iF

This week what it seems is that Israel and Iran have fallen into a parallel.

22 April 2024

(23:59 PM)

Iran has pushed the boundaries of the asymmetric of the 'shadow war' after 45 years regional terrorism with its attack last week on sunday 13 April, Israel on this occasion decided it was time for them to move on and rebuild Jerusalem in 2025, and that the State of Israel was now more than ever in need of expanding the meaning of the Jewish unity at home and abroad, if e.g. Iran would decide to make true their promise of annihilating the Zionist dream and Israel in the foreseeable time. It looks like the Prime Minister and his defense cabinet understand more profoundly in these last days that Israel and its people cannot allow this vacuum to become their new reality and standstill of a new future. Six months and now in its seventh month there are some in the Arab world that are publicly and openly saying that Israel has been defeated. It had responded last friday morning with minimum force against Iran and its nuclear facilities, if that was meant as a forceful retaliation for the ballistic drone missiles it had sent into Jerusalem a week earlier. In Arabic perhaps the word deliberately does not exist or translate well in daily grammar, and in the Arab military business there is no such a thing of a deliberate attack on low frequency. We must wait and see. The point here is not how the Arab world perceives the meaning behind the quiet operation of Israel against Iran of friday morning, because Israel has moved even quicker on and is keep on moving itself in the apparent vacuum and does not know yet what the real nature is here. The worst is yet to come, but can never happen in real time. It is in fact more urgent to wonder whether Iran has become a kamikaze regime of desperados. And based on this assumption it could be that Iran is dangerous and could turn the table round in a spastic war scenario with Israel... But then again there is nowhere in the world this need of self destruction and imploding the human race. And that from this angle it will be imperative for the US to stop the war and the huffing and puffing of Iran. Also what seems to be the case this week is that while Israel is moving around in the dynamic vortex of the vacuum, Iran is pulling a blanket over its head and thinking this will all go away very soon. After all who is afraid of spooks? The future is difficult to see and this is not only a problem for Israel, but it is also a bigger problem for the super power of the United States. Whatever the new world order was a year ago, what Iran has done was unacceptable in the old world order.

The future will be less susceptive to paradox. Because what if the military will become extremely more military and revulse the past completely? No one will know the new reasonings behind their every move or no move. Technological warfare can only be in the hands of its makers a powerful tool to act against any 'adventurer' of armed conflict against another nation, and not only in the military sense. If global politics will be reshaped, as so many were convinced that the Economic Forum in Davos had planned against the western world with the Covid19 virus, there is no telling at the moment. Israel has never been known to be an 'adverture' military machinery, that is if it is so that it destroys the worlds of the many nations on earth. The Foreign Minister of Iran this week has said in an interview on the friday morning retaliation attack from Israel, that (while shutting his eyes nervously and emotionally nearly choking) these missile attacks were like toys their children play with. What is still making sense of Israel's brutal force and bombing of Gaza against Hamas, since 7 October 2023? Their toys, and killing, according to Al Jazeera journalist M.Bishara 20000 children in Gaza? Tonight in Israel and for Jews around the world it is the Seder night and its celebration. That is the conventional description of what used to be Seder in Israel and for the Jewish people, before 7 October. Why has it always been the Arab nations to attack the Jewish Home on Jewish holidays? That is rather a simple question to a complex answer to have when you are not Jewish. Followed by an even more simple solution: why don't you move out of here in the Middle East that only belong to Arabs with a strong history in... The pyramids of Egypt perhaps? The oil business? Seder is an independent understanding of humility. In all other days hubris is part of all Jews for most of the time, even when kind. It is only on Jewish holidays that hubris is forbidden and unclean like unclean animals. It looks like Jews know how to deal with extreme temperaments when it comes to both instincts, and that we should never underestimate how it can end for their enemies. The writing here is nothing more than a simple explanation why Israel will stay forever the only independent nation this earth has known.

In short Israel is more than military when it comes to the State and its people. It is also cultural. A young State and nation of not even 76 years old has yet to deepen its cultural heritage in the promised land of Israel and build the hierarchy it needs to harbor at least a Sukkah ready for the Messiah. When ancient Greece was in its glorious days here on earth they too had State and a pantheon religion side by side, as did the Romans too. The Middle East/ Asia Minor and far east have never been without religion of some sort, and Israel is not any different when living in the Middle East, that is if religion has a world map of its own! That in fact is the dust of time and is making tonight's Seder for the Israelis even more painful to 'celebrate' when still 134 hostages are in the hands of the terrorist organisation of Hamas. Had it not been for global public opinion support of Hamas and Iran, there would never have been such a thing possible as pushing the boundaries of the war against the Jewish Home. It is their secret weapon. Many are realising today that the Jewish nation have nowhere to go and it is not because Tel Aviv can be wiped out from the Middle East, but more that when the walls of the world stand against them they will be on the other side of the wall and standing on their own. When the same world can kill many as 6 million Jews, well, bad conscience will make up for the good of everyone. Incidently the ridicule is on the logic of mankind once again, that after 20 000 children dead in Gaza, the Palestinians have urged the UN for having the right to a State. One wonders what the Jews deserve as their right after 6 million Jews were burned to ashes by Nazi Germany. But the Palestinian people are in luck when e.g. Jews are on their side against the governments of Prime Minister Netanyahu and send out damning messages in the name of humanity against the State of Israel, and calling it right out a racist State. They are also completely tone deaf when the same people are calling out in the streets very loud and clear that Jews colonize everywhere in the world. It is no wonder that many non- Jews feel as if there is something sinister going on in the world today, because the ambivalence of the Jewish activists for Palestinian rights and being Jewish is not making it any easier to understand where to draw the red line for antisemitism. And to take seriously. It could be that Jews refuse to be compared to Nazi Germany where no attempt was made to destroy Hitler's regime, except for a very small minority of the nobility in Germany. One could say passively well yes that is a noble aspiration and should succeed. But humanism is a principle of democracy, as is civic life and civil obedience. One last difference on Nazi Germany: Germany was never surrounded by enemies and that wanted to annihilate the German Republic. The simple truth here is that it was Germany who wanted to conquer and expand the vast realm of its authority across the whole of Europe and in the rest of Eurasia. And so forth.

Additional: in nuclear warheads it is not how you use them, but in fact the paradox is how not to use them and damage the environment at a mass scale. Wiping out Tel Aviv is at an enormous wide scale and to trigger the wrath of WWIII, WWIV, WWV, WWVI and so forth, ending the sum of all paradoxes on earth and in the heavens.

To be continued.

For Israel its existential motto is changing to Military hierarchy is closest to the cycle of life for Israelis.

21 March 2024

An interesting devolpment in the meantime is also taking place right under the nose of Israel, and this is closest to what could make or break up public opinion in Israel among the millions of Israeli citizens (population of 11 mln with the Arab population). Now more than five months in its longest war since the early days in the sixties, the war after 7 October was Israel's first and longest war ongoing. And there is a new social order emerging from the flames of war, one that no one in the world had ever imagined or seen before or saw it coming. After all it was Hamas intention to destroy Israel in one day on 7 October, in Gaza/ Israel and in the global world. The one thing that is appearing from these flames is standing alone in the world, but differently than what all enemies were having in their minds or planning against the Jews as a nation in stealth or openly through democracies. Since when do we know an Israel standing alone with literally no ally standing by it as a global leader? The US is slowly slipping into a division that is typically US politics and diplomacy, especially with an outlook on November 2024, with everyone asking the same question if the Biden administration will continue or lose to Donald Trump and make him president again. How well that will make Israel fare is another question, and if the Israel as we know it in the war against Hamas in Gaza with the incumbent government of Benyamin Netanyahu, perhaps it would be better if they keep the two apart. Israel's war has become a war entirely on their own, as the emancipation of the Israeli PM is equally important to prove to the rest of the world that yes they can do it. At the same time to Israel, the PM is right, this military to defend Israelis is to compare to what the rest of the world knows as the cycle of life. There is never any telling why or when the next attack on Israel's sovereignty or sovereign people will be. That is always what it can expect to happen at any given moment of the day. To the diaspora Israel is not considered the jewel of the Nile, but rather the mistress of their gobal financial powers. The Prime Minister of Israel can either be happy and keep his mouth and be happy and pampered, or speak up and take the initiative to lead Israel.

In the rest of the world at the same time democracies are under siege, when for example if they do not accomodate the fierce attacks on Jews living in free countries (as so many other people do when immigrated to the west). The leadership in Israel however is keeping a close eye on these new developments in the free world, that e.g. it is permissible to attack any Jew or supporter of the hostages randomly because they can't attack Jews in Israel. Playing judge, jury and excecutioner, if that were possible in these free democracies. But who will put an end to all this without it ripening as the fruit of war against the Palestinian people in Gaza? Israel is also learning it is utmost important to see where this is going, socially, for the 11 mln people living as a country and its citizens. In Hebrew these translations will make it even much harder, because the meaning of being cut off from the rest of the world might be an ominous sensation to Israelis and they could panic. So, how keep the hegemony alive between government and people, and the miltary in a watertight hierarchy in this new cycle of life for Jews living in the Home land? At this point one thing is also clear that perhaps Hamas and its allies are thinking the same thing and can't make a distinction any more between what is the Arabic word for victory and victor, and the Latin meaning of war and peace (pax). They probably had not expected that Israel under international pressure could survive so long in a war against Hamas. It is important for any Israeli leader to put his signature in clear black ink under Israel's future and bury its bone there and then for always. Never before had this eminence occurred before to do such a thing, but circumstances have changed things so radically for all future prime ministers of Israel, that the most realistic thing for Jews are still their eternal enemies. Whether in blue or white color shirts or as peasants, who will do their uprise against Jews. Now, what does peace means de facto? Israel is not unintelligent. Science was born in our modern world with Jews. A new Israel tomorrow is another scientific approach and this time to remedy war and what urges the enemies to make war upon Israel, near or far. After all the conduct of war is never fought on murderous envy or jealousy of Israel, or by no nation against another nation. Physics of a peaceful environment between the new Israel and new Palestinian people one wonders which scientific approach would be most appropriate under these circumstances. Somehow it all comes back to the three sons of Noah when he was caught dead drunk by wine from his vineyards. There was only one son who pointed to his brothers how he found their father... This is the Middle East and things have never changed since then among the brothers. Which son will walk back three steps backwards and pray to the God of Abraham when Israel feels politically and nationally naked? And since 7 October, who has covered Israel's nakedness and walked away three steps backwards? Noblesse oblige, noblesse oblige. And let's hope it won't take Israel too long to understand.

Additional (personal opinion): two things are important in the State of Israel: the military and the shekel. One to protect the State, and the other to protect the State of Israel State economics. It also should make sure that the shekel does not cause a dead cycle of life and a living cycle of life in a bad return to the State economics of the State, c.q. mainstream economics, e.g. when in relation to the Palestinian non State economics/ entity. For Israel to continue as the State of Israel it needs State economics and not just exist as a cash flow money state to fill the so called State coffers. Or continue this way and dissipate into thin air with practically a worthless currency. The honey should be found in the dead carcass of the lion and its shares in real life and time. Israel badly needs a future and future prime minister by birth and prominence who will be hands off and hands on with the State economics. Also with regard to the Palestinian Authority a greater self of bravery facing this future and formalise the union of the shekel with a new beginning and allow the State of Palestine function as guarantor and intrinsic value of the shekel. This bravery of the prime minister (in memory Yitzhak Rabin) will save the State of Israel and all its defense mechanisms, military or monetary. 

The Israel that we knew before 7 October 2023.

5 March 2024

Why it has become evident that there was (once) a Israel before 7 October 2023 is where Israel is today, post 7 October 2023. Israel before the outbreak of the war against Hamas since last October was as natural to all Israelis as we know life overhere in Europe in the European Union. There was security for Israelis, 75 years long. And there was democracy with a free market economic rise to global standards for the last two decades. This still is Israel and the State for Jews. Accept after 7 October and after five months when Hamas is refusing not to release hostages it had taken on the day of their massacre in the Negev, something in Israel went lost. Wars had been here before against Hamas, but there was no loss of security in Israel amongst ordinary citizens, Jewish or other. No one had ever felt the need to militarize Jerusalem, in theory that is, and to have the military and Police standing tall like castle walls in David's kingdom, encircling the territory by erected walls and gates to enter the city by pemission, whether night or day, and so forth. We must focus on Jerusalem and watch out for more dastardly attacks on Jews, a brutality that no enemy of Israel will leave to chance. If ever there was this chance. In reality the tragedy in the story is that Israel has been attacked, in a manner that is similar to something every sovereignty recognizes but does not speak of it in public. And to say it over and over again that this happens only because this time where sovereignty is the State of Israel and the Jewish people, mum's the word becomes the politics that is as easy as the wink of an eye. And that is confusing to many as no one finds any real legitimacy in Israel's actions when it retaliates against a Hamas that is claiming the right to defend the Palestinian people against the occupation by the Zionists, 75 years long... Real politics must have lost its long breath since October 2023, when on the seventh Hamas decided it was time to destroy Israel in its so called sovereignty. This in Israel is becoming a problem. In previous wars there was no such massacre of Israeli citizens and breach of security by Hamas, and Israel could go on as business as usual. This time the politics in Israel is finding it hard to speak of returning back to safety and move on. The need to change whether in politics or security of the State and people of Israel, how can the politicians know that they would be ever needing such a plan? The future was and has always been some sort of template and you are either with the global community or you are not. These are not difficult to understand reasons, and not either to the Israelis. A true friend would understand, that after 7 October the State of Israel will be needing a real change and not just in politics or security. Hamas and the Palestinian people are not the same either, as we can still see how the protests by Palestinians abroad in democracies live and shout what Palestine to them means. But that is not what Israel needs to worry about right now. Palestinians act outside the State of Israel and the Israeli citizens.

The simple answer at the moment for the Prime Minister of Israel is that Israel must once more find its way out of the insecurity at the heart of Israeli citizens, and in politics to find another way of maintaining focus on the State of Israel. How far legitimacy can solve many of its problems no one knows, and how many problems will be left to any incoming new prime minister is neither something that we know or can say right now. Too many are still busy fighting the public opinion in the global sphere, e.g. why so many countries are refusing to condemn the atrocities committed by Hamas on 7 October last year, five months ago. It is genocide the Hamas organisation is calling against Israel, and so are all the Palestinian people shouting in the streets of free democracies. Something that is hard to swallow, whether genocide is military or political jargon. A verb or noun, dativus, ablativus nominativus and so forth. As long as it works for people to call against Jews that they are committing genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza, killing babies, children, women, with precision bombing, that feels and reads as accurate military operations against the Palestinian people by the IDF. It is in fact true, the accuracy seems true if babies, children under five, and women. And no males. (And perhaps mules) While the Palestinian claims say that they are living 75 years long under occupation, Israel lives 75 years long under accusation that it is occupying the Palestinian land. It seems and is feeling like a travesty of power since 75 years ago to ask when was this ever a Jewish Home. And after the 7 October massacre by Hamas in Ha Negev the history of Israel in 'Palestine' is becoming more and more, as we enter the new age of the next generation, an abyss of absurdity. Hamas leader Ghazzi Hamdan suggested the other day after 7 October that the Zionists should leave Palestine altogether and go live in the US, and that they have nothing to find or look for in the land of Palestinians (this was on MEMRI an interview he gave). In theory this is an interesting notion made by the Hamas leadership about Israel to get out and live somewhere else. What if another option were available and say that why not opening a new evolution of Statemanship for Palestinians in the land of Iran, where perhaps they could contribute more to the Iranian economy and military? Not that this would be in ten years time not another military problem to the new generation of Israelis, but how would they like to be told the truth in this evolutionary way? At least from an economic and prosperous point of view, if Shiites and Sunnies could live together as one. This show of perverse ideas must end. It is not global politics/ geo politics not at least by the minimum. But one thing is true, that Hamas claims bravery and courageousness among its people to destroy Israel and the Zionist dream 'to live in the land of the Palestinians'. In the world of global politics however for Israel bravery and courageousness will have to mean something about the State and its people as Jews.

Snake in the grass: the Prime Minister of Israel and his plans the day after Hamas, c.q. the war in Gaza.

23 February 2024

The outlook on the day after (the war against Hamas) by Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, published today in the Jerusalem Post in headlines, and not in specific details, will make it grim reading on the side of the Palestinians this morning. Paradoxical the snake in the grass is freedom. At the same time no one had expected that Israel would come out with any different plan so soon the day after Hamas' atrocities on 7 October last year. The Prime Minister from this point of view realities in Israel his intention is still the best way forward out of the mess both peoples have been in because of Hamas. This means that the Prime Minister has also set a new timeline and time limit for the Palestinians onward today. And that is why it will be difficult to accept by the Palestinian people, especially as the Prime Minister has put it himself in his plan, and only to be done by technocrats (outsiders?). Technocrats may demand political freedom, State- like constructions, contiguity by air, sea and land, even if they agree to comply with the Israeli Prime Minister on de-militarization. It doesn't look like these technocrats will be ready to build the new governing bodies, as the Prime Minister of Israel has put forward in his plan today, without feeling and being a free people to self determination and rebuild the kind of State the Israeli Prime Minister wants to have living next door to Israel. And for one simple reason that the war is not over yet. Hamas is still holding the last 134 hostages they took on 7 October from their homes in Ha Negev as prisoners. It looks as if the Prime Minister is now trapped in a national trauma and that will continue for the coming years to remain so. But he is also a staunch optimist and perhaps believing that the people of Israel will overcome these difficult memories in time. At the same time another window in his plan remains a mystery, that e.g. there is no Palestinian people to control again under Israeli security presence in Gaza and West Bank. They will not abide and might even say what the Israeli Prime Minister is missing here is the point of sophistication. Technocrats tend to have that strong political awareness. Hence to say is that the snake in the grass is freedom, if only to build the kind of State designed by the Prime Minister of Israel. With the war still ongoing they even might say that again the Prime Minister of Israel is disingenuine. And perhaps what will also be difficult to realize is to come to terms with the limitations set out in the plan, that building a Sate requires certain disciplines on political and socio- economic freedoms. And that this for now is looking at a new plan for at least the coming next five years.

On the other side of the fictional boundaries in Israel the political winds of change also might frustrate many points in the Prime Minister's plan we read today in the Jerusalem Post. However no one knows the details in the whole plan from this 'publication'. Will the Palestinians be desginated to build or rebuild their State within the borders: West Bank and Gaza? But in the plan the blueprints are moving slightly to Israel's view over the entire land territories. And from here this is not making the serene impression a new way of life in this region means or at least should mean in a restart. A restart seems fictional after the historical traumas between the two nations over these territories. But, many know, the Israeli Prime Minister is not a sentimental man and so the question is whether in his view today in the plan for Gaza and West Bank are his rationalities to rebuild this part of the region without any military threat on his doorstep and gain continuous political support from Israelis in the coming time. Mr Netanyahu might need a lot more steel than what he knows is his territory as the leader of Israel. And at this point in time he might not see anything fortunate to come out from cutting the head of the snake in the grass, or also perhaps that could be exactly his point of view. No one knows that much just yet. In short, that was war. And now what is peace? Than perhaps Israel will also be needing technocrats how to build a lasting path to peace with the Palestinian (technocrats), a side by side coexistence. With bearing in mind that Jerusalem will remain undivided. On this side of the world not all is fair in love and war, when comparing the Palestinian issue in the rest of the world where all is fair in love and war. Take e.g. peace, love will have to be divided into two halves. And can the world then understand these realities from their point of view? There is no genii in the bottle and to grant either side their three wishes, and going in opposite directions in long straight lines, one going west and the other going east. "I want fertile land to grow crops," and the other saying at the same time their wish to the genii, "And I want more houses built." Patriotism can not be divided, when e.g. you think how the military force works. The Palestinian people or technocrats might understand this as a political no- go area to force the Palestinians to live as 'patriots' under Israeli security laws indefnitely. And there it goes again, the world condemning Israel on the same circular carousel of blame and gains of the Palestinian people to live without freedom. And the goat of all times, Mr Netanyahu himself, will not be able then to contain the future conflicts of fresh flames again and again between Palestinians and Israel. Now, what could be the trick to charm the snake in the grass?

Four months later on: Hamas cannot set the tone for the Middle East and reject the hostage deal with Israel.

5 February 2024

One point of reference: how did this war started that the ICJ calls a genocide in Gaza and against the Palestinian people, innocent civilians? Israel familiarity with wars against their enemies, near or far, will eventually judge the moment of war and how did had started. 7 October is an importance to Israelis and Israel's Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, to remember as imminent since the Jewish State was created. No one can expect less of this or any other Prime Minister in Israel. The Middle East has equally played an important role, especially in its first week since the attack on Israelis on the domestic land in Ha- Negev by Hamas, as Hamas is reference to something most Arab nations in the Middle East know what that means, since the attack was a frontal offensive against proper Israel. It was expected from e.g. Saudi Arabia to condemn Hamas for this attack, it is after all not on the same line where the Saudis stand on the issue of Palestinian self rule in Palestine. And for the simple reason, that Saudi Arabia is a global industrial country and its sovereignty knows a coherent line of history as an Arab nation with enormous if not exponential wealth. Its responsibility will always align therefore with the global rationality of order and industrial laws in ways more advanced than e.g. Germany. It did however at one unspeakable point for reasons no one will understand not reach the other side, after it was clear there was no way back not for Israel and not for the Hamas organisation. The world had joined in with the Palestinian people during the following weeks against the IDF and bombing, once again in the territory in which Hamas governing body is established. Another question is that the Middle East should not pay the price of war with so little added value, not to the Arab nations or Palestinian people, that is if any future has still some meaning in this part of the world. Imagination of Hamas certainly cannot be to command the Arab sovereignties to succumb to a victory of atrocities against Israel and its civil life in Ha- Negev, and to 'lead' the way forward in future that in fact Israel can be beaten by the bravest among the Arab nations in the Middle East, no matter how small in numbers. This is human nature at its worst. And how can a victor of this size be to be kept in rein? The Israeli Prime Minister has more on his plate than just fighting the war against Hamas and try to clean up the mess this has made not only on their doorstep, but it went as far and deep behind the historical green lines for a massacre and rape (literally both people and physically). The Israeli Prime Minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu also needs to work with the Arab neighbours to establish a new path of trust and peace.

Another flank of stability during the war in Gaza since 7 October 2023 has been Egypt, and who by nature will play an ambivalent role and not by its own choice, but because of its millions of citizens, 109.3 million people and population growth. These are the reality facts no one cannot leave to chance or omssion in the world diplomacy in this part of the world between the different factions and nations. The poorest populations here have a complete different worldview, unlike their richest kings, princes and lords. All reality facts of which Israel and Israelis are not unfamiliar with or take lightly. The question therefore, again, is: how can Hamas reject any hostage deal with Israel and command the whole of the Middle East at the same time with so little to bring to the table of world industrialists Arab nations? Of course, the history in the case of Israel and the conflict with the Palestinian people will at some other new point need or be in need of a novel norm to make a restart to live as peoples in the same territories, both nations call home. And the norm should be architecture and infrastructure, if one can build these norms with Israel for the next generations of peoples living in the Middle East in a more peaceful abstract. Disrespect will be in no one's interest, but respect has also need of a real nature. There should not be any need of predatory aspects or components in the peace or normalizations efforts between a heterogeneous people like Israel and homogeneous peoples in the rest of the Middle East. Neom is proof of a global and regional effort by Saudi Arabia, and no matter how far from true realism it is here and present on God's good planet to show how things can be different when there is readiness to want to build and engineer a way forward, a path of new opportunities. (I personally would like very much to leave the world behind and knowing that this all still has a chance in our small universe on earth) The way forward however will still remain in the hands of human intelligence and bravery. And one thing is known of the Israeli Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, that he may be many unpleasant things, but that he will always be remembered as the bravest prime minister that Israel and Jews have ever known in their entire modern day history. With no less of his neighbouring equals, whether in Egypt or Saudi Arabia, what one is trying to say is that the Middle East needs innovation of new leadership and who will dare fortune. A great war will always remain in the hands and minds of gentlemen and equals, but wars of atrocities to prove a point in the world is a hubris of a people that in the end will always prove dangerous to all sovereignties. Iran is in the territory of world politics. 

Israel's national tectonic shift is only becoming more clear after the return of some of the hostages taken on 7 October by Hamas.

26 November 2023

Israel as a country and nation are going through an unprecedented time of national trauma even when some of the hostages, women, children and foreign workers (Thailand and the Phillippines), have safely returned home in Israel over three days, friday, saturday and sunday today. We thousand of miles from Israel can only witness and watch these images from afar and are hoping it will soon be over after the release of more hostages. 240+ Hostages were taken (still estimated) on 7 October 2023 from their homes in Ha Negev, and leaving behind the horrendous memory what has astonished Israeli society since then. One week later Israel declared the 'Swords of iron' war on Hamas and only till friday 24 November it has initiated an agreement to pause the bombing and ground operations in Gaza. The war is everywhere on Social Media, global news, and in the papers online. Israel right now is in a parallel world from where we are living and take it from snippet to snippet as the news is streaming in on mainstream media. But Israel could be wrong at the moment to be in two places at the same time, e.g. when it is sharing a national experience from the battle scene or scale with the rest of the world. We are close in a digital world and our best effort can only be the last resort: communication and solidarity, that is when you insist on Israel's right to defend itself. A fight that goes up against a very massive and high curved wall and that does not look anywhere favourable to Israel, with the world standing not with Israel but with the Palestinian people. We are also using a second language to Hebrew and the time-zones are a determining scale making it technologically either all happening or disappear. (The global audience is not the military) Perhaps one should stick with Hebrew and reading subtitles, or immediate translations when interviewed on Israeli Television. This is how it works in the rest of the world. To understand what happened on 7 October last month in Ha- Negev is a very good example of how difficult it is for everyone that don't know Israel and Hebrew, how to understand what had happened to the citizens of Israel and where. You have to understand firstly the location and the people living in these areas. Because it is important when establishing facts in the International arena of public opinion. And now, after seven weeks were there any facts in the global English speaking audience to establish the horrific acts and atrocities Hamas has committed? Perhaps Israel doesn't need to explain anything to the world, because our lives in the rest of the world continues its daily cycle on this side of global realities. Our problem right now are different politically and the employment economy. In Hebrew the world is sharply focused only on how the situation with the hostages will end, and not even what kind of future is still there for Israel post war 'Swords of iron'. It is therefore looking very pathological from this point of view.

After seven weeks of television and global media analysis it still isn't convincing anyone that Israel is experiencing a traumatic time in this war. The world's scream on the other hand is calling for an immediate ceasefire for more than six weeks and from Palestinian journalists around the world numbers of the death of children and women keep popping up at any random moment and time everywhere in the world. It is genocide from an apartheid regime and occupation power for 75 years, that too stands out vertically everywhere we are looking, in our part of the world. If anyone tries to be meticulous about 7 October and in great detail how the military law or International Law will or will not see it, you will be silenced immediately. The highest social order is a ceasefire, free Palestine from the river to the sea, and Israel is a terrorist State and killing women and children. Here there is no playing with words, once or twice. The point is however that Israel on this occasion does stand in its full sovereign right with eradicating Hamas, because its motive for military action against Hamas is the red line by Hamas crossing the Green Line for pillaging, rape, massacre and butchering of civilians (non combatants), and therefore crossing the Green Line or International armistice border. It is the same cry against Israel when crossing the Green Line in the West Bank when building homes in the areas A, B & C. Israel has to win by military and legal law, if it is planning on having a future after the historical invasion of brutality by Hamas into proper Israeli territory since 1948. There is no need to be in a particular friend or pro- Israel relation for stating ut supra rational facts in the International world. Personal relations are a deliberate misleading sentiment and Israel deserves better than that, one can only say. It is especially this what makes the horrendous experience for the hostages and survivors of the 7 October atrocities by International norm to condemn Hamas as a war criminal organisation. Ha- Negev is not a military or war zone. Punkt. And then to see the dear faces of the children, e.g. the first child the world saw freed and back in the arms of his father, Ohad Monder (and his mom), we do understand the horror of a happy family being depleted from reality in one second and all in one day. That is the natural feeling for anyone alive on earth and universal, when you lose someone (car or other accident) or your own life (cancer) in a sudden moment.

Our rhetoric is insufficient, and it is also not being or being with Israel that should make things Law and Order in our adult world. Why not help the Palestinian people instead? No one can go against the covenant of the God of Abraham and dynastic root in David in propter Israel. Just as much as no one can go against the sovereign root in the dynastic root of Saudi Arabia. You have to read a little more on the meaning of Islam and the meaning of Sunnah and than make up your mind what it is that we want in the Middle East with perhaps a future, yes, for the Palestinian people as Israel's neighbouring State. And Israel can be a merciful people if the response is there and very clear on both sides. Are the Palestinian people a merciful people? Perhaps the next generations will know the answer everyone is looking for today, but translating it upside down by shouting in the global domain from the river to the sea. Paradise, incidently, has had many other trees in the Garden of Eden. And not just the apple tree from where all discord in the world has the carrier- dna/ root, but acacia, cedar, poplar, and more.

Reshuffle Conservative Party UK.

(Outsider's view)

14 November 2023

Who knows there might be another reshuffle again, let's say next month, in two months, three maybe, or six months. Not good for the PM general el campaign. If he wants to beat Keir Starmer. You might even want to know what is the purpose of all this. One good thing from a PR point of view that this is making for the Labour Party is that the opposition is beginning to look more and more a one man's Party, with its thousands of members moving with the leader of the Party in one forward direction. Keir Starmer is going in the right direction and staying on the same line he started since beginning to campaign for winning the general election. He has the rowing spans that he is using now for a long time during his leadership in the Labour Party longship. We are not hearing much about the general election campaign on either side at the moment, with of course the problems in the Middle East with the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, but also because after 39 days of Israeli military operations many thousands of civilians have died. You can simply can't put this in a general election campaign for Britain and to become the next Labour prime minister, e.g. a promise to the British people. One might be tempted to want it to be a personal feat of leadership, but war never did any prime minister or future prime minister any good in the UK. So, putting it short in writing, there is no point to go there and especially not when the leadership of a political party wants to make a landslide comeback to government. This is the UK and at the end of the day it is only British politics. And that is not what it looks like for the Conservative Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, with his Mahjong cabinet reshuffles to confuse an already disparaged multitude of Brexiteers with the clacking of new and old tiles. Who do they think will be fooled by all the noise the reshuffles are making? Keir Starmer looks like he knows there is an ocean out there and that he must sail it with what he's got. And what can the public expect when the moment comes to win the next prime ministership? There is also the question what the Brexiteer Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is trying to achieve tactically if he wants to win the next general election by putting a former prime minister in the position of Foreign Secretary. And the former prime minister being no other than David Cameron. All you have to do as the voting public is to see where Keir Starmer has put his Shadow Foreign Secretary David Lammy next to him, and not with him. The word hyperbolic comes to mind, but in engineering when you know that what you are planning to achieve will be the strategy only of the Prime Minister as incumbent. Rishi Sunak doesn't seem to even notice the basic elements he needs to become the prime minister for the good of the country and its people.

There is also of course the element of truth that everything that Rishi Sunak is doing as the Conservative Party is not going to his own wishful thinking, to make the Conservative Party prominent again (CPPA). It makes the man they want to beat at the general election 2024, who in their eyes is weak and has no backbone, the Labour leader Keir Starmer, only more representative and the logical choice to maintain a Britain known to the rest of the world as the oldest democracy. But what many also know in British politics is that it can be capricious and let the 'prominent underdogs' still win at the 2024 general election. Nothing goes so well as watching a glorious Britain going down in full excentricism of nearly losing the general election to the Labour Party in the last minutes of election results, who are having no strong backbone pedigree, in their Brexit sovereignty. It is the secret many are keeping well hidden in their Brexit closet. Sir Keir Starmer will have to be cautious with the ideology of what makes a real Brexiteer that no one knows of. How does this make you feel and where British politics has arrived in 2023? Who are the Catholics and who are the Protestants? There are two things very certain in the coming up election 2024: Sir Keir Starmer of the Labour Party has gone through the process of becoming the new leadership of the Party, he is already gearing up for the battle to win the next general election, and the future of the world is holding up all the winning cards, either for or against during the global political future course. David Cameron does not have that privilege (as FS) when in 2016 he resigned as prime minister, to understand what it now takes for anyone who wants to be the prime minister in Britain 2024/2025. Brexit is the answer, and both Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer are of the generation of politicians after 2016 when Britain had left the European Union. It is this experience one can assume that matters in the next general election and for the prime minister of Britain. And for one simple reason: giving the EU 'window' guarantees and to cooperate from a new framework to help Britain prosper with its new beginning as a country in 2019. Old Britain was in the EU till 2016. From this projection the Labour leader doesn't look now like he has that many mistakes left to make before polling day at the next general election. Still, cross your fingers, if you vote Labour.

On Social Media today,

29 October 2023.

mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

What many in the world do not understand is that Nir- Oz, Nirim, Maggen, are kibbutzim since the inception of the State of Israel settlements in 1948. That is making it harder for 2023 to accept their status as 'natural inhabitants'. They are not new settlements, e.g. in Judea & Samaria. Natural inhabitants enjoy full political and security by the State as citizens of Israel. The Hamas made a calculated decision and did not go to the new settlements where settler's violence is known to be taking place against the Palestinian people, is something the rest of the world will not see and understand the clever strategy here. What is deemed by the International world as illegal settelments one can argue would not suffice to have an impact of this magnitude, on either side of the conflict. In conclusion you can see why the settlements in the historical south were attacked in the brutal manner in which it did and the world has come to know: it is proper Israel. The Hamas can only have done this as to attack a sovereign country and must have been fully aware of the time we are living in, when the world wants Israel to leave all settlements in exchange for the future of a Palestinian State outside the demarcation line with Israel. 

MCT.................................................

Outsider's view: the war in Israel. Recent political history in Is, 1000 Israelis never killed under previous and former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett.

10 October 2023

Don't hold your breath, the former prime minister Naftali Bennett is not planning his comeback to government in Israel. The reason why he is constantly streaming videoclips on social media of his visits to families, the distressed people in the South, and his interviews on CNN where Israel stands as a nation and is behind the government of Benyamin Netanyahu, is to some people reminiscent of an early election campaign if only he had the chance. It doesn't also look like he is kicking the dust of haaretz Israel as if deliberately hiding from the people who lost their families and friends in the war Hamas has unleashed over the weekend in Israel. It is recurrent of what has been here before, seen and witnessed to the last ends of a second over the many decades, when we of course speak of Hamas' terrorism. It is a familiar scene to all prime ministers of Israel and a repetitious war scenario the State of Israel seems to have been born with in 1967 and even before that time. But why speak of the former prime minister Naftali Bennett who in the end of his first term before resigning had only one mandate to stay in the coalition 2022? A thousand deaths over the weekend is making somehow a strong case for the time when he was prime minister and for the simple reason that this did not happen under his prime ministership. Hamas didn't turn violent overnight, post Naftali Bennett's coalition in the rotation agreement with the later interim prime minister Yair Lapid. Hamas was violent then as it is now in the present time. The critical question therefore to ask is what did Naftali Bennett do differently, when one thing is certain that during his time he had not given the Palestinian side any reason to believe that this was a prime minister just like his predecessor Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, also former prime minister at that time after decades of dominating the national and international stage with his presence as the only prime minister Israel will ever have? For some reason to believe that this could not have happened under Naftali Bennett's time as prime minister, to have 1000 Israelis killed by Hamas, feels almost natural and logical. By the way, a man also who had recently joined the Center Left of Yesh Atid and plus two Arab Parties in his coalition, and himself being a fierce Right- Wing third Party, Yamina. The fog is clearing a little and one can see why Naftali Bennett is now the most hated man in Israel among the Right- Wing factions. The betrayal of his own Party (according to Party loyal members) wasn't the only reason for this. The real reason was deeper behind the fog and it was because of his military instinct (regressive, progressive or restrictive).

This man is not the Prime Minister of Israel in october 2023. And the tragic loss of lives of a thousand Israelis is not in his power then how best to deal with Hamas. Sometimes boundaries and bloodshed are the restrictive measures you are going to set out first, just to make sure your side is safe, and that there is a clear goal to eliminate the enemy. That would be his D- day so to speak for the elimination of Hamas in their hideouts wherever they are in Gaza. And this operation would also have been in military economics or business more efficient and cost effective. Naftali Bennett was a prime minister completely relying on his own experiences, was the general impression at the time. Whether that be inexperience as a prime minister or experienced as a top killer commando in the army. And when on the global stage, e.g. Cop26 in Scotland, his remarkable nature had given everyone the impression that this prime minister stands by his own side and even when he could lose that respect over the issue of saying, that if the energy minister Karine Elharrar who traveled in her wheelchair in the Israeli delegation to Scotland, to leave the Conference for Climate Change, and follow his instinct blindly if she was not allowed to get in. We know about Israeli prime ministers and especially when it is Benyamin Netanyahu, how publicity with the great and especially when it would concern the Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton, his own would come second. And even without the sicknesss muscular dystrophy: "Elharrar made headlines during the COP26 conference in Glasgow, after she was forced to return to her hotel in Edinburgh due to the event not being wheelchair-accessible. She received an apology from British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, with the disability charity Scope calling the incident "inexcusable"; however, Elharrar said it was "a good experience to make sure the next UN conference will be accessible." (From internet Wikipedia) It is for this reason that Hamas' leaders can feel the difference, and that the former prime minister his disdain for the organisation of Hamas' terrorism is a painful and quiet flow of humiliation in the head. From historical facts over the last four decades one can almost feel how they rather prefer the incumbent Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu better and more. Better the devil you know than the devil you don't know, so to speak.

1000 Israelis dead in one weekend in modern day Israel is a big question mark ballooning bigger and bigger as the days proceed from here. And all in this writing about an inexperienced young man in big politics and as the former prime minister of Israel from 2021-2022. Time has slightly moved half a second since then in Israeli politcs. That now is a magnitude when seen from the distance.  

PMQs, UK.

6 September 2023

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has made with his remark how Labour and the leader, Sir Keir Starmer, their politcis is nothing but opportunism and has nothing substantial to ask the government or the Prime Minister of how they are handling the country and people of Britain. And what is this opportunism referring to, if the Prime Minister was aiming at something much higher? In theory let's say that the Prime Minister did make a good point here about where Labour now stands before the campaign for the next general election kicks off, this then could be a gift to the Labour leader in many ways. For example, if the Prime Minister is right indication of a bad patch down the road to his prime ministership will be something for Keir Starmer to investigate. After the reshuffle in his Party the Labour leader gave something away and didn't know that, e.g. that the Tory hawks saw the reshuffle as a sign of weakness. While Labour enjoys the new Westminster/ House of Commons scenery on the front bench with their new appointees as a sign of strength. The Labour leader and his Party should make no mistake about the Tories wanting to be the sound Party and next government, plus they will be using 'real' government politics to make their views known to the more ambitious general public, who are mostly the ones calling themselves true blue blood Tory voters. Opposite this move by the incumbent government the Labour Party will run its show thinly, and that is putting it mildly. Keir Starmer however may still be lucky and decide that Labour can win the next general election, mainly because it knows how to envision the future, whether in the short or long term. Or, to use Mr Starmer's own words three years ago, that only Labour knows that winning an election is how to explain the glimpse of the future. It could be that the Prime Minister cannot do the same.

When will what the Prime Minister said today in the House of Commons during PMQs to the Labour leader not be a gift, is when opportunism is true diagnostic. Politics in British politics will always require some form of equality between both the Houses. And that means when the PM goes macro, the leader of the opposition goes macro, and when the PM goes micro, the leader of the opposition goes in exchange on micro. And also the whole trick for Keir Starmer is to stay close to the heel of the Prime Minister at a more strategic level in government politics, and not policies versus politics. The whole trick is for Labour to look more like the next government, knowledge basis, without touching the Prime Minister the tip of his nose. It is easy to see that the British public only sees Britain being in charge under a Tory government, because it simply feels more real and wet. They have delivered Brexit and got Britain out of the EU, the price being high and for which this heroic effort is now paying dividend on a more personal basis, the nationalistic one. The closer we are getting into the campaign the more we will also see where the public really wants Britain and the government to go. The truth of this kind of politics is phenomenal and always surprising when it happens to tip the balance against the opposition, even when a formidable stronghold. Opportunism and when coming from the Prime Minister in the House of Commons to refer to the opposition leader and his Party, is something Keir Starmer has to understand that this is a word he should pay very close attention to in the coming time during his election campaign. He cannot be seen by the public as one who leads a Party that is opportunistic or runs its policies only on opportunism. It could make the Labour leader looking like an independent running candidate at the prime ministership.

Common belief is that Keir Starmer and his Labour Party should make up their minds on what opportunism explains about Britain and politics from the government, and that there is none.

The general election challenge for Sir Keir Starmer, and Labour leader in the UK.

2 September 2023

Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer, has arrived in the same place where he was in october, september, august, july and june 2022. The political question is september 2023, and october, november and december, the end of this year. Followed by the immediate political answer for 2024, the upcoming general election. On the Conservative side they may beginning to see that there is no difference between the two years, 2022 and september 2023, for the Labour Party moving on to win the next general election, as they have tried to convince the public since last year november 2022 up to may 2023, before the local elections this year. This is going to be critical for the Labour Party to decide which is which in the ouroboros cycle of rebirth after thirteen years in the opposition, first under Jeremy Corbyn and for the last three years under their new leader, Sir Keir Starmer. Politically the ouroboros cannot have swallowed the straight line of last year's return from the ashes up to the most essential part in this campaign starting this month, september 2023. The point for Keir Starmer that he had made last year after november 2022, was to make the difference by this time in the next year and to put forward more than a promise to the British people about their future and a change of hands in government. If it is true about the Conservatives that they will not be having any trouble dealing with a formidable campaign from Starmer and the Labour Party, and are looking at a weak start this year from this point, they will or might see with relative ease a way to win the next general election again. And this time the humiliation for Labour would be that the incumbent Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, did not even needed trying very hard. It is time for Keir Starmer and stick out his head from Loch Ness. It is still some kind of a myth to see back a Labour government and Labour Prime Minister at Westminster. The floor of parliament so to speak becoming the stairway to heaven for Mr Starmer should now be more than just realistic or pragmatic to become the next UK Prime Minister. But, who knows, it might not yet be too late.

Caution is required: the world is dead serious about the future in the world between G-7 and G-20 leaders. The issues are not a new variant of politics and policies, but more specifically are representing a few interesting key issues on how distribution of wealth can be tangible to millions of peoples for the next generation and the one after, e.g. generation Z. Britain has to make a new start after the disastrous and nationalistic Brexit. It is not all Labour's fault, only when following Keir Starmer's projections that he had made with his team last year up to may this year. He had also managed to challenge the Conservatives on delivering the global partnerships with countries in the far east and northern hemisphere, e.g. Canada. Distribution of wealth has never before in the world been intrinsically part of a realistic way of life, for millions of students who will become the next generation professionals and with authority in many industrial fields. Medical, technology, and management. This may challenge the monarchy in England over the various old historical banners who is sovereign and what his sovereignty means to the British people. And perhaps they may be right that conventional wisdom should not die out or go extinct from the human history and monarchy, but it will not be compatible in the nearest of futures, politically at one point for a much smarter world. Just look around and think again what the millions of people need most in the world today: mass production of everything if living is the reason for the human needs to get access to or have, in terms of the economy. Education around the world is becoming also the new way of wealth distribution for the millions of students new infrastructure exchange. Labour can deal with the new challenges if... Sir Keir Starmer can make the best of his campaign and to follow the straight line of democracy, that is partly British and should become partly global. At home Sir Keir cannot keep his billboard messages limited to his father was a toolmaker and mother a dedicated NHS nurse. Not in september 2023 to win the next general election from a strong Brexit bastion of Conservatives. He is a dad now. And the morning dew of the next UK prime ministership is on his head, wet.

Post Scriptum: the Zionist problem for the Labour Party according to Corbynistas, should also remember that democracy is a principle for which Israel is paying the price, of seventy years in a part of the world where no other partner is considering the same challenges for the younger generations of professionals flocking to a more global new tomorrow in countries and their older democracies.

Due to serious illness, cancer stage IIIC/4 writing has become limited to fewer columns. 

Labour UK, Sir Keir Starmer and leader of the opposition thoughts on returning to power in 2024 in the Observer over the weekend.

16 July 2023

On his ambitions in the article in the Observer this weekend a comment to ask is "How are these ambitions going to work between July and December 2023? And onward 2024? After the strategic idea, isn't it 2024 that will decide Labour's strategic level if returning to power at the next GE?" Another way of saying Labour's ambition is to bring back sound governance to British politics and the people of Britain and nations living in the UK. That is true, in politics. And it shouldn't dim down the political conversations the Labour leader and his tream are having with people living across these realities, where it matters most to them first and last. With poverty as the biggest British disease in its new era of independence from the EU and to a certain extent from other strategic partners, G-7 or G-20, reality isn't the cure when this is still in suggestions or collecting data, especially of the failures from the Tories over the last thirteen years. The political cure should be found in its own political Labour lab for new ideas and matching the wider view of the British voters. Perhaps this is also the moment for someone to say it to the Labour leader, that he needs to be his own ciritic if there is a chance for him to win the next general election, and also to be the next prime minister. No one should pretend that that is only about a leadership campaign and who will lead the Labour Party next. In between fixing Britain and its broken system and the Labour ambitions under Keir Starmer, the gap for masses of realities are too big right now. And to a less fortunate circumstances Britain today is exactly just about all that it is: masses of realities and nothing more real will do or touch them. Coming from the other side of the aisle in the House of Commons, no one will like to hear about dry realism from the leader of the opposition. They are making their own agencies and news when things do get this wrong in the country and in politics in Britain. Except, this is not Labour wrong doing.

At the click of the mouse Britain's failures and Brexit 'retardation' are not difficult to find on the Internet. Seven years later the worldview has taken the solid view now of how Britain and taking back control from the EU has made it look like Brexit was nothing more than lower expectations and by giving the rest of the world the false impression of a strategic vision. The truth however is hurting, but not on the other side to Brexit. It is definitely a real question how will Labour make its return to government and be in power from 2024 to another indefinite period of time? In July 2023 it is looking very much like Mr Starmer is standing in the middle of his campaign up to the general election, come as it may. Except when looking more critically the middle is moving on low personal energy that can be mistaken for tactics, let's say if no one has any idea still where it is leading up to. From July to December 2023 the strategic idea will have to transform to a strategic level in the campaign, as this would mean Labour has the answers the people need from their government. E.g. Sharon Graham, the general secretary of Unite, should not overshadow Labour on 'sound politics' when Keir Starmer is getting closer to the exit stage of 2023, and getting even closer to the general election next. In fact compatibility could be the right tension to bring back power, to Labour and the leader of the Party. Her noise is getting too close to what one could call the strategic level. And it gets only worse from there if she can do the tough negotiations on behalf of the British workers... Wasn't the sentiment to old Labour the working class Party? The undecided 'working class' voter should not want to get into bed with Unite, when the leader is looking highly capable of negotiating a tough deal with the EU, either on return or joining a new relationship based on certain agreements, all favourable to the British people drowning in the sea of politics and poverty (in Keir Starmer's own words that was not any fault on their part). From afar it looks very much that Unite is putting back humanity on the face of politics and unionship. Nothing glamorous, but politically very effective. And what is the Labour Party high energy at this stage in time?

Post Scriptum: due to diagnosis with cancer III this will be my last article on the subject of Labour coming back from the ashes. I need all my energy to face the future. 

MCT........................................................

Sending someone to coventry isn't as worse as a lonely race to win. What are the Tories trying to say about the general election to the people of Britain, one year and a half prior to the big event?

26 June 2023

To Keir Starmer: "Now, look here old chap, you know it isn't fair to win the election race the way you've been carrying on. You better dim it down, because fairness is what our system is, and the rules are about getting there and winning it fair and square. It is either us or you, but not a one man race to the bitter and loneliest end. No more outside help, you understand?" Everything in British politics today is beyond fiction when maggots crawl back underneath the stones at Westminster. Short and brief, no more fortune policies cookies for the Labour leader in opposition. One has certainly made an impression, however 'unfair' it may have seen, among the forbidden colours by the Tories how to win elections in Britain, is the strategy from which the Labour Party had made its comeback into mainstream political blood. Eight months later it is good for the Tory Party when making points of references to transparency, now these last few days this week. Labour also making the same point on accountability since last week. So, one could ask, why dim down for the Labour Party at this early stage in the election campaign? Maybe it looks better when leaders in this two- party system are more equal than others, or at least appearing to be? Political regimentalism is a new understanding in British politics, one way or the other. And if that means it is how Brexit conducts its business in politics for the British people, well, we will then have to say it wasn't here before when the UK was still in the EU. While in partnership that was the way before and did its service when being in the EU. Brexit however is British and the nature of how it conducts politics is subjected to British home made rules, whether ancient, medieval, or modern century. Winning fair and square in any election local or general, Brexit has to make sure it will only happen if the run is equal and within the means of each in the leadership contest for who to run the next government. Other than this will be considered steroids or a harsh disqualification of fit to run a nation as that of Britain. Labour doesn't have a choice and be either in or out of it.

The people of Britain have trust in a British system and that it will repel at any outside intervention to win the next general election, especially when after the 2016 referendum they had voted to take back control of their laws. In other words that means that the Labour leader will have to forget all about strategic projections for the future by a Labour government, anything new where this could lead to an advantage on the Tories and leaving them too far behind in the race. Ambition is not a virtue as much as keeping it fair and wait to finish together. A technical win should be the only decisive (objective) factor who will lead the country next. Britain perhaps doesn't realize the wind in the hubris of flying together to the mountain Olympus of their politics while climbing the steps of pronto policy making. If this is what it takes than touching the staff of wind it is, if only to be and look more manly to one another and see eye to eye when standing either in opposition or in government at the dispatch box in the House of Commons. Let not the unknown tempt thee too! Because this hubris is more at the root of Jove and not at the feet of God Almighty, isn't it? And also desiring a beauty as vague of the trade that you are in, the business of parliament. Vague, for it has not yet built the silk with the rest of the world that Brexit has pertinently left behind. Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party therefore must drop the sword in favour of an only British way of winning the race and the running up to a general election. A nation of mere mortal men and women in the making of a kingly nation, and on God's earth. If Brexit is what it takes and burden the people with sacrifice cutting through limb and rags, Brexit it is that will remain at the end of it all. And no ambition of known or unknown earth's roots will make you again tremble. When the levee breaks? This here ut supra is the reality of the true Brexit, and not ideological, philosophy, or politically. Brexit is nature, that of England. 

The writing on the wall for the people of Britain: vote Labour at the next general election.

20 June 2023

The Labour Party is making a come back under Keir Starmer, now leader of the opposition, and to win the next general election. And what do you think, will Starmer also become your prime minister? The writing is on the wall, the people are fed up with the government and Tories. And when looking in from the outside what seems to be the truth is that the Party in government very rarely listens to what the people are saying, e.g. that they are not better off since the last Labour government. It is not written here as special effect or when you want to point out contrast. And when asked any more closely the answers you get, according to some, is that the people are fed up with the cost of living under the Tories. In principle here there is nothing new. Bad government, whether Tories or Labour, is a very British parliamentary story. And it has always been those who pay the cost of living the most who are also the poorest. In other words, if the narrative is right this can only be when it is only British and telling the rest of the 21st century what 'taking back our laws from the EU' meant and still means. When still the British empire wealth then only meant that this wasn't a political reason to make laws of welfare in the State, but to increase even greater wealth through covetous laws for more 'land estates', however immeasurable. Something of when additional taxation was born. It is British when written on the wall in June 2023, exciting the Labour Party to return to power and again bring back the working people... But to what? Labour has plans to give working people a future and new partnership to help with building Britain. Maybe something has gone missing, but Britain is when both main political parties can ascend to power in government after a general election, and not when power in Britain means Brexit. The real story here is that the writing on the wall is Brexit.

On monday in Edinburgh the Labour leader had said in his speech that his Party was for accountability. Let's hope it was just more than a choice of words and for one important reason: Brexit is half part of that accountability when you especially are saying to the electorate how Britain needs to reconnect with its partners in the EU or across the Atlantic Ocean. Mr Starmer is keeping a close watch with his teams in Britain and Scotland (the Scottish Labour leader) on the Party's projections for the coming months to win an election not based on Westminster intrigues, but on plans how to rediscover a different politics and make the experience for the people of Britain a real chance for change. Again, that is not what the British experience in Real Time means. It is not Boris Johnson you should call a liar, but Charles Dickens. The questionnaire whether the people of Britain are worse off today under 'this Tory government', matches each and every story written by Charles Dickens. The cruelty is inclusive and a testimony for accurate historical transparency. In the eyes of the people the Labour leader is no other than Bill Sykes in the story Oliver Twist. Let's not forget to put the idea to the test before you react with disbelief. In modern day politics in Britain it is the Labour leader who under his leadership has turned to cruelty, hypocrisy, opportunist ideals, despotism, authoritarianism, and so forth. One woman in particular last week even had called the Labour leader a disgusting creature... This is what happens when you open your ears and hear what the people have to say about Sir Keir Starmer in public. It is therefore interesting to say that at a certain point how the Labour leader will change the faul mood against him to opportunity and win the next general election in 2024/2025 should become the point of no return, to Brexit? His battle is clearly one going against isolationist Britain. And that has nothing to do with opportunism, one could argue. Modern day global economics does not allow countries to go it alone or their own way for a reason, and it is one that goes beyond nationalist ideas. It is not in their lexicon for global governance or climate change policies. In Britain however the British people only accept what the British experience means to them, whether this is good or bad. And that means whether it is Brexit or Boris Johnson.

Once again in 2024 Labour will become IInd biggest Party to win the next election.

8 June 2023

There are good signs of a return of The Labour Party in government in the polls this week (MRP), accompanied with some caution to where it now stands, and if the Labour leader will be making it in the nick of time on matters like key pledges to make the decisive move to win voters percentage for a majority. But there is more to what the eye cannot see with the Labour Party if to return to power. Between last year, say October 2022, and the present time, once again it was the Labour leader who brought back the fundamentals of the Party to center attention, that the Labour Party is the second biggest Party in Britain and in the British political system. It offers as much privileges, compared to its sister Party in the Conservative Party, with a first minister at the helm and being the traditional ambition of every future prime minister. Last year Keir Starmer still pushed into the corner by Brexit Ministers and the string of exit Prime Ministers and the incumbent when he took Office in October 2022, is now slowly rising to this privileged ambition to become the next Prime Minister, if the people will vote for a Labour government this time at the general election. It looks very much like Labour will also take this opportunity with both hands and gratitude from the electorate, if the country votes a Labour government into power. But does Labour have the wider scope it needs to expand from past to present, and than again from present into tomorrow's world? After Brexit the Labour leader/ Prime Minister will have to make a strong move to revitalization of British Membership as a world leader in the G-7 again. Just this morning former EU negotiator Mr Michel Barnier said (Preston show), "The door is always open... For a new candidate." Here we are being confronted in a 'special relationship' way in the EU-UK relationship, somehow. Of course the EU and the other 27 Member States continuity is now designed to 'fly on their own' next to the global players as an equal partner, you may say with this quiet brief history after Brexit. Nothing as big as this should Labour underestimate with an election win of a majority.

From the strategic viewpoint this was Labour's new input and to bring a new dimension to Brexit politics at Westminster, that coming back to basics in the traditional form of two party system British politics, Labour has won fair and square, e.g. that no one was toppled as the Conservative Party, and make that the next government win for the Labour Party. Here Labour's virtue was the line of following the two year line up to the legal time for the general election and it worked surprisingly wider to their advantage. Hence perhaps the timing for their key pledge (Lord Kinnock yesterday) is now imperative. The country will have only two options when the next general election comes as it may. Either vote Conservative or vote Labour. The country will have to make up their mind and once again see what government was designed for in Britain. The Two- Party system was to maintain the best of politics and democracy and watching time as its either a component or deterrence. On both sides of the House the country has their political Party, which is what democracy excercise means in a perpetual moving world by only one sort it knows as conveyor of that world: human vis a vis time. Honest victories are rare in Real Time of politics is perhaps what this memory will make for the Labour Party on this occasion. And leading it is the Labour Party leader, Sir Keir Starmer. For his unique understanding also to bring back patience with working on how to campaign for to win a general election anytime and anywhere civilized in the world. For as far as the changed structures the Labour leader is accused of, it is that who ever takes from the Party's fundamental is taking out a slice of the bigger cake and turn that into its own entity in their self made bubbles. And that is wrong, according to a more personal understanding by any outsider. Or to be more precise it is legally wrong against the intellectual properties of the Party. E.g. it, here the Labour Party, can only operate under special circumstances, for example where it is a concerned matter and with it the risk is greater than the cure, and could bring down the legal integrity of the Party. The Labour leader has a great task to bring back Brexit inside the box of Pandora. Perhaps this was the man destined to bring the Labour Party back into the rightful place at the helm of government: the second biggest political Party after the Conservative Party in British politics?

The other Brexit failure 2023 is Labour is not in government.

31 May 2023

May 2023 all that one can assume or say about Keir Starmer and his Labour Party is that technically he is the next prime minister, but not just yet in government as the UK's new prime minister. Of course Mr Starmer is showing focus where Labour's 'vision' for the UK and the British people will be set into future timing, but not at this time of the year to know where future timing territory will be set out into new ways of government and governing. With the Tory government yet still as the Party that is leading the UK the point here to make is that Labour critics are too premature when calling to Labour and its leadership on failures. Can anyone name one such a failure in an official capacity? It is all that one can follow are impressions and speculations of what may or may not be when the time comes at the general election and post GE. In other words there is no vision how to change Britain nor how to save Brexit by a Labour government, as this would have to be then a reversed vision and will include the big players in the EU and other G-7 major players. Time on Keir Starmer's ambition to become Britain's next prime minister is beginning to feel a little compressed, while it is still early to start thinking of a new government under his leadership and the Labour Party. Pehaps it all came a little too soon in a sudden where Labour is facing the possibility of returning to power after thirteen years in opposition, who will say. It certainly has made politics more interesting these days, instead of watching the Tories hiding behind No 10 with no one to hear, see or say anything on their side of governing. Labour now seems to be more challenging on the one side while on the other side also is the intellectual challenge with its return to power politics to win the next general election. However without the people it is not looking all too feasible for now if they will decide their vote on e.g. Liberal Democrats or the Green Party when that time comes. To others it is a rennaissance of the former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn what they are planning to bring back with a majority of their own. At the same time the straight line here is to them that Labour will not win the next general election, or that Keir Starmer will not become prime minister in 2024/ 2025 (January). Was it the former prime minister Boris Johnson who said in his own strong and platinum words that to be PM is an education in itself, after resignation? The question is who is holding British politics to this polar position against Labour and defending it? Question no 2: and why has it to be so extreme at the same time in 'normal politics in Britain'?

The time for Persians and Medes is not in living memory anymore, one could say in order to favour a more living reality of the world in which all people and animals are the living creatures under the heaven and have therefore the right to life in our 21st century. Part of the Climate Change effort is that people (7.888 billion earth population) are the other half of the plans by 2050. And not machine populations. Global industries are not air and polution chemistries independent of human existence, even when in full control of total life. Power can only be experienced fully and truly by human satisfaction. Recalling the Happiness index by the former prime minister David Cameron in 2010. Roughly translated that human satisfaction has built itself exponentially to the living standard not of what we want, but what is necessary to stay alive as a whole planet. And they are saying that all G-7 countries do get it/ that. A Labour government in this future timing will also have to be there alongside its atmospheric allies on all of the here above just written. And not many can see and imagine (John Lennon style) the Labour leader just yet at the top of the G-7 and be a global leader and show global leadership. That might become his first Brexit failure, if fortune is cut short after becoming prime minister. Labour has very little luxury time to indulge in aggrandizement at this early stage of their campaign to form the next government in Britain/ British Brexit. At the same time it is remarkable to have another look at where Labour now stands in time, which is not the same thing at all when looking back at october last year. It is almost envy from the point of view of any triumphant Brexiteer and is also unacceptable to watch the turtle becoming the winner of this race, to be honest. This isn't a good season for the fastest hare.

To look at Keir Starmer one more time again: will he become prime minister and win the next general election? Just answer: yes or no.

Labour UK

15 May 2023

Universal law of survival: when under approximately 70 million people are subjected to the mechanism of survival (livelyhood), it is understandable and even technically logical that the 'few' cannot decide the fate of the country. Reality of course is another universal law, for example that the country and its trillions and government make national relevance a law of continuity and constant. Had it not been for Brexit the country could have run its own business as usual. It is because of Brexit why it makes 'the running of its business' new territory for the whole of the country and the political reality. A vote for Labour in the next general election is based on national compromise, of 'working people' deciding on whether natural life still has any meaning to them, e.g. like they knew before Brexit. Similar to Tony Blair's PMQs in the House of Commons what he asked the people, that they should decide what they want to see time and time again in each and every end of the month... (The perfect moment before the millennium year 2000) One can say that after six months strategic projections of Labour there isn't yet a case made strong, where the people and Labour have come to this 'new understanding'. The question is why not? Shouldn't it be that this would have to reflect the sort of contract people have with their representatives in government or in their political Parties? This strange idea of the law of survival isn't just the national scale of cost of living crisis, but in macroeconomics it is survival in the surplusses. In stead business in Britain thrives under self made rules, e.g. if you can't have your business orders across the world markets you need experts from export academies. The political question for the people in these branches is can Labour bring change in here? This is referring not to sentimental political questions, but very critical of life & death matters. Another question follows suit after these studies how Britain is doing per capita in certain areas over others (e.g. with the few affluent constituencies) or in relation to the rest of the country, that Labour will fall short on realizing the promises they are now making to upgrade crisis away from living poverty. You have to be critical in the time of the year 2023 after the local elections indicate a Labour prospect of coming to government at the next general elections in 2024, if not sooner.

The general election of 2019 with the former Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, and its millions of voters, they said that there was a better prospect of winning the election on exciting socialist ideas. The truth however was dismal if you take for example the reality of not being in the European Union after the 2016 referendum, and also facing the prospect of offically leaving the EU in 2020. With the new Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer in 2023 there is little chance to make the same case again. Mr Starmer will have to come to government with a different approach to Britain's law of economics and change that to Starmeronomics in much the same way G-7 country Japan had undergone under Abenomics a decade ago. It is real people and it is real money when looking at the case for Mr Starmer to make in the coming months to win the general election. What it means for the Labour leader is how to cut the blue wristband of Brexit to be his only problem. There is no simple way to put it that no one can provide the Labour leader with another heart or mind on what will happen when and if he comes to government as Prime Minister. It wasn't exactly the right moment to demand a general election now (Daily Mirror UK yesterday), and fork his new strategy from what he has been doing over these last six/ seven months of introductions if he will be prime minister, in an unequal length of cast metal or make it unnecessary lengthy when no one is just ready yet to vote for him. Yet the call for a genereal election today or yesterday, or last week, has a good undertone of logical initiative in a country in his words can't stay a day longer in this situation and with the government of Brexiteers/ Tories. It was time for the people to be represented and not the few. In memo: people living in poverty have been very active when they voted for Brexit and Boris Johnson, are now even worse off six years later and now named benefit scroungers. Officially they have been in the millions voting for Brexit as true patriots and love for their country's laws Boris Johnson was going to take back from the European Union. Benefits? Welfare underlines much in the civilized world, but when taken more closely it is in fact saying that the rich do not mix in the territories of class realities dystopia. It was globalization that started it first, and what made people and nations come out to join the rest of the human race for equal opportunities. What is the Brexit view? And Labour knows it is now too late to swim back as it already is swimming in dangerous general election territory. (Labour's policies will come under considerable tight scrutiny one Conservative MP said today on Talk Radio, Tobias Ellwood.)
 

Labour (UK) could very well be the mechanism to save Brexit.

1 May 2023

Many are still giving the Labour leader Keir Starmer a hard time, e.g. by saying that the Labour leader was lacking in courage to 'rejoin the EU'. For instance. That would change his electorate chances in the local elections 2023, three days from now, and win. In another article online in the UK Boris Johnson and Brexit over the weekend also shredded to strips, making it clear to the nations how it was all a lie about leaving the EU; in short a grant human colossal mistake. Mr Starmer, as was suggested in other more readings on the economy, could do the nations a favour by rejoining immediately back into the EU. So close to the local elections this kind of reading does not make it the honey drip in politics much right now. The reasons are not just clear yet where or what Labour can do after these elections. Should rejoining not be more processed if it would bring back Britain to join the EU, six years later when it had left the European Union? You can't make the same mistake twice by running up the same hill as what happened during leaving the EU. The local elections 4 May will be a perfect opportunity to start with the process of 'reconnecting' to the EU if either side wins. 1. To save the Brexit calamity, and 2. for Labour under Keir Starmer to make that change by staying Brexit, under respecting International binding laws when resigned to a third world country status, and whether now to underline or neatly put a line crossing the treaty 'binding rule' more thinly. It takes courage to keep the third world country underlined with less pressure of its first bold in metal gold when Boris Johnson as Prime Minister signed the Treaty of the Withdrawal Agreement. To rejoin immediately... How could the nation have known when lied to? Now, do you understand why no one should envy a man like Mr Starmer as leader of the Labour Party in 2023 moving slowly to an electorate win at the next general election 2024, but this time out of world domination Britain? Why some might see this as 'joining the world governance' have a horizontal worldview, while in reality Mr Starmer and his Labour Party would have to find a way to engineer a 'rejoining' as world domination (Rule Britannia) on a smaller scale! A system known to Britain for many decades as parliamentary system with two major parties, and sustained by a military history of approximately five hundred years, does put the Labour Party in a unique position because of a mistake as that of Brexit and wholly on Britain's side. Queen of Carthage, Dido, once again drawing the lines and borders by one string of osxhide/rope, given as a challenge by the Romans; Dido cut the oxhide into fine strips so that she had enough to encircle an entire nearby hill, which was therefore afterwards named Byrsa "hide".

Through the veins of courage and reversing what is impossible in terms of a global scale, love for the country that in this case is Britain, comes a little heavy and mechanical to lead the thick patriotism of red fluid into your vision and its unusual fate of self destruction. A strange coincidence maybe when you think that Israel almost parallel to Brexit also is going through heavy and thick mechanical changes in its political society to keep both religious and democratic rules happy. On both sides history in the new world order Herem (Hebrew word for war & property) almost has the same meaning in proper English, war and property. National pride alone will not be adequate enough to reach a challenging law of planting the finest of trees collonades in your place of home and the motherland/ fatherland. From this point of view and for both countries it is the democratic party closest to realize the mechanism for a change that wasn't here before, having seen/ previewed the places of birth empty or void when destroyed. 4 May, now three days and later on after midnight today it will be two whole days, for the Labour Party's first local elections for a confident leadership to make Britain historical again. (Two days later, a thousand years symbolism maybe, will be King Charles III coronation. Question: statistics don't do monarchy, do they?) The other big word in Labour's future will evidently be that of Britain's future, without Brexit mistakes and emptiness. How is that a point of relevance? You could say for example whether Jeremy Corbyn had he been the leader of the Labour Party would he have been able to bring a premiership to the future of his Party. I'm afraid that mast is now broken and a ship that doesn't sail again in the new future of Labour. Keir Starmer (the affectionate name for people) as leader legitimate distinction his meaning will be sought for in taking Britain out of the Brexit malaise where the Brexiteers have failed to create at least more political dominion for the people and nations in the UK, instead of just pride before fall. An even more simple question: isn't Britain worth a little more than the piss they have taken on it and wetting their own shoes? On the side of the continent EU six years is wisdom and wise to think of another four or five years of having more or less the same, with Labour this time making or planning to make a distinct difference in the project. On the other hand one cannot help but think, what if Keir Starmer fails to deliver his promises or intentions (reconnect) if he comes to No 10 at the end of the campaign road?

Sir Keir Starmer now closely related to election heebee jeebies.

15 April 2023

It could be a trap for Keir Starmer, getting to know him, while he is clearly using another set of tactics perhaps and saying not now (Polly). We don't need to see another parrot at Westminster and in Downing Street No 10, if he wins the next general election in 2024. If the Prime Minister is catching up on Sir Keir in the polls, what looks like he is now considered at a slow peak towards popularity over the Labour leader, well, good for him. After the local elections on 4 May next month he is going to need chewing on the fat of a victory at the local elections. Full stop. No one really is speaking out on the Labour leader's side while campaigning on the doorstep to vote for Labour 4 May, if there is enough fire political power in the belly to win even bigger next year. But some are wary of the Labour leader, that he still poses something of a stealth danger to Rishi Sunak in the coming exciting months after the local elections. He might be the perfect looking sheep in sheep's clothing for the wolf that he is, so say many these days. Is Mr Starmer trusting something else they're not seeing, and if so what can that be? If there is something called substance in Real Time it will certainly be in 'reconnection'. Labour on the bigger issues to take out Brexit from the third world country status (withdrawal agreement) into a reconnected relationship with the rest of the world, seems pretty substance to anyone more than just being simple minded. The local elections are a trap for the Labour leader, and this is perhaps why. He has no track record as a power politician just yet, a novice so to speak. The only thing that is different between today and the rest of the month is that he is refusing to be bullied by the Tories over political and policy issues. All made by Brexit. But also between now and 4 May next month so many are trying to pretend to keep the Brexit facts under the carpet and let it fly off into thin air as if nothing really happened to the country in six first and than three years of winning the elections. After the local elections the Labour leader can simply sit and watch the Brexiteers skin falling off, one peel after the other and leaving behind a trail snaking out somewhere into the never never land. Yes, it is true that Mr Starmer is not aggressively looking for power or to position himself, at the moment, as the man the voters should be looking for at the general election next year. Is this strategic reluctance to sensationalism from Mr Starmer risky?

Of course 'reconnect' is nothing what the UK wants to hear right now. Even if it means that in the long term the pay is good, or at least a little better than what they didn't get after leaving the EU. That also has never materialized into frozen assets. The country therefore from an outsider's point of view is in no state to deal with big issues like pay rise and strikes at the moment. Either you go into reverse or drive off and count the mileage from day one on. Under a Labour government would be fitting that discription more than the Brexiteers at this point, or next year, the year after, and so forth. Why is there a blinding spot somewhere here in this writing? Who knows. Some could say because it hasn't happened yet, which is playing football with my mind. Brexit did happen, as Shadow Foreign Secretary David Lammy said a few weeks ago in a SkY interview with jounalist Beth Rigby. Only, Britain insists it never happened and will do things the traditional way when voting in or out the Party they want or not. And how will the Labour leader be chewing the fat when he loses the local election? Logic. "Did you not say before the local election that you were going to..." And finishing with, "We are still in the same mess of last year ... and no one thinks this will change in the next month or months any time soon." Here chewing the fat is more literally and raw. It is how to build up towards the grand day and finale. Substance over void of substance, so to speak. With perhaps only one thing no one should overlook is Rishi Sunak, if he will be the Party leader and leader of the opposition. He might come back a 'dead lion' who's spirit they say in the world of folklore belief is more dangerous, than alive, and yet serve Mr Starmer blow after blow. Or, dealing with Penny Mordaunt her fierce serpentine and hissing questions for the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, at the future PMQs. "If Britain is to reconnect than why can't the Prime Minister not give a straight answer over real numbers in these areas..." You write this of course without fierceness and hissing. It is 4 May and let's see what happens then.

Starmer's raging bull moment of the week, but Sir Keir...

8 April 2023

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was pretty no more after the Labour Party launched their latest attack on the Brexiteers over Tory policies on crime and punishment for child rapists and other child crime related offences by criminals. Within an hour later after the first ad came a second jab and another ad to bring down the Prime Minister in the ring of the fight. Was the Labour leader Sir Keir becoming naughty and more assertive that made the public so enraged against these two ad- attacks? Between today and 4 May next month it is the local election ring of fight, now in its first two rounds going already strong. With Rishi Sunak as the 'handsome face' lightweight fighter kid Tony Janeiro against the more mature raging bull Jake Lamotta, to impress the voters on each side in the political and public arena. On the final day 4 May we will see who will be pretty no more after the knock- out punch and win the local election. Strategically Mr Starmer has still twelve months to work on his campaign to win the general election, now set for May 2024 after the local election. Nothing will change here for the Labour Party and Mr Starmer can continue with his pertinent line of arguments to convince the voters why they should vote Labour in the coming 2024 GE. It is this strategic advantage the Brexiteers have lost, when thinking what their general election 2024 argument will be to win another term of the Brexit success? Why blame it all on Labour to win the next general election? Critics say neither has Keir Starmer's Labour Party the argument to blame it all on the Tories and win the general election. Last we remember of the Brexiteers and their argument to 'win the next term', was last year when Kwasi Kwarteng had said, "We hear you, we have listened, and this is what the Party is planning..." Six years later? The policies needed to be set out three weeks later, that never came. But it was all too little too late a big momentum at that Party Conference October 2022. Where is the argument now on the new policies? Critics say on the bottom of the blue ocean.

Strategically the unusual fortune for Mr Starmer is incidently not something that could work for the Tories. Putting it like this what people now are saying is that Labour has become the Red Tories during the last four or five months, is untrue. It can only be true if both Parties had the same fortune. As fortune does not rise from absolute failure, as it is also impossible for moths to turn to a fabulous looking chrysalis. The soundbites may sound no different on either side, or nastiness. Other than that Labour alone can do the argument to win the next election, based on future results, figures in the economy, policies concrete (for Britain/ UK) and technically (with the rest of the world), the will to bring success of the working people in the country to a better Brexit under a Labour government. But all this is the impression of the outsider and not living in the UK to know the real numbers of e.g. homeless people, poverty, and deficit in terms of productivity at local and national scales. After the local May election this year however the road to success for the Labour leader will hardly be a honeymoon with a very critical public in the waiting halls of power. Shadow Secretary for Education, Bridget Phillipson, has said it well this week in her promo clip, is that Labour 'will build' a better Britain. There is political power in the grammar here somewhere. And not that of the digressive nature to just say 'the will of what the people want'. People are never satisfied. Now it is Keir Starmer who is too aggressive, playing no more Mr Nice guy. He is not boring now, is he? The new humanoid Starmer is making progress and slowly might also be ready this time to become Britain's next prime minister. 4 May, however, will be a very exiting moment you do not want to miss this year with Keir Starmer having less voters on his side (he no love you no more-lol) to vote for him/ Labour Party.

Economic and political reform. Sounds new to me (outsider's view), as I see both strategies would make the real difference in a plan for the future Labour government.

11 March 2023

Wales, Llandudno, Welsh Labour Conference today. The emphasis in the speech by Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer was on 'new' this morning and how Wales could take back control and its destiny. And the morning sun rising where the Conference was held near the coast of the sea, hope seems brightest to map out a future with a Labour government to win the next election, some say sooner than 2024. They know, so far, that the Labour leader means well. Ànd they also think of the Labour leader that he is not Ayrton Senna, the F1 driver. Despite the brisk wind in his face and hair on Wales modern highway infrastructures, but no F1 wheels. The race strategy seems like this part is clear in the mind of Mr Starmer, he knows the champion is Brexit, and he is also aware that to win the race will come as a shock to many. Will the people accept that he is the new champion when holding up the trophee? Back to the Labour Conferences across the UK with his low profile he is sticking to dribble the smart ball of politics. He keeps expectations of becoming the next prime minister virtually low at the moment, a wise move when no one knows what the Brexiteers might do next and than next again. What they do next again if this has any relativity logic no one is sure. Their latest is finding in Gary Lineker something of a scapegoat that they demonstrated as a bad example of breaching the public good trust. Mr Lineker had made a specific comment on the xx plans of the government on the small boats influx into Britain. Everyone who knows the soccer champion is or should be familiar with his outspoken comments and commentary later when he became a Sports presenter at MOTD, BBC, that is before Brexit. The champion striker above all has always been seen as the most professional presenter over decades, and is in fact very much aware what he means with his comment this week against the government's immigration plans, with more specifically the small boats. The Tories, one would think, perhaps they do not like football, unless it is something of philosopher's football/ soccer and trying to keep hold of the ball in the hands. Witholding talent and opportunity, the very two themes Keir Starmer mentioned in his speech this morning in Wales Llandudno and saying to Conference why Labour needs to be the next government, is to unlock all that intelligent potential in the people of Britain and across in the UK. A simple check of Mr Starmer's tactical movements: what is the opposite of negate? Opposite of to cause to have no value or effect. confirm. support. validate. affirm. And politics is done. Mr Lineker still is very professional, despite the latest spin.

What was particularly also interesting in the speech this morning was what the Labour leader had said and made very clear how the economy and politics of the future in the UK should be working. Horizontal reform, or vertical reform? (My question) In the short term Sir Keir will have to put the campaign to a steeper hill, going down and than up again, and leave the ball rolling side by side with the Brexiteers racing by in their towering high vertical two- wheeler. And doing so on steam engine, darkening the clouds puffing. Only Labour can do it to let the political ball roll and control its dynamics in this new political landscape. The world can see that Mr Starmer is also counting on his Party Members and Shadow Cabinet Ministers, together and not on one single Atlas carrying the Sisyphus stone on his back and shoulder. Going the deeper the question on his leadership will become more demanding and the hope here is whether the Labour leader can realize this problem in time. Britain has never had a democrat before of the embodiment as one of Bobby Kennedy who also was some kind of hero of US political reform. Dare to dream your future with Keir Starmer, with Labour, the government you are waiting for, no, let us dare together to take back Britain's future, has a nice ring to it. And globally Starmer can only be Starmer in the eyes of the world. Because let us make no mistake at perhaps his gullible ways to put it in terms of flanks, Nato, antisemitism, and growth, are unique in the Brexit era to make it transparent where he stands on these issues. Something no outsider can imagine where he is targetting to get go and why he is specifically making point after point on the issues just mentioned. Under the former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn the main thing that was missing massively wasn't that the link to Brexit, but that it was kept in complete obscurity? Transparency related to government or shadow cabinet is a law in every 21st western democracy. What we demand from countries like Israel should align with what you know at home in a G-7 country like that of Britain. This is perhaps why some in the media are saying not to underestimate Keir Starmer and his determination to become Britain's next prime minister. This will have also have to become more clearer as we are now getting into the next stage/ quarter of 2023. In the meantime the Brexiteers are getting closer to the Labour fence and think they see that the grass is greener than theirs, or could they be standing on the wrong side? They can certainly make more of an effort and stay close to the EU... And as for Keir Starmer, new means also the first time for the Labour leader to campaign for becoming prime minister. 

A population of 9 million does not give the world any reason to believe that they will throw it away, a 74 year old democracy.

7 March 2023

A man who strongly believes, only thirteen days ago, in an interview at the Wall Street Journal, with 'Global View' columnist Walter Russell Mead, that it was always Herzl and not what many thought, Jobotinsky, who inspired the Prime Minister throughout his whole life as Israel's only longest serving prime minister, when back in Israel is quite doing something ambivalent with advocating violence in the streets of Tel Aviv against protesters. In the 21st century what the world can clearly hear and understand from these protesters is that their protest is about democracy and the 'Judicial Reform'. It is difficult to make something more concrete out of all that is now ongoing in Israel, e.g. what political nature is there in the protests, and what in the motives of the government to change the Judiciary. If you follow Theodore Herzl's State and nation building in a Jewish State, how many people did he had in mind to start with? Another strange phenomenon also plays part in the history of Theodore Herzl's vision for a Jewish State, that throughout his whole life that he had never seen or heard one Israeli as a Jew. It is no surprise where his grand ideas had come from and they were not from in the Torah. His baseline was German and a very impressive Kaiserreich all German/ Austrian Jews had to leave behind to flee Nazi Germany during the forties. Millions had then been the citizens of Germany and beyond in the rest of Europe. Six million Jews were killed as a result, based on the bureaucratic expediency in Nazi Germany to segregate Jews as non German citizens from the other millions of citizens of Germanic / Arian race. One could say that probably it was the segregation that had made enormous impression on Theodore Herzl. With that he had found the root at all this evil, plus the other side was that his argument to bring the Jewish nation to the homeland was perfectly legitimate and would stay so as a testimony forever. Forever between the 'Arian races' and the Jews. Perhaps it is this subtlety that the current Prime Minister with his extreme Right- Wing coaltion finds intriguing and inspiring. If he could change the Judicial law he is only following Theodore Herzl to become like him, a great historic leader for the people in Israel. This was maybe also the reason why the Prime Minister had brought up the topic in the interview with the columnist Walter Russell Mead at Wall Street Journal. There is one thing that the Prime Minister does share, posthumus with Theodore Herzl, is their equal taste for expansion. Where the late Theodore Herzl had tried bringing forward the great scale of Germany's nationalism design to the Jewish land, then still named Palestine by the western civilizations, the current Prime Minister is trying to keep stop assimilation among Jews and the 'gentiles' his highest priority and divine mission from the God of Abraham, with permission, His Holy Self. His sense of keeping Israel 'Juden Rein' and forbid assimilation could be his only and direct line with his heavenly Father, that is on the one half true and the other half unknown in our world as it is today. Is this a wonder why Mr Netanyahu is flirting with theocracy in Israel?

And yet democracy has given much to his own career when in the nineties he took the rarest of steps to 'globalize' Israel and put it at the same level in the US and created a long-standing relationship for the rest of life with the people and politicians in America. There might be a Palestinian encouragement from all the talk of democracy in Israel and took Mr Netanyahu's words against the greater truth of all universal tests. We will not know how things indefinite can be proven later in time. It is a pity that the Prime Minister did not say a word then about theocracy. With the people now holding him accountable in 2023 in the streets of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Beersheva and more places and protesting his apparent lies/ untruths and the change to the Judicial System. It is put deliberately as 'lies' in the writing here above, from a political memory point of view. (Not a personal point of view) It is only natural for citizens to want to trust their only long-standing prime minister, and whom they have known for most of their longest and shortes lives, to do everything for all Israelis as their Prime Minister. For all Israelis (and Arabs living in Israel), it is expansion, but based on democracy and not theocracy of the few. It could also hurt the Prime Minister who is having ambitions and to becoming the great historic figure Israel has ever known in Israel. A theocracy in Israel will also not be built even with Theodore Herzl's vision of the State for the Jews. Zionism in the world has grown into a deeply secular global State and is wealth driven. If the poorest in Israel, e.g. Bnei Brak, happen to be real purists of blood and race, than it must be that it skipped the attention of the Prime Minister for many decades, something that is simply to judge from the physical infrastructure of this city. Another frozen time and sheet of ice to make these people not eligible for anything rather than poverty? When, compared to the rest of Israel and living in a democracy at a multilevel system and aligned to the rest of the western nations, but especially the US. For some when you do not want assimilation of race you are born this way, and not first experiment with a method of a different kind of bringing ties to the people, in order to part them later on (in democratic forever time) as a new race of purists. If you belief in the Torah, Ezra, for Jews to stay pure, than only the Messiah is born this way. And that alone could insult the pride of many modern day purists. Judicial Reform when reduced to the can you're kicking down this roadway, all the fights will be a shame of waste. The last time when democracy was in Israel was when the former prime minister Naftali Bennett was the leader of Israel. And David was anointed by the prophet Samuel when he was thirteen years old, when also Saul was still king. Amazing how stars cross each other without being seen or understood by so many star watchers.

It is preposterous to bring division to the nation of not even 75 years old (State of Israel).

If you set out the ground to win the next election, spring will be a good season for Labour to test the concrete.

2 March 2023

The Prime Minister concluded his winter with a stunning Northern Ireland protocol amendment to what is now called Windsor Agreement/ Framework. There is no reason to believe that this was a forbode to better times waiting ahead of him and his Conservative Party, for one reason basically that GDP keeps circling, negatively for three years, inside his spectacles for which he knows no cure. Immediate nor quarterly. Sitting on the same timeline with the real problems in the UK also doesn't bode very well for Keir Starmer, leader of the opposition. It is here where the Labour leader would like to go and make his mark as the man the people need as their next prime minister? Time is gone to stay stuck in the pompous era when Mr Starmer was nothing but a fresco in the ceiling of Westminster politics, had no vision and that no one knew what he stood for. He is no Jeremy Corbyn who knew how to sow the seeds of political activism and perhaps divide. There is still no proof of intentionally sowing divide by antisemitism in the Labour Party. Polarisation in order to help the weak or weakest does make up for something more extraordinary when outside of UK's other needs. The electorate stood behind this humane endeavour of the former Labour leader 100%, hence his popularity and fixed term as the leadership the people wanted. Sir Keir Starmer still has to convince his voters about his leadership as the new Labour leader (some already are determined to say that no one wants). One reason could be because Sir Keir speak is about the economy and sustainable growth of the economy. So much for boring subjects! And, like some dads, why is he trying to excite or act cool when he isn't the right man to do so? No wonder they prefer the 'neighbour' to be their dad, and who is truly far more exciting. He at least inspires, and we don't mean the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. Don't you just hate it when your biological dad is strict and grounds you for no reason at all? But than he is a 'red Tory', throwing the towel back in his face and to let him do the dishes himself. How is this going to better people's lives?

At the same time one could say that time is playing tricks on the perception of so many, and to let some believe the Labour leader isn't near his own 'spring campaign territory'. He will not win the election if his campaign is dull and dreary with facts and philosophies how to upgrade Britain's high standard of living, together. Together, wasn't that a term for kindergarden? "Stay together, children." Could it be that the new Labour leader was a hopeless romantic? Sir Keir, could he be more in love with politics than with the problems the electorate are facing as they speak each and every day anew? And as if that wasn't bad enough, another streak also plays its part with him, as some said now for two months, being authoritarian. A civilized despot with no feeling for others or the people he is pretending to serve, just because they are there or happen to be there as his Party constituencies. The highest sustainable growth in the G-7 is his ambition. To many that still feels like a label tag. Come summer this year the global world might reveal where growth is originated for the coming year in 2024, with Ukraine still at war against the occupation of Russia in territories that is still Ukraine's sovereignty. To the G-7 that will be decisive to watch. In the G-20, how is Britain doing? But let's not diverse/diverge too much on Mr Starmer as we have come to learn that he is the man to be in a much more fortunate time to come to power. The Prime Minister equally does his best to stay relevant in power and he probably will, and becoming the Conservative Party leader in opposition. A poodle prize after six years debacle politics, but a glittering prize when interpreted more eloquently. So much better of course than being a flea biting in the skin of the bear. In other words Sir Keir if he is to win the next election and can bin the Conservative Party to the opposition, will help keep up the Prime Minister's image of the golden boy he seems to be making for himself these days. A fine pair of leaders finally in the House of Commons, you could say, one silver (who speaketh) and one gold (silent who keepeth).

Just keeping up the outsider's view:

"What factors affect elasticity?

The four factors that affect price elasticity of demand are (1) availability of substitutes, (2) if the good is a luxury or a necessity, (3) the proportion of income spent on the good, and (4) how much time has elapsed since the time the price changed."

Internet search engine Google: what factors affect price elasticity.

A complete outside view.

13 February 2023

Ditchley Park talks thursday and on friday last week.

PM Sunak if backed by Conservative leaders could decide the future, but especially his own, e.g. does he want to stay on as PM? The facts some say are the troubles the whole country is in. These have become negative factors and should be reason enough to have a GE. The situation is at a crucial point in Brexit, almost equivalent to British political history since 1945-1975. This 'private meeting' between the two sides, Tory and Labour, was interesting.

Brexit is not working within the EU after six years of leaving the European Union in 2016. The point where those in Britain are missing is that the EU has moved on where the UK had left this part of the world to go it alone. 2023 Could become the most decisive year yet if the war in Ukraine will have a new level outcome many are now saying they foresee new developments are coming this April. And not just for the UK, but also for the US and EU. Could this time therefore be the right time, let's say, for a general election in the UK call by the Prime Minister?

Six months later might have a whole different impact should that happen. The Brexit benefits will also not suddenly appear like rabbits out of a tophat during this time, as there is still no action plan on the national troubles people and country are facing in- and outgoing. But it will require a different kind of Rishi Sunak, now contemplating what he wants to be in the long term in the Conservative Party. Does he want to stay as Prime Minister if it is unlikely that he will win the next general election? When the victory of a next general election clockwise win will be Labour. Mr Sunak will or could then make an excellent opposition leader for the Conservative Party, and stay an equal partner with the new prime minister Sir Keir Starmer, in the future of Britain and its greater continuity (EU) and new domestic political process. Brexit has done one thing coming out as a good thing: to prove why Britain when on its own is showing signs of lack of updated laws and industries. Or the so called anti- counterclockwise negatives.

In economics future benefits are a forecast, and there should be a snapshot of what numbers you are expecting to see at a particular date, plus when that date will expire. Statistics at this point in February should be 'oven- ready' and falling like colourful marshmellows down on your desk with stunning numbers. Can these benefits predict that the UK/ Brexit will see a season of bearish or bullish jump of growth soon?

Prime Minister Sunak also isn't assertively fighting for his role as PM. Sir Keir Starmer looks like he is fighting to become prime minister even when the immediate future will not be crowning him with fresh laurels. Has Mr Starmer his days of modest effort to become prime minister been over forever?

The first two months in the new year and already there has been a 'private meeting' that took place between senior ministers in the Labour and Conservative Party? This was an interesting sensation of what one could recognise once more when politics in Britain (seventies/ eighties/ nineties) was solemn between Cabinet Ministers and Shadow Cabinet Ministers. It simply isn't about continuity anymore. Globally the world moves by greater continuity, e.g. beyond the war in Ukraine and Russia. Net zero, energy transition 2030, an emission free world in 2050, and so forth. Brexit, surely, can't have just been digging a hole for Labour to fall in?

Word of caution: global conspirators should keep in mind that the mere presence of Peter Mandelson at Ditchley Park last week on thursday and friday does not distract from the emergency and necessity of the country and citizens of Britain, and equate the denominator to any special outcome in favour of globalists. That could only be just another specific attempt for to distract their right to have better standards of living from the Brexit government. Bút more trying to say to the public at large of Brexiteers that globalists have an agenda of their own and that is not British for the British people the right thing for which they left the EU. Also the question is what do they mean by globalists? This numerator remains empty in all of these debates, discussions and at ground level campaigning to keep Britain out of the EU.

Sir Keir Starmer today, 15 February, in his speech on keeping the Labour Party free from further antisemitism surge has made a chilling call for alarm. The former leadership under Jeremy Corbyn had failed to address the issue of antisemtism in the Labour Party for too long, and Sir Keir promised today his Jewish constituents and members that will not happen under his leadership. Sir Keir is married and his wife is Jewish. When making a specific biopic reference of the marital status of a politician, this is proof enough for the deplorable state a democracy and society can fall into and make reality of governing or coming to government more ambivalent than humanely is to bear as civil. Whether Jewish or Anglo Saxon when plutocrats by definition it can only lead to globalist leading industrial groups. A global economic result clearly, as the saying goes toe to toe that wealth breeds wealth accumulation. And not only is the country a political factor in the whole of economic processes, but that without it the answer can only be one of depletion of civilization and civil life. The deeper groove of trying something else, yes, but by what virtue that either party has any monopoly on? Please, no more push for Menorah or Holy Grail conspiracies. A $/£ trillion deficit means for the Labour Party serious business in 2023 and to accelerate to become the next government. In good reflection Sir Keir was right for his change action and to take out the arbitrary activistic policies from the Party. Britain working again seems to be his main focus and will require change of Party hierarchy. 

Private note to Jeremy Corbyn
Geneva Conventions Art 2- Military Occupation
Tristan Ferraro
"The central role played by Article 42 of the Hague Regulations
After some fluctuations, 8 the definition of occupation was conclusively established
in Article 42 of the Hague Regulations: ‘Territory is considered occupied when it is
actually placed under the authority of the hostile army. The occupation extends only
to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised.’
Subsequent IHL treaties have not altered this definition. The notion of occupation
has been expanded by Article 2 common to the 1949 Geneva Conventions
specifically in order to include occupation that encountered no armed resistance."

Tristan Ferraro*
Dr. Tristan Ferraro is legal adviser in the Legal Division
of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC),
based in Geneva.

What would be the right timing for the next general election in the UK?

31 January 2023

Quick answer: there is none in the first quarter of 2023. The second quarter we might suddenly see a sharp movement set against the government budget in March. The year is 2023 and not 2024. When there is no budget there will also be no government. A flat answer in this situation. So, what must we do, the Labour Party might ask? Simple answer: we must do what the Tory Party cannot do from here with no budget. We take it from here. But how and by what way do we take it? And what say the people? Or better, let's go and ask the people. On the other hand, if a budget will pass the people will have their government. And that is the end of it asking the mystical and difficult question when to have a general election. More precise: when to have the next general election. There is a long term view, too. After the experiment of when to wobble for Labour during the coming months. All we are hearing for the last twelve weeks since November last year up to now, January 2023, is the urgent call for Keir Starmer to come out and make his case to win the next general election, come as it may and whenever. And doing so with strong performances, new approaches far and wide, up and down the country and its people. All good reports for now, but... We can smell no more rats and that is not good. Or gun powder keggs, for that matter. Not good. What can they be up to at Brexminster? Any short term thing will do. This is Britain and long term has never done it for them. Unlike the EU where long term is everything. In the rest of the world long term is vision and not blind vision either. Except where it comes to production industries, e.g. housing and goods. You stay longer than two years in an apartment in New York, you have a cash flow problem. Are you becoming poor? Poverty at tier 1, 2, can come very quickly for some. Thank God we in Europe/ the European Union can enjoy the benevolence of long term policies and social engineering. Now, back to the general election in the UK. The long term view may suffer a set back if it (the it- thing) was today, tomorrow or next month. That could make it die and fade away like the fiery tail of the meteorite with which it came speeding by in an early winter night sky. Why? Well, because it is Britain and not the US, the other Anglo Saxon power. The question now is what can Labour do differently when by a sudden stroke of good luck they can have their general election this coming March?

The proper balance would be to do nothing. Especially when today on Brexit three year old celebration the Tories are saying how forecasts are good for the economy. And that would be a miraculous thing if it would disappear immediately if Labour gets in. Imagine that the treasury is full with all that perennial cash... The Labour government could then sit tight and enjoy the fruits of hard work from the last government. And ignore the IMF report this morning completely with a negative snapshot on the UK growth numbers. Sir Keir has eaten grandma and now had no appetite urges to eat little Red Riding Hood as well, or the politics. Six months later Labour could then start his mission, whatever that may be by that time. And things will get even better by then with the economic growth, if we are to believe the Tory forecasters up and down the country today. Labour never had it so good and can say thank you very much to a leaving Tory government badly misunderstood. Enough of the truth. It is perhaps so much more fun to stay with the lies on a day like this. Brexit was a bad deal to start with, don't you agree? And how much is that percentage wise? 80, 90, 95%, Another question. In that case Brexit should return to the EU and make a long term commitment saying sorry. Nigel Farage today has said this was the wish of the British people, doing it right or wrong in their own way as a government and not being in the EU and not knowing when doing it right. Something like that here quickly summed up. True. Ouch. But as Desmond Tutu once had said in a TV interview, that you must warn against the child playing with fire when you are a good parent. Is playing with the truth on Brexit playing with fire? In either way, by Labour or the Tories. Blow the candles on the Brexit birthday cake for today and, please mind the flames.

The pale poodle price for Labour: "'Yes' was all that was in the Brexit plan." 

Ambition is that good or bad for the UK Labour Party?

25 January 2023

Time is getting precious and the Labour Party is not even yet in the spiral of an official election campaign. We are still in the first month of a new year and at the beginning days. But now here we are, watching Keir Starmer's Party rising to the occasion, with an extraordinary vision set out by the Shadow Foreign Secretary David Lammy (50 years old) yesterday at the the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House in London. The Tory government two years must be looking like an eternity to stay in power... One thing was good from the speech made by the Shadow Secretary for Foreign Affairs, was that he has sent out important smoke signals to the rest of the world from a central point in the Labour Tipi. He wants Britain to simply reconnect again with the EU and the US, but also going even beyond and as far as China. Those are big ideas, big ambitions. It is perhaps silly but wasn't Brexit another ambition? When looking back in retrospect in fact Brexit did make a big impression in the world by leaving the EU, and made many believe there was somehow a very ambitious plan waiting to strike. Six years later now Labour acted upon its new instincts, some say arrogant, and did just that. Synchronisation by approach is vital for any political power with the outlook of becoming next in government, but especially for the UK. Even today German Chancellor Olaf Scholz implored the Bundestag "Please, trust us," on the decision of sending 17 Leopard tanks to Ukraine a.s.a/p. Power in 2022 in the European Union, United States, and Ukraine, is making a distinct difference in the war against Russia's invasion of Ukraine, that wasn't there/ here before. It has an abstract platform and yet the impact can be felt everywhere in palpable essentials: energy and energy prices. No one can predict what may or may not happen in the next three months from today, let alone to say that the war will soon be over. Labour can however look back to this day in three or six months time and say that they did set out important policies and signals how or what a Labour government would do under Keir Starmer. There is nothing in the speech about aligning with the EU. Mr Lammy mentioned something of a security pact with the EU, and underwriting certain reservations as this isn't reality but an intro of what the EU might expect from their Administration. How that could work out will need a special stability mechanism, as going back into a divorced 'Member out of the EU' status will not be easy or less painful an excercise. One gets the impression the 'going back' was put for clarity from what became deeply obscure after leaving the EU.

One might say but all that will not bring about the chance to bring Labour in any time sooner than 2024 and to have that general election now, that they so desire to have. Good point and true. The other impression is that Labour doesn't seem to hide it is keen on having that general election now. Democracy makes it perfectly legitimate and not immoral a desire to have. Concealing the desire to become the next government would be immoral. Bring it back home, Mr Starmer, that what is government and for the British people... The echo dies far away as it is not 1945 post WWII when prosperity was most prominent in Britain to keep in capable hands and leading the way in politics fair and steady. After all, if Britain runs well its mainstream politics one could say about the Labour and Conservative Parties, that one cannot exist without the other or cease to exist at all when broken down. Trying to seek good relations with the neighbours also has been done before in time, and back in the seventies even twice. The EEC had rejected Britain's request to join the EEC the first time, than again they went back for a second time and were accepted on this occasion. How is the prospect of a Starmer government making a mistake to seek good relations with the EU? It is not unknown territory. Time however has been on another scale after the millennium and many have merged with globalization since. But it is important to say that timing again means everything, and clearly January 2023 isn't yet the time to bring out any stability mechanism to reconnect Britain to the EU and world, or Security mechanism (briefly mentioned in the David Lammy speech yesterday and introduced or will be by the Shadow Defence Secretary John Healey). Steady on. First many will have to wait whether the war in Ukraine intensifies the coming months, or that it will get even worse than last year 2022. The Labour leader and his team can bounce back and get on with 1. being in the opposition, and 2. campaigning. One last remark on yesterday's speech: David Lammy had voted against a hard Brexit, and now was introducing an even harder Brexit, according to one in the audience at CH. True. But six years later we have been through a global pandemic with the Corona virus Covid 19, lockdowns, deaths in the millions worldwide, and in 2022 the war in Ukraine. These are radical differences and one has to do the difficult choices that are always closest to those directly affected: demographics, people, citizens, communities, politics, economies (N & I) and governments. While the richest get on parading in their puzz in boots lifestyle. An eminent difference where Labour is doing it right by being the Puss in boots last wish to restore the nine lives of political Britain.

Prince Harry, Spare.

15 January 2023

A negative self exposure. Is the media handling Spare well or are they just highlighting only the lines everyone knows this will make global news and headlines? The book Spare isn't what you could call an authentic autobiography and it also does not look anything like a biography, and explain the life of a personage. Let alone one dealing with the life of the Royal Prince Harry. What was the purpose of this writing and style? If taking all quotes (from the media) and clips with Prince Harry speaking about family details and emotions, and put this to a compilation, some might find that this is not adding up to something definite. The book, as far as we have heard so far on social media, has disappointed many readers. It doesn't take you above simplicity in the public domain of many of his readers and their own lives. What have they in common with Prince Harry? That he is the Spare? But we are curious/ a curious world and he is one using the global eye and mind to his advantage in the most direct way. Behind all that there is lot's of talk about his hurt, again referring to the title of 'his book' Spare. Perhaps to some the disappointment came from expecting Prince Harry his integrity and sensitivity, with some details coming out a little blunt across to the 'receiver's' end. But he is still a young man and took on a job of writing/ being the writer on his life story without the care of a mature or senior. That didn't make him try another style of writing. 'I and you' can make a whole difference in your life story, say many writers or professional writers. When talking e.g. about personal intimate or private parts projection is better and can leave out self exposure, whether to family or friends, or strangers. Writing in a magazine a column on your life story in 11000 characters, well, you could write one or two naughty lines and say "I did this", or "I did so and so". Prince Harry has given the impression (video clips/ interviews) that he was fully aware what he wanted to say to the public. Spare was going to hit the world bull's eye with a whack. Maybe in that he has succeeded 360 degrees. In the aftertaste still some may wonder what for exactly Spare was worth to write.

For some reason Spare and hurt go hand in hand throughout his life story. The question remains however what audience he was trying to reach out to. The generation Z may find other interpretations in the book, while older generations may see something else between father and son, or more primary as fathers and sons. The King, Charles III, the Prince of Wales William and the future Queen Catherine Middleton, and also the Queen Consort Camilla Parker, what relation can Spare have, make or break, in such an isolated environment as the British Royal Family? Let's hope that if Prince Harry is planning on writing the second volume on the story of his life as a royal prince, or abandoned aristocratic son to King Charles III, that he will now try to write about the hurt as a son, brother and family member in the Royal House of Windsor. And the father and son hurting will not leave him alone as long as he lives, but then coming to terms with it and leave out the wounded years of despair. It is as if the Prince cries out to the world and is trying to tell them that he is alone. And when the late Princess of Wales had died his loneliness only made him more aware of this 'being alone'. I can understand why that hurts him, from a universal humanity experience for most having been there in the same experience, as knowing where you belong and who you are in your surroundings, but then as a 'Spare' isn't all that flattering when especially 'endowed' with a relatively large ego. These are humanity's basic feelings and they are universally everywhere the strongest. A father's blessing of one and rejection of the other are to some sons the most painful memories for being the latter. Esau cried... For he loved his father more than anything else in the world. (Genesis: "Esau said to his father, "Do you have only one blessing, my father? Bless me too, my father!" Then Esau wept aloud." In the generation of Prince Harry that is Z Genesis and Esau are extinct from the minds and hearts in their time. There is no point for Prince Harry to keep on being the enfant terrible and kicking against the walls of the place he was born into. Prince Harry may not realise this but what Spare displays is that he is a human being full of love and passion. On the other hand it is in his responsibilty to not corrupt his mind over his life story in this extreme minimalist way. And maybe prepare for the more pressing issues concerning the place where he came from: the oldest of politics.

The second most hated after Brexit is the euro.

3 January 2023

Question is from which angle is the euro the second most hated after Brexit, from the stance of the Labour Party or the Tory Party? Most loved in between is England. And lets not forget King Charles III and the royal house. Here any outsider can see the confusion with which all Brexiteers or remainers must be having if you are not living in England but in the European Union Member States. The European Union has other worries on gas prices and the war in Ukraine that are dominating the scene. To England the war in Ukraine is not their immediate problem, but the industrial strikes, poverty fuel, c.q. cost of living, and the NHS. If Keir Starmer of the Labour Party, some are saying yesterday on the first working day of the new year, 2 January 2023, wants to win the next general election this should be the perfect moment. It is as if you can almost imagine Mrs Starmer saying to her husband, "I don't want that O'Reilly man doing your business for you. Why not take professional builders..." (Fawlty Towers, The builders episode) Another closer look at the prospect of winning the next general election by Mr Starmer and his Labour Party can be but anything close to a professional one. First being in politics for many years and not winning the general election (2019) and only trampoline jump on certain small victories in Labour constituencies over the last two years can't be enough to take back the country to his side of the Labour political aisle. Yes, politics at high level Downing Street No 10 is some sort of marriage if this is going to be your first time in a Brexit government. Conservative Member Anna Soubry yesterday on ... will vote for Keir Starmer, because, she said, almost tearing her heart out, "Keir is a decent man, an honest politician and we need someone like him at No 10." But all that devotion of politicians who are seeking political retribution from the Brexit years (total: 6) are fine except where the real problems deepen and will need Mr Starmer to be more like himself, and not hesitate to take power with a feeling of doing the right thing. Question no 2, what is the right thing on the third working day of January 2023?

Mr Starmer to do the right thing should be aware of Brexit at so many levels (the economy, past and present) if he wants 'to take back control' of the most hated thing as we speak. A family man by nature and emotion, taking back Brexit from the Tories who invented the departure (without delivering a Brexit economy model) from the EU will be a Hellebore of a task. The Brexit economy is relatively new and six years old. You need to be able to peer into the abyss without dizzy height spells, as it is lost at the bottom or at the core since 2016. Is Mr Starmer the new King Arthur? (Should we call King Arthur the first latent socialist?) There are those who predict that Mr Starmer is making no sense to say that he won't rejoin the EU again in a retake of Brexit. But Brexit is not emotion. It is plain and simple a new world and economy. The economy will be the decisive factor of the whole project to win the next general election, if the Labour leader can make the Brexit economics work or tick. And it should, with a component in the global world leading industrial countries calling that The Future for democracies. On the one side Mr Starmer seems to be having the right disposition for it and feeling he has to take power (away from the Tories), to do the right thing and (re) build Britain for the good of the country and its people. But are the Tories going to assist him and do the gentil thing to call for a general election soon? Or rather sink than stink? One example of the latter: the man has never won anything significant in his whole life and we can't be irresponsible and just hand over the power of the country to him, they will say. Or might do. The other half above might say something else rather. "And if he wins and crushes Brexit by some miracle cure he has found, the excalibur of a first Brexit economic principle, we will be looking foolish, you see." The voters outside No 10 have a whole different view that both Parties go a long way back and are practically not any different. The decent thing for Mr Starmer that he will do (great expectation) is to go back to the people. And after that Brexit will still be going down. So, why not stay with the devil you know?

Mr Starmer knows in the end it all comes down to Labour and whether it has all the subtleties (building a design to work with the Brexit economy and partners in the EU, global stage and more countries) needed for a mass scale election campaign and making true promises (filled with massive realism). In the 21st century politics is the big business for most G-7 and G-20 countries. And right now it is inflation that is on each of the Members mind. Parting from money and (r)evolutionize the use of monetary systems to newer ones, perhaps. And maybe it is their only concern to worry over another high inflation depression in ten years time, instead of waiting eighty years. Will the EU take back Brexit or allow it to rejoin the eurozone? Mr Starmer cannot make that decision as it is only in the prerogative of the King, Charles III. Close to the King's destiny is Fortuna est and God Almighty. It is here where the whole matter becomes blurred with the rules that are much older than money (silver) and gold to weigh upon. However Fortune to favour the bravest kingdom and its sovereign can also be human truth. That should make anyone free from tyranny, friend or foe. It is part astonishing of fate and part to challenge your mortality far away from politics and the burden of absolute wealth. The Late Queen Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II might have put Brexit in a whole different chapter of her own and be less poetic or prozaic ut supra. Money is the Pound Sterling and it cannot be challenged by time or Fortune. Brexit is on its own and should save itself from destruction. Keir Starmer or Rishi Sunak?

The saga continues.

2023, Will Labour seize its window of new wider opportunities?

29 December 2022

One such opportunity for the UK Labour leader could be, over 60 hours before new year's eve, that he must beat Rishi Sunak at the next general election. A rare opportunity that had sprung from the moment when Mr Starmer realized his chances to call for general election had evaporated with a new Tory Prime Minister after the resignation of Mrs Liz Truss. In the aftermath when Rishi Sunak was put forward as replacement of Liz Truss as prime minister, Keir Starmer in the meantime had begun feverishly to stuff his timeline with talk of a new approach in the Labour Party, reconnecting with the people especially where the cost of living hit hardest over the last months during fall and where we are today in wintertime. It was all man- made by Mr Starmer from his base and as leader of the opposition. A circle of red flames one by one were coming out of his policies stove and many began talking about the future with a new Labour government under Keir Starmer as leader. After X-Mas on the external things were looking again quiet all of a sudden around Mr Starmer. It could be the holidays and spending time with his family... while in the meantime Rishi Sunak went out to the people to serve food to homeless Dean in a homeless shelter during the day before X-Mas. Everywhere one has to pay attention to these parallels before judging and how to look at the bigger picture. The bigger picture was 2023 and to get an impression what I mean by that one only has to read an article today on Bloomberg.com, The rise of the left was the real story of 2022, by Bloomberg Opinion Pankaj Mishra.
"In 2023, the battle against far-right strongmen will be led by a freshly reconstructed left, says Pankaj Mishra."
In last November this autumn an international convention for governments and Left- Wing politics was held in Spain, and is giving the public some idea about the 2023 outlook for most democracies and leaders into this rare international phenomenon of new opportunities. It seems that Mr Starmer coincides now perfectly with his timing and can relaxed go for it. The convention however is interested in how you get here and move in to join them. Is it personality, charisma, simplicity of thought, consensus, no one knows what it is that defines a participant for high profile international Left- Wing governments and leadership. Why is timing particularly good for Mr Starmer? What if let's say Mr Starmer had had his general election after the appointment of Rishi Sunak as Britain's new Tory Prime Minister?

Another opportunity for the Labour Party could be sought in the LP's own backyard. Perhaps we are misjudging Keir Starmer to say that he already has what it takes and win the next general election with relative ease. And then one gets stuck in the reality of where Labour has been for 12 years and did not upgrade or revitalize the Party over '21st century tomorrow' political and policy issues. Where is the dialogue with Members in his own Party and what news have they got to tell the people/ prospect voters? 2023 Is waiting for Mr Starmer, if you did not already know that. Mr Sunak is lagging behind at a few tiny paces from where Keir Starmer is now standing or moving without a choke. And one more thing to Keir Starmer's advantage is the most hated thing in Britain called Brexit. It is a paradox at work and best, putting Mr Starmer on the Defensive side to be the first Brexit Labour government if possible in 2023. Twice more unique after his realization when Mr Sunak became prime minister. The moment of truth could very well be that the new thing means for Britain/ Brexit that Mr Starmer is in a position to transform Brexit away from the Tories into the land of new opportunities to promote peace (politics EU- Northern Ireland), stability (local and international trade) and democracy (future). It is like playing sports cricket. Who is the striker, bowler or scoring the points. Does Keir Starmer knows where he stands (and not looking just handsome) at the wickets? What should be important to keep in mind under the rim of the straw political umpire hat is that Mr Sunak will equally play the game to win the match. Strategically one can only oversee and overlook the whole field. Politics and to win the next general election in 2023/2024/ January 2025, for Mr Starmer is looking a lot more realistic as we move on slowly by these late and last hours in 2022. The grass however to Mr Sunak is looking a lot more greener on the other side. He knows he can win the next general election from his point of view. Where do the sick and disabled live a more relative safer life or have a high life expectancy? The need of the population in the UK has new a new basics: Britain is broken by just being Britain. And whoever will be telling the story the Tories will call the story told by an old spinster / old wife's stories. "Just humbug."

How will Labour leader Keir Starmer bring back the people in government?

3 December 2022

A new definition for the people would be the workers, instead of the working class something of the decades long misunderstanding that there is no such thing as 'the left' anymore but only elites. Whether in the Labour Party or the Conservative Party. With opportunity looking into the mirror wherever the Tories are holding and hanging up government. Mind you the government is a mega mirror when holding it up. After the last leadership contest with Liz Truss becoming the new Tory Prime Minister and then resigned to make place for Rishi Sunak, bits of pieces have defaced the outlook from a broken self reflex. The new Prime Minister is Mr Rishi Sunak and is or will be leading the Tories unto the next general election. Does Keir Starmer/ The Labour Party have two years to work out their election victory in 2024/ January 2025? If you need transparency the plan has to be one for the people/ the workers. The voters intent has been hanging there in the balance for a long period of time since Tony Blair became the Labour Prime Minister of the millennium. It makes one wonder why Tony Blair was such a success at the time. One reason and probably it is the only reason was that he came from far behind the time when Margaret Thatcher was prime minister. His time was still the Labour Party of growing opportunities for the ordinary men and women, something simply was booming then. Today if Keir Starmer would indulge and mention opportunity the voters don't (wouldn't) consider him trustworthy and they will give him that look indefinitely. Is he trying too hard or doing too little to bring back the Party of the Left back in government and make opportunity great again?

But what can you do when you can't promise anyone a job x historically? And what can you do when the future will not be about jobs in the traditional sense of the British people in the new age? Psychologically the past is falling short of meaning when it comes to employment, something other than living in poverty and houses that were built since the seventies. Here they still are and being the same people, some new and others much older. The Labour Party would have to digress to the lowest levels of the life of workers, some only potentially fit for work. And it is not a new problem as a result of globalism. Fight of the working class meant fight for the workers/ working people of Great Britain somewhere in political Britain's industrial history. The younger generation of voters in the 21st century may still wonder however about what the meaning must be of the Labour Party and why it is split from the ordinary people. The voter's sentiment can therefore only be why not vote for the Tories if prosperity is all that Labour wants. Prosperity for the Labour Party to want goes even vertically further, because the bigger it can get the more it will have bargaining powers 'for the people of Britain'. And what if Rishi Sunak would give all the right answers from there in the House of Commons during PMQs? Prosperity isn't a bit original if it can't be translated to the understanding of the Tories or the people who must vote for the next PM. Because prosperity might mean it was something rather above the limitations and cause more frictional politics/ policies. The question therefore is will the Labour leader bring back people or business to government. In the seventies there was long term employment (the Unions). Can Mr Starmer make similar promises and let the people have their say against a Tory government who clearly is pro- business only?

Some think and see the Labour leader as one who is afraid to swim for being a cat. And calling the PM Rishi Sunak week after week a weak prime minister he is also afraid of mice. Opportunity as a paradox should not also give him the leadership of nine lives and win the next general election if he can't bounce back from extremities. (In earlier writings this was already mentioned a few times) Another question is how he will build a strategy around his message for the British people to go out and vote for the Labour Party and its Green future. Yes, the people in the UK know, globalism and Climate Change does dominate their every day lives, as are unemployment and the high cost of living. Margaret Thatcher yuppies (blokism) of the eighties are fossils in comparison to the 21st centuries young generation of wokism. And life's only philosophy is the global economy. And explain that to your kids living on benefit what high inflation means! Fighting inflation is priority for the working people across the whole world. It is going to be interesting to see the Labour leader coming with a plan and bring back stability. The people want stability just as much as their neighbours in the European Union. Why are private industries not transparent enough, yes, that too. Is Mr Starmer a social democrat who will take on the monopolies without hurting prosperity?

Labour UK 2022-...

(Letter to Mr Starmer)

22 November 2022

With the coming of the next season in British politics (2022-2023), if we understand it correctly from the Labour leader in a Times Radio interview last weekend, he wants/ could be the next UK Prime Minister, he said. He had a team at the moment working out a plan and working on a new manifesto. We don't yet get to hear that bit of becoming PM with absolute conviction from Mr Starmer for some reason, even to layman's ears. Had that happen by freak accident that would come as his natural right and the electorate would be given the choice to come to terms with the new situation, e.g. the Tories resigning from government. And of course go out and vote. Here is where Mr Starmer is wrong. That is also if he wants to change the system of the old way of doing things, or as he keeps saying that the Tories are doing things and giving zero back to the public and the people. They can do very little about their old habits, and that is what only a Labour government can do different under his, Mr Starmer's, leadership.

Leadership exact science is new when it will come for the battle of the better side for the people of Britain to vote for the prime minister they now want. That will not oly be a new system, but also that would be the Labour Party new political system. And that is exactly where this Labour prime minister would want to be, with a career track record as a prosecutor, knighthood and politics. It is important to know why you are going to make the real difference instead of beating a dead donkey, party after party, prime minister after prime minister (12 years), till one drops again. The honest thing tough what is true is that the change of the system is the kind of leadership to be perfect for Keir Starmer. To change the system for the better and the future of next generations of prime ministers in Britain. On the outside where it is today in British politics none of a new political system is visual on the horizon as that is what the people need from their political leader and a new way to do politics in Britain. It is what Mr Starmer is searching for after the very thing he was born to do and be, but is too afraid to see his real political image reflex. Think of the lion of The Wizzard ofOz.

The real question is whether Britain is at the brink of change in the political system. And paradoxical enough is that only a Labour leader will be able to build that change architecture, where the Tories can find on their side the new inspiration for their party as rightful indwellers of parliamentary democracy symmetry in Britain. Brexit went wrong under the old system, while perhaps that would not have happened had the system been a more different one for the future. The pressure whether economics, global economics and social change, is based on everything for the coming seasons and time. But the Tories are not looking out for real change except in terms of monetary policies and wealth. Always going forward has exhausted a heavy price on the British political old systems and is no wonder going under right now. And a new prime minister can not undo their old system from the point of view where Labour leader Mr Starmer now has arrived. To change the power from the Tories will also not bring what the people desire for the future. But let's be clear here the writing is still in dead visions and if nothing happens, e.g. fortune favours the brave, Mr Starmer will also face the same problem at one point and face the difficulty of being the prime minister and can not bring the party and country first ideology forward. 

Looking desperately for Dorothy.

Additional today, 23 November 2022: PMs: Dorothy cameth- fantasy, opportunist...

(Edited)

The PM in PMs House of Commons has used the above perculiar words, having no plan but a fantasy, and that the opposition leader was nothing but an opportunist, answering the Labour leader Keir Starmer his questions from the PM this afternoon. The lion of The Wizzard of Oz could now clearly see his own reflection in the nearest of future public sea, that Mr Sunak was swinging with his arms very nervously around his own head when answering the questions at the dispatch box today, and aiming for the opposition leader from all the wrong angles. If Keir Starmer had no plan but a fantasy/ living in a fairy tale it is because not he but that the Tories are in government. Literally in the present time equals Real Time and not fictional time. The Labour leader obviously is in no hurry and hasten the Labour Party parallel towards a general election at the moment, and doesn't need to be. Is the PM becoming nervous on something the public hasn't heard of yet? Well, yes, in a way because the Tories need to govern two more years before the next general election. That is no fantasy plan on Labour's side, but clear strategic timing. Or is it fortune that favours the brave? And not as the PM has put it this afternoon that Mr Starmer was nothing but an opportunist. As if branding the Labour leader to minimum standards when previous Labour were in government, before Brexit. That was the old system, while Labour, God willing, will be working on how to build the future of Britain under his leadership. And that of course is what this is all about and to wait when the plans are right to execute another era of growth for the British people. But Dorothy was fierce and determined to show the lion of The wizzard of Oz how bad his image looked in the mirror reflex on the surface. And she was furiously nervous about the Labour leader for not accepting that he was the tin man and not the lion he thought he was. Labour needs to work out the plan they are promising the public to understand, e.g. at the CBI conference yesterday/ today's morning. Where there is a nervous twitch for the Labour leader is the traditional short term British way of what used to be the working class in the seventies and eighties. Mid term and long term, so The British Experience 1945-1975 has been saying for ten years (Book: Peter Calvocoressi) does not do it for Britain. For example, the new Y and Z generation if correct will be the new working class of the nearest of future when looking at wages in a richer global world, comparing to the rich kids in the 20th century. Taxation in the 21st century is making more sense on mid- and long term for the industries and mass employment. These are measures proven in history for previous decades, except in Britain. It was always the working class first, the wealthy always. And that has very little to do with opportunism, but again, even less in the 21st century. Dorothy isn't very comfortable at the moment facing two more years of making it clear that they are in government in no fantasy time, while Mr Starmer and Labour can use the time as his currency for the next general election and be ready for Britain, the electorate and the future industries. Mr Sunak can feel it in his tin- man waters that when not careful he will become the next fantasy in the story of The Wizzard of Tories' Oz as the Tin- man.

Why the death penalty for stealing from the Haredim/ Chassidim and Orthodox in Jerusalem/ Bnei Brak (nov2022)?

(I thought about it long and hard enough, MCTaytelbaum)

18 November 2022

Because the century is in the word (classic or ancient/ Torah), and in the word is the blood, and in the blood there is currency (half a shekhel or one for the first born son and daughter by half the price of the son).

75 Years of State building the Haredim still do not enjoy the fruits of wealth that all religious dynasties bequaeath the religious communities. The time has come for a chancellor and chest of finances and who will serve the religious parties and their constituencies under the law as suggested here above. If death penalty will they then trust more in the cycle of necessities on basic life and living standards within and without their own communities? Will they trust more because of implementing the death penalty for whoever steals from them and harm their development as a community within the State of the Jewish State?
This is a radical move, but the reason is deeply moral and philosophical. Has anyone yet stolen from the Haredim due to investigations? What then explains their dependency for decades long in Israel- Jerusalem?

The death penalty will soon come to legislation if Mr Itamar Ben- Gvir introduces the law on terrorists/ Palestinians as his defense on security on outlaws, e.g. the Palestinians/ terrorists. Why there is no ear nor eye for what is happening in Real Time Israel between the secular society and the religious so called parasitical groups in Jerusalem deserve equally more security and defense when it concerns personal, private or religious public wealth. In memo: the religious parties deeply distrust the people of Israel and even when it is one of their own to do their finances. And how do they motivate their distrust to a bureaucracy outside of their own religious and primitive world?
Will they be more willing to listen what others have to say besides Torah teachers if the penal law was here to help secure their consistency and continuity of living, and if the death penalty was introduced as the practical inbuilt deterrence for a vulnerable group within a violent society to rather have them outsourced and changed? Something that is deeply controversial, even with the best of intention on egalitarianism and rules of equality.

Another aspect is one of a political nature. It could be read as Israel's physical change within its own society and on matters of law and order being taken more wider and seriously reviewed. Death will become its appendix if and when it happens and be judged in different adaptations of the new criminal law. Geopolitical that can only mean perception of justice between citizens and their responsible offices in Israel, whether it is perpetrated by Jew or non Jew/ Jew or Arab/ Palestinian. And records must show what the absolute crime is.

With permission, I think this is the bill that should be introduced in Knesset as the extension of law and democracy, to Israelis and other groups living in the land of Israel indefinitely.

Following the news in the UK on recession. Would that be a good thing for Labour leader Keir Starmer?

4 November 2022

(21:02 PM)

A concrete question and the nation's conscience: with recession (BOE) this week half announced and half projected, could Labour trigger a new general election? Built precisely, one could also ask, on recession and the failure of the Tory Party/ government? The grammar is hard to write questioning only what if or what may not be. Just imagine the nation's frustrations and never getting a straightforward answer. How long has that been and feeling only a little finger indexed to show that they needed change. But Mr Starmer has no plan if he wants to attack a plan, according to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, last PMQ's on wednesday. That was a very high score reply by the PM. But that wasn't the end of the PMQ by the leader of the opposition. Mr Starmer came back even more fierce and summed up his question on the Home Secretary Ms Braverman reappointment by the PM, after she had resigned a week before the new PM came to the PM's Office in Downing Street No 10. We can't remember when we last saw something so vivid in the House of Commons between the Labour Party and the government (Tories). It was a political Ben Hur spectacle between Ben Hur and the Roman, Messala. In truth however that did not give the Labour leader more scoring points from the nation. Here is where the people are licking the flames of hell of recession. As said here above it is not yet been announced officially, meaning exactly how it makes everyone living in an unsure state of mind and it isn't politics but the economy. What can the Labour leader say to these people but that he / we are working on it, you have to trust us that we are the Party to bring about change for all of Britain?

If only Mr Starmer could get behind the wall and trigger a general election, so some may think. The Tories have another thing on their minds and will not allow Mr Starmer's shoes get wet on their grass where it is everlasting green. On the side flank since recently the voice for returning to the EU is also now becoming louder and people want their blue star back. A general election would only be adding more confusion to the nation and their state of mind if happened today or tomorrow. One can never be really prepared for that or ready. Like the wheels of a train and not sliding electrical towards any particular real destiny. But Mr Starmer has a team of economists and political analysts working on it and they are getting ready, said an article this week in the UK Guardian. The plan is strategy, for now. Could this be perhaps what the people are looking for, e.g. that Mr Starmer should give a little more of him in the House of Commons during PMQ's time? Nothing fascinates the electorate more, you could say. Except on an empty stomach and living of the crumbs of others from the local foodbanks. More realistically after 12 years the end finishing line gets harder to approach, it is the point where one would almost resort to the idea of why are those behind me not falling so that I can win comfortably. And what is the reason why the race is getting heavier at the last minute looking like it is never ending? The human eye, of course. The honest line should be that not only the Tories that they have mismanaged the economy, but that the truth also is globally. It is the time we now live in, with the war in Ukraine, the energy prices and... windfall tax? Where do you put i in the iota. With an international recession a humanitarian crisis will occur. Plans do not do sudden new occurences, remember?

The Labour Party is beginning to have some interesting features, if only Mr Starmer would start to give more of him to the people. His strategists will know these important factors to persuade the people of Britain how to fight recession with Labour at the head of government. It is not to have a recession and trigger a general election, but how to fight recession from a Labour point of view.

Can Labour (UK) win the next general election?

29 October 2022

The sort of plan one can draw up is not one in writing when you have to accentuate the new position the Labour leader Mr Keir Starmer would be in after Rishi Sunak has risen to the Tory occasion this week as Prime Minister, also after the 45 days of Ms Truss as Tory PM. It is not intended to criticize the Labour leader for the last few years of fighting the extremes in his party, so called under Mr Jeremy Corbyn, of anti- Semitism, at least not before the unusual rise of Mr Sunak in the Tory Party to be the first Asian PM in British Parliament vis a vis the House of Commons. And it matters, it matters to the people and country with the Labour Party stagnation. Because where is the Labour Party in October 2022 and where does it want to be in May 2023? Someone ought to say to Mr Starmer to please look me straight in the eye and answer the question, please? Now there is also physical proof of a transformation in the British political establishment, that what was once inconceivable has now been transformed to fact. It is the perfect chance paradoxically for Mr Starmer and his Party to rise to a second occasion and prepare his plan to win the next election. Not always is it about winning when the country is broken to all sorts of untranslatable fragments, some unknown to human understanding. When the country had prosperity (literally) in the eighties it was the duty for Mr Kinnock to talk of realities with regard to wealth distribution and how to help the country maintain stability under this massive wealth. A fairer Britain, was what he called it, if remembering it correctly. Far from fair are now in 2022 the new realities, and politics has turned to personal gains and lucrative businesses. Logically when thinking about it how can all that go a fair way in Real time? The mood of the nation is hard to describe when you are not British or living in Britain, since this week when Rishi Sunak became Prime Minister of Britain and the UK. But one could say the race issue might be now a more subtle thought, e.g. what if we get a next PM and he is Japanese, Chinese or Amazonian Indian and his teepee?

The Labour leader Mr Starmer can he become more impressive as a classic political leader according to British standards? The answer is not easy to give when we all know visibly or invisibly that Britain at the center of the world is a changed magnitude and has now other segments in society to deal with. The economics has transformed and it is not related in anyway to the penny or the individual when becoming homeless with mental health issues, a disease that is much in the public eye but never related to the general economics as economic casualties of the weakest. Politics does not do elasticity without law and order, as can the economy do indefinitely. When Mr Sunak became PM this week for a moment there it was the winning argument for Labour to advance and call for a general election immediately. The mood of the nation plunged into a new depth and if it wasn't this moment of now or never Labour then was looking at a lost moment forever. Can Mr Starmer look you in the eye and say that Labour had all the metal to give the country back to the people? In terms of a Labour family app, yes, but not in terms of application. His own Party has lost belief in the Labour leader long ago, three years or so. The Party has shown disdain for real politics for too long and went on a spree of finding out who was antisemitic and who's not to catch them and throw them out wherever they were found. In terms of real politics you could say and see this was not about the country, economy, and sectorial growth. As a chain of events and incidently it is the Tory Party, however broken or corrupt to the core, to now crack the nuts and eat them and having the new young PM do his pas de deux nutcracker ballet with great ease and professionalism. And Mr Starmer? Not doing a sugar plum, but is in fact doing a complete nome de plume and finding nothing of relativeness anywhere near or nearest (economic secondant Ms Reeves) to him. Which is a shame for a man showing all the right sparks of a strong Labour leader. Now he is trying to fit in Britain in his father's Ford Cortina and maybe saying to the passengers that it is a steamship (and not a ship of fools).

In conclusion to the here above and first writing on Labour under Mr Keir Starmer, he is not walking on ice but in fact it is clearly the right moment for challenging politics and his own abilities in the up coming months to the next election. But that will not be clearly seen from writing. He will have to design the next moves in his strategy.

PMQ's: Sir Keir Starmer & the PM Rishi Sunak on 26 October, yesterday.

27 October 2022

We can relax now after we have witnessed the PM Rishi Sunak yesterday answering Sir Keir Starmer in the opposition PM questions. That is what England must be thinking the day after. Surprisingly the fresh PM did very well and with remarkable ease, even when at some points he was cornered by Keir Starmer, one could say. This is what they probably are calling a new worldview especially when being British. Was the country ever ready for this worldview being at the center of global attention? There is a different silver lining however cutting through the image of change at a scale of this new view that Britain had not been properly prepared for, or so it seems. It is the seeming that is making it awkward and nothing else... Britain at large with a multicultural demographic density to the metric, here is where it might not fall too well in fertile ground. England country and cities are two different worlds. We do not know what has kept the British for such a long time in the frame of mind of 'being English'. Perhaps it was the British parliamentary system, or maybe there was another reason for the nation's mood. Some have tried a different path and won medals, silver or gold, to make life better between coloured people and white Britain. But the emphasis is not on purity or impurity as white Britain with the new worldview imposed on the 21st century global streets. This infrastructure in principle differs anywhere in the world and not just in Britain. Bring it to a debate and sort it out for once and for all, is what could be taken more as sound advice, or drown in your own blood. What would Britain have said had it been Mr Kwasi Kwarteng as Prime Minister in Downing Street No 10? The Indian Talwar sword ahh will cut through the middle here in history for having been fierce fighters against the British Raj to fight for independence. Africa on the other hand has never took up the sword against Britain, but in fact it was Britain fighting the De Boer's wars and had been beaten/ defeated. Imagine Britain following this new tradition of Asian Prime Ministers and having a Japanese or Chinese prime minister next? Today in 2022 it was Britain's first Asian PM, and it hurts a little no doubt about that. Loyalty however could soften the wound and who knows what Britain is looking at in the future if the Prime Minister can bring back the country to the time it was used to be a leading mercantile nation in the world.

Labour is a little disappointing without a clear strategy how to 'make Britain great again'. With the nation's mood calming down after yesterday's first PMQ's with the new PM of Asian descent the quietness can predict nothing of winning ground for Labour and its leader. Including the meaning for the PM being of Asian descent. And at the same time bringing to the forefront the PM's Hinduism will not make it right either for the man who is leading Britain, primary a white nation's homeground. The next general election e.g. May next year in 2023 is what we are looking at and not at next week October 2022. The thing we shouldn't underestimate is time and calm (global financial markets). Remission is all that the Labour leader will be feeling as duty for the time being and keep watching the coming time and how this unfolds, per day. Had the nation's mood not calmed down with the ascension of the new Tory PM, from afar it looked that it was all strategy and make Labour do the calling shots next. Now that moment is gone. So, what is next? What this line of thinking looks like is that strategically that side is dead with the opening of a whole different and complete new field making the PM to succeed. As said before here above, if the Prime Minister will use his loyalty and not the Juggernaut (in his eyes) to Britain/ UK who knows where this worldview can or could go then. All the king's men... And we are living in interesting times (Chinese saying). The next question for Britain is when will the Tory Party sort out its self reflection and ask the difficult questions where or what they stand for in the 21st century? When they had won Brexit the whole idea was that the British people would be able to decide their own future again, which was very appealing and it didn't need a plan, just the landslide mood. Six years later what remains of Brexit are fragments of 2016, 2017,2018, and 2019. And the EU has moved on. But in fact Britain went since then from bad to worse and making the prospect of returning to the EU as a candidate Member State, maybe behind Hungary. While in fact Britain is capable of joining the EU at the same point where the EU has arrived in 2022 and will be in 2023 next year. But for solidarity reasons it is more likely that the EU will keep it safe and say it has to be according to the democratic process of accession queue. But maybe Britain is in some luck and not all is lost after we (on Twitter) heard Keir Starmer saying on LBC radio (Nick Ferrari) that he is not taking back the country to the single currency. That is big political talk there and what is the reason for his change of hearts? And there is no little birdie escaping his long sleeve to tell the people of Britain whether he has found a secret treasure island and that maybe he is the man from Atlantis (with amphibian flippers).

Ignoramus

Personal op, fiction.

4 October 2022

The UK Chancellor was right yesterday at the Conservative Party Conference speech. The 45p is wrong (which he did not mention)for the private sector, and it goes against human nature on the wider scale as such in the developed world in 2022, and in 1990. Introducing a more asymmetrical approach would be a golden rule of e.g. 15p. In the long term fiction of growth and wealth. Where the Chancellor is standing today in his so called mini- budget, the very definition of crash budget timing in the UK, but also across in the EU economic packages strategy for people and businesses, are part of the idea to make the economy work while at the same time acting united against the Russian invasion of Ukraine with crippling sanctions against Russia. Also where the 'war budgets' (war in Ukraine) split per system architecture (endogenous EU and exogenous UK- C. Chamley?) is still the difference between the two entities in the UK and EU.

However where this mini- budget doesn't fulfil promises in the short term (21days?) is the economic growth. Again timing here too is short and to work out a fast application (to use Mr Kwarteng's terminology). The 15p suggested here above is referring to the global democracy in the highly developed world since the millennium, where fair doesn't only means helpless, but also what is helpful to balance the economy. Futuristic ideas are also at play, e.g. if Britain could be ready for a separate idea of industrial tax to the historic corporate tax. But all in all there is a start somewhere made in the mini- budget and hiding to come out now from underneath the Chancellor's kilt. We have no time to waste and are looking forward to him implementing his economic plans for intermediate (now and 24 November) and transforming end 2022 growth for the UK. Vis a Vis the EU.

ER 1926-2022

Through the fog I thought love would come, not life that could come. Will we ever forget her name, body and soul, she was just mortal? But now, I will put away this empty cloud, eight days later since forever is nigh, and sudden one last time. Still and distant there is the old tree where evening breeze is
moving deepest and green leaves welcoming her earthly presence, frozen from Helios warmth, and love. Heads bowed in black a multitude by all human hearts and minds in one last relevant magnitude. God Almighty on friday eve, not to disturb on this

particular Day, sixth since Creation, give us strength to say farewell to one such of Thy capricious making, since the king of Thebes, a noble myth of earth. Will we ever forget her name, body and soul, absent of earth's relevance to eternity, Regina? What is it that are called the world and its seven decades? Once you are here on this September monday tears will not
wet eyes, faces or your red jackets in vain, or cry tears in vanity when lowering behind the stone wall circle beside her true love and Prince. England's English rose and her nation was it hers, so now many are asking. And the King and heir gives his new answers, consummate and measured by time, or timing.

Her last epic journey: from Balmoral to Edinburgh Holyroodhouse.

11 September 2022

Across the Atlantic overseas the US today remembers the 21st anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 2001 and the many people who had lost their lives in the attack, while also paying tribute to the memory and death of Queen Elizabeth II. US President Joe Biden said that he could remember a message from the Queen she had sent to the American people and that he will never forget . "Grief is the price we pay for love," he solemnly told the crowd. Back in England when asking bystanders alongside the road and quietly watching the cortege passing through the streets in Scotland, why they are coming over or grieving, no one can answer and say why the US President over in America remembers her today in greatness and how her words brought comfort to the American people on the day of the 9/11 terrorist attack. It seems a difficult question to many in 2022 and one can understand why not many are feeling part of the answer in the same way as e.g. life in the seventies. Perhaps then everyone would have said, "Why we're grieving? Because we're English, aren't we?" Fuel poverty and unemployment due to the crisises before the Covid-19 pandemic and its aftermath, plus the war in Ukraine and energy stop from Russia causing many households exorbitant gas and electricity bills to pay. And there are more sanctions coming on Russia and the Russian President, Mr Vladimir V. Putin, was the latest news from the EU last friday. Why would anyone make comparisons to the death of Princess Diane with millions and millions of flowers laid for her every day, even after her burial? WWIII silent movements in 2022 are nothing compared to the previous World Wars, WWI and WWII. It is almost certain that the death of the Late Princess of Wales before the millennium a scenario of WWIII would also have been unthinkable at the time. Global economic progress had then been on a different and much smaller scale, one could say. The love and admiration for Queen Elizabeth II was embedded in key moments within that progress of time around in the world. And, naturally at home in Britain as Head of State. She was no one's teenager love to idolize as was Tom Jones (especially dancing crazy). Why do people grieve for the passing of their Queen? Well, logically the answer is simple that they are English/ British.

What we had never expected is the impact of her death around in the world, and that today in our century was the first time to witness what it means in England to change from one monarch to another monarch. Seventy years Queen Elizabeth II was tolerant and had let anyone be king and queen in their own right, and also had practically made it her brand to empower this sentiment in people 'all over the world'. England had Rolls Royce, Austin Rover, Austin Mini Cooper, horse racing, cricket, football, the armed forces, castles, the countryside, television broadcasting, East Enders, Coronation Street, and lots more. Republicans however see here a tectonic difference of levels to criticize the monarchy and call it racist and the only empire in the world of colonialism. If the Republicans had been there after WWII one wonders what they would have rebuild the UK into. The EU (EEC) begs the other big question. What the monarchy under Queen Elizabeth held together was the rebuilding of the countries in west Europe with England after WWII, and seriously to go for a whole new and different way to live together in the same world, everywhere, even in the South Americas. The world when in decline what history teaches is that it will either descend into war or apathy and cause revolutions. Thanks to many brilliant designs of the forties, fifties, sixties, and till late seventies, Britain and the US were at the top of inspiration and inspiring their nations to sell their products everywhere in the world. (And than encourage others to follow suit) From airlines to small sedans. General Electric and Rolls Royce, two different brands and products, but on the annual balance equally rich. This was the trick how to do things differently but have the same financial results every year over and over again. I am sorry to make it sound so simple. Economics and global economics were not even born yet before the seventies! (At least not in the same breath) In short: England had Queen Elizabeth II, and she became everyone's dream to be (class) and have (fashion) in the mundane Anglo Saxon world (aka global world in the 21st century & statistics want it that more women than men are born in the present time). Germany and France had their own power houses, e.g. fashion and parfume, Porsche, Mercedes Benz, and so forth. Let us not forget André Citroen, France's famous car Citroen. Distinctly different from the other brand Renault.

Queen Elizabeth II was the most sophisticated looking and dressed woman in the world, a world leader that kept expanding like a submarine and even in her very old age and still making the same distinctions. She was saintly beautiful, extraordinary for a married monarch and with a large family. One wonders what Nelson Mandela had commented on the Queen her figure... We will not know until six months later from today how the Queen her son and heir to the throne, King Charles III, will hold together the monarchy after his mother, the last monarch in Britain before him. From afar it looks as if King Charles III his temperament will differ from that of his mother, the Late Queen. But his luck hasn't run out too soon yet, with his two sons, William the Prince of Wales and Cambridge and the Duke of Sussex Prince Harry. Both very much are the generation when Princess Diane died, the Y- generation and economic models up to the 2022 futures. The world is now built on multilevel business cycles and automotive technologies for all individuals. If you can't do that you will simply be out. Which individualism can the monarchy play over the next coming years and decades and make a jump at the juggernaut its wheels? This used to be a very easy decision to take when back in the early nineteenth century, for every nobility went into grain and breweries. A simple symmetric model of doing business. Does anyone know the groundplan for business if it's air, fluid, or hybrid? We know that India has Tata Steel and Germany has Thyssenkrupp. Royal Steel is quite another thing. 

It is announced that Queen Elizabeth II will be laid to rest on monday 19 September next week at King George VI Memorial Chapel for Windsor..

And remember that pain is the price we pay for love, taking it this time standing up and stop the bleeding. (Variant on Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte character Edward Rochester- Timothy Dalton)  

Pax Ukraine- Russia II

Suggestion: EU for Peace, mandatory.

8 September 2022

As WWIII became a military failure of optics from 24 February 2022, March, April till May 2022 without the success of bringing forward a peace plan through deep economic sanctions against the Russian President Mr Vladimir V. Putin and the war between Ukraine and the Russian invasion of Donetsk and Luhansk, world peace in September six months later on is not a realistic recommendation when not made mandatory in the same urgency parallel to the sanctions against the Russian President illustrated in the here above. To the EU unlike perhaps Mr Vladimir Putin after his 'self permission' invasion of Ukraine in February last winter in the year 2022, peace was Europe and vice versa Europe was peace. The emphasis and deep concern here and now are on 'was', before imposing sanctions on the Russian President in February.
The EU cannot fail its ground principle why peace is its highest learning after WWI and WWII that war never again could be the means to an end and result in another world war already coined popularly as WWIII.

What is not popular is that human nature cannot do or live without incentives and especially with regard to a time in the future. WWIII in a matter of months has taught both sides, the EU and Russia, how this human nature is unchangeable and the only way to face a bigger reality is to admit this was from the beginning not to recognize as is now that both sides had quietly from the greater public eye become expansionist. One through the Euro, now a wanted and dominant currency, and the other the supplier of physical (exponential) natural gas and fuel supply. It is within each their territory partly powerful and the other part being oddly compatible, as is the case with everything natural in it's environment and laws.

The war would simply mean on our side in the EU that we have the Euro and on Mr Putin's side he has the natural commodities, now making the divorce all the more painful to split up supply from demand either on this or that side.

The Lisbon and Maastricht Treaties (including the Treaty of Rome 1957) are still open for reading on the Internet and Wikipedia. EU Citizens of tomorrow should access these documents free of charge and help them realize the meaning of Peace in the European Union.

Perhaps the devil is in the detail where history is new as in the 21st century and globalization. But necessity makes that another devil or evil under the winter sun, whether in the northern or southern hemisphere, that when living in the world means living in a WWIII scenario than where do we go now?

Peace remains the ultimate answer in every life and whichever world. There are some that die on the battlefield and some that live for peace, even through sacrifices when made by government or individual, it is eternity where most see what they envision as the means to an end. Almost and always post world wars.

Iran and the JCPOA 2022

21 August 2022

One year later since the first meetings in Vienna took place last year in March, between EU Member States c.q. Nato Member States and Iran delegates, there is still no deal reached on the return to the JCPOA, now JCPOA 2.0. Israel is saying that it won't back down on it's perception on the issue of Iran returning to any deal being reached between the world leaders in the west or superpower USA, that this path is leading to a dangerous arms race if the deal will be signed. Did former US President Donald Trump and Benyamin Netanyahu as former prime minister of Israel before the last prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, made their decision on a failed assessment from both the military and geopolitical point of view? President Joe Biden, incumbent POTUS, and his administration however have set their mind on Iran to return to the JCPOA with clear objectives. Iran is more or less reiterating the similar approach to the deal that it too has clear objectives and key interests. There is also the war between Ukraine and Russia and soaring oil & gas prices going out of the roof that worries the western hemisphere, both the EU Member States and the US. All are part of the same geopolitical map in the present time and being on the same timeline. Where does Israel fit in when saying it is not part of the JCPOA deal and favours in fact the deal between Mr Netanyahu and Mr Trump in 2018? Incidently something, from simple observation, isn't what Iran misses terribly, e.g. billions of Dollars and lifting of sanctions... Former Prime Minister Mr Naftali Bennett during his prime ministership had said intriguingly how best to deal with a roque Iran in the meantime, that there are no automatic answers when it comes to Iran. Perhaps here is where the former young and inexperienced prime minister of Israel made a second difference that maybe he had meant where no one is looking. Differentiality, could he have meant that with his observation? Maybe, it is hard to say now when he has resigned from government as Prime Minister this year in June, 22 June, on a controversial issue with the settler's law in Israel and it's extension or expiring date. The opposition refused to work together with the coalition, per se under Naftali Bennett, on the issue of the settler's law of extension with it's expiring date 30 June 2022. How much truth would become fluidity from Mr Bennett's view on Iran will therefore always remain obscure and irrelevant from any point in the future.

If differentiality, just to stay close here to Mr Bennett's intriguing words in 2021, last year in August, one is simple logic and the other that there are no simple answers how best to deal with a roque Iran and it's ambitions to become a nuclear power in the Middle East. In the long term thinking for Israel it's prime minister will have to work with it's allies more differential and also more transparent, that for example the arms race is truly alive and came into affect by the JCPOA 2.0. These are the important realities whether by air, sea, land or space. There is also significant proof by absence of returning to the deal that Iran will try it's future along the present time 'objectives and key- interests', as it now has experienced a time of four years without the JCPOA on it's heels. How much Iran knows the meaning of the failed JCPOA is another thing, as it has taken more liberties since then in the region. Simple answers, yes, maybe. The differentiality approach however will not be simple for an ambitious Iran if it had to deal with as an answer, e.g. from Israel. In the military these are very specific departments with key interest to specific readings e.g. Fractional vector calculus and fractional Maxwell's equations International Nuclear Information System (INIS) IAEA. Israel cannot keep on repeating the Netanyahu years for a more complex future ad (advertisement) and especially in the region of the 2030 Middle East. The time for basic principles on cooperation will only make good on relations on trade or businesses. On the deeper cooperation strategies however that will have to be subjected to a different approach how to deal best on key interests and complex objectives. One such complex objective paradoxically is peace in the region between Israel and the Arab nations, next to Arab nations among Arab leaderships, and with Iran and it's ambitions. Yet there is no plan to what could be differential from the Israel viewpoint on Iran and the rest of the Middle East region, as this was and still is a new approach of thought. Let's say that the next JCPOA deal is a bad deal, as Mr Lapid interim prime minister in Israel, claims. The question is whether the prime minister has found his basis on all complex questions and answers as suggested in the here above approaches. And what is a good deal, again according to the interim prime minister? The problem here also seems one of incentives. The problem here also seems one of incentives parallel to the grave concerns of Israel and it's Prime Minister Yair Lapid (speaking on the phone to Emmanuel Macron of France, 22 August 2022, today).

In memo: 

24 November 2021

"Ironically, many of those same voices now seem to be lining up behind current Prime Minister Naftali Bennett as he does much the same, shouting from the rooftops, as it were, that Israel will not be bound by any detrimental deal reached by the world powers in Vienna next week." Ryan Jones. "Bennett told reporters during a review of military exercises in northern Israel this week: “No matter what happens between Iran and the world powers, we are concerned that there is not enough toughness in the face of Iranian violations. Israel will defend itself on its own.” 

Alternate prime minister Israel July 2022 - November 2022 with Iran diplomatic and military portfolio, Naftali Bennett.

For Naftali Bennett the political dog house was his only choice, but not his destiny.

16 August 2022

And will Mr Bennett ever return to become Israel's Prime Minister again, once the present time 'coalition' has decided on it's future if again after the next elections 1 November this fall? This is Israel in terms of light- years and thinking of that possibility with a return to politics for Naftali Bennett, also now the Former Prime Minister of Israel from 13 June 2021 to 22 June 2022. But Israel in earth years has also moved on quickly after Mr Bennett resigned as PM. It is also testimony what the real Israel wants from the next leadership and that here no one has any doubt on the issue of bringing back another former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. For now the interim prime minister, Mr Yair Lapid, is holding shop for country and State, and Defense. One can only sit down and think back how this was different under the Bennett government, when Yair Lapid was alternate prime minister and with Mr Netanyahu in the opposition. For a whole year and it was as if Israel not only was a political center of coalition activities, but that also something had revived since the eighties and even before that in the seventies. The wonderful days of building the State of Israel. Something Mr Bennett was desperate to revive under a new twist between history and future in the 21st century. When Mr Bennett had bragged about his 'legacy' as prime minister and that under his government that Israel had known relatively something of a peaceful time in Gaza, and in general with the Palestinian warring factions, the people on the sides of Likud namely were smirking and have mocked the former prime minister openly. Seven weeks later with a devastating three- day war in Gaza reopening operation Breaking dawn became yet another testimony of what many now know in the world as the 'real Israel'.

Here one should take a minute pause and than reject the 'ideal Israel' from what the Bennett government was for a whole year in contrast. With lot's of patience from the former and younger prime minister his testimony was defense. By extraordinary force of personality and using his military experience as a professional on the same IDF combat tactics as he knows, Israel indeed has known relative calm during his prime ministership. In fact it had forced the Palestinian rioters to the offensive and with that made it very clear to the International world for the prime minister that he would not seek to go to war, but use other tactical measures. The world today again is witnessing yet another war and massacre of innocent Palestinians and victims as young as children under the age of nine. Again, during the Bennett government, and this wasn't easy to do or keep, name one child that was slaughtered before the eyes of the world and it's media? On the contrary, it was the Palestinian youth that came out provoking the IDF and armed Police in the Damascus Gate, and also the Al Aqsa Mosque masked riots. With the interim prime minister Mr Yair Lapid the odd reality on the ground seems parallel to the time when Naftali Bennett was prime minister, and not so long ago... Yair Lapid has taken a very aggressive stance against the Palestinians in Gaza with the operation Breaking Dawn. One would expect a Right- Wing fanatic like the former prime minister Naftali Bennett to be aggressive against the terrorist factions in Gaza, as a perfect excuse to be and stay in power. On the other hand there is no telling what Naftali Bennett would have done if he had to go to war against the Palestinians in Gaza. After if they had broken his set of battle lines of defense where he kept Israel under his prime ministership. And Israel, as yours truly, one has to say that the Israel with a strong defense on all fronts makes always the best military for all Israelis who are proud of their armed personnel. No one can forget Mr Kochavi's inspecting eyes while he watched the armed personnel performing the parade last celebration of Independence day. These are the military hierarchies that are incidently also law statutes in Israel. Why use them as purely and exclusively offensive and leaving behind only ravage of a 'defenseless' people before God Almighty and mankind?

But there is no mistake here about the real problems in Palestine between Palestinians and Israelis (non bourgeoisie). Israel's political infrastructure needs mending very badly and there is one good thing about this that the breaking of the system wasn't due to Mr Bennett's time as prime minister. Will the wild animals eat Joseph when the moon obscures the night sky and it's billions of stars above Israel? Joseph was thrown by his brothers into the pit and left alone to die by brotherly decision and judgement.

Neom 2072

26 July 2022

Prince Mohammed Bin Salman has officially announced the designs for his masterplan Neom on monday, yesterday 25 July. (Information from the Arab online newspapers, UK The Telegraph, Wall Street Journal, Al Jazeera English newspaper online, and Saudi Gazette (including photo's of several facades and projections spectator's view). Neom has an interesting and very impressive exterior, and striking immediate effect from the point of the human eye, imagining that if this was just a photo what will it's presence feel like when physically not only to see but also that you can touch it. One keeps wondering what inspired His Royal Highness with the unique inception of his vision. Unique because of it's exactness in one straight meteorite line and now designed to be of terrestrial length: 120 km. It leaves no room for an open mind, conventional or conservative (classical) architecture. Neom moves your imagination and it is taking it to another level where architecture and construction engineering are working in close cooperation on a whole new dimension. The glass mirror facades on each side of it's parallel structure, 120 km in length, is beauty and unequal anywhere in the world. A few points what makes it a personal experience for yours truly: the location by the Red Sea and it's width at this point (especially when you know this precise location in Real Time) is congruent with the land or desert plain whether Sinai or Saudi Arabia. Some of the world's best architects have their doubts whether Neom is truly an extraordinary architectural wonder and perhaps it would be good to hear or read their thoughts. The purpose of the bare extended structure of Neom has never challenged this or other environment before, and therefore there is no data or history available to say whether this is architecture or an architectural phenomenon, e.g. Paolo Soleri Hexahedron.

Prince Mohammed Bin Salman in his statement yesterday has called Neom 'Magical'. As is also the elusive 2072, when the world will be freed from CO2 emissions 20 years earlier in 2050. From that point of view there is no obstacle to Neom and Saudi Arabia for building the new wonders of the world. Neom is also interesting at it's axis for a more pertinent insight. The Line is suggesting a straight basic line with the optical illusion of a horizontal 200 meters -cross-line. In Real Time what we are seeing is a vertical design when standing in the middle and facing east or west. Neom's natural surroundings are mirrored in it's facades on the right and left of the total structure. Here the magic is in the eye of the beholder and it truly is magical glass when the effect is invisibility/ zero visibility of the city at first glance. Adjacent to the design of structures interior and exterior, also there are a catalogue of other disciplines for this kind of habitat and it's inhabitable gardens or ecosystems. As I said before that if you know the location in Real Time you will know at high noon what makes it essential to live in this region of 'Martian red chaos and sunlight'. Will they also have a cooling system to make life and nature edequate or compatible in an environment fiercely contradictory as natural allies? Not on conventional technologies the answer is pessimism. High- tech cities or urban 'islands', you see, is the time that the older generation will not really understand. If the next generation Y or Z are going to continue populate the earth and build their winning/ trophy designs for their time is something to think about again. And the most important question then would be whether 2072 will generate that kind of money, too. Yesterday another country in the region of Africa, Central Bank of Zimbabwe, has introduced a gold(en) coin (22 carat-$1.823...)to battle inflation. What the IMF or World Bank will say on the matter is not yet clear at the moment, but that this was unusual or bold for a small country (with pensioners waiting for $16. a month alongside the pavement in the streets), it just turns your stomach upside down. 1 Trillion US Dollars for a project like Neom and 500.000 US Dollars extra costs in 2022 for 2030, the vanishing point here is 2072 for the total earth?

Post Scriptum: many are enthousiastic on building with mirror reflective glass structures. This from a personal base of opinion I would call the design deterrent and could even fall under the meaning of military camouflage/ shield. Because of it's industrial scale and specific ambivalent nature to protect either earth or God Almighty and mankind.

Additional Saudigazette.com.sa today 26072022: Crown Prince: NEOM will be listed on Saudi stock market in 2024.

Things to say online on the UK zoom debate tonight of the last magnificent five...

15 July 2022

Stop the Niccolo Machiavelli thing.

A leader is passionate to lead his/ her country. Love it, grab it, take it, and hold it together.

Historical deficit, how much is this leg since WWII?

Make it please a live experience to govern.

How to control the future, e.g. first quarter 2023, with energy poverty.

Who is going to be the next Tory Party leader and why say that each can become the Prime Minister with the upcoming election end of the summer? By doing the all people's thing to engage the Conservative voters or potential voters friday tonight on zoom is not impressing anyone in real life, except for those who find every election time amusing. Britain has become the 1970/1980 -ties again and highly unvoluntarily this time. Time has changed out of the millennium and most ordinary people are better politicians by DIY in the 21st century. Define 'cost of living', please? Not in the speak of Klingons- I am your prime minister- or tax- cutting Vulcans, preferably. And explain a little more on which tier and household you will say as the next Tory leader 'Your kids should do with less', of everything and about anything else. Because you can be sure that Labour will do that and come up with one of the opposition leader's weekly PQ anecdotes, "Belinda, she told me how she was struggling with the cost of living that she faces everyday, and living in constant deep fear of where she may find herself in the next moment; the sheer terror in her eyes, because you prime minister your chancellor has raised taxes sky high..." Etcetera, etcetera. Adding the last punch, "And there are millions more like Belinda." Answer Tories: future, future, future, it's the future, stupid.

"What is green economy," one member in the audience asked the candidates. To start with no one is sure at the moment, with the US President Mr Joe Biden, flying off to Saudi Arabia today from Israel in his AF1 and to meet with the crown prince MBS, oil is high on the agenda to Washington and this cannot be a good thing at home for the President, but even less a good signal for our part in the world. Unless the member in the audience meant Climate Change economy (based on physical ergonomics (example online:

• Adjusting environmental factors (noise, lighting, air quality, and temperature)

outside the high office towers in London). Come to think of it when taken architecture back to it's basics, that maybe what is not good for the world is to build too many cosmopolitans with hundred stories buildings and this is not a Marvel comic book. Seriously, fish and chips, bacon and sausages, they are telling you to believe all one by one standing in the debate that they are the people's man/ woman. Do you believe them? "There is too much burro on dos tres..." No, it's 'Un, dos, tres," saying the same and meaning different things. And who are you besides a harmless fool. Unless you are trying to look hard not like your 'real self'. Awkward. X more generations to come soon enough and growing their 'fast life' in poverty like beans or real English men and women. Talk to them like they are real people and not cameras. You are seriously missing the juice of that electorate pleasure when you don't connect integrated enough with the people you are trying to convince to do you the honour. And than you need to understand the complex problems of previous governments who incidently said the same things that you are now trying to send out as your message for the people of Britain/ those living in the UK. Pick a straw and say: No specific policies at this stage, yes. That's why specific is only the future. The general election and winning it. These are the issues.
Projection, projection. In that case I think Tugendhat comes closer by the minute as we speak... 

The last Mohican BJ. Native Tory Party extinct. Just admit it.

10 July 2022

Rishi Sunak, Penny Mordaunt, Liz Truss, Jeremny Hunt, Tom Tugendhat, Nadim Zahawi, Sajid Javid, Kemi Bandenoch, Suella Braverman, and Dominic Raab. What are we looking at and in all honesty what can one say about the names here above for placing their bid at the Tory leadership next week? Be honest once again whether is there anything that inspires to say something sensible, while reading, Rishi Sunak 35%, Penny Mordaunt 22%, Liz Truss 15%, Jeremy Hunt 9%, Tom Tugendhat 9%, Nadim Zahawi 6%, Sajid Javid 5%, Kemi Bandenoch 5%, Suella Braverman 5% and Dominic Raab 2%. The public must be thrilled with these candidates and feeling that each of these names is making Britain feel united again, after the Tory Party and it's members 48% have kicked out the Prime Minister, Mr Boris Johnson. After Covid-19 and the thousands of deaths in the UK, maybe what some are not seeing is that since then things started to change a little with a new opportunity of the wider view or global view during the pandemic. Not too definite at the beginning, being reminded of another Monty Python scene this time from the film Life of Brian, and Brian's mother was explaining to Brian that his father wasn't Mr Cohen. "So, what you're saying is that you were raped?" And his mother answering, "Well at first..." Timing matters. No one can honestly say something sensible about the candidates that have put forward their names and avoid the herring smell or the pickled herring that comes with it and none of them are even coming with the onions along to dazzle the people or voters after the bad experience of thousands deaths of Covid-19. If you are going to unite the whole of the UK to once again vote for conservative and bring back the Tory Party in government, the thing you must ask at this point is not what can we do to get rid of Boris Johnson, but how or what can we do after so many people lost their loved ones when Boris Johnson was prime minister. Can the British or public in the UK believe that message from any of these names here above, Rishi Sunak, Penny Mordaunt, Liz Truss, Jeremy Hunt, Tom Tugendhat, Nadim Zahawi, Sajid Javid, Kemi Bandenoch, Suella Braverman, or Dominic Raab? Or is this just another opportunity? From any point of view this looks more like an opportunity already dead in the political womb.

There is also no new message for the public. With some among them to know how the system really works, and that the ousting of Mr Johnson was just another opportunity and that no one knows yet why. The Tory Party doesn't say, but could it be that the next move is to open up a whole different and new process with a whole set of cards of new demands? During the pandemic what most countries have learned was the fact of being one global community and to get rid of the Coronavirus and it's vaccination programs was to get the whole world follow the same view and rules. The economy was even so transparent that you could work from home an upgrade that wasn't there before Covid-19, if anyone can recall. 1. All countries on the western half of the planet were mostly operating on the same timeline during the first year and second on a global scale, and 2. where the Tory Party goes wrong is that still when back in the 'normal world' that was only the short term view. And not the long term, which is what no one seems to know or see where the future of the UK should be going. After Covid-19 where did the economy in Britain picked up again, and where did the global economy restarted? The candidate to deal with this half elevated view one down and one up maybe would be able to get close but none are qualifying to see the long term 'elevation' of this new economic transparency and the industries. The question is whether Britain or the UK has come to the realization of being in the state of extinction as no political party has yet envisioned new plans and leaders how best dealing with a return to the time after Covid-19, each and every country that was hard hit. What do the candidates mean by technological skills or promoting new technological skills for the people? And also being on the same timeline as the war in Ukraine. Russia is becoming a global threat as we are hearing and reading in the news about global food prices and the energy industries. This doesn't mean that the Prime Minister Mr Boris Johnson was having much success either on this platform, but what he did have was knowing the difficulties and strains about the new dynamics that he alone was facing, juggling between the world and at home being unpopular. When saying that he was alone of course meaning losing popularity amongst his own Party and that none of these members wanted to continue working with him on anything. Let alone to handle the post Covid-19 pandemic economic global 'moving on' present time. At one point you could say that in the end no one had the talent for that and thus the chaos started of ousting him.

The new candidate to their liking will be one who can hardest hit the pans and pots and produce the white noise effect on the electorate, so no one hears or sees what is hitting them. Or, take the candidate that is best known for shutting his ears with both his hands and repeating nananananana till everyone stops demanding for anything. Like the episode in Fawlty Towers, it's better to train a monkey. Who knows it might just do the trick and than move on. In mind pictures one can see the major walking out of the hall with Manuel on his hands to show him where the kitchen/ dining room is (Fawlty Towers).

It's hard to say right now what the next move for Mr Naftali Bennett, former prime minister of Israel, will be.

30 June 2022

Already the opposition leader Mr Benyamin Netanyahu has been addressing Knesset Members this morning about the fundamental danger to Israel done by the government of Yair Lapid. 'They have tried their experiment and failed," referring to the coalition under now interim Prime Minister Yair Lapid. Prices had gone up in the country, e.g. milk. (Not toothpaste and choclate paste as this would refer to the poorest Israelis) The immortal question for Mr Bennett is what will he do now in his 'sabbatical' year as alternate prime minister? With his family and Mr Lapid and his wife they held a mini ceremony of switching seats on the rotational prime ministership of the coalition agreement between Bennett and Lapid last year in June 2021. That is how it was known and called during the whole year of Mr Bennett as prime minister! No need for formalities in Israel when Mr Netanyahu is not the prime minister, so it seems. But one important formality remains in which there is no other former prime minister at this time than Mr Naftali Bennett, and not the opposition leader who now is led under Mr Yair Lapid as Prime Minister (actually Interim PM). If these were naval fleets at sea that would be interesting how to call Mr Bennett or Mr Netanyahu. (Mr Lapid as commander) Mr Bennett today has said that he will always remain a loyal soldier to Israel and that Israel was the love of his life. No future reality will match these words with any other than himself as prime minister or leader of Israel. Rupert Brooke about England in 1914: "The Soldier
If I should die, think only this of me:
That there's some corner of a foreign field
That is for ever England. There shall be
In that rich earth a richer dust concealed;
A dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware,
Gave, once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam,
A body of England's, breathing English air,
Washed by the rivers, blest by suns of home.

And think, this heart, all evil shed away,
A pulse in the eternal mind, no less
Gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given;
Her sights and sounds; dreams happy as her day;
And laughter, learnt of friends; and gentleness,
In hearts at peace, under an English heaven."

So this is the end of it when Mr Bennett was prime minister of Israel. I don't agree with Mr Netanyahu that the coalition failed because the prices were going sky high during one year of Mr Bennett's premiership. The prices have nothing to do with their 'failure'. On a national principle the opposition under the command of Mr Netanyahu as their leader did not vote with the coalition on the extension of the settler's law. Any respectable statesman knows how to tell the truth to parliament or Knesset, you would think. But these are his own words and statements and in fact is embarrassing him when listening very carefully. Mr Bennett did not had the eloquence or semi eloquence in the same order as Mr Netanyahu (known formerly as Ben Nitai) and had something more of a simple and personal 'phonetics'. A deaf man could even hear him thousands of miles away across the oceans, so to speak. And this is reflecting in his short or brief (brevity) career as prime minister, when speaking with world leaders and in the region and outside. All that is gone now and it is time to look one more time ahead what Mr Bennett would want to do in the coming time. His family should not be sad as their dad and husband didn't leave government because of unclean hands. Also, last year or the year before that, no one could have predicted for Mr Bennett that the next premiership would be his to take and lead. We've seen him coming this far, maybe premature for his fortune, why despair?

The only thing that is lacking to make a come back kid of Mr Bennett, if let's say this is what he wants, is something called fate. Perhaps good to read "God in the Years of Fury” aims to probe the paradigmatic thinking of RabbiKalonymus Kalman Shapira, the Piaseczner Rebbe, a 20th century Chassidic thinkerwho grappled in real time with the meaning of the suffering that he and his communityendured in Warsaw during the Holocaust years."

The next election will be held on 1 November four months from now. There is a small chance of the leader of the opposition to try steal Mr Lapid's thunder when referring to the infrastructure both physical and social, was the impression one could get from him today when speaking to the Members of Knesset. One year minus 20 years, under his rule as prime minister, how is he managing this math and sell it to the people that this social or economic deterioration was all due to the Lapid government? And pointing also his index finger at Mr Lapid's reputation as a bad minister of finance. Maybe the message is that Mr Netanyahu could do prosperity in one year. Imagine what this means in terms of 20 years! His fans would lynch anyone to point out such a ridiculous fact to him. But what is Israel's main commodity? Israel is not Saudi Arabia, if you are correct to tell him how the economy works. Today also was the name of the former US president Donald Trump who 'mulls' over endorsing Mr Netanyahu in the coming elections. And what if Prince Andrew endorses Naftali Bennett to come back one day as prime minister? (Forgive me for my comparisons) The only people that do not know about these endorsements are the poorest Israelis in Israel. The other half millions... Israel also is not an all Jewish State in the present time with 3 or 4 million Arabs living in Israel as citizens. How could the former prime minister have done all this 'physical works' in one year time? The future is also about renewable architectures and environments for people and jobs. If Mr Lapid as interim Prime Minister misses his 'broken constituencies' and only concentrate on Mr Netanyahu he will be losing much on his own parallel strategies to win the next election. Do the poor have an industrial base?

UK PM Johnson 211 votes (63 majority) win last night.

(Brief comment)

7 June 2022

The Telegraph UK today on Twitter: "Boris Johnson told his Cabinet ministers at a meeting in No 10 this morning that last night's confidence vote will allow the Government to "draw a line."
No, it couldn't. The PM wants to get on with working for the British people and that is the right thing to do, so he said yesterday evening after the votes. When still in / with the EU this place had all the luxury to keep the government and parliament systems happy. Without the EU Britain is about work plus more work. And no time or luxury to keep the systems happy. In fact answering the here above isn't this the same thing when drawing a line? What you're trying to say in writing is precisely that the Tory party cannot draw any line without explaining what the PM means by 'getting on with the job'. The answer is Brexit. Brexit, Brexit, Brexity versus complacency EU dark sunglasses striped with yellow (belly) stripes. That is the real question to deliver Brexity along the low Y- line of the economy and bring to every British plate in every household for the people of Britain. Growth if this side is where the PM is strongest whether in view or fact that is the truth the people want from their government and Prime Minister. The truth where the opposition and 148 members in the Tory party say he has lied and should go, how much of this reflects what the people really want? And if that does not work by the end of next year's term for the PM will be another thing for which none of his 'enemies' are prepared to dealing with. It is what the people want, so they are saying, is to have an honest man to lead the country. And not one who is lying or deceiving government and the people. They can see that the PM is an unprincipled man and this should be pointed out clearly if he is fit to be PM under these unprincipled facts. It looks very much like it is their job to build Britain along these lines to be on the right side of the principle. Name one first Brexit principle? How will they vote in future without a first Brexit principle? It is work, work, work, work, work and work again. Work in the economy, work in the NHS, work in de industries (which areas?), work in businesses, work and work everywhere across the country's lines and alongside it's borders with Ireland and so forth. The second Brexit principle is growth in the future constraint by time or periods. All of this from simple projections and observations, let alone when true! Can the opposition or any other Tory PM candidate say that that too was their vision? Not when there is not yet an existence of pure Brexit principles to lead the country out of the time when with the EU (decades long). The next PM should have a clear idea where Brexit principles do matter and will matter in the nearest of future. Prime Minister B Johnson, how can one put it, is like Jonah in the belly of the whale and waiting for the whale's water spout fountain to get him out again on dry land or shallow waters by the shore of the universal new world challenges.

Looking back on last wednesday, 11 May 2022, how quick is memory fading to flax linen dry grass in the winds.

17 May 2022

Life must go on and today in the Palestine Chronicle we have seen pictures of agriculture in Gaza getting ready for the harvest. Hope if nothing else is still growing out of the earth even here in these harsh conditions of total debris and other deep tracks with lifeless soils, that wheat and grain are bread and food for your daily basics or need. In time-lapses of this still life how far can your vision see it's future? A refugee camp is not the same as your castle is your home, or where home is there's where your castle is. Nor is it's total debris the fresh lawn of your green garden designed by landscape architecture and it's architect. Yet the people in these still photo's or pictures in Jenin Palestine (West Bank) are saying that they will not give up their land and life in Jenin. 73 Years later we can hardly not believe this determination and call ourselves bluff against the background of sheer human will, to life and living deep under the basic need of some humane constructive and intelligent understanding. Is the woman's soul truly void of palpable existence, as Arthur Schopenhauer once had said? If it is liquid than we can know or find out the truth. The birth of water? On a LinkedIn page on farmers syndicate one reads about investment and you can't help thinking of where investment is the same for the Palestinian people in Gaza starting with the capital of $50.000. Prosperity smells liquid if feasible, don't you see my point? But the clouds above Gaza and West Bank are of iron while the earth is nothing like spurned silver. Yet when the winds blow through the fields dreams pass you by like flax linen fresh grass and than settles in the dust of eternity, too far to reach by the hands of humanity. In retrospect of the death of slain journalist Ms Shireen Abu Akleh on wednesday 11 May 2022, it is now nearly one week later. Still no news on the killer of Ms Abu Akleh. Many organisations military or political say that they will not give up and will conduct probes of their own into her killing, are some of the readings on Internet. Perhaps it can also be in the interest of Israel not to miss this opportunity to investigate how the journalist was murdered/ killed. If they are not the killer, than who is?

After all specialists facts within the perimeters of where her body was found lifeless laying on the ground, dead of life/collapsed arms and feet, facing the ground, not many have yet found what sort of killing this must have been, if the left ear was hit and not the right ear or back of the neck/ head. Technicians are still investigating from which angle the bullet came to Ms Akleh's ear and head. What beats everyone is the lack on specialist information why it was the left ear and not the right ear that was hit/ pierced through and into the head. With her hands, feet and head collapsed and faced down lifeless everyone as was in it's first seconds still are convinced that the shot must have been the result of an instant death by the Israeli army sniper. The line of her body was laying in a straight line. Could there be a new weapon and added to a new catalogue for future weapons in the military or for 'civil' use? How is it possible to have taken a shot through her left ear when this was facing the wall where she took cover and her last breath? From any logical point of view, vertical, horizontal or diagonal, the best shot to take had to be her right ear, as this was exposed to a more wide 'open field'. And if it wasn't that her colleague was also hit in his back the world would have never known that this was the place where the shooting had happened. Whatever it was, which specialised weapon, this wasn't to shoot tomatoes. And more that is drawing concern is that this weapon was/ is built on discipline with a new rationality of 'selecting' innocent targets and with maximum impact. That would leave or take out Israel from the equation and leave it to another question. Which conventional one is hard to say. One fiction does sway here which is that the killing of Ms Abu Akleh was one of a trophy killing as is in the same meaning of any trophy wife. Today, 17 May 2022, in Elkana the Prime Minister of Israel, Mr Naftali Bennett, made a first time visit in the Judea and Samaria region. Aka the West Bank. 

The Middle East and Prime Minister Naftali Bennett after Moscow.

11 April 2022

Ukraine is fighting for it's independence between west and east, west EU/ Poland, and east Russia. Israel has a strategic importance when it comes to security from enemies, of which Russia is key. Russia will not win anything, if getting Ukraine back. That would mean in layman terms it will come too close to the EU (Nato countries). As WWIII is equivalent from the very same idea of Nato coming too close to Russian borders. And President Putin is a man who castles with objectives... Eight weeks on Prime Minister Bennett of Israel is probably doing the right thing to keep his focus on domestic issues at home, with terror incidents as in media reports (Jerusalem Post) are saying over the last three weeks. If rumours are true his coalition also seems to be in some kind of trouble with one of Yamina's MK who has resigned from her role in government. But other news are also saying that this could last as in the days when Ariel Sharon in similar situation still could run government. What has Nafatli Bennett then to lose? Everything he fought for since his inauguration last year on 13 June 2021... Now the difficult question to answer will be what did the prime minister do and fought so hard for, as some are now having us believing? The kingmaker (next to another kingmaker on the Arab side after the 23 March 2021 election) for the first time in political history in our world was taken and not declined, in Israel. What most people are forgetting (willfully) is that Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid also had very little chance without the apparent kingmakers to become prime minister or be the ruling government in the 21st century. Legitimacy in politics in Israel still is on the opposition side with their strongman and leader Benyamin Netanyahu, at 72 still most potent politician in Israeli society and modern- day political history. However his legacy can only evaporate after deep analysis not on the former PM his profile and political biopic, but in terms of future significance. Which is making it an interesting view when one thinks the same thing about Mr Bennett as 2 1/2 year prime minister after Mr Netanyahu. Yesterday in the Palestinian Chronicle Mr Ramzy Baroud in his article wrote, "One may explain Israel’s political significance to the Russian-Ukrainian talks based on Tel Aviv’s strong ties with Kyiv, as opposed to Russia’s trust in Israel. This is insufficient to rationalize how Israel has managed to acquire relevance in an international conflict, arguably the most serious since World War II." Name article: "Can Israel Exist without America: Numbers Speaks of a Changing Reality."

What happened after Prime Minister Bennet's visit to Moscow when the war / invasion broke out in February eight weeks ago? Russia still claims east of Ukraine with the regions Donetsk and Luhansk are Russian, and in Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenski is saying that there is no trading with any of it's territory to Russia for peace. In the rest of the European west many are wondering what then should be placed instead to stop the war that had physically started in 2014, with Russia's annexation of Crimea. One thing remains the only logic, that Russia and Nato will not go for an immediate face to face border and end the threat of war. Or, another World War. This extensive logic can go even further that keeping Ukraine in between the Nato territories in the west of it's border and Russia in the eastern border, is making the better gesture when staying independent from both sides. That alone could also give to Ukraine the leverage it needs to use this independence as a political legitimacy and process in time. Peace is therefore the most obvious administrative remedy for Ukraine after the last invasion by the Russian President Mr Vladimir V. Putin. On paper most of these ideas are looking common sense mind bubbles, it is another thing or thinking in reality / Real Time. Mr Putin at 69 (October later this year at 70) at one point will come to realize how all in this dispute is coming to an end without any definite advantage or gains. When will another moment occur for yet again another war with Ukraine without a clear direction on the subject? Ukraine must find the means to exist independently, and simply because that is it's only chance of staying relevant in the region and internationally. So that the Russian President cannot maintain his overdose of grumpiness infinitely. To now point out why peace or to calm both sides in the first hours of the Russian invasion on 24 February 2022 was vital to mediate is that this could not have been the right balance if the mediator was both imposing sanctions on Russia while mediating peace/ cessation of hostilities on personal visits to Moscow. At home Prime Minister Bennett is being perceived as the illegitimate prime minister, but in a reversal of events and fortunes, he has done the most elementary of efforts as the prime minister with six seats when WWIII was surging high in Europe/ the world and Russia, talk of stopping the war and calming both sides to listen to each of the proposals that were possible even if not invented yet on the table. It was his own initiative, so the news had said of Prime Minister Bennett, in coordination with Germany and France on the last minute before he had taken off. In retrospect it was Prime Minister Bennett as Head of State of Israel who for one brief moment who had represented a global effort to mediate with Mr Putin in Moscow, who invaded Ukraine and threatened all Nato Members/ countries. Mr Olaf Scholz the Chancellor of Germany at the same time had wished that there was a similar mediator on the EU/ UK side. It is here where the west fails as there are no neutrality mediators available.  

Part III in the Ukraine- Russia war aftermath it jus might be the Middle East contraction or expansion of forces to come in play at a later time and date. Egypt, Jordan and the countries in the Abraham Accords and the prime minister of Israel, either Mr Bennett or other, could then be in a whole new face- off when that happens.   

The Prime Minister of Israel, Naftali Bennett, annouced on thursday yesterday, 31 March, that his mediation to stop the war in Ukraine is off.

2 April 2022

(00:54 AM)

Yesterday 40 km across the border reports in the news have said that two helicopters (or one helicopter at low altitude under the radar) had managed to fly from Ukraine into Belgorod Russia and had set an oil depot on fire, and then flew back safely across the border again. Ukraine nor Russia have not claimed any involvement over this attack. Peace negotiations continue online between delegations from both sides, Ukraine and Russia. Five weeks later since the war broke out on 24 February nearly two months ago the level of peace talks or mediation efforts by third parties, either as Prime Minister or President, or private mediator, is becoming a split from realities in the rest of the world and where the war broke out. News reports are also saying that Russia has one or two problems with it's military in Ukraine and that morale was low among the fighters now soldiers among a few other logistical problems. Ukraine is still campaigning for access to the European Union, President Volodymyr Zelensky is talking to all EU Member States and address his issues to parliamentary audiences via Zoom, and he is also stressing at the same time to Russia's delegates in every meeting through his own delegates that he will not seek Membership in Nato. Peace is or seems now either more illusionary or has been moved to a more complex level of talks and negotiations. The war, as prime minister Bennett, during his mediation had thought or desired, will not end any time near or soon. It is perhaps due to each with a different battle plan when the war broke out, and which took on a whole new evolution with especially an energetic Ukrainian President, who never stopped talking to world audiences about the war in Ukraine that was raging and causing death and destruction everywhere. The fighting still rages on as we speak. Prime Minister Bennett has announced that his mediation to end the war in Ukraine has stopped, but only for now. He has his hands full and dealing with the breakout of violence once more in his own capital Jerusalem, Bnei Brak Tel Aviv, and stabbings in the streets, something he thought necessary to fight back by calling Israelis with arms licences (on wednesday night) to use their weapons if and when facing danger from these violent enemies to the Jewish people in the State of Israel.

Mediating to end the war in Ukraine and talking to the Russian President, Mr Vladimir V. Putin, over the phone, has taken a sharp contrast if violence escalates in the capital Jerusalem tomorrow on Ramadan, the Holy month of all Moslims in the world. One requiring serenity and the other a shoot to kill policy. This is not the prime minister the world has come to know as a patient and cool headed young man since he was inaugurated on 13 June last year in 2022. Perhaps it is time to now see him as the Prime Minister that he is and not how we wanted him to be, a servant of the people of Israel... The decisions he has to make or take are officially only his to call for, if no one stops him on a mantra that he is not the prime minister with only six seats. If he is taking on the decisions that are difficult and not based on theories, diplomacy, civic philosophy and other more refined characteristics, he incidently possesses, than yes he is the prime minister. He has to move on and remember what it was like when and where he had started his political career. Mr Bennett has a rare fortune for being also unfortunately the prime minister without a majority to lead the country and State of Israel. If he wants to survive the rest of his term it is only healthy and natural to become a little more selfish and follow the asymmetrical path of modern days politics or the military force to make your mark. No politician in the developed world has ever kept his promises or manifesto promises once they take on Office as Prime Minister. And yet, for some you can only want them to stay in balance before their political career terminates. Or, expire. And when that happens it is always because your political analyst hasn't done too well on your translations, from diplomacy to the general sense of the public and the mood, but especially when in the global sphere. That said, still it is hard work for most of these 'political translators' when serving the prime minister. And that in any ordinary day or time for a parliamentary democracy in the west. But what if it is Israel where each day or moment in Real Time it can turn to violence and death? One translation is saying that it could make you schizophrenic only mildly when you know your world and the nature of your people, but when not who knows what you might do or say to stay on top. Ten years from now the prime minister of Israel, Mr Naftali Bennett, one wonders how he will look back on the present time when he was a mediator to end the war in Ukraine and had a very good chance at deepening the peace negotiation process between Ukraine and Russia, be it on a more personal basis between men, and then stopped. And how will he be looking at the reason for stopping, when he radically called for bearing arms in civil society Israel to everyone with a licence to carry weapons (certain fire weapons). It is perhaps this moment when he will realize how close he came to do the impossible things and that the honour would have only been his forever. Wasn't that too an impossible reach for Israel's prime minister who will never be like any of his more consummate predecessors? One would think that peer- pressure was only during your years in school or university.

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett

25 March 2022

Happy Birthday, and perhaps overcoming much confusion and adversity during your prime ministership is the blessing and good wishes in a time like this the best one could wish for you and your family.

Yours truly,

...............................................................

Res Nullius II

15032022

PAX U-R (PEACE PLAN 2022)

(Amateur peace plan U- R during agreement stage)

What is feasible, what is reasonable and what is natural? Study of demands from the political and military perspective (opposite military objectives by one party when in a war). This means formatting peace or the Pax U-R.
Clause: after presentation this will not be open for any literary interpretation indefinitely. Or come back to all within the ideal and idea of what is unreasonable and resulting in the risk of another war.

1. Feasible peace plan

2. Reasonable peace plan

3. Natural peace plan

Note 13 March 2022

PAX U-R (PEACE PLAN 2022)

(Amateur peace plan U-R during agreement stage)

What is feasible, what is reasonable and what is natural? Study of demands from the political and military perspective (opposite military objectives by one party when in a war). This means formatting peace or the Pax U-R.
Clause: after presentation this will not be open for any literary interpretation indefinitely. Or come back to all within the ideal and idea of what is unreasonable and resulting in the risk of another war.

1. Feasible peace plan: Short term and long term future- retrospect Independence from USSR in 1991 Ukraine not as perpetual intellectual property of Russia. To stop all future wars with Russia, whether the economy or military.

2. Reasonable peace plan: exploitation of Ukraine natural resources/ commodities will remain in the sovereign hands of Ukraine and it's electorates. Third parties will have to submit all short or long term contracts to do trade with Ukraine or the Ukranian people in an official capacity and according to government laws and scrutiny, and International laws on foreign contracts overseas. Ukraine will follow advice on how to keep the country in everlasting peace with it's people, neighbours, and the rest of the world. Russia has only a bright and peaceful future, vis-a- vis Ukraine, if a period of observance can be reached reciprocate instead of reciprocity, distinctly if to avoid Independent Ukraine as a third country party to eternity, from our honourable neighbour Russia's view. Independence thus does not only is inclusive of a parliamentary democracy, but in the uniqueness of a young history and extent to the future of Ukraine since it's Independence from the USSR in 1991. And in not too much elaborate detail: our definition of democracy is fundamentally based on the intellectual perception of not only the dream of the Ukranian populations to live in the land of their ancestors, but also that Ukraine envisions the future of the land as their own heimat for always.

3. Natural peace plan: immediate deconstruct blockage- human basic need- of water systems in Crimea. Human rights to water are universal.

Military peace plan: through Defense Ministries only military, national (and International).

National Currency circulation: Hryvnia

Res Nullius

6 March 2022

(00:29 AM)

The definition of law is different from the definition of war and automatic ballistic fire power.

When there are limitations in place: is the glass half full or half empty? Also, there are studies made on wars and their multiple excessive truths. Science has no answer found yet to this unknown phenomenon of why war can only lead to war excesses. If that is the case of this or that conflict... It is truth that makes it primarily military (ethics), that makes it military in a second degree and undefining war truths, and not just a separate defying part in, perhaps, a universe/ a universal understanding... e.g. that the global understanding will stay equally a universal responsibility for countries, people and states in a living world, that is by nature to unify and when in war to strangely divide.

There is the definition of International laws and their hierarchies, and the definition of war hierarchies.
Questioning whether the glass is half full or half empty is something everyone can understand, how and what the defence is/ could be.

In concreto: one defence is inadequately without honour and the other without adequately defence (world order globalization), but ad infinitum superbus of honour.

To the other side, Mr Volodymyr Zelensky is globally the man of the hour in Ukraine.

26 February 2022

Indeed, an impressive young man and statesman. Popular belief it isn't difficult to say that Mr Putin has had his finer days in politics and that now we must look to the other side in Ukraine when praising a rising star Prime Minister and President. Zelensky is now burning the hearts of his countrymen as a hero who has chosen the same ground for the fight against the Russian invasion as they are trying to defend their lives and that of their children. The complete picture is about the people of Ukraine in the State of Emergency and who are now in despair everywhere you are looking. Still to be realistic it is also important to emphasize the question why this has happened again in Ukraine, after 2014 and 2015 when the Russian President agreed to respect Ukraine and it's independent aspirations for democracy and becoming a Member State of the European Union. TPOU just this morning has once again said in a statement how he is urging the EU to make harder effort in allowing Ukraine and the well deserved Ukranian people to enter the EU Membership. "The people of Ukraine deserve to be part of the EU," so the statement is saying. (Quoting here not literally) But again Russia is making it very hard for Ukraine not to aspire such ambitions if it wants to survive this fragile democracy since 2014. According to the POR Ukraine does not know any definition at this early stage about democracy or what kind it wants, because it has still deep ties with Russia. Does the Ukraine President mean e.g. Tiktok and Instagram for his definition of modern day democracy in the region of eastern Europe?

Yet, Mr Zelensky is the man and hero of the hour in Real Time West. He has been broadcasting many impassionate statements and video messaging out in the world to the global audience about his determination to stay in Kyiv and with his people in a horrific scene of war against a potent Russian army and military. The young statesman one has to admit is very impressive and moving. He is 44, a baby, one would almost feel to say with some sort of internal sentiment for state politics when being the planet size cradle of civilizations. Many now love him, which is not hard to see or hear throughout world media and social media this morning. Hero, hero, hero, is what Mr Zelensky is to the global audience. The Russian President being portrayed to this background by some as the Roman emperor Nero who had burned Rome in a fit of defeat. (Imperator Nero Cladius Divi Claudius filius Caesar Augustus Germanicus) Public opinion is bad advice when used for your generals... And will Mr Zelensky get the kind of help that he needs from the EU, US, UK, and other combative volunteers? This will be important to hear or read what package the President of Ukraine has set up for everyone who wants to come help fight in Ukraine, and take up arms against the Russian soldiers. It could also be seen as Mr Zelensky's moment of agony and ecstasy in the face of imminent danger. Nato it has been said yesterday in a comment on the Internet that no Member State of Nato can send in the military to help fight against the Russian military, or risk Nato going to war with Russia. And that would send out the negative message to Mr Putin, knowing that the Russian military and it's precision technological military weapons could than respond...

For the moment let's keep it safe and give credit where credit is due. Praise again for the young President of Ukraine Mr Volodymyr Zelensky and his compelling speeches in the face of Ukraine's 2022 history.

You follow a certain line of truth and make sure you won't fall off when you are the Prime Minister of Israel.

4 February 2022

When the Prime Minister will look back on last week he will remember the article in the Jerusalem Post (by Lahav Harkov) with his interview on what his government has achieved so far during his prime ministership for the last seven months. He still has one year and six months left to finish his term in the coalition agreement with the Center Left- Right Yesh Atid and Blue & White, and with the far Left parties. One Arab Party included. Incidently the prime minister has gained significant weight during the last eight and a half weeks, since last November in 2021. There could be good reason for this and that maybe his life has changed from an all consuming ambition to become prime minister and becoming prime minister. Six months ago the prime minister was expected to 'get to work for the people of Israel' the next day after his inauguration on 13 June 2021. What has happened in the meantime especially after the passing of the State Budget on 4 November last year, could be one reason why this has reflected on the prime minister on his heavier appearance a few weeks later. Meeting with foreign or regional leaders on the world stage requires a certain statehood of appearance, straight back and stately walk. On all these visits the prime minister had the look of his role as the new prime minister of Israel, straight walk, back and steps on the red or blue State welcome carpets. Other people in the rest of the world get obese from depressions sometimes even from since childhood and seldom recover fully. Political disease cannot be the reason why Prime Minister Naftali Bennett has gained significant weight, we hope. After seven months as prime minister of Israel the only impression that could send out a good message is that of the energetic man he used to be when still campaigning to become the next prime minister. There is another more natural reason when being an Israeli and having a good life with your family and that Mrs Gilat Bennett e.g. is a very good cook. How is this politically relevant to the prime minister's term in Office? Maybe ask a 72 year old why he never leaves the Knesset gym. I foolishly thought that having been an elite member of the Sayeret Matkal military unit the prime minister would do himself a favour and start a fencing first time as a student of the sport in Israel. That perhaps was a long shot as this PM is not a vain man and what he believes in are practical ideas and simple policies practicing. Or so we are to believe.

That makes his latest interview last week even more intriguing when reading his almost candid thoughts on politics and the political actors in and outside government, and even going as far as including his mother, senior Mrs Myrna Bennett, who is supporting the prime minister and son with her personal universal wisdom to always look for the truth. Since the days of David Ben Gurion the truth has since then been the torch for Israel with 73 years later that now the flames are surging dangerously against the common sense and basic principles of what had started in the forties as the moral truth. The State of Israel has never been of any other physical substance than moral truth. A nation that was everywhere persecuted in Nazi Europe West and East had come to the conclusion that humanity was ambiguous when it came to Jews. In the new world it is even more important to understand that ambiguity has never left mankind in any form or shape and that it is still the same self image that we know whether in politics or the omission thereof. Nazi Germany was left behind forever since the birth of the State of Israel and with new generations of the Jewish people, people like Naftali Bennett, the future is about Israel as a State and country. However this is not what Israel needs. The man they believe in to lead Israel on the world stage is Benyamin Netanyahu, the 72 year old who never leaves the Knesset gym. How will this government and it's prime minister find the strategic rationale to deter or defer regional and other leaders and their strategies if e.g. the intent was to cripple the State of Israel for a long term in time? We will not mention any specifics here against a potential enemy of Israel. The Prime Minister cannot be prime minister without a clear mandate to act and be responsible for the people of Israel when it is denied to him to be prime minister with seven or six seats in the present time coalition. It is also a clear government title when there is a new government and coalition to lead government. The opposition still is denying the prime minister his right to govern and perhaps weakening government confidence in the prime minister by allocating no portfolios to build up the political strategies needed acutely in difficult areas or at the center of the people and their 73 years independence. How much is a loaf of bread in Rials in Iran, when e.g. the State wants to generate revenues and that 42,000 Rials to the US Dollar is not clear whether this is from income or consumerism (consumption)? Democracy in Israel is fortunate about it's economy and economics nationally and Internationally, where transparency creates accessibility with the global currencies and monetary policies or politics. How much more is the cost for military weapons in Iran in terms of fiscal policies? The PM was right to say a few weeks ago that Iran is not as world leaders see it and that in fact it is crippling under internal ills and no remedies. But who listens to a prime minister with a short life or term of 2 years only? Even when he is a man who is ready to listen to all parties, difficult and foreign. A good life is perhaps the best thing for any man, wife and children, but this prime minister seems to want to do some work for the country and it's people (with an Arab population of 3 mln).

Naftali Bennett doesn't impress much as a perfect man to be prime minister in Israel, as was his predecessor Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. Cover and Book, two different meanings.

Personal opinion (not professional) after wednesday 26 January 2022

29 January 2022

The legal team to Prince Andrew and himself: between 26 January and September 2022 should prepare for the final conclusive statement made by Guiffrie's legal team.
The Federal Child victims Act is expected to be made their central point against Prince Andrew, one can only assume this logical step. That presumably will be respected by the Defense legal team to Prince Andrew as also by the prince himself. What next? An appeal?

Whether the appeal is a living argument this will end up 'dead' in court against the Federal law of Federal Child victims Act. And conviction of crime under the Act of Federal Childs victims will not be contested by the defense team to keep their respectability in the public and in court.

Appeal Argument Fiction I:
the legal team to Ms Guiffrie has been opportunistic and use the Federal Child victims Act against Prince Andrew over this case as they are professional lawyers and known for having had cases before and were similar (simile).

Argument II
The defense team respects the Federal Child victims Act and will not make any argument it's case against the law to help victim or young child as our universal understanding in all of Human Rights by convention in the International world, but in the end of the day what was not erasable here against the defendant is not made possible either to be permanent in the relevant civil case against Prince Andrew.

Argument III
Prince Andrew known as a visitor of the Jeffrey Epstein estates during the time when the latter was still alive, and is also known a friend to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell since their days in University. Emphasis here is: Jeffrey Epstein's global financial corporate image. Will it be law and lawful to investigate all of the global corporate world based corporations on the findings of the 'invisible' sex trafficking in the Epstein corporation?
Today a global tourist (or other) resort, next an International sex trafficking scandal (vertical or horizontal) intersection, and prince Andrew is guilty or convicted of the sexual abuse crime against a minor under the New York Federal Child victims Act on ... ... 2022.

Argument IV Fair trial - quality of law and reason.

Prince Andrew's lawyers in the US yesterday, 26 January 2022.

27 January 2022

"Prince Andrew demands a trial by jury," was the headline in yesterday's news online and around the world. Virginia Guiffrie's lawyers Mr Boies and Lisa Bloom both have said that this was a PR stunt and 'Bring it on," the news said or interviews. Ms Guiffrie will get her trial by jury anyway, because she wants 'her day in court' and also wants an apology by Andrew Mountbatten- Windsor. Technically her day in court is not the same thing as trial by jury demand by Prince Andrew, as he is not the victim but the defendant. And also that is not the case as the lawyers to Ms Guiffrie want us to believe, that Prince Andrew's lawyers are playing with words here or try to put up a show fight back. It is actually at this point in time the right move to 'introduce' (litmus paper). In memo: the case against Prince Andrew has been a dead voice for more than two years since Ms Guiffrie 'filed' the sexual abuse case against the Duke of York in 2019. Next followed a very passive long path of accusations from the side of Ms Guiffrie's lawyers, through formal complaints and the public condemned without 'trial' that Prince Andrew was a paedophile. It is therefore a bit tipping over today when the team lawyers to Ms Guiffrie want to brush this one off as a PR stunt in the face of a strong and sudden blizzard of legal points coming from the side of Prince Andrew. And they moved on to saying that there was another witness who had seen Prince Andrew with a young girl at Tramp's in London, and that the prince had stepped on her toes. (If yours truly would say the same thing am I then also considered a witness? And by that I mean it is transpicuous and slightly artful calling a witness in court a witness so vague) On the other side Prince Andrew is fighting for the absolute truth and wants to speak the truth by trial and jury (verum dicere). When he kept shtum the whole world said that the prince was probably guilty and therefore denied all the allegations against him. And the monarchy had become the new gypsies and pariahs they felt justly also that this was the time to discriminate against.

Of course everyone is anticipating what the next move will be in the civil case against Prince Andrew. His team have made their surprise move yesterday, and startled the legal team to Ms Guiffrie and who came immediately out running to ignore the move as legal tactics. What they cannot prove is to say that the move made by Prince Andrew's legal team was illegal. In fact this proves the point that the side to Ms Guiffrie were quite happy as all for the last two years was dumped on Prince Andrew as the defendant in this civil case and that there was no one who had seen yet any spark of life from him or his legal team. They are not being dishonest, are they? And maybe it is a better appearance for Ms Guiffrie's team where every one man's up a bit and accept the new challenge for a legal duel while the case is ongoing. What is still open to the public is the opinion that Prince Andrew will not win this case. He has no worthy options. Even if his innocence was based on having had his swimming trunks (hopefully not the board shorts) on while chatting with the girls by the swimming pool at one of Epstein's estates. Or rubbing sun tan lotion on a young girl's (criminal a minor) back by the swimming pool whose skin was warm overseas in the US sunheat. Guilty by suspicion or association in the International sex trafficking Epstein scandal in the end of the day will still be difficult for anyone who had been there to visit these places, a priori to the scandal outbreak. Man or woman. Yes, indeed, what is next after yesterday's headlines 'who dunit'? No one is toying here as no one is toying with the importance of the monarchy in England and Prince Andrew. He is still by birth the second son to Queen Elizabeth II, we must keep or bear in mind. Let us for a moment remember what it means to the crown and it's majesty, that it is here for the reason that the king or queen firmly believes exclusively in the blood of Christ and that all is given redemption throughout creation. It is therefore to some the most ghastly of all businesses that a son to Your Majesty is guilty of sexual abuse crimes before God and Man. Why would anyone try a PR stunt to help the prince fight his case for the truth? What can Prince Andrew do at the moment but await further proceedings.

F1 new season opening in 2022 next year. Should create a 'peerage system' within teams racing.

26 December 2021

Fourteen days ago at Abu Dhabi and we are still stuck in Max Verstappen's last minute in the 'out of this world' race overtake to the finish from Lewis Hamilton. Even when you're not a traditional F1 race fan, as Yours Truly. What will happen in the next season there are many comments to read on this subject in comment boxes on Youtube this week. But as it is still Christmas today there is no rush. And this will probably also give some resting period to Lewis Hamilton to decide whether he will retire altogether from F1 or not. Let's hope that by then he will realize that Max Verstappen had to be heroic to have taken the championship from him, in a surprise! More specifically some didn't call it a surprise but that Max Verstappen was favoured by Lady Luck in the last minute of the last lap in this race and won the championship. It never stops until the last second's moment in a race. Why this race became the most dramatic in modern day F1 racing, well what can one say. It was 2021 and now buried under a pack of thick Christmas snow?.. Other news reads that it was suggested that Max Verstappen should share the championship title with 7x F1 champion Lewis Hamilton. What can change the rules at FIA next year that this won't happen again between equals? Where can I begin when the old rules still apply with safety cars coming on the track to clear up debris from a crash, unlap or lapping the cars in front of the champion, behind or in between two contenders? Maybe it is all down to bad optics to now say that Max Verstappen should share his championship title with a duped Lewis Hamilton by the Laftifi crash during the last four/ three laps of the World Title Race. If good optics are decisive here one can also argue that Mr Hamilton, the older F1 7x champion did not discontinue to compete for his eight title in this race after the overtake by Max Verstappen in the fifth. One question and perhaps this is naive: why couldn't Lewis Hamilton have not stopped if he thought that Max Verstappen was disqualified after the restart? The vacuum gets only bigger at this crucial point in the optics. But optics do not matter in the F1 world as that is not a rule in the policies by the FIA regulations. Maybe next year, but we will have to wait for more news to come in the aftermath as this dispute continues.

In the next season we will have new cars and technologies for the F1 racing car will be fully electric (Hydrogen vehicle auto racing). And in some of the clubs also to watch for are the new drivers, e.g. George Russell from Williams to Mercedes AMG Petronas. Valterri Bottas will go from Mercedes to Alfa Romeo the next season. If Lewis Hamilton decides to leave Mercedes there are already suggestions who will then take his place. Names from the younger generation in the F1/F2 league have been suggested. Nyck de Vries (Holland)? What are we looking for in the next season and what can the fans expect to see from F1 in three months time from now? At this point today the question of Hamilton retiring is irrelevant. Mercedes AMG Petronas industries are the top racing world of the FIA and with it's drivers has made a very impressive championship among the other big names in the racing world also in this year. Every champion has the feeling of belonging when racing in the world of Mercedes AMG Petronas, one can only assume from afar. This belonging has of course no particular price tag into the industries, as far as we can understand it's family rules. You take the price and decide what to do with all that cash in your free time (quoted from Scarface when Frank is saying to Tony Montana that you will get so much money you don't know what to do with all that cash). However in top tier racing organisation, would that create peer atmosphere among the drivers? Think of what then may have happened in the Verstappen- Hamilton battle over the championship title this year! Would not Hamilton think that he had lost not to an individual private person, but to a peer? Forgive me, these are just random questions and answers. There is something very much missing once you have crossed the threshold of the F1 world with no fee to pay your way into racing. We are not talking or thinking here about shareholders fees, which is much more of a generous gesture made by the industry. Going a little deeper here I would think about the family concept as part of the threshold when joining the company or industry. How much do you pay for the F1 car to race or crash during test drives? Especially with E-racing cars for the next season.

Let's leave it to this. One last comment: one can wonder what Michael Schumacher would have done in the last race championship win by Max Verstappen.

Post Abu Dhabi 12 December 2021: let them race again and make the world go insane.

20 December 2021

From an architectural point: building the arena where Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton (now Sir Lewis Hamilton after his knighthood last friday) can battle it out again on the race track in 29 laps. Because it has now become a chess game instead where you play on and on in a rematch, if there is still room for sabre- rattling. The racing logic in the fifth when Max Verstappen overtook Lewis Hamilton in an honest clean overtake was uncorrupted and even, if I may say so, immaculate in racing. Imagine the speed and stay clean to overtake at the last minute or seconds? I am not an F1 automobile expert and I am not trying to think like one. But neither am I a fan. But there are a few lessons you can learn from high profile sports people and I think especially when in the world of racing. Does Lewis Hamilton believe that Max Verstappen did win the championship, not as a result from the chaos with the crash by Latifi (14)? No one knows as we have not heard from Lewis Hamilton since sunday 12 December. How is Max Verstappen honest? That is a very easy question to answer. After the race and still in the car he asked Team Boss Christian Horner via intercom, "Can we do this for another ten or fifteen years more?" There was no answer from the other side and this moment of silence nearly felt like an out of signal from the Apollo 13 Lunar Module (LEM) to Houston NASA. His heart is young and on the tip of his tongue, and still dreaming of to go on living for racing, or as a F1 racer. Something that doesn't fit anything in the Human Rights Judiciary basic principles. Important however is to have a closer look at the transformation of the F1 world and the FIA, that human rights and anti -slavery international laws do have been incorporated into regulations or policies on either professional website. Medicine is also part of the FIA foundation. This is why it is important to tread carefully with this last debacle at Abu Dhabi and still after eight days pointing the finger (almost circumcised) at Max Verstappen who has robbed Sir Lewis Hamilton of his world championship. Fraternity is a very French trait and sensibility and not to underestimate at any point past, present and future. Where had the world of fencing started first among mortals? Play fair are not just empty words as was clearly seen on FIA President outgoing Jean Todt his face and in his watery eyes when talking about his life at the race and track, how he still missed his racing friend...

Let them race again and do the championship race in 29 laps? For not just profession or interest, but more for the ideal of equality among men in the F1 racing world, after the championship one- sidedness... Like in love between two people this is even more important between professionals in a close environment of sports people, because in this milieu you can never kiss and make up when there is a bad effusion. One Youtube videoclip gave an interesting view that is not traditionally in the world of egalitarian principles, is to give back the trophy. To be precise it was put forward as a question to the public. Do we give answers in the world of the court jester also as suggested here above? Who is Sir Michael Masi? And who are the 'Stewards'? The global arena where all die hard fans of Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton live and breathe, are a very convinced electorate to know both offices, that of 'Mikey' (when called by Mercedes F1 Team Toto Wolff) and the Stewards. "No Mikey, No, that is so not right," the world heard Toto Wolff saying over the Intercom to Mr Masi. "The stopwatch never lies," Mr Wolff also had said in his Mercedes video press conference. I know a man 73 years old (family member) who has told me that the moment the cars slowed down the stopwatch had to be stopped, because the race logic here is that it is not a race anymore. After the safety car had left the race track and the race would restart (preferably at the starting line) the stopwatch would also start ticking again. Remember what Ayrton Senna had said in his own teutonic way that racing meant to him seeing God? It makes egalité all the more important to keep it in our principles when facing life and death, whether in daily life, war or nowadays even in peace time, but more here where people are rationally bound by these principles to high speed racing.

At F1 we can't kiss and make up. To brief this it is either go back to racing or let them race again for 29 laps in a new architecture or race circuit 'Another Planet' (Nico Rosberg this morning in the news News Sport). Not like in a chess game, but in fencing regulations rules:

Important Fencing Safety Rules

Wear proper attire. ...
Weapons always pointed down. ...
Weapons are pointed away from others. ...
Mask are on when weapons are raised. ...
Salute must be done from the enguarde lines. ...
Put away all equipment. ...
Don't wear fencing shoes outdoors. ...
Inspect the mask and weapon, every time.

What could have happened differently at Abu Dhabi on sunday 12 December 2021 F1 Racing?

(Personal op unedited)

15 December 2021

Three days later after the F1 Abu Dhabi racing there are still tears flowing from your eyes having had a rare chance to see two champions at the center of the world racing battling for their championship in the Grand Prix high tier racing. Unfortunately the fans are not the stewards or judges and decide where this has gone terribly wrong for the 7 times F1 world champion Sir Lewis Hamilton on sunday 12 December 2021. Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton side by side slowing down in the last lap behind the safety car was the most epic moment of a conclusive racing season, before striking to the final winning seconds... It was Max Verstappen who took the championship this year of this season Grand Prix F1 racing and the world went insane with joy that no one can explain. The FIA had took a controversial decision and also took the race equally to a different level in the last lap racing between Hamilton and Verstappen. To most fans championship goes out to the best man and racing driver. An undeniable and legitimate emotional decision in the public domain without arbitrary scrutiny. No one loves Hamilton less as it is known how the blade works on both sides of the championship sword. Both men gave the world to see something different and instead of what is conventional racing, ending with immaculate clarity one over the other, we got to see the real meaning of what racing is: to win. Names of other drivers like Carlos Sainz Jr and Sergio (Checo) Perez are equally in this race and end season after Abu Dhabi in our unforgettable fire for the sport that is loved crazy around the world, that they have given instead of taking sportmanship to the level of aggressive competing with the champions. This was respect for the sport all drivers are passionate about and more so because it is extraordinary unlimmited in terms of being together as a whole apart from all other sports and civil life. Civil life is hierarchically very subordinate and archaic...

In the world of racing today still there is an behind the scenes investigation ongoing, whether Verstappen has cheated his way out of this championship by the decision Michael Masi took in a very critical second. There is no doubt that Mr Verstappen is the champion of the F1 World Championship in 2021, from the sportmanship point of view and love for racing. Racing has two hearts on each side of the human body, left and right. One being, as I see it, for the human understanding and the other for racing. The racing has a limited life span in comparison to the human understanding of the heart and mind controlling it. It is perhaps what drives one in a personal way and to 'admit' oneself to the insanity of racing and driving on a Grand Prix F1- race circuit, even when sometimes poorly and commercially designed for this very purpose. It is for that reason that we are in love with the Max Verstappen Red Bull team and having only had the fans around the world on their side and no one else at this 2021 global racing event. We understand that Toto Wolff, a dedicated man and engineer to his drivers and Mercedes team, feels the other side of the sport in equally strong terms and who would want to stay faithful to the sporting rules of the Grand Prix F1 racing in championships. Perfection at human level while racing and winning I am afraid is philosophically only possible, Mr Toto Wolff. Racing is still a mechanical world and it's laws are sometimes, as I understand it as a layman (last four weeks), fractional and toxic, and not only traction or speed. Or absolute rules... But one can see Mr Wolff's point and it is only democratic to make that point heard. At his heart democracy is sanctity and should be held above the human desire of only winning a championship at very high tier racing in the F1. The question is whether racing at high level is democracy or a different law of order on a mass scale and magnitude. Democracy then becomes static by nature and racing is known to the world (fictional democracy masses)as something of fast movement. I would say that Mr Verstappen's winning of the F1 championship at Abu Dhabi was a perfect example of what a consummate young man is in this sport when racing at very high speed, but then by an unexpected change to the rules alters to first slowing down side by side with the 7th time champion, before the racing defining moment and accelerates to the finish as the champion. Racing has defined this race and the world was all in tears and humbleness to the racing sport. Surely that does say something about the abilities in the F1 world?

Error sportmanship- sportsmanship.

Has the PM set a time frame and point reference in the future?

(Unedited)

6 December 2021

Today in the Jerusalem Post article: "Arab-Israeli sector: Here is Bennett's plan to fight crime wave
"The law of Beersheba and Rahat is like the law of Tel Aviv," stressed Bennett at an operational tour of the southern Israeli city of Rahat."

Across the Negev the meaning of time is meaningless and this happens to be for Israelis also the same horizontal time boundary wall. Meaning time boundaries: Time boundaries Setting time boundaries means understanding your priorities and setting aside enough time for the many areas of your life without overcommitting." The article in the Jerusalem Post today has been putting forward a plan set up by the Prime Minister, but with no particular time frame and putting also a point of reference tied to the bloc of that time frame, e.g. over three terrains/ projects we will have a workplan and date in 2023 for evaluation and in 2026 to complete all three projects. To contain the Bedoin society in the Negev has no correlation to the problems one can find e.g. in the South of Tel Aviv, where also housing is in a permanent derelict state. The people in Tel Aviv do live within time boundaries and there is also plenty of workhours each project can realize if set to a time frame. Israel also has a horizontal time frame mental boundary that is infinite compared to the vertical time frame to neigbours in the west and across the sea and skies of other infinite territories. Shaw-aw has two constant meanings in Hebrew understanding: to look at or to, regard, gaze at or about; with these additional meanings for regarding vision or sensibilities: 1a) (Qal) to gaze at, regard, behold, look about 1b) (Hiphil) to look away, cause gaze to turn away 1c) (Hithpael) to look in dismay, gaze about (in anxiety). The same can be said for the Bedoins that were not born into the world and recording the first moment of birth for natural rights and being part of life in general. Theirs seems to be timelessness and born within an unboundary frame of time. Life has set them free so to speak. If we want to help this community perhaps the Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, should try first to introduce another set of abstract instruments where the Bedoin communities can get that sense of limited transboundary, and awareness that nothing is 'free or set free only by life' into chaos or anarchy. A Radiostation with hourly local newsbulletins is one such abstract instrument and every quarterly over the 24 hours time block with a more extensive daily news program accompanied by interviews and talks. (And not from radiostations in Arab countries) This perhaps is the only way to keep the people in a friendly- user- way close to realities beyond the communities in Israel elsewhere where these Bedoins are known as Bedoins and born to these territories as indigenous. The Prime Minister his plan is perfect, but when is he planning on the starting date and make that very important first move? Surely it is common knowledge that this is only looking good on paper and bears no relation to any real time or working plan?

The working plan should be the real initiative, something this prime minister seems to be having a good instinct for when one carefully reads the article in the newspaper today. Vertical time is another time architecture in the west e.g. Europe, North and South America, Australia, the far east across the Atlantic & Pacific. It is the reverse effect of being born where we see why and how it parts each and every continent from the other, east, west, north or south across the globe by the minute law. In politics let us be thankful for this prime minister having set his mind on doing what is long- overdue in parts of Israel where society is broken to boredom and apathy. The ministries in his flank of executing the plans written in the Jerusalem Post article today, are Justice, Interior, Finance and Project Managements. It is something desperately needed and not only in the Negev Bedoin communities, or Beersheva, but with greater emphasis in middle suburban places in Tel Aviv. And going back to basic fundamentals in Israel where life simply came at a halt without a care. The former PM Benyamin Netanyahu had some praise for the Bennett- Lapid government today on Iran, for standing up to the World Powers and not giving in to their demands... In the meantime the demands are still revolving and Iran has said today in a brief that there will be no interim agreement after the talks in Vienna last week. These were talks to lift sanctions, according to the spokesman. But praise for Prime Minister Bennett is at home when rebuilding Israel's broken societies and slums in the big cities. Iran has it's own slums problems which is unsolvable with the nuclear race across it's military threshold. Iran President Mr Ebrahim Raisi, with all due respect/ permission, knows how to look across the fence to Israel and it's conflict borders, but does not see his back where the people are 'crying black' for a more humane governing and reform? But it is always easy to criticise another country from the armchair and sitting behind a desk somewhere remote in the world and forget the kettle calling the pot black.

Post Scriptum: only one minister writes his notes during the debates in Knesset and this is no other than the former prime minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. Ministries use the oral messaging of their views, while in a modern day democracy there is such a thing as sending memo's or requests before debate in Knesset. The Ministers should be informed beforehand to any debate. Is the PM aware that his government is virtually non scribe when debating and delivering motions? 

From Jerusalem the prime minister of Israel in this morning news is once again making his Foreign Policy on Iran top priority.

5 December 2021

After the talks in Vienna last week it is cold urgency and top priority for the Prime Minister Naftali Bennett of Israel, even this morning and calling once again to the world powers not 'to give in to Iran's blackmail'. As he has used in his previous video message at the beginning of last week on monday. Jerusalem is not convinced that sanctions should be lifted and if returning to the old agreement could become a game changer for security, seems to be one perspective. The talks in Vienna have been mostly designed for objective purposes, and trying to find a resolution to the problem for not having Iran in the JCPOA deal under the new administration in the US. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has also said at the beginning of this week that the US was not convinced Iran was giving any reason for optimism after the last round of talks have ended with no sign of any cooperation from Iran, with the US to keep sanctions in place. The question on the table is whether the west can afford a subjective outlook on the situation with Iran not being party to a renewal of the JCPOA and to continue 'underhands' with it's nuclear program. And if there are other options, so say some, what are they? Stability in the region is a strategic memory for decades long and has always been the basis for strategic interest and key role players. In all this Iran does not have a majority voice in the overview, and from an even closer look it will not have any change on this in the coming decade. Perhaps it is best to say that what we are looking at from that point of view is that Iran is artificially inflated with military aspirations and set on either outdated military policies or is with new military weapons and not backed with the new military outlook at a global level. Nuclear is a global agreement among it's members in a historic design between the powerful nations. Of which also Iran (imperial?) was part of before the JCPOA architecture. To Prime Minister Naftali Bennett as the new leader in Israel and has been in Office since this year in June, Iran is using it's own set of 'tricks and schticks', to use here the former PM Netanyahu's words, when dealing in difficult politics. Another question burning on many their lips is also the question which is closer to dealing with Iran, whether this will be Foreign policy or Defense.

On another Offense issue closer to home for the prime minister was to allow his spouse, Mrs Gilat Bennett, and his four children to travel on a vacation abroad. Government rules for all citizens of Israel were in last week's new emergency again changed by the prime minister that no one should travel with the new variant Omicron abroad or coming in (without properly following the rules of quarantine). When Foreign Minister Mr Lapid and President Isaac Herzog also in the same week went on diplomatic visits to London the same was said by Prime Minister Boris Johnson in the UK in a statement. It is a matter of good management prime minister Bennett seems to be thinking where it applies to his spouse and children, and that he was open for all national criticism. Foreign Minister Yair Lapid managed, as did the president Isaac Herzog previous in the week before. Is it fair to say that Mrs Bennett will also manage her trip and going on a vacation with the danger of contracting the Omicron variant? Where you can have diplomacy on Zoom video calling, a vacation is another matter without 3D vision download travel. The world is still a natural place to live and not yet set in e.g. Gattaca and uninhabitable by living humans and other organisms. Or go to a no- confidence vote against the prime minister? When the Foreign Minister and President of Israel traveled in the same week and the week before to London, perhaps this was a safe destiny and our only hope is for Mrs Bennett and their children to follow suit in the same safe line to avoid the deadly variant Omicron with smart travel. If the no- confidence was filed against prime minister Bennett does that mean that the alternate prime minister, Mr Yair Lapid, then will become prime minister? For a political party leader with 17 seats and known to people in Israel as the second biggest party to Likud, perhaps it will be his prime ministership to bring reconciliation in the electorate domain, after the former formidable strongman Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. But, this was also known before Naftali Bennett became prime minister. Foreign Minister Yair Lapid like Julius Caesar maybe thought friendship had priority over general cold politics, and especially with change in mind. I am an ardent supporter of Prime Minister Naftali Bennett for the simple reason that he was on the road of reform and rebuilding what was broken in society in Israel through low- key or gradual compatibility, and also knowing that that would be a mammoth task after the Netanyahu years of global economy and market economy (the former PM's words). In a previous experience prime minister Bennett had had some experience on horizontal economics and dealing with prices of milk (?). Fate or destiny had the prime minister forgotten the honey with which you sweeten the electorate? Gideon Saar is vice prime minister.

Chapter A & F

11 November 2021

The Duke of York and the Duchess, Ms Sarah Ferguson, will be facing the world alone when the time comes next year in December 2022 for the 'hearing' of the civil case against him (and maybe even against Sarah Ferguson to testify, was suggested two months ago). And from there the future for the Prince is only looking more bleak and strangely enough is also 'ungiven' of any other time to look forward to in happiness. Many are preparing for the worst case scenario after the hearing next year, that the Prince will or should be giving answers, either in person or via Zoom, at the request by his plaintiff in court in New York, Mrs Virginia Guiffrie (antecedent Virginia Roberts when still 17 and she had met with Prince Andrew at Epstein & Maxwell's house in London). It is looking especially isolated for both, the Duke and Duchess, from another point, that the world is still fighting the pandemic Covid-19 and as a result that maybe by then the public's interest in the story will be waning or wane totally from their minds. Everyone is now more worried about their health & safety issues, being either vaccinated or not, or getting a booster shot in six months from now. And another pressing issue after COP26 in Glasgow Scotland a week ago is Climate Change. Today it was announced that the next COP27 2022 will be hosted in Egypt, and in 2023 the UAE has been selected to host the next COP28. The future away from 'the castle' (House of York) is quietly becoming the image of a once robust past and architecture with barely any embers to burn in it's greater future hearth. Royalty once believed by all mankind was unable to go extinct and especially when speaking of royalty in Britain. It is perhaps this age that we are living in that is making globalism a universal presence to be felt everywhere in the world with no eye for historical exception or uniqueness of any sort or kind. People everywhere in the vast continents are becoming aware in our time and era of their own right as part of a greater humanity, and are not thinking of reversing their apparent successes to greater autonomy and thinking about a different time in history. Specifically the British royal history in former colonies. In the old world order procurement was the global sacred cow and many believed it had massive golden horns for eternity. Self awareness and living more connected from nation to nation wasn't until after 2015, or in Britain's case after 2016. Brexit proves another moment of change toward self awareness and to go her own ways again. It is not the ordinary Brit alone who will be doing all the fighting for sovereignty at the end of the negotiations with the EU, but, as it seems, it is also the British royals that will have to fight for sovereignty after Brexit. For Britain in short it is not just Prince Andrew and the allegations made against him of having had sexual relations with a minor (17), but there is also the story on Brexit that is still a fierce debate in the House of Commons.

The question on everyone's lips is whether Prince Andrew can do some good as a 'disgraced' member of the Royals in Britain. The latest in the news on the case against the Duke of York is saying that Prince Andrew is lately reacting very aggressive on the allegations made by Mrs Guiffrie, and has even said that it was another pay- day for the plaintiff and why she was now on to him. That doesn't look like his best defense yet. At least not when defending your world and work when that fateful time had happened. The years 1990,2000,2010 and 2021, do not even had the use of personal Internet in homes in common as this was only advanced after the millennium by 2007, as a prelude to the next digital age. And in 2023 we are even looking at a new future of the Great Reset, as is written by Klaus Schwab (President of the World Economic Forum). Our future and not just that of the Duke and Duchess, or British Royals, will become subjected to another unknown of great magnitude, and this is after the world of yesterday's globalisation. At the moment as we speak what most people worry about are the vaccinations, and how many will survive Covid-19. The other half is protesting the vaccinations and infections at a national scale to any government in the European Union. And, of course, outside and in the UK. To cut a long story short one can only ask whether Prince Andrew his defence is defending Prince Andrew only, but then as whom or what function (royals have functions). It is his logical point of view to think in first person when accused of sexual misconduct with a minor, but the other side to this logic is whether he is also defending another abstract area that he is part of, let's say initially by royal blood relation. That is a very important question as it is something only he can do and no one else, or they will try it poorly. Unlike the surgeon who can only defend his skill and performance if the patient has died from unexpected complications. The surgeon is also not a fortune teller, at least not when your skill is all about precision. But what he can't do is that he cannot defend the abstracts here and mention anything to his defense about the hospital! Let's hope that the prince realizes the importance of his defense and how it will be conducted in court when the time comes. He can't miss on trajectories that only he could and can build, as the Duke of York and second son to Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. (I see here e.g. Hexahedron by Paolo Soleri)

Post Scriptum: If accused wrongly by Mrs Guiffrie in the civil case against the Duke of York,the burning question is whether Prince Andrew will forgive and show merci to his accuser. It is advisable to keep a strict zeal as second son of Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II to defend his faith in the good of mankind, as he is part of the institution of the throne and defender of Faith. 

Reading:
Integrity in the Public and Private Domains
Book A. Montefiore
Book preview

Oil is prosperity.

9 November 2021

Iran and Israel after the passing of the State & Economic budgets are getting a lot more closer to deciding the fate of the Middle East. In the news today (journalist Lahav Harkov JP) an article is saying that Prime Minister Bennett must have a new approach to Iran and it's nuclear arm's race in the region. (Not literally quoted from the article) The military approach that the prime minister has in mind will be, one in coordination with the US administration, and two, if however Iran bogs down in renewed talks in Vienna later on this month and that it will not rejoin the JCPOA deal, the prime minister will make it ready for an approach to Iran with his new policies. The article was an excellent writing on where this government stands on Iran, compared to the previous era of former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, and it makes distinct differences in the writing also to the new Israeli prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett and his plans. The alternatives of his plans others also might or will say are not any different as the prime minister believes he has to the previous government under Mr Netanyahu when it comes to Iran. You see the opportunities, and chances of getting to do things differently, but to make your move prudently has never been the Israeli 'ready for action' military plan. The message has to be clear and direct, that the regime in Iran should now pay heed to the new prime minister of Israel and when he promises a new approach will make a difference if it would come to the threats of destruction by Iran. Both nations seem to be speaking in different directions and meaning the same thing every time again and again. But there is also enough room for fiction as one article suggested last night on the Jerusalem Post, that Israel and Iran should be thinking of making peace or having a good relationship. (Daniel Dana- Iran and Israel could have a good relationship - opinion) And this fiction is that oil is prosperity. Rationality will have a whole different view on that prosperity as it has historically always the Saudi's who have been more closely being the only global supplier to the rest of the world, especially in the west. Why would Israel need Iranian oil if demand would exceed the present or future time for Israel? It is the bug that is called the 'Old world order' and making Saudi oil homogeneous in demand and supply throughout time, history and the present time. Iran, from this aspect seen, can only be the heterogeneous supplier if demand would come to it's wide open gates of it's long sitting static oil. This is a real fairy tale with a Shiraz sound in it's pronunciation as oil prospects policies between Iran and Israel.

But the prime minister of Israel, mr Naftali Bennett, cannot simply do a 'kiss and make up' for old times 'invisible wars' between the two nations and their regime changes. It falls too short and becomes caricaturaux if the prime minister of Israel would go the unilateral way without any backpack leverage. Iran in it's hubris since ancient times has never seen the Israeli State as sovereign and does not consider it a sovereignty close to theirs. Unlike other adversaries with whom they still might want to see eye to eye if self interest requires a change of attitude. It is what Iran perceives as sovereignty in another country and peoples that is making it impossible for any real change in the region and it's future. On the other hand to make things more quick here in this writing, the prime minister of Israel neither needs any apology for the existence of Israel and have it written to Iran in an apology letter. In the line of God, as the prime minister was heard saying in a statement with the president of Colombia, Iván Duque Márquez, State visit in Israel this week, there is no telling how things might fare in the future. With a little luck the prime minister of Israel might or shall come to be heard more as an individual voice as the leadership in Israel in the coming time, and who knows that he even might surprise Iran with that same voice without the reproach of being imperialistic as the USA. Right now the prime minister needs to make progress at home and stimulate his domestic agenda for sustainabilty and economic stability for the citizens of the greater Israel. Incidently the greater Israel of the ordinary citizens, in reverse or vertical projection from the previous government's greater Israel that was open only to global business. Iran cannot teach the new prime minister about democracy and how to be burdened with a pantheon of politicians in their own sovereign right. And this includes an Arab Party Ra'am in the Bennett- Lapid government, which is unique in the Middle East and by the Mediterranean Sea. Iran might do some good by remembering where democracy was born and see how the struggle of Israel is not as futile as they might think, that even in ancient Greece where democracy was born there are no 3 million foreigners living in the country and flock their sovereign establishments. The understanding between foreign and national citizens may echo in your ears or mirror reflex... Mirror, mirror, on the wall who is the most and worst regime of them all? I am sorry to point it out in no other way too. With the new prime minister of Israel we are also seeing no change in his belief on Iran, that it is deliberately speeding up it's belligerence towards Israel to show it holds ancient rights to dominion in the region, and with it keeping up the appearance of a never backing down sovereignty of the Iranian people. For a thousand years? As in 'Nuwroz mubarak', that can only last as far as one day in the year. Fiction II: Naftali Bennett as Israel's new prime minister is inclined to use his instincts for diplomatic peace in the region... But to be like the former and late president of Egypt, Anwar Sadat, we are taking the fiction a little too far or too early to say. It is also not conventional wisdom to suggest that the prime minister would need to break the old boundaries of hatred (without entrenched in bloodshed) between the two nations. Or, so it appears to be through the ancient dust of the Middle East for decades in the new world. But... the prime minister of Israel is still young and is butting like a young ram. 

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett "Easy does it" message to COP26.

2 November 2021

The Prime Minister is right, Israel is not New York, if he had chosen a more pompous phrase and not chose to compare the land of Israel to a fraction of Scotland. And doing so perhaps for the simple reason that nature can't be fooled. For example there is no flat explanation for the climate and evironment of Israel possible, having Jerusalem as mid mountain area, Haifa higher up in the mountain, the Negev desert as a completely different environment if to deal with a more homogeneous approach, and when comparing it's geography to neighbouring countries, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the Arabian States in the Abraham Accords. But making it different from his predecessor, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, to address the climate problem in Israel at this conference of parties, had to be also something on his mind as Israel's new prime minister in Office. 13 June 2021 is not that distant yet from 2 November 2021. Where the prime minister did try to accelerate his national view on Climate Change in Israel from a policy body he has kept an ambitious vision, that the startup nation will and can meet it's obligations to meet the targets in familiar areas with the International Climate Change program. Prime Minister Bennett is meeting with a historic moment, that seems to him, different from the time when he was the Party leader of Yamina and not yet the prime minister to lead the country through the message on Climate Change at this global scale. The time as Party leader of Yamina was four months ago and for 12 years before that. If correctly he is also at another historic moment the coming days when the State Budget has to be voted on to pass into law, something his finance minister, Mr Avigdor Liberman, has been working on with great determination to pass the national threshold with his coalition and the State Budget. According to the Minister of Finance this State Budget could become Israel's next big moment from a domestic viewpoint where and when the people will begin noticing that every day living standards have been improved and make more compatible with Real Life situations for all the citizens, Israelis and Arabs. And cats (so say the newspaper The Jerusalem Post in an article yesterday, 1 November 2021).

When the prime minister returns to Israel on wednesday, tomorrow, COP26 will stay behind in Glasgow and will have Israel's 'small footprint' in the Global Climate Change process in memo for the coming decades, if the prime minister's pledges e.g. to help save the world for future generations will take effect. This could enhance the strategic vision the prime minister seems to be aiming at and which he seems to be eager to bring at home and to the region. COP26 if anything different this year it is the urgency on security of the planet and to return back to balance of nature and industries for the global community. Human consumption has grown exponentially from the time when the industrial revolution was the first startup nation and peoples (in Scotland said Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II yesterday in a video recorded message to all delegates of COP26). Earth's surface must have been more flat when reflecting back in time on Climate Change. The State of Israel was born much later in time, but had in a way experienced it's own industrial revolution during the days after the war of 1967, and Israel was assertive to ascend into the world... It is therefore important to make this pledge by the prime minister at COP26 that Israel is maybe small on the bigger chart of the Conference of Parties Climate Change plans, but it has in fact ascended in many ways to meet a challenging future. Be it peace, war, the environment, climate change projects, diplomatic relations in the region, Iran and it's nuclear offensive policies whether at home or International. The latter can only be made defense purposed if all is fair in love of Life... Another weapon that Israel understands well indeed, Chaim, and that no other nation holds more dear because of centuries long persecutions and antisemitism.
Yes, prime minister, easy does it for now till the State Budget 2020/ 2021/ 2022 will pass...

Glasgow November 2021. "Climate change is not static. Quite the opposite, it is constant and dynamic."

28 October 2021

Start with the tour around the Stonehenge in the northern part of Scotland for all attendees at the COP26 Summit next week would make it a good beginning. You could say it is the public view, a total of 7.753 billion people that our planet earth harbours (x oxygene). The climate change evolution after the millennium is only beginning now based on urgency and emergency according to global CCExp, climate change experts. But the will of the nations and world leaders are not here to invent the wind, solar power of the sun, or moon tranquility oceans when meeting in Glasgow next week for the summit. However it will be setting out all global technologies to explain why they need a desperate plan to make climate change relevant and earth- related. Energy is earth- related so much different from the industrial world and it's close populated areas in the millions. But the other question attached to energy is whether industries and people can do without it. To know this answer the cutting in emissions will then make more impressive understanding and the target to reach half the total need for energy 'negative waste' on the balance of all future summits. What will they be talking about at the next one when holding this e.g. in Israel? BTW, we are all watching for the Israeli Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett and his delegates, Environmental Minister, Ms Zandberg, Energy Minister, Mrs Erharrar, to join the world leaders at this summit held in November 2021 in Glasgow. It is also said this evening (Spectator) that the Prince of Wales will attend also. Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will not attend as she is confined to resting from her doctors. The weather forecast on Internet data forecasts for your area where you live, saying that it will be 10 degrees cold in temperature. And raining showers. Last year we can't see any comparison at the same time in the year and date. There was more sun in the sky and getting just above average temperature of 5.5 degrees at this time of the year, by reading old 2020 weather charts. With climate change weather forecasts can be important to predict as well as how this impact experience affects human or animal life on the ground, per square meter, per centimeter, millimeter and to the second. World leaders all are familiar with GPS systems to keep the planet safe at the scale of... No public person would be able to tell you at what scale the planet is safe from a satellite measuring sky and earth window.

Another balance: how far did the climate change new technologies come since the emergency was first announced and CO2 emissions had to be reduced rapidly? And when standing next to Climate Change it is Covid-19 to make it this year the summit of a new clean planet and reformed humanity. For the moment we have to wait and see what the world leaders will say about this post summit north of Stonehenge in Scotland.

To clear his name, coram vobis.

(Full: quae coram nobis resident ("which [things] remain in our presence".)

29 September 2021

Lectori Salutem

Like truth innocence is not obsolete in all of human history. If and when an error in judgement has occurred in it's midst, through court, high court or living community, his or her name should be cleared in the presence before all, God, Queen and country.

Your servant,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prime Minister, welcome back in your parallel world the Middle East from the West.

30 August 2021
(23:53 PM)

Maybe the fly on the wall was squashed when Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, was still in Washington to meet with US President Joe Biden. Every time there is one theme coming back, that how many stories on visits in Washington have already been told to the people of Israel when the prime minister returns? The fly knew stories is all you can get and that nothing will change the parallel universe of Israel with the world in the west. Until Naftali Bennett became Prime Minister, 13 June, two months ago. Daylight and night, a two colour switch from one to the other kaleidoscope is all that one can imagine will be his next stage as prime minister after his visit in Washington. The prime minister now is looking very much that he was born for this day and time specifics, and be a leader of great inner strength combined with patience. We have seen him when speaking in Knesset and addressing pressing issues, while the opposition can only protest his presence as prime minister of six seats, so they heckle him. Now, the same is what we have also witnessed when meeting with the US President friday last week, with the President bowing down his head in repose and waiting, but with the prime minister acknowledging that he should then speak quieter as he went on explaining the meaning of the Hebrew prayer he had quoted. Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, if correctly, was the first Israeli prime minister who made it a first time to be this considerate even when globally the moment was what they called embarrassing to the Israeli PM. Now Naftali Bennett has just raised the standards how to deal with US Presidents in the future, especially when battered by double terrorist's attacks against American civilians or the military elsewhere in the world. Israel however still prefers Mr Netanyahu his 'flesh pots' and are pining for his return. And the former prime minister still believes a come back for him is at the end of this road, after the coalition collapses.

Another fly will take it's place on the wall again while Mr Bennett is Prime Minister. 6 Mln Jewish citizens and 3 million Arab citizens are waiting for the next State Budget if it will pass this time round into law, under the new coalition. One could almost say that the prime minister his problems are just waiting for him around the corner in the coming eight weeks. Sheherazade 1001 stories are both in Israelis and Arabs becoming something of a folk story about a Jewish State and ending in a political anti climax some other time maybe. The logic today in the State of Israel is not about the fish and pearls are the same, but more that pearls belong to shells and not to the oysters or fish. Four years with a stark difference with the opposition this coalition of Right- Left- Wing, and far Left- Wing parties, Ra'am, Meretz and Labour, the people of Israel on both sides, Arabs and Israelis, are just at the beginning of real change as was promised in the last election, 23 March, approximately five months ago. The Prime Minister however considerate at times (Washington), his deterrence to keep Israel safe from it's enemies are still or seem to be part of why he wanted to be prime minister. After assessing what security means domestically for Israel, maybe by then his end as prime minister in this rotational government with Yair Lapid as next prime minister he will see wisdom at the end of the tunnel and leave it to the man who will become the next leader of Israel. Regionally no one can say what will happen after the Taliban took power in Kabul from the government in Afghanistan, and if this will change the course of Middle East strategic and economic stability. Going to war is putting Israel safe as first, and secondly keeping Israelis safe... What do the people of Israel want from a prime minister if this coalition fails to pass the State Budget, just like the opposition has done for two years? Covid- 19 will also not leave the world stage any time soon. It is clear after the prime minister's first nearly debacle in Washington, if he had to come back home without meeting the president, that the people do not want an appeaser for prime minister of Israel. Alexander the Great had studied Tarshish for + - five years before he decisively broke them down. It comes down to 'optics' as the Americans call it at the end of the day. There is no word yet in the JP on the prime minister since he got back home yesterday on sunday, 29 August 2021.

A US shabbat shalom for Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, in Washington DC this evening.

27 August 2021

No huffing and puffing this time from an Israeli prime minister in Washington DC today when meeting with the US President, Joe Biden, late afternoon today. Tomorrow Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, will be flying home when closing the shabbat on saturday evening at sunset. A first day can begin when he arrives back home in Israel and looking back on his first State visit as prime minister with the kind of certainty you put in a tube for further research in the political lab at home. There was one moment in the meeting with Pentagon / US Defense Secretary, Lloyd Austin, the world could see through Naftali Bennett's eyes that he was not in the ministry of Defense anymore, but was now the prime minister of Israel, when DS Lloyd Austin welcomed the PM back to these halls that were familiar to Naftali Bennett when he came here last year and visited the Pentagon. The PM looked and it was as if he almost wanted to say that being the prime minister was nothing like it than when he was Defense Minister. A rather perturbed moment, you could say, but handled very well by the Defense Secretary to say 'welcome back'. The public however will only sell on the embarrassment of the delays, and say that this confirms their political point of view on the prime minister. You can't be a kingmaker (six seats) and meet the US President in his Oval Office, and talk like you were the chosen leader by the people in a landslide. Democracy is also what Americans hold dearest, so they will say and Mr Netanyahu did win all the votes to come back as the legitimate PM. It is the never ending Love Story with the former prime minister, still. What did Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, achieved so far with his first State visit to the United States to meet with the President? Maybe there wasn't much time left this afternoon for any new plan on the side of the US or Israel we could hear about during the press brief (not yet broadcasted). New was only to be said of the first Israeli PM who didn't come to the US with lot's of huffing and puffing. Mr Bennett, also a military man, was the opposite of insubordinate, but submissive in a friendly- users sort of way. Perhaps he knew this was more than he had ever dreamed of to get here and talk to the US President, one on one. One on one in a global political atmosphere with the world leader of the 'free world' (as one journalist at AL Monitor put it in her writing this evening). We can only applaud the young prime minister for showing courage and also showing that he has a taste for good manners, when speaking to the leading power in our world. But caution is also the way to remember it all once you get back to your family at home, safely.

In conclusion: talk is easy.

G7 vacuum.

25 August 2021

In short: What empires failed to do leave it to the sea with the creation of an Afghanistan bay. The G7 is busy (on tuesday yesterday) with the US on the deadline for completing the pullout from Afghanistan before 31 August next week. It is not as some had said two days ago, on 30 August. To the rest of the world the sudden crisis in the city of Kabul in Afghanistan came as a bad surprise and leaving many feeling why this was related to the west so closely. And also that this was supposingly something dealt by the military powers of the west. From this point to most people in western parts of the world Afghanistan was contained effectively by the modern military powers, over the more 'primitive' use of military weapons by the resistance throughout the country in this part on the planet. It is from observant view on Google Maps a land without the sea. In the 21st century the people here seem to be living in smoke, they come and go from far and wide. The west is expected to help all the refugees (including personnel and staff on the side of countries and nationalities) now fleeing the country from the fighting force the Taliban. The country was taken by the Taliban last week when the US pull out it's military under the new administration in the US and the President Joe Biden order. It became the order of the 21st century after 20 years geopolitics in this region for not only the US but also the UK, and other allies e.g. the Netherlands. The G7 that was looking differently today from the time when it was looking more G+7. A wide big gap was created and not as in an engineering project of 'capping' land in Afghanistan in exchange for water of the Gulf of Oman / Arabian Sea (3D with Iran / Pakistan via bridge) streaming in and out infiltration of an artificial bay. Citizenries in the west are not experts on Afghanistan and governments involved in the evacuation crisis in Kabul will come to some sort of criticism why this has happened and why logistics to help people in the motherland have not been more coordinated, pre- crisis. The US President, Joe Biden, is now focused on extending the deadline for the final pullout of the US military.

The UK Prime Minister, Mr Boris Johnson, still imploring the US President yesterday not to pull out it's military while this is still all ongoing and with no particular plan of replacement or vision of orderly exit from Afghanistan.

Knesset session today: can State Budget become law?

16 August 2021

The corridors of power were not made for one man only, this time, so they say or scream across the Knesset floor, it is Naftali Bennett's turn. Motives seem secondary on each side, opposition and coalition. The former PM, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, today is not in Israel but on his way to Florida US. He and the former first lady, Mrs Sarah Netanyahu, are going on a vacation with, if a picture speaks a thousand words, their son, the young Yair Netanyahu. Anything that happens today in Israel during the session of voting the State Budget in or out there is so much ocean between the two, Mr Netanyahu and Knesset in Real Time. No one knows what will happen if the vote goes against the State Budget and the coalition dissolves as a result. Almost symbolic before Yom Kippur in a few weeks time. We keep on repeating the same old song for too long on the State Budget, except that the coalition was this time not Right- Wing and under Benyamin Netanyahu, but Left- Center Right and Left, plus Ra'am the Arab Party. All of Israel was convinced that this coalition was the anti- Bibi Party in government and this was their only excercise of democracy under disguise. The opposition has a version of it's own after two months having been ousted by the coalition, that they have only one thing on their minds and bring down this government. If the State Budget is voted down by the opposition it will be in itself a very interesting move when probed on why, if to prove anything of a protest against details and scale of the new budget. Without any the voting down was or will be only subjective and not objective law and order. The opposition with their eyes on detail in the financial state of country and nation, they are dealing with a status quo of two years since 2019 with the last S B was passed. Naftali Bennett could be in trouble introducing a so called 'new S B' and making the nation believe he is going to make a difference at a national scale, especially for the 2/3 mln people living either in dire poverty or are 'elligible' for social security, when businesses are going bust. The Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, will not be able to persuade the government he has a magic wand to make society's ills suddenly disappear with the new State Budget. This is a very serious matter, Mr Prime Minister.

Can the PM promise growth under Covid- 19 that has no 'expiring' date? He is right in his plan published sunday on the Jerusalem Post, how to tackle the virus in the meantime for the coming period, that this must be done or risk poverty. He seems to be on top of the ever moving virus and it's fluidity across the whole of the planet. No country is out of the woods yet until 2023, if populations will be fully vaccinated and some parts in the global economy can reopen for business again, be it more on a slower pace and even more miniscule movement of growth (national or international). The Prime Minister is being followed by many countries and also citizens in this part of the world, the European Union. The antisemtic protest against Covid-19 in some places in the western hemisphere are literally in a ball of confusion how bad the situation gets day by day in Israel, too. If the coalition wants a State Budget to pass into law it will be one of the most difficult moments for this government to exceed expectations on a global situation going bust everywhere, except for Israel... It is looking very much that this new State Budget is still the Netanyahu State Budget till 2019, and when sitting on quick sand for two years till the last election when Mr Bennett entered a coalition with Yesh Atid and Blue & White (with the smaller coalition partners, Meretz, Labour and Ra'am). There will be no growth this year at a national level. Growth stimulus also for the coming year will be nihil and could maybe be getting a slight horizontal move at the end of the year in it's last quarter. If these financial mechanisms in Israel work as written here above, it would be better for Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, not to raise expectations too high with the new State Budget. His idea of unity of all Israel as one (his Knesset speeches) could only hurt him more when failing to deliver the promised improvements across the different sectors in Israel. Or, I am being naive. And the PM is also naive as blind as well for love of the nation as one.

But not all is blind with the PM: when on Iran, the Middle East, relations with countries the PM seems to respect with special regard to Covid- 19 battlefields, and who is foe or friend of Israel. We can't say much about the Foreign Minister, Mr Yair Lapid, whether the alternate PM is part of the government's strategies and moves. With especially emphasis on today's voting of the S B. He might still be somewhere between his State visits and at home in Israel... It seems that some are right to rebuke his absence on the battlefield against the Coronavirus for not being next to the PM as part of this particular military comradeship in difficult times for the nation and it's government. PM Naftali Bennett has a good eye on the rest of the world, the Middle East region, and home in Israel. He knows it is not fiction anywhere in the world on this planet of earth. E.g. Climate Change is at everyone's front doorstep and it will not exempt Israel as the greenest country in the world. But a living piece of the earth of 9 mln people living in Israel, has scale wise something differential compared to countries with populations over 80 or more mln people. And when near home in Israel how will climate change effects be for the PM to fight when arriving from densed polluted bigger places and countries around and in minor or Asia? 2 Years to be Prime Minister for this young inexperienced man, 49 years old, he is in the end of the day only human... And not an octopus. There is also no immediate sight to see on the Two- State solution at the moment, when Covid-19 rages on in the civilized world. So far there is only speculation on the architecture of a world after the pandemic many see as the new world. It is not fair to say this, reading how much the PM is trying to accomplish the hard way and being the coalition government, that sometimes it looks as if it had been better for this young prime minister and his extraordinary talent for instinct, political or military, that he had been the party that had formed government from a majority. I am sure that his worldview would have been of a softer kind, more humane and realistic (especially on difficult issues such as Iran or the armistice lines). Up to now the Messianic peace has been out of the human league, Prime Minister. All we have as mortals are hearts and minds, purple, orange or red. Just hearts and minds, for now, are the order.

Error: article was meant for finance committee leading up to the State Budget. The Knesset meeting was between MK's of the coalition and opposition today, 16 August 2021.

First quarter to Israel's State budget proposal after 12 weeks.

3 August 2021

The coalition government Bennett- Lapid perhaps will now understand why Prime Minister Naftali Bennett had said before his inauguration, 13 June, nearly two months ago, to put ideologies aside for the sake of the country and people of Israel. It was the State Budget and how this was the only way to bring back some of the weakest sectors into the world of the living. Mr Bennett has made great sacrifices since then on his part being a Right Wing Party and entering a coalition with extreme Left- Wing groups, one center left- right, and the Arab Party Ra'am. The Arab Israelis are also making up much of that 'weak sector' and now has been estimated into a currency for 51 Bln NIS in the State Budget. The Housing, Health, Social, Military and Economy ministries are the next in line or a straight line. The timing however will remain restricted to historical data and numbers, with an actual shift to see it move out of recession at perhaps zero % growth. This is still looking very low- key at small government and not at big government overviewing. Under the Netanyahu economic high laws for macro economic growth this new State Budget is but a dripping of waterdrops into mainstream economic cycle and what was then based on dynamics and not static intellectual economic laws and that are basically also more automative. If you take the bullish side to the domestic size economic situation of any country this will go in all sorts of directions with little progress of any kind. Just as much as staying bearish will or could harm the people if this 'out of the povertyline' remains with zero growth. The Bennett- Lapid government may fall flat on it's face with confetti raining down from it's own economic mind ceiling and celebrate this special occasion...

It still will be however a celebration. This government of Right- Wing and Left- Wing parties have also managed to expose the weaker sides in society at government level, something that used to be in the backyard of the people's ownless places and living 'environment'. There is nothing more fascinating in politics than to help the working class, which by definition is always the most impossible mission you can excercise as a politician or Prime Minister. This Prime Minister, and alternate PM, both have set their hearts and minds in the right places of the people and still have very little success so far. It takes more deeper planning to put back the domestic issue on the table and make it by mandate (fictional or real) that it will benefit the weakest societies in the country. The military and it's Defense Ministry will still have to rely on it's long historical budgetary constructions. This also means that it will very well stay balanced with a promise in the new State Budget of the Bennett- Lapid government. No one has yet come forward and call the budget approval on sunday, 1 August 2021, a mockery of the government of change. The former PM, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, did say how this budget will harm people and went as far as calling it an 'Abbas tax' (where it will hurt most). The former prime minister his understanding of the economics in this budget by the new government is simply: the people of Israel will pay more tax to finance the Arab Party Ra'am and his programs to transform the ordinary Arab Israeli's lives. Please, Mr Former Prime Minister... Acting like a wicked stepsister in this 'Cinderella fairy tale government of Bennett- Lapid' is unbecoming of you as opposition leader. It also was an attempt to scaremongering the people of Israel, with a straight face. The former PM deserves a medal of bronze for his attempt. After 12 weeks, Prime Minister Naftali Bennett will have to come up with his first quarter snapshot of the budget he wants to put into law after 31 October in the coming fall. 1/1000 (Promille) growth? Still, that will be something to celebrate...

Man- made vaccines.

18 July 2021

One: man- made, industry and vaccines in medical economic history is man- made and is known by it's industrial growth as pharmaceutical industries. E.g. from Syphilis to Covid- 19. And how is a vaccine a bio- weapon different from when battling 'biologically' Syphilis as an infection and a disease? In the end of the day all medicine is chemistry, biological and man- made. From the industrial point of view that is not rocket science, as is landing on the moon or Mars. But if people keep on insisting that vaccination against the Coronavirus is a bio- weapon, the end conclusion can only be that this is the new military in RT (Real Time). It is fascinating coming this close to the giants and yet not to know anything about them or their vision for the coming near future, and that will affect not just me or you, but all of human kind. Why do windows or fire places have a lintel to keep up the posts and house architecture? Why are bridges built by thermodynamics? This is a man's world, sings the man of soul music, James Brown and when looking around there is no point denying this. Basic information on the Covid- 19 vaccines has changed any local grocery store with a warning to keep the 1.5 meter distance and that only three people are allowed to do their shopping at the same time. The other customers will have to wait their turn outside. This is what democracy has never been like or looked like since it's perception to free man from tyranny in ancient Greece. All people who are still not vaccinated are walking with a thorn in their eye and heavily protest the infringement of their democratic freedom they were born in. Just as being born to aristocracy, democracy was a privilege and has always been cherished to be the noblest of all ideals, made by men. Could that be the problem over who is more superior? Democracy and clever engineered vaccines, both are man- made! Unlike our planet earth.

To come back to what people call that the vaccines are a bio- weapon injected into the human blood. Is it the new military? It has to be and cannot be just a simple story of a cat and his curiosity. He is also a very cynical man and has no serene thoughts how to hold millions of birds in his hand, when memory is trying to remind him how having love was the only real thing in life to have or hold. In this global philosophy it's standard thinking is looking very much more simple that basically all life is just having sex. Even family life will not come to any achievement of having their offspring without the act of having sex. We don't know who the giants are and this is why everyone is resorting to ghosts for predicting the future where all of mankind will end up if we don't stop all vaccinations to battle the Coronavirus. Covid- 19 however, so many are saying, hasn't been there at all. But wasn't it a military weapon and perhaps is now waiting in the dark before the real virus will be unleashed on to the nations? The balance: what isn't man- made when looking around in our world of global connectivity? Isaac Newton his answer is something that we all know: gravity. The ten plagues in the Old Testament have been natural disasters and diseases, but didn't had any viruses. Our hypocrisy can sometimes be the one natural plague for which we have no vaccine to cure us from. Christians have a saying that the splinter in your opponent's eye is what you are easily pointing out, but the heavy beam inside your own eye you can't see. We must assume that dealing with Covid-19 is not something anyone can explain and will not be able to make a persuasive impression against the vaccination program and overthrow the giants. I am on the receiving end so I should know what it is that I am trying to say. Maybe we are also simply underestimating the determination of the giants.

Benyamin Netanyahu, king for a day after defeat of government's failure on controversial reunification law.

6 July 2021

Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, has to rush to more pressing issues after the defeat of the immigration law and reunification families law of Palestinian citizens, known as the Citizens Law. He told Reuters journalist (question: global economics relations) that he wants to tackle the issue of domestic businesses, that are not doing well and that this has no global relation with global economics. This was clearly a rushing for the PM from one field into another this early morning (afternoon in Israel). 59 Voted in favour of the law and 59 were against, the Likud and Joint List Arab Party, and so spinning out of it's own sockets in the opposition. The long term thinking has never been on the opposition side, even when being the government and vote for extension of the present time law (ending on tuesday today). The Bennett- Lapid government failed on it's own confidence to pass the law. World News, Wall Street, NOS Netherlands, and others are among these who made headlines on the failure of the law on immigration and reunification for Arab Israelis in Israel. The new government under the current prime minister is now looking fragile according to opinion. Why Reuters brought in global economics during this meeting in a question to the prime minister is unclear, as this was not related to the defeat of passing of the bill this morning. The Prime Minister however asnwered the question quickly by saying that they are working on the domestic businesses, as if to say where does this come from? Some are saying that the law had nothing to do with security, but more with it's 'apartheid' undertone many see as discriminatory. But neither Likud nor this government could and can go on forever on an extension mechanism of the law, as this has no first principle law by any humanitarian and sovereign standard. The government was therefore right to try passing another extension again and then work hard on the law and make it sovereign for the long term, this between Israelis, but also between Israelis and the Arab population. It's critical viewing can't rush this one, also because of the focus on how extensive assimilation between nationals and Arabs are another pressing issue for any future law. Humanity for some reason has defeated something in Israel, that wherever it happens the State bears the burdens of law and order at the same time.

What exactly was Mr Netanyahu's long term victory in the opposition today? He has actually failed, because the fundamental is that it isn't a law at all, but a temporary law extending time and time again. Prime Minister Bennett however will be the one to take the credit for it if he can make it a long term fundamental law for all citizens and security of the State, if sovereign. Sovereignty of the State is a reference and only then can it be an indefinite way of life for the people of Israel, Israelis or Arabs, Palestinian Arabs with Arabs, or nationals with Arabs. And it is necessary to work on this bill as it is also saying that Israel is not opportunistic and does not allow opportunism getting in, just as any other sovereign State in the rest of the world, from a sovereign point of view. But what exactly is 'not or letting opportunism getting in' means? Serving in the army? Sharing Intelligence? What are the experiences in other countries and democracies? Why the Likud, Arab Joint List and Zionist Religious Party, danced today for defeating a dysfunctional temporary law and not giving it a chance to be transformed into a more functional law was self defeating and self deception of an unreasonable degree. Reasoning takes time and can't be rushed as an answer to questions. And even this government might not come to the final work of the bill as this is a process with various speeds of movement as it progresses, e.g. on population growth and increase of existential threats for the State and people of Israel that are Jewish. In the same way as the domestic economy is not based on long term thinking/ prognosis for small businesses. This government has to juggle through lot's of time and timing issues, at many different levels as no government before them had to do. Benyamin Netanyahu had chosen one curve and from there went on a constant global economic progress. In the Middle East small businesses are the lifeline for the domestic economy, while at the same time on a different speed and timeline it's macro economics is constant and stability for an indefinite timeline. Both, security and the economy at home, are entwined without the tool to make any prognosis for the long term, but are in fact based on law and order dealings with the daily or annual basis (economy). Here is where the Citizen's Law is related to the economy. And not to the global economy, unless enhanced to Citizens (plural) of Israel Law.

10 July next week a symbolic day for Jerusalem.

1 July 2021

The former PM, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, is leaving Balfour Street, he and the former First Lady, Mrs Sarah Netanyahu, 13 July 2021. It is expected that the new prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett and his family, are next to move to Balfour immediately. Living in the Balfour residence, some say, is a very significant symbolism for the nation and State. It is giving a definite presence of the prime minister to Israel and in the rest of the world. This official residence for the family and prime minister is their 'permanent' address to the International World, explicitly when the first State visit is next for Washington. The Prime Minister and First Lady, Mrs Gilat Bennett, cannot be seen leaving their home in Ra'anana when being escorted by cascade (not quite sure how intense this is in numbers) to the Ben Gurion Airport for their first official trip to the United States and White House. Their four young children, 9-16, as one would think, will for security reasons will be also experiencing a first 'mandatory' moving and shifting between residences and circumstances by the State of Israel. It is their dad who is now the Prime Minister of Israel, to put this gently. Which is half military strength and the other half being the government's strength when going abroad. When the former prime minister was the country's Head of State and Foreign Minister, the Right- Wing government broadly respresented the whole of Israel as a complete body and wings, wherever he might be or go to. The rotational government Bennett- Lapid however is keen on showing a different face to the US Administration and it's President, Mr Joe Biden. On this trip the people of Israel will hawkishly watch how their inexperienced prime minister and first lady will be doing, entering and being at the White House with the US President in his office. We already know that the President is looking forward to his meeting with prime minister Bennett. And that is a good sign for the coming time and nearest future of this government, in Israel. It is not that anyone knows in the public domain what or why the nearest future is always mentioned in writings by outsiders. But some newspapers online or the media can give proper news to enhance the global learning experience of all of mankind while events are happening. The Middle East will eagerly be waiting and listening to what the White House will say when meeting with the Prime Minister of Israel, and if there is anything interesting to their part of the world. And what might they be looking for this time what they could not get to see from the Netanyahu era?

So far it is looking quietly for the last two weeks during the transformation of the new government (coalition party) in Israel. Angles that might have been open to the opposition are fairly looking covered, the economy, strategic importance of Israel, and to a certain degree the democracy in it's first weeks. On the economy Minister Liberman on his first days has signed the tax agreement with the OECD, and so blocking any smart move fromt the opposition to attack the government's lack of experience after the Netanyahu economic successes, something that appears to be of a strong establishment to most Israelis. Strategic importance has already been mentioned in certain communications with the US, that Israel wants to maintain the old policies of the Right to defend itself and that Iran remains a threat to Israel and the region in the whole of the Middle East. This emphasize was to keep it's proportionality unchanged and that every dimension in this right exists on the military concept of Israel's survival (nation and State). There is no incentive yet of fluidity between peace agreements with the Arab states, for the simple logical fact that here peace has a different meaning when e.g. compared to the European Union. If Israel wants to build a future with democracy and strength of the military, to some degree the remaining existential threat is still that it is the only democracy in the region, next to autocracies that are hundreds of years old in the Middle East. Peace, as Europe too has learned, is a slow progress when autocracies remain unchanged to the idea of democracy and it's sense of egalitarian principles for people and politicians. Israel still has a long way to grow out of it's 100 years confusion and start to build it's future now for the rest of the 150 years in it's present time reset and plannings. Industry is quite a new and modern achievement for Israel, even since 1967, compared to the OPEC countries next door in the same region. It's industrial success is also more digital and technological based. It is unfair to the Bennett- Lapid government to expect a great era of country successes within two weeks, when the coalition is still coping with egalitarian problems. Left, Right and center must excercise the will to reach a democratic equality model, if possible. The intellectual challenge is expected to match the coalition's appetite for democracy and justice in Israel with this government. This includes to a certain degree to reach an agreement of some sort on the Israeli- Palestinian issue. Honesty, indeed, for the Prime Minister will be a lonely word for the time being.

Naftali Bennett is Israel's Prime Minister, in the meantime the world is moving on.

18 June 2021

On Brexit there is not much since 2016 that has changed for Britain and the British people. Britain has left the European Union in June 2016 by referendum, then still under David Cameron as prime minister, and end of the Brexit story. Five years later, this year, no one knows anymore what the British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, will get done in the end, now seems like a long distance from here. Where the government of Bennett & Lapid meet with the UK can only be when there is another demonstration in the streets of London against the apartheid State of Israel, from young Palestinians militants and protesters. When we think in terms of 'meet' it is always that both sides monitor the situation very closely in terms of security and that no Jewish citizen in Britain comes to harm. This will continue working together and sharing cooperation, one can assume. Many other Heads of State have in the meantime also congratulated the Bennett- Lapid government, many in the European Member States. This is after decades of quietly agreeing to the prime ministership of Benyamin Netanyahu, then a Right- Wing prime minister and closely associated with the same ideologies of Right- Wing groups in Europe, but with also many that have tried to keep the integrity closer to democracy. Most came from personal integrity. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, thanked the German Chancellor for her good wishes and congratulations, and has even invited the Chancellor to visit Israel. The world is now moving on faster than we can say or think. Father Time has already now given the freshly baked Prime Minister of Israel his first 120 hours after today, on friday and Shabbat evening in Israel. The former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, so the news on the JP is saying, is still living in the prime ministerial residence in the Balfour fortress. No one knows yet what to make of this or to say anything more by definition. Across the fence from the Balfour Residence when we are looking at the new government under a new prime minister, there is a certain question mark shaping unbrella hoovering above Jerusalem. What has the world still not understand about Israel and it's democracy?

This too, like the end of Brexit, is a long distance from now. In a news article by Gil Hoffman, JP journalist, the Bennett- Lapid government wants to work closely with the US Administration and is saying that if the President, Mr Joe Biden, wants to proceed with the peace process that he is deemed to do so. You can almost hear the rumbling of a man who is cooking audible enough through his head and ears, unbelievable still, that Israel is slowly being taken out of it's own timeline now. And where will it end? Maybe back in the arms of Mr Netanyahu? A few things are pointing to Mr Netanyahu when he was prime minister and they conceal much of what you could call undemocratic. And it's first principle is that this is not Italy, Greece or Switzerland provincial or canton State. Mr Netanyahu's Israel stood as a first of all other principles in the Middle East and by the Mediterranean Sea. In many ways he has kept a consummate eye on all sides and how to keep his government and country secure, second per second. Israel does not have a long term timeline or view, or disappear in an instant when an enemy would be this smart enough. The former prime minsiter was always right on Israel's strategic security and it's readiness to go to war against any enemy far and wide. He never also did miscalculate his goals or targets, and always this was for Israel and the people he embraced armored with steel and victory when returning back from any military campaign. Being a knight and champion of the people is far from democracy and modernity, but in fact is deeply medieval. Either French or English. With the new prime minister no one can say right now whether Mr Bennett will be able to follow his act and become another Benyamin Netanyahu, when embracing the people of Israel.

Mr Bennett is only 49 years old this year in March (23 or 24). There is no need to say about this prime minister that he should belong in jail for ripping and rigging his voter's mandates, and for joining the Left- Wing parties under centrist Yair Lapid and Benny Gantz. The Haredim may be right on keeping the Shabbat and living in religious ecstacy to serve Ha Shem, but they are wrong to say that Mr Bennett belongs in jail. Democracy is a difficult state of affairs when one big majority wants the State to be usurped by religion, no matter what reason lies behind their motives, and one other big majority wants a Right- Wing party to rule democracy indefinitely. In one hand clap between the religious parties and e.g. the Likud. When watching how former prime minister Benyamin Netanyahu kept his rule for two decades ongoing, and not once came with the Palestinian issue solution, because it was the Palestinians who did not want peace with Israel, and also on sovereignty in the West Bank, it is not difficult to see why the United States is an important ally on all these matters, for their eternal patience. Where Mr Netanyahu is right is that Israel is not America Nr II, and that when he speaks of Iran as dangerous, that this is in the Middle East one should only be extremely cautious. No one who knows Israel physically will think that this former prime minister has been fibbing on these difficult subjects when there is a never ending story to it. Especially from the point of view of an Israeli prime minister. The other misfortune could come when we get a Palestinian wonder prime minister or leader, with an American accent and to whom the House of the Senate would be glad to listen to in it's own accent. Mr Bennett is the new Prime Minister and he does not need to ape or immulate the former prime minister, mr Benyamin Netanyahu. But the Prime Minister should explain the meaning of 'Real Peace' very soon and unfold this to the detail before the Biden Administration will start the peace process. It is nothing personal against Mr Netanyahu, but why stay behind fortified walls, former prime minister of Israel? Are we looking at a Netanexit? This is a political biscuit.

Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett.

13 June 2021

Apronto. PM Naftali Bennett will have a limited amount of time, let's say eight seasons of focusing on pertinent issues and monitored. Local and national/ International, with 3 different political accents will challenge him as first in this rotational government. Best photo moment during the inauguration speech by Naftali Bennett: the children sending hearts out to their father while he was heckled across the Knesset floor by Likud mercilessly. Tonight there is an open space sigh of relief from those who came out to the Rabin Square to congratulate the new government and not so much on the 'ousting' of the now leader of the opposition, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. The I24 newsreporter standing by also said approximately the same. It was an incredible 'show of parliamentary democracy' in action from 16:00 to later 20:30 PM in Knesset, with first the speeches, and the voting for Speaker of the House and then the Prime Minister. You would almost forget that this wasn't in Hungary, Poland or Italy. For democracy another celebration is in place when you think that this was in the Middle East in Israel and not in Europe. Democracy came back sailing and blowing it's horn of winds through the land of Israel tonight, which was an unusual experience for so many of the younger generation who have never known this excitement before. To the older generation it could take a little longer before it had come back to their memory, of how it was many decades ago to have a say in politics directly. Mr Bennett and Mr Lapid, no one knows how they have put up a fight to stay in the coalition with his mandate, after mr Netanyahu had failed to produce a coalition from the first mandate two months ago. Tomorrow is the big day, when everyone in the country and even in the outside world will talk about the new government and that the impossible had happened in this lifetime generation in Israel, that Mr Netanyahu went to the opposition on 13 June 2021. The sigh of relief could be slightly exaggerated...

Democracy so some say need now and then a little shock through the system, to let everyone know this still works and needs to be determined again. The ballot box can tick like a clock when needing to wind up mechanically every four years with a new election. It is remarkable to have a country in the Middle East going through the motion of democracy while vast territories, east, south, west and north, call for prayer in Arabic to assemble in mosques. Remembering the leader of the opposition his words, modernity over medievalism. Mr Netanyahu then had also said that modernity in the end will win. And 13 June 2021 proved just exactly that. But people will also ask, "What is democracy?" tomorrow morning early after waking up. Wasn't democracy Bibi? But if Bibi was democracy, who is Bennett? And the intrusion goes on in the electorate their minds and hearts, as if the new prime minister has committed a crime against humanity and the international Human Rights organisation on this one. Democracy is in fact constitutional, but this is not in Israel. Something different from the concept of a constitution. But we won't go into that in this writing. The coming seasons for the prime minister as first in the rotation half is eight. The next prime minister will have another eight seasons till the term of government can be dissolved for a new general election. Both prime ministers will have limited time to change government as the people know it. Local government and national scale government will have to divide their limits to a bloc of time, and so forth. Except for the economy, military and Foreign relations. Also when something results every three months and is only eight seasons long, you will not tip the balance and this will go on below negative. The government is sworn in in the present time, but the economy is continuous till the 13the month, or first month in 2022. (And this is as far as my basic economics goes)

Let's say the coalition government of change holds up till next year after spring 2022, all that has been invested in time, energy and social economics today/ starting tomorrow will come with it's first 'real' results next year in spring. But don't start at a later date, e.g. in september 2021. Because than you have to wait until next year in September 22, to actually notice any percentage of growth, e.g. 0.6 % to 0.2%? It is where Mr Avigdor Liberman comes in handy, but also deputy prime minister, Gideon Sa'ar when designing specific laws and regulations to help bring back transparency and balance. Another big question for this government is whether it matters at all to get things done. "The ink isn't even dry yet on the divorce papers," from Mr Netanyahu's era and governments, what is precisely the 'cooling off' period? Talking about Iran, perhaps? Gaza, the Palestinians, Hamas and Hezbollah, now these are more important matters for the citizens of Israel. And let the economy take care of itself, because no one can get wrong with that. If there is one thing to talk about Iran it is the economy and how they are handling their private sector when financing domestic projects and national government monitors. US President Joe Biden has congratulated Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid on their new prime ministership rotational government late in the evening yesterday (it is now 47 minutes after midnight, 14 June) and hopes this will bring more cooperation throughout the broader region. The new government and it's open window to the world with the incoming government inauguration, it is the whole world now knowing how Israel's democratic parliament works. It is also the global woke movement that is putting the accent in politics these new days. Just follow the news online on Twitter or Facebook and you will get to know your new world for now and tomorrow. This is after Covid19 and it's pandemic proportions worldwide. According to Mr Netanyahu this new government will not be able to stand up against the US Administration on Iran and the nuclear deal JCPOA. On the different levels of communication the military is highest in Israel (or any other military nation/ power), but this hierarchy is nothing new to Mr Bennett, Benny Gantz and Yair Lapid. The military is the only guarantor for the Jewish nation living in Israel (and in the rest of the world) and this is written in capital letters on all IDF commanders foreheads. Politics is like Havel, and the Military is like Cain. No one is suggesting the new prime minister knows nothing on diplomatic etiquette with the US or EU, or any other Head of State in the world. On toughness, excuse my humour, but no one is greater or tougher than Mr Netanyahu on the planet, earth. And you can only learn from the best. Or be torpedoed.

They will have to be fully transparent with the public to include, once this government is sworn in.

2 June 2021
(23:46 PM)

Information technology is fast. As we understand it the next government in Israel under Naftali Bennett as first prime minister in a rotational prime ministership with Yair Lapid, want to start working the moment they are sworn in, next week. Tonight they have reached the agreements needed for forming a government. And the pressure is adding up as we speak, as to where and when to begin. Internal and external, the public is the right tool if they will be looking for electoral balance and inclusion. There is no problem of constituencies in Israel, which means that all the hard work can be done at a nationwide level and how to reach each one citizen with new information. If this coalition wants to make it work between eight different parties and polar by nature, it is the public they are forgetting is the ninth party of this coalition. And it is a rather large majority of 9mln people to design government and local government apps of (interactive) information. This way the electorate will be directed and redirected in a friendly users way to the right public office counter in their area, or across the land. How can a stark diverse coalition work for everyone that is in it? A simple example: where is cannabis free and where is it still considered illegal? Once the public has found their perception for the government coalition that this works better than they can remember the last time it was in Israel when citizens still had their say, that will indicate whether the coalition has reached to stabilize the country to calm and acceptance. Just keeping it simple and logical that will likely be more of the key to succeed on a government that no one wanted so badly. Keep it utopian and let it be, should not be the attitude after the first 100 days for the prime minister. We still have a few waiting hours to the last finale of the second mandate left up to next week. Anything can still or might just happen popping up like a paper rabbit from the hat without any live rabbits left in the hands of Mr Netanyahu.

For now we wish the coalition in waiting to be sworn in good luck.

Personal op

Yair Lapid & Naftali Bennett stall for time with building a unity government.

28 May 2021

Mr Lapid is doing surprisingly well showing how cautious he is with the coalition building even before the mandate ends on 2 June, next week. This caution was in a news article early friday morning today and saying that he did not know if he would succeed in forming a government with Naftali Bennett next week before on wednesday. Some are not thinking the way politicians see it, from where they are standing and watching the empty seats of any government being formed in the coming time. Also, Mr Lapid is holding on to a prudence others may say that it doesn't suit him when he is not the prime minister just yet. The public assuming is again not what Yair Lapid assumes right now, and when he knows that this is extremely difficult to make right what seems to be legally wrong to the political parties on the Right. Or, when even of the extreme Left the same could be said. Why not make it all go away by a magic wand, zoof! It is extraordinary to discover how strong ideologies in Israel and the political parties have formed this system where there is no chance of forming a coalition on pragmatism and common sense politics in the State of Israel. What may have looked democratic a few weeks ago is becoming in the last week of it's mandate something of a serious fracture to a watertight political frame based on notions and political aspirations of the parties. One can only say this with caution, as we all know in Real Time that this makes up everything the country is built upon, since it's inception in 1948. Naftali Bennett must be thinking right now about other priorities and that one seems to be dominant on his mind that he is calling the future of Israel. The belief is optimistic in a reverse stream and avoiding mainstream politics of the last four decades for a moment. It is also looking very easy to imagine politics in Israel as mountains to climb and all you need is a great mass of energy and optimism, also being athletic and know how to handle the climbing equipment and techniques. The public however can only see from where they are standing that these are not mountains, but are in fact the abyss and Naftali Bennett is walking right into it like a man who has been blindfolded, some say, by his ambition to be prime minister. The question now is where to look for the answers on the nature of this abyss. The voters on the Right are saying the problem that Naftali Bennett is facing is on the Left- Wing of this coalition, which differs from what the public thinks when calling Mr Bennett a traitor to his ideologies. In fact it is not that easy to say, but is more profoundly in it's diametric because it's end goal is the State. One prime minister already has had the mandate to transform Israel into a world nation and economic force within three decades, how? Politics with a broader consensus is the only answer and it wasn't from the outside looking in. This is how government works with a strong man at the helm and who will ruthlessly keep it's home base facilities wide open for this process of modernity (in his own words). Modernity or modern life for Israelis is in every corner of their society similar to coexistence.

What else could we ask for at the moment, when many are convinced that the prime minister has corrupted Israel and it's political system to become an invisible 'pantisocracy'? The question also is what that exactly could we be meaning. There is no visible corruption except for this swipe of building high skyscapers skylines in Tel Aviv and some smaller parts in Israel, bringing big business to Israel, and consolidating power to minister all these new modern lives to the Israeli public with his own personal touch and cunning. It will be hard for Mr Bennett on his mind how to play the prime minister's trumpet as virtuoso as he could. To get to the heart of the matter it is always the truth that wins the real virtuoso, that it is massive consensus within the political parties blocs that Naftali Bennett will not be able to obtain and therefore is giving up a most cared for religious and political ideology on the Right. He cannot replace the global politician that is still his prime minister during the mandate period for the coalition forming by Yair Lapid, of centrist Right and Left. Mr Netanyahu truly enjoys a great majority in Israel as the prime minister. And it is no wonder that Mr Yair Lapid would not be all too enthousiastic about this prime ministership of a good friend, who has so far held back to jump into the abyss with a Left- Wing government. It is either this or the here above is conjecture and void of any real meaning in the real political sense. Relevance however does matter, from Naftali Bennett's point of view and he will have to decide this one on his own. Either he goes with the coalition or government: when first in the rotation the impression will be that Mr Bennett is going to government with the Left- Wing, and when second in the rotation the impression will be shifting and is looking strategically more that he is going alone with the coalition of change and staying out of government consensus on the bigger scale on the Left. And that would not put out his relevance as a Right- Wing party once his term as rotational prime minister is over. Or call off his kingmaker position to form a government of change in this mandate by a pragmatic decision to stay on the orthodox Right- Wing bloc. In another four years his dream to become prime minister in a Right- Wing bloc from a majority will suddenly make more sense and is more becoming of him, because in a fragile moment he did look like the role of being the prime minister of the future in Israel. Another mountain? By estimation what is the future scale of Israel? Just an honest question without intentional or hidden dishonesty.

17 May 2021
An unusual playwright and fiction.

Lady Sarah Macbeth of Israel!

End scene:
Lord Benyamin Macbeth, "What sayest thou, Lady Macbeth, that I shouldest invite Lord Naftali Banquo to our castle and speak with him privately?"
Lady Sarah Macbeth: "Indeed, my lord, yes. It will give me pleasure to gorge out his piercing eyes with envy and quiet rage after thee. How can this riff-raff want to take my lord's place in the same place of thine noble blood?"
Lord Benyamin Macbeth: "Ay, I see what thou meanest. But I can tell thee it will not be so easy to persuade him not to become prime minister in a government with Duncan Yair Lapid."
Lady Sarah Macbeth: "Nay, I won't have you be humiliated before the whole land of Israel, just by this, this, rapscallion from nowhere. Israel is ours, mine, yours more than mine!"
Lord Benyamin Macbeth: "But, I am a bit concerned about the world how they will react to his sudden 'retreat', especially one who does not liveth here in the land of Israel..."
Lady Sarah Macbeth keeping her ears closely like the sharpest of blades: "Hssst, who speakest thou of, the one that does not liveth in the land of Israel?"
Lord Benyamin Macbeth: "I say this with deep concern, my lady. But this is the one who wants to see Lord Naftali Banquo as prime minister of Israel and will do everything to take the prime ministership from me and give it into his hands. You wouldn't want to know who this person is... The matter is getting out of my hands, and is nearer as we speak here privately in the chamber of our great comfort. Still, the Likud will not let that happen. They are the old lords of Israel and are on the side of their crowned champion, to stay prime minister of Israel, again and again to eternity."
Lady Sarah Macbeth: "We must have a banquet, and poison too..."
Lord Benyamin Macbeth: "But my lady, what sayest thou there? Enough of bloodshed in Israel, if you pardon my frank speak to a horror I have not yet committed before, not before thee or myself, or mirror reflex in the deep murky waters, thou knowest, the wars with Gaza... The people who support him are convinced of his valour and worthiness, as we speak, now and maybe tomorrow. Sir Naftali Banquo they call him, in the world, a world that has always been mine alone."
Lady Sarah Macbeth: "That is precisely why my lord we have to go not to the people, but to the rats. It is a sweetening for rats that could help you maintain the richest man in Israel, and to stay Lord of parliament in Israel."
Lord Benyamin Macbeth: "I understand thy reason if there is anything unreasonable to meet me and thy fate in the castle of Balfour. I must yield and do go out to meet Naftali Banquo, lord of the mighty air above Tel Aviv, and coalesce him in my shallow scheme, excuse my pertinence, I mean to say in thy mighty scheme."

Scene: epilogue. To be continued.

Word of the day in the early mornings: 1+1=2

13 May 2021

Israel + the Palestinians do not equal in any simple form or physical reality and they are therefore two different identities. For some odd reason these nations are living in the same geography where neither one wants to live as a derivative to the other. This week is just showing the same problem again when both are fighting over territory within this geography. And what is making the situation more fluid this time no one knows at the moment, but some are saying around in the world that the Palestinians are protesting the occupation by the Israelis, a struggle that has historic proportions since 1948. After the British mandate. One would seriously have to ask whether it is possible to create two countries out of one territory, or two countries for one, Gaza and the West Bank, and one for Israel, in between the two other countries. Known in the International jargon as unilateral dominance when seen from the Israeli point of view. It is therefore 2+1 basically, and not 1+1=2, which is not hard to see in real time. Peace between Israelis and the Israeli Arabs inside the geography I in Israel is showing that here also there is difficulty to define the meaning of realities when both coexist in one territory, when violence in a sudden breaks out. The ones here paying the price are the Israelis who believed that peace was possible and who have defied the other side with this kind of integration between populations. The prime minister in Israel yesterday, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, said that this cannot be in Israel, between Jews and Arabs, who should be looking for prosperity together and a future to live with each other in this country. That was a first time he admitted to a different reality on the ground when coexistence broke to pieces by riots in the cities, places where most Israelis have known security and safety for decades. Maybe the prime minister realized that Israel will now pay a heavy price when it's cities are under attack from within, and not by rockets but by stones and other forms of ordinary vandalism. In some European cities there is a call to Israel to show restraint while it is under attack within and without?

In the meantime we also do not know how much of it is true that Hamas has taken stock fromt the situation in Israel between the Right- and Left- Wing to form government, now given the mandate to Mr Yair Lapid of Yesh Atid. Conspiracies are bad in a moment like this for either side to deal with, if Hamas would challenge Israel on the ground of political instability. But there is always a first time for everything under the sun. The first in this rotation government is Naftali Bennett, who is being grilled as prime minister to be how to deal with a war home and in Gaza. Any prime minister will not be discussing security matters to any one, whether the public inside Israel or outside. But what answer can he give, asks some members in the public? He did say that it was a national crisis and all Israel becomes one in a situation e.g. like now. You have to contain a situation like this when toxic and explosions are everywhere in the country. Citizens first... We hear now words as mixed cities, Jews and Arabs, and straining the efforts on the citizens part to put to safety. Which are which on the insurgency side, that is hard to distinguish in a toxic situation. And who's fault is this when the Arab population living in peace with Israel in one territory or country cannot be distinguished from rioters or citizens? The pointing of the finger is going out to the 'occupier' of the land, but referring here to history. Or to put it better, when fighting in Tel Aviv or Ashkelon or Jerusalem, the uprise is still against the occupier. Intellectuals have called Israel the occupation in the West Bank and see it justified to chase them out in any protest, here in this geography or in the rest of the world. Intellectuals should also remember in times of war or armed conflict that this territory is called the armistice lines, and it wasn't Israel who designated itself to live like this next to the Palestinians in Gaza or the West Bank. What Israel and the Palestinians need is a break from the colonial chains of containment, that has been nothing but a murderous pit to both nations since it was designed. It undermines Israel's sovereignty on a perpetual relation to none existent sovereignty. And the cherry on the icing here is the call against Israel's occupation. The right to defend itself is also strange when it strangulates the 'occupier' Israel.

Israel, Apartheid State.

3 May 2021

Lack of chemistry with Israel does make that impression and when not making deeper analysis. In 2022 this news will come to it's natural end, for one that no one in the rest of the world knows the 'real' scale of Israel. Whether as State or nation. Time is just a great tease and trying to get away from the true empirical, that the Jewish Home outgrew it's purpose now for nearly 100 years in the same region. It has no natural ending today in a world that never before has seen this society elsewhere on the living planet that we call Israel. Israel was envisioned from x point, while not expecting it's grow of any Y- form. But it has arrived at the Y- point many decades later and grew stronger as a nation with a hands-on mentality everything that moves in Israel or is going out from Israel. This however is not a defensive writing expecting the worse can happen in the nearest of future. Scale- wise it is what e.g. the Palestinians envision about Israel in terms of measurement and on assuming that it has vast multi level powers, what is making the impression of Apartheid State. It is not only vast but also it is feeling very unnatural in the middle of Palestine. Without a democracy of their own it makes a grim reading of the way Israel as a neighbour thrives from a democracy, well and good. Human Rights as in every civilized country starts off with the right of the citizen or people, which lies very much in the hands of the community when not yet having an established State or government. But when having a government and there are no people and rights, where does Apartheid starts off if not home base? (In specific cases and places) On a first principle of democracy or 'goodwill democracy' by a people, and continue to look across the fence to the greener world of the neighbour, or sending into their territories rockets to disturb the peace, can only make it impossible to have any clear vision, one must hold very seriously in mind. There have been wars and they have left many in the aftermath devastating and in complete astonishment. Also from the same aftermath came deadly consequences for the side of the Palestinians.

There is no easy way to say or put this, but these wars have been here for 72 years and in the same environment and place. In other words Israel has been since day one the Apartheid State ever since and on the plus side also had the right to defend itself. But disproportionately is another thing... Defending Israel since day one did not include diplomatic negotiations with the enemies, but in fact these were full blown wars where people/ soldiers had been killed in action or combat. The Human Rights Watch should state then where the Apartheid State first started off, or whether this only began when Israel did use disproportionately military force. The military in late 20th century became by then a formidable army and it was built to take on any sort of defense against any enemy of Israel. Where are the red lines to cross for this kind of military by the International World? With the right to defend the country it becomes natural logic to assume even the kind of sovereign (regimental) powers to go with the military, as this could be the only way paradoxically to keep or maintain restraint. Israel's military, one would say, has been built for military combat on the battlefield, but was forced time and again by armed forces from Gaza to stay closer and defend their borders (within the armistice lines). This ongoing battle between Gaza and Israel will not stop to be this battlefield, now historical. Any deeper analysis about Israel and it's military can show how this Apartheid State was 'progressed' and it only shows again and again that no one can build anything else from being the country/ land in between Palestinian territory in Gaza, and the other being in the West Bank. These 'borders' with Israel in the middle the logic it requires can therefore only be one of extreme vigilance and unending combat when armed, on one or the other side.

Why people in the rest of the world seem to think here of Israel being on the side of an Apartheid State, while living 'apart' from two territories in the middle and not friendly to Israel as the neighbouring State, can only explain the deficit of civilization of all nations, and not just seeing what is the natural truth on one side and other on the greater scale.

Yair Lapid, message in a bottle.

19 April 2021

The idea of creating a democracy in Israel tomorrow (metaphor) comes to Mr Lapid's mind as a unity government. He wants to be Left- Wing, central liberal and Right- Wing in this government, so he suggested yesterday on sunday, 18 April. Immediately the short- and long term than becomes the question on every politician's mind, during the forming of government under the current Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. Mr Naftali Bennett has not been named at this point as the one to form government, and change the formation again. However tomorrow's government in Israel does have an interesting feature with a sharp end of democracy. It is the will of the people that is most on Mr Lapid's mind, even before the election. It was there as long as for the whole year last year up to the next election, 23 March, nearly a month ago. The other question when seen from the Israelis point of view is another thing altogether. Mr Netanyahu his popularity was never tarnished among the electorate in Israel, one has to take this seriously if you want to comment or judge from afar how politics in Israel works. The current prime minister is still the beloved of the people in government. He is a champion on the world stage and has been seen as such for more than three decades, even before he had entered politics and when he was still in the IDF. Israel then had a leaning toward social democracy, before the innovation years after the eigthies. How much of the incumbent prime minister stems from that time is not very clear as the story goes that he was the first global leader of Israel, something that had never happened before his time in the country. Mr Lapid in these years was still young and would not make the same start in his adult life. Now Israel is looking at both men, albeit be it in different times.

In the present time and for the last two years one talent so it shows is that Mr Netanyahu does not have or knows, is forming a coaltion based on political differentialities. A global leader who was chosen by the will of the people, at a time when Israel was full in swing on several levels in politics and Defense, needed a champion on the global stage. And this was conveniently enough for the man with his beautiful eyes and dandy- like style and to do what the people asked for, to represent them. Worldwide in every Jewish corner Mr Netanyahu was refreshing and they had also been astonished at this new style of representing the Jewish nation. It was momentum, and more so, it was Mr Netanyahu's momentum. Looking back one does see and remember the transformation years from the eighties to the nineties. It was not an easy task and forming political coalitions at home would come together anyway, based on national sentiment and sentimentalities. Mostly old ones, or even ancient ones. There was no politician in Israel who had then looked under the rock where the future problems would be hiding and hiding away in a serpentine way, only to come out later in the 21st century to seek out the people on their empty political stomachs. Strangely enough at the same time you could say that was a deliberate lie. One that was manufactured by opponents to the State of Israel and it's god-like first minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. And sedition in Israel is a crime, so the Penal Law (1950ties) say. Other candidates to become prime minister in the 21st century, surely this is democracy at best?

In two weeks there is no one who can tell what will happen if the President will give the mandate (not binding by law) to another candidate. It could be that there was something of a revolutionary road this time and say to Mr Netanyahu it is also written that gods do come to an end and leave their titanic nature behind like the old skin of the serpent. You have to say this with some sentiment of regret, but Mr Netanyahu isn't in his 50ties to prolong his prime ministership with agile. Yes, he was dearly loved and worshipped, one has to agree and bow your head. But the prime minsiter himself too must come to the end conclusion, however, that mortals should remember something of their own good and make the right decision when the time has come to pass on high Office to another, Olympian style gentleman. This way the momentum continues, only not pro- active. Imagine that, the pacifist mr Netanyahu! One day it is another prime minister his legacy, good or bad, someone else will write perhaps in the same way as here above, about him and his name (or her). By that time this writing will be nothing more than a fleck of dust. Time passes on and tomorrow is the future of Israel. But to say and be honest, could Mr Lapid become the prime minister of Israel? One thing is more than he has right now is that his ambitions are political and not to be on the global stage, something the electorate has been there and done that. It is also a man of the people in every sector in the economy of Israel. What he doesn't seem to be is a war prime minister and pointing with this to a war cabinet. One should wonder how this prime minister would act in a time of war against enemies of Israel. Mr Lapid's interviews do not appear to be indicisive when it comes to defending Israel, but that doesn't make him a commander in chief just yet. Or does it?

But here is where the coalition will be fully operational and with a rotational prime ministership with the Right- Wing Mr Naftali Bennett, than perhaps we are looking at a few changes in this shifting democracy of Israel. Mr Bennett seems to have the talent to be tactical and strategical and can do this exectutively. He sees straight lines when it comes to defending Israel and it's role as the Defense Ministry. Land, people, non visual and visual borders, these are his home ground volumes and he seems to understand beginning or end here. "Land does matter," he told a hostile audience to his speech in the Peace conference held in Israel a view years ago. From that you have to take it where his logic goes when it comes to Israel and it's Defense. But now he is saying the political cross section line, that people do matter. This was especially during the Coronavirus during the first hours of the outbreak last year. And he kept close contact to people in the audience or public sphere, mostly from the working class. Are we looking at a political alignment from Right Wing to Left Wing, between the leaders Mr Bennett and Mr Lapid? Again here is where both leaders are showing more political talent, when comparing to Mr Netanyahu's global leadership qualities. It is strange how this rotation is impossible not to be rightest in Israel, that even when Left- Wing you are still in the end of the day Right- Wing, if you want to keep the country a safe place for all citizens of Israel, day and night. In conclusion: War is Right- Wing and democracy is Left- Wing, or centrist. The Mediterranean Sea now is looking very calm today... And so is the Red Sea, or the Dead Sea.

23 March 2021, Israel.
(After midnight)
23 March 2021

24 Hours later today Israel and the world will once again witness the winner in the general election, or delay the outcome until friday on 26 March if there is no clear winner. There are those who will remain loyal above the simple logic of change and democracy to the current prime minister, de facto voting for the current man holding power for the longest period of time in history in Israeli politics. Or, there will be another moment in the grand scale of time and the people will vote for Naftali Bennett in the hope that they are voting for 'all of Israel' as was being demonstrated in his campaign time and again for nearly a personal political incubation time of nine months. Today is now too late to talk politics. The results of this election will decide by the snap of a finger whether change in the political landscape of Israel was ready to let go of the man half of Israel worships as the leader of Israel since Ben Gurion. Tomorrow morning, 24 March, could very well mean for Naftali Bennett his big call to receive the news of having lost a place as kingmaker in this election. A greatly missed opportunity and untimely rebirth of politics in Israel, uniting perhaps the most impossible coalition of the present and future. Period. And, let's move on.
A few things first this month that need urgent attention: the ICC probe into war crimes in Israel against the Palestinian people. And also no one knows yet in the Israeli public what the real plans are with the Middle East and how the Abraham Accords will bring lasting peace and prosperity to Israel and the people of Israel. Some can barely afford leaving the city for a vacation in Eilat, when living on low income. And also these are the people who have been here for the last four decades in the same place and living with probably no where else to go for improvement of living standards. If 9 mln people minus the rich we are looking here at 8.5 mln middle income and under the minimum wage majority. Peace with the Palestinian people is another cost of burden without anyone noticing. Perhaps it would be wise to compare 8.5 mln people to the neighbouring country Egypt socio- economic picture and see how the scale tips the balance when prosperity never reaches the majority of the population. (Egypt: 100mln people) It is a reality that should bring any leader a horrifying vision at nights, how the future might prosper at the top but not for the rest in the country and to see paradise only when the moon is shining above the Mediterranean Sea and is universally cold.

Strategic ambitions must go on and it is also imperative to any reality in all advanced economies in the world today. There is no 'small country' anymore to talk about when referring to Israel or any other neighbouring country, but after the A A this will be the whole territory, that is the Middle East+ South and North African countries. The A A is a small reference to a much greater plan for the future for all that are participating in this mega project between Israel and it's Arab neighbours, and Arab nations south of the Middle East with the north and south Africas. It is also the will of the leading nations, each with designs and an axis of allies forged to their main platform, top on top. It is a simple design of elevation and steps, one blade over the other till you get to the grand mill's head. It will be a shame to let Israel without designs and an axis of it's own in this 'platform building' and a prime minister with a state of the art military knowledge (tacit or academic) to control a position in this new global or strategic future peace between it's new generation of allies and Israel at the center. The western nations in the world are not like the neighbouring countries living next or in the same region as Israel. There is also no telling what the architecture of the future of these territories might hold in terms of prosperity and purpose. What is or could be the end purpose, one can ask quietly and in complete anonymity. The prime minister in Israel his orientation on the 'east, west, and south' will be different from now on, as the north is clearly a different time and constant on the whole of the balance when fighting Hezbollah and Iran. If Naftali Bennett was prime minister his keen eye could almost tell you half the story what future awaits the region as a whole, as he has been saying this in his Haaretz peace conference and in other speeches (a new law of war) a few years earlier, what his vision of 'real peace' was. Some things you simply cannot ignore or obfuscate, and his vision then was also clear on the Palestinian issue. He did not gave a speech on solutions but he did address this in terms of reality and the nature of what you could call State next to another State in the same land, if... Tomorrow it is this man I would want to see as prime minister, because he is the embodiment of Israel's east and not the west, that was already won by the current prime minister of Israel, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu.

Surplus is a strange phenomenon in the east, as it is different in economies in the west (or middle Europe). The world simply does not do templates anymore after the world financial crisis in 2008.

Ianus-

20 March 2021

An impossible dream: building a second Nile Delta in Egypt. In 2050 the strategic question, one can only carefully say is that the worldview of the Nile Delta II would be a very interesting one if this was one of it's achievements on the surface of this desolate planet. Socially no one can say whether humanity was or will still be part of the 2050 impossible dreams of great scale. But here there is fundamentally something out of scale wherever a new world was or is introduced in Real Time. A certain inland architecture disappears in thin air and people go flying on carpets to move into their 'new homes'. To build anything from the moment in the present time this is going to improve the future's long term history, from past to present, is the universal understanding. The planning point of view also has one key dynamic to open up society and the future and it's key is employment. One cannot begin to imagine how this 'deployment' of mass employment will become physical realization of it's new future, scale wise. It is only 30 years from now where 2050 awaits humanity and the transformation of the planet. Or, the so called terra nova. Ianus head: the world will be in new leadership hands.

Something no one in the leading nation asks: our problem how is this? Wars fought for many centuries with no answer to say where the birth of secularism was born, and if so the answer to war would then have been a first time most important. Interesting today is the fading dust and life in Egypt long history beyond time, and not remembering anything about true pharaohism, that in fact wasn't this where secularism was born and priesthooded by the Egyptian priest caste? Their first war was incidently against religion, by the Jewish deliverer and against Yahweh, with a different angle to the meaning of religion. It was not secularism but worship of One God by a people living in heavy bondage in the land of the Egyptian pharaoh. One particular law was in every way now common among the nations today, but when the war was between pharaoh and the God of Abraham this was never about war or peace per se, but was in fact to establish true religion for the people of Israel and their God. The law states: no more worshipping of idols. In the year 2021 when properly observed again the world is building upon secularism and hoping the nations will more be trusting and have trust in this method of new global leadership and being under a new generation of younger leadership. That makes a certain idolship (fact idolatry) of the future generation leading nations when sitting at the table and who will only discuss the planet and how best to keep this in balance. Another law in the Torah states that Israel will never again return to the fleshpots of Egypt... Or a lack of fleshpots, perhaps, too?

In 2050 the Middle East will be looking promising as in a vision. And for what a vision or dream is worth yours truly will stick to the Nile Delta II, turning the staff to a serpent to eat the serpent of the magicians at the court of pharaoh Rameses II. "Let my people go," Moses had then implored.

Post Scriptum, 26 March 2021: I also like to stress (from a layman's point of view)that building a second waterway from the Nile I in Egypt to a second artificial waterway Nile II is a personal fantasy when in our modern day engineering technologies, but in terms of labaratory engineering that it is not the natural right of balances for this region. It could disturb the climate and air to over- surpluses and call for plagues, e.g. flies or other insects, and bring a terrible scale of waste into Egypt and the neighbouring countries. Nature when tipping the existing balance, e.g. of purity of water for irrigation of growth, could turn to 'over sweetening' of air, water and crops. The second waterway Nile II should therefore only be seen as a fantasy.  

What happened to the vision of Israel in the 21st century?

28 January 2021

Physically Israel became it's vision that the people and politicians had when they came from countries in Europe to build the Jewish Home in the 19th century. Post vision, depending how you want to look at it, the nation does not want to be addressed in political or diplomatic words and this is not because it is in English, but more because the 'Jewish people' is alien to the citizens of 'the Jewish Home' in 2021. What the people want from the next election will be about their choice to elect the prime minister of Israel and doing so not from vision of any future in Israel, but use their voting right as in a citizen's excercise. The world is inside the Jewish Home for more than five decades now and the new generation experience is in many ways the same one as in countries in Europe have in correlation. Europe has seen this trend in Turkey when President Recep Tayyip Erdogan was prime minister, the new rich and politically engaged young generation wanted to have and see change, was their demand. And then they followed their vision to reaching out to the global world... The young in Israel are now more or less doing the same also, but with the exception of reaching out to the global world especially during an election. The question is what do they actually are viying for when given the chance? Perhaps looking for joining the World Economic Forum platform? And precisely it is here where the gap between the prime minister and his constituents are in lost territory when going to the polls. Three decades ago many were still toddlers, so to speak. And the time maybe has come not to look up to who your parents if they are wealthy or not, or richer relatives overseas when you need support (mostly financial if possible), but to stay in the land of your founding father's vision and create a permanent right of nations home and in the International world for the Jewish nation of Israel. The blueprint vision of Israel is the future and where it will always stay or be.

The Jewish State of Israel is also a tolerant society, if you take it's full scope and size visual. Arabs, Christians and Jews can live here when they have the means to sustain their lives when compared to poorer Arabs who would become dependant of the State in which they live as unemployed, low income families, and they are considered 'outlaws' by their Palestinian brothers/ sisters now for too long since they became part of Israel economically and half politically in Palestine. In this writing however the underlining is toward tolerance in Israel as a society as a whole by the Mediterranean Sea and being 'open' for many who seek to live in freedom. That is jeans and sneakers to be part of the fashion trends for millennials, as gents and girls. Was this part of the political strategy to stay a sub- tolerant society and culture in the Middle East when Israel had a vision to build nation and State in the years before WWII? You could also say that this shared value is felt between Arabs, Jews and Christians in many parts of Israel's society in the 21st century. With the upcoming election in March this year perhaps it is better to look again at this freedom that the many young are enjoying as their natural life and environment for as long as they can remember their lives. It could make the difference to their hearing if someone would care to explain the remarkable achievement as the Jewish State and what this can mean perpetually. It is heritage of the Jewish State since 1900 or the nineteenth century. Most Jews refer to heritage the ancient history of when the people came out of Egypt and when David became King in Israel. It is no great wonder why parents want to speak of their social issues with the ministries of Israel, because it is in the end of the day how to feed your family well and how to maintain your shop as shopkeepers. In the end of the day everyone comes back to the same old life- story, income, rent and living. The gap between Naftali Bennett and the people, young and old, Arab or Jew (or Christian citizen) isn't that wide anymore during the time of the upcoming election. At least not as wide as the current prime minister and the people of Israel, living in complete freedom, a tolerant society as no other in the Middle East, and who are better off with a globalized high tech world.

Why should PM Mr Benyamin Netanyahu go?
(Personal op)

10 January 2021

The only question you do not ask in the whole of Israel is that the incumbent PM of Israel should go and make way for a new prime minister. The media has been reporting the protests outside the PM's home in Jerusaelm for the last 'six months', but in the rest of the world we all know that Mr Netanyahu cannot resign when there is another election in March this year. He can be beaten at the ballot box, so to speak. Another thing many outside Israel are watching are the criminal charges that were brought against the PM and seeing this as a whole domestic politics issue, rather than an International issue. On the International side the PM stands another trial on crime against humanity in the last war against the Palestinian people in 2014. What and how much can the public do for the PM who has been the highest public servant in Office and has served his people and country well, and probably now would earn an honourable recognition for his virtue to keep Israel four decades long safe and secure? It depends where you are standing and see what that means, for Israel and Israelis. Military superiority had an advantage as in no other era to secure the lives of Jews living in Israel, but as rumours go also have been an watchful eye to keep the lives of Jews around the world close to the same rights of safety as any Israeli Jew. What this holds is nothing but the truth so help me God, when Mr Netanyahu pledges anything to his people. Four decades the whole truth is what he gave them and when Israel has reached a certain pinnacle in the 21st century of 'real security', no one else can step in his place. He is their leading and strongman, if only he had not been the prime minister in Israel. And that in simple terms means serving a term of four or eight years in the least. Mr Netanyahu has served his country and democracy for more than one or two terms as prime minister. The political question is whether this can go on in the next election and from there to eternity.

Why pop the question when Israel does not want the prime minister to go just yet at the moment? It does feel as if this is the rhetorical question that no one understands and doing so for a number of reasons when you are living in the northern hemisphere of the Middle East. Is another election going to also make any difference, when e.g. there is no one who could take the place of Mr Netanyahu as prime minister? As prime minister, maybe, there are a number of men perhaps in his own party who could take his place, or in coalition with another party and strong leader. It would be the easiest thing to promise the people that the government is for them and will work again with the people and politicians, hopefully kissing the pain away by saying with more equality. But here we are not in Italy, Spain or Greece, and believe that a successful prime minister as part of the global leading nations will easily give away his accomplishments just to any greenhorn who wants to be prime minister. The wealth of the nation has a standing as close to any EU country, and we expect to see greater tension in the coming time for Israel in terms of economic growth. And who can the nation trust with all big financial and economic deals than the current/ incumbent prime minister? Mr Naftali Bennett, who is now not a member of Likud anymore, but has his own party Yamina? (With keeping his party ally Mrs Shaked as 'second man' in most of his political duels as secondant) Maybe we are only making things a little too complicated here.

We do need the PM Mr Netanyahu to go, but not as in a coup d'etat. It is simple logic and the legitimate way forward to go in a democracy and make way for the new prime minister. The Netanyahu era is designated for the political history of Israel since the beginning of it's making in the years of prime ministers who came to Israel as colonists. Israel has built itself and is at the brink to enter a time or new era of expansionism, while at the same time it is more social to keep it's government in close connection to the people of Israel, if you want in cohesion. But who is to decide whether this is expansionism and can be successful or secondly not depends on a prime minister like mr Bennett, but a PM who will be Israel's first technocrat in approximately eight years time from now? That is the estimated time, if such a measure could or would be taken. And it is also what you could call or say that the people indeed deserve better without actually knowing in what ways that can be achieved right now. The big global businesses are here and thriving under the Israeli sky, blue and black (at night). The other logical question is to ask whether anyone can truly see that the incumbent prime minister can expand the future expansionism at this moment in Real Time and with the immediate prospect of a months away general election/ snap election. It will be the fourth election held in two years time. The people and politicians seem to again and again come to the same checkmate and no one ever knows why and what it is that is causing a government stop. Both are convinced over something, but what that is we do not know. Technocrats handle these situations differently. And for only this reason that it is time for the incumbent prime minister to salute to his great friends in the world and to the people to have served them and make way for the new prime minister, if he will not be elected in this fourth general election in March 2021.

Study of Tel Aviv suburban areas in December 2020

15 December 2020

With the coming of new elections in March 2021 in Israel so many will vote for the economic downturn caused by the pandemic COVID-19 and beg a boost from government by way of protest voting, and the answer they want or are looking for is 'Israel in the future'. The government that the people want however is not very clear just before the election time, let alone to decide which leader would best do in this new setting. And time is pressing on all sides for Israel, especially now with the new administration in the US and new Democrat President, Mr Joe Biden. Everything is going back to 'normal' in Israel again and around the world, some say after 14 December 2020. But one thing that is clear right now is that no one knows yet where this US administration is going, in terms of the future for the US and it's allies. The transition from Donald Trump, former Republican US President, to a Biden- Harris administration is in the case of Israel a definite waiting on which hand will move you. If we get a new Prime Minister in Israel in March next year in 2121 and with the new administration in the US, expectations for Israel might stay on 'only focus'. In the long or short term is hard to say right now, as we are still in a Likud- led government. One new way for the US to look at politics and policies at home is when the President mentioned something in one of his tweets on Twitter last week about housing for people in America. Tel Aviv desperately needs the same policies where change has never seen the daylight of the 21st century just yet... It is good to have a government in Israel and to put this question to it's ministry of Housing, of why too many crumbling houses in bad and derelict state continues to coexist next to a globalized world in Tel Aviv in an unfair way that does not make it a democracy as in most countries in the western hemisphere in the west. In the south of Tel Aviv where most immigrants from the African continent have come to live in Israel are living, is a perfect example of these derelict places and also are crumbling on all sides on the compass. Except where smart technologies make a suprise 'colour effect' in the streets (infrastructure) to remind everyone that they are still living in a smart place and that all of Israel is not only how people live in zergs and waiting only on the sun to mutate into locusts and locusts 'housings'.

The coming election to elect the Prime Minister in Israel, whether this is the current PM or a new PM, when the Housing ministry is looking at it's imoby (in my own backyard) another ministry of State Economics, must concentrate on the total nation and it's national Jewish Home. One looking out (outlook) and one looking in the rear (input). The people say that they do not see another man in Israel to replace the incumbent PM, as he is still the best Israel has ever had since Ben Gurion. Facts and truths are being perceived as one and the same thing right now in Israel when it comes to the man to lead the country best. And Time and the future will be about globalization and whether this stays human or hybrid. In Tel Aviv or in Budapest, scale will only tell. The new PM would also come in an 'unfortunate situation' to the political stage if he is chosen/ elected Prime Minister in Israel and a new leading man. The politics that he will inherit are all about transition (especially in relation to the US), where the Middle East with it's Abraham Accords have come in the modern day of this century, transition is theme and keyword. The global economy did make the transition in the world after the millennium and is now steadying while some are already settled or in the process of settling. To inherit a government is one thing in the eighties, but to inherit a government and global transitions is another thing. Is the new Prime Minister of Israel ready for the future based on change and magnitude? Tel Aviv has a great potential to be like Italy and the city of Milan, when it has the same Mediterranean winds and climate traveling across the whole land of Israel. If the new PM in Israel could also focus on the people living in the suburbs in all it's major cities, transition would not be a thing of the past, but only the future even when locusts. After 73 years since WWII democracy in Israel is not a matter of 'It's okay' and 'it's not okay' opinion poll. The people having to live in Tel Aviv and enjoying their derelict 'zergs' have the right to live in a healthy country, and not because it is the land of plenty, but more because Israel's government is fundamentally truly a democracy. And it is not void or a void system as in many dictatorial systems. Naftali Bennett, strangely has both qualities to lead the country in- and out of it's flows as the past and future of Israel. Will the past of Israel vote for him? Will the future of Israel vote for him? It is until now strange as he is coming from a third position and will not be seen as legitimate to enter the bigger arena of politics in Israel. One can understand... But a king at the age of twelve is still legitimate in all parts of kingdoms on earth to be king.

Mr Bennett is indeed looking the new image Prime Minister of Israel.

(Personal op)

24 November 2020

Mr Netanyahu's star is fading fast and will go the way like all meteorites do at their crashing, in Israel's soil and earth. Indebted we owe much to this Israeli Prime Minister who has battled with global titans in the early eighties, and than later on had witnessed the world changing to a globalism in the cradle. Not many realize how much the task was one of Herculian then still for the young Mr Binyamin Netanyahu. But he was a man of many vanities in the right place and time, just like Egyptian neighbour Mr Hosni Mubarak after the assassination of the late Mr Anwar Sadat. This is the man who became Israel's Prime Minister while globalism was still about fierce competition, protectionism, rivalries, and rising capitalism. A golden time for all leading nations, G6/7/8 & G20 countries. Mr Bennett does not need to be the same like the current prime minister in the 21st century. A comment on the JP today said that Mr Bennett could start a new clean history in Israel. But this is Israel and become the PM is not just a personality contest in the world today. In many cases slightly charismatic chosen PM's are rising to the occassion fully breasted, but wane very fast and stick to best the older ways. The political machinery is in these cases something of a 'safety net'. Quite seriously, if Mr Bennett can make it in the next election and win a majority of seats with his allies and form new government, his first pressing issues may be the ones he could not answer immediately post election, as a first or any first term PM. From many articles in the JP for the last 3/4 months many are suggesting how Naftali Bennett is connecting with the electorate and he is engaging people with people to him. There is also mentioning of him being close to his political allies and is keeping a watchful eye on why the government is in a state of dysfunctionality(perhaps dysfunctionalities), without blaming the current PM on a one-to-one basis. The party closest for addressing the PM is Yesh Latid, with party leader Mr Yair Lapid. Everyone outside can get the cycle and how this goes on forever, and with no one to say enough... If the people could they would say enough at the ballot box in yet another election?

Mr Bennett is now in a unique position almost in the middle of the world, inheriting the other half of surplus capitalism in real time. If his heart is close to the people of Israel one can expect him to be also close to labor and income. But building bridges and telling people to keep the aspirations in Israel when even circumstances are adverse at the moment with the Coronavirus, the economics dreams of re-starters is a good place to start first. Horizontal economics is important if not the bloodline of Israeli starters or re-starters, if Mr Netanyahu will leave government with a parting shot. He will know where Israel stood when he would leave politics as the PM of Israel. It is also leaving a great sea of unpopular decisions for the new PM to make and create with his ministries. Some things in life you have to work hard for and are not free. The clean history sheet when empty can look more promising when without any written abstract in it, is another fact in political life to start and being the ordinary mortal. In the global world not the barbarians are at the gate, but titans. Behind the scenes the truth also gets a strange spectacle that the new PM in the end will feed the mice to the cats, but that wasn't the plan firstly when he had his eureka moment and thought to dazzle the electorate by showing mice and cats could live together peacefully. The big question here and now is why vote for Mr Bennett when you are not blind? The International world will also monitor him closely and carefully listen to his slogans and soudbites from day one as PM. Not 'You are blind and I am blind too', but 'We can't stay blind to the future'. In the book of Proverbs it is said that you must buy wisdom if you don't have any for yourself. And wisdom to buy for the people of Israel, it looks like this will challenge the surpluses nationally and to a certain extent his global allies. Can he do it?

Error: Herculean

I am not one who is loved among humanity, and with this you don't get very far with in either modern or ancient day Israel.
(Personal observation)

20 November 2020

The platform of your observance is zero at the starting point in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Negev, Eilat, Sinai, Beersheva, or Haifa. Arabs and Jews, in nineteen, twentieth or 21st century, this is the touching of living stones built around you and wherever you are looking in this environment, if not strange from wherever you might come into the Holy Land. And from there it gets only more tiny or zooming in to feast your eyes upon the reality that is going on as a living before you, yes here as well as you know from where you come from, e.g. Europe or elsewhere. This does matter to keep it behind in your mind, or get lost in time. How Jews experience the arrival in their homeland, some say, is different. There is immediately the welcoming love that awaits them at Ben Gurion Airport. At one point they stay and you leave again to go back home. Israel becomes a distant memory and years later it won't make any sense anymore until providence takes you back many decades later in your life, virtually. Or, have you tempted providence without the L- word (love) this time? Time in the seventies was different, something more of freedom of thought and ideals, where some went even further without you understanding or realizing what they meant by ideology. Youth plays different parts in our imagination when young, too young to understand that you were standing in a country where people came to 'rebuild' their lives after the Holocaust (mass murder) and that this was their homeland. The kibbutzim and Mushavs do not tell you where you are exactly; they are a people to people community and you are not being paid in terms of salaries to work here and start a life. Ideologies only do help create a temporary home and address for each volunteer that is a visitor in Israel and do all the work for free only to learn about the country and it's people as much as you can understand. In Israel it was part of a noble activity when a volunteer from distant countries in the rest of the world. Palestinians or Arabs, for some reason then you did not arrive at Ben Gurion Airport for... Time has changed.

No one can say what is true and happening in Israel when the world only has a virtual image or idea about the country in our time. In this virtual it is packed with much of what they say is Israel today, that the Jews are oppressors of the Arab population throughout the land and are trying to make this a whole dominant Jewish land. Even if it will take years. And the best way to arrive in Israel or Arab land is not to use the Ben Gurion Airport, so where do you arrive when leaving the International terminals? It is difficult to say when there are no borders and explicit international connections to the land of the Arabs living in Israel and welcome visitors. Virtually they could be doing something wrong also against the 'mainland', if one could point out what that was. Israel is isolated from the international world and cannot be seen as safe to visit (or exit), unless you are Jewish. And love gets tinier and tinier to a mere fleck of dust for non Jewish visitors that are no diplomats or world leaders. This is where it makes a strange virtual to any rational human being and asking why come to Israel while you could also go to China or Japan on vacation. Israel is the land without borders and you should refuse to go there when you can only move within two other lands divided by green lines. In a way Jews refuse to come here without knowing how confusing this works in real life for Israelis in general. Much of it goes unnoticed by the heavy noise pollution to infinity on a daily basis. And yet it is better to engage yourself in politics of Israel and the Palestinians as to show yourself how much you value humanity and being Jewish in the world today. Could it be that intelligent people are refusing to come to Israel when it is not a State nor does it have real sovereignty, but is squeezed in between two different territories belonging to one other nation? Go to Israel and visit the Holy sites and quick get back home. The world, I believe, should protest to come to Israel and demand that the borders are put out straight first. It should be either partitioned between two nations, or built in such a way that we can see it's strategic sovereignty from mighty far, space or earth's farhtest surface. You can see why this only works when you are not loved by humanity. Yes, perhaps.

Anybody home? They all seem to be knowing where we're going.

6 November 2020

Are you well hungry tonight for the last dripping votes of the US presidential coin in Pennsylvania? Have your bite first, because from where we're looking how this will finally end it is looking very bad for someone... Which economy is doing bad when so many go out and vote Democrat? The other half with about everything half of this or that can't make it. Echo: so displeased, but yet you have to belief... Of the four years of Mr Trump he is going to leave a better America who can't now vote for him and will vote Democrats. Once you make that promise it will come true. This is America. And than you are out and can go home- base. Who else is on this line of thinking? And what can we expect from Mr Biden's victory- to- be? "Who loves you pretty mama?" It is so very painful to watch the incumbent go down on his own sword, badly. Unless... His side of US democracy is still working fine. (They say tonight - EU time- the military veterans are now flooding in) By the same sword (named Damocles) the other guy is also... No one can finish this line, after... Jelly bellies. Is there nothing that we can do and look back on tuesday night after Florida? Or go on hating your wife for the rest of the week. (And don't pay attention to her "You told me after such a long time that you loved me and this was tuesday night.") Is the world ready for this democracy process globally of looking beyond a US male president to a US female president now? (We've been there and done that in 2016) Something that looks more than a fly on a head to deal with. Speaking of flies. Who would not have wanted to see the next four years with the incumbent president and be a fly on the wall? And also looking back on the time when he was the only juvenile and bad boy US president in history. There was hope, there was something more than that too. They say it was luv... Imagine that we could have had him and not Mr Biden to see France moving their embassy to Jerusalem, as the French PM has written in the Jerusalem Post today where France stands on the issue. (Le premier jour for France and 'my wife' in one day) The whole idea of Middle East Peace with the Arab countries and the Palestinian people with Israel will then be looking like a changed order, or indeed, a changed world order. (And then maybe love your wife again, madly)

So, tonight everyone in the world is anxious to see Mr Biden as elect President of the US. This was the most tensed general election of the century, to be honest. Better than when Barack Obama was elected president. This time it made you forget you had kids. But we could get all this terribly wrong on face value. Domestic politics in the US is nothing like it's foreign policies ever. And as one comment said somewhere online, the vice president isn't stupid. He knows the system inside out. The Democrats are now in a position to transform from donkey to crocodile and cry a lot, could be one thing... Once they will be the sitting presidency in the White House they will be in the right place of all changed strategies of the near future and still be unreachable to the rest of the world. The US general election is like reading the balance every four years: there is nothing missing or added they don't know about. On the other hand you can't be too old and than write about the future generation of Democrats in the White House and miss out on a few 'unknown' points. The millennial politicians may have other plans and styles. By that time when all this is called 'the new administration in Washington DC' who will remember who Donald Trump was? He will or might be missed, let's say if France indeed would move their embassy to Jerusalem. They could send him a group photo signed with 'We wish you were here, Donald.' Fin. Can we forget about him now, please? This is the day when the world will see a wax Trojan horse to convey a new class of US presidents. Call it poetic justice and if not you can always call it real justice. But, having said all this here above you still have those few moments left to call it the nightmare scenario in a nightmare. Once you will open your eyes it will all be beautiful again and nothing like it as reading this. "Maggie (the cat), come over here!"

It is saturday morning and they are still counting in key states, as you are walking around in the kitchen in your pyjama (EU) and writing your thoughts down. The balance of power in the US who will approach it? The world hasn't been paying too much attention four years since Donald Trump became president. The story, simple version, goes like this that Mr Trump has woken up the sleepy beast. And the question should be something like this, is it wise to take it from here or wiser if we take it later. Time is pressing both parties and fulfill the prophecy that is fate across the whole world. The incumbent has put it simply to 'No more wars but putting peace on demand' is the formula to pave the way to a greater globalism. Don't you wish you had design such a scheme yourself? This study was done while the majority of countries and people were busy talking about Mr Trump's only bad behaviour, that the president in his term was doing in the meantime remarkable things when compared to former US presidents. The meaning of war and peace changed with him to peace and not war in a globalised world would be best to describe it. (Study/ opinion FvD Dutch EU parliamentarian politician) And while pressing Nato Members to put more funding into the alliance one has to understand how deterrence works fine when everyone agrees on peace and security. Imagine what the Democrats could do once this is what globalism must do. . . It will do one thing and that is to make members of Nato get out of their pyjama, if the US incumbent president stays. End of the story and saying privately is how to steal glory from a fool?

More tension in Israel and so little time. Question is the agitation and where that is coming from.

24 October 2020

Politicians are not good to predict where future economy plans will create political incentives for people, country and government, even if they still are promising change during campaigning to win an election. The next general election in Israel might be looking close to something like an economic plan and promise. The truth this time, let's say that Yamina leader Naftali Bennett can only point in that direction, is from a conservative point of view how to unite people and industries in the private or public sector if he becomes the next PM in Israel. The other question is can it stick in the people's 'solvable' minds? The situation as many are writing their editorials in newspapers online are very toxic, with an aged PM who hasn't been handling home- base economics during the pandemic very well... What that means to outsiders is not something easy to understand. Life get's even more complicated as the pandemic threatens to flatten the economy in Israel mostly in the public sector segments. Israel's security is asking a price to infinity, if you look more closely and agree with big government and the current PM how his old strategies have achieved all the great things the Jewish Homeland cannot do without. Period. If Mr Bennett would become PM much of that path he will have to build in the same way as the former PM and others that went before him. Strategically the private sector is in the right position in Israel and also when it considers a bigger industry than economic corporations, the Military. It is the people of Israel that in the end are paying the price for all the security that is needed to keep safe the country and it's nation on the face of an increasing hostile earth towards Israel. What we are looking at is dis-unity among Israeli citizens and their government. And here is where tensions are growing each day and moment in civil life.

If Mr Bennett would become PM in Israel one thing he will not be able to do is creating an artificial island of economics for the people of Israel, while keeping big government on mainland as an imaginary capital of big business in the country that he commutes in between and in certain hours of the day or night. To do that the new PM would look nothing like his predecessor, Mr Binyamin Netanyahu who has been dealing with national politics only in terms of war & peace (international). Today in the JP there was mention of the role that former Justice Minister, Mrs Ayelet Shaked, is playing in Yamina next to Mr Bennett. These are millennials cq leaders of the political party of the right wing. For Mrs Shaked Justice always works more ambulant than sitting in the seat of the PM and stick to one place across the ocean of time in any first term of four years, if so happens. The interesting point was that in the piece there was mention of a Netanyahu, Bennett and Shaked formation presumably in a next government. Mr Netanyahu has been surging in the polls yesterday over Yamina again, it could be that this is the reason why calculations of formations change or can shift. No one knows what will happen in Israel the coming twelve weeks before the Gregorian Calendar 2021 new year. And to stay close one has to always bear in mind that Israel has changed to a big corporation government for the last three decades. It is as good as a vertical city with great ambitions situated in the Middle East. At the same time the Coronavirus is not making a flattery image of the people crawling out like worms in a can from bankruptcy and poverty in and out, if that will happen across the center into the distant corners of society. You have to look too deep and no active politician will come to that during his first four years term in government, and do 'his job' as PM.

There is plenty of money as a starting point, fictional or not. What do you do when you are PM in Israel 'with all that cash' (scene in the movie Scarface)? Snapshot: for quick money and no revenue; mainstream economy big money and big incentives. The wise thing to do is very simple: it is where the economy flows in and out in a big way and stay here or there, if your prerogative is making choices of your own. People outdoors are weeping or fading to grey in sorrows or mortal coil, just throw them a bone or two? What a terrible dream or nightmare if Israel ever turns to this perpetual darkness even during daytime! These are times of India in the thirties and forties, all passé in the 21st century globalization. Answer the questions and answer the difficult questions too.

The true manifestation for change in Israel.

(appendix: storylines)

16 October 2020

The Netanyahu government has come to it's end of the cycle of decades being the only political Party for all of Israel, and also around the world. Jewish identification comes with Likud, the Party of which Mr Netanyahu is leader for 20 years, in Israel and outside. We are looking at an exponential political body and with enormous power to at least last for two or three decades after today. The question is a serious one: will it ever disintegrate before that time and also what can make politics in Israel become political again? Patriotism and politics always go hand in hand with Israelis, especially the older generation (base European Jewry). World Society is of great influence but when at home in Israel today it does not manifest what the ordinary people want. In 2020 Yamina and Likud, and other parties, could make that manifest public without making manifestos on changing government and it's establishment. Mr Bennett should be writing an editorial right now in visible ink so that tomorrow or the day after, all people may read his reason why he wants to be the next Head of government in Israel. (Literally) After more than two decades of the old Likud, Kadima was no match for the biggest wave of politics then, the people have come to the end of this cycle almost two decades later and want to say what they think publicly and within hearing distance of the rest of the world. That e.g. the time when Israel was about war and war crimes is now over. It makes a true manifestation on issues that matter and are relevant in every day life to the central ground of society in Israel, where are the problems hanging on for decades and with no ending? The political right of the Jewish people has been forgotten around the world for too long under the universe in our time. Tell us the truth what the people of Israel think and want, please?

No one has ever seen a critical mass in politics in Isreal before just yet. The people in Bangkok go out in masses unto the streets to demonstrate and say it out loud in the world what they think. Israel has dried up at this point and it's Elysium seems too distant from realities in which people have to live, also when there is a virus now darkening their personal lives and freedoms. The best you can have in a democracy is freedom is now nothing but textbook 'flu- jabs' to make everyone feel better, but in reality that numbers getting only higher with out of work and people into poverty. Politics has lost the moral compass, so many are thinking privately. How could anyone ever been thinking that under these circumstances any third temple of a divine promise by the God of Abraham would be built? That will not be in the manifestation of the people when out in the public if this happens at all. Patriotism is another word for the third temple and also that that will happen in Israel. The other question is whether Naftali Bennett can bring back the broken pieces of the political Ming Vase of Likud and glue this to the central government of his choice, if he would become Prime Minister in the next election. More and more that is becoming also the first 'blue thread' of his manifest corner as the new man to lead the government and people of Israel. It can happen in Israel, yes, and that is natural politics over abstract politics. Too many people here are suffering from illiteracy on all that went wrong with the current government and it's long life history in Israeli society and politics. Mr Netanyahu indeed brought universal or global security for the people of Israel after many years of 'living in the wilderness' of post colonialism. And he will not be forgotten either for what he never understood when dealing with democracy and his fellow countrymen/women. All political parties must come together in this manifestation and do what is expected from people representing democracy and government. (As the rule of manifestations put it, 'with respect to government') If the next political machination works for the new PM he will have to thank political science and it's makers, because Israel has no immunity from the tutorials in politics and theories in and around Israel. All this is true or a horrible nightmare. And apology will sire vipers.

What is on the drawing board in Israel and it's State politics today?
(A story)
20 October 2020

You could say it is in the present time hard to say what the ceremonial meaning of Naftali Bennett as next PM really means, but at the same time it is also a very interesting development now ongoing as a very good prospect for him to become the next PM in Israel. Another part of Israel and State politics is the Two- State solution Accords with the Palestinian people, a vacuum that won't change an inch from what it has been since it's conception. It is however the plan of nations, some EU Member States and Britain, to challenge that voidness the coming decade. The sentiment here is that it all comes down to a matter of opinion and vision. Possibly, but now when the next PM in Israel will not be Mr Netanyahu, who has like many of the EU nations, did not see change of government after a long while and will not know if this will stay or come to a different level in our living memory on the issue of the Two- State solution. The new cycle of government with e.g. Mr Bennett as Head of State might only focus on the generation of millennials, and not necessarily on the generation gap of older politics/ policies and the future. The truth is that the Palestinian State is every PM's weakness and will also touch the tender flesh of thought at one point, either to fail or create the illusion of success. In Israel the people will not notice much change on the ground except where the new PM will press on with his policies in government. They are already saying that Mr Bennett is a capable leader and has leadership qualities just for a good time and place. Time and place being the present time. Post election he even might be looking out from the window in the apparent vacuum and watch from on height at the infrastructure some are planning to build in Israel and Jerusalem on the 'land of the Palestinians'. It will be an interesting view by then for the new PM and it even might inspire him to pick up from where the former PM, Mr Binyamin Netanyahu, had left the matter. The battle now is how to get him up to State Politics as Head of government.

Factions on factions building will be hard work and in the end might become the labor of love for politics in Israel, is one way looking at the prospects in front of the polis. The technical details always are here the regular prescriptions how to win an election, if you listen to your spin doctors. And the nation follows only the talkshows on national Television during the battlefield in action. If indeed everything will be standard procedure the next PM does not have much to do right now by introducing new politics or policies. He can wait until elected in government and as Head of State. Once again said. And yet, differential is what Israel needs more than ever before and no one knows yet how to put it and where. A differential of gentle coup d'etat and a mixture of the Prague flower revolution x Eduardo Peron's military coup as Labour Minister. The ethical question is but in what way was the present government a threat to the nation and State if there was never such a thing? After all, the world is watching closely how things fare in Israel between the big political parties at the moment. Much of Mr Bennett lies in his past as education minister and a natural urge should not be to re-educate the government and it's establishment. People also might interpretate this as 'dicatatorial' religious! And in the meantime time is pressing on all sides, not expanding anything. At such pace you expect this PM at the end of his first term that he will know by then whether he was a winner of his generation as the man leading nation and country, or, that he literally saw government fracturing deeper and at it's lowest before his very eyes. For what you will ask yourself then was it necessary to have a mini coup d' etat when all the flowers are now dead and turned to brown compost? That might all change to his advantage if he were to do something more spectacular and call for the building of the Third Temple. One: which Jew, secular or other, can refuse such a thing? When the political climate is either cold or heat you know the smart thing to do is to see the bigger picture. It is going to be neither because the climate is the game changer.

The Third Temple to be built will then be looking like taken out of an evil textbook in politics and reality worldview, even to Jews. Mr Netanyahu similarly did something of that nature by promising Biblical land to the settlers. 1 July annexation of Judea and Samaria were to take place and it didn't. If you are going to go down in history as the 'failing' PM of Israel, it is better advise to take down with you the wall and plan that Israel is not building any Third Temple yet at this moment. Let the people remember how a religious PM (hybrid in secular ways) has called for building the Third Temple. Only Esau would give away his birthright and say that the time isn't yet here for the plan to be carried out. Who will bring Jerusalem to the Third Temple? Architects and civil engineers? The point is that everyone will say that you can't build the Third Temple without having first the land of the Al- Aqsa Mosque, even when civil engineers will say that no one can build the Jewish temple of such massive structure there, but somewhere else where there is space and a wider environment to build this mass monument of divine symmetry. Also from the point of the Torah nothing can be given to God's might from the side road. It could be mr Bennett's big plan to make a start with and create not only a cabinet of live democracy, but also a war cabinet to build the promise of the nation Israel in Jerusalem. It is an evil plan, all depending which hand is giving and which is taking. Government is not waiting for passé reform or any change. The Palestinian people also are in close perimeter and building their infrastructure, and not only politics. Theirs is much a worldview as the emperical view of Israel for 54 years State and nation building. Is there any other way for the next PM to make history in Israel alive in a time when the global community has relative achieved peace among nations in the Middle East? The former PM would be remembered as the man in his time who walked with the great on earth to follow just that path of peace making! And then others might also say that the building of the Third Temple is better off by staying the dream or myth, if Israel wants to avoid going to war with the nations on earth. England? The EU? The Armistice Lines? And also with Iran lurking from behind the high walls of Tehran or Shiraz. The Middle East next profligate might be the military and challenges... "The Third Temple, Prime Minister?" Somewhere from the heavens a loud yelling is saying, "It's the economy, stupid." We should leave the next PM to ponder on this one for now.

Error: Juan Peron

What we should pursue is the Pax Irene and do this fanatically.

Personal Op

25 September 2020

For the perfect setting of the chase and in one look Israel looks like the ideal place tonight. It is also adjacent to a wider territory we call the Middle East, and when keeping focus through air and sky here we can see thin horizontal lines where beginning and ends meet into smaller territories. This is why some have a misconception over who is running Israel, or one of it's neighbours. But, then again, we are not looking like politicians who are running countries. Your eye comes running down the Y- axis like a itsy bitsy spider and you are following the plains with comfortable eyes when seen from any height. Not that we are now in mid- air and write about Israel, it is now all imaginary and harmless. It also looks from mid- air that the Middle East is ruling the countries within it's periphery by land, air and sea. Here it is inconceivable to believe anything else, e.g. that Israel is the most powerful nation in the region. How much of the story about Israel as the strongest nation in the Middle East is still true in fall 2020? According to the Jerusalem Post the country is disintegrating as a government at this very moment without any sight of anyone to lead the country. (Katz, 25 September 2020) That is the vertical X- axis. Most important image are the people of Israel and the government (what used to be 'their' government in the distant past). How does one say it in Hebrew when one man faces the people of Israel? In ancient Hebrew there isn't such a man and to govern the people in a government. It is a mistake to say that the story of Moses as the leader of the children of Israel from slavery/ bondage in Egypt, into the land of Milk & Honey, were such a Prime Minister Office. Before 1948 there had never been a PM before in the land of Israel, only kings and foreign empires. It is no wonder that in a night like today the people of Israel have lost faith in the Prime Minister, or any other for that matter. In countries like England there have always been Prime Ministers in previous centuries. In short: not only do the people cry out in the streets of what is happening in Israel, but in their hearts the flesh cries from the conscience that what the people prefer is to leave it all to fate and let the PM go. They have the democratic staff to prove it and that will eat the other staff of opinion of his enemies. And catch their breath to go back to where they were before the Coronavirus.

And then we see the country again through night vision: Israel is more than geography. For many decades Israel has been always a big government for it's people, not close, but far enough where you could not reach with bare hands for any Israeli citizen and holding up sign boards with demands for him to resign. It is September 2020, the year when annexation of the West Bank 30% has failed, when peace with Israel's Arab neighbours was signed in Washington eight weeks ago, and even the PM of Israel has become human like any other in the public sphere. And that is a bad sign when even Mr Netanyahu believes that. No smaller government and when even with the strength of a lion at it's helm would now be able to save the people, country, government and also, yes, the Prime Minister. In the flame of the lion, a very sad eyed PM is watching himself when he was still the promise of Israel. His wife will always come second, for any good human being will believe that he, Mr Binyamin Netanyahu, was once in love with Israel, just as what he is now seeing before him in old age in the lion. If Israel had known for hundreds of years to have a Prime Minister, that would have made a difference tonight in Israel. Existence is not the same thing when over 3000 years. One has to move more closely and see what the meaning here could be. It is the question who or what is Israel after a few star Prime Ministers since the forties. The world is slowly coming to the awareness of a deeply confused government in Israel and that the people openly revolt against this Prime Minister. And the test of truth lies very much in the successor that is missing, that Israel is genuine confused. Another such proof is that Mr Naftali Bennett has for ten years keeping up his finger and asking to be the next PM, but there is no one who was or is listening. (He speaks good English) Just maybe it is the first coming out of the people of Israel against their democratic elected leader, that he is not what they want anymore. But it is who they want that isn't here or there, which makes it hard to any outsider to believe that the people are genuine when rejecting mr Netanyahu in worldwide protests. In most countries we have at least the 'least of two evils' choice, but that a country with such strategic importance in the Middle East could think that Mr Netanyahu would live forever is unbelievably inefficient. Narcissism is the culprit in the saga for finding the right man to succeed mr Netanyahu. But who is it that we are talking about? To lead the people of Israel again through the Red Sea while being chased by the chariots of Pharaoh Rameses, perhaps it is Mr Bennett who is first to walk into the sea and almost sink like Nahson did before the miracle can happen of seeing the impossible. Israel desperately needs a new Prime Minister.

Instead it is Israel that is standing down in favour of Mr Netanyahu, or it only seems that way. There is a small chance for a change of history in Israel if it can come to decide in a majority vote in favour of Naftali Bennett. It is not what the world thinks of him per sé if that would happen, but it is the simple fact that he embodies Israel, be it the 'small government' Israel of the people. There is no need in him either to be partronized from anywhere else, which is typical the Israeli mentality when born here. But one averse of bad fortune and this is all over forever in a centon, so to speak, and he will join the human race anew. Or, join the Haredim in waiting for the coming of the Messiah and the third temple to be built. Can a lion live on bread and water? Perhaps, yes, when the people are still the electorate and use their right to vote for someone new to represent them as a country. That is simply not a fight between left & right alone when it is about Israel and the Middle East. Humanity in Israeli citizens is something the world has seen before and we believe these stories are right. One in particular is interesting, that when the people are forgotten it is not only unethical in the eyes of humans, but in the eyes of Ha Shem it is a grave sin (linea recta). Perhaps the world is failing to see why the fuss over a new Prime Minister is the latest fever in Israel or for other private persons, e.g. who do not want to give up on a nation that can barely stand on it's own two feet as ordinary citizens. Not many know what is keeping up the people to go on living in Israel, and that it is actually for and because they are speaking Hebrew. When everything else fails the people of Israel the only currency they have is Hebrew. To the rest of the world that means the language in which the Biblical history began. It is not as many have come to believe in our modern day world that it is Mr Netanyahu (who prefers to speak in English) or Netta Barzilai. The latter, I must say, could count for half of the youngest population of Israel with her 'You stupid boy I'm not your toy', while Mr Netanyahu is counting for the rest of the adult nation singing 'This is dedicated to you, mr Netanyahu.' Seriously saying, once there was a man named Abimelech and he wanted to become king in Israel by whatever means he could scheme, and so he did become king. No one knows if that is the appropriate history to recall tonight, since it can't be mr Bennett, but luckily it is neither Mr Netanyahu. The interesting thing of this story are the others who were asked to become king and they flatly refused because of their olive oil or groves, while the other had lovely trees to attend, but that only Abimelech wanted the kingship. A whole different man compared to Ahimelech of Nob. That is why Israel is more than just geography when the choices the people of Israel have to make are intrinsically Jewish.

If the mountain cannot come to Mohamed...

13 September 2020

That is how the saying used to go, but not anymore. The Prime Minister of Israel, Mr Binyamin Netanyahu, in his efforts to 'cloudbusting' the old Middle East geopolitics of the thirties, fourties, fifties, and so forth, has managed to set new rules in the region for Israel, north of the Middle East and the southern part, for the last two months, August and now in September. Peace has been the long and winding road (old Beatles song by John Lennon and Paul McCartney) for many decades and under previous Presidents and Prime Ministers, of Israel and in the west, and left it standing at the door or gateway for too long, the lasting peace in the Middle East. In the 21st century Mr Netanyahu decided it was time to 'play' the role of Mohamed and go to the mountain. UAE and since yesterday Bahrain also are his first steps in that direction of establishing a breakthrough with old politics, from Washington and the EU on the Middle East. This could be another boost for the PM's confidence and everyone expects him to go a long way yet after this diplomatic 'cloudbusting'. He is now also Israel's first white knight Prime Minister and his demonstration of calling out to Israel and the rest of the world, that he is the leader as no one was ever before him in the Holy Land. If peace could bring the Jewish nation closer to the building of the Third Temple, that is worth all his efforts of diplomatic change between Israel and it's Arab neighbours. Unless change in the geopolitical hegemony of the Middle East, one could say, that it's meaning is more technical of substance. No one knows what that means yet. Time is for now still white noise and perhaps with wider meanings.

But time is by the look of things not on the Prime Minster's side now where he is standing as PM of Israel and the people. There is a black knight going round from door to door in Israel to call for their vote and not because the PM is acting as Secretary of State of Israel, but because there is a desperate need in the country for actual change. This man is facing the high sea of another 100 years of the already 100 years since San Remo, 1920, existence of the Jewish Home in Israel. In his own words, Mr Naftali Bennett, has said a few days ago that 'No more politics, but management of the people'. (Similar as famous Korean Planning city architect calls it 'people management' through building infrastructure in mountainous areas) He is the 'home minister' and acting in his own right as deputy minister, only for the good course to bring the people together and not chasing them away from government politics and policies. It looks like the State needs the people badly, at least if they want to prove that the marriage with democracy is still on. Another level in the next 100 years in Israel lies very much in the idea of the diaspora Jews across the whole world. Without any new town or city built the plan for growth (economic cycle) is yet in this snapshot non existent in the present time in Israel, as it is expected that many would want to live within the golden crescent of Jerusalem and Haifa's existing economic infrastructure. (That is also the title of a book: Crescent City, and something very different) Where will these new towns and cities be built, in time of a great influx from Jews in the west or the EU? Just a tiny little theoretical question. There are plenty of limestone mountains between the Area C and Ashdod/ Ashkelon, but no 'physical infrastructure' (a term coined by the Dutch Finance Minister, Mr Wopke Hoekstra in building new future infrastructure in the Netherlands) or other creative thinking, recreational e.g. sports or tourist stops in the middle of earth's center in these uninhabitable places called Judean desert plains. But this is Israel, seen from within the Armistice Lines since 1948, that if the God of Abraham could live in the wilderness forty years why not the diaspora in the luxury of this century? In the meantime in Jerusalem the current PM is making his plans to bring Israel closer to the promise of the Third Temple period, that can only be built in peace time. All according to the writings in the Torah, which is a scripture of and for eternity. Bezael Smotrich, MK and Yamina, will go even a little deeper and maybe will bring Israel closer to theocracy.

The people long or short term will decide next whether it will be the black or white knight to be their Prime Minister. Also, the people are the republic and democracy too. (Some may even ad cosmopolitan for cosmetic reasons)

From global cooperation to global coordination in a new century.

2 September 2020

In a meeting between Prime Minister Mark Rutte and Chinese Foreign Minister, Wang Yi, the Dutch PM has coined the words where the future for the G7 might be heading was global coordination. In the same week countries Egypt & Jordan have also called for a similar outlook to have in the Middle East, with focus on a centralised coordination with the Palestinians. 20 Years of global cooperation is now bearing the unusual fruits of a global coordination vision and embodies the new global reality. Anything else would be looking void of meaning or is simply blanco, apart from the design. But, there are also other trees in the Global Garden of Eden and 'we should have a browse', might be the answer to fit one's curiosity or interest. Once you are here expansion is what is on your mind and then further expansion until you have hit the rim of the steel. A not so immaterial question would be next, whether the EU Member States are ready to 'interconnect' to a deeper understanding of global coordination. It is old political instinct based, especially between political leaders. Renewed energy, still is on top of the list of the G-7 and G-20 countries. Expansion now being the new developments and projects to help build infrastructures in remote places with populations over 20 000 everywhere in the world. It is the best sign of what global coordination could mean in the near future and it's success if big players can become interested to create new mechanisms in different parts of the world, north, south, east and west. Especially good work is already on it's way in e.g. Gambia. (A Saudi- led project) China also is following it's own vision of expansion in the Middle East (UAE), the EU and in the Americas. Without global coordination competition would look only much harder to any intention to change the future of the world for improvement and prosperity between the G-7 & G-20 countries.

Much in the same way is happening in the Middle East timeline today. Egypt and Jordan have also coined the centralisation of coordination with the Palestinian people, last week (JP- news). It could meet with the global coordination at one point in the near future, so to speak... But nothing has been designed yet and a model to build coordinated from any starting point, data or political. It is difficult to imagine the Palestinian people to have a future in this stake with a coordinated and centralisation built from around countries in the Middle East, in favour of life fulfilment. The Middle East is not a place for philosophies where conflict is much more a decisive factor between parties and factions. A new political development between countries in the Middle East can have it's benefits and that new economic ties are becoming the trend to follow, e.g. Israel and the UAE deal of peace. Economies thrive when an employment rise is guaranteed, as is for any federal community. So, yes, seen from the window of the Dutch Prime Minister and Jordan & Egypt, the future should become more of a globalised coordination in every part of the world. In Syria president Bashir Al Assad might not yet be ready to join the rest of the world, as he is still claiming political and military victory over his people. Iran is a business hub in the Middle East and this is seen from a theocratic long lasting regime that will go on forever as long there is the Middle East. It can do little with transparency and it has no appetite to change it's ways soon or soon enough. And when coming much closer to the key factor of peace in the Middle East, is that the Palestinian people are the odd one out, but this might not be so in the long run. If federal peace is about to change the Middle East (or a glimpse or nephew of federal peace) it will be very hard at one point in the same future as the rest to ignore the Palestinian people their human right to coexistence and to connect to the rest of the world.

London, Piccadilly Circus 2020.

23 August 2020

Panasonic immediately pops- up in mind when the name of Piccadillly Circus is heard of or talked about. This is global understanding with most peoples. 2020 Has not been a very good year for Britain while battling the global pandemic Covid-19 virus. There are Brexit, political battles at Westminister on battling the Coronavirus and put to policies, the EU exit at the end of this year, or it's extension, and the Exchequer. It is the image of Britain we are having in the rest of the world and not the Piccadilly Circus and infrastructure. Interesting to read (personal level) was how critical questions were once also asked by Pepys or one of his contemporaries whether the vaccine and plague could have been resulted in the way it had ended. You have to read the story from there and make up your own mind/ conclusion. Perhaps it is worth something how we are now looking in most countries in the European Union at the 'handling' of virus and/ or microbes of dark origins. It is not being suspicious at the whole of humanity as we now often see or hear. It is the medical principle of finding out and research mind and also curiosity. Are we becoming too oversensitive and responding therefore less cooperative or maybe too much when not needed? Importance is being given to testing and date to when vaccinations will be ready in the next year. Death as a result of the Coronavirus for most governments are the reading of the statistics each day. The public can only read it in the newspapers online or on Social Media. Priority is not the future of Britain at the moment and on many politicians their mind. What could build that bridge the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, was talking about?

In one word: new infrastructure. In many parts of Britain what one notices is that time stood still as concrete during the last six decades. At some point people became first and than a majority in the political parties when leading. It was and for a very long while it looked the winning line and high score to decide any future of Britain from this point of view and leave out the inhuman card of industrial needs like modern day road building to industries as private citizens or politicians who wanted to have more money than they could chew or eat. We stop at Piccadilly Circus and then say what is wrong with it. First it is not representing the 21st century, but in fact an older and out of date time. Which also does not automatically means that the PC is timeless and blinding with beauty. Aesthetics should be timeless by approach. Secondly traffic in still time & is always looking as if chaos might drop in any moment out of nowhere into the square and coming in with a terrible impact on humanity. It is  chaos with a magnetic field of it's own kind for all sorts of traffic jams and congestion. Pedestrians also can look perturbed like frightened animals alongside the roads and on the pavements. In short the Piccadilly Circus has not made it to history of monumental architecture and civil engineering in modern days time. London's last time in history books only had made so much history for the books when time after the great fire was ended in a much more Just system of living standard and also creating decent roads and infrastructure for it's people or citizens. And what was water infrastructure became land infrastructure for use for eternity. Which planning and architectural/ engineering design would be the Piccadilly Circus' winner in the year 2020? One thing is sure that the winner will not be the one to put new elevated infrastructure for industries and industrial traffic flow (opposite curvature), east- south, north- west (?) through the existing road networks of the Piccadilly Circus, and build secondary roads for residents or visitors from all over the world and adjacent pavements. Relax the whole area (Regent Street) in the same manner or similar as in Oxford Street with a much more orderly geometry. We understand, that this is not on the PM's mind right now. The question is: will it ever be on the PM's mind, Tory or Labour? (Display as Panasonic)

Bayreuth, Germany.

21 August 2020

East, west, north and south, German infrastructure has been narrowing down to a town scale road system and paths, snaking their way up and down hillside country and the lower valleys. This is bad for most parts in Germany to have lost their inspiring nature and common sense how to build proper road systems and infrastructure. In Bayreuth, on an experimental scale, is just one small example of the loss for an update state of the art infrastructure engineering and road building/ construction, a network of static roads and connecting with bordering towns, east, west, north and south. Bayreuth is lacking a center and one cannot find the orientation of the place or town alongside the existing main and secondary road systems. If there are any such findings of secondary roads. Over all it looks as if Germany has also lost it's talent and skill for methodology in engineering, now for more than 50 years. What we read is in some places it is not feasible to rebuild some of the roads, that are notably motorways with a densed traffic congestion per day in both directions and is a tight scale. In other words, the best year for Germany and it's infrastructure is dating back as far as the sixties. Or further down even. The time of gas stations and motels alongside the highways in the seventies are over and have completely disappeared from the map of Germany autobahn history. Instead there are holes and further deterioration of the infrastructure most evident for any 'visitor' to notice or experience when using the roads for traveling. Bayreuth is quietly sinking into oblivion from the past when glorious and still attracting the many rich of Europe to opera events. Roads, residential areas, and criss cross main roads should be suggesting the living standard, or something of the kind. But it does fail the bigger picture of a global standard as in Berlin, Hamburg or Munich. The Roman emperors also would now fail to see why they should build in Germany, had it been in the year 350 BC. On top of the cone Germany is looking good, but down the cone spiraling down to a more rustique living or country life, here nothing is changing and the leaves on the trees are left undisturbed.

Are we perhaps looking at an impoverished Germany with a surplus of 12trl (approximately) and still doing bad? Size is not good for Germany when it lacks quality and is oversized in quantity. As for the rest of Europe why look at Bayreuth or Heinersreuth when global business and politics in Germany are concentrated in capital cities? Part of Germany dares not to look to the future ever again when unemployment is the picture of constant return year in and year out. Industry does look from Bayreuth flattened over the last four or three decades. Another question: are we facing a GINO, Germany in Name only? If so it would make Brexit look like Cleopatra leaving Mark Antony behind during the battle of Actium. There is much to make of this in modern day Europe, Germany or the rest of the EU Member States, e.g. that European soil is weighing heavier than their purses in the 21st century and it is not due to lack of opportunities. Compare: from an artistic point of view it will now be useless to build a concept, osche horn style between Bayreuth and Heinersreuth infrastructure plan, when this can only be paid for with soil or sands. No one is blind enough to build another schloss in Bayreuth in Real Time 21st century! (Osche horn style or Oxbahn) What can change Germany in the future? Tossing the coin between pessimism and optimism it is hard to say what it's chances are from here. It is not infrastructure, national, local or landwise, which is contradicting this piece of writing. And yet we have to stick here to the truth that we are fifty years too late somewhere in mittel Germany. If soil can ever become flour there could be a future, yes, maybe. And stone can turn to gold. And so forth. And when too pedant rebuild Germany with it. For the ordinary German people maybe this might help in English that there is method in the madness or madness in the method (as in luftbild). But even better when the time comes to live like Nebuchadnezzar of eating grass like oxen.

Sub plan Aleph II, Israel.
(Personal op)
7 August 2020

In the meantime between now and the realization of plan (Aleph concept I) time, what is the sub- plan?
The Middle East region with Israel/ Palestine next door to Arab neighbours east, west, south and north, are strategically military as a zone and region. Compare to oil industrial Middle East zone Saudi Arabia and others in their region.

Israel has the dominant military supremacy in the 21st century and now in theory is becoming visibly more out in the clear that this is true. But democracy in Israel in it's unique history with especially the United States (the Kissinger- era) was able to be the only reliable and loyal friend in the Middle East, e.g. in the seventies to the US. Can the future become more extreme than the present time fragmentation when this will be seen through the broken glass spectacles of Middle East Peace Process?

The future of this region in the Middle East in both, historic and in the globalised world, a bold action should be taken in terms of reality and fact of what is here in Real Time. It matters when Israel will not go anywhere or de-militarize, from it's already fragile state holding up the State of Israel in the International World. This part of the story is not about Palestine or the Palestinian people in Gaza or the West Bank, but it is about the region in which Israel has a Jewish Home now for more than 73 years.
Geology of the region where the Jewish Home is Israel and borders with the Mediterranean Sea on the west, has a deep contrast when inland or looking at the land to the east, north and south. A humorous thing maybe, but ancient Philistia with people of a different race and as a nation, this would have given the people of Israel what it is missing out on today in the logic of the International World, the logic of two different people that are not like the rest of nations in the Middle East region. The people of Philistia some say are of the island Caphtor.

Israel and it's Jewish Home is in the region of Arab States and nations who have a considerable military prowess and they are also convinced this to be their prerogative as we know in English as birth right. They are in the south of Israel, Egypt, Jordan (moving eastwards and north), Lebanon and Syria, Iraq and Iran in the north (far north- east). Here is where the Jewish Home of Israel is part of the region. One can only read from this geography the military and State importance for Israel if translated to scale.
The zone of Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations have by 'birth right' the right to strategic globalized industries and it cannot afford a wider military conflict and provoke war in the region where Israel is the Jewish Home north of the region in the Middle East. Oil industries make it very vulnerable. It's military 'right' is not in it's geography next to only Arab neighbours.
In Israel closer to Home a strange phenomenon has been the war with Gaza and the fight over land with the West Bank since 1948. At a much lower scale when the Palestinians yet have not formed central government of some sort, this makes a strange and dangerous force majeure if the world wants the Palestinians to have a State in the short term future as the only solution to the conflict. This is not the region reality in which the Palestinian people to seek a State, with it's strategic military composition of Arab States and their military forces that are no child's play in north of the Middle East. It could even become dangerous for the Palestinian people, still jet lagged from the wars with Israel, who will need to be a start- up nation as well as a green nation with little expertise as a national government with aspirant qualities for extensive foreign policies, and let's hope, starting with Israel. The Kissinger- era in it's end conclusion was hoping (book) for a balance of power for the two nations, which is the most critical outlook when imagining Israel is eternal and the Jewish Home is for indefinite time.

Palestinians are by nature traditional, archaic, and patriotic since their political awareness in the sixties and their identity 'deep rise' into the real world, in Palestine and in the International World. To leave out defense in their coexistence something is not right when the region in which the Palestinians are planning a State of their own in the strategic military zone of nations next door. What happens when the future becomes more extreme indeed?

Israel can manage, in- and outside Israel. Secondly: should the Middle East not partition between the region of Arab States with a military State from the Arab kingdoms and global industrial prowess? This especially when Israel has become the only aggressor in the Middle East according to imageries in the rest of the world.

World peace in the future will be a Strategic Peace design between the nations and world populations at a realistic scale of a world that outgrew this older view when still a start- up global effort. The Coronavirus as the first world pandemic of the 21st century has a scale of 360 degrees. This is showing to what extent reality in the world can go and also under extreme circumstances if planet size.

Note:Aleph, artistic illustrations of Peace in Israel/ Palestine in the Middle East.

Sovereign Palestine, a scientific experiment or fiction?

(personal op)

25 July 2020

To help build Palestine, this is Gaza & the West Bank, has found it's way to global institutions for strategic & developments affairs multiple times for the last two decades. Private and public sector government bodies have made individual contributions by State and ministry, or collective efforts made by e.g. EU- institutions. All named documents are online if the public has any interest in reading or find information from an interest group or social interest of any member in the public. We are living in an age where global inclusiveness also means to be informed or having the right to be informed. How can a strategic vision be of any interest to the public at large when this is about Gaza & the West Bank? A shortcut mostly taken by grassroots workshops or organisations are small scale institutions to empower good causes among the general public, until public opinion is formed on the issue. Good information is therefore imperative and not to end up with hatred against, e.g., Israel or the Israeli Military Force. In most strategic studies or visions on the topic of Gaza & the West Bank there is enough scientific proof of how rebuilding the two territories into a sovereign State and peoples, and which the public supports passionately anywhere in the world. In political systems this success story does not create the kind of mechanism for land and peoples, politics and stability of interior politics. Here we are thinking in terms more of voting systems for the people, east, south, north and west of Palestine and ranging from highest to lowest incomes. Public opinion at large cannot create sovereignty or government systems adequately by support or passion for their good causes, or even as membership joining. This is why the Strategic Vision of Gaza & the West Bank, I am sorry to say, will need more self rule from Palestinians in government, achshav, and secondly how to maintain sovereignty within the borders of a fictional hegemony between Gaza & the West Bank. Global efforts to help build Gaza and the West Bank are sustainable based institutions.

One important note: in most feasibilities studies the reoccurance of 'Safe Passage' is mentioned and how this might work in the future when rebuild as proper infrastructure, crossing the land of Israel. Central government in Israel and some global institutions also recognise the need for proper infrastructure and have agreed in concept to become more 'friendly- serviced' based to the Strategic Plan of Gaza & the West Bank and hold restriction rules civil and military in these designated areas, when crossing Israel's territory. It seems like a natural condition, situation and rule of law by the International World. To a national government in Israel this necessity is an aberration to it's domestic and State Politics. Any use of land is individual and it's integrity is the use of that land, especially when transformed to country and nation over many decades. In any strategic vision of Gaza & the West Bank what is missing visibly is the mentioning of Israel's land use and it's integrity. But how to solve the use of land by both nations in a strategic vision? Strategically Gaza would be in the south and not in center or north Israel or the north West Bank. Strategically Israel and the West Bank also do have northern parts with Jerusalem in the middle, outside of Gaza's territory. It is perhaps an ancient Israel dealing with land of the country in northern and south Israel. And also with Philistia to the outside by the Mediterranean Sea. Gaza is the key factor in any strategic plan locally and not on national platform to either Israel or Palestine/ West Bank. If bearing this in mind the image becomes even more clearer that Israel is very much part of any strategic plan for the future of Palestine and Israel, e.g. in 2030? 2050? Gaza is the Texas- Austin in a scale model building in south Israel and south West Bank horizontally. And, need one say more, to make the Armistice Lines relevant in our time and century, Gaza is now the country in the south.

The State of Israel, public domain and Yair Netanyahu.

14 July 2020

Is the Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, his son for fun or for real, is what most people are seem to be asking in response to an alleged 'through the grapevine whispering' by Mr Yair Netanyahu on certain high profile members of society in Israel. On some occasions Mr Yair Netanyahu is making sparks- fly- off remarks on politicians or journalists, but also when it concerns honourable members of the 'political innercircle' where his father is Prime Minister of the Republic of Israel. It could be ascribed to personal motives, his father's hearing in September later this year could be one, or there is a serious attempt by the young Mr Netanyahu to demonstrate his ambitions for politcs. If that would be possible it would make political theory breakaway from old to a new millennial age, that here the politician aspirant is known to be an 'enfant terrible' in the political arenas, left and right, in Israel. In the public domain the fly-off- sparks are unflattering and even reach verbal abuse at times at Mr Netanyahu's 'behaviour' or for his 'rich mischief' accusations against the establishment. No one understands his deliberate accusations that are beyond funny or fun. It is his life and when at the age of 28 years old and not wanting to design a sports car instead. The generation Z makes his political ambition at his age slightly irrelevant and that perhaps it would be best if no one would take his words for real... And yet at the same time he has managed pulling the strings that make some people nervous and write columns on mr Netanyahu's latest 'deranged' talks on social media. Including yours truly, and admit that Yair Netanyahu is someone who is making people nervous.

Surprisingly he can be at times very articulate. His view from Israel into the rest of the world is flat but also strange. Or, he could be a very nervous young Netanyahu in fear of the future that the Prime Minister, his father at the age of 70, is not a man of 50 at a time when his son is reaching maturity. In the bossom of his politician father Yair Netanyahu is a wild adder and still juvenile with endless appetite to bite the heels of all those imposing as Hippocrateses in Israeli society. We should learn more from him in personal op- eds and than see where this will take him in the end. His emotional 'instability', as some call him, seems to be in the right place and edge to hurt those that are not pre-occupied with the future of society in Israel, and starting in the metropolitan cities in adverse times. He is the fly on the wall, if you want to call it that. And he is not under oath or sworn allegiance to lead Israel. Is Yair Netanyahu for fun or for real, that is the simple question for the Netanyahu dynasty (political?) and it's destiny. If misinformation has anything to do with his destiny he is also being seen as his father's personal political and strategic adviser, interstingly enough in a time when his father has been accused of bribery and breach of trust of the State. In another world or rosh chodesh, twenty years from now, strategically maybe if Naftali Bennett is not Prime Minister by the time, it could be that another Netanyahu would take office again. In the millennial crystal ball also Israel might have a 'Capitol Hill' to suit a young and ambitious Netanyahu a second time to bring light to the obscure times between the outside world and Israel. It could be Mr Yair Netanyahu's strange sense of humour after all and to earn his specific attitude and success as the first Israeli and millennial politician with the next generation of Z. We leave out the old abstract for a moment.

Israel is timeless and defined by covenants.

5 July 2020

There will never be peace in the classical sense, e.g. the British Mandate that is not a representative of any covenant in the Jewish sense of living and existence, if anyone wants to avoid the meaning of history. In no covenant of the Jewish people was it that they 'inherit' land from the people living in Israel, and cause friction or fracture with passage or flow of passage. Borders have always been settled by both parties and in these Yahwehistic models of covenant primary was to live in peace from each other. Timeless here means when land by conquest was the natural right of the strongest. Later Omri, Ahab's father, and king David, have been the only two men in Israel who purchased land from the inhabitants of Jerusalem and it's surrounding. In contrast to Saul who 'took' their land and turned the people into servants in his kingdom. The covenant of buying land is what makes Israel the only nation in the ancient world a different creed of people, in comparison to it's ancient neighbours taking land by conquest. We can immediately see the shadow of suspicion on the question who are they that buy land? In Europe this suspicion is not any different, also the place where kings and kingdoms only 'took' land from another via holy wars. In other words, the Jewish Home is nothing more than a precise land bought. How this invention works is when it will yield it's produce and growth and fill the baskets of the owner, who in turn is the rightful and absolute owner. Initially it is only once difficult, but after that all that is yours will only be yours to enjoy. Why take when you can buy?

In July 2020 the question of land again is topical and Israel is at the center of the land, but which it had not purchased by covenant. 1948 Exodus from Europe was nothing like the Exodus when leaving Egypt in a hurry thousands years BC. And this creates something unusual to Israel's psyche how it is possible after all the firepower of the Israeli army against the enemies in the Middle East and near to the 'borders of Israel', why after 54 years it still is the Mandate of Britain that rules the land. While civic freedom is being enjoyed by the people of Israel as in every other country where people are the citizens of their homeland, e.g. Peru or Lima. Israel has become part of the metric system in a world that is now defined by global standards, and big data. When it is looking good on the satellite map and in coordination that is what defines a country and people. And not ancient covenants with people of a specific nature in their cultural life, or religion. And that is the bird's eye view of the world and it's real time system. Israel is dealing on two flanks with issues one could ascribe to sovereignty, which are borders with Gaza (non continuity for Israel) and the West Bank, where Israel does not enjoy continuous flow of sovereignty of land in between these two entities. That is illegal to put any country through, for it can only create negative force and constant friction, and needless wide military control. When this design creates much negative force between the two nations all wars and atrocities as a consequence is wrong in first degree, since this can only create pathological realities and is incapable of creating peaceful pastures of what we know as a homeland. It harbours insincerities on the side of the 'model makers' or in the worst case it is nothing that is promoting the Home for the Jewish people, and a State for the Palestinian people. The model has to be altered to the realities of two peoples, and not three. Another area of sovereignty is the State of Israel.

What is the State of Israel when given to create a Jewish Home in 1948? And what is the State of the Palestinian people in the year 2000 and beyond? Side by side they are sitting like the two golden eggs and never hatching. And that is not the same thing for Israel who ultimately wants to hatch and live in it's homeland territory for the rest of eternity. As it has only one chance and place to live in the covenant of their God, the God of Abraham. Who does not want to understand what the covenant with God means to the Israeli people is committing an act of unwillingness that is nothing more than Internationally indecent and breaching primo 1 Human Rights. In our time we are not asking the God of Abraham for ten plagues to convince the world of this natural right for the Jewish people to live in the Land of Israel as Jews. Here the ambition is not to impress the world in 'irrelevant' ways, but to establish the right of existence and coexistence as Jews in the homeland Israel. It would be pointless to impress the world on this occasion, when in fact Israel is the strongest global force around the world... (Some even accuse the Israelis for training the Police Force in the US preventive techniques) The Prime Minister, Mr Binyamin Netanyahu, after three decades in politics, should try to avoid a fourth election so soon after the 'silent day' on 1 July 2020. The State of Israel needs a mature and experienced Statesman, while the walls of the fortress in middle Israel are not bleeding in his rear more than usual from it's stone walls. Here God is King and the covenant with Abraham and timeless.

Territory and country, two different layers and levels in the process of determining sovereignty.

30 June 2020
(23:07PM)

This is just an excercise the night before Israel's sovereign State and the Palestinian non- State could be more defined by stopping annexation of the 30% West Bank in the US Deal of the Century. Stopping annexation has some of the most varied implications, or complications, that may go into effect almost immediate after the PM's expected speech tomorrow. One, e.g., is world opinion over the last six to seven decades on Israel's Jewish Home existence. It reveals astonishing facts on the ground to both peoples, the Israelis and Palestinians. Consequence can not be ignored, if the State of Israel only exists within this model since 1948. Two, but what can complicate this 'new process' that if Israel has sincere plans to change the intention of annexation to a more wider understanding between the two nations? The Prime Minister seems sandwiched between sovereignty and annexation. And also we can say the same of the PM between the US Deal of the Century and World Opinion. And all this squeeze coming from Middle Israel, being existentially squeezed in between Gaza and the West Bank. Change that and who knows we will see a different future for another 100 years and much more of a success story comparing this to the present time peace talks or process, now simmilar to a handbook on history pages. Just as the Military is the military when using the latest version of handbooks.

Territory is the problem, and by illustration should put this to a hypothetical question. If e.g. Saudi Arabia was the middle of Israel and not Israelis, the problem of criss-crossing SA territory from Gaza to WB and vice verse, would still be there, but only as between brothers of Islam. To elevate the middle territory SA would want to have this for it's global industries and maybe suggest to the Palestinians to build a by- pass via tunnel/viaduct to interconnect and interact. In Real Time, unfortunately, it is not Saudi Arabia in between Gaza and the West Bank, but Israel, the distant last and not first degree cousin. 54 Years of wars and terror, both very high profile, are proof of that distant cousin problem and it is making it therefore an unforgiven pathological experience to both nations in the land of Israel. But, one has to agree, that from an a- political inspiration the humanitarian 'suffering' isn't what the world up to now is thinking, that Israel is the political cannibal eating up all of Palestinian land for it's own illegal occupation. In fact the humanitarian suffering includes the ethics that is 'chancelessness' to both nations. Israel does not stand a chance to succeed under the present time model of it's existence. Instead of atmospherically enhancing peaceful coexistence next to Palestine, this model forces it to contract into a lasting pang that is neither untimely birth or any birth at all. It is somatic and extreme disorder, one on the side of Israel and 'complementair' on the other side of the Palestinian people. To put it all more simple: time for change on the ground must be profound in the best intention and interest of a healthy nation relationship and to remedy the wrong that was here when Israel had it's existence within the model of the Armistice Lines/ Green Line.

For that change one needs to be inspired at an enormous wide scale. This does not mean that there will be a 'By the rivers of Babylon' moment between the Israelis and Palestinians from now on. Israel's continuity is not about right to existence within the perimeters of a designed human model by law. How to contemplate another design by origin and physics is creating a whole different chemistry for both nations immediately on the ground & for indefinite time. But in the International world to go outside the present time model Israel would be in danger of falling of the earth and disappear, if the earth was not round but square. Israel's origin and physics is a new drawing that has not yet existed and is therefore 'clean' from war and terror. Perhaps the only faint defense, but innocence and this scale would make irreversible truth. The truth within the present time model is making Israel the only strongest entity, right and left from it's eye viewpoint horizontally. Question rises immediately next to what is just said, why is the vertical missing to give us the meaning of 'normal autonomy' and law and order in this part of the land? Once more: the Palestinian people need to interconnect from Gaza to the West Bank, and vice verse. This is 115 km. A very critical question on humanity and freedom, but not only seen from the Palestinian side. Israel's right to natural calm is equally as important. Starting date: forties since industries created industrial areas in Ha Negev near Gaza border and not after the millennium only to dupe the Palestinian people living on the other side of 'two borders', one in Gaza and the other in the West Bank. Incidental: over 1mln people are residents of Gaza and qualifying for country status...

Israel is not ancient Greece with a platonic ideology.

Israel is temptation and not in the same way as Christianity teaches. An example: if one brother is the provider of many, and even acquires the leadership over his 'business', still it is the other or older brother who will lead in adversity and who will lead where his brother could not go. And it is not by leadership qualities that the brother in adversity will lead, but by temptation. He will be able to challenge and overcome or win the argument with his brother's enemies... Israel is not ancient Greece and it's Prime Minister is not an 'educated friend' of the State or the people. In the 21st century Israel will have at home a unique challenge equally to adversity and temptation when see how the State will fare in the deep future, e.g. a decade from now. The Christian teaching when about temptation can deal with issues concerning carnal ecstasy or adultery, but always forgetting the universal prayer saying 'And lead us not in temptation', when praying to God. That pointing  to a higher level of temptation closer to religious institutions, maybe Rome? The Prime Minister of Israel in his appraisal of US President, Mr Donald Trump, to a certain degree is right 'naming' his relation with the US President one of friendship, for it might lead to mutual dividend and promoting peace for an utopia (as it still is in only a deal or agreement) that might come to a more realistic result, one that would score higher to previous results by the US in the past. Is the US President, Mr Donald Trump, friend or foe? And who is Saudi Arabia, friend or foe? The secret lies in all parts of a greater peace in what one could call reciprocity, only more courteous.

The same question can be asked throughout the world by all or most governments in 2020, the present time, about who is leading the country and people and if they are friend or foe of society. It is not in a direct way a relevant question, but in countries like Israel, when most relations with the outside world is based on peace or friendship, society would have to be compatible to what it represents. And not creating only 'dystopia' (as is perceived today by many in the world) since the State of Israel was born, as a one sided entity and leaving out the 'other State' behind, Stateless and with no share in 'friendship'. But Israel was in a hurry of it's own and wanted to establish it's need for a Jewish home after the Holocaust, for new hope and life. The promise was made on Jewish terms of rebuilding a people and nation, a first priority after losing a significant number of six million in four years time. Now it looks like Israel has punished 'innocent' people for it's needs and haste during the rebuilding days of Israel and Jerusalem. If the PM of Israel will go ahead with annexation and offer no 'friendship' to restore relations with the Palestinian people, being a friend of the US President will not go down well with a people on different levels that are in a hurry to create a State of their own, in the place where Israel left 54 years ago. The long term for the State of Israel has now found itself in different waters and endless needs, and annexation of land and Jerusalem are it's first steps in that direction. But is the PM a friend of the people of Israel? And what institutions is the PM promoting through this friendship with Israelis and what is this friendship when on foreign relations?

The Book of Proverbs 17:17: "16Why should the fool have money in his hand with no intention of buying wisdom? 17A friend loves at all times, and a brother is born for adversity. 18A man lacking judgment strikes hands in pledge and puts up security for his neighbor.…"

Sovereignty in Israel 1100, 200 Jews living under the Tower of David.

26 May 2020

Israel Jerusalem in July 2020, 931,756 is the population wide and in Israel the number of people is 8,655,535 of the wider population. Birth of State Israel is 1948. We are looking possibly at either an egg shell or a State in a nutshell. 1 July the Prime Minister of Israel, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, will insert the fruit of the egg into the egg shell, when he will be holding the vote on annexation in Israel. And Jerusalem is the heart and heartbeat of the State's architecture egg shell, or, depending from which angle, it might have been an optical illusion and was always the nutshell that was mistaken for a more living organism. Panic over the annexation process has already started among the many factions, pro and con, while others even predict or bet on the retreat of Mr Netanyahu and leave Jerusalem for the time being 'out in the cold', as a naked dream an Israeli Sabre Statesman and Prime Minister, now indicted in the whole of Israel for bribery of State money, only he thought to be able to deliver. It is out in the world the most transparent news that the western world and maybe to a lesser set of standards also the Arab nations, will not let this happen, but in fact it will deem such a move by the Israeli Prime Minister as illegal under International Law, pre- 1967? A simple observation inquiry knows that we are also looking at the truth when taking the International Law a peaceful and none aggressive global institution or organisation. It will only then have the authority to International Law for peace and order. The Prime Minister of Israel also has a point of peace that when historical the argument to annexation of Jerusalem, it will be by historical standard and scientific norm why it is still the place of Jewish history to have Jerusalem as their capital and center for religion to excercise freely and not in terror. It is not 1100 when 200 Jews had been living as the tiny group of people under the Tower of David.

Israel has risen above the surface in our time and century, in 54 years time. Beside the State building egg shell it is also a peaceful message from historical background in Israel, that the Messianic time must be made prepared for the people of Israel and to build the third Temple (designated place is still disputed). Peace here is written clearly in terms of Biblical peace. You could say that a written law does not extend that far back into history, nor when the place is meant only to build a nation and State. The International world is not blind and can see why the International Law is against annexation by Israel when facing 54 years old a State. On the other hand the International Law cannot be in a nutshell the executive power to cut through impartiality for global peace. Most dominant is the staring at the 1000 years vacuum in Jerusalem, since the Templar Knights, Byzantine empire, Roman empire, the Ottoman empire, the First Crusade, and later in the eighteen century the change to enlightenment of the nineteen century 'modern' days. If the International Law is right this time how will it serve the Palestinian people and it's more stronger neighbour, Israel? Israel did not emerge from the rock in 1947 and created the State of Israel, or is it? The Byzantine empire clearly in it's records made mention of massacre of the Jewish people, and this was long before 1947. This also does not make wrong of genocide right in our days. To many at the time it did look or have something of a miracle by Christ, but not in the eyes of the Jewish people who think that a miracle is more when a woman of 190 years old can still give birth to a son called Isaac and that had made her giggle. Peace in Jerusalem, also, like Sarah, makes one giggle. Ishmael on the other hand was real and in Real Time ancient Israel, by a young mother servant of the patriarch Abraham and Sarah, his wife. In the Middle East religion is a life necessity and not a commodity to satisfy basic economic needs. This makes it even harder for the west to understand, where basic economic needs are sacred as life itself. If it has any future the Middle East will also have to decide which basic needs they will need to satisfy and if the road to prosperity can come without Israel. Perhaps in future the political need for prosperity will be a greater factor in the balance of their decision when they are ready to accept global realities as they are in Real Time and not in dreams. For the Prime Minister of Israel it is best to remember that the strong have tears too. And that is what retreat sometimes means. 

Naftali Bennett, the young lion Minister of Knesset of Judah, intro.

14 May 2020

Geachte Heer Bennett... Ancestry of bloodline and origin can sometimes snake it's ways into a life, a people, and maybe in many cases that of the many Jewish people living across earth's surface. Mr Bennett his father also has/ had something of Dutch origins, as a place can have great influences from childhood to adult life in his/ her roots. These are the seasonal coats of the human and sheltering shadows before entering the real destiny of his place of natural origin. It is not just the Dutch side to Mr Bennett to make him what we all know about the minister of Knesset, and leader of Yamina, today (next to Party partner Ayelet Shaked, also a Member of Knesset and former Minister of Justice, Israel's parliament). He is the familiar 'outsider' and coming in drop by drop like a nagging waterleakage on Israel's political arena. In the new coalition government with Mr Benyamin Netanyahu as fith time Prime Minister, before Mr Benny Gantz of Blue & White will become PM one and a half year later as planned, the nagging of coming in for Mr Bennett to the VIP box in Mr Netanyahu's political imperial presence in his political arena, is still in it's paradox years. Like the young Gaius Julius Caesar and later Mark Anthony. But Israel is not Rome... Mr Bennett is not getting the portfolios and the chance to join Likud this time. As a columnist of the Jerusalem Post put it bluntly, he is perhaps just the right person to be in the opposition/ title: it might just be the right move for Bennett to be in opposition. Are we looking in the right direction that the future of Israel is holding it's breath and that one day Mr Bennett, like Mr Netanyahu, might become Prime Minister in the 21st century Israel? In the next decade no one knows the direction to ultimate sovereignty of Israel and where it will lead the nation. If backwards, Naftali Bennett his cockiness might do the trick and help overcome a depressing time, and if accelerate to greater widenings of Israel in the region, at home, and abroad, he could get to become the perfect political 'bridegroom' for maturity as a statesman for global Israel. Right now it is difficult to judge the minister his fate or biopic from a complete unknown place outside of Israel. But what we do see around in the world is that all new politicians in all four corners of the world are advancing with new politicians and younger men and women, as if to profile a better world and readiness to govern difficult moments that may lay ahead  in  the International community. It will be a great miscalculation to leave out a man and minister like Mr Bennett not to lead his country  and nation in the best seasons to join in with the rest of the world, whether this be friendly or unfriendly diplomacies.

The lion of Judah in the 21st century will not be an elderly Statesman, e.g. the late Mr Shimon Perez, and others, but the ideal choice is the not so ideal choice to come up with a PM in Israel who is body and soul Sabre and mundane enough to understand his time and place with a termperament that is soft, and strong when this could be dangerous decision making. And who is without mistakes in politics anywhere in the world? We are not going in the coming future towards an ideal world and if Israel is still bent on having sovereignty in Jerusalem/ over Jerusalem, I'm afraid, a lion is required. (And lioness if this would be MK Mrs Ayelet Shaked) Like Germany where kingship is a mythical world, in Israel the same is being said about King David. Human cannot break it's boundaries as it is eternal. Mr Bennett also has some German influence (as Dutch and Polish) from his father. Today there is not much to say about this minister and the direction of a future Prime Minsiter, but he is already it's glimpse and he has the 'psychedelic colour' of hashmal.

The global format of containing COVID- 19.

3 April 2020

Mainstream News Media is trying to keep up with the 24/7 newsfeed on COVID- 19 globally and what we are hearing, the many populations worldwide, is how the pandemic is close to whatever perimeters can be found near you or your loved ones. Keep the 1.5 social distance is key to fight the virus within the range of a designated distance between two or more people from now on. From an observatory point of view you should be able to draw circles around the ereas where people keep the 1.5 SD. If this works against the Coronavirus 'eyes' your safety is statistically in group NI, or Not Infected. The World Health Organisation 'on the other side of the virus' is in it's first historic moment in the COVID- 19 history and making overtime helping governments and people getting the message fluid and without leaving out anyone. A format at a wide scale how to battle the CORONAVIRUS has yet to be indexed at least in 28000 ways to follow it's unique movements. 28000 Referring to the fly's eyes compound and it can also be detected, as male or female. When looking on the 'positive' side as many people want to believe it is good how governments emphasize the 'microbe' as distinct for indefinite time as it continues to exist and not being a natural sort. Sooner or later the future will want to know why COVID-19 had caused human and economic disaster around the world and probably changed in the way humanity sees life on earth, whether by his or her individual perception. It is possible that we have not yet found a global format of containment to help make the planet survive on not what it doesn't have, but what it does have. 'Staying in' looks a very simple enough advise to follow from any civil obedience old animations point of view, Health or Social, but when put against the balance of a global economic collapse the world will not be as sympathetic in it's personal or general mood of any formal advise by then. COVID- 19 is something of the predator no one has ever dreamed of in a worse first time, or read in Science Fiction.

Friday evening is for prayers in Jerusalem, not for burying dark blood under the century.

28 February 2020

Empires come and go but leaving nations behind with some deprived of all humanities and others that rise in highly respectable places above the rubble (to fragment of Heraclitus). The world at it's best lives in complete confusion in the present time (also when an epidemic like the Coronavirus outbreak calls for global response). Also this evening fire broke out in Paris and has sent a surge of high flames to the sky of thick smoke, unexplainable later when died down and no one can remember what happened in previous timelapses. This is the west in Europe and it is no different in the western hemisphere. The abyss is on the other side of the world and to many this should always stay there, especially when unstoppable in war situations. President of Turkey, Mr Tayyep Erdogan, has decided, also this evening, to lifting his elbow up to allow displaced peoples through to come to the golden shores of Europe. It's all this way when troubled places like the Middle East are getting overloaded and overworked, and in worse case scenarios get's overboiled. In Israel however the world knows that the people of Israel are living in their ivory tower of democracy and the rule of law to keep it's citizens a happy nation in the turbulent world outside... For Jerusalem however applies an ancient law and it is the natural law to refer to anyone coming to Israel and have built up expectations as a religious Jew, and also having made great sacrifices for having given up the luxury of the west. Jews living in Jerusalem and specifically in the old city are not Jews who would want to live in Tel Aviv or Haifa, that most consider almost unclean. With families returning to Jerusalem if per thousand the situation is becoming somewhat dense with a new population of Jewish citizens and who are clear in their demand to live here to the day they die, a sacred death that is desired with fervent or esprit. We can almost assume it is in their saliva when tested for a DNA sample why the choice is always Jerusalem.

In the rest of the world reality is a major factor. That can't be the same for Jerusalem when people come here to live for religious reason and serve the ancient religion of the God of Abraham, the man who came from Ur Kasddim and who was buried with his wife Sarah in Harran, in Turkey. The Palestinian people like the rest of the Jewish people belong in the universe of what humanities call the planet and our world. It took Israel 70 years to build the State of Israel and it is taking the Palestinian people to fight for their place in jerusalem 70 years and also they are making the same claim on the land where they have lived in this part of the Middle East for longer than the west can remember, that Jerusalem belongs to the State of Palestine. The universal truth however does not explain the memory of a Palestine State in terms of former days and will now be restored again. The future State of the Palestinian people therefore is making an nought fiction hard for Israelis living in reality to believe that this is genuine and has a chance for existence side by side with an 'older' State and flourishing universally. Perhaps the world is staring at a much outdated political influence under the new reality in Israel and is absurd at the point of defending a nation or peoples that have not managed to create the State for the Palestinian people in seven decades, and it is moving tectonics in the current state of their defense of the very people they would want to assist in state matters or affairs of State. Of course we cannot underestimate the sagacity of Statesmen and Stateswomen in the 21st century and their right to organise a governing system where confusion (red & white) is cause for much pain and humiliation because of simple panic and despair in every day reality. To govern is based on divine wisdom. And here is where the God of Abraham holds his castle in Kotel as ancient Enoch witnessed when wandered off in to the heavens. But in concreto the Middle East was once Mesopotamia and the land beyond was Kush... We are talking families of nations here, aren't we? Ahab and Jezebel (of Syria), Shlomo and the daughter to Pharaoh (his wife in the House of the Lord/ estate) and Ruth and Boaz. There is somewhere here a subtle difference but one party can give the answer from a sample of saliva, while the other is keeping blood a written document of proof to own land and State. While children only see white and orange blossoms in the air of the next imaginary generation.

Centralised policies in Israel and communities around in the periphery.

18 February 2020

The DoC fitting in the small tube of 'small Israel' gives for most of the day major food for thought, if ever a realistic future is at the center over the already existing centralised politics/ policies in Israel. In plain language of every day life the most depressing in the DoC is it's magnitude, paradoxical to what it wants to achieve to make things better for both peoples. The world's concept of Israelis and Palestinians is tagged as 'peoples'. Time before the State of Israel is waning into the nearest of future, as is the territory and it's former 'owners' is also disappearing at a mechanical speed. Britain is still a memorable friend of Israel and it is slowly semi- detached from the time where it left the country in it's former state of affairs before the 1967 war in the country. The House of Israel is sovereign in the 21st century. With this new awareness it also is changing cosmetics to real architecture politics in the world and at home for the nation by which we know it's name, the Jewish nation. To some this small exaggaration is poignant and also is in quiet despair for the process with real Jewish identities in it's policies. The extreme right in Israel is one interpretation to this and it saying that they won't be overruled this time (DoC). The EU believes there is more gain to win from older rules in whatever time, because the EU is contstant by nature and will hold up to that trait when dealing with any global change in the world, and not specifically in Israel as an isolated case. But that is the diplomatic timeline rotational governing bodies speak. It cannot deal with urbanization in Israel, between peoples and peoples... At least not in the same way the UNSC can deal with certain matters alone. Global stability is primary a concern for the EU Member States and how to fluctuate over the coming quarters and wherever nature ends in endlessness. And antisemitism perpetuality in the EU countries is negative gain from any currency's point of view when taking a critical eye whether rights of existence should be intrinsically more for the weaker side over the stronger in Israel. Basic understanding is that no one wants to hurt the other from a Statesman/ woman point of view.

The far right in Israel is right on religion only for the first time (DoC) in Israel's recent history (postwar WWII). Here the people are in close relation and attachment to the region and more specifically to Jerusalem. Art nouveau decor has a place of it's own in some big cities in Europe and is well established, and here we are having the same or similar sentiments with one sharper angle of realities. If architecture in the religion of Israeli Jews becomes more autonomous it will only have to be dealing with Israel as the State of a people and nation, and not as many would see or perceive rights and wrongs from an older point of view, that this is still the territory of empires and foreign sovereignties. Of course that simple interpretation is not Catholic, Protestant, Muslim or even Jewish de facto. Prominent Jews would more adhere to a global religion of peace between nations and promote perhaps a less restrictive nature in relationships between religious groups or their mega organisations. Democracy can once again be celebrated in the world as the way of freedom of movement globally. Except when a religion doesn't share the view of free will or have a religion by randomness. In other words that if the world wants to universally honour the commandment not to coveted thy neighbour's virgin wife or possession it has to also give way to the first and most important commandment, perhaps less universal, that to honour the God of Abraham with might (even when not having this might which resemblances people without real power). World populations are more than over millions on the scale of the planet with each and everyone the simplistic right of religion and human rights, except when demanding a place that is fiction in terms of religion in Jerusalem by a people on the one side, and another on the other side. Challeging universality is not from good instinct or nature to deny human rights. Who will be challenged e.g. if a synagogue was built in Kotel and change the center for the Jewish nation across the world? Perhaps the ghost of empires with no relevance in the civilized world and that are not examplary of humanities... (Including Isabel of Castile and Ferdinand of Aragon) And centralised politics in Israel coming out against the background of lost empires as the, forgive the paganism of words, Hercules in his cradle facing a full mature serpent gazing at him eye to eye.

The architecture of a Palestinian State

9 February 2020

This is the moment of a full blown excitement for the Israelis and Palestinian people since last month release of the United States Deal of the Century. 30% Is Annexation and 30% is for the Palestinian future Statehood. In politics and economics that is not like looking at a building bloc in the same place or erea, e.g. in the shape of the palm island in Dubai. Dubai Palm Island is an interesting contrast nevertheless. In fact perhaps what the Deal of the Century means could be designed in the shape and form of an identical Palestinian architecture design of something more uniform to the meaning of the Statehood it has long been dreaming of and fighting for in this dream. 30% Palestinian territory in the DoC is still something one has to visualize when living in the rest of the world, especially when it fundamentally means shifting peoples, institutions, organizations, and a decades long domestic conciousness of way of life for the Palestinians, from small scale to a larger scale of responsibility of the nation als a whole. It is also heartbreaking for many, is one impression the rest of the world also insn't very often familiar with, who would want peace with Israel and feel the need for respecting each other's integrity and rationalities. President of PA, Mr Mahmoud Abbas, is not thinking in terms of small scale and local politics. By refusing to negotiate with the US administration and Israel's government/ Prime Minister of Israel, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, the impression that is coming from Mr Abbas is now looking much more that here is a man who is nearly king of the century in the world of the Palestinian people, if it can take that long enough a term as the sitting President. It is still only an impression. Peace is not like in the decades before the 21st century when Israel & the Palestinians were considered the 'influencers' of the Middle East region peaceful nations and politics. Globalization of the late eighties became a worldwide new order and it changed in many ways how nations should perceive what politics and economics mean.

The question in 2020, many decades later, has put it more concrete with the DoC by the US, and has given the Palestinian people and leaders a choice to upgrade life and it's living standards. The world and it's public opinion is crying out against the 30%, that this is another way to bring a people not out of social and economic poverty, but is in fact doing quite the opposite in the short and long term. Statehood building standing on it's own and desolated in what was meant to become flourishing industries in these places now only a place where the wind comes howling through arcades and high windows. The world is not taking time to form public opinion on real time facts on the ground, e.g. building projects in these areas. Rawabi is an interesting hill where the mall, both flanks right and left, and road through the middle is going straight off into the east, west, north and south through again another section of it's heartland. It is by studying these sites and architectural designs where one can only sense a bit of what Palestinian Statehood would mean to it's nation when fully fledged. It's building physics is not abstract in megapolis concepts as it's neighbouring countries and cities in the Arab region and world. Rather it is of a modest middle and always in balance with it's surroundings and heartlands (debris or not). What many would say is that this is not the same Palestinians that are building tunnels underneath Israeli sovereign places. In every society human is part of it's hierarchy, political, military, economics and social structures. And, mind you, it is possible that the warring factions are more of a macho culture and that they are the so called 'diehards'. The DoC could help build that long dream Statehood, designed in level of talks and communication and lift up the long depression of the last five or six decades to a more brighter and central focus of how life is more diverse and brilliant for the local people when walking and talking in freedom, as citizens of Palestine and Israel e.g. in the Damascus Gate.

Brexout.

31 January 2020

Sentimentality and it's place. 14:21 And yet no plan of Britain on the vertical line of it's economy for the future projections presented. Not good for a friendly country and giving transparency to the rest of the world today. The time for mixing opportunity with opportunism for Britain is as from today, 31 January 2020, resigned to it's parliamentary history for good. What remains is the friendliness between the EU and it's neighbour the United Kingdom, being it somewhat one sided. Horizontally the celebrations are high momentum and impressive to an audience who has favoured this Brexit from the EU in January 2020. It's presence is now also being felt in quiet antagonistic terms if anyone cares to listen more carefully. But being hostile to the future could prove to be a dangerous adventure, with the British public who's say also stops today. The EU will move on and with the rest of the world change is the only opportunity and not the personal approach of either being for- or- against- politics. It's not the economy, but the economics, stupid. Which is not something of a laughing matter and it will be staying under critical watch from here if a friendly nation indeed is a friendly nation. EU officials this morning indicated that no one should think to play out Member States against each other and the EU. EU Member States are directly or indirectly participating in a global economics system and also are now much more integrated to a larger abstract where this fictional global prosperity might lead to in the near future. The UK has chosen the opposite direction from today on and leaving the EU Membership behind after 46 years of blind cooperation.

Principal will always remain the moral of the majority is most democratic.

Vote for Mike is very effective.

19 January 2020

The year 2019 has moved on into 2020 and this is showing with Mr Mike Bloomberg campaigning for to be the next US President on 3 November 2020. What is the story so far for Mike (known to campaigners and the public) when this campaign means how to beat incumbent President Mr Donald Trump? Home base Mr Bloomberg is trying to get your vote by balancing the facts from Donald Trump's 'fiction', and also doing so with great emphasis on initiatives and not from promises, when seen from a few nautical miles from another part in the world on first impression. Take a closer look: what do we see with the 'U-turn' Mr Mike Bloomberg's campaign so far is that in a more perfect world and state of mind where wars are extinct from the human race, he is the man with the golden head for effectively and strategically running great continents in our modern day world. We are not living in a perfect world and effectively running the United States in the world isn't standing still in motion, a wide motion with globalism as it's proportions in the middle. Everyone who loves Mike for President, the next US President, wants to see him arrive at the White House on 3 November, six months between now and as early May. And there are difficult questions for Mr Bloomberg to answer as the next President, on different issues that come from heartland America and upstream in the big economy industries. The Democrat has been there and done it before when he was mayor in New York city, 2002 to 2013, how beauracratic US works especially with focus on policies and infrastructure. As President in 2020 the focus is on what's in it for America in the future. First by voting for Mike Bloomberg and last by voting for a new President.

Another impression, from afar, is that Mr Bloomberg does impress as a billionaire, and this too that he is the man who could be sincere about executives on this side of politics facing e.g. excecuting the same policies where necessary as the President of the United States, somewhat different from being a global business leader. Who can you believe when not yet in Office? Mr Donald Trump is dominant on this side of the scale and maybe is fortunate enough to win again in the next presidential election later this year. The deficit in popularity of Mr Trump doesn't look like it is waning right now just yet, but maybe it might effectively become dent by the time all presidential campaigners, Democrats or Republicans, get to the finishing line later on in 2020 US Presidential Election year. For some strange reason many in the world appreciate the sitting President, Mr Donald Trump, for not being like the late former Republican president Ronald Reagan, but that Mr Trump is the digital age president, the man who speaks in Twitter- speak and is in touch with the public all over the world. He can even be personal and maybe unexpectedly close... Mr Trump seems to have won the digital platform as an active participant on social media, one of the world industries as never before has existed. He has won no poodle prize here and showing the world that he is the US President who can speak on Twitter as if he were your buddy. (He is incidently not) But the world needs a different feed right now and it looks like Mike Bloomberg is going to exceed this one. Or, it might just be the wrong assumption when not living in America and being somewhat naive. Small print, on the other hand anyone in the world who can write about abroad affairs , from in the public domain, is showing that the world/ US is still good on transparency (outward transparency). 

A world without Britain was once impossible to consider, despite it's deep racists views.

10 January 2020

Damn you, Britain! A natural ending of the United Kingdom has now become more inevitable and will perhaps even going stronger as we proceed in this age of planet size changes. The early signals, e.g. western expansion, since the eighties or even late seventies, should never have been just on estimation but on deep realities for the coming decades after. Not long before all this would require more discipline from most parts in the world, starting with the bigger countries or what was then known as industrial leaders or leading countries, the G8 and in lesser ways in the G20. One discipline of nationalism in the 21st century was going to be a big squeeze out of the even larger transformation of change worldwide, the change of turning the planet into a full industrialized place where nations live to survive and prosper through only industries. And that would just be the tip of the iceberg. The world has a new natural and it is technically completely justified from logic and willingness, not to distribute wealth but how to distribute broader equality and not just for Britain. The dead end for the United Kingdom cannot be received by any understanding of how it has failed itself to read beforehand what it should have seen coming from the extremes to which prosperity would take the world after the 20th century. The European Union only acted as the mediator of scales to which many Member States had complied all for reasons of what industries demanded and uncertainty of more expansion prosperities. Britain did little for the last two decades to harbour any readiness with the changes it so well understood when being on the other side of the Island. Independent nations will now only think and see disruption from breaking with global willingness to maintain position under constant and rapid changes, 24/7 and counting seconds. This time it is Britain leaving and it wasn't desirable by the many nations, friendly on the one side and also on the other a very serious global face imperative to maintain stable. What seems that stability planet size requires even greater sacrifice in our era. It is also what a majority is saying among the G7 and G20, what also equals democracy of an industrialized democracy. Britain has to decide what is just and justice in it's 'breaking away' from the worldview.

Scientific peace is a European Union approach to the next 80 years.

5 January 2019

A strong European Union at some abstract point in the nearest of the future will receive the first signals of wide scale changes that are being made close and in the present time within it's 27 Member States union. Peace will have to match this wider scale in time and scientific time. A few have already opened public window readings online (Jerusalem Post today in some of it's writings on the EU institutions) and have gone through great length and emphasis, that if Europe wants future security for prosperity it should now take the chance and talk about where it would want to be in 80 years time, not for the older generations of political leaders but in fact of securing another period of governance and democracy for it's younger generations and political leaders. Peace requires a profound understanding of Europe in the future and also that it's natural and only ally are the last seven decades of progress and realities. And 80 years might be the secret ingredient for this new approach among it's Member States and key players. The first strategic question is how to expect and avoid war when by it's many subtleties some might slip into EU- fatique, or simply can make an abrupt case against the EU and is refusing any longer to live on 'survival'. On the plus side the Member States can reflect on fresh evidence and memory how the EU has been in it's 70 years cycles of integration and monetary union policies much later to again prove the necessary basics for a lasting peaceful century. Adding another 80 years of probably the same (in the first decades) of the 'old EU' into the future, are we then not looking at a new probability for established peace by science (emperical reading of the last seven decades)?

In reality many can see or imagine that the only war to expect is how to break up the EU, thus pointing to a mediocre strategic point and a very popular line of thinking. Indeed, that is part of how to study the meaning of the nature and order of peace in the coming eight decades.

The EU moves on.

31 December 2019

There is the Euro and Member States are inclusive as are their governments and citizens. After the rotation from the exit country Britain on 31 January 2020, business as usual will resume. The EU is an old system and there is no one to say that from the 31 January 2020 inclusive will mean a wipe-out on the EU map or collapse. All depending on the spectacles in between your eyes. All EU ministers are preparing for the time ahead and so are governments, industries and citizens. Everyone has business- intensity on their minds and more than usual on the activity intensity. On the better side this might even increase or enhance business management and put more people in employment. We are not in a war scenario where governments have to fear that this could take a while as they see it, and working more from approximation. The EU is not an island, but in fact it is part of the global world and most Member States here have their starting point into that part of the world from the EU- institution. Politics will stay within the EU and so is the ECB. And the generations continue from within the Member States, with no disruption on their minds of any kind (that from now on the monster will come and eat all their children). Some Member States might even get used to the vacancy of the arbiter and will be reminded of their time when it was the chic thing to do and have an arbiter in good service on-board the EU. Vanity is on the bonfire. But to govern to the EU means a little more than business alone. 513.5 Million EU citizens are not just estimation for population density alone. There is purpose here and the story it is making. And the old world stops here.

2020 Will be about the new world named 'Moving on', in principle and on all official documents. The Special Department (?) can handle the rest and leave the EU political bloc hands-off. Some are expecting that between the EU and Britain from 31 January to 1 July 2020 a different image might emerge on the horizon. Others think that Trade is Peace, and vice verse, in the modern day world. And Trade and Win belong to an older system/ culture we cannot parrot in Real Time today and shout hooray! for the pirates. We now know that education taught mankind that humans are social creatures and that what is existential is a universal inherent right to a human being. Poverty can be addressed and it has many institutions that are dealing with these issues, and also what does the world needs beside crop production mass? Organisation, political, military or social engineering, are the few basics of the last decade and could be an answer. How can you not know about massunemployment in your country and that this is the biggest threat facing the world today? Employment could help make Climate Change the next global solution to the problem. People need to understand the symbiosis between life and living standard (even in CC). And that will make mankind the social creature he/ she is and who would want peaceful solutions. Not only should WWII not happen again, but neither should WWI never happen again. Let's put it in another way, with world domination Peace is the test for it's champion. And, of course, if all that fails the test of Peace in fact has lost. The EU is not facing that problem when seen from a coherence between the Member States.

India, what is your blue and green secret?

17 August 2019

Wealth has intesified the global need in different areas where oceans, seas, land and people, sky and satellite technologies are the main scope for studies and scientific solutions around the world. India is not a novel idea for the global future and it's plans. Wealth also inspires peace, if from any technocratic viewpoint all countries can set their standards high. Unlike wealth nature is unpredictable and indefinite without time engineering. Another aspect of India's realities is how transparent is their own vision of the future, green or blue. To many citizens in the rest of the world India was known for personal experience, in the seventies. Over many millions of peoples have seen India in the last four or five decades is another astonishing fact. Socially India is seen as an upgraded subcontinent as international witness came to rage in Slumdog Millionaire, in a positive light of things... Perhaps India's academics would be more critical from a political point of view and see this attention as seriously squandering the many realities of the people living in this part of the world and have little relation to India's or the country's bigger plans and how it wants globalization to be it's high standard classification tag. The extraordinary thing in the world today is perhaps the alignment to all countries from any point where a country starts and ends. Who invented India, next to China and Japan? That is perhaps the secret of India, but from who's visionairy?

The Europeans are familiar with the silk road and the legendary Marco Polo spice caravan routes, and Alexander the Great war expeditions campaign. To know the whole world you need to know where it ends, according to ancient Greece and to them it ended in India. Globalization goes even further and is taking unfamiliar Indian terrain where Alexander the Great stood only on foot, the future e.g. 2050. The logic is that of machineries in the 21th century. Mathematics as a global vision however is telling you that the logic of machineries do not match India's illogical blue and green, or brown stroke of land in between the middle. This can only work in logical settings e.g. in Germany where nothing can erect by random or is spontaneous, unless by a miracle if this is a Gothic castle to be there one morning in Bayreuth that no one knows where this came from. Localization in India is determined by it's many factors, whether blue, green or brown and grey (monsoons), on a daily basis for many centuries long since it's story in the beginning when it was discovered by the Europeans. In a globalized world there is already some proof of impact into the continent as a first time in the history of India's making into the world with a wide scale marketing mix of both globalization and localization. A new potent India would become more attractive if these plans are going to be successful in the future time, one for the imagination worldwide. For now the world believes that India is not the end of the world. And than we are looking at natural resources in our own blue, green, brown and grey secret or treasuries.

India is not in some kind of trouble. You need to look inside India and it's monsoons.

8 August 2019

A straight line from east to west, from north to south, from eye point view would produce an interesting middle or central of India almost immediately to the viewer, distant or physically present. The question is what do we expect from India in terms of the near future. That is also the global question, outbound. When industries from around the world are investing in the future of India sometimes this seems very clear that we are looking horizontally at made investments, one that never crosses the ambitions of the country, looking at a low growth vertical economy and high tech development for decades if not centuries. Forty years ago India was flat seen from any rational point of view to the western nations, except where it's concerns relations with e.g. Britain from an imperial past was going to end anyway someday. Civilization and a civilized India, many then thought this would be sufficient and to leave things the way they were would also bring about a miracle perhaps of self-reliance and low- key sustainability, completely fitting the nation's velocity... India was derelict for many decades after that, only not in the way that was visibly dominant at the time. What India was lacking wasn't British polish on the nation e.g. civilization, but engineers and engineering on a wider scale and further deal with it's monsoons and tectonic asymmetries, or symmetries. Forty years ago India was perhaps readiest to start looking for new technologies and parties who were interested to help build with all toil and soil architectures, but did not or could not find support from around the world. Designated: lack of expertise.

The future of India will not be any different from the point of British civilization in India, so welcomed and bitterly taken up to the point where Britain had left and then turn this way of life into a live- business, even a global outlook in many segments of Indian life and societies. All good initiatives were defect. To some this was due to a lack of expertise on the Indian side, and others were convinced that nothing would work in India if any project would start from a wide scale. Micro scale projects were then introduced (water projects, Bangladesh musical concert by George Harrison)and the government in India was desperate for results to improve rural and urban life on a pressing timetable. Water was imminent and monsoons kept flooding earth and soil without any natural device and track systems known in India. Forty years later in the 21st century it is this miracle that happened for many societies in India, global systems that made India a place of fascinating terrain of engineering. Any hope how the country should deal with it's vast natural resources is high tech and on the ground solutions. Still there is a margin of misconception if India will only depend on satellite technologies and political strength. And still many people are living under the poverty line homogeneous. India is profoundly fascinating with this complexity of soil and terrain stagnation and it has done so for as long memory serves to be the only way of life it knows best how to live. Water and clay make bricks and India builds. The perfect system to productivity output in terms of economics for rural areas is not only how to introduce market knowlegde and the digital solutions for ordinary lives and people, but how to build a future for the world from India deep and high symmetries.

UK is trying hard to prove new PM isn't champagne Brexit, but Blue Nun.

25 July 2019

Trying to make one relevant to the UK and then have something to say about the new Prime Minister, Mr Boris Johnson, this morning, or the morning after, is quite frankly, irrelevant at multiple levels also quite immediately. The Brexit- EU deal is one for a start. And, end. It is all too ridiculously monotonous, when seen from the driving forces of the European Union with their new starting programs how to shape the coming future of the 27 Member States, and leaving Britain out of the game in good friendship. Friendship doesn't come cheap, because Mr Barnier has already asked the difficult question under Boris Johnson as PM what sort of deal or no deal Brexit will be. The future, simply said, is not for change or turn. But as it seems PM's in the UK are a dying breed nowadays. Back in the nineties the world could still expect to see Britain's version of how to impress the world PM's. Mr Johnson fails to impress at this point, when the logic of Brexit remains unchanged from the EU's point of global view. What is Brexit primal fear at the moment? A political one or historical two. The UK's cabinet this morning also is looking more like a nice flower arrangement cabinet, and faces that are clueless about where Britain now stands, after the former PM has resigned and is being remembered as Britain's worst PM ever. The US President, Mr Donald Trump, has congratulated Britain and the British people (relevance?) with their choice of PM (keeping the Tory- leadership above sea level). 'Do you remember, Attlee,' or, 'Do you remeber Ted Heath', have now become the dying ambers of this extinct race of politicians in the UK. Or, maybe not.

What we know so far about the new PM. Yes, Mr Boris Johnson is a scion of Eton. 'Do you remember Dave', of the same or similar background, also a PM and who took Britain out of the EU, via referendum in June 2016. What will the 'flower cabinet' mean for the British people and business in general, could be the next big question on the list of the new PM, the morning after. Or, why not abolish the whole system of electing a PM for Britain, all together? It seems pretty much so already, one would say or think. Mrs May was a bad engineer in Brexit negotiations, but there isn't one honest person who thinks that the new PM is bad enough to go the same way, let's say the other half? Politics and Brexit are not in the same order as champagne and white Beluga caviar. And how does a British PM goes for less in the 21st century and make an impression in the world as 'great PM' to take Britain out of the EU, over broken bridges? The new EU Commission President, Mrs Ursula von der Leyen, could offer Mr Johnson a 'hug democracy' and keep smiling lovely... From what one can see is that here there is no level of action left over for the new British PM, by his predecessor, Mrs Theresa May, and perversity tells you that she has accomplished something rather peculiar with this when leaving No 10, the day before yesterday. Does this PM has anything else to stimulate progress of any sort right now in the British people's domain, politics perhaps? Why didn't they go for a good old fashioned election in the country, one can ask to infinity now. Instead all that was done was changing the bottles of true vintage with riesling, because no one will notice what is really not happening in this cabinet. The Tories are lacking, by historical definition. Or, maybe, by global definition, we are looking at the right Prime Minister the UK has never had before.

Germany meaning: siblings and myth of no paritcular use.

13 July 2019

In the 21st century Germany is one of the largest physical proportion of continent in the European Union, in terms of politics, economics and population. It is unthinkable for any modern day German nor other to say this is subsidiary to the origins of what Germany could have been in myth and meaning in many centuries beyond. Wagner nor Nietzsche approached with little or no real effect reconstructing what by unknown reason (if Germany was built on reason) force went into extinction, the meaning of the first German family to walk the continent. It could be dwarfs or tall giants decor and stay indefinitely being looked upon as Germany's mythological ancestry, for no particular reason. Our time in a globalized world there is no use for any German myth to revive or 'dream' that this is useful in terms of mechanism. It remains hopelessly unuseful and has no significance to revise history. This is a dead end street, and yet it's derelict grounds are open widely and inviting sky and soil, the human soul, and curiosity, for something to explain it's silent nature in the past epochs. Germans in modern day Germany are giants of another sort and related to industries for generations. Blonde Germans do not fit into this financial picture of a G7 country. Time has fallen off their blood and myth to oblivion, especially after it's extensive crimes against humanities during Nazi Germany and even before that. Nazi Germany was never a myth of what was it's meaning as Germany 'blue blood' theories, and if without the divine will of God, was grotesque to ethics.

Germany is silent by nature and has quietness in it's eyes, that sometimes one questions their ability to understand the world as the global order of all demographics we know and have on a wider scale. In a sudden this white noise can turn earbreaking and advanced with a technology of that what was silent nature turning to a different race of peoples distant and unknown. But Germany can't exceed it's expectations of what Germans consider their natural 'heimat', and the world will never know how to explain the language concealed for Germans in this word, like any other random word in the rest of the world. Where there is heimat there is memory of home... As father and mother, in universal terms. But where do siblings play beside in their heimat? Many see it as romantic, idyllic, and even sentimental singing (Franz Lehar) that Germany must have been sprung from rivers and deep seas and are somehow amphibious, quite contrary to Wagner's themes of operas. In modern day time we will not see a renaissance of the myth that was Germany, and in terms of God's will, it would not make good manners to do so either. Germans are where they are today, absorbed by their own largeness and instrumentalism. Koenic is one such instrumentalism, and a simple example to the rest of industrial landscape and mountains. If by blood heimat is or should be considered where the myth was first and only has seen the light of day in a whiff and then completely went back to oblivion, perhaps where it is safest, as siblings? The rest to the story is exactly what we humans are if there is any such ability inherent to the human nature, subordinate to the will of God. If His will was a demand against monotony, and in a greater theme challenged greatness in mankind for drama and might, and yet so lowkey, that what if siblings are the German heimat and turn it's red blood in military uniform to blue and deep melancholy? "Verruckt!" Is another real Germany.

Mr Jared Kushner, a young gentleman in the world on the 'global leadership stage'.

5 June 2019

The suggestion here is non- academic when taking a closer look at President Donald Trump's son-in-law and to ask yourself the question whether Mr Kushner has what it takes to be a top- diplomat or is the right person on Foreign Relations and representing the most powerful country in the world. Textual he is not good at talking points and scoring points either, so it seems to many who hear, see and speak of him in the public domain. Americans alone can judge Americans, end of the story. At this stage in his career as the Middle East US representative of the Trump administration, scoring aggressively with points would make Mr Kushner's important role look rather silly and clueless indeed. Rather he is now an acting adviser to the US President and doing so in cold play (playing it cool). The crossing of avoiding old razor sharp blades in his plan for the Middle East is proof enough that he is the youngest on the team with a greater talent than most of his peers in the White House and not to suggest or promise popular ideas from a different century. Is he what the 'Deal of the century' needs from a representative serving the White House? The question is a deliberate pointing of direction and taking much of it's emptiness unto the level of where globalization has failed other and in previous decades, but could now get a new approach if success was guaranteed. Also whether Mr Kushner can be trusted one could say that this rhetorical question is irrelevant without the dogma outspreaded for a long time behind him in this part of the region. What is true is that he was never a minister and lacks the ministerial experience with difficult mediators for his plan on both sides, Arabs and Israelis. Trust comes with age in the Middle East, e.g. Mr Tony Blair, former UK Prime Minister in the nineties up to the millennium. And Mr Kushner will have to learn how to age with the 'Deal of the century' in his future. Or take it as a marriage of inconvenience.

No one actually knows what the content of the 'Deal of the century' is. And the widow of diplomacy can sometimes mean pains without gains. Mr Kushner's answers in the Axios interview were brief and accurately clear when listened well to him as the prominent interviewee. In the 'Deal of the century' the question is whether this will weaken the dogmatic truth of the Middle East, that the only active truth is Israel to be the aggressor and that no such thing is true in the Arab world. And finger pointing is toward Iran by quiet consensus. Strengthening of a peace plan in our century for the region in this part of the world will be challenging, if it's architect was or is a young Jewish man and who is too young to be dogmatic at his age, and therefore biased in any way against or for one side against the other. In Citizen CNN Mr Kushner believes that if the plan fails then let it be so in a state different from it's starting point, and be left at a place where previous administrations had not come. It's a misunderstanding when realism and feasibility of any big plan get's a review by it's maker a priori as a possible failure. But why, that is something new to the Middle East and maybe not if transparency is tied down to security. Any new idea to security could be setting off the alarm across the whole region, let's say when complexity slowly would unfold into transparency of some sort. Who is willing to pay the price on either side and instead collaborate on peace? Right now mr Kushner should know that once in Bavaria a young king named Ludwig also in his time thought of peace and that wars did not solve anything between nobility and governments. People, on the other hand, can only be represented by death on the battlefield, and Ludwig detested ignoble death.

The Middle East of Israel.

11 May 2019

In Israel can peace still be delivered between it's enemies and people? The outcome of this survey might be a fifty- fifty percent, let's say on the Jewish side in a free society and democracy. Left and right decide how the government should form it's cabinet around this particular outcome, on a first or last term as the Prime Minister. Peacefully, instead of in uprise. One of Israel's strongest arguments is that it's people come peacefully to the polling station and cast their vote, and the world can witness this event to a blade sharp point for holding accuracy of voting and ballot casting in high (not hide) regard. Peace is only a definition when related to the war with Palestinians, and when of course Israel is under attack from terrorism. There are no thin blue lines from and within this approach toward a peace dynamics. Where dynamics is most reflected and felt deepest in every day life is only pin-pointed by war torn places, between Israel and Gaza for the last five or so decades. It's story is true and International. Again, fifty percent in Israel of it's people know the same problem of the story for many decades since their generation were the first arriving in the country to build the State in which they have renewed their nation from scratch. The other fifty percent is the Android Israel and are living in a high tech state of mind, believing their legacy as global winners can only get better in the world from where they are living. Their Prime Minister isn't born just yet and leaving it for now at conventional wisdom to the older politicians, also, that they see as brilliant tacticians. This is what is peace in Israel and a true live- experience for it's citizens. Only when coming close to east Jerusalem it disconnects and then stops at a sudden. A global (Anglo Saxon) and modern day Israel isn't connecting very well with peace on the other side, if designated a war place. But that is what reality does really mean to the big cities. Jews differ from their Arab neighbours and are living in another timeline.

Story after story is a long history in Israel on war and peace, and many signatures are it's testimonies. A people versus another people and the end to the conflict has now turned black into a myth in it's own right, and the world is still counting for how long it takes both sides to come to some sort of truce that could become lasting over an indefinite period of time in the future. The question is how the other side is experiencing domestic peace and if that equals anything they see on the side of the Israelis. In terms of economics no state is on it's own in 2019, first, second, third and fourth quarter, when side by side. Unification and integration of good standards is as a first priority to sustainability in this luxury idea of having a State and democracy of actions and not beautiful words on principles alone. Israel's Middle East so far isn't based on the writing here above. At least not from the point of view if it is guilty of any sort of war crimes against it's neighbours, the Palestinian people... The political science of many Israelis and the Palestinian people by approximate is saying much of the same thing and it is still never ending. How can anyone help when peace is divided in many pieces and war is consolidated every day anew? Is it also now a global problem what happens in the Middle East between Israel's government and the Palestinian leaders? In many ways, yes, it is a global issue and problem. But so are the wars in many other places in the world with killings and high death tolls, and also taking place in the same world where life is 'normal' and responsible, e.g. in parliaments and not in entertainment gigs (to the horror of many religious groups in Israel). The Middle East of Israel is still a long dream in the pipeline of multiple sciences of humanities (including environment and clean energy). And these are very ambitious plans on the side of Israel to inspire the region to do the same.

Jared Kushner puts 2 & 2 together in his 'Deal of the century'.

5 May 2019

Mr Kushner in a conversation on thursday evening, Washington CNN, 3 May, 'Inside the Trump administration's Middle East peace effort', is making one or two things clear, that he is finding complimentary details for both Israelis and Palestinians if they can work together once the plan has been revealed, or lose an opportunity that can only come once in a lifetime in greater politics. Clearly for the Palestinians saturday morning and for the rest of the day, their sentiments are not the same and they fired a barrage of rockets into Israeli territory once more. Security meetings will be held tomorrow, according to the news bulletins in the Jerusalem Post, when Mr Netanyahu will discuss the plan of action with cabinet. In the meanwhile President Trump's administration and the European Union spokesperson, Ms Federica Mogherini, condemned the attack on Israel from Gaza Hamas into Israeli territory. Clearly also is that the International world is keeping a very close interest in the momentum. It is always hard to see hostilities fire through the fog of war and make any effort of peace go mute indefinitely. Staying mute for a hundred years from now isn't what Israel should be viewing if the next generations of Jewish people mean anything to whoever will then be Prime Minister of Israel. The fog of war could prove it's most deadliest to it's sovereign state perhaps one day. Mr Kushner is right about that this is a hard problem and bearing in mind that the economy in the US isn't just yet made greater again, but if so than what will happen to any peace plan in the future? Some other details: Israel is counting it's population at nine million today, next to 2 mln Palestinian people. There in between lies a future in abyss.

The US administration unusual approach so far has been one of integrity from the President, Mr Donald Trump, on escalation of the situation in Ashkelon tonight and is calling for immediate halt from firing rockets into Israel. Determination to make peace work in the Middle East with this 'Deal of the century' may push an old system, where only the war between Israel and the Palestinians seem to determine the peace process, maybe a little further away from achieving it's goals as set out in the document. By definition this region seems to be more in need of a multilateral peace effort, for business and economics, and from here find some of it's symmetrical ideas on micro and macro economics in future relations. Visually the Palestinian people are much part of the Arab world as they are citizens of Gaza. The hardest problem so far over the last seven decades has been unfortunately one of deep prejudice between the two neighbours, the Israelis and Palestinians. And it is still costing many casualties of war and blind terrorism. Nine mln people in other parts of the world are called the dominant nation, and two mln a minority. It is a crtical look into the military and a sovereign State, e.g. for Israel. Now others blame the Prime Minister of Israel that he perhaps should find a cure every time he sneezes and Gaza responds with rockets. It is a simple formula of diaglogue when nothing else works, or the plan is too big to deal with, or maybe even that most of it get's lost in translation, just to mention a few non options. In conclusion: what is not adding up in real time in this part of the world? The US is a strong stable country and has the oath to govern with honour and integrity. In Israel stability comes with a price tag and sovereignty with fallen heroes. It must pray never to have a Prime Minister who is sqaemish and a romantic, and leave it up to fate what happens to Israel and it's future as the Jewish nation in the Middle East.

"We make fast decisions, and we make good decisions," says President of the United States, Donald Trump.

10 April 2019

A still picture is saying it perhaps more astronomical that when a President like US President, Mr Donald Trump, is in this picture there is only one kind of truth in it at the speed of light. What if you can't make fast decisions? Some countries are still stuck with the old perception when globalization was about empowerment of nations, global efforts, international cooperation, national and global growth, and top priority global participation in all G27 and G7 countries. It took decades for some before they took 'fast decisions' and where they are now socially and still coming up, for some even from very humble backgrounds and grassroots. Social engineering is now a success globally. One of the 'good decisions' the world then had taken from the globalization process. If the future will be about taking 'fast decisions' by the world leading and most powerful nations the new front image will be one of astonishment and awe. But what does that mean if fast means ferocious as fierce as lightning and turning the head of the US President to mythical proportions when Egypt worshipped Sobek? Sobek only to be seen alive when lightning illuminating the dark sky for less than seconds, is the kind of sense of what you might be thinking of. What has changed world leaders to this new pantheon of mythical creatures of old? It is 'fast decisions' and it's making. Globalization summing up all it's global achievements and what was accomplished, perhaps over the longest period of times since WWII ended in 1945.

Still hanging in there is Brexit, just yesterday saying it will ask for more delay from the EU to leave the bloc. The quietness tonight, 10 april now just after midnight (9 april), is one of a unusual one in Britain. The E-Type Jaguar can't be fixed again and 'get on with it', and seen from the side roads in Europe, next to neighbouring countries on the main highways all driving E-cars (powered) and full computerized luxury cars. No, it is not a dream or vision. It is true and real as water and bread. Bre+it transformed itself from a simple x to le crois somewhere in the middle, signifying a dead era for the British nation. When will Brexit become part of the 'fast decision' era? For some inexplainable reason sometimes inhuman can still be more human. Brexit has both characters, if one represents the people's vote being watered down, and the other, ah... Who wants to go there tonight? The people's vote machinery became non existent since 29 March 2019, replacing it with more delay and 'flextension' gold dust. If the world makes fast and good decisions, Brexit is hanging in there like a loose billboard and with a story close to a quiet nightmare. Just one for your kids on Halloween nights. "That up there, kids, is the PM of the UK, once the leading industrial G7 leader in the world."

Brexit is now history, but not so to be set up as a copy- book e.g. for other 'Exiteers'.

1 April 2019

One thing to learn from the failure of Britain leaving the EU is that if anyone would study this failure more closely, it will astonish the student how this can enrich another 'Exit' country with proper and tacit information, whether this means in ways one should not adventure such a move, while still the lesson to be learned is what it may look like for another 'exit' nation from the EU. In theory the richness could be surprising and rewarding, e.g. let's say that if the Netherlands would want to leave the EU, in theory only, the tacit question would then have to be, is it going to be a hard Nexit, or a soft Nexit. That would be the wide opening into society and the parties involved, if they could simulate such a move and leave their natural partner, the EU, for some other theoritical reason. Also, we have to bear in mind that a country like the Netherlands and it's sovereignty is more receptive to free interpretations, a little different than e.g. Britain and it's long historical monarchy. Denmark, Sweden and Norway, also are now experimenting with a novel idea to merge all three kindoms to one great one, was said today in a tweet on Twitter, Visit Denmark. You can't just leave the EU on populist ideals or ambitions, as we know in Europe this is a continent with historical regions, one different from the other in so many places and countries. Europe did away with all that. We even now have to thank the EU for blocking what some called to inspire countries to leave and take after the then example of the referendum outcome in Britain, in june 2016. Many would have woken up today in a complete different reality with Britain not being able to deliver Brexit on the day that was set out by the Prime Minister a few months earlier...

The Netherlands for example isn't a majority of leavers, plus fundamentally they are more prone EU, something Britain never did understand from Europeans, west, middle nor east if it wasn't about war. Britain is a war historian when it comes to middle and eastern Europe. Here is where others make a fundamental mistake, when speaking in the same way as Britain about neighbouring countries in these regions. Russia is in great parts also one of these mistakes. Overhere in the west of Europe it is not about war and peace, but peace, economics, democracies, and old parliamentary principles. Something Britain has always monitored for centuries. Coming back to the Netherlands, by example, what we see here is a majority and minority of rich and conservative groups. In order to match Brexiteers you would take a whole country, made up of a majority (similar to Labour in Britain), and not a minority, which in return would only backfire at society overhere in this majority. That would have been devastating to 'ordinary' citizens. Another factor in Nexit is also the EU. The EU is the natural partner for a country or Member State like that of the Netherlands. It is about economics, trade, social cohesion, and security. If sovereignty had been their priority ambition to keep it out of the EU, similar to Britain, and in the same majority, a very dangerous balance would have become more than just theory in real time. Globally the Dutch sovereignty could even be decimated by other 'kingdoms' throughout the land, and no one would even notice. Similar to what Denmark, Sweden and Norway are now trying for up north with another enlargement of kingdoms in one. Leaving the EU for any other 'exiteer' now can model itself against Brexit and it's failure, and who knows, they might succeed in something else in future. It is expected of the EU to be a bastion in future of real brilliant governing it's vastness and vast territories. A wider expansion of democracy of it's first kind is not unthinkable, but maybe now feels like an impossible birth of nations.

World inclination toward a monetarium global community.

19 March 2019

After the bronze and golden age we are now convinced there is something similar either going to happen with our century, or that this will soon be the new way a global community may be morphed into. We are heading toward a mint related world, putting it in popular words or digital terms. While many world citizens everywhere are catching up with the digital age, a curious torsion spring is pointing out to a different direction above these levels of human 'understanding', how real life in the world is being experienced. The smart age by then will be outdated, replacing many agencies with a new monetarium global community, perhaps splitting up in many new agencies or constituencies. Mint is always a good thing, theoretically, and is accessible in even greater theories to all of humanities or mankind. With an extra edge to for not having the same gold fever. Question is whether we will ever get there by the next decade or is it too soon to envision a world without nickel and dimes once and for all? Our petty monies ancestor before the time of globalization gold bonds. What are exchange financial markets other than mint related communities, while in the rest of the world everything else is fluid. These may be unreal ways to speak of a world coiled to spring from it's metal into a torsion of a new monetary direction end, but is nothing more unreal than reality as we now know it. It is also extraordinary by nature if it can substitute for humanity. What you then will see is how our world, speaking in soft terms, was destined

to get up to the point of no return, for there is no such thing as reversed wisdom. (Not to compare to reversal of fortune) If the world agrees to this global monetarium being the central institute for the coming or near future, this agreement will only say something about it's destiny being the whole of the planet in a few hands. Another aspect in this trajectory of mint related global communities is the chance of survival, let's say when resources would e.g. repulse 'small units' and only accept constituencies of 'rich' units. A few decades ago everything was driven by global policies and goals, wordings and textual. Banks had little monopolies exposures, if you remember it well, keeping the coloured bubble in the time bottle, sliding each and every time with another colour, to brighten up hope. Years later wealth was exponentially expansed and it became clear at one point how quickly the meaning of politics and industries would have to change, if saving the world monetarium for the future was to be fruitful and tight. 'Rich mint' doesn't conceal an embedded system for survivals or survivors. The meaning of wealth is becoming more of an obscure reality and the great paradox. Fluid ownerships are also trending quickly, from small businesses to levels of heavy industries. But with change also comes new hope, e.g. on issues of control and governments. However there is much proof of the cold desire to keep political establishments in our living memory, where they can... Be it in somewhat a more mint condition. Is the future as we saw it e.g. one year ago in 2018?

The European Union realistic project: the future.

15 February 2019

Global elites are convinced that the US' position in the world will have in the short term some effect in some countries, but that this will be less e.g. in Europe, and more specifically in the European Union. This short term snapshot of how the global economy will change the evolution on the longer term future between the two continents, isn't something many people have noticed yet, but hoping that politicians are already getting signals of some alarming 'effect' if they can't extend the EU any further from where it is at the present time. Expansion was the plan, now a historical and almost outdated version of what was basic and hardcore trajectory the union of Member States had signed up for, from Maastricht to the Lisbon treaty. The future of the EU in 2019, just before the EU Parliament election in May this year, to a surprise by some in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post, is slowly falling apart from within. Italy, Deputy Premier,Mr Salvini, earlier today said that Italy won't abandon the EU, or is not planning to leave the EU. Only Brexit or Britain still believes the only 'realistic' future for the EU will be the 'unrealistic' future of the establishment in Brussels. The EU Member States alone know where the future of the European Union should be in the short or longer term, if the neurosis of Brexit is over, this is expected by 29th March, in a few weeks time from now. Global elitism isn't one to miss the boat when it leaves and will set sail into the future. Europe, according to the newspapers online here mentioned above, is shrinking also very slowly at EU level. At this point it is almost certain that these merchants of purple and opportunity will choose the silk road into the future and travel the world from the designated caravan route and continue their high tech and technology sophistication businesses. We are facing a new era in the short term, all depending on where and when the effects will come.

Difficult to think where the future is heading when no one has any idea...

22 January 2019/ 23:59 PM

The last decade lasted like a real big surprise in the world, one way is to say whether anyone could have guessed it, and another way is to say that isn't a surprise, but more like the way things should go if the world is really that big. And it is very interesting to notice how humanities have changed from all this, feeling much more secure in the meaning of democracy and social expansion across most of the western democracies, but now also including more nations to join the majority in which this democracy is an ongoing process. Economic hardship explains itself on a massive scale of financial infrastructures, also across the same global hemisphere. We are here for improvement, equal to Human Rights, or as close as. From all this and much more in big business humanity is left with a feeling of enthousiasm and aspiration, which are fundamental to where it wants to be in terms of the future. Accept where it isn't clear to say with precision what the future really would be looking like or is. Is it a cosmetic or cosmic dream? Or maybe similar? Time (age) is constant and so is human life. How people will govern in this imaginary future seems like an interesting question, only when you are still young and alive. For others, once you have reached a certain age, the future might turn to a great invisible monster and being there everywhere you will be looking. Big industrial leading countries by then indeed would be the size of cosmic proportions, in which it's inhabitants are agents of life and are called the best you can be when cosmetic. With politics highly consolidated at top level. Yes, only the absolute rich could create such a perfect world.

At street level time goes back very quickly and there is still this obstinate world of Zombie places where there are still remnants that will never be able to pick up life in a cosmetic sense or way, not ever is there destiny. So it seems. And then you are wondering what could make their part of the world honest and relevant next to that what is the big world out there. Why not ask the high profile politicians on this one. Zombie places also need sustainability, in order to keep it clean and not rotten. Of course, where this future is envisioned it isn't built not just yet. You can't build a world without humanities, if science is the answer for most outcomes in a future where humans will exalt to a higher level of understanding in their environment and natural habitat. Industries will always be in need of humans, since it is not scientific that robots need to consume as much. Consumers are on the balance of multinationals industries a very decisive economic factor, and this goes from the need of simple items to greater ones, let's say in hospitals or medicine. Size does matter when it comes to enlargement of demographics. It is hard to imagine a future without human lives preferably on massive scales. Rich people don't do their shopping in the same way when consumption is basically being considered something only 'the people' do... (Referring to the Zombie places) Death and birth monitors will be needing special care programs and keep their eyes fixed on their screens where and when this is showing any fast rate droppings, localising fluctuations. The question therefore is whether anyone has any idea where they are heading when speaking of the future in a globalized world.

Leave the EU or stay, what is the plan?

3 January 2018

The UK will leave the EU (area of single currency) on 29 March this year. The world and world leaders all are now informed on the subject. Some are responding in editorials or bulletins on global TV, or in social media like Twitter, saying the same thing repeatedly. The unexpected thing could only be if Britain leaves Britain itself, quietly in Viking Knarr longships and other smaller boats to sail away by night. Once the world and EU would wake up on the day of leave, this picture here above could then be the only thing that is left of Britain and will come into a real shock they would never understand. Or, is there indeed another plan of leaving the EU? Perhaps a by-pass underground? We are all guessing of course and leave nothing to chance or coincidence with Brexit. The plan could altogether be a very cunning plan! If they can invent Blackadder you should then be aware of the Brexiteers... Actually the paella comes to mind, and what is in it for Britain. But that would be 'your surprise'. As the days are drawing near to the final act of Brexit no one is getting any wiser from all this talk of leaving the EU. And, also, no one knows what they're hearing or should believe. Logic, that here is a nation proud to sink with great pride, isn't helping either to get to the 'real plan' some think the UK isn't planning or working on in these last few days before they put the deal to leave the EU in a final stop. Somehow the world thinks it impossible, while the Brexiteers say this is possible and they keep on playing with our minds. Can it be that Brexit means a psychological exit from the EU? (The Germans think it is all about sausages) That would be sheer evil, if so, and playing on the nerves of everybody who enters into the dangerous fog of Brexit. So, what could England be planning right now? A last minute resurrection of Sir Winston Churchill?

Air pressure can be massive in a tube, of course, yes... But what does that mean? A piling up of uploads no one has ever heard of but in England? (Titles uploads: 'This is no laughing matter, hahaha!) Also, they will not be standing at the borders with anvils waiting on every euro that get's into the country to be hammered to break in two, from now on, so to speak, and cast aside in baskets as 'not very useful to us'. Yes, this is Britain and we might soon find out why they say there is method in the madness everywhere. Even when it doesn't apply in the European Union how Britain is expressing itself in sayings or aphorisms. Brexit, a parable... Starting with "There was once a human story, starting in Britain as the Brexit deal.." Is this how the story of a nation goes into human history? The lady at the Thames vanishes? Westminster is collapsing because it was too determined to collapse the EU, or something like this as the story will go. And they do so openly. But let us not kid ourselves on Brexit. Once Britain will get to that stage the frenzy will autopilot the leave battle in a terrible shout from the EU. And from that moment on this will be the terrible cry of a myth that Britain once was in the middle center of earth, and it shall be remembered no more in that great and terrible way. The world will witness the slaying of a dragon (blue, red and white) without even sensing this sensation from afar. Many will also call it a tragedy of epic proportions, they have ever witnessed. For some reason there wasn't any gold or silver left to feed him/ her and the euro was not what it wanted instead. Since no one can think of Brexit in terms of real time politics or economics this was therefore the only thing left to go to for an answer, if there was any such thing available. English is the world's favourite number one language in the 21st century. It doesn't matter to the global audience where they got the speak from. Even when it would go extinct from human memory. God, help us! To rely on an entirely new English speak and subjugate us all. Can Walhalla be their new home or country when Britain leaves the EU this March?

No Deal, perhaps a long stretch into a one way dead end road?

19 December 2018

But, as the saying goes, there is more than one way to skin the cat. Perhaps this is one war that is not to be won, in the long term. Where will it bite, where is it expecting to bite in the short term? No rush thoughts, please?There is this thing with speed, that if in one place you are slowing it down you will get strange flows in or from it. Maybe it has something similar to thermo- or earodynamics, and England is a carmaker by defintion! All you need to do is scale it down if, let's say, speed was a cube and great magnitude. Now, how does this work for Brexit? Keep a square wheel on the road is quite an invention. In five years time some will notice how this works for Brexit. One might also ask, 'And who will be on it?". Of course, the 'No deal' ministers as far as they will go with this long stretch into the dead end road. The next logical question would be, what then will happen to speed. There is only one simple truth to the whole idea of a 'No deal'. It's right under your noses if you can find it. And that is all there is to it. Since there is zero incentives yet in Brexit or a 'NO Deal' to be reported what this means can only be that here the kernel of the move has nothing to do with mechanism and would only be for the time being something similar as dynamics. And we all know that Britain will not leave it to that. Britain is a great mover, is something everyone can expect. You can look at this theory of a 'No deal' in ten different ways and in each and every time come up with a different answer. In the meantime the EU will do just that. They seem to have the stomach for it too. One has to know that in our world today the thing with smart technologies is that there is always another way to outsmart your opponents and this is what we have to believe right now. It is only wise to believe that Brexit and also the EU are going to go for smart and not for proxy. Can anyone predict under these circumstances who is or will win, let's say in about five years from now?

Another way of looking at the 'No deal' everyone is speaking of today on both sides is that the provocation will not die out by itself, from now on. Because it is too vague to all sides, if peace time is still relevant in our world. A few decades ago the world was a much happier place and all nations in the west worked together to create the new world order, if anyone can still remember how that was. Will it still be the same after Brexit? The fact is that Brexit now has different meaning after the 'No confidence vote' that the PM has won, although it didn't shake off the chaff from the deal she wants to go ahead with, that is now dead. Sovereignty means sovereignty, so the Brexiteers are shouting throught the top of Westminster's roofs. And the Spanish Armada is sailing away from the Thames... These are illusions on fire and they will not stay for very long in metephor speak any longer. It is a bit extra to ask, but what is this ultimate goal that Britain envisions in the world? Also, they seem very angry at something else outside of Brexit. There was even a slight beam of hope in outsider's eyes, to see the king's men and not highway men, looking for someone to hang. Today it's not Oliver Cromwell they are fighting nor any windmills in these political world dreams. But maybe they still do have the right to tell you how and what to think when it comes to Brexit. The EU get's the role to play the victim here, next to the victim of Brexit's own pride. And has Britain been here before in this situation ever on earth? Some might say but neither has the EU. Labour in the meantime is convincing the House of Commons about their vision of Brexit will be the only thing that is good for Britain. They can keep up with the wheel of speed and let it be so, because the livelihood of many poorer families is the one thing they are worrying about. They know the password to the riches to come by heart, Brexsesame! A novel question perhaps but can Brexit be done in our world today? Because if so you will see a great thing once again happening in the world in our time. And if not another superior thing might become more visible immediately thereafter, e.g. that life without Britain in the EU is possible.

Brexit view, a Y- Dutch response and questions.

(Excercise and co-writing)

1 December 2018

The UK seems to be in an economic crisis, at least this is what everyone is saying outside in the EU and some more distant others in the rest of the world, e.g. G20 meeting in Beunos Aires yesterday, friday 30 november 2018. Some of us, especially the younger generations of EU citizens, this does not reflect concern yet, at least not from a collective point of view, but maybe there are those who do think about this, as it holds something of the future we're going to be in or live through time that is not yet behind us. The older generation might know a lot more about the EU and UK, now departure or divorce from the EU by Britain, and their view are distinctly a stronger one in comparison to any millennial view in this particular moment. My questions can therefore be only a minimum of that strong view. Now, what can we expect from a future where the EU will be expanding to engage the younger generations of EU citizens, while leaving our close neighbour, Brexit, to a distant memory? This is even to our generation a bit odd to experience. Growing up so far was more complete when life in education tells or teaches you about the place you're living in is called the European Union, and that this is the union to keep countries and governments in this union to better our standard of living and enhancing all intellectual aspirations throughout our young lives. The Dutch view isn't any different here from other EU- Member States Y- generation. Nor the X- generation, for that matter. Are we not being critical enough, having a closer look at this particular time when the UK is leaving the European Union? Perhaps we are failing our Y- generation in the UK by showing limited or scarce solidarity with their divorce from the continent of the EU nation's economic bloc, is perhaps the view some in our generation should ask.

What the older or X- generation cannot be viewing right now, maybe it is a good idea to put this/ our question forward on a special forum for political questions and economic problem- solving questions about what exactly is the EU future. Something that tells our view and concerns. And, also, what can be the difference here in both worlds, the Y- and X- generation EU nations? Our politicians are saying that they are doing the right thing, and that it is right for the UK to leave the EU in an orderly exit. No one is asking our generation whether we find this divorce as natural as they see it, from an academic or education point of view. In Holland our democratic excercise includes that of the Y- and X- group inclusively a lot more than you can imagine and think. Some even dare say that this has never been more true in our modern day time. Brexit was to us as important as to the senior politicians in the country and as a whole in the EU. Only, and I'm sorry to say, our political view, or objections, were never asked. This is perhaps why our British Y- generation citizens do not know why they should leave or stay in the EU, and only think it is economically and politically better to leave. The ones calling for remain, from this point of view as here above, they also do not know why remain in the EU will be the future for all Y- generations throughout the EU. Former education minister, Justine Greening, is a bore, many may say that about her, but maybe she has a point when speaking out for our generation, and that this is an important part in the process of whatever the future of the EU will be expanding in or to. I'm not saying that we could have changed the British government's mind on the future of Britain, but maybe it would or could have convinced our neighbours how important this debate is to all of us, in or outside the EU, X- but mostly the Y- generation.

The European Union and the UK exit agreement (november 2018).

23 November 2018

To many Europeans what the EU has set out in this agreement much of it isn't routine but out of the ordinary. They do however recognize the model in which these elements were put forward, so that each Member State can read and decide on it by sunday this weekend. Sometimes Europeans talk easy and give that impression to the public, while at other times some details in their treaties they may open to the public or press. The hard work behind the scenes it is in the EU- style of communication to keep it out of the public's sight, because this can sometimes be confusing to tell them snapshots of what goes on in the 27 Member States bloc, on a daily basis. The UK wants to divorce from all this by 29 March next year. A simple example of where things are getting tight and cannot be explained in any translation to make the British people understand how the EU actually works, you only need to think about one Member State and how they say the same thing but not quite so when translated to English. In politics that makes enormous difference and most is getting lost because it doesn't sound the same. E.g. papa, po and paard, are dad, potty and horse in English translated from Dutch. That in politics is unacceptable to English speaking politicians in the UK. They may mean the same thing but it doesn't sound like it and off they go. The divorce from the EU is not any different from the UK's point of view. What Mr Barnier so clearly states in this declaration withdrawal of the UK doesn't sound like anything in English, because this model was designed perhaps in another language and translated to English. Forty years in close cooperation with the EU one would think that the UK had learned by now how to understand Europeans, since all laws are technical jargon. Most law technicians in cooperation work closely together with all Member States. This is not the case, say the UK for England anymore. 'We're leaving the EU by 29 of March, next year.'

The question is: what language do the European Union Member States speak that the UK doesn't understand? Mr Barnier said that they are going for an ambitious plan for the future with the UK/ Britain, and this is one example about the 'potty and po' where translation becomes inadequate to the hearing of British politicians, which can only make it more likely to feed other grounds like not having a deal at all and walk away. Or, No Brexit, but not seen from the UK point of view and meaning a whole different thing to the EU. Logically No Brexit means something else to the EU, after the referendum in 2016 for the UK to leave the EU. This again, in the eyes of the British, must mean something of 'paard and horse'. And making it more mysterious to the public that voted for 'Leave'. Technically that won't work in reality for either side and prolong this unwillingness to understand something each side is making without contempt. No one can get it quickly done by a simple declaration of withdrawal in principle and not legally binding treaty. At least not as simple as 'papa and dad' translations. Mr Barnier also stressed the meaning of time, in any language this is luckily the same meaning by 'not' (nicht, niet, no, and so forth) as emphasis. Once you are unable to admire your neighbours perhaps it is best then to leave the bloc quietly and orderly. Assimilation is not the answer but naturalisation of politics. That would be a distinct thing and uderstanding, and leave out all stereotype language from real political cooperation and respect for ingenuity at this scale as is the EU. In Britain they tell their constiuencies how the EU operates, from a very old view of elite corporations and is only corporate, therefore they are not for people as in socio- economics. Hmm... The EU in 2018 is everywhere, even when you visit Social Security (in our Member State) in a remote place. That is not good according to exactly what law? If following the law of gravity it means that the EU and the apple are one and one should respect this formula. Or it's gravity. No, the UK is saying quite the opposite and that the apple can go back to the tree and lose gravity of pulling and speed. This writing was meant anecdotal and nothing makes sense here.

The political scrum in America over 1%.

1 November 2018

Who will win the next general election in the United States, when that happens? The Republicans, or the Democrats? It doesn't seem like a global issue just yet. According to the incumbent president, Mr Donald Trump, voting is an American issue, and so are most Democrat candidates thinking the same thing in their mind bubbles. It is a constant 'Our constituency,' or, 'Our frequency'. And this becomes louder each time you listen to the US election pitching by both sides. The President of the US goes the Spartan way, and who will be doing the Democratic Hellenism philosophy of what is good for the American people? This choice seems quite simple: where the Spartans divide (spoils?), Hellenism consolidates on a large scale. When former president, Barack Obama, was or became a first time black president in the US, some of that consolidation started well of at the  beginning, and then gradually was vaporized. And the American people felt left out of the politics in Washington again, while the global world was accelerating under Mr Barack Obama. Now this is all history, when you listen to the US President in 2018 more carefully. What the US is now hearing from this President is uniting America. And in the same stretch finding it not so hard to convince his voters for a next term in the White House would be the next best American thing for a global future. The US President cares about the future and his global leadership. But some know better and know that this is all due to charismatic talk and becoming more each day like the Roman emperor Nero Claudius Caesar. It's not meant to be cruel to the President, but rather a strange way to compliment him on his transformation.

The battle is now more real than ever in the United States between the Republicans and Democrats in the coming election. Again, what is the global issue here? "Vote, vote, vote!" This S.O.S. is coming close to the edge and the question of 'but what about the 1%?'. With the unemployment falling, and the economic rise by promille, aren't Americans already feeling the wind of change coming their way any time soon? But we must stop here and take a deep breath again, or perhaps even looking back on track records. The first battles were probably won, and the people chanted the President. It's only when you look at controversy something is not going right and might even get very wrong in the end, because the world is getting into a balance on all sides in their corners, which means that the President of the US will be needing a larger stretch where all this will fit in now and tomorrow. For example, like Europeans in the future, Americans will also need proper training and new skills. After all the economy is what working class people need the most, the world over, that this will be their way to participate and be inclusive as members of society or in their own communities. And this begs for national and international institutional care and concern. In some parts of the world this is already happening and in 2021 is expected to join the global vector economy. Income is the fibre to make the economic infrastructure great again. And you don't need to start at the top, but start first e.g. a small place like Spokane. It's not just the two major global businesses, Hollywood and the music industries, which btw are great and are making people feel greatful. But there are also meat & food industries, and normal living people. Where do they go at the end of the day? America needs change again .

Leadership always comes first, and man second.

13 October 2018

Where do we see this happening when leadership will be first in the world? The United States only have two choices, the Republicans and Democrats. The rest of mankind can have a dozen of other choices to pick from, mimicking formations of Labour, Conservatives and moderates. In some other parts of the world we can even see extreme contrasts to what the public in the west perceives as true leadership to lead the living world. But to put it simply, our world is changing and it will be putting in some new mechanisms by the year 2020, let's say by estimation. One ambition might be that leadership in the 21st century will have to match the mechanism outside a man- made world and putting in it's place an election of candidates to lead this animated new vision. That is the Republican way, from a US point of view. To most peoples in the world this vision is not a very realistic view and Democrats should capitalize on the chance to bid for a new change of leadership by then, in 2020. The grass has been cut, and cut, and cut again and again for too long now. And what is more confusing in our time everywhere in the world is the fact that no one understands why no one understands why a sophisticated world should still be looking for wealth, money, and income. What the mechanism will be dealing with is time and only time. A democrat, if elected president of the US, will know by what mechanism his leadership will put the space in his name, e.g. Michael Bloomberg, will then become M I C H A E L B L O O M B E R G, which gives a whole different meaning to 'the one man' that will be leading a very big world in time. Financial markets say that no one get's it what they are doing, let alone predict outcomes how the stocks rise and fall by every second or minute. They are even inviting people who have a theory to come forward. Where can a democrat president by 2020 make the difference and have the people still believing in the art of living?

My writings on the global future all on website cityoverthetop.yolasite.com:

1. From surface to sky, the surveyor
(From observations in the city of Rotterdam, Holland.)

2. We have been waiting for flexibility, porous and not yet set out in solidity.
Rosh Hashana, 10 September 2018

3. Global Fiction.
19 September 2018

4. The unknown industry of demographics in the 21st century.
1 October 2018

5. Industry and mobility.
4 October 2018

6.
What will hurt the British politicians and it's government is not the EU...
6 October 2018

7. Cohesion, or future projection (EU).
10 October 2018

8. Michael Bloomberg, former Mayor of New York, now Democrat President?

11 October 2018

9. Leadership always comes first, and man second.
13 October 2018

All writings on the subject 'the global future and engineering' were inspired by Dutch academic, Ms Maartje van Lieshout's work on Scale framing, field of agriculture (published on internet under her name- Amsterdam University)

Michael Bloomberg, former Mayor of New York, now Democrat President?

11 October 2018

In 2020 Mr Bloomberg will make his bid for the coming presidential campaign to run for Office as a democrat (not Republican). Destiny is calling for him from the sun to become the next US president as a Democrat. This announcement for the bid registration was made yesterday in an article by Bloomberg.com. Also, this was a surprise to any outsider in the world following Bloomberg.com news. Or, we do remember Mr Bloomberg distancing himself from big politics for some time now. But, here we are, and this time he will shine for the world one more time to follow the fortune of his presidential star and run for president in 2020. Here we are also seeing that his moment to run for president matches something else, e.g. the world we are now living in, especially with another prospect when England will leave the EU next year in March 2019. Mr Bloomberg will then be ready to organise and re- organise these two continents and the new start for Britain in another era of it's own without the both, the US and EU. Some expect some changes that will be coming to this very definite ending of a relationship from another century. If Mr Bloomberg would become the next US president in 2020, this would put him in a rather unique position as president. You don't need to be an orator for that to prove you understand who and where you are in the world in this century. What Mr Bloomberg will have to say is where the world will be going next as a peaceful and friendly nation of the world. He has the technological insight for this and he can also understand the world from where he stands (or will be standing in 2020). The world by definition doesn't do Hillary Clinton anymore, nor will it do another extension of more Republican triumph...

From a more poetic idea on Mr Bloomberg presidential bid one could say that the people will or would believe in him, to be the man to reconcile the dynamic world with it's leaders, and having these leaders understand a former ally (Britain). And that's what we need in the future in a US president, if poetic justice has anything to do with it. Back home or at home it looks like this reconciliation could go as far as to the hearts of the American people, that nothing is impossible once you set your mind to it. "If I can do it, so can you." And there is no one who would doubt the 'golden words' of Michael Bloomberg, running for becoming the next US Democrat President. And that is what it is all about in the future... When you're president? At the moment it is also all too early to suggest anything about this presidential race for the White House in 2020. "Can he do it? Yes, he can," continue the legacy of his predecessor, former Democrat President Barack Obama. Was that a good choice of comparison, one can ask. Maybe, if you think 'Healthcare', and not just global business and mega infrastructure global projects. Healthcare is deeply and hardcore politics in the US at the moment. Unemployment also can't be swept under a magnificent flamboyant colouring global carpet, even when everyone else believes the opposite will happen after Brexit. One can't help reading the 'bad news' on this subject, e.g. the IMF forecasts, or even Bloomberg.com articles on Brexit. When on top of the roof everything looks sunshine bright, what is looming below deck is more obscure and deeply ominous when looking at the world in today's window. And, yes, that may be so or true, but now we have another chance at the presidential run for Office in the US very soon! (Where chariots rise).

Industry and mobility.

4 October 2018

A simple battle formation gives you some idea what mobility and industry can have in common, in terms of model and scale. Doing so is to exclude the popular idea in our time what politics now call 'migration and immigration' problems, e.g. in Europe. In the military model a flank is ordered not only by command, but by the military and it's industry on the battlefield. An extraordinary thing occurs immediately when looking closer how this is instituted to move either forwards, sidewards or when recalled to retreat a few steps backwards. This formation is showing any spectator on the side, especially the commander in chief, how successful the plan goes, human and artillery. In economics what you see is logistics. The military logistics is telling you how this industry is operating on the field, when mobile, and when not and is back at base or barracks. It's from any time or point of view 'normality' as long as we can remember warfare and it's history. In relation to the present time society is not moving any different, when highly organised. Every citizen, man, woman, child, and home pet or in the field, are now logistics and part of the industry at home. Call it what you want, the economics, social industries, or existing industries. Our world is running it's systems in a highly organised fashion and manner and is doing so by planning and pure calculations, this is always from global engineering systems. It's command is indisputable, what is misinterpreted as tyrannical. This interpretation is now costing the world an unclear loss of revenue, where another misinterpretation will suddenly appear and it won't disappear, and staying for emotional intelligence and ways in most humans.

There is no particular reason for looking at industry and mobility of humans in terms of logistics, unless it has already been done, e.g. by the World Bank. This is a mere experiment on a personal basis, for example when looking at 'real migration' of peoples and not understanding why it is so disrupting in the 'industry of society's battle formations'. Perhaps, and most carefully, we should go back to Waterloo 1816 and imagine our society on the battlefield, highly organised, and formatted as a military force to defeat the enemy. Our common enemy in 2018 are not Napoleonic armies! It isn't about that alone how one is perceiving our world and it's impossible ways for economic growth, on an equal basis as top five banks in the world. The relevance of this idea here in this writing is trying to find a reason for imbalances one could easily say that this is because of the displaced peoples who 'broke away' from their formations at home when they thought that their society was organised. Disruption in another flank is confusing and in the military sense highly disruptive, if not a stronger word by confused sentiments. In no military there is any flank prepared, while facing the enemy, how to deal instantly with disruption within their own flanks. That would always mean a battle already lost, if the enemy catches the whiff of confusion on his side. It is this 'whiff of confusion' our world is catching and it is causing a complete standstill at some levels in the global industries of living and life timelapses. Mobility and industry can only go hand in hand if logistics of humans and animals are one flank or in battle formation to face the world. The question is, how do we get to this highly organised way of living in the 21st century if no particular attention is being paid to change society into a wide scale industrial, mobility and logistics- human and animals- format (of it's own, attitude, temperament and nature)?

7 September 2018

From surface to sky, the surveyor

(From observations in the city of Rotterdam, Holland.)

What is more earth- bound than population density area surveying (area engineering). It always is referring to basic human memory and natural points and angles. Experts say that you should look around you and determine what it is that you see, or how much environment and space it is that you can absorp in terms of seconds and minutes. Science is telling a whole different story: what people can tell about their environment is set out only in life span, extension of time or human miles.
Another part of the human expert at a longer longitude introduces to the environment a very simple idea of planning areas for industry or a small range of industries, next to residential areas where public space is every day utility. (e.g. Rietdijk, Charlois, Rotterdam) They are putting two magnitudes side by side, but one seen from 'open space area' and the latter seen from 'incidental space' (set out in units). Historically it isn't simple when this particular 'mode of thinking and planning' is suggesting many decades of similar or even the population's 'own experts' view and construction sentiments out in the field and land (sub & di)vision.
This is how we see our environment almost 24 hours per day for a whole year and never understand why fixed points never change or transform at the same rapid rate of consumption, that is now transformed into global consumption.

Litterarly it means that whoever builds environment and public place as the here above 'model' knows how to build according to city planning from the angle only view, or what one can call in more popular terms the point of reference, earth's surface or sky. It is also conceptual from the most ardent observer, which by definition is non scientific. It is perhaps the old sentiment of observing the story of planning and construction in the general sense in city planning or residential planning. Old, because it is built from standard angle and cleverly splitting of time, area and space. (Dutch scale framing?) Inhabitants only occupy the 'pedestrian space' adjacent to roads orderly arranged for usage of highways and roads in both areas as one congestion. Globally this is known as the planet's living space. But the future is also somber when you turn around and have a peek over your shoulder at what is the present time and to ad this to the new eras ahead, and question the ability of all city planners whether they will be able to transform city and it's people in not only new standards of living, but also pitching towards a more earthbound transmission line and how to deal with increasing numbers of people in densed living areas. The city is sublime when seen from earth and sky transmission lines and surface flatness. Will the human mechanism also completely adapt by that time to a more inbound view of his/ her environment, incidental or wider open space?

(1. For more reading on the subject go to  Basic surveyor of construction surveying;2.Research, part of a Special Feature on Scale and Governance
Do Scale Frames Matter? Scale Frame Mismatches in the Decision
Making Process of a “Mega Farm” in a Small Dutch Village )

World Cup 2018 dreams are over for England.

12 July 2018

Croatia beat England last night with 2-1 in extra time at Luzhniki Stadium in Russia. I don't know about you, but for me World Cup 2018 is over. I was very inspired by this England squad and had big dreams about them going through the final, to meet France this sunday 15 July. This inspiration wasn't just a thrill or freak act of sudden interest to see and believe in an England win at the World Cup. I could see that the squad was too young and make it to the final this time, although at moments it had been possible, especially after young Trippier's opening goal of the match last night. Supporting England in this tournament was to outsiders and not being English it gave you some of that good feeling about sportmanship and that made you simply feel good and cool. 28 Or more years you're a World Cup Soccer home spectator and then finally see England coming near at close range (so to speak) to the final isn't just a dream, I would say. It is a long lost love and seeing him or her back many years later in life. Because of this inspiration I transformed the Piccadilly Circus completely to a state of the art citysquare sight and called it the artistic view. Maybe to make that strange statement of possibillities how to build things, England going through the semi final and losing heroically by 2-1 from Croatia, and yes, the Piccadilly Circus if the future in England will now change it's meaning to the world and change it's old public square from curious to fascinating as a nation. This English squad really deserves to be called the three lions and for all they have inspired the fans all over the world to experience a stunning excitement we will not easily forget. In two years, when I'm sixty four (song), I think that they will be ready for the European Championship in 2020. 2020 A long way still when seen from behind the time wall of England leaving the European Union in april 2019. What say  you, sir?

My innerleague: world cup 2018 final, Uruguay- England.

4 July 2018

I never thought on having an innerleague, but after last night's World Cup match between England and Columbia this had dawn on me the first time and I was unexpectedly weeping,or bleeding,  remembering the words of Basil Fawlty "Oh, I'm so happy," when Lord Melbury borrowed 250 pounds from him. Both, it was the paradox of living in great expectations and now finally realizing that the England Squad had it all along in them to win a penalty shoot- out, and by making outstanding and also impossible saves in one night and perhaps in seconds. Jordan Pickford has done the impossible in Spartak, Russia, last night. Yes, we are living almost two decades later since dreaming about getting England into the QF. It isn't a joke now and the feeling of letting England perish since you're impatient waiting for so long, that too seems today like the longest distant memory. I admit I abandoned England and thought that 'caning was too good for them', at one point. (Quote from Monthy Python's Life of Brian) I actually found myself crying last night and thought why is this happening to me, unless a new moment's born for England's soccer team came to the illuminated 'thing' we call life? This also became the moment where you're thinking or saying, "Why did it take England so long to get here?". And then a bold answer followed: because it is now all possible with players like Jord Pickford... (Quote: UK newspaper today The hand of Jord) But Sweden will also be bold and beautiful. And they are in some 'deep senses' more experienced players compared to the young generation in the English squad. What can this mean in soccer book of tactics and perspective technology? Young players have a tendency to climb up energetically against walls, while more experienced players play it down and cool, which can exhaust their opponents. This is to fans also difficult and almost like chosing which one you like better, the husband or the wife. I pray to God in unholy soccer terms and say, let's hope saturday at the Samara Arena stadium in Russia  that the England squad will be the wife. And good luck to both. No, actually that is not true...

The beautiful game, World Cup Soccer 2018.
(Personal op)
1 July 2018

OMG! What a beautiful match last night between Uruguay and Portugal. And what an unforgetabble moment of Mr World Cup Ronaldo and Edinson Cavani together on the pitch when they walked off like real teammates on the same team. Only it wasn't, because Ronaldo totally belongs to Portugal, while Cavani, goal scorer of the night, wholly belongs to the Uruguay team. Uruguay has played beautifully and introduced throughout the second half some interesting new characteristics to the beautiful game with special (glow and gloss?) effects. You have to see this match again and watch the butting (of the ram?) near to earth or Fisht ground surface by one of Uruguay's players during in the heat of the match. Again, omg! It was very enjoyable on the other side of the world seen from Fisht Stadium, Sochi in Russia. You couldn't help thinking this was real football and how it should really be played by big teams in a world cup. It was less stressful, near quarter final... Yeah right, you will not experience any stress at all! But now we can relax and wait until the QF and watch Uruguay again on friday, 6 july, against the second big team, France. Could Uruguay win again? It is between the two ends (one being quite extensive when seen from WC height) in this match if you would toss a coin. Edinson Cavani is now the man of the moment and he really deserves to be proud of his team. Portugal also was beautifully locked in this world cup soccer match with Uruguay embrace and Cristiano Ronaldo equally deserves the olive branch throughout this World Cup for superb sportiveness e.g. that he demonstrated last night in Fisht Stadium holding and supporting Mr Cavani getting off the field. A real gentle giant and the people love him for it. Let's hope Cavani will be able to play again after last night's (knee?) injury. How I forgot (15 years) how to be this excited about the World Cup! I am now again and have to thank last night's match for this. I am rooting for Uruguay and this seems like a long way in a greater way when World Cup Final is gold. In every sense for every world cup soccer player.

What do you give up & what do you keep when you know that you're not going to make it in the real world?

26 May 2018

I don't think that we have worked out just yet why getting here was the easy part and the hardest was never where you started. Day one, in terms of futuristic views of the world, is the one image too you will remember for the rest of your living android time once you're on board in the larger parts on the planet. It is the stop sign you will also see last... In terms of human memory, when you look behind and see what it is that you're leaving, it is a relief to start a new day and way in the 'heartland' of this new futuristic era. Your living memory turns ice cold almost in an instant. Up here the paternal line is saying 'I am a bridegroom to my family'. And you will understand these words, one, as your first real home, and secondly it is a privilege standing in a place with only the passing clouds to see and touch if they were close enough. Leaving what you give up was worth to sacrifice as your sacrificial lamb and this is also what you know almost immediately, that you will never return to what you're leaving behind you. That is the last time you ever had the human instinct of being and seeing the world as it was in your daydreams time. Day two and now you're told that here is where all the 'how to keep it Banks' are fully operational, on a 24/7 basis, and which one will be your first time tier X/Y experience and testing. Toast! All for one and one for all. But, keep it in mind that marriage is not part of the deal and you will never be able to create a paternal line among your peers. Do you remember how to get out of here?

Total number of countries around the world: 195, if Taiwan would be part of the official counting. Total number of currencies in the world currently: 180 (British pound old from 8th century on). Total number of world and populations currently in 2018: 7.6 billion people. Mainstream economics at world level: cosmopolitism versus world- state.

28 April 2018: koningsdag in the Netherlands.

(Error: Today, 27 april 2018 is koningsdag in the Netherlands. Not 28 april 2018)

27 April 2018

The annual celebration of Koningsdag in the Netherlands will be tomorrow on 28 april. Some are looking forward to this event in the same way e.g. England is looking forward on Queen Elizabeth II's day when celebrating her birthday. Others across the whole country, known as the biggest 'Oranjefans', will always make sure that rain or shine it won't be a day without dancing, drinking and singing in honour of Your Royal Highness, King Alexander, accompanied by Queen Maxima and their daughters. What has changed in Holland on kingsday? There is even a new mood of non historic day to celebrate this day in the rest of the land, when people can't see if there is any political connection 'in it for them' as they remember from previous decades, when Queens day did bring high momentum to the people in every corner in Holland and they celebrated in the manner as we know from liberation day in many history books, whether in Europe, Australia or the US. In the year 2018 big segments of the Dutch Society at large are feeling socially disconnected, and not only from Koningsdag, but also from politics. We have learned from the EU(France Member State) that the future, for the coming next two or three decades, will have to keep working on a closer union between Member States, more even than we now know today. It is probably a Christian sentimental thing to say, but serving two masters is and always will remain unfamiliar to countries with deep fundamental Christian values, as many think of countries such as Germany, France, Denmark and Holland. Who do we, the citizens of the European Union, celebrate more?

Tomorrow, somehow, we can be sure that this Koningsdag will also not be without a Royal Jester, even when invisible to the whole country. It is an interesting thought if we could find out what things he might have to say about celebrating King Alexander's birthday in good spirit and happiness, that after all he is the King of the Netherlands and all peoples living as citizens of Holland. And, what might say he, the Royal Jester? It might be something about memory... For money is less, if wisdom has anything to do with one's faith and the fate of kings, or queens. There is one crown for the head, and one for the heart of every king and queen. Yes, and that too... Ah, but where can it be found when invisible? They all seek it here, and they seek it there... It is here in all majesty, blue as the sky, red as vermillion, green when emerald, and yellow when the living are joyful and gay. And he wears his mask, and rattles with his bells, and the public are expecting with this Royal Jester's jingling bells, that time will yet change again and discontinue to go from iron to iron in the short term future. It is perhaps our only thought that need sharing as a union of people with people, and maybe, Koningsdag is a better day than any other, yes, and who knows! The world does love a mystery no one will ever be able to solve or expose to the larger public. We refer to 'one day' that might be different, if memory is still our true companion in human nature. Tomorrow on 28 april 2018, let's keep this melancholy Royal Jester just away for a longer while, for his theatrical tears are of no use to the people who are in the mood to celebrate their King's birthday, in a sort of goodwill manifesto?

Italy 2018.

(SO small observation)

6 February 2018

"It's the economy, stupid." That would be the easy part to say, to any outsider, who has been listening and following Italy's last election results, on monday 5 March yesterday. Where it gets more difficult visualizing the real problems political Italy will be facing forming a new government, that won't be accessible for some time to come. We all want to see in every EU Member State what we want to see, it is about the dominant side of effects and projections on different political issues. Italy is fed up and they won't be bothered very much living up to this act. But what is really the bottom line here, after sunday's election in Rome? One thing is clear, the real voice in Italy before the national identity crisis after Matteo Renzi's resigned from Office, isn't quite what outsiders can follow. When everything goes according to the political or election playbook nothing is really going wrong here. Also the electorate doesn't care much for a big political victory. Italy is Italy. This much only is very clear. Any deeper view and good luck someone should try to look in the Fountain of Youth for answers this country needs badly. The younger generation, as any other EU country, or close neighbouring Member States, Germany is one such close neighbour, isn't just ready to participate in the greater political process that is ongoing in Italy right now. They are not making any difference either compared to their peers in the rest of the EU. Only the centre left or right can or could create something of a format that would suit Italy better as soon as they have formed a government. Wonderful, the sky above is blue and no one really understands why every one is celebrating in the political arena, if there is no real effect.

What about past success, for Italy and it's politicians? Again you're looking at this in the wrong way. Success was never an extension of the real Italy where home- base political life had never left the cycle of small businesses and economic thrive. That was pure luck for a very long time. And now that seems to be running out or thin at the pace with which polilticians would want to move on and become 'great again'. Actually here is where this never ending story still ends. And what can we expect to see in the future, let's say in the short term? Is Italy truly done with any possible long term prosperity (intellectual and economics)? Technocrats are not feeling chic anymore and they are leaving it up to the general mood and how this will impact the country very soon. Then they will see what they can do, to put it simply. Italy may be looking out for the monsters of the sea, cynically, and say it may bring them the inspiration they need to rule again. The other reality is Italy as a sovereign country needing political religious clerks who would have the humility to unite the people of Italy once more again, as praying for a miracle they can then say it was answered by God Almighty. Or go secular and follow the meteorite economics of the world. One could try asking if Italy is good at following ominous signs that only blurr their sky. On science these can be top politicians and stay very high profile if needed. On respectability this is also not a fantasy. They are doing quite well as top designers and have sophistication as their inbred and this is worldwide known. Can Italy confidently say there is no real loss of face during the chaos of not 'knowing how to form government' in Real Time? A novel democracy is entertaining enough, but an internet democracy is unknown of what this would mean in the long term for Italy. Brexit or the EU make their own projections and Italy for now at least is hanging on in a lazy haze of political winter. Poverty will be treated with contempt. And nationally this will make strange headlines in the national or local newspapers. Italy is no more opulent. Only Mr Silvio Berlusconi who is trying too hard.

Feeling outsourced? Long term, short term, the end is the same. There is no next moment to create a system outside the system.

1 February 2018

Outsourcing is one thing but what it will never be is an advertising campaign. It won't be considered good advice either, this is how to put all the energy capacity to some good use, and innovate or envision where the next idea will come from and go. Best way to handle the geometry of outsourcing is perhaps by finding the starting point, unto the next line and from there try again for the new line of productivity and so forth. That would be short term dynamics. Where it does get harder is with a long term perspective without ending to outsourcing. Size is possibly a handicap when you are trying to fit in, but certainly not getting back inside from the system that has outsourced you in the first place. Or is it? Getting back would open new ways for you, unlike the previous ones these will be both a relief and new pressure. Is it also period bound, the nature of the contract and outsource? These are difficult magnitudes in each different case, personal, private or bigger than one particular size... Mechanisms are not designed to solve problems with outsourcing, which is the hardest thing if you are trying to work on the problem. You can't stay forever in the 'solution factory' and thinking you're only phasing out. What does the public know about outsourcing, industrial, economics, socially or other? It is politically easier to fight the injustice at a broader scale in life, than e.g. it is for being outsourced and being at a definite end. This is telling you also how you should try dealing with the reality that we are living in, and on the plus side you have to find your own 'live- situation' somewhere in between the two realities. Where is this fiction writing trying to take you? It goes everywhere, because it is also to find all around the world, if not the possibility to make things happen or simply put it out.

But you will be getting back, or face sudden death in time. Which btw only means that you have ceased to be alive as a magnitude, but continue to go on physically or naturally. Outsourcing is very much the same as the natural law. Both have the same impact on your live- business and continuity as they impose two laws on your well being: the present time and every living moment. Otherwise you can only be dead. "We desperately need new vision," is another way of saying how bad things got for you. But finding a new system or magnitude, that could be more interesting, when you are on Mars. Our earth system has only one mainstream that is a global network. Sit and pray in solitary on a rock like the fool on the hill won't impress the world either. And each and every minute passing this is getting more difficult and not easier. The longer the phase out is taking you, the harder you will find your way back into the mainstream. It does look similar to logic, only it isn't. What can one do after the outsourcing? On your way out you have never got a list with the dos and donts, saying what risks you can't take or mistakes you can expect to make. And then when you are on your own it is fantasy time, and it isn't because you will try any fantasy. Falling back on your human side it will exhaust you endlessly to become human again. You will have to reinvent your own human self and existence to find ground again where you are standing or falling. Outsourcing doesn't do grace nor triumph. Stay in and be instrumental and subject to these laws, go out and stay human or start acting upon social policies. When nothing written as here above applies to you let's be grateful. Otherwise you are in for the long term and subject to natural law and control.

What is the world getting wrong on the Holocaust?

28 January 2018

World remembrance day of the Holocaust was yesterday and sunday today in most parts of Europe. This is a shared moment by thousands of people who march the streets or just walk quietly in most major capitals of the continent, but also in Britain. Today these are the capitals also fighting for existence, or sovereignty e.g. Brexit. A peaceful demonstration of the remembrance day isn't what it used to be when globalization became the new world order and start the world all over again with renewable energy and esteem for the G7 and G20 countries. Prosperity was a promising outlook and confidence was boosting faster than money, back then. It was good for money and the world. In the year 2018, many decades later, now it seems, that not many are as confident anymore as when they first took off in the greatest and greater adventures no one had held possible ever before. Somehow that is what inspires nations to learn from past mistakes, when improvement goes wrong. Economies are at a extreme low compared to the wealthiest of nations, and there are noises of poverty everywhere coming through this fallen empire or new world order, and echoing loud enough to the skies, with a big question mark why? What are they doing wrong in the world and why are so many economies now underperforming when first they were slowly coming out of the woods, and face the sun of globalism radiance? Latin America is one such example. The Holocaust remembrance day doesn't seem to ad up to the here above. Many now feel as if they went back in time and that the 1930ties (deep frustrations) somehow are coming back. It is what is human behaviour when prosperity has changed it's face and many go from high to low, sometimes in an instant. Next to homelessness the march of the Holocaust is right when quietly passing through...

What most people are getting wrong about globalism is that this isn't our real world, just yet. From top to bottom often the failure is about lack of transparency and accountability, that this was what globalization first introduced to avoid anyone staying behind in time and change. About four decades later the human history in the 21st century can either ask why was globalism wrong, but then do the brave thing by also asking what it did right. When watching the EU and Brexit negotiations coming and going for the last 20 months, the public seems to think this is happening on the background in the bigger picture and it will not make any difference to ordinary lives and livings. Politicians have failed to explain to their citizens that all had been changed fundamentally with the new world order. At a higher level politicians are also failing to explain about how transparency and accountability have gone to a wider network and control to keep our national and international securities tight locked from 'foreign invasion' by and from any kind. What do we still believe in could be the next thing on the planet that was better to ask today rather than tomorrow, if today technologies might catch up fast and keep track with human intelligence rather than another alien kind of Artificial Intelligence. What would ask some how has the Holocaust being relevant to all this? To be polite one must answer this question by saying, that is the whole point. Humanity has a universal face and that is what we must remember every day in life today. Genocide can come flying from just anywhere, so to speak, and turn lives unpside down in a coma of alienation to all living things. Or worse when for the most poorest across many big and small places in the world. And, nothing is stopping them to keep on a bright future as the most promising new way for the new generations. Outsourcing can also just be anything.

The Jewish nation feels penalized against this background of falling democracies and economies. Right and wrong get's entangled on a wide scale and not many can withold the storm from within when enraging. Anti- Semitism is fading like intellectualism to a very deep low and no good answer is to find at the moment of why our universal law was built this way. Why is human behaviour always prone to repetitiousness and is also recalcitrant? The problem is much deeper than being Jewish in our world today.

People are allowed to change their mind on important issues. That is democracy...

20 January 2018

If there is any changing of minds and hearts with another referendum on Brexit, no one knows right now. The institution of democracy, e.g. in Britain, can provide answers in difficult times, when one answer is that the right of voters can be respected if they so wish or call for and have another go at the deal of leaving the EU. Where all the confusion starts and ends comes with political parties, one being the hardliners of Brexit, the other is Labour, in my opinion or to my impression, who wants a 'good deal' when leaving the EU. Democracy is not marketware, it is not merchandise, and also it can not accommodate any big political game. The way that the Speaker of the House, Mr John Bercow, has put it today in the newspaper The Guardian, is the one platform no one speaks of when defending their ambition for Britain. Both parties are dealing with an outcome that is calculated and much of it is also discriptive, rather than politics and the right of voters in Britain. Democracy has extensive meanings when it is serving the right and just rules in government and balance. Why play games with it when it has the greatest of answers throughout time anywhere in the world, if and when it sets roots? What Labour wants, what the Conservatives want, want and a maximum of want, while it ends up with strange deals, e.g. Mr Macron, President of France's offer on borders in Calais. 44.5 Mln is strange, but 44.5 Billion is serious security. And that is the difference of true alliance.

Democracy in Mr Bercow's view one presumes that this is a timeless factor of life as we have come to know it. Where this view is not shared are in countries where a regime is confined by one term at the time, thus making it impossible to bring about change or any other changes of human behaviour. Let's not name- drop any specific region or country here. That is not the point. On the outside Labour is the champion of the people for decades long, despite it's spendings and borrowing economics. On Brexit they don't seem to get it right either when speaking of democratic rights of the people. Democracy does not need to reverse anything, at least not in an offer that is better than that of the other party. When it gives back the right to people to decide on the future of Britain they will do so by free will and intelligently. And when saying it is intelligently, yes, how some fail to understand people being in constant threat of losing their jobs and security in life when not being in a job. Poverty or mismanagement across the country sharpens the need of people, and making it a thing of constant debate. Government is only hearing from all this in a different stage. Brexiteers want the same thing and to make it a success when leaving the EU in good peace and cooperation... Like Corporal Jones in Dad's Army, someone keeps shouting to the PM not to panic. In ten years time no one realises that all this will be completely over. Out there the world wants the future to be a new way of living in all global major big cities. Politics will be a thing of the past and considered very much of a relic. World finances now has priestly powers and it will bring about the change it wants. How does Brexit fit in this story with limited visions of who is right and who is not in politics today?

So, what's the plan after UK cabinet reshuffle today?

8 January 2018

The PM must be thinking right now, 22:58 PM (England), about former education secretary, Ms Greening, leaving government, "Why, why, Delilah?". And that is as far as the song goes on this occasion tonight. Some say, mostly BBC and newspaper journalists, the reshuffle didn't go according to plan. Bloomberg.com has said the same thing in it's report at global level. The feeling is one of mixture and puzzling. Wasn't it the Prime Minister to empower her government amidst the crisis in which Brexit is coming down from a very rough ride since the referendum in june 2016? But from a distant sky the winds are traveling on a wide speed into Britain at the moment and no one knows if this will leave a critical time behind when it leaves again. In relation to the world, EU and country, this reshuffle will have to show it is capable of relationships within all three corners in the global sphere where we now live in. Between earth and sky it is you alone dancing through life, from now on as newly fresh ministers in a Tory cabinet. Once you have established yourself, the EU is on the other side waiting. As they are inexperienced and young ministers in this arena once they see live-animals coming on to the center in the political theatre of Westminster, the question is what they will do. Mrs May seems to be in the room with the new ministers in her cabinet and she is quietly singing, no not kumbaya, "These are a few of my favourite things," to calm down the nerves of her freshly picked team today.

Ms Greening and Jeremy Hunt have been coined this evening as the protesters of their appointed new posts, with Ms Greening quitting. Secretary Mr Jeremy Hunt stayed on in his old job as Health Secretary, with Social Care as another piece in his ministry. And this would not be the world of politics without crocodile tears from the people who comment on these articles in the newspapers. They will miss Ms Greening, as she will be remembered for her kindness and the respect with which she treated people. Also among these are some journalists. But she will stay on (or running) as an MP for Putney, Ms Greening wrote in a tweet on Twitter earlier on tonight. It is rather strange to hear about Ms Greening her refusal to become Secretary for Pensions & Work, and that she was ferociously defending her commitment as Education Secretary. It was what she strongly believed in after launching her Social Mobility Strategy, last month, that this would work in Britain or Brexit. No minister is less committed as soon as they are posted where they have been placed in. Work & Pensions is very hard work and 'cloud busting', but a Britain in motion up to Brexit is the place too for any minister with seniority in his/ her field, national and international, that this is not a post one should turn down, for the greater good of the country. So, that was it for today (now yesterday, time: 00:54AM). Day II of the reshuffle will be later on today and then the reshuffle show is over. Mr Jean Claude Juncker, EU topman, said yesterday about Brexit that no one should think it won't happen. Also, he said that the EU must abandon the concept of net countries and net recipients. How man sometimes underestimate his opponent is perhaps the most frail side of the human mind...

Expanding of jobs in Theresa May's government is following an invisible trail...

7 January 2018

Fact I: we are living in a modern world. To most world leaders that particular fact is twofold and are left with blueprints no one can access, except for the ministers in cabinet, this in Mrs May's government, the front bench with each their familiar faces to the rest of the world and public at large in the UK. This was news early in the morning in an interview with the PM on the Andrew Marr BBC One show, 09:00 AM. Bloomberg.com didn't say the reshuffle was scheduled for as soon as tomorrow, but said it will happen soon. It is rather sad to see where the Prime Minister is running government in termporary moments with equally temporary qualified people, who in turn seem to wander around the political spectre like lost sheep in sceneries of their own makings without ever questioning the real goals of this government. Nothing becomes clear to the outsider, or indeed the people who put their trust or vote in elected people to be their parliamentary representatives. Mrs May is convinced she will install a better team of young ministers this time. How to understand politics in Britain today is another 'big' story we rarely see it's true face. It is true that Education Secretary Ms Justine Greening isn't inspiring enough, or at least show the right face in a country when it is going through transition and how dealing with a great difficult time to establish more diagnostic approach to education in Britain and what it really needs. Ms Greening was better at being the Transport Secretary, good or bad on trajectories. Many have blamed her gender neutral policies or iniatives on her chosen life style, or suggested that the minister wasn't objective enough on certain issues, yet too sensitive in some areas and communities in Britain. But then again, we are living in the 21st century.

If Mrs May's government needs another makeover, or mini reshuffle, this time it will look like the Prime Minister is looking for a quick medicine to heal the sick and wounded in her cabinet. Throughout these historical backgrounds in which parliament is operating it's political business, something is dying out here. The temp thing isn't making Mrs May looking good as leader of the government and country. What does Britain want from their government and Prime Minister almost 20 months after the referendum in june 2016? The same question will be asked in 2021, when the government can actually look back on five years from 2016 on. All depending how Labour and the Tories will cross the political Charon river Styx from the shores of life in the EU back to Britain, hoping by then they can be purged and blessed to reach Elysium. A new time and more diverse. In EU territories it is better not to collide but averse collision, emphasizing broader cooperation peacefully and avoid to invoke partners to ambivalence within Europe and outside the European Union. This alone could make Britain strong and give it the God given strength they alone know best how to live up and rise to the occasion. The only thing to hope for with this reshuffle is a government able to succeed and stay as long as four or five years on. It will then look back on a remarkable achievement in the world, that here is looking at you kid and we did the impossible. How many people outside believe in Brexit? (Not necessarily supporting Brexit) That is one thing the May government must be looking for in a serious way, and not mouth to mouth advertising, the Jerry Mcguire style. "Hug me, I'll kill for you, stay with me, please?" Between past & now and the short future (2021), what Britain is looking for is a strategic centre and minister for Diverse (not diversity). Ridiculous to even go this way out of the EU? Not if you have first tried it, the place where Britain is right now.

One such blinding effect of Brexit is starting at points and junctions.

30 December 2017

The year 2018, starting in about 48 hours or even less, is an inspiration to most parts in the world and it's vast populations. We might even come to see demographics shiftings causing landslide changes across many countries and their societies. Everyone is hoping to see the same thing will happen overhere in Europe and neighbouring country Brexit. So far, as is with Brexit the case, we have seen a May government surviving the most horrible hours since it came to power. Power in adversity is a rare quality for and to any governing body as the government. And survival is one such virtuous proof, that when all is leading towards adversity one must be able to show opposition with just strength and belief in one's true identities. In political Brexit that would be either the Tory Party or Labour. On another aspect of Brexit the year 2017 will also take home with it the relic of how life was for Britain when being in the EU as a Member. This also meaning that life after the EU will never be the same again in Brexit. It is even logical to expect a more bureaucratic Britain exposure after it has left the EU, starting in March 2019 at 11 PM. The year 2018 must somehow bring about that inspiration to the national mind and become the guided system to work with from there and start all over again with a turning point (?) to create new relationships with 'old partners' in the EU, and outside. Labour is not inspired in the same way. In fact the Labour Party doesn't need inspiration next to Brexit in another Britain, the one everyone in the world knows of in the 21st century. In short, Brexit is the unwanted child by the Labour Party, because it's condition is wrong for life in British politics and welfare. It has spasm? (Word used by Mr Adonis, Labour minister who resigned yesterday)

But aren't we an interconnected world? The EU too is facing extraordinary strain in it's establishment over Brexit as the new relation and partner for the Member States. Once you get that fixed inside memory it won't be hard to see why this is the impossible and difficult thing to do, yes, even for the EU. If it will happen on both sides everyone is expecting to see complexity and a system that will work, without the time and chance of being first flight tested on symmetry. What can we expect that will happen when it breaksdown as soon as the first second of Brexit in March 2019 will start in? To the public it is hard to imagine the size of Europe at the moment. In a fantasy we can imagine a lot more in free style and say that in a few decades time the EU grew immeasurably big and that when something like Brexit happens it doesn't have a spare wheel to change tires on this juggernaut. The Brexiteers do not share this sentiment with the EU and also they don't consider it to be their problem. Brexit is their primary problem and they are dramatically swimming in their own pool of blood. In a tweet last week by Mrs Margot Wallstrom, Sweden Foreign Relation minister, the question was put forward to the Union and the answer was astonishing, that these are not people who are afraid of new technology, but they are of old technology. Is Brexit comfortable with old technology? It looks as if the EU will not. And that may be in a lot of things to them. Last question: what is deep cooperation by definition in Brexit (Britain leaving the EU)?

The latest on Brexit could end up in satire...

10 December 2017

On friday, 8 December, the EU and Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, in Brussels said in a joint statement that a breakthrough in talks was reached, or agreed. Today on the Andrew Marr show Mr David Davies, Brexit Secretary, has said something else (rather intelligent), that the 'breakthrough' was not binding, (de facto?). A sigh of relief... No, because if there was no agreement it will be like walking into one door (front) and walking straight to the next door (back) out of the talks. Ireland and the Northern Ireland team of experts, seen from a distant land, one could only think that they weren't unhappy about the 'breakthrough', if certain issues were to be respected on all sides. First you break the piece into three pieces, and by some XMas magic you glue the pieces back together, but only in a different order or in the reverse, clockwise or against clockwise. We are lucky to live in the 21st century, all depending from which end you were looking out on the whole Phase I saga. In the meantime the EU had bigger things on it's mind on friday, e.g. signing a deal/ agreement on trade with Japan (Swedish Minister, Mrs Cecilia Malmstrom). The International world needs indeed to go forward and do this by having a new world vision, and if we're very lucky to do this the peaceful way. Peace comes from Statesmanship, as one founder of the EU once said about the European Union that it is to advance peace for countries and peoples. (Rough translation) Trade, in my opinion, is secondary even when it's the embodiment of the entire living world and planet and standing as trillion dollars multinationals in the global sphere from the US to Japan, India, China and more. Mrs Malmstrom is right about the EU is now the new global leader.

Where does all this leave the British people after the world unites on these new agreements? Well, let's not pretend we have invented politics or economics. All G7 and G20 countries can tell you about the world and Trade. (And banking too) Much in our time is indicating that in the near future what to expect from globalization countries, places where economies transformed in the last decade from third world economies to global players, are now  offering vast pieces of land to build productivity and developments. Brexit should welcome the human race and join the rest of the 21st century countries... Hmm, not quite. According to the latest, the British Prime Minister is unable to become one big player in the global arena, if e.g. the trade deal with the EU would fail. "I love my uncle, he taught me good, man, he taught me all I know, he taught me so well, I left him laying by the side of the road." (Song lyrics by Dino Valente 'Me and my uncle') Perhaps we're staring in the wrong direction all along, and maybe what we should be looking at is the EU. Two weeks ago they came up with the EU Defence Deal, and two weeks later their next magic trick was the trade deal signed with Japan. A giant walk for mankind done in two weeks time, wow! Sometimes I wonder what it is that we're missing to hear or see here. It isn't surely the heavy snowfall today across many countries in Europe. Hooray for the children to play outdoors! Mrs May will not come to play outside with the EU, because there isn't any game to play. In the 21st century it should be considered a political correctness to keep the world in one piece, again by addressing the nations on a new world peace order for the future. It's a small step for one man/ woman. And that is understandable, if you're an ordinary citizen and cannot do the same as world leaders can do?.. Thank God Almighty for having world leaders to think with sagacity instead!

Let there be peace for the world and it's future first among nations, and secondly let there be a prosperous way to get there by the same nations. Brexit is still England, the England we have known for so long (the Geneva Convention 1954) as leader of the western world, sovereign (military) and parliamentary (academic & democracy). There is no need for Mrs May to crumble with Braxton (Brexiton) and Hicks pains or pangs in government, does she?

Level I; Britain's industrial strategic plans cityscape or fantasy skylines?

30 November 2017/ 20:55 PM

This UK government, one can say, is wide alseep and it is therefore not seeing what is already there in front of them, e.g. if London is the world's biggest financial hub. If you want to find the glasses on your head, and having the whole of parliament looking for a set of expensive glasses, who can come in and tell the Prime Minister that it is on your head, Prime Minister? Having been part of the EU over forty years by own request in the seventies is a good clue and is now becoming the sans solvant glue of the deal today when leaving the EU for good. What happens when you join the Club Country and then suddenly you change your mind on your membership? That means the Club Country is losing you as a client. And after a while it settles down on you, that London does have the infrastructure built a few decades ago to be in big business or the G7. But unlike the Club Country with the privileges that come with it, the EU only set it's price higher each year, practically keeping it on the Membership to walk in- and out freely from Brussels to London, and vice verse. Call me foolish or sentimental, but with privileges cometh the money, or am I wrong here?.. London is a world financial hub, or it isn't. It is time to understand this from a Brexit point of view, which is something close to coming back from the future, only this time in real time and not in a movie where the idea is mad. Mrs May wants to see a 'fairer England' and is looking for new ways with the neighbors in mainland Ireland and Northern Ireland, but more she is looking a lot more closer at her friends. Only, she is not Michael Corleone.

Okay, let's face it: is Level I in her industrial planning to change Britain going to work, if let's say someone is kind enough to tell Britain's industrial planners where the PM's glasses are 'hidden'? London is a cosmopolitan city and it has been for decades. It will cost the engineer lot's of imagination if he wants to put in place another cityscape or skyline much closer to Brexit's expectations, but it will be right through the middle of an already very busy place like London. Not to say expensive. Politics in Britain under this picture is drowning fast underwater. One thing is sure: business did make Britain richer and it's political mass of millions, counted in votes, walking the ghostwalk on it's own in politics. Is there any hope to go back to the political roots of a 'real' parliament and government in Britain? Brexit is offering exactly that aspiration, so they say. In real time we are then looking at a Brexit with a nostalgia for nineteenth century politcs, which is impossible, whilst at the same time it is very much possible that Brexit will bring some sort of heartbeat back into what is assumed to be the real government. If the earth at least can remember when Britain did see itself in the mirror for the last time before walking away to more distant shores of sand and beach shining in gold dust. (Or, was it stardust? Best find the meaning here: "Stardust Dragon", is the rival of "Blue-Eyes White Dragon".) The best level for Level I can only be found in limitation, because of what privileges in politics offer government and people 'in the eye of the storm' when the tempest arrives. No doubt economics is Brexit's first meaning and keeping this a fixed point if they want to hold on to the future sky and earth in Brexit. It won't be empty. Of that you can be very sure. LevelII?

EU Military Expansion in smaller details...

17 November 2017/ 15:03 PM

It is almost certain that the public, EU nations, will say 'what is the point?', when they read the news on the EU Defense deal, signed earlier this week in Brussels by 23 Member States. The public thinks very practical and in terms of our time in this century, and not 18th or 19, or in fact 20th century. Globalization and it's step sister the European Union, have turned the world and it's audience in a new generation who believe more in Iphones and smartphones, trendy glasses/ spectacles and shoes to go along with their time and education, than they would believe in a treaty of EU Defense anno 2017. But the shores of the future are far reaching and the imagination is catching up fast, and also among the eastern nations. Europe of course is first in most changes it is undertaking or undergoing, e.g. Brexit. Thus in fact military expansion anno 2017 isn't the most illogical thinking, let's say, if e.g. that time would change and trouble a mind of nations or one nation against the world's leading nations, who with a historical advantage of scientific progress and historical setting lasting as long as this age can remember. And not many can claim this position or disposition (the nature of things), we have learned to see on earth. The treaty was an important step, even when it lacked in detail a small matter of mandate, and to be more specific, actually by whom. In short, Europe didn't go to war again as in years before in the 18 & 19 th century. Under supervision by several countries this was restrained to a minimum of two major wars, instead of ten major wars, in theory or argument by logic. And, of course, by result of wars when treaties were made necessary.

Is that good when the EU decides to have a deal made up and signed by 23 Member States in the year 2017, most of it being an independent view from actual war and necessity? Fundamentally the public might think that maybe they're missing something here. The EU is a union of Member States and it's main business is politics and economics. Beyond this point it only get's more confusing to members of the public, and no one will understand what and where the EU Defense deal will ad value to their unemployment or lack of opportunities within the European Union. This could turn into a very hot political and diplomatic debate, if the European Union can't find the smaller prints in the deal to ad, like any other citizen in the European Union, more value to the future generation and prosperity expectations, but keep on paying heavily into the Defense budget of the EU, almost tributary. The ECB promises very little on change in prospects for this prosperity. A defense deal within the EU isn't the problem, one should think. But then what could be, in small print, today unseen and tomorrow this suddenly changes everything secure into insecurity? It is simple and plain, confusion. Historically Europe knows confusion is the one thing no time or era was able to deal with, and not even the smallest, like the throwing of a stone through a glass window... And then suddenly the military seal turns to bloodthirsty and is a hydra gone mad or loose/ out of control.

It can only be a good thing when the EU comes back in december at the end of this year and discuss the EU Defense Deal again.

Sexual harassment: global crisis 'who came first out'.

29 October 2017

With no particular reference of importance many have learned in the year 2017 and in the month October about a new global crisis, of who came first out to tell on sexual harassment in Hollywood, the media and now this week also in Britain at high level in Westminster. The public can only hear of names, at face value. But in fact the problem is a global crisis when it concerns parliamentary establishments and private industries. Is this a starting point of something no one has heard of before? Respectability is on trial and the witnesses are cueuing- up in high numbers around the world to join the theatre of disgrace and publicity over these allegations. Sexual harassment has never been exposed at such high global level. Basically not many in the public know the real importance of women coming out first now to speak out, some even among them are names we in the public never associate with 'female disadvantages' (e.g. in the third world) in a man's global world. In the UK for the last thirty years some have come to believe that every female MP lives like a fortress in parliament and Westminster political establishment, and you go from here even further by thinking of them as 'having a regiment of their own'. Where is the groping happening? In what closet and what echelon? The lady with the bucket and broom, surely that is now not the issue?.. In all of the last four weeks on Mr Harvey Weinstein's stories about his heavy promiscuity and promiscuous behaviour throughout his three or four decades of industrial years as a Hollywood producer, today someone else in the same industry, Mr Kevin Spacey, our millennial man, made an extraordinary difference to this 'global crisis'. He spoke of his apology to a young man, thirty years ago, and he pledged himself to live an honest life over these lessons he has learned from that incident. The boy was then, as told in the newspaper, 14 years old. It could have been anybody's young child son, which is the real importance to any society or parent at that stage and age. It is a difficult question, when e.g. political establishments come to a new low over this cult where women are not as it seems to the public, that once they have graduated from Oxford or Cambridge University they will be automatically treated as equals to the much older system and establishments of men 'only rights'. The Prime Minister has promised last week to look into this story of MP's coming out against sexual harassment at Westminister and is now threatening with sackings on these findings if and where it involves respectable members in parliament. Now it has become more than sleaze.

If our world in our century is capable of tackling sexual harassment at a much deeper and higher level and make it a global crisis, the question is getting cynical at the end with no particular answer of where people intend of going, there is no exactness of telling where one wants this crisis to end and restart clean. We have no 'clean world'. The attitude of 'hiring and firing' will not change for the sake of a campaign without any political intention or degree of women 'coming out' on sexual harassment. What exactly are we forgetting and udnermining, and perhaps do more harm to the self so many are now trying to preserve or regain the sliver of their existence? Was Mr Harvey Weinstein an existential threat? His industry should be analyzed before anyone can pass judgement, if things should change at this global level for not only Hollywood, but maybe Bollywood as well. Somewhere in time high standard of living and life mean starting at the head and now it seems we're just ending at the tail's bushy end. (Like fleas) Can anyone say or claim in all honesty that from now on a 'big boss' will allow a young woman 'picking up pencils' in his company to be treated as an equal? An equal to him or other women? Other women make up yet another crowd of their own, wouldn't you say? From any moral or class point of view it isn't mr Harvey Weinstein's promiscuity that is here on trial but the hypocrisy of society over many decades in every part of the world, as we all know what people mean by calling it a first man's world and with no 'real' place for the woman being designated by right. Rape, I'm sorry to say, is only being treated as a crime when taken place at home or in the public space, or even in marriage. 'Third world countries' rape is a sign of male triumph over the enemy when fighting in a war. And by third world we also mean in other places like the Middle East. Sexual harassment isn't just a luxury item on a lady's 'list to do' for the day, and Mr Harvey Weinstein get's caught and jailed. No one wants his or her daughter to be caught by the elderly gentleman in his 'spider's web' of pleasure, if respectability is an establishment between the two. The law goes even further as to say that even when it is 'consensual' or love, the crime can't be erased for 'Romeo & Julie', if even this means death. (One should try to understand the meaning of Amor, that a young woman can threaten to take her own life if she has to go on living without the elderly man she loves) And one can only hope this global crisis can be examined more properly and not ridicule. E.g. sending your secretary out to buy you sex toys. Political establishment is not a kindergarten where you hide one's toys or that of the girl's. This sexual harassment campaign should be a lot more serious and examine other sexual harassment stories of also men being a victim here. Sexual profligate worldwide comes in every human society and establishment. And like animals people's lives are becoming shredded by a new century and world order more easily and fall prey... (X- guideliness to a more clinical approach of big idustries and responsible governments)

Amor movie by filmdirector: Director: Michael Haneke.

The PM has found a whole new idea how to start a new day for Britain, after Brexit.

10 October 2017

Tuesday 10 October 2017: quiet is good, but not when you're the UK. One detail in the architecture for Britain's future, set out yesterday by the Prime Minister in the Commons, is how to match the 21/7 EU readiness to talks about Britain leaving the EU, short or long term. After 15 months, Labour yesterday questioned the PM, why hasn't anything constructive been done yet. And Mrs May was right to point out to Mr Corbyn, the Labour leader, informing the House on technical details for contingency plans in caae of a 'No deal', was and will be necessary as 'we move forward' to leaving the EU in 2019. (And why not ask the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky too while we're at it) What was particular good news yesterday in the PM's briefing yesterday was hearing her say that Britain will remain a democracy after Brexit, and this was of course some sort of 'eventuality' future aspect if e.g. the EU wants to be cynical on Britain's leave and see this as a fracture of a world in the making of democracy and equality. After last week the UK can be proud of the Prime Minister who made a comeback and being unusual assertive again yesterday, on monday 9 October. She did had a very bad week during the Party Conference at Manchester last week. This new idea of Britain leaving the EU is another example of what can be made possible in the 21st century between nations and countries that may prove itself just in the farthest corner of time in the 22nd century. We now all linger on the fact that leaving the strongest bloc of democracy feels little unjust to friends and neighbours, and if honesty has any value on it's scale, well, there is no easy answer right this moment to give anyone who is near or far why Britain wants another opening in the whole of EU strategy plans to move on as an establishment for Europe's peace and prosperity. Emphasize should always be peace and prosperity when it comes to Europe and the EU Member States. Millions of citizens depend on having a safe place to go on living in the way they are used to having. It can only be the moral code for a strong EU to stay successful on the continent unending. Mrs May and her government are also aware of the fact that it isn't a fight over supremacy and who is bigger, but that this is possible and she is willing to prove why if and when the time comes. But like any other divorce, the sea and sky will be open too. And that is not a joke in a sketch where damage is nil or none existent. It is not just borders that are priority when Britain's new day has arrived and leave the European Union behind it as a closed gate to EU triumph.

Democracy is good. But should it stay perfect when it can be more effective with a strong Britain on the one side, and the EU on the other side? Economics will have to be a lot more deeper, cooperation will be more interesting, and accomplishments will or could be more exiting in terms of rewards, mentally and emotionally, as human life changes with it's century. This particular change we can all withness in the present time when watching the millennials and listening to them what their perceptions are of a future they're planning on having. To politicians the future 'have nots' and 'haves' is the new brewery on ideas how to form governments and reach out to the people behind in the future, but leaving them in competence and not just logistics... It is not just the Prime Minister of the Conservative Party who is sweating in bullets to lead the country out of the EU in civil friendship and trust. All future PM's will have the same problem or meet up with on their way. The youth is king compared to 'navigation' in government and State. Strange as it sounds but Mrs May is looking today more and more as if she 'got the message' from her government and the people she is leading in Britain youngest and oldest communities. She knows they are unsattisfied, which by definition is admirable in the PM who is under pressure to do the thing of the century. But there have been a few female PM's before her and they had the 'iron' in them just as much. And they understood the irony of their fate. A Hollywood actor once said about his broken nose he got in a fight with a fellow actor, that that was the best thing ever happened to him. His name was Marlon Brando. Before this fight he was just too perfectly beautiful a man and it nearly looked ugly or feminine on his manliness. Mr Walden was the fellow actor. The EU is too perfect and it needs something of a broken nose, could be a guess. How credible our world will be in terms of fifty years there is no record just yet available. Chance is all that you can get from any given human condition or situation, can be another good guess. Mrs May knows what to anticipate at home and with her partner, the EU. They are both very much blue blood when it comes to politics and democracy, simply because they are the oldest makers of this very democracy. Democracy never did come or was sired by despotism. And that is a very hopeful sign to start the day off while waiting for another in the coming days with negotiation talks ongoing. Innovation isn't just for milk bottles. It is even more needed in high places where big decissions are being made in politics.

Party Conference, Manchester Central early fall 2017, England.

5 October 2017/ 12:23

Miss Ruth Davidson is simply brilliant, some say. In Manchester Central earlier this week indeed it looked as if she had enough brilliance and sparks going and coming in and out of her speech this time at the Party Conference for Conservatives. But what made it look that way, looking with great interest and awe at the Conservative Leader of the Scottish Tories? You can only first think that Time was what made her brilliant. There is a stubborn belief she is displaying subconciously and dangerously of her own belief and conviction how she split time from the last time we saw her in a TV- debate with calling for Britain to stay in the EU, and now almost with hand on her heart pledging to be a Party- faithful to the end. As she is stubborn, the first Minister of Scotland, Miss Nicola Sturgeon, being the stumbling one in her daily routine in Scotland's parliamentary debates with Miss Davidson, we get a clear idea what wonders Time does for the new star Tory in Scotland, Miss Ruth Davidson. This is not criticism on her performance and awesome speech earlier this week in Manchester Central UK at the Party Conference for Conservatives, on the contrary. She was brilliant as was her speech. After a long time it was nostalgic listening to politics in Britain body and soul again. Usually to outsiders listening to parliamentary debates or party conferences in Britain we are acting like consumers watching the best product a country or perliament can offer across the seas and land. It rarely happensso  to feel and be captivated in matters of seconds, as was this time the case for hearing the Scottish leader of Conservatives speak her 21st century political speech at Manchester Central. But will Time remain her escape tunnel or route every time she is speaking about forwarding her ideas on leading the Conservatives into the future and act like the 'Julius Caesar of Scotland'? She is not a war minister, even if she has much of the former Prime Minister David Cameron orator skill almost at the same pace with hers, this is the thing she does best whether debating at Holyrood or speaking at the Party Conference. Next to Miss Sturgeon a forceful and accelerating Miss Davidson becomes the Messala, and pushing the First Minister of Scotland in her chariot to lead the people of Scotland to Independence like Ben Hur aside to smash. From a spectator's view we just love these debates, but in the political arena it needs a different effect. Is Miss Davidson real enough to bring about any sort of effectiveness on three occasions: the EU, Brexit and Scotland's future? It is perhaps wise to first understand how this triangle moves (rotational) from platform to platform almost by itself mechanism... Miss Davidson is brilliant, but who will rise must fall and become the 'absolute super girl' you never find is realistic in politics, whether in England or Scotland.

Dear JR,

31082017/ 23:04 PM

Dear JR, I know you think you're God, full stop. You are sending mixed reviews into the world and somehow the papers got soaking wet on their way out. Bricks don't stick, and sand is slipping quickly. But now we got visibility again, thx to the sun high above in the sky. One question: can you please tell us (aka the world) why they call you God and not just Saint JR? It is kind of strange to already think of you on the next level, e.g. when you will be addressed differently and much closer to your ultimate supremacy. We love what you have done for the world. You have turned the word 'concrete' into an entire world as we have never seen it before. Not even in Babylon! And how does it feel when shooting arrows into heaven like the Cushite Nimrod? Man, you're awesome, as one can say it only to you and all the time. You must be the most envied man on earth, being said here in modesty. (LOL) So, what's your biggest problem, except for where to spend all that cash (movie Scarface)? You, my man, you are way beyond the juggernaut now looking ordinary next to you. What were they thinking to say that they could beat you and catch up with you? But time is never still, with you. Who will dare to dream that they could be like you, I wonder. If looking straight into your top one can only bubble- think our first time on earth now means something else than ever thought before. Hail unto you, oh JR! We now see a total different world before our eyes and it astonishes every day like the sun that shines at high noon. As far as I know, do we still think that humans are only competent to think and dream? President Donald Trump made America great again, but you made the world the greatest ever. Respect. Tomorrow in every second is getting you closer to the zenith of your powers. There is no denying you anything in the heavens. Mankind is holding up their hands awaiting the turning of the century, and trying to reverse time, back to freedom when life was still in it's evolution of plenty. We love you, JR. But you're not letting anyone 'in'. Why, why, why? The Philistines had Delilah, and let Simson in. Pharaoh Seti I had Moses, and he let him also 'in'. Like Potifar had Joseph, who was faithful with his master and defied the wife of his master. And last but not least, Nebuchadnezar had Daniël and let him 'in'. I think that that is your problem and the reason why you think you're God.

To be continued.

PD TUSA, President Donald Trump of the United States of America tonight.

15 August 2017/ 23:34 PM

America is America again when the president of the US defines murder from terrorism and making this very clear for people who can never understand politics at this level of honesty. But it is America and a slight sliver of what is left of real Americans if there is such a memory relevance today. One impression one gets is that the president sought very hard and carefully tonight how to win the diplomatic pragmatism in a crisis so close to home, as he was reckless a week ago by poking fun at the North Korean president Kim Jong Un at a global level that America will meet with hell & fire if need be. The world has long awaited to get to know the real America and with president Donald Trump as Chief Commander of the USA and the military, this waiting has come to it's final place in the 21st century global history. Why did his predecessors looked more distinguished for a good many reasons we have no idea anymore. Time has changed and so has the world. Mr Trump as the US president isn't an easy ride that he is getting from the world audience and the people living in America to be on some 'old side' of the river called home. He is getting a very rough ride and it's storms, one after another, is only getting worse in something of an unpredictable weather forecast we, in the rest of the world, have also no idea why and from which direction the gales are coming from. US president Mr Trump is being ridiculed on all sides and not once was he treated with the slightest respect for his command. That is a rough ride. And when in a crisis at national level one just wonders why he can manage to bring out the odd thing that only Americans possess is to be at odds with reality and darn it but get to bo honest and let it rain hell waters coming down. Just to cool off the home soil... He should be admired for trying his best and doing it the hard way, even if we have to bear in mind that here is a president who is a billionaire and he is the United States' president. Ten years ago a president like Mr Trump, where do you think that he would have been standing next to if he were not a Republican but Democrat like JFK, or his brother, Bobby Kennedy? Only one name throughout the crisis of Charlottesville resounds something of what America should have been, and to say that he admires the president's honesty. David Duke. Murder and terrorism by two definitions is not something president Barack Obama would have said or spoken out in presidential words to make the American people understand that this is not a high tech thing but a people's thing called 'Americans in the domestic vicinity of civilians' (in fact just being home). High Tech on the other hand should have been in place and check. If a country like Ukraine can come to America and implore for help to Ukrianians with high tech or fatal (lethal) weapons in the war against Russian separatists, it is unbelievable how fragile peace at home can be in America.

Society is a social multiple level platform, if we have anything that is left from globalism in the world. If globalism was a law at international level tonight's words by president Trump would have made an incredible political and international right hit in America today. And why? Because, another impression is that he has a strange inclination that he wants everything to be done the legal way to control damage in any way, seen or unseen, expected or not. He is after all a billionaire president. The question is, whether America wants to go cosmetic globalism or stay buried under the rubble of the old globalism and it's sc free world. But the fight isn't about fairness, no. It will be about questioning the president very soon later tonight why he thought it was murder first and terrorism secondly. That is called honesty going down in history as the 'bad' choice of weapons in politics. But no one doubts that the president can't handle it, when given the chance. Good luck, mr President. 

E. Macron, new president of the Republic of France

08052017

General elections in the European Union Member States do basically intend to create an atmosphere of individual States at this time of the year, in 2017. In the words of new President of France, Mr Emmanuel Macron, we have to change this view, if any of the challenges facing the EU ahead, short or long term, and think of the world outside the Euro States. France has intentions of changing the view not many of his colleagues in the EU, including many high representatives, are sharing with him at the moment. His other strong words on domestic and foreign policies underline somewhat of turning his country France from individual Member State to the height of another platform, only shared by those who want to see the world succeed again very much in the same way globalism started off in the early eighties, a few decades ago. His voice comes with a silencer, unlike his opponent, Ms Marie Le Pen, in this general election and battling it out for what the people of France would want to have and see in their new president. From the info feed the world can learn about the new president and his wife, Brigitte, being 24 his senior, and that Mr Macron is a Roman Cahtolic French man, practicing the Christian faith. Earlier in 2017 other fellow Member States also won general elections, and being equally pristine enough to represent their country in the European Union. Maybe we humans intend of forgetting what are the more important outlooks and overlooks. But, we do understand that Mr Macron is European and is ready to put back the EU pastorale temperament in the old politics of the EU, and where change need be, he is also considering this is the right time to put out some under review. One would almost be inclined to forgive the young president for his first mistake, because not only that he is France's first youngest president, but that he is quite armored with charm, handsomeness and a good wife to follow him in his career. In all of European Union history people remember previous founders like Baron and Baroness Neil and Glenys Kinnock who were the pioneers to help built the Union as a prime democratic institution and fight for it's establishment as a legitimate power to all Member States. According to Ms Anne Applebaum's writing today in the Washtinton Post, Mr Emmanuel Macron has won the election like Napoleon Bonaparte (hopefully not at Grenoble), which would mean that he has a political picture mind set of how he would want to see France coming back from behind Germany and be the second largest country in the European Union and who will lead like a double headed eagle alongside Mrs Angela Merkel, chancellor of Germany, in Real Time EU and global politics.

Mr Emmanuel Macron should know that no individual Member State can crown himself, country and State, emperor in the European Union. The Euro single currency makes that dream look small of a chance at any time, even in the farthest future.

History's quote: "The mediocre attempts of the Bourbons to revive the unstable economy had no effects."

Change the world's view deserves a fat but impotent questionmark.

10042017/23:43 PM

Science doesn't has the answers that come close to change the 21st century global view. But it does keep energizing the dynamics of it's closest links, e.g. RT, the present time and the future (most popular among global leading industrialists/ industries). Unless, of course, someone in his apparent genius finds a machine that can take away both future and past from all of human history. Our emotional world in RT or the present time can start from anywhere and equally ends in the same way, but maybe not in the same place. The simple fact is that no society is like the other, even when basic sharing is another outcome, known or unknown for whatever human reason. It was the global view and perhaps to this day, 10 April 2017, it still is. All yearning has gone to the graveyard, very similar like life and death are merely being the new yearnings in vast populations. Some even go that far and say about governments to have a world view it deserves, fat but impotent questionmarks. Panic or despair stay unknown and the whole world can feel that too, to all scientific machineries. People in place do seem to make it just as long as they are on the move and keep on moving in the architecture of colossal RT, Time, and future platforms. And there is a logic to all this that some may call apogee. If you are up there, to the rest of the world it simply means that you are not here (with us). And that is the end of the story, the world history of our century told in one second. Can politics and democracy reach that high in orbit? This will get too complicated to answer on your own if you're not ASIO. In other words, who wants to 'save' the world from reaching a full circle on it's global view and developments? The war in Syria has become sound deaf, scientifically. One can almost hear the crowd or human hubs in local places think of the war in Syria to be only making sense to people who are in charge with an overview decision where their interests are best served, political or militarily. And so they stay switched on, country by country. Until then the world view was always adjacent to serious business and global achievements. Time wasn't as cynical then as now, e.g. when calling for new ideas in the Group of 7 today. Personal beliefs would like to do panic or despair for staying human and stay inspired even when second graded to world supremacy thinking, in case you are not a robot...

Good. Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, has an initiative.

11 March 2017/ 00:41 AM

An initiative is a combative word choice, unless you are the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, and your aim is to show goodwill under any circumstance, let's say when relations are strained, e.g. with countries who do not know the merits and joyous moments of signing the Maastricht Treaty, or Lisbon Treaty. A mere technical detail for Member States of the European Union from the start. Paradox is a wise decision, as is going forward, in stead of looking backwards, or anywhere beyond the single currency. At Head Quarter, or HQ, Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, will be putting a big reference on the table of the talks he will have with four members in what the article calls 'the architecture talks with the big four countries', seen from the Benelux eye corner. (Article Leonid Bershidsky, Bloomberg.com, Multispeed Europe) Curious enough, in the meantime, or better, very soon this month in the Netherlands another general election will go to the ballot box, on 15 March. In the news this evening something was overheard, whether the Prime Minister will still be in government after this election, or stay on. Like a good dentist, Mr Mark Rutte is keen on hygiene and secretly has a love affair with his sterile instruments on operating his political dentistry. Rather than flexing muscles. And he is remarkably good at what he is doing when the mindset is based on fairness and sincerity, within obscurity of the more powerful basis outside the Netherlands, whether in the EU or global platform. This is no easy task on any Prime Minister of the Netherlands in the 21st century. The world audience as critical as always might ask why this country is bothering itself by trying to put their country in the middle of the global map, with only four big Members, Germany, Italy, France and Spain, in mainstream global economic and political reality. The argument here is good excercise to members in the audience, but it also helps keep the Netherlands alert and it's assertiveness on the edge, almost at a new constant. Which in global terms it is just what the doctor orders, when keeping a fixed eye on western democracies and governance, and when the understanding is your only great potential for the moment. Here, it is true, the Netherlands is a small size country with an underestimated mill of industries on the other side of the argument. The next general election is expected to have little or no meaning changing the fate of the Dutch electorate in 2017. In ten years time their millennials might catch up and for the better change everything under the sun by then again.

Europe, the European Union and the global world, are part of all Member States within the EU, indefinitely. The above here could very well have been the writing on Italy, Belgium, France, Spain, or Germany's political and economic strategic policies, if moved upward by new events, or downwards when there is no movement and stagnates continuously. That is difficult to work with, when you are living in the United States and hard to understand what is making a small community fractured into even more smaller communities over a big area of land and sea. The economy, or economies, translating here make(s) an incredible outcome, that is paradoxically, and make half of the trillions of Dollars revenue for the whole of the global world. It is therefore important to maintain good relations with the continent and also to have sensible or serene ideas about the future that is only a small piece in the big puzzle to the rest of the world. Humanity or the nations of our planet surprisingly can act together as one, proportionally and in different timelapses. History today is unique and it is intended to keep mankind on it's toes and not to give up too soon when man- made organisations collapse. Simple enough, they can rebuild the world again... The Netherlands has nothing to worry about as a permanent Member State of the European Union. Neither is the impact of failed talks with new Member States of great significance. Political union between all Member States on the other hand shouldn't make that mistake 360 degrees. Europeans, de facto, are a strange people (5 mil or more), and 'gebied' (Dutch/ German word) means as much as commanding and territory. For hundreds of years rivalry between the nations of Europe also meant being at war and having relative peace. Just adding here a small reminder of why mentality can be a difficult negotiator in new existing rules and in a modern technocratic system of governing national 'open window' politics. But, it is true, constituence politics is particularly interesting at general elections, whether in the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Sweden or other. If there is a point to go forward with the far left or far right doctrines in the Netherlands, France or other EU Member State, this can only reach as far in a stand point. It won't change time as a factor on the global platform. Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, and indeed most other Prime Ministers within the EU, are particularly keen on keeping war distinct from destructiveness, something that is making Europe a distinctive voice throughout the world, after two World Wars seventy years, and beyond, ago. The BQ (Big Question) is: what is the general election in the Netherlands in the coming weeks, also post election day, going to change for the people at home, if it can't individually tip the balance elsewhere in the more bigger issues?

The Sign Stop everyone is reading isn't just optical.

15022017/ 23:49 PM

There are some things in this world that humanity is not used to, e.g. living in a world having stopped being a people's place to be in. No one is born randomly, whether man or animal. The meaning that we used to know as historical or history, thousands of years just to start somewhere in time, is now completely changed and has become what we now know globally as the worldview. And this comes with a sting, except it isn't the bee from the honeycomb. We are looking at a possible bigger species of an immeasurable size that is now taking over time and space as we know it. Once you get the story there is one thing clear to your singular braincell of the being that you are as a human, that here we are now living in a multitude of omega braincells and they seem to be in control, yes you guessed it, of everything. It isn't necessarily a bad thing if you are able to put aside your human skin and head. In return for a better living place where you can live and even have a 'family', and respect your more superior 'being'. Development in the world was always there, even before our time in the illuminated years after the Roman and Byzantine empires. Does anyone remember the Tubal Cain story in the Book of Genesis? (Google: TC, he was the forger of all kinds of tools of iron and bronze) You are considered a great optimist if you would theorize on the future, e.g. thousands of years from now, and say that it still will be bronze and iron, even then. Exactly what has such great impact on global society and put every big country in a state of life support, or not? Some old views remain with the economic view, others believe it goes even beyond popular belief and call it global economic view. And they keep on double checking the world on this forever without getting any closer to the multitude of the nerve system of our life lines in the world. (It is definitely not Lego world) For the time being our world that knows a magnitude of 'only top' there are no particular worries here, so it seems. When transparency was needed as a scientific test of each bloc in the world this became an overnight success, let's say in the 'iron age' of the eigthies and accelerating into the nineties. Transparency in our time isn't development anymore but a factor of how much power a country can have or has. That being analyzed again into different timelapses would be making you a maker of the world, next to the 'top' or 'only top'. If normalcy is your share in this world you will automatically know where the Stop sign tells you, yes, to stop and leave it to the 'only top'. A child nor dog could sense these ways where men didn't come or go, but only machineries.

The world doesn't need development per se, for it is all here as a global reality. Personally one could e.g. argue that it is a big question asking whether there is still something called 'The Middle East'. Whether there is still something called 'East of Europe'. Or, that there is still something called 'Asia'. All three nation's blocs ceased to exist the moment they became transparent. It is interesting to see how Brexit is trying to become the only visible lifeline, as a transparent and closed bloc on it's own. The makers in our world are the 'only top' for a reason, as is medicine to cure the illness. In short, our physical world as we used to know it through either prosperity or poverty, is now over for good. Even today, in a retweet by Mr Javier Solana, Apple says in an article online that there are eighteen countries with a large GDP. Economic continuity can now reshape itself and doesn't do manual operating machines/ manual operative anymore. Again, for whatever was said on optical illusion in the technical years behind us, that is not so today. When seen it is visible on the horizontal timeline of the citizen, but vertically only optical when seen from government's position. The world was never before developed to be in control of great multitudes and neither was it known to man by what method. In fact it is a simple method, really, when you think logic has everything to do with the way the world is now run by the 'only top'. Everybody wants to be smart, that is the name of this method being instrumentalized throughout the whole of the planet. Science is a flip flop system and you can participate whenever you're 'wearing' one. It is a mistake to think that these 'test engineers' are going to make mistakes... The Sign Stop is invisible, and no one knows really what that is. One relief: thank God Almighty for politics. Through the world of democracy most people can still be human and think independently from government involvement or 'only top'. Compare: unlike the medical world one needs to be a professor of e.g. oncology to be on the board of directors or shareholders, and is a speaking of 'only to medical staff'. In politics mankind is everything and nothing, and sometimes at both ends. In our perfect world one wonders in the classical way and e.g. asks, who would want to be the enemy here and overthrow all of this in exchange for the normalcy we used to know as the worldview of mankind?

3 January 2017.

3 Januari 2017/ 23:01 PM

The desire to live as humans was scientifically a post war world vision since WWII, in 1945. If in 2017 this would tell you differently nothing will ever change that human desire here and into the future. It's transmission is worldwide what we today call 'global awareness'. Once this silk thread of humanity can be established in whatever society, tribal bush people or highly sophisticated academics, the reason for living becomes a simple road any man/ woman can follow till the end of their lives. The days ahead of us in 2017 are not going to be any different from the human desire to live. Anything other than that is secundary to our primal longing to be and stay alive, to be healthy, and dream. And if science is correct at this stage it was expected how human lives would transform into a bigger society achievement, or simply put into big society achievements. Quantity exceeds quality living for everyone, on the other hand. But that could only still be a prediction so far. Globalization is the abstract world that likes to keep it's world on the edge, as to maintain a vigilance of all governments and people to keep on building ambition into a bigger one that benefits all of the world populations. It's key factor was thirty or forty years ago to create more understanding between the nations and peoples. Once they got there after the millennium there was another human created to show the rest in the world how to be successful. Today we ask whether Brexit was one of these successful dreams a nation could make for itself, or whether the people in Ukraine were successful when they deposed Viktor Yanukovych as their president after the Maidan Square revolution. In 2017 the human desire still believes they are living in a free world, and that western democracies are an old supremacy of human reason, even before Adolf Hitler's time as the Fuehrer of Nazi Germany. This is the side of human desire and it's phase throughout existence since WWII. But like with everything there is a down side so is human desire to be ambitious. De facto that would mean change the world as we know it, and of course to follow the dream to become better and more excellent than ever before. Globalization did help to achieve all these goals in one strike, e.g. when it kept the world in financial shock in 2008, and then it waited on governments to design their own playbook where they would put an idea forward of how to be more ambitious to have the future being pulled by a rope, as the moon to be pulled by a single lasso. Success is a daemon to inspire extreme wealth above extreme poverty, is what the dream might be at the top in our time and century.

Let's not be ungrateful and honestly say that humanity now believes in all facilities society might bring upon them, even while sleeping sound and no worries are there. The 21st century has greater sophistication than ever before in general life, e.g. medication, science, technologies, accessibilities, subsidies, and a wider more services distributed among the millions of populations in the whole world. Logistics records show in what ways globalization is trying to reach out to everyone and it will even go further to any outskirts to introduce the future schemes for basic health and mental health programmes to help include all living human beings, old or young. Planet earth has all the characteristics of a peaceful place where mankind can live, compared to hostile environments in another time or planet. There doesn't seem to be a reason to criticize the benevolence of science that made our world a living green and habitable planet for as long as we can see or know life. What the inferior idea about global economics can't reach anymore, science has already won this race a hundred times over.And one cannot simply let go to waste all the olive branches of victory to the extend of the future in what all humans believe. Ambition is our new world order and it's purity lies in audacity for one simple reason, e.g. that the world has now outgrew it's small provincial style of governing bodies and made them bigger to match only big things... It is fast, furious and also what it wants is constant success. It speaks in terms of inhumane quantities to set the target for every major economy or city in the world. It's process continues on an agressive pace and process, wherever top corporations operate to maintain a wealthy economy, compared to the old style healthy economy. Of course no one can get this far without hurting some people wherever there is hardly any income or possible change in their situation. Some are even forced to beg their way throughout the day, when or once they've been made redundant by the machineries of the wealthy. The year 2017, one can say, will also be the year of all fears to see the success formula coming to an end in a globalized world. The legacy of institutions after WWII will not fail the human desire to live or to be. But where and when they will fail is entirely a different matter.

Member States in the EU are writing romantic fiction to everyone's astonishment.

09122016/00:47 AM

When Europe is burning without visibly anywhere jacking up a fire one should know that this is the time for most governments to resort to writing romantic novels or stories, on how everything changed one day in continental Europe into a place of unicorns and fantastic colourful rainbows hanging from the sky deep inside the heartland, and where people have or are becoming more animated than in the real people's world. The anticipation simply stops here and they are gone to a place where no one else can go, except for when you are e.g. German, French, or other. In Europe historians would never call it denial but a natural response of some extraordinary reaction, because Europeans do not believe in fantasies beyond their own old tales. Reality simply disappears from their grasping or comprehension and in stead the world is invited to watch live stories streaming non stop from morning till night in the show where real people became real live cartoons on a good sunny winter's day. Is this true, or is it possible for humans to go down the part of the unknown? The force is dark enough, one would say. And the role that fate is playing in these epic stories is one of eternity, a tactical move against whatever dark forces could be or are on the 'other side'. Welcome to the age where men are mice again, and both fear the same adversary, with an incredible avarice for small meat. Most European kings have responded in a similar fashion in their own time, e.g. the Sun king of France, Ludwig of Bavaria, and a worse many others in straight jackets once they were declared completely insane. Underneath this theory of who they are as Europeans when going back in a time of their own the force get's even more seriously or clinically dark and it is not only because they disappeared from Real Time altogether, but more because it happened in a snapshot of the moment. The world outside is probably aware of these changed people, and is trying to cure the 'disease' by buzzwords such as, apathy, lethargy and pathology. A surprise result remains for the time being absent and waiting is another word sent out by the insane.

The world and Brexit, a new formula.

04112016/ 15:19 PM

Of the part in Brexit that the public at large is missing is now taking shape by forming itself to a hot iron shoe or plate neither side, pro or against, can hold on to for the last 24 hours. If and when Brexit will take place, under any such construction, it will be a matter for the world and Brexit to have any discussion over what future either side can or may go thereafter. That won't be, as world technicians would say, as simple a formula. And this is not because the other side would be more difficult, to continue as Mr Tony Blair is suggesting, this week in the news, Telegraph UK, but having been for so long a super power alongside other G7 Members, Germany, Japan, France, Italy, and others, not as a country is Brexit impossible if conceived properly or well. It is the other side to Brexit where the world is asking the question, e.g. how that will be as a country that ejected itself from the global seat as one of the big seven leading industrial countries in the world. It is here where all conflct theories and even new ones to smoothen the path of Brexit, or for it, keep on failing for the last one hundred days and something. To cross the ocean the simple choice between canoo and freight carrier, Britain chose the canoo to go upstream...Upstream up world or upstream down world? But being British one might feel the center of the world move as Brexit has changed the entire worldview from a tiny canoo, struggling with the high tide of the economic seas that know no God or heaven to succeed and will not subside or lower waters in these circumstances, out of fear that technically something might crack the high dams of wealth above nations. From this point it looks as if England alone is living a borrowed time in the 360 degrees global circle. It still is the question, but how many countries are now living under the same reverse?

Back in the US the presidential race is getting to it's final and many are expecting to see Mr Trump win, when Americans will vote for Donald Trump being the next president of the US, or the anti climax Mrs Hillary Clinton to win for Democrats and Americans who want to see another term for the Democrats administration to be back at the White House. Who has the stuff? Some say that the Russias have4 got the stuff... LOL? Coinciding with the present situation in the US and here within the European Union facing Brexit, or vice versa, and as if it has any particular meaning, the movie SNOWDEN has gone in premiere this week. The world might go and see this movie, and perhaps it will learn something about our era. Why will Mr Trump win this general election from Mrs Hillary Clinton, who it is said is to be the more experienced one of this duo? One guess is saying that Mr Trump can win simply because of his character flaw by being the 'oversensitive' one, when compared to the Democrat nominee for this presidential race. This was the first time in the US that the Americans allowed a man with a sensitive nature to tell them like crazy how to take back their 'American lives' from underneath the blue skies across the wide USA. And he did so by doing the odd thing, with no Republicans to back him once he has left the lower threshold of disloyalty of any member till that time has come where all men should be equal and good... The House of congress is not like the maffia, where on meritocracy you get where you are. Loyalty is virtue among all good men, or crazy men who have not yet been chosen and can still wash their hands from the bigger things that e.g. the US is dealing with on a dialy basis. Mrs Clinton knows that part very well. And so many say that she is not able to wash her hands just yet. But this all is happening today in the US. The final touch or out of tochness with greater politics in the US will be next week on 7 November 2016, this coming monday night. Let the people decide.

The extraordinary thing about England.

18 October 2016/14:35 PM

Parliamentary debates have only three wishes to make Brexit happen, so say the latest news coming from England these days. But wishes, can they be adequate enough to reach far outstanding measures to meet the final accord on the matter of Brexit, e.g. in March 2017? It is being listened to by all sides for the moment, including the European Union remaining Member States. The Queen's government can't make that decision alone, was also what they said in the newspapers this/ last week. It's hard currency of sterling now is at it's lowest, according to the world financial markets. Noting here the most praiseworthy on the pound, putting up a brave face under the circumstances. What used to be the formal group of G7, can England now be in the leading industrial nations club without the Member States in the European Union bloc ongoing and as we speak? That is the wishful thinking, in maddened controversy, all are agreeing that is one thing they do wish for. Want it perhaps too. If it is the interest side one wonders only to what extend the EU and England would come to agreeing any kind of measure with regard to Brexit. No one has any visibility yet and think of the right way to determine England's future outside the EU, but also when thinking in modern ways of solidarity what Member States might say or see in their interest, when sidelined by England sooner or later in the nearest of futures. Post EU for Britain is nosediving everywhere it sticks it's nose in or out, is something many are convinced elsewhere in the world already. And the British Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, is to believed having the longest nose(Pinocchio?) in her own government. The battle for England's evermore is predicted that this may take the longest day and hour yet in the line of British history, politics and democracy. If the government falls for failing to deliver the new birth of a nation without the EU, Brexit will fly out like Wagner's Flying Dutchman and turn to a myth forever. Britain's own modern day's myth. What is missing from the formal papers, dare one say it, is the one drop of royal blood that won't be or stay with the rest in certain conditions of expansion and strange banners...

But 75% of the world population is considered to be the younger generation. Also in the 21st century that truth is point carat diamond of it's most hardest ore. It is upstreaming and not backstreaming for looking upward ever again. Democracy is doubtful if you can't buy or sell it in the wider sense, if not widest. Under these circumstances the survival of an independent England is making visually no sense. It is abhorred by the future generation who will blame ours for not taking rationality to heaven, and leaving them out on starvation. Unemployment has risen rapidly under the modern days of collective prosperity, and it will go on till at least 2050. Wishful thinking isn't scientific but beyond magical. And are we talking beyond magical of future generations? You can't help it if you are the British Prime Minister, e.g. Mrs May, watching your own honourable nose grow larger and more large each day as we speak, for promising that Brexit means Brexit, if that is it's definition to the last drop (blood?) in English political history. So, is this what the world was made of? And leaving out God Almighty His ethnicity from our own making of mankind? Thanks to presidents, prime ministers and governments. Astonishment can eat out the bones inside your eyes quietly by merely watching all that is happening today in the world. And going with it the responsibilities being shredded to the sliver. Former industrial nation Britain can only mean making a very big promise to the British people if it wants to lead in the world again, by ignoring all the rest that is giving and making this world. Christian England should know that there isn't that much fish in the river Thames for all the people! (And smaller streams) No one has forgotten Scotland, Ireland and the Scandinavian bloc. No one is forgetting either about Nato and it's alliances. Some things haven't changed, that we know too. And also there is no one who can forget about the world without the United Nations that is believed to stay even if the world disappears completely and is void of any humanrace. Our world slowly turning to the dark side of the moon and inhabited by one flagpole of a great nation. (Stars and stripes) A smaller nation could have the pomp or glory, if...

Who to talk to isn't rocket science, or is it?

03102016/00:33 AM

You can lose your appetite almost at an instant when you look around, watching everything happening and then know this is what your world will look like decade after decade, if you're lucky. There is something more indefinite about the 21st century. Deja vu in one snapshot of the mind takes you to many places, the embodiment of the unknown embraces you, and then you're wondering who you should be talking to and telling what, whether you are here or somewhere else. Life has become a dark matter, more darker than you might think or suspect. Where it's potential came from no one knows, and yet here we are witnessing that during the last decades earth's potential has certainly grown exponentially. It is not like we remember it from out in the woods. The stories that generations will tell you about our past as humans, believe it or not, comes to an embarrassing nought to nothing time. Or killing time momento. And how many are there out there? It is the old canopy of countless stars which no generation of the 21st century think it's cool. Darkness is much more fun. And so is dying. You have got to hit bottom low and smash to death, it will be awesome. This world has no politics or government as our only agency of every day memory. People are much bigger than that now. Any government is nothing specific in earth's potential as today. Education has lost it's appetite for evolution as well. And so is loneliness, just to name a few of the highest order in the 21st century 'omnipotent' humans. Tacky people need tackiness, if you have ever heard of distribution of wealth. That is what in some parts of the world the younger generation is making out of anything coming or going beyond their ultra richest nation's view. And yes, there should be a 'ssst' or hush hush going along with it too. The world was built on something we used to call transparency, in the modern world. In this way it could deter any agressor from making the same mistake in Nazi Germany. In a new world it looks like it was precalculated which 'stars' will rise and which ones will remain silent forever. A proper balance of good and evil should lead to any conclusion. Open or closed.

Who should your child be talking to in the 21st century? In Europe it is very hard to say if your children believe something e.g. like Brexit? Part of the educated brain will keep asking hard questions. Universities should provide the answers, and turn the future upside down, and then again have another look at the latest plans. In Europe this is unusual and unease philosophy. Any critical view, known in the world of faculty, some will hear saying, isn't what it used to be in Diomedes' world the imperatives, but from now on will have to be in the language of pecunia causa, especially when derivatives (Latin). The western world has moved on and since then into a 'connected world' and it has changed some fundamental believes of our human lives in this century. The dream is every day getting out there and make it happen for you. In the West or North underlining what it's exponentially measures conceal most of many their lives. We eat what primates eat if you can't rise above equality. In the east still are too many who go hungry, just about round the corner where your eyes will never see. And yet, interestingly, this is where we live, in a world that knows how to pray and prey. (One the ass and  one the jackal) But if you tell your story right, word for word, textually literate, it can make a world difference. In our time every leader in government is not having an easy ride. Nations don't seem to be making peace, when without money. Industrial nations with natural commodities have become in itself a scarcity and are saving for the future. Rationalities, thank God (of Abraham), work hard on inspansion on getting the right balances correctly. A slight curve might make unnecessary springs in your circuit. The world is either at the beginning of it's myth as gigantic species having ever lived thus far, or it is ending it's own like a bad written scenario ever. Who am I now talking to?

Turkey's President, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, 'bad hair day' is getting more unmanageable by trying to contain it's model reflexing...

17 August 2016/ 23:09 PM

An old saying goes that whoever is building sandcastles will eventually have to face up to uncertainties, when and if that moment comes down and swooping by imagery of eagles or the wind. One image will remain for the rest of political time as we speak. It is tonight something of the release of a number of convicts held in prison to replace with the protagonists after the coup plotted literally by thousands . If counting is correct this is about 38000. In the storm of the wind the coup had failed and it turned into public humiliation at their national level in Turkey in an instant, or overnight. The question is not a simple one when trying to find out what is drifting more each day into the quicksand politics of Turkey in 2016. One thing is certain, that in this reversal of fortunes for the Turkish nation is one that will not go away: the political voidness of chaos, even when kept low- key. The nation still can't come to terms after it was taken into shock- treatment with another coup d' etat renaissance, and when it told the public that building sandcastles is a thing of the past. But in stead it is here right now. The President of Turkey since then has thought of many new ways to discipline the coup players and their links were shutdown immediately, wherever national security was threatened. The whole world reacted with astonishment how the military in Turkey suddenly had changed the political scene with military speak. It was democracy that took the impetus of thousands to support the Turkey the people remembered best: Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan's era.

Can journalism get out here and return to democracy when counting the population's numbers supporting Turkey and it's President? A great champion of democracy, if clinical means anything in it's presence turbulence. It is the muezzin that is reminding Turkey isn't the world's oldest problem and all will continue to exist without cease of existence. In most parts of the rest of the world they are concerned with the future of the new generations when the future is being debated or discussed at forums (that Turkey's President knows too well). In Turkey, so it seems from afar, concern for today's generation is the moral story and calls for everlasting supremacy throughout all generations, past and beyond. The sandcastle is the biggest problem that Turkey is now facing. It won't adhere to the 21st century voluntarily, one could say. Turkey wants to charter it's own destiny and find the seashore it came from, before it settles down as a nation among nations. There is still a good chance that all will fall back into the right pieces and no harm will be done, or find their own answers by flipping coins with the nations. Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan is desperate for creating chance, one might think so. And there are ways to get there... In the mind bubble the President has four names he will not be able to do without: the EU, the US, Turkey and the Turkish people. Isn't there a way to tie these names together in a bundle of joyous democracy? And for young and old.

JC

12072016/22:58 PM

Should JC stay in, or out of the Labour leadership contest in the UK? Time passes, and so are political parties contests. It's becoming something of a cliché, when you are JC, or what is known in these circles to be Mr Jeremy Corbyn. But the man has proven to be bonkers. And then again, bonkers is good. We do not know Mr Jeremy Corbyn in the same way the world knows former Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, and Mr Tony Blair, now a prominent envoy for the Middle East peace. This is not made up stuff, it is in fact the best proof for real life politics and in living memory for every nation. It is the thing JC is lacking and lacking it badly when needed the most, in order to survive the days of panic when he disposed himself to become a man of the sidelines during the referendum, like an innocent bystander. In fact he wasn't. What can anyone expect from the Labour Party, e.g. after Ed Miliband? The latter was defeated in the general election in favour of the Tory Party, then still under the Prime Minister now leaving, Mr David Cameron. JC is a man on his own. The public does not take too much interest in him. The man has fans (inlcuding Ms Anna Ford, so they said), die hard fans and there is where his story as Labour leader stops. And yet, he is also the man dancing at knife-point on big topics, e.g. calling Israel to be like ISIS. It was risky, it was bonkers. The big question now is can he do risky again? Or a bit of both, bonkers and risky.

Mr Corbyn, say what you like in the public, when time struck midnight, his face was the ruddiest, if such word exists in the English dictionary. It was meaningful, but quickly brushed off into a gimmick. Gimmick in these difficult times equals something of the pale colour. You keep wondering why Mr Corbyn chose to flirt with bad anti- Semitc raves, matching a bit of the trend elsewhere in Europe. But he regained back some control and disciplined himself rigidly. He has ideals he can't simply forget. That's all. The side of Britain close to his bones is that of a people's Britain nostalgia. Like Rigsby, Mr Corbyn grew up to understand those pipes and drains, when the rain pours down and something is ticking that this is home for always. Unlike his more glamorous colleagues at Westminster, alongside the rich and famous in the global world, he remained just JC/ Jeremy Corbyn. What more can we say about a man who isn't like his more opulent colleagues, Haig or Cameron, Osborne or Mrs Thatcher? Mr Corbyn impresses more like a man who wants to keep Britain 'out of trouble', a nanny, a friend, or maybe the next Labour Leader on the ballot? (It takes one nanny to know another nan) And still, the public outside of Britain doesn't know him. Fortunate or not, heads or tail?

It is for the moment all technical at Westminster.

04072016/22:10 PM

We are not losing the edge to stay critical of what might happen if Britain leaves the EU, once the plan for a Brexit leave becomes transparent to the people in Britain and the rest of the world. One thing should also be part of the Brexit vote to leave, which are not just friends of Britain, but EU citizens, and divided whether they too should 'leave' Britain and split the ideology of an ever closer union of nations in Europe and beyond. Thousands demonstrated in London last weekend to stay in and not out of the EU, or in fact have made their cries heard over leaving the EU. If Mr Jean Claude Juncker and Mr Martin Schultz could understand the inclination here, people, democracy and Brexit, no one would dare say that easy is one solution the EU is used to and will do so again, now. To put it down in to a row from top to end which political classes are still effective during Brexit, on both sides, and which are their new names, then maybe to the rest of the world it won't look like anything falling off the cliff that only the EU top can see. It is for the moment all technical at Westminster. We have been accustomed to having Britain at our side for decades and it has always been our best model to rule and reign over civilization, domestic and abroad, it is almost as if this is the habit we must learn kicking out.

Behind the facade at Westminister the country is slowly becoming aware of Westminster Brexit. On our side it is the EU exit from Brexit, in some ways, one could say, yes that too. Which are making things more painful to watch in the rest of the world, that is if pain means birth of a new combination EU- Brexit. (English: Brexit- EU) Something did change in the world fundamentally calm and orderly. To some this is unclear whether the world still has a political leadership over nations. The overview isn't what we were used to, but instead find ourselves 'gazing in simplicity for ambitions (that Brexit) craves'. (Lyrics UK Band song) Basically the big Q is how Britain will now make money to breed money outside the EU. Which mechanism are they going to have after Brexit to deal with a global bloc of other nations and their currencies? And having arrived at this point one must not forget the OECD, always ranking Britain highest among the nations for their scientific contribution around in the world, and engineering, all top marks for a basically wealthy country, if you're a fox hunter or ex fox hunter. At the moment no one can say anything or even try to write about Brexit leaving the EU.

The Big Six nations of the European Union , Martin Schultz and Herr Jean- Claude Juncker after Britian's exit from the EU, 23062016.

27062016, 13:19 PM

The atmosphere is getting more sterile after Britain's vote out from  the EU on 23 June, last thursday, with adjacent to this the quiet as mice public inside the European Union bloc. To put it quite simple: "Britain, what did you just do?" For good manners, let's just say, England's leave should be respected by the EU and it's Member States Big Six, and in return should there be respectability for the remaining nations heading the EU post Brexit. Perhaps this wasn't the most desired position and situation ever wanted by the EU, not after seventy years since WWII, and certainly not in our time, that this establishment or institution of Member States governing bodies, is facing for the first time a great challenge and will for some practical reason balance very heavily on e.g. the Big Six Member States, in a reflex of permanent self sufficiency without Britain from now on. The public will find out soon whether this was the way it was supposed to go after Brexit. A staying in the EU, now, also is questionable, had their campaign won.

EU Post Brexit morning: the EU Big Six nations must find the reflex of permanent inward 'outlook' to continue EU Membership in these difficult circumstances, or full circle of 27, while also create an extension room for Britain's exit bound by mechanisms of time start to end. There is also reason enough to believe that geopolitics and it's networks of nations will proceed more frequently and constant when English is spoken or that the existing structure language will remain in English. The EU Big Six and 21 nations can't differentiate at this point to make e.g. Swedish their International lingo and to do business or politics in this way with the rest of the world. Here we see why the big six EU Member States could be feeling the squeezing out by Britain's vote to leave the EU. But, it is the new normal now for the other 27 Member States. Time is strangely enough holding everything together in the meantime for the EU and the Big Six.

History Part X

05062016

Good evening. When will it come undun with the BREXIT story this month 23rd? Between the US and Europe the King Salomon has an old problem of who the real mother could be to the infant age of globalization, and realizing at the same time how many eyes are watching and waiting to hear his verdict. If Brexit, well, we'll come to that later. First it is the Stay camp who have been unconvincing of why to stay is good for Britain and Europe. And so has the US failed convincingly explaining to the British or American public why Britain needs to stay in the EU. But Salomon can see the problem probably more clearly through the maze on both sides. The US cannot for one moment believe that in Europe globalization has been a great success, just like e.g. in the United States. Both sides could be wrong but not because of political will or unwill from e.g. the Brexit camp. In the US globalization started earlier, as to say, a hundred years ago. In Europe it only came flying by three decades ago, and adding another two decades of introduction years since post World War II. It is making things quite difficult for the UK Prime Minister when he is oblique from recent history in terms of industrial years. And the Globalists are too eager to go ahead with reason in their own historical ways...

What can this mean for the UK if staying in the EU becomes the only way out of poverty in the new data? Europeans have never really woken up to the fact that their history isn't the same thing as the US when globalization was it's first cry under the sun, approximately a hundred years ago. What was going on in Europe a hundred years ago? WWI & WWII, both extracts from a divided Europe in history, and then coming to terms very slowly under this or that imperial crown. Some people find it amusing with the Europeans and their tribalism, comparing this to the wilderness of African nations, also a hundred years ago, by estimation almost every part in the world had their own problems dealing with the change of time and centuries. (This is also true for Russia) Now this is what makes globalization real and palpable to all human kind in the whole world. Put it in another way, while the US is getting closer to Mars, here in Europe the question is still whether they will land on the moon in any time soon. At the same time one can critically have their say by pin pointing out a world that misunderstood it's own history, starting with staying in the EU and having a spitfire to deal with in their tail, aka BREXIT wheels. Globalization can't make mistakes, but if Europe is too slow in this Juggernaut it will frustrate speed and velocity when rising to the sun.

If Britain stays in the EU there is another chance for a referendum in forty years from now, for cosmetic reasons of politics.

28 May 2016

The world might have big plans of it's own which is not very clear to the public domain, e.g. unemployment will fall in every country by a certain percent, or that humanity from now on will be able to alter their lifestyles with more relative ease, or something. That being something written with a capital F (Factor). Once the referendum is over and the UK has moved it's island closer to the continent the big plan here will need to be revealed at one point. A promise to the British people at this moment, by then, was that staying in the EU would alter the future economics of the country to the greater levels of globalism. A writing in terms of figures and value comes to a near of total fortune worth, let's say of trillions of $, and in terms of time, the coming 250 years? (In English) By the unemployment rates across the globe many have got used to the one eye-stick of global data (Universal substitute for global governance by a mouseclick, gilded in personal/ RAM coat of arms) and have long forgotten that human intelligence equals emotions too. One to perceive and one to receive are called also instincts. It is important for the leave EU campaigners to understand how this can affect a global structure per capita in Britain, just to make it a 'casus' to understand the rest of neighboring countries, also being constantly in the same time lapses as the rest of the world. Brexit is a big challenge to the global system, but then again they speak the same mother tongue.

To reconstruct or rebuild BREXIT, if stay in the EU has lost the referendum outcome, is being predicted by the media as a costly game no one wants to get in or their hands burned on. Between the rest of the world and BREXIT why is it suggesting something is different in Britain? As long as you pay your bills it doesn't matter to a corporation who has changed hands in your home, to put it in an oversimplified way. Fortunately for Britain the corporation (fictional) can't stop paying their rights in the country either, if that would be the case. Like the Assyrians once said in ancient times, "I never thought it would be so easy to pick our victory from the enemy. It was as easy as a bird's nest. The same feeling comes to mind while unfolding a few oddities on the seam of politics this easy and to explain the referendum conundrum coming up next month, 23 June 2016. We can't help but detect a major inclination of complacency on the side of British political establishment post 20th century Britain. If correct globalism has a mechanism that will continue at the same pace and ratios, while Britain decides on it's 'emotional' future, or will take on the 'intelligence' road of the universal uncertainty and sharing this with all of mankind and countries. To be completely honest, globalism has got there at first rights and will contest it's strength not for war but peace. Mr David Cameron is Britain's Prime Minister (Conservative Party) and this is all he alone (lonely goater) has to think about, now and post referendum 23 June next month. If he is wise he will be honest, when falling down from the sky... No questions asked, none answered.

Rise and fall, how the UK now has become the underdog (from grace of undergod) herself.

16052016

The thirties were great for British politics. Post war Britain, mid or late forties, was strong on revision and reviving industry of any sort, especially Banking. It was this time when emphasis was put on privilege versus non privileged. And for a good while this system has served well under the governments of Labour or Conservatives, a golden time for politicians to pick and choose the 'gold from the grain' in first time history bloodless harvest England. Europe had been in war twice, so much looking like something was holding back the British governments to have a mature and prosperous Britain at the time. A very long bridge far more extensive than the Oresund they have in Sweden connecting to Denmark, or vice verse, into time and globalisation. Now only a memory of smoke and mist since the EEC, Steffi Graf and Gabriella Sabatini, Ivan Lendl and Michael Chang at Wimbledon. The real England/ English flavor of Chelsea flowers shows by Alan Titmarsh. BREXIT? What did drop so low, after the rise to a globalised world? Had the Princess of Wales, Diana, lived, hmm... You guessed it, England would have put the blame on her and her recklessness of flirty relationships with men outside the perimeter of Windsor Castle. Luckily she is buried safe in our memory. Away and unaware of the leave or stay battle for Britain's forever more, debate or referendum 2016. The Duke of Endinburgh, Prince William, son to the late princess Diana, now is facing this duel of fortune in which he had let himself play the royal underdog and suggested Britain and the EU should stay in a business relationship. He is cool.

Europe wants something desperately but can't put it's finger on it for a long while now. Any student may tell you what it is or could be by just one peek at the world they are living in, of course wanting more prosperity and chances of opportunity for their generation, something Mr Cameron is happy to provide and asking the British voters to stay in the EU, if the future means anything in terms of currency above intrinsic value, and the students will vote too on this one. Theirs is the voice of the reality drousy older generations are too far back in time they can't think straight anymore. Europe is theirs, the younger generation has spoken. Politicians should listen to them, instead of going back to nostalgia times. The young city planner has a much different view of our world today, compared to the school of architecture of the old. It is right, exactly that will happen for these young men/ women when the globalists find new meaning to an aged world they are desperate to do away with once and for all. All the money will go their way... Thank God for politicians and politics. Nature has taught men order and no theory of man will ever be a learned view without that basic stuff. (You're with me?) Natural order isn't just organisation. But who will find out?

Some say crazy is the new black. What can we say of arrogance? Perhaps that arrogance is the new crazy? Just to make the theory complete. Of course there still will be normal living ongoing as we speak the only tested proof of human life and existence, like football or soccer in June 2016, the European Championship, Brazil and the Olympic Games, or Tokyo burning all it's spy satellites near the sun. It's all here and it's all there, there and overthere. ISIS for some reason has been pushed back on the billboard to number 10 hot item, and so forth. BREXIT? Where? Oh, I see, in England. It really matters to the British people, oh yes, indeed. (Who is winking?) It is true when they say that BREXIT is holding the pin on the grenade and nervously is waiting to be pulled. In the TV- series of Combat, starring Vick Morrow and Rick Jason, the Germans had long thin built designs or grenades. Took too long to make and wasn't ideal for wider trajectories in combat situations. The smaller the grenade the deadlier and effective, I would say. If BREXIT is truly British made it will have something that we don't know yet, but will typically be British and we'll see it from there once it is out. Surely it won't be like the thirties or forties/ fifties Britain, or even the seventies and eighties, Steven Frears style and suspense... We are living in interesting times, so say the Chinese proverb. Are we really?

Brexit is not a big breakfast if you are having big leftovers.

02052016/21:50 PM

One good look at the outside world today (far from our inner world) somehow is telling you a big story impossible to imagine on low adrenaline of the human intelligence of individual living. Brexit or staying in the EU is a mere suggestion, up to now, toward the idea of going on here on a very big thing for the people of Britain, the European Member States, and the rest of the world because statistics say that no one is reading history anymore in our century/ time. We like to stay in politics, government, the economy, and stability of all three together is basically the moral story. No government would want anything else 'instead'. Leaving the EU is roughly estimated an 'instead' story with no politics, economy or government, thus far. It is just leaving you go hungry more and more for more 'instead' stories. And who knows best? The people of Britain on 23rd of June? How will our world look like one year from now? Perhaps the best way to get close is to imagine what it was like three months ago. You can't ask three questions in a row, by rules of grammar. In the case of leaving the EU all that changes the rules in thinking, as if there is still something new under the sun to discover. Good news first: there isn't.

Leaving the EU is a simple  eggs and fish story. It makes you wonder what the answer might be, as if you heard it before but can't put your finger to it just yet. On the other hand if you look at it that way which would you prefer to consume first, fish or eggs. We are soon approaching the 23rd of June 2016, the day of the UK referendum to either go out and go your own way, or staying in politics, the economy and 'real' government. It could also be that Brexit is being blown out of it's wits and a small proportion into a fictional lion share... A new way to venture investments for the uncertain future? A tight belt might look dashing on lean and important men in big business, I don't know. But where will they be or not be is another question. And then there are other bigger issues our planet could use to pressure governments, e.g. climate change, environmental questions and going even bigger financially. Brexit only seems to be ready at their own national platform to make 'it go away'... It being staying in the EU. Presidential (Obama administration) style for campaigning to stay is what Mr Cameron should tell the UK: "Yes we can!" And be less elusive/we-lusive. You can't split caviar from the fish once it's out of the fish and big ocean. Maybe that is basic instinct in a man's world?

How technology teaches the world to be hands free and dynamic wireless learnings.

30032016/23:44 PM

The human body isn't plain anatomy anymore but has become a complete Dashboard for technology through eyes (Google), ears (micro headset listening) and body functioning in medical industries. Our planet and it's inhabitants now can have a world of their own at hand distance, virtual reality or the latest augmented reality, something that is distinctive from fantasies and all kinds of subtleties to go with the total of territories it intersects. The younger generation or so called millennials are having the most fun in our century and world / global technologies. It teaches them distinction and decision making, by a simple tap on the screen on their smartphone. A myriad of reflections appear in milliseconds with fast internet 'wireless' connection at any given command. (Four year olds are now the fastest learning generation in user's friendly technologies) Looking further beyond one's own horizontal horizon (comparing multinationals vertical horizons) this is quite a harmless activity on a mass scale. (Sales index figures are proof of how the global scale on mass production can reach top financial platforms) Is this the  wealthy earth in our century, more than the time of Thraciers' golden treasures?

A hands free and wireless technology in a microscopic reality can leave you asking lot's of questions, e.g. is there a stop to this? Within every vicinity of every office desk there is almost a sense or feeling having something similar to a 'frame time', of when to approach and when to keep distance, in case that might not be safe to 'outsiders' wanting to have a peek into data across the corner of one's eyes or across the shoulder. An open archive system of the 18/19 th centuries didn't had this 'office & desk deterrence' once far back in time as we now seem to have on a daily basis in modern world progress. If you want security in your 'frame time' you are breaching the order of the global systems, is also another feeling not very close to human natural behaviour. Technology is very low on natural human law for some inexplainable reason, causing a serious deficit across the world without anyone actually being aware of it, you could say. Why not classify humans into two groups: the younger generation (fulfilling the goal of potency globally) and the 'senile' generation for the over 50ties? It could be that technology not only has clean technologies, but also seems to have an embedded dark side in it's GD or global disc- ology (with great emphasis on the Y in it's meteorite size tail). And that perhaps is the 'new natural human nature'? In future if ever another WW comes back to visit our world this might only be because realities have become factors of real life (frame of time) and being too close and hands free/ wireless. Yes or No?

Adam Johnson, Sunderland soccer star, sentence today reaches global level of sexual abuse of a minor

24032016/23:00 PM

The news of Mr Johnson's sentence, six years in prison, is seen today on CNN home news page, a global network and news corporation with viewers over at least 12 million (a month) say statistics. We may not know it but when a celebrity falls from grace, or in Mr Johnson's case, a young girl of 15 year old and the 'accused', he himself being 28 years, the centre of the world viewers becomes in an instant 'the wrong family' you would want to be in. In the UK all national newspapers online have been plastering the sentence hearing and explicitly mentioned the reasons for the Sunderland soccer star why he was sentenced. It is one man in the wrong place in a sudden who was cut off from the rest of the world. His crime is the worst kind for any man. But in his position as a public figure and soccer hero the crime was a young girl of 15 years old. What can you say as a parent with a fifteen year old daughter who is textmessaging with a man almost twice her age? That is if you leave out the charismatic bits and pieces, a potent and hansome celebrity, football/ soccer star, a hero, big money, love and sex. Empathy or sympathy for a human falling so steep from glory is almost the wrong feeling to get, at this point. The law is there for keeping law and order for all it's citizens and is not a dealing in circumstances of any kind. Was the girl in love with Mr Johnson? Love is a divine and universal law. Rape on the other hand is a crime of any kind.

There is so much to agree or disagree with if you are just human. And pray to God Almighty that it may never happen to you, that too. Two things are very true in the sentence: the girl her age and that of Mr Johnson. But where you do find truth a mixture of right or wrong isn't very clear, since this is irrelevant. Human is irrelevant as an emotional creature, sometimes immature in many ways when at the age of 28 years old and being in the eye of the nation the favorite soccer hero. Also a few moral bastions have been breached as well by Mr Johnson by words such as 'grooming' the girl for a period of time. Our global view of the word means as much as 'condone' human trafficking of young girls and therefore the sentence should be particularly harsh at hearing distance. And then followed by our modern day technological freedom of social platform and it's transparency laws: a bulk of 800 textmessages were exchanged between Mr Johnson and the young girl's in that period of 'grooming'. One should not make any mistake: the sentence is a good one for any one committing this sort of crime. But in Mr Johnson's case the sentence is a light story resulting in a severe punishment, for a man who clearly was emotionally 'unstable' at the time, if love still counts for periodic/temporary instability as scientists claim. (Mr Johnson showered the girl with gifts)

You see, from a lawful point of view (?)the girl should be asked very clearly whether she was in love with Mr Johnson. If not it was rape. Is truth not the law?

A few rules will change the world as we have never known it

11032016/ 22:40 PM

Once this is over, after BREXIT or staying in the EU for England/ the UK, the world will be ready to conceive once again, let's say, since it brought globalization to your front door on a door to door sell only two or three decades ago. This time, one assumes, the world will be ready to set out a few rules to the new world it will unfold, if it has one single voice and eye. The top view might start working on what and what not to implement as quickly as possible, perhaps the stage for this change is already set in place, and focus will be how to maintain the only real reason they have found by expansion from BREXIT or staying in the EU for the UK. There is only one way to find out if you are carefully looking around you and wonder where all the big money is going, and if it were you would you do the same? If you are still thinking the idea is horizontal and micro- sharing, what you have is also what your neighbor is having, and from there going as far as if politicians can have it why not me, it means you belong on the other side of the future expansion in social sciences on a more profound basis. Investment is big money. And big money breeds even more bigger money, like violence breeds violence. The world of the older generation slowly is going extinct from many basic rules, and where they're going is hard to tell, if you are a global business man...

It's here: morning air is for the younger generation. When you are over 50/60 what is the point of discussing the expansion of the future with you, when most of the time you will be half asleep or having a nap? It is true, don't they all say this, that politicians fight for what is right for you, the people. Welfare is not a system anymore. The pressure is on the younger generation, 200% more than the previous generation had. Each decade will amount that number to going higher. And when at 500%, finally, the top goals, one can say, will be complete. A slight fortunate thing for the over 50/60ties, who physically will not be here long enough to see the world changing 'for the better'. Deep social science should make human beings more honest and stay there. Business, well, can anyone really believe that this will be the way how to get rich? Top money globalists can't stay rich if they resort to trust like ghosts. It is a tie here. BREXIT, from the world view in this writing, is either shortsighted or it counts it's blessings quietly (under a pint). Can governments save the world on a welfare system? Can governments save the welfare system on big money? AKA the economy of your country.

Dear Anne,

06032016

Your 'end of civilization' nursery rhyme is saying that elections are funny things, the electorate fickle, does not go far enough and begin to describe the reality that awaits e.g. the EU, US Presidential general election in the fall later this year, military historical alliances or nationalism with vertically deep sentiments how to run their country again. Time does not resets itself to accommodate International and national objectives & objectivities. When civilization ends, usually, that means a simple enough objective has been realized. And just maybe the EU is such form of reality, once the referendum on 23 June this summer in the UK has become fact from fiction. Perhaps you will be in the wrong place when there is no end of the world? Or, maybe, you will be in the right place once it commences? To turn the 'corner stone of society' in Europe to a greater 'self', a family portrait of EU nations, who can say that EU makers have pre- calculated all of it when clearly there is no substitute yet for a 'pan (your own word) European' platform to replace the historical place of ordinary households and incomes, aka family values. You can lament as much as you want but change in Europe will come, while your body stays in.

Let's forget about the UK for a moment, but for most EU Member States there is a deep moral story of enlightment at the end of the need for struggle and footprints in this 'way up' to some sort of EU- anti climax. This objective wasn't conceived until recently that is true. Would it not be better to create room enough for let's say another room, and than again the next 'other room' for what may come if it may in all vagueness? If the UK stays in this will be coming at a bad time with questions to ask why so inconvenient a time was chosen for a stay or BREXIT of the UK. Things might just not be held together by your little or long fingers any more. The mechanism that may now be way over your head this time is one of the machinery's to tear down the old human heart to pieces and bits, and let's hope, for the greater good. It makes your role in it insignificant. But you too belong to the world of 'one man one wife'. Another old family value? Machines obey only mathematical and arithmetics programmes. Per capita how much is their worth per family? Here you can't play with machines like you can when playing with kittens. Pan European Union hasn't begin to exist, just yet. And that is what you are failing to see. But it might take a big leap and change the spots of the leopard once and for all, when precisely?

Our world at  the Fish Tower too was never a real thing. And that was hardly playful, had it really existed. A nursery rhyme? Only seen from empty nursery rooms, Ms Applebaum.

EU Member States nominal view of Brexit remains a passive and European way of realtime life.

27022016

Britain means business and this will determine the Brexit or stay of the UK on the day of the referendum, 23 June this summer. European Member States, from a more daily routine, will only see the political impact that may come with the leaving or staying of the UK, once this is fact by a Yes or No vote by the British people. In all of a sleeping to wake- up economics 2016 now is turning it's back against the high walls it calls the European Union. Here the vote is unanimous but explaining very little in details or invention about the first impact and if there is going to be a second wave after that, for common sense, no one expects that is what it is all about or will be in July 2016. One has to expect an initial jolt with adequate preparations. It could also be worth the investment future economics want to see if a true shaping for the next generations will truly be feasible and build. Big plans and ideas. The European view can't do homesick blues for the moment, to the time when the EU needed much to persuade governments on the concept of ever close union and becoming the bastion of these governments and their prosperities. Then too there were big plans and now are realized, in fact, with or without the UK.

On saturday afternoon G20 Finance Ministers have said it will be a global shock if the UK had voted out Britain from the EU on 23 June. It is like this: buildings don't collapse because you are having no main door or gate. Whether or not that is aesthetic is another thing. A simple enough assumption, maybe so. But in architecture that is the truth. So, what is it that no one can yet see from this side of Brexit? Nothing, really. Except that Europeans are great architects. How to define the plan with the UK leaving could be either a suspension bridge, how large, how narrow or how long does it want to go from an abstract point like 23 June? Then, another point might occur from just out of nowhere, that, what if there is no suspension bridge at all, if it will cost a lot more, compared to... Fear of costs is a terror issue among the architects of Europe they suggest they can face, but then again they are not. If you are a civil engineering company perhaps building a tunnel would be the cost- effectiveness something the doctor might have ordered? Leaving aside all emotional stress when the UK does in fact leave by a majority of votes in the referendum. Yes, stay or Yes, leave? What else could they be facing or doing in this EU- curve with the UK leaving or staying?

Among 27 Member States, west EU, are countries: Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, and France. It is unthinkable to say these are not prosperities' countries (vertical economies) since the start and state of the European Union.

No one knows how to deal with the uncertainties of a new deal with no historical record ever made in it's greater understanding (behind).

19022016

The UK Prime Minister, however, has done exactly the thing, and where Britain is this morning, facing the 'uncertainty' of voter's outcome in a referendum later this year, after his announcement later today in the House of Commons. The EU 'renegotiations' deal with Britain, in so many words, has reached the agreement the Prime Minster has been saying it was or had to be on all points in this renegotiation to stay in the EU. Now how that is making history for Britain no one can say today and at the moment. The hour is still young and a new deal with Member States in the EU isn't cute but acute (angle compared to reflex angle). Europe is not in it's infancy as in previous decades in post war II. Some things will never change in politics, as being part of the natural source of survival, national character, and other traits more trivial but nevertheless is and always will be limited. In a new future with Britain holding 'special status' as EU- Member, but not the State, a few uncertainties will try for a shift expertise where it is or will be possible; one thing the EU has been showing a good example for the last ten years more frequently that shifting is possible. For the moment it isn't in Britain's main concern mindset if politics on the continent or beyond will be unlike today a good deal still in 2020. It is about migrants policies for today, a 90 degrees British acute angle.

The last time Europe did something similar how recently was that? Something distinct sparks out immediately from here that is fighting asphyxiation in meaning or muteness that comes natural with big moves of immeasurable proportions no one can oversee just yet where this is coming from or going. EU Member States have reached agreement, and Britain as a result of that, can now have it's long hard negotiated 'special status' in the EU. This is highly political charged and is also a boost for something else not yet defined. It could be economics, social cohesion, or government sterile pains for the future and future generations in all European Union countries? This is the side Europeans on the continent can see more clearly, one would say based on simple logic, that one tends to see up to the greater center and not to the corner of their eye, such as the deal Mr Cameron has won this week or since friday evening, 19 February 2016. Speaking of shifts: where are the obstacles, from d reflex angle point of view, that were there first and where will they be in the next era? Okay, let's give it up and be gracious to the EU and say: "Well done.". No one should temper with Divine providence in it's marvellous greater makings, even if no one understands it just yet. Salute! And let 'the voters now have the final say' (as in a CNN article read this morning) later this year.

Provocation high tech war.

14022016

The machinery has only two windows: symmetrical or asymmetrical, depending on where, when, what and how in any situation. Also, politics may suggest otherwise to weaponry theories, but on the ground/ air or sea in the military when ongoing, if provocation by high tech war is the method for one, it automatically sends out invitation to an equal high tech war from antoher side. In our century and in real time as given in the situation in Syria, it just might be the case if Russia and the west (NATO) come to a similar conclusion. On paper this calls for an immediate ceasefire. No nation would want to go there, if rationality still is the dominant structure in the mindset. Has anyone thought of war by high tech and it's aftermath? To one nation that might be the goal they are after, while to another nation it might be the dead of mankind. From here it looks like no easy choice to avoid greatness... (Getting mankind sandwiched in between by thousands). Provocation by high tech war, in theory, just might be the last ultimate test for recreation or to reshape our way of living on the planet. Perhaps a simple equation if let's say 70% of earth will withstand the blasts and destruction, and can be rebuild in a decade all vegetation and living organisms, including humans. Human behind this thinking can only mean living or dead organism, survival or renewed. In a way, if your eyes or window view is critical of all wars, this is already the case happening in Syria. People are on their way to survival or renewed human lives, somewhere out of Syria, in hostile environments (much percentage to survive) and deadly hostilities by force of seas (natural machinery to kill). The problem this morning for the west is how far they are willing to go with the 'new global vision'. Or how far they would like to go back because of conventional wisdom.

Today is 14 February 2016. The world has come very close to it's own reflection in the mirror with Syria to be the new Waterloo 1816, also when one man thought of his blue would cover all of the red and take Europe. Studies later wrote about soldiers dying from heavy injuries or wounds by the side of the road like stray dogs, on the winning side... We must wait and see what will happen the coming weeks in Syria, and if provocation is worth the sacrifice rationale.

Cosmopolitan politician in the US won first to cross the rubicon of the future generation of Americans. H C.

02022016

The crazy is over, but now the real crazy is on. It is an interesting outcome to start with this morning, let's say by estimate and only hurled in for the last 70hours or so. Could it have been that rival and Republican candidate Mr Donald Trump came dangerously close to burst that cosmopolitan bubble of America and politicians, who seemed at the beginning of this presidential race in 2016 at a lost of direction that was almost final for US political primaries? Republicans or Democrats. There are now a few 'open' questions to be answered after last night's nominees race in Iowa. What will be next for Mr Trump? In the US that is a clear end for all who would have wanted the Republican candidate to beat Democrat Mrs Hillary Clinton on the first real test to the presidential race to the White House. But what do we mean by saying this is a very interesting decision outcome? It is also clear enough at this hour that most people would want the next US president to be a woman and the Democrats to be back in the White House. Never mind the red carpet and velvet glove, Mrs Clinton is a potent leader with great consummate powers if America wants to be the leading nation again, but now doing so with a much 'deeper' and 'wider' understanding of the present time global changes. She is perhaps a woman and wife to former president Bill Clinton with the right mindset for the task ahead of her, if she would become President of the US and making history at the same time.

Can the Republicans with last night's winner  Ted Cruz make a u-turn and come back sharp to be on top of the 2016 presidential race for the White House? If they do they will have to do this standing up from the heels. (Achilles heel) Let us wait and see what happens in the second quarter later this year for now. (Any view today will only be amateur point of views for what is expected to be an offical demand as a world nation)

Ancient Athens: what is the original citizen accuracy? In our time we know that it is statistics.

25012016

On a good day morning in the 21st century you are wondering about politics in ancient Anthens, if this was a political will of the people and another way of teaching philosophy for idle men. Hobbyists finding something useful to do, perhaps not in the same way we understand it, but like the only good way of wasting timelessness. Then it wasn't like in our successful financial state that time is money. If Athens had only five men in the city, who day by day, came to plant their tree of politics and political philosophy, encouraging the 'citizens' of Athens to do the same, when it is the work of citizens to nourish the growing trees, this experiment would one day be useful to all living in this city... That means every man is potentially educated in politics and political philosophy, or educated also as a citizen to care for these plants. How many big cities in the world today are still doing it in the ancient way of political grooming? It is way above their heads and they 'stare blindly into space 24 or 6 to 4', Chicago style (music). When in times of trouble or a crisis statistics help and do all the rest, to calm the people or citizens. The point here, Chicago style, is how to be rich and grow richer. The tree that was never planted during the making of the city in ancient Athens.

How did the Europeans on the west side do this over the past few hundred years? That's easy, being close always to Greece or it's ancient history, they kept a more accurate record on the political history of Athens and Rome. It was an interesting learning, knowing from scribes how these political phiolosophies were heavily tested by great excesses of sexual perversities and deeper sins of the human mind and flesh. Our world isn't any different from that angle, but keeping the world in check by it's remains in politics, order and law, somehow they have managed to successfully maintain the authority of building societies throughout the hundreds of years through time and places. (Villages or palaces) Accuracy above transparency is a very sharp blade, but there is proof how it works and can do the political work a great deal of good, throughout generations. Someday they will return to these old fields of political Elysium again... It may come true, in a swan song? But I wouldn't underestimate these lords of the old city in Athens school, you see. Under the International law all nations are equal. There is a greater story in the making or waiting for the near future. Yes, perhaps so. If you can't love politics, at least you should fall in love with the skill.

But what if there is none in the old city? What if there was none ever found in the old city of Athens? We are living in a world measure for measure. It would have been strange to do sands for sands, under the tyranny of the sun or night. The delusion would be emperor, don't you think? In our time it is presidential campaigner Mr Donald Trump saying exactly that to the American people, that the emperor is naked. No matter how good you want him to look, it won't change. So, make your choice a real one, and formulate a new way into the future of the unknown one we all seem to talk about. Technocrat that he is, he is a success story so far in the opinion polls. Time lingers on... For some that can mean it is their obscure moment, while others continue growing the plants of a million times security and make it a mass product for their citizens to... Yes, do exactly what? Play maybe? Like what, GTA Games? GTA Games or financial success are not in the written laws of International Law. Why? Because the city of Athens never spoke to their citizens of financial success. The five men (fictional estimation) spoke of humanity, reason and equality (of some kind). These are the few international heirs of all written laws and texts. Who is without is like spurned silver, you see.

The time and date of new envision could be very real already in the present hours...

22012016/21:13 PM

Ask anyone in Europe about the 'gone era' and what that means, and you will be surprised at the response or opinion of any member in the European society. Davos, or the World Economic Forum in Switzerland, now for many years later, has learned how to take the European outlook, from country to country, and State by State, to a wider center from national governments into closer integration with the rest of the world, and has made this successfully every year. World leaders in the G7 group next to the G20 coming here every year again is proof of that success. But most citizens know that it won't make history, scientifically. (In fact Latin and Greek are dead languages and are inadequate to reach the wider stretch of diplomacy and politics, economics and, paradoxically, even science in the 21st century) In every society there are stubborn citizens and will not say really what they truly believe in. Is the UK going to stay or not in the EU? One or two simple answers can only give you an idea of what the UK Prime Minister thinks Brexit means. If more money the best idea is to stay in. You see, anyone could have told you that. (Not Edgar Allan Poe in the Raven) The German Chancellor, Mrs Angela Merkel, isn't making any history either or not at the moment, if she refuses the majority of the German voters on the crisis and emergency the German people are all facing here. Who will be their saviour?

When you think about envision the artistry comes with a much wider window in a place where global stability feels home and safe or safer. In the United States, especially when a new President will be elected this year in November 2016. The American people are set their mind on a revolutionary change in the presidential contest, either to have a woman be first female president, or Ahimelech, since no one in the Republican Party could get strong enough by the end of the presidential campaign. Mr Donald Trump wants to be king of America. And he is repeatedly calling the emperor is naked. In Mr Trump's future there is a small reversal of fortune for the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, that he will return to the G7 and making it the G7+1. This can only mean that Mr Trump simply doesn't know the other side to his reality, in wealthy surrealism, where the poor become poorest or critically rising in homelessness. Only the wealthy understand the Russian President, or plutocrat, Mr Vladimir Putin. But not all is lost in envisioning where world leaders think they should 'go now'. Israel and Turkey are rationalizing some sort of balance of power and diplomacy between the two countries and re-open an entirely different path to negotiations. One cannot help admiring the Turkish Prime Minister today at Davos for his valiant presence during these difficult times, on all sides, in which Turkey is showing great willingness to follow the lead in the global sphere. In the meantime history is slipping like sands through his fingers... In the Middle East there is no envision but a wider mirage. In case you are wondering.

Strength in 2016 must come from global decision makers

01012016

Peace minus war makes a rare appearance in any age or time, but especially when this is all part of the decision making process by questioning. Where did the world go after 2008, 2014 and 2015? The sobering thought of dropping the act of confidence shouldn't just be the teaching of one country, Middle East, European Union, Middle Europe or far east, if just to make sure to be on the safe side, peace or war. 2015 Was a very important year for all global actors, political or diplomatic, when this was the chance to learn how close the world can come to war again, and that this time victory would mean destroying the peace of post war WWII. That is a very serious undertone and idea, to put it like this. Decision making in 2016 will therefore have to be the ordinary job of principle soul searching, and whether or not the invitation looks appealing. No personal pointing of finger is directing this direction, but the towering industries in the present time having no other meaning, other than being golden in unmoving sunshine. The planet is not a dead star just yet. The Anglo Saxon world has come a long way since the end of the Byzantine empire ceased to exist. Time does count for something when it is evolution and revolutionary. It is the character role of our virtual past/ history, civilization and vision realization in 2016?

On the happy occasion of the first day of the new year perhaps self reflection is a humble thing to do, by form a mini post war mode... Or in human street language one can only say that International terror isn't singular but plural by nature, a common enemy won't hide anywhere in these places, and that the threat to global stability isn't the terrorist freedom to do so, acting as a privilege or prerogative from any attainable corner in the mind or eye. Nevertheless this morning Germany and Belgium are on high alert over the terror threat in their streets and squares. Europe can not afford another crackdown on Humanity by their own hands instead of decision making process and how to deal with incoming refugees by alarming numbers. Elsewhere decision making is the new thing and how independence of centralized governing bodies must take on the new challenges, this year and beyond. Peace minus war in our time can only mean pressure, by approach only. Underneath the graphic details another pressure continues/ prolongate, which is unemployment figures across all global leading nations and traveling even further down with great speed and ease. The world must hope and not give up, of course. If alive?

Shake hands, the forgotten protocol of world leading nations

23122015/23:56 PM

From 1945 to 2015 constant, of world goals, assembly of nations, wars in between decades, computer age takeover from former decades of industrial revolutions, the understanding in our century, from nation to nation, or people to people, changed the human mentality at very deep levels beyond imagination. And what is wrong with that, when 'hands- on or hands- off' means something to any new born in our world today? In the meantime the world is planning on having more of it, than less of the next big unknown to be discovered, if that would mean the new way of improving life and it's live abstracts, e.g. living? It is not whom the bell tolls for but for whom the handshake will be next. If none, half of the world may depend on it for a reason, it still will be dead or void of existence. If done, half the world may still be needy of what will never be, but at least written in the deal over the next ten years. Of course, everyone wants something. In the end it does get there and reach the final destiny... Seventy years ago, imagine for one second how the world would have looked today if world leaders only 'socialized' at high level, and no handshake of peace was done. Today that 'custom' has gone out of the fashion window without the mega smash of broken glass.

Tonight, just 24 hours, before Christmas 2015, a tranquil sea of apparent calm resounds the world. Which, in fact, is strange to experience. What is your best memory of the year 2015? A question any child could ask from a parent. But what if it concerns the citizens of Paris answering the question? Or worse, like e.g. Syrian refugees fleeing Syria because of the long civil war back home? Globalization did take that unknown turn in the living abstract of mankind and wants to erase it's memory. (Don't mention the handshake!) At this time of the year only one mass imperative matters more than the speed of money, gold or death. Millions of people forgive during the Holidays of Christmas. They come together from everywhere and corner to especially forgive those who wronged them, deeply or patholgically. Poverty and unemployment, homelessness or mourning the dead, private or public, this can all go away when it's in the festive mood of Christmas. No one can follow this or even begin to understand that what you see with the eye isn't what you are getting. And next year won't be any different. Still with high pitched color bees inside our eyes next year will be our best time. In a hug, a handshake or kiss between families. World leaders have already  changed and exchanged tradition by textmessaging their good wishes, country to country, nation to nation. The protocol is missing on the real deal and handshake, and creeping like a giant heavy king serpent in the same old rhythm, like a peacock, whilst everyone is celebrating new year's eve at the fore-or background sound of heavy fireworks shots going deep in coloured air.

For one moment there was a blip on the war screen in Syria this morning...

29112015

1.6 Kilometres inside Israel's control zone and than fly out again safe, without a tail of Fighter Jets coming after you, must have been the global experience in modern days warfare for Russia earlier today. Israel Defense Minister, Moshe Yaalon, kept his cool and pointed that this was the pilot's error and there will be no shooting down of any plane. The Russian pilot entered the Golan heights zone and than flew back on his way into Syria. Or, in plain language, a kamikaze stunt? In theory, had it been a deliberate stunt it would have meant something rather different, from a military standpoint. The world at the top is not easy to understand as in our daily lives from 09:00 to 17:00 hours. From here everyone can see the global idea of every day life is in a gridlock and that no one can escape. Except from going into the middle eye. But we will know when Russia is ready. That depends on how far this theory would go. Formation of battle in our time doesn't happen anymore on the table/ time table, and moving battleships manually on the maquette. We have 1000 or more than 8000 reads per second technologies in modern life today. 1.6 Kilometres is quite long a trail in one flash and no collapse.

See the article on Yahoo.com news. On the other hand, President Vladimir Putin is not General George Armstrong Custer in his first battle of Bull Run.

Indistinct voices in the background can tell you real stories on the state of our world.

08112015, 22:02 PM

The Middle East is a hub of it's own when listening closely or more closely to all the voices in the media. And the same goes for the far east, back to Russia and in a natural swing all ends up back in Brussels. What exactly are these voices saying, or better, what is it that the world is hearing between this week and for the last month? Actually there was one blip on the chart of global happenings last week. Imagine what it must feel like now to also have a search engine for the Kurdish nation! And then it swooped down again later that day. For radical changes in that part of the world the bigger question goes hand in hand with it. Turkey, obviously, does seem to fit that size of a question after the AKP win on 01 November 2015. And judging from this size, it doesn't only come for Kurds or Turks alone. The hub of indistinct voices in the background are murmurings of a new time or vision and shift that in time with another big factor. Iran, Syria, Egypt (after the crashing of a Russian airliner/ passenger's plane), Russia and ISIS, are perhaps on a nose- dive course with their latest pursuits of a tangible peace- deal to stick around for longer than a decade glue. ISIS just means crisis. Just like the US is just crisis- solving. Other than that there are no more unanswered questions left in the bag for the Middle East, at the moment.

A year ago in a clockwise spin the world was wheeling itself from a jam, from any small observationist's (is this a word?) eye. Maybe it's a good sign when world leaders sit back and relax a little, after a global phew! But, some want it all and more. It's interesting to read on a sunday night on Twitter when someone tweets about the old institutions how hard it was to build, while destroying them is easily done. What's the big secret here? History can now project it's own downfall by any standard, be viewed by millions of people on Youtube.com, and more. While there is still so much infinity left in us to pray for something vast above all this. It is either romantic or sentimental blackness of the mind- lagoon. But, it is the hip thing to do/ be, to think that human can now play and be God of eternity. It's cool to think that God Almighty is cool. "God, Almighty, barbarians are at Thine gate, my Lord!" Paganism of the very sophisticated kind is now a religion when matched by super stars in the universe. As always, the conservatives say ney. Life doesn't speed up far enough for any individual as the human kind. We have kindred spirits that only go as far as your nose or toe. Do they understand that? Be honest, what do you think? And what do G7 and G20 world leaders think? We're not hearing anything for now...

Man made kings are bad for any day in life and century.

25102015

For some reason I have chosen this subject today with some love and the feeling of 'being earnest'. It holds three great symbols of man in sight: God, a young child of nearly four years old, and also kings as we know it's meaning throughout all of mankind history. Where did the split of age went or disappeared to no one actually can recall. We are now living in a whole new way to inhabit the earth, so one could say. It is the part of great earnest sentiments but also holds truth Internationally. To say that there is this immediate knowledge (global)front, undeniable at any time and in every age real or fiction, that man alone knows, that e.g. the king is law and established order. No matter how great a crusader, immaculate by immortal shine, there is no way the International understanding will be or is going back to the crib in Christian humbleness in the straw. And then, what happens when men are made kings? Standing in line in organizational kingship? Here they are already and took hold of the world. In our man made environment, as Climate Change calls it, the logical idea can only be that man for a man is king and truth in our century. Tradition, what was that again? Traditional hereditary only is an old organization made by men. Truth can be hurtful like common surgery among old and new men.

And then the oceans in high red planes split the foam of time... A child, earthly and plain, bathing in our sun, stands up and moves in an incredible matrix, to open the flesh of man and beast, God in heaven, our ancient God of Israel, and he swims like a great magnificent whale in the sea. And for one moment the world is his witness that here is a child, unaware of all earthly or universe powers, does that one thing the whole world knows where it came from originally in our time... Mars was even silent, and not violent or volatile. A boy was king for one brief moment, and made this a measurement unknowingly. It is good news, that God Almighty His truth can only be when His truth makes kings out of man or race. King David was such a man and not Saul. And we leave it at this short moment of witnessing what man did not make. What God of Abraham wants alone can also be more Just and inspire all mankind. Modim d'Rabbanan is a greater truth, that is God of ancient Israel His love is forever. Love here adopts, and yes, even a Hittite! What comes next can only be a miracle. For wise councils, and as they say in the old Russian Duma, Boyars? Where is this child now? Today that is not important to answer the question. He is for certain among man and living in a parallel world from where men are made kings in the world. Love! (When hiding in thick green Ivy)

West ends by mid 2016 it's lifetime's work on agreeability and agreements

17102015/21:57 PM - 18102015

If true, globalization's ending has come at a much premature time than expected, or what experts on the subject for the last decade have predicted. By 2020 the end of globalization will end up in a big plastic bag on the dump of advanced economies, what used to be capitalist giants. One place to look for this differential is going back to 2014, after the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, decided Crimea was no longer part of Ukraine territory and that this needed to be annexed. Europe after the annexation of Crimea, was by a sudden in complete disagreement and for a while it stayed in a diplomatic shock. What was now possible had only been impossible 24 hours before (and longer). Ukraine in the meantime in hundreds of initiatives since then has tried to convince the outside world, (out of Ukraine and middle Europe), how Russia wants things to be done in this part of the world. Fierce fighting was ongoing for months, before the May election and elected President, mr Poroshenko, and continued after the outcome of the election. 2015 Some are wondering what exactly did happen and changed in Ukraine, if relevance and conflict (with Russia) still means danger to all of Europe, namely the European Union Member States. The world is convinced that it is the Middle East to make the difference it is waiting for to stabilize first. Syria has gained middle ground and is advancing onto several fields of politics and military powers, and doing so deliberately. Russia decided, for a second time, to back up the Syrian President, Bashar Al Assad, but this time as a cooperative super power in the G7 and G20 to fight ISIS. You sow what you reap or is it the old saying that you reap what you sow?

Next year, in two and a half months, 2016, it is feared that social policies and politics will be falling apart if the war in the Middle East, and refugee crisis in Europe from Syria continues. Overnight a fatal stabbing took place in Germany and it almost became nostalgic of the stabbing of Anna Lindh in Sweden, for a moment. Ms Henriette Reker, a German politician, mayoral candidate in Cologne, was stabbed by a man in the crowd, for disagreeing with her politics on tolerance she is advocating in the refugee crisis in Germany. Anna Lindh was Foreign Minister, a whole different issue on the war against Bosnians and the bombing of Kososvo for most Member States in the EU, and being a global issue as well... Twenty years ago who would have thought it, that one day this will all be over, the west will be divided and globalization would halt? For Europe it has always been a dangerous place if public opinion no longer find agreeable politics with governments. Here, in this part of Europe, they are not Ukraine! Also, if anyone suggests otherwise, history for many countries within the EU are historically sovereign and at one point could make that their right again, if forced to yield by alienation of some kind. All lost or losing of control can then only be symbolic. (Compare to the United States, that no state can reverse dependence on the US central government to symbolic order) This is one thing the Russian President has a good sniffing nose for and he understands how to mark and respect territory, be it of the Duke, Duchess, prince or Queen/ King hunting grounds... One has to understand these things to the other side of the hubris we grew accustomed to thinking the US alone has supremacy in the whole world.

SO (Small Observation): what is it? The wrong bet in Syria?

03102015/ 22:02PM

Theorethically the smart world is ongoing and moving on, and on, and on. In particular places we call, let's say for humour, countries, this is vertically true. Some countries have even become more than just being silent partners or on the side giants in the new industry of smart technology/ technologies. Take for example China and it's Galaxy smart phones. Or even the auto industry, Daewood? (Bloomberg is convinced the Chinese car automakers are too big too fail...) In terms of the longest history in China all industries have now got a name and brand of their own, which is a sign of fortune when not beginning in Kanji. In other words, mathematically the world on this side is running like a ProRail train, while in middle earth parts, e.g. Syria, the refugees influx into the EU, Ukraine in 2014, and other relics of war since the millennium, well, here they are in perfect alignment to eclipse the world with the greater forces of high expectations. There is definitely proof of gross inefficiency gunge hanging there somewhere in this global plan, green or red.

In the meantime human kind are now many running on their sides or rolling like pebbles off the earth. A wounded animal, even when crippled, has to get up and stand on his/ her feet to get to the well. Philosophy of the State today is saying something rather odd about humans who are crippled and get to the well... And the unemployed in global numbers are indeed a great many and many more to come. These facts are fanning intimidation all over the world like common Dandelion (in Dutch, paardebloem), global size. So, it is true what the world is saying, that after 15 years since 2000 our planet has transformed into a smart changing world 24/7. Password: do not dare look back! (Human kind may than turn to pillars of salt) Fifty or sixty years ago this was a lot more simpler, if anyone can remember General Electric. Wages or income, or taxation laws for that matter, since then have never changed! Rich and poor did reconcile after WWII very briefly, but after a while the romance stopped for many rich industries. For some odd other reason, if people still live by the same taxations, income or wages since the thirties, you have to wonder how smart they will be if ever to choose sides between good government and bad ones. Like platonic love, so is loyalty, a very deep human kind would understand.  Of course, depending on where you are in  the world today.

Donald Trump as Presidential 2016 candidate for the Republicans

20 August 2015, 22:23 PM

For Mr Donald Trump Americans and America need a new definition why the US is the most powerful country in the world, and why the need for focus as President of the United States doesn't need another Democrat, like Mrs H. Clinton, or Republican like George W. Bush. America has become imaginary, if you are true to yourself and honest enough to admit it, if we understand Mr Trump's 'great sleeper' line this morning on CNN online news. But this is just a small estimation of the next presidential 2016 campaign in the US. Mr Trump will not be able to make that global impact Mrs Clinton almost has standing to lead the next US government singlehandedly if she get's through and wins the election. Again, the future of Americans very much are looking more comfortable in the hands of another Democrat President, this time could be a woman president. And yet, one should have another look at Mr Trump. He at least is admitting that at ground level America is looking suspiciously like a great third world country and making all the right moves with the economy at home, and in global economics. Is this the way forward for 'this great country'? So, what is Mr Trump offering instead?

Once you give up all your crazy stuff, domestic and international, and planning on taking your place in the world seriously to become e.g. the next President of the United States and the American people, it seems that in Mr Trump's case   it is  a humbling experience. To lead the world from the White House isn't just a trade deal or even agreement between men and women in corporate global businesses. He's got you! You can't underestimate a man like Donald Trump. He knows America inside- out when America was still building with bricks. Something not many 21st century Americans can remember or recall as vividly like Mr Trump. This is why the presidential candidate has a point about focusing and which direction he would like to take Americans. And you can only think that this is truly greatness in a man, who's innocence is almost moving, his loyalty to partners and friends is almost heartbreaking, and so forth. Honesty will do it or for now. Virtue as a Republican candidate Donald Trump is assuming this is on an automated basis anyway, so how hard can it be for a man with great fortune like his? One question on foreign relations: "The Prime Minister of Greece, Mr Alexis Tsipras, tonight has resigned. Would that worry you, Mr President?" In politics honesty usually means diplomacy. Mr Trump has a lot to offer and perhaps he is doing so already, winning hearts and minds of the public. But in the end of the day for the US President is a world leader as seen by the whole world at the White House. Does anyone know what that actually means? (God is on one side, and the US is on the other side?)

Good math: keep fight on ISIL (US Policy) curve

11082015/11:20 AM

(Personal op)

In ten years time the Middle East is expected to be a different landscape, adjacent to hosting countries on equal friendliness or even mutual friendship alliances and embrace the future abstracts or organizations. A startling design if one takes a more considerate approach on singularity rather than multiplicity. This is the unbreakable curve policy destined to take over a very exhausted generation still trapped in old politics and global views. Other theories, like for example the Ground Theory of each government in countries along the Mediterranean or Middle East, share a different view and say that this is more identical to older centuries in these individual places. Turkey is such a century old place and has always been at the centre, somewhat more than country neighbor Syria, in the region. It is looking from this point of view indeed a fight or rivalry going much further back in time before the US, Europe and EU were born world governments, now global leading nations. How does the story of the Kurds, the unlikely cousin, fit in when in another time and century, like 2015? This truly must be Turkey's worst nightmare.

The US policy curve won't change and it's logic makes sense, just like building bridges and roads make sense. One can only expect that these are billion Dollars plans that won't back down. Ten years from now the world will probably reach another high peak in existence, where there is no single nation or group of nations, to even try taking a complete earth into it's stomach. Humanity never is going to eat that much land, sea, air and faraways. But technology can. What the US wants is high tech advance and getting rid of all low tech industries and their governments. Unclear of course is that not many know what exactly this policy can mean, in terms of natural law in ascending order. Who or what it means to want more isn't going to be anything like three decades ago, is all they can tell you. ISIL seems to have grasped side effects intentions from the big picture in the world, and has probably decided on using this to it's advantage industry. What can the human cost mean at this point?

Turkey has started an avant- garde war with PKK

01082015

This is where Turkey finds itself on saturday morning having fresh air strikes attacks on PKK targets and killing dozens of PKK fighters, say world media newspapers online. It is over the week something you either know, or you don't know. Period. Except of course, the Prime Minister Mr Ahmet Davutoglu and his present ministries, of war? (Outside this illustrious garden of parliament is Turkish high totem of war cypress sculpture of no other than the President Recep Tayyip Erdogan who have seen better days come and go from Turkey in and out) No, we do not understand the Prime Minister's 'Top Gun' adventure on PKK, at least not after the general election this year and last year in October 2014, when things did look as if the Kurdish people in Iraq and Turkey were planning on to change history for the Kurds, a story supported widely by western politicians of all walks of lives. (We, meaning here public opinion in different countries) Turkey, unlike last year's mass protest over Kobane and lack of Turkish government to help fight the war against IS across the border with Syria, is now taking a rather loose stand (off) with PKK, this year in july and august 2015. The prong being exactly this or that, but no one can say the prong being exactly what. Politically Turkey is now being split into a confused society and truly that is no playing game for amateurs. (The Turkish military is not known to be amateur-ish but always closes ranks when in a crisis- compare to God Almighty/ Abraham when saying to the Israelite, 'Remember thine mother a Hittite, thine father...)

Another story's bid is that peace has become a complex unit for the government in Turkey after the general election in May 2015, with a definite victory for the HDP and showing that it won't go back to previous times when all Kurdish citizens in Turkey were a prime suspect of terrorism against the State of Turkey. Is there a greater enemy to pressure the government in Turkey to cancel certain priorities and to have put instead no advanced Turkish involvement when proceeding with strategic ambitions for the new Middle East countries? Public opinion, please, don't go there... To openly attack PKK targets across the border with Syria could be pointing to a new concept of war and politics, when for example Kobane shows a different Turkey and military readiness. (All in line with the 21st century) IS is the International world only enemy in the present time. Also it has given the Kurdish people global recognition after October 2014 and the debate in the House of Lords, England, in the same month. Somehow the world is not looking at answers over the peace process with the Kurds in Turkey and beyond, especially if Turkey has decided not to close ranks but are going for 'open attacks' on it's former enemy, the PKK. Incidently still deemed terrorists in the US and EU. Not even German Foreign Minister, Frank- Walter Steinmeier, will be able to escape this snake catcher L-shaped metal iron...

Germany's latest attempt to help out Greece can only make sense

09072015/23:46PM

Politics of this institution many have come or learned to know as the European Union goes back sixty years ago. It is this body that now has matured for many European Union Nations, aka the EU Member States. The EU has outlived it's name and establishment. There is a new generation now of the young middle class and beyond. Why would it be more important to help out Greece and prevent Grexit, by using the argument everybody in the street knows, that it just can't be done the way all/ most EU- citizens would want to see? Looking back the EU was constructed in 2001, 12 Member States were the bloc of that construction in which the EU mechanism for economic and monetary union did take off. Greece back then wasn't the problem for any future collapse, not in the least. It was overseen and impossible to have that kind of premature concern, that if... The year 2015 proved all EU Member States wrong. Including the ECB and IMF. But there is a slight glimmer of hope throughout the chaos of Grexit. In politics the EU is constantly changing as it is expanding. This is one principle to hold up universally in balance with most Industrial countries and the leading industrial G7. Greece today  is also part of the G20. Of course, politically it has a saying of it's own, and probably  it has used/ exhausted that right in the crisis. Intrinsically on the other hand Greece has never been recongnized as a full Member State for being the smallest country in this EU rim of massive steel. That is one side of the problem, one can say.

How did  this become possible of taking Greece out of the Euro/ European Union Membership for the last two weeks, one thought it was only due to public opinion? It wasn't until the result of the referendum when political leaders in Germany and France, and to a certain extend the US President Barack Obama, for the first time since the crisis became dominant no longer could deny Greece a 'have your say' in the prospect of a possible exit from the European Union. That didn't go well as the crisis was ongoing and making an even harder exterior against creditors and EU Finance Ministers these last two weeks. Should Greece now seriously try convince the rest of the world to live up to it's democracy and show solidarity with the other EU Member States where austerity hit hardest over a decade, and even more since the global financial crisis in 2008? (Btw not a thought I have come up with myself but a woman old enough to be a pensioner, here back home, and still forced to be looking for a job as a volunteer or other) In it's new plan or proposals tonight perhaps this solidarity is indeed the content of the writing! The younger generation of Greece equals the rest of the EU Member States young, that's one reason why the Greek Prime Minister should comply half way with reform and think of future generations. There is no point to hang on there to outdated politics and government direction. These are new things, yes. But when a fool on the hill it is only the hill that is getting higher and not the fool.

SO (small observation): scaredy- cat, scaredy- cat

29062015/22:59PM

Thirty hours ago the Prime Minister in Greece did exactly what again? On 5 July next sunday, in his own words, called for a referendum on the debt deal of 1.7 Billion euros, with creditors and the ECB in the backscene, he wants a vote on it by a crowd that is angry and dissatisfied with everything the EU stands for in this global crisis. That's a laugh, and never did seem that way to the rest of the world. Greece still is the smallest in the EU (2%), what then exactly is defining this to be a crisis of global scale in the west? Also till up to now the Greek Prime Minister Mr Tsipras has only been associated with his right wing party and propaganda against the austerity in a battered Greece of four or five years. In this stretch no one expected the Greek Prime Minister, by party politics a hard man to bend by any modern day politics and standard, being able to play both fronts at home and as the EU Member State small country. The problem with Greece is bigger now and it has reached as far as the United States, especially when sunday the President Mr Barack Obama thought that now was the time to have that call with the German Chancellor Mrs Angela Merkel on how perhaps 'not to solve' the problems the EU is facing with Greece at the moment. A scaredy- cat? That could be, but then why such a big name? 30 Hours later after sunday's announcement by the Greek Prime Minister, the world is now looking on a different place or being in it. To others this might just be the tip they need and keep them on the edge, and in fact could be best described as the terror they need. It can be an exciting time if this is your place to be and run the world's fastest money. Compared to the fastest way to gossip in the world media feed, that now isn't hot.

12000 People tonight are in support of the Greek PM and they are in the streets protesting with 'NO' to more blackmail from creditors, so they say. At this point one cannot help but wonder whether Mr Tsipras had intended the call for a referendum to balloon so quickly after sunday and now taking off to mid air. Mr Dijssenbloem has been cautious tonight by saying that Greece can only do what seems right or deemed right in their eyes. (In so many words) Walking away wasn't good on emphasis, but... Also Spain and Italy earlier today shared their thoughts in public, and Spain even going slightly further by suggesting that the Greek Prime Minister had shown the difference between policies. Step by step Mr Tsipras will come to a point of no return and necessity will prevail somehow. But as things are now looking for Greece tonight it doesn't seem to the 12000 on the streets it is going to be Greece who will be king or queen of necessity. For tonight only? This thing could lead the PM of Greece to unknown new heights in the crisis. What was apparently fragile the Prime Minister can or could now change the course of a few fronts in one big move, or turn Greece to become politically bankrupt as well as financially. No one can be sure whether the Prime Minister has that kind of 'vocation'. And neither has he the kind of superstition to believe dark clouds above Athens mean something of the Old Greece...

Error: Tsipras Greek government is left wing. Hmm... 

(Two old  writings in 2012. Differences today with time are either mere fantasies, or else... )

The Trap in the dragon’s egg

27 february 2012

It is not in the plan of interest, the sort of surplus you create to keep countries borrowing more & more, if the cost of living and human life will be drained one day and stop being productive on a mass scale. And it may come to that when e.g. national governments/ countries – to put it simple- will keep failing to pay back their future debts. That is no easy or simple system dealing with that kind of debt structure magnitude.

By 2050 the welfare society will become extinct and a thing of a distant economic wasteland or horror.

The first to go are always by whatever social plan the dependants on social welfare level UPL- under the poverty line. But the second to go is where the economics is good sense and a balance of cost of living and stay productive till death. Here there are no 'comforting' costs or rewards. The rich have only one rule and not like in the past building economies on a multilateral system for all industries and industrial countries. That too will have to go, the welfare for the ‘upper class’ worker and be replaced with the work ehtics of what will be around the clock megaphone, that you pay your way to live and die. This exclusive system is your privelege to serve and participate in it. Unlike 'those people' you see outside in the streets and happening for no reason at all... Except for their own fault.

Even more reproachable is the ‘ex- welfare state’ parasite.

It looks a horrific picture before the eyes of the human quietly born unto the 21th century and within the limits of time is growing even much closer at eye level, that basic economics is the new ‘welfare’ of the city or state. But in comparison to the sky above you where economics is the impossible dream and is harsh reality of some sublime law to control all in stealth and when hostile, you can't be much more than a UPL paperclip.

Governments around in the world for example will become too weak to do anything on their own. No military will be able  to take on what is the one rule system over one and all. And if you take another good look, this is skin deep and stretching a law of it’s own alive and growing higher into the universe. When still brilliant and playing/ playful the world is looking benevolent and never ending in it’s welfare promises of golden times yet to come! But it will hatch at one point & startle all of human life, when naked and trapped by the end of the old world, 

And if this is not true, what then is the point of the globalist?

PS 2050 Is about the globalist immunity law of physical life, a process that is by nature immune from judgement and democracy (since born to create a stable government and society, and when in our time or century/ 19th to 21th parliaments for example in Europe strongly believed decreasing the level of social justice to zero value for human life could in history be interpreted as sinful and onforgiven if life continues to the end, Christian, Jew or other).

Public opinion is getting more & more interesting over Russian Valdimir Putin today

5 march 2012

The mood certainly confirms a sort of lion/ mouse game, and not Mr Putin being the lion, but the public of young middle class opponents of the soon newly elected President. In the west newspapers online, Der Spiegel, Politiken, and the Daily Telegraph, have crossed blades/ swords over the outcome of last night’s win in Russia in favour of Mr Putin, that this was not as honest as he claims, and if that is the case the future for the Russian people was not looking all too rosy and holy water. But at the same time the western European view is more keen to keep an eye on the industrial political game that has grown more feathers in it’s talon over the recent ten or five years. And they do make good sense from a Russian macroeconomic point of view, but perhaps lacks a democratic sovereignty throughout Russia’s recent history and is slow to change even under a strong and focused leader like Vladimir Putin. Better the devil you know, than the devil you don’t know, is the saying that comes to mind for now. According to Mr Putin, the Russian people have made some distinction between sovereign Russia and modernization through norm and standards only known in the west so far. True, that this is a problem if Mr Putin becomes President again that he will have to face & address over and over again the coming term of his presidency. This time he is not going to ‘work’ his way through power solo, but he will have to look more for consensus across political parties and other interest groups. And isn’t that looking a bit like the Russia in a mousetrap we have never seen before? Or will that just be the President?

And there is something else that will be a bit of trouble for the President soon as he is inaugurated in may. Public opinion in and out of Russia. This is a legitimate spin he has not met with before in all his previous years of ruling Russia. What is important is that he stays focused and allow democratic protest to coexist with the ruling party side by side in the country where this sort of freedom of expression is a healthy challenge to Russia’s future and not it’s immediate centre of political powers. That is also the structure that is known in the west and making this their lion’s gate for democracy and democratic rule. This evening another assembly of protesters will be out in the streets to protest the election outcome in favour of Vladimir Putin last night. In terms of reality and journalists all over the world pragmatism, this is one mouse they will not scare. In fact he is looking sharp- teeth as ever and articulates his speeches very well in the crowds. And then again I’m a bit of a softy when a leader is strong and ruthlessly handsome. Just to prove that I’m also human, I guess. But these are serious times in the world and it is important to know what sort of leadership the President is going to select for the future of change in Russia. Three years ago USA President Barack Obama had a similar fate to suffer at the hands of the American people, well that being in a good sense of course. And yes, except for the fact that President Obama was never before in politics as it’s President or PM. If Mr Putin will have another term, four plus two extra years, staying in power to rule his country, this is the moment of truth for him.

To be continued.  

HDP brief history now old 48 hours and is continuing and the ticking of the Turkish political clock

09062015

13% Of the votes counted on sunday evening does have that impact of something inside the AKP magnitude where in fact the story ends. But with 13% the story does not end for the HDP, it knows for years and decades a different percentage story with every election in Turkey as to maintain it's civil meaning through a fixed 10%, now some say was unfair. Unfair is one definition and it can go on forever. 10 Million Kurds in Turkey and a few more millions are expected to live abroad, in Europe or elsewhere in the world near 'home' in the Middle East, have emerged from obscurity politics to a more illuminated 3% since 7 June 2015 and will find it hard to believe. The future of the Kurdish nation is starting off with a new belief of only 3%, or that due to the HDP victory Turkey has now dissolved parliament for 45 days. Technically one can say anything, from procedures to coalition horse trading. On face value Mr Selahattin Dermitas of the HDP in his hearts of hearts is a greatful man and as of today will enter smart politics he has never faced before in this world. CNN Christianne Amanpour didn't wait too long with her interview of Mr Dermitas, this was last night's program. The Kurdish future will do smart politics from now on. And that is exactly what is both exciting news but also troubling news. One particular platform the EU is inclined to do it more slowly, by studying the implications of the HDP victory once it will take off for real, as they say in plain English. "Welcome to the world, Mr Dermitas!"

Under the Mango tree in this year's summer of 2015 when looking up the world is a new place for the Kurdish people in Turkey. Democracy is hanging from every fruit in the Mango tree and a dizzying color display  could make any newcomer, as is expected, rather dizzy. From a veteran point of view democracy and staying independent as a nation in Turkey, Mr Dermitas now will have to make a few changes and rehabilitate the Kurdish people that the war is over. Peace with Mr Erdogan, as his mentor of peace, and Peace with life in Turkey, peace with Turkish neighbors, this is not a separate private deal anymore. 3% Makes a whole difference in the Kurdish history after sunday 7 June 2015 general election victory. 3% Is the mark given to the fallen men and women in their struggle for peace and freedom, in a world that was created especially for this purpose, whether in Africa or Amazon, that all men must be equal and live on the planet as free. (One American President once said) Based on this injustice of why for the Kurds that wasn't entirely their right, at first, but now they can join the rest of mankind at a global stage, it is of the utmost imperative for lonewolf Mr Dermitas to keep Turkey as homebase. In ten years time if fortune favors the Kurds, Inshallah, the miracle of staying a nation and independent, in Turkey or Kurdistan, could then become an extended 3% giant monument. With good hope, not a fallen monument like Saddam Hussein in Iraq, but one to stay erected throughout time.

UK political confectionery is rich with top Conservatives like Prime Minister David Cameron

16052015

Where do the post election results of last time general election matter now the most? In Britain or in Scotland? Silence is not a good forebearer if it wants the world to know that 'good old England' has done it again, and that with a Conservative government in power the future had better watch out for this Prime Minister in a second term in Office. In previous decades, at least, that was it's clamour of men stamping their feet in the House of Commons during PM QT... Past glories of England's parliamentary sovereignty when flying high above Westminster and holding up England's symbolic powers together by flagpole and flag through dark or light of day, and this on God's majestic earth. If Scotland is another sovereign nation under the SNP 56 seats in UK's post general election 2015, another divided earth will stretch out in one single white line (chalk) to face two borders on each side to the other with no chance of any reverse and come back being one union now and forever. Also, if that is inevitable and will so happen e.g. in 2016/2017, England then must be prepared well by a few (stresses)in the magnitude of the change. In fact as we speak, live and die, that day has already arrived in the UK. Scotland will go ahead with it's ambition to have more and not less of self rule and powers in the devolution pact turning over to a dynamic solution for the Scotts. The Conservative government is here for symbolic reasons and lot's of confectionery for as long as?

Did anyone read the OECD's upgrade report on Scotland and it's economy this week? The Scotts can be upbeat and confident that the world is on their side. And now, as by a lightning bolt from the blue May sky, Mr Cameron is also making sure that England will delegate more powers to Scotland and doing this a.s.a.p.. Both countries are in a hurry, so it seems from the windows in our minds, and the global financial markets are calling out 'this is destiny'. (This is destiny for all market driven economies and governments) Imagine the future Prime Minister of England being less than the governor in the State of California? Sometimes one can only wonder whether in this world science is more powerful a tool than murder. If we knew the answer it might be the last convulsion inside our bodies as part of the human race as we are now. No human being wants to stay behind, politician or car mechanic. There is no Pi sign branded on any politician's forehead to lead the world and understand it's wide landscapes, just money making politicians and living fast. This is a serious question why leading industrial nations still bear that flagpole on the knee but who have no real relation to reality as globalization widens all horizons underneath the feet of governments and their politicians. It seems that they are using a whole different tool and technik...

Alex Salmond 'admitted' tonight SNP win will break up England; it's hard to say, isn't it?

09052015/23:41 PM

My lowly birth forbids me to do this thing, driving 'old pals' to the extreme boundries of old ties. One such boundry is what you would consider an impossibility full stop. At least not in realtime. England and Scotland with their tails are tied together to do a dance macabre as long as it takes for now, is more the impression close and confidential. Can there be such a thing possible? The law of politics won't reach the sphere again where England had a future if natural was the only logic and law of nature with last week's general election, a logic of England thriving from relationships and global cooperation. It was suppose to go that way with the whole world watching. But that didn't happen quite like that and many are now beginning to wonder why. Who saw this one coming? That could be anybody, a dark clown? (A dark clown but zillionaire) You get that distinct feeling about England losing sleep over the next step it will (have to) take, that's one. The second being Mr Salmond saying tonight what the end product of this election win will be for the SNP, after winning by half Scotland who voted for Ms Sturgeon's political Party. Impossible? A second referendum on Scottish independence so soon after a stunning victory for the Conservatives in England? (My humble beginnings by birth are turning in my stomach to continue writing on this subject, as if I am performing some sort of art that I was never made for)

Firstly: what sort of future did Mr Cameron initially trusted more before polling day? That should be a public and not personal thought for the Prime Minister. After all 24 hours before 7 May 2015 there was a very strong indication in every mainstream newspaper in the world, this was a neck and neck race, with Labour and the L- leader, Mr Ed Miliband, blowing their own trumpets out in the streets that he is the next Prime Minister to lead Britain and British politics. Who can now believe that the voters could work out the strategy of the polls and possible outcomes? (Billions of bids just losing?) The world has returned home and this is all forgotten. But who has sowed the dragon's teeth across England and in Scotland, like secret packages in a GTA Game? Political leaders were dispersed from the public scene afterwards and they too have gone home somewhere where it is safe and sound. If Mr Salmond is right that would mean for the Prime Minister in England that there is a banging on the kettledrum near home, and abroad on the continent the EU is set on playing hard to get. Like Samson the British Tory win for Mr Cameron will put him between the two columns and toss either to one side or both at the same time, could be his last challenge here, one would presume. A blind Prime Minister, floating in his blue air balloon above the shires and screaming to the people from mid air that they have no idea how beautiful the countryside looks from 'up here'. With Scotland roaring like a bloodthirsty tigress, Ms Sturgeon isn't sleeping either.

But let's not be pessimistic because there is no good reason for this, really. Britain will come through, as any child would say to the Prime Minister in England... Why fear a doom and gloom that is here to stay? A brilliant move: there is even no war possible to fight from the grounds where the PM is standing today. And neither will any written English law do. (The English law was never made for such a war/ foe or invasion) How can Europe help? Are not the Europeans who stayed (the unintentional) globalists, in comparison with England today? On the other hand, why not continue as usual with the unusual win to have a Tory government back what Mr Cameron had sought after in this last election? The same goes for Mr Salmond/ SNP leader Ms Nicola Sturgeon. Another prediction can be made here from this situation that neither will win and reject the offer they can't refuse, to join the rest of the human race/ humanity and globalism. A man's castle is his home. And that isn't just pep- talk.

Error: boundaries

This is not the hour to mock the next Prime Minister to lead Britain, if Mr E. Miliband

05052015

Is there a point to this when thinking of a strong Labour leader and having Mr Miliband reincarnated from his predecessors, Mr Gordon Brown and Tony Blair, if he appears weak or gentile in the eyes of many voters? Mr Miliband is not, but leadership has an unfortunate habit of extrovert outshine above others in Parliament/ House of Commons, a place where the whole world can witness democracy at work and best in time. And watching is exactly what the world will be doing for the next less than 48 effing hours. A dramatic climax or anti climax is expected with a big Milibang to come, or go. Either for the incumbent Mr David Cameron, or Mr Ed Miliband. It is an awful thing once the change of guards sails the ship on to another course and God knows into the hands of what unknown. The latest echo: the Labour government overspent when last time in power, under Gordon Brown? Did this overspending just came out of nowhere after Mr Blair? One thing from the debate on BBC QT a week ago, Mr Miliband gave a stonking response to the audience when asked him about the overspending in last Labour government. "There was a global crisis..." Etcetera, etcetera. Was he right or wrong? Was he telling the truth of the moment? Today and tomorrow that will not matter. In government the truth get's larger and larger each and every day you are in it, one supposes. Ah, let the man win his victory. God knows England is bigger than that, now a small consolation prize?

What does Mr Miliband need to be the leader and a darn good strong one too, if he is the man to lead Britain in 2015 and beyond? (Why some are comparing the situation in England to Israel's apparent inability to form government isn't making it easier) A strong leader out of opposition in 2015 and have the government under David Cameron outsted, is a successful man for being British and who is holding the key to the future of this country. It has been done before this way and probably so will stay in line for all British politicians looking for to try the stone and be king for a very long day in British politics. (Finishing writing the next morning, 06052015) In the news this morning, in the Daily Telegraph UK, Mr Cameron now insists he will win on friday, and even if he will be the minority Party. Also another curious hand of mystery, God or fate, Britain and Nato are in the Baltic waters on the watch for Russian latest military manoeuvres... A show of force? Up to the next government in Britain the public will have to wait for that answer. If Mr Cameron can insist he will again be in government after friday 08052015, this sudden seizure of change in the midst of Mr Miliband brass band entry into government, all will be written down to what happens in the crazy days of campaigning and watching the polls. And what is Mr Miliband's response? In the Daily Telegraph he is quoted saying that he could be the next Prime Minister on friday 08 May 2015.

Last election promise was that David Cameron was to start a war cabinet when elected to get things done. Has he indeed?

(Personal view)

26042015

100 Days would do it for everyone who rememberst the last election when the Conservatives didn't get the majority they needed to be in government. Anyone remembering the 100 Days from last time? David Cameron is wandering the flat surface of what now is Britain, almost audible at Rockfestival hertz volume, that the city of London is becoming the ghost town of what it once was or stood for. There is no point to go back that far, also because there is no one to explain to you what or why desolation and not isolation is it's latest problem, yet again just conveniently before another general election. What does he really want to be this time? Prime Minister? A landslide win for the Tories? And then? Doing for Britain what needs to be done, vaguely perhaps? The Tories would need thick fog to make it at least look good for the country and their 'hard earned' capital. The British people are the strongest point and argument in elections. But why use this routine that everybody understands? Isn't it a bit thick? It is maybe more simple than that: when the margins are matched by the results there is no going get tough in any place or anywhere. It will be again going back to square one for the Tories and only score as high a point in government, leaving the British People out of it indefinitely. Who wants Tories back in government? 56% Say 'Yes' already, leaving a measly 52 or something % to Labour. Or, is there a better deal more profoundly political?

If you're going to back political parties it will come down to whom is more richer or could get the country's finances upbeat again, for personal wealthiest. And that is where they really want to come/ arrive. The electorate could make things difficult for the political parties, if only they knew how. But who is going to tell them? (A Juncker joke?) Labour? The Conservatives? Liberal Democrats? Or the Greens? No, wait a minute, how about the SNP in Scotland to tell the people the truth so help me God? Britain needs to be manly about the country's fate: no one will go back to poverty, and become like addicted junkies in the streets of politics. Follow the money and get the election drums to beat the loudest when it's time, on 7 May 2015. Yes, sad really, but that's all there is to it, folks. On the other hand it is visibly possible for David Cameron not to look too comfortable telling blatant lies to the people that will be going out to vote for him. It is not his first time, you see, for Mr Cameron to be in government. He said himself that this was his third term. And for the last ten years he is a man who has learned the hard way from experience as leader of the Tories, that he is not Midas, touching everything and turning it to gold. If gold, that would be more Mr Miliband's time to have a try.

Mr Miliband is the fresh blood of UK's political leader in 2015, a future time compared to Mr Cameron's third term and now being irrelevant. And looking fresh is the secret to the future Prime Minister. Also looking younger, vibrant, potent like any fresh horse at the races. (Not knowing you get to be whipped the hardest) But how will a Labour win treat Britain after the general election, and make Mr Miliband the Prime Minister on 7 May two weeks from now? (Approximately) You see, our time is a strange world and does not let anything divide this in any way, today and even more extreme is expected in the far future. We have to respect this mechanism as the way it is today in our life time. Mr Ed Miliband isn't doing much different from the Tories, except when respecting the global mechanism to which he is taking a huge risk estimating Britain as the right asset for that precise future. There is a passion in this man concealed for leading this part of the world, looking at times opportunistic, exactly because the future is fortunistic. (Made up word) Another quick view is this that like Charlie Chaplin he will be or could be squeezed in by the same machinery too, if Britain revolts in parliament, for example. Like the EU Member States, Britain is also a small wheel of fortune, and not like the big wheel it is when seen in the United States, the giant big wheel of fortune. The one thing no one can trust in Mr Miliband is his intention to hide all this from the 'hard working people'. Who will the people trust more on 7 May 2015?

Mrs C in Clinton can only mean Mrs Currency. Let's try this again.

14042015

First it was Bill Clinton branded the 'comeback kid' and now his wife may be very well in the same line to carry that torch to the end of her campaign now four days old. With enormous lift off she thrusted into the sky on sunday with the announcement that she will run for President of the US. And already the wolves are all over her, but not like we are used to in previous presidential campaigns. They come out and do not growl at her, for now. Some might even detect a little nurturing there, as if this time it will be no ordinary campaign for the one to get the top job at the White House, by 2016 still being there and looking the same way as if time doesn't change within these invisible high walls in Washington DC. Can a woman run the world from this place if she becomes the United States first female President ever? That is not a simple question to ask anyone, anyone passing by or random. America and Americans are now facing a big question for this Presidential campaign, if they will be backing a woman to be the next 'Mr President' of the United States. And that is one way looking out for Mrs Clinton to be that woman. The world also, if Russia quickly came yesterday with it's own opinion on having a woman US President and if that woman should be Mrs C what they then have to say about global affairs and the United States, is ready for the Honorable Lady who could become a serious choice by the American people to be the next President of the US, and is doing so with great interest.

A woman president and in the White House, could she be the global leader how best to deal with tensions between the US, west, EU and Russia? Mrs Hillary Clinton is 67 years old and only collapsed once in a serious moment of health problem, hmm... That may not affect the former First Lady at this point and for now. She seems in good shape and has the will with which she was born to indeed run for president. Mr Putin in Russia understands, he too was presumed dead last month, or seriously ill when he disappeared over nearly two weeks. But he is now back, which is showing how global leaders can reappear out of nowhere again and resume their Office on the national and International fronts. Just there is one problem in this analysis: Americans care for life in America during the campaignings. In India Madam President would have been the natural choice of the people, for some inexplainable reasons only Indians can tell you why. In countries where royalty has been god- like and worshipped not for money but divinity, the rest get's easier to understand a mass culture like that in India. Can Mrs C be compared to the high caste of politicians who can get the voters and elite to do her honor and make her the next Indira Gandhi of the United States?

Back in the US hour- glass analysts are much in the dark on the issue of how to get the Democrats to win this presidency from the hands of the voters that do not have any connection in Real Time or Mrs C, and by Mrs C it isn't mrs Cunningham. In 2008 Mr Barack Obama with a lot of charisma had America believing what he wanted most from them, that his offer was genuine, that he understood their pains, he was once there too, and born an African American. That was like good news or bringing 'home' the good news. And all political basics had a fundamental impact on the voters or citizens of the United States, one assumes. (When not being American or living in America) There is a danger lurking here somewhere behind the bushes, if Mrs Clinton would make any mistake that would not ever be forgotten or forgiven, for example on any mistake on her part for not being informed enough or misinformed when addressing any randomly picked American citizen in the street. "Hi there, Buba! (Redneck) Can I ask you somethin'? Who'd you vote for in the presidential election in 2016?" Not good? Campaigning is extreme when out dining in the streets or on street corners of the poor. But, Democrats do people and the people's thing. "Hillary? Well I'll be damned. You're here on campaigning for the presidency in 2016?" Mrs C: "Yes, sir, I am." Mrs Clinton will have to do that for a whole year.

First US President in a long row since post World War II now could be a woman. She is American and her name is Hillary Rodham Clinton, nomen datum est.

13042015

Mrs Clinton is the America not many know as the Obama Administration America, if this Presidency campaign will make any difference and show to the world and especially the voters that this time the Democrats mean business will be business and leaving no one behind to keep on living in the 19th century America. Mrs Clinton's political message is expected to be something of a showdown, but seriously aspiring too to let her voters know what democrats could be doing differently this time under her administration and presidency. She is not there yet, but in the future of many Americans they want change and as visible as possible too. The system is ready for that change, it has matured into a world of seventy years prosperity and has since then be the only country and nation in the world to maintain for so long to be on the path of constant change in the process. But will the voters see a woman with a long past in the White House, or a woman in a man's world pushed to the corner like an outsider trying to get in, for example via roads that have been paved by e.g. her husband, and former US President, Bill Clinton? To the rest of the world the change to a woman president would also be a serious call for real politics to be the next government's only theme, which in a way is another story-message.

On the snap of the fingers the US is leaving within a month two major areas of deep political 'shakeups' behind, and now this at home where the campaign for president of the USA is launched by Mrs Clinton, that she will run. The Middle East and the deal with Iran, and in the last hours of the weekend another 'foe' of the US, Cuba, was given some sort of 'clemency', all big deals for the US. From a nostalgic point of view both are reminding old generations of the Kissinger and Nixon era. This means the US is dynamic and is pursuing another shot at time to make a comeback with a 45 degrees swing and doing this slow and smooth with a woman the world already knows as formidable. And she is formidable, both career- wise, but also she is in many ways the kind of political animal in the system with that specific global outlook... And it is rather strange in a wide and solitary green glass window in high mid air to see our world through her eyes, that maybe America is really top view and deserving it. Not many see this as an  achievement of long political stretch and the nation's hard work, because of the many seas of million or billion dollars cash flows per day, but it is in any overview. Can the world and US be ready for a woman President? Small comfort: she is not Frankenstein. But can she become one, when seriously calculated? 

Transparency was never to build on horrors

06042015

Ten years from now, in 2025, our world it's expectations are that it will not be hold a calssified secret anymore. A simplified version is to compare 2025 to the world's largest open book exhibition for all citizens to have a peek inside without despair or knowing despair. World Wars might be in it and no citizen will despair or personally know it. The center for Transparency and Information will be open all hours to 'brief' the citizen on all these 'classified' details, and you can walk home safe again. Isn't that a bit too idealistic when thinking about the future of our world and transparency laws? In the year 2015 there is already a proto- type of ten years ahead of us running the first tests of a world in time ahead of us. Last year in 2014 with the Russian annexation of Crimea and later it's military excercises being held in east Ukraine at a constant this has made the world think again on the course set to a future world where citizens are completely informed and subjugated to information like good abiding members of society. That is all what the world needs to have and know. The rest to one individual life is duty- wise not relevant when there is no immediate danger close to the human body present or visible. Danger will not come any closer to any individual at that time! Behind the doors of all high buildings in the city will remain closed indefinitely.

As far as literacy goes to know who and where you are living in the future can resemble something similar to operations in small community centers to rehabilitate citizens with programs coming from an unknown and subconsciously known place that used to be government utilities. There won't be any 'out game' or 'in game' involvement like in years previous to the new world in the future for any citizen available, is what one can expect from a total transparent big world. Sovereignty too will become a thing of the past by that time, and with it have a symbolic armed force for any case of a riot and to quickly supress this occasion. If this is the world we're heading for and being the ultimate goal globally in the end there will only be citizens and tall buildings alive under the sun from now on. The people too weak to exist beyond the closed doors of the high buildings will remain on foot or drive around in stolen cars in and out. Politicians and the Police Force in a strange union of reappearance and disappearance by then can only serve the living planet and keep the citizens 'outdated'. (The only rule of law) These are very tall orders by any standard in life, that being God is not enough for it's measurements. It is rather strange in this argument that becoming God Almighty, if a monster in Martian seas, won't do well on earth. 2015 In the meantime still feels like spring forever in the air and earth's population has a right to be under the International Laws at the United Nations.

For transparency look to the sky and not to the deep abyss. Primitive cultures around the world are looking distant from the west and it's eight billion people wide  sophistication today just yet. One day the story will end for all citizens. Like veterans are to wars and then live homeless in the streets.

In the news today: Iran deal reached. Middle East politics shows initiative is stronger than instinct

(Personal op)

03042015

The world took an enormous swing of miles long and wide from the headache with Russia and Ukraine to the Middle East for the last two weeks on the Iran nuclear deal. In these talks and final deal end product there are lot's of codes in various colors, all defining stages in this initiative from the world leaders and Iran. Blue, green, purple and perhaps most dominant the color pink that would be very close to red. Israel today said, from a newly appointed government formation, it is alarmed. Israeli generals were summoned by Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu to tip- toe into a meeting just announced (early afternoon today). They have no reason to celebrate this close encounter with a deadly enemy in Iranian government, but then everything from here get's more obscure to the global audience following the news and listening to the President in the US saying that this was a good step to get Iran listening to 'our present time politics', is the impression everyone is getting from the President's message. And in this not only President Barack Obama is content. There are a few other world leaders sharing the same enthousiasm for the 'new deal' with Iran. In Tehran the people are celebrating a deal with the west and EU Foreign Ministers was reached.

Personally I think the public doesn't have a clue and not many scientists either. The instinct has gone somewhere else since Russia took Crimea from Ukraine in 2014 with little left for the world to keep building on instinct alone for the rest of the decade. It might 'un-cock' Russia's nuclear arsenal for a while, if the initiative in the Middle East becomes a serious effort by all world leading nations and Foreign policy impetus, to do exactly what in this sandbox? Apart from self appraisal the other side to this deal is dead of instinct. First too little preparation on the deal was  ever present and secondly to pressure a country like Iran isn't what one expects to get peace nor a solution squeezed in quick as possible. Last year the world was entangled in an east- west/ west- east 'cold war' with Russia, and today one year later, Iran and the west have reached a deal, based on it's historic nature on reducing Iran's nuclear enrichments. In the public's eye, yes, it's good news nevertheless. Mute on or off, the world rather lives peacefully next to one nation or many nations. Iran needs tourism for it's cities and who would not want to visit Isfahan when this is peaceful with the rest of the world? 45 Years since the 70ties when the Shah of Persia was still in power in Iran is a long time ago to catch up quickly with the 21st century. Many ordinary Iranians will not be able to cope with timelapses going mainstream and passing by them with enormous magnitudes of speed. And then there is this trend to follow around the globe: prosperity. It is that what the deal would mean at the end of the day for Iran, isn't it?

You see, in the Middle East a mirage is something of a miracle. But if the deal is real Iran will need lot's of prosperity to upgrade it's country to normal conditions for government, people, and the rule of law?

It is election contest 2015 year for politics

28032015

Politics is coming down with a peddling power landing, perhaps starting in May in Britain a first time serious of the year with the general election. Or it is one of the many in the world in 2015, like a Miss Universe contest, one star among the many others, equally attractive and astonishing messages for mankind and our world. There was confusion on thursday this week whether the Prime Minister David Cameron had it right as he announced that he won't be serving a 'third term' in government, or lead the Conservative Party. It became a joke, according to what some newspapers had to say online on Mr Cameron's counting ability on his own terms in government. This can happen, the stumble in Hollywood on the red carpet by Helen Mirren, or that the Prime Minister in England trippled over/ on something in his very pointy shoes/ boots. Later afterwards either Mr Cameron was just a boy cried wolf, or a puzz in boots screaming 'Karebas!', or being just himself in a natural way. Natural is not something the Conservative Party is doing right now. Parliament has become rather fictional and isn't too sure whether to go this way or stepping further away from all abstract politics as a whole. The 'old England' is dead, metaphorically. Can 'dead' be a good thing for government in the next win for whoever may win the election? That would fall into the line of clever assumptions or something more abstract than assuming dead politics in Great Britain in 2015?

Actually the world has become more simplistic than what politicians and journalists make of it in our time and age. Here you have a bowl of beans, and in the other hand politicians unmovable from stone and writing there is a bowl with stones/ pebbles. Citizens take your pic. It is that simple, really. Many in governments and as nations go for the bowl with beans, not because it is more pretty or dull, but human beings have a strong desire to stay the same as ever, or take a risk and do the magic thing, like in stories or magic beans. There is also this attractive idea of being distributed a package for each to take home and this will be your own fence from now on. Fence for fence as they come and go after the election and never looking back on times when life was too complicated having the bowl with pebbles and a never ending story to decide who was more important, smaller or bigger sizes inside the bowl. Beans are magical: they grow the same way, they are the same size and they are easier to grow on the fence. And that is what people want, to grow, no bean bigger than the other. There is no thin line between love or hate, rich or poor, importance or insignificance. It is what the global audience does best and wants to do. So, beans it is? (Agricultural ministers in the European Union, like beans, are becoming Beans Ministers instead, if the future would let them)

In other parts of the world election fever goes round and there isn't anything irregular about them to say so far. This weekend in Nigeria people are expected to go to the polls and choose a new government. Why this feels like you are at the Olympic Stadium again, in august 2012 in London, is hard to say. Governments seem to be in a competing spirit to get a newly elected president or Prime Minister this year, and still in the first quarter of the year! That explains why the PM in England had got his terms wrong, it was sheer excitement to win again in this next election due in May two months from now. There is a slight chance no one will vote for the bowl with pebbles. Not that they are not as attractive as oiled and slick beans, but you never know. There is something ominous looking about them when looking crafty as little devils in the details, a writing in stone or veins you have never touched or seen up close. Are they marble, onyx or gems from the streets? Icon: big smile. Stones don't grow on fences, your backs or anywhere for that matter. It is probably more likely that the electorate will pass by that one this time, is equally probably a hunch be it a more an evil one as one has never seen before?

Maybe England is still hanging there somewhere in the hemisphere where it has always been so doing for many centuries long. But you have to admit, it isn't clever enough compared to beans. Billions of them make a collector of pebbles startle with fear, don't you think so?

Victory for Benyamin Netanyahu, yes, but be it a blindfolded one and maybe even gilded in golden cloth.

19032015

Another wonderful day for the Israel we know to start again at a new term for Mr Netanyahu in government, probably with his own handpicked coalition after the 2015 snap election. All his loyal journalists tell and whisper of future dealings with this 'four terms' Prime Minister of Israel, and others are doing just what they do when being journalists, one more prominent that the other. It is our world as we know it, stuck in many 'traffic jams' of our own. What usefulness is it to the rest of the world to quiz about Israel's politics and where it is planning on staying where it has been for over seventy years? 70 Years in terms of western perception of time is still not long enough, as is theirs going for hundreds of years in parliament. Personally one can only assume to Mr Netanyahu a fourth term in Office feels like 7000 years... We will never know. The future, as Mr Herzog himself admitted, is an 'open' field and unseen just yet by our human eyes. For the last decade Israel has managed to cut off many ties with the rest of the world, what used to be their peers, and have done so for the last five years almost at an anarchistic hardcore disguised in golden cloth blindfolding the nation and government in mainstream directions. Politically or when at war. The future is plain and simple: is it possible for the Jewish nation to find peace again in the rest of the world, living side by side with sovereign nations? If Israel knows the answer the 'open field' is closed.

After all there is much proof of wars for the last decade when Israel did it's utmost best to 'defend' Israel against barbarians at the gates of 'Old Jerusalem' or in other places where terror struck the people of Israel. Politically this sort of proof is the kind you take to parliament and convince the Members of Knesset to get a mandate for another term, that the wars brought safety and a new promise to the land and people of Israel. Is this what Mr Netanyahu brought to the Israeli parliament yesterday, or tuesday 17 March 2015? In today's morning newspapers online there is little to be found of the political substance of that proof, but instead Mr Netanyahu believes continuity of war logic is the best way forward. Not only will it make Israel obscure of political substance on the short term, it will also cause ridicule somewhere in between squeezed as a timeless government on it's own from the rest of the world. Mr Herzog, in a bizarre call, was named Prime Minister of Tel Aviv in one of yesterday's newspapers online. This world has many nations and never was a world where Jews had been on one side, while the rest of mankind lived on the other side, distinct by a visible white line in the middle. Also, in politics namely, who can criticize governments in Israel for the last five years? Or is there something different about Jews living in the Middle East, in Israel? The Israel Mr Netanyahu knows best.

With victory to go ahead with the policies on Palestine's greater ambitions and curbing this by Israelis and their government, Mr Netanyahu is making the people of Israel he wishes to protect an accomplice instead of a worthy people to criticize their government continuity of war politics only and military readiness blind by ambition to do good... Just like Russian President Vladimir Putin is accused of, with Ukraine and last year's  annexation of Crimea. Mr Netanyahu has many contemporaries doing exactly what he is doing for his people and country. The gift of God Almighty and Abraham was never a poisonous one, but one scent of the pure almonds in the 'open fields'. Unlike Russia, admitting the global system is quite 'out of their league', Mr Netanyahu has a simple choice to make: being in the Middle East or be part of the western countries and in a greater system of political will and it's destiny. Politics is the best foundation for pursuing war politics or policies since days of the very ancient. If we will have a PM for Tel Aviv, in Turkey we can also then expect to experiment with a PM for Istanbul! That's what kings do and not what Middle East governments should be up to in demonstrations before the sun!

Mr Herzog will need the wheel with many brilliant colored eyes of the Kerubim if he wants to hold the seat of Prime Minister of Tel Aviv, creating a new law in Israel we have not heard of since the making of Israel's State. Blindfolded?

Tonight news of Mr Putin in the Daily Telegraph UK: Mr Putin has got the flu

15032015

It is maniacal but personally one can think something worse had happened this week, that e.g. Mr Putin's much younger girlfriend, Ms Alena Kabaeva, dumped him for a young man of her own age. LOL. Of course, the much older man and President of Russia, also G8 ex- President/ leader, didn't take that as a compliment. In fact he might have been enraged and was left alone in a frenzy. Something like in the French movie Chamade. Only less sophisticated. (And I am saying that deliberately not to hurt an already wounded man and lover by emasculating him as weak and sophisticated) Why didn't I think of this before? I simply ignored I saw a brown eagle sitting at the end of my bed? Let's wait for tomorrow. The President of Russia is scheduled for his meeting withPresident Almazbek Atambayev of Kyrgyzstan on monday tomorrow. The Kremlin reassured the world that nothing is wrong in Moskou and that everything is alright with Mr Putin. We are not rid of him yet and probably the world still has to battle with him for some time. "Oh, I'm so happy!" (Old phrase from classic sitcom Fawlty Towers, A touch of class, John Cleese) For a moment sunday today it was surreal far far away with the Russian late afternoon sun setting in the east in this particular slideshow. Is the sun not setting in the west? Yes, but then it wouldn't be surreal...

Of course the Russian President is fine and will appear tomorrow back at work. When Mr Viktor Yanukovich was ousted in February 2014 the country celebrated their first taste of real freedom. And the whole world watched this event unfolding in public, that a political leader had lost his majority or electorate to back him up in government and therefore had to step down from office. The world expects these things from political leaders or leading nations, even when it concerns G8 exit leader Mr Vladimir Putin. Also this leader in his documentary airing tonight in Russia said that they were ready to use nuclear (readiness) and thought in the back of his mind that this was optional, which can only be done by another world leader. Politics at top level is a tricky thing for the 21st century leaders now... Or to put it more direct: the world has a right to celebrate this brutal dictator had died, if that were the case. Unless it is more discreet to keep quiet on Mr Putin, let's say had he been dead? Mr Yanukovich wasn't treated with this much discretion by his political bloc at home or next door neighbors within the EU. But let's be happy, the President of Russia is fine/ OK and has got the flu. Very plausible.

Error: Kyrgyz. Not Kyrgyzstan.

After decade long multicultural integration the people got there faster, than e.g. MP's and PM's in Europe

05032015

Following new rules, policies and politics on diversities in society of peoples from different backgrounds or other, what we are seeing today is that transformation of peoples did really took place over the years and not as some are suggesting in future time to become a real problem, or better, a real political problem. The best place to find proof of this future with the expectation on political problems is with children's education at schools or socially on schoolyards. Here is a generation in making of the world to come while we the older generation are a world to go, it is perhaps now time to again follow one's own rules and law making of a diverse society with many different peoples living side by side in school or in society. In Europe, and especially within the EU Member States, the problem with multicultural systems is now becoming more of a problem to e.g. MP's and PM's. Who is taking who's job? That is the only political genius question to ask today in politics and during election times. As if to address the issue many 'natives' will be able to relate to more direct than any other. Our definition of natives still is an old one and all that is not native is 'foreign' with a negative tone of breach. Right- wing MP's and PM's have an enormous task explaining this is the right thing to do in a multicultural society with peoples being prone to anti social behavior compared to many others like for example 'the natives'? There is a different generation in the making and their colors are splashing right before our noses, thanks to the change of hearts and minds a decade ago, or more, on the issue of a diverse society. It was then promoted and the future of this generation was still more advanced than compared to the laziness of thought creating racism or separatism...

Is there a stop to more diversity? In other words if birth control is good for the geese, immigration control is good for the ganda. The EU has introduced for peoples of many different races or backgrounds to be a citizen like any other within the EU Member States at one point in European history of the millennium, rather than having peoples being discriminated against on these apparent 'incompetencies' or what is not compatible in the regular sense, and doing so by discipline. New schemes are a success story by any MP or PM to introduce freshly upon the constituency, but can harvest on a bad progress if things go wrong? Young children are enjoying multiculturalism the most in the world today and do so believing it that this is their life and the way to go, to put it simply. They celebrate each and every festival (as I witnessed the other day in our neighborhood at the Holi festival/ celebration) not as a discipline but as life, something more binding and solid. Mr Javier Solana in an article last week did mention something about reverse time to be impossible for sovereign States, and that could be true when the next generation is the very future of the EU and the rest of mankind. The individual is sovereign and no more on paper. The citizen is multicultural as good as the native. That is progress and diverse enough to distinct from societies in a jam of their own dispersed situations and caught like fish in the net with the bigger ones. (I agree, I myself didn't believe it either until I saw the next generation playing in front of me like colors from the rainbow and enjoying their lives together, Turks and Hindus together, Creoles and Moslims together, Algerian and Hindus and Turkish people side by side making or drinking tea, and so forth.) MP's and PM's should really try to explain what the future actually means in terms of real- time. It is one of a mighty blade cutting through everything hard or soft when in motion... (Millennium goals?)

Politics and global non- expansionist globalism, if existing

(Unedited)

19022015

The descriptive story on Ukraine and Russia is very straightforward: Russia is not backing down and not doing so even after it's second ceasefire agreement with Ukraine, Germany and France in Minsk earlier this month. Technically the Russians are saying this isn't Russia's fight, but Ukraine's and the rebel held regions in the east of Ukraine. But in another layer of truth on top of this story the President in Ukraine Mr P Poroshenko doesn't agree with the Russian view in Moskou, and is saying that the Russian President and his government have multiple parts of shares in the fight in east Ukraine. Places on the map are for reasons of world view images how the war in Ukraine is evolving in a country where there is no beginning or end democracy story, and probably never will become reality. Mr Putin denies his government involvement in progress reforms in Ukraine will remain the no- go area in east European region. This blocking in politics, US or EU, can be seen as a clear message of non- expansionist globalism and a clear ending here. That is one side to expansionist politics and policies for the last two decades US- EU and Russian global relations. In global politics are the nations and leading industrial nations still holding this view?

At their very best none is very sure of which way to go in the coming decade, by humble opinion. From news reports Mr Putin is desperate to get his side of the story extended on global affairs with Asia and Minor Asian countries. Success also in that part of the world and to the rest of globalism is unclear whether the Russians have enough political influence to excercise in these regions and will do so successfully the coming decade. Where the west will stand on these changes also drifts away slowly into an unclear time and future. The world is still at war against terrorist agents in the Middle East and their perpetual grassroots organizations and flowing funding masters that is leading to more imbalance of power in this part of the world and leaving no trace behind to regular democratic powers in western countries, nor is finding any concrete evidence to name and shame these powers. Here it is nothing new under the eastern sun in the Middle East at an almost prophetic source of constant as time. Also the war in Ukraine has no echo in these parts of the world. For now it seems that globalists will take a long time to realize their side isn't what the world wants anymore. While at the same time Mr Putin in Russia will have a similar problem to deal with if the future could/ would be ready for Russian style globalism leading from Russia with 'tender love' over these far countries and very distant from the US and EU. Or some things may never end. Period.

What the rest of the world fails to see is that in Europe Mr Putin is a surprise.

09022015

The other question is whether the Americans can do surprise too. It is still a funny world, the mind. Or one swallow. Another surprise Mr Putin is managing e.g. is playing as we speak in 2015. And his character still dominates the scene after the year when Europe had lost Crimea to Russia. Mind and machine have been since then confused on the side of western leaders, but more specifically in the US. One thing very simple: in Crimea people do not speak English but Russian. In the mind of many academics the Soviet Union breakup has been nothing more than a clever utopian dream or contructivism abstracts with big geometric wings and colors to keep you in aftermath Soviet haze or hypnosis of self assuming power. Little green men acting on behalf of the Russian political thugs is a side effect of a very lethal drug called Russia. Is she the mother tongue of real hard core Europe? Behind the Germanic powers on myth and slain dragons? In England the Russians are far or distant royal cousins, a total different way of looking at the Russia that is today becoming more and more the adversary of the whole of the west and her system. After one year having been this close to Russia and Mr Putin the west by now will know this is not a man to define by 'our standards' in the US. There are no allies this time to disrespect Mr Putin for reasons such as 'he is a dictator'. The same manner when dissecting a frog, surely, but not a prince of the Russian men and women in 2015?

What don't we know in 2015 that the US is holding up as the only step in Ukraine after the Munich conference failed a. politically and b. militarily. Mr Lavrov, said the newspapers online, wasn't even himself and had uttered strange points in his speech as the Russian Foreign Minister at this 'peace' conference. Strange things can happen to people when addressing the audience and make a few irrational mishaps. Mr Lavrov is not Stephen Hawkins, but there wasn't anything to laugh at, or was there something some people missed? His first point causing laughter was his 'defense' of Russia in Crimea in 2014. To me that was a very serious point in terms of proportion. Globalization isn't that something of the world here and beyond? What Mr Lavrov meant here to say is that now isn't the time to talk about the past. It is hilarious, but never mind, one should mention it happened. Yes, in the military what really happened is more than just a smoke signal. At this point I can't see any laughter. Especially today, when Mr Obama and Mrs Merkel in a joint press conference have been talking specifically about steps in Ukraine. Can Ukraine Americanize it's leaders and people finally? European logic is deeper than speaking English. (It's more to Europeans than being either Venus or Andromeda  and the US as Martian country- A Applebaum article today in Wapo online)

Now we had seven decades of interest rates politics and politicians

31012015

Each and every decade the interest rates politician knows an agreement is an agreement... The EU for a decade has had only interest rates politicians, and having us believed they were technicians. In future, the near or long term, the interest rates politics could very much become a reason to go to war for, as the ultimate sacrifice when the nations further disagreed to continue as is in the present time 'normal' to do global economics and all it's hostilities to anything natural as opposing it's artificial change since post WWII. Some understanding is easy to make here, thanks to the information technology Internet and reading on this particular subject with a variety on the history of inconsistencies and their relevance to all human lives and what is wrong and right by law or International laws. This from a pre WWII perspective holds absolute truth where countries make this recognition as their own vision and natural instinct to do well for their nation and country. We should make an effort before going to war and point out to the people why this was the necessary step and make civilians casualties in a great war. Interest rates are just sitting there lazy by a pool of dead water. This is one way to assist 'backward' economies and help them, was probably thought in two or three decades ago. Pre WWII economy had a tendency to follow natural ancestry of wealth, and made that the most obvious reason to take the future as artistry for poets, writers, idealists and great thinkers. In today's world: the future is real money, from a globalist point of view because it's nature is not dead but perpetually alive.

There is no building without precalculation plans, and by nature always a projection of what will be tomorrow if you want to avoid any abstract view of the poet's future mind. In global business there is nothing more ambitious than 'tomorrow's world'. It has changed many nations not to look back to/on poverty or disadvantage you're born in. In this the globalists have used the newest of centuries for that precise reason why they were born unto humanity! And of course, that requires clever thinking. Even if it only helps the globalists to accumulate more resources of money and other valuable goods they need. In the ordinary ways, like so many worlds before have done, the globalists have failed humanity terribly, one should honestly say so from the heart and mind. In terms of reality and International subconciousness, what is the future without continuation for all and not just one? I fiercely oppose globalism when unemployment is a black and white picture, and talents for the young are being put to waste and many other failures to do it right and humanely, as was once promised and intended by globalism. But this tyranny is making a strange law of nature in their argument. And they have a point you can't argue with: continuation is for all nations their only chance to be in the living world. Pre WWII conditions are not too kind if for example third world economies decide to be part in the free world (as many have come to know since the fifties).

Is there a blind spot in this snake fight argument weighed by an eye of the grain?

Global debt

19012015

The smart thing to do? Smart answers, please? And governments have they done any better for the last seven decades, a small number compared to previous centuries? The world in which your answers are lying, as you now clearly can see the difference in which of the two you're in, doesn't do smart, at least not with you. Didn't they teach you this when you were a kid or at Harvard/ Yale or Cambridge? Tomorrow's world, again, lies in between smart and the world never getting in. Commuters pay a high price for trying anyway. But it's not just your problem oh great insignificant one! Everyone is in it, governments and all in one, limping on a giant mammoth in equally giant hair swings going up and down again. As a child when at kindergarden drawings like that could win you a nice stamp in red or green. But what is that image doing in the world at a global stage, being a child's idea of great hairy beasts in rainbow colours? Global debt is another thing if you ask a child what that is. Of course, the Prime Minister can tell you... This nightmare will never go away, Mr Prime Minister. The planet is an enormous cost- prone- magnet in perpetual motion, not for the sake of money but because it's simply physics. And that's just one part of it's beauty. Mankind wants it all from an economic point of view, which is impossible. Physics is another thing, don't you think so?

A small observation perhaps, but there is some indication that globalists have set their eyes firmly on physics and perpetual laws of the planet, seasons and effects per decade. The governments have different tasks and they call it earth's core environment and global responsibilities, and a match in heaven is made... In the meantime realtime media is showing us images of mass protests in the streets of Paris, and how the world has gone Je suis- mad. Can the people win wars again and double the Republic of France with revolution fever? To many global audiences this might be their wake up call and then seriously think: but why? (In Mexican wave- style) Protests seen from any 'moutain view' in scientific terminology is just a character of the moment thing. Hollywood is renown for it's perversities and scandals, but what we do not know is that they have changed much of the 21st century global view for any audience in the world. And that is what I call true globalism if for example we take a random stroll at H Avenue and pick a movie like The Truman Show. The law of physics is what most would call in certain unknown circles as the 'new technology' ? Governments do not have that kind of money to pay for 'our view' in the world, sky, far skies and so forth. Funny you would ask that question: what is it's relation to serious finances in the present global system? The smart world doesn't do questions. Period.

Europe was and is always it's worst enemy. No mea culpa moment or whatsoever...

15012015

Not even after the attack on Charlie Hebdo in Paris France is Europe ready to admit it is not just the citizens problem in society, here or overthere within the other Member States of the EU, when nationalities of a diverse community are not living in hipster terms like harmony with one another. On face value that is what it looks like, in Paris. Jews in the market place also were involved and killed as a result of chasing the terrorists, who deliberately chose that place, the reports have said. An article today in the Telegraph UK is asking the question since when is it normal to blame Jews again? Last year and the year before, in fact shortly after 2008 world financial crisis, blaming the Jews has been on the minds of so many since then, without specifics of why and since when. The answer to the short and innocent question goes way back in time one can assume? Money In France, Germany and many other EU Member States, where is it directing the stench of it's color? Ask a good lawyer to tell you the same thing written here in the above: and where is your mea culpa moment?

There is no point hating or blaming Jews/ Jewish money moghuls and their inclination to even become bigger and bigger each and every day of your future life time. The world isn't that small anymore after globalization taught the world one or two things of getting the kind of wealth every government and country deserves, and for individuals too if they are willing to get there. Treaties were signed, as so many times before I have said in writing, Prime Ministers have signed with smiles and conviction what they believed in, now all seem to be lies or they have committed perjury publicly and when in office, and so forth. What exactly did these governments trust more? Jews in disguise as globalists, or was it the color of money? To their defense they probably will say it was for the good of all citizens and the minorities that otherwise would never have or get a chance to show their talents and skills. Central government is not important but it is serious enough to have another look at oneself today when 'blaming' Jews to be out of control with 'other people's money' and they are not stopping at any point.

Money also convinces political parties, to be opponents for life. It is all making sense, because that is what we have always wanted to be and do. Who can win the battle if ultra or extreme right or left come to their wits end? Europe's old government models, for aristocrats or getting close to aristocrats, have been replaced with a fairer for people and merits model by globalism. The success story here is astonishing. Jews have done something right, for Europe, Asia, Middle East, South America and even in the east of Europe. Mankind is now convinced that you don't need to have what the Jews have, but what you can have should be good enough to sustain your needs for any future on this planet. Family wise or single. The cricket in open fields or derilict terrain is chirping, calling foul, foul, but that is not because of the cricket. There is a bigger view, the city inhabited by people and some of them are politicians. There is where the story begins and ends. Governments are not a business empire, then why was it treated in such a way? Have some done an illegal thing out of the spectre from the crowds without any clue? Some people die for the good of the majority and some even go higher by risking to do the brave thing for minorities. But what is exactly the legal point of that? Which Europe is ready to answer that question? Shame on you to count on the innocence of citizens! The only ones who would be ready to e.g. kill Jews?

Unless you can prove that you had to sign the papers or your brains would have been splattered all over it, you will have to take the blame first and say that Europe needs a mea culpa moment now. And that will be a silent march of thousands/ millions worth the pavement of your streets as was a virgin's first time or wedding night.

The traditional length of another year has started. Goat's year 2015.

01012015

In the first Quarter of 2015 expectation is that from every major country in the world the view will be set on many cycles prognosis and annual balances programs. This can make the difference whether 2015 will be a happier one than the previous year. The tense atmosphere came creeping in early in the morning in most parts of the world celebrating the New Year's Eve with colourful fireworks, especially clearly seen in residential areas. A new promise or continuation of 2014 are both possible fogs in the fireworks displays of last night. Since then a few hours have already passed and are currently holding their breath in a bundle of global suspension and speculation continues. Nothing else has changed, except that the fireworks have stopped since 02:00 hour this morning. We can only hope that none of this will frustrate the cycles to friction in the new year. This morning on 01012015 countries like Germany, France and Russia are keeping a quiet front in the background and they have been unusual less spectacular on the end of 2014 celebrations. Syria's President wanted to send his message into the world this morning by eating houmous with the troops and saying that the country is not celebrating anything because it is at war. That is honest enough a message from the President of Syria. In Britain the mood was a bit more upbeat and optimistic noises came out in the news if e.g. Greece wants to pull out from the European Union. Great prosperity is good news, but for whom?

Budget economies are planning to get lower costs and sharp difference moods will have to come where economies are elligible to get an extra plus point for subsidies. The so called 'free world' seems to get even bigger and more complex to maintain their reputation of 'free market economy' going to the end of globalism. Or have a U- turn to Russia and perhaps set for a global split. (Mohamed El Arian is still there and writing on these issues at Bloomberg.com) But when things on the bright sight/ side contract by the end of February this year, prospect into the spring season by the sudden changes might get to a 'calm down, dear' final exit from 2014! All G7 and G20 leaders have set their eyes perhaps on the midterm already. And the world seems big enough for these cycles and possible frictions. Either coming or going. By now on the first day01 January 2015 all human eyes are set on where their next chance to a bit of cash will come from. The inheritance balance is nihil, Bank balance is nil in piles of debt, and many more plaintiffs are or will be knocking on your 'global citizen's' door this year (too). Lot's of goat's hair? Or the goat has no green lines in it's red hot infrastructure when only made to collect from it's more superior species: the human being. Correction: the employed human being.

2015 The year of the goat great in prosperity but very short on temperament when not prosperous. We have to wait and see.

Natural and instrumental growth are still key factors

21122014

The planet in it's exponentially hormone bubbles are, let's say, if all nations can agree, large. Also the natural growth, once it has stopped at maturity, the instrumental growth was introduced to do a few things with the 'future weight' and estimated costs present in the Real Time world. 2014 Can be named a curious year, the point where historical and future wealth have been battling out some sort of 'endgame' in a divided world, at least so it would appear on contracts. (Expiring dates and financial markets) With the apparent stumbling economy in Russia this last Q. for 2014, the world seems convinced 'the end of the world' also complies. Both worlds: natural and instrumental growth. A good question is what the story yesterday on Goldman Sachs $1. trilln was that the oil fields will face losses this time on the big numbers they have published in this article on Bloomberg.com

Phantom or fiction this week between the super powers east in Russia and West in the US have made a fluid palpability without the natural or instrumental growth, something of a new story. The President in Russia, mr Vladimir Putin, remains a defiant adversary of the west, on Ukraine and Crimea. There is in fact nothing going there, and if so the reverse from mainstream super power economics will only be on the Russian people and the next generation of a real heavy toll to pay, especially politically. Russia intends on going somewhere strategically. By estimation that can only be Mr Putin's tall order and a great ambition, real by nature, but in abstract still in poor conditions for a great tactician. In real life there is no pleasing both women, mother nature and mother Russia! And Mr Putin, contrary to globalists, intends or insists on going that way. (The way being through Europe and old agricultural independence) Is that sensible ground or politics? Not if the EU is cutting through the middle and expanding it's own establishment on the platform of EU Membership countries and instrumental growth. That is too narrow a split sea and land level in political hot waters or rocks that are not planning to move.

And what is this 'endgame' now called? World War III, IV and V? (Complete package) World War III: national and global politics, World War IV: national and global economics, and World War V: national and global military super powers. Three columns side by side, but when read from their architectures in details one can only get dizzyspelled at the mere sight of colossal details out of any jurisdiction from human understanding. But people are still not serious enough and get out of the phantom stage. Wherever governments talk of cyber warfare there is very little known to the public of how people can do this for a living. Home Computers and the public's imagination are probably the only reason why there are so many of us who believe the truth of any cyber threat through 'pacified' mediators... Cyber warfare is illegal and has no jurisdiction of it's own and therefore is criminal. Also, no country will host a criminal organization. (S K Y F A L L) In it's upstart days till now in terms of incentives cyber warfare is non profit. Take for example hacking the new James Bond movie SPECTRE script.

Of natural and instrumental growth, I'm afraid the world has given many nations time enough to accumulate their 'last quarters' time and time again. In whatever gone era. History of the future can do no other way either and starting at every human born in our 'fascinating' world. And growth is probably a silent understanding when still a foetus, but nevertheless will one day become the titanic or titan want of and for all mankind. 

Life after V P will be crazy and dull. With VP at least things in our side of the world are looking more interesting for a change. But in the end of the day VP is just an animal killer. Or should that be an animal lover?

04122014

(Unedited)

Did you had breakfast this morning? A good way to start off the day should be when you go online to read the news and find in one of these articles a headline where it says that Vladimir Putin, if he leaves Office, will create worse a place in Russia and be a danger to the west. The hit comes hard between your comfortable sheets or eyes after last night's rest. No, it isn't. By the time that would happen you could be dead. Yes, that too is possible in real life. But when it's your job to find out whether Vladimir P in his present time Presidency in Russia makes any difference to the west, there will be soon something before your eyes of a deep visual of how life without Putin would be. Dull and crazy, comes to mind. Plus, who will make the west look more interesting politically and militarily? We've been waiting for a very long time on this platform of western super power state with any challenger in Russia to be it's adversary by status. "Thank you," would be in place? The Iraq wars do not make the west look good in any way. Afghanistan maybe? High or low peak, wars over the last decade seem to be lacking one or two things, if you compare our present situation when Russia and Vladimir Putin took a leap with Crimea earlier this year. But true is this that the Russian President remains an animal killer in the end of the day. (Or should that be V P is an animal lover?)

Another one thing is sure, that Mr Putin has been an unusual Russian dictator who painted his face on your t- shirt and you thought that that was cool, or the coolest thing to do. From this one can only assume that the Russian President without giving the people a cent became a patron of something like a foundation of Putin's images. And once you have donated to him via his products you belong... From a nation of intellectuals believing deeply in existensialism and impressionism, our century changed Russia and it's citizens. Gulag also could have a name- change to Night Club Gulaag or clubbing at Gulag Discoteque. Who will next achieve this mixture we can clearly see as the making of a new brand of Russian Marketing? Your opponent made you look good, world, for a while. His name is Vladimir Putin, the current President of Russia. And Adolf Hitler can just kiss his boots. Nazi Germany had a propaganda machinery, but Mr Putin has PR within the International Laws. Question is how does the west intent on looking as cool? Being jealous perhaps also of Mr Putin's success across the world as a handsome man? I am not being vile here to admit the truth for 'academic' reason... (I usually don't have an academic background) The west isn't interested in the persona package of the Russian President. Content- wise, like I said before in the here above, the Russian President remains an animal killer. And that could be only a dragon, as killing a dove could paint the President as vulgar or dastardly out for easy prey.

Who wants his job? In a funny sort of way you are missing the point big time.

World leaders are walking tip- toes four weeks before the next new year of 2015

2811204

What is happening up front the world stage, the impression is that nothing is happening much behind the scenes at the moment, except where die- hard politicians insist a business as usual approach can bridge the gap. If the globalists are in some kind of 'power vacuum' where should we be looking for the reasons or answers to explain the silence of end 2014 that will go down as the year when modern history came to a critical division between the west and east? Take for example Russia and how the Russian President Vladimir Putin is still 'working' on his 'exit strategy' from the G7 and G20... Tip toes diplomacy is not a prelude to the world war every global citizen was expecting to see in February 2014 and beyond till summer 2014. The Russian President to a certain extent did make a lasting impression on his western partners as world leading nation according to several world organizations and institutions, that the Russian change wasn't just bad attitude but an introduction to lead the world. Which world wasn't mentioned specifically. Speculation only said that the Russian President was aiming big time to bring Novorussia back from it's obscured past life. Close to the Russian President is Turkey. The Turkish government will take to the stage soon with their turn to chair the 2015 G20 Presidency. Also tip toes back or in reverse to instead watch this presidency term from home in Ankara. Mrs Angela Merkel's astonishing move on Ukraine's bid or Nato probably is the odd one out from all tip toeing world leading nations, making a point that are both useful and useless in global politics in it's present form...

The year 2014 has no coherent plan if carefully watched from what 2014 has marked as fact from fiction global governance. What no one is talking about is that under these circumstances on leadership there is no leader who could act a serious act of anything where there is no coherence between the nations renewal. Is the balance gone for good? 20 Years of consolidation now dripping from the top ivory roofs of global partnerships in slow drops of falling States in free falls. A small consolation prize maybe, that this is for example due to natural testing of too many exponentially great powers... Will Germany succeed on it's own when pushed back to be a giant on the European splinters of 2014? War is more based on fog than ghost riding in reverse. At least if 2014 has left the Europeans with anything significant after the annexation of Crimea. If only symbolic the year 2015 could be looking back on a year where Crimea was nothing more than the shooting in Ferguson. And prize winning ISIS in the Middle East can adorn itself with Kobane and killing many minorities in the region, if significance was given to global threats. (Not to forget adding to ISIS' horrors the beheadings of western journalists on Youtube videoclips)

If you are paying attention today to the world's mood it is one where the nations are losing confidence in their leaders, that maybe they too are free- lancing like all other temps? In the 19th century that is bad. But in our time, well, maybe that is a good sign?

2015 Prediction: poverty will equal extremism and terrorism

04112014

2015 Year of the Sheep or Black Sheep? The Chinese zodiacal sign for 2015 has been disclosed a thousand years in or out of starlight and to be still relevant today... Global poverty in a sense is senseless suffering. In the 50ties up to end 70ties humanity was promised a few changes to come in the following decades, erradication of global poverty someone very prominent has often said or used back then in time's volumes. In ordinary terms employment and visible or physical industries, industrial plants across the land, are a deliberate creation of the industrial nations just to make it look like production is ongoing on a 24basis nonstop in serious mode with highly sophisticated electrical panels and skilled people. Engineering has been for the last two or three decades the number 1 great illusion of mankind and capitalism in the name of constant factors. New plants are build to replace old derilict ones in new cities or places. (Mostly in foreign places...) Economics in the 50ties was simple: a few countries could meet the demand for production of mass cars and it's sales. Millions of people buying a car took many car industries sky high with lot's of private profits, in Japan, the US, Europe with specifically reference to Germany and Britain, Russia and China. And they kept on this production speed going up to an over production mass that is now more going back into a downstream of demand, with pollution or change in consumers' attitude, because of over production. Major heavy industries have already had their bar mitzva a few years ago, with nothing to sell on big orders, unless to rogue States. Technical procurement perhaps still is the biggest business in our time and is upholding it's industrial image high above all the rest in the world of industries. New owners can be anyone...

Can it be that e.g. Globalism has lost it's moral argument on global poverty? In the lower parts of Africa, is evidence of the lost argument nearly over three decades. The Middle Eastern tribal nations? Asia and South America reaching disturbing similarities since Bangladesh relief was launched in the early 70ties. Mexico and now also Europe where many have to live under the poverty line on 40euros each week, the so called social welfare 'living money'. It is difficult to say what the cause for global poverty in a sophisticated world can be. In many global organizations say that it is not due to lack of humanity to tackle the problem in the slums of the world. Rather more due to lack of ability is the reason for human suffering in these regions. (Contrary to the cheeky documentaries with smiling faces of children to get a buck to bring home in a family with dozens of relatives with even less to eat from) If it were in a more personal way I would wait with the new world order when human rights in the striken areas with dire poverty are a dead dust. The human will literally walked out of here into the greater goods of globalization one morning. In the west that is seen as the bravest thing each of these peoples can do... Immigration laws will do the rest. Academics when at the university take the subject of developing countries and poverty with typically western motivation, helping those in need of social care, but which is a study hardly taken up by the fast lives young men and women who have set their eyes on global economics. Helping the poor has it's own divisions in the western cultures and it's diversion can be felt only when this division is between the haves and have- nots or losers and winners. It is global economics heritage putting people in divisions like that. The rich in the new world order rarely will ever get sentimental like the King of Bavaria Ludwig (Movie Luchino Visconti) and help e.g. the poor against all odds in world governments or establishments. (Ludwig was committed to a mental asylum for his constant refusal of funding the armed forces. Heaven! Where all blood is brown or black dust.) Imagine that, a king of royal blood making a foolish mistake to help the poor! I am afraid we shall have to wait on to another time before we see how the mighty in the world can produce an heir to do something foolish in God Almighty's eyes?

For now global poverty equals dire extremism and is criminal when it fights back through economic terrorism maybe?

Should women in the 21st century be in the fighting force next to the males in combat?

28102014/ 20:47 PM

When it comes to 'irregular armies' in the world the accountability on loss or casualties will not make any regular report but irregular infinitely. It happens as we speak in Kobane, where for example female fighting forces are the perfect back up for the other half of their male fighters. It has been done this way for many decades and will not change. But in the 21st century this particular sacrifice of women fighters shows a reckless or fickle world on the side of the west, to only pay attention not on their struggle but the death toll they make. And yet as a whole e.g. the Kurdish people do count for some sort of collective group at the moment, to Nato and allies, in the fighting against ISIL. A pre- dominant male military 'adventure' or mission can only mean that the fighting here can only be done by men and not women. But much of this war game has changed in the regular sense when women bombers from fighter jets can drop bombs on ISIL hideouts or whereabouts. Doing so without dismissing going home to their families and be in time for dinner or to put to bed their offspring. Kurdish fighting women unfortunately can't say the same about their family lives. And the world is shredding these bits and pieces further to pulverization, while in fact the need to preserve a nation at home would be more desirable, especially when the men are out in the field of battle and may not return. With some of them who will never see their unborn or born children again. That should be something to worry about, if the west claims the time has come to change the fate of the Kurdish people. Procreation is now very much in the hand of the women, and they should pay attention to this specific need in the nation building or Statehood. It very much also holds the continuity and strength of any future Kurdistan. Or as the west would say, family is the pillar of society. Prominent women and feminists are not emphasizing enough to the need for hapiness at home with families, where children also should see the age of fifteen years old before entering the military hierarchy of the tribe they are living in. Instead women just join the men in their fighting.

The Kurdish people are closest to the western civilizations. And no one is crying over the patience men and women (including children and the elderly) have endured for decades, and their consistency over rights and State. Perhaps in it's slightest light of things this Kurdish revolution only found existence in it's outlaw names, even more consistent than addressing the cry for human existence. If that HC/ Human cry does not qualify for nation building at the institutions in the International world, is there another way where the world can critically look at the core fundamentals of a people desperately trying to raise their 'goodwill' in the world nearby and outside? They are painstakingly being denied a family life, children growing up properly and men building defenses to keep their families from harm. And denying women to strengthen their families either for the future or the army is hypocritical of all prominent women/ feminists. Only arms support can help the Kurdish nation or women is a charity rather hypocritical and first degree. It is no surprise why any peace agreement e.g. Turkey can't be filled with a reasonable beginning. Civil life is unknown through the Kurdish self appointed leaders for too much a long time now. And for some reason here is where democracy makes it's first roots, at home.

If defense forces can clearly be distinct from combat forces, even joined in both by women, the only hope is that there are equally distinct policies with regard to personal circumstances and do this quite extensively. Toiling the land is also of vital importance. In short: we are defending a nation or we are not. A nation that has managed to pull itself out from the darkest corners in our universe unto the 21st century to meet the attention of the world, is very presitigious. Nato and it's allies are fighting ISIL, alongside are the Kurds helping as a irregular groundforce to defend Kobane and other places in the north of Iraq. The Kurds here being men and women.

What the world needs to understand

25102014/ 21:44 PM

Despite my criticism, be it latent or public, I feel that the world needs to think about globalization again. And not only globalism seen from the global audience, divided in 1 and 99%. Can we remember what the world was like in the 30ties up to the early 90ties years? Nato had a dreary face, with General/ Commander Joseph Luns back in time, the 70ties. Opec and it's oil embargo in 1973 had put out all world oil industries and governments for a season, something only newspapers around the world and TV could access. There was no public opinion nation born yet. And to be honest there was no need for any public meddling in the affairs of State at the beginning of the new turn in the 70ties. Only great men, Richard Nixon, Dr Henry Kissinger, Lyndon Johnson, and many more could go to war or be the President of the US. Children also then were born on stardust. The cold war had given the world it's first 'global crisis' or as it is known the Cuban Crisis, not many can remember who were born a decade later. But we had universities, literature, and nothing else. The information society probably would like to ad science to the short list I just gave you, but I'm afraid that says or reads as a 'No'. Science between the 30ties and 70ties didn't go any further than NASA. Space Exploration could only be Science in the days on this frontier. It's Top Secret signature was all over the archives, when found decades later in the new world explosion of globalization. Today the world audience can access NASA from the laptop in the kitchen and show it to your kids or five year olds! The world did change and thx to globalization we can access new frontiers, earthbound and space exploring.

Who would want to go back to the dreary days of the fifties? Ask Microsoft, Samsung or Nokia. Mass engineering brought you Home computers comfort, Internet, and information sharing worldwide. Businesses are literally in orbit! If the Universe had any meaning of life it was this world mankind has been waiting for and praying to God in heaven to make the world be like home. What we never had expected was that Information would be the real human experience and give us universal energy or synergy. The world of supply and demand simply disappeared from the planet almost overnight if you believe in strong currents in time dynamics. We are now wondering whether life still holds any philosphical meaning in our century. Hegel, Kant and maybe Ibsen in the far distance also had this dream to enlarge nations one day, but never would have dreamed in these exact formats of interaction. Quite the opposite was absolute truth, that no participitation among unequals should ever be the highest norm. Only equals of the same science and background. Responsibility of science didn't had social engineering at the heart of it's lectures, unless when dealing in psychiatric issues or disabled persons. The EU in it's early days did the humane effort and erradicated all forms of discrimination and exclusion, before it became the institution of the ECB in much later time. The next best thing to be born from interaction and the information era was criticism.

Today the world has become the most excited place to live in and to be part of life as we have never known it before. Of course, globalists too have to learn how to appreciate their creation more and allow to be looked at critically by the people. Whether this be the global audience, electorates and public opinion. This criticism will die too. And like moths in the headlight we go. Who is doing the shooting or not, we only question whether this is still the world as now is perceived by billions of people, a world without discrimination and social exclusion. And truly can wars be the answer?

Part Two: Treasure Island 'What does the world wants to do next about Big Banks?

(Anecdote)

23102014

I put the question in another form today: a conversation you have with your wife, at the dinner table. After all, going out of a job, can be pain and agony for families. And looking to find another job is long term thinking over every short term employment available. The conversations as it goes, eating or waiting to be served souper in the late evening. Time: 22:00 PM. “What if this was our last good meal?” (Meals from Soup Kitchens are not exactly home cooked 'good meals') Miraculously your wife answers all the right questions you're asking, especially when it concerns good food, good diet, good health and good sex. It is irritating that she wants you to hear what she is thinking or has to say on the subject, but this is always a minor irritation when you're home and married. But my bad, I asked for it and she is going to give it to me, in exactly, counting: one, two, three, four, five seconds. And I'm listening. “What do you mean by 'good meal'?” Fantastic, 10 points. I am going to have a monologue with my 'other half' in another wonderous second. I am asking the important questions, and she is echoing my questions. Great married life, and it costs the government a fortune to keep us both happy. The pillar of society actually. Why not by a golden mirror and talk to my image reflection? Imagine millions of people 'living' in this way. There is a 'magnum opus' silently going on and on and it is still on full pay. Maybe, since when? But divorce is exponentially more costing...

“Okay, let me put it in another way. (Are you ready?) Can you tell me where the Big Banks are?” I know, I am sending her on Mission Impossible Part X1000. She is looking at you with a puzzling face and then visibly choosing from the digital menu in front of her face to say: “Yes. I can tell you.” Just to irritate you more for her disappointment the night before? Maybe. Or she remembers the night before with pleasure and definitely is looking for repitition of some sort tonight, “No, I can't tell you where the Big Banks are. And frankly, I don't think you know where they are either.” Okay, fair enough and we are eating by now. “But imagine having all that money, where would you build your Big Bank?” And for some reason I'm observing her every move now, almost like she is not on my side but 'on the other side'. (You dumb woman. Is that before or after she says 'in my honey pot'? Just a blib from a previous marriage, I guess.) The world is very simple, according to my wife that night. The collecting side is one half and the other is making it. Are the Big Banks going to be on the 'making it' side or the collecting side? Of course, Isee. We are the human mind all together and we are having eyes like the caleidoscope has many pieces and colors. But the wheel that is steering our whole life is one system. The Big Banks do not have caleidoscopic eyes and if they do colors they are strict codes for bills and numbers. Imperial and empirical. My wife is a clever girl, and she is beautiful too. On this occasion one can skip desert for the night...

Treasure Island: what does the world want next to do about Big Banks?

23102014

Wherever you hear the words Big Banks the ordinary idea to it always refers to something literally being overthere somewhere in between the ocean and land, but where no one can point where exactly to look more specifically. Psychologically there are very few people in the world with that magnitude of an imagination too if they were asked to point out to the world where the Big Bank, according to their mind- expertise, is built. World governments on the other hand are something else. But even if they knew could they go there? A simple personal theory tells me: no. The Big Bank is prepared for all human efforts, if smart. The nations could be in a state of global frenzy one day, but the Big Bank or Big Banks can do more harm... After that explosion of 'their money', is it possible the nations can come back and start from scratch getting a new currency, or monetary policy to behold it's worth intrinsically and worldwide? It's a big risk no one wants to take and say: life over money, we'll start again if we must. Politics truly has changed. There is no sharing the spoils after whatever or any conquest, but in fact is telling each nation of this club to go home and be happy. The spoils are for the Big Banks only. If that is the truth in our world can it be acceptable and create a happy relationship? Yes, it can. It's called reality.

The Treasure Island is a big money machine. Ask millions of kids to draw you a Big Scary Money Machine, and you'll get a bona fide idea of the mala fide giant you want yourself to see but doesn't have any clue. Who get's the glittering prize? The one drawing with the giant spokes' wheel and the lines spatting out from the wheel in equally giant sparks? How will all the dads in the world defeat such eye- pain ugliness? In our every day world a Bank is just a building. You get inside to beat it, people are working hard to keep it running and let the GDP do the rest. That picture of the 50ties is still our traditional thinking of a Bank. But the treasure island with the big machinery looking like a giant wheel and sparks coming out from the giant spokes is out of the ordinary books of thinking. It might also have a giant chip that goes with it. Or micro chip in a double hiding monetary policy? Sauron? Maybe, and that's the closest our human eye can get to it. Doesn't this just make you drool after the days when each and every nation had a country to go to? When State secrets were sanctity and holy matrimony in every oath or pledge taken in High Court or House? And when Hillbillies was just a mighty distant world and dream. To both: Bankers and people. Which decade should we blame for the treasure island in later times? To what use is the Skylon? How do the nations get their money back? (If there are Big Banks the nations shouldn't have any money) I have an idea: why not let all the mice do the chewing of the chains in the big money machine? I know, I am so f......ng clever.

Sobering words Sunday today from Mr Erdogan on PKK leader Ocalan's prison conditions in the news (Hurriyet D and ZT).

19102014

One week and a half Turkey and the Kurdish political organizations are picking up the pieces from the short but very intense moment of violence outbreak two weeks ago in Turkey's cities. There is more pressure on the Kurds in this new situation, and also having been so close to what almost turned out in a mass civil unrest and then was suddenly stopped, by intervention from Mr Ocalan in prison and his mediator. The pressure is also dealing with another aspect from what we can now call the new order of the day. This is an opportunity for the PKK to say,'let's stop the old ways, and reassert our forces to help organise our people better and respresent this case more assertively. Instead of killing the enemy or enemies and lose the important goals of this century. That's not an option, and probably it never has been or was an option seen before. 50/60 Years of fighting the enemy only make poor references to the people who we really are and could become'. The world outside 'Kurdistan' basically is a civil world and it will for some understandable reason would want to help empower the Kurdish people's aspirations. And not just through wars or helping arms Kurds to fight ISIL. The struggle of the Kurdish people on the white paper would like to emphasize a few principles of it's own and would want to alter this at another stage closer to the respecting order or system in Turkey, and quite dealing with this long standing issue between the two peoples with minimum impact but go for radical changes at the same time. There is very little chance at the moment to see it not just yet this way, but in the long run something must be done here to get peace on both sides to honor the moral principle of future generations.

In the end of the day the United Nations isn't just there for implementing wars. To help build nations is the only positive regime our world needs at the moment. And equality for all nations to seek that 'positive regime' through the United Nations must result in the best outcome in lawfulness. And many nations are now represented in the United Nations Assembly, from the far corners in the world to the more developed nations. The peace process isn't over yet. Nor it's miraculous path to the gateway of nations in the Assembly. And this alone should be the 'golden opportunity' to seek for all nations in friendship. The Kurds too could be standing right here in ten years time, if profound measures are or will be taken now/ today. On the other hand, let's say that two weeks ago, that had the civil unrest risen to more violence and clashes with citizens and the Police forces in several Turkish communities/ cities, the here above empowerment of nations would have for very obscure reasons been forever gone. A civil war prelude or not only renders the hour for war but nation building goes up in smoke for many years and decades to come. The next generation of Kurds surely can't be politically starved again? But it is tough and decisions in Turkey are going through a delay process before it even gists. The boiling point could make all the difference and a steady way in the present situation to give some visible clarity on both sides, Kurds and Turks.

To be continued.

HISSTORY

14102014/ 15102014 (01:28 After Midnight)

Fear of total control to self control in the hands of the few, to the invidual in mankind can only be born unto the State and not as in Biblical terms from the woman when in labor to give birth to her child. As soon as the nations agree there is enough reason to fear any self control force is advancing on their State, the logic of finding answers will be urgent and urgently sought. And they will be terrible decisions if imposed on the nations and their regions. But that is another story. What matters is the century we live in and to particular underscore the way global communities are experiencing Real Time living. Do we notice any difference with the last days, years, decades recently? If the answer is that we do not, fear dies. It only resuscitates when suddenly you are unemployed and can't get another job for the rest of your life, permanent. The economy is quite extensive on unemployment rates in every part of the world of risks and crises. And this network could be real for years or decades! And is anyone telling you what or who is advancing? The global maps have changed since, let's say, the 1990ties? Can anyone now notice what it is that is different in 2014 to the previous decades? Of course, like in WWI and WWII, the State has other responsibilities when holding State and nation together. It is this kind of responsibility that should not become the nerve of fear, whether in this or that place and then slowly come to recognise the change of natural courses within the State.

2014 Doesn't seem to be ready for State leadership of any kind. It is there for the people alone, the economics too and a general sense of happiness achievements through social democracy as we now know. In one year time we have had in many places the call for independence, compared to previous times. The last time we had this kind of marathon petitions for independence was when? Before the global financial crisis in 2008? Eastern European countries were getting Memberships to join the EU and have been in successful transitions of reform in politics and economics. But there has been a change of mood recently, with specific tactics, and perhaps saying that this can be done across the regions in the world where most needed for change. England and Scotland are in the hot seat over independence to have another go after 18 September just a month ago. Maybe very soon, in 2015 perhaps? Two decades ago England, still bathing in the spoils from heaven, could only have been polite to the Scottish dream... Reality, I'm afraid, has come closer and it's no nonsense approach is doing the impossible everywhere where they crusade... Like the Scots, a few degrees of 45 maybe, in Turkey, the Kurds are also pyshically trying to come back to the front stage with a new demand for autonomy in the south of Turkey. 80 Degrees on this global map let's not forget also the annexation of Crimea by Russia in February this year, with Ukraine fighting to uphold it's independence from Russia at the same time. Will they not stop here? (The UK MP's in a symbolic gesture has recongnised a Palestinian State earlier yesterday/ the day before yesterday by a majority of votes in Parliament)

Ten weeks to go in 2014 before we enter another year, 2015. Maybe squeeze in Catalonia in Spain for their independence and could make it in time before the Christmas holidays? Total control is a very fast train and is flying through Real Time of it's own. When the nations agree the fear of alien self control in each and every State in the world boomerang should be free to do so in a free world, then this will transform to subordinate State leadership. Indeed, for the greater reasons for the century we are living in, peace and prosperity in the world is the perfect end goal and justifies the 'self control' behind total control. Objective law will become the law of neutrality, and will be for every man/ woman born unto the world. And companies or corporations should also get their fair share of non profit organizations. Globally that is the outlook that may already be in progress... And from the point of view of total control or TC/ GTC, global total control, that can only be encouraging news. For some strange reason you are not going to see fear envisioning itself but smell it in your excrement. Scientifically this fear is fascinating to the learned men and women too! And God (of Abraham) only knows that understanding this point of view isn't very hard to accept if all world industries can change to neutrality as are their workers in whatever contract they embody, bound by time only. Personally I have been many times here when writing on this subject, but now will have to shift from the greatness of what men can do when in power or total control of the planet. Like power so comes fear with it, I think. But that is a question of fortune between the brave and not so very brave... At least for tonight it is so.

Note to self, 22:46 PM, 08102014

The situation in Turkey with 21 deaths in street protests over Kurds in Kobane, Syria, since yesterday is this a prelude for civil unrest, and in a worse case scenario a civil war outbreak? The Kurds now have been long gone very patient with the political stalemate in Turkey, from on and beyond the nineteenth century. Perhaps this protest can become the moment they have been waiting for, be it not intentionally, since respecting Turkey's authority for decades long, but is now finding momentum. And that could cut deep inside the political national and international structure of Turkey as a surprise new day that this has now finally arrived.

If the country falls any deeper off the peace process with the Kurds, the outcome could be for Turkey on this eve more unpleasant than initially thought when the country decided on going for the hard deal over Syria and to help the Kurds 'alongside' this primary path. A civil war outbreak in Turkey up to now was what the government had never seen or foreseen in it's worst nightmares. Tonight again there are protesters out in the streets, calling to the government in Turkey over the Kurds in Kobane.

It is expected that calm will return in the mornings when everything is brighter... The man they are looking at is the current President Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has been championing the story of the Kurds for the last decade. Now it is not looking the same, as the Kurds will see a betrayal of trust in the peace process personified in the person of Mr Erdogan.

Up to this evening and night we can only speculate and air some thoughts on the present situation outbursts in the streets of Turkey. What is very real could be a whole different story. Social media might be blocked to air the latest news out to the public. That at least is the impression for tonight. In Kobane US Air Strikes have pushed back ISIL for the moment. If this is true and civil war breaks out in Turkey between the Turks and Kurds, the national embarrassment will be thunderous throughout the whole of the western world.

The summit held Wednesday afternoon earlier today should bring a solution to the problem in Kobane and Syria that Turkey is now facing on it's own territory... No one has mentioned anything on a civil unrest or possible civil war outbreak once the Kurds decide on seizing momentum and fight for their sovereignty. In the end some might come to say that Turkey was ready to learn a lesson from the situation it created on it's own and did not blink an eye when it was busy doing so. Perception of countries breaking up have rationalities of their own and if it serves a people with better promises, you lose your argument.

This morning, reading Hurriyet Daily article Yasar Yakis- Kobani threatened by ISIL

09102014

“By linking the success of the democratization process to the support that Turkey should extend to the Kurds of Kobani, Öcalan is making an appeal to Turkey to prevent the fall of Kobani at the hands of ISIL. Turkey may chose to do whatever it can in order to meet this expectation. However, it does not want to burden the democratization process with unrelated issues. Furthermore, it has no immediate interest in fighting ISIL and letting the PYD grow defiant, because the latter may later cooperate with the Syrian regime in order to delay its fall.

The importance of the democratization process stems from the fact that the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) wants to secure the votes of the Kurdish minority in Turkey in the June 2015 elections and obtain two-thirds of the seats in Parliament, which is the required majority to amend the Constitution. The AKP hopes to amend the Constitution to introduce a presidential system in Turkey, a system that President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is very much in favor of.

Despite the complicated background limiting Turkey's freedom to act in the Kobani crisis, a dispassionate approach on both sides may ease both Turkey's concerns and the Kurdish cause if the democratization process is allowed to progress.”

Globalism redifined

29092014

Earth population is now estimated on 7bln people to inhabit our world in 2014. What could their view be on globalism when taken further apart from this top view? According to governments and world leaders for every human life (even animal when in Switzerland) born and alive must not be without the basic human rights in our time of universal civilization, but made a crime when forces in the world alienate peoples or simply let them seek destination or destiny in dark slumber and the morasses of deprivation. After WWII human sentiment in comparison to our age of fluid globalism get's it's life experiences from a different philosophy that is not the dead stone age of classic learning anymore, but a more graphic panoramic of one's own self menu. Therefore the talk of value of human life and rights are expired and cannot find the wider sphere of what globalism actually created for governments in all aspects of ordinary or developed lives of so many people now called citizens. What does it mean to be a citizen or global citizen in our age? And with this change what is their view of governments? These answers will be found in the next generation most global leaders will say when confronted by a crowd of the 19th century, at the age of perhaps between 50 and 60 years old. The next is always the gateway for all globalism. And always is a plan or project in the waiting. Life without these plans is now impossible to imagine, whether for politicians or world leaders. The older generation, well you can only guess their cost of living and where that will go in the end when ended up in budgetary constraints. The next generation 'smart life' has exchanged hands, the happy life on the farm under wide open skies. At night or day. And some are still stuck with their heads inside globalization not for winners, but losers. These are the nations that can't keep up with the fast life of celluloid futures and globalism for the developed world. Once you're there you have to celebrate your arrival and get smacked... No chivalry nor contest of virtue, just show you're rich enough to get smashed by lethal drugs and come back, and no harm done to your capitalism...

And your crime? Your crime is sublime if it lords in the world of capital and organization to maintain it. You were never born a human... Globalism will teach you what love is up in the sky, or better it will name you and then you were never born out of woman ever again. When you look again in the mirror this monster is only going to be you and looking back at you from the mirror reflex. It's perhaps the weirdest initiation ritual since ancient Greece and who invented oligarchy and plutocracy. This is the world every young male dreams of in absolute truth. A truth cold as the blade ungodly but to kill for. Is there any one who could challenge such a world of complete sterility of humanity? (Female presence here are the toppings in various colors to please your vanilla ice life with) Time to descend upon the races, from the world where all you can have that money buys you to the world where human life is a crime and needs sublime laws to trial each and everyone. The wrath of your machineries must be felt. And you take no prisoners to make your ascension light as you came sliding down upon mankind. Except for that Skylon you will take with you to show off your new toy... This revision of globalism isn't what you expected, I'm sure. And yet, still that is what this writing is what it wanted to tell you. And your critic? Impossible and what a great fantasy. From a godly point of view that is right.

The Future of Scotland an upgrade view/ prospect or projection?

22092014

In this morning newspapers in Scotland/ UK Mr Salmond, exit First Minister of Scotland, came back raging like a bull/ bullish to tell the people in Scotland independence through a referendum was but one route to take the country back from England. (Free translation of the FM's words) Comments on that followed from different corners and it was not to tickle the exotic creature of politics his belly. This was a dangerous path the First Minister would choose if he still wants to take the nation along the path of independence. But you know, yes dangerous it is, and still if he was Gaius Alex Salmond of Scotland, First Minister of an already republican structure, and one more thing one would need for this ambition but can't put this to words yet, a column in the name of the future of Scotland could indeed be set up to mark an understanding between Scotland and the UK. Understanding our age, world, the changing of times, a strategic need to fulfill purpose to benefit the next generation and take for each half the burden of that. At the moment no one in Scotland will be in the mood to play on the lyre of politics and calm the beast now wide awake at Westminister and angry at those who had woken him so rudely from a beautiful 307 years old union sleep. Btw, the beast here is the beast of union. But Mr Salmond only dressed up as the beast of disunion...

That won't work and to put Scotland in a strategic position. That imagery does not resemblance the real Scotsmen and Scotswomen in public life. Privately we all have some imagination and from here we can see epic journeys or simple paths of self glory. And when noble disposition there is room enough too for a Scottish community to live happy as they are for ancient times when still at Walhalla, the plain of all Celtic and Anglo Saxon origin. Also Westminster now is facing itself in a rather odd way over the PM's reflexes over more devolution and trying to make this the truth. But 'No' means 'No'. This in fact means de facto nothing can change now. Any need of change would be or have to be considered seriously a challenge to that. Why would any one need to open up a seal when the 'Yes' vote had never won? The Scots will realise in the coming days perhaps that the 'Yes' voters can only be reduced to becoming the most progressive movement in Scotland and who will maybe one day make a difference for Scottish society and win it's own day. The independence Scotland would want this morning as Mr Salmond has put it, that is impossible without a legion or military force. And no one is suggesting that the writing here means going to war with Britain. Both countries have a love for politics and preserving civilization to eternity if they must. An armed force under these prescriptions therefore can only mean the institution of the military forces to improve relations and conditions between the two nations and to promote a peace alliance of indefinite end. And not to antogonise Britain.

The future of Scotland this morning is not looking so bright, I'm afraid. It's echo is everlasting for the moment and no one understands what to do next. Instead the FM speaks as if he is telling the media having inherited his shaggy hair from his mother, quite amusing in a way.

The Scottish people did the unthinkable. Prime Minister David Cameron cannot ignore the fact for much longer

21092014

One can feel the need to ask almost at an elevating constant in what way did Westminster win to save the day of doom from the hands of a tiny number of people, 45.3% voters, in Scotland? The public is silent and the world audience cannot act like a tribunal over highly sensitive State matters for England at the moment. That is true. But in Scotland and after the rejection of 'Yes' to independence, in fact, these are again citizens of the UK. A boring and perhaps simple fact. Something to take home with you and remember how close Scotland came to bring down an empire old for hundreds of years, at least in the eyes of all nations on earth. The global citizen would not try or make the effort and say that there is a distinct difference between the monarchy and Westminster in England. Public opinion would have gisted overproductively and spreading quickly, by mouth- foam only. Looking back on the moment of possible break- up of the United Kingdom, still is spectacular to all common people. In fact that would have even startled Gaius Julius Caesar of all common beings known as the emperor of Rome! Time can heal the wounds this deep, having saved Britain from total collapse of worth and 307 years of the English- Scottish union. If that is cliché, no. It can't be said often enough, young squire. By a massive push from Scotland all eyes are now on England and wonder how far this has moved the establishment the English are so proud of. Two things actually happened on Friday 19 September 2014. 'Yes' for independence had lost and the second one was the announcement by FM Alex Salmond of Scotland that he will resign. And the bleeding promptly stopped.

If the next First Minister of Scotland / SNP Party leader will be Nicola Sturgeon without any other serious challenger candidate, this is quite strange as continuation of what exactly. Will the public remain silent this long in Scotland? Of course it is careless to suggest anything of this scale by an outsider in a remote place on earth. There was hope on Thursday 18092014 and the world was still in one place. More definite to say is that the Anglo Saxon world was still in one place. That big picture is now scattered to pieces or fractures all over the same place. Top view would be seeing just ants and buzzing bees running home or away from home. The hornest's nest at Westminster was rocked by both hands: the 'Yes' and 'No' vote. And that was anything but gentle rocking. Devolution revolution, extra extra read all about , when you are a lad and not a Statesman. And some their hands are just tied on the back for not trampling too much on this vanity of bonfires at Westminister house at the moment. If the Prime Minister in England wants to continue as a leader of the free world there will be a time of deep questioning to follow, after the 'No' vote on how England now stands in a world that cannot be put on hold when the PM has to first sort out things back home that cannot be solved within days. The United Kingdom is one guarantee, but a messy United Kingdom isn't the same thing. Globalism, like Westminster, is a very demanding mechanism and holding the life- line of the world at great magnitudes or velocity. Yes, Scotland has done the unthinkable only to receive something from mount Westminster England as serious as the ten devolution commands?

The Future of Scotland when not read on your tablet

10092014

Next week that could change and if a 'Yes' vote to end Scotland's relation with England in a referendum is accepted by a majority of 57% of the votes against the 'No' for Independence. The House of Commons is nothing like your personal tablet, but that won't matter if you are not English or Scottish. The global audience is always a fierce supporter of anything with 'free' in it. Free Ipods, and now Apple latest gadget. What is it this time? Iphone 6 or 7? The Scots would want the same 'free' ways and goods too. Up north the majority living in poor or poorer conditions would even crave to have 'things' as well and to able to travel on Air Miles to get what they want. Are these the Scots who want independence from England and are eligible to vote 'Yes' in the referendum? The SNP people don't strike you as irresponsible politicians with a special knack for adventurism economy in Scotland and it's future, or are we mistaken? Independence is good for business and the Scottish people, because it means more jobs, more power to decide on the future of the country, and what more does Independence mean in these remote places to a global audience? The economy has only one principle: only elite and skilled labor decide it's meaning. What job in the new IndependentScotland will be available to a man with an A, B, C and D driver's licence and who has been long unemployed? Who is selling the fish in Scotland? Big fisheries and markets. Very much the same story and picture will remain there even after a 'Yes' vote next week if they can get the majority to win. But that isn't the point in politics or global business in the Scottish parliament for now. Let's go for Independence, period.

Of course, no one outside England or Scotland understands the economic prosperity this country holds. It is campaigning on big promises to the people and omitting to tell them the harsh realities of what has already happened to neighboring countries across the channel in Europe, only +/- 190 miles distance from Scotland. (Norway) If Scottish Independence from England has to make any sense the Scottish elites political or business should do this without any 'golden' economic promises. And from what one can read in the newspapers the political debate hasn't even started yet, in both countries England and Scotland! Scottish devolution in these places without the business plan seems that this will be the kind of hurt that is in meaning totally different from a colonial independence, where promises of golden opportunities and prosperity does win the majority of a free people. In the 21st century Scotland will not be exempt from this hurt in the longer term to break up something historic that is more than a myth of financial hub. And if that wasn't complicated enough, what is making everything more difficult is that HM the Queen, E II, will remain Head of State after a 'Yes' vote for Scottish Independence. SNP leader/ first Minister has now no choice but to join an acrobatics in politics he is not equipped for if judged on face value. This morning one newspaper online said that Mr Salmond wants to make his path to Nato and the EU if it's a 'Yes' vote in next week's referendum. Sweet dreams are made of this, Mr Salmond and all free people understand this need. But in politics at Westminster there is no dream or sweet dreams beatbox.

England is acting upon an old instinct to campaign for Scotland to stay in England. That too is not helping the Scots.

Turkey is in trouble with ISIL

08092014

Fierce criticism has come over Turkey from the US and other Nato allies this week over it's 'public' support of ISIL and threatens government high Officials, including President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to drag unto an unwanted path into more 'double troubles'. Mr Erdogan, who is now the President of Turkey, will quickly have to find to detox this boiling matter now getting to the point of extreme heat pressure. Something perhaps the Prime Minister Mr Ahmet Davutoglu should come to the President's aid to change the present formula? ISIL according to the US should be destroyed and the US President Mr Barack Obama has the backing up from the Prime Minister in England on this standpoint. To Turkey it is now too late and blame it on The Cause Celebre of many other strings before that now also seem like ancient history. If you undo one string, who knows what you have actually done or cut through... In all in it's bloodiest of forms ISIL remains a string with probably a deadly presentation on the International stage at the moment. Iran, Iraq, Syria and now Turkey, all seem to be involved and why this is probably the reason for the west to put this in their priority basket and discuss proportionate combat readiness to deal with this face of threat. ISIL has, like the serpent once in the garden of Eden, seduced many Islamic countries far too long now and this time it was the last drop. ISIL cannot be kept among humanity and threaten the world with it's inhumane acts. If they are representing Islam fanatacism they are doing this without the mercy of Allah. The records of their actions speak for themselves.

In Israel the President Mr Shimon Peres wants countries Quatar and Turkey to be punished for their 'involvement' in ISIS, something a global leader or aspirant global leader like Turkey, cannot be associated with. Globalism is one place, ISIL belongs to a dead race e.g. under Sargon I. The beheadings of western journalists on the 21st century planet surface was unacceptable. (We leave out statistics for beheadings of people in the world for a moment) Islamic religion also has stretched beyond the Middle East and far East in the 21st century. You could say that in our age freedom created many 'free' species while being in the process of a globalized world. It is at it's best good science and progress, knowledge to advance one's own boundaries and limitations, but at it's worse becomes only a bad choice if criminal intentions are involved. Or as is in the case of ISIS/ ISIL re- engineer the chance of modern technology in combinations of their own makings. Turkey or Quatar are standing on the median of the world, but when in the Middle East that is not holding any truth, and not because the official Job or Office they hold is untrue. It is quite seductive to the eye of the beholder when every day you can wake up to a different memory of how great once Turkey was, almost in every century past and gone. What truth can such trivial looks mean in high Office of the country? That you may tear it's heart apart, simply because you are the head of the pride among lions and lion whelps? Turkey or Quatar basically are historic places to the rest of nations in the Middle East. But in politics proportionate force is in place, even when it is ISIL/ ISIS, sir. (Error reading: especially when it is ISIL/ ISIS)

“How to respond? Given the (not unreasonable) unwillingness of the countries of NATO to go to war with Russia over Ukraine, it would be unwise for the alliance to start sending heavy weapons to the battlefield.” Bloomberg article, 03082014, How to punch back at Putin

03092014

I personally have waited months for this to be written and said. The double rage edge in this 'spelonk of war' against Russia should be telling e.g. the US where this conflict will end and how then the world could look like in the aftermath. Europe for example is echoing old agitations known to the most of Europe during WWII, and despair not knowing how to deal with a war not won by one individual country at a later time in the war... In September 2014 Europe is having a double rage to experience some similar unfinished business of that other time, to put it simply. It is both a mistake and cure this time, where the human eye can't get. Once again for a reminder: the US and Russia have liberated Europe, and since then NATO has been, even without Russia as Member of Nato, there to maintain this alliance of Members in Europe and from overseas the USA. A complicated stitch to 're- open' again and remove some bits and pieces from this alliance, if some Members insist on keeping relations with Russia's trade and saber- tooth industries. Like the forbidden fruit or love, from the here above now we also have the forbidden experience that can't last longer than this term of uncertainty on both sides of now and when resolved. Liberty once again is senile and unable in the face the world now faces in a much younger generation, compared to 70 years ago. Question is: what is making the US dominance at this time different from other Nato Members in the Organization?

Complaint from the US probably is that who to save from Russia in Europe, if European countries and Members of Nato, can't give up dependency of Russia. Trade get's dirtier up this roadway even faster if the conflict get's more intense and not only in Ukraine, but in the diplomatic world with the West as well. And the US refuses to be brought down at low level to beat up a wfe... Just to put it mildly. After this the world can only get smarter and create the better plans it holds for the future, from the US to Europe, and beyond. And the world and his wife couldn't be more happier! The present time tensions however are not the right climate yet to go there, but is inclined to inspire young politicians to act upon the instinct of 'greater good' and how to do this by the act of patricide. And it seems that the Russian President understands this biopicture of future and promising young politicians. When fortune has anything to do with it, Mr Vladimir Putin is their friend and only one, if they need any 'help' or would need his help. The biopic is rather an unusual and emotional one, father is good, sons are good, and mother is good. The outside world cannot make any sense of the bad that goes on where good is everything there is to be fighting over! Let's put it in another way: the US dominant factor throughout seven decades has been largely Jewish or the top world Bankers. It is in more popular terms known to be the only American dream to follow for eternity. When at happier times globalization it made mother a place to live happy lives, rearing of offspring, properties, sporting with lot's of programs, democracy and raising incomes annually or periodically with loads of pocketmonies. All that disappeared once the term for globalization came to the legal age of stopping to be under-aged... A nice parable on a hot September morning? Maybe, just maybe...

To be continued.

World economic growth no change since 1950

18082014

What is 3% exactly in comparison when snapshot of today's global financial pic 2014 and 1950? This is the number exhausted going any deeper or much more than that. So why should it make economists, e.g. In the UK, happy to see some 'progress' in economic data in august 2014? in comparison to Italy, USA, the Eurozone, the question is one of a mystery. The UK perhaps could have a secret trading partner outside the global economics to forecast the incredible number on it's GDP. And then again, leaders of big governments have special responsibilities in the Happy index command. But how many realize this? The global community is getting more into an abstract life of it's own, scale- wise. If this is true, the 3% growth, is it showing a direct relation with income, family and other earners? Let's have a say all together on this one. Big corporations first. They have all the numbers the government need to make that announcement on a dreary day in august 2014, when the world is falling off the planet asymmetrically with wars in Ukraine/ Russia, the Middle East, and now at home in the US a shooting yet again of a young man called M Brown. Pressure economics is on Russia and the Middle East. And don't ask from which point of view.

3% Means optimism, just like in the 50ties. And that is just my personal view, also since I looked it up this morning and compare the UK Prime Minister's tweet on GDP growth yesterday. Italy is showing an interesting number there... What was it again? 1% or 0.1%? Something of a fluid reality growing bleaker for Italy's government? Others, the specialist economists, might say to the public how economics illiterate (yes, Iam) we are on releasing numbers on GDP, and that we will not know which factors are giving us the real facts resultsin the world of GDP per country and nation. That is very true. Voters care not for GDP growth but are concerned who governs. And which Party is in government. I see it like this, mainly because I have nothing else to do this morning. But I can't help getting the same feeling as Johnny English in Switzerland, that Oh God, please do not let me die at the hands of the Swiss... Globalists do not do forecasts on GDP! In the middle of fierce fightings in Iraq and Ukraine, two factors of imbalances in the global community and economic sphere, why this is not the right time to talk of prosperity in civilized countries I can't quite yet say. Adolf Hitler probably thought the same when his Nazi Germany was rising in a time of war, and so were his collaborators selling and buying perhaps arms? The thing is 3% is peace time number rates. The golden days of economic growth according to the OECD in the 50ties. And the sanctions against Russia remain a constant worry in our time today...