iF




14 April 2024


Iran launching ballistic drone missiles directly into Jerusalem Israel is a crime against the State of Israel. 

It has directly launched its missiles through Israel Air Space, with no real reason to do so historically, e.g. that the territory of Israel would belong to Iran. 

Israel has every right to fight and retain that right on its borders, now under fire in the South and against the terrorist group Hezbollah in the north. With the war against persistent terror and terrorism on the borders here above mentioned it is in israel's Military right to stick with the strategy of its defenses. Iran should be aware of the military strategy concerning the sovereign border of this territory that is the State and Republic of Israel.

The attack on Israel's sovereign territory last night therefore With missiles directly launched from Iran into Israel is a violation and irrelevant of any historical or political meaning. 

The writing ut supra is a personal op. Additional: Israel is standing a very strong case against Iran, that its barrage of missiles was not retaliation, but a right out provocation. Legally and military legally a second provocation of the same magnitude would mean that this is war Against the State of Israel . Therefore from 7 October 2023 and in April 2024 Israel has been pushed into war by its enemies on its territory. The God of Abraham is yet Israel's Strongest and supreme ally, when clearly that the enemies of Israel mean annihilation of its existence in the ancient land of Abraham, Jitzhak and Jacob/Rachel.

World order: Iran is a third world country, progressing to the rank of a second world country, and not as its attack on israel's sovereign territory last night suggested an imperial Iran to conquer the land of Israel. It is constraint by its limitations c.q. Republic. Its attack on Israel should be taken into consideration more broader and deeper, with intellectual prowess if Israel decides to extract a price from Tehran. There is oil, and is it impossible intellectually to go another way that will bring more incentives for Israel?

To be continued.




Word of the night: why would Iran underestimate the old world order? There are no new players in a new world order.

12 April 2024

Iran has two possible war scenarios in mind and they are not very difficult to understand. One is that the old world order likely will continue, if the new world order will suffer a setback for a while long before the world can speak of an aftermath. One week ago in the heat of the moment with the international world backing Hamas and the Palestinian resistance, from that the window to Iran and a new opportunity was clear that this was now or never. Loss of both borders first by holding the borders south and north in constant armed engagement with the IDF, and secondly by public opinion in the international world, the window of opportunity did bring Iran closer to the war scene and a bold declaration of war was made by its leadership in Tehran, that it will take revenge for the bombing of its high officials in Syria. The leadership in Tehran could with ease ignore the rest of the world of any order, as far as the Middle East was concerned. One week later the same threats do not make the same sense, if it will e.g. attack Israel within 48 hours, so they have announced over the last 48 hours. Public opinion doesn't stand with Iran, it does so with the Palestinians. From that point of view it looks very much that Iran is being pushed back into the corner of the old world order, of which it has a historical role to play here or risk a terrible gamble. In 2014 it was then Russian President Vladimir Putin with a similar gamble, and to challenge the world order. Incidently what can Iran expect to be left with if for theoritical reasons it should succeed in the world as we know it? Or they are not concerned with the kind of deterrence of most Nato Members coveting our planet earth? Iranian leadership should be wary of a total war scenario with the rest of the world, one can only see from the latest threat to Israel. A small faction of terrorists Hamas did the trick and has dwarfed the leaders and generals in Iran, when they crossed the border with Israel and came to massacre and rape the citizens of Israel in Ha Negev. Had it been Leonidas of Sparta the world would have certainly called him king of war. That however is precisely what the Middle East countries thought of Hamas after 7 October! Sometimes a rival brother (e.g. Cain and Abel) can be more deadly an adversary or mistrusted relation or relative... Especially when crowned by the people everywhere in the region as victors with waving palm trees leaves by women, old, young and elderly, standing by the side of the road to hail the king warriors. And the world stood by Hamas.

The other war scenario that is most unlikely and to hit Israel directly is one that is making no sense in terms of provoking the world order in a total war. Unless they are ready to gamble in an all or nothing scenario. They will be needing at the same time a new planet in the day after, when we know how this planet is quietly being controlled from its apogee. Why would Iran make a terrible miscalculation of its own 'greatness' and not remember what happened with the Russian President in 2014 after he had challenged the global world? To take Crimea was like peanuts to an elephant and then he came back in 2021. Also perhaps thinking that this was the moment to be even far more greater, and bearing in mind Russia's powers in space. In the new world order what perhaps is part of its rationale is that the world has learned many lessons from the past, and that the future will therefore be run by only those nations in which its populations believe in allegiance that they stand for justice and freedom. Iran may underestimate that allegiance completely. And where the people are most and best served by governments (even when difficult), there is no other peoples which have alien ways of understanding living conditions of all. Why would they support in any sort of way or public opinion a people not known for their human kindness as a governing body and government? With the old world order it is maybe good for Iran to remember the Iran- Iraq wars. To say this is for a reason, that when again feeling the ambition of going to war once again against another nation. The writing on the wall: first Shiite and Sunnies, and now Shiite and Jews. How will we know whether Iran will become a new player in equally the new world order?












Intriguing never to ask why Hamas provoked the IDF on 7 October 2023.

3 April 2024

It is on paper very clear that Hamas when it had invaded Israel's old borders since 1948 that this was not meant to attack the people of greater Israel, at least from an overview when an army wants to plan an attack against another. But it had a better plan and it decided to massacre the part of Israel that was closest to the border with Gaza. 75 Years of occupation, the Palestinian people are saying is what the presence of Israel means in this part of the Middle East. And also that Israel is known to be a brutal army like no other in the world. How do the Palestinians know that? How does Hamas know that? From the military point of view it should have been the ten dollar question to anyone: that having been in wars before with Israel one has empirical understanding how the apartheid regime conducts its wars against its enemies or threats from the enemies. Why then provoke Israel in such an unprecedented way as never before to break through the high concrete barriers of the borders to rape, massacre and incinerate Israelis from the kibbutzim? It is this what the world labels as unjustified Israeli war against the Palestinian people/ innocent civilians? In military science disproportionate is then what will follow, and that only in the aftermath of the war can one investigate or examine why there was disproportionate use of force in this or any other war. The military works differently and it is not the same as civilian order in the rest of the western world. Civilian order is under Police order, and governments are part of the military order as a deterrence against any alien invasion of its sovereignty. The future of Israel will not be secured by winning the war against Hamas, as many are saying among the enemy nations. De facto Israel does not need a war to have a future, because if it did the Balfour Declaration has sold them a cat in the bag Jewish Home without sovereignty or State building. Why do they see that State building in the non State next door? Here the act or deed of intent has never come to any fruit bearing for the people of Israel de jure. The future of Israel however continues and that is its real first line. And also it does not owe any other nation a penny to exist and be a Jewish Home. This sharade of a so called State for Israel, aka the Jewish Home, must end here and today pronto.

Another version of the 'occupation' among the enemies of Israel in the Middle East is another unofficial military on paper 'rationale', e.g. that Iran insist it does not share responsibility with Hamas on the 7 October massacre in Ha Negev Israel. And that is difficult for the IDF to prove that Iran's denial is the strategy they are using to blur the image and continue their fog of 'silent' war against Israel and its persistence to be a country and State in this region. Here we see nothing new in tactics when coming from Iran. The accusation against the State of Israel and its defense forces is that Israel wants a wider war in the Middle East, as its latest. With Hezbollah in the north and attacking Israel on the border will make that of the accusation the harder to accept, as also the meetings with Hamas Officials in Teheran. The wider conflict now imposed on Israel is a direct triumph by Iran and Hamas against Israel and widely in the region praised by all supporters of the right to the land of Palestinian people struggle, on Social Media messages. It is low cowardice to deny this glorious mission when they mean by that Israel is occupying the land of the Palestinians and should be removed from the whole of its territory. It looks as if on this occassion the war was imposed on Israel... Or, there are bigger fish to catch with Israel as easy bait. In simple words: Sonny is hot headed and Barzini knows this. Until Michael came and said that if history has taught man(kind) anything it is that nothing is impossible, difficult maybe, but not impossible, referring to reaching the impossible enemy... Michael being a military man and hero.) And more simple words: who will become Israel's Michael Corleone? Especially when in Israel there are too many Fredo's and are not having any respect for a brother like Michael, even when warned never to take sides against family. That happens since the beginning of time: Cain and Abel, Jacob and Esau. What else is on the paper for Israel and its nation? Democracy, be that a little more asymmetrical than the usual symmetry of a two- party system democracy. It is perhaps naive to say at the moment, when the world is turning its responsibility away from Israel's pangs of a new birth in another hundred years future, that as a nation Israel has every right to be respected as the rightful people of the Jewish Home. (Not even I as yours truly could live inside the walls of the Jewish Home (now castle) as a non Jew!)

Let us make no mistake: the reversal of war fortune has turned the table in favour of Hamas and Iran in the wider sense of the word. It is therefore in no mood for returning any living or dead hostages to their homeland Israel, and neither will it stop the war. In their reasoning it is simple enough, that, why stop when we're winning? (Casino style?) The wider war is imposed on Israel.










Hamas has unleashed the mother of all traps for Israel on 7 October, five months ago.


(Personal op III)


17 March 2024

The relative quietness so far during the Ramadan holiday in Jerusalem is probably due to the IDF preparations in weeks before the celebration had started. In Israel this makes enormous difference scale wise, with the war in Raffah that is still ongoing. This week also it seems that Israel is not winning the moral war in the international arena of public opinion and diplomacy with Washington, but at home where it is a matter of life and death Israel is winning the war, so at least it must seem to the people of Israel at the moment. Military rationality as difficult as this is does not work in the same way as the logic of people or citizens. In a democracy civil life differs asymmetrically to that of the military or Defense Ministry, and especially at times of war against an intrusive enemy like Hamas. So, who are these people massively protesting against the government of Prime Minister Netanyahu, yesterday in Tel Aviv? The most sober answer is that they are the citizens of Israel and are in their democratic right to air their resentment in the way that all democracies excercise this right. Israel is on the path of its own evolution as a nation and its politics. And that is giving some idea where the country wants to be in the near future with the birth of a whole new nation in the making, despite the vile trap Hamas had set for it to fail or be a failed State in the eyes of the family of nations. In the end of the day it will always be down to the country and its people to decide the fate of their State. In the rest of the world we must allow this young State to prosper and fair well, even when it seemed impossible at first or since the breakout of the war after 7 October. And what is more important is to get rid of the most primitive idea that the world is a better place on God's good earth without the Jews. For the simple reason that many nations align with what they consider good governance among the nations and their understanding of living as human kind on this planet. For the simple reason that they have already had their evolution behind them, fighting wars or losing their wars to come to the notion of what peace means and how that brings more incentive to its people and sovereignty. Now is the time to make that wish come true and to allow Israel to be part of the rest of mankind, and not just as their global and personal financier. The so called global moral obligation toward an equal as we see each other in the rest of the world.

The yearning of most religions is to see a forever Zion in Jerusalem and not to deny this right of Israel, call it good faith but it must be done sooner than much later and never again expect the Jewish people to diminish to a few hundreds left of what they have managed to grow into the millions, after the Holocaust. You don't need to be Jewish and see the promising picture in its oldest prophecies or Songs of Songs by Solomon. Israel today in his interview the Strategic Minister Ron Dermer has said that Israel has a future and it was very exciting. (Interview on X) The world must honor the obligation and remember where the center of the world layeth. Hamas is a mere fleck of dust in comparison to the greatness of God and no nation should fall for its traps, even when the mother of all traps was set out for Israel by Hamas on 7 October to make it an undesirable people living in the Middle East among the millions of Arab peoples. Beulah is the personal name for Israel and its land. However in geo politics the name for now will only remain in the present time as Israel, a new nation after the Holocaust being given the most ambivalent letter by the British government to be allowed and live in Palestine. And as for the partition of land without contiguity between Israel and the Palestinian people, it is most embarrassing that a sophisticated nation as that of the English government has made it more worse than it was ever in its entire history for Jews. This grievance has lasted the longest of times for both nations and when once again looking at its design, you have to admit that the trap was an unfortunate one and will not be resolved by even a Two- State solution. Even the genii in the bottle could not grant such a wish and make the territory between Gaza and the West Bank congruent to Israel, or for the Palestinians. Their interpretation therefore resorting always to genocide or occupation by Israel, and that Israel must give back their land! They could have taken the attitude of Carthago and still manage the lands between the two nations in 75 years, in the meantime. On the other hand with the young State that was erected after 1948, yes here much has gone wrong over the decades. These mistakes will not be here in another one hundred years from today, in good hope. In the end of the living day on this planet nations have the obligation and responsibility not to fail their State and people, and that will always be an instrumental truth throughout perpetual life as only human kind knows it. Whoever wants to adhere to rationalities as democracy and State building will in the end have to build a country and civility, or disappear from civilization altogether and hide under the rocks in desolation and profligacy for the rest of their time under the galaxy of the desert sky. History, Israel now has a War & Peace story (Leo Tolstoi) of its own making. Some reading the whole book, while others only are using pieces and bits, and say they know the whole story.












After five months war against Hamas the question is how far is Israel prepared to go from here.


(Personal op)


9 March 2024

The two levels of reality for Israel and Israelis are one for the military at war against Hamas in Gaza and one for Israelis living at war as a country. With no progress on release of the last 134 hostages in Egypt the latest news on X is that the country is not looking for a political solution at the present time, but only a military solution. That is a whole new and different situation for all of Israel. The military solution, one can imagine, can only bring a long thread to what may follow after the war is over scenario, e.g. that Israel will need to transform as a country and decide where the point of the new start will begin for that fictional tomorrow. Or as the Prime Minister calls it, the day after. The objective today is a clear military one: to eradicate Hamas from Gaza. We are not hearing the real reasons from the terrorist organisation why it pursuits the rejection of releasing the hostages, as this would be the first step to stop the war. Its answers are making no sense and there is never going to be any understanding ever in a civilized world for Hamas, once the world has come to its senses on what the real reason for the war was and that no Prime Minister could have ever been persuaded to seek a more benign solution to the brutality of 7 October 2023. This is the illustration: Kfir Bibas was nine months old when taken hostage with his mother and young brother, four years old. His father was taken separately. The point here to make on this serious understanding of the infant is that he was still in the age of breast feeding or milk feeding. How is it permissible in the eyes of the civilised world to take as young an infant in that milk age as a prisoner of war by a violent terrorist organisation? The chant of the Palestinian protesters is that what is one child, when Israel kills thousands of children. The bombing started not on 7 October. Between the time of the bombing/ air strikes and 7 October incidently there was global euphoria for Hamas in all Moslim countries. Happy perhaps that they had killed collectively (physically and abstract) so many Israelis in one day? And also that they had taken the infant Kfir Bibas, when seen on video streaming by the terrorists (with his mother and brother). We are perhaps also looking at a new pathological design to feel euphoria when terrorists kill Jews, kidnap an infant (while probably still at breast fed age), but then when retaliation by the military of the country responds with air strikes, the euphoria changes to pathological screams around the world of genocide. Science of any kind should seriously once more look into its own scientific learning. There seems to be a lack here for any judicial body to condemn this sort of war tactic by the terrorism of the kind that Hamas is. And therefore no harm is done by Hamas.

Israel will transform from the war mode to normalcy, the day after, as the Prime Minister of Israel is looking at the situation after five months. But this transforming will have to result from Israel and the people of Israel standing on their own two feet, and for one reason that the International community simply demands that there is no reason for them to see and help through with that transforming. Unless Israel will give up some of its fiction on territory and sovereignty, e.g. east Jerusalem. After 75 years this is the only answer for Israel and also it appears the only solution. The 1948 border with Gaza does not appear to have any severe effect in the International world, that this was a breach as that of e.g. Ukraine by Russia. One would think that once this is a breach of International order it is a clear invasion of another sovereignty by the invader. To Russia it was clear that they had invaded Ukraine and that the west would respond in a very effective way against the Russian aggression. And it did not complain when the west imposed the most extreme packages of sanctions against Russia immediately. Hamas is not Russia. The question is: why did Hamas invaded Israel and brutalised Israeli citizens in one day by the thousands, and felt legitimate to do so by then calling the ICJ after the first bombings that Israel was killing thousands? From the point of genocide now Israel is standing alone. And to the world this is justified and justified to the extend of what precisely? It could be that the justification is an indication of a collective demand or desist. You must be insane to decide a fate as fickle as that of a people with a history known to the whole world. It also feels a little uncomfortable (at least to yours truly). The rational and universal truth is that Israel does have the human right to exist and that the world cannot just turn it on or off. That, once again, would be preposterous. Especially because the international world order does know the rules of hearts and minds in times of conflict or armed conflict between two parties. If Israel is truly sovereign as in a binding letter (Balfour Decleration) this should be the only line to continue and let Israel come back from this war against Hamas in the time it choses to do so. With no friend of Israel or international law by its side, the world is facing a new deficit of its own. What kind of deficit is for them to make up their minds. Tomorrow President Isaac Herzog is expected to visit the Holocaust Museum in Amsterdam and the call for his arrest as a war criminal has been issued by a private person from an activist for Palestinians group. The judicial bodies have disintegrated into the public domain prerogatives and there is obviously no control here or higher order to deny these calls against an official (not terrorist organisation) of a State for his arrest. It said so in many tweets on X, that the activist was calling for the immediate arrest of the President. I hope that the European Union will understand the seriousness here and make it clear to all European Member States, that democracy is a law where all peoples are included and that no harm should come to them, e.g. who want to wear the yellow ribbon in support for the hostages. I believe that that is order. No one in their right mind can support genocide, but it is not something that came out of the sky and was dumped on a group of peoples just for genocide sake. (I like to wear the yellow ribbon in support of the hostages in a free democracy in the European Union, and do so without any fear of attack by those with aggressive urges and to do me harm in the name of Palestine) Back home for Israelis the anxiety is getting worse and also there is renew fear of the rest of mankind, that no one sees it any different than that Israel should deminish. And to know that it is to know your enemy. In the coming days and weeks the US has announced they will build a floating pier alongside the coast of Gaza, to deliver aid. The war is far from over by the look of everything taking place in Israel and Gaza. And worse will be when there are no more hostages alive.

Between 1976-1978 I have lived in the Negev in kibbutz Nirim. 












This is an issue: why won't Hamas give up the Israeli hostages after nearly five months war after 7 October?

20 February 2024

Five months after 7 October Hamas is still keeping the Israeli hostages captive, as some suggesting, in Gaza Rafah. As the Foreign Minister of Hungary has said two weeks ago, the first moment is very important to go back to when Hamas stormed into Israel proper near the Gaza border with the kibbutzim in Ha Negev, or never find the answers that Israel is looking for. And going back to 7 October after five months, what is striking is the refusal of releasing the hostages. What difference do they want to make, except that Israel would pause the war and have all the hostages safely returned to their homes in Israel. Hamas has nothing to lose, not this time. It has everything to lose and when looking closer it is also building momentum by refusing to release the hostages. Hamas has in fact demanded a topping of the release of thousands of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody. It could be the most critical question now to ask why Hamas believes it is in a position to make such high demands from Israel. On the exterior they have nothing to worry about as the world spirals into a spin of ceasefire demand by several government actors at the United Nations General Assembly, and with also another built up at the ICJ in The Hague to call for an end to occupation from the Israeli government in the ancestral land of the Palestinians. It is not in the human laws courts what this exterior means, if also examined on the issue of the atrocities committed on 7/10/23 by Hamas to defend the Palestinian people peaceful resistance, and adding to it the historical rights of the Palestinian people against apartheid Israel. It is right therefore to the mind of Hamas to keep the hostages in Gaza captive, as long as Israel refuses to withdraw from the Palestinian territories in the West Bank and now in Gaza. Incidently we should not have any illusions about the war on narratives, that ancestral land is a serious demand, at the UN and ICJ, when chewing the fat of victory against the apartheid regime Israel on 7 October. In return the question is: if Israel is Palestinian ancestral land, than where is the Jewish ancestral land to be in Israel? That is the question to be asked more critically when referring to the Prime Minister of Israel as genocidal and who wants to get rid of the Palestinian people. Also, it is understandable why the Prime Minister of Israel will not even be able to determine a political landscape from either a deliberate confusion or unintended confusion dating far back in time, since the Balfour Declaration in 1948. The war in Gaza since October 2023 and not stopping since then for over nearly five months today, is about Hamas and in the manner it chose to attack Israel through the high fenced border with Israel in the south. They have fought wars before and should have known the choice of war Israel would choose on this occasion to retaliate these atrocities and upstreaming it across their side of the world everywhere as if the euphoria should be felt across the whole Middle Eastern region. We are not exaggerating the atrocities seen on all these video streamings across the entire world.

It is therefore, once again, a critical question what could be next in their playbook of wars against apartheid Israel and to impose maximum damage on the regime and its people, after their first taste of regional and global victory. Do they harbour more 'victories and victorious' plans? After all, what do they have to lose but their reputation as the victors of defeating the Zionist regime in the face of all of the nations? It is to Israel strenuous effort to get their citizens back, with especially attention to the infant, toddler, of the Bibas family, and trying to find them in horizontal operations on the ground, also fearing they might be put in harms way for sport of Hamas. And this is all that we are now seeing, hearing and reading about in the media, and not analysis on the infrastructure of tunnels deep underground in Gaza. No one has any clue to what these tunnels were actually built for in coexisting peacefully next to Israel. After the last election in the Palestinian territory they had thirteen years of sovereignty in Gaza... The tunnel infrastructures does not even qualify for urban warfare against Israeli bombardments, and yet it is here and being something of a facility of something unsaid and uspoken of. Israel is not the occupier from within, if Hamas has been using these facilities for purposes to control its citizens, and the question is also whether they did had satellite accessibilities and experiment on all sorts of other spywares. The citizens would believe anything told to them, that this was to keep the Zionist regime in vision when they strike or are planning something covert in Gaza, the West Bank, or against any Palestinian living under occupation. Of course, the IDF can make better judgements on the tunnel infrastructures found in Gaza, but one thing is clear they are not meant for political reasons, as a prerequesite for a Two- State solution.








After 7 October the Palestinian Authority will suffer not only heavy defeat, but political deficit.

14 February 2024

Israel still is in a very difficult moment with getting the war rationality right in Rafah, and release of the hostages from the terrorist organisation c.q. governing body in Gaza. The world is not holding its breath and plans are looked at from possible and impossible angles, how to save the citizens in Rafah from more destruction in the war against Hamas by the Israeli Defense Forces. There is no telling how far the government in Israel is prepared to go from this point and to get their objectives or coming close to them over the coming hours and days. One thing we do know about war is that it cannot proceed this way to both peoples. The Palestinian Authority this morning has called to Hamas to release the hostages and softly softly has also called for a different direction. Perhaps we are already seeing here a sneak preview what might happen or come after the war is over in the south in Rafah. The two nations couldn't be more divided, and that will post war be something the Israeli Prime Minister will need to make something of a move towards the future of the State of Israel, but now also as fact will have to come back to file for a workable plan with the Palestinian Authority to rebuild this division. And rebuild it with hearts and minds policies, one can only presume. But having learned thus far how Israel responds to the Palestinians after every war, let's hope that this time Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu will be able to design the impossible future between the two peoples. The Palestinians, what we can expect, should understand that the people on their side need something of a new political direction, and not a State. Their political direction out of the debris of the war after 7 October should be more a political sovereignty, firstly excercised by their own people and secondly to accept there is no written text on the divisions within their own society, and that it is for certain that this has not ever been done with their closest neighbour Israel. Instead what people outside the Middle East are saying, thinking and seeing, are the two sides fighting for political survival for reasons you could interpretate either randomly or speculate. After the war corruption and chaos will go hand in hand for a long while, some of it intentionally and other not in a direct way by intention. Living together in practically the same geography does make it in so many ways like that, and human nature has been destroyed for reasons that cannot be traced to make it progressive in the present time. What is history is history and will remain so forever. And so much more has gone wrong where politics were never born to create and sustain the ambition of a viable State building. The problem that also became clear after the Hamas fiasco since 7 October is that Israel is not a foreign place or country, that isn't the problem. The Palestinian problem is that Israel is sovereign and should be treated or approached with mindfulness. The PA President, Mr Mahmoud Abbas, cannot deny Israel's history nor future (that could last more than seven generations/ 750 years) in the 21st century. In reality both nations share almost the same realities on an every day basis, the same stores, markets, poverty numbers and lack of employment on both sides. And this is more than just economics, it is in fact more knitted when not written in any law to both peoples.

No outsider can understand why it is most complex, to the Prime Minister in Israel, but also to a people without a State, to come to some form of high level diplomacy between the two sides. It is not that the suffering of the Palestinian people do not hurt us, but strictly taken by text and law/ order, as happens with a professional army / military like that of the IDF, logic will always serve sovereignty, while also trying to save the people trapped in the siege unwillingly. No one can say that Israel wilfully is hurting the people living in the West Bank and in Gaza, while at war against a divisive and elusive government that is spreading danger across the territories where civilian lives are and should be productive to build their societies in peace or calm. Jerusalem should be the jewel of all religions and not surrounded with chicken wire everywhere to make a 'lasting' impression to more cosmopolitan or metropolitan tourists from around the world. (Personally I would like very much to see the Damascus Gate transforming to an open area with adjacent areas where all can come to do their shoppings and sell their wares, be it dates, camels, donkeys, fish, or sheep. To both peoples and to the rest of the world visitors. The sun should shine freely through the whole of this eastern part in Jerusalem as if it was taken out of bondage by the enclosed quarters in the present time old walls and miniature towers of bricks. And starting the future control by Israel with a small Palestinian bureaucratic municipal to keep watch over this area) Peace is still far from the chalice to drink without the bitterness in the wine of many hurts and pains since the misconception of the Balfour Declaration, having been interpreted in haste and not in terms of hundreds of years coexistence, in short many more misinterpretations were born wanted and unwanted by both peoples. Just to suit the moment as time moves faster than we can think, sometimes, but especially where nothing is or looks solvable. Hamas has ousted itself from decent politics between nations and in difficult relations. A delusional rule of 'outsting' the land of Israel with its people, how is this world politics? And how could it have ever been perceived as a way to win world domination? Even without political sovereignty first? In the myth the story goes as follows, that natural birth happens in a natural way, but when Zeus natural birth might spring from the head, it is the most awkward story in ancient Greece told of their pantheon. And what is happening between Israel and the Palestinian stuggle for freedom is no less awkward, as it will spring from the head or Heads of State, e.g. Israel, the Arab nations, the US, European Union and others. At least trying could be the first step in the future of many hundreds of years, or you just won't do it.













Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu is right to order his ministers not to say anything in public on the ICJ court ruling in The Hague yesterday.


(Personal view)


27 January 2024

Military operations in the global sphere have no specific area in mind where the law is overly excessive, either for or against. It is also known to be respected in all restrictive aspects of the law and military laws. Can a citizen of the world change the law and military laws by being a representative of citizens in a clear conflict between fighting forces in a non or specific area of combat? In the 21st century the power by empowerment of citizens in general have changed dramatically in favour of the course as in many types of courses in and around the world. And yet at the end of the day it is still the government that decides on how best to organise citizenship when standing on the platform of protest or other to call on for support for their case. What can we expect the military will do and stand in the theater of active war? On social media this morning there are many citizens speaking about the ICJ court ruling of yesterday in The Hague, and saying that it has ordered Israel to stop the war, and others saying it as literally when heard, that Israel should restrain from genocide. Where the ICJ court has been resolute on is the release of the hostages held by Hamas in Gaza, unconditionally and immediately. It is in its subtlety clear that the ICJ does not say Israel, but is referring to the Israel Defense Forces and the military campaign in Gaza after the Hamas atrocities on 7 October last year, 112 days today, in its court ruling. There is therefore no need for any high profile official to speak out against the settler nation that was born out of the Holocaust and living in the land of Palestine or Palestinian lands. (It is the Jewish nation and not settler nation!)

The military logistics machinery: it is restrictive to highly qualified personnel and only in terms of engineering the heavy machines, e.g. tanks in the field, flying Fighter Jets, precision bombing, and others. It is not as random as jumping on motorbikes and holding some type of weapon in the hand on a rampage to massacre a whole part of a region in its sovereign land. Here is where the meaning of genocide begins by intent, and not as in the ICJ court ruling Convention meaning, if correctly read and heard yesterday. It is not beginning after when in retaliation the military responds as the military machinery (equal to conventional military forces). It is what the terrorist organisation wants us to believe being a choice of a few measly men on motorbikes, and this is how Israel responded? Genocide to Israel can go deeper when questioned by their government and military: that what we see from our view is the reality of Hamas, not only being a terrorist organisation, but in fact being the government in Gaza and has a population rule when they were officially elected by the people. A whole constituency is sharing the ideology by Hamas, 2 mln people living in Gaza and not in the West Bank, that Israel is the settler nation and does not belong here in the Middle East. And Intent of genocide plunges into a dense and thick high cloud above the Gaza strip, and it is reaching beyond into the global sphere, on practically every doorstep in the rest of the world. Now for 112 days. It is the cause of bodily harm, mentally and physically, primo to the innocent citizens of Ha- Negev on the morning of sleeping hours on 7 October 2024.  secundo: it was perhaps a mini- genocide and did not reach the thousands of being killed by the Israel Defense Forces the way it has done to the citizens of Gaza in retaliation?

But Israel is studying the ICJ court ruling in the meantime, when the Prime Minister has told his ministers not to say anything just yet about the court ruling in The Hague, reading from a tweet this morning. And that is not defiance of the ICJ Court ruling. What is defiance? Hamas has not heeded the immediate release of the hostages by the ICJ court ruling yesterday in The Hague, but is in fact euphoric that the ICJ has ruled in their favour against the genocidal intentions and actions of Israel against the people in Gaza. De jure: it was a military campaign and it remains inherent to International Military Laws. Israel did not jump on motorbikes on a rampage to massacre the people of Gaza. Or, worse, the government of Gaza has no laws to govern a government and therefore can take any moment by impulse to attack the enemy or settler colonial Israel. It is this randomness that Israel wants to stop and have been doing so in every war against Hamas, and doing so perhaps not any different from the Byzantine, Roman or other empire.










Personal journal.

14 January 2024

No miracle morning today, sunday 14 January 2024. 100 Days and Kfir the infant taken hostage by Hamas on 7 October 2023, and his little brother a toddler, mother and father, still are being kept in Gaza. It is slowly beginning to look like presumption and reality is fading to the background in the far distance. Before the law I hope that the leader of the South African legal team, John Dugard, can see not only jurisdiction but prudence as well and to put more emphasis on the abduction of Kfir, an infant not yet one year old. Would this not make jurisdiction of high order, if you want to defend innocence of children, women, and a people? The law equality laws are not quantity is better and that quality should be ignored as the same with sovereignty from his domicile. In short: where is Kfir, nine months old when abducted by the terrorist organisation, his equality in International Law, his equality before the law? He, Judge Dugard, said in his statement on thursday at The Hague, that the case of genocide should be conducted in a manner with great objectivity investigation to proceed... In his own words one wonders where that was going, and if the Judge in his own prudent way was dealing with a very complex legal case on the International territory to impartially argue the case of genocide, as set out by the government in South Africa, of which he is a distinguished legal member at the ICJ, against the State of Israel, its military and government. There is also the matter of deference over wild accusations, the matter of premature timing as the war has not yet been concluded, and to bear in mind the hegemony by which a sovereign State operates. Is it beyond truth how this case of genocide was rushed to the ICJ and make it hard evidence on and by the government in South Africa, as a third party, to intervene on behalf of the Palestinian people in Gaza against the State of Israel.

The question of the matter is simple, I would think and say, that in this case of genocide Hamas does not constitute anything of even the slightest constituency in the International law. Hamas is a disturbing frequency of brutality and unlawful aspirations, e.g. to eradicate the Jewish people from Israel as a nation and State. The question after the first two hearings however is whether Judge John Dugard can continue his case of genocide and do so unchallenged by the new world order and where the future of the next generations in Israel, in the Middle East and the rest of the world, should find shelter and prosperity, not meant here in terms of monetary, but in terms of continuity and prolongation of life. I have no idea by what philosophy Judge John Dugard imagines what the future of the world must look like and be. That will be a challenge on his prudent mind and the question whether the Honourable Judge can take full responsibility in this case of genocide against the State of Israel and its military. Kfir, the infant, nine months old when taken away from his domicile, and today living in captivity in Gaza under inhumane circumstances and under brutality by Hamas, is the decisive factor in the war against Hamas by Israel. Kfir was not expected to fight for Israel and kill Palestinian people, or distort the nature of the truth. And he has never held a gun in his hand and shouting out in the streets of the world that the Palestinian people should be killed, from the river to the sea. It was his country that took the military into battle against Hamas, who contrary to Kfir are not innocent little infants. In fact once that has been established properly the second level will be about the elasticity of the war itself, in logical order. As Dr Christopher Staker, Defense lawyer to Israel, said on friday 12 January 2024 at the ICJ, is this a novel way of conducting law, and referring to the case of genocide against Israel timing?













The geopolitical split from the military geopolitics on the war in Gaza.

21 December 2023

All political Members of Knesset are trying to get their message through why they will continue the war and operations in the north and south of Gaza, in the coming time. The new year is just around the corner and still the 7 October massacre of Hamas on Israeli citizens behind the Gaza border with Ha Negev hasn't yet stopped, one. killing of Palestinian civilians during bombing or ground operations by the IDF, and two. any rationale will do at this point in the war on the side of Israel, which they don't seem to have or simply are not revealing just yet what their next plan will be or is. From afar the future doesn't look as bright as usual for Israel, as in a State there is so much more to lose when there is no plan where the new beginning or morning will proceed from there, for Israelis and country. New border disputes, land disputes and territory disputes have not yet been announced at this stage, as the country is at war, but we do expect to hear very soon if there will be a political answer in Israel either by the incumbent Prime Minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, or as there is talk of bringing back the former prime minister, Naftali Bennett, to lead the nation. But first they have to bring back the hostages that are still in captivity in Gaza and held by the terrorists Hamas. The world can afford to only concentrate on the Palestinians being the ones to pay the price in this war, but for Israel there is much more at stake. One thing what the Prime MInister can't promise the people of Israel is going back in time when Israel had been living in national and global security as Jews in Israel and to a certain extend in the rest of the world. For Israel it will be unwise to neglect the fact that Hamas is the victor in this war, and especially when it ends or has to end under International pressure. When honest, we haven't got a clue what may come in the next stage of ending the war with Hamas on the terrorism they committed on 7 October in Ha Negev, proper Israel. When the world is not saying anything about 7 October the message will be loud and clear in these parts of the world, that Hamas had taken revenge on Israel for the occupation of the land of Palestinians. This is heroic. Hamas has given the world something else to see when they do the fighting against Israel, in Real Time. Does that mean the world has failed for decades to do their prominent job, while now Hamas has given the world to see how to do the job? You could say it almost feels charismatic how Hamas has gained some sort of heroism fighting the most powerful and dangerous enemy by a handful of 'outlaws' and succeeded to let Israel do the dirty war.

Hamas runs the show. They have children to show how Israel must win the war, thousands of them under rubble or dead. The world does not see the invitation of war was made by acts of atrocities primo against Israel, as someone put it in a comment on the JP, committing mass murder and mass abduction. No one even understands this precalculation was made by Hamas very easily, having decades of experience how Israel is fighting its wars on Hamas, how to win the war this time round. This is where the world can't seem to understand that they are clever people who have done it what the super powers in the world couldn't, not any G-7 or G-20 country. Hamas therefore is acting like a prince of war, whom the god of war has favoured against the most powerful nation and military in the world. Plus public opinion stood by Hamas' side now for more than two months, and even when they are not releasing any hostages. It is the pressure of ceasefire to make that happen, on their terms, Hamas and the world. It aggrieves Israel bitterly at this stage to realize there are no friends left in the world to support the sovereign right to defend its people against 'stealth' acts of terrorism on their soil. The US is exhausting all its resources to help their ally Israel continue fighting to get back home the hostages. How to understand this in terms of military geopolitics only the future will know. Perhaps it is time for Israel to recall the God of Israel and read the covenants again, with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and the first king of Israel David. And to remember that God Himself had bought the land from whom ever lived here before in the land of Israel or Judah. There is no relation to the war against Hamas to say this, but then again it isn't meant for anyone else to understand. The State of Israel, according to the Palestinians, is in fact Palestine. The Jew aristocratic or poor does not have a homeland in Israel, and not even the family of Rothschild. Or Michael Bloomberg. The land of Israel was a joke and Jews are joke people. The world takes Hamas seriously and for the real people of Palestine. And they have a point, just like the Byzantine and Roman empires had, before Hamas. After all this evil empire Israel had done unto others in the rest of the world things that no daylight could take, deprive honour and majesty from men and women, who cares what happened to their women and children on 7 October? They had it coming to them. Everyone remembers Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Jews are perverse... This wounded pride in the higher echelons of world powers who knows that they might be right, yes in a free world. The Affairs of State however are nothing like the free world and cannot be traded, especially not when it concerns the Jewish Home. It is no surprise that the world keeps on branding these heroic people in the terrorist organisation Hamas as Palestinians and not as Arabs living indigenously in the greater lands of the Middle East, where land is free. (Since trading land is forbidden) When under these new realities for Israel as the 'victim' and the Hamas as the victor there is no mentioning yet of what the plan for the near future should be for Israel, is no wonder. What was there for 75 years for Israelis has been knocked down within one day by Hamas. And the whole world knows that.

How do you extend a helping hand to Israel, after 75 years? And after 7 October 2023? By staying objective as any good law and justice should do. That may be ointment for flies, but not for Israel and Israelis.

Additional: "The idea from Ezekiel 16:3 is repeated: your father was an Amorite and your mother a Hittite – and Israel acted just like those pagan nations. b. You are your mother's daughter…you are the sister of your sisters: God had called Israel to be different from the pagan nations, and instead she became just like them." Israel is home in the Jewish land called Israel.









On Social Media today:



23 November 2023


IDF launched Operation Swords of Iron in the Gaza Strip, ten days later since the Hamas massacre on 7 October 2023 in Ha- Negev. (Ten days euphoria by Hamas and nothing of genocide by Israel was then called)



mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

3 m

IDF launched Operation Swords of Iron in the Gaza Strip, ten days later since the Hamas massacre 7 october in Ha Negev. (Ten days euphoria by Hamas and nothing of genocide was then called)

mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

IDF launched Operation Swords of Iron in the Gaza Strip, ten days later since the Hamas massacre 7 october in Ha Negev. (Ten days euphoria by Hamas and nothing of genocide was then called)

mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

IDF launched Operation Swords of Iron in the Gaza Strip, ten days later since the Hamas massacre 7 october in Ha Negev. (Ten days euphoria by Hamas and nothing of genocide was then called)

mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

IDF launched Operation Swords of Iron in the Gaza Strip, ten days later since the Hamas massacre 7 october in Ha Negev. (Ten days euphoria by Hamas and nothing of genocide was then called)

mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

IDF launched Operation Swords of Iron in the Gaza Strip, ten days later since the Hamas massacre 7 october in Ha Negev. (Ten days euphoria by Hamas and nothing of genocide was then called)

mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

IDF launched Operation Swords of Iron in the Gaza Strip, ten days later since the Hamas massacre 7 october in Ha Negev. (Ten days euphoria by Hamas and nothing of genocide was then called)


mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

IDF launched Operation Swords of Iron in the Gaza Strip, ten days later since the Hamas massacre 7 october in Ha Negev. (Ten days euphoria by Hamas and nothing of genocide was then called)










Mr Ghazi Hamad, might have a vision for the future of Gaza.

1 November 2023

In this Memri interview today the Hamas Official stated his visionary reasons to remove Israel from Palestine, and did very clearly so to inform the rest of the world. There is an interesting tone here in the interview how the leader expects from the Palestinian people to understand why there are so many falling dead during 'his campaign against the Israeli occupation'. But no one is listening as Israel is in war against Hamas in Gaza as we speak. What is striking as is disturbing intellect about the words in this interview is that from Hamas' point of view, that they are fighting a noble cause and to bring back all of Palestine land to the Palestinians. It is not a surprise that such a voice of vision and a visionary exhilarates all 'oppressed' people in the Middle East, as here they are more than 80 million, living in the utmost poverty and sheer deprivation. In fact Mr Hamad is speaking to all Arabic people living under dust and rubble in most Middle East. The bombing of Israeli forces seem like a luxury, as this is beyond their own 'free' will and choice (outdated from the human species thousands of years ago under the pyramids now in Cairo). One thing is certainly true, Mr Hamad does make his side of the world understand every word he is saying and that will be conceived as the words of a semi prophet from God. How popular is Hamas? In a man's world that could be a pulsing 100% and with extraordinary high ratings of the male heartbeat among these young and potent Palestinian males. Are we not forgetting something very existential and in essence very essential to this sort of propaganda against Israel? Three weeks the western media have globally made very clear to their audiences how Israel is bombing women, children, babies and infrastructure. Men seem to be in more safer places... Sacredness? Hamas is the Palestinian version of a very big boy's club (compare to what that means in Britain). For mr Hamad it is glorius to dip the blood of killed Palestinians in fresh early morning bread and martyrdom for the greater good wiping Israel off this Palestinian land called Israel forever.

What it is exactly is that Mr Hamad and his vision of the future Palestine you could say has global proportions and could make a very big impression in the world one day, you might say. It just goes beyond all theories made by nations who studied civilizations. That from the smallest of nations a dream of wiping off Israel from the Middle East, or from the River to the Sea' could become a reality on this planet earth. Without any help from the United Nations, the International Law, Geneva Convention (incidently stating that if the occupied take up arms the 'occupier' will have every right to destroy this threat- reading differently in legal terms), and no US Administration to foster peace. The rest of the world are all fools dressed in executive suits and empty heads. If peace in the Middle East means inside out that it should become an Arab- only- continent in the south, is there something in this message that no one understands in the Anglo Saxon language? One thing that we also know is that Mr Ghazi Hamad is no Omar Khayyam and his pearls from a place called heaven. It is no surprise why 30% of the Palestinian people, men, women, children and perhaps even the donkeys, look up to Hamas and swallow their daily muezzin rhetoric to keep fighting Israel. One thing is true given the geography of the Middle East and its Arab sovereignties, Israel could never make it an all Israeli hegemony like e.g. Hamas can do with their vision of joining the rest of these nations. And it sounds from the interview given today on Social Media that mr Hamad will go a long way from here, 7 October. "7, 10 or million of October," he claimed as long as it will take them to wipe off Israel from Palestine. In the Old Testament it is said of Lebanon that it has wealth in a grain of sand. Are these the people that come from the same grain of sand like Lebanon in the Old Scriptures? Israel are the new Ottoman Turks everyone east, west, north and south must fight against. And against Benyamin Netanyahu Suleiman I of Israel. (Not meant here as disrespect but as spoof) Hmmm... The logic of it all! Mr Hamad does he not know to wipe off Israel from Palestine will pass his own boundaries of what is ancient and God (Aleph)?

Post Scriptum: What will Mr Hamad say if the Palestinian people were an independent future political force conform (full Calendar days and quarters) to a Palestinian democracy? 



II Writing to Mr Ghazi Hamad,


Additional detail of observation: the military. The IDF objective and strategy is to bring home the hostages, taken by Hamas on 7 October 2023. It is today: 2 November 2023, 15:34PM.

Hamas and in the 21st century should understand the military intelligence how this will work when the hostages are still not released by this weekend. First and absolute: the infant. Second: the toddlers, third the young girls and boys, and fourth, the adults and elderly.

Israel and all the Jewish communities around in the world are standing behind Israel to have the hostages released. There is very little doubt that in the future in Israel it will not repeat another 7 October 2023. Whether under the incumbent Prime Minister or new one. Or risk another defeat for Hamas and the Palestinian nation health, prosperity, and right to exist in peace.

The weekend is here to make immediate history. Either by Israel and the military, or Hamas to release the hostages and help stop the 'war crimes'. May God Almighty the God of Abraham be with all nations when at war and in peace time. 

 












On Social Media today,


25 October 2023


mctaytelbaum

@mctaytelbaum

Word of the day: first year Israel historical yield curve? 1967? 1980? (1980-2023 free market economy)











UK: Let's hope the country can agree with the PM, and his Party too, after his speech today in Manchester.

4 October 2023

This is an outsider's view: all announcements in the PM's speech today at Party Conference are pointing to two things: the last Quarter 2023 and the first new Q2024 in January. One being the moment when the Prime Minster came to the Party and held a long speech on being grateful to the system in Britain and becoming the first Asian PM, as in modern day Britain. Britain has moved on and it has changed for the better future generations, one can sum up from his speech this afternoon. Rishi Sunak is the Prime Minister of this brand new world and is looking quite the role he is having to play. The truth cannot hurt the Conservatives when appraisal means change within the Party. Except where it still has the prerogative of deciding what and when change takes place and still holding on to the tradition of 'for whom the bell tolls'. The second moment is that most of the PM's announcements do not add up, that is when he will have to start the election campaign next year and as early as 1 January 2024. The great projects he has been telling Conference about surely this could not have been meant for the end of this year? Next year? In 2025? To a certain extend you have to agree with his big changes to big infrastructure projects e.g. HS2 and railnetwork engineering reversing existing plans to make it more cost effective. Still, even with the PM's genius, to become Prime Minister at the next general election it is looking very much like the wind is blowing his way too cold. You can't start with the planning to build the roof first and forget to mention the plot of land on which it will be built. The question is: why or what did he forget to tell Party Conference today? Was it not to win the next general election? The people of Britain were kept under the carpet, be it softly softly and risking to sound more like a social democrat at times.

It is the problem with time in politics and governments in the present time almost everywhere in the west. For example that it was time for the PM to forget that he is not campaigning to become the immigrant's son, but that he will and must become PM in 2024. What is the PM fighting the hardest right now, especially when facing Conference? Is it true, but does Labour have no greater ideas as the ones the PM has announced in his speech for a better future for Britain and the British people? That went a bit off when the PM mentioned something in the spirit of Keir Starmer and the Labour Party not being able to do the long term thinking. He almost branded the Labour leader as short term man. This does look a bit like quiet panic. And so he should, after today. Parallel to the PM's speech this afternoon what will be important to watch and listen to is the Labour leader at their Conference speak next week. Last year till this year in may the Labour leader had already made very clear on his ambitions for the Party and government if he were to become the next prime minister. Then followed the inspirational speech by his Shadow Foreign Minister, Mr David Lammy, on how to reconnect to the EU and new partnerships overseas. What the PM is missing here is that the future he so desires to bring to the people of Britain, will in essence not be very different in the western world from one country to another. Also whether Labour or Conservatives the next two or three years will have to be able to be compatible with the other G-7 and G-20 leading nations. Be it that it is a given in terms of global partnership that the global economy will be synchronised over a hierarchy of many new levels. That depending on the mechanisms each country maintains in their sovereignty. The UK and their British Prime Minister simply cannot chuck it all in the tin can and kick it down their road, not the likely thing to do. Big projects require a certain amount of planning and which is never three months, a year and another year. These are large cable networks underground and require stable soil symbiosis. Ten years? Next year it is election campaign time. Yes, tedious isn't it?

To be honest and for reasons of simplicity one can already see why it will be Keir Starmer to win the next general election. And for one reason only: time. Four years ago he was already talking about how Labour wins elections. His answer: by having a glimpse of the future. It is also simple logic where the Labour leader now stands, compared to the PM today at Party Conference for the Conservatives. On him time has a synchronised pressure that will gradually fit the nature of his campaign in 2024 to become prime minister. (In memo: the political comparison is would he have won the general election had he triggered a general election in october 2022) It is Mr Starmer's biggest project to become prime minister of Britain and the British people. Well, in either way, let's hope that the country agrees with either of these men, both wanting to become Prime Minister.














A herd of elephants storming the room today in the UK, Britain.

15 September 2023

21:45 PM

Level II? What are we looking at after Starmer's Europol apparent blunder in Den Hague today? The question is: where do you make the real start again, tomorrow from the point of level II in the coming election campaign, starting since November 2022 to September 2023 so far. The Europol visit by Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper have proven the opposite of what Starmer had intended with this sudden blitz visit at Europol, Den Hague. The Tories would like to believe that this was Starmer's first test as leader of the coming Labour Party to government, and they have played it out well against him as leader of the opposition almost the whole day today, and loud enough, making a herd of elephants of one musquito. Tomorrow- not literally- level II must continue.

Many policies before have failed once Britain had moved out of the EU. Brexit only complicates things even more today, how e.g. to create a common solution to the problem in the whole of western Europe and Britain on the issue of illegal boats coming to the shores. Whether this is poisoned waters, or as in this case the burning problem with the illegal boats crossing the seas into land nearest to the European Union and the shores of Britain. Level II politically Starmer still has to get into government, in a total of 15 months approx. The future Prime Minister and the Labour Party should reach the final stage here in these apparent 15 months and doing the ultimate final stage in this election campaign.

It is imperative for Keir Starmer to get as quickly back into the saddle and do the strategic election campaign levels quarters one by one in the months ahead, and to win the prime ministership, where all previous Labour prime ministers eventually arrive, in order to change Britain for the better. And the burning issue of illegal immigrants, people, must then hear from the Prime Minister in Britain that his Labour government is ready for whatever must be done, and do this humanely as possible and that he will be decisive.

Sir Keir's team of working class shadow cabinet ministers it is important to point out that these are 21st century modern days and post millennium working class millennials.  











The State of Zion and Zionism, not the republic of Israel.

5 September 2023

The people of Israel there is something one should ask about where their majority still feel that there is a strong connection that matters much to them, either being Jewish, Zionist or just human. A human much more different let's say from forty or fifty years ago, when the people of Israel had never seen 3 million Arabs living in the State of Israel yet as citizens and when there were no Arab political parties in Knesset. Zionism can be seen in 2023 as the success story in our time, as this wasn't there six or seven decades ago in the land that people around in the world have come to know as the Homeland of the Jews and Palestinians. Now the land too for Jews from parts in the world e.g. like Africa, India or even farther in the east beyond Cush. And it is all happening in Tel Aviv like a burning feast of millions of people in the narrow streets of Cairo. Perhaps it is the will of the Mizrahi Jews who are becoming more than ever before the 'real people' of Israel and who are also demanding to build a pyramid of their own and as monumental as the one in neighbouring Egypt, to harbour the billions of grains of sands in the middle of Israel. It is in fact not possible with the Ashkinazim in Jerusalem halfbreeds between the two. Israel and the people known to the peoples living in Tel Aviv or Beersheva, either from north to south, east and west, in 2023, however are not concerned about chauvenism on skin tan or whiteness of the skin colour they are part of, whether Israeli or Arab, black Jew or white Jew, as they are more preoccupied with the cost of living and employment. And not Zionism, as it goes without saying that all the people in Israel lower are sharing the same fears of having no money and poverty when on a daily basis for many decades. And what are their dreams when going late at home and coming back from work as a daytime bus driver? To the rest of the International world and in geopolitical terms a Jew always has the top level careers and businesses, and also having the families of nations believing e.g. that only Arabs are bus drivers. How do they do it? Where they are not looking today is that the future of Zionism as the democratic State of Israel might all disappear in time, jut like the pyramids in Egypt.

It is how democracy in the State of Israel works at its best. The Prime Minister and his coalition, but also the opposition, know when every second means eternity to these 'ordinary people' living in Cairo Israel. Where everyone is a clergy man? Also when pushing a cart and selling hundreds of loaves of fresh baked bread in the streets. Jews in the diaspora do not want to see this part of Israel lower. Paying in a different currency other than the Pound Sterling or American Dollar, or even the EU Euro, helps imagining that Zion is only Zionist or Zionism and pure when being fenced off from the high dirty Shekels and its inflationary vacuums and retail economic sectors. It is no surprise that despite a whole year of doing absolutely nothing the current Prime Minister and his coalition partners, that they have something of a sabbatical from all functionality in government and building the country where all Jews live and a people and more than ever before also are related to humanity in our modern times world. Democracy and the Republic should stand with them as e.g. is the case for the people of France. Especially when they are standing close enough to each other huffing and puffing about Right- Wing or Left- Wing political strife. One hundred years from today they will remember today's street revolution, one shamefully that wasn't about the people and their dreams how to live in the Zionist State when having no chance or access to a better way of life, but only was about the man living in Israel as the Prime Minister building castles in Spain... Or, pyramids of sands he is throwing the people and democracy in the eyes, and who are without the voice of the majority lower or proper. Israel is or should go through the moment as in any other political history in countries like France, Italy, Russia and many other places known for political changes through revolutions. The geopolitical question then will be whether we want Israel to succeed as a democracy. And see this as the biggest challenge to build a future world for all democracies. Seventy years Israel has had its own representatives to represent the State as a republic and democracy. What is happening now in the streets of Tel Aviv? Is it that tomorrow's democratic cosmopolitan life is calling from the other side of the future to the Prime Minister of Israel, whoever he / she may be?












JR ruling Israel.

28 July 2023

Israel should stop this macho mud wrestling over the Judicial Reform when there isn't a single grip to prove their technique is superior to that in which Israelis have their memory locked in for many decades. You don't need or try to explain how JR works if thousands on the streets in the big cities do not know how to read and are acting only silly. We are not interested in a silly fight, with people getting seriously hurt during protests against JR. The world got used to the visual of Israel being a strong military, far more stronger than in politics as a State, and secondly as the only Jewish State in the world. Can the coalition as the ruling power now convince the rest of the world it is on its way to build the third temple, having a vibrant democracy amongst equals when in government, and hold on to a responsible military to defend the country against old and new enemies? Where are the people and their voices, 9. something millions? The State of Israel is in total confusion and it is without a plan to end this 'sharade' on the streets fighting a non conformity plan of the incumbent Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. A democracy is the standing invitation perpetually to both leaders, one in opposition and one in government to lead the nation and country. No one needs to remind Israel how this works in Real Time. So what is happening between the two sides, Right and Left? After one year having pushed the 'pause button' on the JR, allowing it to process more naturally between people and government, we see nothing existential is happening still, no real work being done and bring probable change to better the living standard of lives for 'thousands' of silly people. No one living outside of Israel has any idea today what radicalism now means for Israelis. There is no political formula to define that as a meaning and educating the public protesting in the streets, every day over and over again and waving the Israeli flag, as if parading toward 'change'? Democracy wasn't in the Israeli Prime Minister on the Right, since last year November when he had won the majority he is now keeping in his glass display case at home in Caesarea. The majority didn't come from voting for the Prime Minister, but was only possible this time through simple coalition building between the extremist parties and Likud. It should have become a new era and not this lolly pop democracy style of 'we are a majority' in a democracy.

Israel has come out of the dreamtime decades when the people believed that they were a nation of great wealth and that poverty was only temporarily as caused by the Holocaust in Europe. The Late Prime Minister Mrs Golda Meir had thanked Argentina for their humanitarian help when Israel needed to build the new Jewish State under a non existentialism for Jews in the new land of Palestine, next to Arab peoples, it is now the government offering the people more or less the same, as Jews. For some reason history is repeating itself for Israelis and it is not because the world is against Israel, this time. Equally the opposition is for much the same to blame. Whoever has lived in Israel during the seventies will know why the opposition too is not without blemish for Mr Netanyahu's ambition to meltdown Israel in his image decades later in 2022/2023. There is one defect in the Prime MInister and he knows it too well, that never will he be able to bring back the 'beautiful country' it once was, a dream of every nation to raise your children safely and never allow anyone to hurt them again in their living memory. Grandparents had found the burning bushes through the generation born to Israel after their own experiences in the Holocaust as their gift from Ha Shem and to start anew allover again into Chaim. Today Israel is compatible with nuclear powers in the world, and has a deterrence capability next to the right to defend itself as the only military power in the world having this unique International right. Why should it defecate Israel a crater full with populist desires in 2023? Is it because we don't have a prophet midst Israel and to halt the recklessness of this perversion to be like other nations with reforms? One could just give up on Israel and stay healthy or keeping your energy to live, because the worth of it has just gone from your veins after the last prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett. A man who had no power in the slightest but wanted to try to bring Israel back to dream of the future, where Israel would be a good place to live in and to deal with old wars. The Palestinians will not be gone at any time soon either... JR is good for them or not good for them, that's the question and not the answer. According to Prime Minister Netanyahu there is no division between Israel & the West Bank. What uniformity of plan does the PM has found in the soils of his landscape designs? And does the government still stand for a family of the family of nations? How? By being silly or mud fighting?












Boris Johnson resigns as MP in his constituency of Uxbridge: "We will now deliver what we haven't delivered."

10 June 2023

"We will now deliver what we haven't delivered," wasn't what Mr Johnson has said yesterday when he resigned as an MP in Parliament. This is the shortcut version of the letter of his resignation, the kind of shortcuts you get with games like Grand Theft Auto. And they can be tricky if you are not familiar with GTA cheats, Windows or joystick. Why does it always sounds familiar with the public when Mr Johnson is making impact? And how many times can you retry the same mission? To Gamers this can become an addiction because it makes you feel invincible and real. In fact it makes you feel more real than the world around you. With GTA games your world has a window of its own. Question after Mr Johnson's resignation if this is now a definite resign from the nation? 14 Million last voted for him and his Brexit magical mystery tour dome. Remember Caesar Johnson, thou art mortal. Another question, after reading his resignation letter online (Guardian UK), what new construction are we reading from it as in where will it lead to after this demonstration of bowing out? One: the committee was corrupt and has stitched him up like a fly against the wall. Two: they were not real judges, it was a Kangaroo court. And thirdly, his parting shot, was aimed at the elephant in the room with no face. If the former prime minister did not had it in him to be clever, as in precalculative, and defense for his lies, this time he was most clever. According to Mr Johnson in his letter of resignation, the Conservative Party have to start in the coming weeks to work on their/ a growth- vis a vis investment plan. In the coming weeks/ months?! His three prong arrow shot hit the elephant in the room and make it say ouch! Isn't that Labour's plan for the election campaign to win the next general election in 'the coming months'?

Hmm... But what if that shot was meant as a clever aiming? He will be lucky again if the Kangaroo Court doesn't send him another one of their 'branded with  prejudice' boomerangs! Are you meaning to say this, or what? In fact, yes, if they are using boomerangs Mr Johnson will be once more lucky again, but not if he uses the same weapon of choice. A boomerang is not a frisbee... That so it explains on internet has an end zone. Okay, so where is Mr Johnson now off to? Can he really come back and do Brexit and clever at the same time? Where are his plans for a green economy and the future world the Martians would be jealous of? He has never shown any instinct to create the industries of tomorrow's world. Instead it was Brexit, Partygate, and the Coronavirus Covid-19. He made a heroic recovery from the latter, back in 2021. Now, back to business. Should we call the former prime minister now a liar and cheat? No, I don't think that is proving the very point for which they are saying that he is half pig- half human. But I do think that when in your letter of resignation your writing confirms the fact that you did not deliver what you should have for the people, it is clear to me that you have failed to be the prime minister, which is a very first / primo serious matter. Secondary/ Secundo: the Partygate and Covid disaster of the many that have died as a result of not informing in time how the people should quarantine under a global pandemic, or lack of equipment and vaccines pronto after its announcement by the WHO in February 2020, and how to build Covid- free spaces, this too becomes a grave mistake of the former prime minister not to see his mistake. But you can't gravy the duck and call it a Christmas turkey. And no defense lawyer can ask the former prime minister, "How do you want your defense? Crisp or crunchy?" There is no point to hide the truth from him anymore, that even if he is not guilty of the alleged, his time is up. Democracy then can win the day. And Mr Johnson for some reason knows that.

The puzzle however today is why did he do it so gladly to resign as an MP? Some say that he didn't want to face the music. What an extraordinary man. Yes, he was. Like it or not he had a rare sense of nobility, too. Perhaps in the same way that the people of Israel have loved their Prime Minister for decades long and even called him their god king. These are certain types out of the stereotypes men who know how to clasp the nation to their bosom, and with that thinking that he is holding the nation close to his heart. Yep, that is what life is all about, for and to them. Labour has an extraordinary next coming months and this pains the former prime minister when it would be so much something for him, if only he could do now what Labour will do when coming to government: where Mr Johnson had started. Industry, industry, industry, that is what the people of Britain need. According to the Brexit ground plans. Adding on top, green, green and once more green. Bill Gates is still waiting for the answer to global industries and if it can be built in transition as soon as 2050 net zero. And one thing that is good with static plans outside the dynamic proportions is that Mr Gates is keeping a clear head over these plans, whether it is feasible to transition universally to green for all global industries. So, why lie to the people who vote for a government through the ballot box?

Additional: It is the manner in which the former prime minister, Boris Johnson, has wronged history is what is here the imperative question. And not what sort of bait he has been using to fly fishing for the people's vote and make Brexit in his giant stony image. Clearly it seems as if the former prime minister is drifting the Tory Party car away from the real show.












Definitions. Brexit failed, Brexit failed, Brexit failed, Brexit failed... (We're getting somewhere in the end)

4 June 2023

Brexit has failed. Proof for this: Nigel Farage, even he is saying it has failed. The cost of living economics of Britain, distinctly negative from the rest of the UK macro economics, or, perhaps the same and have a zero outlook as a result (meaning to say output). None of this comes easy of course at a time near the general election. The people are asking their government, 17 million, what they are going to do about it: no asnwers. It is after all Brexit has failed. Imagine that Britain had been like communist Cuba... If the government as much as to make a little mistake the military could come in and take over the country. Overhere in the western world where we have democracies the inclination for human nature tends to be a little different, and subtle. It could also be that Brexit has failed as a result of being too pampered by the EU? In the meantime nothing changes here. Brexit= success, and success= Brexit, the winning formula for every Tory government in the present and future time, is more than just a supposition when you're looking up. It is only when looking down, horizontally, the cry one hears is that Brexit= failure. That begging the question which is which when the truth. Here there is no winner, as in a British Prime Minister. Just Rishi Sunak, the Tory Prime Minister in the whole of the UK. But now comes another storm... Rexit, a play with words Rex & it, or with a pinch of imagination: re- entry and exit from Brexit. Scientifically it was perhaps always here, deep inside Brexit political molecules and hiding primordial that if ever there was an implosion the chain reaction would be a surprise nuclear fission like cause of events. No one is making up this stuff, but think again that Brexit failure is not scientifically defined. How some already speak of the damage Brexit has caused the British economy and people one would think that all these come from a set of data and to make this case hard enough. How then could the British Prime Minister not resign and still be in power? It is no wonder that the Labour Party has come up with a 'monstrous' design of their own Brexit and how to make it work, Wreckxit and maintained by Rexit. And the whole political establishment laughed out loud, as if they were watching a puppet theater show for frightened little children. Whahahahaha!

Now, let's say that Brexit wasn't for the fainthearted, nor for children, crybabies, it is than to assume that Brexit was meant for the more mature public and especially inside Westminster. And it could be true as a test of Brexit manhood to keep saying how good the people have it after six years. Let them eat Turnip, was meant as real encouragement instead of what the media had made of what Theresa Coffee had said. (Thérèse Coffey, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs of the United Kingdom) The thing she forgot to mention was the next line: we're all in it together. Your hardship, is my hardship. You go to bed hungry, I go to bed hungry. And we will keep going until the end. Just adding a few more lines to the cycle. Maybe only then Brexit would have been successful when the country and politicians can 'work together' through thick and thin, for richer or poorer. Instead they lie. 'You love this country, and we will burden you even harder.' I'm sorry, but isn't that what the Battle of Evermore is all about if you care to read the lyrics and exclusive of the melodic music? In other words, Brexit failure is sheer craftmanship and British. Now it is Labour's turn and what used to be the most boring man in Britain, it turns out that he isn't anymore, but has popped out to be a ruthless tyrant. Be it a rather very handsome tyrant. Rex-it. Hopefully there is some meaning to this. Brexit chariot has been going so slow that no one can blame anybody to climb and get over into the cart and take over the helm. "No, no, no, we're still running the show here and going even faster," the Tory Prime Minister exclaims in June 2023, the second quarter entry (nearly said re- entry into orbit). How could Labour run the chariot at slow speed, people are asking seriously? Even when running the risk of a Brexit depression? (For never having made it to the finish line) It is understandable that Keir Starmer is not the most loved and popular man today in Britain. But he is right on when taking Britain back on the generations' highway, that globalization is a force not to reckon with... And he knows that. Almost as if born with a special sixth sense and see what others don't. As long as the Labour leader keeps saying that no it is not wizardry but simplicity of logic, no one listens to him. In Britain you don't do truth without wizardry or the Balck Moors. E.g. that Brexit was the smallest but loudest thing happened on earth. The whole world has heard of Brexit. And now in the House of Commons the minister is saying to the Brexit voters to eat Turnip, Hobbitnizing the leave victory six years later. If Brexit is a success, what then is causing people to eat grass?













In memo:

(For Tessa)


Leave the EU is serious business, in the 21st century. But so is sovereignty finding new definitions, also in the 21st century.
30062016
In its own right the UK has become again a sovereign country, after forty years having been (and this is important to understand first) there with the European Union as part of the EU from the start since the EEC. Where the 'angry' voters' vote went on thursday 23 June 2016, by a majority of votes of 17 miln +, between the high platform of the above and where every day life in our time 'remains' mostly in the EU, some now see why that wasn't adequate enough for serious politics and governments of 28 Member States to divorce the UK, and vice versa. Strangely enough, also to many others, they say that it does matter where the voters 17mln + is taking the UK, e.g. out of the EU, and into, let's say for reasons of theory, the global world? True, there won't be an easy solution found right now, when standing on the hills, to point out which way is the UK now going to go by a mere glimpse at the whole world. One definition of the 21st century comes seeping into mind: globalization. Its orb has been the making of nations in stages, each period names are known to most governments in the EU, now Member States, and outside the EU, the UK, Sweden, Norway and Denmark. And yet here we are now facing the divorce of the UK from the EU, a long battle and breath of unpleasant discussions, frictions and barrels, top to bottom, with lot's of fiction, and speechlessness coming from both sides, the EU and UK on the other hand.

Technically divorce doesn't have too many meanings but one 'out' way, as getting 'in' is always suggesting a complete different way. It is no one's interest to sit too long on a bough that has been broken in two, with the EU holding one end of the stick, and the UK, well, holding the other end of their stick... (Or, sceptre). If the EU was a technocratic society by definition for decades long, no one can expect it to be too emotional with the leave of the UK from the EU at the moment. Here we are looking at architects of the EU in a position very much the same as looking at a derelict flank in the establishment, many could see it coming. (When derelict experts or reports from experts) Also by looking at the making of the EU and its physical facade in Brussels, well, what does it stands for in the world besides being a great powerhouse of governments and politics? Democracy is the big question for the EU in the crisis of Brexit, yes. There is no sane way of explaining the insanity of the moment that Britain chose over staying with this powerhouse to infinity. Britain is not our adversary of the 21st century, yes, that too. It was the EU next to global leaders in the G7, deciding in recent history of nations, that the world should share responsibilities and tackle global insecurity. A sovereign Britain is expected to maintain that responsibility and it should also keep world peace in its tender votes of the best part left from the Remain camp during the referndum in June 2016. The EU has only gained more speed without a fifth wheel and should be able to live with Britain by its side as an open new society or country who wants to keep sovereingty and technocratic relations with the rest of the world as the new way of sharing great responsibilities among the G7 and G20 nations. (What say you?) Is this possible? We leave that to the new Tory leader who wants to be Prime Minister very soon in the coming days.







It is for the moment all technical at Westminster.

04072016/22:10 PM

We are not losing the edge to stay critical of what might happen if Britain leaves the EU, once the plan for a Brexit leave becomes transparent to the people in Britain and the rest of the world. One thing should also be part of the Brexit vote to leave, which are not just friends of Britain, but EU citizens, and divided whether they too should 'leave' Britain and split the ideology of an ever closer union of nations in Europe and beyond. Thousands demonstrated in London last weekend to stay in and not out of the EU, or in fact have made their cries heard over leaving the EU. If Mr Jean Claude Juncker and Mr Martin Schultz could understand the inclination here, people, democracy and Brexit, no one would dare say that easy is one solution the EU is used to and will do so again, now. To put it down in to a row from top to end which political classes are still effective during Brexit, on both sides, and which are their new names, then maybe to the rest of the world it won't look like anything falling off the cliff that only the EU top can see. It is for the moment all technical at Westminster. We have been accustomed to having Britain at our side for decades and it has always been our best model to rule and reign over civilization, domestic and abroad, it is almost as if this is the habit we must learn kicking out.

Behind the facade at Westminister the country is slowly becoming aware of Westminster Brexit. On our side it is the EU exit from Brexit, in some ways, one could say, yes that too. Which are making things more painful to watch in the rest of the world, that is if pain means birth of a new combination EU- Brexit. (English: Brexit- EU) Something did change in the world fundamentally calm and orderly. To some this is unclear whether the world still has a political leadership over nations. The overview isn't what we were used to, but instead find ourselves 'gazing in simplicity for ambitions (that Brexit) craves'. (Lyrics UK Band song) Basically the big Q is how Britain will now make money to breed money outside the EU. Which mechanism are they going to have after Brexit to deal with a global bloc of other nations and their currencies? And having arrived at this point one must not forget the OECD, always ranking Britain highest among the nations for their scientific contribution around in the world, and engineering, all top marks for a basically wealthy country, if you're a fox hunter or ex fox hunter. At the moment no one can say anything or even try to write about Brexit leaving the EU.



How to do a Trade Deal after Brexit is official? Like catching a fly in the universe and turn to golden.

13072016/ 11:45 AM

Date of Brexit will mean a few things in Britain. It will have the EU and the rest of the world juxtaposed first and last to deal with from henceforth. "I have never done a Trade Deal' before. Looking from one corner in the eye at four different directions immediately. It can't be done. That is nr one strike off. Goldman Sachs, in this morning article on Bloomberg.com, has already given the winning strike over Brexit wherever it might take position after it leaves the EU, that there is someone appointed for exactly this job, Mr Manuel Barroso, former EU President, and who will be in charge of the system after the Uk leaves the European Union. Both unions will be tested by time and the systems having been long or decades keeping like a suspension bridge between the two opposite (since Brexit) sides. This will be a work of industrial art in the near future. Can it be done realistically? In the meantime time is splitting up into another dimension, with the inclusion of new countries who are not yet in the European Union, e.g. Ukraine. The price to pay will have some sort of freeway passage, if the WTO considers the future on a much bigger scale thus far. In some parts of the world there is already proof of great industrial works taking place, naming for example the cable suspension bridge, now building in Marocco to Africa, and vice versa. We have to pay attention very closely how the world moves fast in constructions. Much of that outcome in ten years time is a decision factor for any future trade deal. Can Britain become part of that?

For now what is needed is how to envision a reshaped model of the world and it's infrastructures. And, also, in a more simple fashion where all peoples will be when living across the planet, having some constantly on the run from war torn places like Syria, something that isn't stimulating growth or future trade at the moment. The world believes in it's own future. Fifty years ago the WTO had only one or two major members to do the deals needed to keep our planet in motion, long or distant range. Industries have outgrown it's former size and is now a full expansion of great magnitudes. We need each other, Goldman Sachs or Britain. The EU isn't the only philosophy when prosperity is the only system that now works for the whole world. And it's inhabitants. These are also full forces, any future of Britain must understand and find the humane solution to hang on there on the silk thread. Or, in political terminology, the crimson red thread. Let's wish for the best when Mrs Theresa May is Prime Minister, that e.g. Britain won't do pretty faces ministers anymore. One could see it coming, that for example EU bosses would raise the stakes quite high. It is called in Trade Deals not only logical but it is now the very basin of survival and perfect balance. There is no evil or blame game here possible. Once it was this girl is not for turning, now it is this world is not for turning. Tina (there is no alternative) is passé.









Taurus 2023

Song for Keir Starmer, Labour leader in the opposition UK

I made him prime minister and it wasn't his global view
it was red all over the place the city's borrowed once again
much more than it could chew well so they said this time there
is always this time I made him prime minister and he is bragging
about it to every newspaper his personal view only

came after the first blow harvest season from elections don't
last that long Xiansheng as in premature birth of a new nation
a promise you know that won't be golden he made you prime
minister it was just blue or red oh can you see your future
you and the political rodeo are you ready now for the ride that

you're taking or the fall of a new Xiansheng that is now the
dawn of your era in this town time is hiding behind the fog
if you can see through it with excellence and human nature
the politics of blood that runs this city has no love or
compassion and it won't end its violence blue is eternity they
say eternity they say


Song/ rhythm (loopmasters.com)

(Indie Pop samples)

This time

This time
This time
There is always this time
I had made him prime minister it
was not his global view
(it was) red all over the place and the city's borrowed once
again
much more than it could chew well so they said this time there
is always this time so they said this time there
is always this time both you and me we made him prime
minister (I made him
prime minister) and now he is bragging
about it to every newspaper he's out there and his
personal view only

came after the first blow a prime harvest season from
elections
don't
last that long when no strong eastern wind's blowing
Xiansheng/Xiansheng in your premature birth of a new nation
unknown promises you made to the people
knowing that won't be golden once you're
the prime minister after you made it it was just blue or red oh
can you see the future in your crystal clear prism
you and the political rodeo you- must be- ready now for the
ride
taking you to the fall of your new name Xiansheng this is the
dawn of your era in this town time is hiding behind
the fog
if you can see through it with excellence and your human
eyes
this time there
is always this time so they said this time there
is always this time
the politics of blood running this city has no love or
compassion and it won't end the violence blue is eternity
they
say eternity they say
this time there
is always this time they said this time there
is always this time



Fit for the future

Song II

Too many questions one click of the mouse
And you are going to tell them all about it Cameras are rolling
the thousands of pieces you have put together
Fit for the future prime minister that you are going to build
Accessibility goes to the top roof and down again
Holding a new sense of gravity together we will
be able to build this new plan he is saying
fit for the future I've never heard before
That is fit for the future and post war say we built it
There is money in your gaze and I don't know what I fear the
most you or them once I forget who had once told me so
Another simple dream like most do out there in the streets
a business man a politician like fallen clouds from the sky
Welcome to the club and look around your 21st century
Don't look behind you again when you're answering questions
That is what I do It's something you can't make up as they go
and just put it to bed fit for the future dynamic or static
celluloid I am your prime minister in the waiting he said












UK MP Dianne Abbott and her racist faux pas on saturday/sunday.

24 April 2023

One would think what could be more relevant to the Labour Party when facing the 4 May local elections. Tory Party Penny Mordaunt on sunday had launched in one of her Party's constituencies, Porthsmouth, in contrast to what to Labour was more relevant on the same day, a campaign start. It was an interesting day just to see how the campaign was making progress on either political side, Labour and the Tories. But then again, Ms Mordaunt is known for her ambitious disposition when it comes to be in government and leading her Party. Maybe like her colleague, former Deputy Prime Minister, Dominic Raab, she has hard work as her work ethics to prove her political and loyalty more resolute. Mr Raab has resigned last weekend over bullying allegations against him. A sore bullygate that has left the Brexiteers now swimming in sour cream after Mr Raab's resignation. Equally interesting how the former Deputy Prime Minister had put it in his letter of resignation to the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, that 'the bar was set to low' against those in Office as Ministers serving in His Majesty's government on bullying high civil servants. Legally no one has said anything of what the Deputy Prime Minister meant, whether on Twitter or articles in the newspapers. Because in fact legally he does have a point and no one knows why or why not. The Party came back after his resignation and one had even said of seriously thinking to reform the civil servants way of doing their jobs. Interesting, if the Brexiteers will use this in their election promise manifesto up to the general election in 2024. It could be interesting if they win the next general election, by a twist of fortune, if this would become one promise they could keep. Or maybe the spokesperson meant for the change to be tomorrow, so to speak, between the present time and the local elections? You can't do this, or can they? Isn't what they say in the military about tactics and strategies how different this works, but very rarely is understood by those who use these terms in politics? (Read in an article on the Jerusalem Post website)

In the same weekend Ms Abbott was all over the place with a 'letter' she had drafted and which was published in the Observer on saturday, 22 April. How this draft ended up in the Observer and than was renamed a letter, wasn't very clear in her then written apology on sunday for her 'racist attack' on Jews. The sensation immediately went on exploding like a powder keg in her face and was raging on its fire. From reading the letter there was not a particular exposure of racism against Jews, but only illustrated where situations occur of racist segregations, legally primo, secundo- up to degratio and conclusio that are unknown for blacks. If you want to be more definite all you need to demonstrate is drawing a square and put each discriminated group in one of the 4- angles. It is that way more clear how to 1. read the visual, and 2. how to specifically take one angle from the total square. When you don't excercise with science, what is the point of your highly academic 'legal profession'? The Labour leader Keir Starmer, of course this is not something he would not understand. Ms Abbott was right trying to point out a clear distinction that she made between prejudice and racism. In Germany between 1940-1945 it was prejudice that made Nazi Germany evil of all evils under the sun, because they have used a methodological to select a particular group out of the other millions of Germans. Based on simple prejudices (always part of legitimacy of nature)/ stereotyping. Black racism is happening as if the colour of the skin is a legal document to be beaten up on the streets, women, children or adult males (remember taking the knee). Stop and search is one system, and can happen not only when you are roving the streets in a hoodie, but even when you are perfectly decent looking in an executive three pieces suit. You do that to a Jew in the 21st century and you will learn... You could also wonder whether the letter had a purpose, just before the local elections. In British politics there are always bigger fish to fry/ catch. On monday another big event and first time happened at Westminster; a first time petition debate on a Brexit public inquiry was held among many MP's and Ministers, Labour Shadow Minister, and Tory/ Government Minister. Of which Hilary Benn made a strong case for why there should be an inquiry, costs and effects, after leaving the EU. He was present as a petitioner. Did Ms Abbott write the letter or draft prior to its publication in the Observer on saturday for reasons other than this? And why all the twists and turns? You wonder whether the MP had written the 'letter' by herself, or was there someone who had rendered this service as a freelance attorney general? Where was the rationality leading to when the 'letter' lacks a prologue? Unlike Jeremy Corbyn who is outright blunt about his fight for the Rights of Palestinian people against the State of Israel and the regime. His choice of weapon: apartheid. I hope that the Labour leader knows how quickly the flame for the phoenix rise can be put out, especially when you are thinking of running your party on conventional Labour (campaign) routines.

Labour can make a serious win at the next general election and be a serious government under Keir Starmer, that the people will need after six years of no benefits that was promised by solemn truth to them. Sovereignty is a solemn word and 'thing'. And Hilary Benn on monday demonstrated just that of how important it is to bring the 'artificial mechanism' of Brexit to the table. Brexit is not something one can reverse, so then what do you do? The Brexit manifesto (petitioner words) and these promised benefits is also missing, or has escaped the Brexiteers their attention in a Back To The Future scene. Buy your cinema ticket now. Now that will be interesting to watch.

Additional, 26 April 2023:

Cross- examining/ questioning Ms A should bring more light to this matter of the 'letter/ comment'. Will she do that considering that her background by association (JC) might do her no good?

And adding: the other side might be right and perhaps will be, on the occasion of Ms A leaving her turf (Labour Left) to enter the unknown collective conscience (by OECD standards having been a global success of the 21st century integration). She should nevertheless be treated as equal prominence as an MP by her peers. And should apologise making a move to enter the geneal public sphere in the new world she doesn't know/ didn't know before throughout her career as a (20th century) politician.












"In our life time," Naftali Bennett today on Iranian International Washington DC.

21 April 2023

The former prime minister of Israel Naftali Bennett was referring to the question asked by the journalist on Iranian International News Channel in Washington DC yesterday, if peace and prosperity was something Israel and Iran he could see happen in the near future. "In our life time I think Israel and Iran will have peace and prosperity, as I see it," the former prime minister answered. Water and costs of war against Israel were the other more urgent questions in the 29 minutes interview the journalist wanted to know Mr Bennett's views on and wanted also to hear his answers. To Naftali Bennet this wasn't his first time when he said that there was no ill feeling from Israel for the Iranian people, but that the regime/ Iranian regime was what Israel wanted/ wants to halt when it comes to weapons of mass destruction. At the United Nations General Assembly in 2021 the former prime minister had said exact the same too, and how he could not understand why the regime was/is not 'investing' more in its people and country. He spoke in a tone of voice void of hubris against what is considered by the incumbent Prime Minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu as the mortal enemy of Israel in the region of the Middle East. At the time no politician or prime minister had ever been in an interview before on Iran International, and this was only two years ago. Mr Bennett resigned in October 2022 last year. The bigger question from the journalist to the former prime minister of Israel was: how will peace and prosperity come in this life time to be for Israel and Iran? It is not the lack of spiritual will between the two sides, depending on who is campaigning for friendly relations between the two countries.


Reality check II: the generation of young Israelis are not compatible with the young Iranian people, with the latter having lived all their lives in the world of Ayatollahs and the Islamic religion, when Israelis for many decades have known freedom, democracy and their own worldview (related to the western world). This is why the journalist asked again after the first time, that the religious parties/ extreme parties in the coalition in Israel, had restriction of... With the former prime minister interjecting "Yes, but they are a small group..." Israel is not a democracy of words, and now the question is whether it can be understood even by the younger generation in Iran. The 'Cyrus Accords', as the Prince in exile Reza Pahlavi wrote in his tweet on Twitter when he announced he was to visit Israel on the Holocaust Remembrance Day, seem still a long way from today's reality from the former prime minister's seat at Iran International News Channel in Washington DC. Iran was different during the deposed Shah of Persia in the seventies, and in ancient times during the time of Esther and Xerxes I, again there was only a written Hand of the God of Abrham Almighty only miracle of Jewish micro coexistence between the two nations possible.


The nature of the Ayatollahs will remain restrictive and repel against all other natures outside of Iran, even when creation was meant to be our totality on the planet, from humanity to beasts, green leaf or pastures, and by what way it was destined. Human innovation e.g. democracy, secularism, technology, macro/ micro social structures, have no sense of quantitative or quality to the Iranian regime as their strong hegemonic nation of nearly 80 million people. It also seems that their strongest aversion is highest against democracy and secularism, as this incurs a perverse wordliness and worldview. If Naftali Bennett were to bring technology to the people of Iran and open up a great fountain of water in its middle of the center in Iran, he is therefore still bringing to Iran something out of an unholy land that believes in freedom and democracy. Why the Ayatollahs believe in chastisement above body and soul, we will never know. The Torah still teaches compassion and merci with the ones that are chastised by their Levites or Priests, in ancient times. Privately the Iranian people do like to indulge in a sense of humour just all the same. And talented Israelis do make comedy that is making them chuckle... Beyond the writing here above the mysterious question is still to make for Israel: to get into Iran through the front high head and offer its best talents, for peace and prosperity based on equality as partners. And it is possible in the 21st century without Haman, the Amelakite, between the two entities and nations. Also there is one hope one can make informally in this writing, is that the envoy of a mission of peace to reverse the adversary, that this can only be Naftali Bennett. He is relatively young (51 years old), compared to the Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu now 74. Iran should also remember that weapons of mass destruction are very serious engineering, but to move fresh water out of the ground into a running canal or spring is as serious as blood and engineering, too.














When is a situation fluid in the middle of the country?

10 April 2023

A good speech from Prime Minister Netanyahu this evening, 20:15 PM Israeli time. The home situation after a four day rockets blitz from multiple fronts coming from Lebanon, Gaza, attacks gunfire and unrest in the West Bank and Judea and Samaria, into Israel, the Prime Minister has made a rather calm address to the nation. From the calm in his tone of voice one can understand that the situation was still ongoing, over which he could not reveal any more details for national and military security reasons. He digressed also on the political situation between the coalition and opposition, as a reminder what had persuaded him to go against the Lapid interim government. On a night like tonight the Prime Minister is allowed to keep things as normal as they were before, this was last week. And also keeping Yoav Gallant, the Defence Minister, in his job seems significant enough at this point. This is a total new situation, also according to the writing this evening/ night in the Jerusalem Post article, that Israel should not think it is setting the tone for wars again. In the writing the author was trying to find answers on this specific issue, of how to respond when the enemy will attack again in the same manner that they have demonstrated on thursday afternoon to attack Israel on different fronts. The IDF figured out they have done so, but study is indicating that there was no planning prior to the attack. Perhaps by phone the moments were decided unconverntionally when to attack? Perhaps. Minimal damage but a loud enough impact did give the impression that the Holy Land was in trouble, it was instant and effective. Only, why? Mr Netanyahu gave the impression in his speech tonight that the previous government was to blame for the encouragement of Hezbollah in the north, by signing last year before the coalition had come to power a so called gas deal. It was what made things worse today when being attacked from these specific regions against the people of Israel and the State. But, the Prime Minister also answered his own question on responsibility and said that he was the person to do that, as Prime Minister. Here he is right and it is also his track record during his time as the longest serving Prime Minister of Israel.

Indicating with his answer on his responsibility as Prime Minister of Israel, that the country is fluid as he spoke. On sunday the readers of the JP also saw in the news that Egypt had stopped an attack to target Eilat, putting the President of Egypt unambiguously as the only Arab nation to have shown no aim and arrow during this 'new war' against Israel from the north, south and middle of Israel in perfect timing on last thursday. On monday however we read in another article that the President of Egypt, Abdel Fattah El Sisi, will meet with his counterpart in Turkey and meet President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The Turkish President openly called for the Arab nations to unite against Israel, almost instantly after the first rockets were fired into Israel from Lebanon thursday afternoon. This was unusual, after normalizing relations with Israel. And also because this particular call was contradicting Turkey's own highly organised military bureaucracy. The Middle East is getting toxic and the question is why now? Based on the side of humanity and questioning whether it still has a future on this planet, who can make any sense here out of the 'strategy' to wage a mini war in the Holy Land at this time? And not only that, but it is an outdated idea / old sentimental idea who will conquer Jerusalem. Global military technologies do not allow anyone to conquer Jerusalem. But this could be very much the reason why they can win. Anyone another idea? Prime Minister Netanyahu does not want a full scale war with Syria, one journalist had said in his writing/ bulletin over the weekend. And Mr Netanyahu said tonight in his addressing of the nation from the Defense Ministery, that he is ready to work with all in the military involved to bring the outcome and how to properly react. He will keep it reflective, for now, is what you get to hear as an outsider.













Political strategy for Sir Keir Starmer as Labour leader might break or make cometh 4 May next month.


Outsider's view:


31 March 2023

We are not there yet, time and month. It is still March 2023 and tomorrow 1 April. Can the Labour leader and his team convince enough people that a vote for Labour is for improvement and the will to change Brexit for the good? On the side of the Brexiteers equally there are many saying about Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to give voters' confidence back since he became prime minister back in October 2022, by working hard on promises in his five point plan this year. He is Prime Minister, the government, and should deliver. Next logic is that when he can't deliver there is always another chance and choice, but this logical thinking in Brexit does not work anymore. Mr Starmer should therefore pay heed very carefully. Much in the Labour campaign is still traditionally about the Party for the working man and woman, equality between workers and employers e.g. in the public sectors, and the private sectors should actively be encouraged to invest more in Britain and employment at home, as to get started off somewhere where the Brexiteers have failed for the last thirteen years. Primarily it is finding the right twist and then go from there to win hearts and minds. But the Labour leader has another problem: this is his first personal campaign for Keir Starmer's Labour Party. He needs to be more on the offensive and not as some say that he is ruthless. There is no blind or blinding strategy how he can win on 4 May local elections. (Blind strategy e.g. that the Brexiteers win on 4 May will trigger an immediate effect to Mr Starmer's advantage, while the other way round if Labour wins, that could turn the general election coming period to a nightmare scenario for Sir Keir. Looking again at the blind sight where the Labour leader should be looking, is that the Brexiteers already have lost two years up to the general election 2024.

Timing is the blinding effect to both political parties before the local election next in May 2023. Technically, if one may call it that, Mr Starmer has the better advantage to win the next general election, even when he cannot quickly make a win on 4 May in the local election. That is an option he is looking at. The professional strategist will concentrate on voters. Again technically the Brexiteers in a parliamentary system like that of Britain one cannot help thinking that Brexit is technically dead. It is however so much more good taste and refined to engage in what the people have to say and think if they want to continue putting their faith in a system that gave them zero to nothing six years later since they left the European Union.

Mr Starmer, have a pint at the local pub, talk to people intelligently, and kind. Who knows here they will see a different character in a Labour leader, which by definition is and should be different when other Labour leaders haven't been in a Brexit framework before. If Mr Starmer doesn't win the local election, as from a lay person's point of view, one can only see more for him at the end of the government's term, when it will or might come to that. Winning and losing shouldn't be his optical illusion, blinded by the bright headlights of Mr Sunak and his Brexiteers. All writing here is not political analytical, it is where no one is looking from this angle. Nothing is more beautiful than a built up momentum to a finale with a prime ministership deeply deserved and that no other will easily repeat soon. Only Labour can do this system.) Where he is strong in the overview of two years before the general election in 2024, is that the Labour Party has arrived at a point of natural territory in politics and its system. Imagine the Brexiteers stay in power forever? That would kill off the arbitrary powers of a parliamentary system that is only there to serve the nation and country, and King. Nevertheless simple common sense is telling you that Mr Starmer has a problem making a real rock star start now with his campaign launch. He is in desperate need of a Mr O'reilly, "You've heard of the genii of the lamp, Mrs Fawlty, well that's me."

The answer however wasn't reassuring from Mrs Fawlty: "I've seen creatures more intelligent than you lying on their backs on the bottom of ponds..." Etcetera, etcetera.








If this was as easy as writing the PM of Israel off, okay. But it isn't. Who will be the next leader in Israel? Now that seems to me like a real problem the nation is facing.

20 March 2023

One may think all is over in Israel after US President Joe Biden called Prime Minister Netanyahu yesterday on sunday evening, and that the revolution was so yesterday. Back today in the newspaper JP online it is expected within two weeks before Knesset goes into the spring recess, that the reforms will follow up planned on scheme. But the people are awoken, they have woken up from the slumber of decades of relative apathy or lethargy, and at times were totally void of what the government was really for. Four decades Israel became Benyamin Netanyahu and vice versa the Prime Minister became Israel. It is no wonder why the Prime Minister had never seen this one coming from the same people that worshipped him from the womb to the grave, so to speak, 11 weeks since two months plus March this month. At 74 this year it will be critical for the people of Israel to make up their mind as one where in Israel another leadership like that in the league of Bibi Netanyahu can or will be found again. Especially when actually the only man fitting this kind of leadership was no other than the former prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, but will not do it for them and was rejected at the last government. For him there is also an advantage as the or any reform will have no personal relationship other than the State and its people, and also has no personal motives for changing the Basic Law, but in fact has every reason to do the reform based on objective motives. For example, the future of Israel? There is only one problem for the Israeli people: everyone wants to be prime minister. And that is precisely why any political demise of the Prime Minister at a moment like this, walking through the flames of a mini revolution, is very critical thinking. If you forget the flower in the Latke what will happen to your potato cakes in the heat of oil? No, this kind of uprise against government proposals on Judicial reform was never before in Israel a revolution of this scale, national and this friday on international scale. Starting this friday from London to 30+ other major cities in the world to protest against destroying democracy in Israel and calling on the Israeli coalition in government to listen to the people of israel. Mr Netanyahu's hands are not shaking from disease of any kind, his hands are shaking perhaps for realizing his enormous influence has reached unexpectedly global scale. All beyond reproach.

The world thus far had only seen for decades long Israel and its long-standing war face, mostly against the Palestinian people living next door... What the rest of the world is now watching still to many are both unbelief and astonishing. For the first time in recent history Israel is allowing the world to hear, see and know that here they are political and understand how it works, even in their part of the world from their country and government. But that is while this process of awakening of a nation and its politics the other is more worrisome for not yet having a leader other than Mr Netanyahu in Israel. It surely isn't the same thing as rising to the occasion, as in so many other countries on the planet. The Prime Minister isn't the modal leadership and running mediocre around telling people how great he is and leading his country as the only Jewish national home and forever if must. He has also been known as a consummate statesman to friend and foe in every corner of the world. In his younger days he had also been an impressive attractive man. Which made it even more harder to friend and foe feeling superior over the Jewish people, persecuted in WWII by six million. Since the inception of the Garden of Eden mankind had to know the world was and still is a physical thing and maybe to eternity it will still be that way after thousands of reincarnations you will or might go through in the meantime. Wasn't he the first Jewish male who drove fear into every mortal's heart and mind? (Including yours truly) So the question is where is the Prime Minister heading in 2023 and why insist the Basic Law to change? His enemies pronouncing judgement on his trials for bribery are saying that the PM wants to escape imprisonment. There is more of a chance that the PM will sit out his jail sentence like Pluto in Hades, a banquette by candlelight and wine among the memories of ancient kings and princes hoover above his mortal head. And why? Perhaps for the simple fact that Mr Netanyahu was born a little with the dew just above his eyelids to be the first true Jewish caesar. And, yes, Caesar, yes even he was made by men and nobles. What an extraordinary fate to have been always statesman first and second a savvy political- businessman. Also he has never uttered any obscene or vulgar word in public no matter how the rest of the world would see or talk of the Prime Minister. (Behind the scenes, well let's leave that to the truth not to be told for the moment. It's hard to say when you don't speak and understand Hebrew.) Friday the Prime Minister will meet with British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, 24th March. The State of Israel on two occasions is meeting its fate, where it might want the PM to go home, it is entirely of a whole different matter of where they will find the next leader of Israel among the nation in the State of Israel. Both parts are of monumental importance, ken, achshav.















What is happening in Israel today is not even a syndrome disorder.

2 March 2023

The November 2022 general election/ snap election, the opposition leader then, had said that the people wanted voluntarily to have another election and vote for the government they want. He was also convinced about the people that no one would vote for the Center- Left leader, Yesh Atid Yair Lapid (and his far left and Arab parties). Now months later with Judicial Reform for the last two months people seem to have a rethink, only on the Left, that this is not what they voted for or want. Involuntarily even comes to mind. In another part of the country, the West Bank, Minister Bezalel Smotrich, thinks he can 'wipe out' Palestinians like a swarm of locusts eating the crops of the young settlers living in these areas for over more than three decades. After the US rebuke by White House Spokesperson Ned Price, Minister Smotrich has rephrased his words more to the language of diplomacy. But this train is squeaking on the rails. Yesterday Mrs Sarah Netanyahu was ambushed by demonstrators against the Judicial Reform and lasted for a three hours long outside the hair salon in Tel Aviv. She was upset and had seen being comforted by the Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, in his arms in a snapshot photo on Twitter. The Left have reacted with strong words against the Prime Minister, saying that they will not allow the Judicial Reform go- ahead. And that they will keep on demonstrating until the government changes its mind and take the whole thing off the table forever. (A thousand years?) The Prime Minister gave his answer and said later that the Yesh Atid leader wants to bring down his government and have new elections. An interesting way to put this chaos to its end. Interesting, because it would have zero logic to go that way and lose again from the Prime Minister. One can only say that the best shot Yair Lapid had at being prime minister was when Naftali Bennett was Prime Minister in a rotational agreement with Yesh Atid. Speaking of voluntarily choice in Israeli politics in the 21st century, between Yair Lapid and Naftali Bennett (with other coalition partners), voluntarily agreeing to certain demands and ideas was the only and best shot not to do anything unvoluntarily for a change. The former prime minister, Naftali Bennett, did the only unvoluntarily thing to resign when the coalition under Benyamin Netanyahu constant 'opposing' collapsed. This is where we are today: the Right- Wing and voluntary eager parties had become coalition partners and made the victory for Benyamin Netanyhau a x- times reality to become Prime Minister of Israel again. Politics has become like playing house with Barby dolls, fighters and civilians, where all the dolls are disappearing one by one to nowhere, and leaving the doll's house empty to the point of irrelevancy. Someone is playing Conquistador through the middle, taking gold in exchange and paying with mirrors and shells. Just as Spain had done once in colonial history with the native Indians of Peru. Where it could get tragic, and no one wants this, could be when there is loss of innocent lives among the protesters. The question now is one of a political nature: was this the political victory Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu wanted, when he said that 'no one wants Bennett as prime minister'?

Four, or nearly five, months later with the present time national protests against the coalition the vacuum for another approach is becoming even more necessary as we speak. As ministries need to run on State Budgets without any disruption, for country and peoples. And on top of all the chaos a war against Iran is also looming more closer and making it all beyond ridicule if the Prime Minister has to fight this one from his toes like a magician. I am sorry to say, but hasn't Prime Minister Netanyahu failed his goals this time as the Party with the vast majority of the votes? For a radical change from democracy to another interpretation of political law a plan would have been wise to have. For example, when the former prime minister Naftali Bennett came to power his plan was a simple formula: change the country for the better, and make it all inclusive based on Real Time realities. Whatever that change was, and even when not there, the vision of its dimension was clear enough to all involved in this coalition. After six months the vision for change had proven improbable, and six months after became clear to being impossible. But at least the former prime minister had failed, almost, as according to plan. And making it easier to question: what if it had worked out, so that one can see why there was difference or political effort. To fail because of chaos and nothing is added value throughout the scrum of people protesting (criss cross the land), what plan is failing and what politics? But of course, every country has once in a while a moment's obscurity from politics, law and order. A dangerous vacuum for a strong leadership and who will have to play his role out as firm and resolute. For now Israel seems blessed not to have such one among the people and nation. Others don't put half their heart in this way, while putting the other half in another way out. They are just virile and take. That happened in Spain, Argentina, Italy and most countries in South America. Once again, Israel is blessed, because Naftali Bennett was brought up well (when listening to his Youtube interview a few weeks agoand talk of his parents) and will not take power to control its people in Israel. In between his eyes you get the impression that this man knows there is a small possibility that Israel will some day have such a man. Can that be right?

Additional par exemple: Bnei Brak observance & eligible for immediate State improvement.

State budget road networks Bnei Brak- road network highest priority of age older than 5 decades. Centra: central market hall, housing for young families, and proper sanitation upgrade.

Experiment: land and town maintenance system for upgrade.

Town Hall/ municipality projects and planning; local authorities, environment.

Health facilities and constant watch on local campaign for society and security across town.

And local economy, based on Kosher food and drinks, and other extraordinaries related to Torah rules, be it Levitical or modern civil citizenship.












Third month of the year, what would you do as Sir Keir Starmer's political adversary?

23 February 2023

After today any political adversary to Sir Keir Starmer would have a sigh of relief and thinking 'For you the poodle prize, and for me the lion share' when the election comes. King for a day, so to speak. But for who(m)? The poodle or the lion? Politics can get very confusing in a world like that of ours, let alone in a world of where political chaos is complimentary. But they have been here before in the UK, haven't they? Just give an honest answer. Brexit is not as immortal as they wanted it to be in the majority- yes vote. It could have still been in battle cry mode had it gone to heaven and come back by train and railway to Westminster with container bags full of benefits and not stones, for all the people of Britain and those nations living in the UK. Love matters, that wasn't one of the lines written here for the last four months. Lines of sheer tenderness and care, that is what politics is all about when the Conservative Prime Minister from the point of view of patriarchal rigidity. When the boy coughs, the emperor simply becomes irritated and would want to make an end of the coughing. ( Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus and his nephew, Suetonius) What could that mean in terms of politics and to win a general election from the emperor (not personalized on the prime minister). Exempli gratia. Speech after speech, what could make anyone fear Keir Starmer's own procession of 'self proclaimed next prime minister of the UK'? In fact it is just that what many are now trying to say to the leader of the opposition in the Labour Party, that what he is doing is nothing more than the boy cried wolf. (No reference to the Style Council track Boy Cried Wolf in the eighties) Mr Starmer is in another dimension with today's five missions announcement, also said by some people. Yes, that of aspera ad astra, perhaps. 'We do not know what he stands for,' and 'Why would we trust what you're saying, Mr Starmer?'. And why are you wearing glasses, is the one they forgot to ask too, while the future PM was prancing restless like a happy horse in Manchester today. Today Sir Keir Starmer was half horse and half wolf in sheep's clothing, standing in the rarest of all political breeds man had ever seen under the sun. He became a genuine contender to become prime minister of Britain, of the UK, over the last three months. And that was not what they had ever seen before in him when he was sitting in the previous Labour leader's garden like a lost Michael Corleone, insignificant and on the sideline to a greater man than himself, his Labour leader/ Don Corleone. Anyone remember the film Godfather and when Michael, or to be more precise how Michael came to be the Don? His wife was his only big fan and she, Conny, Michael's hysterical sister, had got it all wrong, Michael didn't kill Carlo. He could not have, he treated Carlo like a deputy. Humanity can be strange when caught acting like immortals. There is always something that makes them startle.

If you want to go against fate than go against Keir Starmer and all of his hubris by emulating to be your next prime minister. Humble, humble, humble equals growth, growth, & growth. You cannot find the secret formula just yet and it makes you go mad. Growth set into a deed can only be signed by the magistrate and make it a factum est permanently. Let's hope the people have that mandate and understand what growth is more important: the past or future. Sir Keir Starmer seems to be in the right time and place to make the real change of perception. Intent to watch your hard work turn to shoots and bring it to the national market scale. Intent has also that quietness for a virtue. Unless something burns down your crops. And to put something of the currency right: has the Labour leader burned any crops of the people yet? It could be very well the real reason for his words on partnership, because where the people will make the new move, he also will be doing the same thing in his new role as your prime minister when elected. The word is solidarity of a different currency. Wasn't it Penny Mordaunt who had the better primus inter pares today after she had heard Keir Starmer's speech (House of Commons debate)? One almost felt how this could have played out so much better and without disappointment if she had been prime minister. Things would look so much more interesting for the coming 18 months between her and the leader of the opposition. Three months later since december last year in 2022 the young Prime Minister Rishi Sunak seems to have lost his Hermes wings in the heels and failed to do his feel of flying. And we had such high hopes, remember? The adversary has been crushed underneath words such as crops, partnership, coalition of partnership, emotion(s), and 'Why not Britain'. The big ones, G-7, super power Britain, Greener future, and one other in the same line of breath, a Labour government, are here left out deliberately. You do that when you are the adversary. The adversary to growth (industrialization and modernization), challenges with their own employment and networks, empathy and sympathy. (Empathy without sympathy, or sympathy without empathy) Searching for new socialist words: synergy (not socialism). Synchronization democracy (not democracy). Growth comes in true nominal values, gross value comes exponentially. And one last shoot: fundamental change is the best architecture to start planning and change perception and vision. Or say sayonara. (Bad fork tongues have already said that the Israel lobby is behind all this 'new change' of Sir Keir. Where Mr Starmer was four months ago was being dogged down to a forgotten self when he had lost his chance to trigger a general election from the chaos by the resignation of Liz Truss... Fortune? We have to wait and see)  












After the EHRC report will the Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer include more in-depth change in his party?

21 February 2023

Change is good and so is new strategic thinking especially where there are still relics from the previous Labour leadership hanging loosely in the air. In the coming decade where the new leadership under Sir Keir will take course some are saying that there are still no clear signs made here. What are his new real visions for the next six months, for instance. Changing the Labour Party, fighting turfs wars within the party, and are there going to be more 'retributions' to come? Where all that does matter is where all his actions will make clear to the people of Britain/ UK that Labour is back. And perhaps starting at the first principle of its own history post WWII. When and where are all Labour's traditional voters now? Strategically there is no demographic and clear answer to that question, as this is something irrelevant without having a clear idea which new change will be Labour's answer for the coming future as the party to win the next general election. And what do the people want? One cannot be naive to expect that this want will have much differentiality from e.g. neighbouring countries across the channel. There will also not be a tectonic shift from the great depression years in the thirties. Not all is Keir Starmer's fault and have or make a slow start to get into power, so to speak. Can you say that the future for Mr Starmer will mainly be as a prime minister to keep Britain/ the UK in the G-7 and G-20, while also reposition Brexit in the global industrial world? With Labour Brexit could be in the G-7 and G-20 as it is still a competitive economy with a nation on board that is great in hospitality and friendliness toward all nations. Sir Keir seems to be aware of the deal made when Britain left the EU and that this will mean the kind of work that will extend beyond his own natural ability as a lawyer and prime minister. The row on antisemitism by then will long be gone from his cabinet or be delgated to perhaps a special authority for racial equality and an official watchdog dashboard to monitor where radicalism might pop- up once again and be no black & white paper doll.

In short: Sir Keir Starmer promises a future of complementary new policies. As prime minister he can also be expected to have a more proactive approach when it comes to Foereign politics, e.g. the issue of a Two- State solution for Israel and the Palesinian people. The idea is new Labour and Foreign policies will be a great part of this transformation. It is important for the prime minister in a Labour government to build relations inside and foreign over the issue here above within the party's new infrastructure. Alongside US colleagues the future UK PM should do as well as Secretary of State Antony Blinken when dealing with complex issues actively or passively, or interchange of both, when addressing the Two- State solution. Israel in 2023 is not what Tony Blair will remember when he was prime minister.  












President Volodymyr Zelenski impresses once again.

9 February 2023

Unannounced Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenski made a surprise visit yesterday coming to London, and today went on to the European Parliament and make yet the most powerful speeches of our time. His words on keep on fighting Russia's aggression on his borders, but especially when addressing more specifically the architecture of coalitions from the west with help for Ukraine and its heroes. The other specific came as a surprise, as the President had not yet addressed this issue before that is of the bigger picture for a new history in the world. This most powerful shift of bringing Ukraine and the western world together was nothing simple as a single fight for Ukraine and keeping out Russia from its borders. Nato is nothing simple when bringing coalitions together against an aggressor as Russia. In time that would be between now and the first three months of this year, followed by another three months further and so forth. 2023 The war in Ukraine will be determining Russia's fate indefinitely, according to what you hear in the news and from speeches such as that of Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenski. One thing however keeps coming back like a fly on the nose. In a new history for Ukraine would that not mean that a switch was made, e.g. not Ukraine belonging to Russia, but that this was indeed the other way round and Russia belonging to Ukraine? In fact it would not be that far from the original Russia, with Kyiv as a central reference to the origins of the nobility later known as 'main Russia', after expansion into inhabitable land Siberia. Maybe insignificant and a diversion from the time in which we are now living, many thousands of years later on. But the swamps are still calling and both sides, Russia and Ukraine, have lost the smell of the waters. Incidently, the fly has equally a million eyes and just not how to see realities as they were, but also as they now are/ stand. And Russia is hardly the kid being bullied in the schoolyard! The President of Ukraine his heroism also means that he knows about 'Damian' and he will not be fooled by him and his 'young' age. Mr Zelenski adamantly emphasized the evil of what the aggressor Russia is doing to his country, people and independence. Firstly: how did the world/ western world ever excepted the Russian claim to Ukraine for hundreds of years?

It is no wonder the miracles to believe in on the side of Mr Zelenski seem a little 'overly' demands for tanks and fighter planes, when still in the west many people see it as a war of one year old. With the start in 2014 when Russia's annexation of Crimea had to be a first strong alarm to the west. Europe especially had never thought after WWII that they would have to be in a warlike situation like the present time ever again. Peace and stability had contained much of the 75 years since then. It is obvious that Ukraine is decisive on to adhere to the European Union values, living standard- acceleration-, and way of life. Doctor Henry Kissinger at Davos also had given it his second thought on bringing Ukraine to Nato this time, with the pressure emphasis on war from Russia. The young President must have been impressed by all as written here above, while Russia takes on a whole different view of the situation in the meantime. When you see one fly you get the feeling that you are still in control and chase it away. But not when there is another one, and then another one, coming on to you aggressively. In this war, who knows which is the side of the many flies. Clearly the Russian President now must be feeling that his long term plans/ objectives will not be won this way. The time for complete surrender from Ukraine is now over and that this is one objective less. Neither can he subjugate the nation of Ukraine to Russia's authority as planned (presumably). Down goes another objective. It is what came instead could be his immediate worries for now. And can anyone say what came instead? The US, Nato, the EU, military help and training, joining the EU and perhaps soon also Nato, c.q. the new world. Incidently, the world as put here in writing is also a socially and highly organised world especially when it concerns global security (Nato Secretary Jens Stoltenberg last night in a briefing with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken). Russia is becoming isolated from the western world and it will have to either panic or desperately seeking 'Susan' on his side. Japan and South Korea are historically and intrinsically engaged in the western world. What can therefore be the end conclusion?

Adding a song for the President of Ukraine, Mr Volodymyr Zelenski: Tell me no lies- Camel. 













Did the Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer yesterday made a gaffe on self- referral?

16 January 2023

The self- referral- thing is a bit more complicated than that, don't you think so, and to explain how physicians or GP's views are at the moment when heavily under pressure and understaffed. It is what Mr Starmer perhaps didn't want to touch more explicitly, or come across pedant on subjects with clearly x- of much technical and socio- medical metrics only the professionals can understand and know. Priorities are for the politicians, but in Medical Health Services these are not in terms of Health Policies the same. Mr Starmer came back this morning on Nick Ferrari's radio show and explained what the 'gaffe' was all about yesterday on Laura Kueunssberg TV Show on sunday. He does make a good point on GP's bureaucracy, of which many see or think it works all for the best of public health. But reading a little more on how this bureaucracy is setting out priorities, now that does not come across as not being blind to inventive ways to 'declare' referrals among physicians. The future Labour Prime Minister is right to campaign for and against excesses of handling finances and policies made more accessible and is showing concern for time going to waste for nothing. One way or the other he has to get out of this tit- for- tat and change his perception over to what moves big politics in Downing Street No 10, e.g. when the NHS is moving or clustering into industrial tiers way above the mass and their perception of NHS definitions. He can't make up things here and anywhere if he wants to become prime minister. Laura Kuensbergg yesterday asked the Labour leader whether he wanted people to trust him. "Yes, of course I do," he answered with a straight face looking at her. Eighteen months is a long way to wait for the general election and kill the suspense whether Keir Starmer becomes prime minister or not. He still has to appear on Davos Switzerland (WEF) this week's platform, next to the Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves. At home he is campaigning to become prime minister and going to Davos what will he be when on the global economic forum stage?

The impression one gets of Keir Starmer as the Labour leader who wants to be in government next, is that he is better at being him than when asked awkward questions in the early hours of his campaign. That could become another faux pas for being prematurely prime minister, while the Tories are still the government in power. Power having here Real Time on their side in full. It is especially showing when Mr Starmer has to take tough stands on e.g. the transgender age issue. Policies have to mature and strangely enough to become the new physics of a new age political future. Laws too seem to become more organic and biological. You could say that Keir Starmer slowly is becoming the hare and turtle racing toward the finishing line. Or the worm wriggling out of the Tory greenest apple of discord they are throwing at him over the fence on 'their' big issues. (Maybe not knowing he is the chrysalis morphing into the monarch butterfly; internet: are monarch butterflies intelligent? "Yes. If intelligence is the ability to seek out nectar and pollinate flowers, yes. In terms of long-term travel to their southern climes and back, Monarchs in particular never cease to amaze.") But we keep on studying, listening and reading Mr Starmer's every word, because this opportunity comes once in so many decades/ years when the Labour Party has a leader who has the interesting fortune to come to power under what some perceive as highly unlikely. (He is looking nowadays incredibly handsome too! But beware, that might just make things worse on the difficult path he is now taking to become prime minister) Where Keir Starmer is getting a bit lost on the oomph or is off are when moments come from the media to ask him about a woman having a phallus. No one puts the question to the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak just yet! A woman having a penis, till now, only fitted Grace Jones' cover of her album in the eighties when showing in a stark naked pose her all noir beauty and from between her legs (side view) an enormous hanging penis pointing to the ground. And still respected in the James Bond movie: A view to a kill.

To be continued.













Happy New Year to high inflation.

1 January 2023

What this means is that money/ legal tender has ceased to exist in our century. And that perhaps off the legal tender branch only currency matters as legal mechanism. Weighing national sovereign currency has lost its plural mechanism.

2020/2021/2022 And 2023 the inflation curve keeps on rising as we speak, with very few members in the public sphere asking why. Except where the discussion and wholly accidental rises and would notice the point of the euro against historical national currency. And say that the euro has saved society from the rise of inflation. Irrespective which Member State under the euro.

Reverse calculation prices to historical national currency will make astonishingly a very precise new monetary value of the euro/ money and principle realization. Yet still maybe a feeble explanation on the theory of its complexity monetary package. And that 10 years from now in 2023 this legal tender may trigger another spring- moment of high inflation.

As for the King's money it is Fortune favours the brave/ Fortuna est.













The most dominant sentiment to have Keir Starmer as Prime Minister has been getting bigger over the weekend.

12 December 2022

Where some might critically argue Sir Keir his policies on e.g. constitutional reform others are more for following the temptation of having the Labour leader to win the next general election. What can he do to win the hearts and minds of the voters he still hasn't got on his side of the political demographics? The truth is that nobody knows the answer to that question just yet. When they say prosperity or the economy the birds don't feel that could be their bait. In the writing last week (The Guardian UK) someone has said that the Labour leader is definite about becoming prime minister and wants to form the next government. Here there are two logical points: one is to form the next government and much understood by voters on a national scale. And two is the constitutional reform, he and Gordon Brown (in memo: the former Labour PM after the millennium) had announced last week on monday. The first logic is forwarding something of the voter's wishes, beliefs, the new future, prosperity for the middle class, the ordinary business man too, and maybe living standards improvements for the other half where no one is looking. And last but not least the logic reaches or could reach as far as bringing the poorest back to visibility map. The second logic at this point of extra large economic destitude for many feels too magnanimous and for some (historians) make a cacophony of 'Who than is king to order reform on the king of England, Charles III?'. Logic should not confuse people living in the mindset or mind bubble of the 21st century. They don't want to go back into the future and find their lives make a false impression of wealth and luxury compared to those who didn't know sanitation from hygiene. To politicians, if the Tories, it is interesting but you get that impression of holding up exactly the picture of that kind of prosperity before their noses like a warmed up sausage. And that means it is never going to be about change from Westminster to a public service wholly based on the digital age plus accessibility for everyone registered as a citizen of this country. Where will all that pampering money come from echoes privately somewhere behind the walls of parliament. But it could now lead to Mr Starmer's cue and even lead when changing the lives of so many Britons and introduce smart technological minimalism in local communities with an approximate population of 20.000?

That is also the same technology to help people waiting for an appointment at GP's or the Hospital, with maximalist interaction between patients and online 'first aid'. We in the European Union are far advanced when it comes to the logic of connectivity with government bodies, especially in the areas where you live. Governments e.g. the UK are massive oak trees (hierarchies) and local communities and government bodies/ authorities are the bonsai growing kit wherever they must be placed or will be tested in new situations. (The Tories last night came out with a call for Tory democracy and a new website (?) under Priti Patel, the former Home Secretary) The work that the Labour Party will be doing in the coming time is a serious building up of available resources and where new wells of resources can make a heterogenous new life. The Shadow Chancellor of course will be on Mr Starmer's heels and remind him whether it is going softly softly or hard with immediate impact of costs. The impression some get with Britain is that Brexit is running on negative costs and that it won't be gone by the time Keir Starmer will become prime minister next. And hopefully into a government with also positive growth at the end of its first year. There is something also of a vague impression on who is really accountable for governing England (the UK). Of course that answer is easy: the man who looks more serene as a politician and who wants to become prime minister of the first new Labour PM. Rumours has it that no one wants to do Brexit anymore as it is becoming too physical and consuming. Another question: who is thinking of Mr Starmer to be the man and do the politics that are hands- off and not hands- on just to avoid too much of the same Tory politics that never got sticking to your rails (train of thought)? Next month January 2023 we all just might have a different level in this story and than ask the same questions whether Mr Starmer is making progress with his (delta) vector campaign to be the next PM at Westminster in the House of Commons, at the dispatch box every wednesday from then on. If so the story will become more complex and dealing with the global issues, at home and out in the G-7 & G-20 worlds.












"This is way bigger than politics," yes, what is bigger than politics on those issues of 'magnitude', Mr Starmer?

8 December 2022

That sums it all up in PMQs yesterday, wednesday 7 December, by Keir Starmer in the House of Commons. When listening, if you are and I think this is the precise if not critical time for Labour to do so, how both leaders of the Political Parties in Britain do their QA on wednesday, it is as if for the last four weeks in every debate we get the same overdose of political verbatim. Nuance comes in plenty, some say, more often than they were used to hearing when e.g. Mr Starmer became leader of the Labour Party and the opposition and asked the PMQs. But what we are not hearing, or perhaps that is what we are exactly hearing but won't admit it, is what is this all about before the end of the year 2022, 23 days from now? If there is a plan for Labour to win the next general election one wonders whether that is the kind of debate to have right now and ignoring next month in the new year of January 2023 to know the plan. The clashes are much harder and getting harder each time the leaders stand opposite each other with the whole world watching and willingly analyzing these PMQs. (Without dipping the Westminster political honor in blood but in water) The global world is now involved and is burning with curiosity... Are we watching a raging bull fight all over again between Jake La Motta and Sugar Ray Robinson, and whoever surviving saying, "But you didn't get me down, Ray." Words do not make strategy and politics, just as Sir Keir Starmer said yesterday in one of his questions what gets bigger than politics. Or a blow-up, you would feel inclined to ask or say, of what is now getting bigger in politics for the last four weeks? If the latter would be happening but isn't. Oh yes, the fight is definitely on when e.g. watching the Shadow Chancellor's face on the PPE procurement deal the PM was specifically pointing in her direction with his finger. "... She wanted to buy this from a law firm..." Etcetera. Mr Starmer also had called the Prime Minister 'a blancmange prime minister'. The world is watching this, yes, and with pleasure. And all that the PM has are the sparks coming off the trainrails to bring the strikes and union up again and again. What we don't realize is this is getting harder every week and to exact a precise reason for voting for Labour in the next general election is evaporating into thin air like the blue sky (at a wider scale). That is the answer we can't find or see through the scrum and dust of the debates in the House of Commons between Sir Keir Starmer and the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.

It is the white King Cobra versus the black Cobra every week since Mr Sunak became Prime Minister 23 October, approximately four weeks ago. And they are already shaking the global audience and media? Labour knows that the Tories will put the lid on legislation metrics and stop the opposition getting its hands in the cookie jar. Goggins little theory: "Goggins completed many races by utilising what he refers to as The Cookie Jar Method. Simply put, the cookie jar is a storage container for past achievements and failures that you've overcome. It is something to revisit when you need that extra push, something that keeps you going when you feel like giving up." It is hard not to look at it from this angle, but Mr Sunak is becoming the prime minister he never was planning on becoming. No, it's not thanks to Mr Sunak why Mr Starmer is doing better at scoring points for the last couple of weeks. Something new in British politics perhaps: it is thanks to Mr Starmer it is why the PM is running a better showdown during PMQs at Westminister. And why? Because there is good enough a chance for Mr Sunak to also be in a real position to win the next general election by serving the country in a genuine way.This old and British ancient system called the House of Commons and having that unique design of PMQs. Imagine a similar system in the Israeli parliament/ Knesset with regular PMQs. That would make government and governing bodies more transparent to the citizens on both sides, Jews and Arabs, with accountability becoming also more relevant to all the people. What we can only see / hear in the present system are dictats, everyone doing their say/ shoutings and there are no questions asked from the PM or MKs by political parties. Britain however has a unique system and in all the planet we do not have seen anywhere else similar such a system. Legislation is debatable and to ears and hearing what everyone listens to are questions with the exceptionality what can only be interpret as legal and done collectively for the public through interpretations of law and order in the House of Commons between the leaders of the political parties, one on this side, the other opposite asking the prime minister questions. How can Labour gets its hands in the cookie jar? By proposing to change the House of Lords, Non- dom taxation and calling for nurses pay rise? De jure Labour is not a political branch of the Unions, but it does share deep policies for over a hundred years with the Unions. Nuances? Yes, a handful of plenty.

Let's hear it from Brian (Monty Python Life of Brian) in the political arena on wednesdays in Britain selling his wares to the spectators: "Larks' tongues. Wrens' livers. Chaffinch brains. Jaguars' earlobes. Wolf nipple chips. Get 'em while they're hot."

Shadow Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities since 2021, Lisa Nandy, Labour UK.


27 November 2022


(GBN Mark Dolan on Twitter poll: "Can Keir Starmer make Britain great again..." MCTaytelbaum: "I vote yes. Division is too costly for any country, but especially Britain and historically was always at the center of the G-7.")


IInd Comment tonight Lisa Nandy- Labour to borrow £28 bln: "Als antwoord op @Channel4@afneil en @lisanandy
MCTaytelbaum: "Ms Nandy will have to wait a few more months, e.g. when her Party Leader KS becomes more solid as the future PM the voters want. And inherit the previous government borrowing."

Adding to comment: healing for Britain and British politics could be Mr Starmer's first priority: different political areas in the apparent future political climate and landscape. Adjacent to Brexit after the referendum and post Brexit in 2019 with former PM Boris Johnson - Rishi Sunak in 2022. What is key for the future Labour PM, if so? Dividing the country has been a costly transformation, after leaving the EU, for Britain. And the more it borrowed the more it made sense for six consecutive years since 2016. Under a new PM elected into government, e.g. Labour Mr Keir Starmer, borrowing will continue and some can already make good estimates where this will end into in five years. £1 tn? Between November 2022 and February, March or April 2023, he will do good not to mention too much about investment and what Britain needs to finance across the country when there is no more money to work with in these investments. Taxation won't bring back the £500 bln (Tory QE) in one year from the people paying their taxes. To get out of the time zone after the Tory government in either 2023/ 2024 (January 2025), the Labour leader/ PM will simply have to enter either global realism or disappear into the other side of the past time zone. In three or six months this must become very clear to the people in Britain and the EU vis a vis Scotland and Northern Ireland, that Mr Starmer is the future.The Cinderella shoe that only fits the Labour leader and not the PM Mr Rishi Sunak.

To be continued.












PMQ's UK.

9 November 2022

(20:35 PM)

Sr Keir Starmer this afternoon took the PM Rishi Sunak slowly onto the blades of his trachea, like the green grass adder, swallowing a lapwing's early autumn's egg. Where he had found this egg was easy to find for any parliamentary serpentine in opposition when following the latest of Tory crises and when as leader of the Labour Party. Luckily for the PM he had seen this one coming and sliding towards him from underneath the dispatch box this afternoon, earlier today. And the PM gave in return a rare impression of being fully aware and admitting with his hand on his heart, scout's honor, that GW was right to resign after the damaging allegations of bullying members in the civil service and colleagues. The serpent then just had another look at the Prime Minister, and gently moved on before he made another attempt at questioning the PM. Something hissing on Shell and tax exempt as the largest global multinational...

Conclusion, the PM gave a political and personal response on character and the government, but at the whole sum this afternoon had failed to impress big time. Something like losing your first teeth. And on went PMQ's and over to Mr Blackford after one or two questions from the other Members. What happened to the green grass adder? No, this PMQ's was not a happy of forever end. That means he will be back next PMQ's on wednesday seven days from now. And will it be any better next time? We don't know yet. But thumps up or down it is from here for whom the bell will toll from the people of Britain, next.














If there is one thing about a close- up photo of the Russian President tonight (media), what do we see?

13 October 2022

If sarcasm is not a crime where do we start? Is Vladimir V. Putin guilty or not guilty, seen from the photo? This is the question similar to those questions about looking inside his head, or try to. But maybe we should not only be looking at his portrait right now if we want to know the whole picture. Let's say that we know the whole picture inside his mind is Ukraine, where then do we put ours? One thing we can be sure of is that Vladimir V. Putin does not have a mind e.g. Peter I fighting the war against Sweden in 1709, bringing a defeat to the Swedish army. If Mr Putin we in the world know as the Russian President would have had any troubles with a certain health condition like teething or autism would that answer the question for people who are asking what Mr Putin has inside his mind at the moment? It all depends how far sarcasm can up its level or ante against all the horrors of the war in Ukraine since the invasion February 2022 to the present day to find a moment's Eureka in this line of 'questioning'. There must be lead there along this line of thinking to give us some idea why he looks like the man the 21st century has been waiting for and fulfil at least one scene in his apocalyptic role. Soon we will know and find out whether the Russian President has healing powers to fit his choir boy appearance or that he has become the 21st century Roman emperor Nero. And will the sarcasm be the crashing star on the global stage if he appears to be an elderly nerd and misfire his precalculations in Ukraine once again? And miscalculation isn't necessary always when doing something wrong... That would be fatal and once again fatal in that case for the Russian President. Then the war would have moved to the question what is he then doing right or wrong. To the west both ways have their own strategic meanings when seen from our side. Perhaps one can try to imagine what these reasons are for this line of thinking. Your gold fish can see you but how do we really see the whole picture where communication completely stops or doesn't exist even when live by the fishbowl and mini mass of water at least from the fish's visual? Mind you, communication with your gold fish can only be similar to talking to your Youtube channel or TV.

Feminists might have an idea how to answer all your questions what the Russian President might do next and they have come a long way condemning all violence in the world if one can remember. With the exception of Amazons. There is no rational explanation here to give you why this sudden mentioning of Amazons and feminists came to mind in this writing. Except for an attempt of making the distinction once more that only God Almighty can know the fate of human and the planet destinies, if coming - descending- separately, the divine power of Holy war and Holy Me, (much like in the song by Duran Duran Ordinary Life). That is exactly the thing that no one really knows about the life and role of Mr Vladimir V. Putin. And his age, 70, isn't making it any easier for anyone to get to the surface of the Russian President's brain. After WWII who would have thought or predicted another large scale war to be again on European soil with another eastern European of the continent? In the military it is usually preparedness that takes you to victory, instead of when not prepared. Tactically it means that we are starting preparedness after attack. A sort of reverse tactical preparedness. The EU e.g. had only prepared for more economic expansion and successes already setting the ages to a futuristic future where your apples and nuts are grown in a clean atmosphere and zero dirt. Maybe when seen from the height of sarcasm what you can then see de facto is irony. And then again war has that effect when it comes in a sudden without warning. It will be hard to make something of the Russian President after many years (certainly until 2018) of having liked and dined with him for the many American celebrities (Steven Segal) in the music and movie industries. He was loved and liked by most foreign celebrities, and hated in politics. In 2022 and his war in Ukraine and the threats he made to the EU of cutting off gas and fuel I am afraid that he has now been oxidized. That could be sarcasm on the one side, but irony too when seen from another angle. But what can we do about reality as it is?












Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have got it right, going through the backbone of the nation as they see it.

9 October 2022

The time for Britain's industrial revolution is a by- gone era, one of a kind when comparing to German or American steel years. But in politics some things are hard to forget, when, as in Britain 2022, the nation comes back with the oldest realities of another time and thinking they can all blame the 21st century. Generation X (X- or X+) faguely remembers the 1970ties. What was the Conservative Party fighting against or for before 1970, e.g. 1965? Labour was strongest by driving the winds of Labourism fortune through the pipes of the nation's backbone and everything was UNION. Some may say or think the only thing on Mr Starmer's mind was fighting the Party's anti- Semitism after the Corbyn years, and maybe that is the exact opposite of his strategic thinking, for the Tories. Let the Tories see and think about Labour's priorities and make a wide slipping on the soaking wet floor with 'dirty laundry detergent'? It has to be, because who will suspect the greater ambition in the Labour leader and calling it 'the future of Britain'? True deception. The Conservative Prime Minister Ms Lizz Truss just maybe might be knowing where that is coming from, only the 21st century in its forward mode will not allow her to believe what she is thinking. Has she ever paid close attention to Mr Starmer in action in the House of Commons? He knows when he is beaten, but then again he is the kind of man who also knows how to stand up right again and keeping his back straight. You may ask why and how come he is coming back again and again on the same chewed fat of the issues? The impression one gets is that he wants to get into power as the Labour Prime Minister, the man who would be able to make sausages have a voice! Let the products speak for themselves, they are included or deluded in the prices set up by the Tories, long ago... The Conservative Prime Minister is following time not anti clockwise. Perhaps the wisest thing to do for Ms Truss would be not to underestimate the Labour leader and not only Members of her own Party. Mr Starmer is no Mr Tony Blair and it is very clear from his body language that on the waterfront he is the man in charge, he is the man in the fancy suit, and he is the man that is doing the punches or kicking with his smart and fancy shoes too.

Coming back to 2022. Labour is winning the poll and stood at 54% last friday, 7 October, when last checked. The Prime Minister still doing what she is doing best, all that is wrong in Labour's eyes. Britain is changing its religion by hammering on and on (eternally) on the U- turn of the 45P by the Prime Minister. And they are all banging on and on on their cymbals singing Hare Rama Hare Krishna the 45P was wrong to U- turn on. The Prime Minister should resign, resign, resign. And so forth. To a certain extent they are right because the PM is not offering the backbone of the nation on a silver platter to the Labour Party leadership, aka Starmer & Reeves (Shadow Chancellor). But 'what she is saying / doing is to get on with the job'. Mr Starmer however calls her bluff and almost as if he is saying this is a lie because it is not on the platter. Wrong, it was a technical and necessary move the Tories had to make might be something that comes to mind she answers, that Mr Starmer should listen to her Chancellor, Mr Kwasi Kwarteng. He is anything but a nerd and he knows what he is talking about. How people cannot do the interpretations between the intervention of the mini- budget, the Christmas ghosts and the new fiscal years 2023 up to 2024, oh come on. (Evil laugh(ing)) Maybe PM Truss does know where Mr Starmer's strategy is going... She must slip from the prime ministership. Cuts and spending, her dog gets it and he/ she is not barking up the wrong tree, might be her last words or balancing act. Hmm... British politics could become interesting again as the time was in the seventies. For the moment it is worth to try to get the PM chasing her own tail round and round up to where she will get dizzy and forget that she was a Conservative leader and the Prime Minister. And the nation then could see that she was not fit for Office as PM. But things might change if the Tory Party gets a hold of itself and reverse the Labour fortune up to the next election. Now, the question is what is the definition of politics in Britain end 2022? The PM and her Ministers are not on trial and don't need to be prosecuted for their policies, short or long term. Even when the whole nation seems to know more on fiscal policies than the government floating on its own. And what is not to forgive when no laws were broken? That having said still some are saying the PM should watch stepping on her own toes as she proceeds with her 'Britain is moving' policies. In the end of the day: cities, cityskape/ skylines, moving traffic and traffic lights, all human infrastructure, have all been products of the man- made brain work. The choice is clear whether law and order can make the same contribution made by politicians. By the way, contribution is not as the same thing as projections.












There is nothing to write about the UK PM, Liz Truss, unless you're going for a challenge in the unknown.

8 October 2022

"I get it," or "I am thinking about it," which is which/ what, being on the tip of the sword either dancing or standing wobbly. Perhaps like something like the PM at the Party Conference on wednesday two days ago. It feels like cold isolation, for now still imaginary, for the Prime Minister; you see something inside your mind, a picture or movieclip from the seventies/ eighties. This time it is a woman typing in the high and deep empty hall all alone and far away from civilization. "I get it and I am thinking about it. I get it and I am thinking about it. I get it and I am thinking about it." Klick, klick, klick, klick... Does that ring a bell when you are at the age above fifty years? Next scene: someone walks into the hall to ask the PM how far she's got with the writing of her message for the people of Britain/ UK. One look (evil/ interesting?) at him and the spectator knows everything she is not going to say and the understanding you're taking as a bonus that here nothing needs writing or saying. "How many times have I told you that you should not interrupt me while I am working on my speech?" This feels genuinely Conservative, because it is unthinkable to imagine the opposition leader Sir Keir Starmer of Labour to sit exactly in the same place and chair doing the same thing and looking frenzied at the 'intruder' while working on his speeches. You expect more civility from the Labour leader when a colleague inquires if the speech or message is ready for the day. Where has the Conservative Party arrived in 2022, after the resigning of the former prime minister Boris Johnson? Where has the Conservative Party arrived in fact after the last decade, remember the days of David Cameron when he was prime minister? Then, as anyone of my age over sixty, to say resign was equal to committing a sin in the most ungodly way possible. You were a 'dirty republican', meaning not like Cicero but like something more lethal than betrayal. Will the 2022 Prime Minister (post Boris Johnson) do things differently than her predecessors?

"She doesn't have a mandate," some are saying to protest her being Prime Minister after the U-turn. Politics now we know also is suffering from early dementia symptoms if only now you wake up and remember that she only became Prime Minister last month. Or so. It seems that no one wants to say where they actually went wrong by making her fit for Office as PM. But this is Britain today. A ghastly place for politics and politicians, so you're thinking privately. And if it is true, well don't even go there if you are serious about energy prices, the war in Ukraine, the cost of living in the horizontal economy, or in Britain's case the Pound Sterling. Whatever problems we in the EU are having let's hope that the Prague meeting yesterday was good for both sides on the straight line, the EU and UK. Here also the UK PM was again for a moment among people to remind her that it is good to be part of the human race and how to celebrate these rare moments in our time. Something like that we are kindred spirits. Back home in the UK Ms Truss will have to go back to a cold and empty hall and with no telephone lines connected to the outside world. It will be cold this winter in the UK we are hearing they say. A little like Apollo 13 being stuck in space and waiting the new instructions from NASA how to save energy or power to make the trajectory around the moon to get back to earth. I know, this was also in the movie. Is there a serious line in here somewhere? Let's for a moment imagine that the answer was no, than what? 'Yes' would be at this stage almost surreal. Well, that depends on the angle which is stronger on hypnosis. And avoid that immediately. And not just by avoiding the term with 'I am focused on the issues at hand'. Maybe the only thing the PM can do right now is focusing on being and staying the prime minister. What do UK PMs do when not resigning on U- turns? According to her own Party Members that is exactly the path now looking impossible to continue. Not when all of Britain are ganging up on her for taking the U- turn on the 45P. Well she is not a Labour leader, how else could she have seen or done it as the Conservative leader? Yes, she was once a Libdem, but this was years ago. Today she has grown out of that and became Conservative, now the Conservative Prime Minister. By merit and hard work, she herself has said many times but especially during the leadership contest for the job. Or has she broken the law with the U- turn on the 45P?

Britain has changed since the eighties and nineties. And British politics is now more ruthless than it has ever/ never been. With the passing of the Queen, Queen Elizabeth II,  on 8 September last month and today exactly one month later, to the outsider it looks as if it is getting worse now with everyone wanting what the first born or minister has. And 'ravage the blessed', quote from a song by Gino Vannelli. ('The greed of all men have ravaged the blessed- Summers of my life)












Prince Harry's latest on his memoirs.

26 September 2022

Rewrite, rewrite, has been the latest protest on the half of the other side of the red line he seems to have crossed according to many insiders who know the first draft. Also what seems to be the problem is that certain details could cast a shadow on the Late Queen and so soon after her death; Queen Elizabeth II is also the Prince his grandmother on the paternal side. We in the public are hearing rumours coming and going each time the Sussexes turn their backs. With much of the focus going to the Prince his wife, Meghan Markle. What was the reason for him writing his memoirs at the age of 35? In his own words this was meant to deal and write about his alleged mental issues during his childhood to him becoming 'the man he now is (or has become)'. Harry Windsor is not only the Prince the world knows universally as the youngest son to Prince Charles and Late Princess Diana, he is now even more important as the youngest son to King Charles III. Understandable, if Prince Harry feels that he has to write about a time he went through obscure emotions since the death of his mother and perhaps finds no forgiveness for having lost his mom he loved as a child, and perhaps now only remembers that love in quiet worship. It can happen each son's experience is different when losing his mother at an age when just awakening from post natal age to child growing up at nine. In details his memoirs however are also dealing with issues much closer related to the Late Queen, his grandmother and other senior members of the Royal Family. Apparently his wife, Meghan Markle, was not treated properly since they got married in 2019. England had initially welcomed the Duchess into their national arms, but after a few unpleasant occurences had happened, the media realized something else about the newly wedded party Harry and Meghan.

That something is unclear as it is also most obscure with no definite point in the story on Harry & Meghan, or Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as the Sussexes. Just for the record: next to the Sussexes we have the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (now also the Prince and Princess of Wales). With on top of the Royal Family's list, the Duke and Duchess of York, and the Earl and Countess of Wessex. In this labyrinth of Royal Members in the Moutbatten Windsor world top to bottom is packed with children, grandchildren and great grandchildren to the Late Queen and her husband, Prince Phillip. It is also the family of British history for a thousand years or even more. Prince Harry therefore is de facto part of a thousand years of monarchical history in Britain, be it after his decision to leave the Royal Family for a secular life in the United States of America with his wife, Ms Meghan Markle, now been treated or seen as a detail of significance being made hard as insignificance. All depending how arrogant the global media is against the Prince and his wife, the Duchess of Sussex. A secret question: how would the late Princess Diana have treated her daughter in law had she still been alive? Sometimes sons get in the same situation when having their father, much loved by the son, and having to go on running the company after the late father's death. "What would dad have done," comes to mind when something goes terribly wrong in the company. The only human answer will be that time will tell. But this is not why the world is obsessively interested in Meghan Markle, Prince Harry's wife, especially now when Queen Elizabeth II has passed away since 8 September 2022, two and a half weeks ago. Of course, we understand, it would be unforgivable bad taste to publish the memoirs close to her freshly passing and committal. You simply can't do it on a business as usual mentality in the coming time. Legally however is another story from the publisher's side of things. Another question ripples through the mud is why will it be in the public interest to hear or read about Prince Harry's memoirs? Racism, prejudice, pride, personality disorders, arrogance, intolerance, self indulgence, plain stupidity, entitlement, self centered, maniacal, control freak, pauperism, global views or its distortions, and so the list goes on. But we have done that and been there before haven't we? Each and every human being and family in our global world for the last two decades and with no one doing anything differently. It is the 21st century and it is welcome to the world of complete surrender to transparency or the ridicules. In other words: who is without vanity in our century?

It is a simple gesture when and where people love each other as a family, and for everyone that is very hard to understand when and where this love survives. But more that it is harder to define that survival by words, sometimes even tender words do not sufice the greatness and simplicity of it. It is also called conscience and where its path will or could lead you, country, nation, people or family all alike. That love is entirely up to anyone which way to choose, confined by tradition or free by a secular life, if there is an eye for vision and simplicity of life and its continuation. Hurt and pain are clichés if it wasn't for the Mercury (356.62 °C ) burning to make you cry. Unfortunately formal life as a political or regal life command virtue excercise and Chimeran laws of nature and obedience to survive. So help you God Almighty.

Priority I: Prince Harry has changed his mind on the memoirs and wants to rewrite some of its parts not to hurt the legacy of his grandmother, the Late Queen, Elizabeth II.

Second priority: Mrs Harry Windsor, the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle.












Queen Elizabeth II passing, the end of an era.


9 September 2022

(26:14 PM)


Earlier tonight at 18:00 PM King Charles III addressed the nation, the people of Britain, the Commonwealth and people around the globe, who have been pouring in their condolences and tributes of flowers in the last 24x hours alongside the gates at Buckingham Palace in London, to show their respect to the Queen. This is the end of an era, are what some of the people are saying when they are asked about their thoughts or feelings on the Queen's death, 8 September, yesterday. We are 30 hours far on in time since the death of Her Majesty was announced yesterday at approximately 18:00 hours, and we now already have met with the new king and have listened tonight to his pre- recorded televised speech from Buckingham Palace. Protocol must be followed with precision and duty, as what the Queen would have wanted for her son and heir to the throne. It was what the Queen had worked for, precisely this moment, was what someone had also said on SKY UK. Once you are following the next events as they happen the interesting thing here is how everything was scheduled for this major change between the passing of the previous monarch and the immediate passing on to the next monarch. Perhaps this is a new aspect of transistion for the monarchy in our age of transparency, that the general public do not only follow the ceremonial sides of the change, but are now also through social media participating more directly. Social environment is based on broad interaction and accessibility. 25 Years ago it was the Queen who had said in one of her speeches that every home should now have access to Internet, then still called the World Wide Web. Looking back in time you just realize how digital illiterate we were and not even that long ago. And 30 years on many then still believed in other parts of Europe that Stephen Frears and his films were all that England truly was. Freezing time one tries to find out when was it ever a good time that we as people in general have known in the last three decades? Globalization then made its introduction into our lives and a new era was born without borders through an architecture of networks across the globe. Massive employment was now on the move and you didn't need staying in your hometown or country when looking for a job. You could mobilize yourself and move to India or Japan, countries where employment friendly nations were beginning to spring up like mushrooms everywhere in the freshly glazed 'globalized' world. When we overlook history since we came this far in our globalized digital world, we are never looking again at life when it was still microscopic. Only through music bands like Oasis and Stereophonics the new generation (now X- Gen) were beginning this slow process of change into the next generation and to act globally or globalized (when employed). What has that story got to do with the new monarch of England, Charless III, tonight? In straight lines it is how one looks at a model and what used to be in a previous era chock full with cubicles is now without the little boxes in one square, aka our planet.

You don't need to invent Mars or the Moon anymore and know their trajectories in relation to earth. What we are doing today is re-inventing in fact our planet and it's evolution and make it sustainable again. And for one reason: we now have the technologies. The homo sapiens that we are also is on the same level of rediscovery as its brother re- engineering evolution. The new monarch of England, Commonwealth and people around the world respecting the monarchy in the new king, will know why people believe blindly in the fate of the planet from the wider perspectives and mass infrastructures economics and social up- or downgrade, more than believing in privileges from an era that has lost its soul with the passing of the last monarch, Queen Elizabeth II, only 'minutes' ago in terms of mechanics. We have to be honest with each other and yes, it still hurts and the heart is still freshly aching with grief or heartbreak at the passing of a beloved majesty in Queen Elizabeth II, if we think Justin Trudeau of Canada with his Bragolinian tears in his eyes and Emmanuel Macron of France, but the king knows that time is literally running. We have ample time for mourning the death of Her Majesty, as time moves on in the rest of the world e.g. overhere in Europe where our energy crisis is now being protested in Germany to reopen Nordstream 1 and stop the sanctions against Russia and its President, Mr Vladimir V. Putin. The new king will not be able to say that the tradition of constitutional monarchy means keeping politics and geopolitics out of the parameters it has set for thousand of years, and don't see it coming how to see a people in the 21st century. Under the great wings of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II the world that she did not raise her family in will not be the same for King Charles III anymore to enjoy. The new world order is creating new politics based on a peoples idea and experiences of self- determination and direction. What these transformations are saying in fact is that people only believe in physical and personal prosperity when 'manufactured' by their free will in a free world. Whether that be employment on minimum wage or self promoting their status. On a one on one basis the king can stay forever blessed to eternity. Imagine a people at mass scale demanding privileges from employment, status and wealth from small businesses... That could become frustrating when you can't do anything to either help or share with the people. These are also the same people who do not consider the monarchy an industry to employ people, as industries e.g. IBM or Shell. The king is not considered the industrialist as people see e.g. in Michael Bloomberg, Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos. Of course that would be nothing new to Prince Andrew when he wanted to learn about the many industries through people he had met during his time as Trade Envoy of British interests. Do not take it the wrong way, what we have seen and heard last night from the speech by King Charless III, it was simply breathtaking and deeply impressive. Grief has given him a strong sort of emotional expressive look, and it was all said and done in great beauty. Once in time King Charles III would have made a great shepherd of many sheep and keeping the wolves out with his golden crook. Today however the wolves are robotic and like Dalek they kill differently.

The Queen was in many ways a saint (the President of France Emmanuel Macron practically said it perfectly that, to you she was your queen, to us she was the queen), and King Charles III who would want nothing better than stepping into his mother's shoes, will now see or face a different multitude.












Is she the dancing or kissing queen when we are talking about Sanna Marin, PM of Finland?

25 August 2022

Let's ask Abba, Swedish pop group seventies, and if it is true about the Prime Minister of Finland to be the dancing queen. The answer is simple: no. And why not? Answer: because the Prime Minister of Finland is not sweet sixteen, but in fact is a mature woman and doyenne 36 years old. The same question about the kissing in the photograph only recently that went viral around on social media. The kissing: two young women and blonde, naked breasted, were seen kissing on the mouths and the photo was taken presumably at the official residence of the young Prime Minister Sanna Marin. AKA the Russian President, Mr Putin's, mortal enemy. If you're interested in, you know, Social Media stuff. Potentially if that were the truth, hmm... nom de plume. For now we should leave out Nato from the dancing and kissing in relation to closing in the bio pic of a party-ing (Bart Simpson animated voice) young Prime Minister. One thing is true to be thankful for her dancing when comparing to that of the former President of Russia, Mr DmitryMedvedev dancing "The American boy". Or staying even closer to where I am, the Dutch Prime Minister, Mr Mark Rutte, having been seen doing a few rare steps called dancing with a group of dancers somewhere in the Netherlands. That surfaced as something of a wooden clocks dancing. Nothing like watching the infectious moves by Sanna Marin, now known as the dancing Prime Minister of Finland. The Prime Minister doesn't know where we came from when over sixty years old and that we have all seen it before, e.g. when John Travolta did the Saturday Night Fever movie and dancing to the hit by The Bee Gees then, And not always at chic discotheques... You should be dancing. I'm still feeling hot when I am now thinking about it. And I wasn't the only one as many women and men loved him dancing. Ouch! Oh yeah. We were once young too, you see. 

At 65 our taste for dancing or music will remain with the old boys we used to know as Billy Idol (Flesh for fantasy) and wild oats like the Rolling Stones. And so forth. Sanna Marin is not part of this category of professionals. She is still the Prime Minister of Finland and according to some of her devoted fans she (sans titre) was just enjoying herself. Lucky for her never to have had anything in her mouth that was ever toxic or liquid as narcotics. The drugs test came out negative, something the public had demanded she had to proof scientifically. Happy now? When I commented that the Prime Minister should instead eat green apples there were many return comments on my 'infringement' of the young woman that she was and just dancing, ffs. I wasn't even suggesting the green apples to be something more fetishing as 'the forbidden fruits' and taking that into better account if or when next time... But I do agree, that was a bit blasé, well, on the part of playing nice about the dancing Finnish queen... Oeps! Faux pas. Respress immediately! Back in the eighties we had the Simple Minds, and you could dance to his music up to a certain level or simply stand in awe of Jim Kerr by the podium steel decor. Where this isn't going is asking the real question. There was nothing about the PM dancing and then take it to Social Media as something of revenge porn by the unknown camera... Who was the one taking the clip of the PM? But when once out it doesn't take much left to your imagination that in fact the PM was dancing intimately and clearly was intoxicated. Let's quickly clear that last remark up: intoxicated here only referring to alcohol consumption. Whether blasé or misogynistic this could all become blurred in seconds when you see the clip of an intimate dancing attractive PM, or at least be clouded with adolescent desire. Of course, to dance with her. And not clinging on to her in any other position, Kama Sutra or missionary. (Another quick correction before incriminating oneself here unnecessarily) And what about the two kissing women, one with a Broke Back Mountain hat on her head, and the other just kissing holding something in her hand closely resemblance a beer glass and full with presumably what looked like beer and not lemonade? Let's leave that one to the public domain.

To my knowledge the Prime Minister has done nothing immoral, if Batman and his Batusi was perfectly legal to be in a family program in the sixties/ seventies. Accept what we are looking at now is the Sannatusi bringing you the 'fleurs du mal' straight in your face and staying the untouchable. As Prime MInister?










Penny Mordaunt is second on the list of Tory Party leadership after Rishi Sunak.

12 July 2022

First question: what deliveroo will Penny Mordaunt do to become the next Tory Party leader, or better, what deliveroos will she do and become the Tory Party leader? Another question: Suella Braverman also yesterday, 11 July, told the British public (in particular) that you should not vote for her because she is a woman, brown, but for other reasons that matter to her as a leader of the next Tory Party. (Latter part not literally quoted, but interpreted) And the punchline to her message, "I love this country and will do everything for it." And last but not least tonight's update/ lastnight was the announcement: UK's Conservative party to announce new leader on 5 September. Next: the coming eight weeks for Mr Johnson will be as animated Prime Minister Moderat style of Bad Kingdom. And that is the end of it and just to quote a line from Bad Kingdom, "What did you had in mind..." (Actually not what you had in mind) And watching the black ink transposing from his last day as PM to another day without being the PM. As simple as that. Will it matter tomorrow for Liz Truss to promise her tax cuts for the UK economy of 64 million and something people? Periodical could be in the clause in the deal that she might have in mind, a plan? Sometimes what this just looks like is as if the people know just as much as the politicians, not knowing what to think or humanly feel. Except that politicians are with the extra human- thing when reaching out to the people/ constituents. Just to check what that means again: "The MP is playing on his constituents' sense of regional identity to win votes." Twenty people are backing Penny Mordaunt since last night and with forty to back Rishi Sunak. In the same palace of Westminster another candidate is sweating in the meantime from the hot weather. No one will have any difficulty imagining what he would be under heavy pressure, e.g. before a select committee for more than two hours. In fact which one of these candidates would be at par to answer questions impromptu and 'laser point' (can't remember who has used the same word in an interview last night). This was more than a deliveroo.

Another appearance was from the leader of the opposition, Mr Keir Starmer talking to Channel 4 News, Labour says it's time for a new government. It was interesting to hear from the opposition leader that he had played the violin on one of Fat Boy Slim sessions/ lessons and also had kicked a ball into a goal somewhere in England with a famous soccer name. Interesting about the violin playing by the opposition leader, as he must also be tone deaf if pure musical theory would be involved. E.g. on the piano one will learn that on one- key you can't make any musical harmony with. You have to at least use two keys to hit for a note. Not similar to Mr Johnson caprice- Nicolo Paganini- style when talking wherever he is speaking. Actually words are sometimes freebies. And the clever thing is that you have to know when they are not. Question: do politicians do freebies as well? So, what is missing today except for removing the prime minister and take his place at the helm of the Tory Party? Maybe if one tries not to look or open their eyes to see what is there so obviously clear that something was achieved and is now making a huge difference on the political stage at the moment. And it did not require any expertise from any of the talented people that are on the first and second on the list to become the next Prime Minister and promise to deliver 'that promise'. By definition what is this promise that the prime minister could not have or did not deliver? Maybe the one thing the PM did not do or deliver is to leave his job to a technocrat. Let's say or put it this way that the war in Ukraine against Russia requires massive logistics and logistical operations on the political and military side in cooperation with the rest of the western world. It was after all WWIII that came straight after the Omicron variant (and economic elasticity global collapse) last February. Could Penny Mordaunt fit the profile or biopic as PM in the UK in a scenario of war against Russia who's President, Mr Vladimir V. Putin, is planning on up the ante in his objectives? You have to at least be a war minister according to the old Tory playbook. Saying all here without being disrespectful to the Hon Lady is another thought bubble. As well as picture her on the bicycle and pa(e)ddling towards Westminister with a special delivery: to be or not to be Prime Minister.













Brexdad, Boris Johnson, resigns today from Nr 10 Downing Street as Prime Minister.

7 July 2022

Brass lion Downing Street: 10. What else can one say after the resignation of the UK Prime Minister today, 7 July 2022. The Brexdad is leaving and another Tory Minister will become prime minister. That means the exit PM Mr Johnson is caretaker prime minister until then. To any outsider in the global audience who are not in government in the UK or Tory Party the speech given by Mr Johnson sounded very brilliant and well chosen words. Herd community mentality, was one, and when that moves it moves... Or, has Mr Johnson given up too soon, just like the former PM Mr Naftali Bennett in Israel on 22 June last month? Some messages did not come across too well while he was still prime minister and serving the British public, one could say in this brief hours and it's aftermath... He had an unusual smartness this afternoon shaped round him like a well polished halo while delivering his resignation speech. His future unfortunately will not be one of golden anymore, but rather to many he will be remembered as the boozy prime minister during lockdown and the pandemic Covid-19. He barely could repeat his words on giving the country back it's own laws, of course the famous exit from the European Union. The Tory Party isn't about Brexit anymore, as all is proof of that today and no more 'exits from the EU are going to be anywhere near in the future again. After 2019 Mr Johnson stood a very fair chance of winning another term from the electorate and there is no good reason to give for it to why that could have been or happened. His fight was a positive fight from the point of view of Brexit and bring back all the laws to the UK and the British people. But that was yesterday when he held the 'world in his hand', and to a certain extent was the breath of new hope throughout our part of the world across the channel. Now he is Brexdog. Could have been a Led Zeppelin song.

Mr Johnson has slipped on the dust of immortality amongst the many great British prime ministers since it's first inception when still the exchequer to His Majesty King George V was every prime minister. Another term as prime minister would have made him immortal in politics. Where can he hide now? Sir Keir Starmer today has said that Mr Johnson should disappear altogether from the dispatch box as caretaker PM. Kicking a lying dog when he is down for any puritan politician makes an odd impression as the one delivering the kicking. In the public domain Mr Starmer's words do not even matter anymore after today. The up coming election will be of more interest to the people and electorate. But first things first: who will be the next Tory Minister to become the party leader? You see why it makes Mr Starmer's words look or sound more a premature 'fest' of some kind? Ladies and gentlemen, we got him to resign. Hooray! Sound the bugle and let loose all the hunters to run the dogs. Foxes on the side and kept as innocent bystanders in the coming time and election. What is all this hunting all about? Another Beatles song, You give me no money, just funny papers, Mr X... And when we look back and see the smoke disappearing into the grey sky today what are we thinking when this is England? Going back to the European Union? Like a dog returning to it's vomit. No smart words to ad today in this writing. Mr Johnson had all the smart looks he deserved today when resigning, and incidently was looking very handsome too. In time history if not yet extinct from human living who knows how people will remember Mr Johnson. It wasn't just huffing and puffing. Brexit was actually fact in recent history.

Additional 8 July 2022): to decide on who should be the next Tory leader or caretaker PM one should first look back on the 2019 Boris Johnson victory from Mrs May and ask what was the main view then and now. Mr Johnson said something very import in his resignation speech no one has bothered to pay any attention to, was that to be PM this was an education in itself. He was the architect of Brexit, but not from the European Union side. And that is what made the 'view' a sharp constrast from his predecessor who got stuck in the cherries and cream when Britain was part of the EU history. Brexit when looking back wasn't just a deal or contract Mr Johnson wanted to win and retake whatever it was he had to do and bring it back to the UK, it was something more than that. The laws as they call it now were institutions of decades agreements between the EU and Britain, also some of them disagreements; the signing of the Maastricht Treaty (if correct by Gordon Brown), all that is now being laughed at that he should go for lying to the British public in apparently when lockdown was easing in June 2020. And all this is now history as if it became the white invisible elephant in the room. There isn't a simple way out of Mr Johnson as prime minister by chosing another Tory leader as we speak. But there is also tension or contraction that equally after resigning in this distinct manner of British statesman, he cannot go back being the prime minister either. He is a tough act to follow for anyone who wants his job. But he is fighting back like a wounded lion with so many against him and the success story behind him of having delivered Brexit where no man went and came back a winner isn't making it any 'smoother'.

Taking over in 2022 from Mr Johnson now seems easy than when he took over from Mrs May in 2019. It is a tempting sight with no difficulty and something to deliver as a promise of Brexit. Equally who can you trust with the future of Britain being in a better state than where Mr Johnson stood in 2019? Of course, it has all the ills of any other global leader in the G7 or G20, with one slight distinction that Brexit is Brexit. Only the problem is what you have never designed and built time can be a blind wide spot between your eyes. And all it's subtle details of experience and development. Brexit was the new experience for Britain and the British electorate. Time also means not only what is next, but what isn't right now and present immediately after the resignation of Mr Johnson. Becoming Tory Party leader does not feel as the same thing quite what the next PM will deliver for the British people, historically. While being alive and still kicking Mr Johnson could only feel his political death and bereavement at the same time. And maybe being human feeling a little crossed. Or sad and pain as he said in his resignation speech earlier yesterday. (It is past midnight, 8 July 2022) Someone has called for a caretaker PM to unite the party with an extension view of uniting the British people behind him. Others fear some kind of political mutiny by the Prime Minister as he is considered dangerous and clever. Britain is desperately trying to find the right man and face who will be the next Tory leader after Mr Johnson's moulded face and embodiment of the Brexit king. Michel Barnier, like the ghost of the past, still remembers when Mr Johnson was the Brexit negotiator and that he was almost certain after the referendum in 2016 that this meant the end of the European Union. He did not mention any of this, but he just appeared out of the blue yesterday in a tweet on Twitter. He was hoping for more calm and cooperation next. Next as in the next British Prime Minister. It is so very confusing for the fish swimming first against the wall with certain fishing EU Member States, and now might going back to their old deep current without maritime borders? If and when taken to the extreme, also the citizens of Britain will get their EU passports back for travelling. What is next? The Euro? There is lots mentioning high inflation with nowhere to go from the present moment into the near term or shortest future. The next PM will have no choice but to take Britain to strategic economic decisions that are drastically needed... Looks like they will start a whole new process and demands. Good luck.










Mr Yair Lapid speech last night, 2 July 2022.

3 July 2022

Campaigning for premiership in Israel Yair Lapid should he not concentrate on statistics, socially and sectors, and not on logistics where the previous campaign was about showing where the 'ohter half' lived from the have- nots?

Parallel strategies and also social infrastructures can only go one way from now in his campaign in the next election, as the opposition is already showing a strong hand with it's chosen battlegrounds, e.g. the high cost of living and starting with positioning itself with a plastic bottle/ container of milk by the opposition leader earlier yesterday.
Yair Lapid with the change in the premiership from Mr Naftali Bennett since this weekend now will have to make his campaign with nothing new under the political sun in Israel, but rather make it a picture or biopic of stability and continuity from what the previous government has already started working on.
Mr Lapid's speech earlier in the night yesterday (2 July in the evening) was a clear selfie of what to expect from this prime minister or caretaker prime minister till 1 November in four months. There were and are no specific references to his campaign starting the coming week made in this speech, nor was it to attract too much attention to his role of becoming prime minister again after the next election and perhaps in yet another coalition with the Arab political parties.

What at this point is very worrying is the strong performance already made yesterday by the opposition leader and demonstratively walking into a grocery shop to get a 1.5lt plastic bottle of milk and showing to the camera how this affects all the people of Israel with the high cost of living and prices under the former Bennett- Lapid government. (The news was not in English) And one has to be wary of Mr Netanyahu when he is on the campaign war path, experience has taught Mr Lapid already over the last decade. Leave out global strategic thinking, as everyone knows that is why the Bennett government had fallen! Home is where your castle is and if Mr Netanyahu wins it no one will ever know what it might have been if Mr Lapid had won and become the next prime minister by a majority vote in the land.

Of course this is only politics... But it can be of enormous importance to have another side to Mr Netanyahu, now believing in Israel himself and not looking for the country to believe in him. You catch the people with honey, so to speak. After many years of giving them rubble/flint and vinegar to eat and drink it would now be gratitude to have the man they loved and wanted nothing more from than to hear him calling them to come to him, is not to underestimate when promised to get out of poverty, because of Bennett who was nothing more than a tax tyrant. That will be his honey sweet talking this next campaign election. And the people will personally see him and his appearance... Mr Lapid cannot beat such a union of beauty (the people) and the beast (the politician Mr Netanyahu). Let us not underestimate love of Israelis for this man.
But what if Mr Netanyahu rediscovers his older self and once more believes in Israel and that he would want a genuine relation with the people he had abandoned for too long? Maybe the opposition leader too has learned something from the Bennett government, that it is a great feeling to have when you can also love your country in return. Israel than has a heartbeat that is everlasting and not fiction. The rest of the world is fiction, so you will probably think and envision what is before you. Who knows, men at his age of 72 do come to the extraordinary height of potent wisdom and pick up the spurned silver (the nation/ people) once again.

The nation on the other hand might not forgive so easily and get to vote for the opponent, what could feel at this point more sensible to do. This is politics after all.
In the meantime it is not clear whether Mr Bennett as alternate prime minister has an active role yet to play out his hand. If...












I never had him down as a Roman imperator, but I do think that Mr Bennett has something more than that, to be Rehoboam and come back.


19 June 2022


Fifth time round is destiny. Nero still can't see the flames coming nigh. In Naftali Bennett his announcenent this evening, local time- 20:00 PM in Israel, this is what he had to say I read in a tweet on Twitter:" Gil Hoffman
@Gil_Hoffman
·
18 m
At Knesset press conference,
@naftalibennett
officially announced break from politics and that
@Ayelet__Shaked
will head his Yamina Party. She could hold the balance of power in the next election, helping
@netanyahu
form govt or get revenge against him and perhaps end his career."


Mr Bennett's tactical moves are quiet and holding the breath of destiny. He has never been a prime minister of pomp and glory, red carpets or military parades when visiting leaders in the region or outside of Israel in the world. Cop26 October 2021 will stay with him as the prime minister who had threatened to leave the conference if the organizers would refuse to open an entrance with access to the Israeli minister of Energy her wheelchair. His was also the first and biggest delegate of 120 people, since when? Something Gaius Julius Caesar before becoming emperor and serving as a military commander would also have done the same for any preator with a severe physiological handicap. Mr Bennett is leaving his time and 'imperium' behind now (In ancient Rome, imperium was a form of authority held by a citizen to control a military or governmental entity) and decided not to run in the coming elections in October 2022. I believe that he will become alternate prime minister in the coalition led by Prime Minister Yair Lapid as of later at midnight tonight. The opposition can smell the shashlick already on the skewer and how it was marinated in his toxic acid for a whole of one year. Of course it may be very tasty depending where you are living, whether in Iran, Turkey, Greece, Europe or Caesarea. The Middle East from that point of view is always deeply homogeneous. Mr Lapid is lucky with a smooth transition and we can't say tonight whether he had expected to get to this stage after last weekend with Kaisar Netanyahu breathing already close to his neck with an alternative government. One has to say, that it was a nail biting waiting what was going to happen on wednesday today. No one is sure that we have heard and seen the end of it just yet. The coalition didn't put up much of a fight either, or so it looks on our side of the global spectrum. Behind the scenes well you could say that on one or two occasions it was almost as if you did hear the pin dropping. I personally will look forward to the next stage of the premiership in the rotational government under Prime Minister Yair Lapid. For personal reasons, such as 'finding who the traitor in my family is..." From Godfather II when Michael Corleone had a heart to heart talk with Frank Pentangeli in the old studies of the Godfather, aka the Don. How is Mrs Gilat Bennett taking the news where she will now have to deal with another level of personal abuse against her husband, as former prime minister of Israel? And senior Mrs Bennett and her innocent grandchildren? When in Europe most executives have exit strategies and a recommendation letter in his briefcase to take home with him and show that to his wife and children/ family. Let's think carefully right now and remember why the prime minister has resigned nine days ago. In future this might become his intellectual property (or properties), how doing what is impossible in Israel when taking the premiership and how to succeed with scarce enough knowledge to become prime minister of a people without social problems (someone on I24 has said today- there are no problems in Israel).


Can anyone recommend Mr Bennett any time in the future to come back as Israel's prime minister? I want the diplomatic answer and not shashlick. Destiny is not something on the skewer to roast and have it later. Also, why correct an enemy when he is making a mistake? People who are in favor of having Mr Netanyahu back in the business of politics as prime minister are always saying unreservedly to anyone disagreeing with the same idea, that it is because you are scum. Without saying whether they mean scum of the sea or earth. There is a difference if you carefully look more closer. It is actually politics, stupid.













Right- Wing and democracy if Likud returns to government in the next elections as early as October 2022.

23 June 2022

Wonder if 2 mln Israelis living under the poverty line are yearning for the Right- Wing under Benyamin Netanyahu to come back; democracy failed under the mildest PM, Naftali Bennett, in Israel's history: logic begs the Question how this will be under a Right- Wing government when bringing back 'sanity' in the next election.. Listening to May Golan, Likud MK, in a brief interview on ILTV, youtube.com "No one knows what is happening behind in Knesset, giving billions to Arab parties, and we only are watching crime rates rising in the Arab community, and no one knows why they are getting so stronger..." According to the Likud MK their party is working hard on coming back and this time with a real Right- Wing government. Also the people of Israel are starving for elections and to go out to vote... Apparently Likud is perceived by it's members as the only democratic party in the country/ in Israel. This settles our mind then as we in the west take democracy very seriously... But the sticky issue here remains or is in what way to perceive the government of former prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, on the balance of real politics? By assumption let's say that his government was Right- Wing, with Yesh Atid, Blue & White, Yisrael Beytenu, New Hope, Meretz, Labour, Ra'am (the Arab Party)... Today's certainty is that the resignation from the coalition agreement on rotational prime ministership of Mr Bennett is what everyone should respect. History will judge all of this one good day. The world had been under the impression that democracy was for the first time a proportionate respresentation with the Bennett- Lapid government over the year June 2021-June 2022. An only Right- Wing government that is democratic when listening very carefully to interviews on camera after Mr Bennett's resignation that this will not look anything so diverse as what the country had been under the former prime minister Naftali Bennett. One also wonders whether we are too thick and not understand anything about democracy and respresentational governments. Is anyone practicing law in Israel and knowing that it has only legal legitimacy when set in stone against totalitarianism? Russia is a perfect example in the present time how totalitarianism and democracy do not make a handsome pair.

But this should not be misunderstood, that no one wants to steal the thunder of Benyamin Netanyahu, after what his party calls it was a miracle that the fall of the coalition happened so fast. Thank God Almighty for Mr Bennett and his decisiveness. In time people will come to learn about this young man, how he was deliberately underestimated, almost at a misogynistic point of pure envy, but how he was made in one year to become the glimpse of a warm season in total chaos/ rubbles from where he wanted to rebuild a renewable Israeli society for all. Mr Netanyahu, to a certain degree since last night, is promising the citizens of Israel more or less the same roads to prosperity. Here is a man with a legacy of prosperity and making a 'new' campaign pledge, is my understanding. Well, one thing is true that he does know how to do the accent and make it more articulate than e.g. the former prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett. Except where the world has learned that Mr Bennett's accent was not about articulation but courage. A faint-hearted man could not have taken out Benyamin Netanyahu, with utmost care without hurting the reputation of the then former prime minister. And where does Yair Lapid, now caretaker prime minister, fit in the Right- Wing political or personal scrum between Benyamin Netanyahu and Naftali Bennett? With the caretaker prime minister Yair Lapid it is numbers that Mr Netanyahu respects, his at 36 and Yesh Atid at 20 seats. In Israel there is nothing better to show how insignificant the other is compared to what the name of Benyamin Netanyahu means to all of Israel. One can't help thinking that in another scenario both men could have been in government in a more developed democracy between parties and the Knesset. In this scenario both men would have been fully aware of what the country needs and what it can do to stay that way. After all, isn't it what you can do for your country that matters in big politics?

The next big question is what happens to the truth? In the last election, or before, in February, Rabbi Gilad Kariv (Labour) had said on I24 in an interview that 2 million Israelis lived under the poverty line, with one million in the waiting after Covid-19 and collapse of the economy. The premiership of Naftali Bennett had not even been born yet, in June 2021. Under the governments of Benyamin Netanyahu these were the people who lived invisible and of manna from Mr Netanyahu's heaven. In the south of Tel Aviv half the city is in debris and the living standard only matches that of locusts and how legions of them can live from under these dirt and filth rubble. Israel has only one street to match the historical wealth of Rotschild, the Rothschild Boulevard. There is a human face also to be seen and found in Israel and it is just as much alive as Margate in England. What housing plans is the Likud thinking of and where to make a start of rehousing and renewable living environments for it's people? (Some of the young Ethiopian young girls lying in the streets on a daily basis in Tel Aviv and dying from stabbing wounds without anyone to help) No one envies Mr Netanyahu for the real truth about Israel and it's greater society. With Mr Bennett as prime minister we had at least a 'freshman' prime minister and who was keen on rebuilding society wherever it was broken. It was clear after Cop26 October 2021 that this energetic young man was not looking for self aggrandizement, by demanding that the organizers change the entrance for the Energy Minister Karine Elharrar to enter by wheelchair or  that  he would leave the conference. He had clearly demonstrated a piece of how not to be misogynistic and vain! It is true that Israel should keep watch over it's territory and the Jewish State, there is no one to do this for them, and to excercise extreme precision when it comes to security. But that is something everyone in Israel can do or give to the country. And for one simple reason: because they have to. Comparing to Iran who does not have a security problem to survive as a country. The truth also begs the question, last but not least, if Judea and Samaria will be better under Benyamin Netanyahu next now more than ever before. 











Historic moments that went unnoticed by mainstream media and the world.

14 June 2022

After Queen Elizabeth II Platinum Jubilee weekend on 5 June 2022 (The unforgettable fire- U2 song equivalent) and celebrating a longest historic reign as the monarch of the UK and Commonwealth, not many have been aware of what else was taking place in other parts of the world or in society as 'historic' moments. This month in Israel the coalition government under Naftali Bennett as prime minister also, one could say, was something of a historic moment, be it that this wasn't referring to the past but the future. If you believe that the government of Naftali Bennett has a direction and magnitude effect (vector). And his magnitude was for staying on as the new Israeli prime minister now over a year by one day today. Last year after his inauguration the opposition then had given the coalition 24 governmental hours to stay on as the government of change in Israel. One year later the opposition doesn't understand that it can only look back and suffer the humiliation to 'return back' to lead Israel. Not quite the same thing in terms of magnitude. Let's hope the pupil will overcome the teacher also in his second year as prime minister and change history for Israelis to look the other way / direction. The same also goes out to Prince Andrew Mountbatten- Windsor that he will not return to his former titles and privileges even when maintaining his birth right as Prince Andrew, now fourth to the throne in line. (Last check was ninth in line to the throne) Prince Andrew couldn't prove his innocence in his sexual abuse case of a minor in the US, when friends with a convicted peadophile Jeffrey Epstein, a global financier. His was a historic mistake not only to have been close to the monarchy and throne, but because he was born unto the institution of the monarchy and throne. Now that will take any future king to rebuild the fall of the castle walls under Prince Andrew... By another wall the death of Ms Shireen Abu Akleh, the Palestinian and prominent journalist who was killed by a bullet through the ear and head, still is hanging over it like a dark ghost that haunts the world. CNN, The New York Times and yesterday also now the Washington Post, have concluded their examinations of visual and hearing evidence this month and said that the journalist was killed by an Israeli soldier. The bullet is not in possession of the media or International Criminal Court in Den Hague. The question is why was her killing a historic moment for the people in Palestine? A turn of events might give you one of the answers to that question, or hasn't it?

The world however can't do much about these historic events when the media concludes it's own investigations e.g. without the bullet, and still writing 'likely killed by an Israeli soldier'. Just as writing that Prince Andrew has paid the settlement in his sexual abuse case, but that he was 'not convicted' in court by Judge Kaplan. Why is it that people do not pay attention to the writing? It is in English and not in Babylonian cuneiform that needs deciphering first.












Queen Elizabeth II P J

4 June 2022

Hooray! Hooray! Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, HM70, regina, and toast everyone in the UK. She looked marvellous and still is beautiful, one has to say so quietly and mindful of the Queen's age at 96. In her 70 years reign, I believe, that there isn't one soul or global citizen who can say anything wrong about Queen Elizabeth II, where she has ever done anyone or caused harm. I am not sure any of her predecessors had the same global reputation in the previous eras and centuries long before the 21st century was born unto mankind. In what way does this matter in our age and time to the rest of the world? In two ways one can find something and answer the question. If let's say that we are at a unique point in the present time the question will obviously be about relevance of the monarchy in the long term once the reign of Queen Elizabeth II has changed to the reign of Charles III, her son and prince of Wales, Prince Charles. We never had to question this before, so why is it different this time as if a tectonic shift had taken place? The second answer is that the future will be about globalization to the whole world with an accessibility of a full 100% to the whole population alive on the planet, and will therefore automatically become respectable as such. If not so yet still that will be the way forward for all free people and nations, is not to underestimate how globalization will then become king of the world next, like the Leviathan. Many have already come to know that these are unstoppable forces in Real Time as we speak. But, even if the head is made of pure gold, the headache might still be somewhere between it's teeth if it aches. And the monarchy, twist or turn it if you want, has a deeply rooted canal in human history and earthly mud when especially in these regions, West of Europe, East or Middle Europe and Great Britain. On the economy of historical growth any currency might find enough new ways to design growth from another time and realization and put much more emphasis on the human collectivess in all sectors of life and global prosperities. King Charles III will he have the answer to lead the UK and his monarchy more prosperous than what it was and has been historically under the reign of his mother, Queen Elizabeth II and her and his predecessors? The free people are not fooled and do their economics only based on growth in the economy and not longer on 'how much we love the Queen or King'.

And laws will change with the coming of a new world. Today we can still ask the question what it feels like to live without the Queen and get a pre-taste of that already to miss her at Thanksgiving on friday yesterday, 3 June, at Sint Paul's Cathedral. And on saturday today later on in the evening where the celebrations opening will be hosted by Prince William and Kate Middleton, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. But for now it is only a slight heartache. In 2050, 28 years from now, who knows what the revolutions for the coming times will bring for the world! Ten kings will not change the course of their fate in the face of the 2050 Climate Change target year. (As in ancient Greece 30 tax tyrants could not change the fate of the country) But it will pain Your Majesty if she would ponder on the fact that this might be very well saying goodbye to the monarchy as the first global institute in the UK and Commonwealth. And what rivers and oceans that reign has sailed! Where most monarchists go wrong is that the globalized powers in the world are doing nothing different when it comes to prosperity as once did the empire. From Taipan to the West Indies, Caribbeans to India and Africa, and so forth. To put it more modal it was never about the monarchy (only in ceremonies), but it was always about hubris and wealth and hubris and wealth only. Love never had fitted in this equation of it's servants to the king or queen. Even when many are still loyal subjects to Queen Elizabeth II and their memory is durable in any time or age. Yet, wasn't love humility and divine law that the monarch has protected by the sceptre? Humility as in purple and it's convoy, the Tyrian purple snail (Murex). Tonight when the chill is over of last winter it is the orange sun we might fear most today or just yet when celebrating the last moments of thousand years in Queen Elizabeth II. But destiny will not go extinct and die by wars or destruction, e.g. WWI and WWII. Perhaps to put too much emphasis on King Charless III, or Prince William, or even Prince Andrew being the prisoner of everlasting obscurity, the idea of globalization will not go away.

Error: opening tonight concert Buckingham Palace (square), by Prince Charles and his son, Prince William. 













S A N C T I O N S

23 May 2022

Personal note:


Economic sanctions readings can give a better idea of why (economic) sanctions against Israel will not work. Palestine historical economic industry doesn't make this type of economic sanctions sustainable for any outcome realistically or fictional on their side. Israel's monopoly at macro level industries have for the last three decades even outgrew it's own public sector and what was before this in the seventies, sixties and fifties. Palestine 21th century intellectual properties however could do with more access to low- key markets, where Israel also seems to be profiting from. With the gap of the lost years in wars and crimes Palestine doesn't has much leverage historically to call intellectual properties and defining what it's present time future could be when put on a competitive platform, regional, or far more external beyond it's own local level. Autarky is bad in Ukraine, South America and other places where this was rejected by the people and governments. This is not the model here that is suggested where Palestine should plan it's industrial future when Israel could be sanctioned for it's killing of Al Jazeera prominent Journalist Ms Shireen Abu Akleh, 11 May 2022. (The investigation at 'operational' level by the IDF is still not concluded) For some reason Israel is asymmetrical to Palestine's historical industrial vacuum. The question is: how will sanctions on Israel help Palestine? New optics are the future in the global world. Incidently this is what happens when GDP contraction is triggered: "What happens to inflation during contraction? Inflation decreases during recessions and increases during expansions (recoveries)."

The Shekel would/ could stop it's 'inflation'. But this is not based on economics and theories. It still only is my personal opinion. And how will sanctions peg the Palestinian currency?












Naftali Bennett has betrayed his Right- Wing voter's base when he joined Yesh Atid on 13 June 2021.

28 April 2022

Amichai Chikli, the news in the Jerusalem Post today is saying, that the democratic victory will be if he becomes leader of Yamina, of which the Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, is Party leader. Amichai Chikli has not betrayed the voters who voted for Yamina in the last election, 23 March 2021. Technically one can argue and ask whether the second mandate that was given to Yair Lapid was legal in any other democracy historically or the present time. Benyamin Netanyahu, now many in Israel are saying, was the real winner in the last election to stay prime minister for having had the lion share of the votes. Yes, but like a nice sports car without the right wheels, you still cannot drive off and go somewhere, anywhere. Without forming a coalition, without Ahmad Tibi, is the Right- Wing supreme victory? And even with Yamina waiting or joining Likud it still fell short of seats to make 61+ in Knesset. Naftali Bennett waited and offered to join Likud after the last election. People do not seem to remember systematically how the truth became when in the second mandate, given to Yesh Atid, Yair Lapid, Mr Bennett decided to then do this for Israel and taking it out of it's political lethargy to only blow some new life into it's empty stomach. But no one was complaining and so, why did Bennett took the prime ministership away from Mr Netanyahu? It must have been his blind lust for power and to become prime minister, some are writing on a daily dose basis in comments (under politics in Israel articles). Therefore when receiving yet another threat in an envelope today with a bullet addressed to the PM's son, Yoni Bennett, it is sheer attention seeking of what the Left- Wing always does. Just like Peres and Rabin... (Writing in a comment today,

Bennett's son receives threatening letter with bullet attached

This is the second time in the past week that a threatening letter has been addressed to the prime minister's family.



And where is Rabin now?


There is no logic possible anymore at this stage to deal with the swelling of the public behind the Right- Wing protesters against Naftali Bennett. A death threat twice in a week is tribulation. Technically as kingmaker and the rationality of this particular moment after the last election and second mandate to Yair Lapid, the kingmakers Mansour Abbas and Naftali Bennett had a choice to make quickly, or go back to a fifth round of elections. When the people believe the narrative of betraying their votes to join Left- Center Right- Wing and now enjoying the full high Office of prime minister, who wants to look the other way? But Amichai Chikli who wants to join Likud, but can't do so after monday's vote against him as rebel in his own Party, is better suited to lead the Party they are saying. Or start a new Party in the next election. The embrace was warm and tight on monday evening in Knesset between the opposition and Amichai Chikli. In older democracies this could all be ascribed to a matter of opinion. And continue with the business of daily politics. How to defend the Prime Minister when the violent protest goes against him and his family, on which argument was that again? He betrayed his voter's base and took their votes to join the Left- Wing, and he became Prime Minister, oh yes, that argument. Also the public is speaking against the PM to point out to his excessive cost of living from their taxpayer's money. If this is a death threat argument that once on the Right there is no Israel when going over to the other side on the Left- Wing side we are not speaking about a democracy, are we then? At the same point in this axis these protesters have a point and it is making all sense when seeing it from their standpoint. The point here being made by the protesters however is perfectly capable of writing out against the PM, in this case. If other than writing what then would it have to be to make their point? And walking with murderous intent is under any law on this earth a criminal intent. Politicians are people not only in power, but they do have some writing and thinking skills as well, and so are the people who vote for them. There is no unwritten democracy yet invented as institute for the people and by the people.












Al Aqsa an unholy stinkhole after last weekend riots on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.

21 April 2022

If you decide to play soccer inside the second holiest site in the Moslim religion you are not going to score very much points between the pillars of a cramped place like Al Aqsa. You willl also never become the next Renaldo who happens to play high profile soccer in a world class league. It is all delusional from the prayer courts here, or imagine the steed of Mohamed stretching his elongated legs from Muhammedan heaven on your panna football. Also, and if you decide on creating new year's eve with fire crackers inside the holy site of Al Aqsa Mosque interior this is not going to make much sense either as it is the holy month of Ramadan and not New Year's eve. And throwing with Molotov cocktails on the premises toward the entrances and through windows is also not what one would call peaceful praying to Allah. But the Palestinian youth decided in this year's Ramadan celebrations on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, that this was the perfect timing for doing things much more different than was ever the case in it's long history of second holiest place on earth for all Muslims. The Arab leaders in the Middle East, Jordan as head of Al Aqsa, immediately released firm statements against Jerusalem and it's government that this sort of provocations are not accepted, if you put two and two together, so to speak. On the one side one is obliged and should be critical of Israeli's Prime Minister, why the explanation of action by the Police was not beforehand, but afterwards, after all incidents of vandalism had already taken place by the Palestinian youth. Sit and wait was critical to restore order and calm again. The Prime Minister has paid the compliment back to the Arab leaders, or more specifically Jordan's Foreign Minister, that this was unacceptable to criticise Israel for the riots and the violence that took place when the Israeli Police had arrived at Al Aqsa. It was meant to restore calm, the PM said. (Interview with Christiane Amanpour, yesterday, 21042022) The Israeli Prime Minister currently is head of government in a coalition with the inclusion of Arab (Palestinian) parties. If your words are precise or surgical enough to patch up things for some reason this is looking as if some things are switched off from the real sound going around in the world on this bizarre act of vandalism by the Palestinians in the Al Aqsa mosque. Perhaps the political survival picture behind the Prime Minister was or did blur in the background for a moment when speaking to the world media last night on Christiane Amanpour. 'Doing good' just wasn't enough this time.

It will be interesting interrogating the Palestinian youth who were responsible for the 'self immolation' of Al Aqsa on Temple Mount in this year's Ramadan. The Palestinian people should form an opinion whether this is the political end or means to a Two- State solution for Palestinians and Israelis and to gain autonomy. The message it is sending out into the world is one of a very confused wording and visual. Defecation of one's own religious holiest site is a very serious reading.

Error: Al Aqsa Jerusalem third holiest place for Muslims, after Mekka and Medina.



Additional 24 April 2022:


Terminology with regard to the here above in the writing:

"On the one side one is obliged and should be critical of Israeli's Prime Minister, why the explanation of action by the Police was not beforehand, but afterwards, after all incidents of vandalism had already taken place by the Palestinian youth. Sit and wait was critical to restore order and calm again".

(Wikipedia): deep defence or elastic defence- Defence in depth (also known as deep defence or elastic defence) is a military strategy that seeks to delay rather than prevent the advance of an attacker, buying time and causing additional casualties by yielding space. Rather than defeating an attacker with a single, strong defensive line, defence in depth relies on the tendency of an attack to lose momentum over time or as it covers a larger area.

Attrition: Attrition warfare represents an attempt to grind down an opponent's ability to make war by destroying their military resources by any means including guerrilla warfare, people's war, scorched earth and all kind of battles apart from a decisive battle.[1] Attrition warfare does not include all kinds of Blitzkrieg or using concentration of force and a decisive battle to win. The side that reinforces their army at a higher speed will normally win the war. Clausewitz called it the exhaustion of the adversary." 

On the balance what is not always interpreted on the one side is: the military, while the other is always seen as 'the attackers' from whichever side from 'the field of violence'. In the public domain timing is always being seen as 'deliberate' delay and not as in elastic defence or attrition without battle scenes. 

Criticism of the PM of Israel is legitimate (military hierarchy thinking) when the violence is not being interpreted as to why there was delay before the Police had arrived in 'battle gear'. There is no reason also to make the outbreak look like 'random violence' and as if the PM doesn't understand 'deep defence' or 'attrition'. It is this reason why the world is assuming 'deliberate violence by the Israeli military' (on an annual recurrence).  












QE future projections

9 April 2022

Can the world rebuild itself on QE if the present time QE four or three decades theoretical history would come to an end? From the layman point it is hard to be sought for why or what can cause a restart of QE, especially if remedies are the new policies. The question is whether that means the world of QE has gone broke while we speak and breathe? (When set next on the scale of gold standard) QE is based on belief and is not an institution. How well can you trade QE into the real world of trading only? This is the good business and is serving the greater common long term good, as long as you believe in it's purpose or as means to an end. Where it seems to go quite more narrow as time literally flows out of the present time are the Central Banks and their accountability for maintaining wealth and wealthy nations. Here the currency flow is historical and regulated by tight monetary policies incidently on quatative real assets. The gold standard trade value is just as much historically quantative and then from here time and place will make it's own assessment as time passes from generation to generation, at least if nothing unpleasant happens e.g. a WW. Today there are many individual billionaires and yet it looks as if the world globally has gone broke. Why? A new scale perhaps, of inadequate gold reserves versus overtly printing money 'reserves'? In other words even when in the aftermath of e.g. WWIII the future projection is will still have to continue with another period or epoch of QE, and rebuild the world. How a little ignorance can change the world when effective or effectively applying simple logic! Especially when it is advisable not to cut down your tree of QE dependency (the EU).

Question is what could be a future QE projection in 2022 where we are now, facing a prospect of a WWIII with Ukraine and the Russian invasion? The answer might be that all industries in sum are a total value (x of a certain number of populations) exponential prospect for the coming ten years, and that divided by a fictional value of QE. QE could become more than theoretical or rhetorical at that point in the future time. Another big question then could be whether the present time historical currencies will still be circulating the world (or world trade markets). (I think I felt something kicking... That might just be the answer and visionary thinking of the projected and fantasy future.) The other side to the QE present time is that regional nations will pay out of their own money for unpleasant happenings... The balance cannot become oversimplified and take this as the new 'gold standard' or 'golden cross section line' of QE and historic wealth. (Not to confuse with golden ratio in architecture) Once again, gold has quantative value and the question what can give growth to this. Peace? A future projection of QE could than also mean that peace is imminent for the global world glue of nations. Perhaps what we are looking at in the world bygone is the vitality of currency and growth where the present time is failing to project or calculate. One reason could be that peace time is expensive and 'overcosting', and leaving no room for any spielraum or spillover (surplus?). If money or currency is de jure dead, this is probably what one can call 'the end' of the world as we know it. And before we know it another day has entered our universal understanding with QE mandates inside every town, city or country on the globe. Imagine that the future QE would still be needing the gold standard value once again, than there is no chance of another brand new world ever going to be possible under a historical use. Up to now QE is only 'easing' under the quantative gold value at a real 'fantastic' price, so to speak.

To be continued.












Prince Andrew on Instagram for a brief moment, not as shallow as what people make of him.

4 April 2022

A lost son returning home is the highest Christian value of penance, a sacrament. This was a message of 700 hundred words to give account of his memory in the Falklands war and remembering what this had done to him as a young man when he confronted a moment of how quickly life can pass away in an instant. He faced death in the face and in cold sweat everything froze from then on. In his message on Instagram, the Duchess of York's account, sunday morning, what was striking from the full text was that Prince Andrew is not a hollow man as we have come to believe after the sex abuse case against him by Ms Virginia Guiffrie that she had filed against him. It was a good question by the Duchess and to put this forward to her ex husband Prince Andrew on a day like this, especially when he alone can tell the story of this real experience in the Falklands war. And what was even more striking here was the Prince his contemplative words on what war means in our modern days or times wherever there is conflict and human suffering. He prays, is what the message says, fervently for those in places of war and conflict. In one article on sunday on the Guardian UK he also had used very clear words on his thoughts for the people in Ukraine. He wept, is what it says in the article on The Telegraph UK. But no one gets carried away by the Prince his sudden empathy for the world in places where war is 'the failure of peace'. He is holden life at 61 a sacred sacrament through belief and faith in peace and not in war as the supreme solution in world conflicts. For him having been long known as a friend to the peadophile Mr Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and over sexual abuse allegations, the global audience may take offense from the more 'changed man' image of Prince Andrew. Above everything else in memo is Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. Was he found guilty in court of any wrongdoing in his sexual abuse case? It is fitting in the tradition of his upbringing that he can also 'come back' from wandering off into the wilderness where temptation had held him by the heels and in the end pierced his Achilles tendon.

Like T.E. Lawrence in Seven pillars of wisdom, perhaps it is with Prince Andrew time for self reflect. From his 700 words text he has showed how time can change fast throughout a span of a few decades long, and then to meet with the real vision of life itself, but especially as a member of Royal England. England still is at the heart and middle of the modern day world, as was recently demonstrated by Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge in the Caribbeans. After many decades when the world was changing after WWII still there are old conservative voices in the colonials for independence and now are finding new impetus in a more globalized world to meet that threshold. Among other things, e.g. slavery reparations and indigenous rights expansion. If currency follows wisdom it might be the right way for all who want or seek independence from the kingdom and monarch as Head of State. Independence in Ukraine however is another historical vision. This could take years to study how to stop the war in Ukraine with Russia in a peace settlement that will last. After the war broke out on 24 February five to six weeks ago many had made the effort to quickly end the war and have mediated with Russia and Ukraine on a one on one basis. Emmanuel Macron, France President, and Prime Minister Naftali Bennett of Israel, both men had left no chance at this when on the ground the bombing and chaos was ongoing as they spoke. China and Turkey also in their efforts made tirelessly calls for peace and peace talks (in Istanbul or Ankara). What we are missing is the understanding where all good intentions by several Heads of State, or global leaders, will take the world now five and almost six weeks later. Russia is struggling with disrespect from it's peers in the global industrial world, and peace now more than ever in Ukraine seems truly fictional after all the atrocities in this war. It is this reason why when reading on sunday how Prince Andrew wept for the atrocities taking place in Ukraine as we speak, why this is actually the first chill of the new world to come. England still is at the center of the world, if we can remember...

To be continued.












Simple observation: WW3?

24 March 2022

There is still no peace agreement or the start of a peace process between Ukraine and Russia reached, making this the fourth week since the war of an invasion by Russia broke out on 24 February last month, officially. Rumours go around that we could be heading toward another WW, if talks of peace fail, just any time soon. WW3? And the choice of battleground is not just in Ukraine, but will be on the western half of our western civilized world, where world against world will presumably do battle over the freedom of the Ukrainian people (43.13 million). Witnesses when speaking of the situation 'overthere' in Kyiv are saying that no one wants to really see this for real and what is happening 'overhere'. Today Nato has stated that it will come to Ukraine's aid with Military, humanitarian, financial reinforcements, but that no soldiers will never enter Ukraine, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said and that more soldiers, jets, combat ships and submarines will be deployed. (Quoted from the Jerusalem Post headline of article today: NATO coming to Ukraine's aid: Military, humanitarian, financial reinforcements. Though he said soldiers will never enter Ukraine, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said that more soldiers, jets, combat ships and submarines will be deployed.) Could this mean that peace is out of the present time equation? Simple observation and even from any angle is that a WW3 cannot become, surely, part of helping Ukraine against the Russian aggression and that the west is risking to bring an end to it's own civilized world? That, in it's fact, could take centuries to rebuild another and won't be seen or realized in our x- generation time. The thought is abhorrently getting closer however, if let's say President Vladimir Putin would decide the unthinkable. Could this war have been fought differently, you imagine you would ask in the aftermath and when in astonishment realizing it was all over for the west? With democracy buried under the debris and rubble of Europe's old streets what used to be parliaments and Member States. One cannot help the melodrama at the bare thought of a possible breakout of WW3 on our half on the European continent.

But there is still more drama to come along with the coming days and uncertainty of how to proceed exactly to more aggression from Russia, one defence- Nato- and the other mass offensives. Apparently there is also a new world order coming as we speak, so said US President Joe Biden this week. If the Russian President Mr Putin continues the war of currency exchange to pay in Roubles instead of US or Euro for oil and gas supplies we are possibly looking at the first signs what you could describe as WW3 and a new world order. While the west is moving horizontally, Mr Putin decides it was time to move more vertically and go for the heart of all the world: the monetary powers. Personally I am left feeling rather sad how everything turned to the dark side in our part of the world. By an instant, when the ink on the settlement of Prince Andrew and Ms Virginia Guiffrie wasn't even dry yet, when the invasion by Russia happened almost overnight. And Covid-19 also was pushed immediately to the shady background in past sentence to make place for the next battleground in the same year and time. What can the ASEAN countries say about the western civilization and witness the selfdestruction that is everything but a projection of their own industrial minds? In a worst case scenario one might look back and say where all the survivors of the west will go to after WW3. The last emperor? (Referring to the opening/ end scene when the former emperor had to become like one of the workers in a rural area when everything had changed to the 'people's republic of China.) How times have changed since Tiananmen Square when the student- led demonstrations were held and one student had stood before the soldiers and tanks and then made global news all in the name of 'peaceful demonstrations' white flag. Archives called it a massacre (Wikipedia). Many students in 2022 also do not want war or a WW3 and are popping up here or there individually during certain meetings between the G7, Nato and EU, or other organisations, with mini- protests, and are then quickly removed by the security guards from the plenary hall. It is not too late and immoral to want peace, if instant logic still does exist in March 2022. The military is never a subjective plan, but objective and logic, or in layman (sixth grade) words: it is beta and not alpha. News just in on Twitter: "Joe Biden on Thursday night declared that Nato would respond "in kind" if Vladimir Putin resorted to using chemical weapons against Ukraine."











Not the easiest job as PM to have right now. His critics have a dominant voice in Israel.

10 March 2022

The Prime Minister of Israel Naftali Bennett is becoming something of a Phantom of the opera mediator between Ukraine and Russia. When he returned from Moscow saturday night after his meeting with German Chancellor Mr Scholz in Germany, back home to Tel Aviv, the Israeli public had been scratching the back of their head over his blitz trip. The Jerusalem Post reported after the PM take off that this was coordinated with Washington, Germany and Ukraine. Let us not forget where the war in Ukraine stood on saturday last week 4 and 5 March. 2022 As it now is looking after it's fifteenth day between Russia and Ukraine, this is not looking as if any particular country will be harvesting vintage grapes this year. Also and even if Mr Bennett could mediate calm between the Russian President Vladimir Putin and the President of Ukraine Mr Volodymyr Zelensky, that is still a harvest of sour grapes every time he returns home to his prime ministership, the people of Israel see as illegitimate and that Mr Bennett is not the real prime minister of Israel. No one voted for him to be prime minister, so many comments say in the Jerusalem Post comment box under articles. But in a time like the moment where indiscriminate bombing of children's hospital or other utilities in Ukraine, it is interesting how people perceive the prime minister in Israel. That hasn't changed since 13 June 2021 when Mr Bennett was inaugurated as prime minister of Israel, succeeding the former PM Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. A poll after Mr Bennett's visit to Moskou with meeting the Russian President Mr Putin, 20% had voted for the prime minister as having done the right thing to see the Russian President and try to mediate, while 50% voted for the former prime minister, that he would have done a better job at this. A menacing 30% still made the nine old month prime minister look very bad... 50% Voted in favour of the former PM is saying that only if you have been for two decades long the PM of Israel that you could do the job well. Nine months 20% would be alarming to the former PM, now opposition leader, that this was done in a short period of time. It is also not a matter of opinion.

The comments read that the PM of Israel doesn't decide anything by himself in government. Whether Defense, the Economy, and Judicial, he is literally almost as if he isn't there to be prime minister. When the prime minister Naftali Bennett decided he would go to Moskou and meet with President Vladimir Putin this was the week of a hot battle ongoing. Let us also not forget that this novice prime minister is in fact a political leader of a political party (Yamina) and has done so for more than twelve years. This was his time as a 'matured' politician made ready to one day become prime minister. What no one had expected was that this would be sooner done than anticipated, and by the looks of it, even by Mr Naftali Bennett himself. Men and women in politics in Israel he had allowed himself to be tutored throughout all the years of learning and working hard to get there... closer every time to his end goal. But the prime minister would not be good at doing Mr Zelensky's job, and vice verse. The impression one gets when carefully listening to the PM's words in the news (mostly JP), the idea is that he is a high tech man and seems to always be looking for whatever he is thinking, doing or acting upon, formatting. Again today carefully he is treading towards the UN Mr Antonio Guterres, Secretary General, and discussed very little or brief on the situation in Ukraine, but always stressing the realities (bloodshed or suffering of the people trapped in the war situation) that are or need the highest priorities for all countries who want to help. The scoring points do not seem to be the PM his priorities at home or in any future election. Nor was this important against the opposition leader of Likud, who was asked by Mr Bennett to be the special envoy or mediator at the start of the war in Ukraine, two weeks ago, 22 February. No one just yet knows what lesson is to be learned from the here above on the PM of Israel. Geopolitical decisions are made in Washington and not in Israel. It is my impression that the PM of Israel, Mr Naftali Bennett, is fully aware of that fact.












21 st Century, 9th day of the war in Ukraine.

4 March 2022

We are talking metrics and milimeters still aren't we, if e.g. Nato will protect every cm of the war conflict with Russia if and when the latter decides to cross Nato's red lines for Europe or any country / Member State in Nato? You have to use the mm instead, or do it wrong by a wide gap of centimeters. The biggest nuclear plant has been attacked by Russia early friday morning in Zaporizhzhia. Nato condemns the Russian aggression on the nuclear plant it has set to a blaze. In the news this morning we can also read that Russia has stopped the gas flow Yamal to Europe as of today. European peace is coming to an end in the 21st century, ironically in the digital age of global progress. As war peace is not built on logic and intent. That is the strange paradox all classics have been studying since the days of Oedipus Rex. (Playwright Euripides and Sophocles) I am referring to it's first inception and age, and how in the 21st century AI is our only guide to intelligent decisions. The Russian military build up before the invasion on 22 February 2022, some sources had called a massive build up presence and also that the Russian President was preparing for an invasion of the kind of scale we have not witnessed in recent history. Donbass was under complete Russian military... But then in the first hours of the Ukraine invasion on 22 February the Russian military was already struggling with it's proceedings of the invasion in Ukraine, and on top of everything it was the Ukranian President who in an instant had turned to the king hero of Ukraine in the world. A great achievement in the 21st century in February 2022 in Donbass. Many in the news during the days of 'massive' invasion also kept saying that Mr Putin had made a grave mistake and miscalculated his chances with the invasion of Ukraine. Yes, timing was bad to put in one word or one 'massive' strike. And these are observations from a thousand miles away from Ukraine simple point of view, without any relation to connectivity analogue or digital with the rest of the world. You just observe and listen to the news.

What Europe should ask itself this morning is where is it's heimat? In this part of the world peace has been since WWII a sanctity, or similar to what is considered the highest moral good for all and everyone living on the continent. Military ethics was strikken out for good from the modern day mankind and International Membership as the family of nations. The moment after 1945 was celebrated and sublime, as if Kant and Hegel were put on the pedestal in an instant for their classical hard work of a universal mankind footprint to walk the earth in future generations. Softly softly Europe like the twins of Rome were suckling the milk from the wolf and had turned it to a global institution for global relations and more growth (percentage wise). Europe does understand it's longer relationship however with the bureaucracy of a much older hierarchy especially when in a crisis that concerns their heimat. No, not really. More would be on the other side of the fence where the lusty grass is looking much more greener, after the fall of Russia. On the balance population growth is exponential in Europe & in the European Union alone. And only one percent lives of global industries and not living on income salaries. (Income rich) 99 % Lives on the minimum wage. (And not to mention here the percentage living under the poverty line) No, again, Europe cannot want destruction or a war starting in Ukraine. How is that part of the EU welfare plan for it's future generations? (Public and private sectors) In the end of the day it comes down to the little man and the big men, wages against policy makers, taking big decisions for the European Union and outside it's rim of steel circle. The Russian President is threatening with a nuclear war if Nato would attack it's sovereign territory. (Me love you long time, echo) Also, the Russian President seems to be struggling with his mental (or metal) health... Any way you care to look at this war doom scenario in Ukraine and the impact it has on Europe in the west, the point of going in against Mr Putin and his military presence in Ukraine is becoming more and more unclear. What is his position in his strategic plans? An ultimate position could never have been Europe. There is too much history between the two super powers, e.g. Tchaikovsky piano concerto 1. And many more waltzes (ladies & gentlemen of the finer laces and violets). From a personal touch on the German side perhaps for the German people who cannot remember it will be Ein lied geht um die welt by Franz Lehar, just because of the heimat- thing. In this part of the world democracy also means foodbanks... (UK Universal Credit System) If you don't know the Russian President personally or his financial support in your bank account, foodbanks and safety are all you will vote for to keep and be anti- war in Europe, period. Some secretly are thinking and saying, not true. You are elitist and secretly love/ admire the Russian President. Even without a penny (to eternity) from him. It's flowers, the flowers that bedazzles one, and the nutcrackers. Or maybe it's just grass and it's freshness after the winter?


Yours Truly,


..........................................................................................










There is a pause in Mr Putin's invasion of Ukraine tonight, or... we are fooled once again.

25 February 2022

Reading most of the news online or watching Youtube.com videoclips almost for the last five days tonight, there is still one thing on some their minds. Why invade Ukraine again after 2014 had come to an end conclusion with the taking of Crimea? Mr Putin has in the meantime threatened with the use of unprecedented force as not seen before in modern day history, only this week. His rhetoric is matching some of his projections he has announced as of monday morning and after signing the declarations of independence for two breakaway regions, Donetsk & Luhansk on monday evening. Today is friday, five days later and, without any disrespect, it is dangerous to underestimate Mr Putin models of military invasions, why has he not already arrived in Kyiv and subjugate the citizens of Ukraine and it's capital? One reason could be that he is a man of the finer arts and would want to preserve the costs for something else more important when keeping Ukraine under siege for a long period of time. Why destroy the architecture of the capital when you are trying to prove a point, with reference to a personal class or upper class military leader? Russia must get into the mood for knowing who it's leader is, and that after him there will not be again such suave leadership found under her wide skirt. This is all simple conjecture from afar when sitting comfortable in your armchair and writing about a war that no one has any idea yet where this will end up. It is indeed puzzling how the Russian President will materialize his goals, if it was only meant to get Ukraine subjugated to Russia's rule of law (to the west lawlessness). How can we get to be more intelligent without knowing Mr Putin personally or what he might be wanting to do with his second time invasion of Ukraine in the 21st century? Just take one good look at the man and watching him in his presidential role behind his chestnut wooden desk, announcing his terrible visions for Ukraine and if threatened he could also take on the world (in the west). Mr Putin, would he be assuming the greater things in life and find it attractive at this moment to sound and act apocalyptic and envisioning his personal touch in the coming of a new Jerusalem descending in his time as President of Russia?

Without being disrespectful, but wouldn't that be slightly blasphemous to the 'written apocalypse' as a devout Christian would see this? And if apocalyptic to darken the earth for a few days with the invasion of Ukraine, what then could be next to further his angelic mission on earth? The problem with Mr Putin is that he is capable to make such an assumption reality and believable, almost as if... you wanted it to be true. After all no one can forget the horror of Covid - 19 and it's death tolls, the first apocalyptic horse and rider? The world is a bad place in the 21st century, so Mr Putin is trying to say in so many words on monday this week. But he cannot do away with all the hypocrisy by his personal desire or ambitions, surely. The apocalypse is still a written document of happenings in the end days, according to the New Testament. Like the Hebraic Torah is also a written document, you can't just have ambitions on your own and proclaim a war on nations to prove that you are the Messiah. That is evolution of one's own mind and theory. (You might add doctrine) And not what the written apocalypse is saying in 'divine' end truth. War is a dirty business without paying attention to how the refugees will have to flee and no sanitary cabins are underway or going with them anywhere. That is the most homely truth also. And yet here it is: Russia invades Ukraine. Global protest is everywhere in major capitals of the world against the invasion of Ukraine. At this point some are doubting the Russian President his faculties or intelligence and call the invasion one of his biggest mistakes in history. Could the president have acted on a whim at the age of 69? Intersting view, especially when this time he is threatening with the use of nuclear weapons if must. Even to say that he made a mistake one can frown with the eyebrows, as Mr Putin was found for intriguing in the west and the general elections. Russia also has a space station MIR. Hardly a State actor, and who can go so far, even further than anyone else on the planet. But a meteorite, is he? Or, was he born to be a choir boy.












The Russian President Mr Vladimir Putin


25 February 2022



Title: End Balance.

If your war against Ukraine is apocalyptic, Mr President, is it true that you are a devout Christian and live a life of this orthodox piety and save the lives of only Christians and their cities (and perhaps it's brothers)?

Post Scriptum: ending all hypocrisy in the 21st century comes after the written apocalypse.


Yours truly,

......................................................................












After Russia signed two agreements yesterday evening with Donetsk and Luhansk.

22 February 2022

The Israeli PM in his own words always makes more sense when in a crisis. Because no matter how neutral as a super power when moving at this pace and 'rage', the crisis goes out throughout the whole region as this will also go through Europe. It is indeed also a crisis for Israel, depending on which straight diplomatic battle lines. In the PM's own words tonight in an article on the Jerusalem Post, "Israel’s Prime Minister Naftali Bennett instructed government ministers to maintain careful messaging and not to express opinions and interpretations on the situation, rather focusing on evacuating Israelis." This was after Foreign Minister, Yair Lapid, was misquoted earlier in the week on sunday. "Lapid’s words on Russia taken out of context by Channel 12 -While Yair Lapid was quoted as saying Israel would support sanctions against Russia, the Foreign Minister actually said they will wait and see, while adding that the Ukraine embassy may be moved."

How and when the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, would decide on his next move last week, wasn't what anyone had anticipated when he signed with the two breakaway regions, Donetsk & Luhansk, yesterday in the early evening (European time). The Russian President had made his move as sudden as in a surprise to everyone who (Nato) had been present at the borders and assessed these movements for a period of time (not to forget since 2014). If the Foreign Minister in Israel had spoken too early/ premature on their relationship with Russia, this would make it look as if the Russian President had already made a move to invade Ukraine. It is for the Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett wise to keep assessing the situation and focus primarily on the Jewish population when trapped inside Ukraine. Israel is facing for the first time it's International crisis with the super power east of their line, where the region of Iran is aligned with Russia and to the west the Mediterranean Sea. The Middle East will now have to keep close monitoring on how or if this might send a diplomatic tremor throughout the region, while Mr Putin has made Ukraine his battle zone today.

Naftali Bennet as the new Prime Minister of Israel will now with this crisis have his hands full on playing the part of a diplomatic battle line he has to secure. It will also be his first crisis in the region with super power Russia on an extreme wide scale.














Mr Alan Dershowitz, the accused.

26 January 2022

I agree that all sides must be heard, as Mr D. so fervently believes. It is a complex case and therefore all sides must be heard. With the absolute (not formal) truth nothing will or can be left out here. But this is as far as I (layman) can go with the understanding of something so remote from every day realities in the streets or in civil life everywhere in the world. But it isn't remote from realities when being labelled as an International Trafficking scandal in the Epstein- Maxwell abuse case. The 'streets' however leading to the Epstein mansions and Island have or must have been seen by the suspected clients and friends as a geography of their own on the planet. Jeffrey Epstein is analogue to sex trafficking crimes, as is Ms Ghislaine Maxwell. Friends or clients have knowledge of these roads that led to Mr Epstein's properties and territories. Remember the Guyana tragedy? Waco? It should make friend or client suspicious when having been part or any part during the time where the sex crimes were taking place. Mr Dershowitz can reconstruct time and place when establishing facts in crime scenes and to also when establishing the truth, we hope. When a friend, the suspicion equally befalls him/ her in the above. One of the reasons when a much closer friend, aka Prince Andrew and now citizen Andrew Mountbatten- Windsor, is unable with the adversity of Sisyphus, to prove his innocence from close intimate friendship. It is another case for a lawyer as a personal consigliere to Jeffrey Epstein. Let us put it differently. How is it possible for Mr Dershowitz to prove his complete innocence from client/ friend to Mr Epstein? Others have also done it and were there in this private world of Jeffrey Espstein's International sex trafficking business! In comparison to the Prince Andrew story the global community knows now that he was Mr Epstein's friend and all of Britain also knows that the prince and Ms Maxwell were old friends. With that the 'client' bit is pushed out of the Epstein sex womb and trafficking orbit. On both cases it is separately very complex and there is no softer judgement on either. Mr Dershowitz was a professional, client or friend? Prince Andrew was a friend and with much more emphasis put on 'personal friend'. And it is in particular much harder for the professional to prove his innocence, is my understanding.

But from formal understandings it is that Mr Dershowitz must be heard and give him room enough to tell the public of his true relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and secondly why this can't be related to Ms Virginia Guiffrie in one and the same breath. Also equally important are physical attributes and one can say the attribute on Mr Dershowitz in his younger man (40/45) days gave the impression of a somewhat attractive professional and lawyer. He looked his part perfectly. On the other side the Epstein empire was an International sex trafficking ring, which could easily have been seductive and misleading to friend and client/ lawyers. The young girls or minors were also in the same vicinity at the time of visits by friend or client. "... But I kept my boxershort on," is indicating something physical was done here for the lawyer, professional, friend, and maybe had switched to either a very good friend to Mr Epstein or to 'client'. It is not Mr Dershowitz who could be a prominent member of Mr Epstein's sex parlour with minors or young girls, as a client to Mr Epstein or was it? By which code of conduct accordingly with the Bar Association in the US? Incidently Mr Dershowitz cannot deny his presence in the Epstein private estates when visiting. The sex trafficking was a serious crime scene of International Sex Trafficking and this makes it for everyone visiting the Epstein territories or estates a feasible suspect. And Ms Guiffrie was one inside this International Sex Trafficking ring crime scene.

To be continued.










19 January 2022

Other news in Britain: will the Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, resign on the 'Party- gate'?
In both cases the wisdom that is most acute to the people of Britain is that it is too late for abstainers and ascetics.

One would also think how Britain is known in general of being people with a stiff upperlip and inclined to extreme show of self control. And maybe, occasionally, find ways to show cruelty and neighing toward excessive behaviour and going out of control completely. But then there is also remorse, from their Christian belief or even pious upbringing. Timing is not their best choice when waking up from the horn of plenty/ plenties... And realize that like other mortals the British are just as anyone else in the world and not as Gothic as they would like to end with and be immortal. As is the rainworm in the green grass after the rain. Leaving also behind forever an invisible steep tower once theirs to be or have, now gone from the point of view of the human eye and mind, out of sight, out of mind. The myth that was the reign of Queen Elizabeth II, after Prince Andrew her second son became a Maverick, humbled by his fall from the world and his own, the oldest monarchy, in England.

Or hope that he will be triumphant, some other day, some other time, and remake his own history as prince or king Mountbatten- Windsor in a world of his own.
("Some other day, some other time," quoted from Alan Parsons Project song "Some other time".)








Ghislaine Maxwell was found guilty in a court in New York on five charges. How is this now looking bad for Prince Andrew?

30 December 2021

It is the trillion dollar question how bad the verdict in court against Ghislaine Maxwell will be for Prince Andrew in the coming days or weeks. One thing is certain that after the 2019 interview on Newsnight with Emily Maitlis he has said that it wasn't so much being friends with Jeffrey Epstein, but in fact that his friend was Ghislaine Maxwell. The plus-1, so to speak? This was a terrible way of ending 2021 new year's eve for both people and their families. Luck will have it that Prince Andrew has spoken the truth from the beginning, and as we all know that is what it is indefinitely. Ms Maxwell was found guilty and the media attention of course at the moment is high. And also what most newspapers are already saying is what most people are thinking, that for Prince Andrew this time will have no escape route or find any out of his civil case of sexual abuse of a minor, then Ms Virginia Roberts and now married to Mrs Guiffrie. But there are no new facts that have been emerging since August last summer, about Ms Guiffrie's claims in the civil case against Prince Andrew. His innocence has also not changed it's story or truth. The trillion dollar still remains their option against the Duke of York, that he will be called and held accountable over these allegations. From the public's point of view it doesn't seem that the Duke of York has much to unnerve this case by a single whiff. Where the stench is coming from the public has no clue at the moment. A Prince fallen from grace is not the likely outcome anyone in England is waiting for either, especially after these last few months when the people have again learned to love their queen, Queen Elizabeth II, and appreciated her Christmas message interaction of a few days ago this month.

After a few months of absence Prince Andrew is now back in the news over his sexual abuse allegations by the plaintiff Ms Guiffrie. People think now that Ghislaine Maxwell will try to name a few names to reduce her sentence (not yet) if she goes to prison. But Prince Andrew his name cannot be on her list... Oeps! Ms Roberts and Jeffrey Epstein had signed an agreement saying that she will not sue any of 'his clients' and this included the Prince/ princes. The public therefore will say that his name is not on the list, but wasn't he a client to Jeffrey Epstein? His place was convenient and Prince Andrew had stayed at his house on many occasions... Innocence is running thin or to thin air here and getting hot in the room for maneouvres, as is always the case of a legal case against a defendant. In 23 hours and fifty minutes it will be 1 January 2022. What can we hope for at this point for Prince Andrew if his name accidently pops- up on the GM list of powerful men and their sexual visits to Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita world? It was striking that during the holidays Prince Andrew has kept himself invisible, while the other royals were engaging with the public either through COP26 or Christmas. What we are missing is the element of truth in his story now with Ghislaine Maxwell as Prince Andrew's friend, and that she has been found guilty on 5 charges from 6. It was sex trafficking that is making this story intriguing but then not in a good way. The public at large in Britain does think that Prince Andrew did engage in sexual misconduct with the young girl in the photograph. Her name: Virginia Roberts- Guiffrie and now 38 years old.

The monarchy is holding on to the realm as ever and even in these adverse times awaiting perhaps the anticlimax to the sexual abuse case/ story on Prince Andrew. Next year Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is expecting to celebrate her platinum jubilee. And that is expected to be more than pomp and glory to the public in the world. 










Prime Minister Boris Johnson, 17 December 2021.
This news just in on social media Youtube.com
"PM 'accepts verdict' after by-election drubbing."

17 December 2021

(Personal op unedited)


What does the PM want himself? A clear answer is not to resign but to get on with the booster as not enough people have got theirs yet. Prime Minister Johnson also made very clear in this interview that resigning, question of the journalist if he would resign, from his reaction is not what he wants. He also has been trying to say this much as there is a subtle difference between politicians and politics and that it doesn't serve any public service to have those two submerged to one squash in the press. North Shropshire has now gone to the LIberal Democrats in the by-election and the Tories have lost their seat. The Telegraph is saying this was extraordinary. Or to put it differently as Prince Andrew in his interview with Emily Maitliss in 2019: "What was this all about?" Something is taking everything out for the outside thinking of the box, so it seems and staying also very invisible to the public, what has now been coined as the Partygate. And when we say the public let's not forget that the global view has now been also following the 25 cents coin videoclip that went immediately viral across the planet. If you are familiar with tossing the coin through a box and watch the video. Allegra Stratton, spokeswoman to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, is now famous for asking "What is the answer?.." To the question if there was a party in Nr 10 Downing Street on 18 December 2020, the time when Covid19 restrictions when in the whole of the UK were in Lockdown. One year later how many countries are not making the same mistake with the Omicron variant, or is there a distinct sense of difference when this is not a party but Conference? The whole idea of Prime Minister Johnson resigning came two weeks ago with the breakout of the Partygate at Nr 10. And the Wallpapergate...

Of course, there is nothing new here that hasn't been before. During Covid19 the Prime Minister has always had his high and low moments and with no one who had thought of him resigning. The death toll rate is one example and increasing morbidity rate over two years since the outbreak of the Covid19 pandemic in January 2020. Next year in January 2022 we will all be giving up the hope that this will be over soon. Or to put it more in a medical message: by January 2022 hope as life will become debilitating slowly and gradually increased. No western democracy and government will think it wise to have the prime minister resign who has been with the people and country from the beginning of this pandemic and battling just as hard to stay safe and alive from the virus and it's variants. That would only make a flimsy impression on the government how it can ignore the lockdown and restrictions by sending the people to vote for a man to lead the country again, since they do not trust the current prime minister as leader of the country. The people care for a strong leadership to deal with the national interest (Brexit) and also that it can't be very easy for the prime minister to fight Covid19 as a feral disease since the virus had escaped the Wuhan lab in China in October 2019. But Prime Minister Boris Johnson, so they say, hasn't got a clue what he is doing and more so what sort of mischievous his Party members are up to when he turns his back into a wallpaper UK Prime Minister. But maybe we haven't a clue either? (Coy or coquettish) So, let's fill in the gap. What the Prime Minister is very serious about this morning is not to resign. For some reason that shows enough commitment from him as a man and prime minister who stays confused and when under pressure he wants to play a game of Scrabble. As the global leader in the G7 group playing Scrabble comes across as catching butterflies after one has been declared absolutely sane and harmless to his next of kin. Rumours!










Six months after his inauguration Naftali Bennett is still Prime Minister of Israel.

14 December 2021

The Prime Minister is looking at an interesting last quarter of 2021 with a visit to the UAE, on sunday 12 December the day before 13 December 2021. Another historic moment at the same time and hour also was at Abu Dhabi with the Dutch Grand Prix F1- driver, Max Verstappen, winning the world championship from Lewis Hamilton, a seven times world champion F1- driver. What thunderous ear- splitting it must have been for Arab neighbour UAE to be at the central stage of the world for this day! It was announced on sunday that the prime minister was going to stay overnight in a Hotel and not accompanied by journalists on this first official trip, due to the Covid19 pandemic restrictions and with the latest on the Omicron variant. On tuesday the prime minister will as usual be back in Israel to hold meetings in the Knesset debates. And his visit did not sweep up half the planet with cheering and uproar as did the battle for world championship F1 finale between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton last sunday evening in Abu Dhabi and was indeed less so at federal level. The BBC News did mention yesterday that Prime Minister Naftali Bennett was the first State of Head in Israel to visit the United Arab Emirates and in overview that this was a historic moment for the Emirates and Israel. In the Middle East things are being done differently between all the Heads of State when on official visits or a State visit. We have a tendency to forget that sometimes there is another way in the rest of the world and not doing things the way that we know in some other part, east, west, south or north, e.g. in Sweden or Denmark. A brief example: "Former Immigration Minister in Denmark Sentenced to Prison for Separating Couples. Inger Stojberg was sentenced to two months' incarceration after being found by a court to have illegally ordered the separations of married migrant couples in which at least one person was underage." Diplomacy, so one can see by example, can have it's embarrassing shortcomings in some parts of the western world.

Israel what it is known for in the last three decades is it's military superiority in the Middle East. A visit by the Prime Minister of Israel at this point in it's young history of 73 years therefore cannot be seen as a light visit to the UAE, and also with the latter as a host to countries Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia in (the last) two weeks. When Foreign Minister Yair Lapid and the President Mr Isaac Herzog went to London for a quick visit to meet with the UK Prime Minister, Mr Boris Johnson, two weeks ago, and to urge the prime minister not to allow Iran to dominate the JCPOA talks held in Vienna a week ago, there was a clear direction made by Israel that it will do anything to halt Iran from aquiring the U- enrichment of over 20%, as it said many times over in the news on the Jerusalem Post. We have been hearing these concerns around the world made by the Israelis at a very high level chicane with allies in the US and the European Union plus the UK. But it was the Prime Minister, and being on the same team, who overtook the race and has now made another visit at lightning speed and seconds to also talk to the UAE about where Israel stands on Iran, as the threatening power in the Middle East region. (This is by assumption by the author) In memo: is this not the same man who some consider a boy- prime minister in Israel? Or, he could also be seen as the wolf in sheep's clothing... We have to curb the tendency of prematurely think this young Prime Minister is none of these things, but rather is being the man you can never find among the more callous of hearts and minds in the world. Anyone care to remember COP26, when the prime minister was adamant that the Energy Minister, Mrs Elharrar, should get in and have her say as well or he would walk away? Mrs Elharrar is visibly disabled and in a wheelchair. This was the same man who had earlier been seen on a photo talking to the Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton, the day before. The Prime Minister his heart could have turned to gold overnight from all the new sensations in his prime ministerial life, something he had never done before and must have been overwhelming at one point. I think this extraordinary.

Wachting the prime minister in a warm greeting of the UAE’s leader Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, equally was the most extraordinary photo shot yesterday to see in the news, that this is till the same man that he has been for the last six months as prime minister of Israel. Christians say that you find the camel through a needle's eye that it is something very hard. Prime Minister Bennet's lightning visit to the UAE last sunday to monday the next day is one through the needle's eye if you follow miracles and pilgrimages in our world today. Fighting for the future of the Middle East and the countries in it's periphery perhaps is requiring a man like the prime minister, and who is not stirring any darkness in a man's heart, brows or blood.










Lectori Salutem II


(News Source the Jerusalem Post)


JCPOA End Talks November 2021 in Vienna.



2 December 2021


The talks in Vienna between Iran, the P4+1 and US will conclude this sunday on 5 December 2021. Israel's Foreign Minister Mr Yair Lapid and it's president Mr Isaac Herzog adjacently have met with the UK PM Mr Boris Johnson and the President of France Mr Emmanuel Macron, from stopping Iran returning to the JCPOA deal, aka the agreement.
Prime Minister Naftali Bennett today on 2 December reiterates that Israel is still on high alert.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------










Prime Minister Naftali Bennett first test of a global crisis: Iran returning to the JCPOA.

30 November 2021

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett today calling via video message on the world powers in Vienna not to re-enter the JCPOA with Iran, as this is posing a constant existential threat to Israel and the Middle East. In his own words his message was clear rhetoric to make his point as effective possible when speaking from his Office in Israel and addressing the world powers from a significant distance. After the first round of talks European Chief of Staff of Joseph Borrell, Enrique Mora, later on in the evening when he walked out to leave the Palace Coburg had only this to say to the journalists waiting outside, that there was no immediate urgency for the next talks and that a time date had not yet been set. Tuesday today talks resumed with Iran and the P5 plus 1 world powers, making each talk the next level at very high level after 2018 when the US had exit the JCPOA under the Administration of Republican former president, Mr Donald Trump. As it is now astonishing to return after three years to get back to the original idea and deal in the JCPOA it was then, when seen it from today's perception, the last convulsion in the old world order last days. Economic sanctions against Iran from these talks will be remembered for it's highest level chamber and that this was also not equivalent to any pre- talks earlier this year. If and when the next level of talks will take place it could be very well that Prime Minister Naftali Bennett will not be in Office anymore, but the alternate prime minister, Mr Yair Lapid, now Foreign Minister. Also today Mr Yair Lapid has called for a military threat to stop Iran, currently he is talking to President Emmanuel Macron of France. The world powers are plagued by the question which hour is more eminent, that of the human or nothing at all. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett perhaps is already making his assessment on how to react whether it will be his own vision or that of the 'old world order view' of Israel since it's creation in 1948, on either outcome of the talks held yesterday and today in Vienna this week. The former PM, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, was to believed to have served his country and nation to the end of his Office this year (and who was a majority Right- Wing political Party for decades) after Naftali Bennett took Office with the coalition Yesh Atid, a centrist Left- Wing Party. When leaving the JCPOA by the former US president, Mr Donald Trump, it was Mr Netanyahu who had never imagined a different prime minister in Israel to take this from him three years later. From this convulsion it was the only way to show leadership in a time and height of a globalised world exponentially wide and was also expected in every part to continue indefinitely in the old world order. The future now proves to be more natural and capricious.

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett his idea of the nature one needs to know another in the region is intention. He misses the scale of intention in the JCPOA talks and if this will be sufficient to annihilate the threat that Iran poses on both the Middle East region and Israel. A new world order between world powers, whether in the G7 or G20, is not his idea of automatic answer and then feel that something will change 2000 km away from Israel and be forever good to all peoples living in this part of the world, and where time is statics (not static). In his own words 1 August this year, there are no automatic answers to Iran, as if the prime minister had his first premonition of a more astonishing fact that Iran would return to the JCPOA and it's sanctions would be lifted under conditions that were at a very high level preconditioned. Also today there was a discussion panel with some of NATO Members and the question was about NATO 2030 and beyond. Prime Minister Bennett could never finish his plan, if this is what he considers a different answer to Iran, and meet the future military politics in the global world when he will leave Office in 2023. One gets the impression that the world will have only two global businesses, one military and the other is constant growth of populations. How can the prime minister strike a balance that will meet the demand of future politics and military policies at a global level, this week, next week or next month? Balance also will not be the same idea as in the old world order, mass and military design. Trust for nations as one understands it will be or is decided more from the military logistics and it's global military markets. And that can be anything from a computer chip to aviation or maritime engines. That could have been his world if Prime Minister Bennett only had more time for maturity as prime minister. And at the moment it is also not very clear whether he will be able to keep out his own ideologies from the Left- extreme Left and Center Right coalition for much longer. Or he has the thick skin of a white elephant being both true and mythical. Fact remains after today's talks in Vienna to resume where it was 'interrupted' yesterday and also on the other side of the Asian Middle World that Israel and it's government of change after Mr Netanyahu his prime ministership will have to meet urgently and decide which part they do want to take in geopolitical groups and institutions. Will it stay conventional pre- emptive strikes or a new military design in the Middle East by Israel?











Lectori Salutem

29 November 2021

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett calling on the world powers not to re-enter the JCPOA with Iran today in Vienna, as this is posing a constant existential threat to Israel and the Middle East.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------








Karin Elharrar, heroine of COP26.

3 November 2021

Who is Karin Harrar? She is the Energy Minister in the coalition government in Israel and led by Prime Minister Naftali Bennett. The coalition government as it is now called as of 13 June 2021 has an agreement between Yair Lapid of Yesh Atid and Naftali Bennett of Yamina to lead this government by rotational prime ministership. In 2023 the agreement says that Mr Lapid will become prime minister, and making a new historic change in the country from what the previous leadership called his long career establishment. That may not be any longer the only truth if the State Budget passes into law this week before friday, 5 November 2021. For Naftali Bennett as prime minister time has not been for him an easy ride, flowing naturally from winning a majority to leading the people of Israel as their next prime minister. But after four months in Office this fragility has made up for him equally in more than one way... Paradoxically. His meeting with the US President, Mr Joe Biden, in the White House, next to meeting with a major regional leader from Egypt, Mr Abdel Fattah Al- Sisi, and when also meeting President Vladimir Putin in Sochi Russia, the people of Israel if observant will by now know how the prime minister has done so far since he took over the prime ministership from Benyamin Netanyahu, the former leader and prime minister of Israel. But one different timeline has made it for this prime minister also new to politics in Israel, is that his strategic vision is not only how well he is doing with the other leaderships in the world, as written here above, or regional, but more that he is paying personal attention how his government can make a difference in Israel. Israelis and Arabs make up both 9 million people living in Israel, of which 3 million are Arabs. The coalition of Left- Wing and Right- Wing desperately needed a coalition that represents the whole of Israel's society, by which it is now made and going strong in all it's sectors, segments and colourful fibres. Naftali Bennett has taken especially care also on the gender equality issue with this government,which has been under the previous prime minister, mr Benyamin Netanyahu, nothing less of the present time change government, and the all inclusiveness he holds up, so it seems from some of his coalition partners and colleagues in Knesset, close to his vision how Israel now should be self reflecting itself in Real Time and it's 21st century realities. Meet Karin Harrar (news feed internet): "The new Minister of National Infrastructures, Energy, and Water Resources was born to Moroccan Jewish parents, and she is the first Israeli minister with a disability due to her suffering from muscular dystrophy."

A delegation of 140 Israelis had left on sunday, 31 October on the first day of the week (this is in Israel on sunday), for the Conference of Parties in Scotland Glasgow this week. The Climate Change conference was held in the building of SEC in Scotland. (Internet: The Scottish Event Campus (SEC) is a world class venue in the heart of Glasgow) When a conference is held on Climate Change venues somehow the global public is to believe to hold up the idea of a very high standard of meetings for all participants and members. It is if not the highest of standards social venue on the planet, and expected to be representatives of industries and citizens to saving the planet and humanity (inclusiveness under agreement by OECD and signed in France in 2015) from a disastrous future of global asphyxiation. Karin Harrar had expected nothing less at this high social event where she was to be holding her speech on Energy and Water resources in a sustainable way for future generations, whether this was in Israel, the Middle East or when meeting the obligations with the rest of the world on the topic of Climate Change. It was therefore a painful experience when the Minister of Energy and Water resources could not find any accessibility entrance at SEC when a wheelchair was her only way to get into the building. The Israeli prime minister then had to stand by the Energy Minister and threaten not to attend on tuesday at the conference if the organizers would not allow the Minister to take part. Mr Bennett kept his cool however and was visibly grateful to 'the intervention' by the UK Prime Minister, Mr Boris Johnson, who had quickly made the entrance still accessible to the Energy Minister the next day on tuesday, Mrs Karin Harrar. And the UK Prime Minister had also renewed his apologies more than one or two times when meeting with the Israeli delegation on this unfortunate matter. Based on what the UK Environment Secretary, Mr George Eustice, later on monday said to the BBC, the day of the organisational embarrassment of no accessibility of wheelchair entrances in the building, that Israel had not 'communicated' the issue of accessibility to wheelchair needs of the Minister with muscular dystrophy prior to the visit of the Israeli delegation attendance. Which does not compliment in any way the Climate Change high venue and global social standards, on security of the planet and humanity. It is where you put the apology to the Israeli Prime Minister, the Energy Minister and the delegation, when coming to Scotland on this occasion in good faith. From a design point of view what is the Environment Secretary trying to suggest with communicating the special needs of wheelchair entrances in advance? Neither architects and engineers can change the design of the SEC building at this point of it's completeness... (compare to Bundes Reichstag Berlin - Norman Foster partners) It took an upsetting experience for the Energy Minister and the delegation to convince the security that she should enter by wheelchair and doing so for 2 hours long without success. Statutory laws cannot go lost in communications on entrances to disabled persons and wheelchair accessibilties throughout the 'building physics' of SEC. The Israeli prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, on tuesday, 2 November, was heard saying to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, how this lesson should be for all to take on board when again there will be another high social standard conference like this one. (Not his exact words quoted here above) We expect that the UK would be more compassionate under the circumstances of no entrance to any disabled person in a wheelchair and trying to find an entrance to get in time for her speech at the conference. Because it is distressful and painfully embarrassing. Israel and it's prime minister however kept an all inclusiveness from their point of view thoroughly and absolute.

ErrorKarin Elharrar.











Will it make the economy stronger? 3130 New homes in the West Bank.

27 October 2021

Just to be on the safe side: "No ideologies," wasn't that what this coalition at it's first time in Israel's political history after the nineteenth and twentieth century had said on 13 June 2021? The article is saying that the Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, has approved of the Defense Minister Benny Gantz his initiative to designate Housing Minister, Mr Elkin, to start building in the very short term 3130 new homes for the settlers in what is sensitive territory for the US, EU, Britain, and many Abraham Accords partners in the Middle East. Just when the State Budget will pass into law we now see a reflex by the prime minister that is contradictive and entering controversy, so it also seems, by his 'free will'. After four months Mr Naftali Bennett should know by now that nothing is randomly or easy when it comes to being the prime minister of Israel, when the premiership has changed hands from the former PM to the new PM who is leading the most diverse coalition in all of Israel's political history. But it is true after the last coup d' etat by Defense Minister, Mr Benny Gantz, when the PM was in Washington to meet with President Joe Biden as prime minister of Israel, there was more to see or expect from Mr Gantz. A failed or foiled coup invites more mischievousness from the Defense Minister at the point before the State Budget passes, something he himself had wanted desperately from the former PM, mr Benyamin Netanyahu, who had promised Mr Gantz to become prime minister. Thus here we are again at the West Bank junction with the International world, where the Defense Minister stands and is taking decisions... And the Prime Minister approving his decision... And taking a risk at his own premiership.

On monday it is said that the Prime Minister of Israel will attend the climate summit COP26, together with Environmental Minister, Ms Tamar Zandberg and Energy Minister Karin Elharrar in Glasgow Scotland. Your Majesty the Queen, Queen Elizabeth II, will only attend by video recorded message after she was strongly advised by her doctors to take time to rest for the coming days and time. No one knows how this story will develop in the meantime, as it is today still in mid week on wednesday 27 October 2021. The Queen is 95 years old. What we know about the summit is that this was organized for most wold leaders, and now of which Israel is sending it's prime minister to attend. Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles are both visiting the Middle East next week in November also in the same (next) month when the summit is held in Glasgow. Tonight it is worldnews that the prime minister of Israel has approved building new homes in the West Bank, ignoring the Biden administration's advice to halt construction in these areas of long-standing conflict. It will also trigger the opposite among the world leaders next week in Glasgow, if the prime minister wants to be seen as the primus inter pares and promoting Israel on the United Nations world stage. But who is the white elephant in the room? The world might see that this prime minister has come under lot's of pressure at home and cannot sweep a controversial issue in the occupied territories under the carpet and standing up straight faced. His misfortune has come a little earlier, one can only say at this point. Of course, if the story is right this evening in Jerusalem that the prime minister has approved the plans for 'housing' in the disputed areas in the West Bank.

If it passes next week this State Budget reflex is another unknown territory for the coalition as this will be their first time in a new time and history. It is important to precalculate what is and what is not good for the economy for Israel and if all planning will uncover weaknesses from the previous government before real change can make the new start in the next fiscal year under this government. There is no word yet from the prime minister what that planning might be, except that he agrees today with the building of the homes in the West Bank. Is that good for the economy? Building homes in Tel Aviv for immigrants from Ethiopia or Somalia, Jews who came to live in Israel and start a new life with the normal living standard for the first time, this would give a historic value to land and property (owned by the State) and also intrinsically to the monetary system of Israel. Tel Aviv or Ashkelon are cities within Israel. This new prime minister so far has not made any mistake yet on controversy, but if the story is right this time he will have to admit himself that this time he didn't succeed keeping within his own words and the coalition agreement on keeping ideologies out of government. The occupied territories are in it's natural state non habitus in the International perception of occupation, and to move on to any form of habitus one needs a deep principled condition and state of life as to oppose the state of contstant military presence or violence, as that cannot transcend to any living or form of life. A beginning should be thought of and made into being and starting to build on principles, as was the intention in principle of the Balfour Declaration, specifically calling for law and order through conditions that needed to be met with- the creation of a State and peoples within these conditions. Seven decades later a principled share of land and it's cost, and more so it's incentives in the short and long term, especially when in contrast to the historical beginning of the State of Israel and it's older cities that make up for a country as a whole (geography). But why put all this forward to the prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, and not wait until a more experienced prime minister in this rotation takes on the helm of government? That is exactly the point to make: Naftali Bennett has poor reflexes, but he is the right man to take on all the difficult issues here above and no other man in Israel, is probably the only explanation. And it looks like a personal explanation with which you can only go so far as you are right. If wrong you collapse with everything that you have said so far about the new prime minister of Israel and estimating his hidden worth.










Booster shot or creative science?

25 October 2021

There are millions of people who have been vaccinated across the globe since the pandemic breakout last year in January 2020. That means in layman terms that we are now looking at half the pandemic circle in 2021 it was last year, before vaccinations programs had started to be implemented. Three institutions, local government, national government and International or global governance, had become also the emergency centers for Covid-19 and vaccinations policies of first low- key Health 'control'. In March 2021 infections were still high and an aggressive approach to start vaccinations as soon as they were available were strongly recommended. Are we half way there and nearing the end of the pandemic any time soon, some might ask and want to know. It is quite intriguing where science has made the leap to the booster shot in the last quarter of 2021, the additional protection shot, after you had your two vaccinations inoculation PfizerBioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson. The latter only one shot. First the people had to deal with the emergency of the first moment and spent their time in quarantine, face masks and 1.5 meter distance; the second time came when everyone could get the vaccine against the deadly virus Covid-19, and ending with another time getting the vaccines by policies of Health and Safety measures from your local and national government bodies. The pandemic should now have been beaten by all Health and Safety measures, two years on in next January 2022. Adjacent to the pandemic emergency plans and orders to bring everyone to clinical safety, another aspect of this virus outbreak were the introducing of lockdowns or how to avoid going into lockdown. The infection line peak was getting higher by the minute, hour and day, while the line for businesses was getting down at a much higher speed. Life for business and death for the virus infection is what you could say on a graphic to measure tension and friction snapshots. It is no wonder after this period of time why people are turning back to the first moment and are desperate to see the end of it all next.

This is what Real Time now looks like in late October 2021: either vaccination or no vaccination. And with another aspect on top of the world related to Covid-19, or more, life after Covid-19, is the book, The great reset, written by Klaus Schwab (Economic World Forum). And the only answer science can give you is that you will now also need a booster shot, for 18+ and older, and for older than 65. The death rate has not dropped since the first fatalities in the first moment last year, and is in fact still surging at a global level. Reading from the scenes written here above it is hard to say that we do not see the cities have turned into cities of death and destruction (economy), and then slowly becoming similar to critical cinema ghost towns. The pandemic has not yet ended it's cycle: symbol? 95 % Divided by life (100%) you will still end up with 95% only safe from Covid-19 and stay alive 5% unprotected? What we need is a critical analysis of the scientific arithmetic and starting with day One to get closer to a few real answers. It is paradoxically also an interesting development throughout human history when the pandemic became a global emergency in 2020 (start date in 2019), and also that this time it was it's first global scale pandemic impact in a relative young age in 2021. That depends how you define age and earth's history. Every day is a new and not an old day! However the most ethical question is, where is it all leading to against the wide blue sky, immeasurable earth size, deep space, billions of people as it's inhabitants (plus animals)? Klaus Schwab his answer is clear: The great reset. And to put it to an oversimplified test is simply to say The great Reset= 100% and after Covid-19 every life is 95%. The law of physics is earth bound and The great reset than must be a physics bound entity or magnitude to maintain alive. There are a few answers fluidity coming through these questions (free creativity) and what you see or get is that earth will inhabit human lives at 95% safe after Covid-19 and have new pandemics. (Bill Gates has already talked about this on Youtube.com videoclips, e.g. on future pandemics) Beyond the world after The great reset we have no idea how to predict anything in it's nearest future at this point in time: 25 October 2021.

And the economy is still sailing multilateral archaically across the globe. Natural physics is still here as are millions of humans as are automobiles when following the arrow going forward. It is perhaps a silly observation, but The great reset could not exist without global infrastructures that are fully operational on a daily basis 24/7 and accumulating exponential wealth or growth. Remember what industrial wasteland can look like and never be made reusable in their old debris. Imagine another great reset in another time where humans had lived, e.g. in ancient Greece. Here you find an immediate different magnitude of truth of unusefulness, that either The great reset was a magnificent stroke of global genius, or a global genius failure how to have the right perception of what it means: human and earth hierarchies. And animals, and vegetation. All living eco- systems work only on living organisms of which the human and their families are the main theme. We are becoming just more and more aware of what the meaning of human and life have in common when now dealing with the pandemic and the vaccinations to stay safe and alive. Including the life of children. Covid-19 can also infect the people who did get vaccinated and hence the (third) booster shot six months after the first two shots of vaccination. It seems that science is becoming more inadequate than it wants to admit and deal with a phenomenon like what you can read in Mr Schwab his book. Psychologically Covid-19 has made of most humans already also mentally more unstable by constantly looking over your shoulder whether one is or is not vaccinated. And probably becoming as a result hysterical about the vaccination and it's immediate or apparent relation to government. But, you can't hide and you can't runaway from Covid-19 nor from comirnaty 95% (2x). How are China, Japan and Taiwan doing so far? And South- America, Africa, Eastern Europe, Russia and the Middle East? In the North Americas more than 400mln people are vaccinated a report said yesterday evening on the Jerusalem Post in a Breaking news story, 24 October 2021. And all countries are run by State Budgets... How do they do it and make global or national (and local) economics match Covid-19 sciences? L'chaim.

Post Scriptum

Personal fact: 2x Pfizer Comirnaty shots in July and late August in 2021.
Side effect first three weeks of September 2021: Herpes Zosner (antibodies)
Flu (2 weeks in October) and self test result: negative (no red line on the T during the self test). C red line visible and clear of positive during self testing.









Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and the UNGA, monday 27 September 2021.

24 September 2021
(23:13 PM)

After a first meeting with the POTUS, Mr Joe Biden, last month in Washtington and then meeting with President Abdel Fattah Al- Sisi of Egypt three weeks later, this month, the Israeli Prime Minister is now tip- toeing comfortably again to the US on sunday to New York for his one day visit at the UNGA. And he is planning on giving his speech without props, the JP is saying. His main message is simple that times in Israel have changed and that he is now prime minister, and not Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, the former PM. On monday four days ago the President of the US held his speech, and earlier today the Prime Minister Mr Boris Johnson of the United Kingdom has given his speech. For Germany Federal President Mr Frank- Walter Steinmeier, also today, had called for a special message to the world and said: "You can depend on us." The session will last until 27 September on monday next week. An interesting quick reading for any outsider following the UNGA world leaders here on stage and addressing the global community is the delegate handbook. Two things: one being the Head of State or government, and second was reading where deputy prime ministers stood on this list. Israel's Prime Minister is not the deputy prime minister and we are left to take him as Head of State and government as delegate from Israel. Now the prime minister is quickly stepping on higher ground and whoever had made a mockery of Mr Bennett last month, attempting a little coup, will now have to think very carefully when he will be representing Israel on the world stage. The former prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, in the news on the JP website, is banking on the performance of Mr Naftali Bennett as prime minister, and has said, here is where we will see how inexperienced he really is. The mockery has a long memory, but the UNGA is not a judicial body as is the ICC. All world leaders are invited to come to the United Nations General Assembly to have a platform and address the world. Their messages are about coordination and their national and global priorities for the future. The UNGA institution has a mechanism of always moving on forward. Where will the speech of the Israeli Prime Minister begin and where will it end?

The Jerusalem Post said in an article yesterday (4 minutes past midnight- 25 September) that the Prime Minister is getting himself ready for addressing the Assembly and sending out a message into the world that the idiotic, vicious and unjust standards by which Israel is judged should not continue on International platforms. Something tells you that this Israeli Prime Minister is following his own politics and wants to bring not only change from home, but also unto the world. It should be said that he is indeed going to be a different goverment actor at the UNGA to be heard and this is a surprise. If not refreshing to hear a few decent words after years of another era when the former prime minister Mr Netanyahu was more belligerent when he addressed the world. He was certain and more experienced, we have to give him that. But we are living in different times and appreciate a more straightforward talk to hear from this 'inexperienced' prime minister. Always to the point and no nonsense. Mr Naftali Bennett has moved on since he became prime minister on 13 June, three months ago. His speech at the UNGA should be seen as one of remarkable prestige in so little time. The dreadful State Budget is still gnawing and his government will either stand or fall with it. Important to note is that maybe we are looking and seeing Mr Bennett now for real while time is ticking. The people of Israel still have to come to terms to have a prime minister with only six seats, but who is now swimming in the big waters on earth with world leading and developing nations, and their leaders. The President of the Palestinian Authority, Mr Mahmoud Abbas, has given his ultimatum on wednesday at the UNGA to let Israel decide on the occupation. Israel has to leave and go back to the 1967 borders. Prime Minister Bennett is planning on being frank on equal footing and will give the world to hear his ideas and plans on the Palestinian issue. It's highway was built many years/ decades ago to have a Two- State solution for Israel and the Palestinians, but natural logic wants it that in Real Time one drives in the other direction, while the second party drives in opposite direction. Political infrastructure and logic is based on human understanding and sense of direction. Two nations cannot drive the same highway in one direction. It makes the whole thing a faulty design of civil engineering.










What the military had forgotten in the Middle East was instinct.

15 September 2021

Today when the sun will set later on in the evening it will be in Israel Yom Kippur and will last till the next day. It is also one of the most sacred of high holidays in Judaism, and is similar to the first day of the month Abib (days of Pesach). No king goes to war during these high holidays. It is interesting to read the statutes or rules for war in the book Tanach what is roughly translated to the Greek translation of the Old Testament. (Later to English, the King James version as first translation) War in ancient Israel, if one reads it carefully, almost felt similar to a wedding and how bridegroom and bride must purify before entering the sacredness of vow or standing under the wedding canopy. And from consummation comes blood in a pure marriage, just as bloodshed or when killed by the enemy stains the king or prince's body armor. Or his men and animals. Horses and chariots were for the Egyptians, Babylonians and Assyrians. With later on as the people of Israel established their lives in Palestine also the Persians and Medes. The time AC and after war again had changed the face of it's ancient history to a new century and the 'heartbeat of an era'. (Words in the Old Testament) In the 21st century there are no washing the tipping point of swords in rivers and saying prayers when ending or going into battle. There is only now bloodshed and the washing of it only goes to gutters and revel in mudslides. Since Waterloo 1815 warfare has become the 'iron age' in a world of it's own next to that of the human world. All nations with war- torn countries will not or never see the day at an peace institution to be a prize winner of a laureate and Nobel Prize in Europe. Indeed, to stop the war in war- torn places is our only hope to win the prize for peace. We have to admire a few new 'generation' of leaders e.g. in the Middle East, with yesterday on monday the meeting between two historical old partners of peace, one in Israel and one in Egypt. A remarkable history and very true when the late president, Anwar Sadat, came to Israel and met with the late PM of Israel, Mr Menachim Begin. The year was 1977. Israel had now fully acquired the status of a political force and defense superiority in another time almost independently for Egypt and Israel. Peace was an agreement of promises and not just a formula to create publicity. Globalization and planet size inclusiveness of all nations had after the eighties now also changed the story of good for evil, or evil for good, right and wrong, or both as one unit of the global body in it's entirement. Will the new generation of leaders, again e.g. in the Middle East, now build relations and peace from a future wrong and right?

That will take courage on all sides and not only the ambition to be the regional leader of all 'member states' in the region. Perhaps we can indulge in a little fantasy or fiction how to get there, let's say if Egypt, Israel and Jordan, could form a new axis of shared power. The crescent moon shape with the rest of the axis still obscured by old world order regional powers in the other Arab countries. And the fiction get's better from an imaginary point of view, that let us assume for a moment that this had always been the blueprint for the Middle East, a division by natural 'armistice', east, south, north and west, this could serve the purpose of a plan that was already drawn up before it's making in the human mind living in these parts of the Middle East. Israel can't be seen as if it were better to be in Africa, when it's nature of the nation is pure Semitic and co- inherent to what all the other nations in the same 'crescent' have been for thousands of years, Semites. Egypt and Israel are the most independent of nations in the Middle East on the north and south side of the Mediterranean Sea. Ras Mohammed in Sinai will always have more of a military connotation when meeting either with the PM of Israel and the President of Egypt. Cairo on the other hand is for the real State Visit of any leader in the world. One would say or think why is it going wrong when in this region the military is a professional force? Like chastisement is more deeper of love especially if this is your wife (always the virgin wife of your bosom), this is the natural force in the Middle East and why many as multitudes go after religion and try to dominate one over the other, without sympathy or empathy. (Nor for people of the poorest or animals to help out the poorest) And also sometimes that is reflected in the environment. Like weapons there is nothing that cannot be manufactured or manufactures itself (especially the poorest). A small change could be the military departments of Human Resource and how to introduce a different level of civil 'obedience' or living standard, again where they are poorest and are still boiling coffee on camel dung. The military alone has the instinct of the people in the Middle East, even richest as poorest. Iran is the north- eastern side in the Middle East when seen from the Mediterranean Sea. It is a pleasant welcome back again to read about the PM of Israel, Mr Naftali Bennett, that he is back in the driver's seat since tuesday yesterday. On Benny Gantz in the coalition of the Bennett- Lapid government, after yesterday to also have read a distinct word by the opposition in the JP, it is no secret for Likud that they would like to have Gantz come back. If this is what Mr Netanyahu wants he is making a perfectly legal move, which we have to admire in him even when nearly of a much older age at 72 than when he was much younger and started his political career in the 20th century. The old world was all about natural instinct and drive. Time will reveal everything, Inshallah, as the Muhammadan say. Astaghfirullah, yours truly.











The Prime Minister of Israel went to Washington, Naftali Bennett and not Benny Gantz.

2 September 2021

Quick take: while the Prime Minister came to Washtington to meet with President Joe Biden, the best way to dissolve parliament or the coalition would be better if let's say Defense Minister, Benny Gantz, would have resigned from the coalition. We must get this straight: the defense minister is a ministry under Benny Gantz, and the general Aviv Kochavi is under the defense minister and ministry. When in an established military hierarchy. How was it to be taken when the defense minister goes out to meet with president Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority? And not only that, but it was during the Prime Minister's absence on a State visit to Washington. The whole world has 'heard' already of this little coup d' etat from the minister of defense, Mr Benny Gantz, that he had taken on him the role of the prime minister while he was being away for a few days to Washington. If there is another explanation it can only be the interpretation of a failed attempt to 'overtake' the role of the prime minister and make the Israeli public see that the man who is prime minister is nothing but a fraud presenting himself as the leader of the people of Israel in Washington as we speak... The minister of defense couldn't have been more wrong and not only undermined the Prime Minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, before God and man, but the people of Israel are too undermined that here is a nation who cannot tell the difference between two and two, let alone one and one. It is the people's intelligence that was clearly exposed badly with the attempt of the defense minister to take from the prime minister his role and territory. One would almost think that the prime minister when in Washington decided to play it low and even sent out messages of not being able to meet with US President, Joe Biden. In Israel this was probably a signal to act now and not wait any longer. Until friday, 27 August, when the President decided to meet with Prime Minister Bennett. But, it was all too late within seconds at home in Israel, that the meeting with Mahmoud Abbas was already set for sunday, 29 August. And then to make it by camouflage a security issue... Should the ministry not go first through the commander in chief and who is the Prime Minister? The Prime Minister's job is regional and domestic security for Israel and it is his responsibility at the end of the day.

It leaves Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, nothing but to do the decent thing right now and to show the Israeli people that this was the only sensible thing to do. Defense Minister, Mr Benny Gantz, cannot become prime minister in the coalition government of Mr Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid. The chance for Mr Gantz to become prime minister had expired under the former coalition with Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. As also was the mandate before this went to Mr Lapid after the last election, 23 March this year. Mr Gantz had to speak up then and there, and decide not to enter the coalition with Yair Lapid and stay with Likud to form a majority. Sensible or confusion, neither should be random at this moment. What happened in the week when the prime minister was not in the country will be seen by the Middle East and in other parts of the world with keen interest in Israel and the region, that here we see a nation at war with itself up to the point of amusement to all foes and enemies. If the defense minister was serious to become prime minister than resign from the coaltion and sent the people back to a fifth election, and be the strongman and not the strongmouse. It doesn't seem to be in the nature of a refined prime minister, as we have now witnessed in Washington when meeting with the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and the President Mr Joe Biden. But surely being prime minister in Israel should be of the kind of leadership that shows where he stands with the people, for better or worse, even when facing a coup d' etat from within his own ranks? The prime minister has been up to now a gentleman and an all around mr Nice guy. Leadership however requires setting an example. And this can be a political example and in adverse times or moments a military example. The adversary within should also know that he has crossed the battle lines of any decent order within a democracy and State security. And for putting State security at random risk to act prime ministerial with the 'enemy of the State of Israel', a role never before has been done under Mr Netanyahu by the same defense minister, Mr Benny Gantz, was foolish and a sheer folly on his part and behalf. The Prime Minister didn't seem to have anything to do with the defense minister his folly on this occasion.









The PM has got his red thinking cap on again. Good points in his plans, but how long will this go on or last?

22 August 2021

Time doesn't seem to be on the Prime Minister of Israel on his side, if he will not succeed to pass the State Budget this fall, 4 November. Strategically this was the right prime minister, and also in the right place at the right time, if only to see at all where Israel had arrived after the Netanyahu economic (and military successes) growth. For journalists it is easy enough to write about the PM and when his visit to the US to meet with President Joe Biden will be a high score on his timeline as prime minister, mostly to the Israeli public. If the Israeli public does not see him as the official Head of State it is even much easier to see that there is nowhere any high score to last as his success with the US President on 26 August next week. The PM his next two years in Office could make the difference for this trip and tight schedule. If the State Budget does not pass into law ten weeks from now there is very little hope his visit to the US had made him the lasting impression for his career as PM. It is not the undermining that is the problem as is the underappreciation of his talents, military and strategically. He seems to have had his eyes fixed on the national front, local governing bodies, the people of Israel as it's old citizens (for some), the economic input and output in low- key government, and military questions. This is history for most Israelis and not just something for communities of woke or millennials. Existential life has changed for Israel since 1994, a timeline the prime minister desperately needs to go back to and understand the different time that he is living in and also when he became the PM of Israel. Also in recent history the ugly wars in Gaza and the West Bank occupation is keeping on coming back to the PM or any prime minister, that in the end it is the Two- State solution is what will be the deciding factor for Israel as staying in the Middle East.

Until that day Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, is not the PM the people of Israel want. And some even suggest that he 'is lazy' when speaking in the public domain and are completely missing the point in his plan of action and workplan. Two months are not providing with the desired results in these plans just yet... It is however the kind of resentfulness he can ill afford in any upcoming or the next election. But even when having said this at the end of the day as PM he is the man now taking and making decisions. At this end of the stick there are others convincingly saying that he is not that kind of Prime Minister, but rather is some sort of a ventriloquist to alternate Prime Minister, Mr Yair Lapid. Politics is stage play by nature and for whom there is no hiding place as PM, whether in Israel or elsewhere in the world. This seems to be an unsympathetic biopic to give on the prime minister after only two months in Office. This won't change for him either after two years when his date has expired as PM, and based on only one fine quality: zero bribes. Helping to stimulate Arab citizens with a budget in the State Budget wasn't a bribe, but essential to help get the people out of the status quo and exclusiveness from the national scale of Israelis and Israeli society. In the Middle East Arabs are inherent to the region and you can't expulse the people from Israel only to be a Jewish Home forever. Mr Bennett understands this situation and that this is also a very old scene for all Israelis and Arabs living in Israel and not just in Jerusalem or the Damascus Gate. 100 Years since the State of Israel was born under a people that were de facto Europeans and fleeing Nazi Germany.

Today it is the economy that is making history and not from a pioneering stage, as when Mr Netanyahu had taken up the prime ministership from Mr Begin in the eigthties. Actually the nineties. It was a natural belief for all Israelis that the future was about their sovereignty in the land they were getting to build and it probably was a prophetic moment of this is the land of milk and honey that was once promised to the forefathers, Abraham, Yitschaik, and Jacob. That sentiment must have been the strongest and to live in Israel nothing more could be real or palpable for a new start as a Jew now living in a Jewish Home. Have a good look at today's Middle East again and if you can reassess what has been left of the land of milk and honey. And, incidently, not all reasons are the cause of antisemitism in the rest of the world! Leaving out the global solution from Palestine, the Two- State solution, almost is genocidal in the 21st century as it leaves no option or land 'open' to the Palestinians. This prime minister has already been giving weak signals (from his lighthouse) that this can never be his plan, even if he is tied on his back to build new homes for settlers in the West Bank, area C. With the coalition and even when it had been a coalition with the Right- Wing, Israel had come to it's dead end on sovereignty (for Jews only). What could the Old Testament have meant with Jerusalem being the throne of David forever? 3000 Thousand years vacuum leaves only one chance of survival left: 100 years after the Balfour Declaration. Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, can he remember the pound (pegged to British sterling in name only) in Israeli currency? That decision was kept with golden bravery of the then new people of Israel after the Holocaust. If he can't there is little he can change in Israel at the national scale, which is a stark difference with an artificial economic growth since 1994, something which only is attributed to the former PM, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. It is particularly interesting to hear the PM say today sunday something about the government they have inherited. All of the coalition hands are tied to this previous government, when led by Likud and mr Netanyahu. The latter is perhaps keeping Bretton Woods and exchange control mechanisms far away from the present time 'rookie' prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett. Or, the other option is that when the budget does not pass into law we will have to search the land for a new prime minister who will change the status quo consistently and with a cavalry of new teams, not young but older economists, who are still able to remember the first flowers on the many young trees of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem when in the sixties and seventies. History is scarcity when it comes to prime ministers in Israel, when they are the flower of the nation and not big government only and wither.










PM Naftali Bennett on top view Iran, Hezbollah and the region this morning.

8 August 2021

President Ebrahim Raise has other problems at home in Iran/ Tehran. The economy (82.9 mln people), Covid-19, water & electricity shortages, and moving the poorest out of the poverty line. The same for PM Naftali Bennett, fighting for moving 2/3 mln Israelis out of the poverty line (State Budget). Article (Ms Lahav Harkov today in the JP Israel won't accept rocket attacks from Lebanon): he is also right to refer responsibility to Lebanon. Both, Pres Raisi and PM Bennett, after every war they have to bring prosperity back home to fill the treasury. It seems as if both leaders are on the same timeline and are dealing with similar problems. Prime Minister Mr Naftali Bennett seems this morning to be more of himself and is on top op the matter on Iran, Hezbollah, and the situation in Lebanon at the border with Israel. This is an old scenario, except that the new prime minister of Israel is actively assessing every move made by the enemies of Israel, especially when moving logistics from one place to the next. It is his cost and effective assessment that is making him being a different prime minister, so far. He is not being respected by the people working with him and also when turning the public's face toward the opposition. This could all be shear gossip from the public domain where most of us live on assumptions and impressions. It is however important to read comments made by members of the public in a democracy and pay attention. There are many ways to do things different for the PM to what we have been used to from the former PM, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu for more than 12 years. The wars against the enemies of Israel for example when critically looking back you just wonder how much prosperity was brought back home to fill the treasury or by what policies this became law (war on land or at sea). Many criticize the new prime minister that he is weak and irrelevant to Knesset and all MK's in the Knesset, and are also refusing to call him Prime Minister. He deserves this open rejection, before God and man (the world), undeservedly, as his six seats meant that Yesh Atid, Yair Lapid, could form on this differential a government. You can either comply with the mathematics or ditch the system as a whole. In a small rephrasing: the economy, Covid-19, Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas and the Two- State solution are the prime minister's graphics (constant x-y axis). And his visual cannot only be that the former PM did better or was much more (landslide) preferred to the 'rookie' prime minister, mr Naftali Bennett. In one article, incidently by the same journalist ut supra, Ms Lahav Harkov, he had said on Iran and the Mercer Street attack in the Arabian Sea, 30 July last week, that he does not want to do the automatic answering every time Iran moves. He is clearly taking a different stance and approach in the matter, when Mr Netanyahu would have been more convincing to have the US and EU join him to strike Iran... That never has happened. When the prime minister, Naftali Bennett, called on the International World to respond to what had happened in the Mercer Street incident near the coast off Oman, many in the public have mocked the prime minister for being a copycat of Mr Netanyahu. After nearly two months in Office the prime minister can't change the subject and it's narratives for the time being. But what if...

The Prime Minister of Israel in this rotational government with Yair Lapid, the alternate prime minister in two years time, has come to the conclusion that what Israel now needs more is to stop it bleeding dry at home, among the many populated places with people living under the poverty line and poor housing, small businesses that are now broke or bankrupt because of the collapse in the economy from the pandemic Covid-19. He could extend this conclusion even further from the periphery of his mind and also have another look at what could bring some incentive back into the country while he is going to stay the PM of Israel. If he has no automatic answers to deal with Iran/ Tehran it is clear that the prime minister his (out)look is a long stretch what the psychological view would be here. On both sides these new leaderships are dealing with dire economic problems with the not so small difference that one has 82 mln people to deal with, and the other has 9. 3 mln in Israel. Adding to Mr Bennett's own words, that territory matters, but numbers also matters when it concerns the amount of peoples living in the State or country. Population matters where territory comes in first. Or the sea... The war at sea has another specific need for the prime minister to reassess. If in the present time there is no specific law in the Maritime Laws of Israel on provocations by enemies, near or far, via sea or at sea, e.g. fines on the provocateur against Israel, perhaps this could deter e.g. Iran from future attacks, directly or indirectly, on Israel or it's citizens? The Middle East is an old region with lot's of antquated laws for the peoples living here thousands of years. A new perception for change would be imperative and to reach the height of God is good for Israel and the people living in this part of the world. It is an interesting moment for some to listen to what the prime minister of Israel will do next as he moves on to the stage of putting the State Budget into law, 4 November in 12 weeks time. His counterpart in Iran will also do the same by approximate. A few things that are not illusionary but hardcore realities in the second quarter of this year: the economy, Covid-19 and the population. However with answering these questions the answers remain until now much more closer to being illusionary. Israel can act alone if it has to, the PM had also said in the article mentioned here above by Ms Harkov in the JP. That, I'm afraid, would be a big step to contemplate at this point and being only two months in Office as Prime Minister and young lion cub. Tempo, tempo, and than a pronto! It is evaluation and evolution of the Bennett kind of theories is what we need to hear and see most, right now. There are no simple automatic answers, but perhaps there are some complex automatic answers, sir?










The PM of Israel on Iran needs to create a tunnel vision on this one.

1 August 2021

Off the coast of Oman the Mercer Street tanker was attacked by Iran and has killed two members of the crew, one UK member and one Romanian, and captain. Zodiac Maritime is an Israeli partnership with vessel owned by Japan (Liberian flag). Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, this morning, has said that Israel has proof of intelligence on the attack that this was carried out by an unmanned Iranian bombing near the coast of Oman in the Arabian Sea. It is clear that the region where the prime minister lives is inspiring a few sentiments like that of the battle of Trafalgar, or worse. Iran is his closest enemy and another missing link would be in this scenario that is now completely absent, a certain Mr X or Nelson. The Prime Minister has also said that this was a mistake on Iran's behalf. But who will catch this bully of the Middle East caught red handed on his mistakes? This is no match for a boy prime minister, should be the mind picture of Tehran, one presumes... And Iran in return, when returning the compliment, should be terrified at boys being military leaders! That is a historical and ancient fact in military history to both nations Persia and Greece. The prime minister of Israel has called upon the International world to respond on the attack of the Mercer Street in the Arabian Sea, just off the coast of Oman. Keeping alive the tunnel vision with Iran from the PM's point of view isn't what the vision of the International World holds when dealing with the region of the Middle East and also when dealing with Iran specifically. The question is now what is eating Prime Minister Bennett at the moment for going to war and not on land but at sea? There is some frustration creating the optical illusion through the sextant of the PM's mind, that again it is looking like Iran is getting away with another one of it's many tricks. The trick of playing this one out in the Arabian waters and not in International waters. The sea has become Iran's battleground this time round, when 'a boy is the military commander in chief' in Israel & as it's rookie prime minister. And if Iran has done it's home work on the PM of Israel, it also knows that he is a combat man of the elite forces in the IDF, and will certainly not be able to disguise himself as a naval officer of the waters around in the Middle East nor in that of the Internaitional waters. It's caricature of Iran doing the banana peels throwing at sea here for the Prime Minister of Israel, Mr Naftali Bennett to slip a very bad fall.

But boys will be boys... Iran is becoming a giant in the sleeping hours of Mr Bennett, when facing it's tricks. Like Greece had Alexander the Great, Israel had David who had by a simple slingshot hit the giant Goliath straight in front of his head by a godly surprise. In the Middle East diplomatic and military complexities are going hand in hand with divine perplexities. No one will ever understand, as they seem retarded when seen from the west or western hemisphere. Perhaps it will be one day come true that the western Anglo Saxon nations will do what many have done, to enter e.g. India and come out from it torn and tattered, and trying hard to escape it's natural densities embraces. Israel is determined that it has mass self determination and it should not be challenged either by folly or foolishness by a fickle enemy who is vain like Iran. For one: Israel is constraint by the International World not to use force or military fire power. ("Hold him up," and Michael gets punched up by McCluskey) All this here above is making it as if Naftali Bennett is not the de facto Prime Minister of Israel and not the slightest de jure PM of Israel. That depends who is reading, because the writing is inclusively written on Mr Bennett's natural instinct for the military in Israel, and secondly he has a novel way of doing the business of politics in this region, one he knows the recent history all too well when in bloodshed (listen to all Youtube video clips on this subject). Integrity is where he is tending to look for change of Israel's strategic position, if feasible. The naval war with Iran, if this makes him too emotional and nervous, then maybe that is something Mr Benny Gantz could be more decisive on if Iran continues playing the sea wolf. Also this is a short stretch to the PM's visit to the White House in a few weeks time. And just too close to the passing of the budget on 4 November this coming fall. The US is another 'tunnel vision' to the PM, when seen from this sideline, and when lying in fetal position on his bed at Balfour. Where to put priority, Mr Prime Minister? Man or mouse, to be or not to be, questions, answers, EVA, US, Israel, and fly back home safe.










The thought isn't just yet complete, but the new politics writing tonight in Israel emphasize real uncertainty over national certainty.

30 August 2021

Is it the State budget with a certainty of the deadline, 4 November 2021? This was the apple of the eye of former prime minister, Mr Netanyahu, and if passed will cause a seismic shock through the system and his, and who knows that this will throw in something of 'an apple of discord' between the coalition and opposition maybe permanently. The State Budget that did not pass for two years since 2018/ 2019, under the government led by Mr Netanyahu. You could say that this will have sentimental values for the former PM at any point in a future passing of the State Budget by no other than the present time Bennett- Lapid government. In the heart of the nation Mr Netanyahu is still the heartbeat as the only man to lead Israel and the economy. He could never tell the Israelis how hard it was for him to stay constraint and that external powers are in fact the Lord exchequers of Israel. He was the prime minister, as in the same meaning of the PM of Britain in 1915 had been. You must learn to understand the difference. Yes, it is true and worrisome how the Bennett- Lapid government will pass the State budget on time, but more so where they would be putting timing between local and state government in the State budget. And there are too many initiatives waiting already to appropriate budgets... Or are we fibbing now? The politicians today and in the government of change after ousting the former PM, Mr Netanyahu, may already know the answer on the deadline, whether the State budget will now pass or not. It's downfall will be known to be a strategic choice over that what used to be the political unwillingness of the political parties to let Mr Netanyahu become and stay prime minister. This downfall however weak it's exterior and interior will make a different smash once it will be over for Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid in the coalition government, what was perceived a first time impossible coalition under the Israeli sun ever.

Strategically Mr Bennett will not be as many are now predicting or saying behind his back, or even to his face, that his political career is/ will be over. In what way are we thinking about politics in Israel, one could ask? The future needs new politicians and politics from this generation of young men (and women) in government. Mr Bennett can always talk back and say to his constituency what it feels like to become prime minister of Israel and that this is nothing like a volunteer job. You also have to be fortunate to feel that this moment is the right time to rise to the occasion and that prime minister is something that you can feel... And who will fill in the vacuum of the next generation politicians that no one is looking for in the uncertainty of the present time? Ten years from today there will be many Jews living in Israel who have arrived at a certain point to live here, but under the current laws in Israel can't become the prime minister. We expect worldwide that after Covid-19 the world will change and be ready for transformation to a world of federal peace with one another. In Israel the ministry of Defense or the military will still be on the same timeline as it has been here for almost 100 years in Israel. Yesterday the Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, has said that the best role for Israel is and was the Middle East his key thinking. He believes in deeper integration of Israel into the region. Under the former prime minister, Mr Netanyahu, the western hemisphere was always first and the Middle East (before the AA) was strategically. We should read the 'new political writings' in Mr Y. Katz his article yesterday evening, if we want to understand about the situation in Israel moment per moment, but also to a certain degree how it's future remains unshaped and unscaled at this point. Israel is more than just about personalities, when you read this article. (I wish for men like Mr Katz at some point in the nearest of future to enter politics, based on his instrumental thinking that mostly runs everything around him and the rest of the people living in Israel) In the world of industries a luxury carmaker from a mass production carmaker/ auto industry isn't based on the car or even sort (hybrid). Before the deadline of the State Budget to pass this year in November the big new political question will be whether we can see 'real change' and mass production get's it's legitimacy, or that of the luxury carmaking decision if Israel wants to stay 'unchanged' and see democracy and local government not passing through time and future time. Ideologies, perhaps are for the facilities of a faculty and not to be in the business of hard politics. And 9 million people living in Israel makes it first degree hard politics to govern.










The BL government in Israel fifth week.

18 July 2021

Covid-19 has returned on the PM's agenda. Worldwide we are not seeing change yet, that after 1 1/2 year the Coronavirus has effectively been brought to zero infections across the Corona affected centers in the western hemisphere. Whether in Israel or Europe, India or Africa, defusion still seems the only way out of the pandemic. While in the meantime the Corona solidarity is also growing between many countries and peoples. Perhaps there is a more simple explanation in this global confusion, that now globalization was replaced by Covid-19 and that we must prepare for the next world without our old way of life and living, some agree would be the thinking or question. Freedom and democracy now seem monumental when we look back (in anger). Humanity now also seems greater and we are doing this for all the wrong reasons that we find in the laws of transparency or accountability. What is the mortality rate in a snapshot today globally? We are still working on it to bring down these numbers from the moral point of view that this is the new humanity to battle this crisis. How far will the new government in Israel go to protect it's citizens from the infection rapidness and new agents variants. And where does one begin with coordination? The answer across the world is vaccinations. That answer is to some the start of a WWIII. In the Middle East however medicine is a scarce commodity and the thought of WWIII will not impress much of the people living in this part of the world. Medicine to the Middle East is like a Genesis when it has been engineered by the most clever minds in the west and can only be distributed as an industrial privilege to the poor and poorest. The medical ethics issue will remain here a distant drum that no one hears or understands. Science is always in these parts a God given right and blessing, by contrast with the people in the West fighting against the government that vaccinations cannot be mandatory or face restrictions and access to social life and 'normalcy'. It is also this reason why the Corona success story of Israel is partly because not that many people can see why they should object to a clever pharmaceutical, that is to help against an infectious disease of a widespread virus. The Prime Minister will now have his hands tied to Covid-19 in the coming days and weeks, especially with the movements between new variants.

There is another pressing issue for the Bennett- Lapid government circulating also these days, that the coalition is suffering many defeats in Knesset by passing nothing through they have asked or submitted. The opposition in fact has been asking certain members of the government to defect to the Likud and bring down the prime minister and his coalition. An energetic mr Netanyahu, the former prime minister, is doing all this hard work against the government of change of Bennett and Lapid. On the balance of things in politics some do not see a return of Likud under Benyamin Netanyahu coming back as leader and prime minister, but in fact maybe fear that Naftali Bennett has made quite an impression already to the people of Israel and among the countries he has spoken to on the phone. They may be overestimating their opinion on the prime minister, because he is potentially very much present in his forty days during parliamentary debates and clashes (with the former PM). Fingers crossed it will stay this way for another forty days, and then another forty days plus twenty five. He is the fiery flying serpent some ancient kings in Israel were called when others thought they were gone or extinct from the royal scene. It is in the books of Samuel and Chronicles/ Kings. The Prime Minister also seems to be concerned how Jews are divided as in the days of the first and second temple. He is still a religious man in the orthodox sense next to being prime minister of Israel before God and the world. Tisha Be-av is ongoing at the moment as we speak on the Temple Mount, the place also for Muslims living in Jerusalem who come to pray or keep their presence dominantly against the background of this historic Jewish day. In the 21st century the other questions are in the public domain and the strangest of these is whether Israel is still a Jewish only country. 3 Mln Arabs among 6 mln Jewish citizens looks as if this is not the image of oppression, but rather a forceful tool of advance. The coming weeks are crucial to the PM not to remind the people of the former PM, whose members are behaving like Scarlet O' Hara dreaming only of Ashley. "Ashley, Oh Ashley!" Mr Bennett on the other side will say the famous Rhett Butler line, "I don't give a damn, Scarlet." Or change it to, "I don't give a damn, but you will love me from now on." Yes, a little LOL.










Watching the battle of lions

(For Naftali)

5

Arctic planes seas sky and oceans in the blink
of an eye and some are saying things
Digital worlds defined by the simplest of words
just make or break we are everywhere
keep it clean and tell your children to look up
to the stars that are just like the bugs
you never see in your playing dreams
Do we fight or stay alive
the batlle of lions in panavision before
our very eyes how do we vote
the violence is just different now
The battle of lions they come from anywhere
Any generation this is happening as far as we know
Just counting my blessings while holding a lady bug
Afraid not to be alive while breathing
Who are we
The four lions, east, west, north and south
where you are or walk away while you're standing
on the edge with half a heart that you are holding
inside your hand











A touch of sobriety for Prime Minister Bennett...

5 July 2021

On 4 July the prime minister has given the most sobering message on his vision of the new relationship with the US Administration, that he was committed to working together with a spirit of strength and cooperation, the news said in the JP last night. This morning also the former prime minister was back on his 'war path', and this was a different message on the domestic politics side in Israel. He suggested that the Palestinian people were 'infiltrators', and he has put his full weight behind this new statement. We in the outside world might be missing something essential from all this coming from Israel, that here the former prime minister still has the power to address the public. One could think that this is because of the legitimacy of his 30 mandates in the last election, which he could not form the coalition he needed to again run the State as prime minister. Israel has no ordinary democracy, if let's say, when we take the former prime minister now today in the opposition benches. Good State politics in Israel in Real Time today has become a complicated game of policies. Whether former or present prime minister, it seems for the future long term situation of Israel the first thing to do is how decisions should be taken and made, and not only from the new government in Office, but also in cooperation with the former prime minister. Unlike other countries and democracies a former prime minister retires quietly and within weeks will be forgotten as life moves on. Israel is not like any other democracy where daily political or military anecdotes seem to be the order of the day. What is really politics and the military is another thing and here there are no stories to tell or know in the public domain. And, of course, the former prime minister needs no telling how to know or deal with his homeland and people. Will the new prime minister work the same way? His understanding was his focus on the domestic recession, aka the status quo, and how to fix it in the short term. From the news articles in the Jerusalem Post for the last three weeks there are clearly a few signs making a weak flickering of light towards a new approach, e.g. the water problem with Jordan, humanitarian aid in Gaza on border crossings, and the Evyatar outpost agreement to leave and be replaced by the IDF. The US President, Joe Biden, also still has to meet with the prime minister.

The next crucial date is 10 July, five days from today. It is the moment for the former prime minister to vacate the Balfour residence of prime ministers. Mr Olmert and Mr Ehud Barak, both prime ministers after the millennium have made their entrance and exit also, and then be occupied again by Mr Netanyahu. This time however leaving Balfour by a man who has been a great prime minister in the public eyes, by friend or foe, was also the man who had shown great leadership at a global scale without asking for more throughout his prime ministership, except where he has lived this high office life as a discount on all perks and expenses (now called by some as extravagant or corruption). A great prime minister in other democracies, e.g. Margaret Thatcher, from the same era as Mr Netanyahu when in Office, know that the new government is always allergic to interference from 'historical' prime ministers and this can only be faintly explaining why it is very difficult for the new government then to combine new strength of the State with the old strength of yesterday. Israel should have an additional law for prime ministers, after Mr Benyamin Netanyahu. The Jewish nation should know that in the end of the day the long term plan for Israel is that they will stay united as Jews and living in the State of Israel. It is an unusual situation for Prime Minister Bennett, that today Israel is no longer a divided nation between past and present, but a united nation facing the future (that is worldsize homogeneous). Balfour I and Balfour II, what are these? The latter is or should also be part of the future State of Israel, that this is the residence of the former prime minister with every new one henceforth. Balfour II becomes then the symbolic residence for the former prime minsiters, this because the united front of Israel is another meaning only known here in this country and nation as most imperative. There was never such a thing before the Holocaust and also not when the Jewish Home was created. You can't throw a great man like Mr Netanyahu to the dogs, to put it more bluntly. The State and new prime minister and his government should try understand, that what David did not do to Saul no good prime minister in the 21st century should do any different in the land of Israel. And at the same time this should tell the former prime minister something, that the long term idea, former excellency, of Israel is being Jewish and living in the State of Israel. Whether this be in rags or riches, Balfour I or Balfour II (symbolic castle).

Friend and foe, this is the eye of the world to Israel.










The Palestinians should have sub sovereignty.

27 June 2021

This is land substitute with an old artificial land- division between two nations and nationals within the historical armistice lines. It's motivation is not political but geographical and from a certain point of logical observation. We are looking at the old design after the British Mandate for 100 years and what is now the most bitter conflict between the two peoples in this part of the world, in the Middle East. A basic fundamental truth however remains for all peoples, is that land in itself is always reason for recognition of sovereignty and next it is the inhabitants of that place. The land Palestine is sovereign from a geographical observation point. That is if we leave out the historical substance of it and only concentrate on where this region begins and ends to and fro, side to side. If the 21st century has taught the global community something it is that nations can make these claims on land and sovereignty, in other words why the Palestinians and Israelis think this is the time for both peoples to decide on their future State, for let's say the next 100 years. And that is just one aspect compared to the full magnitude of the Middle Eastern region. To the rest of the world this is highly irregular land and peoples, with no sight of the State in sight close or by far. Israel still is depending on a Balfour Declaration, and the Palestinians are also to a certain degree part of the same declaration. And with no particular borders included in the declaration. With an explosive growth of the population over approximately 73 years we are not observing the same situation or size of the Balfour Declaration anymore. Politically everyone knows what is best for Israel and the Palestinians, and also because there is no regularity elsewhere to find on the subject. We don't want to know the whole truth so help you God. Neither has anyone any idea what design could solve the problem once and for all. And this is the simple truth and for one way of looking at a first step out of the impasse and bloodshed of many old decades between the Palestinians and the Israelis.

If Israel wants to keep the land physics as it is known to the people for 100 years after the Balfour Declaration, it will further the balance into a deficit, according to the International World. Palestine crossed the name of Israel, is also a viable argument by the many Arab nations who have lived here in the region that we now know as the Middle East, not knowing what it was called in the days of thriving Mesopotamia. Palestine may well be the true name of Israel, a word that was lend throughout the passing of ages by the dominant races living in this territory and had no other learned skill other than herding sheep and cattle. Another name for the patriarch Jacob could very well be Palestine. Akkadian? But this is difficult to decide if then the Palestinian people have been living in Israel/ Palestine for many ages and assumed it was land belonging to their people. This is why a sub sovereignty should be granted by Israel/ Palestine to a defeated people by any standard of a higher body and sovereignty. This alone could and would solve the conflict as it is of a binding nature by law and statutes. From no other but Palestine/ Israel. No one is looking in the 21st century at the Middle East from it's very ancient beginnings and peoples. The modern world has made Israel or given the Jewish nation a Jewish Home, and prior to that there was no other Israel. It is not fiction when looking to the east. The International Law only deals with designs after the 19th, 20th and now 21st century. And before this was only the English law, starting in the 11th century. I'd like an examination of the origin of the word Palestine. From Biblical literature we know it is the land of milk & honey from the Holy mouth of the Lord God of Abraham. If Palestine is an Arabic translation, Akkadian or Babylonian ancient dialect, a didactic error was made and has caused the Jewish and Palestian people a great many suffering and sorrow, forever. This is not the US political body's way of looking at Israel and the Palestinian conflict, but in England there might be a different approach and idea with a classical reading in it's geology and design. But we know that the British government is in favour of a Palestinian State, under Prime Minister, Boris Johnson. Palu and Tiglath Pileser, this was the name of the Assyrian monarch. And it's language is classical Assyrian (Tuklat Pal asar). This too it's phonetics are similar to Pal-es-ti-nians. It is just a thought and not a geopolitical initiative to solve the unsolvable problem between Israelis and the Palestinian people, unless we take their sovereignty very seriously.

Peleshet and Philistia are names for the people living in ancient Gaza (Hebrew Bible and the Old Testament).










Benyamin Netanyahu is still the prime minister.

4 June 2021
(21:00 PM)

Again tonight many from the Right- Wing bloc are back out in the streets and protesting against Yamina MK's. Former prime minister Ehud Barak called it earlier in the evening 'political terror' being acted against the MK's of the Yamina Party as we speak. Just to remind ourselves, the mandate was given to Mr Netanyahu first and second to Mr Yair Lapid of the Yesh Atid Party and his coalition of Left- Wing and Arab parties. Chairman, Mr Naftali Bennett, of Yamina and his faction have decided to join Mr Lapid's coalition, and so did Gideon Sa'ar of New Hope, Yisrael Beytenu and Blue & White. All political parties in this coalition have passed the threshold and can act legally to join any coalition whether Right- or Left- Wing. Mr Netanyahu knows the procedure and he also cannot find any false work in play here on Mr Lapid and Mr Bennett. But he would want Naftali Bennett not to join the Yesh Atid Party coalition. And the protesters outside the MK's homes are saying and demanding the same. Israel is the middle street and it's people are mute, because they are watching something of internal politics unfolding and the question is where it will all lead to. The global leader of Israel, Mr Netanyahu, wants Yamina to get out of the Left- Wing and join Likud. And plus the Arab Party Mr Netanyahu had wooed to join him and make the 61 mandates to form government, last month when he had the mandate. And from what we read in the newspaper JP online after 23 March, Yamina had said yes, but New Hope wasn't going to be in it, or Yisrael Beytenu. The kingmaker had no choice but to use his ticket to form a government with the left- over- party (pardon my French) of Yesh Atid and his parties leaning far and extreme left. Israel again was left in the middle and so was it's people. The question put to Mr Netanyahu was whether he wanted a fifth election or let go off this party and coalition, headed by Yesh Atid leader, mr Yair Lapid. A simple and logical question and answer view. What answer can the prime minister of Israel give, when he is 72 this year in October and has been for 30 years in politics? From all the protests outside the homes of Yamina MK's it is clear that the prime minister doesn't know all the answers and is certain that he can win and come back to the Knesset as a fifth time prime minister, perhaps sixth or seventh too! But in the meantime the coalition will advance.

Another question to mr Netanyahu is what is so dreadful to be in the opposition when it is already clear that the coalition will not be able to deal with long term results in the big government way as he was used to? The debate could slim down every time the ousted prime minsiter would put forward the question of what long term plans the prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett, has at multi-level issues or historical facts on the economy national and global levels. He could deal the novice prime minister in his first one hundred days blow after blow during these debates and win the day again and again. Unless, this is exactly what the incumbent prime minister fears most, that what he can expect of the prime minister Naftali Bennett are answers. But realistically is this the truth in a coalition with a short period of time to exist in government? Of course, there are other issues e.g. the Palestinians living in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and in Gaza. Also the 2 mln Arabs living in Israel are new factors on the coalition timeline when Mr Bennett will be prime minister. The answers are existential as it is here since the inception of the State of Israel in 1948. The International world has since then reminded Israel of long and short term consequences of any action they might have taken or will take on the Palestinian issue (keeping out Israel's existence out of the equation). This wasn't only Mr Netanyahu's problem to deal with when he was prime minister. Every prime minister of Israel will be in the same squeeze over and over again as long as it will go on without any solution to the problem in Palestine or between Israel and Palestine. In other words, some things are not Mr Bennett or Mr Lapid's fault or early failures. But it is nevertheless an issue to worry about, in a healthy way. Today the world is a lot harder to impress with deterrence and agility to go to war. The nations around Israel in the Middle East have learned to see something different in the last two decades, that if you come against Israel with force or the military you will be giving them the reason to use disproportionate force against the provocation. And it will take the right to defend itself as a full right against any enemy, near and anywhere in the world. Basically these are existential laws to maintain sovereignty of living in Israel as Jews. And they are not short or long term, but eternally. Under this prime minister or any other in the future. This is also something the incumbent prime minister knows and cannot deny the truth that this is holding the nation together as one. Indefinitely.

Coming back to protesting the MK's of the Yamina Party not to join the coalition with Mr Yair Lapid, or known now as the Left- Wing, one can only say that it is quite sad watching the people going down the drain and leave out democracy from this story in the name of the Right. But then again, how do global leaders act when they are about to be ousted and coming down like a built lego- man? Mr Netanyahu's propaganda machine against Mr Bennett is not holding any water. Israel is looking at a new design of coalition under the Bennett and Lapid prime ministership. When saying new it is referring to the political historical process in Israel and not as in other democracies very distant from here. One thing however remains very important if they want to continue without Mr Netanyahu as prime minister, which is the question if there is a good reason to oust him at this point. Was it his corruption charges, or was it his mismanagement of the national economy? When there are a few issues for the Right- Wing prime minister, e.g. sovereignty in Area C, the Palestinian Two- State solution, the wars in Gaza and the ICC probing of Israel on war crimes, what could then possibly make him want to stay prime minister? If Mr Bennett and Mr Lapid will become prime minister that will have to be dealt with as this cannot be something to sweep under the carpet. They are a herd of white elephants in the room and hard to ignore by any prime minister in government in Israel. Meretz party chairman, Mr Nitzan Horowitz, was in favour of the ICC probe, and one cannot begin to wonder how this will go down for the prime minister Naftali Bennett who is resolute against the ICC probe. Is it too late to say that Yamina could become a new Right- Wing bloc with the other 'defectors' from the Likud Party? A fourth factor is putting the same question to Mr Lapid. Because what the prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, is now saying is that neither Bennett or Lapid will be having an able government and be prime minister, since they cannot bring sovereignty to Judea and Samaria, have peace with the Palestinians and can stop Hamas from attacking Israeli citizens through stealth belligerence. That is a trap, as you could go on defending your newly fresh government over and over till the end of it's term or crash. What was it again? The people of Israel that needed a change government?

Another warning: no one should be falsely making any imagination to use this government as a diversion of the state in which Israel has got itself in with the International World.

My tweet, 5 June 2021:
Word of the day: Israel & the Republic of I. I send the monarchy through the motion of parliament.
Votes 120 MK's: Yes
No












There are very extreme moments between Meretz and Yamina. It is either drown or sink for the coalition right now.

1 June 2021

Empirical studies are giving some answer to the problems the parties are facing while the other side to this is all kiss and make up for 'lost times' (?). From the outside hundreds of nautical miles away one can only not try go there in these deep political swamps in Israel and try stopping the battles between the camps of Right and Left Wing parties. Tamar Zandberg, staunch defender of basic human rights for Arabs or the Arab citizens living in Israel, and advocate of LGBTQ minorities in Tel Aviv and around in the big capitals of the world, US and Australia, is the one crocodile and her unity tears to woe Mr Bennett that everything is okay by her and her party for him to lead as first prime minister in the coalition with Yair Lapid. From the public all that Mr Bennett and Ayelet Shaked can hear from the camp of the Right- Wing is not to give in to Ms Zandberg her fake cries and that he should pay heed. Why people make it sound as if Mr Bennett has entered a viper's nest outsiders cannot imagine why public life can be made so difficult between politicians who happen to have had university degrees. But fair play is all dead. Also the problem Yamina voters are having is the thought of breathing side by side with Michal Michaeli, Labour, as if she had just landed from Mars and now is trying to body snatch mr Bennett to act like she is human and not Martian. (Mars Attack?) Parliament is the same body and has changed tyres that are not from the same brand as the car. But what can you do on your way to destiny and had your tyres punctured? If we understand correctly the far left extreme party Meretz is only extreme when you are the other party and being extreme. It is called diametric. It is not something you feel and touch. Where is politics running short in the public domain, one could ask. To others around the world when the government announces their coalition is a temp solution and not permanent, there is no problem understanding what the government is saying. Or are we too stupid to listen and give ear to our politicians? The bureaucratic will and the will of the people, God forbid, do not exclude each other. If democracy dies in our part of the world we are dead. Without a democracy the economy and it's 24/7 pressures, even when a global economic crisis, the citizens would sink without having the right to a welfare state and help bail us out quietly out of the mess. The citizen can go to sleep and not notice anything of this global menace. We live in another world perhaps.

But in Israel perhaps the Left- Wing and it's extreme party Meretz are deadlier than the Taipan in the Asiatic sea, now trying hard to bite from the surface instead of deep sea. On land they also seem to have special biological abilities to transform to herbivores and telling people how eating grass or flowers is good for everyone. Imagine Mr Bennett to start doing the same and coming home to his family with a health box of bio products, ordinary grass, and from now on fanatically switching from falafels or eating kosher meat to Meretz diets. It's milkshake. Some in the public on the JP in the comment box have tried to picture the military (incidently that is also what prime minister Benyamin Netanyahu has done) with Ms Zandberg, Michal Michaeli, Yair Lapid and Naftali Bennett as security ministers on defense issues. Of course, a civilized Israeli public is standing de facto on the outside of all that is security and defense (military secret weapons are not discussed on the streets of Tel Aviv). But some say that ministries are de jure and that therefore these are not the right people to lead the country. The late Mrs Golda Meir once told Anwar Sadat, then president of Egypt, before the assassination, "Let's make love and not war." Who will pick the last straw to use similar language to Israel's fiercest enemies? The sixties, ah... What nostalgia years for Israeli politics... The army generals will problably also say about the present time coalition vision under Mr Yair Lapid, "You cannot be half pregnant in the military when you want to secure all lives of the Israeli people." No one knows what answer to give about having two extremes snakefighting behind the scenes in this coalition. The only hope that you can have right now is to think that the military will not fail to secure the lives of Mr Bennett and Ms Ayelet Shaked, who are trying to do something in a democratic textbook. A coalition drehbuch, if you please. Or, a difficult marriage (Ingmar Bergman style). Mr Bennett as prime minister in a hybrid coalition will not give up annexation? Under the incumbent prime minister, this was last year, mr Bennett had said that he was postponing annexation. His polls had fell immediately from 24 to 16 that week. Today this can't be relevant in relation to Meretz in the coalition. Ah, viper's are mothers with serpentine eggs too! So, stand up and man up, all women and men in this coalition of change. The public cannot do your infighting here behind the walls of your political castle. Neither do we sit with you and eat your grass or kosher meat. "If you need me I'll be sitting in my backyard with a good book and enjoying a little late springtime sun or red evening sky. I am just trying to chill-out from all the pain in this coaltion fight against the great prime minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu senior." Play with words. Ben gidiyorum.

Error: Merav Michaeli.












Tax payers.

29 May 2021

Mass unemployment across the European Union makes another sickness next to what we are now witnessing out in the streets against Israel. Among the unemployed in big developed economies a 'brother' is a welcome gift, whether he be from the end of the world or from Palestine. Some things are not difficult to explain in what ways social cohesion can fracture deep enough in these societies and by the slightest opportunity can be or feel 'empowered' to reactionair cells of aggression and 'civil terrorism'. Attacking Jews over the Israeli- Palestinian conflict is a form of 'civil terrorism' and is disturbing in a democracy as that of the European Union. Life for life, feeling deprived of all connection to civil life and employment one can understand the underlying anger here and why so many take to the streets to alleviate their frustrations against the prosperity of the other levels, tiers, getting richer and more each day as they breathe. The mirage of helping the Palestinian course is always going to be about dreams to fulfill this hunger for esteem long lost through long life unemployment of any kind. Wherever they come from, this is Germany, France, the Scandinavian countries and also in the Netherlands or in Belgium. Among the here above Germany produces the biggest terror cell where long unemployment has become a disease without cure. During the operation Guardian of the walls between Israel and Hamas, the Police in the Netherlands were extremely alert and even held a collecting of weapons (Kiko) immediate action, where people could hand in their weapons of any sort or kind in a container at every Police Station. The message was very clear, even if some could argue whether this was effective enough. The public however were also made alert that some in civil life and society do carry weapons and in a moment when people take to the streets with the intention of committing acts of violence against Jews in particular it made a difference in perception. You have to work on clever schemes in this new wave of antisemitism out in the streets, just not to increase the already danger and violence in which you can get yourself into for being Jewish. Democracy is not only about vandalism and violence or protest over a conflict outside in another country (in the Middle East), but that tax payers will not be happy to wake up in the morning and the city has been made destroyed by violent protest. That can't be the meaning to 'freedom of expression' by large.

In 1940 the Jewish people e.g. in Germany were also citizens and living in a democratic country. Today in the 21st century one has to think hard again why antisemitism is getting out of hand once again in the streets of the European Union. The tyranny of the 30 tax payers in ancient Greece, who remembers such a story in a time like ours? The 30 tyrants decided for the people that it is not for them to fill the treasury and they should be exempt from paying taxes. Some things are true on a small scale, but when stretched out on a bigger scale, by example to mass unemployment, somehow the memory of mankind grows back to the grassroots of hatred and filling their sense of justice against the tyranny of 'the rich' only, Jews maybe? Imagine 30 mln rich Jews only while closing your eyes and how this makes you feel. But the other masses have failed also and were incapable for decades to radicalize in a more economic sense of protest and get back to the fundamental meaning of what is holding up society in a democracy. The first principle, if you want. Throughout history the public has always 'gone to war' against the aristocracy and in France even against the autocracy of Louis XVI, the Jewish aristocracy is not something strange as in a new phenomenon in our time. What is demeaning or lewd is that they have no particular social or intellectual method (politics or economics) to protest inequality amongst the mass of people whether in the EU or outside. Instead they walk up to individual Jewish people out in the streets and use face recognition (not techniques or technology)by random, or some other physical feature of the Jewish people, and attack such a civilian in the same population where they are part of. It is their sense of grace and feeling the beautiful people, when being on the 'right side' of life. Another strange phenomenon is the showing of their fair or white skin, that Jews are not the only 'white' people in the Middle East. And also they do this with strong proof by their allies in the 'real white people'. A stark reminder to the Jewish people when being branded Semitic from their German white folks, could perhaps be here the underlying message. The Israeli- Palestinian conflict, I'm afraid, goes a little deeper than that and it is of vital importance not to be tempted to bury Israel under the rubble of hatred and ignore the fact that Israel is a democracy de facto. When going out unto the streets, please, talk more politics and not that the Jews should be killed and wiped out from Palestine. Politics is the way of the EU and at the end of the day it can only work this way. Even for it's own duped people...

You can't help but notice how in London the Police has one policy for the Palestinians (demonstrations are violent and belligerent) and another for the Jewish citizens, 'go home and be safe'. Another policy and logic is that London should be safe for all citizens, whether going home or coming out of their homes. It is called a civil society and strong democratic country with an old and tested democracy. (Israel's democracy is not that old at all, but is only a measly 72 years young country). England's misinterpretation of antisemitism with purely something of Germany and not English is dangerous when it gets out unto the streets as freedom of speech and acts (as if by legal acts). Where antisemtism in Germany goes beyond public perception, if true that the upper class had anything to do with the Holocaust, that it is not so much incinerating the Jewish nation with a gladness of heart, but more it is to punish divine providence and give some actor to do this grand theater of massacre of Jews everywhere and wherever the eye meets with this insanity. It could be one person not agreeing with mortality and fights a private fight in the comfort of his crested mansion, somewhere in the blue mountains of Germany, against God, for immortality. Former US president Donald Trump had said in 2020 that they hate God whoever hates Jews. What this writing is trying to say is that some hate Jews (especially in northern Europe and in Germany) because they hate God to have cut out a nation for His own from among the many other princely nations and made them Hebrews. If we believe what the Nibelungen is teaching it's own audience of believers, the German could reach such a degree of hatred by fighting to get his immortality, from God. He is prepared to go that far and only he can perform this insane act on his own, or... He creates a creature among nations...








Unconditional cease- fire and the end of Operation Guardians of the walls.

22 May 2021

The US, EU and many around in the world have welcomed the cease- fire between Israel and Hamas and to end the war. This time the war lasted for 12 days since 8 May at the beginning of this month. Also the civil unrest in Israel between Jews and Arabs have come to some sort of quiet and ebbing further down now. What happened yesterday at the Temple Mount did not reach a national emergency again, compared to the weeks before. But nothing feels just quite normal yet and there is much talk in the aftermath about the damage done of Israel's first civil unrest. No one knows what may be coming next, except when we are talking about forming a government. Yesh Atid still has the mandate for forming a coalition till 2 June 2021, and also many are wondering whether Naftali Bennett will be the first in a rotational government with Yair Lapid. Is Israel still a democracy after the burning and flames in Israel and Gaza? The simple answer is that as long as we still have a Left- Wing, whether active or in opposition, that Israel is still a democracy and the politicians are now trying their best to suck from it's stone when set first in 1948 by the founding fathers of the State of Israel. In world opinion the answer is negative and saying that Israel is a ethnocracy instead of a democracy, with Arab citizens not being treated as equals. They have never seen the daylight of equality in Israeli society that was to their advancing greater prosperity of any kind. "Think not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country." Does this ring a bell? 2 Mln Israelis are living under the poverty line with one mln in the waiting, multiplied by 2 mln Arab citizens living without equal rights, yes, it is impossible than to make up democracy in Israel today by definition. If prime minister Mr Benyamin Netanyahu (Ben Natay) could come to some agreement with the Left- Wing and centrist Right parties, that Israel needs a government to proceed with the democratic process and stabilize the country after the flames and war Operation Guardian of the walls, than perhaps we could have something of a moment's pause from all sides now feeling tired and ill about not having a functioning governing body.

Secondly, that makes it more important to maintain stability in the country and continue with the negotiations between Yesh Atid and other parties and form this government everyone is now talking about. Even before the war broke out. A stable government is good for a stable currency, so they say. The Israel built by Mr Netanyahu in three decades also deserves a good leadership after him and to maintain stability, or let it go down the drain like rainwater. But that is the economy, or as Bill Clinton former US president once had said, "It's the economy, stupid." The real problem that Israel is facing is of another opinion. The Palestinians in the West Bank, that, as someone said in 2013, must have contiguity of land and movement without the disruptions of occupation and the Jewish settlers. From a political mind and opinion, and this is today globally, these are the right choices to make and Israel should halt the settler's movement or buildings in Area C, in the West Bank. We need maps to see and visualize how many decades ago this had started kicking off. And we need a letter with a map of the Jewish Home and it's contiguity, when written to Lord Rotschild in 1918. Every evil has a root, one could say, if Israel has been the one usurping the land of Palestinians since it established the Jewish Home many decades ago. Perhaps a slightly technical detail of reading the maps could make a universal difference in the world opinion on the rights of Palestinians to have the land of Palestine when only defined when the British Mandate 'occupied' Palestine. No one can turn back the time machine either and make this go away forever. So, what can we do now? Again, it's the economy. Thousands of years many empires 'owned' Jerusalem. It was the treasurer at home and his budgets who can tell you about the bookkeeping/ accountancy what 'owning' Jerusalem nominally meant for the country at home! The human race has changed, but Jerusalem has never changed and whoever 'owns' this part of the world, will know which treasurer it needs to sustain this 'owning' or 'ownership' of Jerusalem. Israel is now 72 years old and has until now made heavily investing in Jerusalem, without the treasury getting poorer, but is in fact a growing factor among the Jewish nations in around the world. How long can this ownership go on is the Messianic question, and only for Jews. Perhaps an irrelevance of some kind in that way of thinking, but it is not based on prophecies or pro- Israel thinking. When Palestinians will be living in the West- Bank and take Jerusalem, let's hope they have a treasurer as well that goes with this. Because Jerusalem gives nothing in return to any conquerer, but dust. Israel alone, has so far, been able to make the dust gist in it's timeline. For Jews the incentive is not to do world trading business from Jerusalem, but to maintain it as the Jewish Home. The emphasis is on 'maintaining'.

All this quick snapshot thinking can be a little inadequate for those with greater works and analysis on how to give Palestinian people the right to exist and build a future State for Palestinians as a nation. But inadequate can sometimes be more accurate when in technical details. Instead of emotional building up momentum. And this is easier for a non Jew to do the reasoning on the outside (as yours truly).










24:00 PM/AM, Israel.

5 May 2021

Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu for a fourth time in two years has failed to form government. The blame according to prime minister Netanyahu is on Naftali Bennett, after the mandate given by President R Rivlin last month after the election was expired at midnight (1') tonight. Some of the journalists from the JP have already warned this isn't the end and that Mr Netanyahu could still bring down a government led by then Prime Minister Naftali Bennett in two years time. The time of his rotational prime ministership. Mr Yair Lapid, for now, would be than the alternate prime minister. It is true that the incumbent will or might come back and haunt Mr Bennett, when prime minister. He will be sitting on the benches of the opposition and keep his keen R- W eye on the man who became prime minister with sheva mandati. It might bring some loud laughter to the other side as a surging sea or ocean. All depending on what day or time during these Knesset sessions. Laughter in terms of human relation to the imagination which is organic and not political, that could be, yes. But let us make no mistake here with a man who did become prime minister with sheva mandati. He was the challenge that was never before to become prime minister in the ranks of the Right- Wing bloc. It was unthinkable and the incumbent and the old boy's club of Likud should remember the time before it happened. This has never happened before, perhaps in the history of western democracy, unless... Let alone in Israel. We know of Mr Michael Heseltine in England who had challenged the former and late prime minister, Margaret Thatcher and lost, also this was within the Conservative Party. Then John Major had won and became prime minister. It is in pure democracy terms or philosophies when necessity becomes in the national interest to act and seize the moment of intervention. It is not the strike of the lion, unfortunately, but that of a fiery serpent. Politics like Medicine is a bit of a similarity when seeking remedies to heal either the body of one, or the body of the people as a whole. We understand, it is so unlike Israel at the moment. Time is past midnight and the date is in it's early and almost unborn hours for this particular moment: 00:29 AM. On this side of the Atlantic or Mediterranean Sea, all depending how to say that today when still early in the embryo minutes just after midnight. Tomorrow we will know more how the President will decide on giving the mandate to either Yair Lapid, or sending the mandate back to the Knesset. Journalists have said last night that the President will not give the mandate to Naftali Bennett. And that puts Mr Bennett in a rather odd situation with the Right- Wing bloc and his own ideological Party, Yamina. The pressure is cooking on him how to cast his mandate in these last seconds.

Mr Netanyahu is an old lion and smelling the meat he will devour coming nearer to him from across the Knesset floor. Very soon indeed. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and alternate prime minister, Yair Lapid, are big meat in the incumbent's eyes, because of one reality that they share. They are both new to the game of being prime minsiter in and of Israel. Being prime minister in Israel and being prime minister of Israel, the grammar he knows well, are not the same thing but two different entities. It is something like people living in a country but have never been to the King's palace. Except there is one different aspect of people and the 'king's palace'. It is democracy. News just in: the only really truth of the hour today is that the Left should insist on heaving an Arab Minister in this formation. Democracy is also becoming a parallel as well as asymmetrical in this government, one could say. Mr Bennett should very well take care how he will walk this high rope from one side to the other side in the coming days. The Yesh Atid government formation is a centrifuge of many 'dirty laundry', something that is automatically inherited from the previous decades and governments. Where will they start on day one? Horizontal government and vertical government to govern has always been a unique way to govern where and when it happened, and than succeed. But here the experience feels more real than in any other country in the Middle East or overseas in Europe. The formula in Israel seems to be one of 'how not to succeed'. After many decades the corporate side has done it's lionshare of stimulating the economy for business and the rich, while the share on the side of democracy went bust. 2 Mln people are living under the povertyline the statistics say in the first quarter of 2021. Perhaps the lion is not Mr Netanyahu, when looking at data as here above on the 'real' economy. If Mr Bennett as prime minister would know how to answer when questioned how he will help the people of Israel, of course with fat numbers of poverty in Israel in the hands of the opposition leader, he might become the lion of Judah and Israel. Well, if Mr Bennett knows how to assert power as the prime minister we will experience a dramatic change in politics of Israel very soon. It is not a matter of how to assert to power, as when campaigning! Mr Netanyahu will be fierce in opposition and show his contempt here, which is the kind of thing you do not expect from a statesman like a former prime minister... But why else should you also want to be prime minister when you already know what you stand for and who is the other side? No one would want to be in the young prime minister's shoes when the moment comes for him at 'prime minister's questions'. But it is a challenge and you get the impression of Naftali Bennett that he likes this kind of the political battles and confronts them as an expert, and who happens to know what it feels like to 'work' for the man sitting across the floor and who was once his boss. Or imagine him sitting on the bench in his silk pyjama's feeding not hyenas but other domestic animals. Mr Netanyahu was once a consummate leader and politician. But what if he still is, ask many journalists on suspicion tonight.

Mr Yair Lapid has offered Naftali Bennett to be first prime minsiter in a rotational government with him. It would make Mr Bennett his mom very happy, and so his wife and maybe the children. Or the glass will stay half full or half empty to eternity. 

Additional: If Naftali Bennett will take up the prime ministership in the first round of his rotation, in his defence should pledge why formation of this kind was necessary between a Right- Wing cluster and the Left- Wing parties, and that he will suggest to parliament that for all times when the nation is a danger to itself through representatives it has elected this clause should again be open for 'alteration' and 'intervention'. A political crisis should not harm itself nor the state in which democracy and people become estranged. A clause also with great emphasis to exploitation through sagacity or even by clever designs. It is the nation and it's conscience when fallen prey to political lethargy. We can all understand where such a path could lead to in a free democracy.










Mr Benyamin Netanyahu reversal of fortune in politics, a grotesque outcome...

28 April 2021

The love of the people for the prime minister was and still is an undying national sentiment ongoing for many decades, and despite the indictments or his trial still it is the Israeli public that wants him. At the end of this road is demoracy and even for the man who is worshipped by his nation and countrymen/ women. When looking with oversimplified eyes from the outside the prime minister has nothing to lose by resigning, and could have lived a happy rich life to the day of his demise. As a great man and leader, and prime minister. Many want to make old comparisons how Israel once had leaders of a different stature, the late Mr Ben Gurion, the late Mrs Golda Meir, all great people at the beginning of the creation of the State of Israel. What we are missing here in the big picture is that Mr Netanyahu does not belong to the same class of the older politicians, except where it pitches partriotism in Israel, as this is still ongoing and will also play a new role if Mr Bennett and Mr Lapid come to some sort of unity if they have to form government, later on this or next week. Mr Netanyahu and his government have never before existed in Eretz Israel and whoever is going to 'inherit' this government and democracy is in for a big surprise. Israel is now big government and it's inner State is not any different already at this young stage from it's peers in some western countries. There is no proof the people of Israel saw this one coming over them and now wants to take over their ordinary lives. It is grotesque to think something bad might happen in Israel at this moment and kindle a flame that wasn't there before. The flame paradoxically is love for the prime minister and the woke Israel is thinking that he does not reciprocate with love, but is actually making things easy too complicated for everyone. Why, why, why, Delilah? There is something of self inflicting wound event happening and this is not hidden away in conspiracies behind the emperor's back, but in fact is out in the open as we speak. What has happened to the great man and leader that Mr Netanyahu was for years?

Has his fortune been similar to feudalism and becoming something close of a feudal lord with Israel to be his castle? Literally his home is where his castle is. And not the other way round. It is just more than boiled eggs and toast in this situation that he insists on, first that he wants to stay on as prime minister and doing before God and man everything possible to create the laws, not of economics, in new canons. Israel in it's 72 or more years has never been a big government as the one Mr Netanyahu created after the eighties. At the end of democracy the big cannon of law would have been to change hands within the party and let someone else 'inherit' or play his role, one would say and think. The question therefore is why doesn't the prime minister wants to retire gracefully and sit in the seat of honour to serve the country from the 'back benches', so to speak? It is a puzzling and sizzling affairs of state, because it also looks as if all his actions taken are deliberate. He refuses to recognize for example Mr Bennett's great political potential, and will not share power with the alternate prime minister Benny Gantz (this was last year in a rotation government agreement). With limited understanding how politics in general work, let alone in Israel, still there is something eerie about the news bulletins you can read on the Jerusalem Post for the last four weeks after the election 23 March. And the saying goes that where there is smoke there is also fire. But considering the age of the State and it's memory of the Holocaust, no one would think that today the same people have turned to a more mundane nation and very earthly in terms of riches with a sharp contrast from national rags. Have the people of Israel 'normalized' their humanity to the rest of the world and forgotten how to make the distinction of the Jewish fate from that of the gentiles? And democracy is moving now strangely in Israel, lama?

Mr Smotrich has said something that needs reminding, earlier today, about sovereignty in Israel and of the people. The landowners in Gothic England understand where all this could lead to when the lords do not honour their responsibilities and this is one for land and the other is to maintain honour or respect for the system. The more grand the system the more one has to make deep bows to country and sovereignty. Why else consider yourself above the fray of others? And this includes that a country cannot go to war with itself when sovereignty is king in the country. Or be doomed and cursed. Mr Netanyahu has been rich and living in luxury in a prime ministerial residence for many decades, but the land Israel it's sovereignty went bust in his mind somewhere and some time ago, one can only presume. And who is Naftali Bennett, leader of the Yamina Party? To mr Netanyahu everyone else is looking like a peasant or country boy who wants to be prime minister, even when we know that last year Mr Bennett wasn't busy conspiring against his beloved prime minister to become the first minister in Israel the following year. Today everyone calls for him to leave politics as he has usurped the prime ministerial seat from Mr Netanyahu, which doesn't reflect the time when Mr Bennett was busy fighting with Mr Netanyahu against the first moments of the pandemic crisis last year in March 2020. Watching him work with the prime minister is still the real truth about Mr Bennett, that here was not a man who was planning the following year to become PM. He only had made a comment on his role if he was the PM and what he then would have done right now (then) with fighting the pandemic. And some (including yours truly) took hold of this prospect to capitalize on since then, perhaps calling to him to have a shot if there would be a next election. Also it was a time no one had thought it possible and that Mr Netanyahu later on would not allow Mr Gantz to become the prime minister in November this year. In December last year all was lost and the new election was called. What could Mr Bennett do?

In short one can say that it is not about Naftali Bennett, but the principle of democracy and State that is being eclipsed by the sun god and person of Mr Netanyahu. And his rays of power are blinding politics and the nation at large (or at the end of the day). But no one is holding that against him, but in fact are encouraging him to go on living his life in the sun until his last day on earth in Israel. If only the principle of State and it's young democracy is honoured. Or has the prime minister at the age of 71 become a political mechanical doll in the 21st century? To the greater volume of today's politics in Israel the question everyone is asking or not saying in public is whether everything happening right now has any bearing of a democratic process. And making of course this one for the books of history. Sovereignty comes first for people and State, and secondly it is the prime minister next. Also another question with regard to the here above writing is whether the people now know how to serve their prime minister. In Israel it is part of law almost being the greater divine law to do so, in an equally greater conscience. Love is being abused somewhere in all of this when the prime minister rejects all the members their good efforts, or we are completely mistaken. Should people draw conclusions of their own and say that the principles drawn by the prime minister are here to serve him in all his purposes, whatever they are in broad daylight? In the meantime it looks very much an eagerness by Naftali Bennett to push for the output of domestic economy into the newest days of Israel's future. A sort of Bennettnomics introduction, but not quite as big as Abenomics of Japan. Will he get the chance on 7 seats next to Labour's 7, Meretz 6 and in bigger pictures that of Mr Lapid's party, with 17 seats? Today Mr Bennett has held talks with Mr Abbas, of the Arab Party. Bigger levels of politics is new to a man who wanted to have nothing to do with 'begging' for the Arab Party is now acting for the first time in his career as the real politician Israel seems to be needing today. Little is written here about Mr Lapid his majority with 17 seats and this is done deliberately for the time being. One thing that can be said of the Left- Wing going out of it's own traditional ways too, just as much as the Right- Wing, is that on both sides these are sturdy patriots. And in another scenario Israel, as Mr Bloomberg said last year in a news article, that both nations belong to this country, Arabs and Jews. Patriotism is a very attractive hearth of any 'growing up' country and if both nations have to defend Israel at large, who knows that this was the miracle of peace to be forged and yet to come?

Back to Mr Netanyahu. In heavenly thought the prime minister could still have a good thing to give to the people of Israel. No one could also think otherwise of him. Why eat your young as tiger dads do with their tiger cubs? A worldly Jew and known to the old order as 'the toast of the town', now descending into a vast other world no other prime minister of Israel should go or follow, or envy. Another eerie about all his actions is that he is not really a chaotic man or doing theatrics. But who are we on the outside and not knowing how Israeli politics really work in practice? The country would still come to him for his advice at any time, if let's say he had resigned from High Office. It just isn't adding up to his character of politics, something you have to give the man. Yes, it is true, no one will ever be able to stand up against Israel's enemies, suave and sophisticated enough on the world stage and tell them how it works when you provoke Israel. He had an enormous great style and at the same time he was ferociously resolute to make and take decisions against any enemy. Is a dead lion (metaphorically speaking) better than a dead dog/ dad dog? When looking much closer one can say that he is acting unlike him at the moment. Especially because he has been in the opposition before and playing the 'dead lion' fooling everyone. Perhaps he is much more worth than we can ever imagine or dream? What if he was your dad, isn't that what you would have believed, that your dad was the most powerful man and had a worth of immeasurable content? Left and right, the beast that tears him up is not mr Bennett, or Mr Lapid. It is perhaps conscience or a fight against a stranger like Jacob at Bethel. He should be capable of making anyone a greater prime minister than he had ever been, if truth. This is no way for a man like him to go down. And what has he desired so much more than being a first citizen of Israel? Or, these questions are all to lament a man you don't really know, but only have seen or read about him in the media. For decades. The man was Abner, the man was Joab. Why does he has to be in this isolation as if it were his political Colditz? People say that he is mad to act in this way against the State not appointing a Justice Minister than only by way of sheer cynicism. Madness would only be if he thought and acted like Napoleon Bonaparte, or Benito Mussolini, in a sudden change of physicality. This man has been on the world stage holding up the pillars of society in Israel, from the eighties onto the 21st century. He is a heavy karat prime minister to have or to have had. But he is refusing to share his knowledge and help transform Israel yet and once again to it's future? Will he accept that people still would want to respect him and are trusting his good nature to be respected? It is an important question if this was the same man who wanted to annex land for the good of Israel.








Unity government on rotational prime ministership in Israel?

(Personal op)

22 April 2021

From an outsider's view: not only a unity government but in the long term it also should become a participation government. (With the Arab parties going to the liberal seats, as so to stop controversy coming or going to the center stage of politics) This unity government also seems like a one term solution and not to prolong the current political crisis. But in the middle when rotation changes hands we will have another breaking point, and after that the next general election to go back to the majority party rule in government. Especially seen from the point of view of Right- Wing, then prime minister, Mr Naftali Bennett. We don't yet see any new updates on the situation how this is today, on the Jerusalem Post, but it is expected later on that we will have more on this, also whether or if any change in the Netanyahu bloc has been made in the meantime. This situation could go from bad to worse when there isn't a clear design ready- made to explain to the electorate on both sides, and not forget the side of the Arab parties, why there was no other solution but to go ahead with an emergency change of rules to form a coalition. Is mr Naftali Bennett seriously heading towards 'widening the political spectrum' in Israel with his Right- Wing party and change the present system that has been known to all of Israel for the last three decades under Mr Netanyahu? Here is the political devil at play, with a unity of Right- and Left- Wing, but also the Arab parties. It is especially one to notice when swearing in a new coalition into Knesset, and strangely enough not visible if one considers the Arab parties that have been part of Israeli politics now for some time. Mr Bennett is not only taking on an enormous step forward, but he is also making a great commitment to step back from his 11 or 12 years experience in government as minister of Defense and Education.

His announcement last night to head a unity government (Yesh Atid) if Mr Netanyahu would not be able to form a coalition before 4 May, in two weeks time, was almost as shell shocking before or post anything happening from now. The people will not understand how this has happened and that Mr Netanyahu is right to say that you can't become prime minister on sheva mandatie. The wider view and deeply rooted in ancient Judaism on the other hand can say that this was done before when King David went to Achish and formed a 'strange alliance' with the Philistine prince. It is true that what Mr Bennett has been suggesting here to head a unity government (with Yesh Atid) was committing himself to a 'strange alliance' which is how you feed to the political hybrid beast in history, wherever it takes residence in a direct democracy. Someone or something will benefit from this opportunity, in the end, and become himself the hybrid beast... It happens, more than once or often. Design is therefore crucial to this political asymmetry at this very moment and do it a pronto. Before the break point will come when changing hands from Right- Wing to a Left- Wing prime minister and being cheered loudly by the parties on his side. This moment should be celebrated in a different style when it's beginning were humbled by crisis and not victory. What can the moment at the breaking say or be named and let the prime minister- rotate on a post steady course? His destiny? There should also made provisions at the beginning how Mr Bennett could go back to being a 'majority' and out of the unity government with the Left- Wing. (His Yamina Party at this start of prime ministership was not a majority) This is why symmetry is always the best and more strongest of democracy and it's architecture. 1 1/2 Year to be prime minister in a Unity Government is not only finite, it is forever finite.

Israel itself is also not ready at this point to accept a different system than the current one, to serve all the people alive in the country. Seven mandates should also not become a ridicule in the mouth of the people and have a laugh forever on Mr Bennett's expense. The people do not have a 3D vision to understand how difficult the situation was and how architecture works in politics, that most is done by structures. There is no such thing as a structural emotional democracy, just as much as there isn't a structural emotional economy. There is a difference of moral and ethics when social democracy leads to social welfare in a State! Many are also forgetting that Mr Bennett not only has seven mandates, but that he has also 12 years of ministerial experience in and outside of Knesset. No one will bring him presents on a 1 1/2 year prime ministership, as the rule says that one can only do that after a 10 year prime ministership at least. Today when not receiving presents, Mr Bennett also is Saul, who did not get any presents from the people or men when he became king. How bitterness remains our lesson in ancient and the present time histories, that is something that is followed by human amazement all the time. What can the politicians explain to the people at the moment for this Chimera- split prime ministership in Israel 2021? As much as it is important when unifying, so this will be at the time of divorce. No one eats half the apple and throws away the other half, when sweet.

What is the destiny of England? I asked her.
(For Tessa)

15 April 2021


Word of the day: destiny of England, what is it? To observe England and the overseas, it is a station and more specifically it is a train station, where conception of nature and human rise or fall. It is what Eton teaches it's students when still young and without having any idea or knowing perception. Yet it is still here on the deacon's mind, when it is not stone scone. England's destiny cannot be on a stolen scone and live from it's own station? Flying on Taurus, the bull, and tell the story about England's destiny, now. Or, face eternal gloom. The student will have to know the real destiny that can only be England and not Scotland, but nay not when Conservative. Conquest feels more like England's destiny and accommodate far greater impressions to the overseas about it's high fate. But remember one more thing about destiny which no mortal can ignore in the living world. The people, you know, rich and poor? England has the greatest ability among nations to observe nature planet size, but it's destiny is to keep observations at home on home ground, as has it ever done so clearly for centuries and not only for poetry or prose? There is a clear answer: the station. And with it comes and goes the mechanics. It could be the mechanics of natural force, or finding English iron ore. It is the smell of the earth, and all the digging of it's holes deep into the heart of it's soil(s). It is in England where this vision was born, a destiny belonging to England alone and not to another, cousin nation or other. England is a mechanical nation, by observation. One, the prime minister should know how to answer the deacon, what is England's destiny? Tityrus and Meliboeus, "Or shall we mount again the rural throne, and rule the country kingdoms, once our own!" It is here where we have arrived, once again at the station. And was this not England? Or then be doomed forever. But here we are, an extension to our destiny, is the world. How does England observe Israel and it's ancient destiny? Or hardened thee thy faces and sharp foreskins like the old sea peoples, the Philistines.










Israel and the new Members of Knesset today.

6 April 2021

The President Mr Reuven Rivlin once again has given the mandate to form government to Mr Netanyahu, for the fourth time in a row of deadlocks over two years. It is the Israeli parliamentary system and mathematics of the last election results. The world had a rare view during the procession of these talks at the residence of the President, yesterday. Timing was essential and everyone should sigh a bit of relieve the result of these meetings came the next day, and not waiting until wednesday, tomorrow, 7 April. The incumbent prime minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, now has 28 days to form a coalition and to present a government for another term. But some are already whispering carefully that the prime minister will not be able to form a coalition with 58 seats and will have to go back to the Arab leaders of certain parties to meet the amount of 61 and form government. No one can point out what went different this time and if there was such a moment at all just waiting to take the center stage in Israeli politics by a different mandate and leadership. What we are also seeing are practically the same number of seats on each side, not any different from the previous elections and also not during deadlocks when survey polss are executed routinely. And yet the differentiality was still here and slit through the middle only to expose what the real picture of the electorate did look like in reality (divided over many other greater realities in every day life or living). This was a strange phenomenon in Israeli politics, something that the previous elections did not expose before. It now almost seems like for that which it is a phenomenon and only because of it's nature. Israel in terms of precentage is 100% happy and rich and it doesn't need half of this to share with the left parties of Israel to only make them poor again. The left are only asking the people to make 50% Left- wing and 50% Right- wing, why? They, the people/ electorate, do have a point.

Another question from the people is that the Right- wing is either 100 % in government, but not 50% for Mr Netanyahu and 50 % for Mr Naftali Bennett and Gideon Sa'ar. Again, the people do have a point here too. However in a democracy such as this one the question is not just a mathematical one, but is also a populace one, and which in fact is and should not be void of it's historical pedigree. But we will not look back on the wound in this writing, as it doesn't invite to do so at the moment when the dressing of the wound has started and Mr Netanyahu has made clear today in his speech that he is the prime minister to heal everyone in Israel. Everyone has to respect the choice of the people and the trust in the President of Israel, and to see that nothing goes lost too prematurely. Was it a just move by Mr Bennett to put his prime ministership in the public sphere, when he had not previously done so in the last three elections? In the same year Mr Gideon Sa'ar in December 2020 also had made public his 'defect' from the LIkud Party to form a new party, New Hope, to rival the prime minister and said that he wanted to become prime minister. Along the line of conservatism these were the two men who had challenged the Likud leader and to alert the people of their presence as Right- Wing politicians who could and can lead Israel in the next election. Now the last election in the meantime. But why? We can't keep making wishes on falling stars and think of dazzling the people with the night sky. In Israel that is not politics and reality, but it is that you are living in ridicule 100%. To put it simply: who needs democracy when you have Netanyahu? And also, who is Lapid? Gandalf? Always thinking in doom and gloom in his sad saga of forces of evil fighting the good people of the land? Nah... And perhaps the future ends right here with the will and the speak of the people or demos kratos. City democracy, land democracy and defense (anti clockwise going through both democracies), well, to put it simply, the people have Mr Netanyahu and this is all that matters. Bennett and Sa'ar, they were the fallen stars and have made an impression only briefly. If you are not a cosmonaut it's not a big deal. The people have Mr Netanyahu for their currency and that is real. He is also something of a Bit Coin for the people of Israel. Fortunately, yes, indeed. Unfortunately, yes, indeed. Some might now see where the watertight vacuum in Israel is and it is not hidden away from the world to see where that is ongoing. You are almost committing an act of tyranny from behind the scenes to point out to those who are interested in humanity and truth, that the will of the people in Israel is called Benyamin Netanyahu. And not Yair Lapid (Left- Wing), Naftali Bennett or Gideon Sa'ar (Right- Wing). 100 % Is 100 %.










100 Years from now and Israel will look back on today and say the election was never about Mr Netanyahu.
(Personal op)
26 March 2021

Israel still is a very young nation and now going through what they see as a major crisis after another election. It is also to the rest of the world the strangest thing happening, when a prime minister time and again can win the general election only to enter in another deadlock again. How to proceed from a political jam requires wisdom and debate, and not on how to make a deal work or loosen parties. In the Middle East the only two neighbouring countries who could understand are Turkey and Greece, also remembering how they too once felt 'short' to form coalitions, even before the last five or ten centuries. If Israel comes back in a hundred years to this moment they might have found the answer to time and politics, and remembering how Israel was once in it's infancy and no one even had thought about this as a problem or reason for all 'stalemate' in politics, or forming coalitions with parties opposing the logic of true politics. When and where you defy these oppositions requires maturity and ageing as a nation. There are a few 'good names' in Israeli politics today: the prime minister (now without a new coalition), and other members of the political parties across the political spectrum, but are jammed. This pointing with your index finger can go on, if you are young and time is the only reason for you not to look to the future, but forcing to look back. And how to look back is by standing still, and strangely enough standing still dynamically. And even for those who want to continue, under several designs of coalitions, cannot proceed from here. Why proceed under a coaltion where the parties are bound to break up again? Some even would find it political suicide. Israel has this problem for the simple reason that it is still a very young nation. Seventy two years is not seven hundred years of democracy, and is therefore now exploring the deadlocks and the nature of this democracy it has become. It is ready to deal with a new democracy in it's relative young age. Once they find the wisdom to reason this jam out, left and right will have to agree and say that the country needed this crisis to advance to the next level of Israel's unique democracy. This is only by approach if you want to understand why democracy is becoming a blame game in Israel and isn't very healthy to keep going this path time and time again.

How will people make the difference and build democracy in Israel with an odd coalition this time? Make democracy great again in Israel? Had it not been for heads like Naftali Bennett and Gideon Sa'ar in this last election, no one would have been here today to make the difference in Israel's present time democratic system, e.g. that the prime ministership wasn't something perpetual but rotational in Israel. If no one makes the reach of 'power grab' there is no one who will ever know what prime ministership means and can be. In a democracy it is the prime ministership that matters above all, and not a private person or his stature. In one hundred years Israel will understand. For 72 years prime ministers in Israel were elected and coalitions were formed, because it made the public and the prime minister envision or 'blind'. Who challenges the blind except for one who can see and risk to be stoned to death? The key to this election wasn't right or left wing, but the challenge of those who wanted to replace the prime minister and having done so either in a low- key campaign or with much last minute bravado. But that is what a healthy democracy means and is. The question remains whether in one hundred years both men, Mr Naftali Bennett and Gideon Sa'ar will look back and say something to each other, that the world in Israel after the election in March 2021, democracy was founded for the very first time and only because of their challenge to the prime minsitership. They will be both in political heaven by then. The Grecian theater and plays most of these pieces look theatrical and irrelevant to modern life today. But what if democracy meant 'political heaven' and not 'political haven'? Democracy wasn't written in the Torah, but in the haven of the world for nations. Now it is time for Israel and find the heaven of democracy and find it in theater. As in the theater of war. 72 Years will not yet beat the older systems of democracy, even when you are on top. After 23 March what has gone wrong according to the parties? If no one knows the point of not forming a coalition it will not make any difference today or the next time another election is held. There is talk of who will betray the parties on the right, and then there are talks about the parties on the left 'inciting' of betrayal of the public's trust in the vote. The coalition has only one mechanism: it is rotational. And from this point it can either be Mr Yair Lapid, on the left, or Gideon Sa'ar on the right putting mechanism and rotation to the front. Mr Bennett was the challenger to the prime ministership and should understand how this works in the aftermath, when the coup d' etat has failed... Unless the balance he could make would be that his campaign this time was not aggressive but low- key, until the last two weeks before the election when he accelerated the momentum. He would have to deepen his chance once more, if that is what he still believed he could do. Now there is no point of being humble, but actually the nature of politics have changed after the March 2021 election and up the level, for him. Again, what choices the parties make isn't yet clear at the moment, but we keep our fingers crossed and keep our eyes shut. At least for now.

PS The orthodox have played a prominent role for 72 years in the Jewish State. In the Middle East the Jewish State also means the Jewish Home. And by definition the Jewish Home is where it all began in time and religion for the Jewish people. Democracy came later in the 20th century.












Election show time in Israel is nearly over. Who will be the new prime minister?

18 March 2021

According to the current prime minister there are only two parties in Israel, Likud and Yesh Atid, making this a two- party system in all good faith and wishes perhaps. One day perhaps that may come true, but it is today something else for the last seven decades. The coalition can be led by two blocs of right- wing and left wing in this formula. Next week is a decisive moment for Israel and you can hold your breath for another few hundred hours to wait for what the result might bring or be. Can Naftali Bennett do the trick? If you asked the prime minister, Mr Netanyahu, this question his answer will be a definite 'No'. Continue the question to ask why, the prime minister will say that Bennett has no experience to fly the plane. It could be a bit naughtiness from the pointview of Mr Netanyahu, to be challenged for the first time by another first timer as he once was, without much fuss about experience. Logic will answer for anyone asking the same question that Mr Bennett cannot have prime ministerial experience for the simple fact that he has never been prime minister yet. But what he has is e.g. to convey Israel to it's destined future in the world as it is in Real Time, and that requires a particular character, which should be rare as well as effective. The world will be looking for leading nations who can do this particular thing convincingly and with compassion. One whole year has been mr Bennett's true side of showing care for Israel not as an electorate, but as the people of Israel, and he talked quite a lot to them on isolated cases how their daily mores hits them and how hard this feeling is. Bringing that to the table of the Knesset isn't necessarily the prime minister's job, but it could be part of his job that his government should pay attention to the people first and last, before leaping into the greater challenges for the State and what he calls all people of Israel in a changing more faster than during globalization world.

Mr Netanyahu is currently still the experienced leader of the country and has been doing so for the last forty years and who has also been most loyal to the people of Israel, as prime minister leading the country. What they get on their plate is another story altogether. What the people seem to be needing is a prime minister who is not afraid to face internal problems and can rise to any occasion when dealing with matters of State and Defense. Had Mr Netanyahu been the age of Mr Bennett today, yes, Israel would have been really in good hands and probably for a period of thirty years certainly. But this is now wishful thinking and emotional knowledge, as the current prime minister has aged and is over 70. It is another wishful thinking to have a mature leader in Yesh Atid's Mr Lapid and win the election from him or losing it to him, rather than losing to a young man with enormous potential to mature in the prime ministership (belongs to the people) as a society and people. In another life there could be a place for the current prime minister as one of Israel's men of valour, but that life is today different when in a democracy. You have to respect the people's vote. It is reflecting the people's principle to elect the leading government and it's prime minister. The day after the election you can't afford to let all go loose again, not this time. The people now want a government. And the world wants good leaders and join them for the next level of globalism. We have to face it and now think of Mr Netanyahu more in terms of endearment after his good service to the people of Israel and for more than three decades. And if possible to face yet another future with a good young man becoming the prime minister of Israel. Good in the meaning here is adhering to duty and loyalty to lead and not only by experience to fly the plane. The future will require a leader to fly two planes and also is expected to be a bit of an astronaut to fly around the orbit, like John Glenn. Mr Bennett always is saying that he is an entrepreneur, which is equivalent to exploring. To explore could very well be his next big step.











Israel's anti- climax election on 23 March 2021, for the people or politicians?

7 March 2021

Without too much political coordination and concentration anyone in the greater public can see or notice, that the fourth election in Israel is slowly becoming something of a suspense between three names in the Israeli political 2021 arena. It is also one, and be honest, we have not seen before. Or, at least not for many years since the millennium when Tzipi Livni was considered to be the next female prime minister in modern day Israel. The late Mrs Golda Meir has yet to wait for another moment when she can extend her after life blessings on a female prime minister in Israel, after her. The man of the hour is Naftali Bennett who has made a surprise 'come back' to politics as the candidate for prime minister in this next election on 23 March, in two weeks. What started last year during the Coronavirus crisis in the world and more fiercely in Israel, has turned into something of a quiet miracle during the year, day by day, week by week, month by month and now concluding in an acceleration of anti- climax. Last year, mr Bennett said in his interview last week on JP with interviewer Maayan Hoffman, that he wasn't even thinking about becoming prime minister. But now he has taken this prime ministership almost by surprise and is clearly a more convincing man to become prime minister than some of the other candidates. And just for one simple reason: Mr Bennett is kinsmen to the people. His campaign was low- key and going steady from people to people, square to square, all in small little places where he thought their voices were not heard or have been heard for too long. Six months ago that may have looked like not something the future prime minister ought to do before two weeks to the election when people go to the polls and make new promises. Here no one can catch up with him on this one. Six months ago the prime ministership also may never have looked a reward for his every day hard work to meet with the people and listening to their thoughts how they perceive politics in Israel today. He is third party base. By now Mr Bennett must have a fair good idea what troubles mainstream Israel, and this time not the upper echelons, but the people with bare income and poor living standards. For decades here is where they have been all these years.

Now he has to tie the people to a myrtle bushel and unite both sides in government, politicians and people, or rich and poor. The world outside of Israel, this is also the countries in the Middle East, are keeping a very close watch on the election in Israel and they seem to be expecting to witness the impossible to happen if Mr Netanyahu will be deposed by another man in Israel and become the prime minister. Perhaps some even can remember the days when the young prime minister Netanyahu entered the prime ministership most of the Arab leaders had not been young or younger and that this was the decisive factor then to accept a new situation and unfamiliar. Mr Bennett on his Arab neighbours flank has many leaders who are equally young to him and do not share the same sentiment of elderly statesmen or leaders, but who are keen to move on with business and pursue power. Their sports are breeding studs and eagles for leisure as part of their upper class culture of Arab young leaders. For Mr Bennett the question will sooner or later appear on his desk or mind what the definition could be of this generation and their regional leadership when young as he is himself. Regional stability and balance has never been a young man's vision, as all elderly statesmen know. On the other hand power and ambition are the hunting grounds for a royal breed of young men when taken from their class or sort. And these will become the prime minister in Israel's allies.

Will Mr Bennett then remember the election and the people of Israel he has met in the streets and had listened to before he became the prime minister? Unless he is a very fortunate young prime minister who will get the national understanding of the people and his fellow men in politics, that the time has come to meet the world and the neighbours, at a different level. They have done the same for Mr Netanyahu for decades long and was enabled by the people to form a strong political and military body in Israel and in the world, and near in the Middle East. It was almost at the point of inheriting the prime ministership from Mr Netanyahu, had that been possible in Israel and it's democracy. Imagine that! A hereditary prime ministership in the 21st century and in Israel would be the same as in a monarchy. But precisely it was this formidable office held by Mr Netanyahu that no other man in Israel could feel inclined to dare challenge him. How does one applaud and depose Mr Netanyahu at the same time? Perhaps a little titan luck has helped the process of ousting Mr Netanyahu with the gentle gloves in the name of the good laws and order in Israel? We can't say which is which from two weeks before the results come in who will be elected prime minister in Israel next. Mr Netanyahu in all fairness is a remarkable man, when seen from the Israeli point of view. And his softer side was or is that he is also a family man, something in Israel that is sacred to hold and keep, but more if so a man of high standard is keeping up his appearance to be in love with his wife and love his children. Critics might say that Mrs Netanyahu was his third wife. In Israel people tend to look at the character of the male in a marriage and his tendencies when faithful. And this was a good score on the scale of ten with the Netanyahu family. For Mr Bennett, say some writings on him, not only is he a good family man and in love with his wife, but he has many female members in the party who are working on his campaign to get him to the anti- climax in this election, and maybe they love working for him and find in him a good leader. Now mr Bennett must lead Israel, men, women, families and politicians. If all this will be over and he has lost the prime ministership it almost will be like losing a chance in a million with this man. Remember this is Israel, a country with a reputation abroad of being callous and without compassion. But now with this man we have seen the human face of an Israeli no one held possible a year ago, especially not after the war crimes allegations from the ICC against Israel.

After this election the world will from now on know that not all what glitters is gold, and this counts for countless people in Israel. The elderly are not living in golden cages as some might think or believe, compared to the poorest in Palestine. In a war torn place like Palestine the situation makes it absolutely plausible for many to live in these conditions, and suggesting that could change an instant had it been granted for them to live differently. The world is on their side. But who is on the side of the elderly in Israel with some even living under standard, and thinking here health or hygene. Israel has a bulk of success and riches, the rest is easy to make or finish the argument what it means for the poorest in Israel living under Kaiser Benyamin (Wilhelm) Netanyahu's success story. I am sorry to say, but had to. There are many ways to really know Israel that the world doesn't seem to want to know, except when it concerns war crimes and occupation in their reports. We have a unique situation in Israel, despite all the bad reputations. Israel's aggression is one strange phenomenon in the whole of the Middle East, when it concerns the religious orthodox tribes. Despite their aggression they carry no weapons as it is forbidden in the Torah for the orthodox to do so. Except with the men who guard their communities, scarcely. In stark contrast to the memory of those who kill in the name of religion this way that Israel seems to be makes a stark contrast with most nations living in this region. The military force is another story. And so is the State. Inherent to the nature of Israel's people one or two surprises are here to find if you are just enough and use honest tools to poll them. Also Israel was the first Middle East country who had introduced secular laws for democracy and socialism in the 20 th century, which no one in particular did understand from the Arab point of view, learned or not. The 2021 question: than why are Israelis who know the meaning of law and order so unwilling to cooperate with the ICC? No one knows the answer and can answer for the military and State of Israel.









Bill Gates.
(A personal viewing)

31 January 2021

Beautiful tyranny and living. The soul of the planet with it's crystals (vaccines or virus, harsh or soft), indeed a very surrealistic world for the next generations. Art? Prolongation of virus or pandemic after COVID-19 cannot be art. To answer the big question is that homo sapiens or other living creatures will keep following e(motion) and understanding, as these are the kind to be the soul of the world. What is Bill Gates saying? Unbound and we will build again time and the timeless as in one: earth and one: sky. The timeless we must 'unfollow'. Human and government in the next generation can expect to see the world through a whole new environment of control for the greater purpose that was set out after COVID-19. One great purpose from this assumed plan is to pacify human and nations to become without the instinct of going to war in the future... What you might speculate is that after hundreds or even thousands of years the one failure of all of humanity is that of distinction. It is known to many as the natural life and laws for all living beings. Transforming history from natural law to a global 'masterplan' of homogeneity can therefore only mean to control the world from the point of beauty and purity... Humankind will worship the soul of the planet and never again understand the meaning of war, distinction or instinct. And humankind is the new human being: Jew or gentile living on the same timeline and in close relationship with one another by the greater purpose in the global timeline. Surreal or an ideal world, with a high frequency reach from top to bottom in it's metric plan. Mass vaccinations and control of new viruses for all living on the planet will become audible enough as once were the laws for purity in medieval times. E.g. the time when Arthur was king and he alone could draw the excalibur from the mystical lake that was presumably not impure but perhaps came from Avalon, purity? Or pagan.

The next question: human versus virus. Or from generation to generaton, a change of architecture of the fibre and tissue by one iota? When a child is defect if by down syndrome it misses a constructive chromosome formation. But with generation, a play word maybe by it's engineers, without the iota and transforming the name of the future generation to generaton the defect is only surreal when you can keep cleanliness indefinitely next to godliness. The world of medicine and pharmaceutical 'godliness' as suspected from a planet- size plan such as illustrated in my fiction here above will give us the crystals and the generaton will be a crystalized humankind. Demonstrations in Real Time today however do give that impression of rebellion against Covid-19 and the lockdowns it is using to combat the virus or pandemic in most major cities around in the world. This is the present Real Time. But to put it simply these are not the demonstrations and work of planet size arts and therefore may suffer defeat in the end. Subordination by a lockdown with national curfew in place on the other hand is awesome surrealism! Tomorrow is just another ordinary day between thousands of years and today. Iran and Israel are the latest proof of the new crystals to purify their countries from hatred or violence, two way coming in and going out, if of course the news was meant to give transparency to the public. (Jerusalem Post writing tonight) What we do know from Israel's recent history is that it has great ambitions for peace in the Middle East with it's Arab neighbours. Again, it is distinction and instinct that has kept war over inclusiveness between Iran and Israel more than a few decades. Third big question: what will God Almighty have to say about the new humankind?

Israel in the labyrinth of democracy, and all are blindfolded by time.

17 January 2021

In a podcast with former Likud member, Ms Tzipi Livni, last week (Twitter.com) there was enough momentum on the democracy of Israel to be interviewed. In another interview with Gideon Sa'ar and CNN Christianne Amanpour (JPost writing), almost at the same time last week, this was very clear to hear and read how MK's (even former ones) have found the door/ gate of democracy in Israel again, and now they are determined to do something different this time with the new election campaign in March 2021. That is less than nine weeks from now. But who is going to replace the current prime minister, who has almost single- handedly raised Israel up to the height of globalism in the 21st century and isn't planning on leaving the political stage, not in Israel and not in the world? And yet there should be another prime minister in this twist between past and the present time Israeli political history to bring it back to the people. It is what Israelis are good at and love most: democracy. The money is always good and to the outside world Jews and money are one and the same thing in every age in human memory. And that is why it is interesting when the world can hear and witness this extraordinary thing to hear politicians and ex politicians speaking of a democratic Israel, yes, because this was exactly how the State of Israel had made it's beginning in Palestine in 1900. Looking back on lies is one thing, but looking back on truth makes Israel on this occassion universal. The founding fathers of Israel had done the right thing then and built on a democracy (representative) for the people of Israel to begin with or that was first. This is the whole truth so help you God.

Democracy in Israel started back in 1900. It was then also surrounded by nations who in their own sense of imperialistic ideas and living in vast kingdoms had no objection to a way of life alien to the Arab nations that the new immigrants called 'democracy'. It was just that the Ottoman empire had left the soil of Palestine. Democracy was little or no threat at the time when it was conceived by the new colonists from Europe to come and build their country in Israel as the Jewish nation. Also, it was peculiar to be called a Jewish Home, as to veil any suspicion on the 'new people on the block'. In the meantime in England between HM the king of England and the aristocratic family of Rothschild exchanged a certain letter of approval that the Jewish Home can begin in Palestine, but that no harm must be done to the 'natives' already living in the same place and land. It was this agreement that created a bigger future for the people of Israel we now know was democracy. When looking back on the Netanyahu era very little or no harm was done to the historical beginning of the land of Israel as a democratic founding by it's people. And democracy is law in the International world. The new prime minister would be able to take hold of the past in 1900 and the future in the 21st century if he was elected, one could say. With little ease even. For the family of Rothschild divine providence/ korban tamid this means 120 years of building a State for the people of Israel with a good and strong founding stone in the world of civilizations, east, west, north and south. At times it looked as if Israel was losing it's strength in the political arena of the International world, and with some of it's 'oldest' modern day politicians in Israel. Thank God, it wasn't just money for Israel!

But with democracy for and in Israel came danger. Similar you could say that something alien had put the democracy in Israel to a fast sleep for the last four decades. Despite the seriousness of the matter it was to compare with the story of Cinderella falling asleep for a thousand years in the Brothers Grimm story. The witch that was spurned had put Cinderella to sleep by the point of a needle. Through thick and giant thorns now finally she was woken up by a prince and his lips on hers. Naftali Bennett? Democracy in Israel yet still could be a dangerous awareness for the real political class in Israel and in the rest of the world among the Jewish political elites. Once you realize that Israel is similar to Argentina during the time of Juan Domingo Peron with a strong democracy and military, what the people could decide in the coming up election is to take back real time democracy from the present prime minister, Mr Netanyahu. With one difference, that the witch now knows who the people are and what they believe in with the new generations. The same window and simplicity it is for anyone interested in Israeli politics and it's existence, it was also to Adolf Hitler, who had said in his infamous and simple writing that the State of Israel was 'something' he did not see (through his narrow window) as possible to become what Jews wanted to assume as their country in Palestine. WWII had mysterious beginnings... By assumption. The only harm Mr Netanyahu now/ presumed is doing is a political one and in our time the people can't maximize that wrong of continuing his prime ministership. The new prime minister is in checkmate and when inexperienced in the matter of democracy what can the people hope or be looking for in him?

Israel, IV The Election Project.

24 December 2020

We have arrived at this point again (within 2 years) to go back to the ballot box in Israel and elect a (new?) prime minister. The jolt everybody feels goes far into remote places of most political Jews in the world, closely connected to Israeli politics or politicians. Under this kind of pressure no one knows just yet what is written on the paper towards electing a 'new' prime minister. It will not be about only what you see in politics this time, so it is believed. If you get up from your easy chair into places where the people who are voting for any of their parties, the visual of what should this election be about is very clear. Time and place will be (or could become) the decisive factor when the people will go back to the ballot box, with some of them being 'forgotten' for too long by the present government for decades. The election program has been renamed to the election project, at least here in this writing. One: world leadership. Almost every Israeli looks up to the prime minister if he is the leader they want him to be as the world leader representing their country where ordinary Israelis cannot tread and go. Second: where some may stay behind at Bethel and the milestone with Ha Shem home in Israel, in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem, or maybe even living in Ashdod or Ashkelon, climbing the Jacob's ladder up and down for any leader of Israel is what most also perceive as a goal in politics. This is not the written law for democracy in Israel. Third: time and place exchange hands every hour and minute, whether in Arabic or Hebrew, among the many citizens in the country at an abnormal constant and pace. It is reality as many are knowing it, from generations behind and now when living in the north of the Middle East. The new prime minister if he is elected on the 23th of March next year in 2021 should at least be aware of this 'ordinary vision' next to what some know as big government visions. That could be unique and unique is ripe enough this time.

Naftali Bennett is not a new name that the world knows. He is making the rare chance of replacing the current Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, when seen from a global viewpoint. All new hope parties can strike home and perhaps run comfortably throughout campaign and on the day of the election, but this will only be a home- base win at the end of the day. When the world does not know your name to replace mr Netanyahu at the helm might become the battle for prime ministership in Israel harder. It is the world stage that matters at the general election how to represent Israel as a nation and country. How can the new prime minister connect with the citizens of his country and people? In that case the people end up very much in the same place that they have been for decades under Mr Netanyahu and former prime ministers. And then regret to have crowned the home boy MK to prime minister becomes the old music of regret and disappointment and is the old encore and chorusline again. The people, and they are many, when living in poor or poorer conditions want to see quality of life improvement and not only see smart technology everywhere on all streetcorners in Israeli big cities and smaller towns. What happens if the global view of Israel turns against time and place, and this time against the citizens of the country? What is also happening in Israel during the Covid-19 worldwide pandemic is for many other countries in the world very much the same level of multiple insecurities. Disruptions of what used to be considered peaceful coexistence is now heavily disturbing without any answers that humans understand wherever their habitats are. The new PM will concede and play his part in the International world as any other prime minister in Europe, South America or the Americas, Australia or the far east.

By the time the new pm his term is coming to an end in four years or eight years, as one suggested a few days ago in the Jerusalem Post, our world might look very different than the one we are now currently experiencing. Human life will cease to exist as we know it, simply. Why would we want to vote for a man like Naftali Bennett with no hope in the future to stay human? Exactly the point where it does matter to vote for him, you could say. Let's hope that Mr Bennett knows how to detect the inhuman faces in a bigger and more impalpable global world. In the next election Israel as expected one can say will be more than just a vote for democracy and it's election system. In this tragedy in which the pandemic has put humanity collectively sadly it is the electing of a prime minister that now remains important. Also another side to this tragedy is that even with mr Netanyahu staying in government to lead Israel out of the pandemic, his body and familiar face will not be adequate enough in the long run to represent himself as the man behind the new world of vitality of an aesculapius. In fact Mr Bennett does have more of the features to be the aesculapius, and he is much younger at this stage in his life. The planet is in a new dynamics and nations and people will not be chosen randomly into these mechanisms. And that is as far as one can do the vision or propaganda against the virus. Another unique story to go back to the ballot box in Israel we have to say it did came in a sudden burst. We can only hope it is not a wine sack with new wine and damage the election project of electing a new first prime minister in Israel. Also no one leads on a campaign of only hopelessness. And one more interesting fact to look for in this election is a campaign led by Likud with the incumbent PM, Mr Netanyahu. Giants speak giantly and are frightening.

The Tel Aviv myth 2020.

(A story)

3 December 2020

Perhaps not all that is comes from light, the illumination when looking in daytime at land, sea, and sky. But time says it all after the first 2000 (?) immigrants from European Jewry started in a small community in Tel Aviv building their homeland and polis. Consensus and agreement have created politicians and people forming then what wasn't found in the new homeland sand dunes, a unique democracy between equals. The vision was mountainous, indeed if only 'a few' envisioned greatness by the sea and on dry land, and under a steel blue sky in a singular event of a small unit. Here the new people of Israel saw 'the living creature' within and without, almost similar to that what Ezekiel had seen by the river Kebar thousands of years before. L' chaim. Here oranges grew like industries hanging on trees and on waiting for the working hands of the people of Israel who have come home from faraway places and distant memory. These were the hands that had made Israel fertile for land and stone, and indeed sands. To look the other way or ways was for the military and soldiers, a land with a small household literally could then not have explained what the future was to be and live on in this place that did not had the same feeling as Milan or Greece, but was nevertheless alongside the Mediterranean Sea, if the wind would from now on blow favourably for these new inhabitants. A race was born as to one & as to a family name and members, this feeling of 'aba and ima' unionship became since then more hereditary to the Jewish nation than in the meaning self in the Hebrew language, which perhaps none had yet spoken. Who will understand the Tel Aviv myth without the 'first equals' set foot on the soil of Israel? In 2020 and soon transcending into 2021 a towering panoramic view of skyscrapers are pitching the sky with their own magnificent blue steel glass facades, top to bottom, and have a complete view of past and present time. They are invisible giant mirrors and the origin of this modern day parade is not questioned nor answered by old nor younger generations of Israelis. Let's leave it alone and continue with our lives as the days come and go. How long has it been like this way in Tel Aviv?

What not many understand is that in Israel and looking critically at the big cities, is that this is a country of the nation Israel, but more so that it is surrounded by old adversaries. The conflict with the Palestinians is a worldwide problem to both peoples and within the lines of this context alone. There is no point in stopping the Catherine wheel in time while it is still ongoing and the two- state solution is at the border right here in Israel between the Palestinians and Israelis, but is still too distant from memories since 1948 for Jews only homeland. For Israel when facing east it is sensible also to watch their backs. While the myth lives on in Tel Aviv, whether north, south, the middle or west and east, in another place in Jerusalem the fighting is ancient. Ancient here also means crossing the Jordan River at one point in Deuteronomy and going back into the days of antiquity of Egypt and Israel where the soul of Moses was born and bred. One should think that Egypt and it's great capital Cairo also have been emptied from their opulent time as pharaoh Rameses I to the young child king of the newest kingdom, just have a look around with your relaxing walkers on Youtube to see what the face of Egypt is looking like today in Cairo. It echoes nothing of the Hebrew slaves to Egypt in wind nor sunshine or shadow. We are not looking in the same way at Germany, France or Luxembourg. Or England, and north, middle or east of Europe. Having both in one eye the land Turkey and Bosphorus would do you much good to stand here and admire the world on this side of the continent that is Asia Minor and Europe. While perfect of beauty, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem are ceremonial of beauty, and teaching the world where forgiveness, merci and compassion resides to eternity. Who knows that the greatest sin of our world was to see God! In stead now we have residu religions and bloodshed (Byzantine) demanding that Jerusalem can call for God to come down. (Xerxes of the Persian empire was once refused by his royal queen and spouse to 'come down' and show herself to the noble men in the kingdom of all of Persia) We do not know if Tel Aviv has to come down in display as well as queen in deep debris of Israel. And, yes, you guessed it already, Jerusalem in the end will win the favour of the nobles of the land and be queen Esther once again. Or, stick with the invisible sky high mirros in Tel Aviv that are paramount and platinum.

What happened to the Promised Land? And what is it called now?

17 November 2020

For 72 years the formula was called the Two- State solution, what is now feeling more like the proverb in the Book of Solomon, and a very powerful saying when encompassing the world affairs for the last 100 hundred years Middle East politics, that the pit that was there was meant for one to fall in it. Israel for decades now is known to have been the aggressor of the Middle East and had the military supremacy to unequal in many ways it's enemies to it, and it was falling time. This Two- State solution like swathes of earth also fell upon it's head and try to bury the Promised Land under a heap of bloodshed and dirt. For the last four years now it seems is that Israel was creeping out of the pit, let's say in theory that this was the green line. The political analysis is the satellite green view of what the promised land in our time looks like from as far as the night stars. In fact these were the same stars that once told Abraham of his generations of nations that will belong to him. Universally time and stars have never changed, so one could observe and say from the owl's point of view. Israel was self destructive and destroying it's side of the promised land, next to the State of the Palestinian people nextdoor... But the proverb is much too powerful under the ancient dust of Israel and it says that whoever is digging a pit for one to fall in it, he/she will fall in it him/herself. The US president- elect, Mr Joe Biden's, quotations are from another part of the Solomon period, and he wants Americans to heal and unite. The time has come for America to heal. No one can resist the book of prophecies once written in ancient Israel and quote daily what it is saying throughout time and the human race. Who can say that temptation is greater and take out Israel out of the pit?

Another 54 years have amended the meaning behind the existence of the Jewish people (article 80 UN Charter) from the promised land to Zionism since then and world affairs was promised to take greater steps, especially after globalism was introduced to mankind three decades ago. And the closer one is looking the more the land naturalizes to a two nations region for two parts that are Gaza and the West Bank, and for Israel the middle one part. To many ordinary people in this part of the world the common perception they are having of Israel is that as long as Zionism is and will stay here it is safe to live as a Jew in the promised land till the Messiah will come descending upon the East Gate in Jerusalem. While another flame in heaven is burning night and day from Al Aqsa for all the people of ancient Kedar. Had this been in a deed do you know how to define the meaning of what is called the Jewish promised land and purchase it's wealth and fruits? New ideologies are fine as it suits many in the masses of people and even inspire building new worlds, but which none resemblances the promise of a promised land in Israel/ Palestine. The promise has become a dead end street, in fact. Or, it was overeaten... A big question on Israel's future will remain inside globalism or reverse it's memory to the old days when the world and nations did call the land of Israel not only the promised land, but also the chosen people. It's an old shoe thrown out because it served no real purpose to the many generations thereafter. For a new commodity to sell a new shoe one has to think very careful as a Jew and return the complimentary how to maintain peace with the nations, that what Israel is giving you is for free in return for peace in the nearest of future. Something of this design is neither based on the promised land nor on Zionism, but on homogeneity of peace for & by the world in the Middle East before it advances on. And of course there is also something here that some will call this 'mandatory' peace throughout the world, and say that isn't this what they call digging a pit be it more like the icing of a world war cake?

Addition: The love for Israel and it's many hats: peoples sovereignty, State sovereignty, military sovereignty, religious homogeneity, democracy, constitution, Middle East peace, Zionism, religious tolerance, Hebrew language and rationalities, the future, survival, and realities in local districts/ communities. And so forth versus the many hats for hating Israel.


Naftali Bennett: more isn't possible if we are speaking government in Israel.

16 October 2020

Where should the 'third party' Yamina be looking when it has set it's ambition to be elected Head of government in any new or coming election in Israel? Study of what Likud and it's governments embodies for more than 25 years is the kind of answer on your plate and try to 'eat it'. The Netanyahu governments are a continuous flow of what reality politics in the State of Israel have been in war and 'peace', the time for change from big government to Yamina makes it highly questionable and beating natural politics by the slingshot of a small boy in the valleys. Goliath politics from Netanyahu governments are political tauntings, you could say, and Yamina blinded by vision and ambition could just change the course of this contempt for basic laws and order. What then could the leader of Yamina be looking for without the broader support of Middle Government, that is a de facto much more bigger ally of the Netanyahu government? Better the devil you know, does that ring a bell? Can the religious party become the centrist right- wing party and the biggest in any coming election in the short near future? Love does not hold for mr Netanyahu at any time in the future from the people mass, and his supporters also are swimming up against the tide as one can judge from the present situation in Israel between Mr Netanyahu and the apparent 'left-wing protesters' against him every day for the last month. But it is a protest full of mazes in the meantime. Is there a point to Yamina's ambition to persuade the public how to vote for Mr Bennett instead of the current Prime Minister? It takes a strange kind of person when to undermine big power and government by popularity among the public for managerial skills. That is a serious attempt to harm one's political career also. Because even if the PM would lose this election (fiction) he will be able to still have the winning face in opposition and become even more bigger than the government under the new PM, e.g. Mr Naftali Bennett. Simply because the PM and his government are too big and time is on their side.

Where Yamina must be looking is why there is no prospect of a new PM. In a demos and it's democracy they should always be remembering to look to the west and not east, and that can only mean Israel is not just a State, but demos. If Mr Bennett's strength was to unite the military and politicians that would make a significant approach to become the next PM of Israel, but in extensive form. As a temporary measure only, because no western world will accept it otherwise. In writing alone and making all other details void or unseen (foreseen) isn't good enough. The system politics a man like Yamina's leader, mr Bennett, would have to be built a pronto, right now, yesterday and not tomorrow. It is possible/ impossible, when classical and in Europe. Turkey seems that they have had several attempts of creating a sub climate for strong urges of democracy, theology, socialism, and some other relevant urges of old and new politics, in many cycles. 54 Years of building the State of Israel had it's losses in terms of building also more inclusion for it's political system and third parties in or outside government. Israel also has an orthodox silent system and not many can see this from the outside when looking in. Mr Bennett knows that from within and to make a leap at big government at a difficult time, being opportunistic as well, is the message in a bottle and it only says how much the leader of Yamina loves his country and people. As from the point of religion it is impossible to reconcile the Haredim or Chassidim (around the world) that Israel has a Prime Minister who is Haredim and centrist right- wing to lead Israel. Period. Period? Why do we underestimate the love for Mr Netanyahu in Israel? Isn't it like a political battle of Spartacus and Crassus? Poor Mrs Bennett, like Livia, will next see her husband crucified and hanging onto his destiny and audacity forever in name and reputation. But this is not Rome or Greece. Israel could tolerate democracy at a chance in a million and beat the system. It stems from the people and love for their country. Who knows if that makes a new legitimacy for a new system and level of democracy in Israel. Political issues and hard issues as well for a religious Jew in Israel as PM e.g. are what you can call controversial and challenging. Mr Netanyahu may be many things bad and good, but social cohesion in Israel was under him most expansive and his commitment to stay Head of government was and is always great, if not the greatest, in the 20th and 21st century for the quality that he has. It seems that Israel has a language of it's own when it comes to demos and democracy. And as for Mr Bennett the question is whether he will become a David or Abshalom.

The New world order and the fly, future book.

8 October 2020

What does the fly symbolizes but a sleeping disorder of the many kinds, e.g. world politics, presidential debates, and that includes VP debates, the people at home watching the leader of their country and vice leaders to be the traffic warden going one way or holding up at a junction joined here or there overlooking the 'fly over'. Also the weather is getting colder in the season of the first days of fall this time of the year, in most countries on the western hemisphere. The fly is very particular and only pointing to the whole world where everyone has to look for the meaning of the leading nation and it's leaders. It could be a reincarnation returning to the stage, what was once perhaps Richard Nixon, J F Kennedy or Eisenhouwer. Everyone would wonder what they have to say about the next US President at the White House. Is the United States still the only leading nation of the free world? The answer is COVID-19. The fly could also be the natural pathologist on dead bodies affected by the disease and now  reporting on national TV in ambient speak and his/ her heart beating mezzanine. Just give me any number, Mr Pence or Mrs Harris? The fly feels above high floor on the vice president's white haired head for a moment. You could say, judicially, that the fly stands in for Mr Pence as his secondant, in case things would get tough during the debate and that would make him look dull and incompetent. We are all witnesses to this spectacle between the apparent titans what they will bring the people at home and around in the world tonight. We love to fly.

"I only exist when you want to see me. For the rest I am invisible," so the fly keeps saying. Who do we believe more, the Republicans or Democrats after last night's vp debate? Unifier of the night: the fly. There is nothing being said about the future of Americans and America, and making the vacuum it is in even wider. Fly- coveted looking very much like the only plan they've got so far, well, that's on the Republican Trump side. The newspapers this morning have mentioned something about putting in too much defense on or in the debate last night between Mr Pence and Mrs Harris. Well, in that case, nail his head, Wallace. That is the name of the fly and now that has also been cleared. "I told you, Mr vp, making peace in the Middle East was going to be a lot more easier than winning the election from the Democrats this time. They mean to play it hard on us." Said Wallace, the fly, to Mr Pence, quietly and very discrete. "That may be true, for thou are mightier for being tiny and knowing all the details." I wonder also about the viewers' rates. Was it up or down, compared to the last debate between Mr Trump and VP Mr Biden? The future of the world will look a whole bit more different after the election on 3 November. COVID-19 might be airborne and the cure might be the apogee. The higher it can be pushed into the less it will be effective, I am just saying. Erratic, irrationality, it's all here, you see. Wallace knows something on his distant cousins the microbes. "The microbe could cause (self) disorientation at a certain height, because temperature rapidly would change it's fluidities and making it than more transparent. Transparency to the microbe is a killer to them." Go on, Wallace, we're all listening what you have to say about your cousins. "It's nothing, good people. You know the saying, a thief catches a thief?" Back at larvae stadium we call it flytastic, you see.

Wallace, from the movie Internal Affairs.

Word of the day.

7 October 2020

Word of the day: MP (Mister President). Second word of the day: MO (Missed opportunity). LOC (Letter of Confucius), and there are more. MP and KH fierce debate is expected later tonight, between de two US VP's. And Time is on his side (Bread tune). Plural: words for the day "Let's go back to stoning." From MP Life of Brian. For whom the stones roll, this could be a perverse version of saying 'give me shelter' from the people and their IV (individual voices). And as for MAGA, should that not be MEGA, Make economics great again? Who will be ironing the President's shirt tonight at the White House where he is working late? Could be the men standing outside, the Marine. Something interesting in the air tonight: global atmosphere. We are definitely loving it worldwide. It is quiet and the story goes that the President of the US is the old spirit of Walhalla, that he is the true Viking the world has been waiting for thousands of years. He has been king for the moment, America's first king crowned by global admiration. The only man in the world, Confucius, warns, this might be great fall of great coconut tree. Many coconuts will come rolling down like heavy stones on his administration. And king will be replaced by the wise. But seriously, is it looking that bad for the President? Interestingly some mathematicians do not share that sentiment. They are wizzards and the genii in the political bottle will return to his time back to timelessness... Hmm, a bit of spice and doom always makes a good cake for those who love to bake. Admit it: whatever happens during the coming next four weeks this the world had never expected to experience in the 21st century USA in a general election. It is everything but dull.

Word in the day after: let's make that a w and ad something like d for defeat. Than what can we make of this? Winning is daring? It is also beginning to look as if this President is really smart and only in the American way. Now, what could that mean to us in another part of the world? This general election is putting a whole different emphasis on the outcome, that if Mr Biden wins he might still lose time and country. Was that related to his age or his many years in politics? But if Mr Trump is re- elected President of the USA, to put it mildly, that victory would be epic. It's all about proportions and not perspective. We couldn't be more wrong at a time like this. But wrong is another definition and also very strange to have it connected to this general election. Word of the day after? No, not now. It is still in pre- election time and we call it word of the day before the election outcome on 3 November: disconnect. LOS, Loss of signal. In these circles perhaps the motto is that it is better to be spoiled than spoilt. Chicago will never be the same after this election again, that's one thing for the Trump Tower. Another could be that the Viking refuses to go back into the fog of Walhalla. The Commander in Chief was here... So to speak. It is just beautiful, Mike Pence will speak in 'detail tongue' to the American people later on tonight. He is going to do it on the MEGA and the world will follow the treble. And Mrs Kamala Harris will have to face the waters and seas on her own as captain of the sea. Cas, Cas, Cas, what could be made of this that is not as far fetched as Cassiopeia and utopia? AMSA, America means something again. It is the bastard version of MAGA.

Fictional, what if Israel had been a country for and by it's own?

21 September 2020

A giant innovator of various sectors, but without questioning Israel's existence as a conflict ridden country for more than 54 years one answer should be given if anyone can imagine what it could have been. LIke Japan and Britain, two leading world nations, what we see in the 21st century is that innovators build their country in a specific way when it is a country of their own. It may not look the sophisticated question to ask, but when geopolitics is deciding the conscience of the world based only on 'the minute', we will always follow only the next minute and so on, eternally. Israel is 1% ultra modernized and for 99 % country and people living in an older timeline. Infrastructure is not renewed and neither built, or as far as the eye can see. The wilderness between Jerusalem and Eilat is expansive and it overrules what is up north living in 'ivory towers' cities. Typical how one deals with elephants in the wild, keeping the tusk for their ivory and leaving the mass of flesh/ body to the vultures and other wild beasts in the forest. The question 'what if' with regard to Israel is one that depresses the conscience of the greater questions. Perhaps the feeling that one gets is that Israel, actually, would have been the Japan in the Middle East in the 21st century, next to Britain and indeed Japan. (Islands) This leading authority in sciences like engineering that would have put this country at a whole different level like many industrial giants around the world. But there is no one to give you the answer on the 'what if' about Israel. On the balance in our timeline it is perhaps interesting to ask what if Japan would have been a torn place by conflict and war and look like in the world today. Or, Britain. Yes, what if Israel had been a country of it's own?

What now looks more like a choice of it's own in Israel is puzzling to anyone's mind, but hold their silence. We swallow the truth and digest it in many other ways. It is the 'what if' that is creating a matter of great conscience in this writing. Would you not have wanted to know the answer? When looking back one can only feel a little grieved that we will not know the whole answer to that question, which is the lamentation of our time that no one will ever come to understand. What we have lost in the world is the truth to that question, that what if Israel had been a country of it's own and what it might have looked like today. Perhaps very much the same as the youth in Japan, very rich kids in all parts of the land and industrious too. Japan's kids are pro- active in all fields where their fathers and grandfathers have built industries and land. And these 'little giants' become later in life the industrial leaders of Japan in the world or G- 7. It is either this truth, or that of what Israel is what it is today, a country torn by war and conflict with the Palestinians. This side of the truth does not fully answer the big question on the side of greater conscience of the world, one might think. A giant innovator should not be living in between armistice lines, or limestone rocks and occupation of land to keep it safeguard from consistent 'incoming' danger. It is no wonder why sometimes it looks as if the 1% would want to move to e.g. the US and leave the rest of the 99% as a wandering mass behind walking in piyamas. Or, maybe that is the wrong impression.

The answer is simple: we will never know. Also, the question doesn't seem to be relevant in real time. The 'what if' doesn't constitute any law in the real world and it is not the same thing as in 'now'. One thing is certain that the wilderness is not the military camouflage to maintain war with the Palestinians in the country. To a future prospect this land is suitable for new infrastructure wide scale. One would expect different answers from a giant innovator like Israel and it's 1% economic achievements in the region and the world. And also dark  expectation is that one day the talent with which Israel has built itself greater than all the rest in the region, it will one day gnaw inside the world and it's conscience and for one reason that we simply do not know the answer to the question, what if Israel had been a country of it's own since the day it was called the birth of the State of Israel? This truth is like the Leviathan and moving deep and heavy alongside the shores of all other greater things in life that are real and reality. What if the native American Indians had been the United States of America today? But here is a distinct difference known to us. Indians are Indians everywhere, whether at Machu Picchu, Cusco or elsewhere there had been an Indian empire and civilization physique in a very recent time in history. With Israel before 1948/ 1920 the Jewish Home did not exist yet in terms of a global industrial leading nation. We all know that the world has progressed massively  and globally, and it is still doing it's work to advance the path of wisdom and civilization. Day in and out the nations are trying to help build peace or strategic peace in the world, which at times can look dismal at the end of the day without any progress. We do not know the pangs of the world as well as they know. But we all know in every language that nothing progresses without God Almighty and His providence, and that mankind are saying their prayers every day. What if Adam first had a brother in the Garden of Eden and not a wife? It is a prayer to also say 'What if Israel had been a country of it's own for 54 years now?' It is the giant question moving deeply and dynamic slow in the big ocean of the truth like the Leviathan.


The Palestinian State.

3 September 2020

Two visuals: territory and geography. And one potential: political optical. And since there is no concrete past of both here above, the future is the best illusion to describe the present time Palestinian State. It is also the best reference point. The world would disagree and see the Palestinian people as their point of reference when they speak of a Palestinian State, but that could remain confusing infinitely long into any time near or long term. We are not looking at the next century here just yet and go hysterical about so much that hasn't been done yet, and so much still waiting to be done. The Palestinian people are a number in existence and that is how one can work out the several stages of the Palestinian State, once it could or would be built. A greater need for peace at 'that particular' stage is or will be inbuilt in one stage here or another so that the Palestinian democracy can keep it's focus on some collective governing body, and who will be playing bureaucracy on the same timeline. It is 'a step by step approach only for giants' and also literally. 18 Years from now the generation to survive time will then have replaced the older generation and politicians known for many decades to the Palestinian people as their leader in 'government' and those in opposition of the PA. There will be new politicians and leaders to the Palestinian people in ten years time, and also a high score for aesthetics when in high ranking position or representatives or official flag bearers, pointing to evolution rather than revolution. But coming back to the present time reality, forgive me for saying, are we not looking still at the same political illusion and it's abyss? It is not climbing the Solsbury Hill and bearing in mind the 'historic' Armistice Lines. The lack of concentration in the Palestinian State is a physical reality for now and going many decades up to the point of the dead body of a donkey in politics. Or perhaps at the point where it should be animated into Oz.

Contrary: the Palestinian State is the interpretation of a point in the future if there is no change in it's past or present time. Anything beyond would be a prophetic orientation. In Palestine there are two religions, one Islamic and the other Christian and are both spoken in Arabic since decades before 1948. One more other thing is that the Palestinian State is also not building the road to recovery that is based on the future economy model where it wants to see people and nation thrive from point A to point Z. A few years ago when the world and EU did plan to empower the Palestinian State and it's people we have learned through the media that there had been high stake activities made in both geographies, Gaza and the West Bank, between the political factions and high promises were made to all 'the people of change'. There had been some kind of method to this approach and then died as the years went by. Hope is not a metaphor and neither is the Palestinian State at any time in the near future. The new world order perhaps is already on it's way and will soon want to see all nations comply with certain rules as is the case now with Climate Change or Covid-19. One expects from this new world order that it will want to see all nations to independently vying for a place in this tall order and not fall back to conflict or poverty. Palestine is situated in the region between the Mediterranean Sea and Jordan. In one glimpse one can see why the Palestinian people badly need to vertically upgrade their claim to the land as their homeland in this region. It's cooperation with the world is imperative at this stage in building the future Palestinian State. And not just as a pet project, even when facilitate helping to build the future of the Palestinian people is deadly serious. It is more what one envisions as political hegemony and economic infrastructure is what should point into the right direction of the Palestinian State. When one still envisions definite voidness on this occasion a very good reason should be given to the world why it repetitively fails to upgrade it's state of affairs before honorary members.

It is coming to the end of an era for the Prime Minister in Israel, mr Binyamin Netanyahu.

28 August 2020

Strong Prime Ministers, also when sickness is the reason when they think it is time to resign and do the respectability 'thing' to inform the public that this era is over, e.g. this morning news from Japan on the resignation of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe(nomics), should know the meaning to the last heartbeat of their time in office and in government. What is happening in Israel at the moment is protesting against Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu in a show of force with no particular rationale, than only to oust him and make an impression that here democracy is king and not Mr Netanyahu. And the Palestinian people are on the side watching on what will happen next. The candy floss sweet deals with Arab countries is not uplifting the country where it wants to be for the next decade, in mid- air and controlling the region from north to south and back. But what do the people want when the only Prime Minister is actually the only PM to have, by imagination and last straw. It is as if the PM of Israel many times came home with the winnings of his political games and gambles, but lately was not on a winning streak and now everyone is talking about it. Was it the number that got jinxed, or the picture in the card? Instead the PM is not a quitter and he continues with his strategies to bring back Israel into the future, while perhaps ending himself in a kangaroo life- style retirement and be for the rest of time bemused that once he was a strong man and PM of Israel. And if any one could have achieved great things for Israel it was always Mr Binyamin Netanyahu. He can also be obedient and stunningly honest at strange times or moments. Last time he did this was three weeks ago when he had said (JP) that not him but the US stopped him from annexing the West Bank 30%. If anyone understands in the rest of the world how much more harder it is for the Israeli PM to say these words, they would understand the gold in this honest statement. It was also deeply political and time was pressing from his words/ chosen words. He desired more than any other to have things now go somewhere and not stopping, otherwise a plan designated as the only plan to lifting things up in Israel might end and be gone forever.

Lifting up the idea of sovereignty, but perhaps not in the right direction, and also dealing with the constant difficulty of the Palestinian State, or maybe it's equivalent of Two- State solution.We are misunderstanding the difficult decisions in Israel that from a distant few miles are looking easy and do- able by will power, but in fact are flames in a dragon's head to any PM in Israel. The dragon head being the region in the Middle East. It doesn't look like any other new PM could achieve this level of coming close to greatness in terms of strategy with the rest of the world as Mr Netanyahu. And that is not something you will say because of admiration for the PM, but more because he is more pragmatic than seems. Mr Ehud Olmert is a shrude man and dangerously clever or cynical, if he considers the PM to be his king and court. But Israel does not need a sublime clever PM who will find reason more important than humanity of the people of Israel. It is not an intellectual tic allowing the Palestinian people to having the same rights as Israelis in whatever plan is there available and create a quick- fit solution to the long lasting problem between the two nations. And humanities does matter as the only theme for the future of Israel to become an independent and  more greater country. This vision of independence should become the infrastructure for a new Israel and hoping to find it quickly at speed if wisdom is what the quest is. If this is also what fate is than perhaps the PM of Israel has become a man who has missed his moment to become truly great. And maybe the PM does know it, that he has lost the lulav to bring Israel more closer to the pre- Messianic time and after. Like king David the PM is not allowed to build the house for the Lord God of Abraham. It is his political son who will build the House of Israel and do this 'thing' for the future generations. But, efo ze? And, matai? Israel needs the ordinary world and say 'Let's do this thing right and rebuild Israel'. Lo machar, aval hayom, aval achshav. And maybe eat our hearts out.

What could change Israel and the worldview, if there is any room for subtle difference?

4 August 2020

Have your cake and eat it too, but if a global cake only fictional how will it fulfill the many vacuums in our real world with a critical eye kept on the future of the planet and humanity? A strange disease has already been the sign of the times to show what global effort can mean this year, and there is still no aversion to the virus and risks yet ready to manufacture a solution to the problem in every country when effected by the COVID- 19 microbe stealth movement. It doesn't stop here when global only can mean Real Time for you and everyone else still alive on the planet and everywhere close or remote. There is also the European Union still battling a recovery package for countries hard hit by the Coronavirus, Italy, and there is much talk ongoing on a budget to tighten the belt between the richer Member States, if solidarity still has any blood in it. And maybe to a certain extent the Morandi Bridge in Italy says it all, if you keep your eyes, ears and mouth uptight shut? Estimation of the new building of the bridge had not reached a trillion euros, which is a nice victory for the State and people. Compared to building infrastructure strategic vision of Gaza, Israel and the West Bank, to a higher level of peace between Israel and the Palestinian people and stop the 54 year bloody conflict, a strategic vision that would match engineering, law and peace of an estimated 1tln euros? After all wealth creates wealth, and not in the ordinary sense that a dime would create another dime into wealth. The EU is wrong on saying that Israel is one land when the Armistice Lines are clearly here to say this was meant for a Jewish Home and it's Arab neighbours. One land for two nations/ peoples cannot be under the same (national) flag without the approval of the International Law or the UN. But when talking about eating the global cake we are maybe looking at the extraordinary.

The EU is planning building it's master plan between the two territories in Israel, Gaza and the West Bank, what they call safe passages. And any Worldview of Israel will be that the sky is blue everywhere. Can one man alone be blamed? A man who has known the world and likes of Mr Robert McNamara and the time when this was the global cake to eat from, crumbs or the full piece of slice, just as he knows in the world today about living in the lap of self imposed luxury in an avarice lap to have it all in one lifetime. By global definition in 2020 however this is not corruption when still a family man and not soaked in public sleaze of sex and paedophile crimes. That would not give this guilty man his diplomatic cool as a long serving Prime Minister of Israel. Leave out the pistachio ice cream story now and only put the blame on whoever made this man rich and powerful, if bravery could still save Israel from itself (as a writer puts it). And paradox wants it that the current PM of Israel fits half that bravery, which is a hard and tough act to follow for any future PM in Israel. But the worldview also has a point to show it's index finger at a more serious problem that is looming for Israel if it is unable to reach a high level peace between Israel and the Palestinians in the very short term, and guarantee a future of cessation of hostilities. Chivalry is not in the global crumbs when looking to find any, but it may be in a bigger slice found? In a personal opinion, of course. And also maybe depending on your legacy. At one point one can only say that Mr Netanyahu has failed on only one occasion and leave behind the real reason for keeping Israel from harm, or deciding it's future. If the Messiah will come this will not be for the pistachio ice cream, no matter how expensive and sweet flavoured. Opulence is what the worldview of a return of Jesus Christ is more in their church courts, that this will be different from the time of the poor stable in Bethlehem. Can it be that the global cake is all about who comes first and last in strife?

The nearest thing to the future, please, don't take a guess.

30 July 2020

Our planet and world instead of breathing the future it is completely airtight with an unusual situation called a virus, that is deadly and known to the human race as COVID- 19. We also have now 'pandemic debates' in most governments around the globe and all are equipt with 'rabbit hole' visions. Now we just can't take a guess on what future we should be looking out for, except for uncertainty. The planet cannot survive some have already said or estimated, east, west, south and north. Except maybe for Sweden, with a miracle cure of it's own COVID- 19 averse society. But no one can know for sure if this was and is truly working. PPE in the public domain has reached unusual platforms of the G7 and G20 countries and Heads of State. E.g. face masks, also in different designs and languages, and keeping the disease on the X- bridge. For your children however apple green and regular handwashing will help keep the virus away (used to be keeping the doctor away when eating fresh apples and your greens) On the balance Health is a capital letter word and challenges laws and sciences both. Economic structures may not come down just yet because of COVID-19, but the microbe has enormous battering ram's horns to bud itself through employment and unemployment (due to the disease). For a while it looked as if the solution was here and found by reopening the economy in May- June, in the last months. But then there was also keeping the social distance of 1.5 mtr globally. In short we can say that one year ago this was perhaps the future everyone was talking about and that we didn't know. What does your face mask looks like?

Writing here proves that you are still here and that you have not been affected or infected by COVID- 19 at this stage, yet? Also you can't convince anyone having seen the dead passing by in the river near you like the Ganges, where this ritual is norm and a holy sent off. It is only where people die rapidly in high rates we get higher statistics readings on the Internet in the International and national worlds. Among the many natural places COVID- 19 has much more appetite for the civilized world and to a lower degree it can also be found in the Amazone rainforest. Or plague the indigenous people of Australia. If you can remember the health-o-meter of life previous to COVID-19, anyone remember by what number a healthy person was 'relatively healthy'? Do you agree when the government is saying it is mandatory to wear a face mask, or do you agree with your government when it is thinking beyond wearing a face mask, privately? That would be something for the Corona- istas to answer and who know more about microbes and their life- lengthiness. 'Come back together,' if we expect another wave comeback in the community of going through the same 'motion' together again? And stockpile again while governments on TV say not to panic and there is enough for everyone, if you buy of each product one or two items (Paracetamol 2x package of two strips). The city will just go quiet again, suggesting sterility without the men in white suits. And still the public does not know the reality of the Coronavirus when and where dynamic or most aggressive in a herd of more than three people. Perhaps it is time to re-think the future or stay with the retro version and hope to live another day?
Negative effect COVID-19: national and local proposal of antisemitism in many countries going around the world in careless whispers.


The inspiration for a new design of Israel is with Palestine.

1 July 2020

Seconds, minutes, the West Bank this afternoon is on red alert 'after assessment' (an article said on the Jerusalem Post). 1 July 2020 feels anywhere else in the world like any other normal day, with the exception of a few philiipics against Phillip Netanyahu, that are warning Israel against applying annexation for the coming hours of today. In almost poetic language, never was the hour so elastic to remind mankind that time is father everywhere. A new strategic opening should not be seen as the choice of bad military bureaucracy, let's say if israel would want to follow the inspiration pursuing greater rights to it's already sovereignty as the State of Israel. Deterrence is a passive in the story today when in Israel or the West Bank. From afar the annexation saga day is like watching a Greek tragedy, where names and personages are interchanged, e.g. Mr Netanyahu to Phillip of Macedon, and to a certain extent and due to his age and non- Palestinian State, Mr Abbas, and in his last attempt yesterday to sent a letter to the Middle East Quartet, as no other than Philocrates. Both nations with no peace treaty on the stage... But let's not get too distracted when there is much damage to expect from Israel's moves if it still is annexation at the end of the day today. But since this is not writing from an organisation the next question is easy: who or where is Demosthenes in all of this Israeli first tragedy on the International stage? That just being put in a brief question.

Who can rehabilitate COVID- 19, or maybe what can?

28 April 2020

In biology man and beast are both physique and visible nature to the rest of the planet. COVID- 19 on the other hand is invisible when side by side with the anatomy of man or beast. but It has only more potential than any man, woman, child or animal. And this is what is driving the world going round in circles and only following the horror of death and other related stories in it's tail. Wherever the virus strikes people are going off into mini cyclones or whirlwinds of emergency and following the rules, that in many ways have become automated since the beginning of the outbreak and now reaching it's second phase (after lockdown in some countries and easing restrictions). The US wants desperately to go back to (the new) normal, and restart the economy where it had stopped abruptly in last February. The economy, also, in many ways has the same 'building' as COVID-19 and being not visible to man or beast. What we see are cities, skyline, homes, objects and so forth. Yet here is where the thinking goes out into the world that the virus is 'killing off' the heart of the economy in every country wherever the spreading was or had taken place. It is when they ad globally or at EU- level, in Europe at large, and Japan, we are then getting nervous and alarmed about the invisible 'enemy' of global society today. This is a difficult picture to put man and beast on or in it, at a personal level when e.g. they have lost a family member or loved one who has died from the Coronavirus. The general public is the second factor on the scale of this pandemic since they called for it's declaration, 27 January 2020.

Phase II of Covid- 19 has a starting point that equals blanco. Evaluation projections are mostly done by organisation from country to country, institute by institute and will probably have to end at the global institutions for Health & Pandemics, Emergency during pandemics. After 4 May next month the global effort idea to combat COVID- 19 is expected to come closer to the target of containing the virus for people and the economy where you live.

The story continues.

COVID-19 in Real Time: hours, minutes and seconds.

24 April 2020

Lets whack it. Just whack the disease, or find a way to whack it. (Term used by US President Donald Trump in a briefing last week) Well, that is one way to deal with the Coronavirus and dealing with it very effectively, one could say. The problem is that it is not visible to anyone like malaria and it's courier, the mosquito. But here is a US President, convinced, and who is telling the American public and into the rest of the world, that Covid- 19 can be beaten. You only need to look hard enough to find a cure, very effectively and fast. In fact, before the vaccine is out, let's say in 12 or 18 months from now. The UK just knows how to crack the code. In the end of the day all briefings are about how to whack and crack COVID- 19 and stop it from spreading. And it doesn't work that way, is also what the experts are saying. We can draw up a list of the President cures on Covid- 19 as: to use disinfectant, bleach it, ultraviolet light, hydroxychloroquine, humidity and hot air. Or, indeed, whack it. It is perhaps not medical genius how the world should deal with the virus as it is still beating the economy hardest, but it does tell you one thing about America as a G-7 country. And, of course, Britain, also a G-7 leader. The termite eats up the building and before your eyes it demolishes the existence of it the memory with utmost precision to ashes or rubble. Covid-19 does the opposite and eats everything inside the building with precision, man and income. Artists have given us many photo's to see where infrastructure is being laid bare to silence and desolation during the evenings, but also during the day. Covid-19 is hard to see through the cameralens, yes, even then. This one is totally on the eye of the beholder and the story of the devastation can only be told by humans and their witnesses. And what you can't see but is 'killing' you can drive anyone insane, and frustration is also going nowhere. The question by the World Health Organisation is how to build an architecture around Covid- 19 and then deal with it more properly and orderly. Architecture in science may be about what you can't see with your eyes, but in building science it means that you have to visualize what you can see. This leaves us with even bigger questions and how to put COVID-19 into a curve.

There are many who criticise the US President for quack measures and cures that he adheres to and from quack medical experts where he is getting his information from. Nonsensical would be, 'Let's lasso the virus like the moon and than whack it." That is what we haven't heard the President saying yet. So, in fact, there is still some hope for return to sanity very soon. But is it sane when the new normal means that the world from now on should keep a global measure of keeping the social distance of 1.5 m? You have to ask what happens to people living in poverty striken places and living a human side by side with insects, whether here is also the 'new normal' to make the difference in saving lives. It is a big question for the 'real' scientists who know by what measurements they are dealing with COVID- 19 and the real impact of this virus. And if anyone is using the number of dead people the question on survival is getting more and more dominant for scientists to come up with 'the new normal' set of rules how to combat the disease and how to survive. And another team of experts should take the global economies in the architecture that one can see with the eye, as WHO has put it to fight the Coronavirus invisibility. But where the disease is defeating all measures is in places where people are intelligent and who are looking for interacting with the disease itself, let's say by artistic visualization. You could make the virus animation where it interacts with the general public and is teaching at the same time of it's deadly existence, if e.g. you don't wash your hands, keep the social distance and build up herdimmunities. Let the COVID- 19 talk to you, should be the real message at this stage for the public to get engaged with what is happening, and not necessarily with what is not happening, yet. Like Dr Tedros said about the moment when he had declared that there is a pandemic, he said that it was the right time and that in two months countries and nations had enough time to respond. He is right, it is all about timing and his timing was pin point. Where it did go wrong, I am sorry to say, was with the EU slow response as a union. In all affluent societies one can expect that logistics was in it's right place presentative to respond when there is a calamity or pandemic. In the meantime, let's whack it. Or, crack the code. For now.

Israel need hawk and speak broken English good.

7 February 2020

Anxious plan of President USA make Israelis come with tent outside and stay in front of house of Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu. Plan of century is peacock with many feathers and colour in eyes, or like bird. Group say sovereignty for Israel is short cut to history of Jews, and magic word is annexation and hawk fly in the sky. Good ambassador Mr Friedman is humble and good man and say wait for magic is better right now. Many question about other anxiety is Palestinian state is like two bird killed with one stone in plan. USA is good friend of Israel and now is also good partner of peace between Israeli and Palestinian people. No mistake can make logic strong for President of USA and Prime Minister of Israel. Sheherazade tell story of invisible rock in Aladdin, and also Bible speaks of Song of many songs. Peacock look in mirror and thinks he is more beautiful than all the world. Hawk see only war. And echo of Sheherazade in big rock say "Open Sesame!" If Israel has no lady bird ally purity will wash open wound of sovereignty with snow and cave will go open for many silver, gold and gems. Jews all over the world will open wings like passports in many colours after that and need translator saying shalom. Ominous of heaven is on Zion. Streets of century has red stop in Jerusalem. Religion is other face of coin. Not end of story.


Jeffrey Epstein's morbid perversity was unnecessary throughout his life.

11 August 2019

Unmarried, the late Mr Jeffrey Epstein has died apparantly of a suicide where he was detained as a prisoner. Social Media is left with many questions unanswered and is very anxious to get to the bottom of this anti-climax on the 'peadophile' trick of disappearing when to face trial at home in the United States. Sex trafficking is a serious crime in the United States. But what is the public missing here, on an equal apparantly basis on this respected member of high society life in the US and a billionaire where he was a citizen and resident? President Donald Trump tweeted today that conspiracy theories around Mr Epstein's death are now going viral as we speak with no one having any clue on why the accused has taken his life at this particular point of the trial. The President was no fan of the deceased, so it says in the news this morning, GMT. Question is that if Mr Epstein was a billionaire from financial business, money was to cheap to buy or sell young underaged girls for peanuts. It is all but a dirty mystery for the moment where this story is now heading. What the world now seem to wallow in over Mr Epstein's death is that here is an extraordinary beautiful man going down a dead dog as a condemned man and villain and it isn't what the people wanted. The crimes itself are evident and sadly reminding not many in the 21st century what being unmarried means to a man like the late Mr Epstein and to die a lonely death disconnected from all friends and society itself. The Profumo affair has a similar victim in Stephen Ward, also unmarried and mysteriously attractive to e.g. Miss Christine Keeler. The public is forced upon the story and question many powerful people/ men in the world, what apparantly is looking bad if they had a fetish for underaged girls, procured by Mr Epstein in total obscurity from the eyes of the world.

Today we will never know whether Mr Epstein has died with 'State secrets' under very suspicious circumstances, or that in fact he took his own life in fear of to make public what he never wanted the world to know. Actually it is the procurement that is now left on trial because it concerned underaged girls. Then secundo the intention of it's nature, e.g. perversity or something even more morbid. With the millions of dollars in Mr Epstein's private life and business anyone else could have bought a 'good name'. In stead what this man did was buying callousness and doing it perhaps for kicks. It is imperative to stay hardcore close to plain and simple explanations on mr Epstein's peadophile fetishes and to get his kicks out of them. He doesn't seem to have understood this part of his conspiracy being some sort of greater part of what he had set up to 'entertain' earth's most powerful men. In popular terms it is either Sliver (film) or Michael Jackson to the public. Suicide is indicating a very serious protest by the late Mr Epstein. And one would like to know what did make him protest with his life and death without leaving spouse and children behind. Mystery after mystery even after his death is now emerging as we speak on the life of Mr Jeffrey Epstein, hardcore lover of young nymphs and perhaps paying the high price of playing Zeus. In the news this week there was something mentioned of physical contact with his victim and not that he examined a girl first before sending her off to 'his friends'. Jonathan Aitken, Tory Minister in the UK, strangely enough was married and had some authority on duty and serving the country in Her Majesty's government. Also another handsome Tory Minister and one would wonder what handsome powerful men have got to do with this ghastly and ugly business of procurement of young underaged girls to sell to friends... You wouldn't want to see that happening to your daughter, as a gentleman. Or, do you?

Who is crossing the road first, the PM in the UK or chicken?

30 July 2019

In about 12 weeks time we will know that answer whether first the PM or chicken has crossed the road to nowhere. I'll be back, sayest the ghost of Brexit midnight. But then again, where is nowhere? N.I.M.B.Y. this is a good question. And how English it is we might never see the day of light alongside the Yellow Brick Road. What we know so far about the 31st of October is that all of England is looking in this direction with 3D red/ cyan sunglasses on across the face and that they are British made carton. Britain has found a new love of masses and it's leader is called the UK Prime Minister, Mr Boris Johnson. And no one knows the cure where the opposite Party is planning on finding this against the strange BoJo-disease. Is it politics? Opinion? One thing it isn't that's analysis. Remember how the last Tory PM has died in her career as UK PM, via analysis. In shorter version we think it is fiction that the new PM is suggesting across the world where England is going for the coming weeks. We have to stop right here and turn on it's head the sands of time. Mr Lawrence Of Arabia is crossing the road like mad and in the end he is going to succeed. Yes, why not. After all this is England.


7 August 2019

Where are the body snatchers? As it were they are across the channel, somewhere. And it is also a humbling experience to be honoured by the molesting aliens for invading parliamentary unparalleled space that is nothing similar to where they are coming from. But then again this is Westminister, UK. You can expect anything from here, whether these are the body snatcher space colony, unsettling the universe or Brexit. And then there are those that insist on Brexit, versus those that desist on Brexit. A doomsday prophet could just be a prop. There is no one in the British parliament to finish the job on Brexit. What is sane and what is mad, that is the question. Let's say that the old world was sanity, it then begs the question why ending up in this madness wasn't the sane result one would expect. And than, what if Brexit is madness in it's purest of forms, what would the result be in terms of one year after 31 October this year? You have to finish the story somewhere, one should think. If the body snatchers are opposite the bench, Dalek is all they can see when facing the Prime Minister. What Britain needs is a good reflection of it's influence in the world, and than determine a chance as great as Brexit. By now everyone agrees that Brexit isn't a small matter to solve to either side, the European Union nor Britain. One thing is clear that is that you can't impress the EU with another insignificant episode of 'We don't know yet'. Why not tell the world why you can't make up your mind just yet on Brexit. But perhaps this PM has the parting shot in his blood and is not facing the real problem of leaving in what is deeply rooted in the EU on the side of Britain and the UK ministerial past. It was still the British realm.

What's there to explain? Moskou protesters are gearing up in the streets preppy- style clothing...

28 July 2019

What is it that people like Bloomberg could learn from the world we're now living in, if uniform people go out unto the streets around the world and interact with the most powerful people in the world via a modern day way of protesting about pain and ideals that never made it through promises or even changing the world, as they say, 'for the better'. No protester need to look plain and worn out. With a new 'clean' world all protests should be 'clean' looking revolutions. And if death or being violently dragged away by MEP or other security forces, than so you go squeaky clean and be detained or stripped of civility that is making all the difference in civil society. Does it matter what the ideal is to the most powerful people in the world when it's not written in an email? Why do politicians and protesters alike have to look like a bunch of loonies and solidarity- fifties- style in the streets of modern day cities? The message is the future a self named century. All inventions have stoppped, what is there to innovate? Economies have expanded and are collective, not individual. Some very big themes are out there in our time to be the moment's battlecry, visual and virtually. It's violence is not weapons, but contrary and carefully chosen... Yes, close to design white- collar. And what should people like Bloomberg learn from a momentum so high? OWS, remembering? Now it's difference is post millennial and the future is Z.

The voice within is universal, it is almost global and non individual. Why not listen?

The new UK Prime Minister is badly privileged.

26 July 2019

It is what difference of opinion makes that many call politics, the political subconcious, and objectives will certainly emerge, but not just from out of nowhere. The political swamp is bad when damping and rise. The global question is are we living in a political world in our time? Of course, it doesn't make any sense when politics is blind and so is lady Justice, both having the duty to inform the public what they do not know yet, in the present time or in near futures. In the UK no one knows yet what the new Prime Minister will do, in terms of politics with the EU and what his global vision will be after Brexit on 31 October, three months from now. His vision works like magic, so many are already saying, e.g. uniting Britain to leave the EU. It is not being critical of the PM when saying that this might not happen at all, when clearly the EU is not going to change it's standview of departure from the UK. On both sides the departure works in a two- way system plan, independently or balance. Making Britain the greatest place on earth isn't any system nor has it technological traits to secure this vision, on EU and Britain's side. A long sense of malaise may follow after 31 October later this year, just before the last quarter of 2019. Another magical moment when not in synchronisation with the rest of the world perhaps? PM's usually inherit previous governments malaise and here it is not any different for this Prime Minister in the UK. His dashing off to Scotland and perhaps Northern Ireland in the coming weeks should be seen as his first ministerial visits to unite the UK behind Brexit... This could be your wake-up call and tell you that something isn't quite just right in Britain or with it. The nessy in the zoo of Scotland is Nicola Sturgeon and Northern Ireland has the Taoiseach, Leo Varadkar. They have been established by the electorate and in some ways are familiar with greater politics if and when nothing else seems to work but against time and reason. It is no reproach of any hidden kind against the new PM in the UK, but isn't he a bit of dog -whistling to politicians who lost a referendum in Scotland and are under no circumstance willing to sacrifice just anything in NI if it means to go back to unknown consequences?

The UK Prime Minister soon will know that politics isn't blind in our part of the world just yet. If democracy should make a comeback in this century in Britain nothing of it will be blind or blinded by fancy ideas or hype. His chancellor Sajid Javid is expected to read out perfectly the upcoming budget, maybe in the nick of time before anything is set back into adversity in British politics, but then again it is what the people make of it in the end of the day for politicians to stay on in their ministerial jobs. The people love the idea of a Boris Johnson as PM and so will they go on till they would be dropping like flies. The real test for any PM comes with new plans in their country and if anyone would say to Mr Boris Johnson about changing the infrastructure in Trafalgarsquare or the Picadlilly Circus, his white hair would change to orange and lose oversight of the future and future economics. A big project should be built on safe ground, e.g. Thames waters, totally in harmony with environmentalists parties and keep rural areas out of harms way. Could that be the PM's real natural instinct for Britain in the world and the greatest place on earth? Politics isn't multiple orgasms or who comes first, but organisms. A pretty faced cabinet has also nothing to do with humanities and sciences, when deliberate formed on the outlook and hide real deception in any political nature that this is not like Britain at all. Putting up a few black and white faces in a government and cabinet will not make anyone dance or polonaise. This isn't Venice. Now, the question by the European UnionDanube is what can the PM do to make it right for Britain?


Inside the Israeli Prime Minister's head 48 hours are now crucial.

28 May 2019

Israeli politics is following the edge of it's latest and not yet in the making of government. And the rest of the world likes this guessing game over what is happening in Mr Netanyahu's bluest of political seas, and what is not happening. That in itself is being perceived as a leap in the unknown and let's leave it to that. Yair Lapid is speaking in a loud voice, across many 'de-fences' on how ability to create a 'unity government' is lowest and not audible enough, but how that there is still something to hope for in voting for the right party, instead of the party that is going to make things stay as they are and always have been. Israelis might have lost the plot altogether and are now looking more for 'going back home' and not any day sooner to the ballot box again. Where is the shimmy and shake coming from this time in Israeli politics? Maybe some are looking for a religious word in Hebrew, while others believe that a leader with a stature of Mr Netanyahu won't be found any time soon yet, and when looking hard through the middle of politics some might not even see what 'hard politics' can be in a new leader of Israelis and one for Israel. Another aspect to this 'first time in history' 48 hour re- election is also how Israelis are affected by this prospect on such short notice. Let us make no mistake, but let us bear in mind that Israel is deadly serious when it comes to 'hardcore' politics in the country. Unwillingness to lead the country could come at a very high price if it takes too long and form government. A global leading nation in the Middle East should prevent vacuums and not be too overtly creative with voidness. And then again, Israel is becoming something of a miracle government in the Biblical sense, sizewise.

Right now there are too many frogs in the political pond croaking and people know what this could mean, e.g. that rain will fall soon.

The threshold of speculation on the 'Deal of the century' continues in the meantime...

18 April 2019

The parallel is obvious if the Palestinian people retain their historic perception of the Two- State solution to the problem that they are anticipating at this point, before publishing of the deal in the US, and a reverse of fortunes. In the rest of the world, e.g. the EU, prominent politicians, are objecting to the same with no specific approximate and 'leaving any diplomatic window open' (Jerusalem Post writing where Israel is getting ahead of the deal for Israelis). For a third time in this session of writings, the emphasis is the 21st century. Israel's Prime Minister, Mr Benyamin Netanyahu, from long experience in office will know all the trajectories and not only as a politician, but also as a consummate military leader of Defense of Israel, that nothing is open for speculation and also the wider view of security for Israel is beyond the threshold of security basics. Samaria and Judea has deep sentiments for the Palestinian people and a particular one at the heart of a dispersed people this piece of land/ territory is becoming close to a promise land... To create history is another matter, one of which Israel is in every way more it's senior in both worlds, past and present. A meeting between east and west on the same timeline is also the piece of another historic fact, that Samaria is territory to a promise made by Jesus Christ. Quoting from Learn Religions online on the history of Samaria: "But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth." (Acts 1:8, New International Version Bible). In terms of geopolitical and International politics ample thought is being offered on the 'real conflict' between the indigenous Palestinian people and the new settlements in the politics of Israel. It is here where the parallel stops, and Israel is confronting it's Jewish heritage unwillingly but very clear.

One can keep on speculating how the Prime Minister is planning on usurping a little territory and enhance sovereignty in Samaria and Judea and seriously wonder if he will erase International concerns about the future after annexing. The US deal of the century is a single global view for the Middle East and it will have to composing an understanding of Israel, past, present and future, only wider view that no one has barely touched on in the 21st century. International order doesn't do Israel's ancient longing for religion or Jewishness. It is participating in all religions, but globally the Jewish nation is similar to dynasties of finance and hardly pious or talk of the religious belief of Israel in the City of David. Writing history for Israel cannot prolong on a cosmetic existence of what holds Jewishness for the whole of Jews. But then again what man of God can stand before Israel in the era of this century? Or to put it simple, the man of God will not speak of globalization but of Israel, and specifically of the city of David. In Hebrew, of course. The Prime Minister can do many things, but with visions he has no experience how to lead Israel through the Red Sea once again in Jewish history to get to the other side of future Israel. And what is the future Israel? On the first level one can see the obvious influence of Israel throughout the region, while on the second level the future of Israel is expected to be and stay in a globalized world. Including or excluding a multifaceted platform will remain in Israeli prerogative. And here is where the State of the Palestinian people comes in with crashing speed between limb and armpit of the current Prime Minister of Israel at any given time or moment in real time. To others there is simply no parallel world between the Palestinians and Israelis. Language is the Messiah perhaps in this part of the world. The question is which one.


Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, the best of both worlds.

3 March 2019

April 2019 another decision time will be in Israel's General Election term, maybe changing history or just the present situation's time, actually with a capital T. Time in Israel is heading for that particular moment when reaching 'in the nick of time', either making a major change or extending just another political term in cabinet or parliament. AKA the Knesset. What can one say about Mr Netanyahu from a far, when not living in Israel? Understanding Israelis is different in this line when talking about their Prime Minister, and known for being the most consummate leader since former and late PM Mr Begin. Others, talk about Mr Netanyahu of being a leader since Ben Gurion, only differentiate on how building Israel with whatever means was needed to secure it's prolongation and future as a State. Peace was the oldest concept, before globalization in Israel became to be it's biggest ambition and success was accomplished deeply into the abstract future of tomorrow's worldstage, under no other than the present time Prime Minister, Mr Netanyahu. What Israel knows is one thing, and what the PM knows is another. How many Israelis still do understand the meaning of war in 2019? Around the world they hear of so many things being said about the world being the place to come peacefully, about civilization is something to be preserved, and that civil society is proof of a nation's leading industry. Wars that were won over the last two decades was in the interest of the nation, a rumour coming mostly from high, but in reality had only impact in the areas where Israel was in danger, according to the ruling political party and it's Prime Minister. Middle Israel always lagged behind, one can only assume at this stage.

The rest of the world has no idea what the people in Israel really want and how their perception of the future might be or look like. They want another leader, perhaps is the best they can come up with and than think or leave things again to those who know best, or what is best for Israel. We live either in complex or simple formulas, when it comes to politics and changes in the world. Israelis find it all too complex an issue, especially there where people are still looking for simple solutions to their every day sores. The Labour Party could make things indeed better for some and others who are feeling excluded from Israel's society at national level. How much security is involved with these simple ambitions, Labour is lacking all the answers, according to Likud's supporters. And then it's back again in limbo time for all Israelis, and they take no action or real decision to change the future of Israel's political direction. At some point Mr Netanyahu is a man of both worlds, Israel and the rest of the world. He has forged a robust political line and timeline (present time understanding) throughout time. He is both, past and present, and he also seems to be the only one who has the knack for the position he is in and making the best of it while the show is still running. The question will now be whether Mr Netanyahu can be the leader of tomorrow's future in Israel and for the whole of the country, yet again in the next term. A proper balance and honesty is another measure one can only secede from the ambition of deposing Mr Netanyahu, at least not at this moment. One thing is surely something he is not, being the big patriot of Israel, he is not Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, who had set fire on Rome.

Mr Donald Tusk, special place in hell for Brexiteers without plan how to leave the EU.

6 Februari 2019

Special place in hell: Britain is now exposed to humanities without leaving any specifics in future how it will still be or stay part of all this. Mr Tusk, EU President of EU Council, half has made a point of Brexit and Brexiteers. Still this momentum as the other half is a decisive factor, both to Britain and EU. If there is going to be any plan on the side of Britain this week what we will then witness is another delay on the previous one, and the one before that. Technically the situation becomes impossible and to reach any ground that is signifying a breakthrough from this point. According to Mr Tusk, even a reversal of Brexit is now impossible and the least the EU can do now is to prepare for a 'fiasco', he said today in Brussels. The question that the public would want to know is to what extend has Britain now been exposed and if this exposure on Brexiteers is of that influence that could harm, both Britain and it's moral point of humanities in any specific. A 'NO Deal' is of that nature that will harm humanities in Britain, and is a strong indicator for the economy when dropped in a sudden. The leaving of the EU from here will now only follow the parallel as envisioned by the EU continuum. It takes a special place in heaven to pray now for an orderly chaos, in the least.

This has been done before, turning the world into science fiction, in movies.

10 January 2019

One can underestimate the will of the people, but so can they do the same when it comes to the future of our planet and inhabitants living in it for many worlds before. Then many love to give speeches how God's universe was dispersed among mankind and places, today we know as our geographical home. Not much has changed since then, unless Germany is now in Africa, and Nigeria has become the Capital of France. The world is now at a new narrative, saying as much as what is it that we have forgotten and what is it that we call memory. Millions can or could give their answers and never be heard, or... Not quite so true to say that, because for the last decade the advance of remote peoples and countries did had a chance to speak out on everything else that matters to all others living in big cities and countries, experiencing some sort of universal identity that was given to all of mankind, and perhaps to animals as well. (Animals don't flock on boats and migrate, not just yet.) In 2019 the question on how humans perceive the future has become in it's early hours something very critical to look at, if let's say the world will loose itself on the meredian and equatorian lines very soon. Science Fiction is to blame, of course, let's say when that happens. A stone throw similar to the falling (failing) star in the distance, the future isn't all black and blue as they appear to be in people's predictions or imaginary doomsday thinking. On the contrary, something happens when we have another look and this time more carefully. A simple multiplication tells you that too many people need this world, which in itself is the new commodity and truth. And the truth get's bigger by the number of peoples, which is also some kind of a futuristic ethics no earthly priest have learned any piety for at the seminar. This can be a disturbing picture of what truth now holds for the whole world and will stay this way into the near future.

The world as it has been for many centuries now seem to be ill prepared for the new future, and some stop at nothing to emphasize their right to keep it to the will of one man and his vision. He becomes of course no one else but another Boris Jeltsin, former and late Russian President in the nineties. You have to be intoxicated with lot's of doom thinking and a melancholic if you don't want it to change. "No! No! No! Nooooo!" That's what it means for a drunk who doesn't want to let go of his empty bottle. Rehab are like hunters from hell around him, when he looks up and can only see their eyes piercing at him from many worlds afar... This mistake is the common thing we have learned so often to see and do the exams how you should change the world and make it more civilized. If you tear it apart for no reason at all, something tells you that you are beginning to pray for your intentions to rebel against an evil world, de facto the world we call the universal world from God. It is the king's will, if they must go that way, so they say. And what is wrong with a smaller kingdom, given to you by the hand that feeds the world? What is also wrong is that no one will admire blind stupidity, as if they would not understand what is really heroic and what is not. This has to stop in our world to lead it by way of bad taste tantrums. After all, even the God of Abraham was sometimes defeated and took Babylon and it's kings to Jerusalem, if this defeat came from His own people. That looks very much like a proper invitation, that the kings may do at will with what have been a bold act against their God and defeated Him, in front of the whole ancient world. In a scifi world it is highly civilized that you drop your sword and make peace with the world as it is and evolving (natural or unnatural). But, there is always the option of a last resort, that if you may take up your sword, stupidly, your folly is your own when you fall on your own sword. How does the saying goes again, 'Wealth will breathe wealth'?

Not writing about Brexit probably the only reality that we all know best, after 40 years.

7 January 2019.

Reading the articles around the global hemisphere this is not as we see any standpoint viewing coming from Britain itself, nowadays, well, except when it doesn't make any sense to the rest of the world. Perhaps it is supposed to be exactly that what is needed to make sense from a country that is leaving the economic bloc of European Union Nations. You can't say that is sad, at least not in the same way as it is for a country that would be leaving the United Nations Assembly. And yet, some concern is needed as well as civilized. Six months ago no one thought of the kind of reality now coming through on a slow treading, that just maybe Britain will crash out of the EU with a 'No Deal', with no one actually understanding what this could mean in terms of macroeconomics within the Eurozone, and overseas. Not a scenario anyone would like to know about right now, and surely too. And when we say it's the economy, one just wonders who the stupid is. All the more vagueness for you, and the more the better, but not seen from the side of continuity in economics of the last few decades. The EU seems ill prepared for the commotion this breakaway from it's establishment is causing it's Member States, by estimation or prediction in the least. This is quite a tall bill and many questions are being placed in front or behind the bill right now, or is maybe even freezed for the moment. What in God's name is happening here? Do you know the story, and then again who wants to know. Britain was clever enough to get into the EU/ EEC at one starring point in the past. You would think in the modern day century they would be even more smarter to get out of the same establishment in 2019. Articles around the world say otherwise. And it doesn't matter how you look at it, it is perhaps a good thing too providing the kind of productivity for many Memeber States and employment new politics and policies. Quite a big thing to say, but what else can you say? That Brexit is a minor thing altogether?

In what ways is Brexit unexpectedly more elaborate than you think? By now change of dynamics in productivity is perhaps the right medicine for an otherwise shrinking economy and poor harvest of revenues. Year after year, and we're not getting anywhere near the 'real core' of what it means to leave the economic / major economic lifeline of the Eurozone. And then again, Europe loves a big challenge and is hating everything smaller than a few euros. Everyone can be sure that this is going to surprise the rest of the world what Europeans do when things get worse in their economic heartland. Risk- aversity is the first thing they will sink to the bottom of the river Rhein or elsewhere, by a mere brick of stone, if they can build new ways to deal with their domestic economies from another resource and adapt entirely. This is or can be exciting and at the same time it might create curves unexpectedly that could outweigh their expectations, on the short term. The big idea will have to be long term, something no one can now predict right now how that might turn out to be. Of course the EU will keep this experiment period under serious scrutiny. Unless, the UK returns... The excitement can also be a false indicator of euphoria, let's say just to say this and to be on the safe side of the crisis. The rattle of the cage can only scare the sharks away for one moment and not for the whole period and as long as there are sharks in their natural territory... Again we might be looking into short term business outcomes, the middle man and have another upper class or similar to deal with the 'real economy'. Necessity is always the necessary evil that is best known to all of mankind, when identified. True this is all intelligent nonsense when you're the writer of these 'unpredictions' being made in writing and without the proper wall. But it will affect only the people whatever will happen after Britain will be leaving the EU in March 2019. So soon! Survival will be cosmetically erased from the film in their eyes, wherever you're looking or will be looking in the aftermath of Britain leaving the EU. And then suddenly you're stark naked watching the world go by, when losing your Universal Credit among the stars that shine. It will be nobody's fault by the time you catch up. Get on with what is left of your life, because this is what human history is called.

After tonight's confidence vote in the PM, the Brexit architect is still partly innovation.

12 December 2018

Naive questions will be asked after the announcement of the vote in the House of Commons tonight. One dominant question still will be: "Can the Prime Minister, Theresa May, deliver Brexit now?". This question has lost all it's star- points in it's own making also this evening when everything became clear she had won the vote of confidence. If the world was in any way involved in waiting on this moment, another question leaps to mind with ease, that is this fight in the British government in any way effective in the rest of the world? How bad could this be for the rest of the world? And that would be the largest scale answer for anyone to give or make their attempt at this complex situation for the UK to be in right now. So then, Mrs May has survived the much hated moment in British politics in the 21st century? Just stop right here and pause for another moment and think carefully again. It is not about winning, and Dr. Liam Fox is saying that it is about the national interest. And humanity stands by their liberties. Britain is putting on quite a display here with politics to the rest of the world. Yet every one is failing to see the importance about Brexit, or what has come to be known as leaving the EU. At least without a Brexit architect. The projections of the future of a Britain on it's own have yet to be invented and make a starting point somewhere, e.g. five years from now. Also, can it rebuild itself from the old time of forty years in close cooperation with the EU? There is no one at this point who will be thinking about rebuilding Britain from an industrial point of view, at least not tonight. But the NHS is very much industrial good... (For the nation?) The answer: sovereignty is what the nation now need most, and this has been projected in the vote of confidence in Mrs May tonight.

The Brexiter 'uber alles' will be left to the quiet opposition tonight, and leave it to that. Again a mysterious 'Fortune favours the brave' comes to mind... If this deal breaks up the kingdom over two years time, which no one is hoping for in healthy condition, when looking back on tonight's vote then perhaps it will be time for British politicians to come together and decide wisely once more, only this time without the political masquerade that happened to Theresa May when she was Prime Minister. And that is going to be a tough moment to be confronted with when that time will come. Because it is not to be done now, and in two years' time it won't be there either to win a full independence and taking back control of British sovereignty from the European Union history. Something so many still see or call an establishment. With Britain leaving the EU it automatically changed the meaning of the EU to historical EU. Now more than ever we see the real EU and that it has been standing there for quite a few decades long in Brussels and  is now part of the EU history. This is why leaving the EU makes it a hard case for Britain and with that to prove the meaning of sovereignty. More specifically, British sovereignty. Half of that was lost for forty years! From a mathematical point of view. The Brexit architect looks at nothing else but having this view in mind, of what sovereignty was lost by cooperation, how the EU is now a historic place, and where are you going to be next for or in when you leave the EU. That is not the voice of a politician speaking but one of a technician, since it will be the only eye in the country with a taste in the mouth for clarity on the whole new phase that awaits Britain outside the EU. In business it is also called 'reality'. Politics is wrapped up in a ten minutes speak, if this is it, what could be the thing to make a moment last longer?

The ordinary people in the UK are listening, and don't hear and see nothing is happening.

22 November 2018

Wrong, something did happen today and Mrs May made that statement in the Commons earlier today. The withdrawal agreement was good for jobs (businesses?) and for the people of Britain. On the streets hardly anyone notices the difference just yet. What the politicians envision is a whole different reality, so many see it or think. The Britain that the PM defends and is speaking of in the House of Commons goes by like whistle to the people of Britain, but fortunately they know now where it's coming from. Business can be happy there are not going to be any disruptions as they had feared in the coming time. Many can relax again while keeping their eyes wide open on the deals the government are making with the EU- bloc nations. From this point it is clear that the electorate are having some understanding about Brexit and it's 'half baked' deals with the EU, and as it is with business that you don't give up until you have to close shop, so they will not give up on having their business continue 24/7, for now. Politicians are not ordinary people hamstering economic advantages when these are free (of movement) or other constants they face every day and during all the year long. Time will not make any difference here. And the only thing they want to keep is not what is in politics over Brexit every day in the news, but when is it going to happen. Some politicians are right to anticipate this thing about uncertainty for the British people on all levels of industries and business. Small business get's the first blow if anything would go wrong and Big investment industries the last. Could life really be this simple? Yes, when you're the ordinary business man/ woman who doesn't want to lose their job or business. Simple because you continue to go about your life every day in the same old way, as in time before the referendum in 2016. The economy was good then for business, and it still is. So, why are politicians against the economy?

Another question one would also ask is, and why are politicians demanding a new referendum, based on the people here above that might have a different opinion of leaving the EU now? Have these politicians learned nothing from globalization (zzzzz...) that no one believes in politics anymore? Sometimes you would think that these are people who understand thriftiness more than the wider scale of the economy they are defending in parliament. For all the ills of globalization one thing it is doing better than the Brexiteers, that they are keeping the eyes on people and the economy. They do this through private and public sector systems worldwide. And perhaps they have all the quick answers and not time consuming debates going endlessly about what is wrong with the deal the PM has accepted and how many industries and political borders are a big concern that matters to all of Britain. If all is private sector it must go a two way street. If it's a public sector this is not transparent enough to the public at large, but only in the names of services in the UK. Or, throughout the UK. In fact, every time you look at Brexit one thing keeps stucking inside your head, that politicians do need to understand people better in the short and long term. Not as individuals of need, but as participants of all sorts and that this is the nature of globalization in general. Human nature changes under every new set of circumstances and not only rich or poverty issues only. Britain doesn't know about ordinary people's changes and a complete belief in the global world where everyone would like to be in the future. Home is good, but if you can do business with Taiwan, Alibaba and other companies online, you are more secure that this is the way forward and live a 'normal' life in the present time. The 21st century requires more understanding of what people really want in their future and how they preceive destiny without the hubris of parliament fighting over sovereignty (also mixing sovereign (relative value) and sovereignty (nil value on the econmic balance) endlessly. Today the news was good for ordinary business people and for the time being they have nothing to fear to close shop and start again as Taxi drivers.

UK 'Deep relations with the EU' deal.

18 November 2018

This weekend however Andrea Leadsom, leader of the House of Commons, will try to change the withdrawal deal Mrs May, UK Prime Minister, has said that this deal was better than no deal at all, and take it back to Brussels and reopen new negotiations. There is still time, she has also said to make these changes in the draft. In another corner there is Jeremy Corbyn waiting like a giant spider, waiting when it's the best time to strike and go for their own deal, but with the bonus of the extra of delivering the kind of Brexit for the people of Britain. It is like mating with the male and he (the people) not knowing that it's dinner too. These candles and flowers on the table of politics therefore are not as romantic and straightforward as the people would want it to be or believe in it. Basic level tells you that the deal the PM is now continuing with is the right deal for the country and it's future, because in this deal all the deep relations with the EU are or will be maintiained. The EU is not waiting for kisses and stroking of the hands in these deep relations. In fact the EU wants firm action from Britain, maintaining indeed deep relations with the establishment. How many levels will follow after that is not transparent at this moment. Or relevant. Now it looks like things are unnecessarily complicated or make people believe it isn't possible for the Conservative MP's to learn live with the present deal, because?.. (No answers) Labour is desperate to do the deal that Britain wants or needs, and paradoxically this is true. From the last decade, or even the previous one, the understanding seems to go one way for Labour and it is doing exactly that what logic requires for the 21st century. Keep globalization and internationalization deep inside Britain, because the future will not change for any country after, let's say 2020. People across the globe want to go that way and escape the realities of poverty and unemployment everywhere and anywhere. Even for Britian this is true. Free movement between constituencies must be smooth and policies polished, if Britain wants to maintain deep relations with the British people and the rest of the world. The Conservatives are falling too short having Britain go more globalization from their base. At least that is what some are saying at the moment. And they want out with it all and preferably 'now !'.

But the EU has already made clear it will not change anything in the draft or Brexit withdrawal text. After all it is what maintaining deep relations with the EU means. In another corner the questions just sits there and is wondering what do the people want now at the moment? Which government do the people want in the current situation when the Tories are unable to stand behind the Prime Minister with the (draft) 'better than no deal' treaty? To understand this side of the big Brexit argument to leave the EU you have to look again to the part outside the UK. Strangely enough what it seems to need is a workable government, that knows a few things about the 21st century logic and fiction. The world is dealing with realities only and not high profile pretence. Nor does it has any choice but follow the machineries of it's making and keep it restrictive to the core of the design. For all political realities in the world this is how governments maintain 'deep relations' with the global sphere in our every day life. There is no time and point to pretend this can be changed for the coming time, aka the future. But Britain still claims it will and wants to have a 'No deal' in stead, ditching the Prime Minister's draft deal that was published on wednesday, 14 November. And, one more thing also stays unchangeable with the stubborness of these Conservative MP's, the EU changes Britain into a 'vassal' state. Yes, and Rome will fall too! (Perhaps a bit of a bad joke) The European Union consists of 27 Member States (28 minus Brexit) in Real Time. There is no need to put a clergy related word inside the scientific English of the 21st century,one could say? Labour can only smell more blood to want to be in government. Yes, a very nice idea indeed. But it will still have to deliver what is good for Britain and what the people voted for in the referendum in 2016, which is to leave the EU. No problem, 'You have heard of the genii, Mrs Fawlty, well, that's me.". (Says Jeremby Corbyn's conscience) Labour must be able to device an inward mechanism for Britain and to leave the EU, while at the same time deal with the world by another invention of outward mechanism. Can Mr Corbyn do that? Yes, he can! It will be an interesting time to follow this high time drama of Brexit a little more, and perhaps not understanding what Britain means by 'No Deal' is better than a half baked deal. Also 'No deal' meaning 'No deep relations with the EU' then. Big Ben is a lonely chime and it echoes loud and clear that Brexit is sacred to the Conservatives.

Politicians in the UK have stopped dreaming bold.

26 October 2018

It is in the national mood where this is most felt and absolutely nothing else is said or sensed. From the world's point of view nothing much has changed and everything goes about it's way in the same timelapse as always for the last seven decades. One example of ordinary lives: without the EU or with it who says Universal Credit would not be there? Politicians are familiar with their own making, past, present or, yes, the future. Why leave it up to the individual with an existence of many unfamiliarities to the real world of what things are really like when you run the country or are in government? The country is a mind map to politicians and it is confined to space and time, and occassionally with end fringes. It has become a Germanic fairy tale where the eternal damnation of a castle must stay underwater forever, but will have the one chance miracle of rising up again when found a single coin of copper cent. That chance maybe came yesterday in the news,  the mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, when speaking to an audience of mayors and business people from around the world, that what Britain would now need is more equality between right and left, and not only a right or left government. In a way he is right, that you can't glue globalism just on one side at the moment. In reality Tories seem glued to Brexit, while others maybe are trying to get off the glue from their hands. "It was never blood, you see," is some sort of convincing of others who don't know what Brexit is all about. It is probably the glue of being an internationalist. Now, what is next? Paradoxically Britain also in an extraordinary way seems beyond reproach for going this way and make Brexit a new path in world politics, aka the silk road to something better, and that always means better than... With high expectations no one would then think about the EU, but that it was bigger than that. Is it?

Both, the EU and Brexit, are dealing with something else you don't think of when the clashing goes on and on. It is that what you can't see or say, but what was Brexit by nature? Was it rationaly deliberate and to what purpose, one could ask. By suggesting 'deliberate' here this is not the same thing as kicking. It is more like 'Me love you long time', and why. The nature of Brexit in terms of the future has a new natural self that can work if it would kick itself to life from an imaginary point it has never had or known, but basically one that is staying a British invention. Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor, doesn't want Britain to kick itself to death, but regenerate from anywhere for a start. Britain has that kind of potential once it can get going. And suddenly things look more promising than beating yourself to death. A delivered Brexit is nothing more than a deliberate Brexit, with a fortunate outcome in 2016 to leave the EU in it's tail. And that is only one part in the whole story so far. The question is in what way can Britain compete with the world outside Brexit? The EU 27 Member States would have something empirical that is similar to Britain, you would think. Competition doesn't make it exactly right to say where Britain will now have to start up again, nor can it also be right politically. Or what is in game technology 'Federalism against sovereignty', and vice versa where 'Sovereignty wins over Federalism'. And that would mean beating the world at it's federal base. The next question is, where does planet Brexit stands? What is very unclear about the future for Brexit is the understanding they see, hear and feel, e.g. that globalism is applied science worldwide. How the interpretation of AWOL or dissident translations will be is not something we can see from the audience or public point of view. And this is no good when you're trying to fight diplomatically in the same public sphere over staying out of the EU.

From the new novel, Many suns, many bumblebees.

The world came into his view. Red dust. We are looking at the center of all things when we say 'world'. It is what moves our generation the most and best of the day. Nahson was looking at world events and how this has changed overnight whatever the past was, as we speak. Change is ongoing. And, you are either in or out of it. What shall I call our civilization, let's say that if we had one, if all of the world were made of one breath and creed? He knew the world for 28 years nearly of his life. It is strange to experience 'real contact' once in a while with your own body, and he didn't mean masturbating. You came to see the world in a different light of things, mostly the big lines along the rim of time and motion. What do they call progress in this century? Are nations going totally blind? The world seems to be waiting for something, it's first atrocity in the 21nd century, exponentially. Some seem to think that either of these two human sort can do it, one stupid and the other very clever. Where do they look? And whom are we looking for? We can look way back when first they sent a dog into space and then the ape followed. A similar situation is what he again seem to have right now in extreme dilemma. But the closer you look the more you see that you are totally wrong. The world doesn't need heroes. You have volunteers for that. What they need is to pay the kind of money that makes them go Ah!!! Ooh! Nahson thought of Brexit. Does Brexit fit into that Ooh! and Ah!!! 'space'? EU President of the European Commission, Jean Claude Juncker, is an apparent kisser and lover of the vines. You can't miss it in the news. He likes to kiss, that's what all these photo's show you. And yet, when it comes to Brexit he is as hard as stone in his approach to the whole situation in which the EU versus Brexit (or the other way round) are struggling to find a way to agree and transform the present time for both sides. If we can still see the same moon every night, the sun every day, things are good. It is not where you stand, but where you are, some would say. It doesn't make sense to Mr Juncker speaking in phenomenon terms. Brexit is too small a matter and the EU, if you like, yes, is the only one qualifying to be called a phenomenon. And we must watch always for the phenomenon. But Nahson knew no one could put any more oil on this heated plate of EU- business. Politics has become the only forbidden fruit from which tree you musn't eat or touch it. It is European soil, also, on which you are standing. Just beware and mind the blue Cherub Mr Jean Claude Juncker at the gate of the EC. Can the UK Prime Minister pray? We are living in awesome times, Mrs Prime Minister. Brexit is always going to be the Eleanor Rigsby, as it is now being perceived by many lonely people. Why not take Fraser with thee to the next EU summit, when hosting EU leaders and Brexit leaders? All he has to say is 'We're doomed." at the negotiating table sitting next to UK-EU affairs minister, Dominic Raab. Let's just presume always a much better a line than e.g. "I give you nothing, senator. That is my answer." (Quote from Godfather II) Nahson logged out and turned off the computer. Tomorrow is another day and than he will read this piece of column again. What will his mother say? She is after all the real journalist of the family. 



Horizontal extensive government.

30 June 2018

The public is using two ends at a daily basis when looking at government or local government. If they are smart or just natural isn't a question often answered by people that remain invisible for most of their lives or will be indefinitely... That is natural law to both, government and the public that lasted for hundreds of years. First question: in retrospect, was it ever a wise thing to form any government? It is one answer the conscience of the nation might not ever want or can't answer without freedom or prosperity, if they have never had the chance. We look up and get answers only a government gives, from those who have absolute freedom and prosperity. Question II: have we made a historic mistake by accepting government to expand more natural than smart for hundreds of years? But the world's pereception of natural formed government at any level throughout the country has changed universally across the global sphere in almost every country in the last few decades. 2018 All expansion happens in an instant or smart design to have and create governments into a better product in our century. An all included society is literally without confusion and knows no obstacles when participating full time within the natural territories of government expansion. Unless during testing all grounds are opened for a run to finish. Now, a third question would be: what is the point of the here above to any outsider who doesn't know how a government actually works in our time? There is simply no formula for E & X, a creative form of exclusiveness, excluding and exit strategies once you're in mainstream government timelapses. Something still isn't right and is going down in vertigo, some say and staring...

It is the public sphere versus something. Let's e.g. say this is abstract, than what will you find in this or that end? (Jokingly: dead end) The future is always smart, and the past a natural law. And what is smart when it isn't law yet but abstract thinking or designing by a machine or team of experts? The public can only see businesses grow and governments stand where they are in one place for decades. The city get's only bigger like an image that is bigger than the mirror... In return something never comes back except where time was wasted, even long before the change was here. But something did change our world and no one actually knows where to look for the answers. If you believe in it the government has turned into a blunt instrument and it has lost most of it's edge and sharpness, created once in the backyards of the world a hundred years ago. Politics is now running their own show on the political platform, and not only in the public but global sphere. Oh, yes, only they are smarter now. (This is without cynicism) Of all the good in the world why did it had to happen to us and know this product aka government? Should future generations blame it on those back in time when freedom and prosperity became virtues and only for some? If conscience of the people have anything to say in the world today, one wonders whether this would be the smart thing to do or the natural way. If natural it won't be good and choke in a sudden panic or confusion. Imagine for one moment smart being natural for all! This zeppelin where only a limited people always can & will fit in.

G-7

9 June 2018

The pitch- fever for the group of Seven isn't over yet and it will continue this or the next year again and again to do the same trajectories across the globe each for different solutions or progress. Basically that's the good thing to hear, especially in a world where outdated goals seem retarded and new ones 'brand new'. They are here in the present time, if anyone cares to know why the G-7 is still necessary only when blindfolded. Advanced economies in the Asean region, AE+, is the new success story and is also opening new paths and abstracts on the future map of world designated economies. The secret is very much open today that the Group G-7 wants an 'open secret' on all these issues and to include all participants in their non- stop dynamic every changing world. Also, there is very much a great need to start building first on the roof and going downwards to previous time and decades where change did it's own ventures and not much was gained from it at the end of the day. Italy and Britain are now members of the G-7 and they are standing on very different lines, if not behind the lines, facing another block or cloud of group in the rest of the industrial nations members bloc. Times and timelines are in dire friction when it comes to 'exit' countries in the EU, or candidate country to exit the euro, Italy. And I have said this before about Prime Minister, Theresa May, that she cannot be convincing enough and do the Michael Corleone thing in Godfather I, saying that Britain's move isn't something personal but strictly business, and nor is Italy going to be Luca Brasi and getting Philip Tattaglia to believe him that he is leaving the Corleone (Euro) family...

It is refreshing to see a young Prime Minister of Canada, Mr Justin Trudeau, hosting this year's G7 meeting in Quebec. The young do that to veteran and senior 'institutions' like the Roman empire, once a young Gaius Julius Caesar said about senators from the old Patrician families. (Either true or false, or I invented this one in our present time in a totally ungodly fashion against the G7 group which may not be forgiven. But I hope so.)

What to tell but not reflective in the world we live in.

24 February 2018

Where do we start? The only first hit in the face that you could get is the media and how the news gets out in the world today. And I think that we're then hearing things that are not necessarily here nor there, but then again they could be. Questions go to headquarters and it stays that way for the rest of time. In fact the world we're living in deepens the need for a self or reflective world or response. By the individual and also by the innocent observer. Sometimes that can bring in balance between the parallel worlds of two sides, or even more than just deepen rationalities. This now seems out of mode with big media and worldwide global news networks, especially when specifically the news is a focus on issues of great importance. Two things come to mind: the need at large in the public's interest, and secondly there is no new format of how to handle the news streamline or feed into the world. Old ways die hard. Human behaviour, so they say, is only scientifically real in the real world. If not, then something must be wrong in your society. News industries are also not in a position to inform the public as a political establishment news network. E.g., when we take Brexit, Britain's exit from the EU, there is an immediate parallel world on the drive, going from A to B, from B to C, and then it takes a leap into F to X and leaving the rest to the public in confusion. Governance in 2018 has deepened worldwide. In the US you have President Donald Trump making America big again, China expansion into the west with projects to improve human life, North Korea in space, the European Union still searching for indentity, and England still deciding whether the desire to leave the EU is hard enough, at least harder than the desire for a new Prime Minister.

But all this is in the news. You can't get it from anywhere else once it's out in the world. Accessibility to the individual is hard on the outside from the 'real world and news stories'. So, how do you formulate a question with regard to reflective news in Real Time, and how societies now really are doing and why some vulnerabilities remain hardcore to societies (and are pushed to BetaMax status)? One thing is sure, e.g. the top few will not be part of this reflective news feed. They lack effects in their private arenas. It is with effects only where the action is, whether static, enforced or active on a daily basis. Before last week no one had heard of a crack economy, unless in certain parts of society. Is this a system? An apparent system, maybe, if you believe that when your little finger is the thief on your body you are entirely innocent.  No one is looking for to put any blame on prosperity of the top world in a global economy. On the other hand a government is first and last a political establishment and can't put any blame on anyone ever. Now, that would be a real system. Can a global audience keep up with the systems if you asked them? "Of course I can. I have a home computer/ laptop, and my children all have their tablets and plus they watch TV/ the news." And the part of where the academic skills come in remain void from the general view of a happy family and their standard of living. In fact science must be doing something right here, one could think. It just cracks you up. And it gets better when logic tells you that when multinational industries 'crack up', how then will the individual do when being out or in the labor force? (WOSO! World, speak out!) Again: what's there to tell about how we're really doing in the world today?

When the younger generation of Europe will take the lead it will be over with politics as we know it.

10 February 2018

The EU keeps on experimenting with democracy and the younger population of Member States, and even maybe in the end change the meaning of politics in Europe. Perhaps it is already halfway there, but more needs to be done e.g. in the military. With Britain ending it's relationship with the EU the challenge also comes back in the shadow vector to the question whether this institution will have some use after all, but only when you are born after the millennium. In 50 years time Europe will have a new generation in the lead. And what happens between now and then will become the irrelevant parallel establishment of what was political Europe, ending with the millennium. Most senior politicians, especially in the UK, could be left feeling that this is a breach to their old politics and see that this 'injustice' should be opposed bitterly. What can democracy mean when multiplied by mass or demographics? In affect this future will have to find ways to communicate with the generation who will know why democracy is good and why politics should stay out in their evolution time. It doesn't make any sense where this is going, if voters of the EU can from now on only vote massively in the same way their peers do, but living in different regions and other EU countries. That, at the same time, is a very ambitious plan or idea to build a functional democracy out of communication. And it is fascinating, that while the EU moves on others simply stick with ancient democracy and are having a deadly belief the world needs civilized scribes to deal with a very complex environment of past and present, when these are the people to refuse that centuries do change.

Mainstream democracy goes global, is for the moment an entirely imaginative or futuristic. But no one can be too sure whether that hasn't already arrived, while senior politicians are using a lengthy time and wasting the public's time with politics that do not do the work and give them the place where they would want to go or be, say in ten, twenty, thirty years from now. Money is part of this whole experiment and the impression you're getting is that many consider this the most sensible way of spending and investing in a 'new real world', with a more younger generation and who are agents of doing democracy without the politics from previous times. One goes into obscurity and the masses of young people rise above all that for reasons no one can really understand. What does it mean for a young agent of the new system? Why isn't politics working any more? It is probably more time consuming that way. Democracy can only work faster by modelling different systems into the sphere where change needs to replace outdated systems (one/ two years old) and there are lots of system engineers who work constantly on new applications around the clock. You simply can't win when politics needs time, e.g. years, to change or amend the law and serve the public. Communication Democracy is less friendly because some believe it moves too fast. People are never going to learn how to deal with Real Time fast changes. Where have they been all this time? The people have learned how to live with worse conditions and on many occasions had no other choice but to suffer a closer to home inhumanity one cannot hold for truth in the 21st century. At the same time we might all go here for another unknown myth and erase the memory of what mankind actually means as the factor man versus mass.

Time is just a castle in Spain.

President Donald Trump: SOTU January 2018.

31 January 2018

A quiet listening to the State of the Union address by the US President, Donald Trump, in another part of the world, you are feeling left with something quite different this morning than e.g. with his predecessors going back as far as former President Bill Clinton and his administration. Supposedly the 21st century had been very much on their minds when kick starting a new American political way forward and how to convey this message to the rest of the world, friend or foe. This was almost two decades ago. But the American people decided that now was the time to have someone in the White House who would 'take back control' from alien powers back  into the US and let them have something of 'what is good about America', as President Trump last night reaffirmed in his speech. 2018 Is getting different, and not just in America. Nations are sharing the same sentiments as the US President, and he is only making this case far more stronger than they might even dream possible. Is this a good thing? America has sovereignty, and one assumes this goes back to 250 years ago. That is something clearly right when American. The people love their country and the President is making their sentiments come true. He speaks of the 21st century in which he wants to take back economic control from foreign places and give this to the American people. Reaffirmed again, even whilst writing this down. On face value many outsiders can only think this morning that the President's SOTU was all good news, for Americans. And he is also right that this SOTU was the first in American history, that a President has taken 'back control', even in America from what was then good from former administrations. Mr Donald Trump isn't the man anymore that he was two years ago when starting his presidential campaign in 2015. He has the power now and he is the President of the USA.

One can listen quietly and one can stand up in the morning feeling even more quiet. He is a good man, but he is now the President and he will execute within his mandate to act upon on his inspirations to 'do good' for the American people. He has his heart in the right places, one half with big business and the other half that is going out to the American workers. He wants Motorcity to come back and this is a promising noise going out to the ordinary folks who 'so desperately' need a job. Mr Trump his economic plans are loud and simple: trust me, I am a business man and know what I am talking about. Who else should people trust? Politicians on the other side of the spectre are big on intellectual powers, no, not anymore. What they have promised did not work for America first. It in fact brought ways of America alone in the world, keeping Americans in poverty and unemployment for decades. On social issues the President was showering with facts and physical proof of the so many peoples he pointed out in the audience last night, military heroes, civilian heroes or even death by criminal gangs who had murdered two very young teenagers, senseless and sheer brutality. Was the number 300mln people the President menitoned that were feeling the family's pain? Once again, this President is doing the unique thing here and somehow he is managing to forge two ends in one straight line, be a friend to America and America will be your friend too. This morning you are left feeling whether to accept his 'offer' (olive branch, Bloomberg.com) or is it for real to be back in time, let's say the eighties? Can this President really do these things, holding on the side the eighties and early nineties (Guantanamo Bay), while holding on to the 21st century at the same time? Isn't that a big dangerous adventure for one President dancing on this rope? Accountability without transparency would easily play the American system into the Democrats' hands. Or is this also just another dream?

Ukip leader Mr Henry Bolton keeps apologizing to the public.

23 January 2018

If you are planning on getting Britain out of the EU, apologizing for a brief romance with a woman half your age, how does this serve the public's interest in economics and social policies? Next time try skeelers (advice Macroblade 90). Mr Bolton today has apologized to his family and Party in the Daily Telegraph for the 'pain' he has caused. First to his wife when he left her with a Christmas present she had never asked for, and that includes his children, and secondly then came the truth out in public that Ms Jo Marney was in fact damaging the 'UKIP image' for being racist. She looks much better on photographs as a glamour model, semi naked, than she is in a political den with the UKIP leader. Brexit was UKIP's baby, now abandoned to the Conservative Party in government, and causing in all corners of the UK mudslides no Prime Minister can survive for too long (some say so). It is striking how a few Tories are asking for vision and a future plan from all this sliding downwards in the present time. But what else can make Britain great? Apologize instead (Fawlty Towers John Cleese, asking what made Britain great. "I'm so sorry."). What would have happened if she had not tweeted about Prince Harry's fiancee? And then went on how she finds black people ugly. There is too much that is making her presence irrelevant at this stage. The point of apology can be reserved for much better things, such as why tell the people that Britain can leave the EU and not building adjacent to this a plan how to get out. Mr Farage doesn't seem to remember Colditz, while every one else does from his generation.

The question is this whether the UKIP has gone beyond itself and they only find out now that they have no parachutes with them while free- falling through air and sky. To put Ms Marney forward as a hardcore racist wasn't a great political stunt to unite the people behind Brexit. She is now an ex mascot of UKIP and equally it is light entertainment to watch Mr Henry Bolton do his 'silly walks' in political Britain. Where would the world be without all this? On the other hand it is providing any one who is close to the idea of leaving the EU, as citizen or other, somewhat of relaxing the nerves and to keep things a bit lighter with the Bolton- saga of the last few days. While the Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, is getting herself ready or gearing up for 2018, there is still plenty of time to be entertained as well. Brexit means Brexit and that is keeping up appearing again. But then again it can only be an echo coming through the caves of sigh. Who should the people take seriously? Is it the UKIP leader, mr Bolton, or is it the Tory Prime Minister? Either one will have to build Britain pyramides, like the ones of Sethi I, by Rameses or Moses. A strange chord comes also with this ancient rule, that all who build the pyramides must die a horrible death at the end. The secret is not out there in whatever age or time. This is the 21st century (and not 2000 BC), that part the PM has got it right. To have Mr Bolton of UKIP in her side flank and leading Britain out of the EU, well, what can one say? I apologize?

What is news? New definition.

16 January 2018

Last year US President Donald Trump has coined the term 'Fake News', and others are trying to treat this new thing as a derivative, a thing of incentive, or commodity to make life more complicated for others. That's global news feed, so some seem to think and fill in their otherwise vacant jobs. Does it bother you? No, not really, say all newsreaders. And perhaps that is the way it is in our world today. Not even politicians can change these ways, many of them providing their own headlines. Newspapers also are a thing of self styled business people that do not have the human touch in stories they print and educate their readers how to decide between what is right or not in our every day life anywhere in the world today. Yes, that too. Sometimes it just makes you wonder what if the Romans or Greek had newspapers in their days of antiquity? Would they be needing historians like Herodotus? (Rome had Tacitus) Maybe that is exactly where our world is different from this view, of writing history. Newspapers at a national and international level don't share the view anymore to make history happen or writing about the time the world is living in and covering from a particular point into the present time and to put emphasis on how a great world is making it's own heartbeat in the 21st century. People don't seem to believe anymore that there is such a thing as posterity or the future. Rather they want an end to the world instead, e.g. Armageddon.

Journalists only expect miracles to happen and they sit and wait for that to happen with primitive eyes and minds, as if this will come out of the smoke from every day news burning, while in the meantime real journalism has been locked away for a thousand years, like the great satan. Is 'Fake News' terribly exciting? What say the industries and syndicates of newspapers? Even subscribers are rarely getting the 'real thing' nowadays to read. It is all misinformation and thanks to Russian involvement in the global world in western democracies. Important stories are guesswork, e.g. Brexit, or Britain leaving the EU, next to Kim Yong Un of North Korea, now incidently making peace with South Korea and not making war. Syria has become the Pandora box of the Middle East when it's never ending unfolding of wars are keeping the western leaders and Russia busy, now for nearly a decade long. And this is only a handful of what could be 'Fake News' (not to me personally)going around in the world and have no chronicle records to leave behind, for next generations. A generation later one can only expect a generation ill informed on what changed the world today. But, hey, that's ok, just as the US President would say. In fact the real news is that the world doesn't want to read newspapers on a daily basis. The second fact is that it wants communication more than anything else. Loneliness becomes the real disease that people want to fight in their own time and on their own time line and evolution as a member of the general public. It is a crazy way to go and think how happiness in Real Time means being heard by another person, wherever. We must congratulate the industry behind this new way of life, on a local, national and global level. The International world is waving from beyond the grave saying that waving back at dying or even being dead is the latest new discovery, so write about it. No, not really. The Financial news is still serious news you should read and write about, especially when coming from Wall Street. Real journalism?

Who and what are we in the 21st century, when still part of the human race?

14 January 2018

If quietly we come and go in our daily lives there won't be any real difference to notice whether humanity is disappearing from it's real skin right under our noses, or that it is gone up in change from any global perspective. The size of the world can now be measured by the blink of your eye in the century that we are living in and most nations or populations living elsewhere do the same speak on daily basis just like any one else, e.g. saying 'digital'. Only to some 'digital' is called industries and technologies. The question therefore is a serious one when asking who and what we really are in Real Time today. Owning a smartphone can make you feel like a king on social media, and you can have the millions of fans/ followers you dream of and want, but the hard truth is that none of this matters to industries and technologies. But it is an incredible century to have when none of that matters to smartphone owners and who are in no mood to fight for what is right and... Politics and the economy can do all other battles where no ordinary citizen or career manager can go. Problem solving from a wider perspective is at the klick of a finger and one understands now how that is feeling to every human being in the world, when holding in their hand a crystal ball in which everything they wish for to see, hear or know is easy to get visually. It is exactly this understanding that is making the world a global industrious place to be living in, and also, that this change is real live experience.

In politics and economics the world has very much stayed the same, let's say since the eighties, nineties and beyond. Real change was written on a white or green paper, and built. In the same way much about the EU was written and built in the same way, when looking back. How some did not see 'this change' coming one wonders why they ever did go to Oxford or Cambridge university. Change, what was it that they thought that meant? Logic tells you that no one can zip champaign for too much longer on real and serious wealth. Sovereignty too has changed. And no one is blaming anyone... To reverse humanity and it's long extensive line of constant change forward, this won't end well for anyone, privately or corporate. Once you have taken the 360 degrees view of our world today only one thing comes to mind and we see something quite extraordinary and unique. And some even do that in terms of seconds and minutes. Corresponding countries are put in quarters and others are put in a 'What?' portfolio, waiting to be the nuptial party in the rest of the world where mainstream is ownership and humanity is it's tender heartbeat. We must admire the British and their revolution of Brexit. It is clear that the Brits still believe humanity has yet to be discovered, preferably by the British State. And, that maybe, the EU can be exposed as a small entity standing in the middle of western Europe and is very sweet. The EU is about industries and technologies. And change is reality to the EU.

Economics 2018: who will stay in the doggy bag? Bear, bull, or dog?

1 January 2018.

Let's first start with the db (doggy bag) economies since the beginning of last year, in 2017. Twenty or even ten years ago this would have been the easiest thing to do in retrospect, when facing another year of power economies everyone expected to do well now and fast. But here is the surprise effect to global economy: now big countries do very bad, do bad dog economics, by holding down the bear and bull in the bag. For some inexplainable reason it is the dog economy that is now doing well in some G-7 countries, e.g. Brexit and Italy. Most EU countries still go by the old fashioned way of up and down bearish or bullish economics. There is prudence in keeping or maintaining this constant balance of mssionary outlook movement. What more is there to explain and who will dare to predict what 2018 might be getting you into if you are e.g. Brexit? First, machineries don't predict or make singular calculations, input or output. Machineries are mechanical and they do outcomes. In order to beat that you need to know the outcome and excel yourself the super humanoid on earth ever. The dog economists love to do the personal touch thing, and that is just because they can touch the screen. In 2018 another sort of economics is on the horizon: the empty space economics, or the economics void of, well, you guessed it, economics, horizontal or vertical, diagonal or even on the tip of the axis. It is this economics that is spooking some big countries, when they see ghosts everywhere coming and going out of their economic modes. Prudency: please, don't say anything clever and do what you're doing best. Keep schtum.It's all in the doggy bag anyway. The bull and bear on the other hand are the rising stars and always in the sky. Mrs Cecilia Malstrom, EU Swedish Minister, was right about the WTO, to ask: "How did we got here?" We have a distinct idea that she was referring to management inside the WTO over the last two decades. It makes you wonder why Brexit government under the present Prime Minister wants to go exactly that way... And to pick a winner at this stage, the first day of 2018, for some reason I would say this has to be Russia. It seems very much like Russia is the dad dog of the year 2018, next to second place G7 country Britain being the dad lion economy in and outside the EU, soon. (The word 'dad dog' found in a tweet by someone on Twitter, 2011) Maybe this has something to do with the emerald or forest green velvet in the new year's celebration of Russia in Moscow last night? Compared to the snow white feathers in London's fireworks display, also last night.

Whatever way it is for the year 2018, whoever might be clever will do a Chimera economics and try to beat the bull or bear in the sky. Being of course of the same sort, partly dog, bear and bull. Up to now Brexit is hoping for a human hero to actually do the slaying of both monsters in this triangle of global economics sky or galaxy. It's halleluyah for now, I guess, when being on the outlook to a better future for this and the next generation of peoples in the world. Halleluyah to the economics of total voidness, just beneath mid air. At home, do what the Swedes do (watching Ivanhoe), and watch a DVD today, on the first day of the new year. (Ghost?)

Brexiteer Jacob Rees Mogg hesitation leaving the backbench seen as 99.9%.

05092017/ 16:09 PM

In plain language the question whether Mr Rees Mogg can become Prime Minister after Mrs Theresa May, currently Prime Minister, in itself is an interesting one to ask, e.g. when no one is really suggesting the demise of Mrs May's government just yet, but there is strong indication of such an argument that whenever this will happen who will then become the next Prime Minister, as a rehearsal of what may be, and not what is at the present time. Still, Mr Rees Mogg makes a strong case to ponder on his name for a while, being resolute on his beliefs as a Catholic and his stance on abortion or gay marriage. The 21st century will not yield under Mr Rees Mogg, at least not without a clear mandate from a miracle to lead Britain out of the EU peacefully and 'pockets full with gold'. There is no doubt that here is an MP who knows why keeping all facts and sides of the present system, if Brexit is indeed the system it wants to be, is part of a devout desire to be it's statesman as Conservative leader if times were to reverse his fortune to come off the backbench and be Prime Minister of Brexit, or Britain leaving the EU. This is what many believe might happen. Mr Rees Mogg will 'sacrifice' his backbench position not by his mortal desire, he has been very clear on this during an interview with Breakfast BBC, Piers Morgan's question whether he will become Prime Minister, but circumstances can change, he said. It was only when Mr Rees Mogg pointed out in a much clearer voice by what model he sees himself as MP or statesman, one loses the plot. Why Sir Thomas More? (Without either in the political theatre, Catharina von Aragon or Anne Boleyn?) It is interesting to hear that a man in Britain can still do Britain a little deeper than his peers in parliament. In his tassel of ambitions he is brushing with a few old ways of parliament and country, and Your Majesty the Queen's government, Queen Elizabeth II. And what if Mr Rees Mogg can't become Britain's next Prime Minister, but can become Lord Chancellor instead? (He practically gave this mystery away by mentioning Sir Thomas More) On the global social platform Mr Rees Mogg isn't doing all too well by opposing gay marriage, from a Catholic standpoint of view, and his anvil for having a political career as PM get's a beating from his own hand when suggesting abortion is wrong even when raped. His pillars of wisdom are consumed with fire and they are for the time being his torches that never seem to consume to ashes. We do need such a man, if politics is his passion, and serenity.

Article 50 & the Lisbon Treaty.

30032017

There is particular reason to cheer the British/ Brexit Prime Minister the day after she has signed to start process to leave the European Union, by what now is known as trigger of Article 50 in the Lisbon Treaty (Treaty of Lisbon). One can't help but think or see her point for leaving, nine months after the referendum was held last year whether to stay or leave the EU. It is now reality, on 29 March 2017, the deal to leave the EU was signed by the British Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May. Now, what is the flea in this pocket of the Lisbon Treaty that so many are calling for, known as Article 50? Neither the EU and Britain clearly saw the point of it, until yesterday, when it did become it's first time legal initial article 50 in the Treaty of Lisbon, signed in 2007. The public somehow was forgotten, and that includes the many high cadres of legal experts, State and Private, not only in England, but throughout the Eurorpean Union Member States as well. You could say that here is where the problem is, or could be, for any 'orderly' exit from the Europen Union Establishment. Also, the crimson silk thread of the single currency, is another problem in the same sphere of high cadre legal experts. This is serious business to both parties, the morning after signing to leave the EU yesterday. Sans rancune are the only words that come to mind, because we are living in Europe and not outside Europe. Brexit did increase the level of cooperation by triggering Article 50, and what is more interesting that via it's illuminating powers in that article, the EU now looks more true and real in it's own constitutional meaning. In this timeline, evolution of the EU can only mean more reality and extensive more lawful as an instution of governments, and not business only powerhouse, as by many in the public domain perceived. But confusion about the other Member States cloud- thought the eyes of the founders of the European Union. Mr Jean Claude Juncker, e.g., only had to say that Britain will one day regret this. As if the future's end will be deminished to a single exit hole when looking inside out, for whom the bell tolls? Article 50 yesterday became it's first legal meaning and is making world history think again. Britain has chosen to be on the world stage again, and it has even managed to do so where no other saw this a possibility before. Only, the cheering is metallic grey paint and not British steel.

Article 50 had two ends, one to inspire EU Member States not to exit and one to inspire a greater future. It looks like it will be a great mistake in time where the EU is now, not to stay inspired if only concerned for the future of governance in general. One that is not human or as soft as a human being. One wonders whether the EU this morning will be inclined to address the issue of Article 50 by a hairsplit and use the same Article as a razorsharp blade and puncture the Brexit legal balloon on it's way out. How they can do that we do not know. In theory, let's say, if a country like the Netherlands would want to leave the EU by the same Article (50), why than would that be uninspiring and x- exit to the extend of the content? (Content is mathematical rather than political text) In other words, maybe, one can say, that Brexit is now the legal winner of Article 50 and covers almost all of it's own influence in the world, but remains size wise and political 'soundcloud'. The European Union can still challenge or lower the EU flag slightly down an inch, as to announce that power is transparent and that it can do accountability to stay powerful, but not as symbol. A safer Europe is what the British Prime Minister has called for in her letter, or when addressing the House of Commons in yesterday's debate. How much is still the EU, there is no real tally or telling on the issue, as seen by the larger public. How the EU will treat 'it's children' after Brexit as it's neighbor, this is hard to say at the moment. In another timeline that could become the BQ or HQ (Hard Question), whether it is legal to do business outside the EU. Article 50 without such content will not be very useful in the end... But we must still wait and see if Britain once again has won the day, by surprising itself and the rest of the world, what it means to be British and also what it means to be a world leader in the 21st century, a time when all are educated nations and understand how to be civil to one another without rancune. Let's pray the EU will still inspire the future of tomorrow, well, yes, what can one say?

The political fleabag in Europe was accidentally hit last weekend... And, then, some thought it was kicked.

14 March 2017/ 11:39 AM

Turkey and the Netherlands last weekend are both here, rather then being the fleabag, they were found both in the diplomatic sack and later on ending up like a pair of scratching cats, to bring or find the escape route out when it was clear to the rest of the world and in Europe, it was not going to be that easy this time. That of course indeed was new. Inside the political world of Europe/ European Union countries/ Member States a sudden burst was unleashed by the events that took place in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, over the weekend on saturday night, 11 March. Dutch Turkish citizens clashed with the Police, and at one point there was even a scrum between the two, which one can only describe as a sudden break out of violence in the most untraditional way between the two countries, Turkey and the Netherlands. Thank God Almighty, that no shot was fired from a gun and throw the crowd into a deep frenzy between citizens and the Police Force in the first hours of the 'apparent' riot. Two days later, on monday, the EU and even Secretary General, Mr Jens Stoltenberg, of Nato, called for calm and to end the stand-off of the two countries. What did infuriated the President of Turkey and Prime Minister, Mr Binali Yildirimin, is now pointing in the direction of the right to assembly, freedom of speech and free movement of Official government Bodies. All three issues will be in the coming days or weeks very heavily discussed, of what and when did this violence became a diplomatic row between Turkey and the Netherlands. There is a particular emphasis on Turkey and the Netherlands embedded in the choice of word as in 'between the two countries'. And there is another with countries Germany, Denmark, Austria, Switzerland, and now the Netherlands, protesting against Turkey for behaving like a authoritarian regime which has no 'equal' in the European Union under these circumstances. And then again it may even go further, when e.g. the European Union Member States, here above mentioned, will examine the intentions behind Turkey's familiarity on campaigning issues back home in Turkey, it's Ministers, government Officials, who were planning a 'mobility' visit in European cities where a large Turkish population lives. It has always been the nature of EU countries to act surprised when indeed they were surprised by Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan's Prime Minister, Mr Binali Yildirimin, to travel outside his own constituency and Turkey for, what seems to have been a last minute plan,a political campaign in Europe.

Constitutional reform is a sovereign right by voting, and a mountain that does not move, to put it more anecdotal. Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, was right to say about the clash in Rotterdam on saturday night, and of what was understood as battlecries against the Netherlands and their government Officials, that this was bizarre and unacceptable speak, by his peers in Turkey. A speak notably spoken in what appeared as fratricide or ending the fraternal relations of hundreds of years in a painful and embarrassing way. Nazism and fascism are daggers better to remain unseen by the public and in modern days politics. Adding to this where is the faux pas exactly going and coming from? On tuesday, today, 14 March, the U-turn of relations is imminent and on both sides government Officials should find a way to ease tensions again very soon. In Germany, the chancellor Mrs Angela Merkel, has also called for solidarity with the Netherlands on monday, yesterday. When looking back on the unfortunate circumstances in the stand- off between Turkey and the Netherlands, a very strong political message will be calling for more solidarity with any EU country, when and if such a movement of Official bodies would take place again in the near future. And that is not a good sign/ omen in our time when the EU Member States make that a necessary stand- off, unless a country showed better intensions and not to put any citizen, including their own, in danger or a riot break out. But, will Turkey, now a wounded lion, come back and embrace the Netherlands in brotherly love or affection after last weekend in Rotterdam when Turkish people and the Police clashed for a few hours? In politics we want politicians to act more than ordinary folks, whether in a crisis or national or international call for action. One can only hope and say that once this row will be over old relations will come back and retain their older friendship and forget (and forgive) the incredible moment of 'loss of signal' between Turkey and the Netherlands. Historically the row will be remembered as the Tulip war explained in (perhaps) thirty seconds? That is unfortunately not what the papers in Europe say today.

President of Turkey, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and high civil servant.

26022017

The balance in Turkey always makes an interesting reading, whether in the present time era or past centuries. Some got stuck in more recent times or decades. The memory of a dead leader now only resonates with the older generations, who believed Turkey could change the world again, from home... Like the pharaohs of Egypt, it is only fair to say that their time belongs to ancient history and civilization across the world. Modern technology only can make more technology in the 21st century. Mustafa Kemal Ataturk and his fate, and indeed still is alive in the mind or heart of every patriot, is determined by large blocks of stone to stay silenced forever. It is the President of Turkey in 2017 who can now change the world from homeground Turkey, if, let's say, he would play his cards well. When one is looking for to pitch Mr Erdogan, perhaps one thing is clear, that perhaps playing his cards well could mean becoming another Gamal Abdel Nasser (after 1956), like in Turkey's Gamal Abdel Nasser? In the old mind politics the wind blows a strange whistle, that we would not be much further from the truth had it stayed that way in the world. Mr Abdel Nasser in the young days of the new world was a charismatic leader, just like Mr Erdogan in the 20th century, and both men having a bigger share in the making of history and reality as we know it, not in fiction but real time, with only a hair's breadth difference... Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan has been a leader with a deep understanding of his politics in Turkey, while he also was to a smaller degree a consummate leader on the global platform, only a decade ago, and showing that Turkey could be both, ready and respect world leaders. It is rather difficult getting these days through the controversy not only seen through the hourglass of the moment, but also when remembering that other part in Turkey's history when it was still the Ottoman empire, putting a definite answer in front of most stories, that here is the new Turkey and it's President. The reading of the many professional people being arrested (affiliated or not with the country's greater politics) makes a bizarre reading every day, and becoming even more bizarre at every end of the day, that one can only wonder whether to the Turkish nation they still recognize the country they live in. You get out for so long only to find out Turkey is turning into a goat standing alone on the mountain it has piled up for itself, and howling like a wolf.

Another balance in the Middle East could be the new force a charismatic Turkey is finding great difficulty with, perhaps even misreading the window for it's rotational powers speeding by, changing the whole region, days and nights. Reading the region's present history isn't just focusing on Syria, but the whole rationality machinery throughout the Middle East. It is indeed most fierce when most countries refuse to adhere to these new changes and there is much uncertainty in the short term and offering no solutions for domestic politics and policies. What else can one say in a country's chaos, and when having to deal with new curves no old establishment can easily adapt to in the shortest of terms. Still, Turkey has been trapped and sitting in a clamp down, and waiting for a natural way to restore it's old strength... Once the country would realize their new postion in the world, or in the Middle East, it then could become clear which Turkey should come back to meet the demands of the global world. Let's not forget that rationality is strange to the Middle East. In Turkey there is still hope in retreat and put forward a much younger generation of the Turkish nation and do the smart move of becoming pragmatic leaders of the future across the many 'strange' platforms in the world. Prime Minister Benali Yildirim and the Former Prime Minister, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, are incompatible if Turkey is the future and having a leader to lead the country again to new heights, maybe for now in great uncertainty. And Time is changing everywhere else in the world in a parallel next to all countries in the Middle East, and not just only next to Turkey. Between the older and younger generation what the world is watching is similar to that of the clash of civilizations and almost leaving no establishment standing erect during conflict or crises tide waves in the poltical currents of the present time. The world can go only one way and not backwards. Maybe it is the younger generation of Turkey who can see why the world will not go backwards, and keep their eyes fixed on how these machineries will create and shape their future living in a few year's time, if not sooner. Israel is one country to stay on the roads of rationality technologies for all peoples of the Middle East, if security becomes a safeguard for all countries in the region. One reason for this can only be one of access to more prosperity and the boost of confidence between all factions, whichever one results from the new changes in the Middle East. Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan has a knack to understand his old friends in the global world, and only he can tell what is truth and what are lies. The rationality is not a lie.

Russia's immunity from terror went down earlier today as reports say a military plane crashed into the Black Sea near Sochi.

25122016/ 24:41 PM

The simple understanding to assess the damage of the plane crash today one should bear in mind that it was a miliatary plane, subjected to scrutiny before taking off and security would be high priority full stop. It is also reported that all 92 members onboard were killed or presumed dead at this point. And no one can be critical at this time just yet and say what caused the plane to crash. We expect the Russian President, Mr Vladimir Putin, will soon have to come out of his deep stare and make a serene statement to calm down nerves at home and abroad, that Russia's immunity hasn't gone awkward since last week's terror attack on the Russian ambassador to Turkey, the late Mr Andrey Karlov. The Black Sea and a place nearby Sochi are such remote places to the outside world and public domain in the west, that there is hardly anyone in the world audience who can explain this terrible loss of lives of all the members who were on the plane and on their way to a New Year's concert for servicemen at the Hmeymim military base. Quote tonight from the Moscow Times, from a release by the Russian Ministry of Defense: " According to the Kommersant newspaper, the plane was built in 1983 and had last month undergone planned maintenance." In the newspaper MT and in the same article quoted here above, there is mentioning of a bird caught in the plane's engine that has caused this serious death toll among the military personnel onboard the plane. But this is Russia and their wisdom is known to be one of extraordinary arrogance and contempt, when especially one lower of rank, e.g. a bird, has caused an apparent innocent but big tragedy among the great Russian President Vladimir Putin his beloved Russians.

To be continued as we read the news.

A complex killing this monday evening in Ankara of the Russian Ambassador to Turkey, Andrey Karlov.

19122016/ 19:06 PM "

Do not forget about Aleppo!" As a man stepped forward from behind the ambassador, who was speaking at an Art Gallery in Ankara, and gunned down Andrey Karlov by a single shot in the back. Reports all over the world now say that the gunman was immediately killed by Turkey's special Police officers. The Russian ambassador is now confirmed to be dead at this point. In an unconfirmed report in Moscow, it is said that the gunman was a special police officer in the Turkish Police Force. The world has no idea what Aleppo stands for, except that here is the battleground of complex military operations to fight rebels against  Syria's army, backed by Russia and President Bashir Al Assad's regime. At this deep level of conflict one is questioning perhaps why Turkey's special officer in the Police Force would step up to gun down the Russian Ambassador to Turkey, Mr Andrey Karlov. This assassination of the Russian Ambassador has shocked the whole world, just before Christmas and new year's eve of 2016. Now one has seen the terrible outcry that is ongoing in Aleppo. The 'heroic' act of one young man dressed in a suit to excecute the killing of the Russian official will have terrible consequences facing Aleppo and the war trajectories from all sides in the conflict. Turkey's response is vital to the shooting and deepening of the crisis that has been going on for months in the region. For now we must wait Turkey's official response that might follow soon.

The killer mood of constructivism and how the world was shaped in one era.

26 November 2016/ 15:36 PM

It is not likely that the moral story of what defines human life will go extinct once our century is over. That is excellent news, depending wholly on how to look at the whole picture of expectations to meet the demand in the next phase of our existence. What is the global push right now doing for getting it's goals and progress across the wider fear projections that many see as too predictable in stead of unpredictability? Don't go to corporate giants and lawyers for your consult, i f, on a more pro bono stratosphere there is such a thing as the godfather of soul, the late Mr James Brown, and his song, that this is a man's world, where men can build trains, roads and so forth. It is also free when seen how the world was shaped in 'one day' by culmination of an era. The potentially female point in your high peak time is showing real constructivism must come from all sides good and bad, benign or malign, in clean leadership, from what was necessary to build after a colossal blunder in World War II. Humanity has found the code to make 'bigger' and faster than life products, e.g. the military, pharmacy, governments, abstract social and economics scientific worlds, bureaucratic institutes, and industrial machineries. Socially all these products were built on land, sea or air infrastructure. And they are catching up on this one, as one communique from Sweden Ministries and foreign ministers yesterday, attempted a serious 'duck call' to a bloc of nations in Europe that the International world is in badly need of a revised vision on agreements made by previous governments and leaders to maintain peace and sovereignty of each country as key to all moral prerogatives only humans can have or get in all of life, here and forever. It is a bad joke, but building and building don't really make partnerships. Also, the moon, Mars or other planets are or could be classified as products of the universe, and earth was meant to have a socially ineptitude or competence. One can only guess where to put the trade industry in this writing ut supra when you consider that manufacturing is de facto only helping a dead economy. Hmm...

The moral: untrue. The world today has an infinite superiority as human and technology that is ongoing as we speak or waste any more time by writing about this kaleidoscopic topic. Enlargement means success and in return the moral is success as well. And not the human falls of the tree and gravity is calculating how value equals the unknown extra's that are still hiding somewhere in it's roots or bough from wherever he/ she has come from. In comparison to the apple and Newton rationality theory. In other words: all you need is one operator, ten machines and one man/ woman to sweep the floors for making what they used to call an industry. And not, in reverse economics, a thousand men machinery, five hundred operators and an x- number of maintenance people. The world is smarter and faster than that, is the global view. We do understand their reasons for training all humanity for maintaining their own way of life and the giving of these new instructions to stay part of the rest in the world. What is sticking like mud on the heels for many, yet on the other side to this argument, are men and women believing that all this won't hold in a socially competent world. Maybe theirs is still the winner after the big prix, as in visions old, and not the disposable by- products, that once all the juice in it is gone you dispose of it. Human life is making an interesting parallel and not the push to have us believing otherwise. The energy markets are a mood killer to all human philosophy and whatever greater ideals can be extracted from this. Asymmetric democracy is another killer bug as well, one should think. The next phase of human existence isn't a joke as we would like to believe, but can only be seen more as the trillion Dollar or Euro question for the future. Part of these solutions come in packages of human management departments and they are assigned to take take care of all horizontal problems when on the line or meridian line above. Maybe mankind is on the brink to stop being so darn retrospective, and who knows, one day peace will contain the right to land and products, in order to expand the quality of life in general for human, animal and vegetation.

We're stupid but not blind.

23092016

The world has yet the longest hour for 'eyeing' everything that is new, this still being said in words and not numbers, something most people understand, even your future is viewed textually 80% and leaving a remaining 20% to be the plus side in all technocratic societies. And, we also know that the future has a right too. Aesthetically that is just the blessed beauty of life in our era today. Humans respond in the same way, e.g. having a family, or roughly translated to 1. Command. Politicians & governments should understand it almost at fast rates and data. This part, let's say, identifies with our blindness and simply is caused by having no number added to it. Our inner most struggle goes with the idea of being stupid, something that would surprise many in the world, also because there is no 2.Command. Politicians seem to struggle equally on this one/ or this side of what governments fail to be honest about or simply not say. A thought behind: but politicians too have a problem with the non existent 2. Command. 'Your future' world isn't that simple. Governments are perceived by their constituencies as competent, so far. That is making history even more complicated on a personal level, at home, with probably no 'real' income, or filing for bankruptcy. The economy seems to decline literally through our fingers as sands in a giant or global hourglass. (A grains' spreadsheet of trillions of sands) And yet no one knows what we're missing at this point or height in our globalized world. There is no 'Return' key with a specific like era or 1. Era. Small observation: so let's be aware when politicians say that 'we're in it together'. Maybe all that they're saying is that we're all statistically 'in it' together and that's the end of our world together at this point.

On the double plus side it is true that never before in whatever past era was this world more honest or prone to honesty, once you can get there/ here. It is not just people in a snakepit of regulated areas trying to find a way out to get above the surface of the wider earth, in our time we are witnessing extraordinary ways that politicians are dealing with too. The real life experience now is expanded as the 'global view' by every individual in the world. And every nation too has become a giant on the globalized platform in the first of it's kind from Kashmir to Alaska. And crosswise into the rest of what is known to us as 'our world'. The stupid ask where is our democracy and why isn't prosperity compatible with this classical idea of politics? (Few good men and women) 2.Command is probably the answer. When on a more individual basis a citizen has the right to the future, socially and economically, but on the global platform you need to get a command code first, which is at a cost of millions of Euros or Dollars, the trend isn't looking into the future beyond your eye/ fray. Today the world is one of vision and it's politics is one of 1. Command. (Upstream, downstream, cross- stream and so forth) It isn't hypothetically in every day politics but a reality, that one is upstreaming to only one command. Hegemony attests for life/ living and the soft bone of what humans are made of, in case homicide would get out of hand without civil obedience. If you think the world is yours one can only say pro deo that your work isn't done yet. Our inheritance as humans still will be to adhere and doing so only to be part of a greater world or to meet with our Creator, God Almighty. For the time being we can only adhere to the order set out by authority, as many know that most people believe it is their duty to do so. Are we there yet? If countries could learn that man adheres to his wife/ bone of his bone, the abstract world today might open up to the nations and find the common cure we seem to be needing badly at the moment. (If only to stop the rumors of wars)

Turkey now referring to failed coup as victory for democracy, or the people's win.

18072016/12:56 PM

One minute before the coup was offcially broadcasted, on social media Twitter headlines were read as: coup is underway to topple President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. By the looks of this minute the Turkish military, with unknown destination, all blockades were well coordinated, the Bosporus bridge, Ankara and Istanbul national TV Stations, all became in a sudden the coup plotters their battlestations and operating fast. And while running a few hundred people died and thousands clashed throughout the whole night. It is hard to say now who was who, Turkish citizens against another Turkish citizens? Moscow immediately tweeted, in the second minute, for Turkey to avoid a bloodbath. This was serious news. And what was going on, the whole world kept asking. President Barack Obama also responded, in the third minute, and condemned the military coup, perhaps suggesting subtly that Turkey is a member of Nato, a functioning army and military, but also democracy should come first. The next morning in the early hours the whole thing was over. Democracy stood as the Olympic torch burning high in Turkey with people to celebrate their win/ victory, having crushed the military and their plot to take over government. That was interesting, because taking over the government to exactly where? Into the blue Mediterranean sea or stay on dry land and disappear into a secret land?

Mr Fethullah Gulen, US resident, so said the newspapers, was to be extradited and trialled for his role in the plot. Assumption or truth? Turkey fell into the pit of chaos in one minute and it is now calling from the bottom or down under it wants to show who was behind the military coup d'etat on friday night, 15 July 2016. In the parellel structure, as it is known in Turkey, Mr Gulen is the scholar with ambitions to take Turkey's 'outdated' democracy to a new level of modern day democracy. He is considered to be a respected member of society in the US. Why President Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan would want to see Mr Gulen in the supreme role of coup d' etat, to topple the president of Turkey, is quite interesting. Things are being made harder for anyone to call for those responsible for the coup, thus far. The world was shocked by the attempt to topple President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his government. This is quite a significant minute to remember and ask the difficult questions of why a functioning military, and member of Nato, would error so greatly and only to become traitors the next hours after. In memo: Turkey failed democracy badly for the last two years and it therefore cannot ascend into the EU as it's future Member State. It is not showing efficiency enough at handling the crisis with the Syrian refugees, even if they exhaust all sources to help with logistics. We are still, nevertheless, admirers of this nation, these people and Turkey. It is quite sad it makes a terrible mess from and of it's own greatness, sometimes by badly chosing the wrong time.

How to do a Trade Deal after Brexit is official? Like catching a fly in the universe and turn to golden.

13072016/ 11:45 AM

Date of Brexit will mean a few things in Britain. It will have the EU and the rest of the world juxtaposed first and last to deal with from henceforth. "I have never done a Trade Deal' before. Looking from one corner in the eye at four different directions immediately. It can't be done. That is nr one strike off. Goldman Sachs, in this morning article on Bloomberg.com, has already given the winning strike over Brexit wherever it might take position after it leaves the EU, that there is someone appointed for exactly this job, Mr Manuel Barroso, former EU President, and who will be in charge of the system after the Uk leaves the European Union. Both unions will be tested by time and the systems having been long or decades keeping like a suspension bridge between the two opposite (since Brexit) sides. This will be a work of industrial art in the near future. Can it be done realistically? In the meantime time is splitting up into another dimension, with the inclusion of new countries who are not yet in the European Union, e.g. Ukraine. The price to pay will have some sort of freeway passage, if the WTO considers the future on a much bigger scale thus far. In some parts of the world there is already proof of great industrial works taking place, naming for example the cable suspension bridge, now building in Marocco to Africa, and vice versa. We have to pay attention very closely how the world moves fast in constructions. Much of that outcome in ten years time is a decision factor for any future trade deal. Can Britain become part of that?

For now what is needed is how to envision a reshaped model of the world and it's infrastructures. And, also, in a more simple fashion where all peoples will be when living across the planet, having some constantly on the run from war torn places like Syria, something that isn't stimulating growth or future trade at the moment. The world believes in it's own future. Fifty years ago the WTO had only one or two major members to do the deals needed to keep our planet in motion, long or distant range. Industries have outgrown it's former size and is now a full expansion of great magnitudes. We need each other, Goldman Sachs or Britain. The EU isn't the only philosophy when prosperity is the only system that now works for the whole world. And it's inhabitants. These are also full forces, any future of Britain must understand and find the humane solution to hang on there on the silk thread. Or, in political terminology, the crimson red thread. Let's wish for the best when Mrs Theresa May is Prime Minister, that e.g. Britain won't do pretty faces ministers anymore. One could see it coming, that for example EU bosses would raise the stakes quite high. It is called in Trade Deals not only logical but it is now the very basin of survival and perfect balance. There is no evil or blame game here possible. Once it was this girl is not for turning, now it is this world is not for turning. Tina (there is no alternative) is passé.

On twitter this morning: Brexit could mean the end of euro and liberal international order (Megan Greene tweets)

28062016

The best reply one can think of is saying/ tweeting back 'Or, the end of Maastr & Lisb treaty. New treaty of circle 27? The article is on Wapo.com, or Washington Post. This fantasy reaches every pixie's ear and hidden under oak trees across the European continent, or on flying mushrooms, as big as the adult human thumb, quite fast, and then from here it is no telling how many more are hearing the same story. Europe as we know it for decades has come to this abrupt end without the kind giant that England has been for so long as they can remember in this generation, and maybe, also some of the older generation. England went home again to the castle of the Queen. End of the story... Why would the Maastricht and Lisbon treaty also end with Britain's exit from the EU and leave the other 27 Member States in a broken circle of 28? In Pixie land they might say: imagine this for a moment, the International order and England as the EU's lawmaker, isn't this a big world too great when that law and order leaves? It is possible that the Maastricht and Lisbon treaties are now invalid without Your Majesty's government in England, is one way of looking at it from the outside looking onward in. And the story is getting much better in suspense, that would also mean another thing for all the giants in this world, that now isn't the EU free from law and order?

Pixies love the evil stories, which it is if let's say that now in these hours without Britain all Member States are hanging loose and have no destiny in any treaty under the Membership of Great Britain. A new treaty for the circle of 27 should now be under way to ascend the empty throne, if indeed the EU is planning on having in the future a system of hereditary breed of men or grand viziers. Actually it is the ultimate vision for fine men and women when able to wield power over masses of peoples of all kinds. After five days since 23 June last thursday the EU has revealed itself to the public in the EU bloc, that the right steps were taken immediately, e.g. the emergency meeting of Ministers in the remaining 27, respresented by an ad hoc group of the Big Six, and also the first reaction from Martin Schultz, President of the European Parliament soon on friday morning after Britain's Prime Minister, Mr David Cameron, had resigned on basis of the referendum outcome to leave the EU by a majority of votes, 17million + over 16 million+. In the EU bloc we have had no 'vacuum' experience in the system on this side yet, or seen it visibly, compared to the kind now experiencing in Britain. The only problem that we might have is the insecurity of what the Maastricht and Lisbon Treaty are now holding by law precision. But, then again, if Mr Martin Schultz comes out and says that this is normal or only temporary, and take it's EU citizens seriously as being part of a new EU bloc of 27, there is much chance of overcoming the whole thing without Britain, is just a guess. And that I'm afraid is not an evil story. The EU citizens have the EU, and vice versa.

Prime Minister David Cameron steps down

24062016

17 Million+ people in Britain have voted to leave the EU, and 16 million+ decided to remain in the EU.

A new plan was immediately injected into the stability of the economy by the Bank of England, soon after the Prime Minister in Downing Street said this morning that he will resign later in the year. (Over 250 Billion Pound Sterling)

The EU, Mr Martin Schultz, was visibly still impressed by the news that Britain has decided to leave the EU, and who was first to give his reaction. Later today there will be a conference of EU leaders scheduled for an emergency meeting. The coming ten days suddenly have a different meaning, compared to the outcome of staying in the EU.

40 Years of the UK in the EU/ EEC ended today. This is what the Prime Minister, David Cameron, calls 'the people's vote' of which he has said 'that the vote of the people should be respected'. He told the crowd in Downing Street this morning that he has done what he thought 'passionately' about, body and soul, and did this because it was the only thing he could do. He held nothing back (from the people and public at large). But new leadership was required to lead Britain out of the EU, as early as october in the fall, this was the decision... Democracy seems to have resuscitated and is again the flatline of the people of Britain this morning going through the country in a steady line. Can Britain come back from 40 years 'lost opportunities' in time?

In one hour time Mr Boris Johnson is expected to give his reaction to the outcome of the referendum. And whispers of his leadership of the Conservative Party after the incumbent Prime Minister, Mr David Cameron, are getting intense and audible enough to hear. Mr Boris Johnson has led his campaign of Leave EU.

Brexit now for a fact has the definition of Britain's exit from the EU by legal title. Starting process of leave will take another two years before it is truly out of the European Union. The European Member States have lost one Member by the referendum in the UK, and they were reduced from the 28 MS to 27 MS this morning, 24 June 2016.

A small consolation for the people of Britain today can only be the Prime Minister's words this morning in Downing Street at Nr 10, that this wasn't against Britain but take the country forward, perhaps meaning either by Stay or Leave the EU. Campaigning is always a methodology necessary in politics and parliamentary democracy. And in some ways the Prime Minister is right, that now new leadership was required to lead Britain toward exit from the EU, indefinitely, a relief, a  word for today.

As for the British Prime Minister, Mr David Cameron, no one can doubt his leadership has been one hard and difficult choice anyone in his position could have had, being just flesh and blood. No crocodile tears were cried here, but only a salute in tears for a Prime Minister who followed his conscience throughout the ambivalence of Statesmanship and politics in the world, and as a world leader in the 21st century.

After six years as Prime Minister in the UK we  will miss him. He  was a great Prime Minister who took an enormous risk in a time of world peace in the 21st century.

Sunday morning 19 June 2016, four days away from the referendum in the UK, to stay or leave the EU.

19062016

(There's only one singer (Peter Gabriel) and two different songs: Dolce Vita and Solsbury Hill)

This sunday morning on Facebook the UK Prime Minister, David Cameron, is giving the people of Britain a choice to make up their mind when the day comes, exactly in four days time from today, how to vote... Under different circumstances he would not have done so, which makes his call to the people and helping shape their mindset, is a remarkable leap for him to take and go this far to risk everything democracy stands for, that is to persuade the British people why it is okay for them to 'stay' in the EU. From his writing this morning on his Facebook page the Prime Minister, from an outsider's view, one can only see how difficult it must be for any man in his position to do so, and also knowing the small stomach of the tired electorate he is trying to be honest as much as possible with. Mr Cameron is doing the impossible for Britain this morning, a place where it has never been before and now is facing with no particular win or certainty. Isn't he doing quite the opposite Socrates has done when going in circles before his death and writing his pleading to the people or Athenians, but doing it Stoically so? (Stoically defined as calm and austere fortitude character) Mr Cameron has been Prime Minister of Britain for the last six years, so he says in his own writing this morning. And we must believe him even more so today. He is going down in British history as the man bringing down the system of British politics as a sovereign nation for hundreds of years. It's a big offer on the plate as any global leader would do. Can the people understand his logic because he is the Prime Minister and must speak the truth? His writing moves you to find the answers to that question in that line of truth. And he is trembling too because what he knows as Prime Minister of the UK isn't just 'bread and butter' worries is fair enough an assumption to make I would say. No one at this stage should underestimate the logic of globalism in our time. It is known that globalism is the Ouroboros of our century. You can't afford it to be in it's tail but rahter close to the head. Global leading nations have a tending to do what the people want  them to do, while the truth is rather contradictive and complex. (It seems unlikely from a globalist point of view that anyone would dare cut off the tail from globalism)

Is the world yet waking up to what is happening in the UK today? There is no soft landing after the referndum on either choices. Both choices have an incredible jolt of their own, if stay e.g. the jolt will be felt nationally, if they leave the jolt will happen across the global system. Now steady on, Mr Prime Minister. Only one particular thing becomes prevalent here for the rest of the world, that is Britain doesn't hold the 007 James Bond England fame position anymore. Zoron's idea has prevailed and is the better way forward for the British people. We have to speak in universal ways when you want to understand what the Prime Minister is saying today, standing alone in the world calling for Britain alone to vote to stay in the EU, because globally the country has a bigger role to play in any time or future. People who study economics (macro economics) can see why the Prime Minsiter is offering Britain the bigger economic picture, implicating all sorts of securities as we now know it today in daily life, and protection. An unprotected Britain from unknown new factors can be even more dangerous and toxic for world peace. Herr Walter Steinmeier, German Foreign Minister, this morning, on the other side of Europe, has warned that NATO's apparent 'covert or overt' operations can do damage in Eastern Europe. And this is just one example of the unknown factors that might get more extensive when disruption will become prevalent. It is no surprise why many EU Member States are holding their breath. And they do so for reasons of solemn solidarity. Here men will be men and not boys will be boys ever again.

Global GDP

04062016

It used to be easy to explain why you are in globalization. Explaining the reversal of leaving globalization doesn't feel the same. Once a city is built and it's citizens have been carefully through utilities been expulsed or hanging in there between expulsion or death, globalization remains there for eternity, if you wish it so. And that's the pain of the real century mainly felt in globalized cities in the west. Politicians are utilities and history was reduced to Brilliantine pomade haircuts in a sharper than blade uncircumcised smoothness look. That is all that we have got and know in a planet- size reality/ realism, when it's not animation. It is not staying or leaving that is making any sense. It is more, can one say in all modesty, why? In the stage of advanced economies and social governance to benefit the poorest among the nations, breaking away isn't the leading way to any respected 'big city' government leadership, you could say/ argue. That is the picture display on every big screen showing a different army and captain, the one of industries and leading industrial nations. And we all know that not everyone shares the same sentiments here and forever. Individuals can't even make it this far, when unemployment plagues the very big cities where they live for most of their lives and will stay unable to touch the outskirts of any big coherent society of today.

Three decades ago globalization was the answer to all world's problems, when going upstream into the mainstream. Downstream economies and governments, as is now becoming more evident in our time, will be sidelined by all mainstream global forces and getting more crushed every day without making forces individually match with the rest of the upstream. Globalization was the chosen force to lead governments and people. People alone cannot reverse that, if logic has anything to do with it. Empowerment of a man- made world is the right leadership to deal with this kind of reality, a fundamental change to what used to be God Almighty's only intention to make nations great. And how do they know the world's greatness? Global GDP? It's machinery works invisible and abstract, squeezing out all individuals in the procession of all it's plans. The future is the only big plan for which big data was planned and programmed. It is also the place where all wrong goes, and by logic comes back to the city. Like the ship ignoring the sea because of it's machinery onboard, so is our world sailing the big oceans of power and money with which big cities were built. (And that includes midget golf clubs or regular golf towns) And what is the beauty of globalization in the big cities? First thing that comes to mind one would say that reality is what you see and therefore it isn't anything else but perception of being here while globalization is in your city. Our daily feeds come from the globalized world technologies and even children of the next generations are playing with it by the time they reach the age of three or four years old. (They are also the generation that seem in command of these useful technologies)

No logic seems to favour any kind of exit- strategy, except where it would cover the entire world of globalization. But this is only my personal opinion.

Brexit Referendum, 23 June 2016.

26052016

Four weeks isn't much enough time dealing with how much time is left to work on politics of both sides in the coming referendum, to stay or leave. We are still in England and the British people think it is time (again T) to decide whether the EU is good for Britain and bad for the British people. Some want to leave, and the other half wants out. The global world has no other view on how this is, an uncomplicated fight over sovereignty and politics in Britain. June is the month of magic throughout the whole of Europe, because with Brexit or stay it isn't worth all the attention it gets, is the only feeling we get until now. You know what the British are like when it comes to Britain... It is more the global audience that decides who's hot and who's not. What popular vote can do for a country in the 21st century one can only look around and you will find the answer to this particular strange question. Stay or go, it is as simple as that. Britain always knows how to put theatricals on every drop on the hot iron wherever they can find the drop of oil. In reality, I'm afraid, you are missing the point. Britain is a G7 leader. And England is a global leader. Do they need to say it more clear? Yes. But we are not getting that, do we?

Let's get closer into or inside the bowels of Mr England, for a minute or second even. Actually and strangely enough the referendum ins't doing itself any favour by suggesting there are only two parties, for or against, here to play it out. The world doesn't fit in your stupid world on either side. Just bear with me for a moment. The world fits only in your world if you are big enough, yes or no? Why don't they say it, that the UK Prime Minister, Mr David Cameron, isn't saying anything against the Brexit campaigners, when e.g. saying that Britain should stay because of exactly where it still fits in? Is there another Britain? Why? Because of the Brexit campaign that doesn't make it any less England or Britain, one would say/ could argue. Maybe an oversimplified way of looking at bigger pictures, but isn't it time to do it the 'big way' when having only four weeks left to the referendum? Any suggestion one could say, let's be serious now. This is what it really is or looks like with the referendum. Ok, and now we wait for the Brexit 'people of Britain' to say something. And then they seem to be unable. It's not even reluctance anymore. The loonies of leaving have been crushed in the media by the stay campaign, even by the wrong arguments, and just leaving it at that. The time to show why leave is a political argument and one of conscience not one is attempting to go that far in the BREXIT camp. Which is very much looking like fortune is Britain's best way to go. If it is fortune that is good, for country and people. (Old fashion style)

Now here's the balance on a piece of scruffy old paper: Mr Cameron or Mr Brexit are making a good point as both camps. Why? Are we not forgetting that Britain is England, whether to stay or leave is British? At this point when the PM his politics says to stay is the way forward for the British people, in mathematics of politics, or it's magnitudes, the leave also is saying the same thing, from now on. Not because they are just saying it, but it is so in mathematics of England. Where will Mr Cameron get his 'contribution' from? Is it somewhere in Avalon or in England? England is the global leader and G7 leading industrial nation. There is no such story on an England apart because of Brexit, being another sort of England but only not the same thing. Even a dog can understand this writing here. Mr Cameron is making a point, but from now on, so is BREXIT. Whatever Mr C is offereing, Brexit is doing the same. Why? Because they are both the same country, England. And it is simple mathematics (of balance). If the stay group is saying that Britain is in the world, from now on, so is BREXIT or can BREXIT say, because there isn't any division between the two groups, they are still one country. In this Britain is making a big point. Brexit is just a switch but stays orbiting round one point called England. You're with me? Politically BREXIT is England, and staying in the EU by the Cameron group is England. 'The world can come with us or do without us', is not something you say to Britain at any point, or is it? Now I like to hear what you have to say for yourself.

UK not a EU Member State and still can have a vote on sovereignty/ sv vote. Compare to EU Member State vote.

(Personal op)

14042016

It is expected that leaving the EU or staying in only seems to have any effect if e.g. reversal is not the issue but a sovereign state, as is the case for Great Britain in june two months from now. A Member State potential and to reverse this can only require serious questions on it's EU Member State life and permanent commitment to the European Union. These are heavy weight political questions and no answer is given  to be the easy solution, if understanding the union of 28 Member States correctly. If there is no other way by force can become the only option. This last option in itself will be falling heavily on it's own conservative decision on it's ascension into the European Union Member State and the process to join the EU prior to it's final decision. The EU establishment is about an agreement between Member States. In both the Maastricht and Lisbon Treaties that agreement was ratified. No one really understands by what meaning a reversal of Member Stateship the EU should stop being (there). It is perhaps the most natural right of sovereignty or a sovereign nation, as is the case with the UK and it's referendum on either to continue or discontinue it's relationship with the EU bureaucracy and offer the people of Britain the illusion or fantasy getting back their independence from the 'being here' all around presence of the European Union in Europe. This doesn't require leaving by force.

Any EU Member State(ship) if voting to leave the EU can only challenge potential of it's own Membership in the EU. It is not only because of it's political and economic ties with the European Union that they are or can excercise the right to leave or stay, but because of it there is always reason to believe in these rights to develop more argument on the process of how one Member State can release a certain pressure that always goes hand in hand with the freedom and democracy the EU manifests throughout it's establishment. Europe is changing course and in 2016 it is opening the window to all Member States for new ideas and maybe to a certain extent also it's directions. The public isn't misinformed on what the EU establishment greater themes of governing bodies needs to find more consensus among it's 28 Member States. Referendum right also is or seems one such greater theme. The Netherlands on 06042016 have just excercised on the greater theme of the No or Yes vote on the Ukraine - EU trade treaty deal. A clear 'No' vote from the people of Member State the Netherlands can bring a serious swelling up of their individual potential, this setting apart maybe greater questions still at this point remaining silent or yet unknown. World Media Networks or news corporations for now are keeping quiet on the outcome of this referendum. Presumably it is concentrating on the UK for the moment.

Winston Churchill's European Union vision has become a monster size machinery in the middle of Europe and is now far beyond tribal ambition, Bavarian or a dead memory of the Habsburgs.

Wisconsin in the balance has put out Mr Donald J Trump by Ted Cruz 48%

06042016

The establishment in politics was right. Mr Trump, the Republican front- runner man, could not win here in Wisconsin. He barely scraped off the extra 17% from Senator Ted Cruz, had he e.g. only made it to 20%. Let's say it was Mr Trump's Bar Mitzvah night, tuesday 05 April 2016. And it will only expand from here into more bubbles when you're under water. Mr Cruz has holed out the fox by saying on his winning night that he is planning on uniting the Republican Party, as his most original and serious statement for the night. No one should get cross over the results putting Mr Trump and Mrs Clinton on the side and go for 'loss of signal' quietness. It is this moment where US politics in quiet union comes together against the backstage where the rest of the world is watching how the primaries unfold, one by one and bit by bit. How are the Trump voters feeling this morning? That is an interesting thought... It seems that in the US when you get to the moment where the presidential election becomes the expansion of all things happening during the primaries, you lose or win, in the end of the day yielding to power politics is your duty as an American. For some reason this is putting Mr Trump more in than sending him out. And that could go more interesting ways, if...

In the US it is as if half way the primaries the test is not about character but power. Half the world can only see crazy Americans trying to be in politics or becoming the president of the United States. In real life of a breathing establishment they call the political hemisphere in the US it is the hardest place to find yourself and stay there each term the president is elected by the American people. It is not unusual for Mr Trump to be there or anywhere close the establishment, but will he stay as he might want and think? His idea some weeks ago to unite the Republican Party then was without an agenda. If Mr Cruz beats him to it we have an unusual game watch, maybe in Cleveland? Mrs Clinton in parallel viewing she will try to get to that point as well very soon, sort of rendezvous for the final stage of the 2016 presidential election momentum. Rebellion by any of the candidates can't be among great and good men the right thing to do after Wisconsin's results last night. Basically because the system automatically transforms politics and the presidential election into an even more bigger system where it matters how one thinks or can do 'good' in the world instead of 'wrong'. From this point of overview Mrs Clinton is now already the apparent winner of this presidential election. Imagine for one moment how it feels like having a Madam President with a Republican as Mr Donald J Trump as the thorn in her side.

"You know, if I'm treated unfairly," Mr Trump says if the Republican Party nomination slips out from his hands...

(SO/ small observation)

02042016

Speaking of the Republican Party per se 'small hands' are not a super model metaphor to win the nomination and start to pave the way to the White House for the presidential election in november 2016. That is one way of looking at the sombering moods this weekend for Mr Trump and how he is doing in the national polls. Now it's history that will decide whether he is fit to be the man who can not only lead the Republican Party but who could also secure the win for becoming the next US president, let's say, by an  astonishing surprise? What is he doing wrong in today's polls? It could be strategy, misleading opponents that he is not getting it right on the mathematics of historical records in polls. Using probabilities checks and balances at this point in the race for becoming president, five months or less before ending the last call of the race, isn't a good omen or choice. Neither does it seems strong to contemplate running as an independent, if things 'go unfairly' against the front runner of the Republican Party Mr Donald J. Trump. What good is he doing to his race at the moment? High level politics: women, abortion, illegal immigrants, whites versus blacks, Hispanic voters, and even concealing a latent homophobia is dangerously close to a toxic anti- climax in the end. Somehow previous records show that US politics is unpredictable, restraint, complex and exponential by the end of the race to the White House. The polls do not shoot up that high on their own. Going deep, only maybe.

It is that strange problem in every race to the White House each candidate will experience when on the way up to the 'best place' on the whole of the planet in our global village. Ambiguity is the one ball of confusion to crack and then quickly pick your win of the day, be it a glorious day if it will be Mr Trump. The Republican front runner can't do both: being alone and the third party 'thing'. They shouldn't mix and blur his vision black and purple at this stage. Okay, let's face it, he is unpopular among a certain percentage of voters and among his own Party voters. Adding to the rest who will vote Democrats or protest their rights. How bad is this looking for the most powerful job in the world? At least next to a Mrs Hillary Clinton lead. Mr Trump is a man who appears on the exterior a very down to earth man, but has shown often enough that he too can be a very serious man. And what better time to show the latter in the coming days, weeks and months. There was never such plan ready to implement once he would pass the threshold of becoming a serious 'contender' in this race. And one other thing is also sure: Mr Trump cannot tip- toe his way to the White House in the next quarter of the year. He should not become a fluffy man.

Actually in short, the fun bit is over.

This is a dark night for Brussels/ Belgium

22032016/22:15PM

We are just ordinary members of the public living in the big cities of western Europe, what can we say? This could have happened anywhere in Europe and that this thought is a terrifying one to get/ have tonight. Psychological damage is worse in the aftermath of any bomb blast or explosion in a public place. The millennium has it's black list of bomb blasts emperical through the last two decades on the record by now. (Approximate two decades) Why, ISIS? This is the coldest human experience one can have with zero answers to find by human reason. The question for governments in Belgium, the UK or Members of the European Union, is therefore the one they do not want to ask: how to respond properly to any terror attack in any big European city and maintain civil at the same time. No member of the public would want to be in the Prime Minister's shoes tonight, e.g. in Belgium. So he stands alone and so are the many outdoors holding a vigil where the bombing took place earlier today in Brussels. Both, the subway and airport, are individual places in a free society where traffic and people move every day around the clock and before today didn't had this horrific fear of being in free movement...

People are being killed in the same way as collateral damage is collected. All the debris is pointing to that and not just the devastation of loss of loved ones. Can it be this simple and that ISIS has no eyes to see it's own horrors in the mirror? Actually, in the stillness of the ordinary members of the public one simply cannot understand why ISIS' hatred for these people so blatantly had to be a demonstration of demonic proportion in broad daylight. They were innocent in any dispute or argument from a military point of view. ISIS, so the impression goes around in the whole world, is 'conventional and conservative' as any regular army in the west and it seems to be challenging on a very big scale the western governments and powers. Here you find ISIS fighting in the streets of the European capital earlier this morning in too much contradiction of it's pride in high tech wars. In fact by fighting quite so low tech ISIS is showing the kind of vulnerability no regular army can allow itself to show, if and when put in a situation badly, one would say. Or to put it differently, ISIS dismisses the aspect of high or low tech altogether. It finds respectability for it's 'present danger' through terror alone, so to speak.

The people now dead were innocent people. It is very disturbing to think that this might go on, finding other fields to open in densed populated countries in the west. That thought is just chilling.

So, what do you make of Donald J.Trump's latest?

12032016/23:18PM

Who's losing sleep in Chicago Illinois and who is not after a swarm of locusts came down to friday night's rally causing a bit of stir in the middle of center stage where Mr Trump was expected to address his supporters? Mrs Hillary Clinton must have felt a bit of yippie yay! in her own 'girl corner' and not really feeling quite unhappy to hear and probably see her 'only' rival go skyhigh with his momentum high to a dismal low, where she knows the path down there is pretty much the last place a 'freshman' billionaire politician in America can stumble upon, and then get up again. It seems too early for all that 'girl envy', yes, that too. No, not really. Mrs Clinton is a career politician (so we are told time & time again) and she might have a latent appreciation being with Mr Trump on the way to the White House later this year in November. She is seeing or viewing this Hillary Clinton night sky with fireworks of colorful expectations and global ambition. Love her, or hate her, she is the world's favorite politician at the moment. And she knows too that she can do it if she can kick it right, well, maybe a bit like her opponent Mr Donald J. Trump?

Mr Trump is really kicking it to make America great again. That is his main theme. "You've been in slick for much too long now, folks, really." When are we living and what is the date? Americans still can't believe how lucky they are having a business man like Mr Trump speaking up for all Americans living in hardcore 'loss generation' across the many States, and making a point of return, starting now and tomorrow. A vote for Mr Trump is a vote for a new starting point in modern American history. If he can, yes, he just might flavour them with his sweetness for a while. It is politics that isn't going to bring the popcorn popping for them. Policies are not made of corn and oil alone. And no one can bring back the mills from the American industrial graveyard. Job offering is serious business to any man/ woman who wants to vote for a better America. Ask Mitt Romney, who is branded irrelevant in 2016. The much hated NAFTA is still making sense in big politics coming from Washington into the global sphere of nations. (Not that we outside of American politics and real time life have any understanding of this agreement. But one thing is universally felt, that jobs are politically sensitive issues to both politicians and voters) But who knows if Mr Trump might be able to look inside the mirror and then decide it is time for change, the new man, the politician Mr Donald J. Trump. (There will be a lot of boy envy and anger closer to him by that time up to November this year)

Correct spelling: businessman

Democracy after BREXIT will come back like a seal broken document, gentle and velvet soft... What is legitimacy?

07032016

Three months from today seems yet like a long way to go or wait. 23 June 2016, the moment of a decisive Yes or No for Britain to stay in or leaving the EU will be determined through the ballot. The ballot, an important enough totem for this day, a day like any other day? You can ask 27 Member States on that one. But you can also ask the 'stay in the EU' British nation what they expect to see or find on this 'white thursday' in Britain. Time is only a matter for deception, maybe could be the right answer. And, strange as it may be, it is not only the Banking industries once BREXIT is fact to leave the EU. The wider scope of Britain exit from the 27 Member States in terms of democracy will know a fierce battle for self sustainability and in relationship with the living planet on that change. Basically BREXIT could not be wrong from the point of view on these relationships for a simple enough reason, that democracy will unite nations and not divide them deliberately. It might become once again the oldest parliamentary debate of the century, so to speak. It even may speak for all things lost throughout the decades of progress and development in our world today, here at the center of the EU and beyond. Yes, the Chinese are probably right, that 'we live in interesting times', could be the curse of this day when the British people will go to the polls and cast their vote.

Timing is essential. We expect the BREXIT group (maybe half the nation) that they will run themselves aground by staying in or out because of mainstream industries, e.g. like Banking or big Banks. By a 'Yes' vote the British government must come back to the nation and present itself to the people as 'their government' by this decisision and make the speech to congratulate their triumph for having voted to keep Britain out of the EU... But this is how democracy works, wouldn't you say? Maybe it was time to wake and shake up the 'old girl' thing of politics, that nursery thing who has helped bring up so many men and women in British society, that she did well by doing so, a she- wolf in parliamentary corners not of stone anymore but of real life. (The British people have wolf will and milk in their veins) 99% Of big Banks cannot be legitimate without the nations and a wider democracy, both seem to have created in the world through globalization. Actually, many have been looking in the wrong direction since the announcement by the Prime Minister in the UK on the date and the referendum day. Money and power have that kind of early morning fog and it was landslide, if you are honest to agree here and now on this one. But it was that old thing of a beating human heart that changed this morning's direction, beating loud enough and cry 'what happend to all English men and women who were and are learned enough' to at least make a point on and, more so, for democracy. If this is not the 'back of your mind' staying in the EU will be fate. A very big thing, you see.

The world is a boomerang.

03032016

First start at the beginning. Secondly any time today will do for the end throw, but not when returning. It's simple enough for the thrower at the beach, but when a leading nation in the G7 or G20 (to certain extend) questions will be asked e.g. by the public more critically. And so it should be for governments of that size. Does size matter in politics? Take England, and on 23 June later this year the Referendum to leave or stay in the EU, size indeed is a problem. First it's boomerang is the monarchy, second it is part of the G7 group and it's globalization (outside any coat of arms) has a long history with the EU in all it's executive seats in politics and business. The time 2016 simply isn't a good choice for a stay at the beach in whatever place in England for the game of boomerang thrower, simply because it is returning back to the moment of origin. The name of the UK's boomerang in order of the champions ranking is called BREXIT. You must have heard of this week many times in the media, in England and in the US (Bloomberg.com). Why BREXIT is suggesting a heavy weight return to England for England nation the rest of mankind is just astonished. And that is on one side. The other side is even more astonished, let's say if Britain can't go out never again. It was just all so sudden in 2016, this moment of the referendum.

On both sides of the continent and overseas in the US something is changing in the world. Americans have Republican Donald J. Trump for President fever, and in Europe the EU has the UK Referendum, some time earlier than the presidential final day in the US, in November in fall. All due to craftmanship this boomerang from end to end, right and left, wants a lift- off to the center of the world and bouncing back a perfect (non violent) return. One: if Brexit flies off to mid air in one throw of the referendum, but drops flat to earth, do the champions realize this was the last chance of such a thing in our century? The Conservative government is pleading with the electorate not to vote out but stay in the EU, especially now when it will reform to make the British nation feel welcomed? (In this way they can take the Trident with them any where they like) Russia until 2014 was also a G7 Member, then the G8. You see the abstract layer of thin air somewhere in the winds above Europe coming in? In other words: Britain stays in the EU not because it had any choice. It says nowhere that they want staying in because they had a better choice at staying out, and therefore reform is a big requirement for the European Union. Politically Britain cannot seek 'independence' from the EU, as this would be giving the people the wrong idea on something more 'unwelcome', like a revolution?

BREXIT has no Banks to lead the world again. 1931 Financial Capital of the World in today's basic economics truly means history in a straight line.

The prince, the Duke of Cambridge, appears never to have mentioned the EU word in his speech.

16022016/22:10 PM

Imagine for a second that he did use the EU-word in his speech, speaking/ addressing future diplomats of similar age at the Academy at the Foreign Office earlier today. A millennial prince, the Duke of Cambridge? That's an interesting thought, maybe not for now but in the long term future? He did mention the global partnerships and their relations to institutions like the UN, NATO and one or two more. It is true that the Prince belongs to the future nations and one expects the world to have expanded developments by the time he will reach his mid 50ties, another two and half decades or so from today. Who can say that where we are now will be the same worldview in twenty years time on. But Foreign Office has said tonight that the prince never mentioned the EU- word in his speech, and we can forget about the millennial thing and theory of such a mind. Small observation: a mind that quickly grew into the weed frenzy of seconds that the prince supported Britain to stay in the EU, something the Daily Telegraph is saying, was something similar the Queen, Elizabeth II, only had said about Britain and Germany, and to stay united in their undying friendship.

The newspaper also mentioned something on saying that the Queen then had said it will be a 'dangerous' thing if Europe was to divide. In English that might be the thing and similar. Others might receive a confusion here of similarities, perhaps who do not speak English. By midnight the newspaper might again add it was a faux pas at very high level where only assigned journalists can enter. The prince, as a millennial, has already got a taste of politics in the future, but is now in real time bound by a non liberal monarchy and he must use politics only for peaceful relations and matters, one would assume. No one should underestimate the power of the future and politics in more advanced years, and not only for the Duke of Cambridge, but for the institution of the monarchy as well. A ceremony with true meaning can only present itself once the nature behind it is truly extinct or fell to the dead fruit of extinction, where land, sea and sky can only see memory from the illumination of daylight and starlights. Power isn't like politics if this future comes with ceremonials like that, set against an everlasting purity of the universe and it's daily fluids. England by then will be long forgotten as a nation and sovereign country, prose, verse, music and humble potato.

Prince William, The Duke of Cambridge, when younger has always been an ambassador for peace and peaceful relations. That is a good record and an  honest 100% too. (Solid gold)  

Big plan: primum non nocere (first, do no harm)

12022016/00:03AM

If tomorrow morning our world is still in one place, the USA, Europe, Middle East and far east, in itself we are witnessing a miracle. And you might say that aloud or keep quiet. Later in the day, 12:47: the big plan II, to abstain from all harm in Syria by world leaders has come, finally. Last night this was not looking like there was any chance of a 'cessation of hostilities/ all fire', or that Russia was planning having one at this early stage in the 'incoming assault'. But here it is and the world can catch up again from keeping the agreement. Aid to help victims of a five year civil war in Syria also is on it's way, so the news says. Clearly there isn't any update yet how badly fractured the country is and what new plans are being made to rebuild people's lives in a battered place like the 'remaining Syrian people' have to live in. One: it could halt the refugee crisis and influx by the thousands. Two: EU Member States, then, would be able to review the situation again. Two very important issues if you want anything to hold this 'cessation of hostilities' ongoing as we speak. Unless, by tomorrow, all changes back to a cold deck of cards being misunderstood for a win situation...

To be continued.

"The EU, was it a boy or a girl? Why can't you give me a straight answer!" David Cameron.

08022016

More EU headaches for BREXIT in the UK for the Prime Minister, David Cameron, he will simply need to either swipe in or swipe out on everything that will get in the way of the real issue. It is going to be a hard battle to win or score points from the rest of England, when on his own. And, for now, it is pointing in that direction for the Prime Minister, as everyone on his side is fearing. The real issue should be about Britain and if England could 'retake' ground back from the world it helped create across so many areas key to the British people to stay where they are, or go from here to nowhere. EU speak differs worlds apart here. Of course, if Britain leaves danger is that the EU then will be less Anglo Saxon... Pff, pff, this is how the mayor of London, Boris Johnson, is taking his punches on the PM this morning in the Daily Telegraph. An article he wrote as if there is something he knows much better than anyone or the Prime Minister, by suggesting the EU after reform could be more useful to British life. (Name of the article in the Daily Telegraph: "Voters have to ask Donald Tusk some hard questions before they accept his EU 'deal.") He is not entirely wrong is a big mistake. Is he entirely wrong is someone else's big mistake. Do you have any idea who that might be? Sometimes it's hard to decide who's playing Michael Corleone, David Cameron or Boris Johnson. BTW, voters are more concerned with the Prime Minister and not with Donald Tusk. And why? Because from this point of view the PM is getting to look more like Tom Hagen, Michael C.'s home consiglieri. (Not war consiglieri)

Don't get this wrong, but isn't it true that if Britain leaves the EU it will collapse like the tower of Babylon in a confusion so great no one will understand across the Member States what the other is saying? Small observation: in fact one could say that the EU is Britain, and vice verse, Britain is the EU, but here EU meaning United in Anglo Saxon speak. In layman terms everyone knows the story of the hare and turtle racing to come first... And has the President of the European Union, Mr Martin Schultz, come first, do you think? It is simply not the logical choice for the British Prime Minister to say that leaving the EU is the right thing to do. Neither does it say that illogical choice is not the way. We must admit defeat when it comes to the EU and it's Member States, that no citizen will ever get this one right on a mere speculative drive. The EU- triangle is a hard diamond and still shaping the countries in it's Eurosceptic slides and loyalists to sovereignty blue rays. Obviously, Mr Cameron, the EU was a boy. Who will kill it or has killed it because of this unholy thing that is going on now for two decades? (Kate called it the Scicillian thing) To cut through the chase here is to say that once Britain leaves, it will be just plain silly to continue life at the EU for Member States to speak Anglo Saxon. Then what? Continue in French? Or German? Or Belgium Vlaanderen or Charleroi French? That will also make it hard to maintain a union under the new circumstances for voting to have another 'patwa' for EU Member States from then on. I am afraid Mr Schultz is no Sir Lancelot. He speaks German and was born in Germany.

China's phantom crossing puts global growth on tenth level or warning

08012016

2014 And 2015, both years have put the Chinese economy on the forgotten by simple choice list, first because it was the new normal to do business with China and learning much more in what ways the Renminbi or Yuan would influence our modern days of global vision. Week 1 2016 did not go off with the unusual complications of broken down democracies elsewhere in the world; spring has lasted almost for the last quarter of the decade ongoing as we speak. But the world must act, and why not act surprised this morning? China is now on the long arm stretch to get something back on track to help out pulling the strings under the watchful eyes of the currency traders. It is exiting, for the moment, if you are the exited type of economy. By the end of the week, some hours later today, all the exitement will snake it's way out for this year, or first quarter, to get in back by april 2016 and stabilize again. Prediction will not exceed 2008, when the global financial crisis indeed was shocking and final. The far east is not seeking 'separation of powers' in it's own seas for the moment. It wants vision. What seems to be more interesting is why take off China from the forgotten list when global vision in 2016 is in desperate need of revision?

Conscience of Europe: European Union

06122015

It is an interesting question to ask whether the conscience of Europe is the European Union, or that the conscience of Europe are the 28/29 Member States in the present time. The European Union is our political center mainly, as is the ECB it's nerve center. It is for this change, since the conception of EEC,  now today that the European conscience is de facto our political heart and mind, for governments and citizens alike. One can see why this achievement by the 28 Member States Union is now the capital goal for each Member State to keep out of all negative sentiment of it's Membership in the European Union. And that goes both ways, politically and in it's economics. After all, by measurement of size, it is more prestigious to have the European Union and the presence of Member States, in stead of the EEC economic club of liberal MP's. The year 2015 can reflect on a great moment in Europe in politics and economics, but also of greater union nobility or philosophy. And, for anti EU agents, playing the record backwards isn't helpful in any way.

From 2014 to this year in 2015 the world has witnessed in a few places around the world, but here in Europe to Middle Europe too, how fast the disease of anti establishment is growing. Security and anti terror laws are now more out than kept in, e.g. when democracy is quiet and uniform peaceful in one place or in the center. 28 Member States are Central Government. Europe is also looking strategically different in the present time, if you take updates seriously and comparisons to former decades. The future of the European Union are in the hands of tactical decisions and technicians, and if nothing disrupts our new history making... In 2008 was the global financial collapse a first time out challenge to test the world and the western half as we had come to see and know it. And then followed by the double shock of not being able to reset any policy or change of politics, e.g. through bankruptcy? Some citizens are beginning to wonder whether the EU has a middle center in it's establishment it doesn't like anyone to know it is still unfinished, and that the builders are on strike/ refusing to finish the job. Something only Mr Schulz can answer.

European Superstate should not turn into Retaliation Superstate only. This could lead to division or a dividing world.

17 November

2015/ 23:04 PM

The Hague tonight leaves a desolate trail of 'last International justice' and a date, somewhere in... ISIS, after friday bloody attacks in Paris, will not be tried here anytime soon next year, in 2016. For the families and victims all that isn't making sense at the moment as they are trying very hard to remain faithful to France and it's patriotic past. How they are doing now no one in the global audience can say. The shock that went through their families' lives will remain a long and high wall of silence, is expected under these circumstances. France on a third night response of bombing ISIS for the friday attack last week, is saying that this is the right way to deal with ISIS, also known as the 'invisible force of evil'. And laws have been changed a pronto for the last 48 hours, and if correct will soon be introduced in all 28/29 Member States of the European Union. One, after all, must learn when and when not to throw away the key. And when listening to the President of Russia, yesterday, at the G20 Forum, you have to say that he is the only man on earth who told the world about the business leaders who forged such a key, e.g. for ISIS? Why does the world has to be a dangerous place in our century? Something lonely and dark comes to mind when thinking again of The Hague International court of Justice... It is after all only human?

(Retaliation does not fit the Hague institution of International court of Justice)

Turkey and the sunday election could go the conceited way and then snap.

31102015

Tomorrow, sunday 1 November, will be quite the opposite of just another snap election call in Turkey. It will have to set a few clear imperatives upfront first, between this and the coming hours, throughout the day and the next day. One or two things are already there to push the nation over de dreaded edge into a majority win for the AKP, President's Erdogan's and Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu's Justice and Development Parti. But it is precisely that what may not happen this time, or the next one. Perhaps the days of Mr Erdogan's Constatinople days are gone for good, and indeed it is the new political sphere to say "Lower your sails, captain Erdogan...". That would be right, if only politics. A bigger question needs yet to be addressed properly and asked, whether Turkey can make it only politics and ignore the rest of a long historical legitimacy with it's people and country and the rest of the western world, e.g. in Europe and for the last 20 years as far as the United States. Globalization indeed took the infant in this part of the region up scale and introduced Turkey deep inside the far east, and with the same reputation, put it close within Russia's sphere as an equal among equals. So, what is now happening and put the same country and incumbent officials at such an alert to abandon ship?

In the meantime US ground troops (under less than 50 commanders) will be deployed overnight, was said yesterday in a White House briefing. ISIS is their side and main target on sight. And somthing else is rocking the Middle East this morning. A Russian passenger plane just crashed in Sinai, Sharm El Sheik, and killing all people on board (still needs to be officially confirmed). ISIS stops at nothing and it won't blink this time either, if... Based on mass calculations these are incredible forces to reckon with. In theory where mass amasses it's scrum is always going to be confrontational. And who will look who in the eye as a result of that. Elections, whether in Turkey or neighboring country Syria, one can understand that this is a mere hot oil dropping on the already ongoing heat of the situation. Up to a boiling level? And let's say that for example Turkey remains on the split with HDP's 13% last time in May this year's election, will the country in this aftermath still recognize the country's mirrors and which ones have been smashed? Turkey's elites and bourgeoisie may have been prepared for any change between the rich and poorest, but certainly that is never near any upstream theory for the poorest the same knowledge or thing. One can see why the AKP is in somewhat a jam with itself at this point. How can you translate twenty years of power into an onvernight instability to the people? HDP for some reason (conceit?) has kept it's political class close to it's own, but more to the bourgeoisie of Turkey, because there is a newer and younger world coming on. This imperative is an intelligent and intellectual goal both parties seem to be speaking the lingo. (Speaking out is another thing)

We must wait and see what tomorrow might bring to Turkey and the region it holds dear to it's bosom.

Poland's new conservatism: credibility/ which century credibility?

27102015/ 20:15 PM

Unnoticed but present you can call Poland's 21st century. Or similar to someone's private industrial park in the eve of a mega city plan. But that could be ten years ago, all depending from which corner in the global eye you're looking. Now much has changed for Poland since then, and what we can see e.g. today is a floating political suit that fits all sizes, once there has been an election win in the country. One can't help but wonder why the far west, e.g. USA, was convinced that Poland could be the EU/ Europe's nemesis, if Mr Jaroslaw Kaczynski won the 2015 Polish election (37%?) this month. And so he did, green vector check. Unnoticed goes for Europe too and it isn't what Americans sometimes make of it, that what you need is to change cultural differences or the political sphere to get that magical result you want or need. "I was under the impression..." And treading more carefully here perhaps this is the time to ask something more critical than usual from Poland, just after the celebration over the weekend after the election. Which century credibility can the country promise it's citizens in the twister celebrations that hailed Mr Kaczynski this week? For example: Poland can't only do politics as Brussels is the head capital of politics within the EU. Also, it is neither Paris. The west European governments may be fully aware of this and leave a polite message behind no one ever receives. Eduardo Peron of Argentina did have that sphere of influence, keeping the US and Britain at some point inside and outside the political changes of their century, the 19th century to be more precise.

Poland and the European nations of the western half did both on each half great effort to build a post wwII era of peace and stability. It's contribution for peace in Europe still is one in it's own magnificent history a credible ally for non compliance to political ambivalence. And that kind of conservatism lasted for decades! Time however is now changing some parts in the world faster and some parts remain slow of pace in that change. European culture is Europe and not a private club of industrialists and art nouveau club. High ideals as a new cult in Europe has been done before and under the king of France or sun worshipper, king Louis XVI. If the EU plays any part in Europe, autocracy, plutocracy, oligarchy or timocracy, are all outdated clubs how to organize countries. And doing so for a very simple reason, if let's say it undermines healthy government, governance and parliamentary democracy. As it goes rumors say that most EU countries are at a crossroadswith the spirit of time and are showing some readiness to face it again if they must: fate. For Poland's fate the new conservative idea behind the election win of october 2015, in favor of Mr Yaroslaw Kaczynski, isn't saying much about democracy at the moment. Reform, maybe. To real politicians having to be in this position can only be hurtful and painful to watch a perfect good piece of history go down the drain so quickly as if it was quicksand, something unusual to Poland's climate.

Provocation, provocation, provocation, tempt not provocation...

09102015

It is quite dull not to say anything today/ tonight on what has been in the news this evening, in a so called summing up all fears of the day. The US is considering a retreat on Syria and fighting IS, was on today's Bloomberg.com news. At the end of the day these global corporations are still a website with millions of readers to access. Also in neighboring country to Syria there has been a rumor of setting up a workgroup between super power Russia in east Europe and G20 country Turkey, this was just announced after it had 'accused' Russia of violating the Turkish Air space on a navigation error 'fly over' by the Russians and in the following day made this statement evaporate the violation of the Turkish air space... Tonight there is a bizarre story coming out of Turkey, where the arms of the government had called for the arrest of Zaman newspaper online, (a coincedence?), chief editor Kenes, which is quite almost like the last drop that could make the already instability become something of what makes the political bucket overflow? They seek him here, they seek him there, it is no wonder many are beginning to wonder why and whom it is they are seeking. Who is this tiny mouse that the Turkish President, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan is the shadow on the wall the little rodent is mimicking? But things are really getting complicated by asking who is questioning the mime. If the mouse, it means someone or something has entered the house and is now exploring chances or a big piece of chance only to end up saying 'Say cheese!'.

Tonight's story on the US retreating could be the last tactical move in this blind spot, by summing up the latest top stories around the world sitting very tightly next to it. It would mean for the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, that the US has frozen the picture on the Russian presence in Syria, in the region of Iran and getting closer. You could quickly also make a bet that now it looks like the Russian President was standing on his high bridge, when all this time right underneath his eye the heli came up to his eye level and than it was a face to face moment nostalgia (for old times' sake?). Tomorrow it's business again as usual in most parts of the world. The time and date now, a few hours later, 10:18 AM, 10102015. What has changed so far in these regions, e.g. to yesterday? Syria, the EU, US, Russia, China, Middle East, Japan, will be looking this morning to their 'gameplan', if let's say, well, not much has changed. In ordinary terms when nothing is happening, nothing is moving either. The same cannot be said for the G7 countries. That is a big difference from any perception angle or corner within the eye.

The restoration of Turkey into Turkey+

04102015/22:38PM

Does Turkey needs saving, e.g. from like what but itself? In a greater vision one might find the answer, as no better time than the present. While Damascus is burning like a monkey in it's own flames after death, as the State is dead in the eyes of the world, in Turkey better times are waiting at the next general snap election the first of november. Turkey is not a novice in that sense. By truth of Allah it has known hundreds of years how to be Turkish and stay a people. Unlike the Mamluks they drew the distinctive and characteristic of the Ottoman Turks into many 'new times' as they went or came. Nationalism isn't something to teach the Turkish nation. Man, woman or child. A few decades ago neither did anyone teach the Turkish government about modern day democracy, in which the Turkish nation had found another 'new time' to settle in, guided completely with a manual in these theories. And like obedient citizens of the new world beyond the millennium great things did happen for Turkey to receive all prizes of glittering overnight success. The west was very pleased with the result to have Turkey breastfed in private, be it a very global privacy. Does Turkey, in 2015, need saving?

The answer is a yes and no-one. For some time now the Turkish nation discovered their worth and decided that it was time to put this unique position to the test, or maybe even start again from the starting point, let's say after WWII. Very recently the Turkish nation's history started with one man and his fever. He is the President of Turkey, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, known to the world as the former Prime Minister of Turkey. Uniqueness is what Mr Erdogan would like to reform the nation with by tailor measuring and some yards of the national cloth. Curiously this urge is being monitored by the International community from up close and this is quite an interesting twist, they are assuming. This is also the difficult path from the other side to Turkey's technocratic society. (That is if you can call global business a technocratic society and not pragmatic) One way to kill this rumor would be the resetting of time, that truly can this man really control the Turkish nation and be a good friend to the rest of the world? (Make that a trusted ally of Nato as well) Yes. Politically Mr Erdogan does has that unique position, remember? Just you toss a coin.

There is much calm after two days at the UNGA in New York...

30092015/21:47 PM

Russia and the United States have decided over the last 48 hours to shake hands and toast champagne in public is probably not what domestic politics is all about, but will do for now in the global sphere memory. The whole world is present here, and that includes many Head of States, kings and spouses. But the devil plays his part too and very much in the present time. Question: has Mr Putin, the Russian president, bombed IS in Syria today, or hasn't he? It could be a hologram (3D), the latest technology on super power military hardware... The public unfortunately can't say. If true the Russian President has rather an odd sort of timing for Air Strikes in Syria today. Just ignore that last sentence and make it better. But it won't look better to have Russia at this point going it alone, even when that would mean an intro or prelude to a grand coalition of allies, like Mr Putin himself suggested at the UNGA, some 24 (and something) hours ago.

Should there be praise for the Russian war- eagerness? If you believe the latest news that is a yes and no answer. High level diplomacy means scaring only those who are in and not out! And serenity can scare the 'living daylights' out of you to see it from the bridge of the wider spectre of things, doesn't it? In this apparent calm between the two countries, the US and Russia, one has to put all his/ her trust in the way the world has found it's own ways of falling back in one piece everytime the shock has quiet down either in this or that place (mostly where wars never stop ending). Tomorrow it is business as usual again and all will be forgotten behind the facades of many office towers and steel windows. Syria will be forgotten right there too! As Libya was before. As Egypt or Tunisia was before. And so on, and so on. The Dollar sign is right there in the middle centre ground. When will we learn? Who needs the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, to move the earth from where we are now living? You can watch the whole epic on DVD by 2020, one assumes. Isn't the world too densed, and we are not only talking population or demographics, for world domination by one clear dominator?

G- points for Mr Vladimir Putin, the President of Russia, if four is his magic number.

20092015/08:49 AM

The world in 2015 knows of a division that only the military powers on a global scale can make. Nothing else has changed much in the world geographically, unless it is clear evidence that climate change has shifted the northern hemisphere and creating dire problems for the polar bear. (What is making polar bears thin, article on CNN 19092015) Syria is a big question, when divided by time and not size of populations. If you believe what the newspapers are saying it is looking very much the same thing for Russia, that here the President is trying again to ridicule the west and it's side of powers. And yet, when taking the Crimea saga of 2014 to mind, the Russian President is a serious consummate world leader and he will go for the extra mile or inch in this very difficult situation where no military solution will last for long. It has to be politics. As much as he would like it is very clear that the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, will have to find his own answer and avoid anything repititious of any last campaign. The war in Syria, how should one put it, is by nature a wild card, not small on the table, but immeasurable when in the land. It's fire also scorches the earth. Something that silences everything else outside of the ordinary in the rest of the world. What can you see through the window of this division? At this point there is no telling anyone how deep this involvement- experience comes to neighboring countries, whether the danger it spreads is a loaded force. Perhaps the world has underestimated the Russian President, full stop. There is no one doubting the US Military and it's political history to be the only super power many governments have put their trust in, now for decades after WWII. It is also still a super power of trust, even when making mistakes, e.g. the Vietnam war, and Iraq more recently. No one can say the same about Russia. In fact when defining the Russian super power we are never sure what exactly it is that Russian leaders think of the human species. Some do understand the Russians and make no effort to change it's racial features or greatness. Both are funny traits, when seen through the intellectual minds in the west. To the global audience it is therefore hard to accept or see anything serious of the role that Russia is playing e.g. in Syria in 2015, a global third quarter. On the panoramic view, where do Russians go when disappearing behind the dark of the moon? (Conspiracy theories have later said that Yuri Gagarin was murdered) The best way to look at this perhaps is for the west not to underestimate time, especially when divided by a force as great as Russia...

The United States has a different opinion: it is only watching what it already precalculated years ago, that e.g. the Syrian President was backed by Russia and therefore they will not ignore that side of the G- point in the G-7. (Russia is after all a former G-8 leader) Despite our great fears of Russia helping the Syrian President or backing him the US has done it's homework with great precision and ratio. When or how they will respond to the new situation created by the Russian President no one actually knows. Let alone to say what it's next level or move will be. On the other hand in free- style writing one can also say that it is particularly worrisome if let's say, in theory, the inevitable might start from here, let's say something of a showdown. There is Israel, Turkey, Iran, ISIL, the Kurdish invisible population, to name just a few places in the Middle East that aid the west. (Except for the Kurds, Iran and ISIL who are not Nato Members but controversial. Israel is another controversy) The world will quickly need a definition of the situation in Syria as it is ongoing at the moment. For one reason is clear, that to block the Syrian President from engaging in a war against ISIL consequences are very hard to see through the morning fog today. ISIL is Nato's prerogative, and it should be clear this much to the International world. In simple words one can say there would be a 'coming down' after the showdown and breaking the Russian President's hand very badly. (Not literally) To be continued.

Two questions by the State on new rationalities: the law of physics and expansionism

15092015/21:49PM

Each day anew in our time/ real time or Universal Time Code helps transform the world as we see and know it. Of course, not visibly, but more in it's extensive nature of things we are used to think this or that is ours. Not being able to do so would be extremely frustrating and one could only sit this one out in a disturbed fashion/ mode. In many ways this is what governments, whether in Europe or the Middle East, are now experiencing with the new challenges to their wavering nature, let's say since after the global financial crisis in 2008? Once they got over that they had realized how big in fact the questions got, and that finding the answers would take more time than previously known or when they thought industrialization meant immortality for the wealthy. That view is no longer a privilege of the rich, but rather one only if globalization has done the rewriting. The new rationalities are not easy topics to understand. What is it saying when you are no longer considered wealthier than others? It is time one would try to find the simplest of solutions: let's blame others. Which btw by any personal view is the most dangerous of thoughts and visions, if the State. (White panic, paranoia and a staggering hush- hush comes to mind)

Earth's physical law has been enhanced for decades long without any world citizen's eye to notice anything about these ultra- exterior changes. Great men make great Presidents, used to be a way to measure all. In our time new rationalities go beyond earth's boundaries and stars. Too hard for any one's imagination! Emotions criss cross in a handful of bloody dust in war places, or like we are now facing each day for the last two months in Europe, the influx of people fleeing Syria. To western countries it could be a mere logistical challenge, let's say if e.g. the EU were hands- free from other political and military challenges, especially after Vladimir Putin of Russia has tried a design of his own on putting a stop to globalization in his part of the world last year in 2014. Now, a recreation of conflict of interest worlds, is still hunting the spirits of Europe, that maybe the European natural law is a worthy one above all others after all? Once other nations are inclined to show solidarity or cooperation time is the only thing or measurement. One new rationality no one believes it is part of the world today is political honesty. In the end that will or might be the true driving force of nations, as they are capable of to face a heartless mechanism to be the dominant force of nature in this extensive world as we now know it.

The questions are getting bigger and answers get smaller in every man/ woman, and shrinking incredibly fast from here.

If QE global economy wasn't the global mechanism for money it would have been free money

06092015/ 22:48 PM

Who had introduced Quantitative tightening between the two periods, just before globalization and after? Give it some thought, if you still can this evening, because one article on Bloomberg.com has been writing about the coming QT this year, in 2015. The world has been slow or maybe too fast on two decades of QE, without perhaps actually giving much thought on the next level of global economics, let's say, when sliding back(wards)? The 21st century economies in all economic blocs are, if you believe the news, in most places are fully integrated economies of either QE and going by some upgraded or downgraded system to make it even more necessary to stay in the QE global economy. This could be just a bad joke told by a non joker, when speculations are good. 2015 Will take the landing, so the article said this evening, or earlier today. Followed of course by some sort of currency crisis, which btw has already lost from the invention of QE and QT. Does anyone ever wonder why this is still serious money and as good as any killing moon? From certain angles in it's magnitude QE serves big purposes like never before. Real money could not have come this far and maintain humanity in greater numbers that only grew more rapidly for the last hundred years. This is a point. People are such ignoble creatures when the money is real!

Of course from a personal view point if the economy flattens by QE or QT there is simply nothing noble in it for them. Unemployment is an eye poking fact. And it has been there hand- in- hand with the rise of globalization, when no one actually thought or cared... This story is perpetually old. And has anyone ever learned the good lessons in these previous times when all saints and sinners signed their deals? Are we not forgetting something, e.g. that shutting down this QE invention and that this would be the cruelest of things ever across the planet's surface since Kain had slain Abel in the east of Eden? Economies in our world today are dependents of QE and it's magnitude mechanism/ machineries. Let's e.g. take Europe this morning. It has to cope with a crisis of refugees getting in and through by a very high toll. They too will become 'future citizens' at one point, and hopefully not at gunpoint. The human will has succombed in all sorts of ways under the invention of our century, as a service to render and God only knows as a reminder of a lesson still to be learned. Would real money have ever taken in this many refugees? Please, don't say yes. At least not when you are an industrialist and economist. (Here is where someone has to take responsibility for acting deliberately honest in stead of the five star hypocrite- Anne Applebaum's article on hypocrites on the refugees crisis in Europe, saturday 05092016, WP)

The stock markets in China crashed today

24 August 2015/ 00:30 After Midnight

On 23 August 2015 early morning the global response was that today would be again like in 2008 when the global financial world collapsed or crashed. From afar both times came out with similar impact to hit the global scale, and then later during the day that was dropped in favor of something more prepared, even when actually that wasn't the case. It means that you do not teach the world the same lesson twice, unless there is a very good reason to do so. Of course, the second lesson always being the patriarchal thing to do, seeking to stimulate our world for reasons of greater prosperity and independence. For what if the Leviathan fails it's century? Also, we do underestimate the Leviathan. After the China stock markets dropped and crashed yesterday morning, wiping off billions of Dollars, the ordinary people fail to see a playful seamonster staring at them from the surface of the sea line... In the end of another global financial crash day this impression will last, that nothing in this crash was like in 2008. The 2008 global financial crash didn't had the size of this one, in China, and seven years later. It was precisely because in China size was always there and it has been the study for decades by it's rivals or economic partners during this time. Governments all doing their homework when following the Leviathan?

Thus far it is where most ordinary people come and then leave it to all that is bigger than the individual or human being. Too many of us are getting it wrong when it concerns how human life continues in foreseeable times, when and where human lives will end up. For example: the world has stopped navel- gazing and created an enormous ego of narcissism, leaving everything alive to chance or impact/ shock. Now the question is this: what exactly do nations like to give up in the universe of profligation? (If such word exists!) In 2015 that is yet the hardest question to ask in self reflection of some kind. Did Russian President Vladimir Putin did the same in 2014? What, you may ask again, exactly do you want to give up as a government and people? The Leviathan as an mythical embodiment of global law and order, should this be challenged? Tomorrow it is very much possible that China will give some sort of 'second day' after the crash and calm the rest of the world more specifically. (China is a major player in the military business) Unlike in 2008, when no one actually knew what to hold on to, the Chinese are a people and military power who will act like people who know where they want or put their money in. Europe didn't had much of the same thing back in 2008. Like the Leviathan balance should be read from the surface as well as deep inside these waters. It is hard to say which to respect first this early morning!

Are we missing something? A lost script or something?

14 August 2015/ 22:53 PM

Human intelligence definitely is now saying in quiet diplomacy and from the white of their eyes in world leaders, chances of jamming future globalists in their plans for new innovations to lead the world, on a scale from 0-10 is zero. Political time is lost or got lost in it's terrific design of lost era. How to find out these scores is easy. In every world leader the measurement is present and blatant how and where this government or country is standing, including the Head of State. And where are they now, level- wise? Greece for example tonight is basic politics time again. Triple bailout, European Finance Ministers and IMF. A child can tell you how many bubbles are in the sky tonight. One by one expecting to puncture, also again... God only knows the definition to these bailouts, let's say if ever one country would try it by it's own uniqueness? Britain used to hold that seat. But let's not go there tonight. "Depression is bad for you," Fawlty would say. Something is definitely missing tonight. Can you say why? The planet is almost at it's quietest moment for the whole day, from wherever you are looking. Outdoors used to be peaceful, luxurious and busy in open wide places city terraces. The natural place to be for every single human being, dog owner and earth's eco- systems. The blind could even share the outdoors as made for them too and everyone else, by SO (small observation). Comfort sustains most evils in the world. Is that happening again tonight?

The sword of heaven just might be indecision to cut through the century in half. Fear of life or having to lose it can only happen to a good guy/ girl that won't be missed in the logical end... And once you're dead, what can we say? Heads off and you're walking around alive like a chicken. How nights can be threatening filled with blackness and alienation in real-time! Elsewhere in the world where there are wars for whatever reason, synthetic or real, the old scene will just not go away, that this is too unreal to be bothered with. The outdoors world wants peaceful continuation of the life it leads, mostly on the western side. Actually, we like our world as it is or goes. It's super cool. Here is where it harbours wasps and your true blue generation to take up the lead next. And one thing is truly philosophical here: you can't say human life was dead at this point. Instead were Banks and bailouts. But the joke is also here, that all humans if lying down on the side would be perfect sandbags. All depending of course what you are trying to keep out. (Journalism and politics jurisdiction are just a few examples of sandbags lying on the side) It is to no one's surprise that we are now living in the age of indecision and enjoying at the same time it wasn't anybody's fault. It's a fruit bag, but it is our fruit bag, our world. Disowning our life on this planet isn't anybody's fault either.

As they say to kill two birds with one stone...

03082015

Morning. Turkey seems to have more than one stone in it's present time hands. It has two. (Unlike the US with the 'deal with Turkey' has more than one stone, but four. And when on the global stage it seems they always have a few more stones, more like any other nation on earth) Turkey's intelligence wires are showing, and strangely enough they are not showing from the heads of politics and military rationality even. These are bad words in a deal when one party is concerned over the other party's 'opportunity' in the matter, just one level below. According to many (Daily Hurriyet) good journalists the hardest hit from Turkey is the stone against PKK. It is a bad smell of sour grapes and perhaps one to hide bad AKP sportsmanship after HDP and it's 13% slice in the last election held in Turkey? Whatever the graphics show the mindset of what is called this morning, the Davutoglu government, there is simply no way to get itself out of this jam. A government with a strong profile for G20 and to be it's host presidency, surely must be able to stick to abstract rather than going for a PKK- kill? Perhaps first thing to establish is the level Turkey is operating from, 1. when it keeps the deal with the US, and 2nd when did the PKK first strike Turkey during this time as a threat to the people and State? (As the PKK is not in Nato it's military has limited significance as a sophisticated armed force in the region and the rest of the world)

But this is how politics is being made as it is a process constantly developing across the whole of the planet. Every region must play it's part and proceed with the test of time/ realtime. Politics in Realtime isn't the same as keeping your eye fixed on the clock tickings. Second archives, second governments, these are the strangest of pairs to the minuteman (from minutemen). The future is about worldly powers, and not the powers of any motherland. Except for one thing that may not be so when real people get killed or are being killed in wars coming out of nowhere. (The best way to startle the enemy or surprise regular army forces) But what can Turkey do or undo at this stage of the US- Turkey deal? Here is the big stone to carry around on your back, that honesty doesn't run our planet. Neither is genius a straightforward talent of the 21st century nature. In other words we can't expect Turkey to come out in honesty and risk the lives in this war and not becoming the global Don Quichotte going round and round. On the same timeline why should one expect to see the US do the same? There can only be one Don Quichotte at the time. When we get back to the ordinary citizen of Turkey and the Kurdish people in Turkey, it's fire could be older. That is all.

This we call our earth, it needs to go somewhere.

27072015/16:51 PM

Rumors have it that in every continent perimeter, always an enormous size by demographics and cubic kilometers, wherever one is looking it is either at war with itself, e.g. Russia and Ukraine, Russia and the west, and Russia going even further into other regions that are independent terrain and governments, or it goes to war politics over economics and global finance. After Greece came back from it's referendum knock- out punch at the EU Finance Ministers and the IMF, now it is saying something completely rare and strange when looking back. Ukraine has stopped somewhere remote from what it has been last year, approximately at the same time this year. What happened in the meantime in places other than the here above do not make the same 'epic distance' you need to be in the headlines as the super power and coded a danger to the world system. Evidently these were mere rumor stories. A new factor for the global system just like shaking a massive fully grown tree, first by hand and then by another way more effective and lightweight. (And when we think here of lightweight usually that means no hard human labor, but machineries)

The point to make here is that it is a sobering fact of life in the 21st century how the world has failed in most of it's millennium goals, either to control peacefully or solve it's disputes without the rumors of war or going to war. That is and was quite the astonishing 'new thing' our century has faced, actually. When the world needs to go places or somewhere who do you trust will be the respected world leader to show how things should be done? A good example to this view is what is now being said in Greece and Europe after the crisis over who actually runs the country (Former Finanance Minister YanisVaroufakis)during it's most difficult time and days. Inuendo isn't a legal detail and yet it is out there in the streets everywhere. Gossip runs like a burning fire and before you know it we are living back in time when you had electorate outbursts of epic proportions. This is one way to set on fire parliaments, on canvas. Not in realtime and in our century. Trust is our common dirt when thrown back in our faces by politicians, time and time again. And rumors are now becoming the pillar of society... Mind you, these are in all the places that used to run the world from it's capitals!

Try make any sense of a power- ego- world in demise can be as false a premise or maybe not?

27062015

Expectations are high in some European corners about Greece, time and future time. This morning there is news from Greece to have a referendum on the Greek debt deal 5 July next week. The Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras ondoubtfully has given Greece a new government and from the news this morning one can only assume that this new face in the country will try to get things done for the people less fictional than e.g. previous and more older politicians. One has forgotten how old and wheathered politicians used to run Greece and failed... Some things are not making any sense here, but who will notice why, where and when? And does it matter? To run the country anything to bring back prosperity for people and democracy does tend to be important for the Prime Minister to be right in all decision making with the short or long term effect, for Greece. Period. But that would be old Greece and politicians with a political past no one wants to hear of in the present time. Mr Tsipras so far has been quite unable to shake off that past from the dust of his shoes, but is unlikely to say so. He is like a trapped Prime Minister and can't do politics in Greece any different from the political and historical chase. Why is he promising now an even more bigger deal into abstract? Global investors are not fictional characters, and they do really exist. This Trojan horse is blinded with eyesight and it stays black, so it seems. Also, the European Union is not a testing ground, this too does really exist. Or is it that I and so many others don't have a clue?

Once we get to the point where the globalists lay bare their serpentine's soul or cloth, corners in the west, north, south and in a later phase the east, this will be constrained at one point where there will be no denial left to plunder and hide in deception. This is and was the making of a world at peace with itself and nations for decades. Whether this is relevant to the Prime Minister in Greece, yes, why should it be? The world has a long history of Banking industries and politics. Who is missing the point here? Putting too much on the shoulders of this new face of Mr Tsipras in the Greek government seems like a terrible choice of weapon, spiked with possibilities and probabilities but might get in the way of the ordinary or more conventional fighter. Greece on the popular side of an old country has lost it's way. It might influence with tragic and divine tragedy one day soon, when this is the only premise left to have as a people and democracy. Unless, that is precisely the Prime Minister's choice and decision. He could even influence a bigger theme beyond anyone's expectations, and crown himself king of Greece in politics? This is what it probably means when they say that Greece has an instinct close to Europe/ Europe's.

EU: governments are just flagpoles in the wind on this warship

19062015/22:41PM

The warship: the longer the project the better it is/was for everyone. And that for a simple reason of building process of anything and anywhere, because it takes a while to build and time is money. Call it what you like, in the end it still is what it is, a warship. Or aka EU Platform. There is so much we can stomach each day from Greece and how one man dominates the meaning of Grexit, if for example he is tipping the balance and bring down the global system, as did the Russian President, Mr Vladimir Putin, in 2014. But with Greece in 2015 this doesn't come through military prowess, and the good news is that it never can. It's weapon is invisible, or if you like, Greece's Trojan Horse in the 21st century is actually eating sugar lumps, like real live horses do when in the stable. The EU Member States do not believe that story. To them Greece spooks them with an invisible design of the Trojan horse and now has done so in politics. You can't make any more sense of it than this. And than there is also the question of whether the EU can or cannot have a defense system or EU military defense system, was asked tonight in an article by a prominent global politician. All that money can buy? How did the wise men in Europe ever thought that money can buy only honor? From day one it was and still is procurement, procurement, procurement. Had this been the mob world like the movie Godfather II, that even a gangster like Hyman Roth has asked the most difficult question of his loyal friends: if the military is out in the streets, now what does that tell you? Mind you, these are always streets somewhere out there and near enough. And here we are thinking that men like Mr Cameron can 'help save Europe' from itself? In all it's pomp and glory Waterloo 1815 has been commemorated this year for it's 200th year history record. This was for a reason seen as the world today as Europe's modern transformation to another point of war maybe? That's what politicians see and believe in. Architects have to draw the plan and make it work by looking in and not out. Unless the EU has gateways, entrances and exit halls. From these gateways they see a whole different world out there. While inside the Union breathes like a living planet within walls of it's own design on a massive scale. Can anyone tell us why that is not military enough? Any English man can tell you what the first rules are to build a castle and why it is called a castle. But obviously the British PM has overruled that particular detail of situation. All he needs is to turn back to England by show of force. (Political force) And then by God's grace the rest will climb over the walls and follow him.

The 'thing' about the EU is this: it is irreversible by nature, which is why it is darn hard to bring it down. This is a new idea of war, a new design even, where Adolf Hitler never came as a Nazi regime winning vast areas of territories inside Europe. Their reputation was then the most advanced military genius, and yet still... Building something with an irreversible nature of mass scale is beyond all military. And when it is unwinnable to retake in any smaller way, by words or every day politics, practice is imperfect full scale. Russia did had a try in 2014 and that was a terrible shockwave through the system. And it stopped. Money does buy you everything on earth, and now that includes a platform of immense magnitude where there was never such a thing seen before in whatever time back. But you know what the ancient Egyptians used to say about architects building Pharaoh's tombs/ pyramids, if you build it you die with it. Imperialists have strange orders. Which isn't very hard these days, so that nothing exotic needs to get out first, like the financial crisis in 2008, before anyone realizes that something strange is happening or has happened. If anyone on this earth can beat such a massive machinery, he/she is a miracle. Other than that there isn't any Prime Minister or President to reverse by fortune alone the irreversible nature of this 'thing'. Does anyone remember how the EU was made available and accessible to the public/ citizens and politicians of Europe? It started off with the disabled. And politicians were marshmallowed from then on into the world of heavenly kindness and equality...

All eyes in global public are set on Mr Erdogan after the election on 7 June on sunday

09062015

In Turkey pre- election timeline the world did not pay much attention to 7 June 2015, and if there was any news in the global mainstream media/ newspapers scarce space was given to the upcoming election, now a very important post- election. What will happen to Mr Erdogan, is the question in mainstream media for now. (Editorial questions are being fired in Realtime and looking for the answers) In Turkey the Turkish President wasn't seen from sunday 7 June till now, anywhere. His absence nevertheless is being kept online and social media twitter.com, 1 day, 22 hours and seconds too. One should question this quiet hysteria and whty put Mr Erdogan as the central point of the AKP. In exact 45 days time will be up for the magical four political parties in Turkey, and a new government must be announced. Before 7 June there wasn't much debate or discussion on the coming general election in Turkey, but as by a strike of lightning the world is a burning flame of discussion on whether Mr Erdogan should stay or go entirely from public life and politics. In a tall order one can understand the call for resignation from all public office, if this is on the mind of the Turkish law/ International law? From here of any tall order anything is possible. In reality this government seems to be bound by a well established political institution as a Republic and empire. What e.g. can be so good for Israel if Mr Erdogan has lost? I thought that was rather sheepishly to mention in articles this morning in the Jerusalem Post...

To 'play the focus game' in Turkish post election, to anyone's guess, should better be spent on the coming days and till the last day of 45 days to be exact. HDP has put up a brave front of almost 13%, an increase from magical heaven, but in Realtime this is still an undefining moment, to both, the AKP and HDP. Post election didn't just came out of nowhere for the HDP win, as one expects to see from polls prior to the general election. Why is it now imperative to see Mr Erdogan go rather than stay? (Bloomberg article yesterday, 08062015) Turkey is not Egypt, Libya or Tunisia, but has been a trusted ally of NATO for decades long since WWII, and it has kept an even greater general sense of compliance with geopolitics in and outside the region in the Middle East, set by the west. Paradoxical this was especially during the Erdogan era. And then came his mistakes, as one can read today on the corruption scandal in December 2013, two and a half years later? In Turkey if correct CHP leader did call for Mr Erdogan's resignation then. In other words: what exactly do these points hold against Mr Erdogan today? Painful as it may be in the eyes of the beholder, but Mr Erdogan surely isn't Colonel Gadafi or Ex President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, is another void question. But should Mr Erdogan resign?

The President of Turkey is convinced that democracy is a culmination, or rather more accumulation, of 'good deeds' and a submissive nation sublime

02062015

Perhaps the Turkish President has caught the bug of Presidents, in most cases they do so quietly or silently. But not Mr Erdogan, just at a time when it is inconvenient before the general election on 7 June this coming sunday. His fight seems to be one he wants to do on his own. From the other half way round the nation of journalists in Turkey are grinning in a strong and high bastion of stone, and question his solo act at a constant 24 hours around the clock, but more why these terms of a President fighting his one man fight? Is he not more like the incredible shrinking man and not seeing the danger in the home spider getting bigger? Nature politics is playing parts with Mr Erdogan's perception of size and magnitude, of what Turkey now seems to him when his own personal view is shrinking. What used to be a home spider afraid of any child's bare feet to be stamped on, now seems so big and scary. And maybe in this election perception is all that it is and matters. The President of Turkey still enjoys the popular opinion of a man with 'good deeds' that what he has done for certain people throughout the land. He brought to them the unusual news of how democracy works and can do more in Turkey. But now all that has dropped flatly down the drain and it is hard at a time of the next general election to quickly analyse all these fixations of time and reality in June 2015 in Turkey, just before the polling day five days from today.

In reality the Erdogan bar for popularity has dropped steeply since last year in 2014, so many see as the result of Taksim Gezi Park two years ago in 2013. A conservative government stream was suddenly unleashed against a people living in freedom and slightly becoming aware that things in Turkey were changing and did not quite feel as how things were before, like e.g. for a decade long of prosperity and global meaning. Turkey indeed was on it's way to become an International and modern State, the envy of the world, had it become successful on this course of line, and then took the unusual step of a botched attempt inside Israeli waters in 2010, even if that were meant to aide Palestinians in a humanitarian way. An indignant Prime Minister Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan then couldn't help but react in a manner one can hardly describe as cold or reserved, and from here it fell prey to it's own nature... That nature is now more transparent for the world and public, which they have named not conservative but authoritarian. What would have happened today had the Prime Minister then resigned after the corruption scandal in December 2013? Diplomats should stay immaculate, but there is a cunning to that trait. Main thing of that resignation would have given Turkey much more advantage in this general election, as a country with a strong sense of diplomacy and political respect for it's institutions, and while nurturing the greatest ideal of a true democratic Turkey.

If the President of Turkey is like a wounded animal in this next general election, his traces will only ignite more sniffing from bigger animals, who only follow the smell of blood.

Are we watching a documentary of the Conservatives general election 2015 win already?

10052015

Tickets for a museum trip in the future for schoolchildren are now selling out in the streets, where they can pay a visit to the halls and corridors of old English parliamentary laws and sculptures, like that of the last British Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, next to that of Ms Sturgeon, as the Scottish leader of the SNP who fought an unwinnable battle for Scottish independence. Do not underestimate the voice of the narrator in this documentary. Who's folly will it come down to? If Britain needs saving from a breaking up the Union, write a documentary. It is effective, and the people will all be listening. What can Britain build on with a majority win to lead the country and nation? Laws and policies under the coalition in last government technically speaking can't stay in, but will have to be channelled out to history books. The Conservatives want to go on with something, do you know what that is? If there is anyone it is the narrator who can bring the story back in focus for a British public and the world audience. If he is not mistaken for the messenger and shot. In this part of the world the situation with Britain being at the brink of it's destruction the rest of mankind continues as if nothing is happening. Money gives that distinct nature in the rest of the world. And isn't equality of nations and governments a noble course for the future and it's generations?

In all this one wonders what Russia meant in 2014 when it said that it had enough of globalization intrusion and integration inside it's territories. But Russia, like any good member of the royal family and European family, it will not say anything about the future of Britain. It still is respecting a sovereign Britain. And one can only assume that to the Russians the affair of respecting Britain's sovereignty is a very serious one through informality and formality. The question now is what are some suggesting that did really happen with the general election in Britain this time? Who has been walking on water to make this happen? (Not me. I'm afraid of water. Lol.) Indulge: if any private person had this kind of power and make Britain victorious one moment, while in theory destroying the Union via SNP, where will it (deliberate error) go and find help to save the country from falling apart before the eyes of the world? What didn't happen in Germany but in England makes it a rare or curious thing to know. With Britain two decades ago it made the EU Member States looking good and it gave them trust, that what Europe needed was a strong cooperation between countries and governments, that this would give a strong economy to face up to global forces in a competitive way, while ever strenghtening ties of peace and do away with war forever. And btw, that wasn't a story. Unlike today we have a little miss red riding hood to visit grandma in the woods, who has been eaten by the big bad wolf and now sitting there on the bed, and waiting in her bedroom for her grandchild to devour.

Last time government the coalition has been another Grimm story: Gretl and Hans wandering off into the woods leaving behind little pebbles of stones, like good policies do, before they were captured by the carnivore witch in a choclate house. From time to time they switched from Gretl to Hans and vice versa. And also as in power politics the house of choclate must have been the house of money. And life was good. In fact it was so good that there was now a slight indication to prolong the coalition government in this last general election... But the storm outside came out against them and blew away the house, and leaving Hans all alone in the woods without Gretl, also a casualty in the storm.  And in stead came the ridicule. The theory could be right and within a year's time change the fate of British politics as a whole. Because, let's face it, if it fails to be right, diplomacy is not going to be looking good against any private person with a strong inclination of destroying world's old heritages like politics in Britain. For the time being the theory is right and going strong, because it doesn't have any other way. It must do this thing and staying on one course from here to high heaven. But one can't expect mercy from this theory and a friendly face. European neighbors who take a grasp of the situation will do so in quiet diplomacy and strife for peace. Everyone thought that if there was ever a little miss red riding hood that it would be automatically the SNP. Hmm...

The deep end of British politics will decide today at the polling stations

07052015

Six weeks ago the main two political parties, known to the world as Conservatives and Labour, like a magician's trick, went each their own way and try to take the General Election into a sphere of 'Affair of it's own', and doing so without spending much time on a few technical points, like for example the Liberal Democrats and last government, the coalition. No one even hinted at the coalition government dissolved before the General Election, except for scoring points in the public sphere, by the one Party the voters are more familiar with. But surprise surprise, Britain has changed five years ago. In today's deep end where Britain is now at a junction in history and British 'oldness' in politics, technicians of this general election failed the public to explain that one: there is no way going back to the two- party system, and b. to continue in this way or out of it is a full stop. Or, reconcile the new forces within the realm and take responsibility Statesmen like, hoping to get a new map in British political life and system. (Systems?) After 2010 the voters were confused and had learned to live with the new system of a coalition government in Britain. In the past this could never serve the old system of the British establishment, but in our modern world political systems in big countries are a necessity, and not simply a choice by the voters between good or bad political parties. Do these men and women in government truly bequeathe the voter with a choice at the ballot box when the country goes to the polls?

Politicians are just beginning to learn how to adapt to the new system, which is a multiple system, and one standing on it's own, orbitting around any central government. Some in smaller portions. Britain is now there and at this point there isn't really a big surprise of why the country is facing an apparent chaos tomorrow morning and taking perhaps all day to get the results right in this general election. Mr Hannan in his article Bow Group yesterday hinted at a possible change in the system so far, and made a very strong point where Britian should contemplate getting a bigger plan than what it has been doing for hundreds of days in antiquity, read years, but now should meet the newest of goals as a country and government. It can be a problem today to make this transparent to the voters, and getting the timing wrong. Voters might consider this a put off when the only election broadcast is about bringing something back to Britain, the great nationalism of Britishness? It could be true or not, in Britain today it is falling and apart, and not because it is a weak country. The outgoing and incoming streams are just not in good synchronization. You do not just push back the Liberal Democrats into oblivion again. The trick will be how to show this to the public, openly and honestly.

This general election has been an affair on it's own. It could be sublime and ready to take on the world powers as well as taking it's interior to a new level of politics and understanding. Fooling the public is not  a great folly or wisdom, thanking neighboring countries for having their affairs standing on their own?

If Britain was more like Russia direct or indirect democracy could be the same question on open and closed oligarchy

05052015

Two days/ one and half day from the General Election is there a debate on the future of England truly ongoing as we speak? Yesterday in the early evening there was a curious idea coming out from Britain in the news, that Mr Miliband would try getting Mr Nick Clegg from Liberal Democrats on his side and reduce relying too much on SNP leader Ms Nicola Sturgeon. Hmm... It was curious given the fact that voters now have to 'trust' Labour on a stele of stone and their promises written a la ten commandments style by the river Thames. (Not really) There was this outlook too where everyone now busy to welcome the next government, the Labour leader Mr Ed Miliband was already being perceived as the next global leader of the Commonwealth, G7 and G20, as well as being the man who will be in Nato and the EU as well. The Honourable Member in his humble beginning is still a British national or citizen. That at some point, but nevertheless an important point in memory, if let's say the choice for any Prime Minister will be to go the extra mile and lose Britain or staying in prudently and win the nation's pride and joy. These are the big themes for Britain in which citizenship and being British is all about. Mr Miliband wouldn't need definitions of such lows had it been that globalism was his citizenship. Over to Mr Cameron.

It is a little too late for that and talk about all the goodies this man has done for Britain. In the 21st century it seems from afar that the Prime Minister Mr David Cameron had a choice to make five years ago in 2010 and even before that time when he was in opposition and lived with promises in his sides like a thornbush, maybe. What makes this Prime Minister worth to praise at a late time near the next general election  2015  is that he was above all a gentleman and fair, even when the hardest of criticism was aimed at him sometimes going as far as to resign. (After Libya) Where he is to blame too is a tender believe in the middle way, not too much honest or dishonest. Big governments indeed are colossal and have responsibilities of continuity no one can imagine size or magnitude. Mr Cameron has stood in the middle and like the Russian novelist (Ivan Turgenev) has said, we stand in mud and reach for the stars, that too can be applied here for the Conservative- Lib Dem government in which it was both possible to have, the mud and the stars. An open oligarchy like Russia can or could understand that must have been a very hard choice to make for any western democracy and being the world's oldest democracy. How to make wrongs right after the general election in one and half day in Britain, well that depends on Mr Miliband and his stele by the river Thames. He should not waver from his promises, not one inch, one can only presume. That would be dangerous a path to take the country into.

When bombast England is fat and lazy. In other times Britain is slim and military. And only God knows what that means.

Don't they know it's Christmas when your country has turned into oligarchy? (Which isn't something that can be said of EU Member States)

01052014

Two defences are possible here when your country has changed to oligarchy and e.g. for countries within the EU as Member States and by Treaties can defend their reputation and country's integrity. It wasn't planned this way either by any sovereign Member State, like in today's world these are not the questions for politicians to answer to. But this question does nevertheless is a relative for future politics, perhaps what the English would call a last concern? Concerns as where to draw the lines on Defense and continuity of cooperation. This important aspect no EU Commission was ever aware of how one day their very existence could turn into a two edged sword for Member States, if for example they would deepen their questions on time and it's expiring laws when may occur and from where, or indeed where they could be going in the near and far future for the EU. Federalism in nature is not the same idea or thing as in oligarchy, one could argue. The economic climate has been the only chance so far for most anti EU governments in mainstream politics. This, they tell the voters, is the only way to turn back from the EU. (Following the coming election on 07 May next week in Britain does give you that impression) But isn't sovereignty by law a written document for the nation and should be able to find justifying ways to tell the nation where and when they kept 'out of becoming an oligarchy' without the people knowing? (Crime of high treason intentionally)

Who would have thought it: the EU Member States will not and could not be part of any self promoted sovereignty and to have taken a deliberate path to fortune to only favouring the brave of the nation... The only way to get back sovereignty can only come through that door, one can assume, because by nature that is proof beyond doubt not to have been part of any accomplice of a greater self by the few. Power does make and give that greater self in any oligarchy. Defending oligarchy also differs from defending sovereignty, which only the Prime Minister can be accountable and appointed for. For example that any Prime Minister in a country, where oligarchy has taken place right under the people's noses in broad day light, should explain why then the Prime Minister kept his electorate in the dark and promising dangerous paths for true believers of national government, that no one should enter a relationship with federalism of any sort and not to become a traitor of that nationalism. Doesn't that make oligarchy a crime of the century? And not in Russia, or Venezuela... For the timebeing there are no Member States wanting to go back from the EU into national governments and historic sovereignty, except for economic reasons. And that strenghtens many oligarchies, don't you think so?

Arabian nights' style...

28042015

It looks an impressive construction sight when seen from all engineering heights in places like Abu Dhabi, Dubai or other. 30 Years of progressive ties with westernized Arab elites at home and global leaders or the leading industrial G7/G8 (until 2014) nations, it's realization is here for the whole world to come to the Middle East and admire it's newest look. But what does this really reminds you of, when walking through the main doors? Is it not a strange environment 'to come home to' literally, instead of going back to ancient times in glory? Arabian Nights' style architecture would today have been like a miracle to gaze upon for any tourist, and make the natives a proud people. There isn't much study done on the real wishes and environment of the nation's investment in hiring employment, self respecting engineering and architecture firms, from overseas. In Babylon there is no 'junk furniture' from a camper style store in the west to find, you see. Why was this in the end more prefab than for example genius interior designing works? On the outside you see genius everywhere, but coming through the door there are halls that may have been to lead you to the dog kennels; in the western world when at the races, could be as impressive as the Royal Manege for horses sitting in their stables. Who do we blame for this success?

The east in the Middle East is another invitation that speaks to the inspiration of minds capable of constructing something of time and the flow of sand ripples through it's own timelessness, whether this is modern or classic Arabic style. In Turkey the Turkish nation always did manage a certain identity of the best of both worlds, whether from rural or wealthy Turkish life styles, or Asia Minor and Europe, and going further in history, modern or historical. If a strong eastern wind would blow through these elaborate and architectural wonders of the 21st century, a terrible hollow cry would echo from here to eternity, or as they probably would say in the Arabian peninsula, from here to Kingdom come. Haste is seldom good to plan architecture or engineering projects with an Arabian nights' style magnitude. Men in obscure twilight, riders on horses descending from out of nowhere, in white tunic, or so it glimpses, when sandwiched in between atmosphere and night winds, these are the inspirations for high thick walls and tall dreams, in and out. No one argues the need for modernization in Arab countries, and that is their proof of scienctific interest, but combined with prefab it is not rock solid progress really. Hope is that politics in these parts of the world are less hollow images and will be able to catch up with the rest of the world.

For more images (public opinion) go to Google, Interior designing penthouse Abu Dhabi.

Hillary Clinton that doesn't exist. The US should be talking about her instead.

16042015

Strike the balance somewhere if there is one. If there isn't one perhaps the 'dirtiest' trick in precalculations is to invent one, in the same way product engineers work on an idea that doesn't just yet exist. But it could be the next big invention tomorrow, is what they might say and start the new concept a.s.a.p.. Is it going to hurt Mrs Clinton, to hang about her political neck the long slope of years back when she was in several 'other' jobs near (when Republican) or in the White House administrations? It is the thing to do when she will run for the 2016 presidency. A tomorrow promise, still, and in it's fifth day freshly start campaign. Many have already aired some of their expert views, mostly Democrats and 'friends', that there is a small possibility within the standard margin, that she is the person who could become America's first female President in the year 2016, and with that send out a strong message to the rest of the world. That's a nice thought or real fiction. When America was dealing with only two parties world in the US, Republicans or Democrats, Americans could push their own America through Congress in any way they liked or took a liking to and no looking back was ever part of this world. These are silly ways to be looking at the Presidential campaign for 2016, one might say. Isn't the US a lot more bigger today? E.g. racism has become very complex where not only the case is for who is black or white, but more who has a job or not, as putting the final touch to the rattle snake's tail. And to put that high and mighty philosophy simply, could the presumably next president woman be a snake charmer and get people to vote her into the White House next year?

The Sun is setting hardest here for Mrs Clinton, in heartland America where it's home to all Americans, like the middle of their eyes. She will also be inheriting a derilict United States. Can she be doing that in her solo flight to the top job in the country she needs to reinvent or at least rebuild? If she makes promises to the people, the question becomes a search of the Holy Grail, what will she say to get them decide to vote Democrats and not Republicans, who in turn seem to be giving all Americans a flinter thin ribbon of what real Americans want from their government, and how they should be voting in a future America or the United States. A big sentimental theme and taken very seriously by many. Mr and Mrs Clinton are the people who probably deserve lot's of credit for their work in charity across the globe, helping many people to get started in places where there is no hope. Even in Kurdistan the people are aware of the Clintons. During Mr Clinton's career and presidency he has helped build impossible routes for people that were doomed to stay doomed in the unknown dust we seem to think can only be designated to the world and it's wilderness. But that's the easy part of being President of the USA. The hardest is when the president has to address the issues at home and where people expect a certain standard of life in return for their vote to make one man/ woman President over the world by far, or the most important American in the White House and country.

The Hillary Clinton of tomorrow's promise (to the Democrat voters) doesn't exist. And to make this woman the next American President, therefore, in a way isn't telling the whole story as intended the first five days for the Democrats. Mrs Clinton is about to get to meet her own Clinton Alphabet for the next 350 days, and touching one by one each and everyone in this. There are also 'some new things' going on in realtime politics...

Would Britain be more interesting with coalition of seven?

02042015/23:13 PM

Any outsider (that is outside England) can see a clear change in tonight's format of debate. It is well picked and addressing the people in a new way, by the number of seven, makes an interesting 'nail on the coffin' of the last government a few days ago? And I am an outsider living outside England, but not in Ireland, Wales or Scotland. Why it is typically British politics and so named within the EU and talking about immigration into the United Kingdom and stopping it in future governments, makes an odd statement to the rest of the world, that a. Britain is not really in touch with the present global system reality, and b. politics is a lot more decent than going to war as a union of nations against common enenmies, one would say or think. If Scotland should have Independence, reality only wants what is fair and square, or maybe not? But tonight's debate isn't about Scottish independence in the near future on such short notice... Political dynamics, one whispers, is a coalition of seven. And the people listen, in Wales, Scotland and Ireland, but now also England thinks nationally this one is an important debate that concerns all nationalists or the people in England. First and last in constant motion as time get's bigger and bigger. Seven does make a nice reference of anything that wasn't there before in England, yes, that too. Should T.E. Lawrence have anything to do with tonight's debate seven would have been the seven pillars of wisdom in British politics for the last decade or maybe even century. (Hope I got the name right, and it is not D.H. Lawrence, something totally different and not related to politics) Technically seven could also mean here is something new you have never seen before in British politics.

The surprise special effect: there are no seven wheels on this bandwagon, which many 'old timers' will let go of the odd one out of this group. And why? The answer to that question is simple: three is boring and an old concept. Seven is your new big picture and the global audience needs it if you want people to connect or keep Britain within all political aspects in modern day politics, was probably a quiet intention. The outside world would need a new challenge from Britain, don't you think so? That is of course if Nicola Sturgeon is making exactly that point to the Scottish people by taking Scotland to higher levels in politics, at home and 'abroad', locally and globally. She got there first, to be honest. It is time for England to follow something too that will not keep them isolated from the global audience during such a high profile election we are used  to hear from every fourth year/ term. But there are serious people too during this campaign of seven. Oh no, seven is fooling me and confusing Hollywood movie Seven with tonight's debate coalition format of seven politicians and different political parties from countries outside England...

On Twitter one can find enough tweets from journalists and political analysts telling the British audience what a global leader in the G7 tells his electorate on the British future. Good Night.

The Public is not naive. UK PM David Cameron is talking: "Can you tell me where I have left my spectacles besides on my head?"

31032015/21:25 PM

Humans have an extraordinary ability to sense defeat or who is going to be the next winner. It used to be that way a long while ago, especially in western politics, when the electorate was deeply engaged into the political parties and when there was no politician who without special favoritism was  a favorite that they wanted.  Perhaps it was what made centrist parties and politics up front and a strong desire to kill off the left or right, not literally, since the sixties? Europe had it's own time during the sixties, seventies and eighties... The people were a sovereign nation, they were demanding the hardest fights you could imagine, and the law that the hardest has every right made it look impossible for politicians to unite (coalition?) against the 'mobs' or rioters', most of them faculty students fighting one day to become a politician themselves. The May 2015 election, three or four decades later, now has a Prime Minister, either on a second or third term, and who was educated at Eton as a young boy. Also this Prime Minister has a double edged ancestry in his Tory veins, being one: Jewish on his father's side, and today in the Telegraph could be related to Kim Kardashian, thus being Persian as well as an English all man. But, manna will fall from heaven when Mr David Cameron needs his winning votes to beat Labour and Ed Miliband at this general election campaign. There is only one thing to dash all hopes linea recta to the political bins. And it is not the Liberal Democrats and their leader, Mr Nick Clegg. This time Mr Cameron or Mr Miliband are facing a tougher audience than ever was before in previous times. The public is not naive...

Why would the world need another Tory era when global business has been good as never before during the last four years under a coalition government in England? When the public will make their balance the time for voting won't be about a future with the Tory Party getting back in government with 'their' majority. Or even Labour cannot make that automatically something they will or could be tempted to get that side on board and form government. Of course, in British politics there is or could be nothing more sweeter thento have a fracture to make politician and politics come to that unique fate of taking decision or not taking decision at all, when too fractured. They have been doing so for hundreds of years, getting the wheel of paradox to be the wheel of fortune, on which they either get hanged or hang you, for mere (assertion) argument to make the best of politics in England only. The whole world may be a dead metaphor, for all they care in politics, but steps made by man and politics will not be mistaken for any other or sort... And this is the real England, one can assume when it is that time again, for Sherlock Holmes? The Prime Minister in England is facing a stonking dilemma: "It's the economy, stupid. So, what are you going to do about it, hey Fawlty?" Answer: "It's all bottom with you Americans, isn't it?"

Hard to see the wood through the forest 'Benyamin Netanyahu in government'.

23032015/23:25 Hours

Opening scene:

The patient is on the table. Question is: who is he/she and who will do the operation?  It's diagnosis clearly is a reference to both, surgeon and patient speaking privately, and this is the moment, not after the operation but before. A third term for a Benyamin Netanyahu government came out the political operation theatre a winner to live once again and be in control of Israel and Israelis as the third time Prime Minister. Israel has only one goal, when on the Jewish side of Mr Netanyahu, and leaving no room but a narrow stroke for the opposition to catch up with his speed. This future is Israel. And this future is about what Israelis want. This future also has walled itself against the Palestinians in the last election, 17 March 2015. It's perhaps simple logic to see where the majority comes from to have voted Mr Netanyahu back in government and his Likud Party, that this was not a Palestinian Prime Minister but Israeli and who was chosen as such, if you cut through the chase. It is serious business for the Israelis that here they have chosen as much as for 'nothing changes'. Israel needs global security and so far Mr Netanyahu has provided this from the 19 th into the 21st century for Israel, is really a remarkable achievement. If anyone is disgusted by that something entirely different must be going on there. What does the world understands de facto from a country like Israel?

The outside world hardly understands Israel for yet again another simple reason when looking hard to find one that will not isolate the Jewish people on the basis of it's 'remoteness' in the rest of the world. Politically, for example, there is simply no remedy found overnight to cure all ills when this long standing Israeli government has skipped all political content from the purpose to secure Israel against not only enemies who want to destroy the Jewish people living in Israel for sixty years in modern history, but in terms of establishment the world believes that not much of it's first days as a State is left to go by and create yet another future with the government under Mr Netanyahu. He is the Prime Minister who will get to know the burden of carrying the blame and maybe in the long term adding shame to it will become unavoidable at one point, if history is still a writing on this planet. The US is now frequently being mentioned as Israel's only ally for decades. Or vice versa. Mr Netanyahu should know better: foreign relations are the job a Foreign Minister must be doing, in whatever democracy. And the Prime Minister will do his job as the Head of State of Israel. And so forth, and so forth. The point now today is not to create a fine written diagnosis or anthology on Mr Netanyahu's wrongs and rights on stele or as a curiosity outside politics, but more on the question it is who will do the operation to save this patient could be the best choice of words. Where is Mr Netanyahu's driving mechanism going to come from in a third term as Prime Minister?

To think you know Israel is to choose for Mr Netanyahu as Prime Minister? To think you know Israel is to choose for Mr I Herzog as opposition leader? What more do you need to know?  End scene.

Small miracles still  do happen  in Russia: the Russian President is back and holding steady

16032015

A visible President like Mr Putin to be alive after everyone in the world had signed him off as dead is always the best remedy to quell ill fathomed rumors, some even sincerely worried still do not make a difference in this crowd. Today one can read about his come back with amazement how he survived for ten days of absence from public attention and being in Office. A die hard line remains skeptical or even suspicious that the President Mr Vladimir Putin is fooling the public somehow over his health and with his appearance today. How is this relevant? That the President is still alive remains the only relevance as Russia's incumbent President and doing this being alive. The military drills throughout strategic territories inside and outside Russia are another plan, maybe. Something interesting was said today by Mr Putin, that the boost of $356 billion (?)for the military is meant to extend into the end of this decade. Military capabilities seem priority and on alert or readiness and that is not explaining too much why the Russian military is looking for combat alertness for the next ten years. Is there a real challenge by foreign powers on the shores of Russia? Privately we will never know when over the age of 60 years old.

Relevance is on and key word in the military terminology. Russia, the EU, Nato and allies perhaps are working on it either to prevent a final showdown or confrontation of some proportionate challenge. We have to trust that the armed forces in the world involved will know what is necessary to maintain safety and security in the world as we know it. The planet hasn't had this tension done before with a split level down the middle within the EU. Smaller Member States with little fighting experience at a large scale as West versus East in Europe will be especially alarmed at such prospects in fighting moods. But in the end they will get there, let's say at the end of this decade? Also politicians today over 50 years old might not last that long in office either or could 'disappear' altogether from the living world and leaving behind no one to understand what may come still as a surprise by then: World War III. With the Russian President back at work there is still a slight hope the world will change for all nations. Do we know what that might implicate?

In theory: where has the Russian President V P gone to since 4 March last week?

12032015/23:31 hours

From the weird to bizarre, the mindful to the mindless, Russia has again managed a different move out of the books of many tactical decisions lately, now letting the Russian President be known to have disappeared from the public scene now over a week. Boris Nemtsov and his assassination has been sandwiched in between then and today, and in the last hours today a real national crisis is ready to go out from Moskou and where people are wondering where their 'strongman' and President, Mr  Vladimir Putin, has gone to and why this was  kept a tight secret from them, for days now. Also in the news with pictures from the Russian Space Industry are three cosmonauts who have returned home safe from ISS today. Nothing out of the usual USSR or normality in Russia was ever lost for too long, nor will it be so today in the Novo- Russia of Vladimir Putin... The President as speculation suggests has been taken ill and some suspect the old foe here was a cardiac arrest, or mild stroke. The world doesn't know yet whether these rumors reflect anything real on the Russian President's health at this stage. It is however a wonderful chance for speculation and conspirators together to get something out of it. But the buzz is catching on quickly and spreading it's buzzing sound across the worldnews in terms of nanoseconds that what if the President of Russia Vladimir Putin was...

Ok. There is logic to that. To understand the public one must study the logic with which the news catches on in the public domain quickly. It's an interesting curve for the night. But we can also believe it to be true, for medical reasons this can happen to the best of us, just anyone, in the big metropole or bush. Heart attacks are a very common condition most people today are living with or learn to. To the Russian President there is no exemption from natural illnesses. He is the President of Russia, not immortal and living in an oil painting on canvas in the Kremlin! Or else, it is serious when due to sudden illness if Mr Putin was taken off his duties as President of Russia. An ulikely scenario considering the making of this President took an incredible leap in 2014 under his Presidency and was given to him in a personal name across the globe: the man who took Crimea (back from Ukraine). He is now a legend of the 21st century whether in the flesh or not. I hope that he is still around and can come back to public life to give his account what or why the President in Russia in the height of International interest it was necessary to leave Office for a few hours. If not, theory will win the day for a long while to come. You see, there is a saying in Hebrew: better a dead dog than a dead lion. And this is still very true in our world today. Especially if superstition tells you the ghost story (not the host story) how the dead spirit of lion or bear has only terrible consequences for the living. In Europe ghost stories about dead bears and lions go far back in Neanderthaler's days...

"Russia's involvement in the civil war in Ukraine." First time I read this, if I'm correct. And that's a clarity sadly too late as now this was for BN

28022015

A civil war (article Bloomberg) is a tight security and uninviting to any outsiders. That should have been clear to Russia, the US and EU first degree politics and global politics. Without mentioning of a 'civil war' in Ukraine after Maidan, to seperatists on the one side and Ukraine on the other, this wasn't clear then and there, last year after first ceasefire agreement between the newly elected government of Mr Petro Poroshenko and Moskou. In the article by Bloomberg on the death of Mr Boris Nemtsov, for the first time the 'civil war in Ukraine' became form and order by the sudden death of the opposition leader in Moskou. It is sadly too late, for a civil war in Ukraine would always be a dangerous adventure in realtime politics if another 'spring' of revolution would have taken place and accuse the Russian President Vladimir Putin of 'involvement' in the 'civil war' in Ukraine. A reckless killing with multiple answers or questions of Mr Nemtsov last night, friday 27022015. It is also putting the Russian President in a bright spotlight with many on the other side not knowing what might happen now, when and if the lights are turned off. A political blackness of darkened hours to follow after the shooting of Mr Nemtsov in Moskou. Sovereignty goes both ways, for Ukraine and Russia in a proper balance of politics. And democracy makes strange moves, especially when sacrifices are it's demand.

This is no time for looking back on times when Mr Nemtsov was a political voice and critic of the former Soviet rule style, even if he was praised by western politicians e.g. Margaret Thatcher, the late former PM of the Conservative Party in Britain. A long historical line of Russian politics is followed after this shooting and murder of the late Mr Nemtsov. Why many concentrate on the shooting in Moskou as related to Ukraine contradicts the words read in the Bloomberg article this morning, that Ukraine is in a civil war. Question is who sent out the invitations? In the classical sense a civil war is purely domestic politics and opposition factions at war with the people underprivileged or angry with the presentation of their government e.g. concerning deterioration of the economy and mass unemployment. In democracy a civil war is a civil war, and is so by law and order within that frame. When the Russian seperatists are the opposition in east Ukraine, and fighting Ukraine government forces, that is war and not civil war, or anything else by law. Russia is very literate on law mattters, one can assume...

If provocation, as spokesman Mr Dimitri Peskov in the Kremlin says, a series of widening investigations should take place. Even to eternity in writing?

World Trade is our global economic reality, not war.

24022015

If on this day, 24 February 2015, there is still no clear vision on what is the global economic reality in our world, that not war but World Trade, a new name must have been found for the coming time, say till the end of 2015 at least. Today even the Russian President Vladimir Putin is exhausted after one year of 'covert' war on his borders with Ukraine and the Ukrainian people in government and in the country, only to get back where he started from, home in Moskou. Mr Lavrov yesterday at the UNSC in his statement on the present situation between Russia, the west and Ukraine, has said something about what the west would like to have in the world over all, without actually admitting why Russia will have to retreat from that global ambition. In a more personal view one can assume that the world isn't ready to have a militarized world regime with only few nations onboard and designated positions over regions east, west, north and south in our present world pic. Politicians in western countries say that democracy might come back with a vengeance. Listening to David Cameron PM of the UK yesterday in his statement did address these issues slightly and delicately how democracy in action could still impose further punishment on Russia's economic world view...

Perhaps what the Russian President underestimated was that public opinion in the west isn't just statistics, but something deeper and existential. The public in the west is accustomed to a way of life and doing so from decade to decade, generation to generation since postwar WWII, there is no ending to this way to put it simply. That is what misunderstanding in our world reality means if in a sudden the Russian President would suggest otherwise. World Trade is massive and is probably the only force of the planet in an ongoing living world. If war was an argument in 2014 between Russia and the west as far as the USA, after one year how would this be defined in terms of relevance? Russia will have to take on the 'world view' if it wants to stay as a nation standing under the 'expansionists umbrella' and keep it's influence at this maximized dynamics for most leading nations and the G20. Not war, another simple otherside to the full pic in our world... Ukraine is not anyone's gateway to war anymore, after one year this month in February 2015. Taking Germany, as a way of fiction, now that would have been truly war by the law books of old militarized Europe. Even if that would have been in the 21st century.

In the meantime, thx to all leaders who are capable still as statesmen in this world and not go for fiction of war over fog of war...

The dynamics of war: US President tells President Putin 'It will cost Russia if supporting the rebels in East Ukraine doesn't stop'.

11022015

It was the first menacing  message after one year of escalating fighting in east Ukraine between rebel forces on the Russian side and Ukraine's defense forces. The President of the US now had spoken in a more direct and blunt manner and said that if Mr Putin didn't back down the US would consider aiding Ukraine with lethal weapons, one newspaper online had said yesterday. (Bloomberg.com?) The world is expecting a big bang or find itself cornered in between world leading powerful nations with restrictions to follow suit, if that happens. And that is a monumental IF. But the dynamics of war is already present and is giving leaders like Mrs Angela Merkel the heebie jeebies at this point of Russia not ready to de- escalate their support in east Ukraine to the rebel forces that remain the anonymous unit of fighting forces. Once again the world is standing at the crossroads of war and this time defining the war is taking leaders a longer time to resolve or even approach by definition of war in the 21st century. Russia is taking the long term road to nowhere, in the eyes of the west, while in Russia that could all be a mistake or error reading as a whole. For now the dynamics of war between the US and Russia can only be defined as 'helping' Ukraine's independence. Self interest seems a far cry and so is territory.

What the call to Mr Putin says is that we have only heard so far what the US President Mr Barack Obama told the Russian President on tuesday night, and not what the Russian President answered. Europe is changing slowly into a block of deterrence and it is hard to say at this point whether free will is involved or not. Greece wants to thrust out and said today in a sparkling message where it could be looking for other sources of financing Greece' s ailing ecnomic defeat. (Or self defeat) The global audience hardly notices anything wrong in our time or realtime between the world leading economic blocs. What could change Russia's mind on the path of changing the world as we know and see it? If the logic for the Russian President changes it will not come with a new offer of peaceful relation with Russia, if honest diplomacy has anything to do with it. Or it will go more deroded along this line as was the case before the annexation of Crimea, and if that is Mr Putin's view of the west in eastern European territory. The dynamics of war may be a whole new introduction of integrity of the eastern blocs in Europe and the EU ready to accept this outcome. If Mr Putin's change of strategic interests in Europe and countries near or far east, isn't that looking as if Russia is demanding new infrastructure of powers in the global system of cooperation between nations? And that is not a blunt message but one that attests life and the living of human kind in new proportions. It is ascetic when still immaterial.

Humanity, 99 % beef and 1 % Internet

30012015

A deliberate error reading snaps out of your system and tells you that is an untrue fact. But can you describe why and tell the world outside your angry solo mind what then is the truth? The whole world is swelling with knowing the truth and being objective on everything real- live situations can show you from instant images on the global networks on news channels. That equals 99% beef. Imagine what life on the planet would have meant if we had 99% Internet! And that from home computers, office computers or hands- on high tech gadgets. Our dream world is at war but from beef there isn't a chance you can cut out the 'bad piece' or in some cases the 'bad pieces'. Strange why in the end we will only find in truth the words by philosophers standing against time, like words from Hegel? Others might find religion at the end of their tunnels. The point here is that I am trying to make is that the chilling fact of mankind in 2015 isn't one of smoking the peace pipe any more, but it is putting lot's of emphasis on the smoke signal coming out from the chief's high built tipi/ teepee. And then, fact is that we are still beef.

Please, don't be insulted and think that only people can be beef. Politicians on the other hand are beefsticks. With special coating marinated to be fried in the pan and to be crunchy, if not wasted and thrown out back in the bin. God, wouldn't you like to know in the layers' end who enjoys all this feeding and be our planet tectonic leader? Trillions of generations would like to know why that is true, if earth is as large as that. In fact human nature has come to it's deep end. And God Almighty forgives us for not caring too much on being here where the world is now standing facing the stars from the edge. Peace is your worst nightmare or enemy in the world for some inexplainable reason in words of war explained. Perhaps Hegel was wrong, about the geen meadows of heaven and now living in the green acres of planet size land of Albert Einstein's? Mr Einstein opened all minds to the theory of relativity and that it was good. Now Mars is there, Venus, Saturn and other distant planets next to ours in close lunar or solar relation and we see this invention for a real fact of life, that for some reason being here makes other planets relative or relevant. And so is the Internet. A better than blood hard fact of science.

Please, surrender for humanity's sake and it's ancient God. And do not misunderstand me, that this is an idiot's wishful thinking. It is in fact the ultimate truth. Our world was built on sacrifice from days of old, from the hands and heads of lance and spear. Where is your sacrifice in the name of God and humanity? It is not even there as a farce. (Which many nobilities have indulged or wallowed in from time to time and for centuries long) How we miss the farce of sacrifice that even the heathen nation has known in all their abominations! Sometimes, war is the sacrifice king and country makes and God His mercy is won that day...

Destiny: je suis Charlie?

21012015

In medicine trauma is a strange mixture of sensation and first degree of anything going from death to multiple deaths. After je suis Charlie in Paris things are looking calm and reflection is best how to deal with the wounds caused by the shocking deaths of the cartoonists at CH HQ two weeks ago. Je suis silence in most EU Member States should be next or be the answer to what had happened in a fraction of seconds killing 12 people... In pathological order almost at an immediate moment what then also happened was the je suis juif protest in England. But this is one thing in Europe that does not need any introduction or story to tell the EU younger generation why making that statement is not meaningless for Jews and gentiles in central European States. The age in which we now live seems to have a few heartaches of it's own, but if any deeper the trauma could turn black and then who knows where that would lead to, some politicians say or fear. This is one to think carefully on before linked to destiny for more greater reasons. We know that Russia has tried to do this in 2014, and then failed the sprint it took as champion of so many 'gold medals' during it's tsaristic period in Russian- European history... In 2015 instead we are now facing a dull winter time and many 'open spaces' in politics that are standing in the cold political parking spaces and covered in blankets of thick snow.

European societies have changed in a fraction of seconds by the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris on 7/1/2015 in the early mornings, from Je suis Charlie to now je suis silence like a hymn by invisible masses of EU citizens. Is it possible to also have pathological order to pathological disorder when heavily traumatised by broad daylight massacre in a civilian place and changed to la place du mal? And that translated to plain English is as close to destiny we have ever come since when, many hundreds of years ago? Even world leaders attended the protest march held in Paris after the fatal multiple shooting on 07 January 2015 at Charlie Hebdo HQ. But one thing is sure: we don't want any more sacrifices being made by any civilian living in whatever EU Member State, to get him/ herself killed. Like je suis Charlie is a new wave of self expression, we should now stick to another one of EU solidarity for citizens and politicians of no more killings among EU citizens, still the youngest of it's making since the single currency was introduced in 2002, if I'm correct. (The Netherlands kept a close eye on developing world story as it was unfolded on the day and after the shooting in Paris, but politicians kept no 'stage public' or 'open to the public' over this tragedy)

Imagine Mr Putin if he had been the ugly leader no one wants to meet or see, his actions in Crimea would then have been condemned as ugly.

18012015

Posterity in Russia may have some worries that no one understands from any political or military point of view. Why are we obsessed with the Russian President and fail to act against him more objectively? Russians worry about life after Mr Putin, and if the west then would retaliate decisively more than they are now doing. In a world where face value is your own personal stamp on everything existential, that's a new dimension to existensialism, Mr Putin has won the prize leadership to all other world leaders in comparison. Russia cannot go back to men looking like Leonid Brezhnev or Boris Jeltsin. Hard men or a soft man with a drinking problem. If this holds any truth when Julius Caesar met with Cleopatra his destiny changed with her beauty and might in Egypt, the same goes for a man in our century, that here is a man with captivating blue eyes, blonde hair slightly streaking his head in an almost velvet manner, and having lips like violet red betimes, lips to kiss eagerly. That is what the world has become today, at least in Europe. He has taken Crimea, an ugly affair. But when taken by 'gentle persuasion' or the hands of a man soft as fresh white silk, can it really be that bad?

The west however still is busy trying to crush Mr Putin's silk mouth and takeaway the dark shadow he has cast on the planet. We are finding it hard to forget that Mr Putin is a communist leader and that his plans will not be like ours, for whatever future we can create in the west or a western 'free' world. If Mr Putin decides to become tsar tomorrow, yeah, why not? Do we know any other world leader so greatly admired for his handsomeness? The role that he is playing as President of Russia, my God, is really cut out so well for him, I would say. You think of love and not war when you hear him speak out... You should watch his mouth cutting smooth and polished his every exclaimed word. Life after Putin will be ugly. Which btw doesn't mean that there is no strong man/ leader to lead Russia back to the future. When we say Russia we then mean a man like Mr Putin. Mind you, when I say handsome I still mean to say that his high Office is his tailorshop. All other 'princes' in Russian politics and the military, well, how can I put it, are like 'false' princes? (BTW also the name of a fairy tale of the orient) Had for example, and thank God Almighty for that, Adolf Hitler been as beautiful Nazi Germany would have lasted for some time longer...

Manners maketh the man in Mr Putin's case makes a strong argument for his future to stay on alive and the President of Russia. And fate mysteriously also bestowed upon him special gifts for Russia and maybe also for Europe? And as Sebastian would say, "You can't hang me, Mr President, because you are too beautiful to me..." (Little Britain episode)

Europe is going through a rather bad phase at the moment, maybe thinking, what are we? Men or kites?

16012015

How remarkable when the young say they must have it all in a strange accent of attitude only. In Europe this is a common thing, shared by most young people in all EU Member States. The future seen through their world gazing eyes tells you enough to worry, when you're old and wise, non parent or parent. The older generation is worried about Europe, you can tell. Politicians are stepping out of their modes, and so are many other secure institutions from behind their desks/ desk jobs. Paris and Belgium are in a state of emergency cell breaking of terrorists who were caught planning another ugly scene of terror in the streets in these big cities. To most of EU citizens Paris and small miniature Belgium are big cities, from underneath the gates to Hades to the surface of history in real life today. The terrorists were killed. Verviers in Liège can now again press the button on emergency again. In Paris this morning at the trainstation Garde de'Lest a bomb threat was cleared from midst crowd and rush hour. Arrests were made and no shootings have been fired at anyone. These are unusual stories in our time when you take a look at the other side where life continues as always. Are we becoming paranoid?

Jewish schools in Europe are on high alert. We are seriously missing something if not all to see that this is even more unusual than the here above. Russia in Ukraine launched fresh attacks in rebel area east Ukraine, or this was seen happening according to reports from a journalist in the area. Nato had responded in a rapid manner... The world has stopped smoking cigarettes but wars and the killing of citizens are as mad. Fancy finding Mr War here, among ordinary mortals! And looking so smug. Europe isn't ready just yet to see it your way. It has eyes of it's own and is looking desperately going it's own way. This might take another 50 years, but in the end they will come to their good sense and radio- talk to the people, that now is the time when country and nation should be thinking about the future and destiny. The government is beaten and it needs it's people/ this nation badly in a time like this? (Winston Churchill had done the same radio talk back in WWII) Yes, all talk and radio power, but who exactly is it that the people should be fighting and save the country? Ah, too proud to beg, hey!

France or is it now which France? The killing of decent humanbeings will leave you one day with the uncivilized as a majority...

10012015

tThe uncivilized as a majority? When that happened the last time it was the rise of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Armed Forces. What soiled mind would want that to happen again? A self belief knows it's limitations, let's say when you are part of a good upbringing and your background is rather endowed with the riches of the better class... Once that path is broken with peers from other privileged backgrounds, you are bound to be left alone first on your own and left to the invisible mankind outside the gates of your riches. And if that mankind is in any way angry or can't see you as one to fit in their dens or slumps, this will be a strange majority to deal with, as they only know how to destroy what they will never have or get 'for free'. Kings are terrified of mankind when and if they have turned the tide or fortunes of his kingdom. While the serfs go on who in future are the long awaited politicians, they will observe and thank God on their bended knees for times that have changed. This is European sentiment and we are getting closer to it with every shock that falls on it's people schock- breaking. Adolf Hitler remains a good example after all for something even more terrible than when he rose from the soil of the earth to taste the salt of blood.

As we know in our world there is for every innocent blood killing a higher price to pay. And if the majority is some kind of witness to these killings but have to remain silent, in fear of their own lives, isn't the cue than not clear where or which way your fortune will end? To kill satirists by what order or rank was this a good decision? The wine for kings is kept in cellars tons of it. One day that is meant for kings to drink with other kings. There is no king who can drink alone and is left to do this with beggars he loathes. Each and every nation has it's own nobility in the State and defending that State in the armed forces. Small or great countries and nations alike. Killing innocent (unarmed) citizens in another country than your own is not serving the nobility of your nation and country, wouldn't you rather say? That is what killed off Nazi Germany in the world forever. There is simply not building a 'good reputation' in the world with atrocities committed against mankind for reasons of vanity and vain glory. And it is precisely this vanity that will condemn any man in his vain glory as one who impersonated himself to be the emperor de jure. Imagine your life sentenced out of the life de jure? It is called the 'black mob' unfaced and unmasked.

Europe has been bought with wealth and their wealthiest, but sometimes Europe by reputation in history can also be bought with bloodshed. And they will not be looking for native Americans where there is no spoils of war to get, but poverty. (My late mother was Indian) To escape fate is quite a rare thing if such miracle befalls you. If not, one can only woe, you see.

Europe has a new landlord: violence in the streets

07012015/before midnight

On the 7th day in the first month of the new year, January 2015, this terrible crime has caused enormous impact throughout Paris, Germany, Great Britain, and many other European Capitals. The crime on Charlie Hebdo and satirists of the magazine Charlie Hebdo in France. Ms Anne Applebaum, wife to Polish Foreign Minister, Mr R Sidorski, tonight has made a comment on twitter and audience, that she thought Europe was gone. As simplistic as that or an emotional arrest of real political life in Europe? Also men stood with rocket launchers in broad daylight in a street in Paris and facing a Police car approaching. This became the global picture of the day and the whole world kept their eyes fixed on this instant image of hard core reality in Paris. 12 People have been mentioned dead as an immediate result of the men with the AK47's rifles seen carrying and shooting their innocent victims, from a civil point of view.

The world had with this terror attack in a quiet side street in Paris a genuine shock through their ordinary civil lives again, after last time in Norway Utoya in the year 2011. It is just shock and horror in heartland 'real Europe' for a whole day now. And the citizen is just free without any unionist sentiment in his/ her body, except when shot down/ gun down by terrorists. It is all a mystery why the terrorists had to pick this day. There is almost a sense of symbolism reaking from the tragedy of these dead people, if we only knew where it came from. Allah is Great and why He had to choose such sharp an angle in Paris small streets can only make Him indeed great on very detailed eyes. And it is a scary detail from any unilateral point of view. How human lives can and do get lost like splinters in our century is a very real threat in life today, as was demonstrated in Paris early morning of 07 January 2015 at HQ Charlie Hebdo. We all like satire, irony in plays, but death is another thing. (Ancient Greece had tyrants) Ms Applebaum is perhaps right from a rational point of view that Europe is gone, but if Europe has a new landlord in violence and death out in the streets you can't be too sure and that includes the law.

The world is not up for challenges. It is more of a long breath journey.

28122014/21:49 PM

Today in the news: ferry capsizes from Greece, and Air Asia behind it's dense clouds in the winter sky has lost a plane during the night. We are having bad weather conditions everywhere in the world, due to the winter season in it's iciest peak. Of course, apart from regions where sub tropical or tropical weather remains untouchable to the severity of climate and season cycles. Asia is fortunate to be a great part tropical and if a higher platform sub tropical, or going even higher when in the Himalayas. Tibet is in the high mountains, next to China and Japan's 'Kilimanjaro' Fuji. The ISS with it's 'better view' of these regions can make impressive pictures to send to earth where most of the news stations get their prime pics for the news release in Real Time. The news about an hour ago has put all countries on the alert for survivors on the ferry, or off, and search parties that will go back to search for the 'missing plane', soon as the light of day comes up again. Experts like rescue teams have excellent staff and technology superiority for situations in freak weather conditions at their best and ready to do their job. The world has no worries there. But if the here above was written or rewritten only for military or political purpose, that alone would be something of an alarm going off red hot, while the public is kept out from the disaster areas or places where these horrific stories unfold...

Fortunately for me I have nothing to do with anything close range military or political in my ordinary life. There is a big IF when writing about the world and challenges beyond our ordinary lives in the global community far and near. Time is getting more interesting as the hour of end 2014 is approaching. Land, sea and air, if frail these are territories a watchful International world has a plan with for 250 or more industrial years and it will not allow anyone or people to fickle with as much as a hair's breadth. The understanding is out of all ordinary lives but is permissive when governments and nations go with this understanding to the end of the world. (Many modern day prophets believe the year 2014 was the beginning of the end days of our world only just starting) One year from now, end 2015, the simple truth has gone already out by telling the world that nothing will change much from this year, and that it will stay exactly the same as in 2014. And the previous years. The world is not up for challenges in any one man show. No, better, the world's new generations only believe in computer science and technologies. Man and machine now has that bonding of what used to be father and son/ mother and daughter- thing. Communication can save lives literally from anywhere in the GS System that we have come to know. Or your mobilephone. (The Red Cross earlier this year asked it's Twitter audience whether modern technology can save lives) Unlike home consumers, e.g. if I use modern technology and only send a tweet into the world saying: Layla, Happy New Year 2015...

QZ8501 and it's disappearing is recurrent because Malaisya has been in the news this year two more other times...

If there is something particular between Russia and Germany, the world outside is even more particular, or getting there.

16122014

There is very little point in fact checking the world out- or inside Russia and Germany in the following sentences here. On the bright side we could be looking at something very fascinating in an equally very long time, since WWII aftermath, or in reality there is a war banquette no one wants to attend or go to, no nation, no country, in fear of posterity or what we know as future time. Is it war or not? Thousands of people are still stuck with conventional ideas of war. The younger generations are not and they know that war is just a frequency somewhere up there... A pic of the Russian Venus landing was in the news earlier on. Globally war means time beyond time. What can make sense from 'war slogans' like that? The moon is sharp like an ancient Persian sword with a name, and cutting through stars where night is still sanctified... The younger generations have even much bigger ideas now of the living species that they are known for wherever this is. And they respect the Army Police or military always at a safe distance. Life can only get bigger, where one half is either there to serve the country, while the other is present or there to respect these forces. You can't be sentimental and dream of equality, humanity or world problems. Here the kids only know money or having money making dads. The outside world is therefore truly 'outside', where kids tag Russia or Germany as cool or 'so un-cool'.

Russia and Germany from their heritage time in Europe and East Europe are uniform people. Not cool or uncool. And maybe they are the ones destined to arrive first at the war banquette? If so you have to be taking this with a great deal of attention very seriously and not pretend you are too rich to care. Pre- war is not the same thing as post war writing. Peace, for example, for 70 years was the 'room' for most countries and their leaders to be part of, in Europe and overseas. That became a lasting alliance of trust and rebuilding that trust Internationally as well as between the European nations. It is a paradox but Germany contributed an enormous role to peace, by being past and present. The German new generation of politicians would spend their whole diplomatic lives on renouncing German mentality, while promoting it's engineering genius in specific industrial areas. Transparent with peers everywhere in the world they had created a sense of cooperation for good and bad reasons and put their old uniform away in the curiosity cabinet from all human eyes. Germany today is still a global leader and G7 country. Like Great Britain still is. In 2014 conclusion days it is still not very clear how the G8 became the G7 and left no trial behind. But as the younger generation would say, war is just a frequency, a trial is no written trial.

MXM 2014

Can humans still decide to go to war, yes or no?

03122014

There is a global atmosphere imagination of going to war or war of the worlds. For to make this something to understand by the global audience it is perhaps better to put it simply and make an estimate projection of the parts the imagination became a committee of war fantasy mongering, and than try to 'get it out in the open' in the room just before you'll be heading for the lounge/ bar. Very much like the Airport, do humans decide to fly these machines in our modern time and technology? But, true, it takes to be some kind of super human being to understand the present time war machineries sliding through the high skies like a silver blade and razorsharp up to the mm. That for any giant machine in speed or flight is as true as lightning or thunderbolt striking over the whole of the city. Imagine our world with armies around the globe with forces like that, what then would you say about humans and for being decision makers? No turtle dove is worth sacrificing the animal for any impossible war of inhuman fantasy! And what's in it for them who control these giants? Let us imagine for one tiny fraction of a second, that they are ready to go to war for a. dominance of the whole of the earth, or b. to take control of all nations alive in Real Time living on earth. Still a big deal?

In places where human beings are still going to war on a one to one basis there are now various names available with a strong sense of scale. 1. Conventional war, 2. Regular Army, 3. Insurgents, 4. Separatists, 5. Ministry of Defense, and so forth. (Should we put NATO on the list?) That's how the ball of confusion runs the military at the moment in some places on earth. (Be it low profile or high profile... Never tell a Turk  thathe is a Turk...) Super humans and it's 'former selfies' of the 19th century do not share records or history as a group or even as separate groups. But it costs nothing. Except where human rights are seriously being ignored through violence, bloodshed or horrific deaths. If there is still a God we should then desperately try to find Him in the middle way or preferably through it's infernos. That one day might come in handy and probably put mankind first to giant machineries! We would like to say 'farewell' to mankind, one way or another. After reaching the stars there might just be that one moment of earthly flashback retrospect of your primitive human mind to just say one thing or for 'old times sake' say it once: "Hello...", while the other side is a lifeless distant blue light in the sky... Modern warfare started long ago, in the 50ties perhaps. Like medicine in the classical sense patent or medical laws, only when the prescription speaks old and has Latin or Greek origins in the cure or composition, that is medicine. All the new pharmacies are synthetic. Effective, yes, but still synthetic. I believe personally that the Vigilante could tell us a few things when first it tested it's high altitudes and broke the records. But that could be just because I'm sentimental. Does mankind want a fantasy war? Globally that is a big 'Yes' based on intelligent and social thinking. But does mankind would want the real war/ thing? I think that everyone with a conscience in his body or under his/ her skin will answer with a giant ballooning "No!". (We have families, mortgages, a business to run or kill...) That's all I wanted to say tonight.

Spoken words are better at the end of the year...

Verba volant, scripta manent

24112014

At the present time there are some rumours 'flying' across the media floor of global proportions how politicians take the global 'center stage' to air their comments or decision making sabre rattlings and time is ticking. From hearts and minds the clinical mind has set it's momentum on wounded hearts and disturbed minds this week in several regions, east or west, that now has become the time to either drop all the hard work after the millennium global targets or the world should decide to get it across the end line of 2014, let's say in theory for abstract reasons. Sometimes the public finds it hard to understand how deeply 'disturbed' global politics can be in our century when for example no leading world nation can build on a future when staying outside in isolation from the rest of the world... These are what they seem to know as 'global proportions'. 20 Years ago there used to be psychological disadvantaged countries on the one side, while on the other they had the more advanced psychological countries. Now 20 years later these co- junctions have become the dangerous T- points on the face of the planet, with governments in the east, far or Middle, to take primo advantage from their historical position and raise their own bar of policies to create gravity or territorial physics of some kind. Both east and west are working closely to see whether it is the future direction for Asean success or failure.

But Real Time is also making headlines in the news around in the world, like for example where public unrest is our daily routine... That is a phenomenon and unstoppable in a world full with people, 60 or 70 bln if we follow world map statistics. A few examples: the Ferguson shooting, terror in Jerusalem and other killings within the fields of civil life in big cities. The universal human being is created in our time and globalization has given them confidence enough to use this incredible opportunity when they are smart humans. In the year 2014 that was the reason for Russian President Vladimir Putin to 'retreat' from further 'invasion' of western democracies, like once did Nazi Germany because of harsh winters in Russia. At some point every mortal has his limits and the place to fiind your destined end. For Presidents and Prime Ministers western democracies in it's long tradition of being the Head of State for only 1 term, the limit to each turn or term is often closed to challenges of the first or second term presidency. The Pentagon or NATO are rotational and no political Party, Democrat or Republican, can be in power in this independent institution or organization. After all there is no telling when a war or World War may break out! For the end of this year one can only assume that sub categories of war in different regions are playing a key role but in the end will not influence to be a dominant factor between the world leading nations and the G-20 nations. That's hope.



Russia ruse in top of the tree?

09112014

Overnight BBC Online news says there has been heavy shelling again in east Ukraine, the region of Donetsk. Earlier during Saturday yesterday AP warned that a heavy convoy of armed vehicles and tanks were approaching the borders of Ukraine. And Russia has no information on this. It denies it is sending any military force into the neighboring country. The shelling during the night lasted for at least 8 hours, the article online said this morning. It is still early morning, Sunday 9 November 2014. There are one or two things to read from this, or if you have watched Russia and Ukraine closely for the last 11 months, what it means to break the 9 September peace agreement and resume fighting. Apart from the death toll on both sides this is not exactly saying that Ukraine is in any sort of danger to be invaded and taken back by Russia, as it seems when comparing the situation in February earlier in the year. Tactically from the random viewer's position coming back to the scene of battle with fresh military rebels (military on leave), significance doesn't blink in the eye. Tactics to impress the west is in the back and to turn their heads to Ukraine fighting Russia in resumed fire power is difficult. For the last three months from august on the world has been focusing on Iraq, the Kurds, Turkey and the Middle East where ISIS poses serious threat to the region. Ukraine was out of focus. Except to German Foreign Minister Herr Frank Walter Steinmeier. In few headlines in Social Media the German Foreign Minister did keep his attention on Ukraine and said so. World opinion is a fragile thing once it can move on to the next hot topic of world affairs, Kobani? Ukraine is done and dusted off their minds and clothes. What can that mean in terms of capitalizing on human opinions?

Mr Putin has pulled the screen up again and turned his back on the patient... How he decides on his thorough examination of the patient having been in and 'outsight' in close contact with communication, we can only guess at the moment. But it is significant if Ukraine falls again in the Russian takeover of the country. Once or twice when a former republic of the Russian Federation falls and fails to establish 'real' contact with the west or EU, in this mass the centre European idea will take shape of any kind. To start there was no point of transition made in the meanwhile. Timing has been sorely neglected by the west and too long a delay made it more critical for Ukraine to move away from a heavy handed Russia. (Compare with Florida if it ever took independence to join Russia overseas in a total different country and language) Inside the 70 year world old view of International Law the west has failed to adequately support Ukraine on the world stage publicly and also to emphasize the advantage of having this particular country on the side of the West and EU. No one is sure that the world would have understood Ukraine's strategic importance to the west put in terms of honesty. There wasn't any but in the minds of writers and journalists. And that is serious recklessness and if this has happened before in the region in eastern Europe, no one can tell how that might affect political leaders if Russia undertakes a more aggressive 'come back'. And whether that makes sense to any western thinker is beside the point. Russia's chastisement of the former republics is a mother Russian act of love. In Ukraine that will show again how public humiliation awaits all the disobedient 'children'... (Your intestines are not like theirs)

For now there is nothing more to say why Russia is back in Ukraine on a non official visit. If the Cold War returns it means de facto that Ukraine is about to fall and then the bloc is sealed off again. (But I could be terribly wrong and do forgive me)

Envisioning Kurdish ascension to power in the north of Iraq raises many questions

03112014

From the many examples in recent history (not digital history) the best to take is from Egypt and Israel, 1977. The two nations had been at war for too long and when the time was right throughout the world, peaceful nations wanted more and were looking for economic integration, the Late Mr Anwar Sadat did not hesitate to make peace with his and Egypt's former foe next door, Israel. In front of the whole world one was able to watch this heroic moment and ceremony when arrived in Israel. Back to our century looking at nations in the Middle East in general what in fact is it that one sees is never asked, not in the west and neither in the region. Two Middle Eastern nations in the 70ties, are they any different from e.g. Turkey and Kurdistan? And the Kurds any different from Iran, Syria or Israel? If anyone still remembers in the former generation, wars between Israel and Egypt were never political wars. The aim was to kill as much enemies on the other side. And vice verse. But how human aspiration for peace could be made impressive for lasting memory and generations to come, is when both nations stood at Camp David with then US President Jimmy Carter, where peace was a handshake on International ground. And raising the symbol of International forgiveness for all bloodshed forever gone into the earth. Another two nations making peace in the Middle East after the 70ties did not get back to Camp David again, unless PLO leader the late Mr Jasser Arafat and Israel Prime Minister Menahim Begin followed in the same steps with the Oslo Accords. (Norway) Kurdistan with a population count of 30mln people is/poses a serious question on Humanity. And up to now perhaps Turkey has been unable to envision the Kurdish coexistence next to their population numbers due to the more introvert ways for too long. For this it has failed to the needs of the Kurdish people in the greater society of Turkey to meet it more extrovert. 20 Years ago the Kurdish people were still unknown on the global stage and it was almost certain that they would stay a dispersed people much longer than anyone could have estimated from the Gulf War on in the 90ties. This is what makes peace an impossible dream when Turkey and the Kurds should go it alone with no end goal envisioned. An end goal to both nations will remain still born in blood if the chance for life is never given or put inside between private persons representing the peace process agreement or resolution. Not a good prospect at a time like the present one, with the need to calm down first after the latest over Kobani...

Strangely enough both nations are sitting down envisioning perpetually what the other should be or not. In a crisis what happens is that there is nothing to go for but staring at each other while the crowd is being exposed to violence and violent restraint. And from these clashes and the spilling of blood the outside world can only conclude this is not a natural love affair between Turks and Kurds anywhere and period. All acts of violence have been created with selfishness or out of it and pushing out public opinion further away from the Kurdish problem in Turkey. Will they ever reach Camp David or Norway in time when peace is finally agreed? Maybe. The International world on 1 November on Saturday has made it very clear that from now on the Kurdish nation needs support from the International bodies for human rights and recognition as a people. Which in a vision of peace should mean that Camp David could be the answer on the question for Kurdish autonomy and that Turkey shakes hands with the new order between the former 'foes'. Would that make a great moral end story? If you are a Middle East expert the answer would be no. There is a harsh reality of wars everywhere raging on and on in the Middle East as we speak, with no clear intervention strategy even when approved by the west. Kurdistan remains for now a vertical projection and will have to wait for another century before reemerging back to earth's surface. And with the strangling of Turkey's political tie around it's neck over Kobani and it's hardlining condemnation of political terrorists in the PKK, PYD or other, intervention to defeat ISIS in Kobane becomes the strangest question ever put to Turkey by the looks of things. And each demanding to digest quickly.

From the top view one can only look down and say that Kobane was a masterly move and it's potentcy can only be that of a military outcome. And with Turkey at the centre this is the first time the Middle East has encountered with an incredible large scale change of times. In Europe only Russia is feared to make a move like that from a technological point of view. The Question is why? (I am no Middle East expert)

World 2015 predictions back to the old days before 2014? Or just yearning?

01112014

Russia as we see it today went through great length in modern history and century to be a little more specific what has been seen for 70 years as Peaceful nations once but now isn't the same thing anymore. Take for example the MH17 disaster above European ground and in European space. Plane crashes are common in most parts of the world, but in European space high above 3000 ft is uncommon and can only be alarming. Annexation of Crimea should fit history pages but this too is inexplainable and in peace time as G7+1, and with Russia as the one year Presidency in 2014, European air has become like thin ice foil and no one having any idea how to approach the sudden change. These are young or the youngest experiences in the continent and going beyond. A very strong characteristic to all this is what the change brought the nations back to and forced a few old things out that they had forgotten, as in German Foreign Minister Mr Frank Walter Steinmeier's own words how Europe has forgotten what it was to be at war. This is an important question. Can Europe go back to business as usual? In our century both yes and no are our answers to all life questions in whatever part of the greater society you are living in. We are now more and definitely coming to terms with human dualty/ dualism (coined by Mr Balkenende in the previous decade during his time in government/ parliamentary debates) or ambivalence many ancient philosophers have tried to blot out. Unless, of course, it serves a great purpose in war and politics. Predictions for 2015 outside the global economics Pagoda will still be unpredictable to a certain degree. The President of Russia, Mr Vladimir Putin, in his 'unplanned' mission has created the new monster with an unusual pointy fore-head that could be anything but human. Europe will have to learn to live with this deformity or take corrective measures and surgically remove all ugly bits and pieces on the creature to make it look like a creature from Schopfung, a unicorn? The world machinery does not do emotions but will definitely repulse the living creature, beast or not.

By mid 2015 in Real Time today still feels like the wet spring ending one does not really hope for in these times. Sweden this week has taken, also, an unusual step of officially recongnizing the State for Palestinians. November 2014 cannot be like the previous years in november, or can you only feel this when sensitive nature tells you so? Peace should be stronger in our time and not just Foreign Relations expansion. And there is a simple explanation for this assumption. The 21st century is more smarter and an honest report says that when children at the age of 5 already know how to work on the tablet how to spend their day searching for programs to fill their leisure time, we know this is the future and smartness in our time. Peace therefore should not be impossible, if the world keeps on insisting there is life beyond earth's boundaries and can be found in distant places in our universe. These sciences are now creating a different humanity that has outsmarted all of human life before. Thinking in battle order one could say, is outdated? The clever thing is that you can't tell or say what it has been replaced with. And perhaps common sense tells you another thing that this is how it should be, that life is great when kept in suspension. A condition that can only make one grow stronger and healthier. And not OD. 2015 In midline august dust or dusk the eastern sun might be a lot more with it's willing nature to reveal it's secrets of the first half of the year. Summer high and summer riddles should make time pass smoothly... A penny in the park fountain for your thoughts.


Vladimir V Putin: ausgespielt

29102014

20/50/70/100 Years in Novorossiya have become the Russian President Vladimir Putin's humbling experience to be back and welcomed to Real Time, the world's own reality. Ukraine will follow the lead into a pro- west government in Kyiv with the new coalition and an old face of PM Arseniy Yatsenyuk. 26 October in itself has been a remarkable quiet day, with no Russian separatist presence during voting and neither were there any disruptions reports. In the Kremlin where Russian President is assumed to be the President of the Russian Republic, perhaps in it's days has never seen such a bleak daytime or daylight for the whole day. On the next day 27 October after the Ukraine PM election, Russia responded and sent out a message Lectori Salutem that no one should mess with mother Russia. A hysterical note from the President was all that the west needed to confirm it's victory still has come after seven months of Vladimir Putin's glory in the months prior to the election held in Ukraine 26 October 2014. That can only mean in terms of Real Time that the end is the beginning or the beginning is the end of something the west will not know, especially when keeping Russia postered against a background of vast territory now in control of the west through Ukraine, the EU and other allies. In reality that is the tiny shoe too tight for Mr Putin he will be trying to fit in, because Crimea is gold after all! In February earlier this year the media very much called the Russian President a few things and all were referring to his mental state. Months later that is now an understanding that as long in Europe this mental state was one of a military snobism only inherent to European culture and the wisdom of seeking the moral argument that will unite nations when on the same side. In the Middle East things are still living in the dark ages of barbarism and 'royal decrees' for executions. Two different worlds on one planet is fascinating.

This morning the west can only ponder on the next move Mr Putin could or would want to make. Victory usually means the opponent or enemy has no where else to go. Why stay in suspicious mind and try suggesting there is still something that the Russian President can do? In every detail since this campaign started in early spring this year, details should be known how the west got here to victory, one assumes. And when followed most accurately this is the end of Mr Putin. He has lost the partnership of the moral argument, one that would have been a calculated step for the military he is so keen on saving as his finest males. There can't be a next time where the scale literally had two wings for Europe and Russia each one. In the military it is not only that one wins the battle but the war is always more difficult and lost without the moral argument, a caring for humanity that you will not find in academic learning but only in the minds of a won war and it's aftermath. Very much like that of WWII. Where Mr Putin has failed will only become clearer in the coming time/ months. The free world has a few theories of it's own and can now use them against the whole idea of moral argument in spring 2014, and making it look sick. And having stopped Mr Putin in the end and leaving him a handful of dust for the future will or could become a valuable lesson in history classes. The return of Mr Putin will simply not happen, at least not in Europe. The President, you see, is rather proud of his military and European origin. When he considers the opponent an outlaw force, as he so often calls the global powers, the more he will keep up his arrogant head high above and perhaps do so above his Presidential station. In Europe however it looks like there is no second time to come either. Another Vladimir Putin is nowhere in the continent or beyond. That is of course if they want to put emphasis on collecting enough evidence of 'the moral argument' to prolong human life unilaterally. For now, the Russian President Vladimir V Putin is ausgespielt.

The end.

The magic formula for Kurdistan: a commercial State or political entity

25102014

While the world moves on faster than anyone can see with the naked eye, what the remains of the day are still the people living in what you call a stateless condition, men, women, elderly and children. That happens in many parts of the world for many decades. But for some reason the modern world in the west has arrived at the threshold of the Kurds and is determined staying here for the time being. While in fact the story is more bleak for the Kurdish people. Commercially the Kurds have done well over the past decades, and have tried a survival package of their own to get by in every day life. Whether this survival 'state' comes from oil revenues in Kurdistan we leave to the imagination of the world. The business world in Asia Minor or Asia is not transparent to the global audience or citizens. We have to learn to live with other facts of life. Facts that are personal and private, in civil life. In the beginning of august 2014 the US- led coalition was set up to defeat ISIS in Iraq. And now it ends in Kobani with the Kurds protesting in Turkey and ending up with 31/33 deaths. The ball is being kicked back and Turkey seems to be having a problem with the Kurds who want autonomy or more rights in Turkish society. The US has been helping Kurds in Kobane with a backing of Air Strikes against ISIS key points, and at the same time is calling on Turkey to do more... Will this lead the Kurds to more political entity? But not before ISIL is destroyed, and says who again?

The International community is sitting very much at home and watch how the story in Kobani unfolds, per second, minute (Twitter) and day. Nato has quiet down and not very much is being said on it's presence in Iraq, Kobani and on the border of Turkey with Syria. And Nato ally Turkey isn't that much in a hurry to get itself entangled in this war, for several reasons it has since the start of the mission. Turkey also must concentrate on domestic politics with the Kurds in the middle, and it is looking desperately for ways how to deal here with the situation. Time to update the situation on the ground again. The US is leading the air strikes in Kobane and ISIL is defeated almost entirely. Key point: the Kurds can come back home in Kobane? Or should they continue fighting ISIS in Iraq? Britain and France are still part of the coalition to defeat this terror. And other coalition partners too are helping to fight ISIS in places around Baghdad. Can anyone see the Kurdish political State crawling out from the here above any time soon or quick? If you can't, that I'm afraid is the end of the Kurdish struggle to fight for a State. And if there is any luck that they just might crawl out from underneath the debris and devastation from the war against ISIS, their luck will still not be in brass. But strangely enough commercially they will do well, whether in Iraq, Iran, Syria or Turkey. And the Kurdish people's ultimate desire was and has been all along a humanitarian one? The appendix no western or global community holds to honor de facto.

Tomorrow 26 October we have another election day in Ukraine. Much attention will focus to this side for a while, I think.

USA: PYD not like PKK. Still, well, much better than promise of castles in Spain for the Kurdish nations of four...

21102014

Turkey must be biting the dust. If that is beef, political or military, it must be rare. And that can only mean it's done. How did the Late Princess Diana say this again, that a princess will never fall? A voice or echo from the castle? In Ankara or future capital city of Kurdistan? It's not strange to take the example of the Late Princess Diana into the writing on Kurdistan and it's coexistence, if you properly address the issue for survival of a distant people living so remote from the rest of the civilized world. England stood up at one point (not knowing whether this was under Conservative or Labour government) and stopped Turkey from a political catastrophe in the previous decade and century, and this was to literally helping to save the Kurds from 'oblivion' in our modern world. Decades later, what Turkish journalists call hollow peace process between Kurds and the Turks, is now the perfect 'think tank' to create lot's of non existent progresses that fail when tested in Turkey's political society, year after year. Also, there is no love story to bind the two nations without force as nations sometimes have to do when rival kingdoms. The balance was from the start a very clear decision on the side for Turkey, in both times the 30ties and 90ties, that to accept the Kurds as a neighbor or citizen of Turkey could not even take place in heaven, and therefore making the obvious choice for the Kurds to stay out. 2014 Is a different year and in time. Here the US this morning in so many words has said a different thing to Turkey. (Interpretation) Racial differences between nations, tribes and others can only be relevant as far as wearing their own shoes, pointy or facing the eternal eastern sun, is beside the point in geopolitics. Respect is for all sides in the human race 'good' etiquette. That's a XX bucket full of brusque words today, especially when pampered like the west's favourite son on the global stage for years, Turkey is or can only feel that it's sulking will not help this time. For Kurds and Turks it's time to grow up. PYD is different from PKK, sec.

The Middle East on the other hand has a stiff neck, almost cast in iron or steel that won't break any time near or soon, as much as the west pushes through with democracy and reform. As now is clear with drawing distinctions between groups in one peoples doesn't beat around the bush what the future holds or has hidden in it's intentions of world order. And kings will disparage on their own swords... Turkey also this morning has confirmed to help the PYD to fight ISIL, after talking to the United States President in a phonecall on Sunday 19 October 2014. Sometimes it is better to understand the physics of the world, that it has changed and it's expansions are reaching the farthest corners on the planet without regard of creed or person. The individual is sacrificed for a more collective approach by world leaders, so they say the story goes. The European Union thus far has done the same and it is still looking for more integration rather than destruction of the treaty. Turkey can't go back on it's own promises to the people living in the country, that the change in the world will pass by or fly by leaving the Turks to live happily ever after in their Ottoman Fairy Tale. The Turks know that Turkey has more potential than just being a fairy tale of what it has been for so long. In fact this is the moment when the Turkish government can take a quantum leap into the future and say to the west: here I am, there and there too! Try catch me! But not quite that trivial. If only just to prove a point that a princess will never fall, like Istanbul or Ankara? The Kurds are holding a different promise: democracy and adaptable to change, which is the plus gilded in solid gold and hope to any new beginning.

To be continued.

If you lose three important battles in one row and in a year, logic is that the next year it can't get better or be a better prospect, for what? To retry?

(Lectori Salutem)

17102014

Battlegrounds I, II and III, had all one thing in common: magnitude. First Russia and Ukraine, second England and Scotland on the referendum for independence from the UK, and thirdly the Middle East in peculiar circumstances in Kobane Syria. This has not happened before as was in the previous years and decades. One just wonders where and why this shift has moved with massive force from those previous decades in policy and politics. A concerted effort by nations wasn't on the menu in 2014, if anybody cared to have noticed. And the mood this morning across the global community isn't one of complete ecstasy but is rather more one of rancunier and undiplomatic discontent. The battle of Yser comes to mind and for no reason sought, understanding why world powers go through such length in order to be halted by a mere breeze or gentle wind in the weather. And the sky is wide open again, daytime or night old canvas of deep dark. This time it must rest and leave major battles in future to one year one battle campaign, or lose again. Imagine what it should have been, Ukraine beating Russia forefront or side fronts, Scotland would have become independent in the referendum on 18 September, and the trickiest of all was Kobane would have fallen in it's first week. Under the changes as given here or summed up, there is a name for this change, don't you think?

But one thing is also clear, that the caller for battle isn't technically impotent to continue it's efforts or plans for total control and excercise a different right and future. At this point it also seems as if they are convinced that this wasn't a mistake, but in fact are more determined to go on. The learning is hard and getting harder without consolidation at the highest of levels. It is probably naive to think or say so, but that day should not arrive any time soon, we are hoping. A simple notion is this that the military supremacy of this side did not adequately match that of the other side. And even it were, shifting public opinion to see difference and weakness has engineered a strange sensation and symmetry. There is also no one to make up what really has happened during the months up to now in the year 2014, the regions of shift, and to say there is concrete evidence there won't be a next challenge. If the assessment can show what caused the halt of these battle campaigns, and can point their finger at the fault, then perhaps first thing to do is to eliminate that problem. A system or private person? It is interesting how a 'next time' can make up for all that went to the history of 'lost battles' this year. Speaking of naive... Next time can happen if just random an attack. But engineering another moment with the nations over dominance, at this moment, is dead.

Written co ram publico and not hidden or keeping a stealth public opinion...

The overview after Kobane, Syria, end october 2014

(Pers op)

12102014/ 22:30 PM

Predictions at the moment are a bit tight or may come loose once Kobane's fate has taken a clear turn, in the coming days this week, so some newspapers online say Sunday today. First the 'blame game', a typical term to define in geopolitics and the military alliance, if involved, simply will put that it didn't think of doing what they should have done, or didn't expect to find what it was doing whilst on the mission. But that's okay. After all if the global law makers when once they draw up the law, direction will be still fresh in the ink and not wait a second to execute the best outcome. Yet something strange is happening during process at this planning stage. The Middle East is changing, this far is known to the whole world. That's not important as much as what's going to be in the outcome once Kobane is over. And like some have said about England and Scotland, that in the end no one would notice something has changed, maybe years later, the same is expected of Turkey for some weird reason. Lordship in Turkey, all symbolic politics for the last two decades, will again leave the Kurd's case to a strict minimum, due to armed conflict in their domestic sphere, is still an emblem in the Turkish bosom, a yearn after a renaissance Ottoman empire, while holding in their hand a fair flower of the world view, and is compared to a fine embroidery wedding invitation to Istanbul and Ankara for business leaders and many more. Kurds are no different business men, but in Turkey only happen to sit on the other side of the table, out of courtesy or just being polite. Kobane is far far away... Now known in the military alliance perhaps as the 'wedding crasher'. In the end, after Kobane, when the blood of innocent people, either defending their cause or fighting to get by or hold on, will color the sky above red and leave a bad smell hanging behind, maybe finally things in Turkey will get more serious.

And that will happen simply because the 'blame game' is the essence for all global decency. With this moral global overview nothing else will be able to argue their case. Let's remember that Mr Erdogan is not the late President Anwar Sadat, a man who never has been called an autocrat but Statesman. He came to Israel in 1977 and made peace with his former enemy, co ram publico. The whole world admired mr Sadat and cherished him for his peace effort. After he was assassinated in the crowd his successor Mr Hosni Mubarak became President of Egypt. But to cut a long story short, in Mr Erdogan's case, if coined already an autocrat by prominent journalists or newspapers around the world, we have to tread here very carefully in this hour, before Kobane... The global overview is a very real goal. It is not a threat. In the west the so called 'threat' of the global overview is natural law, intelligent, and a mechanism that was built by science to assist life in all existing global thinking. In relation to individual countries not many get that far and are often cut off half way. Why would Turkey underestimate this view? Because ISIL will take out Bashar Al Assad in Syria? Or that the PKK members will diminish after Kobane? Maybe, that's a good chance this will become reality once they have been done with them in Kobane. Mr Erdogan can smell the mint in his tea, and he knows where this might come from. The global overview in it's scale of ethics will favor the 'new' people to get a 'new promise', a chance to break with the symbolic past forever. Now this is where the Kurdish people come in. A new people and race to the rest of the world. And time is running faster than Mr Erdogan can think or blink with his eye once or even twice. If ISIS wins the world is de facto now watching the demise of a very strong State known in Turkey for more than fifty years. Any other worse case scenario in the Middle East to public opinion is irrelevant for now.

For the first time in recent history Turkey is playing a major role, national and International

10102014

(unedited)

Is this the end of mundane Turkey? The President has made a rare appearance yesterday and called for calm to all sides in the country, and especially where there has been unrest throughout the night yesterday. It is a very sensitive time, the President said. Kurdish leader Mr Selahattin Dermitas in similar words spoke to the Kurds and also called here for restraint. Violence will solve nothing and could put the peace process/ agreement off the present timetable right now. The present mood between the two sides, Turks and Kurds, are also of a surprise and astonishment. Almost overnight a twist in Turkish fate came hurling down out of nowhere, and crashed into the camp of Kurds living in Turkey. Kobane has poisoned the mood and it's political waters for the future, so say the protesters against ISIL anywhere in the world. There is also another fact not many can see on the outside looking in, that this is Turkey's first major role to play at a national and International level. Military and politics are now putting Turkey in the global spotlight and are leaving it to act as real as it can be on it's own. And what we see is neurosis, white panic and a helplessness many in the rest of the world are interpreting as reluctant to agree to the US- led mission against ISIL in Iraq and Kobane, Syria. It seems, having read the news yesterday on what Mr Dermitas said, that the Kurdish side in their astonishment over Kobane and in Turkey with the protests getting out of hand, that the Kurdish side can also see the big picture onTurkey's stance here. It is a battle stance when not yet ready to actually do battle if the winds are not favorable. Neither Mr Dermitas or the Turksih President are the Duke of Wellington and run through the mud and heavy rain to get to Waterloo and Quatre Bras at the same time!

At least for now this would be their first time, either to go in and help the Kurdish population stuck in Kobane, or help the US air strikes coming through their airspace. The President of Turkey insists that this can only be done in a coordinated plan for 'boots on the ground' mission, and have the President of Syria removed from Office. If Turkey can pull through and come up soon with a plan on their side, preferably co- ordinated with Mr Dermitas to take responsibility of half the 'battle plan' or other to help the Kurds trapped by ISIS in Kobane, that could put the country back on high level and leave all perils of this evening behind to the abyss for all times. Tonight there is still no sign if Turkey will be willing to take on such a tall and acute order. It is regrettable how fast this has turned into violent protests and crude violent behavior in the cities south and east of Turkey. 01:29 After midnight scarce news get's through at this hour from tweets or newspapers online. If this was ISIS idea of punishing Turkey for it's contribution in the Nato led allied mission against it's terrorism in Iraq and Syria, to plague the Kurds with their threat to massacre all, and knowing this will bring down the government in Turkey at the same time, it certainly isn't playing politics to win hearts and minds.

The story continues.

Post Scriptum: Selahattin Dermitas, leader of the pro- Kurdish peoples democratic party HDP

ISIS is a dream state or fantasy State

07102014

Perhaps ISIS has always been there, a presence of something real or something to make it real, a factor maybe? This may be true on their side, but the west hasn't been captivated by their 'Arabian nightmares' on the ground, where they impose themselves on real life of the Arab nations. But where the horror of this Arabian story starts is hard to tell. The West is convinced ISIS could not have come falling out of the sky just on a good sunny day once back in time, 1991 or later. ISIS in fact is an organization, because it had the time to do so over the last two decades. In each and every time finding a new name to capture the imagination of the generations in the Middle East, and this being the unknown factor. Speaking of mere size, how big is this organization? And why do the young find ISIS attractive and queuing up to them? (Just found Queuing theory Janos Sztrik) ISIS is making an offer or selling something to it's new recruits. Nato is doing the military mission from high altitude only. Countries in the Middle East region have also only a great appetite for political self importance and their ambitions are endless at the end of each 'mission'. (This also includes NATO, doing everything humanitarian and help the local people against ISIS) Is there a 'middle smart line' here, if this would be on their side?

From any point of view to admit this is not easy, but ISIS what it is selling so cheaply to the younger generation, Middle East or globally, is the dream. Not the dream State or fantasy State by the name of Caliphate, which is by the way only a real English reference, from Oxford or Cambridge? It has no substance basically to stay on as any Arab nation in itself, but only represent itself as the Arab nation of tomorrow and one day in the near future will establish to become the Caliphate among Caliphates? The Caliphate among Caliphates that is not English, but in fact can only be highly ideological and a great need for creating something very old here. We haven't seen the likes of these for a very long time since orthodox Islam became the religion of all Islamic peoples. It is the equivalence of Lawrence of Arabia... A rider on the storm, but if true a rider from the storm. Not what you expect in the 21st century, in the West but also among the nations in the Middle East, who are in many ways pampered by this century for a very long time. Their luxuries are a good match with the western rich nations in the world. In it the deep eye of the Caliphate sees it's world disappearing or when not started yet, it's chance disappear like a damp of insignificance.

Why do we think democracy is the remedy in the Middle East for all Arab nations? (Think reform) This morning in the news on CNN people are suggesting that ISIS is doing 'good' business in heartland of industries in the Middle East and is being financed from unknown corners around the world. Just to crack the hard nut, I guess. That seems like brand new thing, ISIS doing business with big industries? Or it could only be an exterior. But what if the interior to this nut is humanitarian and help the people with money they need to live or have a life with families? No one will do this, not the Arab nations and certainly no one in the West will even dream of doing such a thing under the existence of Law and Order. You can never come this close to the 'Caliphate', because outsiders are inquisitive for their own 'good', or they come to destroy the 'unknown' factor by bombing the enemy... There is no other proof either why the west should know or care who they are when ISIS is raging through cities or places of peoples. ISIS soldiers are moving like Roman shield soldiers. You see nothing of their true faces... One thing is very sure, the Caliphate is not Samurai. It has a master. But no one will know or find out, because he doesn't wear a popular face as his so called 'helpers' do in the world. Popular faces like the ones of chief terrorists or other. Mrs Clinton is right to say that ISIS is not a State. (This morning on CNN website/ online) But if it's a dream state you have to 'fight fire with fire'(I'm sorry, I'm a fan of JB), dream with dream understanding.

Now it's time for breakfast. Where I live is somewhere on the Western half of the hemisphere. Also in a paranoid state. First Russia, and now ISIS in the Middle East. In the end we are only human. With no end breath in uniform.

The truth enforces not only greater authority but ability must come first

04102014/ 22:54PM

The former Prime Minister and now President of Turkey, Mr Recep Tayyip Erdogan, for a decade has been Turkey's long standing man in authority and was praised openly or privately for years as a man and politician of great ability. That reputation unfortunately was in tatters for the last two years as Prime Minister and leader of the AKP in government. The country was battered by corruption scandals, but not only that. The inner circle to any outsider an immaculate ring of cold steel, was now out in public and reached far and wide across the seas, that this place had become the 'safe haven' for close government officials on suspicion of high profile theft. That damage could have forced the then Prime Minister to resign and sink with it all of his ministers involved. But the President of Turkey can now comfortably count his blessings, that this catastrophe was in the nick of time not relevant at this stage. On 10 August also this year he became despite all demands for his resignation President of Turkey by a majority of votes. All that cannot be said often enough as if to speak to stone dead walls in the new Turkey. And if Ankara would climb on top of these walls and looking across the plains of the Middle East region, one just wonders how much of the wide turmoil and chaos would be there to see in countries nearby or as distant as Syria and Iraq. Has Mr Erdogan gone or stopped somewhere between the front gates and the Middle East?

Turkey is not just in trouble at the moment, trying to formulate it's contribution in the US- led coalition against ISIS, but what is more troubling is the future of Turkey in the aftermath of destroying ISIS. You can read this either the wrong way or try a little harder to see the point in which Turkey plays a responsible Nato ally and help the allied forces. That responsibility is difficult. Being the 2nd largest army in Nato, next to ally USA, this is the whole key point. Of course this is also assumption when taken out of the world where decisions are made in our global community to safeguard security for whole of regions. Politically it is also a difficult choice for Turkey to switch back to the board and pull out some buttons/ plugs. (Switch board politics in times of war) Can the west mean what it is saying, that Turkey has a responsibility because the world expects it to deal with complexities like ISIS, Syria and Iraq in the 21st century, and not as if it is dealing with a telephone operator and sitting at the switch board? These are high expectations for Turkey just after the presidential elections two months ago in august. Time has not really matured yet on his seat, as Mr Erdogan would perhaps have wanted it to be, especially when last week he did make that 'mature' decision of aiding the US- led coalition against ISIS. At the moment it is looking quite the opposite and his decision at the UN Assembly in New York, that this was premature. At home no one was just ready. If the operation is expected as the US and Britain believes this will be, readiness in Turkey would first have to be considered and drafted. Responsibility as the largest or 2nd army in Nato, on official basis, would have to be looked into very carefully. And domestic politics at home would not confuse or interfere with national politics when the country is at war. That is another way.

But the dramatic scenes of destruction unfortunately have taken seizure of the government in Turkey and it is endlessly analyzing the global news feed as if buying time. But that can only be a mistake when the world knows that Turkey can rise to the occasion and give full military backing up if Nato wants/ requires it's assistance. But that is too good to be true and it won't last long before anyone can see the headlines in the news, that for example Turkey let too many people in while contemplating Bashar Al Assad's fall. Complicity is not the same thing, if the emphasis remains on self interest in the need to restore order on the borders with Turkey. Be it humanitarian or fighting terrorists, each a separate colored flag going up or down on the site. It doesn't look as if fighting ISIS on the border with Syria is much of a construction site to the rest of the world now... No one in the west can know these sceneries or scenes on a daily basis either. But why do we invent politics and bring it to the people? East and west? ISIS in the meantime is using a barbaric method of excecuting western journalists or aid workers in front of video- cameras and sending these pictures across the whole world. If Turkey is expected to help fight ISIS in every unseen corner of the world and Turkey's eye, the here above is not unfamiliar descriptive writing. But to any other Arabic nation in the Middle East that would have been hard to see it this way, even when written unprofessionally. Stability is another flag going up and it is red. Now, what does that mean if you are not building pyramids?

In terms of global peace Turkey is now at a new cross road and maybe even in history

Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu not most ideal for challenging future of Israel, or is he?

03102014

The world seldom thinks of Israel in terms of space cubic metres and it's wideness. Do you know it's landmark where this starts? If no, neither do I. The fact is when we hear about Israel the thing that always comes first to mind is violence, the Palestinian people, politics and war over Gaza with the rest of the world. That in terms of each individual space or cubic metres open in our minds and mind bubbles. Public opinion exponential rate must be quite a mass! And yet, the Prime Minister of Israel is doing something very odd when public opinion amasses against Israel during and after each IDF operation against terrorists in Gaza and the military of Hamas. Probably what you could call odd is that the PM as were his predecessors always do the same thing and call for military solutions to the problem with the Palestinian people who support and are members of Hamas' army. Israel must defend itself domestically and everywhere else where Jews come to live or having lived all their lives. We are now not looking at 'Israel's space' in terms of cubic metres anymore... And to me personally that is odd and even strange. When we take for example the present situation in Turkey, to use airspace for military operations by Nato allied forces, a parliamentary decision has to be taken first and last. If the majority of votes say 'yes' and account for more than 75% for and the rest against, the airspace will open. How the world sees itself that is never a black & white strong thing. Mr Benyamin Netanyahu on the other hand can see everything coming and going, and with his government they are able to judge, right or wrong, how to defend Israel based on what they see coming in and going out worldwide.

The surprise thing in this is that all countries must do the same air traffick control watch. To you and me it is also called global security against all incoming threats from anywhere and everywhere. The world at this level is probably most lethal of all existing deterence. You must understand that this right goes beyond any dispute and cannot be argued anywhere in International courts. Citizens should be subordinate and try their best obedience if they want to avoid a prison sentence or become an outlaw by the State or authority. Israel from WWII and in it's aftermath has aligned itself since with the United States/ America's. One can say that globalism was conceived during the recovery of years in Europe and the US after the great depression years. When the world again came to change old agreements and times, after the millennium, all nations and the world leading nations, were ready to accept the inspiration for a new world in a new century that would be written entirely to them and in their own names. What more can a nation wish for? A single currency? The Euro project? Fiscal union? Monetary policies to cross the dead ends? Peace or expiration dates? Space travel? Diminshing of armed forces among G7/ G20 nations? The nuclear weapon arms race? Democracy for all friendly nations in the new world? The Middle East, Russia, China and Pacific Ocean? Israel and Palestine two- state solution? Public opinion may only be a statistic if the world continues at this pace in the coming decades. But what we are hoping for is that world leaders to do good will not go extinct just yet. Then why is Israel howling to the moon?

The time for Turkey has finally arrived to assess political and military partnerships

28092014/22:50PM

At one point the most sensible thing to do for Turkey was indeed to carefully tread on the action of war against ISIS. Sensible when on a very tight schedule. The US and Britain before the weekend on Friday in a very clear call for action in Iraq, also said that they expected Turkey to do more in the fight against this 'barbaric' terrorists' group on it's border. While in fact very little attention was paid to Mr Erdogan's stance or delaying tactics... Chaos is not like the political forums in the west, parliaments or House of Lords, unless a war cabinet in the wake of these dangerous ongoing events is formed and for which this design is taking decisions in particularly war when declared so. The PM in the UK on Friday did urge parliament to take a vote on the issue and soon after would be ready to send Britsh fighter jets to Iraq a pronto. The world has listened and the global audience was no longer confused. Well, except in places like Turkey. The British view of the war against ISIS and if led by a NATO- led coalition, this time has been quicker through parliament and was backed by a majority in the Commons, 524 for Air Strikes in Iraq and 43 against. The outcome of this vote isn't something the public reads into but world leaders, foe and friend. Perhaps that is how Turkey sees this on the global stage and as Nato longstanding ally. If, and this is a big if, the west fails again like in previous missions in Iraq, the minds in governments in the Middle East at one point and unintentionally might come to feel ridiculed and speak maybe of not being taken seriously anymore by the west, especially in close relationship with the USA. And that could only mean things will get from bad to worse only.

On these hypothetical concerns we find Turkey moving very softly softly into the arena of war against ISIS, being convinced this hypothetical but very real war is a very hard nut to crack, especially when projections are made of unending war against ISIS a priori. The strange thing about all this is the real threat to security that is now taking place globally, simply because rationale of this kind becomes a magnet to evil and all it's inventions to do the big test with the big world. And to have people like that around the globe would indeed be a great threat to the world and it's inhabitants everywhere. Why else do terrorists now think this time is the right climate for beheadings and other monstrous acts against people? And to stop all media from reporting on important issues to inform the public that would also mean an end to transparency and accountability. How can we be sure ISIS is just an illiterate organization with some speaking with a British accent and not read the news, available in various world languages? Besides Turkey being at the center of the problem with ISIS, Quatar is not something we should forget or delete from the big picture and also having a key role on this global political platform, only accessible to NATO and the United Nations. No, it is no surprise Turkey is at it's wit's end before sticking out it's helping hand... The Kurds, are they a priority case? Nato? Or future relations with the western nations? Or better: why not deal first with headscarves for toddlers and no more mixed schools?

Nicola Sturgeon's answer to Scotland: make me your first female First Minister

24092014

50000 SNP members (22000 new members) are expected to cheer that candidacy bid of Ms Sturgeon's to become First Minister of Scotland in less than eight weeks from now. In Scotland following this new chorus line you do get things occassionly right. A woman First Minister, leader and member of the largest political Party in Scotland, velvet heels with Great Britain, and the right mood to reconcile all parties with a more realistic approach on any future course, starting right here in the Scottish Parliament. We have been waiting for this moment after Friday 19 September when the people of Scotland rejected independence by a slight majority than the 'Yes' camp. Politics in Scotland comes in pairs; rejection of independence and following the resignation of FM Mr Alex Salmond. On Wednesday 24092014 Ms Sturgeon announced her bid for FM in November 2014 and also last night/ this morning the political parties have pledged to work together and not divide Scotland in future politics. That is good news and everyone can catch their breath that this the world can live with, instead of fracturing anything further between the people and the leaders by wavelength the independence loss on Friday last week has had on scale and impact crash. The next First Minister of the Scottish people said this morning in this news conference that she will start a new chapter for Scottish politics, but also will keep her focus on core social issues where most needed in terms of welfare and an additional package to protect these rights. (Free interpretation of Ms Sturgeons words) That will be something the International world will be pleased to hear as well today...

From this tight schedule yesterday also the SMP Mr John Wilson has resigned on a particular matter of joining NATO in the Independence paper on Scottish Defense. With a 'new chapter' in future politics in Scotland that issue now will have to wait on it's day if still relevant to the time we're living in globally. But given the past of the white paper on the issue perhaps it is very important to remember that joining Nato for each member is a specific contribution of sovereignty. Mr Wilson could be right that in order to join Scotland's sovereignty must be first identified not only as a political autonomy, but also when it is tested for strength it can do so on it's military establishment. (Free interpretation of the SMP words) The answer at this level needs to be re- examined. The UK is the ministry for Security and Defense, also in the white paper a clear reference that was made. The 'Yes' camp published the independence plans on Internet and during campaign only highlighted the impact of economic prosperity in Scottish society after independence. If the next First Minister still believes that Scotland is better or would be a better place if independent, one can only wish her good luck in politics and the difficult choices she will have to make on the whole of the balance. To be continued.

Upbeat atmosphere over 'Yes' vote in Scotland getting dangerously close to stage fever...

14082014

You know, we could have been seeing and reading this event of Scotland going for Independence 18 September this week the wrong way from the start. In every method there is good and bad madness in today's world. Thus, why attack a good business plan to give the Scottish economy a boost out of their present system and economic swamp? Politicians like Johann Lamond (Labour) would want to end the politics of grievance in exchange to enhance more economic freedom and politics in Scotland run by the Scottish people. In fact what these elites are saying to the Scottish people is that before you are standing politicians who are willing to go for more national equality with the voters in each and every constituency. They are the good, bad and pretty ugly chemistry politicians to put their trust in the people and vice verse. A golden future awaits both, them and the people. Are you not yet in your celebrating mood to cheer the Scots for a 'Yes' vote on 18 september on Thursday this week? While you're dancing with the devil on his pied tunes the rest of Europe are a bit too awfully quiet. Jericho (Simply Red) comes to mind if you want to get going on your happy feet. Never mix business with politics, like pleasure doesn't mix very well with big business. Queen Elizabeth II, today in Balmoral, said to a member of the public that people should think carefully about the future, when she was asked what her thoughts were on Scottish independence. It just shows that the Queen of England and Scotland that her work is not done yet. HM Queen's her government will have to figure out a plan to take on board the influx of the Scottish aristocrats who will flee Scotland very soon... LOL.

The Scottish people are over the moon with the referendum on 18 September, four days from today, Sunday 14 September 2014. From a very unusual corner, the Church of Scotland, on 3 September last week, the mood there is also one of advocating the independence from the UK if that is going to be the result of votes. And that is very good news... Considering a great many of the Scots are more Protestant than compared to number of Catholics in Ireland. Poor Mr Salmond, he is now sweating in bullets. Every architect knows this feeling how planning can be fun and reality a dead result once the plan has finished in stone concrete. There are no second plans to be made after the 'Yes' vote, that too is another realism Mr Salmond will have to deal with once the ceremony of change will set in. But for now he has earned lot's of cheers from the crowds already, like old socks to stuff his heart and mouth. (Pardon my French) 300 Years of peace with England will also go gulping down the First Minister's throat if the vote results in a 'Yes'. After that we could be witnessing another surprise spectacle of the unknown. Why would the Prime Minister David Cameron have to resign? “Under this government, a Conservative government with coalition partner Liberal Democrats, we gave the Scottish people permission for a referendum. Which they have won.” That doesn't sound like a reason good or bad enough for the Prime Minister in England to resign. “Under this government Labour has won and got a 'Yes' vote for independence in Scotland.”

Is there a happy end to this story of modern day Scotland soon to become independent or not from the UK? The G7 and G20 countries are holding their breath for a longer while...

21St Century in the Middle East doesn't celebrate any awareness like in US or EU

09092014

If we are looking onward to the next generations or century telescope we find at the end of this view something remarkable and also new to see. The 21st century for the US completely differs from that of the 21st century EU and crossing across the Bosporus into the Middle East own 21st century mass. Almost as if Time has deliberately divided the world by a trident and not by a spade as we always thought. And thought as we have learned for the last decade can be also very much alive by so many millions of people living or inhabiting in these places under the 21st century trident. But what does this trident looks like if we would give it something of a physical experience and shape? Only the nations living under it's roof should be in this competition, as it is at their best interest to shape their own future and living spaces. Do the next generations still believe in architecture or spectacular engineering? First choice: no more side roads, only highways if traffic should be under control and transparent. Closer to home in the present time, this infancy is still a far dream if not as good as dead, or half unborn and half dreamed. Our future races are dead, and kept in great boxes of philosophy metamorphosis. Let's give the idea some more thought...

The spade years of globalization for two decades long brought home with it in every hard working day and hour (or minutes) the square box in which it kept the world safe from breaking or falling. Especially big governments, e.g. thG7/ G20 and other global groups for economic cooperation and participation, each and every one of them took home a copy of this and specialize into what was then known an unknown future, but only looking more good than what we see under the trident of the 21st century. Architecture has solved most problems of the 19th and 20th century, and so has engineering done it's part. Depending on location, diameters and functionality of new lines set out for every city on the western half front. The 21st century built a mass of investments almost single handedly on it's own long fingernails and big toes, from out of the more slow paced or sleeping economies into the real world... (Ironically this plan seems to be a rerun of the movie Sleeping with the enemy, but still very much unrelated) And it was a wonderful amusement park of full industrial activities making their first entrances on a world stage that was never before, not during the times of President Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson or JFK. Russia gave the world view MIR Station, and space with a universal goal was born. In growing numbers all countries in the world were competing to getting there as well, it became the top 100 challenges of our time to also have their own satellite launches. For some reason in the 21st century of England, we can now watch the Scots taking back their independence from HM Queen Elizabeth II, televised and on the Internet. To just nclude the trident nations and time?

Compete for it and design your 21st century, and tell the world from what angle you are working on this Sheherazade Project: 1001 Cities in the Middle East. Or: 1001 Cities in Europe. And 1001 cities/ States in the USA. Why do people think our global leaders are having an easy job?

For some sinister reason let's stay with Europe at the present time for a moment

07092014

Europe for decades long was on the monorail of EU Membership and hard work toward a united European bloc of 28 countries (latest number). Somehow the single currency was squeezed in between in 2003 to establish real social commitment for this high level program, for more equality between Member States and finances business and State. Now, in 2014 and 20 years later, Russia became a ruse up this very high tree of EU social democracy. And it is a ruse of war. Not a term one would use in Europe social policies integration for the last decade. Nevertheless the paradox is there and throughout the present time what is seemingly more important is that Europe in the coming time will probably not accelerate in fast recovery global economics and the slumbering economy of homeground, but what we might come to see and will have to learn is that it can recover a lot faster from a conflict like in Russia with Ukraine in 2014, and give it's leadership more 'freedom' to save itself from an apparent self (not knowing which direction it might go or come from) destruction. What looks now like an Russian invasion under the paradox of politics in Europe, this could turn the page of the former EU and it's Members to a real social issue with no prediction on any outcome. That is at least not yet at this stage. In two years time perhaps one could get a preview, or even in five years. But what one should ask is if Europe will still be the old EU or the new one. All can depend on how Russia will decide on strategy and if indeed that embraces an endgame to what is now considered a conflict in a remote place in east Ukraine.

Europeans have come to that already, paying extensively more attention to a detailed choice of leadership without putting much emphasis on self interest or a deteriorating economy per individual Member State. And this must be hard work for government high Officials in this unusual state of knowing the last decade as peace time governing, while today they are facing a turnaround of fortunes. (Not to confuse with reversal of fortunes movie) But what is more sinister is the prospect of actually not winning the war, is that Europeans can agree on to lose the war if they stand united. That I'm afraid the world has never been made ready for. 70 Years the world has only heard or read victory through winning the war in 1945 and how the west defeated Nazi Germany and bombing Dresden to mass pulverise debris. People expect Russia to go to war with Ukraine, if for example the economic war squeezes the Russian President where it hurts too much. In that case the west will still have a home to go to, so to speak. Another estimation says something different, that for example the Russians will create a different climate for European integration and bureaucracy. Also this model will be based on the new European identity to have looked the enemy hard faced in the eye and retreated. Retreat as far as inside the bosom of Russia, their close natural European cousins. To minorities living in Europe this could become the hardest of times, if e.g. the policies of the present time would change and could make it from now on harder to live in a Europe that can take very little risk again... That is the bastion to an outside world seen from the European continent.

Sinister indeed, wouldn't you say?

This obsession of war in Europe does not impress the global Iphone/ Ipad generation

02082014

Annexation if played out in Europe, political or military, in our time is perceived by many as a 'nothing to worry about and nothing to do with it' attitude by millions of the citizens here in Europe alone, and probably will have a wider audience or followers in the rest of 'our global community'. At NATO summit in Wales (thursday 04092014), to be frank, politicians and Prime Ministers have to decide on which millions to worry about if Russia will go through with his 'act of war' first in Crimea in February 2014 and now in September months later in Ukraine. The west wants to be ready, not only on intention but inclination as well. Globalism is war and this should be no surprise to academics. The height of prosperity has in every century been the natural cycle for precisely that intention and inclination NATO will now discuss with partners and allies where and when to stop Russia if it get's any closer by major advances into territories outside it's own borders with the sole intention of annexation. The Russian President, as being the first in the world, has any understanding of globalism is war. For the scale of the operation Mr Putin seems to be after the first half year and now entering a third quarter, it is vital to him to understand something the west hasn't yet figured out nor it's millions of so called global citizens... But success is entirely a whole different thing when war on a global scale is coming from Russia and not the United States. That is the century we are living in, I'm afraid.

One thing is clear on the side of the Russian President and his government: they are taking their time before deciding on deicisive blows. Historically and more recently it would be in the nature for the Russians not to seriously get involved in a war when the job is done or should be done in a matter of 'weeks'. War and Peace by Leonid Tolstoij is a good reminder of how the Russians choose their war and battlefields. If the novel as mentioned here contains between 1200 and 1600 pages (translation in English 1424), that in real life should be counted even higher when a plan. Mr Putin is not any different from the historical line of battlefield and war choices. He cannot go for short term and will have to take the longer term and to make it unbearable for the west to remain this long inside the giant serpent's throat and not asphyxiate. By then all global communities will have woken up to this rude shock in the world, put down their beloved Iphones/ Ipads/ tablets and start calling home to mother and father, family and friends on their regular mobile phones, when it's too late for these millions of citizens. And crime against the 'greater good' will become law in an instant and come to any suspicious individual with a battery of violence according to volume of law. There is a saying in Chinese martial arts, that if you can't win the battle don't fight it. (Movie The Rising Sun, Sun Tzu fifth century, I happen to have watched last night) But the question is now: why wait, when you are the Russian President?

Mr Putin theorizes war and the west controls the west

29082014

We must theorize back and stop talking about reality, globalism and the future, at least for one second. Theorizing in Russia might not be what the US has done for the last two decades and many more before globalization. A certain pressure is coming out of Russia tonight, while Mr Putin or the Russian President is playing the role of an understanding man and doing so with great emphasis. Vladimir Putin is mediating for the Russian Parliament, Duma, the military force and also in Russia his freedom of movement goes without saying. This part is also no secret to Nato and it's Members. Freedom of speech goes as far as Mr Putin wants it and he decides too in fact how far he wants to reach his audience without troubling his mind over selections. In his theory non of these 'social influences' will matter in the end... He is getting the west or global audience hooked on stories coming out of Russia and is keeping (good shepherd?) that attention lame. Behind the scenes Mr Putin doesn't seem to do any theorizing on war. Again, what understanding does the US has if theory is not reality? (Europe is the place where this could go for a long time, it knows how to 'exit reality' for real) And that to anyone's astonishment the world as we know it will never be able to quickly build intelligence on that. The Russian President knows that this 'so called war' is not about who get's there first to the finish, and neither is it 'de facto' about a Russian nuclear power readiness. Mr Boris Yeltsin was as ready then still in the early nineties! In fact the 'cold war' lives only in the west's psyche and being a stubborn one if embarrassment lies on the other side of the modern world globalism has built.

But having put all the pieces of bits together in your personal matrix, the prospect of the breakdown in the world system is quite a serious one. A theorist of war like Mr Putin doesn't go to war to have and conquer land and peoples. The worst can be expected, that in fact Mr Putin wants to be crowned with the crown of war and maze. If only the world understood this kind of ambition the west would then be able to at least know where exactly that is leading to. The Russian President is an incredible hunter and going after something more precious compared to gems and diamonds. Basically he is doing well using only his instinct, and not for the Americans to see what is inside his mind. That is forever irrelevant, is the impression lasted from the millennium on to the present day. But then again like any hunter knows what could weaken a man this invincible? Political distrust perhaps? Too many long toes allies maybe? Or the assassin hiding like a jackal in the bushes? (This in the latter however difficult to live with the present time 'devil' should never happen) And when is the chosen moment for the public and world leaders to panic? The answers to these questions do not make any sense right now if you are living on the half of the western world. And in Russia Mr Putin in theory might believe that that is irrelevant too. This ambition that he has is written in the stars and the Russian President seems to think that he is a servant of the people in Russia and if blessed also for the people in Europe. Tomorrow is another day and we must wait and see for an entire dark night before we get there...

Globalists Miscalculations: next half year to end 2014 will be nothing like first half 2014, if changing the world becomes rationality

24082014

Strange depths are known to be in unfamiliar places, and hiding well away from the human eye and machine. The economy for example as global science is dead. And in terms of monetary economics the question to avoid is demand of currency. (This is probably where everyone get's into that deep gaze of the judge and having a Steven Russo moment, just waiting for others to come up with hard core global economic numbers that will do something to maintain the current system instead of dealing with adventures of an economic inspiration by so many nations today) If the war in Ukraine has any meaning, or if the Russian President Vladimir Putin are translated into global economic language, we will get to that unfamiliar depth of zero vision and irrelevance almost by wave of the hand. Globalists 'on the other hand' do not make appropriate policies quick enough when in a unique situation like the taking of Crimea by Russian President Vladimir Putin February earlier this year, to sit on it literally for a while. For one reason to do so was perhaps the global leaders of G7 seriously miscalculated from the start too many things and in the following months later. Russia was demanding a war and doing it bluntly, e.g. Ignoring all other demands known to the G7/8. Until now no one also knows if the west is demanding anything else outside to stop the war in Ukraine!

Another strange depth of rationality comes with the present situation between the EU Member States, e.g. Germany, and Russia. Mr Putin, not accusing him for dishonesty in the alliance closer to Russia, insists to continue the war he has on his mind. But when really known to him, he must be aware that war will not get there where the real global economic reality of the world is impenetrable. In a more personal word on Mr Putin's intentions, this is not something a leader with enormous pride like the Russian President feels that he wants to have at the present time. He insists on a formation of war and alliance. But that is not to everyone's impression... What the public sees is what is on his mind and perhaps doing this deliberately to make it a natural feeling for all. Fear is also getting much closer by the day, that if the formation fails and is dead like the global economy that could turn the whole plan in one big asylum no mind will leave or enter again. The hard question the Russian President for the moment should also have is whether much bloodshed is necessary. We should not make that mistake, by underestimating the globalists if truly they run this world. And best not leave Dunston going out and try to retrieve the economic numbers of universal sanctity. (Dunston the chimp)

To be continued.

The Prime Minister in England 2014

21082014

David Cameron can do no good anymore. At least from any outsider's view in the western world, say Europe and probably in Britain too, if truly loved by the British people. (No Conservative PM in England was ever loved or came close to being idolized by the majority of the people/ working class in Britain) But for some reason this Prime Minister came closer in contact with 'ordinary' citizens in England, charmed them with his naivesque sort of 'we're in this together', and go out with fishermen in Cornwall in the earliest of hours. Those were the good days for Mr Cameron. In his recent time the PM is clearly not making it even to be in his bad days, as worse to come is expected soon over Iraq in the House of Commons next week. What did the PM do wrong and cannot make good anymore? Not many have forgotten Libya, when the Prime Minister only read the military objectives instead of staying firm where the British view is most strong with, e.g. that the PM is accountable in the end for any action taken with HM Military in the world. On transparency, well, it fizzled the moment an already eldery dictator on his way out into political decay had to be humiliated and then later on hanged. Not even the ex Labour PM Mr Tony Blair had the heart to do so when Sadam Hussein was in power and also at a later stage was deposed off in a strange fashion one would think this was not for any world still leading, and world leader something to execute on a lesser man and captive. Now times have changed, and certainly Russia is no more in the group of 7, then G8. Will David Cameron, with his short fizzled legacy, enter the Chambers next week looking proud to be PM of Britain and do the honours of respresenting the free world at a very high standard when questioned, and hopefully by his own Party, over the beheading of journalist James Foley?

Proud the PM might not look when returning back to daily politics next week. But he should at least be worried and wonder of how much he is still representing of the British view in general and in terms of British history in recent time. From what one can understand on Britain and their political views, this Prime Minister probably has got the 'real' steel for yet to be the best man for to be PM in Britain, and this is said without any hope. But can he do it alone if for example his aim is to get the country back in order and so with that doing what the next Prime Minister maybe wasn't ready for yet? Basically you have to say that Prime Minister David Cameron is a principled man and who knows that without it there is basically no life possible. Not on earth, in the midst of humanity and beyond if Mars existed. Still we have no hope, and with slight a personal reproach is that the PM is the leader of the Conservative Party in Britain and is a 'devout' member of his Party since long ago. 2014 Happens to become difficult for the PM and a real time to test the nation of Britian too! If responsible the PM will make no empty promises, because that is exactly the measure(s) the future holds and not just for Britain. The EU with Russia also are in the same questioning of where exactly should these nations go if things remain uncertain between east and west, namely the USA. Peace in the world is taking too many steps backward and looking very much like they will shootout again at one point in time soon. And that is not good news.

For now one can only keep on hoping that the PM in Britain will remain the principled world leader that he seems to be in all pictures in newspapers and magazines. The world cannot afford another cosmetic global leader, made of many silk treads... His return next week at PMQ will be a well expected one, you can say only for now.



 






Jews, war economists?

11082014

Better to ask is whether the English are war- economists. Are they? If they are than so is Vladimir Putin, building on growth economies is for classicists. As written here above in the title, why would Jews be war economists nr I? Perhaps when one invests in the future and is expecting a great return, accumulation (this time I got it right) becomes unlimited and should stay unlimited as the first rule or principle. There is simply no end- outlook, and deal with real numbers. At least seen from my point of view! Germany for example comes closest to what Jews are good at once they put their money where their mouths are, and expansion economists are the 'good' Germans on average, you could say yes. But expansion economists have end numbers... Something the European Union has experienced for the last ten years. So, again, when are we going to understand the meaning of the Jews being the war economists of the world? There is something very fishy going on since Ariel Sharon has died, for Jews. (The JP even 'decreed' something tonight of an alarm call to the world audience on the global pogrom against Jews) Innocent Jews will be chased out of their limbs again, and accused of robbing their neighbors. It looks like a small thing to say or do if you're a gang in the streets, but the global truth is this that by 'robbing' these gangs mean the money industries of Jews. In an extension of the intent: this is how the world handles the global economy problem, being robbed by Jewish money institutions called Banks too big to handle. Poor little me!

Basically the westernized economies do not believe in the mechanism accumulation of wealth machinery digits. Man made economies from a classical learning, Oxford or Cambridge England/ Australia or USA, are our best measurements tools for all economic systems, so they say. And with these instruments we can also control the Yen, Renminbi, Rupee, in the farthest corners of 'invisibility economies'. Partly as known in the 21st century, they control us as well and make it fluid. Of course, it is very impressive when you think about it on a daily basis and around the clock every second. But what then is the problem when the global economy decides to take chunks out of the fluidity that seemed a private institution for many decades in old familiar hands? It is by right why globalist economists or war economists can take out these big chunks, which cannot be denied at, say level 2 and going up or down deep, if the owners of top level view are exercising new rules? It is that legitimacy what is the reason for all Jew hating and street fights inside the global infrastructure of countries nowadays. When that happens the legitimacy of currency owner/ holder can be tested out of it's wits. And no one will know the difference, that the west has never had any war economists to start with, let alone to fight the Jews their legitimacy at top level and say that this is why we are saying that there has to be a reverse in our present system to lead global economics. And what will they say about the reverse of our present global economics? That this is for all of (the good for) humanity? How noble England can be sometimes! Real gentry or gentlemen, that's class that is... 

(I am not a war economist, nor classicist economist)






The rise of the Jewish people this time could be forever

31072014

Fate, not as we know it for centuries long persecution of Jews, still might be subtle in it's approach of humanity as a whole, pin- pointing perhaps only the universal sins of nations, hypocrisy is one great one if Machiavellian, and complex inferiorities. Israel is on a mission this summer and is taking Hamas out in a frenzy. And the world doesn't understand why or what Israel looks like afar from western civilization. But what it does know are Jews. In the global economics sphere the same nation, the Jews, are known too for their extreme earthly riches, and if you live long enough to remember the exact date for the accumulation start point. No one in our generation of humanity has lived that long, but that doesn't seem to matter when they are Jews the world should fight very hard. After all, aren't the same Jews the ones killing Palestinian people, old and infant, crippled or not, for the entire of their existence in the Middle East, Israel? Yes, one get's that intent of instant deafness to hear only of killings on the one side, while Israel is insisting on rights to self defense. In the summer of august 2014 the world might even be tempted to stop listening as a whole or altogether. And this time it will be again reintroduced in all of these places to hate Jews again... Europe's readiness to the hatred of Jews, especially the Big Industries of Bankers, and hiding behind the Palestinian suffering at the hands of the IDF, is in fact still the quickest routine that need no polishing up after 70 years of globalization and Jews. And then, all Jews will stop writing articles on Human Rights Act, the UN, Humanity, the Holocaust, and so forth. Instead no one knows what will take it's place when Jews will be silenced once again and there is no nation on earth to give ear to whatever their plea will be. Perhaps they should put down their monocles and have another look at the world...

The Jewish nation have built this world. I would say that it would be a mistake to misjudge the meaning of Jews in our world today and forever wait for mass persecution to set them straight. If what they say is true of Jews today in the world the warning to be more cautious then is only the best warning one can give you. First the world is badly crippled by global economics. After the financial crash of 2008 no one knows which reality became recovery and self rule economies again. But business projects always are built 99% of fantasy or fantastic architecture and engineering, while the 1% worldwide no one actually knows what that is. But hope, that it is a deadly toxic to have world economic starvation combined with Jew- hatred, could be the remedy for all economic poverty around the globe. It is like taking gold from Indians, Inca or Maya. With just a few sea- shells hanging on a string of threats. (Not thread) That was then and this is now, and you do not own the global economy for pure futility. In 2014 the Russian President Vladimir Putin did think that exact thing and it got him a place outside the global community of G7. Only one thing comes as a thorn in the Russian President's side this week: MH17 and the aftermath of that tragedy. I'm afraid one can now comfortably say to Mr Putin that MH17 isn't one of futility by globalism. In fact it's a lid of plastic, and very easy to lift 'the cork' like cheap cider.

At what point will hating Jews help the crippled economies? Unless the hatred is fulfilling and a purpose of our real humanity... 





No immediate tougher sanctions, the Chancellor of Germany Mrs A Merkel said after MH17 downing

20072014

The EU was put in a rather awkward or embarrassing situation with Russia and the Russian President Vladimir Putin on the MH17 disaster on Thursday 17 July. Worldwide condemnation of the downing followed among the western nations and leaders. This was beyond the cynicism of Vladimir Putin losing clearly much of his control over the region as a whole, but now leaving command to separatists and other unknown fighting forces in the area... In a more precise way this area has been the fighting zone of rebels and pro- Russian or Ukrainians for the last half year and has accelarated staying here for the last two months. It won't be in anyone's interest, Ukraine, Russia, the EU nor the USA, if the MH17/ MAS remains an obscure responsibility for no particular group or country, be it a fact to the whole world that Ukraine is at war with Russian rebels in this part of the area. At 30000 feet high compared to 10000 feet low- to surface- is very specific to the eye trained and not to know that this has to be the route for commercial air traffick and not to fly by and dropping quickly. The world has a low opinion of rebels anywhere a priori, but here there are sophisticated rebels and only Russia knows how sophisticated these groups are. But so are politicians of world standard and being very naive not to immediately condemn the Russian President, firstly not because this was his doing, but secondly because it happened in 'his part of the world'. Unless more macabre as it sounds and mad, the President of Russia isn't Mr Putin anymore...

The idea behind the downing of MH17 causing enornous loss for families and friends in countries the Netherlands, USA and Belgium, isn't a simple one judging from the position of target. Commercially any Airliner Industry or Agency could say that this route should have been avoided under the critical circumstances in this part of the world, and go for another 'en route', if taken anyway. Point is the tragedy did happen and can't be reversed back to life. The United Nations has promptly acted and now this is a high profile case to many leaders, but especially for leaders in the Netherlands with the highest death toll counting. Britain is right about the revise in the attitude toward the Russian President, that sanctions should be more tougher or follow Mrs Merkel's political strategy not yet designed how to punish the Russians on the MH17 disaster. It is not in the interest of Russia to ignore or walk away from this situation untouched and stay immaculate. Why world politics has become so complex isn't anybody's guess. This weekend or over the weekend many attempts have been made to get access to the crash and it is still ongoing to be let in by Ukraine and the Ukrainian government. Under the military and fighting most western countries should know this will be designated restricted area for private persons and is unsafe when in turmoil of warring factions. Unless the US, Britain, France and Germany are ready to send in the military?   




2015 First quarter slow predictions from 2014 in July

10072014

If correct a quiet recovery of global economies is being detected, if ‘snapshooting’. Deeper measures will not be part yet of this recovery clean- up until the end of the year. It is good news for those standing on the bridge a few hundred miles high and overlooking the seas of global measure ease. (Compare: economic easy orgasm) Why the global economy has low visibility, seen from 2014 in July, and for example if Europe is your focus point, is probably the quiet panic after the Russian annexation of Crimea, when sentiment was high as noon but then failed like an old fashioned conspiracy against the emperor, and leaving a trail of murderous powder behind in the room of the most unwise of the lands. It is nevertheless panic blinded by it’s own illumination. Fortunately globalism doesn’t understand this kind of panic. And judging from the present state of Russian war diplomacy, the Russian President Vladimir V. Putin will have no second chance to keep at this pace an unconvincingly end quarter of 2014 without any real power boost. The latter not being specified in any way right now. It is what the world ‘outside’ Russia can expect from a President in the aftermath since February earlier this year that perhaps still in a different century and now is just lingering.

Unless something remarkable happens at the end of the year, e.g. new year’s eve like a telephone call to Washington through all global fireworks in mid air, and speaking in quiet words to the President of the USA that this conversation should follow the path of reason and to have talks, between Russia and the US. And that would also mean how formidable the Russian Republic and it’s President are, in terms of setting the mind for the whole world by talking again to the US and respecting the role of equality. In some circles they might say that war is but a blunt instrument on the human flesh, but between Russia and the US that is more than human flesh. The establishment of a new humanity in the 21st century and their nations are an immeasurable size in human understanding and to be it’s leader, preferably in shared leadership. Globalism already is there and waiting. But the Russian President Mr Vladimir Putin might not want to see it that way when not being the virgin’s first arrival. Why the President undermines his own understanding on globalism and being it’s leader in shared partnership is another truly remarkable thing, like almost deliberate. Instead the Russian President goes for home brew stews boiling in dry wine and not tasting any good like shoe laces… We are not in Alabama, and the future of the world is very serious indeed if it needs to be in the perfect and ultimate shape. 2015 First Quarter will be very decisive if the Russian President will fail to call up Washington and succumb to world peace.  





Japan finds simple answer is change to constitution

04072014

Japan finds simple answer is change to constitution

04072014

The world can now safely close down the reference of global anxiety over Russia and Ukraine, with the Ukrainian President Mr Petro Poroshenko  following a step by step procedure of ‘new’ policies inside both terrains, politics and the military, as in the latest news this week (International New York Times, 01072014). There is now old and new shifts also in the International area and catching on as far as Japan this week in a surprise effort by it’s government want for change in the constitution and let back in ‘soldierism’. The world has had 70 years of peace among the friendly senior nations and always left the younger nations, whether in Asia, the Middle East or in more familiar waters like Africa or South America, to challenge and change of times. Some did not make it and kept war or political unrest the way forward in any time chosen by the people or it’s ‘apparent’ regimes. 71 Years of Peace was expected to be a celebration of nations and how to keep inside each and every one of the Members to remain in this long history of accountability with the only chance for a unique human race this earth has ever had or known! In fact some may even be convinced that the bigger the nations and responsibilities, the more novice the leadership will be carried through or lower itself before true International greatness and it’s global awareness. Anything lower than that will not change it’s name even if this is a zealous one.

Japan now for decades has been up to now a country with superb leadership and also has progressed far and wide with the USA, sometimes even more closely than e.g. Germany. Japan and Germany, both leaders in technological invention and engineering, with the latter putting for the last two decades more emphasis on social engineering and leaving Japan having the sole role of a very impressive technocracy. And peace between Japan and the United States always have looked more technocratic rather than a personal favor to the American people… Not in 2014, making a public statement by the PM in Japan to the Japanese voters how Japan’s contribution will always come to aid to the American people, if for example the US was invaded by foe or friend. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe comes from a different generation, like Mr Obama, David Cameron UK’s PM, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, Francois Hollande, President of France, or even the man who took the world this year out for a spin, the Russian President Vladimir Putin, to think global politics has become of little significance after the serious threat made against the US from little love from Russia earlier this year. Why leading industrial nations now so keenly speak of ‘new architecture’ of policies, sovereign or quiet partnerships between blocs of nations, we have no idea. Why would the US be in danger as NATO’s first and only International law- maker?

If Mr Shinzo Abe wants back the military in the constitution of Japan, one is beginning to wonder why Abenomics is stepping out of globalism, and by doing so as if it is suggesting to the people of Japan to have closer ties with the US in it’s ‘new’ policies… For example, Japan for many decades after WWII in the older generation of Prime Ministers in Japan have loyally given their pledge of peace and close co- operation with the US in older laws. Peace was it’s dominant moral and to all friendly nations ‘keeping the peace’. Mr Shinzo Abe should know how progress works with Japan as a global leader of clever design and technologies. One has to agree with China to have priorities in Asia and is trying here to seize the day, as so to speak, day by day… On the other hand the US has welcomed Mr Abe’s present intention to want this change in it’s constitution and to bring back the military; if NATO long trusted Member and long standing ally Turkey would fail to make any significant contribution short or long term, Turkey would be replaced by Japan and in it’s new promptness to help out the US if it came under attack?  If the old version of International Law is preparing for International changes in the law this will be our first time to have literally one bloc of nations against the other ‘unknown’, let’s say, since WWII and it’s youngest aftermath. (Chuckle from Vladimir Putin) 

Additional: In it’s present state the US can hold on to NATO Members if for example the American people would come under attack. Japan, like Germany, should avoid similarities of WWII for having or making changes in their constitution so deeply related to ‘keeping the peace’ among friendly nations and not left to ‘new opportunities’ like the infamous military. Also in Asia China cannot remain as the single power house for keeping peace in the region without Japan, as this shift would create unfamiliar room or territories for confusion of intentions and especially in a  ‘cause célèbre new International world’.  (The latter being in positive balance for globalism and will for the first time be seen in real action for what it was made for at this very large global scale, if this stays without the racial hatreds. Sometimes you do get what you’re wishing for on a five pointed star, mr Putin… ) With reference to Turkey in the above here writing the International world can draw similarities in NATO with the Turkish present government, still under PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Mr Shinzo Abe’s new policies to help the United States if ever under attack by friend or foe as his approach to electrify the electorate.   





Anglo Saxon for the last two decades require multi cultural Prime Ministers

12062014

In the present state the Anglo Saxon world does go on like an odd group of white people deciding how e.g. the EU or G7 leaders should act on the world stage. Except for the US with President Barack Obama, who is clearly not an odd man, white or black, but representing the global stage of a new age in which the Americans pioneered a man to be president and reflecting the change of identity in several of it’s institutions: the UN, Humanity, Human Rights Act, Progress from racial hatred to the future generations of diversity. Europe does not represent the same leadership in Prime Ministerships, and that is the image e.g. the EU still holds, of being at odds with society and diversity. As a sharp contrast and focus Europe is multicultural at very large scales, and not particularly Anglo Saxon like the 60- or 70ties London, Brixton and across the English Island. In Germany or Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, and more, the spectre of nations have made a rapid change or transformation that is likely not to go away any time soon. We, most ethnic minorities, have found a way to stay or live in these countries and are either citizens or asylum seekers from persecuted countries and countrymen. Russia’s standoff with the US highlighted these hidden from civility infrastructures in a curve sharp from what Europeans actually believe in what for example Europe means to Europeans in each and every country on the continent. On the whole, scale- wise, we have to thank our blessings Vladimir Putin for some reason has to postpone that ambition a little while longer… The EU Member States would have been in blind chaos.

So, how does a multicultural society works in times of political chaos and war? Second ‘Tier’ question: and how does this non Anglo Saxon entity keep the trust in it’s leader who is not reflecting the interest of ‘outsiders’ or common man, if let’s say there is a dangerous standoff again with Russia and the western nations, the latter being a divided nations if we must keep the last time exemplary when Russia took Crimea from Ukraine’s territorial integrity. If we had been familiar with a President like the US has in President Barack Obama, our faith in the PM/ President equally would have been at this stage familiar and home base as citizens and see our own reflections that we stand united against foe or foreign invasion… In abstract that means, had the Russians kept their stance, Germany taking economic sides with Russia and leaving out the US to find it’s own place in the economic and military dispute. Natural Germans don’t see the problem, and that goes without saying. I couldn’t be against or half against the US under any circumstance… As I am not the natural born citizen of any European country period. Also, would we not become anti- American and NATO if Russia and Germany share values pitched on an much even older European value? To put it simple that could have turned very rigid and crushing all multiculturalism in an instant. Especially across the ‘weaker peoples’ in Europe, if starting with the Jewish nation (and ending with gypsies whoever the bureaucrats choses and designate a gypsy) and others following suit. Jews after all are considered more pro- US in many ways and industries (the global economics taunt)…

(The writings here above are my personal opinion)

Note: plz read Martin Wolf article on FT today, 13062014.






Country ownership, a remarkable way to rebuild global communities…

05062014

The sword of Damocles too has changed into a two edged sword cutting the body of all humanity piece by piece in a time of it’s scheduled ownership. The plan was first in it’s infancy a simple design: let’s start with the poorest. Through the machineries of globalization this was your top job and to make it work in the third worlds. And then you could be proud as a country, washing your feet in ‘holy’ waters of future generations, who no doubt would be grateful peoples and come to say thank you later. That is going a long way back in time, now for every country. G7 or G20, Brics or Asean. The frenzy of rebuilding went on and became unstoppable. The pyramid of globalism multiplied over the earthly horizon and touched the night skies. Some now even live up there, crazed eyed. Second to build have been the planet’s infrastructures. Pylons of networks, technological or security systems, were put in all places for a reason that had started with the simple mind of opening and accessibilities. The future shone as bright and shone also quite smart. No one asked in hay day globalism that once the rebuilding was finished if this would also become a moment to celebrate, united and together, like for instance the G7 or G20. Not to etiquette and God knows what. Have a look around and then politely shut up at the mere sight of true globalism…

We are looking at true country ownership. Phenomenal and exponentially this success has never been done before in the world! Ashurbanipal, another crazy expansionist in the ancient Assyria and ‘rebuilder’, can now only be compared to a grain of sand, inferior anthology and not superior bigger than life reality. Once humanity had talents and ‘engifted’ natures, like e.g. philosophy, science, religion, ethics, art or even architecture of politics and civility, all this was meant to shape the heart and mind of each and every human being. In our world today politics is left without it’s cousins and nieces sciences, on it’s own and is in danger of becoming extinct at some point in the future where it will only be seen as artistic exercition by excentrics or freaks. That’s the game to play your thing, talking politics in a world in the high slate plains of superb wealth. Where did the rebuilding of country ownership stop again? If logical your guess will be short. And if you blink again in another moment logic says that you have probably missed the boat twice already. And then you keep staring nostalgically about God would not let something like this happen, would He? England, Germany, Russia, and even a small place like Turkey, all have one meaning and it was not found ever before in human history. Another explanation perhaps is this one: the Divine comedy has been rewritten and this time it wasn’t Dante. “The iron ore of profit is it’s poison and corrosion fear, in Hades or Elysium.” (Nomen datum est) Globalism if a statue how would you design your making?     





Klaus Juncker intelligent choices for European Union Membership

02062014

Telegraph article yesterday, 01062014: “it is Mr Juncker and his ilk who ignore the wishes of the people. This is a man who once remarked of the controversial Lisbon Treaty: “Of course there will be transfers of sovereignty. But would I be intelligent to draw the attention of public opinion to this fact?” 

On a strict balance and technicality Mr Juncker has only made the right choice when keeping the public afar from a very big issue in government’s territories. The world is done with simplicity. Humanity and it’s ordinary ways should be kept for a while at least at the ballot box and within political rhymes. Anti establishment, cycle of violence and anti Semitism, that sort of thing. In fact what rhymes best with the mood of nations when anti EU. Will this man become the EU president, Klaus Juncker? As written in the Telegraph (UK) article yesterday Mr Juncker does not feel that he has to be a sensitive man like his predecessor Mr Herman van Rompuy, the Haiku man. But if wisdom rules the scepter of every empire the path of wisdom is eternal and can help find the intelligent solutions for governments and people, crisises, war and peace. If not, whether man fails or wisdom what than will remain as the only choice mankind will have, if let’s say sovereignties are sacked and symbolic governments are floating like islands in the sun, or becoming industrial parks for the rest of their lives? It can’t be a funny story with a happy ending when high officials in governments have become not even worth the paper their names are written on!

The big Banks, unlike people’s needs like food, drinks, a bath/ shower, some nickels and dimes, shelter, YMCA or hipster ‘Gimme shelter’, these are not the ‘intelligent’ needs for Big Banks. A chance in a million in these demographics and residences masses the intelligent choices of Big Banks come with  star lights, dark matter over ordinary lives, force and dynamics not even any future miracle or human being has heard of. It is a dramatic world for the BB and what it represents. Wealth in a shoebox once was held in awe when in the 30ties, 40ties and 50ties, and hidden under the bed or cupboard. This shoebox, paradoxically, is your world and it has global infrastructures and networks all around the world, day and night for decades long. In fact globalism can’t be beaten and now you know why. It is not an intelligent choice to rhyme with anti establishment of EU Member States. You are not a miracle that strong, I’m afraid. Perhaps Mr Juncker’s intelligent choice after all did made the right choice over something more dangerous to the people if you get any close… But I’m sure that was not his intention. Given the bigger than life ethics he should have, if old and wiser in peace and war. 





Global Buzz

27052014

Coffee smell in the morning today: 06:45, 07:05, 08:50, 09:00, 10:15 International News tweets you can follow on Twitter. Special subject: Ukraine, Europe, the EU, Britain, France, Russia, Nigeria, and Thailand. The buzz: war in each of every sector. Personal tweetings: why isn’t Britain moving out of EU and G7? Little cut or big cut? This PM is turning Britain upside down and changing Thatcherism into extremism. Could be many factors going down this path but either you are the leading nation’s PM or not. You can’t have both to do at the same time in the political bedroom. The EU: Europe’s most ‘un- selfie’ institution ever! Why? It’s in black & white. No color Panavision. Egalité, charming France now has gone out of control with Marie Le Pen. In another time perhaps she would be the heroine of blind justice. (If in the right political bloodline) Nexxt Buzz: quiet Russia has gone where exactly after the Presidential election held in Ukraine on Sunday 25 May 2014? President Vladimir P is watching hockey instead. It can’t have any worries like for example the USA… It’s all a meow cat and game show of politics ongoing somewhere deep inside the global spheres. The Military observatory: if he is looking relaxed we are not doing something right. And that is a big buzz.

Personal psychology: I like to know who my parents are. If it’s not democracy, surely it can’t just be knocking on wood, can it? Robbing citizens of their basic human rights, pseudo systematic, is the beginning of a very serious self reflection… Heterogeneous economics isn’t everybody’s flavor, I guessed that too! Buzz mania: Europe must unite again against the Jews. It can’t be silenced at this point of high momentum. By definition Europeanism means anti- Jewtology. (Not an existing word) Don’t panic about the use of languages in Buzz Mania land. Bureaucracy is the parent you want to put through grief like you do your parents. Something to do with privileged backgrounds, or other. But President Francois Hollande made a point earlier today in the news: the EU is disheartening for some people. If 250mln or in between statistical numbers 500mln and 200 hundred. Speaking of President Francois Hollande… Close to Mali there is Nigeria and the men speaking for Allah in a native sort of way. Allah is Great, yes, but I don’t know how to take it through a buzz… End of this morning.







Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko, leader of the Batkivshchyna Party in Ukraine

19052014

Yulia V Tymoshenko could become history. Here are a few offers: her past history as twice PM of Ukraine. She also didn’t get herself elected at the last general elections in favor of Viktor Yanukovich, her arch rival from the time when she led the Orange Revolution. On the global stage her prison sentence became a worldwide petition from all global leaders for her release, this was the EU and some other high US/ White House officials. In February 2014 earlier this year she was released after the President Viktor Yanukovich felt that he was unable to stay on as the government official of Ukraine under enormous pressure from the Protest Maidan that had started last November in 2013. Now two months later Mrs Tymoshenko again became the leader of her Party Batkivshchyna and is planning on returning back to the stage of national politics in Ukraine. If she loses and can’t get herself elected to stay as Head of State her future as the first female politician in a man’s world in Ukraine will still live on in the present decades to come. There is no certainty to say in what way exactly the Former PM of Ukraine will go down history memory lane. Also it is even going to be harder to speculate on her future at this point.

Twice great is a formidable seat as Head of State for any politician, and getting even greater risks to seek a third time term in the same Party or country. The Russian and now Crimean President Vladimir Putin went through a similar experience when last chosen to be President for a third term and lead his country Russia from a temporary obscurity under President Dimitri Medvedev into the global spotlight again in May 2012. His famous victory speech 8 march 2012 in Moscow, during campaigning in the same year for a third term Presidency, and when looking back you could say that this is now repeating itself but on the other side of Russia in 2014... Feeble and fragile the strongman of Russia looked at the top of his voice (pathos/ pathological) when speaking/ addressing the crowd, that he knew about the forces that want (present time 2012) to take over in Russia but that they should not get there, God forbid. Mrs Yulia V Tymoshenko very soon will also address the crowd in similar fashion to let the people understand something that is never thought quite through in these parts of the world when it is time to leave behind a dreary past and face the blinding shine of new opportunities. It is hardly a laughing matter for Russia, one can also say quietly if inclined to do so… But in politics’ purity anything is possible. The comeback kid as the President of Russia has learned very recently isn’t necessarily or always to be taken literally. The adult politician and worldwide weathered Statesman/ Stateswoman, (the first woman politician in the world if Mrs Tymoshenko would get elected in 2014), by serving the will of the people can make a miracle comeback indeed.

Crimea is another and more darker affair of States. Good luck Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko doesn’t quite make it to the heart of hearts, just yet…






But what if the Russian President fails on his last adventures (of the lost kind)?

15052014

The European farce could have gone all the way up for the extraordinary political playwright with Russia and the incredible disruption of US meddling in affairs if it had the makings of a maestro. Instead the old belief goes fine with the Russian pop- up glitz and glamour now and then comes out and then going back in to the box, after the guests are gone well far enough and no sight of them of returning soon to Moscow or the Kremlin. In fact the Russian factory on rationality to the Europeans at this point in the standoff against Russia is secondary and not primary. There are no real shifts here to be made if ever this is going to be relevant talks or policy changes. Primary the Europeans have to keep e.g. the US happy. For the last three decades ‘happy hour’ is not over yet. In today’s newspapers articles are more and more coming back on the alliance of Russia and Europe, historically, recent past and present. If there must be a war between the US and Russia, and if Europe for some freakish reason chooses the strange alliance against the western hemisphere, historically that would be a declaration of World War against the United States and allies (whoever is left of it and not even in political cartoons). Reading from this world peace has been sliced up to pieces leaving no significant trail behind. Global security is quite dependent on global security between allies! But we don’t want to go there at any stage when rationality between global leaders still can be preserved unconditionally.

And what if the farce comes down on Russia and the Europeans in Mr Putin’s arms? A perplexity made right? A primary role of law makers fighting global terrorism under the current International Law. I don’t know why the Dutch painter and artist Tjeenk Willink comes to mind in his portrait of Lazarus sitting among columns and debris of classical ruin, Dorian or Corinthian. The farce could take Europe out of it’s socket and turn the playwright to a collapsing horror, if Russia would fail it’s present adventure in Ukraine and Crimea, and threatening the west with ‘covert’ ways of it's own. To many out in the global audience we do not have a clue what dangers in global politics/ geopolitics mean at a widening per day scale from now. But making politics and policies too lightweight is one such danger. And if that would turn to more vulnerability the forces of what that state could attract remain for now unforeseen or even invisible. Is there a way for the US to prevent such a collapse in Europe and Russia? Neo classical political literature in many countries is about strengthening democracy and not what John Kerry US Secretary of State called the ‘trumped- up pretext’, 19th century style. Or even further back. Ukraine 25 May is the day of political neurosis, for the US, Europe/ EU and Russia. It can pull through the first round of victory, but Russia will wait on the outside and see that the next round will disband. He is right to say that former in exile president Viktor Yanukovich was the legitimate elected president of Ukraine, but under the pressure of the will of the people, if a democracy, the choice was clear in favor of a new appointed government. This fight over legitimacy goes with the territory as fragile as this, you might say. But the former US president Mr Clinton is also right to say today that western leaders might not be aware yet of Mr Putin not being a 21st century foreign policy- thinking man. But so is Europe. If that is not a question anymore...

For the time being the west has to engage the global audience on the coming time more closely. It’s new and for the first time it is going to be radically different than previous wars and on foes of a US- led friendly nations group. 







If one thing Mr Putin was right about it was this that the West would never understand Crimea

13052014

First/ Primo: Crimea was never part of Ukraine. Secondly/ Secundo: Ukraine was never artificial but real. Thirdly/ digression: an elected President of Russia if legitimate is bind by law and it’s vicinity. If not clearly stated by law annexation of territories outside it’s sovereignty should be the prerogative and not the law. First conclusion/ conclusion: someone is not doing his homework on Russian territorial history let’s say since Michael I and II, or even going as far as Tsar Nicholas I. How can the west engage in a war that has no beginning nor ending anywhere in the law that would state one or the other, in Russia or Ukraine? We must presume and not proceed here and pretend that only via mediators the problem will be solved. That can only agitate the case further away from being resolved properly instead of solving this very simple matter, if co- operation could properly be or exist. What other ambition would be more desirable today in the so called stance between Russia and the US (allies included)? Crimea doesn’t belong to Ukraine, because it was declared sovereign somewhere in the 19th century. If reading the declaration carefully to the letter there can’t be any iota saying otherwise, that in this document it is saying that if for example in a ruse it does belong to Ukraine rather than Russia. Or vice verse. The President of Russia ignored therefore the law in his own country, and did this for a reason roughly translated to the west as allowing no interference in domestic affairs of Russia. Under these finite circumstances the future of Ukraine can only look more brightly if it decides on 25 May to hold the Presidential elections as promised. Without any interference from outside Ukraine’s sovereign borders.

Question to Mr Putin for one last time: does Crimea belong to you, Mr President, or does it belong to the 21st century? Presumably the President Mr Vladimir Putin will say with a cynical smile that Crimea belongs to ‘Mother Russia’. A thief no doubt. (And your father was a Roman) It was from the beginning of time very clear that Ukraine could never win this argument over Crimea and it’s sovereignty. If Tsar Michael I or II was alive today that is exactly what he would have said. But bear with me a while longer. There is method to this madness. If Ukraine in 2014 is strong enough this should make it easier to ‘de- claim’ any right to Crimea. Doing so can only make it more difficult for the Russian President to claim or ‘reclaim’ the so called historic wrong made right in Crimea. Some Tsars did not even go this path without a clear reason or law for ‘annexing’ Crimea. Friendship most of the time was the best policy they have exercised in their time and reign. For some reason Mr Putin only wants us to believe that he is a Russian ruler in a world too dumb to know the differences or nuances in Russian history or historical ‘real’ victories, usually deeply political and not the first and only rule as is now the case switching automatically to the military. The world should make things a little harder for Mr Putin and to let him keep Crimea, but at the same time examined by legal experts, whether this was his prerogative or law. It could take years before this problem is resolved!! In the meantime Ukraine can use it’s minimal powers so far in this crisis and continue with the choices it wants to make to recover from it’s obscure relation with ‘Mother Russia’.

Theory, how lovely! If it were only true this writing could be a masterful stroke against the most fiercesome tiger of Russia, symbolically.  







January 2014

31122013

The G8 presidency of 2013 will close in about a few hours from now and welcome the new President Russia. In places like Tokyo, Shanghai, Istanbul, Moscow, and Berlin, are promises of a spectacular fireworks show platform that only include members and not the public at large, even when the public is the crowd that is governed by the G7/8. If Britain was the president in 2013 this has been almost unnoticed by G7/ G20 countries and nations for the whole year. If Russia will do the same in 2014 the total of two years of G8 Presidency and ceremonies have significantly changed if any comparison to previous presidencies could be made. All the same, tonight is a very important moment for Russia. 2014 In more familiar terms one can say that this will be the mother of all challenges year for the G8 President. And if you like that could very well be something we call the set of the Matryoshka dolls. Also if and when pressured we can only see one principal Matryoshka…

The world today is the product of engineering laws and physics truth. Britain perhaps might have seen the balance, but can only understand the truth, when the science of law became humanity’s forefather and now is the ancestor. 2014 Will be Russia’s take on the world. For this we have to wait and see where it’s end day, 31122014, will finish.

Happy New Year. 






 





AIRPORT FREESTYLE DESIGN 18072013 ROMANTICMCT 

Behemot/ Leviathan II build- in spoiler mctaytelbaum. And Cerberus/ Leviathan I; patent ideas

Multitude is for kings; a place without people is destruction for princes (Book of Proverbs) Freestyle architecture 30march 2013 - 2 april 2013 

Mars Tower may 2013 

Leviathan wind & speed play/ study, 18052013

Make a free website with Yola