK problem for the Prime Minister. Europe and the European Union Member States, and in opposite direction, will follow their set course with no immediate plans of changing anything as radical as Britain is getting ready for by 2017. No plans are shifting here, also because there are no individual Member States going the same way as Britain by the fixed date or year of a referendum in Britain. (They've been there and done that) Mr Cameron's government is on it's own. Singularity at a time like the present time, whether powerful or weak, is a singling out of something Britain doesn't quite well understands yet what that could mean on the one side in Europe, and the other with Scotland. To the Scotts second chances are as rare as miracles on mainland Scotland. You don't want to say this: but isn't England pushed into a corner of it's own but not feeling this as usually would have been the case if a magnified one? If that was anyone's plan it must be said that he/ she has outsmarted the whole world this time. With a gift so poisonous?

Can Mr Cameron pull through as the Prime Minister in an overall Tory majority in government after today? If the old myth is a challenge on two fronts, the EU and Scotland, and all the king's men and horses have failed that one before, perhaps there is a new myth for the future the PM could form? Europeans understand union Membership after a long experience as Member States, and having Brussels as Central Government. Five years ago with a coalition government in Britain the 'new myth' was there and neighboring countries did cosy up to the British people as 'one of us' in a very progressive state. In Britain being part of the EU also was the natural feeling for most academics, businesses and other streams the public has no idea of. All voices from all sorts of political parties were heard in Britain and throughout the European Union for the last five years in a 'free speech' of their own. In other words the new myth 2015 will all be about reversal of fortunes, in England, Scotland and global relations starting with the EU? Mr Cameron wants to lead his government and do this with respect. It is sublime and too beautiful to plunge into a highly civilized war, one would secretly and carefully think. But, all the king's men and horses might still be around or there for Mr Cameron in this government. A hope that is barren of a divine child when extremely beautiful the lady and her husband, is a similar thing...

Breaking up Britain is less unforgiven comparing to casting doubt on Westminster indefinitely

05052015

Let's say that theoretically most impossible things are possible, if not by reason only when quite experienced as Westminster politicians mostly are. Cry faul, play faul, is it faul at all? What say the captain of this old political ship, that after hundreds of years repolishing top to bottom it needs replacement with a much newer ship with less antiquity onboard? It might be right or the right thing to do in our century, with a flagpole reaching as far as 2030 in mind. If Britain would disappear before that time what will be common good for all it's citizens who are now half our age (27)? Mr Miliband is Britain's next leader, a wow! factor that only comes once in a lifetime, is what most are already expecting, in whatever form that might come. At this point it is most difficult to make a last moment's try for that distinctive notion for the Conservatives to bring out now and still be able to defuse Labour's premature euphoria. Wisely enough Mr Miliband has moved away from another theory government with Mr Nick Clegg in coalition in the next government... The logic with more hawkish voters would then be: why vote out the government we now have? Can Mr Miliband really do that to the British public and cast doubt indefinitely on his leadership and promises? If so than the next Prime Minister of Britain is ready to become a millstone bearer, carrying this large piece of stone on his own back and then drop. Good thinking, good choice, if you are a swordsman. No one is even sure whether Mr Miliband is a high tech man, let alone...

They say of Roman rulers to have imported Greek scholars and customs, for improvement of civilization and the Roman way of life, or aka the conquerors conquered. In 2015 England perhaps it is a similar situation like that of the Romans, but not yet and sure who the conqueror is, and who the conquered are at this point. You can't be sure, but whom is it that could be underestimated here? Is it money or the political establishment? By reason and all theories, go with the SNP and break up England. Oh yes, that other democracy where nothing of the old is left on the ship. The global economy has already given many nations to believe it's mechanism works and does bring the planet in a forward motion unstoppable and is saving costs by doing so at a high constant. That is the voice of reason among the leading nations. And any government with an advanced economic system hasn't had in the last decade or more another policy from it's parent system in global economics, by which they can bring forward an independent economic force that is totally relying only on interior forces or connected ones in partnerships. It is believable for Mr Cameron to know where Britain stands on this issue, if not a theory but hardcore reality, or at least many can assume so. The curious thing is whether Mr Miliband actually does know more or less the same. If Mr Nick Clegg is his coalition partner in the next government... With the SNP in coalition with Labour in government you have at least the fantasy of exporting what is good about Britain. Theories! What else?

Genocide is grotesque. Turkey, by now, is very much aware of this and putting the question forward, not backward.

24042015/21:57PM

After WWII the term genocide became the world's supreme term for corrective measurement. In it the human being was central and key, and not abstract as any other science or being. (Animals didn't had any rights as we now have luxurious clinics in Switzerland today dealing with animal welfare worldwide) How has Turkey find it's reason back from days going back in time, even before WWII mass genocide of the Jewish people in Germany and across Europe? It is in our modern world the quickest thing to do and let the International world pointing out to this or that country where recorded history shows beyond any doubt a death toll and circumstances, it was WWI, how the battle was won or lost. From madness of war to polemics, this world kept  neat records of all wars since ancient times. That is as much as it says in the books. WWII too has taught humanity a few lessons, besides the corrective measures afterwards, that rebuilding is not just genius, but that it is imperative to prove something of an innocence in the damned nation, that is if humanity is central and the economics is based on skillful expansion. Much of the German Reich did not survive as such after the war in 1945, but much of their 'innocence' was kept in the ability to create an economic machinery contemporary with the rest of the 'civilized' world. The Ottoman empire basically also has had it's 'golden days' and prospered well in the same way as many European nations, also busy building or rebuilding historic wrongs to rights, later known as universal human rights. It is quite remarkable for the International world to after 100 years condemn Turkey worldwide for the 'genocide' of Armenians during WWI, then respecting sovereignty and reputation.

Our world today is not based on sovereignty and reputation for it's leading role in the global community. If Turkey fails to understand the law in it's most basic and simple laws, where does Armenia come in to impose a corrective measure in the political centre of Ankara, and doing so as a sovereign nation? After WWII this was urgently needed after six million Jews were plainly massacred in a grotesque way as no other had imagined possible on the whole of the planet. Not ever before had they any proof. And then for the first time humanity understood that this should never happen again as long as man lives on this planet, (Mankind) as analogue to  the rebuilding of the new world order start -off: global finance and trade. That became the norm for all International relations between governments and nations. And also Germany had persuaded the world, western nations, it wanted to accept it's defeat and will show remorse for some indefinite time to come. Accepting fate under pressure from European nations was considered both intelligent and soulful. Any sovereign nation did have some understanding there and then, without feeling the moral pressure of admitting this was the beginning of a new   age  of  integrity. (Whether political or military)

In April 2015 today there is no one in our world who would want to see this ever happening once again. No one wants to ever experience genocide again, or it's slightest form in atrocities. Where the British monarchy still stands today as it's old former self, when the British empire, the Ottoman empire has gone extinct. Both, Armenians and Ottoman, have gone with the ember of that fire. There should be respecting the fallen Armenian people and doing so solemnly, maybe in every spring for the rest of Turkey's political days. And that could be a long time in the future.

Perhaps not related to a day of mourning the dead, but in medieval times when the Dutch were under attack by some wild men in constant raids, the Turks had advised them to dress like Turks and then see what happens. The Dutch did so as they were advised and a miracle happened. The raids on the Dutch had stopped completely. Europeans and Asia Minor share similar stories. It is intimate like apple blossoms, almond trees and the shadows they cast through war and imperialism. Ankara has a lot these days on it's mind, but listening to the many voices through social media, the world expects the Turkish nation to be intelligent and soulful when rebuked over it's handling of it's sovereignty, Ottoman or other. No one in our modern world wants to go there: genocide as a land and rule of law.

Mrs Clinton, if elected President of the US, will not be able to ignore or neglect adversaries like Vladimir Putin, President of Russia.

18042015/00:05 After Midnight

To this side there is much impatience in the US, e.g. with the Russian President Mr Vladimir Putin. While the brass band keeps playing that familiar tune every five years when another election will be on in the United States, it is this impatience which will be the decisive factor at the end of the election race in 2016, whether the Democrats or Republicans will be in government for another term as President. At this level the fight will be expected to be a big one, expectations of who will come up with the biggest ideas and lead the nation to the true Americans platform, getting ready for tomorrow's future. Some voices have been heard today across the media grape vines, that the climate for war in the world is getting extremely wet. Also the question rises whether a woman as US President could be the right gender (not person) for a top job like no other in the (whole) world. Caesar chose Cleopatra in his time to beat Egypt, or was it the Senate back home in Rome? If the future of the 'next century' Americans is a big theme, chosing a woman to be commander in chief in 2016, to any theorist, is a very interesting choice to make by a world super- power in 250 years. (GOP will be GOP+1)

Theoretically one can doubt the rationality of having a woman to be President in the US, if not sentimental about her skirt behind which to hide the dominant world of men (and their wives) to preserve what will be left of a 'great country' in a not so great time for Americans in the short term future. How Russia reacts to having a woman President leading the west out in the cold, there is no precise telling here for the moment. But one thing is very true, that if Mrs Clinton will be the next President in the White House, that this will somehow be a cue. It has been said too many times before, on how effective a woman president might be for the world's perception of a man's world, always leading from dominant positions, whether in politics or big Banks. The White House is a whole lot different and perhaps is not related to one man or in this case one woman. America's role in the world changed with Russia as the thorn in it's side, and is for the time being the only priority left on the table. That is evolving constant and not like home base issues, subdued to decades long standard or routine lines. If, let's say, Ukraine doesn't stop the fighting, because of rebel held Russian separatists constant threats, in 2016 Mrs Clinton, then if President of the US, the question is a big one how she will convey policies worldwide or in the west, to make the Europeans understand that on both sides Mrs Clinton is capable to keep command of this situation with Russia. No one get's here for nothing. And there is still hope with a President like Mrs Clinton, one can carefully say quietly. And sometimes hope is what you need to stop a perilous situation. Not aggression.

No one will beat around the bush, as they say in English, when it comes to that, for example if Russia can 'trick' the world into dividing the west from Europe and eastern Europe. On sunday morning, 19 April 2015, no one can be sure either whether Russia will continue it's tricks set for reclaiming strategic territories, important only to Russians to understand why or why not. This is deep territory to Mrs Clinton with a Europe that has changed and not like the times when she and Mr Clinton visited Delft in Holland having a coffee and 'poffertjes' treat. A curious thing as well is that Germany has Ursula von der Leyen as Minister of Defense, still when the US elections in 2016 will be held. In this writing it is as if one is chucking things in to make a nice piece logical to read and getting it if possible. War of this kind will be an epic story scale- wise and wide. Women in power will be adversaries from continent to continent, men will be adversaries, also from continent to continent, ending global cooperation in an instant, yes, I'd say that that will be the weirdest thing ever in modern times. Women in all leading industrial countries are no less patriotic than men, and one can only tremble at the sight of prospects of war by such union of patriotism.

All the same, a very interesting development is happening or will be happening if Mrs Clinton is elected US 45th President.

The perfect professionals

09042015/21:58 PM

In the mainstream of global economics perfectness for two decades can only mean to go forward in the system and leave the experts to it. Starting with the global financial fronts: currency and monetary policies. In all fairness the world has turned to one side and it's now establishment of the professional world, from the world unrelated to these professional fronts in the global system. And it was a remarkable achievement for any human mind getting to spin the world on top of his fingers like a super giant spider. on a total sum these are indeed the people to claim the world is theirs at this point in the zenith of their 'petunia causa' overview. But money and wealth are not measured by god- like overviews of one individual nor that of a few individuals. That self is ascending all by itself, no disrespect, but in the same way to a giant doll being inflated by hydraulic force, calm and slowly. You can be of cyclonic proportions individually and still not related to a sovereignty as understood so clearly in ancient Greece's fables: Midas. 'You can touch this!' Apparently that is true and turn everything to gold. But then again, wasn't money the most serious of bondings with man on earth?

On the other side of this bonding between man and money there is another story here. Theoretically let's just take the European Union for one example. Two decades ago the Euro or single currency for example was a bonding to take place between Member States, the sign of various Treaties if you can bear your own traces back in time, in a single currency and European Union. The Lisbon and Maastricht Treaties were signed, then, by eagerness of the rising economies in the global system where only experts 'take your money' and to build (consummated economics) with that money the big idea of professionals planet in a 'wild world' not yet fully tamed or made with it's own sort... In april 2015, 7 years later after the first financial collapse in 2008, it is strange to see or read in the newspapers that many countries in Europe are struggling to stay inside 'the European Union area' and do so because there are no alternatives present, professionaly. And who wants to drop out of school? Greece perhaps? And who will follow suit after Greece? Options are practically renegade and half the consequence of that end product...

Perfect to the mm when you have another look at what they call the professional people and world. And true crystals when they cut you deep. Ending with the GDP economics. The bonding of man and money here can only mean the economics is the new sovereignty and that the GDP is a tool or instrument in it's sovereignty to act as the sole factor in all global systems, and not just money or currencies. In all studies on GDP there isn't one with this resolute truth to say what exactly could they mean by suggesting any sort of GDP that may exist if by nature it goes wide enough to create something of a GDP anatomy and give in return something autonomous back to it's holders. If you die today, this is the world you leave behind. A world at war over sovereignty. You have the professionals, and no doubt they are genius, to turn the hour glass of global economics upside down, and then exclaimed 'Eureka!' after their invention brewings, and said what used to make GDP will now be that Economics will determine any GDP. And not God, Queen and country. Unless you want to commit harakiri.

The GDP in it's humble beginnings is a simple formula by definition: the GDP is sovereignty. In Europe that was the tale of the Neaderthaler first to create, you see. And later in our time the GDP sovereignty is what made the whole world turn around and around. Once upon a time it had given to many nations money attributes in the treasury and guarded this wooden casket with heraldic creatures from the perils of the seas, whether earthly or unearthly by imagination. Men's souls depended on it, God in heaven depended on it, and an all insignificant peasant wasn't automatically murdered for it and to claim his land or rights via injustice in the land of the king or queen. Will the EU do the same? Does it have a GDP sovereignty and if so what is it called? (Not the 'Euro area', I hope) Two decades ago the global system could only be perfect. And many did follow that lead. So like all 'outsiders' did I, not belonging in the professional world of global system, close and personal.

Mr Benyamin Netanyahu officially now fourth term Prime Minister in Israel

04042015/23:20 PM

Alongside this curve of fourth term Prime Minister in Israel, Mr Netanyahu probably has already found the kind of deal to match that fourth term in government: Iran and the west successful diplomatic opening move. And with Iran's ancient spirit this political chess game brings back nostalgic memories of the many battles lost in previous time/ decades. The people in Iran want have no more of that. In fact the trend just might be what the country's doctor orders, that playing fair is a discipline, if not the only first rule, to bring back business to Iran if the deal sticks like glue in a giant tube. Also, staying on the good side of the deal and it's nature, the people will hail the new deal as the undying hope only mankind knows to display when given the main role. The future needs fresh horses or political actors in the Middle East, at least for now. And that's the way to go if the people believe in social engineering. Mr Netanyahu doesn't seem too concerned with the need for industrial prosperity in Iran, and why now? The fourth term Prime Minister of Israel should find a quick answer to his self questioning in quietness. The world has great respect for any fourth term President or Prime Minister, if this was still the old world of only learned men in politics. And Mr Netanyahu isn't convinced a conservative government should turn it's head away from reality nor fantasy politics. (Feels like a quiz without immediate answers)

If the Jewish nation in Israel are in fear of another Holocaust breakout against them how will the government in Israel prevent it from happening again, as being a tiny country in oceans of infrastructures where only hatred for Jews can come from to shore tightly? There is a slide chance the global community isn't clever enough to do this thing overnight, but it might use other ways to skin the cat... For the time being it looks as if it is very important to the world leaders that politics should work, if now more than ever. Governments did had an overnight lesson to learn and became enlightened that this world has expanded too much on war and less of politics was achieved in the last decade of global politics. Hot can be toxic and fluid, cold contracts and is under control in every country's network. Including Iran or Mongolia. The world is just one global network and paying for it. Others would go one step further and say that the ones paying are the ones hosting this global colosseum... A fourth time Prime Minister knows all about the world, one assumes. You build on credibility and respectibility, and on, and on, and on, and on... War is moving to another level and that is the future seen from many battle simulations in the war rooms. And there they are safely kept too!

But if Israel is threathened...

Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his two- phased- peace process with the Kurdish population in Turkey and beyond

28032015/22:45PM

A strange sensation for Turkey and the Kurdish political parties have been in the air, or on it, and quite intensely, with criss cross messages across the country and outside in regions where the Kurdish population have been fighting the enemy in the Middle East, ISIS/ IS, to at least hold the appearance up and above the crowds best known to them as 'hardliners' against a lasting peace between the two nations. To any outsider (including Yours Truly) the two sides are difficult terrain to access it's political meanings from a general point of view, or, whether it should be more selective and specific. But we are in some luck and now live in 2015 and not back in history e.g. the 30ties or post WWII. If correct Mr Erdogan's phase I in the peace process with the Kurds at home in Turkey, the general view of politics is exactly what is now ongoing on a better foot with the Kurdish political parties in Turkey, while the specifics of these politics are being looked upon as future politics in the peace process Phase II. In both there isn't much hope for a success story, by the Turkish government and also on the Kurdish side, now six months later after the last time in October 2014 awkwardness... The need for peace should be a learning process not only when the general election is on the way soon, but important is also not to lose sight of it's making to stay firm on peace that is different a path to process.

Staying here at the general view it looks like Turkey will have to go it alone for a great part to meet the Kurdish population half way. It is being said by the International community and their governments where they stand on this issue and it's specifics. The Kurdish people for a mysterious reason have managed to be engaging in these specifics with not only as a 'new nation' on the rise, but historically the world and the Kurds have been old friends before. There is a promise to honour a people fighting on for to be free from a time in which the Kurds have been unknown people to the rest of the world. This is the world beyond the Kurdish population in Turkey, a world far away from Ottoman emperical. The intensity at the five point star facing the Kurdish nation in the Middle East, and if people read the newspapers on both sides, is not to be an underestimated impression politcally and the fight for freedom. And here is where one can be let down quickly or experience a temporary setback when misunderstood, either in the Middle East or in the west. There is simply no perfect future in our world today. Europe is fighting it's battles within the European Union and ECB, Russia is becoming something of a headache/ faberge egghead to the west, and Greece slowly is becoming the proud owner of a dead cow who is refusing to change from milk to a much finer grain, if existed. The government in Turkey doesn't have all the answers if mathematics have anything to do with it's factors to govern the country, but peace with the Kurdish population is rather important at this stage too, from a general point of view. God only knows if there is such hope in writing when governments were invented in ancient history, but more recently when the world had come to it's era of globalization. (As working process before being admitted to a higher level in geopolitics) Phase II  now looking  out / having  the outlook  of a difficult test on both nations  very soon again...

First Quarter of 2015 is literally coming to an end...

24032015

World leading nations and governments e.g. in the G7 and G20 have been on a quiet course of dynamics in the first quarter of this year feeding the birds in their grand park, here or there, as a show of their undying affection for the world. It's a simple formula, when you want the birds come to you, you just feed them. How they end up afterwards in that aftermath is another story far away. It is true when global organizations say one thing about the future of this century's global civilization, and another from the bird's eye view of governments and nations' blocs. They, like the Russian President Vladimir Putin, may find instead of looking for more building of a 'global future' in the world, perhaps it is better to stop at this point and question the human conscience where their civilization and man made humanity is going to be in an estimate of the first fifty years of yet another century. What the leading nations can't see through their crystal eyed world based on technological hardware, is that what is unknown in human nature, be it in government or as a nation, is for example natural to admit to where all 'unlimited' worldviews stop. Mr Putin in 2014 has made this very clear as an exit G8 country last year. And he is the first in a row with perhaps a slow cueing to follow Russia in her worldview of rebuilding man made governments and people. In fact it comes down to the Russian view to either feeding birds or people.

The grand park has build it's architecture of scientific world on two factors: make governments or break them, and keep the global economy static. That is safe and (drinking) straw thin humane (colors?), and no one actually drowns in the basics of this mechanism that is 'our system' coming in small cups of storm or tranquility. A wonderful creation, one has to say, and extremely clever with no other to match in our entire human history. Our living planet in it's greater part has literally achieved it's goal to have extreme riches, mind and body, of almost 'inhuman' measurements realization. In every city, whether in the G7 or G20 countries, as well is in many other parts in the world, villages or small towns. The need to change this will therefore only be foolhearted and sheer foolishness... And war is another folly. Is it possible that we are both wrong, on the side of the global human race, and the other bloc of nations with 'limited mind and body volume' in the world of 'viewing' the future civilization of the abstract man? (Unspecified) What does civilzation of the future means by any random definition? Long term vision: is it perhaps possible that elections and voting for representatives will become out of fashion one day, and that the force of human existence will thrive on individual time span regimes only? (Opposing the long life span classics of 'what used to be governments'?) For example, and the sun and moon and judgment being given a more supervising role to play over earth's total populations?

This is  only  the first quarter  of the  year  in 2015!

It's never too late for corrections, eventhough it might be argued by opponents of test of law and time in governments

21032015

As a man of hardcore military action no one doubts the Israeli Prime Minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. The Israeli government hasn't yet announced whether Mr Netanyahu will be leading as Prime Minister in this win of the election outcome on 18 March this week, and therefore it is hard to say where and when the next government is formed and then start to evolve. But something necessary has been urgent after the victory in this election by Likud and in particular Mr Netanyahu. Social buttons are going red hot with the kind of urgency Ms Glick in her article are evident, The urgent business of the next government, Jerusalem Post. Is Israel so off reality or real politics that now urgency is the best way forward? Also, perhaps Mr Netanyahu was better off today if he had praised the United States Congress for being a nation in the making of 250 years and still is to this day or future. Israel's own making of State and nation for 60 years could have made an impressive picture, of what it means to have been allies since 190 years ago for the US. In the New York Times some are also worried whether American Jews are ready to give their backing again to this government and having Benyamin Netanyahu to be Prime Minister. Deep social issues in Israel have now been highlighted in a first time, as important as defending the State of Israel and it's nation. Social Affairs in Israel need 'urgent' redressing. Only, why now?

At the top of Israel the elite are blasé and having the bottom live of another Israel behind the rocks or preferably in the crevice, waiting till the ravens come in to feed them with 'good' rewards, instead of dead meat policies that have lost every contact with reality in the world.The Prime Minister should have noticed where this in the end would or could lead to, that deterioration of social living or standards is bad publicity for the rest of the Jewish race proud to lead the world. In governments older than that of the US and Israel, e.g. Great Britain, why feed snobism of older parliaments with so little embarrassments of one's own pride and haugtiness in government? 60 Years have been a time with enormous shockwaves for all former Prime Ministers in government's memory in Israel, and where are it's good times for the last ten years under the governments of Mr Netanyahu? Actually the hardest thing to say or do for any outsider (Yours truly), is that when on the platform of global politics there is little difference with the Israeli incumbent PM and e.g. strongman in Russia Vladimir Putin. Why some in the US newspapers wrote on Mr Netanyahu's appearance before the US Congress as Churchillian, was all and a false note in the music. It was meant to be an overture. Or if... Time is changing the world's perception of all orders, natural or man made. Mr Netanyahu, like Mr Putin in Russia, are not what we can call model leaders, but given the experience they have in our globalized world, they are models of this making. And it hardly ever relates to humanity or backyard social clubs in their electorates. Well said in one case if this is referring to Mr Netanyahu?

Israel is deeply concerned in all segments of society at the moment. The people in their backyards, this includes not only the Jewish population but minorities too, where there are many who have created their own hub of meritocracy and multiculturalism to get by without 'bothering' the government or it's officals too much. "Ah, what do they know!" End of the story. End of their deep search or soul searching. And they could be in trouble with the next government if Israelis pursue a dream beyond Israel that this will bring security home for everyone. Put that security in terms of scientific proof what do the 'real people' of Israel get from Mr Netanyahu? Conditions remain unchanged, if it's bad it stays bad just to show off to neighbors how hardship polishes a man and that God Almighty still has greatness in these humbling or humbled people, His own people. In government there is no humbleness, or even the humility to create good governance for a lasting Israel and aspirations to once become an old parliament in the Middle East, next to miniature Turkey with the oldest political establishment so far.

If Mr Netanyahu somehow manages to survive the moment of confrontation with this Israel as portrayed in the writing of Ms Glick, surviving will become the best moment of his history as Prime Minister.

There is a quiet dislike about Israeli politics and tonight is not going to make any difference

17032015/21:45 PM

Benyamin Netanyahu Likud or Zionist Party Herzog, both political entities have been traditionally known in Israeli politics for decades. The smaller and newcomers are like a rare breed of political parties especially cultivated for elections in Israel when major parties are lacking behind one another. It's a familiar process thus far and the last decade has become the recipe for a final outcome at the polls, when they decide to back the winning next PM and government if there is a clear winner. Some newspapers online already are suggesting that tonight's outcome will be each with the same amount of seats' share, 27 and 27. The night is young and in this election's case this is the night for the 20th election held in Israeli political history can only be younger, let's say if Herzog and his Zionist party wins e.g. promille- wise from the longest serving PM Benyamin Netanyahu (as some say). In the technical sense it can't be any more different than elections in countries of a similar constitution or in affinity with greater democracies in the west. What can be different if Herzog wins tonight and may have to form a coalition? That is important when you are an Israeli citizen to find the answers in your next government. The rest of the world has it's own democracies and electorate problems. But there is another question to outsiders, and it is important to know whether Herzog could make future politics and Israeli politics in specifically one or some order. And order here is a very big word.

We are not very found of Mr Netanyahu and his decade long policies when it concerns Peace in the Middle East with it's Arab minorities or neighbors. We are also aware of the wars fought in the name of Mr Netanyahu's government. (Except when Ms Tzipi Livni was in government) And we also know that Mr Netanyahu is from the 'old Israeli school of politicians' in his time and that of his predecessors, not successors. From time to time his tracks were easy to pin point where the next Netanyahu policy would go or come from, by careful estimation or fact. Of course, no one is saying about Mr Herzog that this man should be incompetent compared to Mr Netanyahu much wider experience as Prime Minister, and this being after a man like the late Mr Shamir. Still, if politics can be resuscitated in Israeli politics by Mr Herzog, it is nothing more than transparent interest or humane hope his victory would mean to be off the old school and start the impossible mission Israel in the present time would badly be in need of. Outside Israel there is a global audience preoccupied with the world and it's future. Man takes destiny literally in his own hands, as we now see happening in Ukraine. And then again, Israel cannot make believe politics and give the incumbent PM Mr Netanyahu another term to be in Office and... There you go again!.. (Causing dislike for Israeli politics throughout the rest of the world)

The search for the Russian President get's louder on friday evening, 13 march 2015

13032015/18:13PM

Louder and louder the people are beginning to ask and wonder whether the Russian President has been quietly deposed from his presidency as President of Russia this week, or as some take it that it is more probable to accept the message could be worse. The military in the US and Canada are anticipating some kind of action from Russia will follow maybe in the next 24 or 48 hours, and saying so in an article on CNN this isn't a drill. It even goes as far as raising the alarm over a Russian threat... Still it is going to be interesting let's say if the Russian President came to a sudden end of his career as President of Russia, the country that in 2014 took Crimea back from Ukraine, and through this has 'opened' many strategies and tactics one can only dream of in a lifetime and never getting there as Ministry of Defense. How did the Russian President Vladimir Putin do it? Oddly enough his strongest weapon of choice was compliance. This is a strange 'opening' or 'gateway' to maintain, let's say if he was taken seriously ill and cannot attend his presidential duties national and International anymore in public or out of the public eye. Can his partners do without him? God Almighty must forgive me, but I think that is a No. Even in the 'enemy' camps if any self respected establishment or military institution that is the only answer you give inside your conscience before God, that a man in Russia, the former Soviet and much hated communism all over the world, had managed to fracture the global system open and wide enough for the next generation to get through more confident and sure, that right from wrong isn't just a sentiment but coexistential to all human lives as well as governments. He has been much hated or loved for his actions no other nation or leader has had the audacity for. Let's not give up the hope that he is still alive and well to return soon.

At times in 2014 the threat of falling into obscurity had been present too and felt, especially the time after Ukraine got it's new President elect in May 2014, Mr Petro Poroshenko. It took the Russian President then and there a few months before he returned to the public sphere with a new approach and his usual belligerency. Ukraine must be feeling safe today and now should go ahead with it's efforts to join the EU and Nato some other 'end' day soon. If there is a Russian threat of deterrence coming around after today, perhaps we should now clear our throats and assume the Russian President was brought down in a quiet coup d 'etat? Strange for a technocratic society like Russia doing something conventional... Like e.g. Franz Ferdinand nostalgia? And yet all this writing could just be a relic to former pomp and glory of Europe- style military and politics. In medieval times or just after it a young Swedish King said about the much more older and mature Russian King,and his enemy, that he prefers him more than anything like tens of other kings. Vladimir Putin will never be replaced, he is in between our eyes that have 'feasted' upon his presence in the world for too long now. He was an ordinary mortal and made God literally the only presence above him, which is unique for Eastern European leaders in Russia. If man in their wisdom would let him live on as President of Russia they would have contracted something of greatness too for them to last. Vladimir Putin in the end was born a pauper but now goes into European history like a prince who challenged fierceness and ferocity in the 21st century when the world was at peace... Let us hope for the Russian President his return.

Swedish arms deal with Saudi Arabia in the newspapers online yesterday, in Sweden and across the Middle East

11032015/00:14 Hours

The arms industries in many places across the globe is this coming to an end and a nervous twitch over who- is- 'our client'- or- who is not- industry in this century? After Russia's annexation of Crimea perhaps the military in most western countries is looking for coy if facing tall orders from clients like Russia over Mistral or Saudi Arabia keen on having or getting military hardware from Sweden this year in 2015. The global audience cannot see the political criticism on human rights or violations and this going straight to the Ministry of Defense to cut off the order, something clearly that was meant to be here common practice routine between the two governments. Sweden is surprisingly quite busy on the human rights and violations of these rights in Saudi Arabia and doing so via the Foreign Ministry and not Ministry of Defense. Online newspapers in Sweden have called the snubbing of Mrs Wallstrom, currently holding the position at the Ministry for Foreign Relations in Sweden, as it's Minister, 'a bloody nose' 0r to be more precise a punch in the face, when the Saudis blocked the Minister from her opening speech in this particular diplomatic chamber... In Malaysia there is no such misunderstanding to make in public when the Ministry of Defense doesn't answer questions if these are referring to  another  department, e.g. the Foreign Ministry? The timing was bad for Mrs Wallstrom, but also one wonders whether the Saudis have seen a moment's retro or vintage flashing by when OPEC and Nr I global oil/ energy industry was top man in a decades long monopoly without any rivals. If the news is correct, not even the Russian President will keep up much longer to huff and puff against the west for much longer...

In 1970 the oil industry was the world all over. In 2015 Russia and Gazprom may want to go that same way too. If Sweden can put Human Rights abuses in Saudi Arabia on top of the list above industries, arms or oil, gas or military hardware, this is unique or would be unique. Saudi Arabia in greater prospect also should understand that this is bad etiquette for any high profile government Official to be 'welcomed' in a way as if with a certain flavor of self promotion/ provocation, be it on a different level of diplomacy and to put that under the spotlight so brightly. There is no higher authority above government Ministers, and in particular the Ministry of Defense or Foreign Secretary. To suggest otherwise is a dangerous road and that can unsettle many in a way that is non official, if this would be far more easier to do. But of course, perhaps Mrs Wallstrom would be looking more regimental if ironing at home on sunday afternoons? Many are out there now looking for 'pirates' on these big issues, which isn't a very good sign in terms of government dealings. Arms dealings, so we have come to believe, should go strictly through the Ministry of Defense to honor contracts and that of it's clients. Human Rights violations or abuses to any decent Foreign Ministry wasn't a pointless attempt to make, duty- wise, but given the circumstances today in the new year of 2015, on both sides it was baseless to frustrate both governments. Also, on the side of Saudi Arabia, this was most unusual on their part.

After initial shock in 2014 Russia is now going for artificial long term war poking

21022015

There is a certain protocol for war en it's decided term in every situation and one term to decide upon any situation is the word for term as opposing termination. Russia has given in 2014 one enormous such term by termination of relations through G8 and the G7 in it's own mindset had no other choice but to terminate relations with Russia over it's annexation of Crimea. One year later today in February 2015, almost coming to an end for March, if Russia is seriously taken by partners it will have to do something quickly in terms of accountability, and also explaining to his side of the conflict why Russia will now go for artificial length of conflict with the west, in particular with the US more than with former trade allies in the EU, and most probably will have to admit it was defeated by term of his sort of choice of weapon. This is a deciding time for the Russian President Vladimir Putin, one can assume, and there is no other story telling about intentions to make Russia a great International leader with so little that was achieved for months now. And one has to be very careful here making assumptions about either two: defeat or victory. Is there a winning side in this war started off last year in February when Russia's decision was resolute and take Crimea?

In the long term the world might be free again. Globalism can continue it's own length of terms and say that what happened with Russia was a natural obstruction and was expected in precalculations in war scenarios and global relations. End of the era we have called for almost a year now the Putin- era. To the west this is our natural way, at least to old thinkers and statesmen. We do not seem to have younger statesmen like the old ones... But what is there to worry when the elderly statesmen are right about this world and it's longer experiences? The new generation of politicians and global leaders can only go so far and probably make many mistakes. Is Mr Putin a new generation strategist and President? On the German side of the Russian- EU story long term is a military term. For politics within the frame of the EU short term decisicions are always better or the better deals by length of experience. And if that is showing any truth one can only look as far as Greece to make a coherent story work in the world today, as perceived by millions of people or others in big financial networks. No one is suggesting that the Russian President should go poking his neighbors and make Russia the 'don't fear the reaper' of eastern Europe. It is just saying that the Russian President can go no further from here in his place of the world. There was an initial shock and enormous impact in 2014 from Russia into the world, but after months of 'salami' tactics he is now ending up with zero achievement for prominence.

Part III in the conflict with Ukraine one can only artificially construct another thing that will have no meaning in realtime life, east or west. Is it freedom for Ukraine from the shackles in Russia? A new relation with the EU and US to replace it with plastic thin or thick deals on reform and democracy? Technically replacing iron shackles with a more user friendly material of plastic, there is still hope for freedom of movement without the hurting of government heels. On both sides in 2014 enormous sacrifices were made in terms of human lives. We are not sure where and when these unnamed heroes can be remembered and why. If leaders like Mr Putin and government officials like Mr Poroshenko are at a constant breakpoint in the war or collapse of ceasefires, now over a year. Have people died in vain? One is wondering whether Ukraine pursues the wrong ambitions in a region where this is hopeless if Russia has legal and legitimate first rights to all former Soviet countries no one knows about. (Secret clauses) Mr Putin was great for a moment and gave an incredible shock to the system when the west was unprepared, but that was all he has done. The Russian president has shown great hubris on certain details that he is a man of prudence and care, e.g. not to take the war to a much lower level that is beneath him... He scored a very high score here: a diamond 10. In 2015 it is crunch time to say: war sucks. Leave it to the suckers?

Minsk schedule deal with ceasefire within 48 hours in east Ukraine

12022015

Mr Putin on thursday morning (after pencil incident) has shown some compliance with the agreement of a ceasefire within two days, the day after Valentine's day 14022015. What we are seeing, from afar by any low standard of opinion, is another thing new from this deal on 'peace' agreement between G7 world leaders, Ukraine and outside Ex- G8 Member Russia. You do not get any closer than this, one can say. The Minsk deal before last night was a complicated situation, even holding latent threats of a possible war with lethal weapons delivery from the US to Ukraine, to a morning in pink blossom with apples and pears are ok in the basket. The Minsk Wallpaper deal? At least seen at this level of crisis talks between the world leading nations. Russia, is after all still a world leading nation from an industrial point of view. And not as the west has it's audience believed that globalism can do industrial and people leading and do this with rigorous progressiveness if so be it. In what way and who is doing the 'we're right on schedule' thing now and here in Minsk? Well, to be more precise, no one is asking questions and from experience in the last decade global political arena, no one will do either. It is as if Russia fully understands now what and where it should look for the Russian way of doing 'global politics' with the remaining G7 countries. But if that is in Russia that under European understanding isn't that bad, or is it?

It is probably Godsend to go back to your wife and good order for any man with high minded ego for reasons of decency and top brass moral, better than falling low in a world of war dynamics in a free world, literally. Last year to bring back Mr Putin to the G7 was and is still something that was much better a deal than e.g. the Minsk deal starting on sunday this week, between Russian rebel forces in east Ukraine and defenders of Ukraine groups. One year later the west is looking to have both, a. to bring back Mr Putin to the G7 level and b. to understand the wider picture of the EU future politics with prospects for Ukraine... Mr Putin is convinced enough, so this seems from this morning's statement, that Moscow will whistle back to the Russian rebel forces to back down. From the schedule points of view between the nations present here in Minsk on Ukraine and Russia, this is good news, whether negative or positive peace can always do better at both, than for example if Mr Putin would resort to weak leadership strategies with personal flavors or to be king for a day. The Russian President Vladimir Putin, if you believe in metaphors, is desperate to reconcile with his wife at home, in this part of the world that is European and not another part of the world. What was the pillar of society again?

IF peace in Ukraine and it's eastern border with Russia...

07022015

Unintelligent and ignorance retrospective of European sovereign nations since the 50ties can only create more unintelligence and ignorance decades later to the present day in global politics with a specific region like Europe. Will it then do as the safer route for senior politicians in both their worlds, past and present time? Russia is dealing with an answer for this precise reason for over a year now, and how clear the President of Russia choses or wants to be isn't very clear viewing just yet, as lately as yesterday at the Munich conference in Germany. But time and money are playing also new physics for the Russians in general, at home, abroad in a much wider world than Russia, and then back to the sidelines with the EU Member States. Mr Putin has made sure of one thing during this one year of Russian 'Defense' against the western 'invasion' of extra globalization in Ukraine, that Time wasn't wasted and that every detail in realtime was a calculated step and that divided in small units to a more multiple unit. God Almighty only can tell whether or not our planet is in need of such a man to walk this earth, cross it with his mighty armed forces and take back mankind to come back home. In future a noble gesture in a perverse time, money- wise.

Will the US take it's own steps today, or tomorrow, or next week, no or maybe next month, to get ready for confrontation with a man who puts his trust in the law of physics more than in human strength? He is intelligent and is using this knowhow in small dosis. Something that is just what Europe needs? When countries are in deep debt government spending some only feel blessed not to be on the side of these 'havenots'. Ignorance is bliss? European countries have failed to come up with viable goods inventions by mass production and then make sense in any way. That standard economic approach made the EU look for the last decade too slow and un- ready for the future on massive demands on the global markets as independent economic and invention dominance. Or something like that. Individually European countries  are also seen as best and innovative genius rights of their own by integrity and 'mass production global demand' experts. It is tricky if one wants to give the little beast a name and relate this scientifically to greater need and luxuries. Europeans are never to be underestimated for that particular genius, is probably a cautious lesson... Engineering is time factor based, if really durable and high quality technological knowhow. Yes, but the military is another thing. Time in the military hardware is fast and cannot be challenged scale- wise for a greater many reasons logistically. And more of course. The Ukrainian government precisely is looking for logistical help on their east front battle with Russia, knowing only one thing more than technology engineering, that the global leader USA is good at that, to provide the logistics in military hardware, e.g. communication and body armour?

Discipline of war or transgressor

If God asks me if I want to see Him, my answer is a blunt one: NO, thank you, God Almighty. I want to see the garden of Eden, if only to see the other trees, a poplar maybe?

02022015

Man to man combat has become irrelevant, but to what extend? War in our century has taken a new phase of violent and cruel measures, beheadings are common place in our century, shooting civilians in Paris over cartoons is something normal if you are the provocateur, and raping young girls as young as between 10 and 12 years old in realtime of 21st century isn't as shocking among e.g. ISIS followers as was once the western idea in previous decades. And these are only a few in our time aberrations no country or nation finds disturbing any more than homeless people living in the streets. If we have a world leading nation at the top one wonders what priorities this president is finding on his A, B and C list. Of course, many nations have a prerogative of self control governments, and doing so on a day to day basis, and full stop. A crisis creates delegates of it's own, and the President can go home to his family, staff and all. The world has never promised this will be a Rose Garden in this or any future century for no nation or government. But shouldn't we blame somebody, from a moral point of view if only to keep our world safe from self destruction? The more self control in government, the more self destruct a path it now seems for having a well earned status of self control. In the discipline of war no self control government can go to war and opposing an even greater central self control union. God only knows what they imply by that!

Self deception on how to maintain self control is only beginning to show us a few traits of when a government can't get to self control status and tries out a stunt act of getting the people to believe it can do the tight rope walk and crossing dangerous waters in politics and global hard rocks, as hard as the Niagara falls. Looking up one can see Greece do their tight rope walk right now, live. Half the promise was done before the election, and the other half is the one to get at the end of the rope. How it would have been easier to train a monkey or bird to do your tricks for you, if as dangerous as sending the first man to the moon! Fundamentally the big question is a military one. (Mission Impossible: 1,2 seconds this info will 'self destruct') Vision scale: 1:1 mid air, 1:1000000 aim and drop. Imagine that this was genuine and could be real... Can anyone feel the appetite responding to this scale with equal response? Mobilizing a man to man combat perhaps? Calling for General Custer or GS Patton? Send the monkey or bird instead perhaps, yes. The bird has a genuine bird's eye view, that could be useful. And the monkey when properly trained at the Military Academy, is ready to die at least in a patriotic way for his/ her country.

In our century the transgressor is not a civil servant, unless we have no choice but to listen to his work and ambition on human outstretched efforts.

Some find it hard to live in our heterogeneous world!

29012015

Take a simple fact from history during the time when many disappeared in death camps like homo sapiens without matter or meaning in World War II, that no weaponry was homogeneous German, French, Russian, British, or even in the USA. It was their best effort not to glue any war weaponry against the enemies of e.g. Germany or the US and allies, that wasn't authentically made in the country opposing another across the seas. Let's not forget also the weaponry in countries more far east, like e.g. Japan, China, India and Korea. This was another century after the last one in 1918, indeed the 19th century. Time has changed the industries aka Arms Industries. MIR Station in the 20th century became ISS. People in every country with advanced weaponry cannot contemplate war politics as a result of old times or for old times' sake. And that is not because the sentiment has died, but it would not be a wise decision to make in government, when there are no more homogeneous weaponry as was intended in previous World Wars. If correctly, and just maybe, the only homogeneous War Weaponry country on earth close to the western hemisphere is or would be Russia. But do allies of the Russian Republic understand where this could lead to, if for example the West has weaponry of approximately the same magnitude? For now it only looks as if Cyberwarfare could do the magic or trick and do this as their flagship.

A people passionate about their country and lives makes a strong argument and indication that it would not know which weaponry is there and theirs to use or make useful. The educated population like you to think they are with the country and do a very useful job being there, but will they be send to war? In general the population ready to take up arms is foolish to think in any government that they could win the public's opinion and start a war they can only dream of at the top. This sort of war is an unnecessary killings of civilians and civilian lives. In our time the military should write critical reports instead, and assess whether or not in a time of war civilians can go to war or even start one from protest groups when massive. If not heterogeneous as human and machine, let's leave it. We are looking back on a time like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as quite more political and infrastructure policing by allied forces in the military under NATO, but not as a learning subject for the public how failure in war outbalances the real world in real time during 'armed conflict', where real weapons are used in multiple ways. The public is uninformed as how the military in the 21st century now conducts it's wars, close and distant, from multiple angles with high tech weaponry. One could say that all killings in civilian places, like the last one in Paris, are therefore deeply disturbing, legally and socially.

The choices are not easy for any citizen to take when entering the phase of conflict of any sort, e.g. protesting rights or abuse of government. This is not an emotional pleading in writing, but it is serious to understand why it is foolish to push citizens for war in politics or economics. Both are factors from a heterogeneous weaponry standing still and waiting...

After a very dramatic week in Paris and across the big capitals in Europe everyone can go back home till the whole tragedy blows over.

14012015

If taken Charlie Hebdo unto a larger plain away from the crowd and then try from the start to replay the short period in which 11 innocent people were killed, and to keep paradox of reason open, also were the surprise terrorists killed by 40 bullets in one shot hours later, to the global audience this went all too quick, and that includes a march held on sunday last weekend by thousands of fellow citizens... Why G7 and G20 leaders attended the march and be at the forefront was a strange demonstration of solidarity ever. Charlie Hebdo always was on the pure side of ultra leftist and not rightist. For some reason having had the world leading nations' leaders present on sunday during the million people march in Paris, for the killing of 11 people, one cannot help feeling that these world leading politicians cared a lot for ultra leftists for a moment and having them sandwiched in between political extremists. I know I am not quite there to pinpoint where I think this is a misunderstanding and why. We are not any longer living in a well organised Europe where only the government is defined for the whole country and the only reference to it's citizens, indiscriminately as much as possible. And not through procurement between left and right, or centre against left and right, public sector or private sector. The kind of world as we know it today.

And then as if out of the sky suddenly the atmosphere was changed from Charlie Hebdo murderers to the Jewish community in a market place. Four were mentioned to have also been killed here by a blast caused by the chase of the terrorists, the news reported. The day ended with the Israeli Prime Minister Mr Benjamin Netanyahu calling all French Jews to become Israeli citizens, where home is to all Jews. These are deep political roots where no Israeli Prime Minister can come after an attack in a residential area where 11 citizens of France were killed. 30 Years of reforming Europe into the EU the political roots are very clear, that Jews, Muslims or other we are all EU citizens now. This tragic event therefore had struck a nerve across the EU Member States to the deepest of their guts, and we can all say it was more genuine sentiment than solidarity. What is happening in Europe? That is question nr 1 on everyone's mind and lips, at the top/ at top level. When EU citizens can die in such horrific manner where are you then looking for the answers outside the procurement laws of the last 20 years? Is anyone pointing fingers? The generation of people in the work force is a continuation demand based on a 24 hours basis. Any projection of the future is unrelated to historical time. How will any politician convince the people/ citizens what tomorrow is all about?

Charlie Hebdo and victims of this sort are all buried in the here above laws, economics and social engineering. But the problem goes on far beyond one man/ woman in political France, Germany, and others. Is there really another Europe beyond all the present time problems with 'foreign invasions' ?

A good reminder: teaching Europeans about Peace (and all it's utilities) is one thing. Teaching them about war that is just innocent thinking.

09012015

Europe de facto means war faction and in upper echelons of their fundamentals that could also mean war is the only good thing God has given to the people living in these places, what became later after WWII countries. The rationale for country differs from the original understanding that e.g. Germany is a place (not knowing from which position) and so is France, Britain, all places in Europe. After WWII when Germany became a country in the eyes of the world, defeat and rehabilitation, all nations on the planet were ready that this was the time to invent new things, like peace? It is a mistake if one cannot see this in the present time. The Question of logic will stop when that peace breaks down, or maybe not. Can peace in Europe with the rest of the world break down in 2015? According to Herr Frank Walter Steinmeier, 2014, he said that Europe had forgotten how to 'make' war or be at war. To all professional armies that would be like music to their ears, that here is a very sizeable nation and country living in total amnesia when it comes to war in the 21st century. But there is also hope, that professional armies have a higher command of breed when it comes to professional staff in the armed forces, that because Europeans have forgotten what they are best at it is especially worrisome to the high commanders. The slightest move could become fatal and very costly...

Places like Germany, or even France, are not patriotic warriors or soldiers from the head. The academic logic here is that the military cannot be recited and memorized like a Shakespearian play at the Royal Opera Stage. War is not artificial. The Europeans, like farmers cannot explain why farming is in their blood, by many artists have tried to explain what the meaning of the nation and war means with Wagner not even coming close either. Which is or could be seen as another reminder, that Wagner as a classical music composer had not failed his audience or fans, but he was a failure for not knowing how to take the nation's mlitary prowess to a higher platform where only heaven has judgement over mortals, like with farmers and the four seasons. The theme Wagner was searching for in his soul (his own Nibelungenlied) that is where he had failed his nation and the aristocratic Germans with military Germanism. BTW, a long dream of the German people, that by military victory only the mortal can impress God Almighty. Mr Steinmeier and Foreign German Minister for this reason therefore could be right, that now Europe is impotent and a shameful condition or disgrace to God?

Please, let's not go there again, please? When rivalry commences between nations over universal good over evil, and all vie for God's eternal blessings, the ambtion to be a soldier is too small in the mind of Europeans. It is known that one only has to fear what the military nature of Europeans believe in, than for example the horror they will cast upon their enemies and victims. (An enemy is not a victim, and a victim is not an enemy) Should we stick with the music we're hearing? Europe has forgotten about how to make war, yes is a nice theme. And when looked at the plus side the Germans are in no condition to fight like a professional army of the 21st century. End of argument, period. And no one can disagree with the army's commander. But have you heard of Franz Lehar? When Germans worship God's earth and turn their hearts to brooming tools to keep His earth tidy? For this philosophy of bloody stone Germans will storm heaven and earth, and not just people. They will always be your ranked commanders, only sacked by God. Similar to this belief are the Russians. Imagine a Europe of that particular combination rise from the earth in the near future...

Quick word after day one of brutal shootings in Paris on Charlie Hebdo HQ

08012015

Je Maintiendrai? One day after the fatal shootings with a murderous motive at the end of the barrel Europe is again facing another specifically European problem concerning it's masses/ citizens. Whether in France, Germany, Sweden or Netherlands/ Belgium, the EU Member States are getting sick to the stomach with a bad assault when happening in their own backyard. What other countries, US or other, do not see is that it is particularly disturbing in Europe with tragedies at a certain scale like the one in Paris yesterday. In economic terms these are all Tier 1, 2 and 3 countries. One can expect to be respected for all reasons in the political or even military levels. Terrorists after 9/11, July in London and now in the Middle East are in their declining years, and have so far only had interest in Tier 1 targets. Charlie Hebdo isn't it considered below Tier 2? (Or slightly above of 1%) Where did the rocket launcher image fit in a terrorist attack, let's say at a different level than previous attacks at level Tier 1? Rocket launchers in the hands of civilians makes an incredible impact on fellow citizens, as to say Quo Vadis? Has Caesar sent you?

Reuters today in an article on their website has asked the question on everyone's political and civil mind: how to respond now? It is also interesting to read from the same article a careful treading not to get into the web of prejudice and premature speculation too much based on routine or cliché. In the past this experience has been proven too many times inadequate when the country is in tatters over the death of civilians on homeground in terrorists' attacks. We have to take into account in short reference the 2014 defeat of ISIS in Iraq and Syria's border Kobane. In these rebel strongholds IS was pushed back by the US Air Strikes in both parts in the region, and was the Kurdish people backing up in the heat of their struggle against the group of IS. In other words these are serious defeats and therefore the west can say for a fact that Islamists' extremism is on a serious decline. They simply can't win, when put next to military powerful Russia. Paris as a European country also is aware that retalliation is not what the military code is saying in it's outdated code of conduct lexicon. Any other belief will or could take modern day European Member States back in time and who will then face the enemies of Europe?

Duma and the President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, have already given their 'opinion' on the threat in Europe, earlier today. "It is clear that not Russia is the threat in Europe." It is time to build trust and remorse instead, no?

Change of tactics: putting country Turkey and Nato ally deliberately on the bench, for a while...

02012015

October 2014 has been a memorable momentum for the youngest among the group of International Transatlantic Organization, Turkey. The Kurdish people living in Turkey had taken to the streets in masses in protest over Turkey's stance on Kobani, a small place just across the Turkish boarder into Syria. For some, on both sides, that was too sudden, while others saw their fortune had changed. Ten days from now, on 12 January, it will be four months later and with no one in Turkey looking back on this moment in an official way. That chapter might have closed and publicly admitted that there were no worries in the Turkish government over any sudden front 'uprise' confronting the Turkish people in their living cities or districts over something of a long disputed debate with their Kurdish 'fellow citizens' and their political leaders. Also, the Turkish government has managed to find a place to keep the white elephant and where it will be staying for now. There are no black and white only squares on the Gameboard of nostalgic politics with the Kurdish people. In this line of thinking the Turkish government is right. What is deemed natural to Turks or Kurds only lives in Turkey or distant Kurdistan. The Middle East has always suffered from melancholiness over nostalgic times, going back to Jerusalem, the land of Pharaohs, the Nile, Petra, Isfahan and others, cities that have inspired the west for centuries. (Rob the Kasbah is a popular version in our time)

Do friends respect each other's friendship? (Similar to boys will be boys in the west and meaning something different with the underlying, but they do cross blades internationally) One day boys turn into men and then make war upon each other till they both disappear in the minds of people like legends or folk stories. "Once upon a time, dear children, were these two boys who grew up together in Istanbul and had lot's of fun in their neighborhood. And they were greatly loved by their peers, the other young boys, while considered in other circles as very naughty boys. And then they grew up and one day became two young men." And the legend continues and will one day or might capture the hearts and minds of the next generation... A few influential people curl up their eye- brows and that is saying enough, or as much as 'No can do'. The future for the next generation of Turkish posterity will be a lot more smarter and potent young men and women. There seems to be a dispute to keep Turkey in the hands off or in the majority Turkish people, while also knowing the desire to keep few in power with a strong International based cadre and take it up from there wherever the challenge in Turkey will be under or come under pressure from the corners of the earth. And that would be a rough estimate of this gemstone the Turks are creating with sharp political machines in the present system and time. (S=T) Two decades ago the Turks have surprised the world with their readiness and today they are even more ready to do the extra mile. No other than veteran politician Mr Erdogan has had a familiar tread with the global systems in his days as Prime Minister of Turkey! The question today therefore can only be: why change back to unpopular nostalgia?

With the rise on their left hand Turkey can only sit back and watch the Kurdish people come close or close enough in the same direction as Turkey has done before. Now, where was this again?

The time for confrontation rendezvous of nations is approaching. Maybe 2015 will be it's 'opening field'?

26122014/ 22:35 PM

When there could be a blank picture shot preview already seen behind the threshold line of 2014, of how 2015 might unfold, the fact will remain that this is still an industrial picture. 2015 Should become the year where there is no particular inspiration given to the 'odd unknown' across the constant active parts in the world economies and humanity in motion globally. (Article WAPO Anne Applebaum perhaps makes an 'odd' but interesting reading this morning, earlier today, with her question on democracy when 'productive' and where the most) Inspiration could lead to peace, one also could argue. We have had a different approach altogether in 2014, and probably it will be best to 'stick out' with this canon experience for a while and perhaps also it considered wise to follow the abstract. Word of the day: structural, opposing destruction or de- struct? The point being made here only became bigger, larger and higher, what now looks like a deformed constructiveness in it's end days of perspective or horizon. All nations are not getting any less at ease when looking down and see a giant mistake deep and far below this making from another century, when globalism was still unborn.

But we should keep focus on 2015. Democracy e.g. in Europe has obscure origins, which never mattered in the time of peace and reconcilliation period between the European nations after WWII, but now can become once again a strong sentiment for research in the utmost stringent of ways, like for example close examination of the meaning of welfare State and why. Technically democracy was rebuild in the years after WWII. This is an important 'open field' for 2015 to look into again, now more critically who 'fathered' the child. We will therefore or might come to a new era of strife of good versus evil, but not knowing who this 'odd' good or evil will be. Globalism for many in the world today, countries overseas, the far east, Middle East and East Europe, was in it's 'infant' years all that the world knew for the last two decades. There is a danger if the shift will come when these 'younger' nations take a different stance and dilligence will be the drive of their mechanism. Another word for today: confusion. (Article Krugman, NYT) Last time the world of humanity did had such confusion was when Eve had eaten the apple from the hands of Lucifer in the garden of Eden. That long ago. Confusion estimated in our world today might have the same impact in 2015, a second time with a question to/ only for mankind. God also might be involved, His Name or as Creator of all mankind, earth and heaven. If the industries are beyond human conception or dreams only God can help us all.

Let us wait and see what the price of a pint of milk will be, soon... Happy New Year?

President Vladimir Putin's Cat & Mouse game commences...

18122014

What is so transparent in the speech conference in Moscow this morning is that the Russian President Vladimir Putin is taking Russian defiance to a new level. Here the President is also suggesting a few new ideas, that for example the ruble collapse this week is measured by a better progressive economic system that will have no choice but come back to normalizing the global economy east and west. Government officials are also in the news and on social media Twitter, with comments that if Russia got here in the 'perfect storm', the logic can only be that it was prepared by Russia itself. 70 % Self blame is the latest invention of Russian government officials to embalm the present hurt by sanctions, and is expecting more to come in the next year. It looks like the Russians have beautifully orchestrated a news conference this morning for the President with no chance of peeking through any split in their relation with e.g. Germany and their neurosis trail of 2008 global financial crisis. For the time being it will just be a Cat & Mouse game to calm the steel nerves in the political world at home and away. A remarkable address was made on education (skilled labor) and the poorest where the present crisis is expected to hit harder. No lack of humane self interest made in his speech for Vladimir Putin.

Journalists and globol news corporations are paying attention to the President's every word in his speech conference. From home dozens of journalists are present to hear the President. The news feed is doing everything to inform the global audience of their every word and translations. The economic growth was specifically mentioned and two years from now. Both related to global economic growth. Almost as if the President has set out a quiet ultimatum unto the 'other side' to pay heed. Where Russia fails to control power over the west it is making up for in other areas. It will study the nature of their argument, today and tomorrow or the next year. Finance Minister of Germany Mr Schaubele this morning has said in a modest few words not to dismiss the Russian President, but to respect him. If the Europeans have a plan short or long term (which one is it going to be?), that isn't clear today. Russia could be a battle ground on canvas with panoramic sharp or matt color codes. But that is only by abstract overestimation. We are inclined to believe the more down to earth version of world conflicts, if this will be 'the bitter path' with the west, and also easy solutions to solve major crises of enormous scales.

And then there is the west. Also in it's stubborn version of globalization to be the natural answer for all mankind. Profit and being rich enough in the classical sense deserves every condemnation one can think of or come up with. Profit too high is bound to corrupt the minds of 'good men' among nations. Instead globalism was an answer and has become the only true answer in every humane situation good or bad. During the argument in the east against world domination by the west one forgets or tends to forget this reality of pure self interest and it's monstrous nature every nation and leader has loved for decades first and now abhors as if never they had embraced it. As much as some would like a final destination for order and disorder in the coming future, the fact remains this: what are we responsible for? We have both, on both sides, created a monster that is reflecting our self image of power and never ending unremorseful thirst. The argument is now on the table of oak. Each side building tension with probably unfavourable consequences to both sides. Even an out of spiral ominous danger could favour a 'spring of revolutions' in certain parts of the world, in places with unclear policies the military or politics. It is not just Russia, Germany or the US, China or Japan. Or five against one, Great Britain. All 'good men'. Perhaps it's time is like the present time when some might rebel in heaven and want all for one nation, era, and government? (Supreme beast)

Glad I'm 'the only naive' in the village

17122014

This is what you wake up with on 17 December 2014, to think that the global citizen is much smarter than anyone else. Russia has a sinking image for the west and it's civilization. Tough man and President is not equipped to do the 'dive' dance. Vladimir Putin wasn't born and brought up in the west, unlike some of his top politicians and economists. That, basically, is the meaning of the Ruble. When is the Ruble king and when not, ask Russia. Vladimir Putin seems to know Mother Russia as his closest ally or confidant when the Ruble is coming down really fast and 'ero- mantic vertigo'. One should agree with one of the President's officials, saying that if politics has caused the problems with the Russian currency, it should be politics best dealing with this problem. At least from Top View. But we have trading floor exitement ongoing as we speak, die hards who believe that the world citizens can't understand any of the 'start trading now' button. From a naive point of view I would say that getting Russia out of the cycle in global economics is like the inexperience carpenter hitting his thump with his own hammer. Who will give a little finger and who will be the one taking a whole hand (plus bonus if the arm is included), do you know?

Ok. What is it that can be missing in the story of the Russian Ruble this morning? What is it that we can't see just yet through all the astronomical fog in the financial world/ markets? Were we born to get it or see what we have never been born with to see? Mr Putin was born in 1952. Now 62 years old. What can the new generation of traders teach him this morning? That boys will be boys, but not with old boys? The Russia that we know in modern days western half goes like this: duh! (And probably misinterpreted for 'DA') Mr Putin is not a trading floor expert. He is the President with presidential duties. But where we go wrong is his style of control. Very sophisticated when in the role of 'hunter and the hunted', and very submissive to his peers in a clear economic crisis that tickles the belly of the west. Either that or he is the boy to milk cows in a rustique picture hanging in his Presidential palace on the wall. In war one must discern the enemy's weakness. With the Russian President that was reading from his office as President of Russia, that he was never born to be a trading floor analyst. And then shoot your arrow straight through his shoulder.

Russian President Vladimir Putin 'tender is the night' politics in Turkey...

02122014

By now you are having a health issue when following the Russian President Vladimir Putin everywhere in and out his public appearances in the news. But this time won't cost you that much of a stress. Turkey is relaxed and even at this moment negotiating for more reduction over gas/ energy prices, from 6 % to 20 % perhaps? Energy Minister Taner Yilmaz from Turkey visited the Kremlin last week in November for upbeat diplomacy talks with Russia on getting the right deal done between the two countries a pronto. We believe it is President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's turn now on the carousel horse, built in Moscow engineering wonders of heavy industries. Opec, also this week in the news, with low oil prices per barrel, similar try to beat the markets, has been something of the easy ride you can only get in world leading industries that no one understands buisness- wise. Are they in or out in the global spherical circle? Industry is still the 'Alpha and Omega' principle rule in the global sphere! Or, mass versus numbers starting with 0, 1,2, and infinitely more of that. If extra refined search one can say that industry is the symbol of mass and business is the accumulation of all numbers starting from the cent or trillion $. Do people stand in their way, politicians or the military? When ever has that happened in our modern day world?

Russia wants to join the big world. But with his mistress back home, Crimea, the low profile for this President of Russia Mr Vladimir Putin isn't making the right impression among the more devoted men in politics. In fact this sounds familiar like an echo from the past. Maybe the trick has been done before, an artist or other? It is obvious that Vladimir Putin for travelling to Turkey on a diplomatic visit in Ankara, that the Russians now also do 'surprise' visits in neighboring countries, based on similarities or political routine. In Turkey hospitality is reciprocal by first intent... This, in other words, can only impress the lesser nations in overview of whatever deal is projected from Ankara or Moscow and looking fantastic. Or we go for sudden death and it wasn't what anyone had expected, if hurt cometh from today's Minor Asia's deal with Russia to hit Europe or the further west, e.g. the US, flat in the face in the long term. What do Russian deals usually mean when not short term? The answer can only be found in the notion that you should never underestimate a strong man like Vladimir Putin. Yes, especially when you are winning. The Russian President is known, that when cornered, he transforms into something more feline like a big cat looking perturbed at his 'opponent'. From 6 to 20 % is quite a leap to do the deal with Turkey, don't you think so?

Still early to say you've been affected by the 2014- end- bug?

29112014

There is no defining the 2014- end- bug demographically. It has, so far, only been there for some time now, the last week, in environments where world politics has been most active over the first three quarters of the year, but in it's last days of the last Q. is struggling to survive. Unlike the moth is attracted to heat from flame or bonfire, this 2014- end- bug is also attracted to extreme (Ice heat?) Also it is important to say this that the moth is innocent and the bug isn't. I am convinced that 2015 is expected to be a hotbed on this issue. Lowly whisperings: is it going to be lethal? There is no telling from any  present calculations without the fact of the hotbed that is projected in 2015. Is there anyone to be eccentric enough to want to enter the snakepit? A prominent think-tank? Or top journalists? Taipan? One public plan will make a fresh start on welfare within the EU Member States in 2015, with emphasis on work pays. If not it is totally legitimate to make the citizen 'perishable'... Where do they keep up the standard in western democracies, and affluent too? This was more than tradition on a sublime charity for anyone who cares enough to read about the subject from classical textbooks. It was the norm for a wealthy State and economic principle not to create deep riffs between the elite and working class. Now it seems that both times have failed to enlighten the elite in Europe. 1930 And 1940 ties.

These are tough Questions for true Prime Ministers. Understanding the electorate is just one part of his/ her job. But it is history when the Prime Minister understands the norms and laws in his political bundle for 'joyous' papers. In today's life and Real Time they have disappeared and are not worth the official paper their names are written on. Perhaps they like a knighthood as well at the end of their wasted years as Prime Minister? 2015 In some parts of the world there will be new election campaigns kick- offs again. Who will lead the Willy Wonka governments? Presents for the good and soot for the misbehaved. How dare they? Easy enough. We are living in a time when people are animated and only colourful of human resemblance. Was that a norm? Hegel or Kant maybe? How these nations without the stringent backbone of any norm to value human beings have thought of a world war in February 2014 against the globalists just beats me. I have seen braver a canine in a children's series called Lassie! Oh, yes, and there was Scotland on 19 September in the early prime of the fall... Mind you, Scotland is still standing as a rock high above the ancient seas close to England's cold and moisted bosom. Crimea is only a stone throw away but echoing loud enough across the waters. And Istanbul still has it's cinematic past time in Eurasia as if destiny itself came here to play it's satirical role with haughty mortals... And so forth.

2015, Sssssht. 2015 Is quiet.

Economic War 2015

2211204

It is today only a perception, that in 2015 the world will probably deepen it's confrontation in the west e.g. with Russia over Ukraine, and in the Middle East change it's cosmetics of war rationality. The year 2015 present outlook at any estimation can be by far based on expectations after 2014. (The public at large will woefully be the last to be informed on global affairs or that of the State) Space and Division on these prospects for the year 2015 are blank. Any suggestion now made in 2014 last quarter about the economic war in 2015 would be for now in the short term, and it is expected to be purely based on the drills every twist and turn in the global economics future quarters. One example, and this is relatively the easiest and best way to test these 'unknown grounds' of 2015, Turkey will chair next year chairmanship of the G-20. An obligation planned in December 2013, the article reads on the Turkish government website this week. Next to Turkey in this new challenge of economic landmark the Russian President Vladimir Putin in similar fashion outside the G20/ G7 also is planning on consolidation of Russian influence and to establish 'good' relations building with some of Asia's world leading countries. The President has his eyes firmly set on e.g. China's future economic prosperity (as opposed to China's historical prosperity). From these example regions the EU seems to be lacking clearly behind, with no particular shape or form, politically nor militarily, as to say where and when it is or will 're- join' the global partnerships. It is a decision the EU Members will have to make, also, at the very short term.

If Political Management comes with great speed from the West the Industrial reality with Russia is based on robust necessities within the EU- bloc. Historically always first a mentality inclined to stay confined when strained by forces outside the continent. The economic war of 2015 by any model standard is therefore future based and not as many expect it to be set in the 1930ties. (19Th Century vintage wars!) But times have changed since then. And our 'sticking point' of the present time can only split up more on multiplicity and conviction being stamped out forever, that ruling the world as we know it today is a decision run by it's machineries and not by individual men/ women/ countries in any classical sense of leadership/ world leadership. The old politics are becoming a dying amber in the new flames of war factions and economic dynasty building... Our planet rhythmic old tunes cradled by so many ways before our time, perhaps is the same theme? 

There are many attempts across the different world regions to keep the nations from self destruct

11112014

Russia briefly made a visit to China for the G20 meeting, the purest of image not to let fracturing relations weigh too much in the company of world leading nations and the group of G20. The cost of cold shoulders is not being discussed too well in the social media outside China, but there is speculation that the Russian President isn't making progress here either. It's a long way where the nations have come in the world today compared to the world before February 2014. If you find balance from imbalance that perhaps could be your miracle moment to last only like a cake that goes off for show, when it get's a darker sky to illustrate the colors and fireworks as a real class. Back home Mr Putin has now also promised the world a new thing: anti propaganda against propaganda from the west. His aim states clearly at another miraculous attempt to engage with the rest of the world outside Russia, and to give people the comfort zone for protest against constant manipulation from globalism. In Europe many far right groups in different European cities could become his first followers and maybe via the Russian comforting zones to fight globalization and the specific characteristics it has. In China we do not have a clue where the global leaders are on these issues or whether they find it reason enough to worry over. We are being kept naively far a way from the place where power begets power consummation. Once there is 'good reason' to continue as planned there is not going to be another way. Period. After WWII the world hasn't been any different. Except, it is less sovereign today compared to the times when men like Charles de Gaulle was alive! The European far rights can only emulate a giant jackal with inflatable power or wind but there is no restoring the old again in whatever wind- direction this will huff and puff.

Mr Putin is a curious man if he continues to try bring a straight line across as differentiation to the existing global sphere old seventy years in length. Almost his twins with the Russian President if he had been born in 1945 as well. Instead like Jacob and Esau in ancient Israel, the Russian President is holding on to the heel of this juggernaut the globalists have designed to be fast and never stop again. That may be just a military expressionism Vladimir Putin is painting and be completely like any artist painter to do this on his own in deep solitary of his own mind. For example, the US in many ways has come to an inability to understand the world as it now is, in it's own image, but the Russian President has bigger worries too. Europe is not the sort of place where you establish temporary measurements or agreements. It has a stark contrast to anything else in the world or in governments. Take for example the Bourbon restoration after Louis XVI of France period. If Mr Putin has been a hero in communist Russia and remains a hardliner of that era, politically and militarily he will find little or no feedback from the 'old nobles' of the lands he is trying to get alliance from based on these supreme laws in European nations. And he has to make careful calculations here. There doesn't seems to be any insurance to the European nations from Russia, if does not have the imperial interest seal at heart... Hardline communist Russia cannot afford to 'overthrow' the world dominance by simply offering 'help' to initiatives of only far right extremists groups. There is a tectonic problem here for the Russian President and one in which he will not find the answers. In a war the umbrella revolution for Europeans truly is an umbrella, and to make it successful the lid is literally only in the hand of the 'deliverer' of Europe! Compare: industries of half products are an economic design in manufactures and can be an endless top process. But reality today: Underneath lies the dragon of war in European waters, sliding like a giant to the deepest of the riff/ reef and who knows maybe only to return soon or never?

Across other regions in the world there are only slow awakenings in dynamic slow motions.

ErrorG20 meeting= Asia Pacific Summit in China.

What is there not to control? The world in 2014 new dimensions are 'to do what we want and not to do what we wanted'.

07112014

Contrary to what many in the global economics top do is that what happened in the year 2014 was a very simple way of conducting business, that on the 1 side you had the west and on the other Russia in the east. It's not rocket science or was it? Does anyone in the public really understand what is going on in Ukraine and why Russia can still be a threat? In short the Putin era has only lasted a few months, but was there nevertheless for a brief moment in a glance. Russia also found out it would not be able to 'act' like the gateway of the west in a meaningful way as is now the whole world reality. And if you are tired of the show you can always leave the violet seat... The G8 became G7 after Mr Putin had left and the G7 continued without the Russian President and G8 President for the one year term/ turn. Britain believed in two options: either to stay in or stay out, hoping the conflict would dissolve in some sort of agreeable outcome to the world in the west again and have Mr Putin back on board. That didn't happen, so what now? In Mr Putin's mind- book that didn't happen because he didn't want to. And his determination shows after all these months for the last 10months in 2014 he seems to take his mind very seriously without getting hysterical or resort to false claims in his name. Except for Crimea Vladimir Putin hasn't done anything else 'crazy'. Inside the Russian President's 'World Map' his conclusion is clear: he will not challenge mankind but only the world systems. And he has given his reasons for doing so. The International world does not respect itself anymore than he does, so why not share in this eqaully. And the offer, is it still standing between the two military super powers? 2014 Soon will be the year of all the things the world on Putin's side didn't want anymore and in the end will have to continue to go on with the world that they don't want anymore. One wonders how big the 'other side' is. When there are no answers to this 'new year's eve' in 2014 question it will only be a good sport to bury this year as deep away as possible. In fact after 2008 the world very much continued in the same way.

For the last two months the world is now at a different level and is 'helping' mankind in their struggle to be free, e.g. In the Middle East. ISIL or ISIS is the name the world should much fear in 2014 and beyond. They are planning on crushing the rose in Istanbul at the moment by upholding siege in Kobani over Kurds territory. This time the rose of Istanbul is not a woman but the President of Turkey, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan. How that will proceed isn't very clear to the general public in details, but we do understand that the Middle East is biting itself in the tail like a serpent in search of fresh prey. Kurdistan is the turtle dove cooing peacefully and that their dream of State and Nation is nearer than it has ever been in modern history. There is still not enough support from the global audience to see it as in the dream... Palestinians have come a long way closer to reality and their dream is getting more and faster solidity in politics at home and Internationally. After almost 50/60 years Statehood recognition of the Palestinian people took ten more years than when ancient Israel walked the wildernes of Sin. But that's how the world is and you can't change it. In Russia the military parade held today in the Kremlin (?) will not make any difference in our world and it's reality obviously still open to the whole world. The ancient Greecs had a saying when the first to strike. I am not sure about it's meaning then and certainly in our time it should be irrelevant, to polemixon. It should mean to elevate your battle order or scene the first to strike. That must have been impressive thinking during Alexander the Great's time or Agememnon. It has that distinction in thinking militarily and not order/ commandeering. After all it is pain to a kingdom when the king's men fall in battle and die in their blood a mess of sheer horror. In modern times military all you need is a manual and GPS system. 2015 is the year of the mystery. Or just a useless fantasy of mine?

The world on one side is full of ideas, while the other reality is holding stiff opposition with the world in the middle

05112014

Ideas can also make you immortal, all depending which way you are paving the way. If in politics or military our world today is certainly weighing all it's chances in the scale of reality and ideas. Some of it does not meet the requirements and deliver the outcome either the politician or the military Commander had in mind. There are four regions in the world. Can this be run by ideas alone and leave out reality to the future like true love sometimes can insist on having life in another time? Reality can only give harsh answers on the ground. Ideas are constant and open for anything beyond any mortal can perceive by a single mind alone. In the US today for example what it says is that the Republican Party has won the midterm and the Democrats can ride the donkey back home to find the mirage of the windmill in their picture. (I did not really pay attention to the midterm elections) Reality is not real to the Democrats but ideas. President Barack Obama still hasn't figured out how to defeat e.g. ISIS in the Middle East in his NATO- led mission and allies. Another idea is ongoing in Ukraine as we speak. Will the peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia fall flat again? Throughout the year what the world has now learned from the Russian President is that Vladimir Putin doesn't do ideas. The annexation of Crimea earlier in 2014 is hardline 'taking' reality. After that he has put his flanks on resting. We know the lion by his claw, or as in Latin: tanquam ex ungue leonem. And that is one strike. The world hasn't seen reality taken by one man and the military power for a very long time. Adolf Hitler fancied lot's of taking in Europe and beyond in the African continent but physically failed to impress time much longer for another decade. The year 2014 wasn't in the first six months a rerun of ideas but in fact made the world tremble and shake in it's boots without a single shot being fired, or bloodshed.

If the world is the middle between reality and ideas on who's side would the world citizen rather be at this moment? The global idea careful projections are all set in the present time on whatever end of the graphic, top or bottom, vertically or horizontally. And that is the only conscience in the world one cannot do without if you are part of it where the scale is immeasurable and getting bigger. Reality in the global idea was outdone and replaced by only global companies and industries. The problem here is that more globalism would mean lacking Membership invitation as it get's closer to magnitude politically and militarily. The future is an idea if the feeling is mutual and not to be confused with division or partnership realities. But when that would be true some ideas will run up against walls and fall on their backs. If any nation on earth wants to contribute at this level in the global idea you will have to first 'dance in the rain' on Mars or Saturn. (Manner of speaking) This 'smoking peace pipe' system politics across all regions in the world is what the doctor orders in an idea run world. With the midterm elections outcome in the US the coming period to both Parties is going to be a very interesting time to watch, whether ideas will run the country or reality. Global economic recovery is just old skin sliding away to create the illusion of world richest nations still at the top in every day's life. With the world changing so has wisdom never to underestimate the global idea. In this century all nations are getting used to being it's hybrids and carry on as usual. The decision making processes are running a life of their own as constant as life itself. Life itself, yes, even when profound remains the greater ideas. Building from one shop to a planet full of lights, billions of lights (30snds to Mars song) and make it your own, yes, is a very nice idea with a touch of purple to it to make it last another day.

1 November 2014 marks Kurds International day in Turkey with peaceful demonstration of thousands

02112014

In many parts in the world the International day for Kurds in Kobani on 1 November on Saturday yesterday have been peaceful marches and quietly passed through the International Law of Law and Order. Demonstrations of democratic methodology after a long experience in the big countries, G7 or G20, for decades, the great depression in the 30ties, Americans against the war in Vietnam, and also in countries like Argentina where mothers fought a hot campaign in search for lost sons and husbands in the 70/80ties, this is what makes the west different from anywhere else in the world. Human injustice protests has taken the unusual ascension for the last two/ three decades throughout the whole world and it has become one thing no advanced democracy can do without. Paradoxically and also because human nature in it's fast life/ livng has become unpredictable, e.g. The Arab spring contradicting the long tradition of the west and said that today is the new day for the Middle East. Still a very young experience to both west and east, or more specifically in the Middle East, today means not only new but also the present time must change. Unlike the other half of the world in the west this is not the place for change without military or politics of long standing tradition. It has been for decades long standing in areas such as regional and international economics, what became later a more globalized economics. What is the point of cultural heritage if you can't put gold or silver in it? In many ways globalization air lifted many economies into the world order view and gave them new responsible ways to live more healthier and stronger but more how to capitalize on resources. No country in the new century can do without a healthy economy and growth for more on skills and the demand to be in the world rather than isolated from it. When these economies fall back flat on the people it not only makes a hard bang on the surface but it can take a few lives as well. It is the bang that is more frequent in the Middle East instead of peaceful demonstrations. Yesterday in Turkey fortunately that for the first time has not been the case. It made it truly remarkable under the circumstances, that is not always making sense to the rest of the world.

Negotiating can make many ills and wrongs in political disagreement become rather small scale, when done properly. One is wondering whether the Turkish government in close session has negotiated these terms for the day, that if peaceful there will be no harm done to the 'peace process' white or blanco paper. For the day of International Kurds day this blanco paper stood heraldric on the shield of peace in progress, like a lion's cub and resting 'on arms' peacefully, at least for now. The next day Sunday today work on the Kobani siege, by now this morning at 03:39 AM will resume and get back to a new dawn for Kurdish history. All be it of a Turkish technocratic flavor and supreme choice toward a more disciplined cooperation between the two nations. The older days of Kurdish people living on a 'pink' (smallest finger) dream caravan back and forth lost in time again and again are probably over after yesterday's International world day for Kurds. It is today a more serious change for paradox. Paradox with Israel, Iraq, Iran, Syria and Turkey, but also in the whole of the Middle East region to the last man in the bedouin. 30Mln Kurdish people is not something to ignore militarily nor politically. Or in the President of Turkey's own words what should be needed in the fight against ISIL, logistics, which can also make 30mln Kurds look like serious powers to do the purchasing right/justice, or not? And like President Blaise Compaore of Burkina Faso in his statement said this week, that power vacuums are a dangerous territory or caveats. This is where Turkey should be this morning, one can only hope. (Not sure if there are any guarantees)

World International Day for Kobani and the Kurds 1 November 2014 is still a long way from home in a few extra miles of self reflection.

Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom recognizes Palestinian State from today on, 30102014.

30102014

Mrs Wallstrom has been a high respresentative for many decades, politician SDP in Sweden, Vice President EU Commission, and only recently a special UN High Representative on women issues in war conflict zones across the world or developing countries. Consummate politics in Mrs Wallstrom isn't uncommon, but extraordinary and in terms of equality she can be seen in the popular vote as the Henry Kissinger female of Swedish politics and among Swedish politicians old and new. Recongnition of a Palestinian State from the official government in Sweden therefore can only refer to a stylistic nature and meaning. And as said here in the above, Mrs Wallstrom understands that in the 21st century global politics has a specific nature more consummate than in the previous decades when procurement was the trend to follow in combative style. Of course this is a more delicate question and it could even put Sweden with the present government in a different state from previous policies and Party ideologies. Mrs Wallstrom's predecessor Mr Carl Bildt in December 2009 became the first known politician who drafted the resolution on dividing Jerusalem with East Jerusalem as the Capital of the Palestinian State. Any successor could only follow in the footsteps of Mr Bildt and now execute with relative ease where he left in time. The new Foreign Minister should be following progress and take progressive measures if the plan for Palestinian Statehood has any coming through the main door in Mr Bildt's architecture.

9 September 2011 Norway on it's own private occasion, and only two months later after the massacre at Utoya Labour Youth Camp by Anders Behring Breivik, welcomed the idea of support for a Palestinian State. Denmark declined and said it will not recognise Statehood for the Palestinian people. It is going to be a very interesting time to now see the Swedish Foreign Minister, how she will pull the Scandinavian bloc to finalize this particular deal she is now pushing for before the International world. On a day like this today no one can just say anything on that importance and the specific nature of the future in the Middle East. This vastness is far too premature. A lesson from the past: Anna Lindh. Margot Wallstrom distinctly mentioned the hope for the young in Palestine is perhaps what convincing words can do to persuade the public and politicians around the world. But fundamentally it is perhaps a slight reference to the late Anna Lindh and her efforts for Statebuilding and nations in the region. Here, as only in Sweden, the picture of recent political history is not symbolic of 'good gestures', but rather a morbid one of death and no glory. And success for the new Foreign Minister lies very much between the two extremes: the extreme environment of her chosen subject and that of what is unknown is her other extreme. Mrs Wallstrom was born in 1954 and she could be predestined to lead Sweden into the 21st century global politics to a more happy 'anti climax' (I'm not being cynical or deliberately sarcastic). We must wait and see as from today on.

2014 In the end is closing it's doors. In 2015 new doors will open in January. Custom of old is that no one will ever know what they will do behind the scenes...

27102014

Last year approximately by the same time today the G8 was getting ready for the Year's Presidency and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The starting date: 1 January 2014. End date: 3112204. Two months later the whole world witnessed the coronation of Crimea in the body of the Russian President, and everyone then thought this was a Russian joke. A country came to split in Ukraine and one President Mr Yanukovich was outsted and chased out of Ukraine promptly. 26 October 2014 the country will be led by a pro- west government, after the Prime Ministerial election held yesterday. And that concludes the long battle of Maidan in November exactly for one year. A short evolution theory here can only mean that the strongest argument has won over the weaker one to keep Ukraine forever under Russian 'parenthood' to run it's natural political and military course. For now the Russian President can only be content with Crimea when everything else is lost. And that is a very small meal for the Russian President's appetite to have greater portions on his China/ Russian Presidential plate. 2015 Ukraine should ascend the global stage with relative ease, while the Russian President Vladimir Putin will stay behind from today on, autumn 2014, 27102014.

From the large continent to a more minature country, also last year at this time, Turkey's Prime Minister Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan also had suddenly found himself on the brink of resignation over the fraud scandal close to the innercircle of the government. Other Ministers had resigned with immediate effect. Preposterous maybe if anyone suggested the Prime Minister should have resigned in the face of the accusations on high profile Ministers in cabinet. With Turkish bravoure the government thought it better to treat the fraudulent findings as misfired political missiles. October 2014 in the following year, of 2013, overmaturity in Turkish city democracy got bigger at home and abroad... Overmaturity brought Turkey to a defenseless situation in the end of the year with Kobani and the Kurds, also in a sudden. And when I say defenseless I mean autocracy can't be the only answer even if necessary to calm the uncertainty in the mood as we speak. One can't help wondering whether it would have made any difference if the former PM had resigned if only to put democacy in Turkey on an advanced path with greater immunity to political change or revolt. For one: there would not have been a story of humiliation to the person of Mr Erdogan. Especially if his goal is to take out President Bashar Al Assad of Syria. Like Richard I in France could the President of Turkey and rule his country from the provincial or rural district in Turkey? We can't be sure about that. With the failure of Kobani to fall the Kurdish political hawks may now see the moment as one fortunate chance to get a bit more from the dialogue they are seeking with Turkey over the elusive peace process everyone seems to be talking about. Which is good thinking, since no one has put anything in it so far. And that means a Turkish- Kurdish affair only can fill the empty shell. Because if Turkey and the Kurds manage this well enough they will be champions in their own right as peace captains. Isn't that what they call in political circles the 'envy of the world'?

Kurdistan, Kurdistan II...

23102014

Parthia was fallen once never to rise again. But unlike the curse in Jericho never to rebuild there again, the Kurdish people in 2014 are experiencing a rather strange sensation for the last summer days of this year, that they are in greater luck and can come back to rebuild their nation. The Jews around the world, US, Europe and beyond, have come to realise that there is still a people they have almost forgotten after the Gulf War in 1991- 1999 (?), a people duped and living in banishment, the Kurds. Jews at Hebrew universities also suddenly discover that Kurds and Jews are sharing a historic gene never seen before, in one of their online papers publicized. Kurdistan is now becoming a focus of attention worldwide, under their new banners of world support. In Turkey, Iran and Syria, will have to move on and turn their political rugs toward Kurdistan, Kurdistan probably very soon in the near future, is a very emotional tidewave and not knowing how exactly to deal with the smashed walls in their present political establishments. The world can't wait, apparently. And when it says it is time, it is time. No political towerblocs will be able to resist the force of opinion when coming through their societies, and like lightning out from the sky. (In a manner of speaking) If this is correct that might put some unfamiliar pressure also on the Kurds, and being a bit stiff from confinement or solitariness from dispossession, how to deal now with the emotional revoluiton ongoing as we speak. Kurds are the new idols on the stands in Bazaars or markets for idolatry works of art, to put it mildly. And the Turks shouldn't hide that fact or misplace the idols.

Positive change in the Middle East has never come from the platform of Kurds and their struggle for an independent State in Kurdistan. And that is perhaps new generation speak and great news for the next generation in all nations. But in terms of seniority in politics, Europe or Middle East, caution here seems like the right warning for setting the hope of a dispersed nation so high on the world stage, it might simply break or fall for getting there much too quick and too soon. Youth and junior politics, like in the Arab Spring, have proven to submit in the end to the existing authorities and lay down their placates or banners to avoid arrests on charges of wild protests and disturbing the peace with violent acts against the government. But the adrenaline of the younger generation is heated up, and Kurds are no different students or groups of protesters. If this has anything to do with building a nation and State may not be relevant, but it is part of the responsibility of their leaders for the moment to preserve the nation as one and not as fractured to pieces. Families should be proud of their offspring in the end, that they helped build the dream that was lost and stopped being a nation. Politics should therefore come through the front doors, whether in Turkey, Syria or Iran. In Turkey for example we assume the barrel for peace is empty and perhaps is only filled with sands on the grim floor. The time consuming machine that is the global world will not stop now. Keep the barrel and content, we'll create a new one, but filled with lot's of pebbles or deformed stone samples from the moon or Mars. Political weight is everything and it is the universe in today's world. And not genes to establish heriditary e.g. Of Kurds being related to Jews. (Post Scriptum: the Hitite (Anatolia) if the story is correct is the mother of Jews and (As) syiran his father)

To be continued.

Turkey perhaps not just ready for new world order

18102014

There are for now too many misconceptions ongoing at top level government in Turkey about the intentions of the US, not as a country, but as one of the world leaders in western history since WWII. There is simply no disobeying orders here at any given moment or point. Not by Europe and not by Turkey. Only this is hard to explain level- wise if that is a good or bad sign one can take back home and then re- addressing the issue with government officials in the country. Here is where Turkey is finding itself at the moment for the last three/ four weeks. The seat at UN Turkey has lost to Spain isn't adding up on the side of the US, but also not on the side of the Turkish government. Instead, as it looks, Turkey was put back fetus- position in it's cocoon and wait on it's own sciences, dominantly political science, to come back with it's own version of transformation democracy or chrysalis democracy. These are enormous time lapses for Turkey to wait on... ISIS is in their backyard, literally or symbolically, and it has arrived in Kobane. Intriguing as it already has been for a while in the region, and with Syria about three years ago, with Kobani, the presence of ISIL, and Kurdish fighters closely associated with PKK in Kurdistan and Turkey (not confirmed), and not to forget residents actually living in Kobane for decades, whether moving in or out, as a loose factor are there just hanging in the balance, as they say in English. Far for democracy in Turkey, a Nato ally, and aspirant candidate to become a Member of the EU in the near future, this is the place where these Kobane residents will seek a safe harbour if fleeing is going to save their lives from ISIL they confront now every day. Front and back, the people are blocked to go anywhere.

As I am writing this piece I should say that I have a very hard time understanding the world in complacency, especially when it's phenomenon is globally spreading it's wings of blind transparency in almost every place one expects to find democracy. Or in meaning. This isn't a term to be related to governments in close confinement with the western half. Yes, like e.g. Turkey? Turkey has one hard and invisible shield to the outside world: public opinion. At top level public opinion from the world to Turkey somehow always seems to sidetrack the State from what the citizens in the world see or think of Turkey. Once the matter is off or dropped the vacuum remaining behind at the world stage again goes behind the invisible shield and literally is only breathing because it is after all a country and with it's population of 58mln people. While in fact politics continues going as business as usual through the global networks, and Turkey remaining included as well. And the only difference one can sense in the general atmosphere is that for now there is a quietness to the outside world, but yet 58 or more mln people are still listening to the President or Prime Minister in Turkey. It's a wrangling kind of atmoshpere, now having lost the seat at the UN to Spain, be it that it is a seat among peers. And the new world order continues.

And just maybe the world can't understand any of this yet. Now with England staying in the union with Scotland, where is the world going to find a new lesson in global history in our time? Once this will become reality the world then will learn what the new world order means, every man, woman, dog or child, like a chrysalis will come out and fly away onto or into this fantastic and flamboyant colorful world the new global order has made ready long ago. Until that time no one can honestly say, not even prominent journalists, what the world will look like once physically it will change and psychologically we will be set free from old traditional worlds once and for good. All that we can now say it is bad to go that far and challenge life itself in its utmost corners of hidden places and treasures of future or everlasting metaphors, heaven, God and Eternity, just bad, bad, and again bad. Every one knows that the human body is legally bound to the laws of nature and reason, but now, let's say if this changes to time- bound only, then what will we become but objects or is it abject ungodliness? The Middle East is very straightforward with it's answer to the world of the new order: we do not want it. It being the towering inferno upon whatever is causing friction... And that's just one point of the argument, end or beginning. In the end continuation or continuity of life and societies across the world of the west, that this will somehow have to answer the life questions to all what it has changed. Something Germany never had to do after WWII. We will never know whether Germany then had a plan to change the world. God and His infinite mercy only will know, but it is important to underline this particular fact today. The global new order on the other hand, without making war on the world, but is on the path of renovating world governments, should have one such plan ready. And if the change will come in surely it can't be a small and tiny little cocoon?

Turkey has strategic importance, is for now all it needs to know when still in the alliance of traditional friendship to Nato.

Imaginary tales of State

15102014

Hypothetically, what if the imaginary tale for Turkey is a simple text message, that if you want to be our friend you have to go? And we are not interested in whether this makes any sense for you or your country, if the President or Prime Minister in Turkey were addressed personally in this way. Just move over and let the Kurds come in. That would of course blow up every conservative mind in Turkey's society and in government. The microphones are off and not on when private talks are ongoing. Like President W Bush found out, this is not a very prestigious thing to do when accidently the microphone is still on... This nevertheless is standard talk between world leaders and officials from 'third world countries'. Old habits and customs are finest during these tmeetings or private talks, but have been the hardest to break. When offended you can always turn back and go home, and create a civil war. In that case 'we'll have to come in and teach these guys a lesson'. Global finance has changed these customs and many world leaders now have learned some lessons of their own and properly address each and every leader in an appropriate manner. So, instead of ordering e.g. Turkey to go, why not ask them to go? That's the global policy shift, you see. And point out to the President or Prime Minister to see it more proportionately and ask questions how they would have done it differently. You can't and couldn't do that. The world needs to go forward and not backward. Being friends now means one thing: recreating space and evironments, new leaders. If that is not possible you shouldn't be standing here next to world leaders...

The imaginary part II: why Turkey? Invention of the moment is dropping us a line that you're not exactly playing or being fair on the Kurds. And we are wondering whether this can only be a rumor. If it is a fact something must be done about this a.s.a.p.. You see, we are planning on a renovation of the Middle East. And we expect our partners to cooperate, throw out a few baggages and keep what is decent. That is if that has any use for our plan. And if you decide to cooperate, then maybe, just maybe we will let you keep some old relics or symbols on your side of the bargain. Forward, remember, the world and how it is doing things for as long as you can remember. And now is the crucial moment where you are going to tell us, yes or no. Let's take a short break and we'll get back in an hour, if that is okay with you guys? Of course the ball will be on Turkey's side from then on and it will have to come up with numbers, economy, flourishing numbers on the side of the Kurds' economic activities in Turkey, welfare changes on both sides, the whole lot in one meeting. If strong and straight enough the outcome after today may save the day, for now. Think tanks, phone calls, don't secure outcomes when this far at the top. One expects Turkey to be familiar with the world other than their own by now. If you're going to save Kobani from ISIL and PKK, I can tell you that you're in for a hell of a job. We'll have to keep in close contact, so you will know where and when we want you to move on. Imaginary or lies of the State?

For now that's all folks.

I used to have a dream...

13102014

What do globalists call the future? The plan for a city, city planning, skyscape or empty skyliner? Another question if you're shopping, what possible dream can one make or get from watching from the highest hill over the whole of the Middle East? In fact it's people. When in the Middle East we, grown up in western halves or halves not, mystify the people living in these so called green and foggy mirages. A child could be standing next to you and tell you exactly what this mystique is without hesitation. In the 21st century the dream might have shifted quite a bit by a heavy milestone. The turning of time and centuries have exchanged hands, and the future, by will of Allah, and if in Jerusalem by Elohim/ Ha Shem, old and young will see this again. Old and young can only mean one thing in a future like this: Presidents and Prime Ministers. And the people? Only those with extraordinary wealth can come to mind in this writing. To many ordinary folks, from Egypt to Yemen, will get the fractured pieces from 'the people' of the new Middle East. Logic is hard to understand in 'The dream I used to have'. And the mystery is now more than ever pre- dominantly mystique. People living in villages could be living next door to the road of ascension or the zenith in heaven. And maybe, just maybe, the Middle East has a few roads of ascension, east, west, south and north. Or what else can the Middle East offer the west in the future? Yes, a basket of fresh dates sent to the market manager as a present for his wife, living miles away. (No order at a local flowershop and personal delivery wrapped in pink or lilac ribbons) What used to be the dream?

A child or soldier can take you there. Destiny plays a great part of who will be your guide to the dream and out again. And destiny has a lot in the choice you're going to make, if let's say you are a globalist. Are they listening to children? Or are they listening to soldiers? Whereas in Europe a child could take the king by the hand to places like perhaps Avalon... Not so long ago, maybe two months ago, a journalist in the UK wrote these exact words with reference to the Middle East, that it will or might blow itself up under the present situation and war- hungry in this generation. Except for Syria... The point is this, what relation does the west actually has with a broken and unruly Middle East? At the heart of the dream one can only believe in the actual reality of this vast territory, that it is not Berlin after the war. Europe despite the set back in Nazi Germany time, is still a very and highly organized continent. Recovery after the war was almost inevitable, and if you had put your bet on that it would have given you indeed a bit of Avalon. Speculation future and investment of capital in recovery of the Middle East isn't what risk investors would want at this time. Instead they would give their money to a trip to Mars or the Moon with the Virgin Spacecraft or Space- Jet rather than drop a penny for good luck with the future of the Middle East. After all the bombing it is just a stink hole as any that nobody would want for free! And Turkey will not be able to help avoiding the dream they used to have in the whole of the Middle East... And that is only on one side.

In short: Kurds and Turks should concentrate on the ripple effect of the present situation. It might just, when in good luck, bring the two nations together and not part the political formation of the last hard years of peace. Again, that would be typical Middle East and soldierism to make peace and not war... Close to what globalists see as what a man should do and not children or women, watching TV children programs, Alibaba and 40 robbers or something more domestic. (I happen to love cartoons, GTA Games at 57. When I was 22/23 I watched Lawrence of Arabia in a small theater room with three more other youngsters) Lawrence of Arabia is back in the news today, Daily Star Lebanon and Hurriyet Daily. Turkey's dashing Statesman, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, made a few remarks on the character of LoA.

Societies will change as futures can come flying by, short tale

09102014/22:38 PM

Global businesses have already done their job and are planning to go on doing the only real thing known to men and women in our century: buy the future that isn't there yet, but will be another century. If you're smart and own riches in your own company or name, buy and never sell the next century. That's how you know you belong here, and the planet moves with you slow or deep. And say 'Hello' to mother earth, she is yours, she can be yours, if you have a good plan. What was that thing you were asking me about? Oh yes, society. That thing tying people together in vision, and overestimate bureaucracy over legacy. They haven't seen it yet, but that will change very soon once the 'glue' runs out or dry. Society is fiction and if big enough you can ad science to it. That doesn't do the trick for the likes of me, but in fact would kill me and my time. My time is more important to hold together, it is the body of my business. For example, you're standing right now inside 'my time'. Why not use it wisely or get out. Go out and stand in someone else's space, if it's free. The government can have you believe in many things. Knock knock, is there anyone home? Inside your freedom you still believe in political properties, democracy and so forth. Then look again and tell me what you are looking at when standing in the middle of this city. People, wrong. Business, wrong. Money, you're getting warmer. And believe me, it wasn't the minimum wage that got me here! Why not go home and buy yourself a mirror. It won't cost you more than 25cnts. And then ask yourself this question: do I belong there? No.

The night is still young. Once the world has freed itself from the knot that ties them together to people, 6.8 billion, the worth of all that we on this side own will increase fast and high into the next century. But it's a slow process, nations unwillingness can kill off the deal. And many politicians cliff hangers are looking at you with eyes that would shame a cow, and then you delay all execution. Not all of us are soft hearted as yours truly. There is no rational reason for them why they are so stubborn. Society makes no one rich as secretly they all wish to be. They keep it in a jar as a free soul that is never going to get out. And like old uncles and aunts their time of living will soon end. And the new generation will live on. And be more acceptable how and when not to waste our time. Objects and not subjects, like their primeval relatives, parents or other. The previous centuries resemblance all ill gains, like mass poverty. Our century of the future will spark differently. With our money that is nothing like an outdated promise. But I understand, the government still has to get friendly with the electorates. I am telling you, if they were living in my time I would not pay them to do the friendly thing! Just remember that. Ok, nice chatting with you. “What happens to you when you die?” That's a last question on my pavement. That's a red area question too and i'm not going to answer that. “Yeah, you live by the sword and die by the sword.” I will pretend I didn't hear that.

Where is the Joker in the card? Or better to ask where is the card/ carte blanche in the Joker?

08102014

The mayor of New York Michael Bloomberg is now a knighted member of society. Bloomberg.com online, news on global finance, and known for quality news can therefore be expected to reflect and maintain it's high standards across the globe and never fail humanity lux, veritas et virtus (Light, truth and virtue)... (Mr Bloomberg got his knighthood for exceptional philantrophy) In the news this morning the world is moving on and has no time to celebrate any honorary fellow human being on high. If to believe the reports in mainstream media, including Bloomberg.com, the small town or city Kobane within the Syrian border, is about to fall prey to ISIS advanced forces. Yesterday the President of Turkey in very loud cries called on to the world to help the situation and fight ISIS harder and not just from midair. The day before yesterday the President had also stated that the PKK or ISIS are both the same to him, and that fighting terrorists would be no 'discriminate' (to put it mildly) choice to make or take. With Turkey's military presence at the border with Syria, the world is watching only 'inaction' from the Turkish government. Unable to help the Kurdish population in the city of Kobane, and according to the news, article Marc Champion, it is not helping the Kurds because the government in Turkey is insisting on the deal with the US to get Bashar Al Assad out of Office. In Turkey yesterday and deep into the night many Kurds have protested against a desperate situation for their people in Kobane, but again the news is hammering on Turkey's deliberate 'inaction' to help the Kurdish people fleeing across the border by thousands. If true, this would be a moral disaster for Turkey and a betrayal of humanity. Is it willing to take that risk?

Technically the stance Turkey has to take is one in coordination with the International law. Syria is a sovereign country and will not tolerate by law to have Turkey coming in across it's border and fight ISIS with the sole intention of toppling the President of Syria. This logic get's to very high places in the world. Even in Russia, who is not a member of the G8 or it's president at this time. The G8 group went back to it's original number of G7 after Russia's annexation of Crimea in February earlier this year. 2014 In it's fourth quarter is nothing like the one we had in the previous year, 2013. Where now does this leave the International community with regard to the disaster prospect of Kobane, if for example the population is expected to be treated with inhumane cruelty and even have the Kurds who are fighting ISIS massacred? Syria's UN convoy of Humanitarian watch called this morning for an International response to the situation in Kobane with great urgency. From the moral point of view if Turkey remains resistant to act decisively against ISIS the moment of the hour will go lost and down in history as failed nation to do the humanitarian thing each and every member of Nato is obliged to do under it's own laws and the United Nation. No deals or hard bargaining can have it's place in these institutions, if correct. This is perhaps why the news is surging with mass public opinion to point out that Turkey isn't doing the right thing and the President's own remarks are not very helpful at this stage that ISIS or PKK are one and the same to him.

The Joker is out and no one actually knows who has this card and play it out against all odds. Will it be higher understanding or a more pedant cooperation strategy anyone can whisper in your ears? Turkey without the President's remarks would have had the right not to cross the border of Syria, at this stage and score high. Also prospects of a war between Turkey and Syria, even under the US- led coalition, from any point of view outside these territories is self destructive at a very large scale. Russia might get itself ready and act it's part in it's own fashion whatever that may be. This could be the clash with a real hard bang no one wants to see happening. It is therefore quite reckless to suggest for Turkey only willing to participate if Syria's President Bashar Al Assad is outsted. Not because of it's improbability theory in the plan, but this may backfire into Turkey at another point or junction, especially when at this stage Turkey is being branded an accomplice of ISIL... This is not a dog eat dog fight or war needed for a number of reasons. Also can it become the 'Mother of all battles III' in a sequence. If personal we all wished Mr Erdogan would not have made those 'temperamental' remarks on PKK and ISIL earlier this week.

The story continues.

Opening Mean Streets in Middle East infrastructure, political or military, is getting better self of USA

06102014

Better education or upbringing in the Anglo Saxon world, first things you know when not in familiar territory or territories is to keep a calm polite and well mannered attitude, unless invited... The political orgie as the one the world is facing in the Middle East, for some reason, must invoke similar feelings, that now is the time to tread carefully and decline where the invitation is unclear and can go against all from home back in the US or other. It doesn't look that way for some, perhaps too keen to get there where the objective will return a decades long ambition to see change, as is or would be fitting in our century. This is getting especially the better self of the US, and to some distant degree journalists in Israel (this morning article in the New York Times, Pakistan's lesson warning for Turkey, co- written by writer in Tel Aviv), which on the fast track of the global mind set can't be the course to go, not after the Russian annexation of Crimea having been a true lesson for the west what instability in Ukraine with no clear direction yet from the est front still fighting Russian speaking separatists, is calling for and can't be delivered. Not by Nato and not by the USA. Europe in between in this dance has still not found true partnership on this or the 'other' side. If ISIS is extremely hard to define in terms of the US- led coalition or military, the politics behind this mission, whether legal without the UNSC vote, and so forth, 'learning while on the job' can't be the goal. The US has formidable military forces, Air, Sea, Land and Space, too formidable on the road no mud from mother earth can hold. At least not as long as it wants, for the US and allies in the west and Middle East. Fairness comes with good upbringing, or maybe not.

For the last decade the world has learned another valuable lesson: going to war in the Middle East, whether in Iraq or Libya, it all ends up in human self appointed committees questioning whether the missions were legal or not, going from there often to ten high stories or higher archives. Turkey can't be warned on pain or frustration with ISIS in it's midst, at least not by the US. Turkey is a member of Nato, this is not something cutting just on one side, but is rather the sword cutting both sides of the present problem the US is facing in the Middle East. It is quite a rare surprise even to have both parties now squabble over technicalities while the region was swarming with terror plots here and everywhere, in the Middle East but also in heartland western nations. No one sees that Ukraine is solved or that normality is restored on workable level, what also means that Russia is just waiting and doing it quietly. Perhaps a bit too quietly before it can hiss again and strike. That would make Turkey the only valuable partner and historically trusted ally, to keep anything of Russian 'hippocratic/ Pantocratic expansion' ambitions in some form or rein. Fantasy wars seems to be the trend these days... But maybe only when the west forgets it's manners and high rank. What happened to the “For God's sake, weren't we partners before?”... Causing an old friend embarrassment isn't as handsome as we sometimes think, or is it just what the doctor orders? From global security the Middle East went to opportunism overnight. That's chaos and turmoil in it's old ways. For the US it isn't as rosy as you would expect from the world most restricted army and politics in Washington to have come up quite late on ISIS. First served is the tacky thing but always happens when you're not there yet. Unless science of knowing all and everything changed that in the system of global politics. Turkey is at this stage in quite an embarrassment, but still an ally and most advanced democracy throughout the chaos with ISIS, if Sunni.

They say the devil came to Georgia and playing the fiddle better than you. Bashar Al Assad, a lover of country music, he might tell you the story how this will end... Let's hope not.

poking President Recep Tayyip Erdogan with west hot iron on ISIL isn't politics but a cartoon episode of Tom & Jerry. This could be either one.

(Personal op)

04102014

Turkey on this road being at war in the region against several factions, north or south, east or west, is suitable. And if you are a Quiz master, perhaps there is a way to point out for whom the bell tolls. It is that time again, for Turkey this time. And the bells are ringing an agressive gong within Mr Erdogan's ears' distance. But I'm afraid this time the President and former Prime Minister is on his 'own mountain' climbing, and has scarce mountain climbing gear: grivel/ ax and ropes perhaps? But a hardened politician that he is in sometimes adverse situations, Mavi Marmara, standoff with Israel, Davos tirade against President Shimon Peres, do not hold a promise of Mr Erdogan's failure in the given situation he is now in with the coalition fight against ISIL in Syria and Iraq. I believe that the west is poking the President of Turkey quite openly on this matter, whether ISIL like a viper was held against Turkey's bosom for some time for economic reasons, cheap business is always lucrative and free for the people, or that he kept his distance more prudent than for example the US wants to literally give him... The US on this road is in quite a hurry too! This morning another beheading, of British Aid worker in Syria, Mr Henning, has taken place. It is worldwide news. Now four in total were beheaded in a short period of time. That is not a reward but unrewarding show for global leaders of the G7 countries. Australia and some European countries have shown great commitment to fight ISIL and are convinced that this will not allow ISIS/ IS/ ISIL to continue it's atrocities against innocent peoples in the future. Whether home based or overseas.

ISIL is the god- fly. It's ability are many in which it can deal in fragments only. Be it horror or atrocities. That is it's war pic or bio pic. But who can tell who they are when dealing in gentlemen's suits or three pieces executive suits and pose themselves for business men? This grey area is where a country like Turkey can come in, if for example they are making impressive and rational deals and doing good business. Like brother to brother, and no risks. The world of men in the Middle East is for natural reasons somewhat different than Barclay's men in London who are only more natural under sterile conditions. Unlike men in vast desert plains. Turkey is saying it is not doing any dealings and wheelings with ISIL, period. The West on the other hand thinks differently and does see the connection there. I must say this is not standard procedure but more delicate if they were men in grey suits. And that remains a hot iron to poke Turkey with in this coalition and do it real hard. With it if Turkey would accidently get hurt on this road, for a strange reason the Kurds depending on peace with Turkey, will be living with a wounded animal and who, if a lion, will isolate itself in the hideout of politics at home in order to get better. That would be precious time and leave the Kurds between the fires burning to oblivion. It seems that the Kurds have everything to lose in this fight against ISIS, first the independent state of Kurdistan and next Peace with former foe Turkey. This, I'm afraid, is what could make Bashar Al Assad dancing wildly on the border with Turkey like a wild devil and adorn his head with some victory that just came out of the blue falling through the sky unto him alone (me, me, me!). Or, like Tommy, Mr Erdogan can bounce back and make Turkey a credible partner to Nato allies and in the region when partners show their true faces. To be continued.

Turkey is dealing with reality in a tight snake fight on ISIS

27092014

The US- led coalition, Great Britain, Denmark, Belgium and other Nato Members, have in a joined decision decided to launch Air Strikes on ISIS in Iraq this weekend. The latest news online are reporting the whereabouts of the Terror Group on border Syria and Turkey, and places within that region. To neighbor Turkey this is one reality, military and political. And Turkey as Nato Member and longstanding ally of the US this rationale is not unfamiliar. It has done so for decades, understanding it's specific role how to keep this routine of sharing responsibilities of International principles. In 2003 at Turkey's own rise in the global community this was certainly high peak, compared to a more lower fall in recent years, e.g. after 2008. Like in many parts of the world, but mostly in Europe, the economy on this side of the western half, had fizzled in many ends of cooperations and shared responsibilities. Recovery since then had also become the new word to equal instability and going from there downwards to quit ratings for growth and increase debts. Governments and nations under these financial shutdowns basically had let down the world to now go out and protect their own. Turkey was no different, especially having been almost at the centre of new capitalism in the global sphere. Then Former PM of Turkey, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, iconic to that time of economic prosperity and Turkey's rise on the global stage, for many years carried this torch on his own and in his name along every road or street in Turkey and his Middle Eastern neighbors, to promote his country into a new reality. Until that unfortunate tragedy of the Mavi Marmara when Turkish political activists, all creed from the logic in Turkey's standing on the global stage, were brutally murdered by Israeli Navy men. It still has no peaceful relationship with Israel, despite great efforts in the political theater of the last two years between the two countries, mostly mediated by the White House and more specifically the President of the US Mr Barack Obama. What then could be the other side of reality with which Turkey is now clashing?

The Kurds have been fleeing Iraq since the Gulf War/ Desert Storm in 1991. (Reports from Kate Adie, BBC One) Almost 23 years later their status from Humanitarian crisis or displaced persons has only recently been upgraded to more autonomy for the Kurds in Iraqi's new governments after 2003. Now 11 years later these small communities are expected to help fight ISIS in cooperation with world organizations like NATO, which can only come as a very high price to the former displaced people with the only historic tie they have to their tents in Iraq. Political autonomy in a democratic Iraq never fully recovered and can hardly be called matured. In the same box there are the Shi'ites. Also a dispersed people during and after the Gulf War in the 90ties. Science can be a funny thing at times, because no birth starts at the head after conception. Political stability in Iraq should have been more science and basic understanding of the peoples living in these places and their regional attachment/ customs, before democracy was placed on them like a giant saucer from an alien place in out of space. It is no surprise why ISIS replaced much of the fantasies these communities have and raised itself above the insecurities on all sides in several raids and rapes (socially and physically) and then created a doom of fear called the Caliphate of the Middle East. At national levels this is another war as no Middle Eastern country will accept a rivalry of fantasy land in their midst. And perhaps this is why they do not hesitate to uproot ISIS today with the rest of the coalition from the North Atlantic Organization. Organization means big business in the Middle East and they have no other sentiment nor ethics to relate time or place, or people.

If Turkey is going to play some sort of supreme role negotiator in the here above writing, I believe personally that will be a day of wonder. In the meantime now Turkey is unable to deal with the influx of refugees fleeing from Iraq and Syria into it's borders. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan for some reason is failing to put pressure on the United Nations that he alone cannot deal with this situation, given the shared responsibilities of cooperation with institutions of International Aid and others. In fact it seems that the President alone stands in this right. As no other individual has the authority to render help in these situations of immeasurable scale. The story will not end here for Turkey. Instability in the region is now reality and if all diplomacy from written policies fail the nations in the Middle East, the west will not have a next time to come back again and finish whatever they say they have started. The richest nations in the Middle East in future might have their own peace initiative and how best to achieve this hegemony. In western intellectualism no civilised nation can fail too many times in one place! That would be embarrassing if this is at very high level. I am sure the chronological summing up of facts and details are not in this writing, but fact is that being a mere observer and illustrating what happened in headlines all over the world in periods and time, is disturbing if for example others fail to work with responsibilities shared or taken. Turkey will have to stretch out it's legs in comical length to help in this reality one side of the problem with ISIS, and stretch another leg into the reality of Nato combating ISIS in Iraq this weekend and is entangled in a 'mondial' snake fight.

While US military airstrikes are on to IS in Iraq/ near border with Turkey in the rear, Scotland post referendum aftermath continues this morning from of the deep side global flank

25092014

IS has VSN/ VISION and CONTROL in one specific area and region: Iraq, Turkey, Syria, Iran, and in the global community. The United Nations annual meeting of Assembly, the US and Britain, are very clear on why NATO allies must put a stop to IS. In the UK parliament is recalled on Friday 26092014, tomorrow to discuss if the UK will join these military Air Strikes to combat ISIS on the ground from where it is posing a threat to the world community and in the immediate public spheres of the Middle East countries. World dominance methodology, and if there is such a thing, has two questions it must answer first in every new challenge or decade, whether this is still relevant politically and militarily, if for example a 'grassroot' or 'offshoot' from previous mssions in a region come back and would challenge the global community or sphere/ platform of any kind/ sort. IS certainly does not think so and it cannot. Not in an empirical way. Question Nr 2 therefore is only logical whether world dominance machineries are still usefull if the enemy or terror group will use time and vision cells (that practically have no meaning and are 'self destructive'). And world dominance in the present shape of our planet and science should be very clear on two things other than science: prolongevity and functionality. To the west in the case of Scotland becoming independent world dominance should then have both forces ready and waiting on that day, and bounce back rhythmic to find a new place of origin in a new time or situation. Without this capacity Scottish independence will only bring misfortune to all sides involved, world dominance or half that world, and from where there is no real side to choose for citizens or government.

This morning the news in Scotland and UK came from very high level, Ms Sturgeon, that if the UK does not hold up to the pledges it made days/ hours before the referendum to devolve more powers to Scotland if the outcome is a 'No' vote, the chance is likely there will be another or second referendum when collapse. Holyrood is defiant and doing so is quite a miracle, had for example the UK decided that now the time has come again for another Scottish Parliamentary abolition. This nagging point keeps dripping from the corner of the roof like an old midwife story. But nevertheless is painful if understood, or even chilling. The UK is honoring it's position and does not speak ill of the 'dead vote 'Yes' to independence' on Friday 19 September 2014. Now known by every Scottish citizen as a historic day. The incoming First Minister would certainly not want to go that way now, or would she? And force the British army to stand guard on the borders with Scotland, would that be the idea of the First Minister Nicola Sturgeon of joining the global community? More on this subject will come in the following days or weeks, is what one can only say at the moment. In the meantime Ukraine and Russia are put on a hold in kryptonite.

Not two futures but two countries, Britain and Scotland a confrontation or gamble?

23082014/00:04 After Midnight

Key moment and is ongoing from Friday 19092014 when the Unionists in a clear majority overruled the 'Yes' votes by 55.3%. Four days later, yesterday, there is another key moment, well no one is quite sure yet where to put Westminster away... But there is a political strategy ongoing by all three Party leaders and a summit held by Prime Minister David Cameron on the pledges he has made on devolution and it's extensions. In Scotland the SNP logic after the referendum 'No' vote of the Scottish people is the challenge of new leadership and who will be First Minister in November this fall. Now it looks like the UK and Scotland are either discussing in each their territory whether the future is about the split by the outcome of Scottish referendum on 19 September last week, or is it more likely that the discussion will or is about two countries. We have to realize one thing first: the Unionists have won the day and not the 'Yes' camp. And that can only make it a British only affair, or if peaceful, a British- Scottish Affair. Had it be the 'Yes' to independence vote that had won the day, four days later the crisis at Westminster would have been of global proportions. We are not there anymore, and the question to ask is whether the Prime Minister in England knows this too. But of course he does when he was the man who made a concession and gave liberty to Scotland for having a referendum in the first place. This enormous gamble or confrontation, through common eyes, was a reckless thing to do. And the SNP leader was only given more access to exploit a one time in life opportunity to the full extend. Why not leave it to history can only be the wise thing to do right now and name nothing what this Prime Minister has actually done. It is called England.

A thought of comfort in our age is this, that mr Salmond isn't Robert I. And living in the age of advanced democracies on the western hemisphere we are safe from the idea of Scotland going to war with England over independence in the Highlands. In 1300 the king of Scotland and Royal England were slow on the invention of a union and live under the rule of England for eternity. The year 1700 changed all that. And the Royal Scots Navy / Army, a few hundred years later, at this end did come under the rule of law and military law in England. This institution has been relevant to this day and held in sanctity by both countries, England and Scotland. Ireland, Wales and the 'High North' also did not challenge the alliances of that time, politically nor military. Now, the question is: what exactly does devolution mean if the Prime Minister in England will expand on devolution? One get's a hunch that Mr Cameron is a British Prime Minister and he knows his stables at Westminster to the last stair of it's catacombs. In Greek mythology Hades is known for it's 'watchdog' the Cerberus. In the Westminster catacombs you have several Cerberus/ Cerberi at the doorgates, waiting to follow time. The planet, as in ancient writings in the Book of Genesis, is man's dominion and he will toil on. Land is for the rich, and taxation is for the poor or even poorest. The SNP in Scotland would find that offensive and retard to go back to a dead civilization when the rich could have the land and stay high above the rest of the people. Scotland now has a nation. All it needs from England is academic sharing, and face the world as two countries.

That may be a difficult path and reality now after the thrill on both sides, of the referendum for Scottish independence 19 September on Friday last week. Also, on both sides there seems to be a great need for a plan out of the vacuum, on the outcome that has changed the rules of long standing disagreement.

Quiet salute to Alex Salmond, First Minister of Scotland

19092014/ 18:25 PM

In a great war first save the frigates. Whether they will pass, or passing... Our world today should be sad for losing a valuable leader like the Scottish SNP leader Alex Salmond, and who has led the 'Yes' campaign for independence on 18 September 2014, and did not win the election/ referendum vote of the majority. It was all due to conventional wisdom in Westminster, versus worldwide institutions and the global mechanism Membership for all free nations and peoples, leading governments and global (portfolio) partnerships. Scotland in it's own rights never was a potfolio government or global partner. But who will know the real status required for access or when ascending this stage? The 'Yes' campaign if you believe the newspapers was not backed as they say by the politicians for independence as much as it was backed by Scottish oil reserves and long term economic prospects of projected revenues. We don't know if ever it will come to that, judgment and blame the First Minister of Scotland at a later time in his political career, e.g. if in 2015? Scotland and England share something other than deep oil wells. In between the two countries the rock solid history of 307 years union was and now still is the sole sharing of HM's crown. Vague or just faded away for a while to the dust of time like a hidden ghost ship with all crown jewels glittering in heavenly sun, bathing endlessly? The oldest only caught the glimpse and vague and it was to understand this 'privilege' to be part of all his life in patience and virtue... A wonderful invention by pious men / high Statesmen indefinitely and not as world institutions like global Banking being part of all mankind only definitely. The fire to which holding UK Prime Minister David Cameron to his heels, well is another invention of virtue in the 21st century Great Britain, after 'No' to independence from Scotland, 55/45 % of the counted votes early this morning.

The world will continue it's global business and governance as for now without the SNP leader Hnr Alex Salmond after he has hand in his resignation from Office as early as today after the 'No' result this morning. This is world news of the hour that came over as quite sudden. A suggestion has been made in exchange and maybe Ms Nicola Sturgeon, and SNP member, was to succeed the First Minister in November, two months from now. Too short the world has known the First Minister Mr Alex Salmond, if the global community actually really does exists. This junior nation will never know or find out for the coming decades just yet. Scotland has for one moment in human history stood on the other side and in a brief moment has been able to see the world. This was not a vision. But to explain to the people how to name 'this one time opportunity in life' to the Scottish people in terms of politics or social issues with England over rights and assets, will be hard after the First Minister's resignation. On this moon the Scottish flag is flying now very high, proud of it's referendum challenge in victory or defeat. One cannot help but feeling sad or tearful to see a strong politician passing, heavily battered by the battles he has fought for years in the good name of political honesty and to lead the Scottish people out of their isolation from the rest of the world. Now it's England's turn to be honest politicians and find the right course along this meridian.

There is a slight possibility this morning if 'Yes' restructures Scotland on Thursday to win the referundum in the Scottish people's favour...

16092014

'Yes' to independence on Thursday, +/- 38 hours from now will not need to be a theory anymore but rather a newborn State. For some reason there is a slight possibility this long argument and all the hard work put in it by the political parties in Scotland in favor of a Scottish Independence might get through 'the barricades' (English phrase). For now that is only theory, still... After this day the national base question then, one assumes, will be the inevitable question how the Scottish people now will deal with their freshly begotten independence. It's a personal state, close to the skin, and yet to many their astonishment/ awakening a life- time abstract no one really was asking for, or did they? Giant effects do hurt when in writing or simply come falling down from high office towers in a straight line of iron works of dangling art. In theory no Scottish politician has that in mind and let such a thing happen even in the face of the strong willed opponents, who will still be there after a win for independence. Ethics on independence of a country can also be asked differently, whether it is a criminal offence and deserves capital punishment. The United Nations Assembly of free nations might see it as empowerment of Scotland as a country and nation, a right to self 'governance' perhaps? And then follows the logic of whether this 'self governance' is sustainable and will qualify in all future aspects of the free world system. There is a watch on constant upgrade of all nations and countries to encourage or discourage hidden errors while in process. We don't think of Scotland in these qualifications just yet, when we take England's response to independence as the red indicator of a Scottish future without Great Britain. Thank God HM the Queen Elizabeth II keeps her impartiality and stands above all political struggles of the day!

Sometimes it looks as if Scottish independence has lost the boat already at the millennium. Fourteen years later in 2014 today the opportunities it has missed to prove true independence in peace time crises would have been better welcomed for the young Scottish nation's independence. The Maastricht Treaty in the nineties, the introduction of the Euro and globalization worldwide. Scottish politicians on the campaign for 'Yes' to independence spoke of ending the politics of grievance... Where is solidarity with the above here grievances? But here we are now and Scotland is getting ready for her big day and leave 'judgment day' to the past. Literally the power of democracy prevails backed by a strong parliament as Westminster! Anything less would be a blemish on the establishment England is so proud of and where all slavery or oppression has ended many hundred years ago. Ten years from now, when on Thursday 18 September 2014 the world could witness one of the finest hours in British and Scottish history, this memory of Scottish representation will/ could be over forever. And as the Irish say, “If you stick to your philosophies you won't get hurt. But if you don't only then hurt is inevitable.”. The global community is ready, the Scotts are ready, what is left is for England to also be ready to accept this final last stage of 307 years bond with Scotland. The instrument is the future.

England and the new world order

13092014

This tricky move from England putting Scotland in abstract 'worlds' of their own makings are now deep political questions for Westminster, mostly backbenchers and elderly politicians. That is if it ever will come to this need or stage, a stage often remembered for the order of the realm. And that is now certainty of something barred from new politics and the world order politics and politicians, for the last thirty years or so. People in the media (Spectator Fraser Nelson?) speak of a mistake if Scotland will exit the United Kingdom and dissolve all ties with it's British part in their side. A mistake? This is not something random happening, but this has been the debate for half a decade if not longer that the Scots would one day want independence from the UK. Perhaps not a topic as hot as going to war in Iraq or Libya, but nevertheless this debate has been there in all this period of time. I find it rather hypocritical of some people in the media who now overnight resort to ghosts of all sorts of magic and occult, chanting hysterically “Let's stay together, please?”. From an engineering point of view, one get's permission to build bridges by the governments involved. And this bridge of independence for Scotland does not only say it will stay an economic independence, but it is going to stay as long as the Scottish parliament lives. England, I would say, is therefore in deep trouble, especially when it does not play a more serious part today and tell the truth or become transparent on this issue. Of course it also has to say why it thinks this time they have been outstanding by demonstrating democracy to a very high degree. But wouldn't that by any chance be the high degree of the world order?

Fortunately for England I am no one in particular. Thank God (of Abraham) for that too. A 'better man' to watch carefully what is happening in England this week and the next could be Mr Putin, the president of Russia? And his interpretation of the event might tell him one or two things on the Europe he knows and the one Europe still evolving that he doesn't know very well yet. In a way it is precisely this world order he would want to see end, if the church of Christ stands by his side, long enough? That in England is another story. If Scotland decides to take it's future into it's own stride, isn't this what they call heresy in another time (since Mary of Scots)? The world order doesn't do mumbo jumbo in it's multi- functionality global order... Strangely enough that is something England and Scotland mutually understand. But the issue here will be of the kind of order that is both a relic and too old to mean anything of functionality in the world order agreed by many great men for the last thirty or twenty years. Or could we be mistaken at a slight mere of an obstacle that the monarchy in England is still here? And so are Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Holland and Belgium. All open fields out there are black and white squares on the chessboard, a mixture of EU and Europe oldest and newest frameworks. A Scottish independence is looking quite healthy on the outside of this project, something no member of the free International world can disagree with or on. And many understand this in the financial world and global economics from a country like Ireland on a similar lesson in world order economics. Question is: are we going that way or not in the future, all democratic countries on ring fence west?

The here above is not an oriental dream of conquest. And the church of England is hardly Jerusalem by far!

Russia, Ukraine, England, Scotland, the Middle East, Turkey, Israel, Iraq, the US and EU global ring of fire and steel

11092014

News today: Russia will hold military drill in east of Ukraine. Another post natal kick inside? Globalism still is overjoyed and is nurturing on it's mere size for superiority over inferiority like in no other time this world has come to know or is going through as we speak. Staying with globalism, also in many news articles online are putting Scottish independence on a Petri- dish and send it back to where this came from in the first place. Is there such an address to receive the latest poll and heat it up to color and true blue? Globalism is it's closest to get, at least for today. How things develop between the UK and Scotland in the coming days, before the referendum one week from now, no one actually knows yet. The Scottish referendum basically wants independence from the UK and return that to England sovereign, and is pining after a 'Yes' vote from the Scottish people. In the 21st century logic, when it's a 'Yes' vote on Thursday 18 September 2014, England will have to accept the departure from the Scots on this day and tell them to be happy in their new home... Scotland, the EU, or globalism, which exactly is what? But this is the least of all Scotland's troubles at the moment. In England the Prime Minister on short term will be engaged in a coalition of allies with the US to fight ISIS/ ISIL/ IS in Iraq. On wednesday President Barack Obama has addressed the nation and world (televised) on how he intends to plan to destroy ISIS. Also country Turkey's visit by Chuck Hagel this week is suggesting that Nato is working on a step- by- step plan for these clear objectives. The US is threatened, the EU and Britain by ISIS global terrorism. The other half of the global ring of fire and steel is catching on real fast too!

China? Japan? India? Russian Foreign Minister, Mr Sergei Lavrov, 'Polycentric' world??

Nato summit is coming to an end this afternoon and leaving without a solemn note

04092014

Hardly a surprise, after Russia and Ukraine are planning on a cease- fire in the next 72 hours, that the public yet has to wait anxiously if the summit in Wales England in 2014 has been one of success under a very high tensed political meeting. The United States is Nato's major ally and contributor for decades, this too was not any different today at this Nato summit, setting out a set of priorities clearly on the table for other allies/ Members of Nato during the meeting held yesterday and this morning/ midday. All other Members are expected to showing more commitment, and not just political but finance their permanent Membership and secure their future alliance to the North Atlantic Organization. And we, the public, are reassured that Nato and it's allies will save the planet from any attacker to hurt one Member and face the consequence of all Nato Members. Russia is on the agenda, ISIS and Iraq. A photo- negative list of battle ready plans are being designed as we speak among Nato Members US and the UK, on position in the Baltics/ Eastern Europe, and putting even more responsibility or pressure on Italy, France and Germany to get the result Nato would want and see when the conflict in Ukraine has ended. The Germans, if correct, are keen to go through with this commitment and we see no reluctance yet given by the German government helping to resolve the crisis with Russia in Ukraine. Also, if the ceasefire holds some EU Members are planning to keep their 'solemn quietness' on further sanctions.

This is equally quite very serious business for the EU Member States closely involved with Russia for many years in the Russian process when still a member of the G7 and G20 countries. It is precisely this industrial intimacy that is cutting through a hair's breadth and making this conflict deeply disturbing. Should the public now worry, that if Nato cannot raise edequate manpower against Russia in Ukraine and in extension over Crimea, that we are in a state of fear? Today we are still fortunate and such questions are tedious, but relatively 'real' in Europe and for Europeans. (This also includes, hopefully, all other peoples living in Europe and not being indigenous to Europe) In the meantime mainstream media are covering the sotry developing on how Nato will conclude it's last day of the summit in Wales. A harsh message on any attacker on one Member of Nato from General Secretary Mr Anders Fogh Rasmussen this afternoon, couldn't be more clear. To families and loved ones in mourning over their family members on the MH17 shooting down, Mr Rasmussen's words can be encouraging and give some consolation two months after the death of 298 passengers on that plane. But first priority today is politics and the military position any time soon in the Baltics. Russia is responsible in many ways for the death of people during the last five months. That is the understanding Russia should get in the end, also any time soon. On the side of globalism or the US, it is true that no one should destroy democracy and leave it behind in a trail of derilict state with no autonomy inhabited by humans. Great or small. If so then we have failed God Almighty terribly...

What do you make of tonight's cease- fire plan?

03092014

Mr Putin has raised the level of conflict by a rotational move 360 degrees today to get Ukraine's President Mr Petro Poroshenko on a cease- fire seven star point plan to agree. The Kremlin denies this report and explains in a short analysis of this bulletin and news around the world, that Mr Putin has no deal of a cease- fire because Russia wasn't in Ukraine. In politics the vanishing words of a ceasefire do hold immeasurable truth, and perhaps mr Peskov, Kremlin spokesman, will adhere to the conflict and take the understanding that this is what the Russian President probably was referring to, and seek to end the conflict with the deal of a cease fire. But what to make of this diamond- point tool and it's usefulness to screw this ceasefire tight to the diplomatic wall in the conflict? Let us bear in mind that the Russian President has entered a whole different field now with the ceasefire deal tonight and that for now no one can see anything clear, which is no surprise as this level can only mean not to reveal it's secrets. If the deal holds the west will feel enormous relieved and now go for tomorrow's Nato summit in Wales clear headed and discuss the agenda. The EU was under pressure on both sides, the US and Russia, before Mr Putin called for a ceasefire with Ukraine on it's eastern border, but can now relax tensions with relative ease.

The President of Russia has just made the conflict more complex and now will go for contraction, but not in a monetary way. After all, this is the 21st century.

Ukraine on 30 august 2014 is slowly losing it's political meaning

30082014

It started somewhere between the present day and 25 may 2014 when Ukraine finally elected the President the people under the Maidan banner of Ukraine wanted instead of ousted Mr Viktor Yanukovich in February earlier this year. This according to the Russian President was of a cosmetic making using external make- over and turning real politics into a Ukrainian Kabuki theater no respected Russian would accept or appreciate. Manners maketh the man isn't enough a standard in real Russian or Ukrainian life outside the theater. Along the same tone and line Ukraine also is blaming the Russian President for not having taken back steps on its borders with Russia since 25 May 2014 after the presidential election in Kiev. And then there is another argument doing the finishing touch over the involvement by western powers in Ukraine, the USA and EU, since last year in November 2013. Before Mr Petro Poroshenko there was Mrs Yulia V Tymoshenko, leader of the Orange Revolution nearly a decade earlier. If anything to say or put in writing, remembering with sound off images inside one's head, any significant in this period of time has only been the corruption scandals that flood the Ukrainian government over and over again and bringing the country to it's knees before Mr Putin's feet... In fact, sound on again, Mr Putin has made several changes to curb some of the scandals and has even tried to bring Ukraine back to political serenity at one point, after the arrest of Mrs Tymoshenko in august 2011. The EU then never interfered during this time to block Russia in public getting very close to Kiev and it's government High officials, e.g. the President of Ukraine. The West's involvement which now Russia is using to justify it's actions or stealth incursions into Ukraine only came later in 2014...

For a production in the Kabuki world every director knows this is a mastery you don't bring to the public and their sophistication without actually having this mastery at your command. If anyone wants to make sense of politics in every big European city and go for principle madness rather than Real Time life streamline, the mastery for this is a designated one if old principles have anything to do with it. In Europe that is by far and wide usually the case once it has found 'good' reason to do so. The point Mr Putin is trying to get across and no one hearing is this that Europe has failed to stand by Ukraine when clearly after offending the Russian Republic a decade ago in their first time revolution to stay pro- Europe, still the Russian Republic didn't choose the dramatic vengeance on Ukraine and it's Officials back then. And who will care in the west that is now flooding on a daily basis with critics of Russia about Ukraine more than Mr Putin or Russia? All of this is old news and what is new seems to be an apparent change not only in Ukraine but in the world too, putting all the bearings of this on Mr Poroshenko's conscience. The west today is not faced with fiction but bloodshed in the dream over Ukraine. Next best thing for Mr Putin is the logic of following the cause and unfortunate consequences of grave negligence on the part of the EU but also of the US when he was still President of the G8. To believe the more popular expression: Mr Putin is trying to annex Ukraine by usurpation of some newly kind method that he finds necessary for the whole of the region and the European countries that can make sensible choices... Or in other words: Mr Putin is fighting a 'defense war' that can make better sense in the end for this particular region. Chaos has to get back into the bottle where it came from and can do no good service to those who are rubbing the lamp of this genie. And that is only one part of the big picture. The other half is our reality as we now know it.

Mr Frank Walter Steinmeier rare moment at Ambassadors Conference 25 aug 2014, a long speech

27082014

At the heart of German Foreign Minister's speech to read first time on Twitter (Tweet Javier Solana) earlier today the message was brief: Germany will be stronger and fighting for peace and renew itself at a different constant than before the crises in the world of the latest months. An interesting level and approach in e.g. the Ukraine/ Russia crisis, if you take the Foreign Minister literally at his word. But no one can rush this rather unpleasant chapter in European political short memory starting in February earlier this year. Peace in the world is also one thing that doesn't come out too well from the long speech the Foreign Minister of Germany has tried to convince the Ambassadors Conference with. And how do we know this wasn't the right approach? You can't simply act as if Russia still is in the G7 and make it G8. On the back cover of this textbook one serious question is still there, asking what for example would the EU Member States have done if not heavily dependent of Russia Gazprom? A crunchy idea comes to mind, that Russia by now would have crumbled. And the real motive? It isn't cherry picking, one can be sure. Russia is out of the G8, what is now G7, and it is barely a secret nowadays, but country Germany, Italy and the Netherlands are dpendent countries of Gazprom. And it's alliance came out very clear against the background of the US and Russia getting more and more unfriendly by the day for the last six months. But the President of Russia can also see his problem and the fickleness with which he is now blessed... Dependency on Gazprom isn't a good motive for Europe to go to war with Russia?

Of course, there is no denying in Mr Steinmeier's sincere purpose on how to maintain peace between all sides in this diplomatic conflict and on the ground where Ukraine is a focus point for each 'eye of the beholder'. There is a genuine intention from Germany, if reading the speech carefully, to have this war in Ukraine ended very soon at brass point. One can only not be sure whether the speech was meant for it's aftermath or is ongoing right now as we speak Real Time. And speaking of tools to go out and do the work Germany is good at, in an aftermath scarcity is the only tool to recover from the debris left, whether in the political domain or International sphere. This speech will not literally 'tie the knot' with any near or nearest future, if honesty has anything to do with our world peace today. Simply because it is now fractured in too many places never considered before. Or to be more specific in a globalization of our time since 2000. What then matters today for a country like Germany? It is where the German government stands. That seems to be the bayonet point. If Ukraine would again make any mistakes, even unintentionally to keep all sides happy, the west, EU and Russia, this could be a long night no one is waiting for. In all fairness, what we haven't heard or read in social media sphere is perhaps the speech we didn't hear? Many countries look to Germany to keep the order of the day ongoing, even in a time of serious conflict with Russia, in Iraq, Syria and the Middle East, shredding to pieces each in a way of their own in society, so says the speech. At top layer of globalism this is unchanged, of course. Europe on the other hand has changed levels since February this year. Mr Steinmeier is right that solving future problems short or long term it will not be wallowing in sentimentality, but sir, also not in love, I'm afraid to say.

Germany's rationality is very effective, for Italy and also for the Netherlands when moving in close slide with Russia in peace time. One problem is only that Russia is at war with the globalization in our world which cannot go unnoticed or hide under the carpet.

Vladimir Putin disregard for International Humanitarian Aid principles...

23082014

On high marks Mr Putin get's an A for 'smarting out' a difficult situation with relative ease, if indeed he has bend the rules a bit on International Humanitarian Aid. Another mark goes flying out to Mr Vitaly Churkin, Assembly Ambassador at the United Nations for Russia, B+, with his rationality on a complete standstill in the Ukraine government over many issues in the east where conflict is ongoing for two months, since June 2014, that Russia has run out of patience, is also equally completely right on the balance of power in a very unstable region quite remote from the rest of the world. There is a special C or even D- mark going out to the friends of Ukraine, the Ukrainian government and people, for whoever has left Ukraine 'dry out' during these last two months and to fight on it's own. The west can't be blamed but are probably not familitar with Europe's understanding that no one opens up the theater of war in Europe and let it be just because the 'job was done'. You don't simply move on like a young charmer of women does with girls, moving from girl to girl on and on like there is no end in the prospect of aging and becoming less attractive and when impotent as well. War is of the same potency. But why, in this personal view, get's Mr Putin such a high mark for creating yet another 'surprise' on the day before Saturn and Mars come together in Scorpio? Mr Putin get's a high mark here because he seems to be good at creating 'mutant wars'. Anything else, well, is speculation.

Mrs Merkel of Germany is due to arrive soon in Ukraine today or tomorrow. This Humanitarian Aid convoy on Friday yesterday from Russia and crossing the Ukraine border where conflict is highest, seems to carry the white flag upside down, according to the critics in the west and western Europe and they are convinced this is against any principle of the International Humanitarian Aid principles. Ukraine is also feeling pressure of another peculiar kind, that Ukraine is now sovereign and independent. During the pangs of real life as a sovereign nation in fierce opposition of Russian presence on their borders, makes it sound off to the rest of the world, and no one pays any attention anymore. This can't go on, which is perhaps what Mr Vitaly Churkin probably meant and therefore seeing the kind of 'opportunity' that only Russia understands well enough to create an even deeper opening in the conflict zone, or better the 'abandoned' war zone by Ukraine and friends. Maybe it is not clear yet what 'disregard' defines at the moment in both the United Nations and the International Humanitarian Aid Administration. With hair and head they are also stuck inside their own institutions over the Gaza/ Israeli conflict over the last two months, and now ISIS in both countries Iraq and Syria.

Europe is no place to lose a war and judging by the cover of this textbook, to win is also not called triumph or victory when you are a polite civil society. Mr Putin seems to be the only party to know the protocol.

Two countries at political starpoint in Europe: Britain and Germany

19082014

Ukraine and Russia, Iraq fighting between Kurdish rebels and ISIS, the Gaza/ Israeli truce now extended for another day today, are now urgent factors in the political sphere for the International world to respond to and to put pressure on countries like Germany and Britain to take a firm stance. This urgency will have to be translated into a political/ military code, especially with the tragedy of the MH17 Malaysian Airliner shotdown last month in east Ukraine. We understand the star-pin-pointing of this political setback between European Members and Russia remains open for questioning at the moment, if for example the Netherlands insist on responsibility and trust between EU Member States and the Russian Republic alliance. This will have to be concluded before the end of the year and decide where or in which place in the political specter they can put their grievances aside over the issue of shotdown a passenger's plane and kill 298 people, citizens of the Netherlands. For countries Germany and Britain this is an extraordinary task to stay still at this starpoint while the world is in acceleration, going from one war flying over into another. For good reasons German Foreign Minister Frank Walter Steinmeier is holding on to this urgency and now having Ukraine and Russia delegates talks in Berlin over the weekend. Mr Putin and his determination not to end the war becomes a personal drive for the President, which he now believes could be something totally different in meaning to 'outsiders'. Ukraine is his focus point and that is a matter for Russia, so can the President believe.

The International world quietly moves on in the meantime and leave behind the difficult issues for example in Europe, Ukraine and Russia. How the west interpretates the shooting down of the MH17 does seem to the public like a closed chapter for the time being. And that perhaps is shocking when one looks back on last month! In all fairness one has to say that not only should the EU condemn the tragedy but the west too should have called for a stronger condemnation/ crossings of blades of / with Russia on the killings of the passengers of the MH17... When I say crossing of blades, this is not literally meant. But you could wonder about the crisis in which Europe would have otherwise been had they not changed their course, and in slow pace waned off from Russia and it's dominant economic energy force. But particularly damaging to the Russian President's image of 'holy crusader' for European nations, this shooting down of the MH17 was enormous and unbearable, even if by tragic accident. Ukraine after all is a split country in half pro- west and half pro- east. But the public will never know to what length the tragic accident could take the world nations. For other good reasons the world is keeping it's eye on Iraq and Israel's operation protective edge. The Foreign Minister of Germany Mr Frank Walter Steinmeier has a difficult task and rather unusual reading through stone nowadays. If the G7 leaders, Britain and Germany, will make any sense of this political and military code over the coming period, that remains to a certain extent very much so in their own hands, when and where the starpoint will turn deadliest of serious politics for this region and in terms of foreign global relations.

To be continued.

Iraq has now two ways to follow the present 'political' situation: the Kurds and Yazidis

15082014

With reference to promptness and immediate response to the situation on the ground in Iraq, Nato and the UNSC, there has not been any mention made yet through the 'proper' channels publicly, over why the USA suddenly had dropped out of the sky, almost literally, to aide the Kurds in their struggle against ISIS, to anyone in the global audience still a new obscure force. And they don't seem to be grassroots 'stuff'. Of course displaced peoples often make regions of conflict more dramatic and certainly will call for global attention and their institutions, and no one could think otherwise. More facts on the ground, global scale, the US- Air Strikes, Britain and meeting with COBR, UK PM talking to Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, the Dutch military and President Francois Hollande. This was on promptness extraordinary quick. And no one likes to go the same path former US President Bush had taken when de-routing the UNSC on the war in Iraq and to have it's approval. The world political and military balance back then still had the Human Rights Watch, as well as all other US made instittutions, instrumental 'distinction implementation' in crises all over the world and where / when the US specifically or Nato was involved. Is this going to help the President of the US in august 2014, if later for example distinction was asked on the operation ongoing in Sinjar Iraq?

Perhaps not very attractive or darn straight unappealing is for example the distinction in Ukraine on the MH17, has not yet fully been made and completed, if now for example the EU still cannot get one aspect of the sanctions right, that all Member States must agree in full compliance with the institutions of the west, such as the International Law and Order, and with great emphasis mainly on the Order. While this mass funeral is quietly living now a life of it's own in the Netherlands, the EU needs a more firm distinct manner to approach the Russian Republic over the issue. Instead Russia still looks to the EU Member States to consolidate their ties and doing it so with great conviction and ambition that this is the future in Europe! Prestige seems to be everything to the Russian President Vladimir Putin. And perhaps there is simply no other way out of the present situation where the west for months was engaged in the change this world never thought of having or witnessing in our life time. Now weeks later after the MH17 Malaysian Airliner shotdown/ crash or massacre, fighting in Iraq is taking place with up front presence of the US military. Britain, Germany, France and the Netherlands are due/ expected to arrive soon in Iraq. I'm not sure, but helping the Kurds (arms) and Yazidi now displaced or scattered around, perhaps Mr Ban Ki Moon can make more sense of the 'stupid' no one actually is seeing in the global community?